All Episodes
Previous Next
June 16, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:00:27
The Lindell Report (6-16-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical and
achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedom.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
All right, good evening.
Glad you are with us as we're still getting plugged in and everything.
Mike Lindell is going to join us tonight.
We also are going to be joined by Patrick McSweeney.
He was a high-ranking official at the Department of Justice many years ago.
A very esteemed guest with an incredible resume.
You ought to look it up.
He's too humble to tell you, but I will.
He has a great resume and is one of the Old guard that knows what it means to be a real lawyer inside the DOJ.
And so he'll join us tonight to talk about, well, a few things.
We're going to talk about the federal case related to Mike Lindell's phone.
Remember the FBI seizing his phone?
Then we're going to talk about the released Halderman report, you know, during this hour last night.
We spent an hour with attorney Dan Eastman going through that shocking report. I mean,
there's some very serious revelations in that report. We'll talk about that. Then we're going
to talk about Dennis Montgomery. Those are the three cases we're going to deal with tonight with
your host, Mike Lindell and guest, Mr. Patrick McSweeney.
Mike has made it into the studio there in Minneapolis area. Mike, welcome back to your own
broadcast. Thanks for being with us.
Well, thanks, Brandon. Yeah, I'm not in Minnesota.
I see that.
I see that now.
But that's okay.
I've been moving around a lot this week.
It's been a busy week, everybody.
From Bedminster to Minneapolis to St.
Paul to Texas.
I've been all over the place.
I like that song, that Johnny Cash song.
I've been everywhere, right?
I've been everywhere.
Right.
Hey, everybody, I want to let everybody know though, before we get started, because I did go back to Minnesota to film a commercial for the towels, the six pack towel sets.
As you all know, Brandon's been telling you the sacred area to get the towels for $25 a set.
That is going to end on Monday.
So right now you need to get them.
And what you do is you go to MyPillow.com.
You're going to use the promo code L77.
And you're going to go into the radio square where it's associated with headphones.
Go into that square, everybody, and click on that towel special.
It's going away.
Remember, this is the six-piece towel sets that we had.
Originally, they were over $90, and they're the best towels in the world.
Here we go.
I guess you're getting there.
So you're going to go down to Radio Podcast.
You're going to click on that.
There they are, the towels.
We're clearing out.
The towels at this time to make room for manufacturing for the MyPillow 2.0.
And so you get the six pack MyPillow towel set for $25 until Monday, and then it's gone for good, okay?
So there's your chance, everybody.
Promo code L77.
We have all the other stuff too.
We have the Geese of Dream sheets for 50% off.
It's right next door there, and they're branded on that.
On the slide there.
Yeah, there's the Geezer Dream Sheets 50% off.
There's the copy you guys.
You got if you get the copy today and you get a subscription, you're going to get a free go anywhere pillow with that subscription.
And you can't beat that's the best copy in history.
I go up higher and I want to talk more about that MyPillow 2.0.
You guys, buy one, get one free using the promo code L77.
That technology is the first time I have added anything to MyPillow since I invented it in 2004.
What they had is a cooling thread that was invented here in the United States and it's made here.
And I said, you know what?
I got to have that for the MyPillow fabric.
So we had it made last winter and we brought it to you, the MyPillow 2.0.
Remember, sleep is all about height and temperature.
So you adjust my pillow, it stays there, it keeps your neck straight, whether you're a backside or stomach sleeper, it doesn't matter.
You adjust it to what you need, and then you have the temperature regulating fabric that keeps you cool.
You're not going to be flipping that to the cool side.
It's going to be cool on both sides.
And then you have right next to it, the Myfuel Mattress Topper 2.0.
It's funny, Brad.
I just, I actually am now trying that out.
It is amazing.
You know, when I get sleep products as I develop them, I fall behind and, you know, cause I only like to try one at a time so I don't change too many variables.
But that mattress topper with the coil technology, coil and foam technology and the temperature regulating fabric, Is second to none.
It's absolutely amazing.
We're actually, I'm flying back to Minnesota.
I have a busy week this week.
I'll be doing two more commercials for one of the My Topper 2.0.
We're going to be doing a big infomercial on that.
You know, everybody infomercial is a half hour long.
It's a half hour program.
And we have our beds too that we've got to If any of you have seen our bed infomercial, they've been just taken off.
There's the sales pitch for today.
I just wanted to make sure you all got in on that.
Six-piece towel sets is going away Monday.
You're never going to see that clearance price at $25 ever again.
That's it.
We're doing this to make room for the MyPillow 2.0 manufacturing for jobs that have came in.
So we had a busy week.
And it's a great week, Brandon.
I know it started out horrible with the president's indictment, but everybody, I went up to bed, mister.
I sat there with the horrible media for about an hour until they ran out of batteries in their cameras, taking videos.
I talked to them and kept talking until they just all scattered, you know.
If you don't give them, if you just keep putting truth at them, they don't know what to do.
They really don't know what to do, everybody.
They sit there, blah, blah, blah.
How am I going to write something here?
It's Mike Lindelli.
He just keeps telling the truth, you know.
And then it got brought up, you know, got brought up about ballot harvesting and ballot baiting.
That got brought up to me and I said, that's nonsense.
And we're going to show everybody what the real plan is on August 16th and 17th.
Everybody, I can't stress this enough.
