Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 20, 2022 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell

58:44

The Lindell Report (10-20-22)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You had me wanting to see that show, so we did put it up on Frank's Beach, right?
	Yes, we did.
	I think we ran that Monday.
	I think that's what you did.
	But whatever.
	So anyway, we've got a couple guests.
	Brandon, explain what you got.
	I just got back, you guys, and I just got this in front of me here, this breaking news about Dominion voting machine tabulators were discovered to be connected To a non-official IP address.
	That's right.
	What a shocker.
	But this is breaking news.
	Brandon, will you explain to everyone what you got going here on the show?
	This is exactly what's going on.
	You've read the headline from the press release, and that's exactly what's happened.
	We'll go through this with our guest today.
	Sean Smith is joining us.
	Sean, welcome to the broadcast.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Hi, Brandon.
	Hi, Mike.
	And we're also joined by Peter... I don't get the name correct.
	Peter Berniger.
	Am I saying that right, Peter?
	That's Kratz, Kratz, Kratz, Kratz.
	All right, Peter.
	We don't have to put his stuff up on the screen there, guys.
	I was just going for his name.
	Pull that down.
	Peter, tell us what your... You guys can pull that down.
	There we go.
	Peter, tell us what your... You're an attorney, right, Peter?
	I'm the co-founder of the Wisconsin Center for Election Justice.
	The co-founder of the... Say it one more time, because we didn't hear you.
	The Wisconsin Center for Election Justice.
	Okay, great.
	All right.
	So, who wants to go first to describe this press release tonight?
	Peter should.
	Peter should definitely do it.
	All right.
	It's his find and that's his neighborhood.
	All right.
	Great job, Peter.
	Go.
	The floor is yours.
	Thank you.
	We had a clerk, a municipal clerk, contact us who was very concerned of what the clerk found using Dominion tabulators.
	And just to back up for a second, our state is run by the Wisconsin Election Commission and not by the Secretary of State.
	And we have a very decentralized system.
	There's 1,852 municipal clerks, and then we have 72 county clerks.
	So we have had several clerks approach us and provide information on other topics of concern, but this one in particular is disturbing.
	I went to the location, took pictures, wrote up a PowerPoint presentation, and the gist of what we saw, I saw, I took pictures of, and then I have the tapes in my possession, the tabulator tapes, is that they transmitted the results to the county, and that IP address matches up.
	So you can imagine on the election night, the clerk, our polls close at 8 PM.
	She stops the voting process.
	If there's no more voters in line, then the clerk presses the button to print out the voting tape result.
	And that's the software programming process of a Dominion tabulator.
	The next step after that.
	is he or she puts in the Verizon USB stick if they transmit the results by modem and this particular location does.
	So the clerk put in the Verizon modem supplied by Dominion transmitted the results and on the tape it shows that it went to the county clerk's IP address and I confirmed that with the county clerk.
	But then About 240 milliseconds later, it also transmitted the election results to a nonprofit in Madison, Wisconsin.
	Wow.
	The name of that nonprofit is WISCnet, and it's W-I-S-C-N-E-T, and their website is wiscnet.net.
	It's a C3 nonprofit based in a science park in Madison.
	Now, they do provide communication services to various municipalities and universities in Wisconsin and also across the nation.
	And in my PowerPoint presentation, it shows the network maps.
	And the network maps go to various cities, Chicago, Seattle, Denver.
	Um, and, uh, various cities in the state of Wisconsin.
	So when you are looking at this, uh, tape printout, uh, and what they are is the tabulator logs and, uh, their public records, but nobody really knew they were there.
	By chance this clerk looked at him and saw something suspicious.
	We have no idea.
	This is the first phase of the story.
	I think there's going to probably be four parts to it.
	Let me interrupt right there.
	Are you telling me that a clerk came to you as a whistleblower?
	Correct.
	Yes.
	We've had several people come to us as whistleblowers, people who have worked inside the election systems from the city of Milwaukee to other locations like the city of Green Bay.
	This particular person is a municipal clerk, one of the 1,852 in our state.
	And on that tape, which is the printout after the results have been modemed, When you say it was multiple elections, it wasn't just the 2020 election?
	after that, like I said, I count it's 241 milliseconds, it transferred the election
	results on the election nights, this is multiple elections, to a non-profit in Madison, Wisconsin.
	When you say it was multiple elections, it wasn't just the 2020 election?
	It's doing it for all the elections? I have the tapes in my possession of the November 3rd,
	2020 election transmission results, the election in 2021, and also for our August 9th primary that
	we just had this year.
	Every election is transmitting the results to the county and also to this Wisconet nonprofit C3 Corporation.
	It's a private corporation.
	On Madison, Wisconsin.
	Is this a violation of Wisconsin law to do this?
	Of course it is.
	And I'm sure Sean will speak more to this, but it violates everything, the legal chain of custody.
	It violates state law.
	It violates federal law.
	It violates the VSSP, federal guidelines.
	There's no certification that allows transfer results.
	Of our election results to a non-profit, a private corporation.
	Was it doing it one time?
	Was it doing it one time or was it doing it all throughout the night?
	It would transfer, the tapes show it transfers first once to the voting file, transfers to the county, and then right after that it transfers it to the non-profit.
	One time though?
	I mean, was this being done throughout the night or at the end of the night?
	Just after the polls closed at eight o'clock, so that some tapes The clerk got the election done in 20 minutes and that's when the transfer was done.
	Another election night, the clerk transferred 50 minutes because maybe she was cleaning up a provisional voting ballot issue before she could do transfer.
	Hold on, Brannon.
