All Episodes
Previous Next
March 4, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
59:06
The Lindell Report (3-3-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
2.0!
Wow, it's so soft and smooth.
It's cool to the touch.
How did you do that?
Well, we took MyPillow's patented bill and combined it with this new technology that we didn't have back then when I invented MyPillow to bring you the best pillow in history, MyPillow 2.0.
Just like all of you, I never imagined that my pillow could get any better.
That's why I haven't changed it in nearly 20 years.
Then I heard about a revolutionary new technology and I knew I had to bring it to you all.
MyPillow 2.0 is truly the next generation of my pillow.
The MyPillow 2.0 is cooler and softer than the last MyPillow.
It is so comfortable to sleep on at night.
I look forward to going to bed and I wake up well rested in the morning.
Sleep is all about temperature and height.
MyPillow 2.0's patented adjustable fill is going to give you the exact individual support you need from your head to your bed.
And now here's where it gets even better.
We've all experienced those temperature-related sleep interruptions where you get too hot, you toss and turn, you flip your pillow over to the cool side.
Well, all that's gone with my brand new MyPillow 2.0 cooling fabric that's made with temperature-regulating thread.
The best sleep just got even better.
Whether you have a MyPillow or not, you need to get the brand new MyPillow 2.0.
Call or go to MyPillow.com now.
Use your promo code, and for a limited time, when you buy one, you'll get a second one absolutely free.
You're sleeping even better!
And cooler too!
And you're looking good!
Feeling good!
I knew you would!
Visit MyPillow.com MyPillow.com
MyPillow.com Hello, I'm Mike Lindell.
And as you know, my passion is to help each and every one of you get the best sleep of your life.
That's why I created my new Giza Dreams bed sheets.
I started by using the world's best cotton called Giza.
It's only grown in a region between the Sahara Desert, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River.
It's ultra soft and breathable, but extremely durable.
I guarantee you they'll be the most comfortable sheets you'll ever own.
I do not like my sheets.
I love my Giza Dream Sheets.
Call or go to MyPillow.com right now to take advantage of Mike's limited time offer.
Use the promo code on the screen and when you buy one set of Giza Dream Sheets, Mike will send you another set absolutely free!
That's right, buy one set of Giza Dream Sheets and get another set absolutely free!
Choose from a variety of colors in solid, stripes, and new flannel sheets.
Order now!
For the best night's sleep in the whole wide world, visit MyPillow.com!
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope, by offering practical
and achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedoms.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
All right, welcome, glad you're with us.
Mike is, well, he's at CPAC, and he's been swamped doing media for the last two days, and he's in some meetings now, cannot be with us tonight due to some meetings he's got there, some very important meetings related to the election bureau, crime bureau, the election crime bureau that he's working on.
So we're going to hold down the fort.
We are going to be joined by Jeff O'Donnell that's got some very big news tonight.
Jeff, welcome back to the broadcast.
Thank you for joining us.
Hey, how are you doing?
Can you hear me okay?
Yeah, I can hear you.
I hear you great.
Thank you for being back with us.
I know Mike's gonna be eager to see this.
We'll put it up online and he can watch it on demand.
But Jeff, you got a big story tonight, don't you?
Yeah, yeah, I have a... I have new information that has come to light from the Castle Records.
As you know, we've been looking at those for quite some time, and everybody out there did their job, and we got so many of them.
By the way, stop for the lay people real quick.
Tell them what a cast vote record is, before we keep going.
Absolutely, absolutely.
A cast vote record is something that's generated by most of the election server software vendors, and it is essentially a spreadsheet.
You probably know what a spreadsheet is, you know, and so every line is a ballot, and it has what the What the votes were on that ballot, what precinct it was from, and how it was cast, whether it was early vote or mail-in or whatever.
It doesn't have any information about the voters, so it doesn't cause any of those kind of problems.
But it does, the important thing is, it does, in a proper cast vote record, let you replay the election vote-for-vote from beginning to end, and even portions of it, which we're going to talk about here.
Excellent.
That's great.
Now we'll pick it up from there.
All right.
So, well, we've been really working on, we've identified many, many problems with these casserole records that point to manipulation, fraud, whatever, whatever you want to call it.
Right.
What really happened though, this recently just sort of popped out through Through, I guess, hard work, is that there is a tremendous, even more of a similarity between how the elections happened in different counties all across the country.
And really what this came out was, I did a very deep dive on Colorado.
And what I found when I did that is that, as you're going to see, I'll give you the You know, the lead first, and that is that of 64 counties in Colorado, 43 of them show a shocking similarity, more than a similarity, identity in the way the votes were cast.
These are some red counties, some blue counties, some bigger counties, some smaller counties.
And I hope you have the little, the graphs I sent you.
Yeah, Logan has those.
You want to show those guys in the control room?
Yeah, because that will help me go through it with you.
OK.
You got them there, Logan, Thomas?
Graphs that you sent over on Logan's email?
Oh, good grief, guys.
Gotta go pull them up.
I told you guys to have that ready.
Um, all right.
Let me get them up.
I can tell you more about what you're gonna see, and then it'll be even more, hopefully, easy for people to grasp.
OK.