I've been dealing with lawyers for the past couple of days.
We're getting very close here.
I think we're a couple of weeks out right here at Frank's speech.
You'll be able to buy stock for you, the public, and get involved with this all here.
This is going to be the big news center, the massive, massive, massive platform that we all need to get the truth out in the time and space we're in right now.
At that event, everybody, remember, and a lot of you that haven't got invites, it is invite only, but it needs to be the most watched event ever.
I think you had like a 15 minute break in 10 hours.
Let's watch the plan worse.
On day one, we're gonna have, well next week we'll have Pat Colbeck on here.
He's actually lining up all the agenda and for the first day,
where we're gonna have all 50 states talk again.
Now I know it wore you out last year.
We gave you a break.
I don't know what more you wanted.
I think you had like a 15 minute break in 10 hours.
What's up?
You know?
I don't know.
I don't know if he's...
You know, if that's legal in the broadcast industry.
Well, thankfully I'm not union.
I'm not union.
So it doesn't matter.
We'll give you a couple of breaks this year, but we're going to, we're going to put out, I know the first day, everybody, we're going to put out the hope for the country, every single state, every single County in this country, we will be putting out the hope of what's really going on out there.
That's going to give each and every one of you going, wow, there is a chance.
We do have a chance.
To save our country, absolutely we do.
This is amazing, the stuff that's going on.
And then the next day we're gonna run, August 17th, we will reveal the plan and for all you media that's watching right now, I'm gonna tell you one more time.
It's never been even talked about before it ever, ever, this plan.
It's never been implement, implement, implement.
How do you say that?
Implemented.
Implemented.
Never been implemented.
Implemented.
But it's now, now they have a sound bite to get me.
That'll make it on Jimmy Kimmel.
Yeah, that'll make it on Jimmy Kimmel.
But anyway, that's where it's never been done before.
This is what I'm telling you.
And we're going to get this all set up for the fall.
Uh, so we're going to have proof of concept, everybody, uh, for, uh, uh, the states that have elections like your Louisiana's and your Kentucky's and your Mississippi's.
And remember, there's a lot of elections.
A lot of states have elections, uh, uh, over the next year here.
And we want to be, have this, everything, uh, just lined up beautifully for the 2020 election.
So we have the, one of the fairest elections in history.
And so I'm really excited.
Everybody, so then this week we had a lot of wins.
All right, sounds good.
Let's go now to Mr. Patrick McSweeney.
I mentioned his incredible resume, and he also works with, of course, legally as an attorney with Mike Lindell.
Mr. McSweeney, welcome back to the broadcast.
All right, sounds good.
Let's go now to Mr. Patrick McSweeney. I mentioned his incredible resume
and he also works with, of course, legally as an attorney with Mike Lindell.
Mr. McSweeney, welcome back to the broadcast. Thanks for being with us.
Glad to have you back again.
Absolutely.
Let's talk about three cases.
Let's start out maybe real quick.
The shorter of the discussions probably would be Mike's cell phone.
You guys were just up there in federal court.
What do you want to say about how the panel responded?
Mike told us they seemed a little shocked the FBI still had his phone and still has it.
I think they were even more shocked at the responses of the government lawyer that there is no limit to what they can seize.
And there's no limit to how long they can keep an item like a cell phone that they seize.
I was shocked and I was surprised and gratified to see them take the same response on the panel.
And how many judges were on the panel?
Three?
Three.
Three.
Wow.
When are you supposed to hear back from that panel?
That depends on when they get together on the vote.
They had a conference right after the argument.
When they write, the opinion is up to them.
It's hard to estimate.
I want to say something there, Brandon.
I'll tell you what, everybody.
There was a couple of things that surprised me.
I'm used to all these judges just kind of pushing things, and in this place we're in now, the last two and a half years, they just kick it out or kick it out there.
It seems to always be kind of one-sided, but I really felt that they took the side of Common sense in our courts these days seem to have been thrown out the window when you bring in something and say, hey, this is a pair of glasses.
They say, no, it's not.
No, it's not.
You don't have standing to say that.
But these judges, here's a couple of things that surprised me.
The one said, why don't you just, you know, he runs a big business.
What if he'd have been selling or something a couple of days before you took his phone?
Everything is tied up in a phone nowadays.
And he said, you can download this in about 12 seconds and give it back.
That was one of the things that was said to this government lawyer.
And she just kind of, you know, didn't know what to say there.
Well, then the next day, the next judge says, these are things that I have to take, which I got one of the I thought one of the strongest things was, you know, you have an attorney client privilege on there.
And I went after the government for my, you know, sue them and the FBI and I'm going and so they're the defendants.
Well, how come they get to look at my phone and decide what's attorney-client privilege and what's not?
Oh yeah, that's it.
Well, you've already seen it, right Patrick?
You've already seen it.
That's right.
Okay, I'm just going to snap this out of my brain here and I'm going to pretend I didn't look at that because I wasn't supposed to see it.
And then another thing they said was, the guy says, how long are you going to keep this phoner?
I mean, to that, something I'm doing, I'm paraphrasing, but they said, basically indefinitely.
That's what you said.
He was taken back on that, going, this doesn't even make sense.
This guy, he's done nothing wrong.
What did they say, Pat, that goes, this isn't contraband.
This isn't a drug deal.
This isn't a cartel thing.
