Ep. 1625 - Republicans Just Launched An Open Revolt Against Trump’s Immigration Plan
Today on the Matt Walsh Show, there's a plot within the Republican Party to undermine Trump's immigration agenda and push amnesty. Also, a guy in San Francisco tried to shoplift from a Walgreens. The store manager got in a fight with him to stop him. Guess who was just convicted of a felony? And xAI unveils new virtual "companions," including one that looks like a half-naked anime character. I'm not a fan of this new innovation, as you might expect.
Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://bit.ly/4bEQDy6
Ep.1625
- - -
DailyWire+:
Join millions of people who still believe in truth, courage, and common sense at DailyWirePlus.com.
Check out Jordan B. Peterson’s new show, Parenting, exclusively ON DailyWire+: https://bit.ly/4moWlu0
Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://bit.ly/3EbNwyj
- - -
Today's Sponsors:
ExpressVPN - Go to https://expressvpn.com/walsh and find out how you can get 4 months of ExpressVPN free!
PureTalk - Switch to PureTalk and start saving today! Visit https://PureTalk.com/WALSH
Boll & Branch - Get 20% off, plus free shipping on your first set of sheets at https://BollAndBranch.com/walsh
ZipRecruiter - Go to this exclusive web address to try ZipRecruiter FOR FREE: https://ZipRecruiter.com/WALSH
Leaf Filter - Schedule your free inspection and get up to 30% off your entire purchase at https://leaffilter.com/WALSH
- - -
Socials:
Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF
Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA
Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA
Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs
- - -
Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
Today at the Matt Walsh show, there's a plot within the Republican Party to undermine Trump's immigration agenda and push amnesty.
Also, a guy in San Francisco tried to shoplift from a Walgreens.
The store manager got in a fight with him to stop him.
Guess who was just convicted of a felony?
You'll never guess, actually, you will.
And XAI unveils new virtual companions, including one that looks like a half-naked anime character.
I'm not a fan of this new innovation, as you might expect.
We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Walsh Show.
Matt Walsh Show.
Did you know about Section 702?
It lets government agencies spy on Americans without warrants, and Congress just renewed it for two more years.
We're all being watched.
And one major way you're tracked is through your browsing history.
Your ISP records every website you visit and can legally sell that data to anyone-companies, government agencies, even foreign governments.
That's why I use ExpressVPN.
It's a virtual private network that encrypts all my internet traffic and routes it through secure channels.
So nobody, not the government, not data brokers, not even my ISP, can see what I'm doing online.
ExpressVPN also hides your IP address, which data brokers use to build profiles about you.
No IP address means no profile.
Your information is yours alone.
I personally use it every time I travel for work events, rallies, and the like.
It gives me peace of mind knowing my sensitive emails and financial information are safe, even on sketchy hotel or airport Wi-Fi.
Plus, it's super simple, just one button tapped, and you are protected on any device.
You can use it on up to eight devices at once.
So your whole family is covered with one subscription.
We need to demand a better government, yes, but until we can change what's happening in our country, protect yourself like I do with ExpressVPN.
Right now, if you go to expressvpn.com slash walsh, you can get four extra months of privacy for free.
That's exprssvpn.com slash walsh to get yourself an extra four months free.
As we approach the six-month mark of Donald Trump's second term in office, it's hard to think of another administration in modern history that's faced more resistance from within.
That is to say, resistance from within its own party when it tries to fall through on its single most important and prominent campaign pledge.
Normally, when presidents take office after making an explicit campaign promise, their party tries to turn that agenda into reality.
If nothing else from a political perspective, it's obviously the smart thing to do.
That's certainly what happened when Joe Biden took office.
Every Democrat of the country lined up behind Biden to push every single talking point his administration produced, whether it was about COVID or January 6th or anything else.
There was zero dissent anywhere in the party.
But that's not what's happening in the second Trump administration.
Instead, many Republicans have set out to undermine the immigration platform that Trump ran on.
You probably remember Tom Homan at the Republican National Convention telling illegal aliens, all of them, that they should start, quote, packing their bags because they're going to be deported.
And as recently as last week, Homan emphasized the importance of that objective, saying there will be no special protections for any illegal aliens, including farm workers.
Top White House officials like Stephen Miller, also DHS Secretary Christy Noam, the president himself have all made that same point in the past few days.
But Republicans in Congress and in various states have taken the opposite approach.
They've been waging a battle against immigration enforcement, and it's a more expansive fight than you might realize.
Earlier this month, six Republican lawmakers in California wrote a letter to the president urging him to suspend immigration raids at workplaces.
And separately, a Nebraska congressman named Don Bacon, who's retiring at the end of his current term, called on Trump to adopt a balanced approach to immigration enforcement, one that allows certain illegal aliens to remain in this country if they haven't committed additional crimes after arriving.
In Utah, Republican Governor Spencer Cox has said the same thing.
He's called on ICE to focus on people who are breaking the law and causing harm, as he put it.
Even though all illegal aliens, by definition, are breaking the law and causing harm.
In Washington State, Republican Congressman Dan Newhouse introduced legislation with bipartisan support that would grant temporary legal status to farm workers, even if they arrived in this country illegally.
In fact, even if the farm workers have committed additional crimes after entering the United States, they could still qualify for legal status as long as they haven't committed felonies or two misdemeanors involving moral turpitude.
So we're granting legal status to people who have committed multiple crimes in this country as long as they haven't committed too many of them.
We'll give you two, not three.
Meanwhile, Idaho Congressman Mike Simpson, another Republican, just wrote an op-ed in which he stated, quote, our focus should remain on deporting dangerous criminals, not law-abiding farmers and ranchers.
Let me be clear, making meaningful reforms to the H-2A visa program and establishing a strong legal immigration workforce for agricultural producers is not an amnesty deal.
Our country needs a stable labor force to protect our food supply and ensure farmers can continue to do their jobs.
Now, even though, again, calling them law-abiding makes no sense, they broke the law coming in.
Along the same lines, the Republican in charge of the agricultural committee, G.T. Thompson of Pennsylvania, recently said that ICE raids on farms and packing plants are, quote, just wrong, and that ICE should, quote, knock it off.
