Sept. 14, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
59:27
Brannon Howse Joined by Attorney Dan Eastman & Ivan Raiklin
|
Time
Text
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical and achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedom.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
All right.
Welcome.
Glad you're with us.
Brandon House in for Mike Lindell, who is again out on business.
But I will tell you, I talked to him today and I am permitted to tell you that he has some things in the works, including there may be something coming that he's working on in regards to Jenna Griswold, the secretary of state in Colorado.
I don't know if it's legal action.
Well, it's something in that vein, something in that category.
And so he's working on several important things tonight.
And so I am going to sit in for him again tonight.
Joining me will be Dan Eastman, attorney Dan Eastman.
We have big news coming out of Colorado, or excuse me, Wisconsin.
Apparently it's a big mess there in Wisconsin.
And the radical Wisconsin Election Commission apparently is going to make a move to keep Donald Trump off the primary ballot next year.
We'll talk to Dan Eastman about that.
They're going to get an update from Ivan Reikland.
We haven't talked to him in a few weeks.
He's been up on Capitol Hill.
What is going on with the Speaker of the House?
Kevin McCarthy.
Why all of a sudden is he willing to hold impeachment hearings and inquiry on Joe Biden?
Was it because Congressman Matt Gaetz is calling for vacating the chair and replacing him?
If so, who could they replace him with?
I think many people have had it with Kevin McCarthy.
He has not released the January 6 footage.
There's so many things he has not done.
And Ivan Reikman will get into that.
But who could replace Kevin McCarthy?
We'll get into that and a lot more and take some of your phone calls tonight.
Joining me first is Dan Eastman, attorney out of Wisconsin.
Talk about the mess that, well, is unfolding related to the Wisconsin Election Commission.
Hi, Dan.
Welcome back to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Hi, Brandon.
Thanks for having me on.
It's always great to see you and be here.
You too, my friend, you too.
So tell me about this mess.
Well, we've got, we have a mess in Wisconsin, which is sort of a disappointing situation, because Wisconsin historically has been a leader in state government across America.
If you go back to the prairie populists of the Fightin' Bob La Follette days, Wisconsin's always prided itself on good governance and good regulation.
And we've really been a national leader in setting the The tone for how to run state governments in all different areas, natural resources, utilities, you name it.
But then we come up with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, and unfortunately this has turned out to be an absolute disaster in Wisconsin.
Unlike most states, we don't have a Secretary of State that administers elections.
Of course, Secretaries of State are elected by the people.
Let me just say right there, you do have some old guy that lives down in the basement of the Capitol, right?
Well, no, no, no, no.
He was there for decades and his name was La Follette also, but he was kind of a carpetbagger from Iowa.
So he gets himself re-elected last year, and he retires.
What was he elected as, though, for all those decades?
Secretary of State.
So you had one, is the point I'm making, but he lived in the basement of the Capitol and had no power, right?
Yeah, he basically fed the great seal of Wisconsin, is sort of the joke.
There's no duties, because...
Everything has been stripped away.
So he gets re-elected in November, immediately resigns, and our Democrat governor appoints the equivalent of the woman you were talking about in Colorado.
They're in the same club.
But it's a good thing that elections aren't regulated by the Secretary of State.
We have an Elections Commission, and there's a long and sordid history of this organization.
But what the legislature did back in 2014 was create a new elections commission, the Wisconsin Election Commission, and we call it WECC for short.
It has three Democrats and three Republicans, part-time board, each one's paid $100 a meeting, they're citizen board members, and then they are supposed to nominate an administrator of WECC, and that's the state office holder who would be the equivalent of the Secretary of State.
It's the top elections official in the state, full-time Unclassified job.
It's an important job.
So they appoint Megan Wolf four years ago, who was the incumbent.
And of course, her term expires June 30th of this year.
And there's a great deal of concern about Megan's performance because there are quite a number of, like Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled that her, she instituted drop boxes, which were illegal under state law, but she did it anyway.
And that's what happened in 2020.
The same thing with curing ballot envelopes.
She didn't issue guidance.
The agency has not issued or adopted or promulgated an administrative rule since it was created.
It's pretty much just, it's a captured agency.
And unfortunately, the people who run that agency tend to be very, very Democrat, okay?
They encouraged Zuckerberg to come into the state and spend $10 million in 2020.
And the email chains between the administrator, the WECC administrator, And various clerks really paint a picture of collusion.
So anyway, her term expires and the WAC has to appoint a new administrator.
So they go in and they reappoint Megan Wolf, but the Republicans vote three to nothing to reappoint her, to send her over to the Senate for confirmation, where they figured she'd probably be voted down.
And the Democrats cleverly abstained from the vote.
So there wasn't a four to two or five to one or six to zero.
It was a three to nothing.
So the Senate, the state Senate picks this up and declares that this is in fact a nomination vote.
They go to a committee last week and they have a hearing.
And Megan Wolf is advised by our state attorney general, a former attorney from Perkins Coie, to not attend because he takes the position that as long as Megan hasn't left the office, the seat's not vacant and there's no appointment to make.
So of course the Senate committee votes are down.
sends it to the full floor of the Senate, and today they voted her down,
and they issued a resolution this afternoon.
They adopted a resolution telling WECC that notwithstanding the Attorney General's opinion,
they have to appoint, nominate someone, and send that nomination over to the Senate
for Senate confirmation.
And of course, the WECC is taking the position that, no, there's no vacancy because Megan hasn't left
even though her term expired in June.
So all of this is going on today, this very day in the state of Wisconsin.
So we don't know if, and of course this will go to court and our Supreme Court has just flipped to liberal.