You know, why are you keeping the physical phone?
And by the way, I asked Patrick or Pat if I could go up there and say something.
What I was gonna say was, hey, that phone was not backed up 10 days prior, of which I spent time that you can't get pictures back that were with my grandchildren and stuff before my dad passed away.
And these were things that, you know, you can't replace them.
And, you know, sure that's gone since past, But it's still a, you know, it just goes to the thing where if they take a phone in this time we're in, your phone is everything.
Now, it's not like 20 years ago when they confiscate something, it's you can just go buy another one or whatever.
You can't, in the digital world we're living in, it's a whole different game, isn't it, Pat?
You know, the judge, I think it was the senior judge on the panel, said there's a Supreme Court case, the Riley case, which talked about this new world.
Your whole life is on that cell phone.
This is a different world.
The fourth amendment didn't contemplate this.
You can't just seize it and have a man's whole life to rummage through.
He got the point.
I don't think the government lawyer did.
Right.
Right.
No, but I think, uh, I really believe it's going to be a good ruling and we need a good ruling.
Everybody in this whole country is waiting for it.
that, you know, for certain have common sense take over in our constitutional rights.
And what an interesting enough, and this is, and I'll ask you this, Pat, what the whole
purpose it looks like for them is to suppress what?
To suppress my right of free speech to talk about election crime or election, what I believe
to be to fix our elections.
And they want to cut, am I saying this right?
They want to, they.
They're covering up crimes that were committed in Colorado by, in my opinion, the Secretary of State and Dominion, this cover-up, which is also my evidence I need, which wouldn't that be spoliation in any other case that you were ever in?
Deleting something that was supposed to be held for 22 months, plus being held for me in my own court cases.
Isn't this true?
Wouldn't that be considered spoliation?
Well, that's a very good point.
Your listeners need to understand there were two big issues.
One was getting the phone back.
Not only the phone, but all of the information, all the communications on that phone.
But the second was, which you alluded to, there is a constitutional right not to be punished for exercising your First Amendment free speech rights.
That's exactly what they were doing now.
They didn't like the fact that in Mesa County, Colorado, An image was made of what the Secretary of State ordered deleted.
That's a violation of federal law.
You cannot conduct the election audits that the federal government requires unless you comply with the federal statute that says that the records of that election have to be maintained and preserved for 22 months.
Under state law in Colorado, it's 29 months.
The Secretary of State ordered Tina Peters To destroy that, that evidence, that record, which made an election audit impossible.
You can't audit something that's not there.
She had every right.
In fact, it was her responsibility because she's bound by the same statute to preserve that record.
That's what she did.
Now they're prosecuting her for that because it was so damaging.
This was the first time we got at what we were talking about for two and a half years.
Which is this vulnerability in the Dominion voting system that allows ballot tabulation to be interfered with.
They were so upset about that, they wanted to suppress any discussion of that.
And that's what this is all about.
That's why you were brought in.
That's why the warrant was served on you.
Right, right.
Well, I mean, maybe they were upset because a little over a year ago, I went ahead and put that image right up here on free speech for the whole world to see.
I put up with it.
What they deleted.
It went around.
It was public.
I put it right up here.
And then to this day, Pat, they go, oh, you know, there's no evidence to me.
There's no evidence.
And isn't it funny?
The media doesn't just say, hey, look at this.
Here it is, everybody.
And this is what we're in.
This is the world we're in.
You know, you think all the media, they love watching my show here, but yet they don't want to put anything out there that would help our country, help save our election platforms.
Does that surprise you?
You've been a lawyer for a long time.
What kind of world are we in right now where everything seems to be against bringing out the truth?
Well, that's why this is so important.
And what just came out this week makes it more important to highlight what's happened with this suppression of your speech.
We're going to talk later in this broadcast about the Haldeman Report.
Haldeman was the expert in the Georgia litigation who said two and a half years ago that that system is vulnerable in many ways.
Now, the media has not picked up on that.
The government tried to suppress that report.
It's finally been released.
That's going to change the perspective on cases like Tina Peter's case in Mesa County.
I think we lost your camera real quick.
Did you hear me?
Yep, we can hear you though.
We had an electrical storm.
I'm afraid it interfered.
I'll try it again.
Let me see if I can get up here.
Just click your camera, see if that'll pop back up.
Same problem I had before.
There you go, there you go, you're back.
You're back, you're back.
Well, why don't we go right into that Halder Report.
That's a big thing, isn't it, Pat, that that came out?
It's huge.
It's huge.
If the media would give it a glance, the public will begin to see what you've been saying for two years and more.
These machines are inherently vulnerable to manipulation from outside.
Now, we've been told that's the big lie.
We'll call them and put an end to that discussion if anyone will pay attention.
Now, there's a competing report by MITRE.
It's a think tank in Arlington, Virginia.
Haldeman has responded to that.
In fact, we had responded to an earlier MITRE report.
It's a bogus challenge to what Haldeman has concluded.
Anyone who takes the time to read those two reports will immediately see that Haldeman's team put this case together as tightly as you possibly can.
And people like Tina Peters, who've been pillaged pilloried and abused and smeared is going to have her day
because these machines are inherently vulnerable and the public's going to begin to
understand.
It amazes me that in the last two and a half years, including myself, many, many, whether
they're doctors, lawyers, teachers, just everyday people that have stood up and said, hey, I have
evidence or I want to report this or hey, look at this.
They've all been just slandered and attacked.
Like, you know, like my company, I said this the other day, the media, MyPillow is an employee-owned company.
Yes, I'm the biggest stockholder, but it's employee-owned.
And they have been attacked.
on the USA company, all my employees, there's no political thing.
There's Democrats, liberals, conservatives, Republicans.
I have thousands of employees over 1500, I believe right now.
And we get attacked and I didn't change.
I never changed.
I'm the same person I was when I was the media's darling.
When they said, how many more people?
Wow.
You make your, you make your pillows here in the United States.
Great.
How many employees are you hiring this week?
Oh, you're an ex crack addict.
Oh, you're helping people out of addiction.
You're bringing people to the Lord.
Oh, you have the Lindell recovery network.
All that changed.
Because what?
Because I wanted to report something?
That there's a problem with our voting machines?
And we need to save our country?
So they attack that, but yet they protect all these companies like Dominion, Smartmatic, Hart, Diebold, ES&F.
We never even knew these names up until a couple years ago.
And then they get all this protection.
And it baffles me because we paid for these machines as taxpayers.
And Pat, in the old, if you go back in time, if somebody said, I always say this, if someone said, Mike Lindell's got rocks and knives in his pillows, what would I do?
I'll go out and sue him for saying that?
No, I'd say, look at the beautiful patented fill.
I would open it up, show him the beautiful patented fill that's inside them.
and call it a day and I'd probably sell a lot more pillows, right?
Why did these machine companies just open up their machines and say,
there's nothing to hide.
There's nothing to hide.
And boy, they would have been heroes, right?
Instead they, because they couldn't open them up because of all the stuff they've tried to cover up.
And I, and it's, I just can't believe the media is...
You know what bothers me most is the media that doesn't talk, not the ones that attack, it's the ones that don't talk, which is your Fox, your Newsmax, your Salem Media.
I want to ask you one thing about that, about lawfare.
All the time you've been an attorney, have you ever even heard of lawfare used to this degree or ever in our country before?
Never.
And it's very disturbing to lawyers, not just the ones that have practiced as long as I have, to see that the professional bar, the lawyers, are not standing up for people who are doing the right thing by reporting.
Even if they're wrong, they have a constitutional right to make those reports.
It's very difficult, as you well know, to get a lawyer to defend you.
And that's particularly true for people, the normal human being who just wants to do what's right.
It's going to be attacked for doing what he thinks is his constitutionally protected right.
And that's got to stop in this country.
One of the things, I'll say this when we can move on to the Halderman thing, but one of the biggest things that bother me is, you know, I have my big lawsuit with, for in particular, the one, the one is Dominion and we went around the country and we subpoenaed machines in different counties where we could go in And look inside the machines and say, you know, this is part of my defense of a one point, actually a $2.6 billion lawsuits against Mike Pillow and Mike Lindell.
And so we went and subpoenaed all this.
Well, in Michigan, we get a judge there says, no, how dare you do this?
We're going to sanction you, and I had to pay $26,000 in sanctions just for asking to defend myself in my court case.
And then one week later, the federal judge out in D.C.
said, well, of course you can go look in those machines.
I didn't get my $26,000 back.
What's up with that?
You know, the judge who originally took that case that Haldeman was brought into, commented that Dominion
refused to let anyone access their machine.
And you were right.
If they had nothing to hide, why did ... There were ways to protect their source code, their
proprietary information.
They didn't want anybody to see what was going on.
It's pretty obvious now.
Absolutely.
And everybody, if you're ... Just so everybody knows our audience, Brad Ransomberger, the
Secretary of State of Georgia, this goes all the way back to 2017, I believe, in this Kerling
versus Ransomberger.
And remember in Georgia, everybody, Kemp and Crooked Brad, I mean, they're down there, even with this case going on, they doubled down and bought $110 million.
Brandon, wasn't it $110 million with a Dominion machine?
That's right.
That's right.
In 2019, when they were already told these things are defective or they're vulnerable, and then Uh, and I want to ask you this, Pat, why this report came out in the summer of 21?
I needed it for my, I was sounding the alarm all around the country.
Everybody's getting sued over 200 lawsuits by dominion alone and forth and or threatening letters to citizens that went and got locks on their doors and stuff.
Cause they were in fear of getting sued or what did I do wrong?
I was just a poll watcher, whatever it was.
And this report comes out and gets stopped by Rasenberger or the judge.
They don't release it to the public.
Then they release it to Dominion themselves, with pressure from the public.
And they don't release it to the Secretary of State of Louisiana, who wanted it, to make a decision.
Then they release it to the government, to themselves, to Sysop.
They release it to them, and then come back and say, hey, we got a problem with the machines.
I mean, what?
In your mind, what would be if you just, why would they do this?
I mean, is there, there's no really logical explanation of why they would do this and not protect the public.
Brad Rasenberger, he's a Republican, right?
I mean, I mean, I mean, it doesn't make sense that he's doing this to his own party, fighting his own party, so to speak.
We know, I know why, because he's uniparty and a crook, but that's just me.
I can say that.
I guess we have laws now for defamation, but what do you think?
Why would they do that?
