All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 18, 2024 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
56:20
The Lindell Report | 18 September 2024
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
My pillow guy, Mike Lindell.
He is the greatest.
My pillow guy, Mike Lindell.
And he's been with us right from the beginning.
Somebody has to help this country, and if they don't, the country and the world are
in big trouble.
Someone's gotta overturn the tables in the temple.
Trump jumping into the presidential race.
She's a bit worried.
Of the apprentice guy?
You know the feeling of power?
Could you handle it or would it devour?
They fear that power.
You didn't do an insurrection.
Had you called for one, there would have been one.
And there would be one if you called for one now.
I'm not sure I want that power.
I want the power just to make the country better.
America first!
And that scares them.
A lot about Donald Trump scares them.
Let's look at everything.
Campaign, his family.
Let's get foreign eyes on him.
We have one target.
You know who he is.
Going after their companies, their families.
That is a dictator.
It's a very dangerous time for our country.
The goal is to put him in jail because they're so afraid of his voice.
I am your voice!
We'll bury him so deep in legal, it'll bankrupt him.
Broke, got him.
In jail right before the election.
That's hard for being that guy, but isn't that election interference?
It's not interference if we do it.
We just want a free and fair election.
Sounds expensive.
Ballots ain't cheap.
Wait, wait, wait.
Did you actually say the word buy the ballots?
We were able to purchase 10,000 ballots.
That's terrifying.
They cheat in many different ways.
That's all they're good at.
Ready to save democracy?
We need to stop him permanently.
And that person will be risking his life.
Too bad it's not the 60s, right?
It's the wing you survived.
And I said, get me up.
Trump has beaten back every attack against him.
It's like the damn Terminator.
We're going to fix our borders, and we're going to fix our elections.
We're going to win.
Vindicating Trump.
The best is yet to come.
Only in theaters September 27th.
Good evening everybody. I'm.
I am Rick Weibel.
I am substituting in for Mike Lindell, obviously, tonight.
And so again, thank you, Mike, for trusting me to run your show and not completely torpedo it, but I'm going to do the best I can.
All right.
So we had a last minute sub in here.
And so I am doing the WWE style, not quite as prepared as I usually am.
I'm going to be kind of discussing a little bit more of the logic and accuracy test tonight, and also kind of some of the latest updates.
So first, we want to make sure that you are making a plan to go out and see the new Dinesh D'Souza movie coming out September 27th.
Make a plan.
Get out there right away in that first weekend.
Get out there, see it with your friends and family.
Spread the word, but also for those of you that are involved with Candidates involved with the party.
You want to make sure that you are ready to answer those questions from the flood of volunteers that are going to want to come in and help protect the elections.
This movie is going to be one of the seminal movies out there that will talk a lot about
the different things that have happened to the former president, but also with our elections
in there as well.
And so there are going to be a lot more questions.
There's a lot more cases now coming forward across the United States with a lot more information.
We're seeing a lot of activism now also by the FBI and especially by Homeland Security.
And with some of the questions that have now just cropped up as to what can Israel do,
especially with these pagers and now the walkie talkies, there are now questions regarding
our elections such as, is it possible a person could go through and attack that?
Bye.
We don't know.
So this is a question that we will probably want to make sure that Homeland Security asks each of the vendors and potentially do spot checking just to make sure.
Now, most of these systems do not have batteries internally like the walkie-talkies and these pagers have, which would be lithium batteries.
And I doubt that there is any type of remote access, but at this point in time, We do have to ferret out any of these possibilities and make sure that our elections are secure.
And number two, we need to start asking our election officials, do you have a valid backup plan?
Because let's not worry about the terroristic threats that could be out there.
Let's not worry about some of the other vectors, but the simple weather things that can happen up in the northern climates.
Those are real.
I remember the Halloween storm that impacted the Twin Cities metro area and also greater Minnesota.
And there were some areas that did not have power restored right away.
And so it took some time.
And so making sure that you have a valid hand count system, making sure that you are maintaining chain of custody throughout the election process is so important.
And so I'm really hoping that these Secretary of States of all 50 states are talking to
their election officials, coming up with a plan and also working with the FBI and Homeland
Security to ensure that we are testing these plans ahead of time.
And for those states that are out there that don't have a hand count method, there are
many great states and organizations out there that do have a hand count process out there.
We can look to Linda Rance's hand count method out of Missouri.
We can look at uscase.org's hand count method.
We can even look at some of the state of Minnesota's hand count method with their pile and stack methodology.
There are enough out there that there should be no state at this point without a process to basically protect the elections.
And so again, September 27th, get ready for the Vindicating Trump movie.
