All Episodes
Previous Next
May 19, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:01:05
The Lindell Report (5-19-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And when I tried my coffee for the first time, I was blown away.
It is the best coffee I've ever had in my life.
I spent the last four months doing my due diligence, and this family-owned business
micromanages every step from the fields to the cup to ensure the best quality coffee
you're ever going to have.
It starts with the beans that are grown in Honduras.
Honduras' volcanic soil and humid climate make the perfect growing conditions for coffee plants, which produce the best beans ever.
Then each batch is tested for its aroma, taste, and other aspects to meet the highest standards in the coffee industry.
And after that, it goes into production, which is all done right here in the USA.
It's like you're getting that small batch specialty coffee, but delivered right to your front door.
So go to mystore.com or call the number on your screen.
Use the promo code and you'll get your very own My Coffee for 25% off.
You guys all know that I've traveled the country for the past year and a half.
I've stayed in hundreds of hotels.
I've tried every coffee out there.
Well, some of the coffees have that terrible aftertaste, some that leave me jittery or I get an upset stomach.
Well, my coffee is different.
It's the richest, smoothest, best coffee I've ever had.
My coffee comes in a variety of flavors.
You get them ground or whole bean, plus it's certified organic and non-GMO.
I guarantee it'll be the best coffee you've ever had.
So go to mystore.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code and you'll get my coffee for 25% off.
And I'm going to give you deep discounts on all my store products.
That's mystore.com.
It's my new platform for USA entrepreneurs.
Please order now!
You're watching Lindell TV.
Lindell TV.
you you
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical and achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedom.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
You are with us, Mike.
Mike Lindell will be joining us in just one moment.
And we are going to have Jordan Conradson.
Jordan Conradson will join us.
He has been in the courtroom in Arizona the last three days for the Kerry Lake trial.
We got some stunning audio clips to play from for you.
Did Maricopa County know Have they been warned in advance in 2022?
Early 2022?
June of 2022?
Were they warned that there was a problem with their voting system and did they do nothing about it?
We'll find out tonight.
And what is it that the media apparently does not want you to know?
About regarding Mike Lindell what story is the media?
Deliberately not talking about writing about what have they blacked out that they don't want you to know Concerning something that Mike Lindell recently did Mike himself will tell you about that in just one moment Here is, however, how we come to you each and every night.
Take a look at my computer screen here.
Let's start back over here at the massive sale we're having on slippers.
They were $150.
Now they're down, and then they were $59.98.
Now they're down to $25.
This is a great Father's Day gift right here.
I love these slippers.
I've been telling you guys about them for a long time.
My friend Michael Reagan, remember?
Michael Reagan coming on here bragging on these slippers.
I didn't ask him to do that.
In fact, he even said, you haven't asked me to do this.
I'm not being paid to do this.
But I got to tell you, you sent me these slippers and they're the only pair of slippers I've had that I can actually wear that don't hurt my feet.
He has, I think, arthritis in his feet.
And he bragged on these.
You guys remember that clip we have of him saying that?
Well, I know they're great.
Michael Lindell knows they're great.
And many, many, many, many people know they're great.
And Dad would think they were great.
So these would make a great gift.
Now I really like the ones that have the fleece.
Let me go to it.
The page.
I like the ones that have the fleece inside.
There's a fleece that goes with them.
Here it is.
That's the pair I have right there.
That brown pair in between the white and the black here off onto the left.
That's the pair I have.
I love them with that fleece in there.
Whoo!
They're comfortable.
So anyway, $25, folks.
Use that as low as.
You can get the slides and the sandals.
Look at these.
These women's long sandals down to $19.50.
I got the pair of these blue ones here.
This blue pair right there in the middle.
Between the white and the gray, I got a pair of those, too.
I was wearing those earlier this week.
Those are just $19.50.
I mean, these are great gifts.
So use that promo code L77 to denote you're watching Lyndell TV, that you appreciate Lyndell TV and what Mike Lyndell's doing with the Lyndell Report.
So get a pair of those for dad for Father's Day for sure.
MyPillow 2.0, the new cooling technology.
Technology that was not out when Mike invented the first original MyPillow.
That's available.
Buy one, get one free.
Use that promo code L77.
We've already talked about the slippers, sandals, and slides down as low as $19.50.
The luxurious Giza Dream Sheets.
Now look folks, Dad would love these as well because I love them.
And until you've experienced them, you don't know what I'm talking about.
But Dad will love these.
This would be another great gift for Dad for Father's Day.
They're also great gifts for those of you who have open houses coming.
You know, down here in the Mid-South, school's getting out.
We get out around the middle of May, so we're right at that time now.
But a lot of you up North still, June, a lot of graduations in June, and open houses.
So, these college kids, soon-to-be graduates from high school, soon-to-be college kids, are going to need sheets and towels for their new apartment, their dorm, their house, they're renting with all their friends to go to college.
So again, these make great gifts and they're very reasonably priced gifts.
Alright?
So check that out.
And then, finally, I want to show you something.
If you go to MyPillow.com, you start at the top of the page.
Scroll on down to right here where you see Mike Lindell wearing the headphones and in front of a microphone.
Radio Podcast Specials.
Click that.
Shop now.
Little secret here.
Look what you find.
Six-piece towel set for $25.
They were $100.
They were $49.99, now $25 while supplies last, and I hear they're going fast.
Again, another gift for Dad.
And when you, again, have tried these towels, you know what I'm talking about.
Once you try them, you know when you've picked up another towel that's not a MyPillow towel.