Mike, you probably know that before Raffensperger and his predecessor, who's now the governor, decided to buy the Dominion system and make it mandatory across the state, they got reports from Texas, which had evaluated the Dominion system and said, don't buy it.
And here are the vulnerabilities.
Raffensperger ignored that.
They went ahead with it.
Worse than that, in October of 2020, the judge said, I can't do anything based upon Haldeman's report because we're so close to the election.
The Supreme Court has said a federal court can't jump in, but I want you to put in updates and corrective measures after this election.
You know, Ravensburger has announced they're not going to do any correction until after the 24 election.
How can they possibly justify that?
And you know what else?
And you know, on page 20 of this report, it says Dominion's documentation claims that the QR codes are encrypted and at least as recently as January 2021, Secretary of State Chief Operating Officer Gabriel Sterling has repeated this claim to the media as a security feature of Georgia's voting system.
In actuality, writes Professor Halderman, as I testified last year, no part of the QR codes I have asked members of Congress to take some action based upon the Haldeman report.
it is. You got Georgia's Secretary of State of Chief Operating Officer telling the media
and the public it is. You got Haldeman saying they're both wrong. It's not.
I have asked members of Congress to take some action based upon the Haldeman report. It's
time for them to get as much as I dislike the government, the federal government getting
involved in elections. If that's the only way to correct what's happening in places
like Georgia and Wisconsin and Arizona, then bring it on.
Somebody's got to take responsibility is not going to stand for these elections it can't be
trusted well and uh... and we've said it and we've uh...
i feel vindicated uh... but uh...
i guess i won't feel vindicated until we save our country that's what it's all been about
to save our elections i've said it before on this show
over fifty countries have been taken by computers and machines
the last one being brazil and uh...
we're always praying for them because they had no paper in one day voting
and they didn't even allow anybody to look at their machines
and what they did down there everybody they could have just as well had a hollow machine a
computer with just lights on it
And this is where we're at.
all that they could have saved a lot of money by just having a hollow box.
Everybody votes to go and the winner is Lula, fresh out of prison to run your country and
doing the same corrupt things he did that put him into prison.
Why would you all vote for him?
And this is where we're at.
We've got to get rid of these electronic voting machines.
And by the way, this report multiple times calls for paper ballots and talks about how
paper ballots is the solution to the problem.
I know you're aware of that, Mike.
I mean, what did you make of that, Patrick?
That's exactly what was discussed today in Colorado.
And the response is, well, you can't trust the counting by laymen after using paper ballots.
Machines do it better.
This has gone so far that the public is going to lose any confidence in election officials if they don't start talking common sense.
This is nonsense we're being preached.
We've got to go back.
I just found out last night from Gordon Chang, who was on here when we started talking about the Haldeman Report.
You know, going to paper.
I didn't know this, but he told me, Gordon Chang did, South Korea also votes on paper.
South Korea is so concerned, you know, about North Korea hacking on them and whatnot, South Korea does all their elections by paper.
Most of the civilized world does.
Most of the civilized world does, you said?
Yes, they use paper ballots, and they count it the same day.
You don't have two months to get an election result.
And you know everybody, we've checked with France's system, the UK, Germany, all paper ballots, the Netherlands, and take the Netherlands for instance, they were warned, when Clint Curtis came out, we've had him on the show before here, he's a Democrat that set the first algorithm to seal elections in the machines.
And he went public about it.
Well, the Netherlands called him up and said, Hey, what do we do with these machines now?
And he says, he says, how do we prevent anybody from backdooring it?
And he says, you can't, you can't prevent a hacking.
You throw them in the ocean.
The Netherlands switched over to paper ballots in five months, little less than five months.
It can easily be done.
Now we have a system that's better than theirs.
Uh, that was developed by Linda Rand in Missouri.
And they've actually had an election in Osage County and went off without a hitch.
So Democrats, Republicans working together and went off.
They have problems with the machines.
They did it with her system, a hundred percent accuracy.
And the, um, I was trusted and it wasn't, and it works and they, uh, and it was 10 times, I'll say 10 times cheaper.
Everyone says, Oh, it's way more expensive.
No, it's not.
It's a lot less expensive.
And how much does, and that's not counting the intangible cost of losing your country.
I don't care what you'd have to pay, even if it was more expensive, but it's not, it's cheaper.
Um, and, uh, um, it was, it's been amazing.
And we have counties all over the country, uh, going to, going, uh, fighting to go to paper ballots and count it.
And, and, uh, we're going to reveal that whole system in August.
Um, but, uh, all this stuff is happening at the perfect time, especially with what I'm going to be doing in August to reveal the plan and, uh, also a plan going forward.
And then also for all these cases, I want to talk to you about one, um, and maybe Brandon, you can bring it up and say, you know, my evidence that was brought to me on January 9th comes from Dennis Montgomery.
I know you represent him.
Um, And I will tell there's news today, everybody.
I'm going to backtrack a little bit on my story.
I got the evidence.
We got it validated.
It's under a state secrets gag order.
Everybody, we've been telling the audiences for two years now.
And I tried to get it to the then President Donald Trump to get it signed, to get it released.
You all know this story.
I couldn't get it.
I got shooed out of the White House by officials and didn't get it signed, which I'm glad I did.
If it would have been signed back then, who knows?
We maybe wouldn't have got this far.
This is all on God's timing and all the stuff that's been revealed, all these horrible unit party politicians and revealing all of the corruption that's out there.
If we would have got it overturned back then, We wouldn't know a lot of stuff we know now, you know, with all those things going on.
But I will say this, once I got sued for billions of dollars, it was by Smartmatic and my company being sued, Dominion, this Eric Coomer, all these things.
One of the biggest witnesses is Dennis Montgomery, and to get this to relief.
So we had subpoenaed him to testify.
And he didn't come to testify.
So now just today, everybody, we have put in a motion to compel.
And maybe, Pat, you can explain what that is.
Because we're doing it where I think that the government's going to have to make a choice or whatever.
Dennis has been in trouble for 16 years, not of his own making.
This goes back to 2006.
you have that state secret gag order.
Is that right or how does that work?
Can you explain what that works?
I don't wanna get your client in trouble, but I just wanna kind of explain what that is,
the motion to compel, what happens now?
Dennis has been in trouble for 16 years, not of his own making.
This goes back to 2006.
He had a dispute with his partner in a business.
He had developed for the Department of Defense, Air Force, the CIA,
certain capabilities that he has been using or had been using,
and the government didn't want that released.
So they imposed a state secrets privilege through a protective order in the case that was pending in Nevada at that time.
They continued to rely on that.
For those 16 years.
You can't talk about anything you've done.
You can't use your technology.
You can't use your intellectual property.
It's covered by the state secrets privilege.
No one can know about it.
Because of your lawsuit, and your right to have his testimony, you are absolutely within your rights to subpoena Dennis.
But we have said, and we've asked the Attorney General Garland directly, You tell us whether you're going to assert the privilege and we'll try to litigate that here.
We've tried to litigate that in Nevada.
To have the court lifted because the government can no longer use the state secret's privilege to hide and disguise what they've been doing for years.
The court is going to be asked now by your attorneys to compel Dennis to testify.
We're going to ask the judge for some protection against the threats, prosecution, and worse, that Dennis has suffered for 16 years.
He's been under this order.
Had he been able to describe what he knows, what he's developed, and what the government has been doing, life would have been quite different in this country.
He's got a wealth of information that he needs to share.
I've asked for help from members of Congress.
He needs to be protected.
So that the CIA and the government can't smear him anymore or threaten him with prosecution to keep him quiet, which is the very kind of thing they're trying to do to you, Mike, by threatening prosecution in Colorado and elsewhere.
This has got to stop.
We'll ask a judge.
He's our predecessor.
He was already attacked before any of this happened because I believe the government knew what he had.
and how important it is for our country, for all this stuff to be released in him.
And all they've done, everybody, is attack him, attack him, attack him.
And it's not, you got people like myself and Dennis, and your Tina Peters, and all the other citizens out there,
people that have had their doors bashed in in Colorado by the FBI, weaponizing them.
Our great real President Donald Trump.
Where does it end where it could be anybody?
If we get to that point, it could be anybody and they might not have the resources or the wherewithal to fight back.
Dennis has been absolutely amazing, but it's time.
He's gonna have to, this government's gonna have to, well the government before should make their mind up, right?
He can either, he either gets to talk or they have to come in.
What if they come in and say, nope, he can't say anything?
That's my evidence, Pat.
So if that's my evidence, wouldn't my cases just go away?
Going, hey, you're not gonna let me show my case to save me billions of dollars?
The public has got to realize and understand what's been happening for decades in this country.
The Department of Justice, usually on behalf of the CIA or the FBI, will go to a judge, and it happens most often where I live, in the Eastern District of Virginia, where CIA headquarters are located.
They'll tell a judge, you can't go any further.
We have state, secret, privileged documents that'll come out.
We can't have that, so you have to shut this case down.
The case that gave rise to this state sacred privilege involved a situation where the government lied and hid something that later on was discovered to be a lie.
The whole business the public has to understand is threatening to our democracy.
Now, last year, I filed with other lawyers a brief in the Supreme Court asking the court to make that determination.
Limit the state secrets privilege so that the government cannot hide its misdeeds.
I mean, these are gross misdeeds.
Some of it is coming out and a lot of talk now about having a new church committee that looked into the CIA back in the 1970s and found out the great abuses back then.
We need that again.
But we're not going to have it if they can play this game with the state secrets privilege.
So, Mike, that's it.
We've asked the attorney general for weeks and weeks.
Tell us what you're going to do.
We haven't gotten a response.
But now we will find out, because that's what we did on our side.
We put in a motion to compel, and we did it in two places, in mid-Florida and southern Florida.
So you got kind of two bites at the same apple.
I want to ask you this.
Could those judges just slow play it and never make a decision?
Like this is, I mean, the world we're in, what happens now if they just say, well, I don't want to make this decision?
No, I don't think they'll do that.
I mean, it's not for me to predict what an article three judge is going to do.
I don't want to be held in contempt either.
I think they'll rule promptly.
I think they'll give the government an opportunity to come in.
But I think you'll get an answer, Mike.
Right.
Well, we're all praying for an answer, everybody, because this will be perfect timing, lining up with the Election Crime Bureau Summit, August 16th and 17th, everybody.
And this all ties in.
You've got Dennis' stuff, everybody.
You have the cast vote records, which we've collected now for two and a half, over a year, over a year and a half.
And we've got one third of the counties in the United States that all show computer manipulation.
And, and then we've got all the evidence that, you know, you talk about being a diamond store.
We have another thing from another part of my lawyers have all this evidence of of China was in the room.
So they were actually in the building, so to speak.
And we're not saying that at this part we did anything.
And then you look over here, we have evidence to say, yes, they did do something.
You know, we have the Koenig thing that was out of Michigan.
But what I always say, Pat, is all these things are the same.
Whether it's the Mesa County evidence where here's the actual inside the machines what happened.
You've got Dennis's stuff, you've got cast vote records that come right from the Secretary of State.
You've got Dr. Douglas Frank, a professor up there.
That's what I was saying, before all this stuff happened, all these people that were professors and And like Dennis said, I'm working with the smartest men I've ever known in my life, working for the CIA and the government.
You've got people that are doctors, lawyers out there, prominent, and they all get attacked because we're all saying the same thing.
Hey, let's look at, let's check into this.
We've got a problem here.
Every camera angle shows that there's some bad stuff going on inside these machines.
Then you even have, you know, I want everybody, we're not just talking about Dominion because of the Halderman report.
I don't want in this country to say like Dominion just said the other day, their CEO said, you know, we might be gone with all this, you know, our name getting run through the ringer, blah, blah, blah.
Well, you're only worth, what, $30 million.
You got $780 million from Fox.
I don't think you're going to be fitting too bad.
And you know what?
I've said it all along.
They just slither away.
And then ES&S, the gorilla in the room, which is the biggest one in the country out of Omaha, Nebraska, They come in, and Pat, I want to show you what they said about their own machines.
Logan, do you have that tape?
I was at a Senate hearing, our Secretary of State hearing down in Louisiana, and they were interviewing all the machine owners, and here's what ES&S had to say about their own machines.
Can you run that, Logan?
Logan, can you run that ES&S clip out of Louisiana?
Okay, here it comes.
Now some folks have claimed, academics, election system experts, have claimed that ballot marking devices are inherently vulnerable to hacking or malware or tampering.
All technology, whether it's your laptop, your phone, an ATM machine, or an x-ray machine, can have vulnerabilities.
It didn't come clear on mine, was it?
Oh yeah, it came clear for us.
Saying that all the machines have vulnerabilities is what he said, all of them.
Right, they all have vulnerabilities.
So he told the truth there, and I want to run one more thing here to show you just how important all this is with Dennis' case and everything else, everybody, and what Halter's been saying.
Um, this is a, this is so we don't want to continue to fight the Republicans.
Pat, we fight the Republicans in all these states.
We want to go to paper ballots and counted.
And these Republicans come in like in Arkansas, when Cleburne County goes to paper ballots, hand-counted, and then a Republican senator goes and makes a new bill that passed in one week to penalize and defund any county that decides they go to paper ballots, hand-counted.
Here we go, let's run it.
Yeah, I've got it right here.
Well, we'll pay for those ballots.
Well, you can't because of the Suckerbuck thing with Mark Suckerbuck with all his dropboxes.
Most states now say you can't put money in to help with the election platforms.
So another thing I want to run is what have the Democrats had to say about these machines
for two decades?
Here we go.
Let's run it.
Yeah, I've got it right here.
Here we go.
I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable.
Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering.
Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes.
In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from one candidate to another.
The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101.
Directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.
These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.
You could easily hack into them.
It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact three companies are controlling this.
It is the individual voting machines that pose some of the greatest risk.
There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines.
Right?
Which are vulnerable to being hacked.
Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine.
It was possible to switch votes.
43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including back doors.
We know how vulnerable now our systems were.
We know, I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly.
I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues.
Here at the Capitol, where we brought in folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines.
Those that are being used in many states.
Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP and 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attacks.
In a close presidential election, they just need to hack one swing state.
Or maybe one or two.
Or maybe just a few counties in one swing state.
I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.
There you go.
Yeah, and there's the Democrats, everybody.
Remember, some of our biggest blockers have been Republicans.
So what we're up against, I've said it all along, is what hacked into our election.
The CCP, the UNA party, the Deep State and the Globalists.
This is where we're at.
If we don't get to this next election and have an election instead of a selection, it's over.
Pat, I want to ask you one more thing.
I'm going to switch from Dennis Montgomery back to Mesa County, Colorado.
I want to ask you this for your opinion on this.
I'm involved, obviously, in the biggest lawsuits of anyone in the country.
I have more against me than anyone with these machine companies.
I think it's $8 billion combined, all said, something like that, accounting my companies.
When they went in and we now have evidence, even right here at Frank's page, just like two sets of books, we have what they deleted.
I posted it inside the machine that's called.
My question is this, why would not I have the right to go To Colorado and go after the Secretary of State and and Dominion or whoever deleted that did the trusted build that deleted all of the evidence that I needed for the 2020 election and for what I was shouting out to the world that our machines machines they got hacked that China intruded
Why couldn't I do that?
Why can't I sue for spoliation or sue for something?
Or is there anything I could do legally to be on the offense there?
Well, there is something we've discussed that we can do short of doing that.
And that is based on the same theory that we've advanced in the case we just argued for you this week.
The government cannot punish you for releasing information that they don't want released.
That's what they're doing.
They did it to Tina.
They've done it to everybody associated with her.
There's a well-defined, well-established, well-understood concept that you have the right to enjoin the government from proceeding with the prosecution.