	I leave for a few days and I come back to this gift.
	This is awesome!
	I'm telling you what!
	I'm sitting here with my mouth hanging open.
	I'm reading this paper.
	I'm going, you know what?
	This is gold.
	My question is, so you just, when you confirmed all this now, that was just this last week or two.
	And that's my first question.
	The second one is, is there somebody investigating this nonprofit yet?
	Or do you need somebody to dive in on that?
	Well, first off, this just was investigated over the last week and a half.
	Wow.
	We announced it today to the...
	A news release is coming out by State Assemblywoman Janelle Branschen, who's the chair of the Elections Committee for our State Assembly.
	We are investigating it as much as possible.
	We do not know if WISC-Net even knows that the results are being transferred to them, and this opens up a big, big door.
	We, I did skip tracing of the IP addresses.
	There's two of them, both go back to WISCnet.
	And those two IP addresses, when I skip traced them back, they each went approximately 30 steps backwards that I could do pings off of different IP addresses.
	And you could see it bouncing around in the UW, University of Wisconsin, system to different colleges and then one of them, the
	second number, went through 30 different pings and then it stopped and it ended
	up in Finland.
	Oh wow. Now that does not mean, I'm gonna clarify, that does not mean that the
	election results were transferred to Finland but it does mean it could have
	been. It's possible is what it means.
	So before we continue, because this might help Mike and I who are hearing all this for the first time, I know we need to get to Sean from the security breach standpoint and why firewalls and other things weren't detecting this, but would it help Mike and I and the audience understand this better if we go through your PowerPoint and these images you sent?
	Yes, very much.
	All right, let's go to the first slide.
	You just call for each slide.
	I'll go to it as you call on it.
	That's a Dominion tabulator.
	It was updated this July of 2021, uh, 2022 with the latest, um, software firmware from Dominion.
	Okay.
	Wait, let's go back to that.
	What do you mean?
	It was updated July of 2022?
	Yes.
	I guarantee you they probably, that's probably when they, uh, deleted the whole election, but go ahead.
	The next screen is the technician menu of the Dominion system.
	And the access to these logs are where you enter, the clerk enters in, typically to change the daylight savings time.
	So she can change the date and time on the machine.
	And again, that's there for the purpose of daylight savings time.
	That screen is the important one.
	That shows where the red rectangle box is.
	It says log review.
	And the logs are actually to the right in the black and white text that you see.
	And I have a printout of those.
	Wow.
	That is a blown up copy of the logs.
	That IP address traces to the nonprofit WISCNET in Madison, Wisconsin.
	That's an actual tape that comes out.
	It's a three inch wide tape.
	When the clerk pushes the button, it prints out the logs.
	And what a log is, in layman's terms, is just a recording of every single transaction that takes place in the tabulator.
	Even if, say, the clerk opens a door, it records it.
	The date, the time, and what happened.
	When he or she plugs in the modem, it records the date, the time, what happened, that the modem was plugged in.
	So these tapes can run on one election.
	They can run 30 feet in length, and it just records every single step, every single keystroke, if you will, of the computer.
	I want to ask, can you go, what it just said there, Do all, as far as you know, do all Dominion systems run on Verizon?
	To my knowledge, yes, and that's based on a letter from our Head Administrator of Elections, Megan Wolf, and it's also based on testimony by the President of Dominion, John Polis, before the United States Congress.
	Right.
	The reason I ask everybody that's watching, remember here at Frank Speech, we are not allowed To text market on Verizon, ever since I posted the interview with our real president, Donald Trump, almost a year ago, coming up a year ago, November, since that time, we have been shut down with any text marketing, any sending texts out to idiots.
	So if you don't get texts from Frank's Beach, everybody, it's because you have Verizon.
	If you have a friend or someone that's getting the text that alerts of what's going on, what we have going on here at Frank's Beach, It's because of Verizon, but that's very interesting.
	I'm starting to see some ties together here, but go ahead and keep going.
	That brings a good question, Mike, is that where is Verizon in this?
	Because they've testified before Congress, they have put it in their certification for the state of Wisconsin and the letter of certification stating that they use Verizon, a dedicated network.
	Well, If that's true, the transmission should go from the municipal clerk via the modem to a cell phone tower to the county clerk.
	So why is WISCNET involved?
	And again, I have to clarify, they may not know that it's being transmitted to them, but then it's the $64 million question.
	What you mean by that, if it was transferred to them, there could be somebody internal, The nonprofit itself might not know, but obviously somebody probably knows, right?
	Correct.
	Correct.
	And that's the question.
	Who knows?
	Who is receiving that transmission?
	Right, right.
	And this next slide right here, can you explain what this is?
	Because I guess this is the proof of the WestNet's IP address, right?
	That is correct.
	That's a service that's available online and you just enter in the IP address and it provides very detailed information.
	I highly recommend their service.
	I have no association with them at all, but they provide very nice detail of IP address information.
	Before we go any further, can we bring Sean in?
	Sean, can you speak to the security breaches here?
	Brandon, where to even begin?
	So first of all, just to stick a wireless networking device into it, that is basically the same as plugging a cell phone into it.
	That little thumb drive, That he's showing in the graphic.
	It actually has a SIM card slot on the side and the SIM card can be loading software into that device.
	Plus, once you plug it in, whoever you meant to connect it to, it's just like a it's just like any other cellular phone.
	You can say that it's on a secure or private or dedicated network, but it's still a wireless transmit and receive antenna.
	And that's the next point I want to make is.
	Just because it shows or indicates or the Secretary of State or WEC states that the purpose of the device was to transmit doesn't mean that's all it does.
