All Episodes
Previous Next
March 14, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:02:01
The Lindell Report (3-14-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh.
Looks like you've been sleeping well.
Megan!
He's back!
The MyPillow guy!
And you're looking good!
Still feeling good!
Well, just when you thought it couldn't get any better, we've got the best pillow ever!
MyPillow 2.0!
Wow, it's so soft and smooth.
It's cool to the touch.
How did you do that?
Well, we took MyPillow's patented fill and combined it with this new technology that we didn't have back then when I invented MyPillow to bring you the best pillow in history, MyPillow 2.0.
Just like all of you, I never imagined that my pillow could get any better.
That's why I haven't changed it in nearly 20 years.
Then I heard about a revolutionary new technology, and I knew I had to bring it to you all.
MyPillow 2.0 is truly the next generation of my pillow.
The MyPillow 2.0 is cooler and softer than the last MyPillow.
It is so comfortable to sleep on at night.
I look forward to going to bed and I wake up well rested in the morning.
Sleep is all about temperature and height.
MyPillow 2.0's patented adjustable fill is going to give you the exact individual support you need from your head to your bed.
And now here's where it gets even better.
We've all experienced those temperature-related sleep interruptions where you get too hot, you toss and turn, you flip your pillow over to the cool side.
Well, all that's gone with my brand-new MyPillow 2.0 cooling fabric that's made with temperature-regulating thread.
The best sleep just got even better.
Whether you have a MyPillow or not, you need to get the brand-new MyPillow 2.0.
Call or go to MyPillow.com now.
Use your promo code, and for a limited time, when you buy one, you'll get a second one absolutely free.
You're sleeping even better!
And cooler too!
And you're looking good!
Feeling good!
I knew you would!
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell.
And as you know, my passion is to help each and every one of you get the best sleep of your life.
That's why I created my new Giza Dreams bed sheets.
I started by using the world's best cotton called Giza.
It's only grown in a region between the Sahara Desert, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River.
It's ultra soft and breathable, but extremely durable.
I guarantee you they'll be the most comfortable sheets you'll ever own.
I do not like my sheets.
I love my Giza Dream Sheets.
Call or go to MyPillow.com right now to take advantage of Mike's limited time offer.
Use the promo code on the screen and when you buy one set of Giza Dream Sheets, Mike will send you another set absolutely free!
That's right, buy one set of Giza Dream Sheets and get another set absolutely free!
Choose from a variety of colors in solid, stripes, and new flannel sheets.
Order now!
For the best night's sleep in the whole wide world, visit MyPillow.com
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical and
achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedoms.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
Well, hello everybody.
Welcome to the Lindell Report.
Today, we're going to Get everybody you can to come on.
We're going to kind of go back in time.
When I see my intro there and I see even the interview with our real president, it seems like it was like a long, long time ago.
It seems like a long, long time ago.
But then I got that first piece of evidence that showed the 2020 election being intruded by China and stole from our great president.
So we're going to talk a lot about different things tonight, but it's all going to be kind of going back in time.
We're going to go, where is it now?
Where is this evidence and where is it now?
And, but let's start with the newest first.
And what's the newest?
The newest is a MyPillow Slipper Closeout Sale.
We got to get this in here.
We've actually, Brandon, if you pull that up on MyPillow, this is our all season slippers, you guys.
We are closing that whole line out and we're offering it here for $25 a pair.
They're normally a hundred and some dollars.
If he gets it on the MyPillow site there, it'll show the clothes out, but they're regularly a hundred and some dollars a piece.
And there's a limit of 10.
I don't want a bunch of people buying them and then reselling them all over the place.
Those people that want to pass this savings directly on to you, Once they're gone, they're gone.
Why don't you click on that?
Click on that, Brandon.
And there you go.
If you're a first-time sign-up, by the way, you get a free gift.
But there you go, everybody.
This is a massive closeout sale.
When they're gone, they're gone.
Right now, we have all sizes, colors, everything.
But we're discontinuing the all-season.
We're making when we had the The other, our other slippers are just, have the fur and stuff for them.
We've got our line with our slippers and slides coming.
So this is an actual closeout sale.
Once they're gone, they're gone.
I wanted to pass the savings on to you guys here.
My slipper closeout sale, they're normally $149.
I will put them up against any slipper in history.
All these things made in the United States that are made here, like the impact gel
made out of soybeans, that you can wear these shoes all day, any day, and they help fatigue of walking,
helps to help your feet.
It's got my pillow patented fill in there, two foam in there, and plus memory foam.
I believe they're leather uppers.
You can check that out.
But it's just a great sale, it's a clearance sale.
And these are awesome, these are awesome, awesome slippers.
They're my favorite.
You remember I had Mike Reagan on here a couple weeks ago, and I started interviewing him,
he interrupted me before I could get to the interview and said, you didn't ask me to say this,
I'm not being paid to say this, I gotta tell you, these are the greatest slippers.
I've got arthritis in my feet.
I have to throw every pair I've ever had away.
I just, I wear them and I throw them away.
I wear them and I throw them away.
This pair, he said, are amazing.
I can actually wear them.
And he said, and I'm, I'm just telling you, this is, and I didn't know he was going to say that at all.
So yeah, we get a lot of our folks that we know have sent him his gifts to people.
They love these slippers.
And I would say my father's day is coming up.
I want to say, Brandon, before you go, you mentioned that he said that he had arthritis.
