All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 25, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:01:12
The Lindell Report (1-25-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Use your promo code and you'll get my coffee for 25% off.
And I'm gonna give you deep discounts on all my store products.
That's mystore.com.
It's my new platform for USA entrepreneurs.
Please order now.
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical and
achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedom.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
Hey, welcome.
Glad you are with us.
I was told Mike was kicking this off.
All right, so Mike's supposed to be here.
Mike's going to be joining us here in one second.
Sure.
There he is.
There he is.
Mike's going to join us.
We're also going to be joined by Kurt Olson, Michelle Swimmek, and Shelly Bush.
We have a full lineup tonight on the Lindell Report.
Hey, Mike.
Hey, Brandon.
Hey, I got to do this kind of like last night here, a little discombobulated.
We're getting ready.
I just want to give you, hold on, let me get this.
Can you guys see me OK?
We can see you great.
Okay, I just wanted to give everybody an update.
We're here in California here, and we're going in in about 20 minutes for the big, each candidate gets to talk for 30 minutes.
It's not public.
And we just went through a debate this afternoon.
Did we show it here on Frank's Speech Minute?
We carried it.
We sure did.
Okay, and I don't know if we're having problems with our app right now.
You want to check that but uh, but yeah, it was uh, it was a pretty awesome everybody and I've been dealing or talking to uh last night I met with over 65 of the 168 and it was so awesome.
So positive.
I really feel things are looking good.
I think they all want change.
At least most of them do that we talked to that came in the room.
I believe they all do they want they want change They want to see our you know our country be saved and one of the things I brought up I know I'm shaking here I'm trying to keep this level, but one of the things I'm going to be done in my speech here when I get down there everybody is up is a I'm going to be talking about the branding, the marketing and the messaging of the Republican Party.
And one of the things is, what will this new brand look like?
I mean, as you know, Brandon, when I went to California a few months ago, I was out there for about seven days with all these people that have voted Democrat and they're 25 to 35 year olds.
And they, uh, they were upset that what, uh, what, what are the, uh, the footprint of our country's in and, and they weren't going to vote again.
And a lot of the reasons where they didn't really know what the Republican party and what it does, or, you know, what did even, uh, what did even, um, um, there you go.
They, uh, that's better.
And what did even, um, Stands for it.
That's right.
And we, uh, so we have to educate them.
And I told them, I'm going to say in my speech, you know, we have to come out with this new marketing or whatever, and whether it's social media, everything to fit the footprint we're in now and, and get the message out.
What are we going to do different right now that we were, you know, to get these, uh, candidates in place, to get Republicans back and to get some wins, some return on our, on our investments.
And, uh, so I'm looking forward to that.
Um, I see we made Jimmy Kimmel again, but it wasn't about him telling me I'm going to come on his show.
It was that time, Brandon, when we didn't have the background was kind of goofy on the phone, so he made us think, Mike Lindell doesn't even know how to run an iPhone!
Oh, you mean when we had the fuzzy background in the back?
Yeah, it was kind of funny.
Tonight should be the night he responds.
He's normally about a day behind us.
We hope he gets with it.
I was just meeting with the New York Times.
I talked to them for about a half hour after we got done with the debate.
You know, I just went on and on with them, and they were good, you know, couple guys, good reporters, I think, but I don't think I said, you guys, you know, what's your agenda, you know, and stuff, and they were right up front with it, and I like that.
Just come up, if you're gonna bash me, bash me, I don't mind, you know.
But what I didn't like is right in the middle of our debate, we were, actually it was before when we were on break for the live show, There was a reporter in there for the Huffington Post, and I went up to grab a coffee and he reaches out and he goes, he goes, is there a promo code for this event?
And I'll tell you what, I just lost my point.
I stopped everything I said.
There was hundreds of people in the crowd, well over a hundred and some, and I said, this is the kind of journalists, our horrible journalists we have in this country.
Here's this guy from the Huffington Post, one of the most important elections in our country coming up this week.
To run our party, and he's asking, making some comment about a promo code, and I'm in it for what?
For a promo code?
Shame on that guy.
Shame on the Huffington Post.
Send out a real reporter out here to California Huffington Post.
Disgusting.
The guy is just absolutely horrible for even bringing that up.
And we called him out.
I called him out on everything.
Hey, is this news?
You're going to report this?
You're going to report this?
So this guy, I'm sorry.
You want to do this to us, you reporters out there?
We're going to push back.
I always do.
And speaking of, here's a good headline.
Look at this good headline at 100percentfedup.com tonight.
, you know my laptop all read it a shock poll Michigan GOP delegates overwhelmingly oppose reelection of Michigan
resident, Ronna Romney McDaniels, here's why we think Mike Lindell would do the best job, that's the headline tonight,
that's the headline tonight, and 100%fedup.com by Patty McMurray, again Michigan GOP, isn't that where she's from?
Michigan GOP delegates overwhelmingly oppose reelection of Michigan resident, Ronna Romney McDaniels,
Dot, dot, dot.
Here's why we think Mike Lindell would do the best job.
Oh, that is awesome.
Yes, that is where Ronna lives, and they were very upset in Michigan because even the candidates that won in the primaries, your Matt DiPerno, your Christina Caramo, and your Tudor Dixon, she didn't even congratulate them, Brad.
It's just, you know, that's no way to run our party.
I'll tell you, when I get down here, I did promise the people, I said, no matter what happens on Friday, we're going to be better for this.
This amazing thing, I've never been to anything like this.
I got people in the streets out here going, Mike Lindell, how can I help you?
And it's a, it's a, there's a lot of support out there.
I'm getting polls coming in and it's about, kind of split between me and Harmeet, but every one of them around, the most I've seen was 3%.
I mean, so this is what the people want.
And the 168, They're elected by the people and they, you know, you're representing their state and their people and their territory.