	The protocol that that system is using Could easily be used for two-way communication.
	So you could be triggering something on the voting system.
	You could be altering something on the voting system.
	And don't forget that, yes, it's showing in that log that it connected after the completion of the polling, you know, after the polls closed.
	But it also connected during, and I would assume Peter can maybe confirm this, logic and accuracy tests, which is before the election.
	So you could have software loaded on there.
	It could be just enough bandwidth for a trigger.
	It could be a feedback loop for somebody who is tracking, you know, the voting results while they still have time to be able to inject, you know, mail-in ballots and that kind of thing.
	I mean, there's all kinds of evil that can come from that kind of connection.
	That's why, so when the Secretary of State, in her petition for approval to the WAC, stated that the system had been federally tested That is not an accurate statement.
	That system was not federally tested.
	A different configuration that was not set up for wireless, because it's not just the wireless device that they're plugging into the tabulator, it's also that there has to be the ImageCast listener software running in some path to the election management system server.
	That opens up the whole voting system suite.
	And remember, this is just one municipal clerk.
	There are going to be lots of municipal clerks and other voting centers that are doing the same thing.
	So what was connected to those devices?
	Who was connecting to it from the WISCnet and from other IP addresses, potentially, that weren't even appearing in the logs?
	Was it one-way?
	Was it two-way?
	Was there any alteration on the machines?
	All of that is not something that the Wisconsin Election Commission personnel or the Secretary of State Are going to be able to answer.
	You have to have cyber professionals with forensic capability and credentials and they have to be independent.
	And they should be operating under a law enforcement investigation at this point, because so many laws have been broken by just the, the evidence shows that the laws have been broken.
	Not only did the secretary of state misrepresent the testing system completely to the whack.
	But it doesn't appear under Wisconsin statute that it was legal to certify or approve the system for use because it wasn't secure.
	And that capability in that system had not been tested for security at all.
	And it's about the worst thing you could do is to connect a system to outside networks.
	Wow.
	Let's go to the next slide.
	Again, this is more confirmation.
	Or maybe, wait a minute, this IP address to which voting results were sent to is the Eau Claire Technical College.
	So this is a different group now.
	No, Eau Claire Technical College is a, including Chippewa Falls Technical College, which is next door to it, or close by, they are members of Westnet.
	Okay, but hold on, I just see Kathy Bernier there.
	Whoa, stop the presses!
	Our old friend, and I say that sarcastically, Kathy Bernier.
	Remember, everybody, I put her in the category as one of the biggest traitors this country's ever seen.
	And what she's done to the people of Wisconsin, along with Robin Voss and all the rest of these, I don't know what you'd call her, a rhino, a traitor, whatever you want to call her.
	She's got a very big history here on Frank's Speech, right, Brandon?
	Oh, yeah.
	She said, she came out and said, she's supposed to be a Republican, I think, and she came out and said that what you were doing was, what was the word, adjective she used?
	She specifically called me out what I was doing.
	She absolutely did.
	I'll look it up while you, it was a charade.
	Logan just remembered.
	She said what Mike Lindell was a charade.
	Thank you, Logan.
	Mike Lindell is a big charade, what he does, and she's just part of a big charade.
	So what do you have to say about Kathy Bernier there?
	Kathy Bernier caused a lot of our election problems in the state of Wisconsin because she was the one that they always went to to write the law and she couldn't leave her hands off of it, take her hands off of the adding more and more and more.
	And that's one of our major problems in Wisconsin is that the law is so complicated, it goes on the backs of these clerks, some who are part-time, some who have all other responsibilities to run the town or the city that they live in besides elections.
	And she made the law so complicated that nobody can figure it out.
	And then the law has been poorly written where it's not clear.
	So now we find ourselves in.
	I blame Kathy Bernier and Speaker Robin Vos for setting up this catastrophe of a system that we have in Wisconsin.
	And everyone thought it was okay and they were doing their jobs, the election officials, until November 3rd came along and exposed everything.
	Well, and plus they're the biggest blockers, I believe, I put Robin Voss and Kathy Bernier in the top ten lockers in the United States to expose these machines and these computers.
	They're in the top ten.
	I mean, they're right up there with Rusty Bowers, Brad Rassenberger, Brian Kemp, all the usual suspects.
	But Kathy Bernier and Robin Voss, what Wisconsin has there, that's why I want to say this right now, it is so important, everybody, that you write in Adam Steen.
	Against Robin Voss and get him out of Wisconsin.
	You know, I'll do a little plug there.
	This is a little mini commercial within the show.
	Robin Voss has to go in Wisconsin.
	I don't care who you are.
	Everybody should be going door to door in his district saying vote for Adam Steen.
	I want to get to Wisconsin and do a rally there for Adam.
	But Kathy Bernier, oh, you know, what a shame.
	I'd love to post her phone number up there and email like I did that one time.
	So people could call into it.
	I wouldn't even know what to say to her other than call her a traitor.
	So we won't do that today.
	There's really no call to action.
	You know, what do you do?
	I mean, there's nothing they can do now.
	But how would they explain?
	How do you explain in Wisconsin?
	Now this is just more piles on the pile after the seventh month investigation of Michael Gableman says we need to decertify Wisconsin.
	Then you've got the crooked whack there, the WEC.
	You guys are giving Georgia a run for your money for the most corrupt state and, and Colorado, Sean Smith.
	I mean, I mean, but you know, these three states, it's like, where does it end?
	Where does, where does, where does evil end and good begin?
	You know, I mean, this is a, And then it's all tied together.
	You go, oh, wow, there's another tie-in to this.
