All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 12, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:02:20
The Lindell Report (1-12-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
the world. And I'm going to be doing that. So, thanks for watching.
Bye.
So, I'm going to go ahead and get my computer. I'm going to go ahead and get my computer.
I'm going to go ahead and get my computer.
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical and achievable action points to
assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedoms.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
Alright.
Good evening.
Glad you are with us.
We're going to be joined tonight by Garland Favorito, Susan Swift, and a brand new guest, I think.
Mary Holdenick will join us tonight.
And Mike is out on business tonight, and we're holding down the fort.
There is no time.
And by the way, on my show tonight, I'll have on Todd Bensman, Dr. Peter McCullough, Mike Hammond of Gun Owners of America, and Roger Stone.
For the next three hours, you don't want to go anywhere.
All right.
Joining me now is Garland Favorito.
Garland, how you doing?
Hello, Brian.
Great to be back with you.
You too, Garland.
And I hear your governor, look at you, looking so sharp tonight.
I hear your governor.
I hear your governor.
We had a press conference today.
Oh, that's why you're looking so dapper.
You had a press conference.
OK, we're going to get to that.
Oh, it is a little video too.
All right.
Well, hang on.
We'll get right to that.
But I hear your governor, Brian Kemp, is going to the World Economic Forum.
Well, that should explain a lot.
It certainly does.
We already knew that the Secretary of State was in bed with the World Economic Forum when he did the Salesforce contract recently, which we sued because we believe he violated three statutes of Georgia law in doing that.
Wait a minute!
Brian Kemp may have broken the law.
Shocker!
Well, no, actually it was Brad Ravensburg.
Oh, that was Brad!
Okay.
So I think it's kind of interesting that Brian is going there, and who knows what he's going to come up with when he comes back.
Well, you keep your eye on him.
I bet we can find him breaking the law.
I wouldn't be surprised.
So doesn't that tell us everything we need to know about good ol' Brian if he's gonna run out and hang out with the World Economic Forum globalist, which today I played a really creepy video by Yuvari Noah Harari, whoever the dude's name is, who is a Jewish guy who's an admitted homosexual, who on my radio show slash TV show today I played video of him talking about AI and how in the coming days AI will know more about us than we know about ourselves.
That our computers will be watching our eye movement.
It'll be monitoring our pulse, our heart rate and everything.
So when we're looking at things on the internet, AI will be able to pick up on our response and know that whether you're attracted to someone of the same sex, Even before you know it.
I mean, it was just a weird thing, a weird video.
These world leaders sitting there, listening to him talk about this, and how wonderful this technology will be, and how you could go to a party, a birthday party, and then use your artificial intelligence to play a game to see who's sexually attracted to what gender.
I mean, it was just the weirdest thing in the world to think this dude is standing there in front of world leaders talking like this, And this is, I guess, the kind of folks that run to the World Economic Forum?
Yeah, and what you've got, you know, all those things that you mentioned, Brandon, are currently in place.
You know, we've gotten the first steps for all of that AI stuff to be basically taking over our minds and everything else.
It's not exactly what we really need.
No, it's not.
All right, well, let's get to your press conference today.
You want to play the video right out of the gate?
Yeah, that's fine.
There's just about 17 seconds of a video, just to give you a little feel for what went down today, and then we'll walk through some of the slides we showed you, and I think you'll get a kick out of it.
All right, let's do that.
Our first guest tonight, Garland Favorito, Susan Swift and Mary Honig still coming up.
Packed show.
Let's roll that clip.
Most everybody here knows that the Georgia Bulldogs won the national championship on Monday but what you don't know is that there was another significant event that impacts your freedom and that is the fact that the Georgia Court of Appeals reinstated the case of the Fulton County counterfeit balance and they had to do that because just before Christmas Well, there you go.
That was a little Christmas gift.
Yes, it was.
It was a Christmas gift to all of us from the Georgia Supreme Court and really everybody in Georgia.
And almost no one reported on that down here in the state of Georgia, even though it was a Amazing overturn of two years.
Wait a minute.
Your Georgia Supreme Court makes this big ruling and your media and your state pretty much ignored it.
Yes.
We had very little coverage of this and it impacts everyone in the state of Georgia.
It's beyond election integrity because it It impacts our freedom.
It says that we, the people of Georgia, can sue any election official or agency if they violate the law.
It's something that we've had all along.
Wow.
So the bottom line, on slide one, I think Logan's going to show- All right, let's go to that.
Slide one.
Yeah.
The bottom line of this whole thing is that after two years, we're back.
We're going back to the, we believe we're on our way back to the Superior Court to try to find out how many counterfeit ballots there were in the 2020 case, the 2020 election.
And what I wanted to point out to you, Brandon, and all the listeners, is in slide six that Logan's gonna show us.
And this decision that we never had standing in the first place, violated all of these case precedents that we had in our brief, both to the Superior Court and to the Court of Appeals.
So when the judge attempted to say that we did not have standing, he violated virtually, I believe, all the precedents in the history of the state of Georgia since its inception in 1788.
And then, in addition, violated all the U.S.
Supreme Court precedents, which says that, you know, that our right to have our vote count is equally as open to protection as our right to have our vote, put our ballot in the ballot box.
That dates back all the way to 1915, the U.S.
v. Mosley.
And then in 1964, Reynolds v. Sims in the U.S.
Supreme Court said that we have the right to protect ourselves against ballot box stuffing.
Explicitly.
And that's what this case was.
We were arguing that Fulton County, or someone in Fulton County, had allowed the ballot box to be stuffed with invalid ballots.
And we had the foresworn affidavits from senior poll managers.
And in spite of all these case precedents that we put in our briefs, Not only did the lower court rule that we didn't have standing, but the appeals court upheld the lower court decision, and they never mentioned a single one of our citations.
Wow.
So that's how egregious this ruling was that we didn't have standing.
And fortunately, the Georgia Supreme Court came along.
We were blessed to get this ruling on December 20th.
Like you said, Brian, just before Christmas, we got this little Christmas present.
And what I wanted to do, just in the short couple minutes that we have, is I wanted to walk you through three statements that the Georgia Supreme Court made in the case, what we call the predecessor case, which was a case where Sons of Confederate Veterans had sued Henry and Newton County because they were illegally removing the monuments, and all monuments, regardless of whether you like them or not, are protected in Georgia law.
All right, so let's go to slide number two.
Yeah, well, slide number 8, we can skip all the way to number 8.
All the way to 8, OK.
Yeah, I'm just going to show you 8, 9, and 10 are the only ones that I wanted to show you, just so that you get a feel for what they said there.
And what they said was, with all the prior case law regarding citizens and taxpayer standing as the legal backdrop against the judicial paragraph, power paragraph, That was readopted as part of the 83 Constitution.
That's a lot of legalese, but the bottom line to that is justification.
They say it is no surprise that we continue to recognize under the current Constitution that taxpayers and citizens have standing to enforce a public duty.
Key word there is that they continue to recognize It has never been in doubt.
This is what I've been saying for over a year, and a lot of people didn't believe me, even some of our friends.
So the Georgia Supreme Court is confirming here that we have always had standing, and they continue to recognize it.
Really huge ruling here in this particular case.
And then if we go to the next slide, number nine, It says that it is unsurprising that we have extended this logic to voters.
Now this is interesting because they have not ruled on our case yet, but in this predecessor case that was before them in the Georgia Supreme Court, they went ahead and extended this logic to voters.
They say because they, like citizens and taxpayers, are community stakeholders.
Voters may be injured when elections are not administered according to the law.
And that is the key point that we were trying to try to sue for.
Elections were not administered according to the law.
So the Georgia Supreme Court upholds what we had said there.
And then in the next slide, I think it's slide 10, I wanted to just show you one more thing I thought that was interesting.
They rule that although the term citizens and residents are perhaps more precise and less confusing in cases involving a public duty, these types of cases reflect that community stakeholders, and they laid them out here, citizens, residents, voters, and taxpayers are injured when their local governments do not follow the law.
When a public duty is at stake, a plaintiff's membership in the community provides the necessary standing to bring a cause of action to ensure a local government follows the law.
And once they made that case in Georgia Supreme Court, where they then ruled in our case, and what's interesting is, and I think we can show this on the next slide, if we can go one more, Logan.
I didn't tell Logan ahead of time, so that's my bad.
But I can talk to it, that we went ahead and, I'm sorry, let's just go one more, Logan, if you can.
And whoops, that's not it either.
But anyway, maybe if we back up one, that was the original ruling.
Let's back up just about two more slides there, Logan, if we could.
Okay, sorry, I must be missing it.
That wasn't it either.
But anyway, the bottom line is that, and I'm sorry, I messed you up, Logan, that was my bad.
So the bottom line is that they made this decision that, Confirmed what we already knew was true.
They did it without a hearing, Brannon, and they did it unanimously.
There was no disagreement between anyone on this entire Georgia Supreme Court that this has always been the law in the state of Georgia.
Wow.
So it was a pretty, it was what we call a legal no-brainer.
It was that simple of a case and unfortunately the Court of Appeals did not correct it and we had to end up going to the Georgia Supreme Court.
To get the decisions, but we're all thrilled about that down here.
We're still celebrating Christmas here in Georgia.
In fact, let's go to this.
There it is right there.
The Georgia Supreme Court order on 12-2022.
There it is.
All right.
And you know, in your presentation, the order was unanimous.
It did not require hearing.
It overrode two lower court decisions.
And order confirmed all previous Georgia presidents.
That was the slide I was looking for and I forgot where that slide was in the presentation today, but the only justice that didn't rule on it was the justice who ruled on the Court of Appeals and he was disqualified from ruling again because he had already ruled on our case.
I think he would have overturned himself actually.
And made it unanimous if he had had a chance to rule on it.
Well, let's look at this next slide.
What's next?
Georgia Supreme Court remitted case to Georgia Court of Appeals.
Yeah, so that's what happened.
So the Supreme Court remitted the case to the Court of Appeals.
The Court of Appeals has accepted that and they accepted it, Brandon, without briefs.
So that means that they really don't have any alternative that I can see other than to simply adopt the Supreme Court order and then return this to Superior Court, which would be back to Henry County where we were before.
That case is being tried on behalf of Fulton County.
And the court could conduct an immediate hearing or they could just simply immediate move to discovery.
And if they move to discovery, then we'll get to look at the ballots.
And then we'll be able to eventually tell you, once we present the evidence in court, we'll be able to tell you how many counterfeit ballots there were in the 2020 election in Fulton County.
Very interesting.
So once discovery is initiated, we get to inspect the ballots, which is what you've been fighting for the whole time, right, Garland?
It's a two-year struggle, Brannon, and what we believe This has been a gross double standard of justice that occurred in Georgia and I believe it's one of the greatest voting rights violations in the history of the state of Georgia.
For us to have gone two years simply to try to find out if the election results were correct and have to fight off a bunch of corrupt officials And some of them, which in Fulton County, they hired criminal defense attorneys to just simply to prevent us from looking at the ballots, which is all we ever wanted to do.
Yeah.
Absolutely unbelievable.
Okay.
So we've got good news.
The good news is you guys are moving forward now.
Yes.
When do you think this will happen?
When do you think you'll get to expect the ballots?
And what do you think you're going to find there?
Now this is just in one county, right?
Henry County?
Well, yeah, it's Fulton County ballots.
Okay.
These are the famous ballots from the State Farm Arena that we've been trying to get.
Now, when the case was routed over to Henry County because they originally considered it to be an election challenge, but we filed too late for that.
We said it's not an election challenge.
It is what it actually is.
It's an equal protection and due process violations claim.
So we said, OK, since we're there, we'll just stay here.
And that's why it's in Henry County now and not in Fulton County.
Wow.
All right.
So are you encouraged by all this?
Extremely encouraged.
I feel like I want to say, I told you so.
But there was a lot of even the conservative media out here that really had kind of lost faith in us.
Um, but, um, you know, you guys have always stuck with us, you and Mike, and, uh, you know, we were grateful to y'all.
And, uh, I was, it's happy to, I'm happy to finally deliver something for, that we think will become somewhat of a national precedent, uh, even though other states don't have to use it.
Uh, we think that, uh, they will put that in this case in their briefs.
Yeah, let's go to the next slide real quick.
That's interesting.
Co-operating evidence will be geo-tracking and video evidence of 242 ballot traffickers, many in Fulton.
Fulton County mail-in ballot images electronically altered prior to 2020 certification.
All Fulton County in-person ballot images destroyed.
Ruby Freeman's audio and video admissions and Brad Raffenberger's admissions.
You'll speak to that?
Well yeah, and of course Brad Ravensburger, that was the video that we debuted at the Moment of Truth Summit.
We played that again today, and that was when Brad Ravensburger had admitted to NBC News, and you remember this well I'm sure, on the morning after the election, that Donald Trump had an insurmountable margin, and that even if Joe Biden got every vote that was left, Uh, which would have been 93,000 every vote left to count.
Donald Trump at that time had 103,750 vote margin.
And he stated that it was not possible for Joe Biden to catch up at that point in time and said that the counting would be finished that day, which was Wednesday.
And instead they counted ballots for two more days.
And instead of, he said that 4.7 million voters Had actually voted.
But in reality, he certified 4.998 million ballots.
So it was 240,000 extra phantom votes.
And that, I think, is down on the last slide, if you want to show that.
All the math there.
Is that it right there?
Yeah.
And if you do one little click there, I think you'll get the rest of it.
There you go.
That's the whole math.
In 2020, Wednesday at about 9 a.m.
on November the 4th, Trump's margin was 103,705.
You'll hear Brad Raffensperger state, if you watch the press conference up on VoterJ.org events there, you'll hear him say that 4.7 million voters voted.
You'll hear him say 2% of the votes were left to count, 93,000.
And then he'll, if you look at the certification results, which I believe we show in the previous slide, you'll see he's certified 4.998 million.
So that's a total of about 240,000 phantom votes.
And that's quite an interesting situation, which he's never been able to explain why he would have allowed counting to go for two more days and 240,000 votes.
More than what he claimed existed on the morning of November 4th.
And Brandon, one last point that I want to make on that.
On the morning of November 4th, he had to know exactly how many votes were left to count because all the counties are required to report their total number of ballots cast and the total number of ballots left to count by 10 o'clock on election night.
So Brad Ravensburger, when he went on TV that next morning, NBC Today, he had those numbers, and that's where he was getting that information from, and I believe he was telling the truth there.
But then he allowed those phantom votes to come in and change the election in the state of Georgia.
Wow, wow, wow.
All right, so good news, a good report tonight from Garland Favorito.
You know, what's really interesting is that while a lot of people wanted to make fun of this geotracking in video, the geotracking that was used for 2,000 mules, I read a report that that's what the officials used to track The killer in Idaho, the reported killer in Idaho was... Well, I do know that they were, that the geotracking evidence in Georgia was used, and this was prior to the election, was used to bring a charge, a murder charge against, I think there was a young girl who was killed here, and they were able to track down the suspect
Based on the geo-trafficking evidence that Greg Phillips and his team provided to the FBI.
So I can't speak to Idaho, but it certainly did happen.
The same thing did happen here in Georgia.
I think that's basically an undisputed fact.
So the bottom line is all these people mocking the idea of that software ability or technology in 2,000 mules.
It's real.
It's been used to report and solve crimes.
Well, right, and if it's their little girl who had died, I don't think they would have been mocking it at all.
Right.
GAVoter.org, right?
VoterGA.org.
Thank you, Brandon, for all y'all do for us, and we are a 501c3 nonpartisan nonprofit, and I'm a volunteer.
I do not take a salary for doing this.
We just want to save Georgia, just like Mike wants to save America.
Absolutely.
As always, Garland, we appreciate your work, and thank you for being with us here.
Thank you, Brandon.
Great to be on your show.
You too.
Garland Favorito checking in, folks, here in early 2023.
It won't be the last time.
Joining me next is Susan Swift.
She is one of the biggest pro-life fighters in America.
She's out on the West Coast where murder seems to be now, well, a way of life out there, a killing field, if you will.
And we want to talk to her about what's happening in America related to the pro-life movement.
Not just America.
How about Canada?
Talk about killing fields.
Canada is going so far now as they are aggressively advertising for people to end their life.
Active euthanasia.
Depressed?
Don't have money?
Out of a job?
You know, you don't have to stick around.
They'll get you euthanized.
As I reported in my nightly news report last week, some of the doctors up in Canada are bragging about the literally hundreds of people they have euthanized.
One report of one doctor I had in my news report last week actually approved for someone to be euthanized who other doctors said, no, you're not a candidate.
Again, active euthanasia.
Isn't this what happens when we allow for abortion?
In other words, a nation that murders its children eventually murders itself.
Did we think that the, well, wholesale slaughter and murder of babies wouldn't end this way?
Of course, we were warned in the 1970s.
By a guy by the name of Dr. Francis Schaeffer.
Dr. Francis Schaeffer actually produced a documentary that was seen in churches and on television stations all over America.
I remember because as a young person, about nine or ten years old, I saw it.
And he made the documentary film with C. Everett Koop, who became the Surgeon General for Ronald Reagan.
What were they warning?
The wholesale slaughter of unborn children would eventually lead to active euthanasia.
The killing of, well, completely healthy people.
That people would be deemed as, well, unproductive resource and euthanized.
And, as we have said for many years, watch as the right to die becomes the duty to die.
Isn't it interesting the timing where all these campaigns and commercials and even a pod, a pod you can actually have transported or pulled behind a car and take this pod and put it out into a field and be euthanized in this pod while the sun goes down or near a babbling brook Isn't it interesting the technology and the campaigns and the commercials and the justification is all coming at a time when the globalists are calling for a great depopulation plan?
Well, joining me now is Susan Swift.
Susan, welcome to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Thanks for having me back, Brandon.
It's good to be with you.
You too.
I don't know if you ever remember that documentary or that movie by C. Everett Koop and Francis Schaeffer in about 1979 or so.
Whatever happened to the human race, I think is what it was called.
But they were warning the wholesale slaughter of children would lead to active euthanasia.
You want to comment on what I just laid out and what's happening in Canada?
You are predicting a possible future.
And that is why it is so very important for all of us to fight for the sanctity of life from the moment of conception through natural death.
Because we believe that human life is sacred.
That's why we call it sanctified.
And we're battling against, whether it's global elites, whether it is a controlling force, I don't know if it's the WEF, I don't know, but what we're fighting against is a very sinister notion that dismisses the sanctity of life, that says life is really, it's fungible, it's not important, that we can sacrifice babies.
In fact, what pro-aborts want to tell you is that this is really a clump of cells.
It's really not human until it's born.
And then they kibitz with you about, well, what does that even entail?
Like you can have a partial birth abortion, right?
So that you can drag the baby out feet first and then snip it in the back of the neck.
Speaking of partial birth abortion, look at this headline right here today.
LifeSiteNews.com.
Top Democrat Congresswoman defends gruesome partial birth abortion.
Representative Sheila Jackson Lee described protecting infants from brutal murder as extremist.
So to protect them from murder is extremist.
A Democrat congresswoman from Texas defended partial birth abortion, claiming that it is necessary for parents who are, quote, desperate for a healthy child.
Folks, let's play a clip and listen to her in her own words.
pro-life legislation. Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, who has represented Texas 18th
Congressional District since 1995, spoke during a morning hour meeting for the U.S. House
of Representatives on Wednesday, where she used her time to condemn pro-life legislation
in her state and advocate for killing the unborn. Folks, let's play a clip and listen
to her in her own words. Here we go.
Before we get to our guest, folks, check out preparewithsentinel.com.
Wait a minute.
I'm getting bleep.
I've got.
Well, I got something else open.
Hey, let me get rid of that.
All right.
There we go.
I got rid of that.
Let me go back to where we were.
All right.
Here we go.
Let's try it now.
leveled against these compassionate advocates for life.
House Republicans are united in our condemnation of the political violence these wonderful caregivers have always faced, and those who choose life.
I'm proud to support House Concurrent Resolution No.
3, condemning the recent attacks on pro-life facilities, groups, churches, and will not back down to violent extremists.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I yield back.
The gentlewoman yields back. The Chair now recognizes the gentlewoman from Texas, Ms. Jackson Lee, for five minutes.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
I guess the opportunity to be privileged to serve in the United States Congress with a little over 10,000 members
over the decades, and for the years of service that I have given at the
privilege and at the decision of my constituents, allows me to look over the landscape of the journey that we
have taken.
I'm...
I was here when medical procedures for parents who wanted nothing more than a healthy baby were then characterized as a criminal act and called partial birth abortion.
When a mother had to make a decision With her God, her doctor, and her family.
I remember the hearings in the Judiciary Committee where mothers were crying because of the medical procedure that was necessary to save their life.
Let me just stop it right there.
This woman, in my opinion, is a liar.
She's either stupid, she's either stupid or a liar.
She could be both because no woman's life has ever been saved by carrying out a partial birth abortion.
Tell our audience why that is a lie what she's saying.
Yes, crazy Sheila Jackson Lee is at it again.
She's just pontificating.
Abortion is not healthcare.
That's a lie that they've been spinning for 50 or 60 years because that makes it more likely to pass, right?
It is not.
There is no such thing as saving a woman's life from abortion.
If we are talking about saving a woman's life that's endangered by pregnancy, you're talking about delivery.
And you deliver the baby within minutes, you can.
And that sometimes is preterm.
And sometimes the baby might not survive, but at least it honors the life of the baby as well.
A partial birth abortion is when this baby is fully formed, ready to be born, and a doctor, you know, kind of manipulates the baby up and around and comes out wrong way, right?
Feet first, and then right before the head emerges, like Kermit Gosnell did, they stick scissors up there in the back of the neck and they snip the baby's spinal cord.
That doesn't save the woman's life at all.
Because the baby has already traveled down the birth canal.
Yes, and in fact what they've done is they manipulate the baby instead of being born head first, which is nine times out of ten, right?
That's the way the baby comes out.
Occasionally you'll get a very rare breech birth, but they actually, when you're trying to save the baby's life, you manipulate the baby to try to have the head first.
That's the natural way to have it caused.
What they're trying to do is they try to reverse that against natural law to drag feet out first, backwards if you will, so that they can effectively kill the child and they're playing a game of location.
And what they're trying to say is, well, because the baby's head is still inside the mother.
Then it's an abortion and we're not actually killing a human baby.
That is just a lie.
It's an absolute lie.
It's gruesome.
And most Americans, if not all of them, oppose partial birth abortion.
And here she is, crazy Sheila Jackson Lee, trying to defend abortion by pointing to partial birth abortion.
I mean, that's just radical.
I mean, if she were smarter, she would be pointing to first or second trimester abortion, where we know that, I think it's 68% of US adults favor some sort of restrictions.
That's from a Marist poll, an NPR Marist poll, May 2022.
All right, so we know that most Americans support restrictions on abortion, 68%.
And yet here, of all of the stupid examples to choose from, crazy Sheila Jackson Lee has gotta go
with partial birth abortion, where Kermit Gosnell was convicted
of murder for doing this.
I mean, she's just not, she's not even good at her job.
But somehow she gets elected again and again.
And to say that you're saving the life of the mother when the child through partial birth abortion
has already come through the birth canal.
So there is no life-saving procedure being done here.
Period.
End of story.
So as I said, she's either really, really stupid, or she's a liar, in my opinion, or both.
Let's listen to what else she says, if you can stand the lunacy of this.
I'm full circle and the extremists want to, again, demonize parents who are desperate Desperate for a healthy child.
She's the extremist.
This is what these people do.
They project onto pro-life people their own sick dementia.
She is calling pro-life doctors and pregnancy centers and individuals Extremist for simply advocating for the baby to have the right to live.
You don't need to kill a baby to save the mother.
You just don't.
If you have to deliver the baby prematurely, you can deliver her in moments and save the woman's life as well.
So this is a lie that's been perpetuated.
Now she's trying to call us extremists.
And this is a it's like They're trying to align pro-life forces and the pro-life movement with domestic terrorism.
That's what they're trying to say, so that they can justify shutting pregnancy centers down and targeting them.
You'll remember in May, as soon as the Dobbs decision was leaked, we started seeing attacks on pregnancy centers.
And over 60 were attacked.
And in fact, the House has just passed a bill that recognizes the terrorism that is, what, Jane's Revenge, and all of these very radical pro-abortion groups that are targeting pregnancy centers.
And the House has condemned it and has actually tried to stop it.
Now I know that this legislation is not probably going to pass in the Senate, but at least
the House that is now controlled by pro-life individuals is trying to at least do something
about it.
Because the domestic terrorism, if there is any such thing as domestic terrorism in America,
it is abortion.
That's exactly what domestic terrorism is.
It's abortion.
It kills babies in the womb.
We are killing Americans in the womb for nothing more than profit and fetal cell research.
And if Sheila Jackson Lee thinks that the extremists are the pro-lifers who are opposed
to partial birth abortion, just how demented is she?
And if she thinks that's what makes us an extremist, what does she then think about the other things we believe?
I mean, in my opinion, This is the kind of woman that would absolutely be okay with the COVID concentration camps and throwing Christians and conservatives in a COVID concentration camp, if not outright eliminating them.
I believe her worldview would allow for that.
That's my opinion.
You may be right, I hope you're wrong, but she sure is crazy, Sheila Jackson.
At least she doesn't disappoint.
But me, being a native Texan, I am offended that there are enough Texans that are being flim flammed by such a woman and putting her back into Congress.
They really need to get an education.
Indeed.
Look at this headline tonight, also live site news.
Illinois House passes abortion amendment limiting safety measures while expanding access out-of-state abortionists who lost their license after committing illegal abortions.
We'll be welcome in Illinois.
And birthing centers have been granted legal authority to commit abortions.
Now, my wife was born and raised in Illinois.
I've spent a lot of time in Illinois.
I've held worldview weekends in Illinois.
But I have to tell you, Illinois is one of the states I avoid.
I only go to the state of Illinois if I absolutely have to, because the fact that they don't want to honor our gun permits, our concealed carry permits.
And by the way, tonight on Worldview Report, I'll be reporting on the fact that Illinois is not only radical when it comes to murdering of children, they're also working on, in Illinois, Senate voting soon to ban commonly owned firearms in Illinois.
So while they want to kill babies, They apparently also want their citizens to die by not being able to defend themselves against lawlessness.
And of course, Chicago is a killing field as well.
Illinois is one of the most corrupt.
How many other governors have been to prison, right?
I understand it's a beautiful state, beautiful farmland, salt of the earth people.
Most of the problems in Illinois are Chicago and surrounding area, but man alive, Illinois, like I said, is one of those states, it has to be an emergency in the last five years for me to go to that state, or it has to be something that's extremely important before I will even enter that state, simply because of the way they view the Second Amendment.
Now, we just read that they're so corrupt, they want out-of-state abortionists who lost their license after committing illegal abortions to be welcome in Illinois.
Yep.
Because it's all about the business.
California is doing similar type things, just like it's as radical or more so than Illinois.
Senator Skinner is trying to block warrants that are issued in states like Texas and other pro-life states that actually, we've gone through the judicial process, we have a warrant to maybe to investigate and then we want to enforce that in California perhaps
because an abortionist has fled there to California and has a license there.
Well, she wants to block any of that.
It is a trend in California to ignore the full faith and credit clause of the United
States Constitution.
They want to say, well, our laws don't recognize other states' laws.
Well, that's not going to work in a United States of America.
So they're doing the same type of things as Illinois.
They're trying to, they want to build California up to be an abortion I mean, it's amazing because many, many people are moving out of California and so they're losing business, obviously.
So what are they doing?
Instead of lowering taxes, instead of helping people just stay in California with lowered property taxes or anything else, what are they doing?
They're building business.
The big business is abortion and the abortion cartel and chemical abortion.
That's what California has now made.
It's the sanctity of abortion, really.
It's a sanctuary state for abortion, just like Illinois, because we're in a civil war for life.
That's what's happening.
We have states that are pro-life, and then we have these states that are abortion-minded, pro-abortion, and they are demanding to push their abortion agenda across the rest of the nation.
They're not satisfied that the Dobbs decision has said, well, we have, you know, different states can pass different laws.
That's not good enough for Illinois or for California.
They are demanding that their laws be supreme over other states' laws because it's, and it's only about abortion.
That is the singular issue because that is how, to get back to your introduction of this segment, it's about the sanctity of life.
If we honor the life of an individual, That is consistent with our constitution.
That is the basis of our constitution, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Well, if life is not sacred, if it doesn't matter, if you can take life indiscriminately, our constitution falls because we only recognize limited government to protect the individual.
So if I can get rid of individual rights, if I can make pro-abortion the law of the land, that sets up the government.
Absolutely.
Give your website, Susan.
Sure.
It's the righttolifeleague.org.
We are the very first pro-life organization in the United States, founded in 1967.
We're based in California, and what we do is we lobby against bad bills, we educate on the truth of abortion, and we help pro-life clinics, centers, and maternity homes Keep their doors open in the most anti-life state in the United States, California.
Well, you're doing great work, Susan.
That's why we like to highlight you here.
Thanks for being with us tonight.
Thank you, God bless you, and God bless America.
Amen.
Susan Swift checking in.
Check out her website.
Joining me now is a first-time guest.
I think, sometimes I find out I've actually interviewed people that I didn't think I had, but that's what happens when you run literally hundreds and hundreds, in some cases thousands, over the last few years through your news desk.
But I believe this is my first time to interview Marlee Hornick.
Marlee, I mean Hornick.
Marlee, welcome to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Thank you.
Nice to see you.
Yeah, this is my first time.
You're correct.
Marley Hornick.
Am I saying your first name correctly?
It's Marley, like Bob Marley.
Okay.
I thought it was at first, and I thought, well, maybe that's not right.
But I was trying to rely on my phonics to get it done.
Well, thank you for being with us.
Tell our audience a little bit about yourself, please.
Sure.
I'm the director of New York Citizens Audit, which is an all-volunteer organization, obviously in New York.
A group of freedom-loving, liberty-loving patriots from across New York State, hundreds and hundreds of us, who have been doing an open-source audit of the New York State voter database and also doing some comparisons with the county voter rolls as well.
So we've been, we just thought, you know, there's probably nothing to see in New York State, but let's just take a look while we're here.
And we have found millions and millions of registrations that clear clear violations of New York state election law and federal election law as well.
Federal civil rights law also.
Wow.
So we're looking at a pretty hot topic here.
We're looking at basically what we're seeing is that the database is being manipulated.
We have hard evidence of that, and we've been working with law enforcement agents across New York State.
We're meeting with sheriffs.
We're meeting with DAs.
We're meeting with SIU of the state police.
We're meeting with people all over the place and showing them we have a problem.
The database is compromised.
The database is compromised.
Now, what is your background?
I'm a homeschooled mom, actually.
I had a lot of time available.
to put onto this.
And because in New York State, the lockdowns were so severe
and the mandates were so severe, we had people coming into our organization
who should have been making seven figures, doing auditing, data analysis, research.
Because they were out of a job?
Because they were out of a job?
So they were out of a job.
So they said, well, let me get involved in this.
So you were able to get some of the brightest people who you said should be making seven figures.
They were able to come work for you because they were out of job due to COVID.
So what you're saying is you've put some serious brain trust behind this.
Exactly.
That's exactly right.
And we've done a lot of research.
We've looked at all the different databases.
We look at the raw data.
We don't download spreadsheets from the Board of Elections.
We go straight to the raw data.
And I'll tell you something, our analysis from the 2020 general election shows clearly that no official sources match in their accounting of what took place in that election.
The Secretary of State, their official numbers don't match the State Board of Elections official numbers, they don't match the precinct counts, and they don't match the county official numbers, and the deficit is actually 338,356 more votes cast than voters who voted in the 2020 general election.
That's before you even look at the irregular and ineligible registrants, the millions of ineligible registrants that we have uncovered inside the database.
Wow.
So it's like your checkbook, right?
If your money in doesn't match your bank statement, you audit.
It's just normal.
Yeah, so you sent over a graphic.
I don't know if I can get it online here fast enough.
You sent over a graphic, though, that says that your findings show that 2,427,827 New York state voter ID numbers attached to 1,170,790 registrants.
1,827 New York State voter ID numbers attached to 1,170,790 registrants.
What does that mean?
Well, under New York State law, and this is true, I believe, in every state, but particularly
in New York, election law is very clear.
You can have multiple county Board of Elections ID numbers if you move from one county to another, but for your entire voting life, you can only ever have one state Board of Elections ID number in New York.
Even if you leave the state and come back, they have to update your registration with your new information.
They can't add another state Board of Elections ID number.
That's because it's as sacred as your social security number.
That is the vote to which your vote... I mean, that is the number, I'm sorry, to which your vote is attached.
So if you have two numbers, or like Mr. B in the Bronx, if you have 21, you can cast two, or you could cast 21 votes.
With the same personal identifying information.
I did find the graphic.
Same name, date of birth, and address.
Wow.
I did find the graphic.
Look at this graphic, guys.
987,490 voters who registered on January 1st from 1900 to 2021.
You got some old voters there.
Is that what that means?
Well, it just means that they registered to vote on a date when federal offices and state offices are closed.
So they couldn't possibly have registered to vote on January 1st.
And that brings up a couple of issues that the New York State Board of Elections doesn't really want to talk about straight on.
What they say is those January 1st registration dates were default dates from when we had to change from paper registration to electronic registration database, right?
So there were some people we just didn't know their date, their registration date, or in some cases their date of birth.
And so we just entered a default date.
The problem with entering a default date is it's false.
So when you have false information inside of a database that is critical national security infrastructure, right?
This is the state voter roll database for federal and state elections in New York.
This is not kindergarten folks, right?
This is not about who plays nice in the sandbox.
This is a national security issue.
Yes.
And this database is carefully protected by a network of state and federal laws that ascertain whether or not this database has ever been breached.
They protect it and they demonstrate if it's been breached.
And so when you have all these January 1st registration dates that are supposedly a default, like nearly a million False dates inside that database.
There is no one who can say with certainty, once they're dropped in there, what the real date was.
I can't say it.
You can't say it.
The State Board of Elections commissioners, they don't know what the real date is.
And there's no way to know if, you know, if all of those were originally transferred or if some of them have been created since then.
What we do know is that the State Board of Elections in New York has the ability And has had it for 20 years since they turned the database electronic to send those folks a postcard.
Say, hey, if you don't let us know, come by the office, you know, we'll fix up your red, come by, we'll, we'll, we'll get the right date in there.
You just let us know.
But if you don't, you're going to be inactive.
You're not going to be able to vote in the next election.
Wouldn't that also mean, correct me if I'm wrong, wouldn't that also mean, though, if they registered on January 1st, which you can't do because it's a holiday, but if they registered on 1900, I mean, are we to believe they're still alive and voting?
Well, that's another issue.
We have another category of ineligible voters we've identified.
We call them the age-disruptant voters.
So we don't really know exactly how old people are when they die unless you can look up all the death records.
However, we do have 20,000 people registered to vote and active in the rolls in New York State who are older than the oldest living human in the United States of America.
So that we do know.
Who of these other folks may be deceased?
That's the big research project.
And we haven't really focused on it, honestly, because the number of dead people voting compared to the number of what we call clones, that's the folks who have more than one registration ID number, is pretty minimal.
It's still fraud.
Yeah, let's go to the next one.
1.9 million.
I'm assuming that's what the MM means, right?
1.9 million registrations in the state voter rolls missing from the county rolls.
Yes, and that's a really big deal, actually.
You wouldn't necessarily know it's a big deal if you haven't read New York state election law.
But under New York state election law, The county voter roll databases are the only place where registration records can be added, changed, or canceled.
So the State Board of Elections has no authority to create voter registrations.
Their database, NYS Voter, is considered the official record for the state of New York, but it is nothing more than an umbrella.
Well, let's look at this next one before we run out of time.
that the counties continually update, lifetime, real-time updates. So as soon as they enter
somebody into their county roles, they're immediately updated in the state database.
Well, let's look at this next one.
Before we run out of time.
Hold on, because that's 1.9 million registrants that can't have been created
according to the law. They don't exist in the county, but they're in the state database.
So they shouldn't be allowed to be in the system then?
Well, the problem is nobody knows how they were made.
And when you have voter rolls that are clearly inaccurate and clearly violate state law in the way that they were created, now you have a problem.
When you go to certify an election, you can't claim with honesty that that election is accurate.
The certifier has a positive and affirmative duty Under the Constitution, certification has legal meaning.
It means I personally, and as in my official duties, attest that this election was accurate and in compliance with the law.
So this, those facts and figures you're looking at there, they prove that the New York State Board of Elections is dealing with a database that has millions of material violations of the law.
Whether they did it, Or someone's hacking in?
We don't know.
But before you certify, you have to investigate.
You can't say it was accurate.
If you don't know that the database has been compromised and you certify, that's perjury because you're claiming it's accurate and you never looked at it to make sure.
If you do know the election is inaccurate and you certify, that's perjury and fraud.
Well, and you have here, in the conclusions, over 1 million felony violations of New York City or New York State election law.
Over 1 million felonies?
That's correct, because all of those excess State Board of Elections ID numbers are felonies, because they represent possibilities where individuals or corrupt officials Can add votes, can inject votes into the election results at scale.
Notice quickly here, 625,359 more registrations than voting age citizens in just six counties.
That's true.
Yeah, we have 62 counties and six of them, I think Nassau County on Long Island is 155% registered to vote.
55% registered to vote.
Erie County is 145% registered to vote.
These are outrageous numbers and this is just their data.
All we're doing is addition and subtraction on their database.
And then we're looking at the census.
Look at these two more before we run out of time.
740,396 ineligible votes statewide.
340,396 in eligible votes statewide 338,356
more votes cast than voters who voted in 2020
They got more votes than voters you
This certification was a fraud.
You cannot certify approvably inaccurate elections because our elections are supposed to be sacred.
The choices and the will of the people is supposed to be reflected in those who are put in those positions to sign bills into law.
Absolutely.
They were not accurate.
And no one knows who the real winners were.
That is the problem during a time period in American history when there is so much contention
between political parties.
Absolutely.
So much stuff.
Throw up her name and organization real quick under her name again.
What is your website?
It's AuditNY.com.
AuditNY.com.
And if you look us up on any platforms, any social media, it's New York Citizen's Audit News.
Okay, give the website one more time.
Auditny.com.
And you can sign up there to volunteer.
You can sign up to help us with our resolution for an end-to-end audit of the 2022 general election because, frankly, these are the results from 2020.
But you know what?
Nothing changed.
We brought all this evidence to our state officials, the Board of Elections, the Attorney General, the Secretary of State.
They never even responded.
Nothing changed in that database, and they administered another election.
There's no way that 2022 was provably accurate, and so we're calling for an end-to-end audit based on these absolute, egregious violations of the law.
Well, if those elected officials got there through voter fraud, then they're probably not going to look into voter fraud.
Well, I agree.
And we have had a lot of resistance.
That's true.
But like I said, we are now officially, there are so many people in New York who are saying to themselves, this just doesn't add up.
What we are looking at as policy priorities in New York State, you know, the ability to run a medical experiment on our children and tell them it's okay to change gender.
You know, if you cut off a girl's She never has a choice later in life to breastfeed a baby.
And that should be a crime.
But that's a policy initiative, a priority in New York State.
Gender reassignment.
Absolutely.
You know, all of this stuff.
It's terrible.
And people are looking at each other like, this doesn't add up.
And so now, like I said, we're working with sheriffs.
We're working with DAs.
We are working with officials all over New York State.
They are coming out of the woodwork and saying, you know what?
We want to hear from you guys.
We want to meet.
Let's talk.
We want to know what you found, and we want to know if it's actionable.
Absolutely.
Great report.
You've got our text if you need to come back for anything.
Any other breaking news, you're welcome back.
Great report.
Thanks for what you're doing.
Thank you so much for having me on.
I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Great interview.
Marlee Hornick checking in tonight.
First-time guest, and I'm sure she'll be back.
Great report.
Great graphics, too.
Very easy to follow and understand, right?
At Home School Mom, we've got involved.
Yeah, great example for all of us.
All right, that's our report tonight, the Lindell Report.
Brandon House in for Mike Lindell, who's out on business.
He's running around the country and making phone calls and talking to people about the RNC election.
So again, happy to sit in for him, honored to sit in for him.
If you like what Mike's up to, and what Mike's doing, and this platform, and this whole network, Well, we need your support and you can support Mike and this broadcast network all at the same time by going to MyPillow.com using that promo code L77.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes, and more.
MyPillow.com promo code L77.
It also works at MyStore.com, the home for American entrepreneurs started by Mike Lindell.
MyStore.com.
Please use that same promo code for savings and support Mike's work.
L77.
Don't forget about the My Coffee there that's so popular and you can get a subscription to that.
Medium, light, or dark roast.
It's non-GMO, not sprayed with pesticides.
Organic.
And the coffee pods are there too.
Whole bean or ground already.
You'll find it all at mystore.com.
Use that promo code L77.
The Worldview Report newscast comes up next.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
You're watching Lyndell TV.
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, and I want to thank each and every one of you for your support by bringing you the pillow that started it all.
Get my standard MyPillow, regularly $49.98, now only $19.98 with your promo code.
Just like all of you, I've tried every pillow out there, and none of them worked.
That's why I invented MyPillow.
▲
Export Selection