We don't claim to be a medical device.
That's old FTC talk.
I have to say that.
put them on a closet and pull them out next Christmas and give them as gifts,
because they were about 150 bucks, now you're getting them for $25.
And I want to say, Brandon, before you go, just you mentioned that he said that he had arthritis.
We don't claim to be a medical device, that's old FTC talk.
I have to say that, I'm sorry.
We don't claim to be a medical device, because they get,
but they really are the most amazing slippers ever.
There's a surprise for everybody.
I don't know if it's up yet, but I'm announcing it here.
We're also clearing out and having a clearance price.
Of epic proportions.
Brandon, pull up the MyPillow website.
I believe we're putting the percale sheets.
We're closing out the percale sheets.
Yes.
Why don't you go to those?
I don't think you'll find it in the sliders right now.
Okay.
You're going to have to go further down.
Keep going down.
Look for percale sheets.
I know they're up there somewhere.
Maybe go to sheets.
Click on sheets.
I might have jumped the gun, but we'll have him on there before the end of the... Okay, now there's a safer kill.
Yes, right here.
My Pilbercal bed sheets.
Okay, click on them.
Click on them.
As low as $25.
Well, click on them, Brandon, if you can.
Yep.
Okay, there they are, everybody.
These sheets are $25, and then go see what the queen size are.
We've got... We've discounted them down to pretty much cost.
$35 for queen?
Look at that.
$35 for a set of our queen sheets, you guys.
And this is...
These were the prices that you see there were as low as $89.99.
These were our sale prices, and now we've got them all the way down to one of the king prices, Brandon.
The king prices?
Let's see here.
King prices are $35 as well!
Yeah, okay now everybody get on that right now because that's a mistake.
Are you on King?
Yeah, right there King.
Okay, right there.
If you get them right now, that is a mistake.
Brandon, you found a mistake.
Go get them right now until I get this called in, which will be in about 10 minutes.
So you can get these.
Our mistake is your gain everybody.
So get on that right now.
Yeah, what's a cow king?
Yeah, there's a mistake there, everybody, so get on that.
Right, Brandon?
Yeah, so I did, first I did queen, okay, and that came up.
Go to split king once, see what a split king is.
And then a split king, okay, 45.
Yeah, what's a cow king?
And then back to king, and then a cow king is 39.
Yeah, there's a mistake there, everybody, so get on that, you can get a deal of a lifetime
right there.
That was the first mistake of the year, right?
Yeah, that's the mistake of the year, but I'm good for my words.
So get them while they're, get them before we get that corrected.
I believe, I believe the Kings are, they're going to be on a clearance price.
I think they're 45 or 40 or I think they're 45, but 40 or 45.
They're definitely not 35.
They cost us more than that, I believe.
So get them right, get them right there.
Anyway, guys, we're closing out.
This is a closeout clearance price.
We're completely clearing them out, and they will not be coming back.
The percale sheets, we've got our, you guys, if it goes like this, we buy whole crops of cotton, and when we buy it into, get as much as we can for a certain crop, like the Giza, there's certain grades or whatever, and you buy, the way cotton's bought, you buy it, and you buy the gray goods, and so you're on the hook for so many, you gotta get them, you know, Back when I first got into the Giza, I bought all the whole crop of it at one time.
I forget what it was called, Giza 88 or something like that.
But the percale, we basically, we bought that last year when cotton was way up and we went with the percale and we've got X amount.
We're clearing that out and then we'll try, you know, we've had flannels and then you have stripes and we've got our Giza.
This is just one line we're clearing out.
We've got to move, get our inventory ready for other products.
And Sarg, I just want to pass the savings on to everyone.
But that's announced right here, Brent.
And I'm glad you found that mistake.
We'll get that fixed.
Yeah.
And then the other thing everybody knows about my pillow, .20.
That pillow, to buy one, get one free.
Also, by the way, everybody, use that promo code L77 or I see they got up there.
You can use L66.
I think for this show, everybody, use L77 so we can see.
I want to see how many of those sheets you get on this show.
What do you think, Brandon?
Yeah, look at that.
It's already gone back to L77.
Look how fast they are.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, there you go.
L77 use, you guys, to try those sheets and get them right now.
I can't change that until I get off this show unless one of my IT people are watching.
That's a great tip.
I can keep you posted.
I can keep you posted.
I'll break in with breaking news if it changes.
I'll monitor.
No, I'm not going to change it until we're done with the show.
Oh, wow.
I need a text.
I need a text about a thousand people, OK?
Is that all right, real quick?
There's a sale on top of a sale on top of a sale.
Remember, everybody, these percale sheets, there was, you know, I don't know the original regular price.
And then we had a very big sale on them.
And now, We have the clearance price, so it's the lowest price in history.
When you can get a queen set of sheets, some of the best sheets in the world for $35, that's amazing.
It's a good deal.
Okay everybody, I guess we've got, what I want to do, you have a guest, you have Walter Doherty coming on?
Walter Doherty's coming on with really great news about a great Attorney General.
Okay, and how soon will he be on?
He's ready in four minutes.
Okay, you guys, and Dr. Walter Daugherty, actually, he was one of the co-writers of the Mesa County Report No.
3, everybody.
And I'm going to kind of frame where we're at.
After we had Walter on, I want to come back to Brandon, and Brandon and I are going to talk about everything with the evidence, where we're at, and what it all means.