	And back on the presentation there, Brandon, if you could show the next slide, please.
	OK.
	OK, that's the local network.
	That's where we were.
	That's where we were.
	OK, that's the local network.
	That's a local network map of WISPNET.
	And you can see that the connections are going out of state and they do go down to Chicago on that map.
	It's just cut off a little bit.
	And then down to Madison, up to Eau Claire, over to Green Bay.
	So all the key suspects, if you want to say that.
	If you could go to the next one, please.
	Where does Robin Voss live on this map?
	He lives in the lower right-hand corner in Racine, which is just south of Milwaukee.
	Okay.
	I got you.
	Oh, that's where all the Racine County Sheriff did all his big investigation and they found everybody in the nursing homes, right?
	That they said, who would you like to vote for?
	And they shake their heads.
	Yes.
	Or whoever they, you know, just disgusting what they've done.
	Oh.
	Now this map shows a, uh, the Northern tier network for WISC-Net.
	Uh, and the concerning part here.
	is that once the election results are transmitted to WISC-Net, again, whether they know it or not,
	there could be system administrators, there could be bad actors inside, but each one of
	one of these points then is a vulnerability of our election results being released or
	provided to election fraudsters to use them in a bad way.
	So look at all the connections though, first, Peter, in Michigan.
	What's going on in Michigan?
	Holy cow.
	Correct.
	Wow.
	This is unbelievable.
	So that's part of that whole network.
	It is.
	It is.
	Does everybody understand how computers, I've been saying this and saying this, computers go horizontal.
	They cover, you just break into one and you can go into this vast network.
	And that's what happened in our 2020 election and probably elections before, elections after.
	That's why these machines got to go.
	We got to melt them down, turn them into prison bars.
	And it looks like we have some more suspects there.
	This is unbelievable.
	So now when the results are transmitted to WISC-Net in Madison or Eau Claire, Wisconsin, or Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, you don't know who received it.
	And once they receive it, you don't know where it went to after that.
	As I mentioned earlier in the ping tracing that I did, Uh, it went back, I could ping it 30 different IP addresses, which are basically either, they're either going to be a personal computer or, uh, typically probably a server.
	Uh, so I pinged it back 30 times.
	Each one of those is a vulnerability and access point, and it could get into the university system, uh, and all those universities are connected.
	So it's, it's unconscionable that we're providing election results to a private nonprofit corporation.
	Wow.
	OK, so let's go to this next one.
	You list off, in support of U.S., you can, you list off all these partners.
	What's the significance there, please?
	Are you talking on this map on the screen?
	Yes.
	Yes, sir.
	It's just showing us that it tells us that it's possible that the election results could go to every single one of those points.
	Wow.
	And I noticed something interesting about this map.
	Notice the two states that it seems to absolutely have nothing to do with.
	Why do we have these two states in the center of the country there?
	What is that, Kansas?
	We have Kansas above Kansas.
	That's Nebraska, I believe, right?
	It probably is the University of Nebraska.
	But there's nothing going on in Nebraska is what I'm saying.
	That's kind of interesting that it's avoiding Nebraska altogether.
	Because who is in Nebraska, Mike?
	E-S-N-S.
	Yes!
	Oh yeah, absolutely, of course.
	That makes all that you're right.
	I'll bet y'all every one of these dots is maybe tied into who has dominion.
	I don't know.
	It's hard to say.
	There's more than 16 states there.
	But isn't it interesting that all of a sudden the one state that has ES&S is like, nothing's going on there.
	I mean, is that, is that, is that a, um, um, Hey, we're not doing this.
	We have nothing to do with this.
	Or, you know what I'm saying?
	Is this, is this too obvious that something's being covered up here or there's a separation?
	I mean, the biggest thing, the The biggest story here is, is that will this be enough for Fox News or Newsmax or some big media to cover this story and to expose?
	I just got a thing while we were on here, you guys.
	I'm doing Facebook Live while we speak.
	And one of the guys put down there, good news, everybody.
	The Republicans are voting big in Georgia.
	Goodbye, Stacey Abrams.
	Well, if we all know we've been talking about the machines in Georgia, the Democrats are not going to win because the Kemp and Brad Rassenberger.
	And Chris Carr are all three Republicans and they control the machines.
	I go, give me a break.
	Sean, you know that.
	I mean, if you're a Democrat running in Georgia, you think you'd win against Brad Ratzenberger or Brian Kemp?
	No.
	You know, this isn't a, this is not a Democrat Republican thing, everybody.
	This is a machines and computers.
	And now they're caught again.
	They're caught again.
	When I say again, we have every, this is like a whole nother camera angle, isn't it?
	Basically, it's a whole nother camera angle of the same crime.
	And here it is another, another, we got you.
	And now it's, where does it go from here?
	Sean, I'd like to hear your comments on that.
	Do you think Fox news is going to jump all over this?
	Yeah, I think just like all the other election integrity news, we know they're cowards.
	Sean, did you say two-way?
	bought out of both. I mean, that's a shocking thing is any one of these instances should be
	enough for a massive investigation. But of course, the DOJ is so corrupt at this point,
	they're more interested in trying to prosecute parents for standing up for their kids.
	Sean, did you say two-way communication a while ago?
	Yeah, that modem and the method that they use are completely capable of two-way communication.
	And it's not secure FTP with SSL.
	It's not that secure.
	This is not something that nation-state actors and kind of advanced criminal actors haven't broken into over and over again.
	That's if it wasn't corrupted when it was handed to them.
	I mean, it's not like the WECC or the clerk is making their own SIM card.
	Somebody gives them a SIM card and that SIM card really dictates what happens in between that cellular USB modem and the network.
	And then what Peter was talking about with it bouncing between all those nodes, that is a classic mechanism to obscure the ultimate destination.
	I mean, we've seen that for infiltration and exfiltration over and over and over again.
	There is no reason why something transmitted, even if there was an authorized reason, which there's not, even if it was safe in any way, which there's not, There's no reason for the transmission or the connection to be bouncing between multiple hops within the same autonomous system, which is like a cluster of addresses.
	So two things there.
	Some of these institutions then may not know that their servers are being used to do this, number one.
	And number two, I want to go back again to the two-way communication.
	If there's two-way communication, what would be coming back in?
	Is that where they then change the votes?
	Or could?
	You could change the votes.
	The votes that they want to appear in the results could already be loaded on the machine in a hidden partition.
	They could even be on that same wireless dongle because it has onboard memory.
	So what comes back the other way could be a command, a trigger that causes it to execute just-in-time code.
	So in the logs, it showed the execution of some C++ source code files.
	And that's extremely unusual to show that execution.
	So one of the claims that's made by voting system examiners at the voting system testing labs, and we know it's a lie because Clay Brake told us it's a lie and he was the one doing security testing for them for nine years, but they claim that they inspect the source code.
	They don't.
	They don't ever do dynamic source code evaluation.
	They seldom do full static source code evaluation.
	But when you see the execution of one of these C++ CPP files, you're looking at code that is being compiled in real time or just in time.
	In other words, it was never compiled on the system.
	It couldn't have been inspected.
	It might not even be on the system.
	It might be on one of the compact flashcards.
	Or even on the dongle itself, you know, you can have small amounts of code that assemble, that are run from there.
	Everything about it is wrong.
	You could also with a two-way communication plant malware, correct?
	That's another question.
	Number two, do any of these communications ever leave the U.S.
	and go, say, maybe to China or somewhere else and then bounce to China?
	You don't see it on these tapes.
	There's no evidence of that.
	But the fact of the multiple bounces, the way that Peter described it, that is a dead giveaway for someone engaging in some kind of malicious act.
	You just don't do that for normal transmissions, and you wouldn't want it for a secure transmission.
	You want as close to point-to-point as you can get, because that's the least vulnerable.
	That's the least opportunity for a tax service to be exploited.
	And the two-way does allow for malware plantation, right?
	To be planted.
	Sure, yeah.
	And depending on how it's executed, it might not register at all in the system.
	There might be any logged artifact of it.
	And again, I'm not a computer guy, but if you're bouncing around all these places in the U.S., does it have to bounce somewhere to a foreign nation for someone to manipulate something?
	Or could they already be logged into one of these systems in the U.S.
	and doing it all from there?
	Therefore, it would need to bounce to China.
	They could be logged in from there.
	There could also be a bot running there that is waiting for specific IP addresses or or machine IDs to come online.
	So for example, and this is a tie in now, so we've talked about connect and the significance of connect.
	And a lot of people have talked about the fact that the data, the personal identifying information, all these election and poll workers has been stored on these servers in China, where Connect gave the Chinese national government, the Chinese Communist Party, super user and super administrator access.
	Connect and Poll Chief weren't just tracking individuals, poll workers, they were also tracking equipment and facilities.
	So if If Kinect has a, if the Chinese have, for example, have a list of the equipment by serial number, by model number, then they know which of these modems is in each of the voting centers in each of the precincts or counties.
	So they could be waiting literally for that ID, which is part of the SIM card loaded into that modem.
	Plus there's a device ID for the hardware device.
	They could be just waiting for it to pop up.
	and say you know the device may think it's saying here i am i have a transmission for you and at the other end is a is a you know a hacker or an advanced persistent threat team or a bot or subroutine that is just waiting for it to come up and then connects it and then loads a program sends a trigger makes a connection We have seen all of that before.
	Plus with all the students China is bringing to the U.S.
	that come in here through the Confucius Institutes, those who are actually doing the teaching and the training, plus the students that come over here with visas.
	We have no guarantee that those people, and we know many of them are, working for the CCP so they wouldn't have to send data back to China if they're sitting here doing it in the U.S.
	Well, once they're on one of those university networks that's part of WISC-Net, it would be easy enough for them to just stick a thumb drive in that would load things up onto their servers.
	It could be a resident, you know, it might be a machine at the library that the library itself thinks is just a search terminal, but it just has enough computing power and enough storage and it's connected to the right networks.
	And so the bot or the malware just sits there resonant.
	It's dormant until it's triggered.
	Yet none of the software that these people have said, we got an intrusion.
	We've got an intrusion.
	No lights went off.
	No IP people were, you know, IT guys were alerted.
	We've got an intrusion.
	We got a security intrusion here.
	Yeah, I'd love to.
	I'd like to address that, Brandon.
	That brings up a point that this is probably the biggest question, at least I have, is that those two IP addresses that are on the tapes and they're in the Dominion tabulators that I saw in person, those IP addresses were given to Dominion to put into Their firmware or possibly on the US modem stick So who gave them those IP addresses?
	That's the that's the question.
	I want to get answered Well, I know one thing I will be all over this because uh, you know, I am in a few lawsuits with these guys you know, there's a couple billion dollars worth going on out there and but more importantly I want to get this country rid of these machines once and for all, so we have elections rather than selections.
	My question is, Peter and Sean, I guess, do I have to talk to you guys offline?
	I mean, someone needs to obviously dig into WISNet, where they either clear their name or find out who's involved.
	And I hate to say it, Sean, but you know, there's not, when you say, well, these need to be investigated, but it seems like we end up doing them ourselves.
	Because, you know, no one wants to touch anything out there.
	Are they afraid of getting sued or afraid of getting slandered?
	It doesn't matter, everybody.
	You know, you've got counties in Nevada where they're being attacked now because they say they're going to paper.
	I mean, where does it end?
	It's like, okay, are getting rid of the machines so bad that whoever even mentions it gets sued or gets attacked or gets, you know, by the rotten journalists and the media that are watching right now?
	And they're actually trying to be really nice to me lately, like they're going to do some real nice pieces on me.
	Well, we'll see.
	I just got a couple apologies going, yeah, Mike, we're not going to do that thing right now.
	We're not going to do that piece right now.
	You know, Mike, are you going to contest the 2022 election if any of your candidates don't win?
	I said, when I said to him, I said, well, if there's no crime, which there will be, It doesn't matter if they steal or try to or not, the machine's got to go.
	I'm never going to stop because we lose our country forever if they're not gone.
	This is just one more.
	This is huge, everybody.
	If you're just tuning in, the headlines are Dominion voting machine tabulators were discovered to be connected to a non-official IP address.
	Peter, can you say one more time for everybody what that means, that they're connected to a non-official?
	Kind of just take us back and summarize what you discovered there, what was brought to you.
	Well, we're seeing two transmissions.
	So when the election ends at eight o'clock at night in our state, the clerk prints out the voting tabulator tape.
	Then in sequence, Only after that tape is printed out of the results, then the clerk, he or she can insert the Verizon modem stick and transmit the results to the county clerk.
	And again, in my opinion, it should go from the Verizon tabulator or Verizon USB stick in the tabulator to a cell phone tower, maybe a second cell phone tower if they're far away from the county seat.
	And then directly into the EMS, the election management system of the county.
	Okay.
	Well, we are seeing that, but then very shortly thereafter on that same transmission, but it's separate, it's a separate file transfer.
	It's going to a private nonprofit in Madison, Wisconsin.
	Now, even if they have a contract with that private nonprofit, it's why are we sending election results of federal and state and federal elections over a private Line.
	At least the government should own the line, at the minimum.
	And I want to interject to everybody, this is all you terrible journalists watching right now.
	I want all you to know, he said multiple elections.
	If you could bring that up one more time, Peter, this wasn't just the 2020 election.
	Can you name a couple more that were in there that you found?
	Um, I have the tapes in my possession of the printout tapes of the Dominion tabulators for the November 3rd, 2020 election.
	I have them for, I believe the end of March, um, of 2021.
	And then I have them also for the August 9th, uh, 2022, uh, primary that we had in our state.
	Everyone shows the same two IP addresses that are not county IP addresses that they trace right to.
	Uh, the nonprofit WISC-Net, uh, and again, I want to clarify, we do not know if WISC-Net even knows this is happening.
	They could.
	Um, but that's the million dollar question again, is that who is receiving these results?
	And it opens up the door every, every step along that way for someone to, uh, receive those results.
	And I'm, I'll tell you what the theory is that what's happening.
	We have a Democrat whistleblower that came to us.
	They told us, they call it the insurance policy.
	Nothing to do with Peter Stroke and Lisa Page over in Washington, D.C.
	They obtained these results.
	Now, I think we know how, through the WISC-Net transfer, they obtained the results.
	They know how the state voted, except for some of the big liberal cities.
	So they know the vote counts.
	They know how many ballots to feed in.
	And that's why you see these delays.
	They're fake delays, like the water pipe in Georgia and people in Milwaukee and Madison and Green Bay and Kenosha and Racine, the big cities in Wisconsin.
	They delay any bogus excuse that they can do, and even Megan Wolf issued the order at 11 o'clock on November 3rd to stop counting.
	That's because they had to reorganize because they were losing so badly.
	They had to reorganize, they had to get more ballots brought in, they had them feed them through the tabulators, and then they go to these badger books and they chick Click off the names because they know at that point in the night They know that the people are registered and active on the wistful system But they have not voted because they have the badger book right in front of them.
	So they feed in other say 500 ballots and And then they go and pick 500 names off the badger books and all of a sudden you voted, you voted, you voted.
	And I'm calling this sovereign fraud.
	That's what this is.
	Wow.
	Okay.
	We're going to have to run because we got two more guests with breaking news out of Michigan tonight.
	I want to quick say something real quick though.
	I will tell everybody here, we will be reaching out to WIFSnet and finding out if they know or not.
	That's A. And another thing I want to tell everybody, this is another reason to vote in the 2022 election, the day of the election, not vote before.
	Is that correct, Peter and Sean?
	To not to vote that same day so they can't find this stuff out ahead of time.
	And it's harder for them to cheat.
	We have to make it as hard as possible.
	And yes, we will get to a point where we won't have these machines.
	But until we get rid of them all, we have to do everything we can together.
	Vote same day.
	Thanks, Peter.
	Thanks, Sean.
	Peter, what's your website address, Peter?
	It's WisconsinElectionJustice.org.
	WisconsinElectionJustice.org.
	Is that where this press release is?
	The press release is coming out tonight yet from State Assemblywoman Janelle Branson.
	But will you put it on your website?
	It'll be on there tomorrow.
	Okay, we'll see if we can get it on ours.
	Show the screen real quick again, guys, because here are your action points.
	You guys are looking for an action point?
	Here are your action points.
	A, B, C, D, and E in this press release.
	You need answers.
	All of these questions must be answered by this agency he's talking about out of Wisconsin.
	These are your action points.
	The citizens demand answers to ABCDE.
	So when the press release comes out at what website again, Peter?
	WisconsinElectionJustice.org.
	Then that's your action point.
	All right.
	Thank you, guys.
	Thank you, Sean.
	Thank you, Peter.
	We're joined with breaking news tonight by two guests we have with us.
	Great work, by the way.
	Excellent work.
	Anne Howard and Patrick Kolbeck.
	Big breaking news out of Michigan tonight in the courts of Michigan.
	Mike, you're going to love this.
	Guys, welcome to the broadcast.
	Thank you.
	How are you?
	We're great.
	We're great.
	Did you say something, Mike?
	For the first time, everybody, so I have no idea what's going on.
	Yeah, it's so breaking news.
	Mike's hearing it for the first time.
	Yeah, it's some really good news out of Michigan, and we got a rock star lawyer by the name of Ann Howard who worked with a bunch of us meddling kids here in Michigan to file a lawsuit against Jocelyn Benson.
	And we had a great victory today, and I'll let her fill in the details on it.
	I just want a quick segue into your previous segment with Peter.
	When he's talking about that insurance policy being whisked net, that sounds a heck of a lot like the backup attack phase in my book for 2022, doesn't it?
	So anyway, guys, but Anne, we got great news regarding the lawsuit against Jocelyn Benson.
	And you know how difficult it's been to find good lawyers to go off and pursue these suits on our behalf.
	Well, Anne's one of the good ones.
	So Anne, without further ado, thanks for helping us out on this.
	Thank you, Patrick.
	And it's nice to meet both of you.
	And I'm happy to hear about what's going on in Wisconsin.
	It's always good to hear what's going on around the country because it's important.
	Yes.
	Thank you.
	Yeah.
	So anyway, we filed suit against Jocelyn Benson because she has been historically putting her hand on the scales of justice again and again and again and trying to weigh the elections in her favor just a little bit here and a little bit there.
	This is about the fifth, sixth, seventh time that she's been pushed back by the court system in the Court of Claims.
	Recently, in the last two years, there was Janetzky versus Benson, where the Court of Claims ruled that she told everyone that they don't have to match signatures with the ballot in the poll book.
	Who's Jocelyn Benson?
	Who's Jocelyn Benson?
	Oh, the soon-to-be ex-former Secretary of State of Michigan.
	She's up for re-election in November.
	I wanted to let everybody know who we're talking about there.
	I'll interject.
	Please support Christina Karamo, who's opposing her.
	Right, right, exactly.
	We need to support Christina Karamo.
	But yeah, okay, so she'll carry on, yep.
	Okay, so Janetzky versus Benson was a case where she told everybody right before the election that they don't have to match signatures.
	So whatever signature came through, she said, just don't match them.
	So nobody matched them.
	And so that made it ripe for massive amounts of cheating to come through because basically just any ballot was good.
	That's what she said.
	And they had to litigate it through the court systems, but ultimately the court found against her.
	So that was the first case.
	The next was another case was Davis versus Benson, where she said right on the eve of election again, that you can't carry a gun to the polls, which makes some sense, but she has to go through the proper channels in order to have that happen.
	And she did not.
	So she got kicked down for that as well.
	And then there was Kara versus Benson.
	Where, uh, she said this poll challengers who are basically ensuring that the poll, that the, that the vote is, is correct.
	And that no one's cheating.
	She said the poll challengers have to stand six feet back.
	And so that meant they couldn't see anything that they were doing and they couldn't challenge anything.
	So.
	Right before the 2020 election, uh, Matthew Granda filed a case and he got that struck down and they had to limit how much they had to modify the six foot rule.
	I just want to zero in on our case, because we're establishing the fact that she is a serial lawbreaker as our Secretary of State.
	But I don't want to, we've got limited time on this, I want to make sure we focus in on the fact that our decision that we just received today from Court of Claims Judge Brock Schwartzel in Michigan What did you win?
	What were the five?
	out of five of our claims against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn
	Benson. So all those people that say there's no court victories for the folks
	that are pursuing investigations on election fraud, here is a very very
	tangible victory here that smacked her down. What were the five? What were the five?
	What was the... Jocelyn Benson issued a guidance in May of 2022 very quietly
	It came out in June.
	And in it, she basically neutered the ability of poll challengers to do their jobs.
	And nobody knew about it.
	And then the August primary happened and my poll challengers, who are my plaintiffs, went to the polls and they weren't able to do their jobs in a number of different ways.
	So in order for her to put out any guidance that can be followed, it has to comply with the legislation.
	for poll challengers and it conflicted five or six or seven different times and we called that out
	Wow.
	and we argued against it and ultimately she, ultimately the Judge Schwartzel agreed that it was unlawful
	and it didn't go through the proper procedure for promulgating rules.
	Wow, wow, well that's, you know, this goes, this was the, this was the, you had two problems obviously
	with the 2020 elections and all elections.
	the machines.
	And also in the 2020 election, it started, uh, where all these secretary of states, not just this one, um, broke laws.
	They, because the legislatures make the laws, correct?
	So they break the laws.
	They break the laws and use some other excuse like the China virus, uh, to break the laws.
	Hey, it's raining outside.
	So we're going to break the law.
	You can't, uh, we're going to, we're going to all use umbrellas here.
	We can, we're not supposed to, whatever it is.
	Well, When they do that, this is a big win in another way, too, because what's happened in other states...
	This goes before the courts, stuff like this, and the judges have went the other way and sided in with the Secretary of State, which really is, that's the big case that's at the Supreme Court, is so judges shouldn't even be able to rule against the law!
	The law is the law, isn't that correct?
	I mean, when you have a law, how could you not win, right?
	I mean, a Secretary of State breaks the law, the judge can't say, hey, it's okay to break the law.
	In that case, hopefully the Supreme Court will say, this can never happen again in our country.
	If you want a new law, you better get your legislatures out of bed
	and say, hey, let's make a new law here if you want, you know.
	Here's one key point, Mike.
	You know, when you bring up the legislators, we didn't get any improvement
	in our election integrity legislation at all in the state of Michigan.
	But this ruling actually gave us some incremental benefit going into this 2022 election, because now as poll challengers, we can document the fraud with our phones at the AB County Board.
	We shouldn't do that before.
	I was neutered as a poll challenger, so all the We had to wait until we got the surveillance video of that van pulling in at the back of the TCS Center.
	I couldn't get out my phone and take it.
	This is huge, Patrick, and I see two big wins here.
	One is the judge didn't kick it out for standing.
	Let's just kick it out.
	You guys don't have standing.
	Come on.
	This is about poll watchers, but you poll watchers, you don't have standing.
	That seems to be the new norm.
	So, A, he didn't kick it out, or she, this judge.
	But the other thing is, it's amazing that you got the ruling before the election.
	Normally, they would slow walk it and go bypass the election.
	That is a double win.
	That's a blessing of all time, you guys.
	This is great news.
	Thank you.
	It's important that we get the news out, too, because in 2020, we won a similar court case that Anne was talking about, the six-foot rule.
	But we didn't get it out to all the poll inspectors, so all the poll workers, poll inspectors were told that the rule was you can't get within six feet.
	Well, we had a court order that said you couldn't do that, so you allowing us to get on the show today with Brandon, that helps us get the word out to all these poll inspectors that those guidelines are unlawful.
	Did I miss anything, Anne?
	Sorry.
	No, I think it was well said and we had a judge that was right on top of this whole case.
	So that really helped as well because he gave a very fair and academic ruling and he followed the law, which is all we asked.
	And this is good for everybody because even if this Secretary of State loses her position, you want the precedent to be set again and again and again that They have to follow the law.
	They can't just make stuff up out of thin air and just push it on everybody and take away people's rights, because that lays the foundation for chaos and disruption at the polls.
	Wow.
	Because the poll challengers are going to be mad.
	Right.
	Well, absolutely.
	And, you know, I want to commend you.
	I mean, lawyers need to step it up and judges will bring back this country.
	The law will bring it back.
	This judge, a brave judge, That didn't kick it out for standing and just looked at this stuff and said, no, it's against the law.
	I'm going to make this decision.
	We need to follow the law.
	And we got so far away from that, and people say that to me all the time.
	Mike, come on, the judges aren't going to help our country.
	Look at all the corruption.
	No, most of them have been in fear.
	I think this is even bigger because it came out of Michigan, of all places, because I think you've had a lot of people living there in fear, especially judges or lawyers.
	Look what they're trying to do to Matt DiPerno.
	I mean, give me a break.
	The guy was just, you know, trying to help the country and they're going after him because they don't want, they don't want law and order.
	And Michigan has a lot of not a lot of people.
	There are bad people in, in high places like your secretary of state.
	I can't wait, everybody.
	We've got to get, we've got to get rid of her and Christina Caramo, everybody.
	And this is another thing.
	We were just on the segment before this, everybody.
	Vote the same day of the election, November 8th.
	Don't vote earlier.
	If at all possible, vote the same day.
	Patrick, do you agree that's going to help?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	It gives them less recount time to figure out how many ballots they've got to stop.
	Right, right.
	Well, Brandon?
	Wow, what a show!
	Great show.
	And Patrick, thank you guys so much.
	Do either of you have a website you want to promote before we let you go?
	We've got OperationOverwatch.us that's kind of highlighting the fact that we're engaged proactively to protect our election this time, where we weren't necessarily proactive in 2020.
	So there's a lot of different efforts that are all coming together, and Anne, hats off to you and legal support team with Bethany and Lou.
	You guys were all fantastic pulling this together.
	How about you, Anne?
	Do you have a website, Anne?
	No.
	Well, I have my blog.
	Do you want to give that out or not?
	AnneHowardLaw.com.
	AnneHowardLaw.com.
	All right.
	Anne, Patrick, great job.
	Thank you.
	Mike?
	Hey, I got a website, Brandon.
	It's MikeStore.com.
	I want you to get my coffee, help these entrepreneurs.
	And you guys, I'm sure the bad media will go, Mike Lindell did his show with the slippers behind.
	We had just got done filming a slipper commercial.
	You guys all see it.
	Brand new My Slipper commercial.
	The new My Slipper, back with new colors.
	The original My Slipper, new colors.
	The wide sizes, the longer sizes, smaller sizes, everybody wanted more added on to those.
	Those patented technology, the best slippers ever, and the best coffee ever.
	Use promo code L77.
	Promo code L77 to save up to 25%.
	Do your shopping there, folks.
	Christmas is coming.
	Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattress, mattress toppers, toppers, robes, and more.
	And then mystore.com, same promo code works, where you get the my coffee.
	mystore.com, L77.
	Remember, we have the coffee pods there as well.
	And everybody, the new My Store shopping channel is there.
	It's also right here at FranksBeach.com.
	Check out the new My Store shopping channel.
	See all these entrepreneurs in action.
	Hundreds and hundreds of USA-made products.
	And we'll see you tomorrow night.
	God bless.
	That's the Lindell Report.
	Take care.
	Thanks everybody on Facebook.
	Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, and in light of the recent events, your continued support means everything to myself and my employees.
	To thank you, we're having the biggest sale ever on all MyPillow bedding.

▲