And I've done it.
I've picked one up.
In the bathroom, and I feel it right away.
That's not my pillow towel.
I reach over to the to the basket that holds them and pick up a MyPillow Towel.
Because once you have dried off with a MyPillow Towel, you don't want to use the other one.
The other one's in there because those are for the dog.
When the dog gets bathed in the bathtub.
So once you have tried the MyPillow Towels, you won't want to go back.
You will be using those and discarding your other ones for your pets.
So dad will love these.
Again, great gifts for kids going off to college.
They've got to take all their towels and their sheets and everything with them this fall.
So give them a practical graduation gift.
Okay?
And then of course, wedding gifts, housewarming gifts, birthday gifts are just a gift for yourself.
Even Christmas gifts.
It'll be here before you know it.
Buy them.
Stick them in a closet.
You'll have a lot of it done, and you'll have saved a fortune.
And trust me, with the rate of inflation, you're going to be happy that you took advantage of these sales.
Because by Christmas time, a lot of these, I'm sure, will be gone.
Because they're cleaning out a lot of this inventory as they make room for more production for the MyPillow 2.0.
So take advantage while you can.
Again, I want to remind you how we got here.
MyPillow.com.
Top of the page, scroll down to where you see Mike wearing the headphones, radio podcast specials, click on it, and boom!
Lots of stuff there.
And then finally, before we go to Mike, go over to mystore.com.
The home for American entrepreneurs, started by Mike Lindell.
And, uh, what you're gonna find, as soon as my internet catches up here, what's going on here?
Oh, I know, I got two things on.
Let me turn that one off.
I'm actually on, uh, high speed, uh, what do you call it?
Um, fiber.
All right, my coffee, medium or light, medium, dark rose, light, medium, dark rose, non-GMO, not sprayed with pesticides.
You can get it the whole bean, ground or in the coffee pods, and you get a free go anywhere MyPillow with a subscription.
So take advantage of all the things over at MyStore.com, the home for American entrepreneurs.
Just keep scrolling down the page.
You're going to find all of these great products.
Check them out.
MyStore.com.
Again, use that promo code L77.
It'll get you savings, and it's a way for us to know that you're watching the Lindell Report, you appreciate Lindell TV, and the work of Mike Lindell.
So MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
MyStore.com, promo code L77.
All right?
Joining me now is Mike Lindell.
Mike, how you doing?
Okay, let's just stop right here.
I heard That you've been giving your dogs, letting them use our bad towels.
Come on!
You need to buy, take those towels that you have for that and use them in the garage for wiping down motors and throwing them away.
Get yourself some MyPillow towels for the dogs, because they actually dry you, Brandon.
They dry the pets.
They don't want to go away and have to shave all over the place.
Well, that's true.
Well, she normally likes to go do that on the bed.
She likes to jump on my bed and do that.
Yeah, come on.
You know what?
You need to get off air here.
When we get off tonight, buy your dog some towels.
Come on.
Okay, okay.
Well said.
All right, everybody.
Brandon, did you get the lawsuit I sent to you?
You guys, I'm going to start off with this tonight.
I sent it to Logan, I believe.
Okay.
I believe, or Caitlin might have.
Anyway, everybody, make sure you have it before, if you got there.
Okay, okay.
I don't have it yet, but I'm going to, I'm going to, I am going to text you-know-who to have her send it to me.
It says Lindell Management versus Robert Zeman, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
came from um Cfk cf kaitlyn conformity i'm
I'm gonna tell everybody what this is right now. It's all right as you do that
So everybody there's Ziedman case You know, maybe we'll have to skip and come back to it
because I thought you guys got it She was supposed to send it right over to y'all
Yeah, Logan is not in the control room, but I got it. It just came in as we were talking. So I got it
Got it. Got it. Got it Go down at the bottom and pull up the thing where I am not
Everybody when we talked about the five million dollar challenge and the Ziedman
This guy that was not he's not even a cyber expert he couldn't even open Wireshark, which is a very easy
program to open if you're a cyber guy and And so this big sham, which over two years ago, remember everybody, the $5 million challenge, I told you all here on the Lindell Report, I'm not going to take this.
We investigated the arbitrators.
The actual lawyer for Ziedman goes back to the trustee with Blitzware, which I own now, back to the Dennis Montgomery evidence.
Anyway, all this going on.
Yesterday, my lawyers put in this lawsuit against them.
And here it is.
I have it.
Here it is.
Put that on the screen there.
And put it up there.
Go ahead and put it up there on the screen.
So here it is, everybody.
This was yesterday.
This is what they don't want you to know.
That I'm fighting back against all this corruption.
Lindell Management versus Brandon, you'll have to read it there.
It's Lindell Management LLC Petitioner vs. Robert Ziedman Respondent Notice of Motion and Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award.
Right, right.
So we go through all the reasons and all this stuff of what this arbitration... Everybody, let me backtrack a little, everybody.
So when we had the cyber symposium in the summer of 21, most of the evidence there was from Dennis Montgomery.
At that time, when we were putting out evidence, just to show that it was from the 2020 election.
Data from the 2020 election.
Everybody there agreed it was from the 2020 election.
Even the Facebook fact-checkers, our good friend Alan Duke and company, and they had to prove that it wasn't from the 2020 election.
We made them kind of do it in reverse.
Show us!
We're tired of saying, hey, we're proving the evidence.
Prove that it's not the evidence.
Prove it's not from 2020.
Well, they couldn't.
Nobody could.