And you'd like to think Wisconsin also has a very, very well-respected Supreme Court, but it has been radicalized by four justices.
who vote policy.
They act like a senior legislative body.
We have seven judges and it's shifted from four to three to a conservative to four to three liberals.
So there's a presumption.
And as a lawyer, I've been a lawyer in the state for 36 years.
And it's really disgusting to think that our Supreme Court, which is one of the best in the land until recently, hopefully, will deviate from jurisprudence to political.
And if that happens, We're going to end up with a mess in our Wisconsin elections administration where nobody's in charge.
You either have a rabid partisan Democrat running the agency, and I could wax on for hours about all of the allegations, or we're going to have nobody run it, or it's a mess.
So we really don't know who's going to be running our state elections.
We have general elections for the nonpartisan races.
In spring, there's a February primary, and then there's an April election, and that's also the presidential primary.
Then we have an August primary, and then we have the presidential election in November.
So what we have today is a complete disintegration of the administration of elections in Wisconsin.
And this is no small thing because the way we are set up, we're very decentralized.
We have 1,852 municipal clerks who are charged with running the elections throughout the state.
You have 72 counties, so 72 elected county clerks that have to certify the election results.
And at the end of the day, WECC's job under HAVA, the Help America Vote Act, is to provide the voter rolls necessary to run the elections.
So as of today, we really have no idea if Megan is still in office or if the seat is vacant or if WECC is going to appoint someone or if the Attorney General is going to the Supreme Court for clarification.
We don't know.
But the problem is the election, we start circulating nomination papers in December.
This is, you know, this is September.
Three months from now, people are going to be circulating nomination papers.
And it looks like this is going to be really, really a mess.
Now, what about the word that WECC may be removing or keeping Donald Trump off the primary ballot?
Well, this is another thing.
The WECC is a state agency, and they're allowed to promulgate administrative rules.
They have not done that since 2014.
There are some inherited rules left over from the prior mess.
All of a sudden, last week, the WECC gets an idea.
There was an orchestrated campaign by the left to bombard WECC with emails saying, oh my gosh, Donald Trump is an insurrectionist and he must be kept off the ballot under the 14th Amendment.
So all of a sudden, a staff attorney at WECC finds in the bottom of the in-basket this old memo and Megan brings it to the commission basically to create an emergency rule that allows WECC to decide who gets to be on the ballot.
Well, they're not going to put Donald Trump on the ballot, okay?
Because we have the Republicans are never Trumpers, and we have Robin Voss, our Speaker of the Assembly, has publicly stated he'll do everything possible to keep Donald Trump off the ballot.
Well let me tell you, the people of Wisconsin want to decide who gets to be the Republican nominee in Wisconsin.
We don't want Robin Moss, and we don't want the WECC deciding who we get to vote for.
It's like the old Soviet Union, you get a list of four people to vote for, and each and every one is picked by the party, so we don't care who wins, because all four of them are what we want.
That's exactly what we're seeing here.
And of course the WECC Democrats are saying, that's a conspiracy theory, there's nothing to it.
But let's pass this emergency rule.
Okay, well, this is what we're dealing with.
We have a state government that is in shambles with respect to elections in the state of Wisconsin.
And all that does is feed and fuel the fire of conspiracy theorists, election deniers, and all the people who look at this fiasco and say, you know what?
We know there's too much wrong.
We know that there's backdoor access to the WSVO database.
That's been proven.
We know that the machine systems are transmitting data somewhere on election day and election night, and we suspect that's being used to manipulate in the central counters.
That stuff's just about proven.
These are not conspiracy theories.
The agency should be delving into this to prove to the people that the systems are secure.
None of this is happening.
They're more worried about keeping Donald Trump off the ballot and keeping their people in power at the WAC so that they can administer the mechanisms of elections.
And that's absolutely wrong.
And I think people are waking up to that in Wisconsin and saying, no, our DNR doesn't have this.
Department of Natural Resources doesn't have this problem.
Our Department of Revenue doesn't have this problem.
The Department of Transportation doesn't have this problem.
We've got, I don't know, 26 state agencies all doing their job every day and everybody's proud of their work.
And then we have WECC, which is our vote.
Our right to vote is controlled by people who simply cannot do the job.
In my opinion, I think the WECC is an unconstitutional structure.
This whole thing is crazy.
We have six commissioners, two are appointed by the governor, and four aren't.
So how do a group of six appoint the chief executive officer of elections in Wisconsin when there's no authority to delegate?
There's nobody in the legislature that has executive authority to delegate.
So at best, you'd have two out of the six commissioners appointed by the governor, confirmed by the Senate.
Maybe it's the two secretaries that appoint, but the way it's set up, this is a disaster.
And this all came out of the heads of the people, the Republicans in power back in 2014, when they created this.
This is the problem.
So, you know, there's a lot of us in Wisconsin is shaking our head and thinking, you know, all we want is fair and honest elections.
And we've got a carnival circus in Madison running elections.
And all six of those commissioners should, should, hey, well, four of them were actually referred for criminal prosecution by the Racine Sheriff.
You know, maybe they ought to just step down and resign, but no, it's just a circus and it's all done by the political parties.
They don't care about the voters.
All they care about is political power and winning elections and, you know, the six million Wisconsinites, you know, it doesn't matter.
How much of this is going on in other states?
Well, I'm not aware of other states having a problem.
With the structure of their administration, their election administration.
They have a secretary of state.
I mean, some other states do have committees, but the reason you have a secretary of state managing elections is because that person's elected by the people.
The people convey executive power to the secretary of state.
So they're like the governor.
There's executive, there's judicial, and there's legislative.
It's the three branches of government, our Republican form of government.
And WECC doesn't have that.
It's a random bunch of political hacks who have absolute control over the state voter roll
through Wizzvote. I mean, we've got this MyVote thing where anybody can log in.
Excuse me, I misspoke. You just go on. You don't need to use a name or password. And,
Brandon, if you lived in Wisconsin, I could send your ballot to Kookamonga and you'd never know it.
And that's the problem. They run a system that is absolutely a train wreck.
You've got the deputy clerk of the city of Milwaukee up on charges because she's the one that made up the three fake military voters and sent the ballots to Representative Janelle Branson.
That's a government employee playing games with the system.
You got another guy who asked for Robin Voss's ballot.
The whole system they designed is absolutely wide open.
No username, no password, no security.
And every time that happens, that's a fraud committed on a municipal clerk who mails out a voter's ballot somewhere it shouldn't have been mailed out.
Where is the regulatory power?
There's nothing there.
And when these issues are brought up to the WEC, Megan Wolf dismisses them, the commissioners call you a bunch of election denying kooks, you know, you're never Trumpers, you're tinfoil hat, all the nice things they say to people who pay their salaries, you know.
And so yeah, Wisconsin's got issues.
Wisconsin's got big issues and that whole thing should be broken down.
It should be put under, and I hate to say it, we have a Democrat governor, but there has to be executive authority where those people are appointed by an executive.
So there's a delegation of authority, just like all the federal agencies, like the Securities and Exchange Commission.
You got five commissioners all appointed by the president and not more than three can be of one political party.
That's the model in Washington.
That's the model in Wisconsin for all the other agencies.
But not WECC.
Somebody with, you know, big boy pants on is going to have to go in and fix it.
And I think that's where people of Wisconsin have really started to draw the line.
We expect more from our government.
We're a very high taxed state.
We pay a lot of money for taxes.
We have a tremendous reputation as good governments.
And then we've got this mess.
And there's no political courage to fix it.
It is a sad report.
ProfessorEastman.com is the website.
ProfessorEastman.com, by the way, has a daily show.
You see his passion and his knowledge, folks.
He has a daily show.
You can watch it live or on demand at worldviewtube.com.
WorldviewTube.com.
That's worldview and then T-U-B-E, worldviewtube.com.
You can watch Dan Eastman, professoreastman.com.
This is his website and you can watch him at worldviewtube.com every day on demand.
All right.
As always, great to have you with us.
Thank you so much, Dan.
Appreciate all you're doing.
Yeah, you as well, Brandon.
Thanks a lot.
Take care.
You too.
Dan Eastman checking in.
We're going to go to Ivan Reikland here in just one moment, but in fact, let me text him and say, are you ready?
All right.
I did.
Went right to voicemail.
That's because you have to call him twice.
You have to do boom, boom.
There you go.
I don't know why he has his phone set up that way, but he does.
All right, let's go to mypillow.com.
Mypillow.com.
Here we go.
Again, we are brought to you by you.
We have the slipper sale going on.
They were $140.
Now they're down to $49.98.
Again, once these models are gone, they're gone.
This is a close-out price.
They are bringing in a new model.
Again, I would urge you to get these now.
Save them for Christmas.
Give them as Christmas gifts.
These are our inflation busters.
Big time, right here.
Use the promo code L77.
L77.
We have the Perkel bedsheets as low as $25 with that promo code L77.
Again, when they're gone, they're gone, but take advantage of it now.
We also have the MyPillow Anniversary Edition was about 70 bucks, now under 20 bucks.
We have also the MyPillow 2.0 with the new coolant technology.
Six-piece Towel set $39.99 with the promo code L77.
Luxurious Giza Dream Sheets as low as $29.98 with the promo code L77.
My mattress topper $2.03 inch coil topper and you know you can get the full mattress mailed to you in the mail in a box Just like that to the front door.
I like showing you the video because it shows you that, well, all you need is a utility knife and it shows up to you folks in the box.
Cut it open.
Looks a little flat, but hey, then it pops up.
There you go.
Right to your front door.
Use that promo code L77.
By the way, the mattress toppers, those come in a, um, Twin size.
Those come in a twin size.
If you'd like to send those to a college student, these right here, here we go.
These come in a twin size.
So you can send that to a college student and take care of that horrible, lumpy dorm mattress.
MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
Then run over real quick with me, if you would, to MyStore.com.
MyStore.com, the home for American entrepreneurs.
And of course, this is where you can get lots of things like the MyCoffee.
This is non-GMO, not sprayed, no pesticides.
You can get it in a whole bean and grind it yourself.
Grind it yourself with whole bean or get it already ground.
Comes in the coffee pods.
And you can set up a subscription.
If you get the subscription, you get a Go Anywhere pillow.
My pillow, Go Anywhere, my pillow thrown in free of charge when you set up your subscription.
Check out all the things that are also there.
By the way, this is a All Natural Energy and Health Supplement that I developed several years ago with an FDA approved facility.
Again, All Natural Energy and Health Supplement.
You don't have to take my word for it.
You can do your own homework.
Contents, ingredients include bilberry extract, red wine extract, pine bark extract, grapeseed extract.
Do your own homework on these extracts.
This is loaded with antioxidants.
It is an antiviral.
Loaded with antioxidants.
It's an antiviral.
It's an all-natural energy and health supplement.
Comes in this little bottle.
It's a 30-day supply.
It's a powder.
You mix it with water, stir it, and drink.
And I've been taking it for years and years.
So it's at mystore.com.
Use that promo code L77.
Let me throw out this disclaimer that I always do.
This product has not been evaluated or approved by the FDA, and it is not intended to treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
But it's there for you at mystore.com, along with all these other products by American entrepreneurs.
When you get down there, click show more products, and sure enough, it'll load more products, and you just keep doing that.
A lot of great products there.
Hope you'll check them out at mystore.com and use that promo code L77.
Joining me now is Ivan Reiklin.
Ivan Reiklin is a former Green Beret intelligence officer and military diplomat who speaks five languages, deployed, countering, he's encountered all the threats you can imagine, and many that our nation has faced for the last 25 years, and he continues to try to push the Illegitimate certification.
Getting rid of this illegitimate certification of the 2020 presidential election.
He's not giving up.
And he joins us tonight.
Ivan, welcome back to the broadcast.
Thanks for being here.
Wow.
I miss you.
Merry Christmas at this point.
I don't know.
It's been a while.
How you been, my man?
It's been a while, my friend.
It's been a while.
But I'm glad you're here.
We're going to take some calls after we get an update from you as well.
So viewers, be thinking about the questions you want to ask.
I want to go first, before we get an update from Capitol Hill, I want to get an update from you on a few articles I saw today.
Here is one.
Let me wait till it loads.
I don't know why everything's running so slow tonight.
Maybe I should turn off my Wi-Fi and just go off the fiber.
Turn that off.
All right, there we go.
All right, here's one.
September 14th, 2023, from the Providence Journal.
Michael Flynn Rhode Island native returns for Sunday event where press
are denied entry. What to know?
Uh, is your oh looky there. I retired lieutenant colonel.
Ivan. Raecklin is going to be there as well so basically we have
according to the press two Very radical extremists general flynn and ivan raecklin
speaking and I bet you they're just radical constitutional supporters of the constitution absolutely
All seven articles and all 27 amendments in their full glory.
We're just radically in support of it.
You're a central figure in a far-right Christian nationalist movement.
That's what they say.
Well, they can say all they want.
I frame myself how I decide I am going to be, and no one else has the influence or power to claim what I'm going to be.
And I think that's probably the case for all of us that are listeners to this show.
And so, they can make noises all they want.
They can make sounds.
Most people at this point realize that they're low IQ, low information writers.
Once I find out who the writer of that article was... Catherine Gregg.
Okay, excellent.
So I'm hopefully going to have a nice encounter with that individual and I will have an opportunity to mentor that person.
On the realities of life and we'll go from there.
And I suspect after I have my encounter with her, she's probably not going to be writing too many articles after that about me.
Why?
You think she'll be impressed with how kind and gentle and gentlemanly and correct you are and you're a constitutional scholar and lawyer and she'll be impressed?
Well, there may be that aspect to it, but I will just let her know that I'll give her the dossier of what I found in terms of dirt on her.
Her friends and her family that she probably doesn't want disclosed.
That's about it.
All right.
The views and opinions expressed me of the guest may or may not be the host and the network.
I mean, open source research results in a lot of things that I happen to just disclose.
Ouch.
But yeah, I mean, I'll mentor her as much as she allows me, right?
Speaking of mentoring, I had a three-hour conversation with the lead Folitico reporter on Capitol Hill.
Yeah, how'd that go?
I can't remember her last name.
Jordan, spelled Jordane.
I was mostly one direction.
I kind of basically provided her the information that I've gathered and summarized my investigation since January 6th, the Capitol Police Board and the malfeasance at a minimum and intentional Basically the coup d'etat that played out on January 6th and all the actors within the Capitol Police Board and then the subsequent cover-up.
We've discussed it a lot of times on this show.
Yes, we have.
And all the other programs.
And how did she receive that information?
I think, originally I had planned, I expected it to be about a 15, maximum a 30 minute, just kind of a coffee discussion.
I wanted to see where she's at and then just to let her know based on, I was introduced to her by The main faux litico reporter.
By the way, some people pronounce it politico.
I pronounce it as faux litico, okay?
But having said that, their main reporter that's covering the court in DC, all the J6 cases, is a guy by the name of Kyle Chaney.
For full disclosure, he has been respectful to me.
He has not gone outside the bounds of professionalism.
So, as an individual, I'm going to extend that same reciprocating courtesy to him, and I've done so.
But having said that, he knows this.
He still only basically he is the lead and most knowledgeable corporate media mainstream reporter as it applies to J6 and the courts, which means he knows about 5% of what actually occurred.
So that goes to show like it's basically he probably knows about five times more than all of the rest of them combined, because he's been there time on target reporting on this.
But having said that, that's my compliment to him.
So as an individual, I do interact with him, his organization, I don't trust, right?
Just like most of these.
But it does report in a more not, I should say, unhinged rhetoric.
So the adjectives that are used are a little bit more benign, if you will, even though some of the reporting is not as accurate as it should be, nor do they report on things that they should.
But having said that, those individuals within the mainstream media probably, you know, so All of them I give about zero level of trust.
So these guys are probably in, you know, single digits.
So at least I can actually interact with them.
Here's another headline.
General Flynn to headline event in Rhode Island this weekend.
And there it is.
It says right there, retired Lieutenant Colonel Ivan Raiklin is billed to be joining him.
Oh wow, you're just stalking me.
What do you got?
Alerts at it?
Oh yeah, I have a whole staff that does nothing but stalk you every day online.
Rakelin, a former military officer and election denial activist.
"...who tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election with his Pence Card Plan, told a QAnon-supporting show..." I don't know what show that was.
"...told a QAnon-supporting show that he contacted multiple members of Congress to push his plan, naming some of whom he contacted specifically..." That's what Media Matters wrote in 2022.
Yeah, I mean, that's libelous.
I just don't have time to file lawsuits left and right against these idiots.
You're going to be there on Sunday.
Savoy, they're really rolling out the red carpet in the media for you in Rhode Island.