Take a look at your local theaters and see if you can start purchasing tickets in advance and make a plan.
So of course, I like to say that in reality, election integrity That is a gold standard that we need to be going towards, and transparency is the inoculation to all conspiracy theories.
We should be working with our election officials to make sure that they are ready to get the elections ready.
And for many states, we already have a deadline fast approaching this Friday.
This Friday starts the Yokoba absentee balloting.
And also for many states, the standard absentee balloting out there for folks that want to early vote or they believe they're going to be out of town due to business or family.
I am not a proponent of voting early because of some of the issues that have cropped up.
and they want to make sure that they vote early and get that banked.
I am not a proponent of voting early because of some of the issues that have cropped up.
We are now seeing letters from the Secretary of State's Association
questioning the US.
Postal Service if they are going to be able to deliver all of the absentee ballots in time for the election going out, but also coming back.
And so because they are raising that concern, I am a proponent of voting on Election Day in person because that is a 100% vector of maintaining ballot security.
This is your one vote.
And it was interesting.
I was working with a volunteer out of Wyoming, Joe Kaufman, And we actually sat down and figured out the cost of what is the value of her vote.
And so we took the entire federal budget and we said, okay, we only get to replace Congress once every two years.
So we'll take the federal budget, times that by two, divide the number of voters that voted in a federal election.
And then we came up with the cost of that vote value.
Then we looked at the state budget, looked and said, again, we get to replace part of the legislature.
Once every two years.
And so then we took that biennium budget, divided that out by the number of voters that participated in that state selection.
Then we took it down to the next levels for the county, the school, and also the city slash township that she was part of.
And we were shocked.
And so when we sit there and we look at what the cost of, what the value of your vote is, it can range anywhere between $10,000 and $38,000.
And so when you look at all of these layers of government and what that value is, now we know what the value of a vote is when it is subverted.
And so that can definitely be a class action lawsuit when we see malfeasance in regards to the test acts.
And we'll get to that a little bit later on here.
But as we kind of look through our checklist for what do we need to do before the election, So, of course, we want to make sure that you're registered to vote.
We need to make sure that we're validating the voter rolls.
So right now, in a lot of these states, you should be purchasing a voter roll and looking at also the deadline as to when your state closes voter registration.
So I'm in a state that basically says 20 days before the election we lock it in.
Neighboring state over in Minnesota you can still register on the day of election and so understanding those rules will tell you how many times you need to buy those voter rolls so you can kind of keep track of Legitimate voters but also illegitimate voters and there are also the absentee data for many of us is going to be starting this Friday and so you will want to be signing up to review that daily absentee data of what was requested if your state allows that and then also what was actually sent out
And then also, if a third category, what was delivered back and received by the county.
So those three buckets of what was requested, what was sent out, and then what was received back, those are important.
The third part of that component is Keep the bounce back mailers.
That's evidence.
And so we like to try to work with candidates to basically say, as soon as an absentee ballot is requested, we send chase mail to that absentee voter so that they can potentially learn about a lower ticket, down ticket candidate.
And if we find that that mailer bounces back, that's evidence.
And so we want to keep that.
And especially in close elections, if we find that An absentee ballot went out to this address, but we followed up with a card and it bounced back, but somehow the absentee ballot came in and that was still voted on.
We're going to question that.
Then in Minnesota, we see the guarding of the ballots that they're looking at, but also the absentee ballot oversight.
It's so important to make sure that your state, your county, and your city have bipartisan absentee ballot oversight.
And so if you don't see that within your county or your local jurisdiction, find out what laws are available that you can request that and make sure that you're working with your party.
to make sure that that is happening.
And we see that issue in Minnesota.
We see that in Wyoming.
We see that in so many different vectors.
We should not be allowing county or city employees to process absentee ballots without partisan oversight in a bipartisan way to make sure that things are on the up and up.
Also, when it comes to drop boxes, we already see that Merrick Garland is saying that anybody that is trying to do voter suppression in regards to drop boxes that they're going to go after
them.
Now, this is a states' rights issue, and I think this is where Merrick Garland and I
are going to disagree because when I directly look at the U.S.
Constitution, it is very clear that it is the state legislatures that decide the time, place, and manner of the elections.
And for him to come out and basically intimate that drop boxes are required from a federal standpoint, I think is pretty ridiculous.
And so I would encourage activists to start working with attorneys and working with their state parties to determine Uh, whether or not they believe in the state's rights aspect, uh, in regards to our elections.
Then we also want to make sure that we are still making sure that the processes and systems are secure of the election equipment.
So asking whether or not your jurisdiction has requested a change order of their vendor to make sure that the latest antivirus has been installed and the latest Windows patches or Linux slash Unix patches have been installed to make sure that we are on the up and up, I think is extremely vital, especially with everything that we've seen this year.
And then also we'll walk a little bit further into detail about the logic and accuracy test.
And this is during the public part that you can participate in.
And so that will be coming up in a lot of jurisdictions over the next two to four weeks.
We'll start seeing some of those notices come out and we will actually be able to take a look at how well they understand how to use the equipment.
So as we look at the review of the daily absentee data, part of that is going to be so important that we are, in essence, canvassing.
We're doing a national change of address check to make sure that those people are actually registered to vote from that location and that they haven't moved to another jurisdiction.
We can also do digital canvassing to make sure that it's not an empty lot, so you can use Google Maps to look for that.
And then also look for incomplete addresses, where if you might see 20 people within a same address area, you want to go through and kind of ferret that out to find out, hey, is this a heterite community that is actually valid?
Is this a nursing home that's valid?
Or is an apartment And they didn't put the apartment numbers on there and so that is potentially a chain of custody issue and so hopefully all the names on the mailboxes are there so that we can make sure that the postal carrier is actually maintaining chain of custody to help out our elections.
And again, make sure we keep those bounce back mailers, because especially sending those out that requested an absentee ballot, and if that card is returned to you, but an absentee ballot is collected by the election official, you need to ask questions.
Now it will be different if they showed up in person and voted absentee, and that would be valid.
But if it was mailed to them, and they mailed it back, that's an area where we definitely want to ask a lot of questions.
So again, we want to make sure that we are asking our election officials if they have a disaster recovery plan.
And this is so important.
And we need to find out if the election official is sick, who is the backup?
And we want to ask now, because this helps them kind of get the juices rolling and kind of dusting off their plan to make sure that they have everything that they needed, such as ordering extra ballots.
I think this is going to be a high voter turnout.
And I think you shouldn't be afraid to ask your election officials, how many ballots are they ordering?
Are they ordering more than 2020?
Uh, for example, uh, we should find out because by reducing what some counties do in some jurisdictions, they may have a ballot on demand printer, or if they run out of ballots, they may actually force people to go use the express vote machines.
Now, in some of your jurisdictions out there, like in South Carolina, where you don't really have physical ballots and you just use the touchscreens themselves.
Um, what are you going to do if those touchscreens don't work?
Do they have printed out ballots at the ready so that if they fail or they don't work, we're ready to go.
And we need to make sure that they have a plan for hand counting as well.
And so this is where I would encourage each of the counties.
Where there are party activists, please make sure that you're working with your party to make sure that you're signing up to be on standby to help the election official if anything happens.
So that way we can make sure that we uphold the statutes, make sure that the election is conducted in a timely manner, and that everybody is able to vote and express who they wish to vote for.
We also have hand count resources available at uscase.org.
And here we have a couple of videos at YouTube where we have a hand count demonstration where a typical flow of the hand counting process and we show some of the ballots there.
And then we also have a hand count demo there of 126 ballots that you can actually follow along and actually mark the governor's race.
And then I also have the hand count intro where I talk about the supplies that are needed to make sure that you have a successful hand count.
And right now at Walmart and so many other After school specials, a lot of the stuff is on clearance, like the binders, the pens, the thumb, fingertip pieces are not typically, but you'd want to get those ahead of time because sometimes those are a little hard to find.
And so making sure that you have those ahead of time is just going to make it a lot easier for your election official.
Then also at U.S.
Case in the hand count demo kit, we actually have, for example, The hand count session one race at a time.
That's a PDF file that actually has the instructions.
Then you can also download and print out the ballots on eight and a half by 14 paper and actually use that with your team.
It's 126 ballots.
They're two sided.
And then we also then have the US case top down tally sheets.
that you can print out, and this is an Excel document, and you can also re-edit the file
for candidates in your races and add and subtract tabs as you need,
or you can even just wipe out all the candidate names and just go there and do it blank
and write the candidate names in.
And so those are helpful tools available for you.
Here's what I want everybody to really understand.
So after the Gore v. Bush case of 2000, and the Supreme Court basically tells Congress
and the plaintiffs and the defendants, look, we're really not gonna touch this
because the Constitution already limits our scope.
And it's really the state legislatures that have the oversight of this.
And so Congress decides to bribe all of the states to get rid of the hanging chads that were problematic in the Florida election back in 2000.
And so they created the United States Election Assistance Commission to kind of help oversee this.
And then they created a standard in 2005 that we're using going into the 2024 election.
And what's amazing is they knew back then how important the elections are and the processes as well as the functioning of the voting machines and they lay it out here in page three of that voluntary voting system guidelines which almost all of the election equipment in the United States for states that participate with the EAC they're using this standard of 2005 and we're going into 2024 election using the same standard
for this election and the general election.
And they stated back then, it is well known that deficiencies in election management and administration procedures can have just as much impact on the enfranchisement of voters and the outcome of elections as the function of the voting machines.
The overall integrity of the election process depends on both of these elements working together.
And so this is where we have come up with the kind of the test deck testing to go through and validate.
And so we see that many states actually don't have really good standards out there when it comes to the test decks.
The laws may be weak.
The administrative rules may be weak.
There may be weak guidance on how to perform a good test deck.
And so a lot of these election officials just have no idea as to what they need to be doing.
And I have reviewed enough states now to basically say a massive majority of election officials that I have reviewed their test facts are absolutely failing.
And that the term failing, I'm going to use a broad brushstroke of they literally don't know how to test to their violating state statutes.
And so, Both of that kind of comes in together.
So in the states where they have strong state statutes, like Wyoming, 22 out of 23 failed right out of the gate.
And we have evidence of this because the great Secretary of State of Wyoming, Chuck Gray, issues a warning to all of the counties to say, look, what we're seeing here isn't good.
And if you've actually failed, we need you to retest.
And he sends that notice out to the counties.
And most of the counties after the retest still fail.
And that is so disappointing.
And so we're working out some legal issues there in Wyoming because some of these violations are actually felonies according to their state statute.
And so Each of those counties has to determine what's right for their clerks and what's right for their counties.
And so as that spectrum of decision is decided for the state of Wyoming, We're going to see other states grapple with this as well.
We've seen a couple of issues in Wisconsin that we're going to be following up on.
We see weak laws in Minnesota, but we see terrible test decks, and we're still going to follow up with election officials to try and work with them to improve that.
Because these test decks establish one of the base levels of trust in the elections.
Do they have the competency to run the machines?
This is that unique evidence that we need.
And so I want to make sure that I encourage anyone who has questions about their elections, make sure that you attend these logic and accuracy tests, because this is one of the public gateways that you will be able to see and determine whether or not your election official gets it.
Okay.
So now let's go into some of the dirty details here.
So as we look at what makes a good test deck, each ballot style has to be tested.
And they kind of fall into three categories.
There's the standard ballot with ovals, usually pre-printed by the vendor.
There's the express vote or disability ballot or ability encompassing ballot.
And this will be a ballot with barcodes that can be read by the tabulator.
Then there's a third category, which is the ballot on demand type ballot.
And so these are ballots that are printed on site during election.
And because this could be a different type of paper, this could be a different type of printer, that The way it prints, it may not be in exact alignment with the standard ballot that was pre-printed because different printers can actually print different sizes of the same document.
And so that's important to understand.
And so a state like Wyoming actually requires all three of these styles to be tested if they're going to be used in an election.
And so this is so important.
Then in their primary election, Another style that is created is when you have a Democrat ballot.
Now that hits all three of these categories.
Then you have a Republican ballot that hits all of these three categories.
And then you have a non-party affiliation that would hit all three of these categories as well, except the express vote ballot is more unique that it still just remains as a number of one for each of the precincts, because the express vote is smart enough to kind of swap places between all three of those styles that it's really just the same card.
But the standard ballot may be three separate physical pieces of paper with a different color banner across the top to indicate the partisan nature or nonpartisan nature of that ballot.
And the same thing would be true of a ballot on demand printer.
So to make it as clear as mud for you is in Wyoming, They would end up with seven types of ballot styles per precinct that would need to be tested because you would have in the standard ballot
Three ballots, the Democrat, the Republican, and the non-partisan.
Express vote ballot would just be one.
So now we've got four total ballots.
And then the ballot on demand printer would print out those standard ballots again, but they could be different configurations size-wise.
And that creates another three ballots because of the Democrat, Republican, and non-party affiliate style ballot.
So now you're kind of asking, so what is this express vote ballot and standard ballot?
So the standard ballot is there on the right hand side, the typical oval ballot that most of us would fill in.
And then the express vote ballot, there are some states that force everybody to use that.
And whenever somebody doesn't vote for a race, it actually does not print a barcode placeholder that indicates that there was a non-vote for that race.
And so these barcodes just kind of stack up as to what did they actually select for the races within that precinct.
And then it leaves the other ones blank in that regard if they're not selected or not there.
It just kind of shifts everything up within that ballot.
So now on to what makes actually a good test deck.
So number one, we want to make sure blank ballots are tested for each style and precinct.
So that has to be there.
Two, each selection within a contest has to have a valid vote, not a zero.
So having a zero there is not actually testing the machine to make sure that votes are going into the right candidate bucket.
Three, each selection has a unique number within each contest.
And what I mean by that is let's say you've got four people within a race.
We should see, Votes like three, four, five.
So three candidates, three, four, five, in that order, or randomly within that contest.
Then we also want to make sure that overvotes are tested for each contest and each possible combination.
So an overvote is defined as, let's say you are voting for President of the United States, you are allowed one vote.
But you decided to select two candidates.
That would be an overvote and that vote would be tossed.
Now what's unique is that ExpressVote ballots actually prevent this from happening.
And so that's where you can't test it for ExpressVotes.
However, except on the screen where it'll actually error out for you versus scanning the ballots in the tabulator.
Now under votes, should be tested for each contest and possible combination.
This is where it gets a little tricky.
So an undervote is, say, for President of the United States, you decided not to vote for any candidate, and so that would be an undervote.
An undervote can also happen, say, for example, in school board races, city council races, or commissioner races, where you can vote for two, three, four, five candidates, right?
And so if you decide, hey, I can select four candidates, but I only like two of them.
So you only vote for two.
Your two votes will still count, but it's still considered an undervote.
And so it can get flagged.
The other thing we should be doing is testing for absentee ballot folds, because sometimes absentee ballots are mailed out and they get folded into a tri-fold format or a quad-fold format, or even a bi-fold format.
And so we want to make sure that those folds are tested to ensure that the folds are not crossing any ovals, which can create votes and or overvotes where the voter did not intend them to be.
And so that those are the top six that I kind of look for when I'm looking at test decks.
So here's an example from a DS 450 out of South Dakota or report where we see that the blank sheets cast She didn't test it.
So she didn't test a full set of blank votes within her test deck.
And here we can see in this other precinct that she actually did test it.
And so she gets a green arrow there where we see that there's three blank sheets that were cast.
And so that was properly tested for that precinct.
And so I'm going to go back to the red one here, and we can see that zero there.
And so in our South Dakota rules, that is considered a violation for that precinct.
But because our laws are a little bit muddled, some state laws are so weak that For the entire county, one blank ballot would be sufficient enough, but I want to raise the standard to basically say, no, a blank sheet should be cast for every ballot style and every precinct that is there so that we can make sure that the tabulator is recognizing that correctly.
Then going on to this area, this is remember where we talked about, so every candidate here, has a vote.
There's no zeros there, so it passes that zero test.
But where this one fails is that we have candidates with the same numbers.
And so in that first race up above, that county commissioner race for Hamlin, we see that two candidates have 10 votes.
So we wouldn't know if the votes were flipped.
So this is an example of something that wasn't properly tested.
Then in South Dakota, we don't have ballot on demand printers.
We have just the express vote and then the standard ballot.
And when we look here at the Democrat presidential candidate race, look at all the candidates that have two votes for them.
We wouldn't know if any of those votes were flipped, which is problematic.
And then for the Marianne Williamson race, there is another issue there, which is, oh my gosh, there's only one vote there.
So if we were expecting a test between the standard ballot and the express vote ballot, obviously one of those ballot styles was not tested.
And so that is a clue for us to know that this was an improper test deck and that we should not trust the results of this machine at all because they didn't properly test and ascertain to eliminate the idea that there could be programming issues.
There are plenty of cases around the United States of simple programming issues that have caused issues in elections.
And when candidates don't understand this here, that this particular auditor started on the wrong foot, that's devastating.
And this is a better test deck that we want to see, where we see that for State Senator District 4, both of the candidates have a different number of votes.
And so it would be easy to compare.
We had 18 votes that we expected for Fred Deutsch, and we had 20 votes expected for Stephanie Sauter, and that's what we got for the results.
So that would be an area that we could trust.
Another area that we look here, State Representative District 4, and we see all four candidates have different unique numbers.
That's a good test.
That's something that we can rely on, especially if we expected these numbers at the beginning.
Now, this is a way to ferret out vote flips.
Now, say for example, Barbara was supposed to have 16 votes, and Vanessa was supposed to have 18 votes, It would be very easy to identify that a vote flipped occurred, and then they would be able to go back to whoever programmed the machines to basically have that corrective action taken, retest, and be ready for the election.
And so when we dive deeper into these ballot styles, what's really need about this standard ballot is that it's reading the ovals, and these are based upon their position.
These are coordinates, and so this is why it's so important to have this right.
And partisan and non-partisan ballots are unique ballots and are different styles from each other.
So remember when I talked about the Democrat, Republican, and a non-partisan?
They will have different races on there, and so that is a different election.
And so that creates the three ballot styles.
Then number three, each precinct is a separate ballot style.
Be aware if there's a split in a precinct due to a legislative or school district split, that creates additional ballot styles within that precinct itself.
So you could have a precinct with six ballot styles in it in a primary election because One side of the district may have District 4 and the other side of the precinct has District 5 for their state representative contests.
Then number four, each contest option must be robustly tested to ensure proper translation from the coordinate positions of the oval to the contest.
Five, if using both pre-printed and ballot-on-demand printers, you must test those as separate styles since printing output may vary.
Um, those of us that have dealt with PDF files, um, you can actually play around with the PDF files and see fit to page or printed at 90% or, um, print the original size.
So there's all those different options that could be hit that could actually just adjust the coordinates just enough to throw off the tabulator from recognizing where it should actually, um, recognize where the ballots are being marked.
So now, this one here is an express vote ballot on the ES&S side.
Dominion has something pretty similar to this as well.
So do other vendors.
And so, note, when this ballot style is inserted into the tabulator, it is reading the barcodes, not the text.
Number two, partisan ballots have no effect in creating a different ballot style.
Since this is not reliant on coordinates, it is reliant only on the barcode.
Three, each precinct is a separate ballot style since the precinct is listed at the top of the main barcode and so it's then going into those individual buckets.
Four, each contest option must be robustly tested to ensure proper translation from barcode to contest.
Because again, we saw in Pennsylvania in the 2022 election where there was a judicial retention election and votes were flipped from basically one judge in one race all the way down to a judge in another race and vice versa.
And so this is where we really want to make sure that all of this is robustly tested.
This is an example that happened in South Carolina that we see again here.
Blank ballots cast, zero.
Then we see that these three candidates have the same number of votes.
And then we see that overvotes are not tested as well.
Overvotes and undervotes.
And so now with South Carolina, because they use express votes most of the time, we would expect that overvotes would be prevented, but the undervotes should be detected, and they did not insert any blank ballots, and so that was not fully ferreted out.
And especially with these three candidates having one vote, that's just shocking.
It's shameful, and that should never have happened.
Uh, then in another one of their contests, we can see that we have two candidates with one vote and then we have a candidate with no votes.
So not properly tested at all.
And this is what we're seeing across the United States.
And then we see in Wisconsin, I just spoke with a good team out of Wisconsin there.
Um, I believe Tuesday night and here we sit here and look at holy cow.
Look at these three candidates here, including Wrighton, where they all have two votes selected for them.
That's not robust enough, and we don't know if any of those votes were flipped.
Then, to make matters even worse, we're looking at actual questions that may have levy implications and here both the yes and no have two votes and we wouldn't know if any of those votes were flipped and so that's also troubling when we look at question number two again two votes we don't know if any of those votes were flipped and so this is just absolutely disgusting to see uh this type
of attitude towards testing that they don't understand, they don't care, there's not proper training, there's no oversight.
So I'm asking all of the Secretary of States to please have better oversight and start helping your election officials to make sure that they're doing the proper test Because many of these election officials are signing certificates to you, the official record keeper, as the Secretary of State, certifying that they properly tested the equipment.
And so filing a false document with most Secretary of States is a felony.
So we need to come to grips with this.
And here in Wyoming, here's the other one that we kind of talked about before in a previous episode.
And here we can see three candidates with one vote, and then we see one candidate with two votes, and then we see right in and two other candidates with zero votes.
We don't know if any of those votes were flipped, uh, within the yellow segments or the red segments.
And that's just absolutely devastating.
And we can, we cannot continue to go down this type of path, um, with this.
And especially when we have Chuck Gray setting the standard out there well before the primary election on June 25th, sending out a letter reminding the county clerks of what the statutes are.
And especially during the test, a different number of valid votes should be
assigned to each candidate for an office for and against each measure.
Now, one of the knocks that some people will have is that he did not explain the
rest of the items within the statute and the requirements.
But the reality is the clerk should have gone in and reviewed the statutes for all of the other items that were required, such as overvotes, undervotes, blank ballots, et cetera, to make sure that they were complying with the guidelines or the actual statutes.
The other thing is, He even talks about at the very end there, if you would like, you can send us a copy of your test matrix spreadsheet for review and feedback.
So this is the secretary of state that gets it and is trying to provide a proper oversight.
But so many of them refused and that's just terrible.
And so in Wyoming, basically 22 of 23 of the counties failed two weeks prior to the election.
Even though Chuck Gray, the secretary of state warned them.
Well, ahead of time, their deadline was August 6th, I believe.
And remember he sent the letter out June 24th.
So that's well over a month that these clerks knew that they had time and support.
And so based upon that, the secretary of state of Wyoming publishes a letter out to the clerks requesting them and also post this on his website.
Look, you need to retest according to our election code.
And so there's the press release and there's the letter that went out to it.
So we have evidence that not everything was on the up and up.
And we have evidence in Minnesota.
We have evidence in South Dakota.
We have evidence in Wisconsin.
And as a matter of fact, yesterday in South Dakota, um, Jessica Palmea and myself, we went to Hamlin County in South Dakota and observed one of the most disgusting things I've ever seen in my life.
An absolute disregard for the U.S.
Constitution, South Dakota State Constitution, where petitioners legally petition their government asking for their elections to be hand-counted.
The petitioner spoke during the public comment section of the meeting.
Then Jessica Palmea also spoke talking about the legal authority, how those commissioners have the right to take this petition and how they're supposed to accept it as face value and then run it through the elections for this general election.
They also, she also spoke about her experience.
Within the South Dakota elections, the different law violations, and also how one of the attorneys was paid by a county to do a background check on S.D.
Kamenstein and review their social media posts.
That's very chilling.
That should not be happening.
And so we have these counties paying this attorney going around doing background checks on activists, and that's not acceptable.
That's not their job.
And that just sends a very chilling effect.
And so I want to give South Dakota Cam and Scene credit for showing up at Hamline County and talking earnestly about their views and the law.
And then I went up and spoke and I actually delivered the bad news to The county commissioners that, look, I don't trust their auditor because she violated state statutes and the rules, and she didn't properly test her machine.
And just because they've had a post-election audit on some of the ballots, and because they've had a recount on a couple of the races, doesn't mean that they did everything right.
It means that they just got lucky and that's not acceptable.
And so you and I both know that there are voters out there That don't trust our elections and they tell us they don't want to come out and vote because they don't trust the machines.
And so when we see test decks like this as part of their work product, as election officials, I understand where they're coming from.
And that's why I'm fighting to make sure that they have good test decks.
And I want to encourage all of you to get out there and make sure that your election officials have good test decks that can help secure elections, minimize the mistakes, but also reinstill confidence.
And if they can't do the test X validly, then they should be going to Han County, simply put, because we have to restore faith in our elections.
Test X is part of that first level that we have to get there.
And if they can't, if they can't do it with a good test X, then they have to go to Han County.
And that's where we have to support our election officials and make sure that we support them in those decisions that they may have to make.
And so again, When I sit here and look at some of the second tests that were done, and so we can see here that this test was run on August 13th.
This is their second try, at least, and they still violated the law.
It's just so disgusting.
They just didn't care.
And so all of these little red arrows are violations of Wyoming's laws.
And then when we look at Um, in Laramie County, uh, this, you know, this test deck is our second one that was run on August, um, 15th.
And it was, the deadline was 14 days before the election.
Um, and then we see where they did, uh, do some things right where they had standard ballots.
Um, actually this is Goshen County.
We can actually see that they had standard ballots tested, 137, and they had express vote cards tested, 123.
That's a good sign.
We've seen other test decks where they had 2,500 ballots, standard ballots tested, but only 10 express vote cards, and they had 40 precincts.
That's just a huge miss.
We also see here in this test deck that the candidates have different number of votes, but then on the overvotes that wasn't properly tested.
So that's why that is in red as an example.
Then going further in this county and we dig down, we see that overvotes were missed in every single one of these races.
So that's a violation of their statutes.
And then when we see here, uh, further down, uh, that there's only one vote for some of these candidates, uh, that tells me that only one ballot style was tested.
And, um, that is, they're not ready to certify this election.
And so that's why number seven, I have it in an error status and this is not certifiable, uh, without breaking the law.
And so kind of wrapping up here.
We want to make sure you guys are validating the voter rolls.
We want to make sure that you have a team reviewing the daily absentee data.
We want to make sure that the candidates and also any of the party folks are keeping the bounce back mailers because that's evidence that you may need to use in challenging an election.
And also making sure that the test decks are accurate.
That logic and accuracy test is so, so important.
I just cannot stress it enough.
And also, I just want to make sure that everybody is aware of the resources available at uscase.org.
The menu is over on the left-hand side.
And we have the antivirus research from January 1st, 2022 through July 8th, 2024.
I really want to recommend to all the Secretary of States, please ask for the engineering change orders to make sure that our systems are secure with the latest antivirus, the latest Windows updates and security updates that are available for our elections.
The very fact that most of our equipment is over two years out of compliance is just stunning.
It's just not acceptable.
Also take a look at the ES&S modem security so that you understand whether or not your system has a modem in it or not.
There are some tips there.
Also making sure that hand counting is part of your portfolio as a disaster recovery plan.
We have some information there at uscase.org and also at causeofamerica.org.
Making sure that test decks I'm going to be working on another document to have a simpler one Out there for just a base standard and then also keep the one out there with the prime number test Another tip when it comes to test decks that most states don't do Is I believe you should run that first test during the public accuracy test Then run it again, but here's what I'd like you to do Change the date of the tabulators to be the day of the election and let's
see if the results and rerun your test decks and let's see if the results are the same. This would
ferret out any of those conspiracy theories that there are any type of scripts in there
looking at a date program where before the election everything's on the up and up according to the
test decks but then on the day of the election there could be a trigger in there that basically
says hey after we're on the election there's an if then statement if
If election day, then we're going to go ahead and torpedo this whole thing and basically run an algorithm to flip votes.
So one way to ferret that out is to change the date and time of the tabulators.
Your election officials know how to do that because they actually have instructions from the vendors that show them how to set the time and date of each of these tabulators to make sure that they're correct for the day of the election anyways.
And this is good practice for them just to ferret that out and to raise the bar for that confidence level within the elections themselves.
And so that's what I have for the base tips for This election for the logic and accuracy test and kind of keeping you guys rolling where we need to make sure that we are ready for this.
So some of this testing is actually going to start occurring potentially next week.
And up to anywhere from two days before the election to 14 days before the election.
Unfortunately, in a lot of these state statutes, the notice is actually not well vetted out.
And I would actually encourage you, partisans especially, go ahead and ask now when your election official is planning to do the public accuracy test.
And go ahead and post it on your website so that you can let people know.
Please attend those events.
Because that is supposed to be the cheerleading event that we know that our election officials have already been testing this equipment.
And so the public accuracy test should actually be the cheerleading event where they've properly tested it.
They're ready to bring out to the public to prove to you that everything is going to work.
So make sure that they have, um, equivalent numbers of express vote ballots.
That makes sense as well as standard ballots.
And so we just want to make sure that they're doing this type of testing, um, so well.
And, uh, I'm going to do a last minute request here of Apollo.
If he can queue up the, uh, video of Dinesh Suza's video, I'd like to end on that, uh, preview and encourage you guys, make sure you get ready for September 27th.
Have a plan.
Get out there.
Watch this movie.
There's going to be so many pieces of evidence out there for you.
And I'm going to sign off.
And thank you so much, Mike Lindell.
Thank you, Apollo, who is working behind the scenes to keep this glued together to make me look good, because I've got a great face for radio and a great voice for books.
I should not be unfettered and feral like this.
out there in the public broadcast, but I hope that the information I presented here tonight will be of some value.
And so take it away, Apollo.
Thank you guys so much and hopefully he will have the video coming up here on cue.
And if they don't, the country and the world are in big trouble.
Someone's gotta overturn the tables in the temple.
Trump jumping into the presidential race.
She's a bit worried.
Of the apprentice guy?
You know the feeling of power?
Could you handle it or would it devour?
They fear that power.
You didn't do an insurrection.
Had you called for one, there would have been one.
And there would be one if you called for one now.
I'm not sure I want that power.
I want the power just to make the country better.
America first!
And that scares them.
A lot about Donald Trump scares them.
Let's look at everything.
Campaign, his family.
Let's get foreign eyes on him.
We have one target.
You know who he is.
Going after their companies, their families.
That is a dictator.
It's a very dangerous time for our country.
The goal is to put him in jail because they're so afraid of his voice.
I am your voice!
We'll bury him so deep in legal, it'll bankrupt him.
Broke, got him.
In jail right before the election.
That's harsh for being that guy, but isn't that election interference?
It's not interference if we do it.
We just want a free and fair election.
Sounds expensive.
Ballots ain't cheap.
Wait, wait, wait.
Did you actually say the word buy the ballots?
We were able to purchase 10,000 ballots.
That's terrifying.
They cheat in many different ways.
That's all they're good at.
Ready to save democracy?
We need to stop him permanently.
And that person will be risking his life.
Too bad it's not the 60s, right?
It's the win you survived.
I said, get me up.
Trump has beaten back every attack against him.
It's like the damn trinity.
We're gonna fix our borders, and we're gonna fix our elections.
We're gonna win.
This is my legacy.
Vindicating Trump.
The best is yet to come.
Only in theaters September 27th.
You ever see this guy with the pillows on Fox?
My pillow guy!
Mike Lindau.
He is the greatest.
The MyPillow guy.
Mike Lindau.
▲
Export Selection