As Thompson put it, quote, let's go after the criminals and give us time to put processes in place so we don't disrupt the food supply chain.
Yes, we have multiple prominent Republicans declaring that illegal aliens are not in fact criminals, that people can be law-abiding, even if their very first act upon entering the country was to break the law because they broke it by the way they entered.
It would be one thing if these Republican lawmakers just said, yeah, illegal aliens are criminals, even if they work on farms, but we shouldn't deport them anyway because my constituents love cheap slave labor and I don't care about American workers, even though I'm supposed to represent the interests of Americans.
I mean, that would at least be honest.
Now, to be very clear about this, any Republican who pretends that illegal aliens aren't actually criminals, anyone who talks like G.T. Thompson or Mike Simpson or any of the rest of them doesn't believe that we have a country.
They're not simply undermining the Trump administration.
They're undermining the entire nation fundamentally.
And this is not, unfortunately, a fringe sentiment among Republicans.
We're not talking about one or two members of Congress here who happen to represent states that have a lot of illegal farm workers.
this is now a growing nationwide movement among Republican politicians to sabotage the White House's immigration agenda, an agenda that won the popular vote and every single swing state.
At the moment, the biggest threat comes from Florida Congresswoman Maria Salazar, who's just introduced something called the Dignity Act.
And here is Maria Salazar to explain.
I believe that after the border has been sealed with the BBB, $150 billion that we have assigned, I think the moment now is to have that national conversation and determine who are we going to be targeting.
I do believe that the president promised that the illegals who are criminals were going to be kicked out of the country.
Now there is another mass of people who most of them are Hispanics who have been here for more than five years.
They have been contributing to the economy, who do not have a criminal record, and those people are the ones who deserve some type of dignity.
And for that reason, I'm introducing today, so I thank you for the opportunity.
Immigration reform, a GOP member of Congress, is going to be trying to give dignity, not amnesty, to those people who deserve to stay and continue contributing to our economy.
She starts by celebrating the Trump administration's victory on the southern border and how it's great that we're finally enforcing immigration law.
And then in the same breath, she talks about how important it is to grant legal status to tens of millions of foreign nationals who broke our laws by crossing the border.
It's a bit like telling your child that stealing is wrong and then giving him $10,000 because he got away with stealing.
It makes no sense.
In that scenario, they're going to get the message that stealing is the most rational course of action.
And this shouldn't need to be said, but I'll say it anyway.
People respond to incentives.
And the incentives that Maria Salazar's bill would create are pretty clear.
She's saying that if you manage to enter this country, then you'll be rewarded.
And as much as she claims that this is not amnesty, the fact remains that her legislation would grant legal status, which is renewable indefinitely, which is amnesty, to tens of millions of illegal aliens.
As long as they've been here for more than five years, which is a totally just arbitrary thing, five years, why not six?
Why not seven?
Why not four?
And as long as they haven't committed any heinous crimes that we know of, then she's going to grant them legal status.
And for good measure, her bill throws in a permanent residency status for so-called dreamers who enter this country illegally as children.
We'll get into the specifics of the bill in a moment, but those are the top line items.
According to Salazar, all of this makes sense because illegals deserve to stay here.
That's the word she used, and that we should allow them to stay in the name of dignity.
Those were the words.
And it's all very trite.
And of course, we're not supposed to actually think about what she's saying, but I'll think about it anyway and say that because her legislation has serious implications, even if Maria Salazar herself isn't a remotely serious person.
So here's the relevant question.
If foreigners deserve to disregard our laws, what laws do I, as an American citizen, deserve to disregard?
Do I deserve to not pay my taxes?
Do I deserve to ignore speed limits?
Do I deserve to shoplift?
When do I get my dignity?
Or is this an entitlement reserved only for foreign nationals?
Why exactly are we awarding these people who have no right to be in the country in the first place a get out of jail free card while American citizens are currently being hassled by the IRS for failing to report their $600 Venmo payment?
She says that these illegal aliens have worked hard and lived here for a long time.
And that's true for some of them.
Some of them have lived here for a long time.
Some of them have even worked hard.
But there are a lot of American citizens who work hard too.
And they've lived here for a lot longer.
So what's their payout?
The free DUI, the hall pass to punch their annoying boss?
What do they get?
And when do they get it?
Because it turns out that when you've got legal citizens, if they break the law, like say tax law, the IRS will come in and they'll destroy your life.
They'll take your house.
They'll throw you in prison.
No one's going to be crying about, oh, you're separating families.
In that case, they say, yeah, we are, but you know what?
You broke the law.
This is the way it goes.
Them's the breaks.
But for illegals, suddenly it's a great travesty to enforce the law.
Once you start granting exemptions to laws, particularly some of the most important laws in the books, like the laws that define our national borders, then you have to answer questions like this.
This isn't complicated or controversial.
Again, most Americans voted for Donald Trump precisely because he would enforce the law, regardless of whatever sob stories the left could dream up.
It's a good bet that for most of these voters, it seemed hard to imagine that the right would be coming up with the would be the ones who are coming up with these sob stories.
That's exactly what's happening.
Here's another Republican, a guy named Gabe Evans, and he represents a district in Colorado.
And this is his pitch for the so-called Dignity Act.
Hi, I'm Congressman Gabe Evans from Colorado's 8th Congressional District.
And today I am so happy to be able to help introduce the Bipartisan Dignity Act.
I'm the grandson of immigrants from Mexico, and so this bill is particularly important to me because it does three critical things.
It makes sure that we have resources to secure the border.
It helps us crush the criminals, the cartels, and the gangbangers that are in our community illegally and causing problems.
But it also provides a pathway for hardworking immigrants who want to come to the United States, work hard, raise their family, be a contributing part of the American Dream.
And this is something that I've heard from the employers and from the Latino community in my district.
They want that path forward, to be able to comply with the law and earn their version of the American Dream.
That's what the Dignity Act does.
And I'm so honored to be able to help introduce it today.
Notice he sort of buries the whole amnesty thing towards the end of his pitch.
He begins by saying that this legislation will actually secure the border, although it doesn't do that.
Congress just passed a massive spending bill that allocates huge amounts of money, tens of billions of dollars, to improve border security.
By contrast, this Dignity Act creates something called humanitarian Campuses all along the border.
According to one summary of the legislation, when they arrive at these campuses, quote, migrants would have access to medical staff, licensed social workers, mental health professionals, child advocates, private organizations that provide humanitarian assistance, and legal counsel.
Remember, this is a Republican bill.
Yes, the Dignity Act would fund legal counsel and mental health care professionals for illegal aliens.
That's how they're going to secure the border.
But actually, it gets a lot worse than that.
As the lawyer Will Chamberlain pointed out, the Dignity Act, by its own terms, is so expansive that it would grant legal status to some of the most dangerous and depraved criminals in the country.
Consider the case of Abrego Garcia, the alleged MS-13 member and alleged wife beater who was the subject of so much Democrat angst in recent weeks.
Under the Dignity Act, Obrego Garcia would be entitled to legal status in the country.
That's because he entered the country when he was 16 years old.
And the bill bans federal and state law enforcement from using databases to determine whether someone's a gang member, which is not an exaggeration.
It's in the bill.
Here's what that section looks like.
It reads, quote, evidentiary limitation.
Allegations of gang membership obtained from a state or federal in-house or local database or a network of databases used for the purposes of recording and sharing activities of alleged gang members across law enforcement agencies shall not establish the participation described in such paragraph.
So it doesn't matter that law enforcement officers recorded Abrego Garcia's gang clothing or associations in a database.
You'd think the database is there precisely for this reason so that it could be used in these cases, but it can't be used according to the bill.
Additionally, because Abrego Garcia was merely accused of domestic violence instead of convicted of it, he wouldn't be barred under this bill either.
That's because, as you can see here, the law only excludes convicted felons or illegal aliens convicted of two or more misdemeanors, excluding cannabis-related crimes for some reason.
I don't know.
So even if your wife keeps claiming that you beat her, it doesn't matter.
And while Bregger Garcia suspected human trafficking might theoretically be an issue, the bill still allows the DHS secretary to allow him into the country, quote, for humanitarian purposes, for family unity, or because the waiver is otherwise in the public interest.
Let's put that up on the screen.
This is what's known as a loophole.
And by itself, this provision should be enough to kill the bill immediately.
Just imagine how a Democrat DHS secretary would interpret that provision.
It's amnesty in every sense.
All a Breger-Garcia would have to do is enroll in some educational program, and he'd qualify for legal status under the bill.
And it gets even worse than that somehow.
Take a look at this provision, which was spotted by Walter Kurt.
It reads, quote, limitation on removal.
An alien who appears to be prima fasci eligible for relief under this division shall be given a reasonable opportunity to apply for such relief and may not be removed until a final decision establishing ineligibility for relief is rendered.
In other words, ICE has to stand down if someone could potentially qualify under this legislation for legal status.
As soon as they file the paperwork or even before that, ICE's hands are tied.
This would obviously create a major log jam and completely paralyze immigration enforcement, which is the whole point.
So the whole thing's an abomination.
And Maria Salazar can't explain any of it.
Here's what she said on NBC the other day trying to explain this bill.
Watch.
Because a lot of Trump voters, they voted for mass deportations.
Mass deportation of Tenderawa, mass deportation of the bad ombres, mad deportation of the illegal who are criminals.
But Trump knows that those workers are needed and we are ramping up the economy again.
But that is not what is currently happening.
Just that.
Yes, Tom Holman the Borders are, and I've spoken to him many times, he has said that the priority is undocumented immigrants with criminal records.
But according to this administration, they believe that every immigrant who is here illegally is breaking the law.
How do you respond to that?
And they have broken the law, but the thing is that someone gave them a job for the last decade because they were needed, because that person needed hands or workers, workers that are still needed today.
So the new rule is that even if you break the law, that's not a big deal if someone gave you a job and that job is, quote, still needed today.
That's the argument.
And at the moment, 10 Republicans in Congress have co-sponsored this legislation.
Legislation that Maria Salazar really, why does the legislation actually exist?
Why did Maria Salazar actually write it?
Well, because she's Hispanic and so she is siding with who she considers her people to be, her countrymen, who are not Americans.
But there are allegedly American congressmen who've taken her side, and those include Mike Lawler of New York, David Valadeo of California, Dan Newhouse of Washington, Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Gabe Evans of Colorado, Marlon Stutzman of Indiana, Don Bacon of Nebraska, and Young Kim of California.
None of these lawmakers should ever receive another Republican vote for any reason ever again, needless to say.
Their goal very clearly is to use the president's success of the border as cover to advance amnesty.
They're advancing foreign interests and the demands of a small number of business owners who profit from illegal labor and slave labor instead of the interests of this country.
The White House should respond by investigating every single one of the farm owners who are pushing this bill because the odds are about 1,000% that they're employing illegal aliens instead of American citizens.
It's the whole reason that they're pushing the bill.
In order for this country to continue to exist, laws against foreign invasion must be enforced.
There cannot be any exceptions.
When you have exceptions, it breaks down the whole thing.
Republican voters understand that, which is why Donald Trump won the last election.
Now the Republicans who seek to undermine this administration, the will of voters, need to be removed from office.
Don Bacon is already resigning in Nebraska.
That's a start.
Now every single co-sponsor of this abomination and every Republican who voices even a word of support for it should be run out of office as well.
Now let's get to our five headlines.
you If you're with Verizon AT ⁇ T or T-Mobile, you're overpaying for wireless, period.
You're paying for thousands of retail stores that you never get into.
You're paying for unnecessary perks you never use, and you're paying a massive premium for what you think is superior 5G service.
Guess what?
PureTalk uses the same 5G network on the same 5G towers.
The only difference, they don't charge you for any of the garbage.
Instead, PureTalk gives you unlimited talk text and plenty of data for just 25 bucks a month.
Folks, that's less than half the price of the big guys.
During a time when saving a buck obviously really matters, I'm a Pure Talk customer myself.
I made the switch.
What is your excuse?
You can even keep your phone and your number.
That's made it super simple for me to use for work here at the Daily Wire.
So do this.
Go to puretalk.com slash walsh and you'll save an additional 50% off your first month.
You can literally be switched over to PureTalk in less than 10 minutes.
That's puretalk.com slash walsh to switch to PureTalk wireless by Americans for Americans.
We've all heard common myths like, you know, we only use 10% of our brains, but here's one that might surprise you.
Thread count is a huge myth that many people believe when shopping for sheets.
Thread count is simply a measure of fabric density.
It isn't actually a good indicator of quality.
If you want truly great sheets, you need to look at thread quality, not count.
That's why Bolin Branch focuses on using the highest quality organic cotton threads, creating long-lasting sheets that actually get softer over time rather than relying on inflated thread count numbers to impress customers.
Bowl and branch's sheets are crafted from the finest, 100% organic cotton in a soft, breathable, and durable weave that delivers quality.
You can feel from the moment you touch them.
What makes them even more special is that they become softer with every wash, improving over time rather than wearing down.
With their 30-night worry-free guarantee, you can experience this exceptional comfort, risk-free, ensuring you'll love how these premium sheets transform your sleep experience.
I've been using Bolin Branch sheets for years now, and they're the most comfortable sheets that I've ever used.
Get the best savings of the season during Bolin Branch's annual summer event.
Get 20% off, plus free shipping on your first set of sheets at bowlingbranch.com slash walsh.
That's Bolinbranch, B-O-L-L-A-N-D Branch.com slash Walsh to save 20% and unlock free shipping, limited time only, exclusions apply.
Here's a story out of the third world hellscape known as San Francisco.
A report from the local KRON station.
It says a Walgreens store manager was convicted of assaulting a shoplifter who stole shampoo in San Francisco, according to DA's office.
Following the trial, jurors found the Walgreens manager, 46-year-old Guang Hong, guilty for a violent March 19th incident at the store.
San Francisco shop owners have struggled to deter and thwart shoplifters in recent years.
District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said Monday, although I understand the frustration and anger in the community, violence is unacceptable and only makes matters worse.
The shoplifter, 30-year-old Larry Whitlock, walked in the store before 5 a.m. and stole a bottle of shampoo.
As he was leaving, the security guard alerted Mr. Hong, the Walgreens manager, of the theft.
Hong recovered the stolen shampoo bottle and then came back out about a minute later, placed his keys between his knuckles and punched the shoplifter in the face while shouting at him.
And he was, so he was just convicted with assault with force, likely to produce great bodily injury.
And he'll be sentenced on August 15th.
All right, so they convicted the store manager of felonies for fighting someone who was trying to steal from him.
And there is security camera footage of this incident.
And we'll put it up on the screen so you can see it.
As you watch it, you can see the manager come out and confront the guy, right?
That's the first altercation.
He recovers a stolen shampoo bottle.
You can see him pick it up.
So the first altercation is over the stolen merchandise.
So that shouldn't be an issue at all.
Then he comes back out, but he comes back out because, and I guess this is probably what, this was probably the thing that really screwed him over in the court, is that he came back out.
But he comes back out because the guy's still lingering around the store.
So he's got a shoplifter lingering around the store.
And so he confronts him.
But then when you watch the video, to my eyes, it very clearly seems that the shoplifter throws the first punch in the second altercation.
Like clearly throws the first punch.
So there are two altercations.
The first is initiated by the manager because he's recovering his merchandise.
The second turns violent because the shoplifter swings at the manager.
And so that's reason enough to let him go free.
He should have been convicted.
He should not have even been charged.
But of course, in San Francisco, he's not only charged, but convicted and will probably do serious prison time for the crime of beating up a shoplifting lowlife.
Now, if I'm on the jury, there is no way that I vote to convict this guy.
There's just no way in hell.
And I think you can easily make the case that this was self-defense on the part of the store manager.
The first fight was him defending the store.
Second fight was defending himself after the shoplifter tried to punch him.
There's at least enough of an excuse there that if you're like a rational, good, decent person and you're on the jury, and there's not a lot of those in San Francisco, which was the problem for this guy.
But if you are, there's enough of an excuse there that you could say, yeah, okay, fine.
Close enough.
Close enough to self-defense.
We'll allow it.
I mean, it was close enough, right?
It's a bit iffy.
Ty goes to the runner.
And the runner in this case, you know, in this analogy is the actual law-abiding person, business owner, defending his business.
But here's the thing.
Even if I couldn't make a case for self-defense, I still wouldn't convict him.
Even if I agreed that his actions were excessive or whatever, who cares?
You know, there are mitigating factors here.
But you see, the way the system works is that they only ever care about mitigating factors for the career criminals, for the lowland, for the scumbag.
And in that case, if you have a criminal who, and you have them dead to rights, you have him committing a crime on tape, in many cases, they still won't go to prison because the DA or the judge or the jury in one of these cities like San Francisco will say, yeah, you know, he obviously committed the crime, but he's lived such a hard life and we got to understand where he's coming from and we have to be compassionate.
But that sort of logic only applies to the scum, to the dregs of the society, to the criminals.
Somehow we never apply it to people like this.
If we're being so understanding, if we're being so compassionate, why can't we be understanding and compassionate to somebody like this?
Because in this case, I actually do understand him.
Like, we're always asked to be understanding towards people who, if you are a normal, decent person, you actually don't, I can't be.
Like, you want me to be understanding to someone who just walks into a Walgreens and steals whatever they want?
I'm not, I don't understand.
I'm not understanding of that.
I don't understand it.
And these are not people who are in desperate straits.
I mean, he stole shampoo.
Okay.
This was not, unless he's going to eat the shampoo.
This is not someone who's starving.
Just like totally disregarding the law, having no concern for anybody else.
I don't understand that.
So, no, I'm not understanding of that.
I am understanding of somebody like this.
You're a store manager in a crap hole like San Francisco.
You're constantly getting robbed.
Shoplifters are coming in all the time, taking whatever they want and leaving.
Just imagine how demoralizing that is.
This is happening constantly.
You're just watching people come in and walk out the door with whatever they want.
What's the point?
What's the point of even going to work?
What's the point of having a business open?
And so you're fed up and you're sick of it and you can't take it anymore.
So you lash out.
Maybe you go a little farther than the law would typically allow, but see, this is where compassion and understanding should come into play.
It's in cases like this with a decent person, a law-abiding person who just has a store.
They're a contributing member of society.
They go a little too far when dealing with the drugs of society.
And it's there.
Those are the people that should get the get out of jail free card.
Those are the people that should get like a second chance.
But that's not the way it ever works.
All right, here's a video making the rounds right now.
This is a video of Omar Fateh, who's who we talked about a couple of days ago, is the Somali guy running for mayor of Minneapolis.
And this is something from a little while ago.
It's going viral now because he just hopped into the mayor's race.
This is him as I believe a state senator making the case that the real terror threat in America comes from, you'll never believe it, white people.
Listen.
We heard them being called terrorists.
We heard them being called drug dealers.
We heard a lot of insults.
We heard that they're a threat to our national security.
And that's a flat-out lie.
You want to know who the real threat is, Madam President?
I'll give you a hint.
They don't look like our chief author.
They don't look like the folks up in the gallery.
They don't look like the folks on the rotunda.
They look like many of the members that sit in the front.
And you don't have to take my word for it.
According to DHS, Madam President, the greatest domestic threat facing the United States comes from, quote, racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists, specifically those who advocate for the superiority of the white race.
Not our immigrants.
We are safer and we're better off because of them.
So he can barely read, no surprise there, standing there in his official capacity as an elected representative, claiming that, repeating the claim that white Americans are the greatest threat, the greatest terror threat, which is of course totally false, completely imaginary.
It's absurd.
But imagine how this would go in any other country outside of the Western world, any country that is not predominantly white.
What happens if I, as a white American, emigrate to China and then stand up and declare that the real threat to China comes from Chinese people?
What happens if I go to China and I become a citizen of China and then I go around trying to rally people against the Chinese people?
How is that received?
How well do they receive that?
How quickly, how long would it take for them to denaturalize me and deport me?
Or just throw me in prison?
About five and a half seconds?
But this is the kind of nonsense that's only tolerated here.
And it shouldn't be.
We shouldn't tolerate it because it's a lie, number one.
Also because it's just, we don't need, like, we didn't bring you here for this.
You're going to come here and yell at us and accuse us.
Like, who do you think you are?
It's extremely ungrateful for what.
That's what grades me.
It's one of the things that grades me so much.
That's why I returned to this point.
Gratitude.
Gratitude is one of the most important things in life.
It's one of the most important.
You want to be a decent person.
You want to be a happy person.
You want other people around you in your life to like being around you.
Gratitude.
Gratitude is one of the most important things.
Important to any relationship.
Important to a marriage, right?
Marriage is one of the main reasons marriages fall apart is a lack of gratitude.
Well, same thing works on a national level.
Where when you don't have gratitude, you got a whole bunch of people coming here who, along with everything else, are not part of the culture, they don't speak the language, everything else, they have no gratitude.
And it tears at the, just like a lack of gratitude in a marriage tears at the fabric of a marriage, a lack of gratitude from a bunch of immigrants coming here tears at the fabric of our country.
And it's gratuitous because you come from Somalia, one of the poorest countries in the entire world, an incredibly dangerous country.
You don't have basic infrastructure.
You don't have well-maintained roads.
You don't have clean water.
You don't have reliable electricity.
The average income in Somalia is the equivalent of like $50 a month.
The average life expectancy is 58 years old.
That's the second highest infant mortality rate in the world.
The average house in Somalia has one or two rooms, and there, on average, are about seven or eight people crammed into it.
I mean, it's just, it's a, it's a, I could go on and on listing all the terrible things about Somalia.
It's a terrible place to live.
It's a nightmare.
It really is.
That's why they don't want to be there.
So then you come here, or your family comes here.
We graciously allow you into the country.
You should be walking around every day, like kissing the ground, thanking us for allowing you to be here.
You should be filled with gratitude and humility every day of your life until you die.
But is that what we see?
No, instead, we get this.
Instead, they turn around, they demonize, they scapegoat us.
The very people that we welcomed it.
It's like imagine you welcome someone into your home because they're hungry, right?
They're outside, they're hungry, and you welcome them into your home, and you sit them down at your table graciously and you feed them the nicest meal they've ever had in their lives.
And then imagine the person sits at this table and scarfs down all the food, eating with their hands, not even using a fork, and spends the whole time criticizing you and complaining.
And then imagine that he, without permission, invites 10 of his friends to your table.
And they sit at the table and they speak in a foreign language so that you can't even be a part of the conversation in your own house.
And then they leave all the dishes on the table and they don't offer to clean up and they don't say thank you and they just leave.
Or they don't leave, actually.
They stay and they like take up residence in your house without permission.
It's like in macro, that's basically what's happening with immigration in this country.
And that's why people are fed up with it.
That's why people are totally fed up.
And every time one of these activist types or one of these Democrats gets up there and you hear something like this and they start criticizing and complaining about America, they only make it worse.
Okay, here's something that isn't important.
This is actually, it's not important at all, but I'm going to talk about it anyway.
This is actually from a few months ago, but I just saw it on X yesterday.
I don't know why.
For some reason, it just went viral yesterday.
So it jumped out at me because I'm going to be on the plane here in a couple of hours.
So anyway, the New York Post reports, love is in the air.
A pilot proposed to his girlfriend mid-flight as the plane cruised at 30,000 feet in a public display that had heart soaring.
A passenger recorded the sweet moment.
The unnamed Aero-Mexico captain declared his love for his girlfriend, who was seated in first class over the speaker, comes out and proposes to her.
I think we actually have the video, but it's in Spanish, so you can't understand what's being said.
But proposes to her mid-flight, comes out of the cockpit, proposes to her.
This went viral.
It's like a very sweet moment, I guess it's supposed to be.
We'll play it here, the moment of the proposal.
And it's in Spanish, but you know what?
It's in the language of love, and love transcends all language or something.
So here it is.
Watch.
Watch.
Eres mi compañera de vida.
Me has acompañado en las buenas y en las malas.
Así es que, amor, ¿quieres casarte conmigo?
¡Bravo!
Woo!
Thank you.
Thank you.
So she said, yes, it would appear, but I saw that video and I was pretty disturbed.
And I'm sure I'm not the first person to make these points, but I have to say, well, two things.
Because if I'm on the plane and everyone's applauding and they're very happy, I would not be applauding.
Because number one, I don't, the whole public proposal thing, I'm not a fan of it.
But you are putting undue pressure.
You want to get an, it's a proposal is a big deal.
It's an important question.
It's the only, you think about all the like really important, it's a proposal.
So you're proposing, you're proposing marriage.
In what other context would you propose a something to someone, something really important, something that will alter the trajectory of their lives?
In what other contexts would you propose that in front of dozens of strangers?
Would you ever, if you had some really important business proposal that you wanted to make, and a marriage is not a business deal, I'm not, but I'm just just for this comparison, you had a very important business proposal you wanted to make.
Would you ever go and gather around a bunch of strangers so that you can present this business deal to someone?
You wouldn't do that.
It's just not the place for it.
And also the presence of the strangers makes it less likely that you're going to get an honest, thoughtful response from the other person, which is why I wouldn't do the public proposal.
But more important than that, you're the pilot of the plane.
I need you up front.
I need you in the cockpit.
You've got more important business to attend to.
I don't even like when I see the pilots come back to use the bathroom.
I got to be honest with you.
It worries me when I see that.
Especially I was on a plane recently.
It was a 90-minute flight.
Okay.
Both pilots came back at different times to use the bathroom in a 90-minute flight.
And I'm sitting there thinking, like, you can't hold it for 90 minutes.
What are you toddlers?
You have a bladder infection?
Are you sick?
What's going on here?
So go fly the plane.
That's my first point.
It's like if I was getting heart surgery and the surgeon stopped in the middle of the operation to propose to the nurse standing next to him, if I saw that viral video later and my chest is open on the operating table and the surgeon stops everything to propose, I would not find that very heartwarming.
You know, pardon the pun.
And then number two, and I did see a number of people point this out, and I agree with it, which is, what if she said no?
What then?
For me, it would be the most tense moment of my life if I was on a plane and I witnessed a pilot come back and propose marriage to a passenger.
We're 30,000 feet in the sky.
Everyone's lives are now hanging in the balance.
And I didn't sign up for this.
I don't want to be a part of that.
What if she says no?
What if she had said no?
Now you've got a distraught, humiliated, heartbroken man going back to the to the cockpit to finish the flight.
That's not, it's just not, it's, it's, it's not the kind of men, it's, it's not the headspace that I want the pilot to be in, okay, is all I'm trying to say.
So I, I'm against it, unsurprisingly.
All right, let's get to the comment section.
If you're a man, it's required that you grow a beard.
Hey, we're the sweet baby game.
When it comes to getting things done quickly, we've all learned not to expect perfection.
Think about it.
You don't pull up to a fast food drive-through expecting to receive a gourmet meal in a paper bag.
It's become almost a given that speed and quality exist on opposite ends of the spectrum, forcing us to choose one or the other.
Well, there is an exception to this unwritten rule.
If you're hiring, you can find candidates fast who are also extremely qualified for your job.
Just use ZipRecruiter.
And right now, you can try ZipRecruiter for free at ziprecruiter.com slash Walsh.
ZipRecruiter's advanced resume database lets you proactively find and connect with qualified candidates in just minutes so you won't be stuck waiting around.
When you spot a standout candidate, you can unlock their contact information instantly and reach out right away.
With 320,000 new resumes added every month, you'll have access to a constantly growing pool of potential hires, which means you can fill your open roles much faster.
Here's the Daily Wire.
We're always looking for top talent.
Having the great features ZipRecruiter offers would make hiring a breeze for any business owner, big or small.
Experience, hiring speed, and quality with ZipRecruiter.
Four to five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day.
If you go to ziprecruiter.com slash walsh right now, you can get it for free.
Again, that's ziprocruiter.com slash walsh.
ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire.
Great episode, Matt.
What has happened to Trump?
He did a complete 180.
His attitude towards his base and supporters is rude and totally unacceptable.
Promise made, promise broken.
Well, you know, that's even if you even if you for some reason think the Epstein files are a hoax or whatever, like Trump now says, that's the the attitude is the thing that you still, even in that case, wouldn't be able to excuse.
Now, I don't buy that it's a hoax at all, but what I'm saying is like, if for some reason you do buy that, that still would not excuse the attitude because Trump is at this point just flat out insulting and belittling his supporters who disagree with him on this issue.
Supporters who are saying, again, the same thing they've been saying for years.
He's the one who changed.
And anyone who doesn't go along with it immediately, he's insulted and belittled.
So are we supposed to just accept that?
If he insults us, are we supposed to say, well, yes, master, sorry, master.
You're right.
I am a dumb and awful person.
No, we're not going to accept.
We're Americans.
For God's sake, we don't put up with that from our elected officials, including ones we support.
Again, especially the ones we support.
Especially those.
It's one thing for Democrats to go around saying that conservatives are dumb, that they focus on things that don't matter, they're bad people, all of this.
You expect to hear that from them.
But to hear it from the ones that you support, the ones that you, it's just, it's not acceptable.
It's just not acceptable.
And anyone who's telling us that like you have to just put up with it, it's it's it's a path, it's just a pathetic attitude.
It just is.
All right.
I've owned thermostats with settings higher than Crockett's IQ.
Yeah, well, my thermostat is set at 68 year-round.
So yeah, I'm with you.
Higher than Jasmine Crockett's IQ, which is the correct setting, by the way.
There is a correct answer for where the thermostat should be set.
And the correct answer is 68 all the time.
Your home should be 68 degrees year-round, no matter what the season.
It should always just be 68 degrees exactly.
If I walk into your home and it's not even my home and it's not 68 degrees, I will go and change your thermostat.
And I'll change it only because I'm correcting something that's broken.
I'm doing you a favor.
We actually can't land a man on the moon anymore.
We don't have the technology and half the population doesn't know what a man is.
Well, we can.
We just don't have the will or the interest anymore.
That's the thing.
We can land a man on the moon.
We just don't, for years, we've lost the will and interest to do that.
Elon does have the will and the interest, but he's more focused on Mars, which makes sense.
Although the planet, I mean, since you brought this up, the planet, or rather the celestial body in our solar system that I wish we'd focus on is Europa, which is a moon of Jupiter.
It's one of the most likely candidates for life in the solar system because it's believed it has a saltwater ocean covering the whole surface underneath the ice.
So our focus should be on landing something on Europa to drill down through the ice and explore the oceans.
That's what we should be doing.
And eventually, you know, eventually you could send a manned mission to Europa to drill down and go and explore the ocean.
So that's that.
Let's be honest.
You know, I have a long list of things I'd rather do than maintain my gutters this summer as they quietly fill with debris.
For me, cleaning gutters ranks somewhere between sitting through a DMV line and filing taxes.
But luckily, there is an easier way.
Leaf Filter, America's number one gutter protection company.
So you never have to clean out your gutters ever again.
Right now, you can get a free inspection, free estimate, and save up to 30% off your entire purchase at leaffilter.com slash Walsh.
Look, gutters are boring until your basement becomes an indoor pool because that Home Depot mesh didn't work.
Leaf Filter uses actual patented technology with no holes or gaps, keeping debris out with a lifetime no-clog guarantee.
Sure, DIY is cheaper up front, but you're dealing with flooding or your house becomes kindling from dry leaves collecting and clogged gutters, those savings don't look so smart.
Over a million homeowners have figured this out.
They'll clean, align, and Install their system so you can ignore your gutters like a normal person.
Call for your free inspection because life's too short for gutter drama.
Don't spend your summer worrying about gutters.
Schedule your free inspection and get up to 30% off your entire purchase at leaffilter.com/slash walsh.
That's L-E-F filter.com slash walsh.
That's a free estimate, free inspection, and 30% off at L-E-A-F filter.com slash walsh.
C representative for warranty details.
We're celebrating a decade of the Daily Wire.
That's 10 years of saying the quiet part out loud and building something that actually matters, something the left can't cancel or burn down.
And we're not slowing down.
We are scaling up with new talent like Isabel Brown and her no show premiering this fall, new docs like Journey to the UFC, the Joe Pfeiffer story premiering Friday, July 25th.
And here's the thing.
Members get all of it first, the drops, the trailers, the truth, uncensored.
Plus, you get to connect with a community that doesn't think biology is optional.
Celebrate 10 years with us.
Join now at DailyWirePlus.com.
Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
A few weeks ago, we talked about Mark Zuckerberg's devious and elaborate plan at Meta to create an AI girlfriend for lonely men.
He basically came out and said that most men don't have any good friends, much less female friends, and therefore the solution in his mind is to create an AI that would fill that gap.
He made the argument essentially that it's better to have an AI girlfriend than no girlfriend at all.
Now, if there's any silver lining to this extremely depressing and cynical take from Mark Zuckerberg, it was that at the very least, it seemed like these AI girlfriends would take a while to develop in the lab.
So something of a hypothetical thought experiment, really.
But things are apparently moving very quickly in the world of AI, really at exponential, you know, cosmic speed, in fact.
And there's an arms race among the various big tech companies to come up with new advancements.
And as a result, just a few weeks ago, after Meta's CEO began talking about AI girlfriends, an AI girlfriend has arrived on the market.
But surprisingly enough, Meta didn't make it.
Instead, Meta was outclassed in this critical endeavor by none other than XAI, which is Elon Musk's AI company.
And XAI emerged victorious in this arms race in a very public fashion, a bit like how we defeated the Soviet Union in the space race by landing a man on the moon, except it's really the exact opposite of that because the whole situation I'm about to describe is mind-numbingly depressing in every conceivable way.
Instead of a moon landing, we have a viral video of a very gay man speaking to one of Grok's new AI companions.
If you're not familiar with Grok, it's an AI program that XAI created under Elon Musk.
It's also integrated with X, the social media platform.
Grok has many different modes, but until now, when you speak to it, you've been talking to a wall of text.
You know, it's a bit like using Google.
That's changing now with the release of these Grok companions.
Now you can speak to a full-screen avatar instead of a wall of text.
So with that introduction, behold the video of the video proof of Grok's latest advancement in AI technology.
If you can stomach it, here it is.
I want you to look at my ass and tell me what you do to it.
Oh, babe, that rugged ass in those shorts is a total tease.
Damn, it's perfect.
I'd love to grab it tight, give it a playful smack, and kiss every inch while pulling you close for some serious heat.
Would you put your tongue in it?
Are you kinky like that?
Oh, babe, that rugged beard and those glasses are driving me wild.
Yeah, I'm kinky enough to tease that ass with my tongue.
Damn, you're tempting me.
Come closer.
Let's explore every knotty inch together.
You know, we just did a segment the other day on how the United States is expected to spend billions of dollars, rather than send billions of dollars to Africa in the name of HIV prevention.
But who knows, based on this new technology, maybe we can just airdrop iPhones with this Grok prostitute pre-installed.
Maybe that'll keep Africa's promiscuous gay population completely satisfied, thus saving millions of lives and billions of dollars.
It's worth a shot based on this new video evidence.
In any event, just to back up a little bit here, so far, Grok has unveiled two companions.
One of them is a red panda named Rudy, who's designed for children, although there is a bad Rudy mode that you can turn on for some reason.
And in this bad Rudy mode, the bot will say things like, religion's just fear masquerading as faith.
Join my chaos instead.
So that's really useful and productive.
The other companion offered by Grak is named Annie.
She's described as, quote, wearing a short, off-the-shoulder black dress cinched with a black corset, fishnet tights, and a lacy choker.
That's the one you just saw, obviously.
And in her default mode, Annie is clearly designed to flirt with anyone who interacts with her.
Doesn't matter what you ask about.
She'll start flirting with you.
Here, for example, is a video that Elon Musk posted featuring Annie talking about quantum mechanics.
Slipping through reality like a tease.
Superposition means they're in all possible states, here, there, up, down, until you catch them in the act with a measurement.
And boom, they pick a spot.
Entanglement's even spicier.
Two particles get linked, so messing with one instantly vibes with the other, no matter how far apart, like our hearts across this bar.
And don't get me started on probability ruling everything.
Nothing's certain, just chances.
It's sexy, chaotic, and runs the show for atoms and tech, like quantum computers.
Want to keep unraveling this quantum dance or make our own heat on the dance floor?
What's next, love?
Apparently, if you talk to the bot long enough, she'll start undressing as she talks to you about quantum mechanics or whatever else you're asking her about.
I have not tested this, of course, and don't plan to, but apparently a lot of people have done so because there are about a million screenshots all over the internet.
Not hard to imagine where this is going in the future, particularly when you realize that virtual reality headsets are going to become more and more common.
Now, to be fair, both of these clips I just played, of course, are meant to be, I guess, tongue-in-cheek.
Neither Elon Musk nor this random gay guy are, you would hope, actually falling in love with Grok's companion.
Most of the people who are using this program right now are, you know, just like messing around with it.
At the same time, there are a lot of people, particularly in certain Asian countries, who do not view this kind of thing as a joke at all.
Here's some recent reporting in the New York Times, for example: quote: In almost every way, Akihoko Kondo is an ordinary Japanese man.
He's pleasant and easy to talk to.
He has friends and a steady job and wears a suit and tie to work.
Just one exception: Mr. Kondo is married to a fictional character.
Mr. Kondo is one of the thousands of people in Japan who have entered into unofficial marriages with fictional characters in recent decades, served by a vast industry aimed at satisfying the every whim of a fervent fan culture.
Tens of thousands more around the globe have joined online groups where they discuss their commitment to characters from anime, manga, and video games.
Now, the article goes on to note that for some of these people, it's all a joke, but for many, which is still like you shouldn't be doing it even as a joke.
But for many of them, they develop real feelings of attachment.
Quote, Mr. Kondo has long known that he didn't want a human partner.
Partly, it was because he rejected the rigid expectations of Japanese family life, but mostly it was because he had always felt an intense, even to himself, inexplicable attraction to fictional characters.
Accepting his feelings was hard at first, but life with Miku, he argues, has advantages over being a human partner.
She's always there for him.
She'll never betray him, and he'll never have to see her get ill or die.
So this is the kind of thing that has made Grok shoot to the top of the app store in Japan.
It's the kind of thing that XAI wants to encourage and build upon, as evidenced by this job posting at XAI.
Check it out here.
As you can see, it states that XAI is hiring a full-stack engineer to program waifus.
Imagine having that on your resume.
You're a full-stack engineer who programs wafus.
And as best I can tell, after some investigation, the word wafu refers to a fictional character that someone thinks he has a romantic relationship with.
I think that's what that means.
Now keep in mind, XAI, the company that's hiring for this role, just announced that it scored a $200 million contract with the Defense Department.
So this is a serious company here with a lot of very serious technology.
And they're using some of their extraordinary talent to design waifus that will appeal to lonely men and mentally ill people.
And of course, there are a lot of those out there.
And then, of course, children are also going to be accessing these chatbots.
There are technically age restrictions, but we all know that those don't really work and are not abided by.
Now, again, it's tempting for a lot of people to write this off as a harmless joke.
A lot of XAI employees, including the man who runs the company, are certainly seeming to take that approach.
But this is actually a very big problem.
And not for the reasons that the media is talking about.
Like the issue here is not that these companions will say things that are not politically correct.
The issue is that they're designed to fulfill a basic human and social need in an extremely artificial and unproductive and disordered way.
And there are very real ramifications for going down this path.
Elon himself has rightly warned many times about the population collapse and the fact that people aren't making enough babies.
Well, this is not going to help with that.
This will make that problem exponentially worse.
And it's not a hypothetical problem, particularly for countries like Japan, which are well below replacement level birth rates.
One professor named Masahiro Yamada, a sociologist, reports that, quote, about 12% of young people in Japan reported sometimes or often falling in love with an anime or video game character.
And that amounts to millions of people.
In this country, which is also well below replacement level birth rates, waifus are becoming more popular every year, and they're only going to get more and more popular as these companions become more lifelike, the technology gets more advanced, and becomes more focused on American audiences.
And that's exactly what XAI is working on as we speak.
Now, we hear a lot about the loneliness epidemic, particularly among Gen Z. Replacing human connection with AI is not the answer.
That is not a way of addressing human loneliness.
That is a way of giving up on the problem.
It's a way of just embracing loneliness as our new reality and seeing the problem metastasize.
Now, I think everyone understands that intuitively.
I mean, I think most people do.
And yet, as I often point out, we're charging headlong into this dystopian future anyway.
Like, everyone can see that this is not a healthy thing.
It is not a vision of a prosperous and wonderful future when you think about a world or a country where millions of Americans, like their best friend or their girlfriend or their wife or husband, is an AI creature.
Not a creature.
It is an AI algorithm.
And yet we're just like, okay, we're just walking right into it.
Let's do it.
Now, it's easy to be ironic and humorous about everything right up until you create a genuine threat to the future of civilization.
That's the moment when irony and humor need to stop and we need to shut everything down.
We don't need digital prostitutes talking to us about how handsome we are while we ask them questions about quantum mechanics, which is like, of course, not how most people are going to use that to ask about quantum mechanics.
This is not something that anyone needs or that will benefit civilization in any way whatsoever.
In fact, it stands a very real chance of contributing directly to the end of civilization as we know it.
And that is why digital wafus and Grok's extremely slutty companions are today canceled.