No, so I mean, basically, if I were to talk to the, you know, the individual that wrote that article, that would be, I don't know, they didn't even seem to want to put their name on it.
If you bring that back up, this is essentially what would be the accurate statement.
And if you go back to that particular segment of the article, right there, it says, I think the accurate depiction would be Raechlin, A former legendary Green Beret, Lieutenant Colonel, Battalion Command Select, retired, and a constitutional attorney, election integrity activist, who tried to convince the nation, and still continues to convince the nation at this point, that the 2020 presidential election was illegitimately conducted, illegitimately certified, and that Mike Pence conducted numerous transgressions and violations of the Constitution, both in December under the Electoral Count Act,
Under this Pence card plan.
I also told a show of critical thinkers that yes, I did contact multiple members of Congress, including leadership, including Kevin McCarthy, including Mark Short, Mike Pence's chief of staff on their role on January 6th, which it would have included.
Hey guys, the electoral contact is silent on how you vote on the objections for the states.
So then why don't you go with the 12th amendment contingent election option?
Which would be a one-state, one-vote plan, and then 27 states would vote to object to Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and maybe others, thus triggering a contingent election for a re-election of Trump, if Kevin McCarthy was not a toxic, feckless, stone-cold, coward, simp, right?
Gutless simp.
And had he done that, and then had Mike Pence said, you know what?
Due to his role as the presiding officer, he would have been stuck with a dilemma.
Do I go with Nancy Pelosi's one person, one vote in the house or the one state, one vote option that Kevin McCarthy's promoting as the majority state delegation chair?
And then if he went with Kevin McCarthy's play, which I recommended for Mark Short to advise him to do, which he didn't, we would have had a different situation.
And so bottom line, all these articles are inaccurate.
And it seems as though I'm surprised that they even mentioned me.
But there's, because I've been dead named basically by the Pelosi press, if you will, since June of 2022, when I called them out.
By the way, the guy that called me out in the third hearing in Congress, as it relates to that Pence card play, a guy by the name of Congressman Aguilar, because he was on that J6 coverup committee, you know, the one that was headed up by Mike Pence and was ran by his running mate, Liz Cheney.
Anyhow, Congressman Aguilar, I bumped into him today.
And I said, Hey, sir, we ever going to have a sit down so I can educate you on understanding my role as it applies to the totality of the run up to January 6th, the legal theoretical component.
And he started running away.
Oh, I got to go vote.
And, uh, he ran off into the, uh, into the tunnel, but I don't know, maybe, maybe he'll take me up on it.
I just tweeted at him to invite him to a, A mentorship session.
We'll see how that plays out.
But let's go to a video clip.
This is the Select Subcommittee hearing on doctors and pandemic and erosion of the doctor-patient relationship.
Do you want to pick it up at the two hour and five minutes and 45 second mark?
Is that where you want to be?
Yeah, that's the COVID Select Committee that happened earlier today.
All right.
Were you in the room?
Yeah.
So before we play the clip, I was not in the room today.
So, uh, we had a five week recess, if you will.
So the Congress members went to their home districts and now this week they're back and they're having, I'll be honest, nothing has really occurred other than Matt Gaetz, essentially coming this close to vacating the chair.
Maybe we'll close out with that.
But the, I think the most important hearing as it applies to our community, which is getting to Nuremberg 2.0, right.
Getting to pushing back against the weaponization, you know, getting to those things was this hearing on, they call it COVID select.
I don't know why they called it that.
It should be called the, uh, the, the subsequent second and third order effects of the CIA's lied, manipulated, uh, assessment of the origins of COVID.
Remember they changed it.
They were bribed into basically saying, I don't know if you heard this, but yesterday the COVID select committee reported that there was a whistleblower from the CIA That said that six of the seven analysts that informed the ODNI's assessment, the Director of National Intelligence's assessment on the origins of COVID changed their assessment from that it was a lab incident origin to none other than the bat soup theory.
And I'm wondering who was behind that, Brandon?
Is it possible that the same 60 scum that said that the Biden criminal syndicate laptop was Russian disinformation and signed off on it in their little memo letter that was published by none other than Folitico?
Is it possible that the same John Brennans, the clappers of the world, were influencing those analysts or the 39 that unmasked Flynn?
I suspect they are.
How do I know this?
Uh, because I looked at the names.
I don't know what else to tell you.
And how about this?
The last thing I'll say on this is, you know, that the staff director, the senior most staffer on the CC or the, uh, January 6th select committee and the last conference was a guy by the name of David Buckley.
Do you think that he's one of the 60 that some people call it the 51 that said it was the, the Biden laptop was a Russian disinfo David Buckley.
Why?
Yes.
He was one of those that signed and covered for the Biden criminal syndicate of the 51 former intelligence officers.
And what is he doing when it comes to J6?
He was the staff director for the entire committee that they ran.
That discredits the entire committee right there, full stop.
Anyhow.
So what are we about to see in this clip?
COVID Select, I think, so the only person People kind of know where I stand as it applies to Marjorie Taylor Greene.
I try to work with people on topics that they're good at.
So I am going to be thankful and laud Marjorie Taylor Greene on one issue and one issue alone.
She is by far the most vocal appropriately as it applies to her stance on COVID-19, known as the CCP-19, right?
And so this is her.
Interaction and colloquy during her five-minute exchange on this committee.
Okay.
Because of anybody on that committee I think she's the only one that did not accept the emergency use authorized death jab.
And while we're watching this why don't you go ahead and get on board online with questions and or comments about anything we've discussed thus far and then we'll ask about vacating the chair and sending McCarthy into retirement and who can take his place.
And we'll take some of your calls.
901-316-8404.
Watch this!
And I'll recognize Ms.
80404 901316 8404 901316 8404 watch this.
Now recognize Ms. Green for five minutes of questions.
Thank you Mr. Chairman.
I find it pretty appalling that the Democrats on our committee are using this hearing to talk about the murder of unborn children, babies, people who have rights in our country due to the Constitution.
Abortion is not healthcare.
It's not.
It's murder.
Healthcare saves lives, and that's what many doctors tried to do during the COVID tyrannical shutdowns.
The censorship of doctors and outrageous government practices that destroyed businesses, destroyed freedoms, took away freedom of religion, free speech, and killed people, and continue to kill people.
And I, one of the reasons we're talking about doctor-patient relationships today, one of the biggest reasons that we have seen an erosion in the doctor-patient relationship is because of this.
Because of all the deaths reported to the VAERS system that have been ignored and not investigated.
And these are the numbers.
These are the reports of deaths that started in 2021 with the COVID vaccines.
And these are reports of others.
But you can see the spike.
And this is why people are having a hard time trusting their doctors.
I'm not vaccinated.
I refuse to take it.
Dr. Williams, what has been your position on vaccination and has your position changed and if so, why?
I commented earlier, Congresswoman, that I was one of the first people to get vaccinated in my company because I was asked to do so and I was happy to do so.
I did it unhesitatingly.
But when natural immunity was being discounted and ignored, my position personally changed.
Now, my practice of medicine has been from day one that it's an individual's decision that they need to make informed with their health care provider.
And I maintain that right now.
The recommendation of the most recent booster, though, has me astounded.
It hasn't been studied in children at all.
How far do you want me to go on this one, Ivan?
Is that good enough?
Yeah, yeah, that's fine.
I wanted to kind of do a little contrast there before we take questions, if you don't mind.
understand it. But I still maintain that it needs to be an individual's decision, the parent for in
the case of a child or the individual patient and their provider. How far do you want me to go on
this one, Ivan? Is that good enough? Yeah, yeah, that's fine. I wanted to kind of do a little
contrast there before we take questions if you don't mind.
So Marjorie Taylor Greene, the only person, let's think through this, of the 435 members of
Congress, how many probably did not Well, Marjorie says she wasn't.
Thomas Massey says he wasn't.
And that might be it.
Here, I have a question.
What I'd like to know is- But on that committee, she's the only one that's not vaccinated.
I want to know- That's the problem we have.
Is Steve vaccinated?
Who?
Uh, the congressman that got shot at the ballpark that's now announced.
Oh, that is a good point.
What's his name?
You mentioned, so Steve Scalise.
Steve Scalise.
The house, the Republican majority.
Because he's announced he's got blood cancer, which again, everybody should be praying for him.
I feel really bad for him.
But as soon as I heard that, I think it was blood cancer.
As soon as I heard that, I thought, well, I wonder if he had the shot because we're hearing about those kinds of side effects or effects from this shot, right?
Right.
I mean, there's a lot more people like Jamie Raskin.
As much as I despise him and his political stance and him being a total political thug, Why does he also have cancer?
By the way, isn't that what separates us from them?
Whenever we hear about a health crisis, a tragedy, a death in a family or relative, we all say, pray for that family, have compassion, condolences, because our issues are worldview issues.
We try not to personalize our issues, we try not to dehumanize them, but we don't get the same respect in turn.
But I will say this, I mean, Adam Bolshev is on the borderline, though, in that kind of scenario.
And same thing with Eric Swallow's woe, I think is how it's pronounced.
Okay.
All right.
So I know I'm getting on the fringes.
Be careful, my mother's watching, so be careful.
Be careful.
All right, before we go to the phone lines, before we go to the phone lines, let me ask you this, quickly, because the phone lines are lit up.
Vacate the chair.
Gates, is he about to call for vacating the chair?
Okay.
Gates gave a floor speech two days ago in the House.
It was a response to because Kevin McCarthy said, oh, all of a sudden they come back from the five week recess and all of a sudden he's just like, oh, I'm going to launch impeachment inquiry on Biden.
The only reason why McCarthy did that, it's because Matt Gaetz, he realized Matt Gaetz and Eli Crane and a few others that are going to come out soon here shortly.
Let's just say Dan Bishop's probably one of them and some others.
are literally ready to vacate McCarthy. Okay. And so how many votes do they need?
How many votes do they need for that? All you need, the way I understand is you need
one member of Congress to say, hey, go on the House floor motion to vacate. And that triggers
a new vote for a speaker of the House. Now, let's just say another four. Remember, it goes back to
how we were doing this in January. So in order to block Kevin McCarthy from becoming the speaker,
it would require another four, meaning five Republicans.
Let's just like do the math here.
I would suspect it's going to be Matt Gaetz, Eli Crane, Dan Bishop, Andy Biggs, Paul Gosar, and others at a minimum.
Okay?
So we already have our five.
Where's Donald Trump?
Where's Donald Trump?
So where's Donald Trump?
So once that happens, this is what could play out.
They could play 14 months.
Of trying to get Kevin McCarthy back in.
I want that play, because here's what happens.
I'm willing to sacrifice all my federal government benefits.
But in exchange, what this does, it literally stops all 12 of the federal budgets from being passed for 14 months, where we literally don't have a functioning House of Representatives that does not fund anything, which means what?
We don't have a DOJ that's weaponized against us.
We don't have an FBI now that's weaponized against them.
They just become unpaid interns, all of them, right?
The White House is no longer funded.
So if you're sitting in the White House trying to figure out a scheme to censor, coercing the media and big tech to censor us, guess what?
You're not getting a paycheck, buddy.
And so I think that is the ideal scenario, including DHS.
You want to physically censor us by not letting us travel?
Guess what?
You don't get paid.
You just don't exist.
There's no budget for 2020.
So do we have any members of Congress on board with your plan?
Well, that would be the maximal solution.
I would say that what they're trying to do is vacate the chair to force Kevin McCarthy out, or at a minimum keep him in, but essentially do a reminder to him, hey, a slap in the face.
We're going to remove you until you go and do what we agreed to originally.
And since you haven't really, I would say this, since you haven't done what we agreed to, beating the Freedom Caucus folks, right?
Then guess what?
There's another list of demands.
One of them is essentially the impeachment, right?
The other one is the release of the tapes.
There's so many things that he hasn't done yet, and I suspect that ideally it would be great to have a Speaker of the House that understands the system, that is willing to go to bat Some people think that his dad is a legitimate office holder.
I think you listed one.
Yeah.
Okay.
So let me ask you this, then we're going to go to the phone lines.
The indictment of Hunter Biden today.
This is just a joke because his dad can pardon him, correct?
Some people think that his dad is a legitimate office holder.
If you subscribe to that theory, the conspiracy theory that he's legitimate, if you will,
then yeah, technically he can go ahead and do that.
But we're still in this constitutional crisis where we do not have a legitimate leader, uh, executive leader and number two in our government, because no one received the requisite, you know, through the process, as I've explained.
Uh, but it's a joke.
Like you said, it's a total joke.
Kevin McCarthy is allowing.
Pelosi's previous process to continue their protecting the Biden criminal syndicate.
It was all an agreement.
It was basically, Hey, Kevin McCarthy, you're going to get the speakership in return.
You have to do a few things.
One, you have to fire the architect of the Capitol so that the Republicans don't have the necessary leverage on the Capitol police board to release the tapes and then to go ahead and expose the feds erection coup.
That was one thing that Kevin McCarthy did.
And that, by the way, the architect of the Capitol was a President Trump-appointed and Senator Mitch McConnell-confirmed Senate architect of the Capitol.
Number two, he's basically doing nothing as it applies to going after the lawless executive branch, right?
He still wants unlimited funding that he agreed to with the Democrats.
Remember the ceiling package?
Yes.
That's the whole issue.
I don't want to go back to pre-COVID numbers in terms of funding the government.
I want to go to how about you're punished for your weaponization against the American citizens.
I agree with that.
You get a zero budget.
You go home packing.
We're going to do to you like we did to anybody that was affiliated with the Ba'ath Party in Iraq.
You're going to be unemployed.
And if you start to act out, well then?
We're going to have to, I don't know, exercise certain amendments in the Constitution.
Let's go to the phone calls.
Cole, line one, Cole in Georgia.
What are your thoughts tonight?
Thank you, Brian, and thank you, both of you.
Thank you.
I am in Utah for Georgia.
There's no real room to hear because we can't even talk to our legislature's constitutionally.
They're more focused on the statutes, not the constitution.
So let me have you respond to that as a constitutional attorney.
Cole's saying we don't really have a remedy here when we talk constitutionally because they're not following the Constitution.
They're not honoring the Constitution.
So how can we get a constitutional solution?
That's what Cole from Georgia wants to know.
That's a great question.
Bottom line is that there still is a mechanism and this is the mechanism.
I think Matt Gaetz is literally the only one that's exercising it.
The motion to vacate forces the legitimate body that we currently have in play, which is, you know, our legislature.
It's technically quasi-legitimate, is to put somebody in there with a little bit more courage or force the current speaker to actually have more courage.
So far, we've been able to drag Kevin McCarthy, you know, kicking and screaming.
And this is another, you know, phase of him kicking and screaming to kind of force him into the right direction.
You know, political force, if you will.
Lawful political force.
And the other thing is, I think we as a society need to push Kevin McCarthy as one of the things that he needs to do is we never had a joint session with the quorum to certify the 2020 election.
We never did that.
Let's do it.
And oh, by the way, why don't we go ahead and while we're at it, nullify impeachment hoax one, nullify impeachment hoax two.
Censure and expel those impeachment managers, because it was all predicated on lies, right?
The Russia, Russia, Russia thing?
Total lies.
We're now finding out that all those that were basically participating in the fake whistleblower campaign, they were part of the coup crew that covered up for the Biden criminal syndicate, which has now been fully exposed through the oversight committee, Comer, right?
And some of the other committees.
Judiciary.
All of this is now coming to head, and I'd I testified about all of this back in February in the joint session legislature testimony in Arizona, which you covered some of when I testified down there.
Right.
And it's now coming to fruition with more details of my assessment.
And some of what I knew back then wasn't really, some of the sources that I was using, I couldn't really disclose.
Now they're coming out, some of these whistleblowers, etc.
And we're at a point right now where Some of these members of Congress are starting to realize what occurred.
And I'm going to say this.
If I was a guessing man, next week might be pretty interesting as it applies to a motion to vacate one, and then also some more details as it applies to proving the Pelosi fedsurrection.
Wow.
Let's go to D, line three.
D in Arizona.
D, thanks for calling in tonight.
Hey, thank you, Brandon.
And Ivan, you sound like me, but you're still not hardcore enough.
First of all, Carthy came out with his wisecrack I read on the Gateway Pundit.
You know, he's not going to be bullied and all this.
By five o'clock today, he should have been vacated.
You know what I mean?
And that would be a serious message from the American people.
And the American people would agree.
We got to get hardball players in there because everything you're saying is exactly What needs to be done, but we don't have the proper people.
If you can get me 218 votes, I would be happy to serve as the speaker of the house for several weeks.
It would just, and then I would, I would vacate after literally three weeks, three weeks.
Okay.
It was all I would need because I would go so aggressive, unlimited.
And then I would say, all right, I don't want to be a dictator.
No, no, no, man.
You're right.
This is the example.
The next speaker needs to follow through.
In other words, what I think, Dee, you're saying is we don't have anyone who gets in the job and then fixes it, returns us to a constitutional footing and fixes it and deals with the criminals and the traitors and the lawlessness.
What you've got to do, first of all, is you were put in there to do a job.
Everybody knows, first of all, that nobody wanted McCarthy to begin with.
So they still put him in, the Republicans.
I personally think, like you said, there's five good ones in there.
The rest all need to be replaced.
The Senate, every one of them.
I mean, our government, our departments, you know, I call it, they were packed when Obama went in.
Now they have all the cover.
You have lawless stuff going around, but in our case, We don't have any heroes.
Like, when we were young, or before our parents' times, we had heroes that stuck.
They don't want to follow the Constitution.
You just keep hammering.
But, and they're not like, see, when I hear Ivan, he's just like that.
But the problem is, we don't have people, our Congress people, like, I like, I'm out here with Biggs.
I know Biggs.
He's all talk, no action.
Look at his record.
When we hire these Congress people, everybody forgets about the bad bills they sign.
And it's either this guy, we vote for the good guy or the worst guy.
Great call.
I agree.
I hear you.
Great call.
But let me, let me, let me look at who's out there as an opportunity.
I still think if you go back to the national file article from November of 2022, it's called nuke bombshell.
If you can pull that up, uh, as I kind of talk this through the, That I think is still on the table, that sort of theory, which is talking about getting Speaker Trump in or maybe even Devin Nunes.
Devin Nunes is not a current member of Congress.
He understands the ropes, but he might be in a position to really get us to the next line.
And then I think maybe if they do vacate Kevin McCarthy, I think that the more likely option would be Elise Stefanik.
So for those that don't remember who Elise Stefanik is, she's a congresswoman from New York.
She helped quite a few Republican women win their seats through her PAC.
So she has quite a bit of leverage.
She's the number four or five member in the Republican conference establishment.
But also, if you look at her rhetoric, it has some MAGA flair to it.
So she's not like the worst, right?
So that might be the compromise.
All right, look at this headline.
Here it is.
National File House Freedom Caucus Memo Details Plan to Elect Donald Trump Speaker of the House.
Let's go to Mike in Colorado Line 2.
Mike, what are your thoughts tonight?
Honored to talk with you, Colonel.
Sergeant Pearson, veteran, U.S.
Army.
We were attacked with a bioweapon worldwide under the rules of Geneva Convention.
We're going to have to deal with the World Communist Movement in a real way.
I just want to propagate the idea that General Flynn should be our next five-star general immediately upon the return of the great President Trump.
And also, I would say that military tribunals are going to need a commander general, and I think you're the man for the job.
Further, I think that command should take place at Gitmo.
I think you can handle both the command of the base and the command of the prosecutions and corresponding executions of the traitors.
We cannot let traitors and spies go unpunished.
Nations that do that fall.
Now, last thing I got to say, all the fellow veterans that I know as enlisted men, we are waiting for our orders.
Wow.
Music to my ears.
The only title that I want other than Deep State Marauder and the title that I want to retire from is Secretary of Retribution.
We're at war.
You need recall orders.
You need to be willing.
It's a big job.
There's a lot of traitors they've dealt with and there isn't anybody I've seen in the chain of command past or present that's going to be man enough to deal with the traitors.
So I totally want to be Secretary of Retribution.
My Substack series that I write about specifically lists are what other people pronounce as HVTs, high value targets.
Let's just say I've made a list.
I'm making a list that right now we have several hundred, but it's going to extend beyond.
One of the divisions of the Department of Retribution is going to be the Nuremberg component.
And that's going to address everybody from Mike Pence, the COVID task force at the White House, all the way down to including every single school board of the 3,143 county and county equivalents in the nation that voted to force another person into accepting a EUA product.
Okay.
All right.
Let's go to Will real quick.
Will, line four, California, our last caller.
Go ahead, Will.
Hey, Ivan and Brandon.
Good to talk to you.
I'm just very upset about the free speech injustice that's buried by these judges and prosecutors these days.
We saw the January 6th committee, we've seen Alex Jones, Rudy Giuliani, Peter, Stephen Brannan, and Mike Lindell, and the rest of them.
Is discovery and evidence for merit of judgments gone from the courts?
Can we ever present our side of the evidence?
And also, Ivan, I'm curious.
I've been following you on Getter and I've actually been trying to connect you with Peter Navarro to alert his attorneys as to your take on the evidence that wasn't brought forth the other day in his first hearing.
Okay, we got 30 seconds, Ivan.
Alright, 30 seconds.
I'm going to try to do it.
So I've already spoken to Peter Navarro's attorneys.
Any J6 defendant or J6 attorney that's listening in or that you know?
The way to solve the J6 issue, it is not in the courts.
It's not with the DOJ, FBI, U.S.
Attorney's Office.
It is with the Capitol Police Board and the political leadership of the bicameral legislature, meaning Pelosi, Schumer, U.S.
Capitol Police Chief Manger, Yogananda Pittman, previously the head of U.S.
Capitol Police, and the General Counsel, Tad Tobias.
The way that we do that is through the motion to vacate McCarthy, put somebody in there to literally fry and expose all the communications between the political leadership and the Capitol Police Board in the run-up of J6 on January 6th, release of all video, so that we can crowdsource and prove that it was a Fed-surrection coup.
Then we start to unravel and educate the judges and the jury poll that they were all bamboozled along with the rest.