So I hope that they, um, uh, one of the things I said, it's great that it's a secret ballot so that they don't have to raise their hand and look over and go and run and look over and say, ah, you better not do that.
Or you're not going to get whipped out of the carrot here.
Right.
And I don't know what other news you're following.
I know that we got Kurt Olson and Michelle Swimmek and Shelley Bush coming, but we do have other news tonight that I think we ought to bring you up to speed on.
Here we go.
Another headline breaking.
Arizona finds massive issues with 2022 election.
Tabulators misread nearly a quarter of a million votes.
Here's what you should know about the ongoing fight for fair elections.
Wow, that is awesome.
And I didn't know about that one, but I will tell you another one, everybody, that another county in the United States, right here in California where I'm at, got rid of the Dominion machines, voted them out, and specifically the Dominion machines.
So, all these wins, everybody, just one after another.
They may seem small, but they're not.
Remember, they tried to block everything.
I told you the judges were going to get courageous, the accounting commission is getting courageous, the politicians are even going to get courageous.
Courage is contagious and we all got to be courageous.
I'm going to leave you with that, Brandon.
I've got to write some notes here.
This is such an important speech I have to give that I want to make sure that Make sure that I don't miss anything.
And if the Huffington Post, if you're watching, you've got a disgusting reporter down here.
here with our guest tonight and we'll guess we'll talk to you tomorrow unless
there's breaking news tonight. And if the Huffington Post, if you're
watching, you got a disgusting reporter down here. That's all I'm going to say. Talk to you later.
See ya.
Thank you, Mike.
Mike Lindell checking in if you want to support his cause to fight to return our elections to free and fair.
Don't forget about using that promo code L77 at MyPillow.com.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes, and so much more.
MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
You get savings and you're also getting great products and supporting the work of Mike Lindell as well.
Joining us now is attorney extraordinaire, one of many.
We dealt with one last night, Pat McSweeney.
Now is our good friend and former Navy SEAL, Kurt Olson.
Kurt, welcome back to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Hey, Brandon, great to be here.
Well, you have big news related to Arizona as well, don't you?
Yes, I did.
Last night, we filed a reply brief in the Arizona Court of Appeals.
We are challenging the trial court's decision.
We have also filed a motion or a petition with the Arizona Supreme Court asking them to immediately take the case.
There has been no ruling on that yet, but the case, in any event, is on an expedited consideration schedule, I will say.
The Court of Appeals issued an order on January 9th, with the final briefing happening last night, and they're going to go into conference on February 1st.
But the reason why we are asking the Supreme Court to take the case right now Because we need an immediate decision.
Arizona needs an immediate decision on this issue.
And I believe you said you're going to have Shelby Bush come on?
Yes, that's right.
She just gave some stunning evidence in front of Wendy Rogers' committee in Arizona on Tuesday about signature verification that showed, we're talking tens of thousands of signatures which are used to verify The integrity of a ballot that's being cast.
And there are literally tens of thousands of these ballots where the signatures are, you could be blind in one eye and half blind in the other and tell that they don't match.
And yet these votes are being counted.
This is a systemic problem.
I'll let her speak more to it when she comes on, but she has just done tremendous, tremendous work to show the people the truth.
And this is what's going on, is that the The establishment in Arizona, and particularly in Maricopa County, is trying to keep this from coming out.
And the more that we, people like Shelby in particular, and others have done the research, done the digging, brought this evidence out for people to see.
And it's one thing for me to sit here and say, you know, tens of thousands of signatures don't match.
But the most powerful image that anybody could see, is when she puts up those signatures and you see two signatures, and we're talking thousands of examples, that they're not even close.
This is a systemic problem on that, and that's one of the issues in our case on appeal.
I will say this.
With this case, election cases are on a different track in Arizona than any other kind of litigation.
We went to trial within six weeks of the election.
We're already up on appeal within eight, uh, about basically two months of the election.
And so this is a much faster track than normal litigation.
And even as that's continuing on and the issues are, we already believe very strongly in our claims.
We've proved our case and that the court should set aside the election under Arizona law.
But even while this is going on, people like Shelby and others, and including ourselves, are continuing the investigation, continuing to bring out more evidence of illegal activity, of misconduct, of votes that should not have been counted.
So, for example, recently, the system log files were produced, and these are for the tabulators that are used at the vote centers.
Maricopa and Katie Hobbs, the now governor, I don't know if you have it, but there's a chart I sent to you.
Here we go.
the chaos that happened on election day was really just a hiccup. And the system logs, which are
hard data. This is every time something goes on with the tabulator, there were 446 tabulators,
223 vote centers, so two tabulators per center. This shows exactly what went on.
And I don't know if you have it, but there's a chart I sent to you.
Here we go. Let's show this heat map, guys.
Yeah, actually if you could flip to, well we can go with this one.
So this chart, this is actually from a picture that was on the Maricopa County office wall, a place called MTEC.
And the deeper red portions, those are the more heavily Republican areas.
And as it shades out, that becomes less so.
And these, the little flags are vote centers.
The red vote centers are the ones where there was more than a one-to-one ratio of tabulated rejection.
In other words, every time somebody stuck their ballot in, one would be rejected.
And what this did is this caused lines out the door.
There were hours-long lines to vote, tens of thousands of voters on election day, which is primarily Republican.
I believe it's about a three-to-one ratio of Republican voters.
You had tens of thousands of voters.
People have jobs.
They have places to go.
They can't, not everybody can wait several hours in line to vote.
And when you look at what happened here, and we have evidence that this was intentional misconduct.
The tabulators and the printers that were used are supposed to be tested before the election.
They call it logic and accuracy testing.
And every single printer and every single tabulator is supposed to be tested to make sure it worked.
And they did not.
At least 132 of the 223 vote centers.
And if you could flip to the next slide, I'll show you something that was really quite stunning from the system log.
Now, which one am I going to now?
The next one, which is the time chart.
Okay, pull that down.
I'll grab the next one.
Did you send two emails?
I did.
Okay, let me grab the other one.
Yep, there it is.
There it is.
there it is.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
OK, I'm going to.
You've got a F20.
There's a chart there.
OK.
I've got that.
I've got that one and then I've got your father the declaration of Walter C. Doherty is that's it?
Okay.
All right is that it right here?
Walter Daugherty's declaration. Okay. All right. Is that it right here? No, keep
going down. Okay. That one. Okay.
So Maricopa County and Hobbs have been trying to say that the tabulator
rejections were just a hiccup.
Basically, they said these were minor technical difficulties to be expected in any election.
Well, what this shows is, right from the beginning, at the left of the chart from your screen, when you see it, that's 6 o'clock in the morning.
So the tabulators by 7 o'clock were rejecting well over 7,000 ballots every 30 minutes.
And that continued all the way over till the close of the polls at 8 p.m.
What happened on election day with these tablets, 217,000 rejections of ballots out of an election that where there were 248,000 ballots cast.
And so what that does is people are going in to cast their vote and all of a sudden the the tabulators are rejecting it.
The whole line gets backed up.
There were lines out the door, two, three hundred people in line trying to vote.
And as I said, this caused tens of thousands of Republican voters who just didn't have the time to vote.
And so this is one of our main claims.
The evidence is very strong.
The other claim is on chain of custody.
And so what Chain of Custody does is it makes sure that the votes, the ballots, as they're being picked up from drop boxes and delivered to the county centers and so forth, that nobody is taking votes, nobody is inserting votes, nobody is altering votes.
Well, the Chain of Custody procedures in Arizona are very, very strict.
Matter of fact, it's a misdemeanor crime to violate any of them.
That includes when you pick up the ballots from the drop boxes, Whoever picks them up is supposed to fill out a retrieval form to note the number of ballots that are in that drop box.
And knowing the precise number of ballots when you pick them up is key to making sure that there aren't additional ballots put into the election.
And key to making sure that there aren't ballots that are thrown away.
So what happened is, when they brought these ballots to the central county of Maricopa on election day.
And only on election day did they change.
They did not count the ballots.
There are 300,000 ballots that don't have chain of custody.
And you say, well, maybe it's just a form, you know, what does it manifest?
Well, there's over 25,000 votes that they can't account for.
So on November 9th, the day after the election, they said the vote was X.
And they're supposed to have a final count of ballots.
And we're not talking about what the vote is, just the number of ballots that they receive.
Then on November 10th, magically, 25,000 more votes show up.
And there's no chain of custody for any of this.
Now, the margin here is 17,000.
And people think, well, 17,000 is a lot of votes.
Well, it's 17,000, but it's about 0.67% out of the 1.3 million cast.
You know, it's 17,000, but it's about 0.67 percent out of the 1.3 million cast.
So it's not by the total number of votes, not really that high.
And now you have 25,000 votes minimum that there's no chain of custody.
Where did they come from?
Nobody knows.
And that's a problem.
And that shows that this election should be set aside.
The Court of Appeals or the Arizona Supreme Court are going to be hearing these issues very shortly.
I feel that our briefing and the defendant's answers to these issues really are non sequiturs.
Maricopa County admitted they didn't follow the procedures.
It was kind of funny because Hobbs and Hobbs in her brief she said that they counted the ballots at central count and Maricopa said we didn't have to count them because the the volume is too large and so they didn't get their story straight which which was kind of interesting.
Wow.
So this is a very important case.
And this, again, is the declaration of Walter Doherty.
And when was this?
When was this filed?
Where could people read this, Kurt?
I believe that that was used at the hearing at Senator Rogers' committee on Tuesday.
Shelby can speak to that, I believe.
OK.
And then you were involved in the filing that we interviewed Patrick McSweeney about last night related to Mike's First and Fourth Amendment rights, correct?
Yes, I'm involved in that case.
I was busy working on Kerry's case, so I didn't really spend a lot of time with that filing.
But I'm very well familiar with the issues there.
And that case we were stressing last night is not just about Mike Lindell.
It's about all our First and Fourth Amendment rights.
So when Mike fights these battles, he's fighting to defend constitutional overreach by our DOJ, by the FBI, that helps to defend all of our liberties and freedoms, correct?
Yeah, absolutely.
I mean, this is part of what, you know, Jim Jordan's committee, now that the Republicans have the majority in the House, they can start investigating some of these abuses of power by the FBI and the Department of Justice.
And it's just outrageous what they did to Mike.
And if they can do it to Mike, and what we're talking about, for those of you who don't recall, he pulls into a Hardee's restaurant to get a bite to eat with a friend of his who they'd just gone hunting.
And all of a sudden, he's at the drive-thru, One car pulls up to the side, unmarked, no uniforms or anything like that.
Looks over and says, well, that's kind of strange.
And all of a sudden, another one pulls up behind him, cuts off anything coming.
And then a third one comes up in front.
And all these guys surround him.
They're not in uniform.
They're not in marked cars.
And he has no idea who these people are.
And they came out and they surrounded him and forced him to give out his cell phone.
They detained him for 45 minutes.
They did not read him his rights.
Or anything like that.
And this is the kind of intimidation that is just, this is so un-American and such an abuse.
And this is just one example.
You know, Sharona Bishop, for example.
The FBI, because of what's happened in Mesa County, where Clerk Tina Peters had an image taken of the election management system before Dominion did what's called a trusted build update For every voting system in Colorado, she was concerned about that.
And so she had an image taken before that was done.
And she also had the image taken after it was done.
And if you recall, what they found is Dominion overwrote the entire operating system and destroyed all of the log files on that system.
Which is a violation of state and federal law, is it not?
It is.
It's a violation of state and federal records retention law.
What has happened, though, is that rather than going after the wrongdoers, the FBI has been bashing in doors like Sharona Bishop, taking, you know, taking their electronics, things like that.
No arrest.
And this is just wrong.
And that's what Mike's lawsuit is about.
It's to hold government agencies accountable for violating, in this case, free speech rights, as well as Fourth Amendment.
So are you saying that the government, both Colorado and the federal government, through the FBI that's overseen by the DOJ, is using FBI agents to literally kick down people's doors, cuff them, take their phones, and then not charging them with anything for pure intimidation?
So in other words, this is the kind of stuff you see in a third world country or former Soviet Union.
This is pure intimidation.
This is not about the rule of law.
It's about intimidation.
Of course, and you've seen it time and time again.
I mean, think about it.
Why is the FBI sending a SWAT team at six o'clock in the morning to Roger Stone, a 70-year-old man?
And you can see it on camera.
They have SWAT team agents.
They've already notified CNN very helpfully so that they can get their TV shot for a 70-year-old nonviolent man, you know, anything, by anything.
And they're, look, I was born in the military, support law enforcement and everything else.
But you know what?
For every law enforcement officer who wants to participate in some crap like that, it's outrageous for HRT teams to be used.
For a public, you know, a public intimidation show.
That's why they had CNN there.
That's right.
It's outrageous.
And we have, we have former, we have former FBI SWAT team members on camera like Brian Shepard a year ago this past November saying What you're saying now?
He said that was outrageous what they did to Roger.
As a former FBI agent and SWAT team member, we would have never used the SWAT team to do that for a non-violent individual.
Never.
We would have never begun anything like that.
until the media was completely cleared out of the way.
And when I asked him on camera why it was done, he agreed it was for pure intimidation
of the American people.
So where is the investigation, the criminal investigation into the agents that did that,
to the officials that authorized it?
And where's the criminal investigation into the Arizona Secretary of State?
Well, in terms of these investigations, you have Jim Jordan's committee,
who is going to be investigating the government abuses of power.
But I want to go back to your point.
This isn't just about Mike Lindell.
It's not just about Roger Stone and others.
There's a reason why the FBI notified CNN that they were going to send the HRT team to arrest Roger Stone at 6 a.m.
so that it could be broadcast everywhere.
That's an intimidating purpose.
In other words, they wanted to broadcast that out to the American people.
See what happens to you if you speak up.
This is outrageous and the agents that are allowing themselves to be tools of that are wrong.
They really ought to look in the mirror and think about all the training that they've gone through that they're being used for that purpose and look back to their oath to the Constitution and just start saying no.
And I don't know if you know this or not, I don't know if you know this or not, Kurt, but we had here in this studio about a week before Christmas one such FBI agent, Steven Friend, who was asked to be a part of the SWAT team to do this to January 6 people that were just standing on the Capitol lawn.
He said, nope, that's not how it should happen.
That's not the process.
That's not the rules.
We don't use SWAT like this.
And they said, well, you could just drive the car.
You don't have to participate, you can just be the agent that drives the car.
And he said, that's kind of like saying, well you don't have to be the one to round up the Jews, you can just be the engineer that drives the train.
Uh-uh, I'm not doing it.
And guess what they've done to him?
They suspended him, without pay, he can't go get another job, it's dragging on, he's an FBI whistleblower, Steven friend, he's been in the studio, we've had him on again a few weeks ago, but guess what's going on now?
I am told by him other white hat FBI agents are watching to see what Jim Jordan and others do with Steve Friend's case.
And if he gets the defense, if he gets the respect, if he gets the help, if he gets justice, then they're watching to say, I'll step forward now.
So we have white hats in the FBI that are watching to see what happens to Steve Frin, the former FBI guy who's still FBI but he's had his badging gun taken, suspended without paying.
They're waiting to see what happens to him and if the right thing is done by him and for the system and for our country and our court and our laws and our Constitution, they're saying then we know it's safe for us to come out and speak otherwise we're just going to be lambs to the slaughter.
So there's a lot riding on this because there are white hat guys wanting to do the right thing.
If Jim Jordan, these guys will do the right thing by guys like Steven Friend.
Well, I certainly hope that Jim Jordan and his committee do the right thing.
But there's no reason to sit back and wait to see what happens to Agent Friend.
The time to step forward and to say enough, no more.
That's here and now.
Everybody should have the courage.
That friend had.
Mr. Friend had.
I agree.
I agree.
And, you know, I realize, you know, everybody's different.
And obviously, if Representative Jordan takes this seriously and investigates and brings people to account for this type of behavior, that will encourage others to come forward.
But there's no reason, and I've actually heard that there are several hundred whistleblowers.
Several hundred?
This is a point, you know, a time in our country where really the water has been boiling or turning up the heat for some years.
And now it's just, you know, it's we're at that point where it can stop.
I mean, when you have black helicopters and agents, you know, monitoring parent teacher or the school board meetings and things like that, then Merrick Garland, you know, you know, comparing Parents who are objecting to filth being taught in the schools to domestic terrorists.
You know, it's no more.
I mean, at the time, this is, you know, people, and I do think people are waking up.
You can see it in these school board meetings where parents are saying, no, we're not going to put up with this.
And so these are, these are the kinds of issues that Mike's case, which is about the first amendment, And to stop government from abusing their servants of the people.
That's what they're, they took an oath to the Constitution.
And it's kind of funny, one of the issues, not funny, but one of the issues in our case that with, that's no longer, it was dismissed, but we can bring it back.
You're familiar with the censorship?
where the Department of Homeland Security created a, in this case, an election misinformation reporting portal.
And this is just for state and local election officials where they could, the DHS with CISA and the Center for Internet Security formed a formal network relationship with Twitter and Facebook and other social media companies and state and local election officials.
And then they would helpfully send up, if they had any kind of post on Facebook or on Twitter that they didn't like, they would send an email to misinformation at sys.org, syssecurity.org.
And it would be flagged and Twitter or Facebook or any other social media, whether it was an article or a post, private Facebook posts were being taken out.
There's tens of thousands, millions of these posts that were taken out.
It's a censorship regime that is just simply, you know, you can't even imagine this would have occurred 10, 20 years ago.
Absolutely.
And so these are, I mean, there are, there is a system that has been put in place to basically control the American people.
And Mike's case that you're talking about is one of the, One of the arrows to stop that.
Absolutely.
Well, we appreciate all you're doing, Kurt.
We really do.
Thank you so much.
Thanks for having me, Barron.
Kurt Olson checking in, attorney extraordinaire, fighting for all of our liberties and freedoms, working with Mike Lindell and the lindelllegalfund.org, if you want to support Mike in all these cases, because in the process he's fighting for us and our rights as well, lindelllegalfund.org.
Logan, get Shelby Bush, if you would.
We'll go to Michelle first, and then we'll go to Shelby Bush.
And joining me now is Michelle.
Michelle, thank you for calling in.
Thank you for being on tonight.
Appreciate it.
Hey, Brandon.
How are you?
I'm great.
Thank you.
Let's go right away to this case in Arizona.
I know you probably got a lot to say.
Here's a headline.
Arizona finds massive issues with 2022 election tabulators misread nearly a quarter of a million votes.
Tell us about this, please.
Well, Brandon, I believe you and I have talked about this quite a few times on your show over the past two months.
Yeah, we let everybody know that the numbers they were reporting weren't aren't matching what happened really the day of because according to the report, I reread it last night, the report from the elections department for the county Mayor Corruption County to the AG in response to their letter and I encourage everyone to read it because It's written like a marketing piece.
It's not written like a report.
I mean, there's words in there that you use when you're kind of joking around with a friend, and they had the nerve to write that they're in the infamous door number three, which was the misread ballots, which is what you're talking about there, the ones that did not go through the tabulator.
Remember, roommate did it 15 times, still didn't go through.
And by the way, when they would not go through, and you mentioned door number three, they would take the ballot, dump it in a black bag, and we don't know what happened to those, right?
Well, that was at the end of the night.
That's what we were instructed to do.
So you had a black bag of ballots that did not get read through the tabulator.
Another black bag of ballots that did get read through the tabulator.
Remember, I signed that because I was a judge.
And those ballots were not secure.
Those bags weren't secure.
There was a better lock system on their site books, which is where you go to check in, which was their computers, because that's all they cared about.
They don't care about your vote.
That had none.
And then they showed up the following Monday, election was the previous Tuesday, at the MEC Tech Center in a big pile of black bags, no sticker, no security, no nothing.
And there we have no idea what was swapped out for those.
Right.
Remember that night?
They just could have scooped him up.
They could have exchanged him.
Because when you isolate ballots, especially here in Merritt-Corruption County, considering we burned them at Hickman Farms two years ago, what makes you think they didn't do anything?
Because that door number three, it's really called the misread files.
It's very small, because it's not designed for a lot of ballots to be in there, because most ballots get read through the tabulator.
And then in the past, this is what I was told from the people that had worked there for years, at the end of the night, you go ahead and you do one last for the gipper, you run them through the machine yet another couple times, flipping them over, that's when I always do the flip over, that's what this is, because there's different markings on either side so that the machine will read them, the tabulators will read them, and you give it another shot.
We were specifically told That we are not supposed to do that at our center.
I remember when I asked my inspector, she started, she used the exact same sentence when I asked her the question, well, can't we just run it through one more time?
Because she got louder and she got more irritated.
She was actually started with a P word.
She was a little bit more irritated.
And she said, due to the situation, this is the protocol we're going to follow, which each center had different protocols.
So some took those ballots and were told to put them in separate bags.
Some were told to run it through the machines again.
And some were told to put them in the same bag so they became commingled.
And some actually ended up getting commingled during the day.
And keep in mind, when they emptied the ballots throughout the day, I found out later, because I read the protocol procedures as being a judge, both judges were supposed to be present when both of the bins, when the bins were unloaded.
And that didn't happen at my center three times.
That's how many ballots were.
And they had to empty that three times throughout the day.
And there was no chain of custody.
There was no supervision.
There was no security on the ballots.
I don't even know where they were because I didn't know that they were doing it because nobody told me, hey, come over here because you're required to be here.
So this whole election, as we've been saying since the 8th that night, and like I said, I've come on the show.
I was on the show with Leo.
We're throwing more stuff at you.
And oh, by the way, we have some really, some really interesting things that we've been digging.
And I will be sure to fill you in as soon as.
As soon as we know, but we're going to do a Spaces on over on Twitter for everybody to get a little teaser once we can verify some stuff, but there's some really interesting things happening.
But the nefariousness, and Kurt mentioned it before, I don't know which exact word he used, whether it was premeditated or preplanned, but it all was.
It was all calculated, even the language that came out of my inspector as far as not following the processes and procedures and all the fact that most of the centers had different protocols.
That's not a system, right?
That's designed and calculated that way to create the quote-unquote chaos that then followed.
But let's go with, I'm going to save the numbers for what Shelby is going to tell you next because she was talking about the ballots that weren't going through the tabulator, right?
And they kept saying the amount of, in the report, this is the report and it's on page four, they said that there's 16,724 ballots in door number three.
Okay.
In my center, they said that there was two, because we have some numbers that came from the county, which here's the thing, comparing the numbers and then comparing what happened the day of and comparing the reports and testimonials from people that actually worked at the centers that was part of that Republican roving reporter report.
They're not even close to being believable on what is in the canvassing report.
So according to their numbers, I'm just using my center.
They said I had 240 ballots that were in door number three.
Now, explain that to me, Lucy.
Explain that one to me.
If, uh, throughout the first three hours when I had the most amount of people, 90% of the ballots weren't going through the tabulators and then magically, remember magically got better was 80%.
Then it was about 60, 40.
Then it was about 40% not going through until, uh, the technician came at three between three 30 and four o'clock in the afternoon.
To magically fix whatever the problem was.
So, um, and that happened at centers all over the place.
So she's talking about numbers like 220,000 or 217,000, somewhere in that ballpark of ballots that actually didn't, that got how many times they had to go through or how many times that a certain amount of certain ballots were rejected.
And, uh, they said I only had 240.
So how do you believe any of the numbers from the county?
I don't believe the numbers.
They don't make sense.
And then, like I said, you just read the reports again, knowing kind of what you know now, using common sense and knowing that the people running this operation, because the entire election system is fundamentally designed to control the outcomes.
That's what the elections have become.
That's it.
That is cut and dry.
You've got to get rid of these machines.
Mike Lindell is the only person literally in the Republican Party that's not just running for chair that actually talks about this.
Because he's in a leadership position.
He's literally the only person that says that.
And you will not have another honest election.
You can't.
You can't.
Because not only is the machines the problem, but they have actually gone through, in the protocol and procedures, and they have manipulated the language, changed it and updated So that technically the fraud that we've been watching happen as we're reading and comparing and going through everything and then using what we remember, they've technically almost legalized the fraud because that's their objective, right?
Is to hijack the election in Arizona, come up with the system, then drop in the ranked choice voting, which was what they have in Colorado and up in Alaska.
Why do you think Palin lost?
And then the rank-choice voting, they're already having their first meetings about it with Richard, who's the county recorder, and Fontes, who's the Secretary of State.
Neither one of them won their election, right?
How could you believe any of these results?
And they're already starting on February 8th to start talking about rank-choice voting in Arizona.
So, I mean, you want to talk about the final nail in the coffin where you can't really turn it around?
That's your rank-choice voting.
But they want Arizona to be the model system in order to literally control the outcomes permanently.
So there's so much more, but I know that you've got Shelby coming up, so which direction do you want me to go?
Do you want me to answer another question?
I kind of threw a lot at you.
Why don't we just bring Shelby in real quick?
How's that sound?
Okay, well let me do this first.
Here's what I want to do for Mike Lindell.
Since Mike Lindell is running for chair, what we put together And we sent this out to all the precinct committee men that's in our nationwide groups and the grassroots groups.
Everybody that's watching right now, his election is on Friday.
So you still have time to call the chair for your state and the state committee men and state committee women and send an email.
And I did it really nice.
I put it up as a post in savemyfreedom.us, which is our sub stack, savemyfreedom.us.
And there's a video from Mike telling you what he's going to do to transform the party, to bring it back to normal.
And there's some testimonials from Steve Stern.
And then I even put a letter there, support that people did, and it has all their names, all their phone numbers and all their emails.
So spend a little time tomorrow doing that.
It won't take long.
And, you know, encourage, encourage them to vote for Mike, because it really, he's the only man for the job.
He really knows how, what to do.
Uh, and he, he gets it with the elections.
Cause the only thing that the entire Republican party, even all the way down to our little legislative districts, we have our state election meeting on, on Saturday, two weeks ago, we had our County meeting.
That's, that's another, that's a whole segment in itself with chaos, drama, and at least the grassroots did make some headway with getting some leader, leadership positions back.
The only thing that everybody should be focusing on is literally getting rid of these machines in your own states, in your own counties, at every level of government, because all of this corruption and maladministration and mischievousness And purposeful deceit runs at every level.
It's right down in our local legislative district.
I'm in LD3.
We're the largest one in the county.
It's in there.
They harvest proxies, which is when you're not there, you give somebody your vote, your ability to vote for you, just like they harvest ballots.
So it goes all the way from the top, you know, poop runs downhill, right?
And it is across the country.
So I'm encouraging people to get involved.
Right, to really step up to the plate because it's happening in your own backyard.
Absolutely.
Let's bring in Shelby.
It's a disaster, yeah.
Shelby, come on in here due to quick time.
Shelby, thank you for joining us tonight.
Hello!
Alright, do you want to add to what Michelle's been telling us and what's going on in Arizona?
Yes, so we just gave a Senate presentation, we the people, AC Alliance, myself and my partner here, Steve.
Had the opportunity.
We were commissioned by the Senate to do a review of the ballot envelope affidavits from the 2020 election, right?
So we took those envelopes and we matched them with the voter registration files.
And when we did so, we found that about 20% of all of the ballots just flew through the system with no scrutiny, no questioning.
They were absolutely atrocious.
We found Blank envelopes that were stamped and confirmed against statute.
We found just everything was a mess right with signature verification.
So we fast forward now to 2022 and we're working with M tech workers and signature verification.
We're verifying with them.
What are your policies?
We want to see.
Hey, did Stephen Richard make a difference?
Did he change anything?
Absolutely not everything in our findings.
is still existing to this day in 2022.
And they're still inept in the process of signature verification.
They cannot verify 1.3 million.
And, you know, it's interestingly enough, when you mentioned to them, you don't have chain of custody on these ballots.
They say, well, that's why we have signature verification.
It's our last line of defense.
Well, the line has been dropped.
There is no defense.
Our elections are an absolute disaster.
And then you move forward to election day and you say, well, I'm not going to vote mail-in ballot because I know what a racket it is, right?
So you decide to get up and go to the polling center and cast your ballot.
But in Maricopa County, they failed at a 50% rate.
50% of the time, the slog files showed us that Out of nearly 500,000 attempts to feed a ballot, they were rejected almost 220,000 times.
So we have a piece of equipment that we paid for, 446 pieces of equipment to be exact, and not one of them, not one of them performed to EAC requirements.
So we've got a mess.
We've got a mess in Maricopa County.
Wow, indeed you do.
Now you sent me some, uh, you sent me some graphics here.
Let me see if I can pull those up.
Hang on, guys.
You sent me some graphics here.
What do you want to say about these graphics?
I can find them real quick.
What do you know about these graphics that you sent me tonight?
Like here, here we go, like this one right here.
Okay, so that right there, what you're looking at is a slide.
This is a graph of what A normal, imperfect election would look like.
This is a representative graph of 446 tabulators in Maricopa County, in 223 polling centers.
That red line you see at the bottom right there, if you go across the bottom you'll see a red line, that's the ACC standards, right?
So, you can find a couple of those tabulators popped out of range, right?
That's an imperfect but an okay election, right?
You've got all these tabulators doing what they're supposed to do.
So now if you go to the next slide, yep, not those ones, that one, that's what Maricopa County actually looked like.
So if you look underneath that little dotted perforated looking line right there, that represents the EAC standards, which is point, 0, 0, 2.
1 in 500 ballots is an acceptable range of misfeed by our lovely federally regulated EAC, right?
Then the dots you see there, those are representative of what really happened with each of those tabulators.
And as you can see, some of those tabulators failed 95% of the time.
95% of the time.
They would not read the ballots because our county didn't know how to appropriately create a ballot that somebody could cast a vote on.
Wow.
Is there anything else here that we need to look at?
How about this?
What's this?
Okay, let's see.
So what you see there, that is an example of one of the many duplicates that we found.
This is one voter that decided that they wanted to vote On October 22nd, and then again on October 28th, and both of their votes were counted.
We've identified many of these.
So they fraudulently voted twice?
They fraudulently voted twice, and when I presented this to the Senate on Monday, I actually had a Senator ask me, well how do you know they didn't call the voter to cure it?
I'm like, Madam Senator, you can't cure a second vote.
You can't vote twice in one election.
It's not legal.
Explain what the term cure means.
What does that mean to the layperson?
Explain that to the layperson.
Sure.
So curing a ballot means if you question it, if the county were to question it.
Unfortunately for Maricopa County, they don't ask a lot of questions.
They just take them all.
But if you were to question it, then you could call the voter and say, hey, did you cast this ballot?
Did you mean to commit fraud?
But if you've tabulated a vote for a voter and then another one comes in, you call the
authorities.
You don't call the voters and say, did you mean to vote twice?
Did you mean to create fraud?
Did you mean to commit fraud?
Did you mean to do that?
Did you mean to do it on purpose?
Should we go ahead and chuck this one away?
Do you have pre-Alzheimer's and dementia and forgot you voted twice?
Or do you have a medical condition?
Or were you just committing a fraud?
We're trying to figure this out.
Right.
Can you explain it to us?
No, but you know what our county did?
I'll tell you what our county did.
They figured it out and they're like, oops, wait, this voter voted twice.
So they merged the voter files together to effectively hide the fact that that voter voted twice.
So to the layperson, they would never find out.
So instead of reporting it to the authorities and prosecuting this voter, they actually covered the crime up.
And how many votes have you found like this?
So right now we've gone through about 380,000 ballots and we have found 128 duplicates.
80,000 ballots and we have found 128 duplicates, so about 300 of these ballots that were fraudulently
inserted.
We've been reporting these to the authorities since before we had access to these envelopes
because we found it in the data.
And we gave it to the Attorney General, we've given it to the Sheriff's Department, we've given it to the County Attorney, and surprise!
Which Attorney General did you give it to?
The one that we were all talking about last year that turned out to be a dud?
Yes, that would be Brnovich.
Yeah, what a dud, right?
What's he doing now?
I don't know, but you know, now that he's not in public office, I would imagine he may want to go into a bit of a hiatus and stay out of public view for a while.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So you said you found how many of these votes were people double voted?
How many?
We found 128 in the ballot envelopes, but in our data analysis right now, we have a data team that's reviewing it and we have found Thousands probably about five to six thousand accounts that have the potential for voting twice that we've been zeroing in on so and remind us what the margin of victory was so-called margin of victory was for for the occupant right now 17,000 votes that's not much Not much at all.
No and you you compile that on top of the fact that 25,000 votes just randomly appeared a few days later and You take those, and the fact that they're not verifying these ballots, it's not humanly possible.
Our team has spent almost 5,000 man hours reviewing signatures, and the best you can do on a clean signature is about 30 seconds a signature.
In order for them to have verified those last 298,000 in two and a half days, they would have had to have 25 workers That never left their desk other than the scheduled lunch breaks, verifying a signature one every eight seconds.
It's just not possible.
It didn't happen.
And then you've got this.
Nearly a quarter of a million votes that were misread.
And of course, are those the votes that we talk about that went into the black bag?
And then, you know, we'll deal with those later.
And then we don't know what happened to those.
The chain of custody was broken.
They could have pulled out the votes for Carrie Lake.
They could have replaced ones for Hobbs.
I mean, we don't know what happened, right?
Oh no, and if you want to go back to that one graph I gave you, I'm going to give you another shocking piece of information.
The one that has the magenta dots on one side and the blue on the other?
The one that shows the circus of Maricopa County?
This one?
Yes, that one.
Okay, so all of the tabulators in magenta that you see to the left, that's 88 tabulators, 44 polling centers.
Not only did they put the misfeeds into a black bag to take the central count, Every single one of those tabulators you see in magenta are showing as zero vote counts in the CVR records because our county decided to clear the results of every single one of those tabulators in those 44 polling centers and just recount them at Maricopa County.
Wow.
Wow.
What is the media doing with this information?
When you testified before the Senate, did the media pick up on your testimony?
Because I hear, by the way, your Senate testimony is going viral, right?
Yes, it is.
Yes, it is.
Right now, I did get a call from the Washington Post, but I haven't decided if we want to contribute to their anti-Republican propaganda, so I haven't called them back yet.
You know, I talked to Steve Bannon today, and you, and Grant, but no, I mean, our local news media is just radio silence, and our Capital Times puts an article in the paper saying, well, we reached out to Mr. Richer about Mrs. Bush's presentation, and Mr. Richer says he's been cooperative with Shelby and answered all of her questions.
Well, I guess they went to the wrong email because I never got them.
Wow.
What was the most shocking thing you presented?
I mean, this is all very shocking, but is there anything that is even more or equally shocking that you presented in your Senate testimony?
Well, I mean, to me, the most shocking thing is that our taxpayer dollars are essentially funding our inability to trust our election system.
And that's really what it comes down to.
We're just, we're throwing tax dollar after tax dollar.
We just spent $3 million buying new tabulators and equipment for this election, right?
Because that's what they said needed to happen.
And our county doesn't even know how to run the darn things.
So, you know, should we as taxpayers fund $3 million worth of equipment that only works half the time?
If my TV only worked half the time, I'd either throw it through the window or I'd take it back to Walmart.
You know what I mean?
So we need to throw them through the window or take them back where they came from because they're not working here.
And what kind of response did you get from some of the senators on the panel that maybe have been for, you know, dealing with election theft?
And did we see any senators there on the panel or in the room like, say, Senator Borrelli?
Or have we heard anything from Representative Mark Fincham?
I mean, Mark, of course, is running for Secretary of State.
What are we hearing from Mark or Senator Borrelli?
Well, Senator Borrelli was actually on the committee.
Good, good.
You know, actually, he's the one that said, I have a question for you, Ms.
Bush.
He said, why are our tax dollars paying for this?
That's a good question.
You know, Senator Kavanaugh, he was the most surprising to me in a really good way, because he looked at it and he said, have we done this with other elections?
Have we looked at this to see if this has worked in other elections?
And the answer, what is the answer to that?
Well, the answer is give me the stuff, we'll look at it.
Wow, and you're doing this as a private citizen, right?
Yes.
What is your background?
Not that it really matters, I mean, if you can do it, you can do it, but what is your background, like data analysis, computers, what is it?
No, I just have really, really smart people that help us, right?
So, I'm a medical administrator.
Okay!
You know, that's so funny you said that, because I was about to say, oh, well, you have the gift of administration.
So, clearly, I didn't even know that that was what you were going to say, but my response was about to be, well, you just have the gift of administration, but you actually have a background in administration, which explains why you're able then to go and put the team together and orchestrate all this and carry it out, and you're doing all this as private citizens, right?
Yes, we are.
We work our full-time day jobs and then we do this by night.
You know, Steve and I co-founded this a few years ago.
And I'm assuming that's Steve sitting next to you, right?
Yes, this is Steve.
Hi, Steve.
Well, thank you for what you're doing, Steve and Shelby.
So, other than us, Steve Bannon, us, and one other show you mentioned, where is conservative media?
I mean, I guess, I'm sure Newsmax and Fox News are knocking on your door to interview you, right?
Oh, you know the Gateway Pundits have been there for us.
Of course!
We don't doubt that, because they've always been good on this.
But have you heard from Fox News or Newsmax?
No, I think they're out busy campaigning for Rona right now.
I think you're right.
Give me a call.
Yeah.
So where does it go from here?
Well, we're going to keep educating the public.
We're going to keep digging.
We're going to keep finding things.
We're going to keep putting it out.
You know, we got to wake up the people.
If the people do not understand that their voice has been taken and stand up and step up and reclaim it, then they won't have a voice again in America.
And so that's my goal is to be the loud mouth in the room.
Right.
And Steve and I have decided to just keep pressing the truth.
And eventually the truth breaks through.
We finally have gotten some Democrats now on board.
Oh, you have some Democrats coming on board that want fair elections.
Good.
Have you been threatened?
Have you been intimidated or threatened?
Because I know some folks in Arizona have been threatened with arrest and felonies and all kinds of stuff for simply doing what was right by the law.
Well, I put in a declaration into the Kerry Lake lawsuit and there was a comment made... Pull the music down so it doesn't break her up.
What was the comment?
There was a comment made by one of the county attorneys that I attained the information I got through illegal means and so they're trying to set the stage for that but right now we just get threats from a bunch of interesting wackadoodles in the public.
Oh gosh!
What is your website, Steve and Shelby?
WeThePeopleAZAlliance.com WeThePeopleAZAlliance.com WeThePeopleAZAlliance.com You can find all the declarations, all the processes, graphs, and presentation on that website.
Excellent.
Steve, Shelby, keep us posted.
If you need to come back, you've got a platform to get it out.
So just call us, text me, we'll get you right back on.
Steve, Shelby, thank you guys.
Thank you.
Good night.
You too.
Thank you also to Michelle and to Kurt Olson.
And of course, Brandon House here for Mike Lindell, who was able to check in for a few minutes.
Again, if you appreciate all we're doing here at Lindell TV with Mike Lindell with the Lindell Report and Mike's Hard work.
Support us by going to MyPill.com.
Use the promo code L77.
You get great products and you're supporting a great cause.
Everybody wins.
L77 at MyPill.com.
The worldview report comes up, and then tonight on Brennan House Live, I have Laura Loomer.
I also have with us a rancher.
You're not going to want to miss what he's going to say about the food supply.
And we have several other important updates.
But first, the Worldview Report, our nightly news broadcast.
Thanks for watching the Lindell Report.
For Mike Lindell and Brandon House, take care.
You're watching Lindell TV.
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, and I'm excited to bring you my Giza Dream bedsheets for the best offer ever!
We're all experiencing rising prices, but I was able to secure a limited amount of Giza cotton for a great price, and I'm passing those savings directly onto you!
▲
Export Selection