Where's the hope?
And why is it taking so long?
Things like that, right?
Yep.
Okay, everybody.
So what we're going to be going through, we're going to be talking about the 2020 election.
We'll be talking about the Dennis Montgomery evidence, where that sits right now.
We're going to talk about what that is.
Remember, everybody, I'm going to explain the three different kinds of evidence, Brandon, that we've all pointed to machine.
The first one, you guys, is All the stuff done in cyberspace through the internet.
And remember, everybody, if they say, oh, those machines weren't online.
Come on.
Yes, they were.
And if they weren't, they had SIM cards, and then they get put into online.
Right.
I mean, come on.
OK, that ship sailed, you know.
They're all made to be online.
Anyway, and they were online.
Ones that weren't have 10 cards you put them in it goes through the thing and they can flip votes there They can do anything they want one of the things that Dennis Montgomery if you guys go to Dennis Montgomery calm Go to Dennis Montgomery calm everybody if you want to learn all about Dennis.
He he worked with the CIA He was a long-term employee there one of the smartest men I've ever known and He's probably one of the smartest men that ever walked this planet, and I mean that with all sincerity, 100%.
He's got more inventions and more things that people, even smart people, geniuses, can't comprehend.
Anyone I've had look at any of his things, I'm not just talking about the cyber thing, the hammer scorecard, so to speak.
I'm talking about other things like compression technology and And, oh, yeah, that's a big one.
There's other things involving drones.
There's a lot of different things out there that, some of the things I don't even want to say because they'll be right away, like, what does he got?
A copy, and try and copy the patents or whatever.
But there's so much technology and IT stuff that he's got, intellectual stuff.
And that is like having a movie camera When you're watching in space, you're watching everything that goes through in there.
And it's called, once again, packet captures, Brandon.
When you're capturing a packet in time and you're capturing this data, they're called packet captures or data.
You're basically having a movie.
Let's say you were inside of a bank and there was a robbery.
It's like having a movie camera of the whole thing being inside the bank when everything happened.
That's what we have with the 2020 election, 40-some terabytes of information.
Okay.
And what does it prove?
It proves a lot, but 100%, 100%, it proves China was inside our election.
That's fact.
You can sit there and then, of course, then we have all the flips of all the seats.
We know that they took votes from states.
Some of them they didn't flip.
Some down tickets they didn't flip, but they suppressed every single state where every single state was affected.
Every single county in the United States was affected in the 2020 election.
Then we also have proof of that with the same camera angle.
2022 primary, the 2022 election, Brazil's election, you name it.
Remember, Dennis developed that technology, so he's able to look and say, hey, here's what's happened.
And then we have Brannon.
The other kind of evidence, what if we were actually able to get inside a machine for one time, right?
Right.
What if we were able to get inside and a cyber guy and actually do an audit to say, hey, what Look at all these things inside.
Well, we've had that for now, let's see, over a year.
I guess we've had it since the February of 22, posted right here on Frank's Beach.
Brandon, could you show where everybody can look at that?
Pull it up, it's called Inside the Machines, everybody.
So anybody that says you don't have any evidence, we do have evidence of what's inside these machines.
Now, are we going to get a lot more?
Absolutely.
A federal judge just said we can look in a whole bunch of machines.
There's the square, everybody.
If you click on that, Brandon, go ahead and click on that.
And you see there's going to be a full report.
Cyber guys can have a ball.
So if you go down, why don't you just scroll down and see if there's a report there.
Where's report number three?
and it than a year ago have a great year with everything
that can open up Okay, now you guys, if you go down this, if you scroll down, this whole report, one of the authors is coming up here in about four minutes, Dr. Walter Doherty.
Yeah, he's ready, he's ready whenever you are.
Okay, I just wanna go through this right.
So there's report number three.
Okay, Brian, that's good.
And we're gonna come back to this a little later in the show, everybody, but I wanted to tell you, if anyone says, wow, that's another camera angle.
Remember, we have Dennis Montgomery's 40 some terabytes, And we have, that's one camera angle.
And you can't, it's non-subjective evidence to everybody that, and we'll talk about that later in the show.
And here we have non-subjective evidence.
This is inside the machine.
This is actually image from inside the machines.
Nobody can deny it.
And it's actually from Colorado where they, they have two sets of books.
You had what happened in 2020 and another election.
Well, they thought they had deleted it, but a county clerk had made a copy of it, like they did their job, like other clerks had done.
And then, and then this is the Tina Peter story.
And then we have another set of books.
It's like having two sets of books, but we have both sets.
It's right there.
You can't lie.
It shows the election flipped.
It shows two flips of the election, shows intrusion, shows manipulation.
So we have one camera angle, which is Dennis's stuff, which 100% shows China intruded.
They were actually in the diamond store to steal and stuff.
Or they were in there anyway.
Then we have another Inside the machines, so somebody did something, they stole something.
Then we have the next thing, which are called cast vote records.
We're going to talk about them too.
That's another camera angle.
What we're going to talk about in this show is, the second half anyway, is everything you wanted to know about electronic voting machines and why we should never, ever use them again, ever.
Anybody talking about these other things like, we've got to ballot harvest and vote early because look at the machines went bad in Cary Lakes case.
Exactly.
We got to get rid of the machines, not vote early and keep the machines.
That would be, that would be losing our country.
So anyway, I want to tell everybody, get everybody you can on, and we're going to have a great show.
Let's bring in Brandon.
I didn't know about this.
This is a surprise to me.
So, um, Bring in Dr. Dougherty.
Hey, Dr. Dougherty.
Welcome to the Lindell Report.
Glad to have you back.
Thank you, Brandon and Mike.
Good to be with you, and especially since I have the chance to share some good news.
Absolutely.
So, Mike, you may remember after the November 8th election in 2022, about four or five days after that election, you asked me, have we got the cast vote records?
And I said, well, I don't know who else might have asked them, but I'm going to ask for them.
So I sent in a request on November 15th for the cast vote records, the ballot images, and all of the system logs, the audit log, batch log, and so forth.
Well, as you might expect, Harris County, which is where Houston is in Texas, denied my request.
But the grounds that they denied it were, in my opinion, pretty flimsy.
So they said things, for example, like, well, we can't release these records because they're under litigation.
But if you go look at the law, the law says If there is a law enforcement agency or a prosecutor who is investigating a crime, they may withhold evidence.
They're not a law enforcement agency.
They're not a prosecutor.
They're an election administrator.
And there's no crime that they alleged.
So that was not a legitimate objection.
And then they said, well, we can't release them because we're under audit.
Well, the reason they were under audit is because, once again, in November 2022, Harris County made such a mess of their election.
So there were numerous polling sites that ran out of ballots.
So the law is very specific about how many ballots you have to supply to every precinct based on the previous turnout plus some percentage for extras or increases.
But there were Quite a few polling places that ran out of ballots.
Okay, doctor, doctor.
Doctor, I'm going to interrupt.
I want to ask you two things.
Harris County, that's Harris County, Texas, correct?
Yes.
Okay, just so everybody knows.
So you asked for the cast vote records and other records for Texas, including Harris County.
Is that correct?
Yes, so for Harris County, I asked for... For those people just tuning in and don't know what a cast vote record is, if you ask for it under the Freedom of Information Act, what is a cast vote record?
Does it come out of an electronic voting machine or what exactly is it?
The cast vote record, very simply, is an electronic record of the voter's choice.
So it's usually displayed as a spreadsheet.
So on a spreadsheet, line one would be, this is how ballot one voted.
Line two would be, this is how ballot two voted for all of the races.
Okay, so this is very easy to explain to people.
Let's say I missed a football game.
If I missed the game and I got a play-by-play of that game in order the game was played, it would be kind of similar.
Is that correct?
That's right.
It is a record of the ballots as they were counted.
Right.
And this record, these cast vote records, that's probably why when we, you know, I didn't find out about them until now.
It was, I don't know, almost a year ago, but, but they're so important because these, these come right up.
This is what, this isn't something we just opened up and see these.
This is what our elections say.
This is actually records from the electronic voting machines, correct?
That's right.
And to get the results for an election, you simply add up the columns.
So the rows are each ballot on the president column in a presidential election, like 2020, you just count how many Bidens, how many Trumps, how many Jorgensens there are in the president column.
In another election for governor in Arizona, you count how many Hobbes, how many lakes and so forth.
So the columns are the races and the rows are the Individual ballots with no identification of who the voter was.
Right.
So nobody will know who the voter is because that's, but then why, why would they try and originally, whether you said they were trying to stop you, they wouldn't release them to you.
And you gave us reasons why, uh, where, where are we at today?
Is there some good news here now?
There's some very good news.
So today I was notified that Texas attorney general Ken Paxton, Has rejected their claims of exemption and ordered them to release three things from Harris County, Texas, which is the Houston area.
He's ordered them to release the cast vote records, the ballot images, and all of the system logs.
Wow.
Praise the Lord.
Oh, wow.
Okay.
So is that for the 2022 election or for the primary or is it for 2020?
It's for the November 8th, 2022 election.
Wow.
That is so awesome.
And, uh, and I want to tell everybody, um, remember we've had these fights in other States.
We've talked to you all about, um, it was, um, there's a lot of States, but we've got, I think we ended up with about a third of all Castro records for the 2020 election, but, um, it's getting harder and harder for us.
Um, doctor, because it's like, The bad guys I'm going to call them, the Unipart, whatever they are, they don't want to give us them because they know now you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt whether it was machine manipulated or not.
Is that like, like by getting these, are you able to tell if it's been machine manipulated or if it was actually just people voting?
Are you able to tell one way or another?
In many cases.
So the, Various ways of auditing election.
The most common way is to simply do a recount.
And that might be a recount of just one race.
It might be a recount of all the ballots.
It might be done by hand.
It might be done by machine.
But a recount only looks at the totals.
Same way with a risk-limiting audit.
So lots of states have gone to a risk-limiting audit Which is basically like a sequence of choices to say which election, which part of the election is the most important to look at until you can decide whether there's a problem or not.
But again, it only looks at the final total.
What the cast vote record allows us to do is to look at the sequence of votes as they were being counted.
So when the sequence of votes as you're being counted, if the votes for mail-in were random, which they are in most states, there are a few states that sort mail-in votes by precinct before they count them.
But in most states like Arizona, the mail-in votes come in at random.
So they're come in from all over the county.
So you think about it, a voter sends, fills out an application and says, I need a mail-in ballot.
It takes a random amount of time for that to get processed.
They put a ballot in the mail.
That takes a random amount of time.
It sits on the kitchen table a random amount of time.
Voter says, hey, I better fill this out.
They fill it out, put it back in the mail.
It takes a random amount of time.
So when the mail-in ballots get back to the central counting location, there should be no pattern at all.
They should be coming from precincts all over the county.
Democrat heavy precincts, Republican heavy precincts, there should be no pattern at all.
So if you start counting them in that order, in the order the mail-in ballots arrived, it should be like a random sample, which is how quality control works.
So when you make a batch of a thousand pillows and you pull out 10 at random and look at every single thing on those 10, if they're good, you say ship the batch.
But what you would find is that after you check some small percentage, actually, you can get a good idea with less than 10%.
But let's just say 10%.
So after you counted 10% of the mail-in ballots, the ratio of the two candidates in a two-candidate race, candidate A, candidate B, ought to be extremely close to the final value.
So I'll just give you a made-up example.
Let's say that the first four ballots were all for Biden in 2020.
Now he has four out of four, that's a hundred percent.
The fifth ballot is for Trump.
Now Biden only has four out of five, which is 80%.
That means he dropped from a hundred percent to 80%.
That's a drop of 20%, which is one fifth.
So the fifth ballot can change the cumulative ratio by one fifth at most.
The 500th ballot can change that ratio by one 500th at most.
The 50,000th ballot can change it by one 50,000th at most.
So what you ought to see in a fair election, where the mail-in ballots are random, is you ought to see a lot of fluctuations when there are only a small number of ballots counted, but after, certainly after 10%, It ought to be very close to the final ratio.
So if after 10% you say, well, candidate A has 56% of the vote, the final ratio at the end of the election might be 55 or 57, but it's going to be very close to 56.
Otherwise, quality control and random sampling wouldn't work.
So by looking at those ratios, if it's not flat after about 10%, you know, It was manipulated.
And that's what I found in jurisdictions all over the country, starting with Pima County, Arizona was the first one I looked at.
It started after the initial fluctuations at 3.3 to 1 Biden to Trump, and then went systematically 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 2.9, 2.8, all the way to election day 1.57.
3.1, 3.0, 2.9, 2.8, all the way to Election Day 1.57.
So when you have a curve that ought to be flat and it has this huge two-to-one slope,
You know, it was manipulated.
Oh, wow.
Yeah.
That's, uh, that's why cast vote records are so important.
You now know, you know, we found, we found true that, uh, we finally found one in Miami Dade County that actually wasn't manipulated, which, um, I don't know if, did you hear about that?
No, I haven't.
Yeah, yeah, that was actually filmed by Jeff O'Donnell.
We have the cast full record there.
And we, incidentally, that was the DeSantis race down there.
Well, they did, there was no machine manipulation.
So we actually know what a completely random race would look like, you know, like a normal race.
And I thought that was kind of strange down there when he was meeting with Dominion lawyers.
And to help sue people for defamation easier, but yet his race didn't get manipulated.
That's kind of strange, just saying.
Now, you need to be careful, Michael.
You can say it was not manipulated in that way.
You don't know if there were counterfeit ballots inserted, if they were valid ballots that were thrown away, because there are many ways to cheat.
But the point I was making is that the cast vote records enable us to detect a type of manipulation looking at the sequence that other audits do not allow us to detect.
So you would, you could, you could, so the one thing you can 100% conclude is that when When a race is manipulated by computers, that you can conclude.
If it's completely random, you don't know if there was other cheating, but you can definitely single out ones that were computer generated, so to speak, right?
Yes, that's true.
And I've got to ask you a question, because we're going to talk about the Mesa County image and other evidence I had.
My question to you is, have you seen The same.
Have you seen anything?
And when you talk about computer manipulation of the cast vote records, is there any similarity in pattern between what you've seen in the 2020 election, which you've seen right in the Mesa image, I guess, or cast vote records from there versus the 2022 race?
Or are they just completely different?
There are a few, but most of the Cumulative cast vote records that I've described have been, for want of a better word, they found a way around it to make it harder to look for that sort of pattern.
So the argument is that we don't want to have any possibility of infringing on a voter's privacy.
So let's say you were driving up to the polling place at 7 a.m.
or wherever your poll opens and you saw John Smith was the first person in line waiting for the door open because he's your neighbor and you know him.
Now, after the election, you get the cast vote record and you look at line one and you say, aha, I know how John Smith voted because I saw he was the first person in line, so he must be the first ballot.
Well, to avoid that possibility of somebody, you know, breaking your privacy, your confidentiality, because the secret ballot is very important.
The reason for that is primarily to avoid coercion or bribery.
So if nobody knows how you voted, then it's harder for them to pay you for the vote because you say, well, I don't have to show you my ballot that I voted the way you paid me to vote for.
Or if somebody's standing over you with a gun and watching you fill out the ballot, then that can certainly affect it.
So the secret ballot is very important.
So what all of the vendors do, or did up until 2022, was to shuffle the votes within each block of 200.
So they take the first 200 lines of the spreadsheet and just scramble them.
And then they take the next 200 lines and scramble those.
So now you know John Smith was the first person to vote, but all you know after they shuffled the first 200 is that he was one of those first 200 lines.
In other words, you don't know how he voted.
So it protects privacy.
Now, what happened, because we were so successful in detecting the manipulated pattern by looking at the sequence, is that Professor Halderman recommended that jurisdictions should either delete the sequence number entirely or shuffle them all.
And so that's what Maricopa County, Arizona did.
So instead of recording them in the order that they were tabulated and then to protect privacy, shuffling them in blocks of 200, which doesn't affect the pattern for the curve that I was describing, you can still tell the curve is flat or sloped.
A block of 200 out of 2 million votes.
All that does is just put more dots on the graph.
It doesn't change the shape of the graph.
So what they did in Maricopa County was they took all 1.9 million votes in November of 2022 and shuffled the whole batch.
In other words, they destroyed the order to say, well, now they won't be able to tell if we manipulated their dot.
So they've shuffled the whole 1.9 million, they didn't do it by matches?
That's right.
So Maricopa County, everybody, that's amazing.
So I want to tell you this, Doctor, so there's two things I want to say before I let you go.
One is, I keep telling everybody, when we told everybody last summer, After I talked to all my cyber guys and stuff, they said, hey, tell everybody to vote day up.
Everybody vote day up.
It's harder for them to steal the day up because they're going to do all this manipulation.
They're not going to know how many are coming and vote.
And you have to flip it right there that day up, which should be harder to do than manipulate pawn names from voter rolls or what have you.
Now, when they did that with Carrie Lake, Last summer, and everybody voted day of, or a lot of people did, and she was down by, I believe about 10% at 11 o'clock at night, and then the same day votes came in, and she got into the lead by 12,000 votes at three in the morning, and they shut it down for three days, and they only had 87,000 votes left to count, but they were all 70-30 carry.
Now, my theory is, That right there, they said, how are we going to beat Cary Lake now?
Even the Uniparty didn't want Cary Lake, and that's your Doug Ducey's of the world, down in Arizona.
So they didn't want Cary Lake.
They'd rather take Katie Hobbs over Cary Lake, even these corrupt Republicans that were down there.
So here's my theory that they, in the end, and it kind of fits with what you're saying, we told everybody, vote Dayeb again.
Now if I'm the bad guys, I do two things.
I've all heard about these cast vote records, so I'm all upset everybody's on to them.
I'm about these cast vote records.
Hey, we got to figure a way to hide that.
And how are we going to get, they're all going to vote day up.
So if I'm them, I say, hey, let's scramble the whole 1.9 million.
So the cast vote records mean nothing, and let's make the machines don't work, let's make them so they don't accept ballots, 60% of them, so we can say put the ballot in the box, by them doing that, that ballot becomes whatever, a mail-in ballot, it becomes, you know, it didn't go into the machine, so we don't know what happened with them.
So my theory is, is there any reason that they would do the 1.9 million and make 60% of the machines not work if they weren't doing something that was basically illegal?
What would be your conclusion?
Why those two things happen?
Well, they have a lot of things to answer for and the simplest one is one that people like Doug Frank, Dr. Frank, have emphasized, and that is, if their own numbers don't match, you know there's a problem.
So their own numbers don't match.
So on election night they said we had this many ballots left to count, and then the next morning they said we have this many ballots left to count, and they were different numbers.
The numbers didn't match.
In the case of the voting on election day, the logs which we have obtained by public records requests for each tabulator in the voting centers shows that in most of the voting centers, there were a number of ballots that were rejected and the total across the county.
Maricopa is a large county, so this is the Phoenix area and all the outlying suburbs as well.
It's a very large county, one of the largest in the country, but for the day of election, If you added up the problems that were reported in the log, so when a tabulator can't read a ballot, it will write a message in the log and say, ballot style not recognized or paper jam or whatever it is.
So there is a record.
It's kind of like a diary that the machine is writing down what happened every step during the day.
We logged, when we added them all up, there were more than 7,000 ballot rejections every 30 minutes, all day long.
So that's like 13,000 rejections an hour.
And there's a video out from Journey Church, which you can look up online.
The voting machines were in a room that had a large glass wall.
And so someone was outside in a public space.
Just taking a video of what was going on inside, and obviously they couldn't see what was on any ballot or anything, but they could see people walking up to the machine, putting in a ballot, and then the machine spits it back out and says, I can't read this.
And then they would flip it over and put it in the other way, which they really don't have to do, because the software scans both sides of the ballot, and if it's upside down, the software will flip it.
But what we saw on that video was people putting in their ballot four times, which is the most ways you can turn one sheet of paper, five, six times.
And then finally, maybe it would accept it.
Maybe it wouldn't.
If it didn't accept it, then they gave the voter the choice of spoiling the ballot, getting a new one, filling it out again, starting over, or checking out and going to another voting center.
When we actually got pictures of these ballots in the court case, which is ongoing right now.
So, um, the Arizona Supreme Court will announce on March 21st, whether or not they will accept the appeal.
So the case Kerry Lake has appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court.
The, uh, the defendants have filed their, uh, briefs yesterday.
Uh, I haven't seen them yet.
But they are public documents, so they will be available soon.
And then on the 21st, the Supreme Court will announce whether they will accept the case on appeal or not.
But as part of the previous case, we actually had one of our experts that you know, Clay Parikh, got to see some ballots that were rejected.
And what he discovered is that a lot of the ballots were rejected.
had taken the ballot image, which is the list of all of the races and so forth, and shrunk it by 5%.
So what should have been a 20-inch ballot picture was now only 19 inches, but then they printed it on a 20-inch piece of paper.
So to the naked eye, if you just glanced at two ballots side by side, you'd say, yeah, they both look like ballots.
But if you look closely, you'll see one of them has a half-inch margin at the top and bottom, and the other one has a one-inch margin at the top and the bottom, because it's really a shrunken picture, a 19-inch picture of a real ballot.
Well, when you shrink it like that, then all of the tiny marks, the little black boxes that form a frame around the ballot, so that the machine can line up when you mark a bubble, it says that's in row 37, column 4, or whatever, Those timing marks are too small and the software that checks to see if it's a legal ballot is very precise.
And if one of those boxes is too small or too narrow, it says bad ballot and spits it out.
So the final choice was, okay, you don't want to spoil the ballot and, and try again.
What you can do is put it in door number three and we'll count it for you later.
So if I wanted to, if I want, if everyone's going to vote same day, what a perfect way to not only discourage voters, but make it so those ballots go in a box.
I heard box number three or whatever, never get, I lost chain of custody, all everything.
Now, And then they wonder why Carrie Lake got a quarter million less votes than an auditor nobody heard of before.
I talked to one guy that worked in the state who was a Republican and I said, how do you explain The otter getting a quarter million more votes than Carrie Lake.
And he goes, well, something about Carrie Lake, you know, she shouldn't talk more about this or something else, this thing or that thing.
Came to more things or more meetings and more campaigning.
I said, I said, she campaigned more than anyone.
I said, can you, why would that make a voter?
Why would it make a voter go?
You know what?
I'm going to vote for all the Republicans except for Carrie Lake.
I'm going to vote for this terrible Katie Hobbs.
I mean, And then you've got all this evidence.
My thing is, it was the perfect cover-up, and actually we exposed them.
Here's what I tell everybody.
By telling everybody to vote same day, it actually made them make a move to be able to steal it from Carrie Lake, and what a way to do it.
And I'd like to find the guy that ordered that going, hey, let's shrink the ballot images by an inch.
And then they won't work, and they won't know why, and it was 60% of the Republican areas.
That was very suspect.
But my point being is one of the things I want you to answer is Everyone, a lot of people, a lot of Republicans, I was just at CPAC and I said, hey, quit putting out the narrative that we have to be like the Democrats and ballot harvest and don't everybody vote early?
Because look what happened in Arizona to Carrie Lake.
People got discouraged.
You know, we need to vote early and we need to get this done.
And because if we get something happens like it happened in Arizona same day, you know what I say?
What happened in Arizona the same day is one of the best things that ever happened because otherwise we caught them.
So I compare it to a race.
I compare it to, let's say it's a NASCAR race, and all these cars, no matter what the brand is of their engines, of their machine, they all go, gee, that's funny.
I couldn't get my car going fast enough.
Something's wrong.
And everyone says, well, let's look inside that car.
It could be a rigged race.
And they say, nope, nope, nope.
You can't look inside our machines.
You can't look inside our cars.
Now once you, If everyone in the country for two years is talking about these electronic voting machines, wouldn't you at least make sure, like in that NASCAR race, that the cars, that the engines start when you get there?
Wouldn't you think that you would make the machines, you'd want to, if you're a machine company, I don't know which one this was, but wouldn't you make sure the machines are in fine working order before you get there so that you can steal the election inside the machines?
I mean, this just blows my mind that they, because they wanted to steal Carrie Lake's race so bad, I believe they exposed themselves.
So my question to you is, do you think it's bad advice for these people that are out there saying, we gotta be like, we gotta be going ballot harvest and vote early?
What would you say to those people?
Well, I think they're putting too much faith in the opposition.
Let's say that cheaters decided, analyzing a particular race, that they needed 100,000 fake mail-in ballots.
And there was testimony in the first day of the Arizona Senate's election committee, which, by the way, is headed by Senator Wendy Rogers.
So on the first day of that election committee hearing, there was testimony that The analysis estimated there were over 126,000 mismatched signatures on the early ballots.
Now remember, Katie Hobbs only won by 17,000 votes.
And these mismatched signatures, they put them into two categories.
One category was following the Secretary of State's list.
Like, does it start with the same letter?
Is it slanted the same way?
Because lots of times people who are left-handed will slant their letters the other way.
And then they had a category they called egregious mismatches.
So the name on the voter registration roll is John Jones and the signature on the envelope is Susie Smith.
There's no way that signature matches and yet they counted it as matched and counted that ballot.
There were ballots that had a Ballot envelopes that had a perfectly legible signature on the voter registration roll and yet on the envelope there was just an X or a squiggle, something else.
So someone who could write legibly when they got their voter registration card and then an illegible signature.
So with all of those mismatches, the projection there was that there were at a minimum seven or eight times the margin of victory.
So, about voting early, ballot harvesting, whatever, if let's just say that cheaters
in some election decided they needed 100,000 extra votes, fake votes, and then the other
side says, well, they won by 100,000 votes last time, so we're going to really beat the
bushes and get all of our people to vote by mail and we'll get 150,000 votes early.
All the cheaters are going to do is throw in another 100,000 votes and they'll have 200,000.
So like you said, when a down ballot candidate gets much higher total than a top of the ballot candidate, same thing happened in Will County, Illinois.
It's another case that I'm involved in.
So that's a suburb of Chicago, Juliet, Illinois area.
So there, the county clerk got more votes than Governor Pritzker did.
Wow.
Very suspicious.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, the only answer is, and I'll just say it, we've got to get rid of the electronic voting machines and computers in our election.
Over 50 countries have been taken by these computers, the last one being Brazil, just a few short months ago.
And we got to go to same-day voting, paper ballots, hand counting.
We're making progress everywhere, everybody.
And I want to ask you this now.
Ken Paxton made this great ruling today that you can get the cast vote records from Harris County, the ballot images.
Um, and more, I guess my question is when, when can you get that then?
And how soon would you have an analysis of that?
Well, it will be up to Harris County as to whether they comply with his order, because they have also sued Ken Paxton, the attorney general of Texas over his ruling last August.
So he made issued an opinion last August, August 24th, that said that ballots and Uh, election records had to be released immediately where people were arguing on a basis of a previous ruling that they didn't have to release it for 22 months until after, until more than 22 months after the election.
So his ruling that really opened it up said, no, the, the copy of the information on the records has to be released immediately.
You can't wait 20 months to do it.
So four counties now, Harris, Williamson, Tarrant, and Travis, which is four of the largest cities in Texas, so Houston, Fort Worth, Austin, and then the county just north of Austin, have all sued Ken Paxton to overturn his opinion.
So a lot of people don't understand how attorney general opinions work, so let me just Explain that briefly.
When a law is passed and there's some question about how it applies, then people who are qualified, such as a district attorney, or in this case, an election administrator, can ask the attorney general to decide whether the law applies this way or that way in a particular case.
Well, he cannot rule on the facts in a particular case, but he can say, My best legal opinion is that if you took this to a court, the judge would say the law should be applied this way.
And so an attorney general opinion has the force of law until the attorney general himself either modifies it or withdraws it or a court overturns it.
Or the legislature, the next time they meet, add another paragraph to the law to explain, no, we mean it to apply this way and not the other way.
So he issued that opinion that says that ballot information, like cast vote records, like ballot images, which is just the photograph of the ballot, have to be released immediately.
They cannot be withheld for 22 months.
These four counties have now sued Ken Paxton.
And in order to overturn that opinion so that those would no longer be available.
So since they have already suited him for that, I'm not expecting them to send me the cast vote record and ballot images very quickly.
But they are now on notice.
That they have a time schedule.
So they say in the law that when the Attorney General orders them to release them, they have so many days to do it.
So the clock is ticking on them.
And when I get it, I and other Texas researchers, we have great citizen auditors all over Texas who are cranking away at the data we have.
We will get on it right away and get some preliminary results very quickly.
Well, that's that is.
Really good news, but it brings up the question, everybody.
Why would these four counties Opposed Ken Paxson, the Attorney General, just to get passport records under the Freedom of Information Act, and we got them everywhere else.
Why would Texas, these four counties, not want to give them up, everybody?
I'll tell you why.
Because it proves machine manipulation, computer manipulation.
We've got to melt down these machines and turn them into prison bars.
I'm going to tell you some other great news going on in Texas right now, doctor, that you might not be aware of.
I have another group that reached out to me, and by the way, one of them is Clint Curtis, which I think you know who he is.
Clint Curtis, everybody, is a Democrat.
And he actually voted for Biden.
He's still a Democrat.
But significantly, if you go watch the Moment of Truth Summit right here on Frank's Feast, go to the Clint Curtis section, he was the one back in the early 2000s, everybody, that set the first algorithms to steal elections with machines.
And you're going, what?
Yes, it's true.
But he said it, then the Republicans started doing it, and then he raised the flag that they were using it to, his algorithms or his, to steal elections, he believed the Republicans were doing it to the Democrats.
And so he showed his system, or how he broke into the machines, showed it to the world, and what manifested out of that, he's been trying to get rid of the machines ever since, everybody, we work with him.
The Netherlands actually called him, the country, and said, hey, now that you've got us so you can break into these machines, how do, well, we feel we're vulnerable.
How do we make them so you can't break in?
And he goes, he said, you can't.
He said, throw them in the ocean.
And the Netherlands, I don't know what they did with the machines, but they got rid of them.
Everybody in five months, they went to paper ballots, just like the UK, just like Germany, just like France.
And just like we're going to be in the United States.
In the state of Texas right now, there's many, many counties and many, the meetings coming up, which I'm going to, I'm not even going to say who we're going to meet with the politicians, but we have some big meetings coming up with Clint Curtis and some others from Texas.
These people working hard on this to make Texas machine free.
And what we're, what we're, what we're going to be showing them is a new paper ballot hand counted system.
Now this system, Doctor, I haven't even seen yet, but I thought that Linda Rant out of Missouri had the best system ever in history.
But remember, she can't use cameras because Missouri law says you can't use cameras.
You can't use anything newer.
It's got to go before the legislature.
Well, in Texas, you can use cameras.
And it's an amazing system.
And I believe Texas is now right in the spotlight to get rid of these machines.
And what a great ruling by Ken Paxton.
And thanks for coming on and sharing that with us.
And keep up.
I know you've worked so hard out there in all these states.
And you're a hero in this country.
And God bless you.
And let us know what you find in those records.
And come on anytime.
Thank you, Mike.
Good to be with you.
That's the Lindell Report with your host, Mike Lindell.
Be sure to support his work by going to MyPillow.com.
Use that promo code L77.
Don't forget the slipper sales.
25 bucks for slippers that were $150, now $25.
Limit 10 per person.
Check that out along with everything else there.
And tune in tomorrow night and on demand at LyndellTV.com, FrankSpeech.com for the Lyndell Report with your host, Mike Lyndell.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection