All Episodes
March 27, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
56:02
The Lindell Report (3-27-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Promo code L77.
Right now he has, Mike does, those slippers.
Those famous slippers that I and so many love.
Normally $150, now just $25 a pair.
A limit of 10 per person at MyPillow.com.
Be sure to use that promo code L77.
While you're there, why not pick up some sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes, and so much more.
Joining me now is Jessica out of South Dakota.
Jessica with SDCanvasing.com.
Jessica, thanks for joining us tonight.
Hi again, Brandon.
Great to have you with us.
Hope you had a great weekend.
I was sick all weekend, and I'm still kind of sick today, so pardon me if I have a stuffy nose tonight.
Well, I'm sorry to hear that.
I hope you have a speedy, speedy recovery.
Thank you.
So, what do you have for us tonight?
Because, again, what you're talking about fits with what Joe Hoft has been talking about over there at the Gateway Pundit, and both Jordan and Joe from the Gateway Pundit are going to join us tonight.
So, all three of you are really going to be kind of adding the pieces of the puzzle together.
Yeah, I think everyone's hot on the trail of this Bepro thing.
And the more the states connect and the more information comes out, the more we connect the dots.
All right.
So you sent me a document tonight.
You want to go to that?
Sure, that would be great.
So I was digging into Washington and Pennsylvania's contracts today.
And in the Pennsylvania contract that I sent to you, Um, I think it was divine intervention, uh, because you'll see it's an 811 page document and mine opened to page 599.
So I think God just put that right in front of my face today because I wasn't thinking very clearly.
Um, and so you'll see there, um, I don't know if you can pull it up.
We got it right here.
Yep.
We got it right here.
Show us what, uh, we're talking about.
So scroll down there underneath the green line.
So BPRO's TotalVote solution was designed as a centralized statewide top-down system.
Can you see that there?
Yep.
And yet we believe TotalVote is a perfect fit to replace Pennsylvania's SURE system in Hawaii, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Washington.
BPRO's TotalVote system is a top-down solution using a centralized statewide database for all modules.
All county users with appropriate permissions have access to data from their county and read-only access from other counties in the state.
In Arizona, the total vote system is a hybrid solution with a centralized database that is accessed by 13 of Arizona's 15 counties.
In Arizona's two largest counties chose to retain their legacy voter Registration systems and be pro built over 70 interfaces that allow these two counties to access read-only data in real time And read-only access to data from Pima and Maricopa counties So I thought wow This got put in front of my face today for a reason and I did actually get in touch with Mark Fincham today and sent him this a
this contracts I thought he might find that interesting and I think it proves that
That be pro, you know networks and communicates with Obviously 70 interfaces there
They also if you can scroll down a few pages right there again. Let's go back to the middle in Arizona
the total vote system Is a hybrid system with a centralized database that is
assessed by 13 of Arizona's 15 counties Arizona's two largest counties choose to retain their
legacy voter registration system and Be pro built over 70 interfaces allow these two counties to
access read-only data from the statewide system in real-time provide
The other 13 counties real-time Okay.
Okay, there we go.
13 real-time read-only access to data from Pima and Maricopa counties.
Okay, so Maricopa County is where obviously we've got a big problem.
The largest county in Arizona is Maricopa County.
That's where we've got the problem with signatures and all kinds of stuff related to Perry Lake.
Can you explain to our audience at all then how this Bepro system is working in Maricopa County?
When they say it's a hybrid, what do they mean here?
Well, I don't have the contracts from Arizona.
However, they customized their custom built a software that can talk to this other voter registration system, the legacy voter registration system, so that they can all network together.
And it's interesting, you talked about the signatures.
I actually talked to Mark Fincham today and he said, well, we're all talking about signatures that don't match.
What about the ones that match exactly?
And I said, bingo!
That's what I've been saying.
They're training the people to look for signatures that don't match, which there's plenty of those, but we're not trained to look for the ones that are identical.
And so I actually sent... Wait a minute, what do you mean are identical?
Wouldn't you want the signature to match?
Perfectly identical.
Nobody writes their signature exactly the same every single time they write their signature.
So, South Dakota, we found in South Dakota, we have a signature clipping software from Bepro or No Ink, which Copies a signature and affixes it to a voter registration Okay so just like if you were to sign a DocuSign like when you sign a legal document most all of us have used DocuSign and signed a legal document and you can choose to sign your name and then use that as the template or one is you know you pick from one so you're saying that they're taking people's signature and using it over and over and copying it people don't even know they're actually posted you know that this is happening with their signature
They're using it to, for sure in South Dakota, sign voter registration forms that are perjured, because we know that people don't live where they're signing up to vote from.
So it was the person's signature, they just scanned it?
They scanned it, and then they clip it and affix it to a voter registration form, and as Mark Fincham was saying today, they looked at perfectly matching signatures on absentee envelopes, and those are inkjet Printed like your skin and really close and you can see there are a bunch of little dots, right?
That is like an inkjet printer.
So I just find it interesting that Bepro has a capability.
Wow, do we know who is behind Bepro?
Who is Bepro?
Bepro is a company out of Pierre, South Dakota.
Okay.
It was, you know, I think it's been in existence since 1985 possibly, but in the early 2000s, Brandon and Abby Campea moved to South Dakota and bought it.
Okay.
You told us this the other day.
Okay.
Yes.
And so they have been running it and expanding it ever since.
Now, did they sell it to someone else and they kept running it?
It was bought out by no ink in, um, I think it was December 31 of 2020.
and was announced in February of 2021.
However, they're still open, they're still running as NoInk, or sorry, Bepro, and their staff and programmers are still there.
So it's still the same operation.
Also, I found Hawaii is using Bepro, their total vote system, and they signed up for Bepro in 2014.
And Jason Gant was the Secretary of State in South Dakota in 2014.
And it's interesting.
He now has a election consulting contract with Hawaii.
And he did four reports on their 2020 election.
And it seems he has some sort of a contract with the DHS and the DOJ for some sort of a system they're bringing to Hawaii, which hasn't been announced yet.
But it appears, you know, I told you the other night that Jason Gant gave away the source code that belonged to the state of South Dakota.
Gifted it to New Mexico and they valued it at a million dollars.
We're wondering how many other states he didn't give away our source code to and then, you know, in return get a discount on South Dakota's fees for using Bepro.
And being the guinea pig for, you know, implementing all of the systems that they now sell and use and promote.
And remind our audience, and explain to any new people, what is your biggest concern with Bepro?
What is it?
I mean, we know what the problem is with ERIC, that electronic registration system, ERIC, that so many states are dumping out of.
It's just filled with a lot of dirty voter rolls.
It needs to be cleaned up, and it looks like it's Used to harvest, you know zombie voters where you need them.
We so we understand that's the problem with Eric What is the chief complaint about Bepro?
so what launched us off was a Discovery in New Mexico where it was backfilling information to the counties for their canvas, right so it was basically Taking information from the Dominion tabulators, calculating it and sending information back, which shouldn't be the case.
And so I did find something today on that.
Let's see if I can find it, but basically says that their canvass, their total votes election canvassing module is used to provide the election night canvassing for all statewide and local elections.
Total vote automatically provides a canvassing report for the county canvassing board.
No extra data is required because the data is pulled from the previously imported or entered results.
Total votes canvassing system would include creation and customization of all necessary reports.
So what they're saying, that's what they're doing illegally in New Mexico.
And we know that they manage the voter rolls.
And, and some of these contracts, it says they fully interface with Eric, which is, you know, how they completely manipulate it.
So if Eric is the one, you know, um, we know is a problem with the voter rolls.
Well, the system that's hosting these voter rolls is B pro or total vote, and it's hosted on the cloud.
So Eric is then manipulating B pros, um, or total votes, voter rolls on the cloud.
Wow.
All right.
Is there anything else you want to show us in this document?
I know we're only on the one page.
There must be more?
Oh, there is more in there, um, that I do find pretty interesting, but basically it's interesting what you find in all these other state, um, state contracts and that they fully interface with the state agency.
So maybe about six pages down, maybe four pages down in there.
Um, It says that they successfully built real-time interfaces in every total vote system.
Is this it right here, all under offer response?
I can't see what letter you're on there.
I'm on 601.
Yeah, I printed mine out and I lost my page numbers, Brandon.
And it says it's totally integrated with Eric to assist election officials, which we know is to steal votes.
And it says in Arizona where BPRO currently supports over 70 APIs that communicate in real time between the centralized system and the bottom-up systems in Pima and Maricopa.
Okay, look what I just did.
I just searched Eric.
I went control F and I just searched Eric.
Look at all the times this document is referring to Eric, the Electronic Information Registration Center.
They're partners in crime.
I mean, it's all through here.
Now, you're probably guessing somewhere around page... what did you say?
Read your paragraph to me and I'll find it.
Okay, now I've kind of skipped down to Pennsylvania.
Through its membership agreement, ERIC outlines the various reporting requirements of the member states and member states' responsibilities in using the Processing ERIC Reports data.
I mean, that's probably one you were reading or would be.
Here we go.
597 edition, BEPRO has built data exchanges for our customers to participate in both ERIC and CrossCheck in order to compare voter registration data with other states.
That's on page 597.
Yep, and then by, I have letter M here, that, right above letter M, that they will, if selected, will support the voter registration API developed by the DOS.
BPRO has built a similar API for Washington's Health Benefit Exchange, a public assistance office similar to Pennsylvania's Compass, and that Basically, they exchange information.
BPRO recently deployed a similar process for Arizona's Department of Labor.
So they also sell contracts and manage data for all of these state entities.
And in South Dakota, the Department of Public Safety, Department of Labor and Regulation, Department of Education, Department of Health, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Public Safety.
So they also have access to all of that information and all of the data points on all of those individuals with their information in there, along with the Department of or the DMV, the Motor Registration.
So I just Jessica I just did control F on Arizona and starting at page 563 I mean all the way down to page what is that 707 22 look how many times Arizona's mentioned in this I mean, that's a great thing about Control-F, folks.
Just a little research tip.
This is how researchers like myself, people always wonder how we do so much research so fast or find stuff.
We will use Control-F and just sit here with keywords going through documents.
I mean, we do this all day.
In fact, I'd like to do one real quick on the fly here.
Let's do Dominion.
See how long it takes to pop up.
There we go.
All right, that's on page 656.
There you go.
Pennsylvania Department of Motor Vehicles, ES&S, HART, ClearBallot, Dominion, Election Systems.
Okay, so through our previous deployments, BEPRO has a deep understanding of the level of effort
it takes to interface with other state systems, along with appreciation for the importance
of the data these systems can contribute in order to improve voter and election data.
Part of this effort below is a partial list of systems vPro will provide interface too.
There you go.
Yep, so they interface with all kinds of state agencies and then this quote from Brandon Campaia, the president of Beepro.
When a person votes on election day, the ballot is counted by a tabulator and then transferred onto our system.
Our software reports the results and provides them to the media outlets.
He adds, we're the official people who know the results before anyone else.
So BEPRO staff are the first receivers of election results in South Dakota and six other states, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, Hawaii, New Mexico, and most recently Oregon.
And now we know there's more states than that.
And then it said as well as Sacramento County and 11 counties in Minnesota.
So he already says right there, we know the results before anyone else.
So then those results come from the back end off of the BEPRO total vote Wow.
So what do you, I mean, what do you think is going on here?
You had to guess.
What's your, what's your thoughts on this?
Well, I always think the election theft starts with the voter rolls.
So, um, they have total access and control over the voter information, the interfacing with the state agencies.
And you know, what, what happens is, They can, especially as places that no ink now sells the full pads.
They can see who's checking in live.
They have access to the voter rolls.
They can see who hasn't voted.
They can plug them in and, and backfill ballots for them.
And we can see that just by the data analysis that we've done in South Dakota.
And of course, states all over the country that have boats that never reconciled boat totals that never reconciled and voters being turned off and on.
And this is because they've never reconciled, and somebody obviously has access on the back end, live, to change these things regularly, and especially on election night.
Wow.
Wow, wow, wow.
All right, so is that it?
Is that our report?
I don't want to cut you off too soon.
No, that's pretty good.
I just wanted to say that in South Dakota here, our state is planning to spend $4.5 million to upgrade BPRO because it says, We've been getting a discount for being the guinea pig state to implement this system.
And so it's interesting that, uh, you know, now we won't be getting a, a, uh, a discount, but why were we getting a discount?
Is it because Jason Gant was running around the country, giving away our source code to other states to implement this.
And then they got signed sole source contracts with Bepro, um, get the money coming back to the state.
So where was the discount going?
Was it going into the Secretary of State's pocket?
I don't know, but one can logically deduct from these things.
Well, they're good questions, and is it illegal in America to ask questions anymore?
One, it's almost beginning to think it is illegal to ask questions, or you get sued for simply asking questions.
Right, or labeled a domestic terrorist, right?
Right, because you dare question the election results.
Yeah, yeah.
Anyway, Joe Hoft, I'm sure found some more things today too.
So it'll be interesting to hear what he says today.
Absolutely.
Give your website, please.
Our website is SDCanvassing.com Excellent.
Excellent.
As always, thank you, Jessica.
Mike said we had to get you on tonight, and I can see why.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Talk to you later.
Appreciate it.
Thank you.
Mike is out tonight taking care of other things, and we're holding down the fort for him.
And again, of course, don't forget, we're brought to you by you, Lyndell TV, Lyndell Report.
If you want to help Mike and What he does and his work and Lyndell TV keep going.
We need your support.
We are a viewer-supported broadcast network.
You can do that by simply again going to MyPillow.com.
Use that promo code L77.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes, and yes, Raquel bed sheets, set clearance, closeout sale is also happening along with the slipper.
How's it going, Brandon?
model so the savings is all yours normally 150 bucks for a pair of
slippers now $25 at my pillow.com promo code L77. Joining me now is Jordan with
the Gateway Pundit. Jordan welcome back back to the broadcast thanks for joining
us. How's it going Brandon thank you for having me. Thank you did you hear any of
that interview then I just did with Jessica Jordan? Not much I
I kind of came on right at the end of it.
Okay.
We were just going through some of the contracts.
The BP Pro contract.
It's like, I don't know, 700 and some odd pages.
Have you seen this by the way?
Have you seen this?
It's 811 pages.
Have you seen it?
I have not.
I think we might have something about that on the Gateway Pundit, but I haven't been able to take a look at that quite yet.
Okay, so when are you going into narrating with that deep announcer voice?
Why are you not doing like book voiceovers and commercials for Pete's sake, right?
I gotta do some voice acting or do a show or something, right?
Something, I know.
Something.
Sing bass or something.
So I just put in the B, I did control F and put in Arizona.
I want to show that to Jordan.
And look at how many times Arizona comes up in the B pro contract that she sent me.
They keep mentioning Arizona over and over.
You're going to want to read this.
I'm going to have to check that out, yeah.
So what is it you found?
I'm going to go to the Gateway Pundit while you talk and grab your new article.
What's the title of your new article over here at the Gateway Pundit?
Yes, the new article is that Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson, he rescinded his recent order, which was basically setting the schedule for this new signature verification fraud complaint that is being sent back to the trial court on behalf of the Supreme Court.
So, as you may know, the Arizona Supreme Court recently took a look at Kerry Lake's lawsuit, and they ruled that the trial court erred in dismissing this signature verification complaint without ever letting it go to trial, without ever letting anyone look at the signatures.
And there's so much evidence.
There's three whistleblowers testifying that Maricopa County was intentionally flouting the law when it came to signature verification, not verifying the signatures.
And then in addition to that, we've seen signatures from 2020 where they look like some child just drew on it with a crayon or with a marker.
There's no way that they're legitimate signatures.
So there's some, a lot of questions surrounding signatures from 2022.
And I think we're, we're going to get to see, see some of what was allowed to pass through the system in 2022 with this lawsuit.
Okay.
Let's go back real quick.
You're the judge that had, okay.
So the judge that had originally made a good ruling, you're saying has now gone back in and rescinded himself.
No, it wasn't necessarily.
He was ordered by the Supreme Court to take the case.
Okay, this is back to the Supreme Court case we were so happy about last week, where they
say take a look at these signatures.
So now he's made a new ruling, and what is his new ruling?
So his new ruling basically rescinded the schedule for what was supposed to be this
We were looking at an upcoming conference on Thursday and replies due by tomorrow.
But something happened in the Supreme Court.
It caused them to You know, issue an order setting April 5th as the deadline for a response to sanctions and April 12th as the deadline for the defendant's replies.
So it's not yet, I guess, ready to be taken up by the trial court, even though it's my understanding that the trial court could take it up.
But the Supreme Court, I've been told that they're really on the ball with this.
They're paying attention to everything and we're just waiting for this new April 5th date and this April 12th date.
for the trial court to proceed, I believe.
But this isn't upending anything.
It's not stopping anything.
It looks like just a little delay.
Arizona, yes.
State Senator Wendy Rogers, though, she said this is a good thing, probably.
This is going to give Lake's team more time to get some evidence.
I understand they're currently doing some FOIA requests for some of the missing details with the lawsuit, some of the stuff that wasn't able to He brought out or that Maricopa County has been just kind of hiding, so we're waiting to hear back on FOIA requests.
I'll be keeping in touch with the attorneys, seeing what they find, what new stuff they're able to find before this actually goes back to trial.
So I don't think it's a bad thing.
I think it's kind of just, you know, slow moving courts and also.
Um, hopefully we're going to see some good coming out in the next couple weeks.
Good.
Excellent.
Okay, so what's the other news?
I mean, you're the one that knows so much about Arizona.
You live there.
You've been reporting on it from day one, almost.
What is the latest news coming out of Arizona that our audience might find interesting, good or bad?
Um, you know, just the really what I'm finding is the border.
There's a lot going on at the border with fentanyl coming across.
Um, gotaways are increasing ever since Katie Hobbs took off.
It's not not only gotaways, but also border encounters and therefore gotaways and drugs.
Um, it's interesting, you know, there were 30% about 10% more encounters at the border in Mom, February versus January when Katie Hobbes took office and about 30% more gotaways in February versus January when Hobbes took office.
And so these numbers, they're already launching up.
They're already soaring.
And it's just like when the fraudulent Joe Biden took office, just immediately our border got wide open and it's happening here in Arizona.
The borders opening up more and more and more every single day.
She's not prioritizing the border.
She's instead prioritizing these race-based executive orders. She
recently signed an executive order banning hair discrimination, whatever that is. What does that even
mean, Jordan?
I have no idea, Brandon. Apparently, people think that they're at a disadvantage because
they have curly hair. I don't buy it. I'm not going to judge someone based on their hair,
their natural hair or whatever the hell they're talking about.
But as, as she signs, as she signs this bill protecting, not even a class of people, but protecting people's hair, you know, we're, we're still seeing number one or number two in the nation inflation here in Phoenix, Mesa.
Um, and Scottsdale, which is pretty much the Maricopa County area.
And we're also seeing drugs just flowing into our communities out like Like crazy, and there's nothing going on at the border.
She's more concerned about hair discrimination, if you would believe it.
My word.
What is the average person, as you move around Arizona, Phoenix particularly, what does the average person say about this election?
Have they been brainwashed by the local media, or are they tuned in enough to know that this is an illegitimate governor?
No, I don't think anybody buys it.
I don't think a lot of people want to admit, OK, our elections are totally compromised or elections are being stolen.
But nobody, in my opinion, from the people I've talked to that aren't super involved in politics, they just don't buy it.
They don't believe that Katie Hobbs, who refused to debate, campaigned from the basement, ran from reporters, was down double digits in the polls leading up to the election.
They don't believe that there's any way she could have won.
So, I think people's eyes are opening up, especially as you see these ridiculous executive orders and failure of Katie Hobbs to sign legislation into law.
I think she's vetoed about 90% of the bills that have come to her desk so far from the GOP legislature.
So, you know, these people are saying, oh my God, we are so screwed.
This woman, there's no way she won the election.
Her disapproval rating is probably through the roof.
Her approval rating is probably in the trash.
And we're going to be seeing, hopefully, some more people waking up as time comes and as Kerry Lake's lawsuit proceeds through the courts.
Same with Abe Hamadeh.
He's waiting for a new trial in the Mojave County Court.
And we're looking to get him because, keep in mind, he only lost by 280 votes out of, like, over 2 million ballots cast.
So, these extremely razor-thin close races, and the clear fraud that was involved in stealing them, hopefully, hopefully, hopefully, people are going to start waking up.
So, what about the local media?
Is the local media, are they dissing those people that are questioning the election?
I mean, has the local media gone all in the tank for her?
Oh, big time, yeah.
Just still going on with the election denier phrase and disgusting slanders and smears that they use against us.
How do they treat Carrie Lake when they report on her in the media?
How do they report about her?
Terribly.
They act like she's a psychopath.
I mean, they act like she's... That's all they call her is an election denier.
Every single article you read where Carrie Lake's name is mentioned, it'll...
Like, be sure to mention an election denier in the state of Arizona or something like that.
They are trying to destroy her in every single aspect.
They're scared of her.
Yes, I think so, 100%.
And yet what you're saying is even the average person who's not really into politics, their common sense tells them a woman that campaigned from her basement and was down double digits in the polls couldn't have won.
Yes, I think a lot of people are starting to wake up to it, especially as when the Supreme Court's ruling on the side of Carrie Lake, sending her case back to the trial court.
I think a lot of people are going to start to say, hey, you know what?
Maybe Carrie's been on to something.
Did the media report that case?
And if so, how did they spin it?
Oh, they reported on it terribly.
They said, Judge, Supreme Court dismisses most of Kerry Lake's lawsuit, kind of bearing the lead, the fact that they sent it back to the trial court to look at the signatures, which, in my opinion, could be the most damning count in Kerry's lawsuit, because it'll blow apart.
If proven to be true, it'll blow apart the entire mail-in ballot system, which is something we've been saying for a pretty long time.
You know, a lot of people have said, oh, no, Don't vote by mail.
Turn out on Election Day.
Now a lot of Republicans are starting to say, we have to vote by mail.
We can't turn out on Election Day.
But I think this is going to prove a lot of us right.
Blow open the narratives that have been pushed out there and.
I think it's going to be huge because it's going to show that the mail-in system is so easy to tamper with, so easy to steal elections with.
You know, the one security measure on a mail-in ballot is your signature.
And if that signature verification is not there, then You can easily put in fraudulent ballots into the system.
And Kerry was telling me last week on this program that there's probably 140,000 of these
questionable signature ballots. Something like that.
Yeah, I think there's more.
I think from the estimates made by We The People AZ Alliance in their, you know, Shelby Bush in her Arizona Senate Elections Committee presentation, I think she said something two or three hundred thousand ballots after extrapolating the data from the 2020 analysis that they did.
They were able to estimate hundreds of thousands, more than just 100,000, probably more than 200,000 were fraudulently counted in the 2022 election.
And the margin of victory was what?
17,000 something?
17,000.
Oddly, oddly enough, about the same number that Maricopa County says was dumped into these box number three ballots or door number three ballot boxes when 59% of the machines failed across the county targeting election day Republican voters.
And you're saying that that number that fell into those bags was about that margin?
Yes, it was about $17,000.
So it's kind of a funny coincidence, but I don't believe in coincidences.
Yeah, exactly.
Jordan, you're writing at the Gateway Pundit.
Is that the main website you want to promote, the Gateway Pundit?
Yes, Gateway Pundit.
I'm right in there posting every single day.
You can also see me on Twitter at Conradson Jordan on Truth Social at Jordan Covfefe.
You might like that famous Trump tweet, Covfefe.
I took that, put it in my head.
So, easy to remember.
Jordan Conradson checking in.
Thank you, as always, for your great reporting, making time for us tonight out of Arizona.
Thank you, Jordan.
Yes, thank you for having me, Brandon.
No, thank you.
Let me show, folks, as he goes, let me show the headline here.
There's the headline.
Let's show the headline of his article over The Gateway Pundit.
There it is.
So go and find that at thegatewaypundit.com.
Jordan Conradson checking in.
All right, joining us now is Joe Hoff of The Gateway Pundit and of joehoffed.com.
He also has a brand new article out today.
They've been all over this Bepro story.
Joe, welcome back to the Lindell Report.
Thanks for joining us.
Hey, it's great to be here.
Appreciate it.
It's great seeing Jordan Cuffoffi.
Yeah, exactly.
And it's kind of the Gateway Pundit program here tonight.
Joe, you've got a brand new article out today.
What is the title of your article?
Well, yeah, we got a couple out, and it's related to this topic that we've been discussing For the last couple days, actually.
I don't have it up in front of me.
Here it is right here.
We'll show it.
Here it is.
Yeah.
While the country was focused on PA's corrupt 2020 election results, PA, Pennsylvania, was busy paying Bepro voting systems millions for future work.
Yeah.
Tell me about it.
Yeah.
Well, you know, so we started off last week, right?
We kind of uncovered this Bepro and how it's being used in New Mexico.
And how it was this go-between software between Dominion and the Secretary of State's office.
We're like, what's going on here?
And then we saw how the data was flowing through these two systems into the Secretary of State.
They could then have access to the data.
And then they sent it back to the various counties.
And then it was certified after it came from the Secretary of State.
And in New Mexico, that's against the law.
The results are supposed to flow upwards, so the results go through the counties first, they certify the results, and then it goes up to the Secretary of State.
But that's not happening in New Mexico, and that didn't happen in Mexico in 2020.
So the system in between was a local name for this total vote system that BEPRO was producing, that they had manufactured and were using in a number of various states.
It's a firm that's out of South Dakota.
So then the next day we found out that this Bepro, well, it actually was purchased by another firm called No Ink, which is out of St.
Louis and which is ran by a guy who used to run the election in St.
Louis, a young guy.
And for me, that's kind of a red flag because St.
Louis elections are horrible.
They rank up there with the worst of the worst in the U.S.
big city.
So that's not something that gives me a lot of comfort.
Although he touts that on their website as being the founder and having done that.
So this site we saw, it has not just this system that's used for, that we identified in New Mexico, but it also has a couple other systems.
One is, it's really big into these pole pads.
And you've seen those things popping up all over the place where you walk in and you sign a pole pad.
And we talked about this the other night as well.
And they're They're bragging about having 100,000 or so of these pole pads around the country.
What they are is just little Apple iPads.
They throw a little bit of software on it and they call it a special device and charge a ton of money for it.
Probably a pretty profitable operation.
So that's one thing that they're doing.
And so when you walk into a precinct and you vote, It actually will show that you did, and they're keeping track of that because they have another system that tells you who voted on election night.
Basically, it's an up-to-date database of votes in various precincts in various elections.
So that is a new software that they're using.
Then we find out that this entity has a similar entity, a competitor, called 10xSolutions, and they're doing the same thing.
They've got this Election night software, as well as these poll pads.
It's not quite as big as the other firm, but it's still quite sizable.
And so today, through our reporting, I received some information out of Pennsylvania that at the time of the 2020 election, as we were all trying to figure out what's happened, trying to demand that somebody steps in and stops this madness, this election in Pennsylvania where Remember, people couldn't get into the door.
We couldn't see what was going on in Philadelphia for three days, and they manufactured more than a million ballots, many, much more, to give Joe Biden the eventual lead.
He won 80% of those mail-in ballots.
And so anyways, that was, we were all pulling our hair out trying to get to the bottom of it.
At the same time, Pennsylvania's Secretary of State was working Moving forward with this new software, this Bepro software that they were going to implement in Pennsylvania.
They had a contract in place.
It was signed on December 28th of 2020.
And again, we're all freaking out.
This is five days, about a week or so before January 6th.
We still can't believe what's going on.
We're like, come on, people, stop.
Somebody stop this.
This is madness.
Joe Biden didn't win this election.
But we're doing that and they're moving ahead to their next operation.
And so that's what they did.
They signed a contract.
And then three days later after the contract, though, the contract was signed December 28th.
On December 31st, Bepro was purchased by this other firm that, and I lost the name again, but that firm purchased Bepro and Teamlink and They had to go back to Pennsylvania and notify them.
When they did, they asked for an additional $3,000,000.
They got $10,000,000 for the original contract, and then they asked for another $3,000,000.
And we're like, what's going on here?
And it also opened up a number of questions in regards to the system, and it's no link that purchased Bepro.
And the system itself is like, well, when you're doing a contract or an offer, Wouldn't you have to note that you're going to be purchased in a couple days after the contract comes into play?
Wouldn't you know that?
Would that impact the bidding process?
And also, what's this extra $3 million that was asked for less than two months later after this NOINC bought BEPRO?
So, some questions there like, what's going on?
And I tell you what, Brandon, tonight we came up with another post.
It's really kind of, it's starting from this group out of New Mexico, and I think you know a couple of these guys.
Dave and Aaron Clements are really behind it in a group that they have there.
They've done a lot of work in New Mexico.
Yeah.
And they're the ones that first saw Bepro, right?
Yes.
And we've now identified that this system was also in use in Hawaii, and it's a breaking report that we just put up.
And in Hawaii, we found out that this software has the ability to backdate.
And speaking from, you know, my auditing and IT experience from the past, that's a big, big, big red flag.
Here's the headline.
Show that, guys.
Bepro, knowing election software, found across the country, is connected to the internet, not certified, and it's able to backdate election records.
That's a brand new article out tonight by Jim Cobb.
Wow!
Yeah, and you can see that picture.
It shows all the states that it's being used in now, like 36 states, I believe, and Hawaii.
And in Hawaii, these people out there, they got some IT guys working with them, and they figured out that, hey, They've got like, I think I heard 500,000 voters in their voter rolls, and 75,000 of these records of these 500,000 people appear to be backdated.
They show that they were signed up, let's say, in 2000, and the system shows a much later date, and they've actually linked it back to another system.
We're going to follow up with another report in the morning on this.
That's that's shocking.
This kind of starting to now.
Now we're starting to find out, OK, here's what's going on.
And we can see these patterns.
We always could.
Brandon, this was the thing that grabbed us all after the election.
How how can you have these patterns in the data?
It doesn't make sense.
And when it doesn't make sense, you know, it doesn't make sense.
There's something wrong.
And we have you know, we've looked at Dominion and this doesn't This doesn't mean that Dominion's systems are doing great.
It just means that we found another system that's worked with Dominion that has the ability to backdate.
And we'll drop another bomb on this in the morning.
Oh, wow.
It's awesome.
There's some plug-ins to it that I'll hint at that will allow all sorts of stuff.
So this system's just outside of Dominion.
The data can flow through it.
We also found through this contract in Pennsylvania that this system, this Bepro system, also is basically attached to Eric.
So now we're starting to see, okay, now this total vote system is connected to, it can be connected to Dominion, it can be connected to the Secretary of State, and it can be connected to Eric.
Or really feel like we've stumbled upon something really big here.
Yeah, absolutely you have.
Absolutely you have.
And I want to show you... I want to show you real quick what... I'm sure you've got the contract, right?
Do you have the Bepro contract?
It's 811 pages.
Do you have that contract, Joe?
I have it, yes.
Okay, so Jordan's asking me to send it to him real quick, because we were just talking about with him.
Look at what I just pulled up here.
I went to the contract.
I'm using that good old-fashioned Ctrl-F, and I put in Pennsylvania.
Look how many times Pennsylvania is talked about in this contract.
This, again, is the contract, the B Pro contract.
Look how many times Pennsylvania pops up.
I mean, I'm going to have to scroll for quite some time here.
Yeah, and if you scroll, and there is a reason for this, Brandon, it's the contract that was put in place back in, I believe this is the one, in December 28th, that was signed by all the parties to bring BPRO into Pennsylvania.
If you were to do a query that control F on Eric, E-R-I-C.
I already did it a while ago, and let me show you Arizona though.
I did it with Arizona, and Arizona pops up.
And while I had on Jessica a while ago, I did that for Eric.
I'll do it again.
Here's where Eric is mentioned right here.
Here we go.
Yeah.
So as you scroll through that, of course for the new folks that maybe don't know, ERIC stands for Electronic Information Registration Center.
This is where they got apparently a lot of dirty names that are used poorly for zombie votes, right?
Yeah, and you notice there's some wording there.
Maybe if you pause right there, there's some wording in there that says, hey, this system connects with ERIC.
And maybe it's above that.
I think right above that there was one, maybe page, To which Eric outlines various, but it's in there where it says that this system connects with Eric.
I'm sure it's in here.
The department's primary list maintenance vendor is Eric.
There you go.
And then it goes on through there.
Through its membership agreement, Eric outlines the various reporting requirements of the member states, member states' responsibility in using and processing Eric reports, data lists for maintenance activities.
Yeah.
Right?
Yeah.
So, so it's tied to Eric.
And, you know, they claim, they make all these claims, but what it does is they've got this other module that gives you, you know, up to date results on the election, on election night.
They call it like an election night software.
I don't have the exact word in front of me.
But that will then tell you who basically who's all voted.
And they know that from the poll pads that they're pushing out there.
So they use the poll pads to tell them who's voted.
They push that information over to interested parties that purchase their software and their other system for the election night, sell that for a ton of money.
And then these people are able to tell What you basically, which voters were voted.
I don't know how detailed it'll get, but ultimately that's what they're basing this reporting on.
And then, uh, they can probably, if they need to, I guess a bad actor would say, well, we need another 20,000 people over in this precinct, 40,000 over here, another a hundred thousand there.
And, uh, let's drop 140,000 for, uh, Joe Biden, uh, in Milwaukee and boom, baboom, baboom, you know, you've, you've, uh, You've just, you know, won your election.
Wow.
And Jessica was saying something about one of the folks is quoted in this report talking about when they're able to know into the night's results ahead of a lot of other people.
Is that right?
Yeah, that's right.
That's what that's that software that they're they're offering alongside this.
This is this teammate software.
It's the election night software module or whatever.
It's amazing.
So remember, Brendan, there was in We remember hearing in Green Bay, one of these, this former Facebook employee was getting data and he was monitoring the election and he was writing other email in other locations throughout the state.
Hey, you guys need more votes.
You know, we need a lot more votes here and stuff like that.
And that was election night, election day.
I'm wondering, you know, where he was.
We've always wondered how to get that information.
Maybe he was using this system.
I don't think he's ever been under oath.
It would be nice to ask him.
Is this system being used in Wisconsin?
I don't know.
I did read something that it does appear to be used in, I believe in Montana, or at least was pushed there at one time, Washington, we know Hawaii, and I believe Arizona.
As well as New Mexico, for sure.
Here we go, here we go.
I just put in Control-F Montana.
In Arizona, Hawaii, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, and Washington, BPRO has statewide contracts.
There it is.
Isn't Control-F a glorious thing for researchers like us?
We can get so much done so fast, can't you?
Yeah, no, that's great.
That's fantastic.
Yeah, I mean, we really think we've maybe Yeah, that's a good question.
I would think they'd be like, who told them?
That's probably the question.
and the end of the day, and I think that's what we're going to
do.
Cause here we are, here we are Brandon, two years later.
And that, you know, why didn't, you know, really, if we were dealing with people of integrity, they'd sit down with us next day, say here, Hey, here, look at it all.
Here's our system.
Look at it.
This thing wasn't stolen here.
We're going to give you free access.
Look at it.
Because you know what we would do?
We didn't get that.
What we would do is say, OK, folks, we looked at it.
It was a clean election.
So let's go and tell the America First crowd what they need to do to win elections, because clearly they didn't do what they need to do to win elections.
But we saw the back end.
Our people saw the back end.
Everything was clean.
It was a legitimate election.
Now let's quit talking about that and go talking about what it is we need to do when it comes to messaging and candidates.
and a right and that's how you we would we would proceed we would have looked at over here we looked over here and
start blaming them the Republican Party the leadership the candidates the messaging that we would've gone that
direction right?
and we could've said oh by the way, the great thing to know is we're a great country that's using technology to run
free and fair elections that are actually working.
Bye.
Yeah.
Yeah, here it is.
to Remember that?
And it's like, well, clearly it is.
Clearly it is.
Wasn't it by their own documents?
Didn't a lot of their own manuals show that?
I think so.
I think there was even some pieces of hardware that they found within the system itself that would indicate that surely it's going to be able to be connected to the internet.
I was thinking the other day too, I think it was in Georgia someplace and they just implemented these new Dominion machines in the state just before the election and there was a problem there.
One of these guys, an election person, was there and they contact Dominion and all of a sudden they go, okay, we got it fixed.
She's like, well, how did you do that?
You're there, the machine is here, and clearly she's like, clearly this thing's connected to the internet if they can do that from afar, off-site.
So, yeah, we know these systems are connected off-site.
Of course they are if they're going to be using this Bepro, if it's going to be using this technology to tell us who voted on a given night from the data that they've got access to.
Of course this stuff's connected to the internet.
I don't know how legal a lot of this stuff is.
I'm not an attorney, not an election attorney, but I do believe, for example, in New Mexico.
You can't, you know, it has to roll up.
It doesn't roll down.
And actually I was thinking about it earlier.
I'm thinking our entire election, we were like in states like Pennsylvania, they were waiting on Philadelphia to tell them how many absentee ballots were going to go to each county because they were all being funneled to one place.
Same with like Arizona, right?
Same with like Atlanta.
In Maricopa County, all the absentee ballots came to one place through the mail.
I think they funneled it all through run back.
But, you know, so who knew what their final votes were?
They wouldn't know it by precinct because all these ballots were flowing into this one huge facility.
So, you know, it's a mess.
To me, it's a mess.
But this is probably a game-changer.
Your articles are probably game-changers in this whole election investigation, is it not?
I think so.
I think this is really, really big.
Because we've got to try to figure out, to me, we've always been wondering, how do you get these patterns?
How are you able to flip votes?
We're seeing that.
How's that happening?
And we haven't had a lot of access to the systems like Dominion, etc.
So we've had to try to figure it out, but we can certainly see that there's some patterns in the data.
We can see that within our first week we uncovered that.
So now, ever since then, it's been, well, how are they doing it?
We're scratching our heads.
And here's another piece.
Well, you know, here's an attachment to this system and this system.
And it looks like it has the ability that data can be managed.
Wow, great article.
Let's show it again over the Gateway Pundit tonight, thegatewaypundit.com exclusive.
Bepro, no ink, election software found across the country is connected to the internet, not certified, and it's able to backdate election records.
That's just one of two articles tonight out by Joe Hoft at thegatewaypundit.com.
You'll also find articles by him at joehoft.com.
Joe Hoft All three of our guests tonight, Joe, are great guests and they all fit together on the same topic.
Great one hour informative program.
Joe, thank you for all you're doing to expose all this and the research you're doing, the work you're doing.
You're making my job easy.
Oh, great.
Thanks a lot.
I appreciate being here.
Thank you.
Joe Hoft checking in.
Check out his site, joehoft.com.
Joe Hoft, H-O-F-T.com, and thegatewaypundit.com.
Hey, that's our broadcast, the Lindell Report.
Brandon House in for Mike Lindell.
Tonight I'm going to have on General Tom McInerney.
We'll get a live report about what's happening in Israel with them approaching civil war.
Some are using that phrase.
There's certainly a lot of violence in the street.
It appears, though, it's coming from the left.
The left are organizing this in the streets.
The question is, is Iran, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, maybe the Biden regime involved in that?
And then we'll hear from Nicole Pearson tonight, turning out of California about, well, the ability of psychiatrists, psychologists, counselors to take away people's children in California.
What?
That and more, and the tragic shooting in Nashville, my state right here, Tennessee.
All that tonight on Brennan House Live, which begins in 30 minutes.
Now the Worldview Report.
Brennan House in for Mike Lindell.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
Export Selection