The first thing we've got to do is ask a court in Colorado to terminate or enjoin any further prosecution or investigation of what happened when Tina decided to make a copy of what Dominion was doing and what the Secretary of State had ordered, which was a violation of federal and state law.
The government itself recognizes that you cannot do that.
The government cannot order you to break the law and then prosecute you for doing what you were obligated to do to preserve the records.
That's what Tina did.
That's what your Trying to get across this country.
Someone has got to preserve those records, or we can't audit the elections.
Right.
Right.
So what I'm saying for myself, I guess I get it.
Tina is in a fight.
I think she goes in four months, goes to court.
In fact, I talked to her today, and here's Segella just doing her job, and she's lost everything.
They've attacked her.
Just the media, you know, everything.
But for the evidence that's there, it seems like the case is being ignored, which is the big gorilla in the room, that the government broke the law by deleting stuff against the federal government.
You can't delete those records!
That's why I want everybody to realize, we had until September 3rd Of this last year of 2022 to get cast vote records across the country.
And that's what's the urgency because it was 22 months by federal law.
And like you said, it's 29 months in Colorado.
How can it just be ignored that the Secretary of State broke a law or the government broke a law?
Who goes out?
What do we do when the government breaks the law?
Who do we go to?
Well, I think the first step is to establish that the government broke the law, and that's what we intend to ask the court in Colorado to decide.
Then there may be private actions that can fall in place after that.
But we're going to keep going until the public is not hearing this, Mike.
Despite what we're trying to do, what you're doing on Frank's speech, the legacy media won't touch the Haldeman Report.
If they do, they'll dismiss it as nonsense.
The public needs to see what's...
Right, you guys hear that?
That's the importance of frank speech, everybody.
We're at a time in history where Fox News, we all know Fox News, your Newsmax's and your Salemedia's of the world.
It's what they don't say that hurts us even more than the media that attacks us.
You know what they do to me, Pat?
When they don't want my voice out there now, they're on to me.
They haven't attacked me in over 21 days.
Even when I was up in Bedminster, I gave all their answers for an hour and 50 minutes.
Not one of them wrote one article about me or said any of my comments because it's like almost they're ordered.
Don't print anything about Mike Lindell right now because he's just using you to get the word out.
We need to have our voice everybody and that's where we are at Frank Speech.
You guys are all going to have the, you'll be able to get stock everybody in, in Frank's speech with the open to the public, uh, with, uh, in a couple of weeks.
And, uh, and, but this is all about building our voice and, and building up to the Lyndale event.com, the election crime bureau summit, everybody right now, which you can all do at home, go to the Lyndale event.com, get signed up for, for watching it, get your email, get involved and, Get out there and share it and let everyone hear it.
People know it.
Go to all the social media platforms.
Get an account on everyone.
We're going to have millions and millions of people here.
So over the next year and a half, we'll be able to be the voice of the country and to get the... Pat, isn't there, there's a lot of hope out there, isn't there?
A lot of good things going on, but nobody hears about it.
This Fulton Report is probably one of the biggest reports to come out.
It's that I could, for this case, for all these cases, probably ever, once you say how important that is, it's huge, right?
It's volcanic.
At the same time, engineers, researchers and professors at the University of Virginia released a report that concluded that, globally, computers are being hacked.
Big business is a target.
They can't keep suppressing this.
It's not just tall women in elections.
We just had Multiple federal agencies hacked again for the second time in two years.
And massive corporations in the last 48 hours.
And the latest I heard before coming to the news set was maybe even some banks.
And of course, this is what the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, was warning.
He said that the cyber attack that's coming will make COVID look like a minor disruption.
And of course, now we see how they can use all this chaos for their advantage, right?
Well, I want to say this, you guys.
Think of artificial intelligence.
We've talked about this before, too.
And I'm going to close everybody with this.
I'm going to say, you know, if we don't have the one thing If we don't have, if we can take computers out of our elections and have real elections, we're electing people that will be, these people, hopefully the public would, you know, elect people that are good people that will be the ones regulating this
Place we're going with artificial intelligence and all this technology that we're getting into this world now.
You better have good people regulating that or it's over.
If the bad people are selected and they're the ones running this, you'll be able to pray people for anything.
You're going, Brandon, you'll be on here.
Instead of you saying this stuff that we get in trouble for, it might not even be you doing that.
That's what's called a deep fake!
And even the FBI came out a week or so ago and warned people that their pictures could be taken off social media and used to put them into images that they will find very troubling.
Yeah, absolutely.
And you wouldn't be able to realize.
The distance between us and Brazil and Venezuela is not so great.
That's right.
When they can take over and our elected officials are not standing in the way, we've lost it.
It can happen very quickly.
Well, we're going to keep the faith, everybody.
Let everybody know about that Lindale event, and go to lindaleevent.com.
Pat, you are awesome.
Thank you for coming on.
It's too bad we don't have 100,000 lawyers like you in this country.
It's true.
My father would say, thank goodness.
God bless you, and thanks again.
We'll get that phone back in one of these days.
We're gonna start winning!
Thank you, Mr. McSweeney.
Appreciate it.
That's Mr. McSweeney, Patrick McSweeney, Mike Lindell, The Lindell Report.
Support Mike's work.
MyPill.com, promo code L77.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection