LIVE: Patriot Pulse: Oil Under Fire, Election Integrity Fights, MAHA in Action : The Mike Lindell Show
Heather Mullins and Brandon Weichert analyze Iran's 94% drop in Strait of Hormuz shipping, Israel's refusal to de-escalate despite U.S. objections, and alleged Mossad-CIA entanglements driving oil prices. They critique vaccine injury stats at MAHA events, detail the America's Counter Cartel Coalition's lethal force pledge against drug cartels, and examine EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin's claims that contrails are geoengineering tools. The report concludes with an FBI grand jury subpoena for Maricopa County election data amid a government shutdown, framing these crises as evidence of systemic integrity failures requiring immediate legislative action like the Save America Act. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm Heather Mullins, guest hosting for Michael and Dell today.
And we're back with another full week of news.
And a lot happened over the weekend, specifically with regards to Iran.
That situation continues to be unfolding.
We want to put up this headline here from the Associated Press saying crude oil prices are spiking as a broadening Iran war threatens both transport routes and production.
And so joining me now without further ado is Brandon Weichert, our national security expert, sort of foreign policy.
I mean, I watched an interview you did with Tucker over the weekend, Brandon, and I was like, this guy knows his stuff.
So I had to have you on because I've got a boatload of questions for you.
So thanks for joining us.
Well, thanks for having me.
It's always nice to be with you.
Yeah.
So let's jump right into that headline real quick because I know you had mentioned you've been following a lot that's going over there.
You called yourself a nerd, but I just think you're someone that actually pays attention and knows what's going on.
Unlike a lot of the talking sort of pundits that we see regurgitating stuff, you know your facts.
So what can you tell us about like what is specifically driving up the oil prices here?
What are some of the routes, the status of them for these ships that need to pass through?
Can you give us a little update on that front?
Yeah, so the Strait of Hormuz is probably the most important, what's known as an oil transit choke point in the world.
Basically, there's about seven major transit choke points for oil.
Panama Canal is one of them.
And the Suez Canal is, like I said, the most important one.
There's also the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb, which is in the Middle East as well.
And then the Red Sea also serves as a very important choke point as well.
These three waterways are under threat from either Iran directly or their proxies, the Houthis in Yemen.
And the Strait of Hormuz has seen a reduction by about 94% of all shipping that goes through it.
Now, there's some reports today that some container ship captains are basically risking everything and turning off their transponders and trying to get through.
This is all sort of scattershot reporting.
The bottom line is you talk to anybody who does oil commodities for a living.
The market is today now very bearish.
We've had, I think it was a 40 or 45% increase in the price of oil in the last 96 hours because of the Strait of Hormuz closures.
And that's because if you can't pass through that strait, that means you have to take a much longer route around Africa to get to Asia or to get to Europe.
Furthermore, if that route is closed, that means that the producers in the Middle East, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, countries like that, they can't export as efficiently their oil.
And by the way, the Iranians are now blowing up oil refineries in places like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Bahrain, etc.
And that means that they can't even produce, let alone ship them.
The Saudis are trying to move their oil transportation away from their ports along the Strait of Hormuz and into the Red Sea port.
But of course, as I noted earlier, the Red Sea is basically dominated by the Houthis, and the Houthis have already said they will be reimposing their missile blockade of the Red Sea.
So, you know, Saudi is going to have in the next week or so, probably some serious complications on top of what they're already experiencing with the Strait of Hormuz.
And what that does is that raises volatility in the global oil market.
And that then causes global prices for UNI to go up precipitously until that volatility is reduced.
And that won't be reduced until the war is over.
And I very seriously doubt the war will end anytime soon.
Yeah.
I mean, I know what you had mentioned on when you were on with Tucker, like there's that sort of like two-day window now to take the golden off ramp to try to say we are like we achieved our goals.
President Trump could say, look, we did it.
We won.
Like let's walk away from this.
Is that two day, like, is that window closed at this point in your mind?
I mean, there are people still saying that, you know, people close to Trump that are kind of mentioning that, hey, he's going to do that in the next week or so.
In my opinion, the, you know, the cake is already baked now.
That oil refinery that Israel blew up, not the United States, Israel against us.
Yes, that's the one right there.
Yep.
So that was done without our permission.
That was done against our wishes.
The Israelis knew that we did not want this to happen, and they did it anyway because the Israelis are not interested in conflict de-escalation at all, even though Israel is being very damaged by these bombs or these missiles rather coming in from Iran, and they could use a reprieve, but they are not going to stop.
So the war continues.
Trump today, I think it was in Axios.
Don't hold me to that.
It was in one of them, said that basically we can't get a war-ending scenario without Israel's approval.
Well, that is a shocking admission.
And on some level, he's right because we are tethered at the hip now together in this mission.
So the Israelis are going to have to have a say.
But ultimately, the Israelis do not want this to end.
And therefore, the Americans can't find an off-ramp.
And even if we did now say, okay, we're done, there's no guarantee the Iranians are going to say, hey, we're going to stop because the Iranians genuinely believe they've got us where they want us.
And this is something that I think the big failure for Trump was that his team did not brief him accurately about the mindset and ideology of the regime.
This is not the Venezuelan regime.
They're not going to just surrender because things get a little tough.
This is a very ancient culture in Persia, and they're Islamists, which means they want to die on some level, and they have no problem with that.
So do you think that, I mean, do you foresee boots on the ground here?
I have, like, at some point as a result of this, I know we have a sound bite here from Secretary Hegse.
We'll play, you know, his response to potential boots on the ground, but then I want to get your thoughts on it afterwards.
So take a listen.
Sure.
Is it possible to achieve the objectives President Trump has set before you if we don't locate and obtain and extract the highly enriched uranium?
There's a lot of different ways we can get after that.
They've used a conventional umbrella of missiles that was growing every single day, their production capacity, to try to cover over their nuclear blackmail ambitions.
As far as how you get at that nuclear option, we'll make sure that their nuclear ambitions are never achieved.
Will we take it out ourselves?
Oh, I would never tell you or anybody else what our options are.
See, that's another thing.
People keep asking a very fair question.
People ask boots on the ground, no boots on the ground, four weeks, two weeks, six weeks.
Go in, go in.
President Trump knows, I know, you don't tell the enemy, you don't tell the press, you don't tell anybody what your limits would be on an operation.
We're willing to go as far as we need to in order to be successful.
Do we have any overt or covert forces inside Iran now?
I wouldn't tell you that if we did.
Only reason I ask is earlier this week you said no.
Is that still the answer?
Yeah, that's still the answer, but we reserve the right.
We would be completely unwise if we did not reserve the right to take any particular option, whether it included boots on the ground or no boots on the ground.
I mean, I guess I understand his point to a degree, right?
Because if you say you're not going to do it, you're essentially showing the enemy your cards.
But I mean, what do you think?
Are we going to see boots on the ground over there, Brendan?
I think there's already boots on the ground there.
I think definitely the Israelis had assets in the country.
I wouldn't be surprised if certain special forces from the Americans were there.
I definitely know that we have people around Iran doing things, preparing the battle space, as they say.
When they say boots on the ground, I don't believe we would see under any circumstances, really, I mean, short of a draft, which now Caroline Levitt is apparently not shooting down that notion, which is really disturbing.
But short of something like that, I don't believe we'll see an Iraq invasion redux.
I think you would probably see, and what I think the administration is working toward is some variation of what we did in the invasion of Afghanistan, where we sent lots of U.S. Special Forces A teams plus CIA paramilitary groups into Afghanistan.
They met up with local organized resistance like the Northern Alliance, and then they basically force multiplied them to removing the Taliban from Kabul in December 2001.
I think the thinking in the administration is they're going to do something similar, where they've identified groups on the ground in Iran, notably the Mujahideeni Kalk MEK, and they're going to partner with them and then help propel them.
The problem is that the MEK is nowhere near as combat effective or large as the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan was at its height.
And there's a lot more ground to cover in Iran and many other groups that are organized and aren't going to want to see the MEK rise to power.
And so, you know, the United States is, I think, biting off way more than it can chew.
But I do believe quote-unquote boots on the ground are on the way if they're not there already.
It'll just be in a special forces capacity, not in a sort of conventional invasion.
We don't have the ability to do, and we don't have the force structure in place.
We don't have the resources.
It would require Congress to get involved.
The administration clearly does not want Congress involved.
So this is not going to be able to be like a re-invasion of Iraq type deal, but it will look more like Afghanistan in 2001, which is still a costly endeavor.
Oh, yeah, 100%.
And speaking of costly, I want to put on the screen here an image.
They announced the death of a U.S. soldier.
There's been a few deaths, but this one in particular, Captain Cody A. Cork, is that the one?
Actually, I think that might be that one was in Kuwait.
And then there was, that was, that was the, was that the one?
There was one in Saudi Arabia that had actually, there's an attack into Saudi Arabia.
He was on a base there.
And like, so now we're seeing in real time, Iran is attacking other countries, right?
So this is now gone outside of the Iranian and Israel border, and other countries are being implicated.
How many countries have been attacked as a result of this?
It's the entire region.
It's the entire region.
There's not a country that hasn't been affected in some way by this war in the region.
But more importantly, I said this on another show.
It's kind of a world war already.
I put it in air quotes because obviously we're not at an actual world war yet.
But you've already got China and Russia providing all kinds of support for Iran.
You've got the British now thinking about sending one of their two aircraft carriers into the region.
The British have been, despite being opposed to the war, they have been with their warplanes in the region shooting down incoming Iranian missiles and drones over Qatar.
The French lost a base, a naval facility in the Middle East at the outset of the war.
So now they've sent the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier.
Macron is saying, I'm going to send the French Navy to forcibly open up the Strait of Hormuz because Europe is the one getting hit hardest by these oil shutdowns.
And so this is already a world war.
There's now fear that, you know, if the Red Sea becomes a battlefield again, with the Houthis sealing it off with their missile complex, the Ethiopians might mobilize their army to take the Eritrean coastline under direct operational control and allow American and Israeli ground-based missiles to be deployed along the Eritrean coastline to better destroy and target Houthi targets in Yemen, just across the Red Sea.
So this is very much becoming a world war, and it is expanding exponentially, regardless of what the administration is saying.
The off-ramp has not been taken.
It might very well be closed.
And certainly the price of oil now is catastrophic for the average American, and it's only going to get worse the longer the war goes on.
So what has Russia and China's response been from what your kind of your pulse of the situation?
Well, officially, the Russians and Chinese have been muted.
They've been very professional about it.
Ultimately, though, behind the scenes, we know that the Russians have been feeding some kind of intelligence to the Iranians for months and even years.
The Russians have been providing military technology and components to the Iranian military, helping to beef them up and modernize them.
The Chinese have been doing something similar.
Chinese have been purchasing 80% of Iran's oil is sold to China.
That now, because people also in the administration say, well, see, this is a good thing.
Israel's Hammerlock on American Ops00:15:51
We're hurting China.
And we are certainly pinching China, no doubt.
But they only get overall about 14 to 16% of their oil comes from Iran.
So Iran, 80% of their oil sales are going to China.
But for China's profile, it's only about 14% to 16%.
China also has been helping Iran locate and target and track U.S. Navy warships in the Arabian Sea, not only with their spy ship that's loitering behind our carrier group, but also their satellite constellation, which that information is being fed into advanced Iranian anti-ship ballistic missile systems.
So they have the option of conceivably attacking the carrier and damaging its flight deck, which would render the carrier useless.
And then also the Chinese have no problems with saying that to us, hey, if this war continues, America, you want to rebuild your depleted arsenal of missiles.
You need rare earth minerals to do that.
We in China control those rare earth minerals.
We're not going to let you get access to them.
And that's where I think this is also going.
In April, the president will be meeting with Xi.
I suspect Xi is going to really strong arm Trump on that issue to try to get him to end the war immediately.
Yeah, because like to your point, China's sitting there.
They're not burning through their arsenal of munitions and things like that while we are.
And one of our biggest competitors in the military sphere is China.
And so it benefits them to just see us go to war with Iran and burn.
And then they learn, they learn also because now the Russian, there's a retired Russian general in Russia who's telling the press there that he knows for a fact that there is a group of Chinese technical officers who are on the ground managing and perfecting the Iranian hypersonic weapons arsenal, which is very believable.
And if that's the case, they're learning from every iteration of this attack the Iranians do how they would then do something similar in China to Americans if a war over Taiwan or the South China Sea ever erupted.
Now, a friend of mine, I don't know if you, I spoke to a friend of mine off the record the other day, and He said what he thinks could end up happening is we could see swarms of drones coming toward like the U.S., like U.S. coastline.
If you can get a ship close enough in the water, then the drones themselves could essentially make it to the U.S. coastline.
Have you heard anything?
Well, they wouldn't.
Yeah, that's 100% accurate.
In fact, either DOD or DHS a couple years ago gamed this out and they found that we basically would be unable to protect critical infrastructure and ports from this threat.
Other news networks covered those assessments.
This is public knowledge.
This is not secret.
In fact, you remember the great drone scare from a couple years ago, I think two Christmases ago, when you had unknown aerial phenomenon overflying sensitive U.S. military installations in the United States, like Langley Air Force Base, and the military couldn't do anything to stop them.
We didn't know where they came from.
It was later realized these were drones.
Now, perhaps they're part of an exercise, or we don't know, but the bottom line is we did not do very well in that instance because we are not prepared on the home front.
We saw last year, the Ukrainians, probably with the help of Israel, that's another story.
The Ukrainians conducted a very decisive drone attack in Siberia on Russian nuclear bombers that were parked out on the tarmac.
Those Russian bombers would have been used to attack Ukraine, and they attacked them by putting lethal drones in the back of what looked like regular semi-trucks.
And then they parked those semi-trucks right near the base and released them and caused all kinds of chaos and havoc.
I think something similar like that could occur at key facilities in the United States.
I mean, F-35 facilities, for instance, in Southern California, F-35 bases in places like Arizona.
So we really need to upgrade our level of intelligence in the home front, and we need to be prepared.
And by the way, they could, like you, to your ship point, they could park a container, a ship, like it was just doing regular business at a key port like the port of LA, and then suddenly thousands and thousands of unmanned aerial vehicles could be deployed from the containers on that container ship and wreak untold amounts of havoc before finally being shot down.
So that threat is very real.
And the Chinese have certainly prepared for doing that to us if a war broke out with them.
I am sure the Iranians, with their love of terrorism, have also gamed that out.
Speaking of Israel, which you mentioned earlier, I want to play this sound bite of you on Tucker, sort of unpacking some of their influence on U.S. politics.
Take a listen.
Said a war over Iran will likely trigger a World War III.
Now, that book came out in 2022.
I remain convinced that we are at the opening salvo of a true world war, and it's happening because of our actions and the actions of our partner, Israel.
I would say even more precisely, it's happening because of Benjamin Netanyahu and the hammerlock he has over the American government, including Mossad officers at CIA headquarters and IDF officers.
Yeah, that one came from the Pentagon.
I mean, that one came from a, you would know this individual.
He's a very famous CIA guy.
I got off the phone with him about an hour before I came on with you.
And it's scary.
I mean, remember, though, Gary Vogler, who wrote a great book for the Libertarian Institute, it was called, I think Israel was the winner of the 2003 Iraq War, something like that.
He was an oil guy working for the Coalition Provisional Authority.
And he identified this guy named Makofsky, who was a Pentagon bureaucrat who ran the Iraq war desk for the first part of the Iraq War in 03.
And he was a Mossad officer, not just IDF.
And he was Doug Fife's son-in-law.
So, you know, this is, you know, our country is unfortunately not being run entirely by the United States and the American people.
No, it doesn't.
You don't see a lot of software.
I'll get emails for that one.
Well, it's true.
It's factually true.
The Secretary of State, God bless him, admitted that two days ago and said we did this because Israel made us do it.
We're going to go anyway.
So, I mean, that obviously caught my attention, especially, you know, being one of the new Pentagon Press Corps recruits.
You know, how much of our government truly is influenced by Israel?
And this is something that's kind of been a new rabbit hole I've been going down, but it certainly begs the question.
I hear about Israel coming up more in my line of work now working as a Pentagon correspondent than any other country in terms of influence over our elections, our politics, our congressmen, our president.
I mean, how big of an influence do they actually have?
It's significant.
Now, I used to work on the Hill and we used to have what was known as APAC Week.
So that was, you know, the unofficial name when AIPAC would deploy its personnel.
And I think they had two lobbyists for every member of Congress, if I remember correctly.
And this was over a decade ago.
So forgive me, I might be off on those numbers, but they have a very significant dedication of resources to influencing, physically, going in and physically influencing Congress to demonstrate that they have the access and ability to basically run operations on America's elected officials.
And when I say run operations, I mean lobbying operations.
And I think it's also very imperative.
We do need to be very clear here.
We're talking about Israel as a country because, you know, this thing tends to sort of go off into anti-Semitism.
So, you really want to watch out and avoid the pitfalls there because it's easy to fall into that.
But, in terms of the actual policies of Israel in terms of influencing U.S. politics, U.S. defense policy, U.S. foreign aid, that is a documented reality.
It is an objective of the Israeli state to do that.
And you can't blame them because it's in their national interest to do that.
What you have to do is blame our leaders for being so short-sighted and greedy that they can't possibly set aside their own personal political and monetary gain to say, Hey, we're not going to accept this influence.
But you do now because of this.
There's an incident that happened years ago at CIA I was told about, where basically the IDF and the Israeli intelligence had a meeting.
They had a new guy that was coming in to kind of brief CIA, and that man wasn't on the list.
So the CIA said, Hey, we can't let this guy in.
He's not approved.
And basically, within 10 minutes of that incident, the CIA officer who denied access to the new Israeli guy received a phone call from a very famous Republican senator and said, Sorry, you got to let this guy in, otherwise, you're fired.
And the pressure cooker was then put on this analyst, and he ultimately allowed this individual.
You know, I believe they ultimately allowed the individual in.
But that shows you the level of instant connectivity the Israelis have over us.
Furthermore, we know, you know, at the Pentagon, this was reported during the 12-day war, that there are permanently stationed Israeli officers in the Pentagon who apparently were barreling into closed meetings with our joint chiefs of staff and demanding that they be given access in real time to highly classified information during that war with Iran.
So, this is a huge problem if you're concerned about America first.
This is not an America first policy, and it has continued under the current Trump administration.
Yeah.
So, I guess, because again, I'm like sort of new to going down like what is the actual influence Israel has, like, where are they within our government?
What is it exactly that we get from Israel?
I know that we subsidize them hundreds of millions, billions, whatever dollars.
Like, what is it about Israel that is keeping us aligned with them?
Is it strictly, you know, military power for stuff like this?
But then, at the same time, are we not paying for their military power?
So, is their military power not really just our military power on a different uniform?
What is the actual like interlock?
What is the breakdown of the relationship between the U.S. and Israel?
There's no doubt that the Israeli military, for its size, has a has can punch well above its weight usually.
Although lately, I would argue that it has actually been declining in capabilities and in professionalism.
But ultimately, the Israelis have been partnered with us in the global war on terror.
You know, they help us occasionally with anti-Islamist elements fighting them.
But you talk to most people at CIA in particular, people who are both Republican and Democrat.
It's not just a one-party thing.
Many people who've been working counterterrorism at CIA are very, very skeptical of Israel because, as one of them told me, Israel not only rarely helps us in counterterrorism issues, but very often they will take information we share with them and use it to stop our operations, to complicate our operations in the region, because they have another game they're playing again for their national interests.
And so I don't even really know anymore how helpful they are in fighting terrorism issues.
There's also the issue of the resources.
We give, as you note, a disproportionate amount of resources to Israel.
And I really think, and I really think it comes down to the religious element.
I think that's the real reason why we're so committed.
It goes back to the rise of Christian Zionism in the United States and its partnership with the Israeli state, believing that Israel has to be basically built into the Jewish homeland so that the apocalypse can be triggered and the return of Christ can begin.
This is something that a lot of my fellow Christians believe.
And there's a lot of people in government, particularly in the Republican Party, who believe that have this particular view of Israel.
And I think that it is misguided.
And I say that as a deeply Christian man, I do believe, though, that this is misguided.
And I think it's actually going to do more harm to Israel than it will help them.
Well, I just want to get one more final question.
I'd love to have you back on it and go down like the more Christian route there and the religious element to this, because there is definitely without region of the world, there is a super religious sort of battle going on.
And, you know, we're told this is about Iran and nuclear weapons specifically.
And so, you know, when I look at Israel as an ally, I think, you know, in terms of like, what are we getting from you?
How is this relationship beneficial to the U.S.?
And with all I can think about is the four years our country was invaded under Biden, where were all our allies helping us as we were being invaded by military-age men.
And so I want to just bring up this last headline here from ABC News saying Iran may be activating sleeper cells outside the country alerts, say, because they intercepted encrypted communications.
So my final question for you before I let you go is just what is your assessment of these sleeper cells?
How much of a threat are they in the United States?
And, you know, just your thoughts on that in general.
There's, yeah, there's no doubt.
Iran is not our friend.
The Islamic Republic of Iran is not our friend.
They've been chanting death to America since the beginning.
You cannot turn your back on this regime.
They do have a love of terrorism.
In fact, I was told the largest consulate for Iran exists in Mexico City.
And that's not because Mexico City has such a large Shiite population.
It's because they are running operations, very large-scale operations here in the United States.
So there is no doubt that the Iranian regime hates us, supports wantonly terrorism both against us and Israel.
But I think the key thing here from an America First perspective is being able to see how likely it are these terrorist attacks to hit off in the United States.
I would be very surprised at this point if the Iranians really went full boar with the terrorist attack because right now they know this war is deeply unpopular in the United States.
If they started initiating very high-level terrorist attacks, say like another 9-11 or maybe a 10-7 style attack here in the United States, they could pull it off, but it would drastically reduce the, it would turn the American public very much in favor of the war, which is something the Iranians don't want, which is why you've seen the Iranians really staying, keeping their targets focused on U.S. military facilities, many of which are abandoned now,
Ivermectin Mega Sale00:03:21
which is why they're keeping their targets on Arab targets to try to weaken the alliance in the Middle East, believing the Arabs are the weakest link.
And they've stayed focused on the Israelis, which is their big enemy in the region.
They have not really started, even though we've been bombing them, doing things on the home front here because they are keenly aware that once they do that, that's pretty much it.
That the entire American people will rightly turn in favor of the war, which right now, I would say at least half of the American people are not in favor of this war.
Yeah, I think that's a fair assessment.
Well, thank you so much, Brandon.
It was a pleasure speaking with you today.
Yeah, see you around.
Definitely.
All right.
Thank you, Brandon.
We are going to take a quick break.
And when we come back, Allison Steinberg, our Capitol Health correspondent, joins us.
We'll be right back.
Let's face it.
You can't trust Big Pharma.
They've already tried to block ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and raise prices on everything from antibiotics to your daily meds.
Well, there's good news.
All Family Pharmacy is standing up for medical freedom and helping people get the treatments they actually want.
My family and I use them all the time.
They made it easy and affordable without the runaround.
While other pharmacies are jacking up prices, they've actually dropped theirs.
Ivermectin now starts at just $2 a capsule.
Use my promo code Lindale10.
You get an extra 10% off of that.
You need ivermectin antibiotics or methylene blue, you name it, they've got it.
They make it simple.
You fill out a short online form, a licensed doctor reviews it, your medship fast right to your front door.
If you want to be prepared and have your medications on hand, this is your new pharmacy.
Talk is cheap when it comes to saving our country.
We're not just any cell phone service provider.
We're Patriot Mobile.
It's not enough to simply talk about values.
We live them.
Defending life, protecting our First and Second Amendments, and celebrating our military and first responder heroes.
We're boots on the ground making a difference.
We're America's only Christian conservative wireless provider with nationwide coverage on all three major networks and 100% U.S.-based customer service.
Join Patriot Mobile today and make an impact every time you use your cell phone.
It's finally here, our second annual mega sale.
This sale only comes around once a year, so take advantage of the best offers ever while you can.
For example, save 50% on our Giza Dream bed sheets as low as $29.98.
And for the first time ever on TV, MyPillow Mattresses and MyPillow Mattress Toppers as low as $99.98.
And you save 50% on our Lux Pure Six-Piece tow sets.
Regular $69.98, now only $39.98.
And our best-selling standard, MyPillows, regular $49.98 on sale for $17.98.
Wait on it, mega sale, only $14.98.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use this promo code to take advantage of our second annual mega sale.
Curing Disease Through Mindful Eating00:05:37
But wait, there's more.
To make the mega sale even more special when you order right now your orders gonna ship absolutely free and Welcome back everyone Joining me now are Capitol Hill correspondent, Allison Steinberg.
Ships with everybody.
I seem like you're drugging today.
Hi, Heather.
Good to see you.
I'm not on Capitol Hill today.
I'm actually at the Willard Hotel.
We are here at a Maha event talking about vaccine injuries and the way forward.
Lots of great people here, speakers, Adele Bigtree, Nicholas Holscher of the McCullough Foundation, Children's Health Defense.
Awesome group of people here talking about this critical issue that I think many people have sort of forgotten about since COVID was now six years ago.
Isn't that crazy?
That's hard to believe it was six years ago.
Unfortunately, people are still dealing with the fallout and the repercussions, the adverse reactions from these COVID shots that were pushed so hard during the scandemic, as I like to call it.
So, really great to be around people that are spreading awareness and still talking about the way forward and how we handle this.
I mean, it's so interesting.
I've heard so many stories today about these stats and numbers: people that have gotten the vaccine versus have not gotten the vaccine and how that's resulted in severe chronic illness and disease in the vaccine community.
This inconvenient study, documentary produced by Del Bigtree, actually highlights the fact that 18,000 kids by the age of 10 were studied.
57% of those vaccinated kids are now suffering chronic disease, which is 40% or 1.4 million kids sick each year from the vaccine.
So, crazy stuff.
I think it's very interesting.
You look at the Amish community and they virtually have zero chronic disease, zero of these adverse reactions versus us here in modern society who've been lied to and told vaccines are God's gift to earth.
Now, you know, one in 31, I think it is, children today are diagnosed with autism.
So, it's just astounding to hear some of these numbers.
And I'm really grateful to have so many wonderful people here shedding light on the truth behind these poison shots.
Yeah, no, I actually saw something one time where, God, I vaguely remember the details, but somebody had followed two twin brothers, right?
And their diets, I guess, from living in different countries was similar, but because of the foods or something in America, like one brother was like much more sicker than the other brother.
And so, it just kind of goes to show you that there is a lot of, I forget the exact study, but that America in particular has been known to be like one of the worst when it comes to food contamination.
Absolutely.
And it's incredible what a you know, prominent role food, particularly healthy, real food, actually plays in our overall health and well-being.
And whether or not we end up with chronic disease, cancer, obviously, diet has so much to do with that, which is why it's so great that we have Robert F. Kennedy Jr., our HHS secretary, that is talking so much about this, really promoting the idea that food is medicine.
You can literally cure disease and illnesses through making mindful choices about food, eating real foods, staying away from highly processed junk food, which sadly has become the norm in today's society.
So, it's just all about making healthier choices.
I know it's a lot of times sounds easier said than done, but once you actually get into it, you practice it, it's not that hard.
And then you eventually stop craving all that crappy junk food and you want to start eating healthy and implementing better protocols into your life.
Like we talked about just last week, the intermittent fasting is also so great.
So oh, I'm so proud of you.
I'm glad to hear that.
I do think that society sells us this idea too that, like, oh, you're supposed to eat three meals a day, but like, that seems so excessive.
When you finally realize that, like, the reason we eat food is for energy, but half of the foods that we eat don't give us energy.
In fact, it makes us like tired and feel groggy and like slows us down.
I mean, it's just crazy how much of just basic human nutrition and what our bodies really need.
Like, I'm having to relearn because everything that I was taught from K through 12 education was based on like, you know, fraudulent science or whatever.
And it was just really science that just created sickness, not health.
Yeah, it's so true.
And that's because, you know, this massive industry benefits off of sick people.
A patient cured is a customer lost.
So they want to keep us all sick.
They want to keep us unhealthy.
That is the ultimate goal, which is why it's so important that we unlearn all of that propaganda, like you touched on, and relearn the correct way to go about things.
I would actually say, you know, you mentioned that we've been programmed to think that we need three meals a day, but honestly, like lately, the mainstream encourages like having six small meals throughout the day.
I can't tell you how many people I hear talking about needing to eat small meals all throughout the day.
I'm like, that is so unnecessary.
It never allows your body to actually digest the food and recover.
It completely contradicts actual science.
So no, you only need like one or two max meals a day.
And I think that we, yeah, really need to focus on unlearning all of that.
And I think you'll find you feel infinitely better.
Support a Talking Filibuster for the SAVE Act00:09:18
I know I do.
And I think actually breakfast is like the biggest lie ever.
They say it's the most important meal of the day.
I think it's the least important meal of the day.
So it's just crazy.
And like, for those that do try intermittent fasting, it's like your body also has to like detox off of the crop you've been feeding it.
So like if you start intermitting fasting, that's true.
Sometimes people mistake like their body detoxing off of the trash they've been eating with like them reacting the intermittent fasting itself.
But like after a few days, it's like you naturally lose the hunger.
You're no longer craving food.
Like you readjust.
Yeah.
And it's like, you feel like you have energy.
I can't even like, I highly recommend people, you know, do their research and try the intermittent fasting in particular.
But, you know, what else can you say?
So it's so important to try.
Well, aside from, you know, all the health hacks, I have some updates for you on the Save America Act.
I know this is something we talk a lot about, but we have an official update from President Trump.
So this is good news.
President Trump over the weekend posted that he is not going to sign any more bills into law before the Save America Act is passed.
So he's saying, get it done.
He's really putting the pressure on the Senate to, you know, make some headway on this.
He said, great job by hardworking Scott Pressler and Fox and Friends talking about using the filibuster or talking filibuster in order to pass the Save America Act.
It's an 88% issue with all voters.
Must be done immediately.
It supersedes everything else, must go to the front of the line.
I as president will not sign any other bills until this is passed.
So this is really good news.
I'm glad to hear President Trump talking about it.
I kind of, I guess, better late than never.
I kind of wish he would have done it a little earlier, though, because I can just foresee this, you know, going through the ringer to get this done.
I think it's going to take a lot longer than anticipated.
It's going to jump through many hoops to actually get to the president's desk.
So hopefully the Senate is receptive and listens to this, but it is going to pose quite the challenge.
We already have Chuck Schumer responding to President Trump.
He posted to X, let me just pull this up.
Sorry, my computer's lagging.
He said the Save Act is Jim Crow 2.0.
It would disenfranchise tens of millions of people, not Americans, people.
That's because Chuck Schumer wants illegals voting.
Anyhow, he goes on to say: if Trump is saying he won't sign any bills until the Save Act is passed, then so be it.
There will be a total gridlock in the Senate.
Senate Democrats will not help pass the SAVE Act under any circumstances.
So I don't know.
I just feel like this is a complete dereliction of duty.
The fact that you're going to say you're not going to, you know, help pass the SAVE Act under any circumstances.
You're going to lock everything up if this is how we proceed forward.
I mean, it's just completely ridiculous.
Also, the fact that he's still calling it Jim Crow 2.0, how laughable is that?
85% of Americans support this, including Democrats.
So to try to continue this ridiculous and completely false lie is just a slap in the face of the American people.
We are also learning that if there is a holdup in the Senate and we can't really count on them to follow through, which I don't think is out of line given their history, the Senate can't seem to get anything done.
Anna Paulina Luna, Congresswoman, is now planning, she's saying that the GOP Republicans in the House are planning to block the must-pass FISA reauthorization act unless the Save America Act is attached.
So she's been talking about this for quite some time.
She said from the very beginning the Save America Act is not going to get passed on its own.
It can't stand as its own legislation.
It's going to have to get attached to another must-pass bill.
And maybe that is the way forward.
That's another potential way around this if we can't get the Senate to act because we know they will have to, you know, pass the Pfizer Reauthorization Act.
Maybe attaching the Save America Act is, you know, the ultimate cheat code and finally getting this done once and for all.
Any idea on like a time frame of like when needs like do you think we're gonna get it passed even with him threatening like the no signing of the bills?
I would hope that that would put their feet to the fire and expedite this process possibly.
I don't know for certain, but uh Senator John Barrasso, who is very high up in the ranks in the Senate, he's basically second in line to John Thune, joined Fox for an interview and he sort of talked about a vague timeline.
Didn't really like pinpoint when specifically, but he did sort of allude to what the next couple of weeks ahead are looking like.
Let's take a listen to that clip from him.
Support a talking filibuster to get the SAVE Act to the floor.
Will you and Jon Thune do it?
That's one way to do it.
Members are having meetings right now to say what's the best way that we can actually get this passed.
I met with the president at the White House about 10 days ago, the day before the bombing started in Iran, to work on finding the best path forward.
We need to get this passed.
We need to get it signed into law.
I'm a full supporter.
Okay, Senator, it's good to have.
So again, no specifics, you know, very vague on the timeline.
But the good news is they are now talking about the talking filibuster in the Senate.
Before that was not a conversation that was being had.
John Thune said it would eat up too much time on the Senate floor to implement the talking filibuster.
So I'm glad to hear the change in tune on that.
We'll see if they actually, you know, put their words into action.
We are learning also, Fox News posted a list of senators that are opposed to the talking filibuster.
And I might add, these are Republicans or so-called Republicans, right?
Rhino Republicans.
You can see them listed here.
Although, take off Katie Britt because she responded to this post and said this is actually fake news that she's working with Mike Lee to implement the talking filibuster to get this passed once and for all.
So you have all your usual suspects there.
John Thune himself, Mitch McConnell, Lisa Murkowski, Tom Tillis.
So, you know, nothing really new, nothing mind-blowing here, but I am glad to hear the conversation is now shifting into implementing the talking filibuster, despite those rhinos we just saw there.
I think this is ultimately the way forward and how we're going to get the Save America Act passed once and for all.
So we'll see what happens and we'll keep the pressure on over in the Senate.
Well, we thank you for staying on top of it and hopefully it gets passed.
But I just feel like I'm at the point where I'm like, I don't know if it's anything.
Like I've just so negative on this subject because I'm like, if they haven't passed it at this point, is it going to get passed?
But I know you got some things you got to do here.
But thank you for joining us as always.
Thank you so much, Heather.
Appreciate it.
Appreciate it.
I mean, gosh, it just feels like this should be something that we shouldn't even have to be fighting about.
And it's just like, I don't ever watch the fake news, but part of me is sitting here wondering, like, does anybody else even know this battle for the Save Act is going on?
Like, are the other networks even covering this stuff like Allison and I are here over on Lindell TV?
Or are people like living in this tiny bubble?
Because the fact that she just said, like, 85% of Americans wanting things like voter ID to vote in elections, this goes, you know, Democrats and Republicans both want it.
So how are so many of our elected officials that are supposedly representing us able to just stall on these kinds of things without facing backlash in their communities?
So it's really mind-blowing, but we're going to take one more quick break and then just, you know, cover a couple more topics in our final segment.
So we will be right back.
With everybody talking about making America healthy again, I thought today would be a great day to talk to all my fellow patriots about the importance of making your homes healthy again.
Well, we have proudly partnered with AirWaterhealing.com and their revolutionary whole home air purification system.
The V3 from Airwater Healing does 3,000 square feet of purification.
It eliminates dust, mold, viruses, and odors.
But here's the part I love: they require no filters to ever be changed and virtually no maintenance.
Whether you suffer from asthma, allergies, seasonal bronchitis, or just want to protect your family from the flu or even greater threats, don't wait to get your V3 from airwaterhealing.com today.
Use code Lindel for 20% off in savings and free shipping.
That's promo code LINDELL at airwaterhealing.com.
Welcome back, everybody.
Trump's Shield of the Americas Summit00:11:13
Over the weekend down in Florida, President Trump had what is called the Shield of America's Summit.
Our very own White House correspondent Kara Castranova was there for the event and recorded a package for us, just sort of walking us through what took place.
So let's take a listen to Kara Castranova.
Here at Trump National Dural Golf Club, President Trump spent the weekend hosting world leaders for the Shield of the Americas Summit, while also briefly leaving the meetings to travel to Dover Air Force Base to honor fallen American service members on Saturday.
Among the leaders attending the summit were Argentina's president, Javier Millé, and El Salvador's president, Nai Buquile, two of the region's most high-profile leaders known for taking aggressive action against organized crime.
Officials and representatives from across Latin America and the Caribbean also took place in the summit, which focused on strengthening cooperation to confront drug cartels and other transnational criminal networks operating throughout the hemisphere.
Throughout the weekend, discussions centered on intelligence sharing, security coordination, and expanding regional partnerships aimed at dismantling powerful cartel organizations.
During his remarks, President Trump said the growing threat posed by cartels requires a stronger response from countries across the region.
We're calling this military partnership the America's Counter Cartel Coalition.
And that's what you need.
You have cartels.
They seem to grow in this region unbelievably rapidly.
It has to do with drugs largely.
Earlier this week here in Miami, Secretary of War Pete Hexa, who's right here, Pete, you are fantastic, doing a great job.
We're proud of you.
And representatives of 17 different nations formally entered this new alliance.
The heart of our agreement is a commitment to using lethal military force to destroy the sinister cartels and terrorist networks.
Once and for all, we'll get rid of them.
But in the middle of the summit weekend, the president made a trip, briefly leaving Florida to travel to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware for a dignified transfer ceremony honoring U.S. service members killed overseas.
It's a very sad day.
And glad we paid our respects.
It's a tough, it's a tough situation.
Great people, great parents, wives, family.
A beautiful ceremony.
I guess you've got to see that.
Presidents rarely interrupt an international summit to attend a transfer ceremony and then return to the same event.
After paying respects alongside military families, President Trump flew back to South Florida to continue meetings here at Doral.
Looking ahead to today, the president remains in Miami.
He began the morning in executive time and will be participating in a closed roundtable this afternoon.
He is also expected to deliver remarks to the Republican Members Issues Conference before departing South Florida later today and returning to Washington, D.C. Reporting for Lindell TV from Trump Doral National Golf Club here in Miami.
I'm Kara Castranova.
Great update there from CARA.
Great coverage.
But moving on, switching gears a little bit, do you guys remember back when the people that used to talk about chemtrails and, you know, the government's got these programs and they're spraying stuff and they were all sort of labeled conspiracy theorists?
Well now the EPA administrator Lee Zeldin says that the streaks in the sky aren't normal and that contrails are basically a geoengineering program.
Take a listen.
Concerned Americans have urgent and important questions about geoengineering and contrails.
The American public deserves and expects honesty and transparency from their government when seeking answers.
But for years, people who asked questions in good faith were dismissed, even vilified by the media and their own government.
That era is over.
The Trump EPA is committed to total transparency.
As a result, I tasked my team at EPA to compile a list of everything we know about contrails and geoengineering for the purpose of releasing it to you now publicly.
In other words, I want you to know everything I know about these topics and without any exception.
Instead of simply dismissing these questions and concerns as baseless conspiracies, we're meeting them head on.
We did the legwork, looked at the science, consulted agency experts, and pulled in relevant outside information to put these online resources together.
Everything we know about contrails to solar geoengineering will be in there.
That means anyone who reads through this information will know as much about these topics as I do as EPA administrator.
To anyone who's ever looked up to the streaks in the sky and asked, what the heck is going on?
Or seen headlines about private actors and even governments looking to blot out the sun in the name of stopping global warming?
We've endeavored to answer all of your questions at the links on your screen.
In fact, EPA shares many of the same concerns when it comes to potential threats to human health and the environment, especially from solar geoengineering activities.
The enthusiasm for experiments that would pump pollutants into the high atmosphere has set off alarm bells here at the Trump EPA.
Prior to now, EPA has never been this proactive to raise awareness about concerns with geoengineering and to stop this activity from being scaled up.
This is what it looks like when government actually listens to the will of the people and doesn't try to squash it.
You can always trust this administration and this EPA to take your concerns seriously.
Answer your questions honestly and carry out the will of voters with integrity.
Looks like that's another win for the conspiracy theorists.
Finally, they're admitting that some of this geo-weather modification stuff is actually real.
In other news, though, there are some travel delays, not necessarily due to weather, but some other stuff going on, like the TSA shutdown thanks to the Democrats.
So, take a listen to this update posted by one of the Trump's social media accounts.
This morning, as spring break travel ramps up, chaos at multiple U.S. airports, travelers facing hours-long delays during this partial government shutdown.
Funding for the Homeland Security Department, which includes the TSA, expired last month, meaning TSA officers, for the second time in six months, are being forced to work without pay, prompting more agents to call out sick.
That's causing delays of up to three hours in security lines, including here in Houston.
We got here at 10 a.m.
My flight was departing at 150, and we're not going to make that here.
The guy said to me, Heads up, it's a mess down there.
Man, he was right.
In New Orleans, lines stretched through multiple floors and into the parking garage.
The disruptions come as airlines brace for a 4% increase in spring break travelers compared to last year.
That's nearly 3 million passengers expected each day.
The partial government shutdown stems from a standoff in Congress.
Democrats are demanding changes to immigration enforcement before they approve new Homeland Security funding.
An organization representing airlines is urging Congress and the administration to negotiate a deal, saying America's transportation security workforce is too important to be used as political leverage.
And, you know, what we need is we need Democrats that are actually going to fund our important bills and departments and agencies.
And the way we do that is by fixing our elections.
So I will end the show on this positive note.
Maricopa County's elections are under investigation.
Take a listen.
The FBI has decided that the history of Maricopa County is problematic and that under federal law, a county or a state must administer the election the way their state laws do require it.
If they don't, it is a federal legal violation.
This is why they raided Fulton County, another place with a long history of irregularities and misconduct, and quite frankly, just incompetent election counting.
And so the focus in this grand jury subpoena that went in the last few days to Maricopa County, seized many gigabytes of election data is the 2024 election, which is interesting because President Trump won there.
But there is a discovery that was made by congressional observers.
Every year, the House Administration Committee sends observers, one Democrat, one Republican, to various voting centers.
One of the teams, the Republican-Democrat team that went to Maricopa County, observed something very disturbing.
They took pictures.
They wrote a long report.
Congressman Abe Homeday hinted at this in an oversight letter recently.
The information in that report was so troubling to the FBI.
And when coupled to the things that the Arizona Senate found in 2020 that were raised as concerns and the things that Homedae and Kerry Lake raised in 2022, they were able to get a grand jury subpoena from a federal grand jury and execute the transmission of a large amount of voter data.
They're going to go through that data looking for some of the telltale signs that were in this congressional report.
I hope in the next couple of days to make that congressional report public so everybody can see what it was that observers on Brian Styles' OS Administration Committee saw.
Brian Style himself acknowledged that they were working with federal authorities on this specific Arizona matter.
So you got Congress working with the FBI.
And I think this is phase two of about a five-phase look at states, particularly blue states or blue areas of states, where elections are not administered the way the law says they're supposed to be.
And as a result, the FBI may come in and prosecute people because it is a federal felony if you don't follow your state's laws.
If you don't treat everybody the same under your state law.