Zeedman then, he contested it, and he went before, which was an agreed upon board at the judges, three judges at the Cyber Symposium.
But he signed this agreement, and we asked, you had to have, I believe it was CISSP, you had to have these credentials that I told everybody, you've got to have these credentials.
I don't want anybody that doesn't know what they're doing trying to say it's not real, not from 2020.
Well, Zeedman, He comes out of this and I guess he couldn't even open the program on his own computer in the cyber room.
This is what we found out two years later.
Anyway, he contested it, everybody, and he was ruled three to zero.
You didn't prove anything, Zeedman.
Nothing.
So then he went to arbitration.
So now it goes two and a half years later.
We went last winter, went to this arbitration.
And I'm going, OK, this is nothing.
These cyber guys come in.
Our experts come in and say, you know what?
Guys that were there, they weren't even my experts.
Guys that were actually there, there were other cyber guys I didn't even know.
And they come in, yes, this is from the 2020 election.
And then the one guy was an expert.
He actually was in the cyber room with this Seidman and he testified, this guy doesn't even know how to open the program.
So right in the middle of the arbitration, the guy, they said, well, open it up.
And he didn't know how to open it up, you guys.
And this guy, so now we find out, come to find out the arbitrators that we had to pick from a pool of seven that were these hard left-wing Democrats, whatever they were.
And that part of the thing, I can't say a lot there because it's in our Uh, court, uh, court filing.
But, um, anyway, so about, you know, you don't hear from, we don't hear from the arbitrators.
I'm going, why aren't they just trying to say this?
And of course this is from the election.
And, uh, anyway, so three months go by or whatever it was in here.
And we all know a couple of weeks ago on a Tuesday, um, Fox News makes this dirty deal with Dominion.
780 million dollars.
Remember, you guys, we subpoenaed Fox for stuff.
They never gave us anything.
They never asked me for evidence.
Pretty suspicious of what's going on at Fox.
Now, we have, we have, we've tracked, you know, owners of this, of Dominion, owners of Fox, that there's some synergy there.
So, you know, that's out there.
Did they just really sue each other or sue themselves?
I don't know.
It doesn't matter.
But it comes out on a Tuesday to scare everybody.
You know what?
Boy, Mike, how do you feel?
Dominion got this much money from Fox.
Same way I always did.
We've got to save our country, melt down these machines, turn them into prison bars, and get elections with paper ballots and counting.
What would that change my mind?
So then what do they do on a Tuesday?
The very next day on Wednesday, they come out with this $5 million sham.
Mike Lindell loses $5 million in arbitration.
Then on Friday they fired Tucker, Thursday they fired him.
So this was all planned in one week, everybody, to get anyone out there to lose hope in our country.
Come on.
Oh man, they beat us down, whatever.
Well, I got news for you.
What did I say?
We're never backing down.
And I said, we're bringing this to court.
I don't put up with it.
Whenever court gets exhausted in anything I do, I will bring it up.
I want to eventually get to the Supreme Court, where by this time I'm hoping it's 9-0 for anything that gets there.
Because this is crazy what's happening to our country, everybody.
So anyway, I was good on my promise.
I filed in court yesterday.
Filed in court for this sham of an arbitration $5 million thing and let the courts decide, right?
Well, what does the media do?
They don't report it to all of you out there.
They don't report it.
So you know what they did today, Brandon?
Oh, yeah, I do.
I saw it.
It was everywhere.
Yeah, so Zeedman today, Zeedman comes out with and they file in federal court.
Kind of like a counter thing because I filed I filed against them and they filed in court that um That I would hear I pulled on I'm losing a connection here.
Um There we go.
Um, so I filed in court And uh, and then they come yet the next day kind of like a counter file, right?
So now the media all over the news Mike Lindell won't pay five million so we have a get brought to federal court and You guys, that's a lie!
That's a big lie!
They went after this because I took them to court first yesterday!
It's disgusting what's going on in our country.
And I looked, I searched, I searched for like 15 minutes, I searched for like 15 minutes, could not find one article reporting on your lawsuit.
Lawsuit, yeah, my lawsuit against them.
You guys, the point being is here, the media, all the media was calling me today, CNN, Washington Post, here come the usual suspects, calling me up, I go, you guys didn't even bother to report my lawsuit yesterday!
That's the big news!
That's the big news!
But the really big news is Carrie Lake, down in Arizona, fighting for our country, and to get these election platforms completely, machines gone, and we get fair elections.
And I'll tell you everybody, the poll came out, Erasmuson poll came out, I think it was yesterday, 60, everybody, everybody, let's just absorb this, 60% of all Americans, That's Democrats and Republicans both.
All American people believe the 2020 election was stole.
81% of all Americans believe we need to fix our election platforms or we're going to lose our country.
I added the last part to be fair, or we're going to lose our country, but that's reality.
81%!
You can go anywhere.
I could go to a Democrat, I could go to a Republican.
Liberal, Conservatives say, do you think we need our elections more secure?
Every one of them says, of course we do.
We've got to get rid of these computers.
So what the media... Shame on all of you media that are watching tonight.
You didn't call me, you didn't write for...
Over a month now.
I was just telling people the other day.
Yep.
I must be right over target again.
They don't want to hear from Mike Lindell, so they don't even attack me.
But when I, when I go down my word and I go after these guys for this sham on this $5 million thing, no media reports it.
But today you report their counter, their counter that they put out there going, well, we want our money.
We want our money!
Well, really?
You want your money?
We're going to go to court and see if you get your money, because it was wrong.
It was 100% wrong.
The data and the truth is that this election was sold.
And here's another thing I told them today, Brad.
CNN called me and the Washington Post and all that.
Like I say, I can name the reporters, but I don't even have to.
But I haven't heard from them in a while.
Maybe they'll call more often now if I don't bash them.
But I'm going to bash this.
I told them, I said, why are you guys, you call me up and you can't even report.
Yesterday I said, you're as bad as Fox News, Newsmax and Salem Media that you can't report
Carrie Lake's case.
That it's just a case.
It's a case, that's just news, you don't have to say either way.
You can even attack it if you want to, but report it.
Report my lawsuit.
Report mine, that I'm fighting back against these machines, to save our elections.
Instead, you're cherry-picking out.
Brandon, I swear, they must get one order from some evil advisor way up here in this market.
They're going, okay, you guys, everybody, call Mike Lindell.
We're all on the attack.
You know, and I flip it back on him.
You know what I did?
I said, you know what?
Why don't you report this in your articles?
We're having the biggest viewed, it has to be, the biggest viewed event in history.
It's got to be one of the biggest ever, you guys.
And that is August 16th and 17th, the Election Crime Bureau Summit.
We have to get all eyes on that.
Why?
Because we're going to reveal the plan.
The plan that's going to save our country and it's going to be, there's 88 days, there's a countdown right now on electioncrimebureau.com.
We should probably put that website up there so people can check that out.
I was very, once again, I wanted to get on to shoot back at the media because once again they're trying to put the narrative out there that Mike Lindell didn't pay the money so we're bringing him to court.
No!
I brought them to court for the sham and what was wrong to myself and let's just keep going after my pillow and my companies and U.S.
employees and attacking, attacking, attacking.
But nobody seems to or they all seem to protect companies like Dominion, Smartmatic, ES&S, Hart.
Let's protect these companies we've never heard about.
All you horrible journalists out there.
Let's never ask them.
Let's never say, hey, Mike Lindell took them to court.
How about that?
How about the people?
You know, there's people all over this country, Brandon, that are doing things and fighting.
It's just that myself, like Kerry Lake, you know, people like us are just out there.
We just have a little bit bigger platform.
But all the people on the ground, you know, they get squashed right away.
They'll speak up.
Hey, we have a problem in our county with the machines.
No, you don't.
If you do, if you even say you do, we're going to sanction you.
We might even put you in jail.
How dare you say something like that?
How dare you say that those machines aren't any good?
Really?
This is what we've come to in our country?
It's disgusting.
Indeed it is.
Jordan with Gateway Pundit has been in the courtroom for the last three days.
He joins us now via phone.
We've interrupted his dinner as it's 6... what is it out there?
425.
I guess it's an early dinner.
It's 425 out there, but we have interrupted his early dinner.
He was gracious enough to step out of the restaurant and join us via phone.
Jordan, you've had a very long three days.
What was some of the biggest news coming out of the three days, and we've got the closing arguments.
We're going to play some of them in a minute.
How do you think it went, and how do you think the judge will order?
Yes, hi Brandon, thank you for having me, and hey Mike, how's it going?
You know, I've been sitting in the waiting room listening to Mike absolutely go off, ripping into these leftist a-holes.
And I agree.
It is disgusting what they are doing to our country, what they're doing, weaponizing the court, weaponizing sanctions, using the court to say, look, I'm going to, Katie Hobbs, for example, I'm going to put you in jail with felony charges if you do not certify my election, my election that I ran, my election that I stole, and my election that's going to fraudulently insert me into the governor's office.
And then, you know, every single lawsuit contesting the election, Maricopa County, the Secretary of State's office, the governor's office, they're all trying to sanction the plaintiffs.
And it just shows you, you don't have a First Amendment right when you can't petition the court without fear of sanctions and hundreds of thousands in attorney's fees.
I mean, you know, when Carrie Lake first brought this lawsuit, Katie Hobbs tried to sanction Katie Hobbs and Mark Elias.
And Maricopa County tried to get $500,000 out of Terry Lake to pay for attorney's fees, which is just astronomical.
And it's freaking BS that we cannot freely address our grievances with the court.
But yeah, so this, the last three days in this trial, you know, we found out, we learned
that 270,000 ballots were signature verified and approved in less than three seconds each.
I mean, for you to call that a signature verification, a true signature verification, there's no way to compare a ballot envelope, compare a signature with another signature in less than three seconds.
So we saw a video of this one guy clicking through, click, click, click, click, click, and he's going in less than two seconds each.
It's clear that he's not even looking.
At the screen, at the computer screen that's showing the signatures, he sure as heck isn't comparing signatures.
Um, you know, we, we heard testimony from, uh, shoot, I, I don't know how to pronounce her name.
Jacqueline Oneke, I believe is how you say it, where she was saying that they were trained to, you know, look through, scroll the screen up and down, look at the signature, try to compare it to a matching signature.
And.
Obviously this guy wasn't doing it when he's just click, click, click, click, click, click as fast as it loads on the screen.
So what Maricopa County tried to do is they tried to claim, oh, because you brought these whistleblowers, these people to testify who were actually doing their job and actually following the protocol, shows that we have a signature verification system, shows that it works, but they disregarded the fact that Right.
certain individuals, multiple individuals who were clicking through ballots in less
than three seconds a piece and verifying hundreds of thousands of ballots over the span of one
month, they, they failed to mention any of that.
Which I mean, I think it's throughout the election.
If you're not going to verify the signatures, they should be deemed invalid.
No one void.
I heard they could even do it.