I mean, a lot of the things that we found, a lot of the people, a lot of things that have been found by a lot of people are are essentially, you know, proof or near proof of manipulation, but a lot of them involve some statistics or some mathematical terms that if you didn't major in math in college or pay really, really good attention, it can be a little lost on people.
And so I was hoping to come up with something that would be so simple that anyone It's gonna be able to comprehend it and I believe that's finally where we are here now Now the email this is the one you sent today.
It doesn't anything to do with Miami does it?
No, okay.
So this the ones you're sent are they related to Colorado?
Yes.
Okay.
So did you find those in there guys?
Logan Logan Get Logan in there.
I can always tell when Logan's not in Master Control.
Everything goes sideways when he's not in there.
Someone find Logan and get him back in Master Control, please.
Tell you what, let's take a quick break before I lose my temper, and let's come back.
We'll have everything and be ready to go as I asked them to do before the show started.
So let me have a come-to-Jesus meeting with a few people, and we'll be right back after this break.
Don't go away.
Logan!
Looks like you've been sleeping well.
Megan!
He's back!
The MyPillow guy!
And you're looking good!
Still feeling good!
Well just when you thought it couldn't get any better, we've got the best pillow ever!
MyPillow 2.0!
When I invented MyPillow, it had everything you'd ever want in a pillow.
Well, now there's new technology that makes it even better.
MyPillow 2.0 has my patented fill combined with a cooling fabric with temperature regulating thread.
MyPillow 2.0 is truly the next generation of MyPillow.
The best sleep just got even better.
Whether you have a MyPillow or not, you need to get the brand new MyPillow 2.0.
Call or go to MyPillow.com now.
Use your promo code and for a limited time when you buy one, you'll get a second one absolutely free.
You're sleeping even better.
And cooler too.
And you're looking good.
Feeling good.
I knew you would.
Visit MyPillow.com All right.
Logan's back in master control.
Everything's right with the world.
He found it.
All right.
That's why... Logan doesn't get to go away very often because that's, you know, I have to have him around to keep things running.
The other guys are good, but there's good and then there's Logan.
All right.
Welcome back, Jeff.
Logan's in master control.
We're in good hands now.
Let's go to that graph from Colorado.
Jeff O'Donnell.
So if you go to the first one, I can kind of lead you through where we're going here.
It all goes back to Mason.
If anybody who doesn't know, there are several reports on the server that was imaged by Tina Peters at Mason County in 2020, or for the 2020 election and 2021.
And I have often said that the information on that was a Rosetta Stone.
And that keeps being truer and truer because what we had is we have the evidence, we have the evidence of manipulation.
And then we also have the Cass vote record from MESA, and we were able to see the fingerprint of that manipulation in the Cass vote record.
And this is something that I call, and I'm trying to make it a thing, the MESA pattern.
I would say, you know, approximately half of the counties that I have looked at show this pattern, this particular one.
There's other patterns too, but this one is really prevalent.
And the pattern is very simple.
The blue line, just don't worry about the numbers.
The black would be the two candidates.
This is Trump and Biden.
The black would be, they were 50-50, and this is Trump's percentage at the vote as they counted the mail-in votes.
Well, Colorado was almost 100% mail-in anyway, but we only look at the mail-in so as to get rid of any kind of apples and oranges thing with With Democrats voting mail-in and Republicans voting election day.
Now let's just look at the mail-ins.
So what we have here is you can see that it dips down, like Trump is doing the worst he ever does, about a quarter of the way through or so, and then it goes up with a little bit of a jag, but the point is at that point it just keeps going up, up, up towards Trump.
That general pattern is the one that we see everywhere, and that same pattern is in 43 of the 64 Colorado counties.
Let me stop you there as a layperson, and based on what I've learned from you, Dr. Doug Doherty, from Dr. Frank, you're saying that that same pattern is in 43?
Did you just say that's in 43 counties in Colorado, that same pattern?
That's correct.
In other words, are you saying that if you were to lay a graft of those other counties on this one, they'd all look like that?
Well, they would all look like that in general, and as I described it, it goes down first and then back up.
And once it goes up, it just keeps going up the rest of the way.
So that's not natural to have that same pattern in all 43 counties, right?
Well, first of all, it's not natural because mail-in votes being pretty randomly sent out and mailed in and received.
First of all, you should not see this much of a difference as you get more votes.
As you get more votes, you should see less of a difference, of a change.
And in this case, you actually are seeing more.
So that's the first tip-off, that there is a big problem.
Does this have anything to do with that software?
It's, again, a three-letter acronym for the software that's, like, tied to your cruise control or tied to a pilot landing an airplane so he doesn't land in the mud or land too far down the runway.
I can never remember... This is an algorithm, yes.
So this is an algorithm?
So yeah, this is an algorithm at work, and as we saw, again, if we hadn't had the data in Mesa,
and a couple other places as well, if we hadn't had the actual data in the machine,
this would still look strange, but we wouldn't understand it.
Because we know what caused this in the Mesa machine, now we understand it.
Okay, let me stop you right there for a minute.
When you say because we have the data in the Mesa machine, you're referring to the data in the Mesa machine that Tina Peters, as the Mesa County Clerk, backed it up per the law, per her instructions.
She's told to back it up.
She backs it up.
Because she backs it up, it's not able to be erased by an update.
Therefore, she has that data.
Correct?
That is correct.
And now you're saying because of that data you can make sense of this that you've just found?
150 percent, sir.
Which means why they're so angry with Tina Peters, correct?
Exactly, exactly.
You're going to see here before this is over why Secretary of State Griswold has worked so hard to keep any other of her county servers from being analyzed.
Okay, and now this chart right here that you're showing, you have just found this recently, right?
Well, actually, this pattern I identified some months ago.
And that was when I say, you know, like I said, we have found signs of manipulation in almost all of the cash flow records we've looked at.
This is one of them, and it happens to be the most prevalent one.
Okay, and just to reiterate, the reason you were able to get this chart and have this is because people turned in by the thousand cast vote records, correct?
Absolutely.
Okay, so when Mike Lindell was telling everybody, turn in cast vote records, turn in cast vote records, turn in cast vote records, and those are public documents, they would go to their city, their county, whatever, get those, turn those over, you would get those, and that allows you to see how these are coming in, correct?
Absolutely.
One led to the other to the other.
We really have a chain of events that goes back to, you know, late 2021, really, when we started looking at these.
And, you know, it's been a, you know, a case where we almost have a, we had an embarrassment of riches.
We got, frankly, I did not expect to get as many casserole records as we got.
How many did you get?
Well, if you count them all up from all the different elections and that, you know, we're easily at a thousand.
And so the point is that, you know, when a state like Colorado, in which we have, I believe, all of them, we have all of them in Nevada, the point is the more you have in a particular state, the more you're able to compare and figure out the commonalities and the differences and all that kind of stuff.
So your confidence level and what you're doing just keeps up, up, up.
And so Colorado, and there's other states, a ton in Georgia also.
And that's been helping us figure out what they did in that state.
How would you get all of them for Colorado?
How'd you get all the cast vote records for Colorado?
Well, you know, there was actually a number of people who responded to the call.
There was one particular patriot named Linda in Colorado.
Who actually took it on herself to marshal the forces and get these.
It was quite the effort.
Sometimes they had to ask multiple times.
But the point is, we got I think all of them.
We might still be missing one small county, but I need to double check.
Wow.
Wow, wow.
Okay, so anyway, I wanted to lay down those things so the audience keeps up with us here, but particularly two things.
Because we have, because you guys have, the insides of the machine of those votes from Mesa County, Tina Peters, the hero, this is one reason they've gone after her, because Mike Lindell called for people to turn these cast vote records in, because you did this work, we now are to this point, right?
Yes, yes.
All right.
Um, I don't want to take it again.
I can't take total credit for it because again, all of those things had to happen, right?
Tina had what she did all these other other other cyber people, computer people have helped in the analysis and, you know, Just figuring out, hey, does this make sense?
Right, right.
So now that we've laid down those markers that this is why these have been historic events along the way to get us where we're going, pick it up right there and tell us what else you found in these 43 counties.
Okay.
Next slide, please.
Next slide.
All right.
Oh, this is like a continuation.
I just wanted people to understand.
That what caused that, when we saw that graph where it was stuttering and then, you know, very pro, it was pro-Biden and then suddenly shot up Trump.
This is actually every hundred ballots.
So it's approximately the size of the batch size that they used in Colorado and Mesa.
And it's not hard to see the pattern as it starts very low and then just starts to get higher and higher and higher, more spread out toward the top and things like that.
That's another thing, if you look at it, those are actually each individual hundred ones.
That is not natural.
That's not how people vote.
That's how computers vote.
Unfortunately.
Wow.
And so, all right, go to the next slide.
Okay, next slide.
Here we go.
All right, so this represents, I don't know if you can see, but they're labeled at the bottom.
These are the 43 counties in Colorado that fit that Mesa pattern.
Now, you may wonder, what about the rest of them?
There's 64.
Well, many of the counties are small.
And if you've got, you know, maybe less than 2,500 or so votes in a county, that isn't enough for the pattern to show up.
There's just not enough data to do that.
So, these are all of the counties.
The only larger county that does not fit the Mesa profile is Arapahoe County.
And I wish I knew why.
There's something different about how they did their election in Arapahoe.
And if anybody out in Colorado uh wants to sniff into that that would be helpful to everybody so yeah so all right here's the point all right they actually that i for my own purposes the blue are the the the county the smaller counties uh less than the less than the the average and the orange ones are the bigger counties so now on the left hand side is is that this is the um i'm not really sure i get this absolutely right because this is this is really important because uh
What this is all based on is this.
I told you in the Haskell record, you can replay the election from beginning to end.
So, you know, you can go right to the middle of the election, like the dead center, the middle vote that was ever cast.
And you can see what, I'm using Trump, but this actually applied to many races, not just the presidential, but you see Trump, so let's say Trump might have had 52% of the vote when half the votes were counted.
And then you know at the end what that was.
Let's say he had 60% at the end, right?
So that means, and where this kind of breakthrough was, that what you're seeing here is a number between 1.1 and 1.4, I guess, or something like that, that is the number that you multiply Trump's midpoint percentage by to get his ending percentage.
A very small range, between 1.1 to 1.4 or so, with an average of 1.15.
So the point is, if you take the middle of an election, we're halfway done, we've got half the votes count, half the mail-in votes count, and you take Trump's percentage and multiply it by 1.15, you will be very, very close to what his ending percentage ended up being.
That is predictive.
In other words, we can predict the end of the election from the middle of the election, and that is impossible.
Yeah, so the only way that that can be done is because there's an algorithm running, right?
There's an algorithm running, and this is, you know, I'm sure that in their little plots here, they didn't like have anything 1.5 or anything like that.
This is a side effect of the way that they were sorting and adding and changing around the votes.
This is a side effect.
That is, as I said, it's remarkably close for all of these 43 counties.
And you shouldn't be able to do that.
Why should we have counties if they're all going to act the same as far as how they get out and vote and what they decide to do?
You know, secondly, I guess we should just stop the election at the middle and just multiply by 1.15 and we'll know who won.
There you go.
That'll save a lot of time.
You know, the clerks are saying they can't count all those votes if we go to hand counting.
Why don't we just count half of it and multiply by 1.15?
Because that's what the machines are doing.
Good grief.
In a way.
And do you have any more indication after all this, Jeff, as to who wrote this algorithm, where it originated from, who was behind it?
Are we talking China?
Are we talking the CIA?
Any ideas?
I have four main suspects.
All are based in America.
Really?
Yes.
Does one of them involve the CIA?
Probably all of them in some way or fashion.
But I would say this, not necessarily.
Did they have their hand in it?
I have other reasons for believing the answer to that is yes.
So you do believe the CIA has been involved in this?
I do think that the CIA is involved in this.
I think China is involved.
I think we saw in 2020 a monumental coalition of people who did not want America to be great again.
Now you haven't, huh, you didn't see my show from the other night, did you?
Where I talked about, let me bring up the title of the show just to get it right, because the title of the show says it all.
I did an hour and 15 minutes on this and it was titled, let's see here...
uh...
where'd it go? uh...
Well, anyway, it was about the CIA, China, drug cartels, all working.
Here we go.
China, Mexican drug cartel, and CIA subvert the rule of law to transform America.
Here's the hour and 15 minutes.
The CIA, China, drug cartel and their election theft schemes.
And when you talk about Sinaloa drug cartel, well, they're in a relationship with China.
China's providing the precursor chemicals to make the fentanyl to drag across the border.
So we know that China and the drug cartel are working together.
We know the CIA with fast and furious and other things is a lot is also working and our government through the CIA the DEA are working with the drug cartel So we know we've got a corrupt cartel then you add in the fact that there's overwhelming evidence that China has bought up a big vast amount of our Congress our companies influence and penetrated penetrated major major national security Apparatuses.
Then there's the evidence that CIA has been corrupt almost from day one, that the CIA director, John Brennan, admitted he voted for communist Gus Hall, candidate for president in the 70s and 80s, still became CIA director.
In other words, when you say I'm worried about China, the CIA, well then you and I are on the same track here.
The same coalition that is working from within.
And then this clown in the White House, who is highly compromised, and more and more information is coming out tonight about, you know, obviously, Hunter Biden-linked Chinese military company is assisting Russia in war against Ukraine.
You know, it's assisting Russia in war against Ukraine.
And then we go look at the relationship between China and Russia, the Sino-Russia relationship, the Sino, S-I-N-O being a word for Chinese, this Chinese-Russian relationship with their agreement that basically has, in their own words, no limits to the relationship.
They're working together.
So when we are fighting a war through Ukraine with Russia, we're fighting it with China, also.
And China's one of the groups trying to bring us down, working with these people that have been captured here in the U.S.
I think we're all on the same path, and you and I are not even doing our research together.
No, we are on the same path, and I've seen the, you know, what detail there is on what you're talking about, and it looks entirely credible to me.
You know, look, in some ways here, in a lot of ways, you know, because we do not have a functioning Justice Department, We have to do the investigation ourselves, and we are investigating a RICO case here, Racketing and Corrupt Organizations, okay?
And when you do that, as I've heard Mayor Giuliani speak about this too, you know, you unfortunately, or fortunately, you have to attack this from the bottom up.
You've got to clean out and turn the street people, who then will turn the people above them, who turn the people that, And so, you know, when we're talking about people like Edison Research and Seidel, and we're talking, I'll even say when we're talking about Dominion and ES&S and Hart, we're talking subcontractors to the main bond villains.
That's what we're doing.
Did you see my letter I showed on the screen the other night where December 10th, 2020,
Congressman Bill Posey is asking the Inspector General over the CIA,
have you investigated the relationship between the CIA and the voting machine companies?
I did not see that, no. Oh, you haven't seen that? Oh, I need to bring that up for you real quick,
because again, you and I are tracking on the same ground.
We're coming to the same conclusions independently of each other.
Let me bring that up here and show on the screen.
Here we go.
Here it is right here.
December 10th, 2020.
This is from Congressman Bill Posey of Florida to the Inspector General, the Honorable Pete M. Thompson, Inspector General, Office of the Inspector General, Central Intelligence Agency.
All right?
December 10, 2020.
I stumbled on this a few weeks ago.
Just in my research, I stumbled on it.
He says, My understanding is that the origins of Smartmatic began in Venezuela under the regime of Hugo Chavez.
The election software was used for the presidential elections that President Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro won.
In each of those elections, opposition parties claimed that fraud occurred.
In fact, a 2013 US Department of State country report on Venezuela
states in the executive summary that authorities announced that Nicolas Maduro had won the
presidency April 14, 2013, by a 1.49% margin amid allegations of pre- and post-election fraud based on a
number of irregularities, including government interference, the use of state
resources by the ruling party, and voter manipulation. Furthermore, in a recent sworn affidavit
filed with the Georgia election law, a key witness described first-hand
the state's efforts to prevent I understand the Smartmatic went on to participate in every Venezuelan election until 2018.
and quote, was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way that the system could change the vote of
each voter without being detected, end quote. I understand that Smartmatic went on to participate in every Venezuelan
election until 2018. The witness goes on to state that in 2013 election, the quote Smartmatic electoral management
system was used to manipulate change results for the person to succeed Hugo Chavez, end quote. It is concerning, writes
Congressman Bill Posey, that the creation of such a system is not a coincidence.
the creation of such a system could have circumvented the will of the Venezuelan people.
And contributed to keeping Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro in power while their people suffered greatly.
Knowing of the origins of Smartmatic software and the Central Intelligence Agency, was the Central Intelligence Agency aware of its use in Dominion equipment during previous US elections?
If so, did the CIA report the vulnerabilities of this software to other federal agencies or state?
Has the Inspector General's Office conducted a national security investigation on the CIA's connection, if any, with Smartmatic, Seidel, or any other company associated with election software or hardware?
Did foreign actors interfere in our elections in states that use this questionable software?
And finally, please provide all relevant documents that deal with the question above.
You think he got any?
I'm told by his staff, no.
The citizens of the United States, says Congressman Posey, need assurance that a free and fair election occurred.
Without a legitimate investigation by the CIA and Inspector General, the outcome of the election results will be questioned by many Americans.
Therefore, I urge you to fully investigate the CIA's role involving these election companies.
Notice he stopped asking questions and went to making a statement.
I think he knows the answer.
What do you make of that?
Uh, it's, there, there is, there is definite ties.
All of these current systems, Smartmatic, Dominion, whichever one you want to name, there is common DNA in them.
And, uh, we, we've, of course, you know, we've known this, you know, for instance, right before, or at least right before, right after the 2020 election.
But, uh, what, what happened was, you know, again, this is what they, they do all the time.
Uh, the press went and said, Dominion, do you have anything for Smartmatic in your system?
No, of course not.
So then at that point, that's the story.
Well, Dominion denies it.
Never happened.
Debunked.
So you're called crazy, you know, on the, on the, on the conspiracy theory bingo card, which by the way, I almost have a full card now.
I don't know how yours is doing.
You know, on my conspiracy thing, conspiracy theory, bingo card.
You know, the common ancestry of all these voting machines.
I might as well just fill it in now.
Well, we were called conspiracy theorists.
Even Fox News had it early on when the coronavirus broke out.
They actually said, I was on the air and the TV was on in the corner, and Fox News was reporting, along with everybody else, that if you said the coronavirus came from the Wuhan lab, you were a conspiracy theorist.
Well, now they're all admitting it because they're trying to deflect from the fact that it actually came from the United States of America and then went over there and was funded.
So now they're willing to admit.
But you were a conspiracy theorist if you said that, as I was saying, so you're absolutely right.
Let me show you something else you may not have seen.
Go ahead, you were going to say something?
No, I was merely going to say that if there's anybody in the audience who has good access to legal history filings, legal briefs, things like that, there's something that actually Dennis Montgomery and I have been looking into this together.
And in the late 2000s, Dominion, Smartmatic, a bunch of those companies were actually at war.
They were suing each other like crazy while they were buying out pieces of each other at the same time, and that led to some lawsuits.
These lawsuits, again, these weren't amicable lawsuits.
These were basically one side calling the other monsters kind of lawsuits.
And where their suits There's discovery, and where there's discovery, there's public.
And I don't know if anyone has gone back into the archives to see what they might have said about each other and what particular evidence they might have had about each other back in those days that could possibly put this to rest once and for all as far as the incestuous relationship between the voting companies.
Well, very interesting you use the term, there's similar DNA among them all.
You know, if anyone does a search of all the companies that the CIA has assisted or ceded money to, people will be shocked to find out, and that your government is going around buying up stock and investing in these companies.
I mean, they're taking our money and investing in companies and buying stock in companies, and one of them is Google.
I reported this week on the Worldview Report some of the seed money that helped get Google going from the CIA.
So again, go to, you know, my listening friends, go do a study of all the companies the CIA has helped to start, and then ask yourself, is it possible the CIA could be indeed working with these voting machine companies?
It's just a question.
Apparently the U.S.
Congressman Bill Posey thinks there are.
Let me show you something else I would like you to respond to.
In my research over the last month and a half on these voting machine companies and their ties to the CIA, that's how I found the Bill Posey letter.
I also found this.
Look at this.
March 9th, 1984, Helms, Jesse Helms, you remember Jesse Helms, right?
Oh yeah.
U.S.
Senator from North Carolina.
Helms says CIA rigged election in El Salvador.
Interesting article.
He goes on to say that, look, the CIA got in there, and instead of backing the guy that would be very consistent with values of America, they backed the Socialists.
And then he goes on to say that not only did they back the Socialists, the CIA, that the CIA provided this Socialist with 400 precinct organizers, A model press operation, technical advice, and funds for the, quote, computer voter registration system that disenfranchised 20% of the voters in the first time around, end quote.
So here he is, the United States aided in the voter registration procedures.
Here's U.S.
Senator U.S. Senator Jesse Helms saying the CIA was involved in
using computers to steal the election in 1984 for the Socialists in El Salvador. We have a video
we played the other night of James Woolsey, former CIA director, who I've met in
person, being interviewed by Laura Ingram, and he goes on to lay out all the elections the CIA has
been involved in helping flip those elections. And then when she says, are you guys still doing
this? He smiles, he goes, and he laughs and she laughs. OK, so we have a former CIA director
on camera admitting to this and that it's probably still going on. It is.
Um, one of the, the situation, you know, whenever you ask me, you know, who the perpetrator, who the perps are, you know, who's doing this, it reminds me of somebody I talked to a long time ago, and it was in the context of investigating the Kennedy assassination.
And they said, well, they said, first we had to figure, first we had to find who in Dallas
didn't want to kill Kennedy that day.
Because that's the implication.
That's just because of the point that so many, so many different organizations and government things,
they had to have reason.
It's like, yeah, we might be quicker to just, you know, figure out who didn't, than who was involved in it.
Well, look at this.
Look at this right here.
This I showed you the other night.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The CIA's murder of my uncle was a successful coup d'etat from which our democracy has never recovered.
Don't you think an agency that could be involved in the murder of a president in broad daylight could also have practiced color revolutions overseas, like I predicted, in numerous TV shows in the summer of 2020, based on reading their own reports, the reports of the liberals, like their Transition Integrity Report.
The things they were saying and we were reading on the air in 2020 led us to do numerous shows on the fact we were warning of a color revolution coming and that it would be the intelligence community that would carry it out.
So I've been on this trail, sniffing this trail, since before the 2020 election.
I'm still on it and here we have the nephew of President Kennedy saying, oh yeah, it's well known the CIA murdered my uncle.
Unfortunate flashpoint when the CIA realized that they could do anything and get away with it.
Right.
Because if they can do that, then there's obviously nothing that's beyond their grasp.
Yes.
Well, keep going, but I think, you know, I have to come back to say, who writes this software?
Who writes the algorithm?
Are you telling me that regardless of the computer machine company, we keep seeing the same things regardless of the machine company being used?
Yes, and I'll get to that in a second.
If you bring that slide back up.
All right.
The one that we were before.
All right.
One with the bars.
Okay.
Now, I just want to point out how important this is.
Again, it enables you to predict the end from the middle.
Now, go to the next slide, please.
Now, This is the same 43 counties.
It's a little busy, but stay with me here.
Every county has a blue bar and an orange bar.
The blue bar is the Trump percentage at halfway through the accounting.
The orange bar is the Trump percentage at the end of the accounting.
Every single one, first of all, goes up.
And look how generally similar, when you look at it this way, the difference or the rise is between the one and the other.
This is what I'm talking about.
I'm saying this is not possible.
Even if this was just Colorado, it would not be possible, but you're going to see it's actually more.
Can you go to the next slide unless you have a question?
No, keep going.
Can you guys make it a little smaller?
So there we go.
There we go.
There we go.
There's a little example sampling.
Remember I said 1.15 to 1.4 or something?
Right.
What's the magic number?
Well, Clark County, Nevada.
Washoe County, Nevada.
Pima, Arizona.
Los Angeles County, California.
Our only Smartmatic county left.
1.2 and Douglas County, Oregon, 1.1.
You have here ES&S.
You have here Heart.
You have Smartmatic.
You have Dominion.
Again, So you have to make sure to always understand you're rattled
you're saying there in Colorado where you keep seeing this you have
Dominion smartmatic and who else heart Heart and clear ballot. We've seen them in all of us and
smart. We have heart yes and s smartmatic clear ballot
And isn't that what Amy Klobuchar isn't Amy Klobuchar the one who in?
that that Clip from what is it kill chain? They show the graphics
they show the graphics of Those three companies as she's speaking you remember that
Yes, I do. So isn't that interesting that she's saying hey, we've got a problem here
With these three companies, I don't remember her getting sued do you
No, I don't remember her getting sued. I don't remember her getting sued
No, no, I don't.
And what this says, in my opinion, again, I tend to think of this, like I said, as a RICO case, or maybe, you know, a decent Bond movie, as terrifying for what they're doing, as these Dominion, the SNS, Clear Ballot, you know, what this shows is they are not at the top of the food chain.
Right.
This would indicate to me that they have been giving marching orders to do this by someone higher up on the food chain.
And that's where we go.
And look at this screenshot.
Look at this screenshot real quick because this is to your point.
This is from Kill Chain.
The Cyber War on America's Elections 2020.
And what do they show?
I stopped the screen.
Dominion Elections Systems and Software, which I guess obviously is the acronym ES&S, and HART, okay?
And then, boom, they show it.
I know you guys want to pull up the audio, you can.
Pull up the audio, listen to what she says then.
You ready?
Here we go.
Because there's only three companies.
You could easily There you go.
into them it makes it seem like all these states are doing different things but in fact
three companies are controlling them.
43.
There you go.
And that's what you're showing us here apparently right?
Yes that is what I'm showing you here.
This means that you know for my military friends out there command and control is at a higher
level than these voting systems.
Wouldn't this also explain your opinion I know I'm asking for your opinion but wouldn't
this also explain how the voting machine companies seem to have endless amounts of money to fight
lawsuits so my question is the federal government slash corrupt CIA with dark money, Sinola
Are they the ones funding things?
Or are they just writing checks?
I mean, I don't know.
I'm asking questions.
But isn't this the kind of thing you have to wonder?
I mean, again, I'm just asking questions.
Why would voting machine companies spend so much money fighting this?
Because they didn't seem to sue the guys at Kill Chain.
I mean, again, the whole Kill Chain movie was called Kill Chain, the cyber war on America's elections.
And it was 2020.
Why did they not sue them?
Why now Mike Lindell and other people?
And who is funding all of this?
Because it seems to me they're spending an awful lot of money for suing people who were saying something that other people were saying they chose not to sue.
Well, there are a few people in this world who do have both the money and the hatred for traditional America and Donald Trump, those things all coming together, that do have enough money to do this.
Probably all it takes is, like, maybe being able to raid $7 billion out of Facebook.
Did I say that out loud?
I'm sorry.
Or laundering money through Ukraine, which who knows where that goes to, what government agency, what dark money the government gets their hands on, and then funds what or who, right?
Yeah, I mean, you know, the Soros family, the Schwab family, I mean, those are the other ones I'm thinking of.
You have my opinion, that when you look at who has the capability, who has the money, and who has the insanity as far as their political and geopolitical leanings to do this thing, that actually becomes a fairly short list.
Thank God, because I'm not going to find all these people as it is.
Well, let me let you keep going, because I know you've got more to get to.
Put the back up, because I want to... Okay, throw that graph back up, guys.
I want to talk to the listeners here for a minute.
All right, go back one slide, please.
Back another slide.
Just, well, you know, it doesn't matter.
The point is, I'm going to make public on my site this particular information, so you can look at it.
And this is, see, now I have a clear direction of where to go.
That's why this is so exciting.
And this is a breakthrough, people.
This is proof.
I challenge any of you in any of these counties listed here or on the next page, get a meeting.
Go meet your county clerk and say, explain this.
Explain why your pattern of voting here in rural California, or I'm sorry, rural Colorado, matches L.A.
County.
Or any of the other ones.
Are the people here that much similar to those people?
How can you explain that?
And keep asking until they give you an answer or they admit that they don't have it, which it will be number two in these cases, because there is no benign explanation for this other than the fact that it was manipulated.
All right, you can go forward two from there, please.
So, yeah, so this is just the summary of what this means.
You know, again, it all comes back to figuring out what was what from MESA, and some other things as well.
The midway point always goes up from the midway, and average of 1.15, which is incredible.
I mean, you don't need a, I don't think you need a math degree to understand multiplying by 1.15, and any of you can go out to the site, you know, one of the The sites that I have that list all that have the raw data for the CASO records, you can get them yourself.
Just take the mail, you know, take out everything but the mail-ins.
And you can do your own calculation to see if your, you know, your county matches that.
You know, 1.15, again, anywhere between 1.1 and 1.4, which is still a very small, small range.
And, and, you know, many other counties, you know, do it.
All right.
Next slide, please.
I don't think that's the right slide.
What does that say at the top?
My eyes are failing me.
It says, uh, Mesa County, Colorado 2022 general election.
Oh, yes.
I was going to say, if you think they stopped after 2020, this is the governor race in the, uh, general election in, uh, last November in Mesa County.
Uh, same, same thing.
You got your dip down and then you're straight on till morning.
Um, did I send you any others?
That's always another one.
That's it.
That's it.
Okay.
Well, that's, uh, uh, I guess that is it.
Yeah, that's all I have.
But, I mean, this is, uh, this is, this is to me, ironclad proof that anyone should be able to understand.
You know, the simple question is, when you're halfway through the counting of your mail-in ballots, should you be able to know what the percentage of a candidate's going to be at the end by a simple multiplication?
And should this same calculation be able to be made regardless of the voting machine company?
That's absolutely correct.
Like I said, there are different patterns.
There's the Mesa pattern, there's the reverse Mesa pattern, which I'll show you some day, and some other things that pop up in different counties all over the place.
But once again, this is going to be the risotto stone to get that.
We're also going to work to, you know, we can probably even get those numbers down a little bit more as far as the range.
I know it's a small, tiny range right now, but, you know, being a math guy for so long, it's like, I want zero!
But yes, this is, I think in some ways, those of you who sent out requests for cast vote records, even those of you who sent out and didn't get them, It's still created pressure in points that you are completely unaware of.
And, uh, if it wasn't for, for all of you and you know who you are, uh, we wouldn't be here.
Kind of like we wouldn't be here.
If, uh, if, uh, Tina hadn't done that, I'll reiterate the manipulation that, that report three shows.
Uh, if we had not had that image, the whole thing, the image, We would never have done it.
There would have been no way on earth that anything else would have shown us that.
Wow.
So do you believe that whoever put this algorithm on there, did they have to hack into the system to put the algorithm on?
How did this get on all, it looks like all machines were involved in this.
So is this an outside hack?
Now we're to the point where I'm making speculations.
I just want to be sure about that.
Okay.
Just based on sheer of what I've seen, I'm honestly about 50-50 on whether this was baked in to the election system software, which it may have been.
Again, under who knows, under somebody else's orders to do it.
Or there could be a common... It would be possible.
For an adept programmer to have written one code that was able to be included in all of the systems.
But I don't say that to in any way reduce the blame on the vendors, on the election system vendors.
Due to the access that it would have had to have and all that, there is zero chance, in my opinion, that they wouldn't have known that this was on here, whether it was something they wrote or it was some sort of common piece of code.
But this had to be running inside the machine.
There is no other place that it could be doing this kind of manipulation.
Now again, because again, I want to make sure I understand.
Are you saying though it is, would it be possible, let's say this, would it be possible for this to be a hack from overseas?
Let's say the CIA chose to hack this from overseas to make it look like China.
Could the CIA do a hack from overseas using servers in China and then come, or working in cooperation with China, and then have it come in and hack the system and put this on there?
It is possible.
Once again, I don't think it would be possible without some degree of cooperation from the vendors themselves, but who actually went in and tinkered with the settings and said what they were supposed to do for every county and even down to the precinct level, that could have very well come there.
I mean, based on what I've seen, I think that there definitely was intrusion from China.
However, caution always needs to be taken, and I think you're very smart with what you just said.
I could go tonight- Wait a minute.
What part of what I just said did you- What you said about the DOD perhaps making us want to think that it was China.
Yeah.
Because I could go out tonight, and for the right amount of money, I could rent what's called a botnet of Chinese, basically a bunch of 100,000 Uh, computer systems in China that they've already taken over.
I can rent that and have them do whatever I want.
And if you saw the incoming, uh, uh, stuff for incoming, uh, network stuff, you think, Oh, that's China.
Cause it would be China, but it wouldn't necessarily be that was under control.
Again, I'm not saying that to eliminate any, uh, uh, culpability here on China, because there's so much evidence from so many places.
But you're right, if the DoD wanted it to look today like Russia did a complete shutdown of America, a denial of service, they could do it, and for all the world it would look like it came from Russian servers, Russian machines, but it wouldn't have.
It actually would have been, in my imaginary thing here, the Department of Defense that did it.
I'm actually afraid of something like that happening right now.
You're afraid of what?
Say that again, I'll make sure the audience understands.
I'm actually afraid, due to some information that I've seen, which is not extremely well vetted, but when you see how these people have been doing things, there are very strong elements in our country that want us at war.
Yes.
They want us, a lot of them want us at war with Russia.
And so I've been, you know, I'm not the only one.
I'm sure there's been a lot of little chatter lately about a false flag that might be happening.
And it's something that would get everybody upset at Russia and justify us putting troops on the ground in Ukraine.
I'm very afraid of that.
And we need to keep our eyes wide open.
Well, you and I are on the same page.
Tonight on Brennan House Live, I'll have General Michael Flynn with me for the first few minutes tonight, starting at 7.30 Central.
Then I'll have others on, and I'll be presenting some information that I believe, again, is consistent with what my hypothesis has been, which is the Biden regime was put into power to get us into war.
They knew that Donald Trump would do his best to make peace and not go to war.
The military-industrial complex, the DOD, the CIA, the powers that be want to go to war.
War checks all the boxes.
We have banks failing.
We have derivatives in these banks.
They're upside down.
They want to use more catastrophe on a global scale to push and justify the idea of a new world order where we can end wars if we just all give up our sovereignty.
There's a lot to be accomplished by going to war and Donald Trump was standing in the way of that because he didn't want to go to war.
He was willing to try to work it out and make peace so there couldn't be war.
And I believe they put a guy into power whose job, and the people around him, their job is to neuter America, destroy our military, make our troops sick, kick out the people with transgenderism who are opposed to transgenderism, fill it up as a social experiment, and I believe that's what they're setting us up for is a
two front war and then they can bring down the power grid they can
collapse your banking system they can do a lot of things to bring down America
which has been the worst thing that's ever happened to us and I think that's what they're setting us up for
and I think that's what they're setting us up for and I think that's what they're setting us up for
Yes, that's magaraccoon.com.
in a way largely as a Judeo-Christian culture and a free market system, which is the very
antithesis of the New World Order.
So I think you and I again, independently, are on the same track.
And you and I don't sit around and talk about this, do we?
No, no, we don't.
We're both very busy doing our own thing.
Give your website again, will you please?
Yes, that's magaracoon.com.
M-A-G-A-R-A-C-C-O-O-N.com.
Incredible report tonight.
Incredible report.
Thank you so much, Jeff.
Absolutely.
That's Jeff O'Donnell tonight for the Lindell Report.
Support Mike's work.
Keep this show going, this network.
MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
Get the MyPillow 2.0.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, robes, and so much more.
We need your support.
Where else are you going to get an hour like you just got, right?
And it's just so diverse.
The topics we talk about are so diverse.
And again, you need this diversity of shows and topics to really get an understanding of what's happening to our country and around the world.
I hope you appreciate it.
The Worldview Report news begins now, and then I'll be back with Brandon House Live, 730 Central, with General Michael Flynn and others.
Thanks for watching the Lindell Report.
Brandon House in for Michael Lindell, who's in meetings in Washington, D.C.
at CPAC.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
You're watching Lindell TV.
▲
Export Selection