I heard they were even doing it from home.
They could do it from home and just punch in, just say, oh, I did it all.
I did it.
I did it.
And didn't this, Jordan, show that this kind of, these kind of shenanigans were going on in 2020, which begs to the question, is this how they stole the election from Donald Trump in 2020 in Arizona?
Yeah, 100%.
This is just one of the ways.
I mean, as we saw Today with the, uh, not today, but in the 2022 election with machine failures, it's, it's multifaceted voter fraud.
And I'll say one thing that's really interesting.
Um, I, I broke some stories in 2021, middle of 2021 that showed former.
And I'll emphasize former, former Maricopa County supervisor, Steve Choukri.
And he's a former supervisor because he resigned after my reporting.
He's saying that he thinks the 2020 election is stolen.
He thinks the so-called audit that Maricopa County performed on their own vote systems was, quote, bull, you know, you finish the sentence.
And he thinks that it was, quote, multifaceted voter fraud occurring in the 2020 election.
But yes, we've seen images of the signatures that were accepted by Maricopa County.
Hundreds of thousands of these were accepted.
They're not even anywhere close to the name of the voters.
So there's egregious mismatches, which there were tens of thousands of those.
There's some with no signature, some of them even said unable to sign due to COVID.
How do you even count something like that?
How are you unable to sign due to COVID-19?
I mean, it's ridiculous.
And to think that we've had fair elections over the past two, three years, it's just ludicrous.
Well, we know we haven't.
Hey, Jordan, what do you think?
If you sat through there, do you think, uh, what's your feeling of the judge?
I know we were watching some of it on, on, uh, Frank's speech here on Little TV and, and the judge is up there and he go, Oh, look, he's, you know, my guy was sent with goods.
Oh, he's keeping track.
He's even writing things down.
Then I had another person who said, what does he do, playing a video game?
I mean, no, seriously, that's what I got two comments from people going, he's not even because he's not reacting to what's being said.
It's like, hurry up and get this over.
Do you think he really is taking it all in?
I get the, I always get the feeling with the judges, they're coming into this looking for a way out, rather than, you know, he wanted to recuse himself, I heard, or wanted to ask the other, ask him, hey you guys, this is what I heard anyway, that you know, maybe you guys want me to just recuse myself, and that was one of the questions.
If, with a judge nowadays, when you make it this easy, I've said it before, I don't hear, here, I got a pair of glasses.
Here was an example we used the other day.
We said, okay, you're a judge.
Let's, um, this case is pretty easy.
It's been easy since the beginning.
All right, everybody follow this.
Does everybody, this is a pair of glasses.
We call them glasses.
And they go, okay, uh, yes, I have to concur.
Those are glasses.
You put up the evidence.
Those are glasses.
Now, let me just look at my book here under Arizona constitution and the laws of Arizona says right here.
If this happens, Maricopa County does not count in the election.
We take them out and see who won without their, because they screwed up their election.
There it is.
Oh, Kerry Lake won.
Game over.
And you know, you brought up a point there when you said all the corruption down there, right after the election, when those counties went to certify down there, I had two counties on the phone with me of people, of county commissioners, supervisors, and they were asking the lawyer, they said, we're afraid we've been threatened by Katie Hobbs, we've been threatened for jail and everything else and they're going, we're
afraid for our families.
And the lawyer said, well, you haven't done anything wrong.
You're not going to go to jail.
And I said, you can't guarantee him that.
Not in the times we're in.
And he goes, no, you're right.
I can't.
So I said to them, but what I can guarantee is I'll pick you up at the front door of that
jail and I'll back you every single step of the way.
But they still were in fear.
They got, they got out there Monday and said, we're going to certify under duress and under,
you know, it's just almost like racketeering or, you know, you do this or else.
And, uh, it's disgusting.
That's right.
It's a threat and too bad here in Arizona, especially nowadays, since our illegitimate attorney general took over.
And especially in Maricopa County, too, where we have a Soros-funded sheriff.
We do not have law and order.
We don't have law enforcement to handle crooked, out-of-line public officials like Katie Hopps.
So it's really a disaster what's going on, and hopefully the courts have the backbone.
You know, you asked me about how the judge looked.
He looked very Interesting, very pretty intrigued, especially by testimony today by Ray Valenzuela, where he was caught contradicting his previous testimony, directly conflicting with what he said yesterday.
And, you know, he was taking a lot of notes, the judge.
So I'm hoping that the judge has the courage to do this.
I don't know what kind of threats he's facing from the defendants.
Obviously, when you have three state organizations, three agencies from the state, you know, we got Maricopa County, the governor's office, and the Secretary of State's office, all going against these brave attorneys, Brian Blem and Kurt Olson.
We don't know what kind of pressure that judge is under.
I mean, as we see, elected officials are allowed to Put county officials under duress.
What's to say that they're not putting the judges under duress?
So I'm hoping for a good ruling.
I'm expecting a good ruling.
I mean, I can't necessarily say I'm expecting a 100 percent.
This is, after all, the same judge that carries original trial on the machine failures on Election Day, despite the massive evidence.
He also threw out Count two before it went back to trial regarding new evidence that the machine failures on Election Day were intentional.
So, you know, there's no telling what he's going to decide, but I mean, all we can do is pray that it's going to be good.
The evidence is on Carrie Lake's side.
I would say that regardless of what happens, I mean, I believe she's planning to appeal, but regardless of what happens, what happened in this trial and the last trial completely destroyed any credibility that Maricopa County and quite frankly, the
state of Arizona have when running their elections?
Well, I will say this, Jordan, it's not just Arizona, it's the whole country.
It's every county and every place in the country.
And there's brave people.
Right now, I just did a thing for Fresno County.
They're down there.
The grassroots are fighting down there.
You got Shasta County out in California that just got rid of the machine.
You got Claiborne County.
They were brave for a while.
I don't know.
They might have been attacked by our own party.
I don't know where they're sitting, but you got Osage County that went into paper ballots in Missouri.
So we've got great things going on.
We have over a hundred lawsuits going on around the country to fix our election platforms.
Carrie Lakes is just at the tip of the spear and she won't give up.
She won't give up.
It'll be appealed.
I wanted to get to the Supreme Court on the big nine.
I think they're longing.
I think they've realized that this country, even the Democrats on there, I believe that everybody sees this.
You heard the Rasmussen poll where 60% of Americans believe the election was stolen and 81% of the people believe we need to fix our election.
Well, we are the people!
How do you think that lady feels down in Georgia, Brandon, when she woke up and she had zero votes in her own precinct?
Nice lady!
Her and her husband.
I say this before Jordan and I joke about it, going, gee, if they would have gave her two votes, they would have said, I'm sorry, don't even talk to us.
You and your husband are the only people that like you, you know?
And that's what they would have said.
But it was such a deviation, they had to look into it.
What Carrie Lake has here is so blatant, so flagrant, that it's like, come on!
Even if we know it was done maliciously, I do, but let's say it wasn't and you're going, hey, I'm sorry, these machines were defective.
If I was doing my accounting for MyPillow and I found out I had a big problem with the computers or something happened with all of our computers, I would audit everything.
I would fix it immediately, and then I'd make it so it never happened again.
What's wrong with our system we have in this country?
I'll tell you what's wrong.
This is how they plan to steal our country, and it's over if we don't fix it by 2024.
So, Jordan, thank you for your great work down there and keeping our voice out there.
It's awesome.
Jordan, they can read your articles at gatewaypundit.com, right, Jordan?
Yes, gatewaypanda.com.
I'm on Twitter, I'm on Truth Social, Instagram.
You can follow me there, but gatewaypanda.com.
I'm posting articles daily.
Awesome.
I'll have some recaps on the Kerry Lake trial.
Some of the most important moments that people might have missed.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Enjoy your weekend.
You deserve the rest.
Thank you, Jordan.
Great.
Thank you, Brandon.
Thank you, Mike.
Yep, thank you.
Thanks, Jordan.
Hey, Brandon, why don't you play some closing arguments if you can?
I'm gonna have a problem with my phone here.
I had to use my regular phone.
Okay, here's I got a couple clips before we get to the closing arguments.
Here's a couple clips if you guys in the control room are ready.
Whistleblower testifies normal level one signature verifiers were sent home early and the signature review function then
performed at the County Records office with no
Observers listen and watch this.
Did they?
Were you told why the normal
On Reviewers were told to go home after 7 p.m. And
And and the signature review function was performed at the county recorder's office?
No, we just thought it was odd.
Why did you think it was odd?
Well, because we had Observers that were constantly watching what we were doing, but there was, I'm assuming, no observers there who was watching what they were doing.
I don't, I don't know.
We just thought it was, you know, we thought they would come to where we worked at.
Maybe they set up in a different area for them to verify signatures, but they didn't.
They just told us they had the regular county recorder employees working Signature Bear
to try and get through all of those.
So nobody was watching the watchers.
Nobody was watching the folks that... Wow.
There you go.
All right, that's one clip.
I think we're trying to reconnect with Mike.
Let me know when we got him.
Here's another clip.
These are all embedded over at the Western Journal.
Here's another one.
Maricopa County Elections Director confesses that employees are allowed to verify signatures without observers present.
Apparently shady backroom practices.
The just trust us defense from people who have demonstrated they cannot be trusted to protect the vote.
Here we go.
A clarifying definition of remote.
Not at MC Tech.
So at our offices, we do have three different offices.
So they're all part of our network.
And even at MC Tech, those 24 temporaries, we also have another 50 FTEs in that facility that when, and I appreciate the term that Mr. Meyer said, all hands on deck is asked for, such as post-election.
We will take those 290 and maybe we only had 24.
We don't rely on 24.
That is our normal, that's their only focus.
But yes, so we could have upwards just at MC Tech, upwards of 60 to 70.
Mixture of full-time employees and those specifically assigned.
Where are the other three locations that you actually do?
Signature verification that are not at MC tech the other two locations.
There's three total.
So make tech would be one.
Yes, it would be the county that were quarters office downtown.
Down the block, and another would be actually here at 222 E. Salvelina, our MESA office.
Okay.
And do you have observers in all three offices?
We have observers offered to, and they have taken us and observed the MCTEC office, including the tabulation and those particular ones.
Do you allow observers in the recorder's office or the MESA office to observe the signature verification process?
Yes, your honor.
Relevance, uh, it's 415 and I still don't know how we're getting anywhere.
I'm no, I tell you what your honor.
I'll wrap it up after this question until tomorrow morning, but I'd like an answer to this question.
I'd like to finish my objection.
It's irrelevant.
I think he's told me he's laying the foundation for his witness tomorrow.
Who's going to do the math.
And so that that's what Mr. Valenzuela is testifying to.
And I think he understands it as well.
So I think he's Mr.
I don't know, you got me all confused.
Mr. Blem is done, right?
Or you got one more question?
Well, no, I was saying.
Mr. Olson has another question for you.
What I was saying, your honor, is, you know, if it please the court, if you would answer my question as to whether or not they actually allow observers In the other locations where signature verification is performed.
Because.
We would just like an answer to that question.
OK, and if you can answer that objection relevance, Your Honor, if it's performed, it's performed and we can all go home.
And by the way, let me just say that one of the things I was reading is that the defense here were constantly objecting all the time.
That's what I was reading today, and that it was really hard to get through this in a concise way because there was just constant objections, apparently trying to stop the truth from coming out.
I don't know if it's meant to distract people, to not put it all together, but I was reading people stating that this was non-stop.
Let's keep going.
Okay.
We see, Your Honor.
It's clear.
Wait a minute.
Let me... I don't... A speech from you and a speech from them at this point in time.
Your question is whether they permit observers at the other locations other than NIC Tech, basically.
Yes, Your Honor.
Okay.
And you're saying not relevant?
It's not relevant.
Whether they're observed or not, if the contestor is going to assume that the work was done here in Mesa, that it was done, and if it was done, we have no reason to be here.
We should all go home.
Okay.
Are you able to answer that question that Mr. Blum has?
I can, Your Honor.
You can?
Yeah.
Go ahead and answer it.
So with regards to observers, observers are offered the opportunity, not a legal requirement or statutory requirement to look at.
The only statutory requirement that observers are under are to observe and they do not do a one for one stand behind a individual.
So in our offices, as an example, I did signature verification as a certified election officer as accredited.
I have that done in my office on my PC that's logged with my username.
I am able to do that, and no, we would not allow the observer, in that circumstance, to come into my office and stand behind me.
But we do in the general areas, any general area, we allow observers to exactly do that.
Observe, not to scrutiny.
All 24, even those in that room, it's one observer.
So if you're saying that the process is broken because we don't have 155 observers standing over each shoulder, that's never been the intention.
I didn't, okay.
You have any other questions?
Well, I'd ask one more before we go for tomorrow, Your Honor, but I do, I do have more questions tomorrow before we bring our expert on.
I am not done yet.
You have more questions of this witness?
Yes, Your Honor.
Well, we're not done yet.
Okay.
Go ahead and ask.
Can signature verification be done at a Maricopa County employee's home?
There isn't, we don't have that currently in place.
Now, well, let me let me back up that.
I mean, we do have one during the COVID back in 2020, but and right now individuals are signed into their network PC.
Well, isn't that interesting?
So they were doing that back in 2020?
You mean the election that involved the White House?
Huh.
Alright, we're gonna go to some closing arguments here in just one second by Kurt Olson.
Here's another one.
Maricopa County Elections Director confirms that county employees have the ability to quote performing quote signature verification remotely as in from their homes absent of any observers.
Let's see if we've played this one before.
I don't think we have.
Yes or no answer, Mr. Valenzuela.
Is it Alright, we did play this one yesterday.
Notice again the constant interruptions.
How is it?
Your Honor, he keeps a protocol smotocol.
Alright we did play this one yesterday.
Notice again the constant interruptions.
How is it, what do you mean relevance?
Wouldn't it be relevant if people are able to perform so called signature verifications
remotely from their home?
Wouldn't that be to the heart of relevance?
And the answer you get back is what?
I think we played this one yesterday before we go to some of the closing arguments by Kurt Olson.
It's a yes or no question.
Can they do it?
An employee can log in and access all of their PC as if they were sitting in front of that PC remotely.
Okay, so I guess what I would like to try to figure out, I thought we just heard that wasn't available except for in 2020.
Was it available in 2022 as well?
Because didn't we just hear it wasn't?
So again, I'd like to find out what that conflict or apparent conflict is.
Is that what I'm, you know, did you guys pick up on that?
The clip before that, it was, it was available in 2020.
Implying I guess it wasn't available in 2022, but didn't you just hear that it was available in that last clip?
So we're hearing reports of contradictions.
All right, now let's go to what were some of the closing comments by attorney Kurt Olson, who's often a guest here.
What I want you to pay close attention to, and Mike was having issues with his phone, so we'll just finish it up here.
Let me have you pay close attention to get the context of this where this video picks up.
Apparently, Maricopa County in June of 2022.
The election's in November.
In June of 2022, Maricopa County was alerted that they have problems.
They have voting issues.
Voting technology issues.
In June of 2022.
Apparently, they did not address them or fix them.
Before the election in November of 2022.
That's how it starts out.
That's the context.
Pay close attention.
Here we go.
This is our friend Kurt Olson.
Regarding Maricopa's handling of the 2020 election.
Requiring a match between the signature on the ballot affidavit and the signature on file with the state is currently the most important election integrity measure when it comes to early ballots.
AG Branovich followed up that statement, revealing that there are problematic system-wide abuses that relate to early ballot handling and verification.
The early ballot signature verification system in Maricopa County is insufficient to guard against abuse.
At times, election workers conducting the verification process had only seconds to review a signature.
For example, on November 4th, 2020, The Maricopa County Recorder verified 206,648 early ballot affidavit signatures, which resulted in an average of 4.6 seconds per signature.
There are simply too many early ballots that must be verified in too limited a period of time, thus leaving the system vulnerable to error, fraud, and oversight.
This letter alone, your honor, put the county on notice of their failures before the 2022 general election.
And regardless of whether the county believes they debunked the statement that there were 206,000 ballots that were processed in 4.6 seconds, what's not been debunked is the actual county data that underpins plaintiff's claims.
That shows, as plaintiff's expert testified, that approximately 274,000 ballots out of a 1.3 million cast were compared and the signature verified purportedly in less than three seconds a ballot.
70,000 in less than two seconds a ballot.
That's not signature comparison.
In accordance with 16 ARS 550, as I will delve into a little bit later.
Maricopa puts on a facade of taking signature verification seriously.
Last week, Council for Maricopa called signature verification an art.
There are no rules in art.
This week, they changed it and they talked about the science of signature verification.
Which there and what defines the science a science is defined by recognized and defined criteria.
And there are recognized and defined criteria for evaluating or.
For comparing to use the express term in 16550, there are defined criteria for comparing a signature.
With a record signature to verify whether it is consistent or not.
Again, this is the gatekeeper defense to voter fraud.
And Maricopa, 80% of the ballots are mail-in ballots in Maricopa.
Maricopa's training manuals note a number of these defined characteristics.
For example, we've heard testimony about the 11 unique characteristics used to analyze and compare signatures, And to determine whether or not they are consistent.
Maricopa knows this.
They've also brought in a signature expert.
You heard testimony that Kathleen, got her last name, but Kathleen, the signature expert, which all came in to train people in the science of signature verification.
So on one hand, Maricopa claims signature verification.
...is a science, and that they are doing a great job training its signature verification workers in order to boost public confidence.
But in practice, it's anything goes, as Maricopa's own data shows.
That data shows that their vaunted signature verification training and manuals is nothing but disingenuous window dressing.
The law is not that flexible.
16-550 states that the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall compare the signatures thereon with the signature of the elector on the elector's registration record.
If the signature is inconsistent with the elector's signature, On the elector's registration record, the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall make reasonable efforts to contact the voter and cure.
The shall compare is mandatory.
A determination of whether or not a signature is inconsistent is mandatory.
It has long been settled in Arizona, in the Arizona Supreme Court case State v. Miller, That the words of a statute are to be given their ordinary meaning, unless it appears from the context or otherwise, that a different meaning is intended.
There is no alternate meaning other than the common usage of the terms in this statute.
Webster's Dictionary defines compare as, quote, to examine the character or qualities of especially in order to discover resemblances or differences.
Webster's Dictionary also defines consistent as by harmony, regularity, or steady continuity, free from variation or contradiction.
The Election Procedure Manual, which has the force of law under Arizona code, requires signature verification for mail-in ballots as well.
Signature verification is the term or phrase that is used.
To verify means to establish the truth, accuracy, or reality of.
ARS 16550 does not say the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall glance at signatures thereof.
The whole purpose of signature verification is to make A comparison of the signature on the ballot envelope with the record signature.
That requires a minimum amount of time in order to accomplish and to comply with the statutory requirement.
If I flip the pages of a book, thumbing through them, I can say I'm reading it, but it's not so.
Similarly, Parking a signature verification worker in front of a computer screen while they tap on the keyboard and scroll through ballot images or ballot signature images is not signature verification in accordance with the law.
You heard the live testimony of two whistleblowers from Maricopa County who performed the signature verification.
That's Andrew Myers and Jacqueline Onegai.
Ms.
Onekite performed Level 1 verification.
Mr. Myers performed primarily curing, though he testified he did perform Level 1 signature verification during the general election in the first week.
They testified that there were approximately 24 workstations at MTEC for Level 1 and 3 for Level 2.
That's a maximum of 27-28 workstations for Level 1 and 2.
Two shifts working 7.30 a.m.
to approximately 7.30 at night.
That's a maximum of approximately 54 personnel with two full shifts.
That's what the public saw.
This was the front that Maricopa puts on to the public.
It's under camera.
There's observers watching.
Looks like things are being done out in the open and transparent.
But Maricopa, as we learned, had an additional 99 signature verification workers that were not subject to camera, that were working in back offices as a recorder.
As Mr. Valenzuela testified, he was doing signature verification and he wasn't going to have anybody standing over his shoulder looking at him.
99 other workers who were not open to the public.
What's really interesting about that, Your Honor, is that both witnesses testified that they interacted directly with the Level 2 signature verification workers at the area which the public saw.
And they testified how the Level 2 workers were overwhelmed with all of the ballots that were being sent up to them.
And they were complaining.
They also testified that the Level 2 workers just flat out could not perform a Level 2 review and were kicked it back without even opening.
Again, not performing signature review.
They were overwhelmed, they kick them back to level one.
The question is, if Maricopa had all this extra help, and I'm not saying they didn't, I'm sure they did, but why didn't even the whistleblowers or anybody at the public viewing station or the level two workers who were overwhelmed know about these other workers?
Why?
Why was this all done behind closed doors?
Bum bum bum bum!
Why was it all done behind closed doors and no one else knew about these so-called signature verifiers?
Huh!
So much for open and transparent, huh?
Wow!
Cliffhanger!
That's Closing Arguments Just a Few by Kurt Olson.
How do you think this judge is going to rule, folks?
How would you rule if you were the judge?
And we haven't sat through straight three days of this, have we?
We've only heard just a little bit here and there over the last couple days.
Well, folks, we're going to find out.
We'll keep you posted.
That's the Lyndell Report.
The Worldview Report comes up, and then Brennan House Live.
And if you appreciate all Mike is doing, and all we're doing here at Lyndell TV, mypillow.com, promo code L77, great sales going on.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
You're watching Lindell TV.
Looks like you've been sleeping well.
Megan!
He's back!
The MyPillow guy!
And you're looking good!
Still feeling good!
▲
Export Selection