MyronGainesX - Scott Ritter On Israel Iran War! Trumps Threatens Iran? Twitter Debate With Liberal Neckbeard!

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 16, 2025 - MyronGainesX

03:09:13

Scott Ritter On Israel Iran War! Trumps Threatens Iran? Twitter Debate With Liberal Neckbeard!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right, and we are live.
	What's up, guys?
	Welcome to the stream.
	I'm here with The Legend of Self Scott Ritter, man.
	Scott, welcome to the show.
	I appreciate you coming on.
	I know we're short for time, so we'll kind of get right into it.
	What are your thoughts on the conflict?
	What's your analysis?
	We are alive.
	We're offensive, guys.
	Welcome to the stream.
	I'm here with The Legend of Self, Scott Ritter, Man.
	Scott, welcome to the show.
	I appreciate you coming on.
	I know we're short for time, so we'll kind of get right into it.
	What are your thoughts on the conflict?
	What's your analysis?
	We're all offensive, guys.
	Welcome to the stream.
	Okay.
	Sorry about that.
	Bunch of stuff in the background.
	Can you hear me now?
	No problem.
	I can hear you.
	No problem.
	All right, man.
	Sorry about that.
	So, yeah, what are your thoughts on the conflict?
	And, you know, give us your general thoughts.
	Well, first of all, we have to understand that this was an illegal war of aggression, a Pearl Harbor type event.
	And we're all Americans.
	We know, we should know what we do on December 7th every year.
	Sort of pause and remember the day of infamy, the day that the United States was subjected to a surprise attack by the Imperial Japanese fleet that dragged us into the Second World War.
	We view that as a day of infamy because it was a nefarious action.
	And yet, our closest ally, at least that's the way it's articulated in many corners of the U.S. government and in U.S. society, has carried out a similarly nefarious act against Iran.
	It was a surprise attack.
	It has no justification under international law.
	Israel has not tried to articulate a cognable case under international law.
	They haven't cited Article 51.
	They just said we're taking it out, taking what out?
	Taking the regime.
	It seems now that that seems to be their strategy, but to take out Iran's nuclear program.
	But the frustrating aspect of this is that Iran was in the middle, actually getting close to the tail end of negotiations that looked like they were bearing fruit, negotiations that involved the United States of America.
	And so it isn't just Israel insulting America by carrying out a surprise attack while we're trying to negotiate a solution to the very problem that triggered Israel's military intervention, but is that we lied.
	These weren't good faith negotiations.
	It appears that these negotiations were, you know, by design intended to lull Iran into a false sense of complacency to make them believe that Sunday, this past Sunday, was going to be a decisive day of negotiations and that everything hinged on the outcome.
	And so while they prepared for these negotiations, Israel attacked.
	I think Israel thought that it was going to be able to combine decapitation strikes.
	They killed a number of senior Iranian military leaders with shock and awe.
	The destruction of high-profile targets, et cetera, just the notion that Israel dominated and was attacking, bombing nuclear facilities, et cetera, could prompt the Iranians into surrendering.
	I think we take a look at Israel today and we can see that Iran not only didn't surrender, but they have lashed back with a retaliatory strike capacity beyond what the Israeli defenses are able to prevent and beyond the imagination.
	I mean, who thought that Tel Aviv would be in ruins, Haifa would be in ruins, that Israel would be in ruins?
	And this is just the beginning if this war continues.
	But the most disturbing aspect of all of this is that the President of the United States, a man who ran on a platform of peace, who said that he was not going to get us involved in yet another Middle Eastern war, he said, these wars have cost us trillions of dollars of lost capital, thousands of dollars of lives, and haven't solved anything.
	Looks like he's getting ready to get us involved in yet another Middle East war, this time with Iran, on the side of Israel, who carried out a nefarious Pearl Harbor-style attack.
	Is this really what America wants to be doing at this time?
	Is this our fight?
	Do we want American servicemen and women's lives to be put at risk?
	I personally believe the answer is no.
	We don't, but here we are.
	This is where we're going.
	Iran has hit Israel back pretty hard.
	You know, we've seen unprecedented damage hit Tel Aviv, Haifa.
	And I think they attacked Haifa yesterday, attacked, I think they hit one of their energy infrastructures.
	What do you foresee is going to be the future here when it comes to the conflict?
	And as far as from your perspective, what's the latest?
	Well, I mean, we are in an existential fight right now, the survival of Israel versus the survival of Iran.
	And as things stand, Israel will die before Iran dies if the current trajectory of conflict plays out.
	Iran has tens of thousands of missiles.
	They can fire like this against Israel for weeks, if not months.
	We're just a few days into this conflict, and Israel is already destroyed.
	Imagine what will be in two weeks.
	And Iran is ready to continue this thing as long as it needs be.
	Israel's running out of interceptor missiles, and the United States doesn't have any left to give.
	That means Israel will be defenseless.
	So we're looking at a trajectory right now, which, if left unchanged, means Iran will achieve the strategic defeat of Israel.
	And nobody knows what the outcome of that will be.
	Israel is a nation that has nuclear weapons.
	Will they use nuclear weapons?
	But the biggest question is, will the United States intervene on behalf of Israel?
	And that appears to be at least something that the president is actively considering right now, because void of American military intervention, Israel has lost this war.
	Israel has lost this war.
	But the question is, can American military intervention save Israel?
	And I believe the answer is no.
	I don't think there's anything.
	The Iranians have been planning for this war for some time now.
	The only way we defeat Iran is by using nuclear weapons.
	If we don't use nuclear weapons, Iran will continue this struggle, destroy Israel, destroy American bases in the region, etc.
	So, you know, we're now at a juncture that if America gets involved, this will more than likely end up with the use of American nuclear weapons.
	And that's just not the world we all want to live in.
	This conflict, you know, at least from what the media says, was pretty much solely because they don't want Iran to have nuclear weapons.
	You know, there's been, I've heard from so many different sources.
	Some people say, you know, there are thresholds that they can manufacture nuclear weapons within several weeks and be able to use them.
	Other people say, no, they don't have the capability of testing it.
	So how do we know if they're going to be able to build a bomb?
	There's so many different narratives out there when it comes to Iran and their nuclear program.
	Oh, they're close to getting a bomb.
	No, they're not making a bomb.
	Tulsi Gabbard said that they weren't making a bomb.
	But then now the Trump administration is coming out and saying that they're trying to enrich uranium and very close to Obama.
	What do you think is what do you think?
	Number one, do you think the Iranians are actively trying to build one now?
	And then number two, do you think they're capable of building one?
	And then number three, will that change the current situation?
	Well, I don't believe Iran is building a nuclear bomb.
	I don't believe Iran wants a nuclear bomb.
	I think Iran recognizes that should it acquire a nuclear bomb, then nuclear weapons will be used against it, and that will be the end of Iran.
	And I believe that's the reality.
	The supreme leader has issued a fatwa, a religious edict, that prohibits nuclear weapons.
	I don't think that that is a subterfuge.
	I think that's the real deal, and he hasn't reversed that yet.
	The Iranians have also said that they don't need a nuclear bomb.
	They have ballistic missiles.
	Now, the whole purpose of a nuclear weapon in Iran's hands would serve as a deterrence to people's behavior.
	But a deterrence is only good if you're willing to use the weapon.
	I don't think Iran views nuclear weapons, the use of nuclear weapons as being incompatible with their faith.
	What Iran has built is an extremely capable ballistic missile force that serves as their deterrence force.
	One key aspect of deterrence is that any nation that attacks you will suffer damage to that nation disproportionate to what they tried to hit you with, and therefore they'll be inclined not to initiate the action.
	I don't think there will be in anybody's mind after this conflict ends if Iran comes out on top that you don't want to mess with Iran's ballistic missile force.
	If they defeat the Israelis, they can defeat anybody in the region.
	So you don't think they're trying to make one now?
	I've heard from several people that they're probably trying to make one now as a deterrent, but you're thinking, hey, they're more focused on the ballistic missiles and just attacking back versus trying to manufacture a bomb.
	First of all, to make one now would require the Supreme Leader to issue a fatwa that reverses his finding that to have nuclear weapons is haramer against Islamic jurisprudence.
	And so that hasn't happened.
	People can say, well, they're making it secretly, et cetera.
	But then that reverses a doctrine.
	Why do they want a bomb?
	I mean, people keep talking about the North Korean parallel, that North Korea has a bomb, therefore the United States won't attack North Korea because North Korea could use the bomb.
	I'm dared to tell people right now, that's not why we don't attack North Korea.
	We don't attack North Korea because they got 30,000 artillery pieces dug into the hills across the river from Seoul, and that there's nothing we could do to stop those from flattening a city of 9 million.
	I know that's the case because that's why we didn't attack North Korea in 1994 when I was on active duty participating in the plans to go to war against North Korea.
	North Korea didn't have a nuclear weapon then, but that's what stopped us.
	Their nuclear weapons complicate things, but we can take care of their nuclear weapons with our own nuclear weapons.
	That's always the reality.
	So the other thing about North Korea is that they don't have the Israeli factor.
	I mean, we don't hold the threat that North Korea poses to Japan and South Korea as being existential to the United States.
	We view that as a local regional threat.
	But somehow with Israel and Iran, the fact that Iran threatens Israel, or at least perceived to threaten Israel, becomes an American national security issue.
	Why?
	Because of the unique relationship that the United States enjoys with the state of Israel and the pro-Israeli elements in the United States.
	And so this is problematic.
	But Iran knows that if it has the bomb, it will die.
	That's it.
	The reason why this war started is that Iran had positioned itself as a threshold state.
	I had been warning for months that this is stupid.
	You're literally waving the red flag in front of the Israeli bull, and now the bull has charged.
	You know, that doesn't mean that the Matadoria can't defeat the bull.
	The Matador will probably kill the bull.
	But you didn't need to be in this ring to begin with.
	And so a lot of the problems that we see today are problems that Iran brought upon themselves by being very aggressive in their posturing in the aftermath of Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from the nuclear, the nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action back in 2018.
	But a threshold state doesn't make you a nuclear state, a nuclear weapon state.
	Indeed, Tulsi Gabbard, the National Intelligence Agency or National Intelligence Organization, has determined that Iran wasn't and isn't pursuing a nuclear weapon and that they don't have any nuclear weapons.
	And I think both those categories last day, it would be the kiss of death for Iran to possess a nuclear weapon because it would give the United States the green light to use nuclear weapons against Iran and Iran won't survive that.
	Gotcha.
	So you were talking before about Iran's nuclear, sorry, their missile program, their ballistic missile program.
	And we've seen it devastate Israel.
	At this point, if the United States came in, how would they be able to, because clearly the Iron Dome, the Arrow, the David Sling, they're not doing what they're supposed to do, right?
	A lot of the missiles have been able to get through.
	What assistance would we even be able to provide at this point to help Israel out?
	And they also got a TAD, and they're all getting pierced by the missiles.
	So what could we even do at this point?
	Well, there's not really much we can do defensive-wise.
	We have Aegis-class destroyers making their way as part of the Nimitz carrier battle group, and they'll have a fresh load of SM-3 SM-6 ballistic missile interceptors, missiles, because our ships are running out of them.
	There was said in the defense of Haifa that the vast majority of the missiles being fired in defense were fired, were SM-3s fired by the United States Navy.
	I remind people that we, in 2023, we only produced 71 or 73 SM-3s in the whole year.
	We have a stockpile of several hundred, and we've already burned through much of that stockpile in trying to confront the Houdi and now defending Israel.
	And we're supposed to be preparing for a potential conflict with China over Taiwan.
	Well, it ain't going to be much of a conflict if we don't have any missiles left to defend Taiwan, and we're getting ready to use all our missiles up in defense of Israel.
	So it's not that the United States can bring anything more to bear on the defense.
	Sometimes they say the best defense is a good offense.
	And so I think Trump might be thinking that U.S. military intervention could tip the scales in favor of Israel and compel Iran to the negotiating table.
	But again, the reality is Israel's using the same airplanes and the same bombs that we use.
	If they can't destroy things, what makes you think we can?
	The only thing we'll bring in differently is a B-2 bomber capable of carrying this 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb.
	That bunker-buster bomb is cleared to penetrate 50 to 60 feet of earth and concrete.
	The Firdos nuclear reactor, or nuclear site, not a reactor, I'm sorry, enrichment facility, is located 80 to 90 feet underground.
	The one in the mountain, right?
	Destroyed.
	That's the one that's in the mountain, if I'm not mistaken.
	Yeah.
	And so in order to destroy this target, we would have to use a B-6112 nuclear bunker-busting bomb.
	But that means we're using nuclear weapons.
	That's all we can bring to bear.
	There's nothing conventionally we can introduce that's going to change the reality.
	Israel already flies 300 U.S.-made aircraft over in the vicinity.
	We bring in a carrier aircraft wing that's 75 additional aircraft.
	It's not going to fundamentally change things.
	It's certainly not going to stop Iran from continuing to launch these saturation missile attacks against the dysfunctional Iron Dome missile system.
	So I don't think there's anything the United States can do to meaningfully alter the status quo other than use nuclear weapons.
	And I don't think we want to use nuclear weapons because one of the things that holds us back is conversations that we've had with Russians, senior Russians, over the years where the Russians have said, you know, we're not going to be the first ones to use tactical nuclear weapons.
	So all the people are afraid of Russia using a tactical nuke against Ukraine.
	The Russians have pretty much said they're not going to do that.
	They said, but if you, the United States, or others, use nuclear weapons, then we will use nuclear weapons against Europe.
	And so, you know, it's a very, very dangerous situation, very, very dangerous game that the president of the United States is playing right now.
	Wow.
	So yeah, so basically there's not much that we can do, even if we did intervene.
	What do you think?
	You mentioned Russia.
	Do you see Russia getting involved in this conflict whatsoever?
	Do they have their hands tied too much?
	We saw kind of with the Assad regime that they weren't able to intervene and save him from the rebels.
	Is Russia going to take a similar stance with Iran and kind of avoid the conflict due to their own war?
	Russia had signed a strategic framework agreement with Iran back in January 17th of this year.
	But the problem is, first of all, let's talk about that agreement.
	That agreement is designed to facilitate economic, diplomatic, and military links between the two nations.
	It's not a formal defensive treaty, but it's a comprehensive treaty that Russia signed.
	It basically serves as the framework for the North-South economic corridor that runs from St. Petersburg to Iran and everywhere in between that Russia would like to construct.
	China has just opened up a train line of communication between western China and the port near Tehran.
	The reason why I bring this up is that there is a vested interest on the part of Russia and China and the rest of the BRICS community to keep Iran, who is a member of BRICS, viable economically and politically.
	So Russia is involved to the extent of which they are able to and or willing to provide military assistance is yet to be seen.
	The same says it holds true for China.
	North Korea has claimed that it will, but we have to wait and see.
	But Russia is not going to get directly involved militarily.
	You're not going to see Russian paratroopers landing in Iran.
	They haven't asked for them.
	They don't need them.
	But I think what you'll see is a transfer of technology taking place, and we could see that unfold in the course of the next month.
	And the Russians would simply cite the American example of, or NATO example, of providing weaponry to Korea, not Korea, of Ukraine.
	And the North Koreans would say, I mean, the Chinese and Russians can say, as long as you're providing weapons to Ukraine, we have the green light to provide weapons to Iran.
	It's a similar construct.
	So I think that's what you're going to see.
	Russia and China providing diplomatic backstopping for Iran and also working together to improve the military capabilities of Iran, up to and including providing missiles to replace the ones that Iran has already fired or lost in this current conflict.
	We've seen these hypersonic missiles cause absolute destruction and pretty much slice through the air defense.
	If you were Benjamin Netanyahu at this point, how would you, assuming you wanted to conduct the regime change and destroy Iran and get rid of their theocracy-based government, if you were in his shoes, what would you do if you were Bibi Netanyahu right now?
	Get the United States involved.
	That's his only chance of survival.
	Get the United States involved.
	And either by compelling Iran or through force, indirect force, the threat of force, or actually making Iran change the nature of its regime, again, through military intervention, the United States is the only hope that Benjamin Netanyahu has to win this war or to at least have a fighting shot.
	Okay, now let's play the devil's advocate.
	Let's assume you're the supreme leader of Iran and you're in the middle of this conflict.
	You've been able to create some damage, but obviously you're concerned about the U.S. potentially intervening.
	What would your next steps be in this conflict to ensure victory?
	I want to keep missiles firing at Israel as long as possible.
	I want to break Israel's back.
	I want to destroy the state of Israel, to compel the Israeli leadership to collapse and to have a new Israeli government come in place that's willing to make concessions on Iran's nuclear program.
	It's essential that Iran, from the Iranian perspective, be allowed to continue to enrich uranium.
	They're willing to have reductions to take it down to 3.75%.
	There's a whole thing that Iran is willing to do, but they need Israel to buy into it.
	And that can't be done under a Netanyahu government.
	So you need to break the back of Israel and compel the collapse of Netanyahu's government.
	We're well on our way to seeing that happen, or Iran is well on its way to seeing that happen.
	The other thing is to keep America out of this war.
	It's imperative that America doesn't get engaged.
	So Iran needs to go through the motions of at least preparing to engage diplomatically with the United States under the hopes that by being engaged with the United States, Israel will not be inclined to escalate or carry out very aggressive attacks during this time.
	But I don't know if that condition exists yet.
	We have a big wild card called Donald Trump's ego.
	And we just don't know if he's does he still want the Nobel Peace Prize or does he want to be seen as a man who won a war?
	Because these are the things that seem to be driving him, his reputation, as opposed to the legitimate national security needs of the United States.
	You mentioned something interesting where Iran needs to hit Israel hard enough to get them to stop, but at the same time, it can't be so catastrophic that it forces U.S. intervention to a significant degree.
	So we've seen them attack Tel Aviv and we've seen them attack Haifa.
	What specific locations would you target from this point forward to kind of achieve that objective where you're hitting them hard enough, but not so hard that you're forcing U.S. intervention?
	What areas would you hit?
	Well, I would carry out attacks that are the equivalent of the attacks that Israel has carried out on Iran.
	I would target government ministries.
	I would triple down on the Kiriya, the place where the Israeli military headquarters is, the IDF headquarters.
	I would flatten it, literally flatten it.
	I would pound it with so much that it just didn't exist anymore.
	I don't know if I were the Iranians, if I'd gauged in tar if I would engage in targeted assassination, because I think it's immoral.
	It might be legally justifiable under certain circumstances, but I don't see Iran doing that because that could also drag in the United States.
	But they've got to keep the United States out of this war.
	That's absolutely essential right now, not to allow this thing to escalate so that America is directly involved.
	Because void of that, I think they can grind Israel down in very short order.
	There was talks that Israel is going to hit Iran's oil infrastructure, try to further impede their ability to make money.
	How do you think, given the amount of severity that Israel's been hit with, do you think that's viable?
	And do you think Iran would retaliate with shutting down the Strait of Hormuz?
	I think Iran's made it clear that if its oil industry has been struck or damaged, that it will not just sit there idly, that it will shut the Strait of Hormuz and hold nations to account.
	Now, are they going to attack Arab nations?
	I don't know.
	We wait and see.
	They have rhetoric saying that they will hold to account all nations who have facilitated the attacks against Iran, which of course would mean Kuwait, Bahrain, United Emirates, Gutter, and Saudi Arabia.
	But I also believe that it's in their best interest to keep these nations as political tools that Iran could use in support of its policies.
	And they also don't want to attack American military installations because that's a direct attack.
	I think Iran has got a very delicate balancing act where they have to sustain meaningful pressure on Israel without crossing too many red lines and therefore triggering Western intervention.
	But they have to make sure that every day they hit Israel, Israel gets weaker and weaker and weaker, until which time Israel will surrender.
	Man.
	And Scott, anytime you got to, let me know whenever you got to go.
	I know we're a little bit short on time here and it's tight, so just let me know when you have to leave.
	How much longer do you think this conflict can go for?
	I know you said you think the Iranians have the capacity to last longer than Israel, but realistically speaking, how long do you think this conflict's going to take?
	Because I know Israel said they'd be doing this bombing campaign, Operation Rising Line, for at least two to three weeks.
	What are your thoughts?
	Do you think it's going to last longer or shorter, given what you've seen so far?
	It all depends on the amount of damage that's been inflicted on Israel and what is sustainable damage.
	It's hard to say.
	A lot of times bombing just blows things up.
	It doesn't get the critical infrastructure that you're looking to strike.
	I don't think Israel can last too much longer politically.
	I think that they're suffering horrific losses.
	The skyline in Tehran is just being devastated.
	Israel's being turned into a destroyed country.
	And that's why I think you see Donald Trump now starting to become a little bit more aggressive in terms of American military potential, because I think he's being briefed that if this thing is allowed to go on unabated for another week, there may not be an Israel to support.
	So I think we're in a race against time if the Iranians continue to believe that it's in their best interest to put the pedal to the metal, meaning keep the acceleration going in terms of missile attacks.
	We have to see.
	Iran, you know, this is a tough situation for Iran because they have the initiative, meaning that they have established operational control of the war of attrition that's taking place.
	Any pause in this could be fatal.
	So I think they need to keep this conflict going and pressure the United States to pressure Israel to accept peace terms that are acceptable to Israel.
	Damn.
	No, I mean, it's very interesting to see.
	I mean, I saw Netanyahu show up to like a day ago or so.
	He showed up in Tel Aviv and was looking at the damage, and you can look at his face that he's like, holy crap, you know, I don't think he anticipated that they would hit back this hard.
	How likely do you think it is that Israel would use their nuclear weapons at this point, given the damage?
	I don't see Israel using nuclear weapons because to use nuclear weapons creates a new political reality that will not end well for Israel.
	So their weapons are for deterrence against nation-killing attacks using weapons of mass destruction.
	I don't see them using nuclear weapons against Iran unless they can prove that Iran has a nuclear weapons program.
	There's been talk out there that if Israel does use nuclear weapons against the Iranian sites, that Pakistan may intervene on behalf of Iran with its own nuclear weapon.
	I don't know the veracity of those claims yet.
	There's some people that claim that it's absolutely true.
	But there's just any number of reasons why I don't see Israel using nuclear weapons.
	And unfortunately, on that note, I do have to go.
	No worries.
	My wife is waiting for me.
	No worries, Scott.
	Thank you so much for coming on.
	I appreciate you coming in and giving us your expertise on this topic.
	I appreciate that greatly, man.
	We'll set up another one in the future.
	I'll try to start up a little bit earlier so that we can get you on for longer.
	All right.
	Thanks a lot.
	Thanks, Scott.
	Take it easy, man.
	Be safe.
	All right.
	Okay, guys, let me adjust the camera settings.
	W. Scott.
	Gary, bear with me real quick, ninjas.
	And I can read some chats.
	All right.
	Guys, welcome to the stream.
	Welcome to the stream.
	Welcome to the stream.
	That is Scott Ritter, former Marine Weapons Inspector.
	The guy knows his stuff.
	Very interesting perspective from his side.
	Let's go ahead and jump on Twitter a bit.
	Let me and see what's going on the latest in the conflict.
	I know Suleiman and them are in a oh, look at this.
	So I open up Twitter.
	Let's see here.
	Nick says, literally just a couple minutes ago, he says...
	Hold on.
	If Israel could plant explosives in Hezbollah's pages and build kamikaze drones inside Iran, is it crazy to think they could plant explosives inside the Twin Towers on 9-11?
	Yeah, that's facts, bro.
	That's facts right there.
	All right, let's jump in here, guys.
	Actually, you know what?
	Let me read some chats before I even go into there so I don't forget you guys.
	We got here.
	Remy Dom says, Myron, been refreshing my locals page on browser and the app for days now, but it still tells me I'm not a supporter of Kennex.
	The kind of diversity in the annuals is really sorry to bother.
	Username.
	Okay.
	Is that for OSS, bro?
	Or is that for Castle Club, Rami?
	Is that for Castle Club or is that for OSS?
	Let me know.
	So let me, I could check this out here in a second.
	And then what's the next thing I wanted to show here?
	Okay, we got here.
	Okay.
	Jose Ramirez, W. Scott, got to keep these streams going.
	Join OSS, bro.
	It's firing here.
	Yeah, man.
	Join OSS, guys.
	We're cooking out here.
	Texas Outlaw.
	Also, I was so excited to join OSS.
	I sub twice on Axe and I support you in every way I can, man.
	Thank you so much, Texas Outlaw.
	MBO5 says, what's happening, Myron?
	I don't know why I'm anticipating a false flag possibly happening.
	Nothing surprising me about these fucking Israelis.
	They'll go to any links to get what they want.
	You're right, bro.
	You're right.
	Coco Manny says, my fear, what's the fastest and most effective way of getting rid of AIPAC and other Zionist lobbies?
	Is it even possible?
	We all know they don't play by the rules.
	That would take massive pressure from the U.S. public to do.
	Massive pressure.
	But I do think that more people are waking up and it is a potential within the next 50 years.
	But it's going to take massive work.
	Texas Outlaw with the big $100 super chat.
	Big $100 super chat on OSS.
	Myron, I'm a 12-year Air Force vet now, defense contractor.
	Thanks for everything you do, my brother.
	Keep me updated and motivated while I'm deployed in the Middle East right now.
	Them boys are really dragging us into this shit.
	Oh, slash, oh my God, bro.
	Yo, now that you're a member of the OSS, I'm even more concerned, bro.
	Fucking take care of yourself.
	Be safe.
	These fucking Israelis are going to get us into fucking conflict, bro.
	The fact that one of my OSS members is out there in the Middle East for these dickheads.
	Oh, man, bro.
	Just be safe.
	Take care of yourself.
	Always listen to the podcast with the volume down.
	Okay.
	I don't want you getting in trouble.
	And thank you so much for the support, bro.
	Just take care of yourself, man.
	Dude, we are closer to war than ever before, man.
	So these fucking Israelis are trying to drag us in.
	So again, Texas Outlaw, take care of yourself, bro.
	Thank you so much for your service.
	And just be safe, man.
	11 team says, on the off chance, America doesn't help Israel.
	What would the chances be that they use nuclear weapons?
	From what Scott's saying, he doesn't think very high.
	It would create some other political problems for them.
	Martin, you always bring us value.
	This is so important.
	I wish more people knew.
	I got you, bro.
	Scott, we'll try to help military Iran.
	We answered that question.
	Not militarily.
	Can Grumpy Martin, do you have any plans to bring any new trade guys on?
	Sorry, it's off topic, but I really catch you live.
	R.I.P. Thor.
	We will soon and rest in peace with Thor.
	White Rhino, subscribed.
	Thank you so much for joining the OSS, my friend.
	Milan says, OSS niggas, my man Scott is in the house.
	W Scott and my fear.
	I appreciate that, bro.
	And I see a lot of you guys are utilizing the Castle Club chat.
	Guys, as you know, OSS, sorry, the OSS chat.
	If you join OSS, guys, all of your chats get read on air no matter the minimum.
	So all you got to do is join OSS.
	I got a promo code in there right now.
	It's in the description.
	Four bucks for the first month, $10 after that.
	Or you can get in for the year at $75.
	Okay, up the price a little bit because you niggas are starting to kill me.
	But no, it's good to see a lot of people joining for the annual.
	So that's a blessing, and I'm happy to have you guys on.
	But I'm still running this sale a little bit longer.
	Nightly Wisdom, $1 says W show W Martin.
	Appreciate that, Mr. Uligan.
	Do not forget to show them how to get the membership for the OSS if you haven't already.
	Yes, thank you very much, Mr. Hulligan.
	I'll get with Noble and we're going to figure out how to do that.
	So let's go ahead and jump in this Twitter space, guys.
	Get the fucking latest that's been going on.
	As you guys know, Solomon's been running Twitter spaces for the past several days, giving updates on the conflict.
	Crazy stuff going on.
	Let's jump in here real quick.
	And guys, make sure to join OSS.
	The link is below.
	Get in at the discount, guys.
	I'm going to be running this promo for a bit longer for you guys, but the price is going to slowly creep up.
	All right.
	What comes around goes around?
	I mean, I believe that finally Israel found out that a war is not putting some people in an air open.
	Give me one sec, Chad.
	I'm just going to get a hundred drinks.
	You bombed them to death.
	So when you're playing with the fire, fire will burn you.
	And this is what's happening in occupied land of Palestine, so-called Israel.
	Jewish with dignity who supports their country instead of support Islamist regime.
	Whose prime minister is a child killer?
	It's a criminal.
	And it's kind of interesting that I heard everywhere that some more breaking news.
	One second, bro.
	Some more breaking news.
	Fire is breaking out.
	We have the Israeli Fire and Rescue Services Fire and Rescue Hotline 102 received a report of a fire breaking out in the southern region as a result of falling rockets.
	We're also expecting multiple waves of attacks.
	This is not just going to be one wave.
	Obviously, we continue to give the news and when we receive it.
	Just want to welcome Marin onto the stage.
	Myron, thanks for joining us.
	How are you?
	Hey, man, what's up?
	I just got up not too long ago.
	I just got done talking with Scott and I'll handle the stuff for you on the side as well, Saliman, about that.
	Real quick, bro, since I'm on stream, and I hate if you guys have already been repeating yourselves, but can you give me a quick little lowdown on what's happened within the last maybe 12 to 20 hours or so, just for my audience, if you guys know?
	For sure, for sure, Marin.
	Truth, do you want to give a quick recap?
	Because I'm just posting out the news.
	Can I just say, Marin, you've come right in the middle of, you've come right in the middle of Iran being hit.
	So Iran is being hit.
	I'm sorry, Israel being hit hard.
	So all three, it's just about breaking news.
	All three projectiles in the latest attack were cruise missiles.
	Therefore, the report from earlier sound missiles over blah blah blah.
	Okay, yeah.
	So all three projectiles in the latest attack were all cruise missiles is the three that's going out.
	Oh, Jose Hussein.
	Someone bring Hussein up because he's good at like, you know, putting in an extra reading it.
	Sorry, Marin.
	I got truth.
	Talmair and I recap hey Martin.
	So what's up?
	It's been a busy day.
	Israel is quite, first of all, welcome to your audience.
	So it's been a busy day in Israel.
	They've been recovering from some major losses incurred yesterday.
	To start, as you recall, Haifa was hit heavily.
	They struck both the port and the buildings that were surrounding it quite heavily.
	So the port's now essentially out of use.
	And they've also struck the refinery, where Israel processes well over 200,000 barrels of oil per day, millions of, obviously, barrels of oil, plus petrochemicals as well.
	That refinery has now been shut down.
	And it's a major source of Israel's energy infrastructure that Iran has been able to successfully destroy.
	And this was confirmed by Israeli media.
	So in addition to that, well over 20 buildings were destroyed as well.
	Over 1,500 homes have been destroyed in Israel.
	We've got a lot of Israelis now escaping, fleeing to Cyprus by five like leased yachts.
	They're spending thousands of dollars, you know, not the Iron Es in loss because this is what they made Palestinians do to get to Gaza or get out of Gaza.
	But they're spending thousands of dollars to flee Israel to get to Cyprus.
	And they're also fleeing into Jordan.
	And Germany's actually helping to smuggle them into Jordan and then into Germany.
	So a lot of Israelis are fleeing the ship.
	They don't want to have anything to do.
	Because the airport's completely closed, right, Truth?
	Just so.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	Bengarian airport's been shut down.
	So there's no access to the commercial, the commercial airfields, of course.
	So they're having to leave by boat and also, I guess, by land as well through the border.
	Obviously, they can get through the border.
	I believe the West Bank borders Jordan, right?
	So that's how they're getting through.
	These are likely the illegal settlers that are leaving from the West Bank.
	But they haven't confirmed, for instance, who's left.
	Iran has also assassinated three nuclear scientists, and there was another high-profile assassination as well.
	Israel won't release that name.
	Wait, Israel assassinated three more nuclear scientists?
	No, Iran assassinated three Israeli scientists.
	What?
	That was when they struck the Weiseman Institute?
	Yeah, that's correct.
	Israel's just been hiding their casualties.
	I mean, there's considerably more.
	They've only admitted to like 16 actual fatalities and hundreds of injuries.
	Those numbers are much higher.
	Plus, there's well over 35 to 40 more stuck in the rubble, and those numbers are much higher as well.
	But what Israel has done is they've imposed a media blockout.
	They arrested at least four journalists, I believe, of Arab or Palestinian descent.
	We're capturing the footage that we were able to use through the Telegram channels, but now we don't have access to that anymore.
	There's some other sources, harder to come by.
	But Israel, again, is trying to hide their losses, hide their casualties, hide their numbers, because a lot of their, well, strategic military bases, their airfields, their ports, their energy infrastructure sites that we just mentioned, and the main bases like Nejev, Ramon, Devolzavoldman struck two, as you might recall.
	Not yet, was it Nejev?
	No, the Nevatim.
	Nevatim Air Base is the one that houses the F-35s, the F-16s.
	Iran also struck a fourth F-35 fighter jet as well, and actually caused Lockheed Martin stock to plummet today.
	Well, it dropped by 4-5%.
	It'll probably recover.
	But that's now the fourth fighter jet, F-35 fighter jet, in addition to F-16s that Iran has been able to successfully destroy.
	And that's, again, that's a real blight and embarrassment for the military industrial complex, which prides itself on producing what they claim are the best fighter jets in the world.
	Real quick, because you're dishing out the information really quickly, and some of my audience might not know some of these locations you're mentioning.
	So just I wanted to clarify.
	This airbase that they struck, this is the same airbase they struck last year, if I'm not mistaken, right?
	When they finally retaliate against Israel?
	Same base?
	That's correct.
	The airbase was struck twice during first True Promise 1, which is in and around April 13th, and then True Promise 2, which is in October.
	It was struck twice.
	The second time it was struck, the F-35s were actually damaged.
	This is where the hangars are and the F-35s are housed.
	The Mossad agents are also killed.
	They hang out there as well.
	And this is the third time, fourth time, maybe, because I believe it was also struck previously as well.
	This isn't the first time they struck Nebatim, but they struck it again today.
	Gotcha.
	So the cities of Haifa, Tel Aviv are the ones that have taken a massive shelling.
	And again, a lot of residential homes have also been struck.
	There have been targeted assassinations.
	And of course, I've mentioned the nuclear scientists.
	And there's more.
	It's just, again, Israel has imposed this media blackout, so it's difficult to be able to disseminate the information.
	So that's crazy.
	So Iran killed three Israeli nuclear scientists.
	Goes around, comes around.
	It might be more than that, because that Weisman Institute was housing.
	I mean, there's a lot of scientists that were actually there at the time of the strike.
	So it got destroyed.
	It's wiped out if you look at the pictures before and after.
	Wow.
	Can someone put that in the Ness for us?
	You know, it's so interesting because you know, the Mossad is literally one of their bread and butters is killing Iranian nuclear scientists.
	So, for and they killed nine nuclear scientists on day one, right?
	If I'm not mistaken, Israel did.
	So, this is crazy karma that's coming back.
	So, now that we've had what we're in day four of the conflict, what are we looking like, guys?
	Who has caused more damage than to the other at this point?
	I know, obviously, Iran sustained some significant damage on their end as well.
	Obviously, day one of Operation Rising Lions, Israel's operation was very significant.
	They were able to be behind enemy lines and launch drones and attack some of the nuclear facilities.
	But at this point, who do you guys say has created more damage and havoc for the other?
	Yeah, it's a good question to ask.
	It really depends on which media you're going to look at.
	If you look at Israeli media, they're, of course, going to minimize the damage they've incurred and, of course, downplay all the casualties they've suffered.
	And they're, of course, going to exaggerate, grossly exaggerate what they've done to Iran.
	They have obviously struck a few sites.
	They struck a couple of hospitals.
	And they also struck a radio network or a broadcasting agency today in Iran.
	And apparently, there were up to eight martyrs.
	But, you know, Iranians, brave as they are, they kept going.
	They kept going with their broadcast within a few minutes of the strike.
	They just didn't care.
	So then Iran struck back with a cyber attack and actually was able to shut down or interfere with Channel 14 Hebrew News, in addition to also interfering with many of the websites that are provided or enabled in Israel.
	So they came back with a cyber attack.
	Now the missile attack, allegedly there were 140, it was 140 missile sabote that was sent with drones, but apparently it was mainly drones and definitely some cruise missiles, at least five.
	But again, with the media blackouts, it's difficult to confirm exactly what's taking place.
	But yeah, there's been a series of different types of attacks, both from the military side, you know, with missiles, drones, and also with a cyber attack as well.
	And of course, there's a propaganda warfare as well between Israel and Iran.
	Iran has disclosed what was happening.
	True, more news coming out of systems.
	The Israeli system only detected the Israeli missile, sorry, Iranian missile only two minutes before arrival.
	So they detected it extremely late, hence why they were basically forced.
	That's why it got ruled.
	Nathan, if there's any breaking news, jump right in, but do continue to sure.
	So that's the other, the other apparatus that Iran's been able to hack into, and that's the alarm system that provides the updates to Israelis to hurry up and get in the shelters because there's an incoming missile attack.
	They hacked that?
	And because they hacked it, yeah.
	They were providing false messaging.
	They did that yesterday.
	So they provided some false messaging.
	Hold on, truth, hold on, hold on.
	Before you, real quick, because I need my audience to understand how significant that is.
	Guys, so in Israel, whenever there's rockets or missiles or anything coming in, they get notified on their phones.
	They hear sirens.
	There's an entire process whenever rockets are incoming towards Israel.
	And you're saying Iran was able to hack that system?
	So they didn't get notified?
	Yes.
	Well, no, they were providing false messaging to tell them they need to go and either.
	So they were complaining.
	Some of them were locked out.
	They couldn't get into the bunker.
	And then others were complaining because normally when they're in the bunker, they get a message every an hour and a half giving an update.
	And they were like so triggered because they weren't getting up there.
	So they were feeling stressed.
	Oh, yes, because, guys, and just so I can explain this to my audience, like that are listening, in Israel, guys, almost every building has bunkers, right?
	It's like all the newer buildings have it.
	So, you know, obviously they rely upon their phones and getting this information.
	So it'll warn them.
	It'll say, hey, you know, missiles are coming.
	Be close to a shelter.
	Okay, get into the shelter now.
	So the fact that Iran was able to, I guess, you're saying hack this so they were giving false messages or just completely mess with it altogether is pretty significant.
	False messages, they're just in the bunker.
	They didn't get the normal message.
	Okay.
	And then in terms of some of them were locked out of the bunkers as well.
	So that's what the way they did it.
	Well, they gave misleading messages.
	They told them there's an incoming missile attack and then there wasn't.
	So I'd say that's the same thing.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, aspect for sure.
	Sorry, I met in the bunker.
	There wasn't a bunker message there.
	Like, guess what?
	Yeah.
	No, this is just for an incoming missile attack.
	And then it didn't happen.
	So they're just stuck waiting and waiting and waiting just to mess with the bunker.
	They thought there was a, even we thought there's a major missile attack and then the nothing came.
	Wow.
	The scene piece of this is it's in the middle of the night, right?
	So these people, you know, they're throwing off their sleep patterns.
	They're already like paranoid and dealing with all the trauma of all these missile attacks.
	And now they're getting false messages, you know, waiting, waiting for a missile to happen.
	And there's been reports within the bunkers, they can feel the reverberations and the shock from it.
	So it's no joke to be able to play on people's nerves like that.
	So, this is also part of the cyber warfare.
	Fires breaking out in the vicinity of Beersheba in the western Negev as a result of the Iranian missile strike.
	Also, the missile fell, a missile fell on the agricultural land near Nevatim Air Base in the Negev as well.
	So, that's happening.
	Like, if you notice my page now, I'm tweeting without images because they're basically doing a full-on stranglehold on the images coming out.
	So, there's hardly any images coming out from that.
	They're basically arresting people if they report on this.
	So, we're being forced to report.
	We're still reporting on it, of course.
	You're going to hear the truth, but the images, the golden images of everything getting destroyed is just not that.
	Gotcha.
	Yeah, and I did see the Israeli police arrest a couple of Arabs.
	I think it was in Haifa.
	They're on a rooftop recording.
	So, a question for you: why is Israel back there?
	Because what happened was on social media, a number of large accounts, such as Vivid, such as that Mossad account, and a few others, sent a video of these people and reported them.
	And then later on, a lot of these got invaded.
	So, there is a possibility that this was done on social media where these guys were basically located and then arrested.
	So, question for you guys: why, you know, why is the Israeli government hell-bent on arresting anyone that documents missiles hitting Israel?
	Why are they so hell-bent on expending resources on that?
	Oh, it's cut.
	For Israelis, normally, it's their psychology anyway.
	They want to give this idea that they're unpenetrable, they're so strong, Mossad is the best, the army is the best, and even though we know all of these things to be not true, and so they want to create this veneer of invincibility.
	The second part is they don't want their people to lose hope.
	You basically seeing your country be destroyed, you're going to have a color revolution.
	And so, they don't want a color revolution, they don't want people to turn on Netanyahu, they don't want people to turn on the government, they don't want people to be against the war.
	You got to keep your go when you have to basically condition your people, manufacture them, keep them controlled, make them believe that you are superior, and all of these things go against that.
	Once your people have fear, you can't do all the evil actions you do.
	And fear takes is actually vehemently psychologically in my view opposite to supremacy.
	Supremacy means that you can't have fear as well, or certain aspects of fear.
	Interesting, interesting.
	Yeah, no, it's amazing.
	Yeah, I'm on your timeline right now, and I see the police for yeah, breaking Israeli police raided an apartment in Haifa where a foreign news crew was filming the skyline and arrested them.
	Bruh, that's crazy, man.
	That's crazy.
	Myron, I got a juicy bit for you.
	Yeah, because they pride themselves on that, saying we're the only democracy in the Middle East.
	Were you going to say truth?
	Go ahead.
	Got a juicy bit to show that Elon's been collaborating with Mossad.
	So, as you know, Elon Musk provided Starlink access to Iranians, but this is on June 13th when they orchestrated the first attack.
	As it turns out, Mossad agents were using Starlink, because they needed, obviously, internet access to be able to then remotely fire off the what they called like loitering drones and also their spike missiles towards various targets, including air defense systems and also platforms.
	So, this was actually done without actual individuals on site, and that's why it took Iran a little bit.
	It took them a few hours to figure it out before they responded within 12 hours.
	So, when Israel claims that it was their air superiority that enabled them to strike the various targets they claim they hit, such as the Natan's nuclear facility and also the Fardon one, it's actually false.
	It was done through Mossad's sleeper cells, and Iran's already, again, discovered a bunch of these labs, these cells, and been able to confiscate the equipment.
	And they've arrested multiple agents and also immediately executed them within hours after the arrest.
	They're not messing around.
	Yeah, I saw that you were posting that a couple of Mossad spies got caught.
	Do we know how many of these Mossad spies got caught in Iran total or no?
	There have been at least 28 detentions.
	I'm not sure how many of them have been executed since June 13th, but that number is expected to rise.
	And I don't know if you saw that guy that looked like Jason Bourne that was targeting that truck that he was shooting at.
	They ended up getting that guy, by the way.
	So, that was pretty cool.
	It was caught on film.
	That was legit.
	So, yeah, no, Iran's what they're looking to do is essentially dismantle Mossad's internal operations with Iran.
	So, they're literally sifting through all these hideout areas or apartments that have just been rented short term and cars rented as well to be able to locate these guys.
	And there's also obviously a spying operation going on as well with the citizens, too, that have routed out numerous individuals they suspect of collaborating with Mossad.
	Because once they can disable that advantage that Israel has, they'll be stuck having to rely on aerial bombardment, which is very difficult for Israel because four of their F-35s have already been shut down, shot down, and including is that official?
	I know day one, there was some confusion whether they shot an F-35 down, but is it pretty much confirmed now that they've shot down four different F-35s Iran has?
	Yeah, it's confirmed.
	The three were confirmed.
	I already confirmed those.
	The fourth one just got done today.
	So yeah, it's confirmed.
	But of course, Israel's going to hide it.
	Okay.
	It came from Iranian media, I'm guessing.
	We also saw a dip in the stock price for Lockheed Martin.
	Okay.
	Did that come from Iranian media that they shot down these F-35s?
	Yes, it did.
	Okay.
	Well, Israel's not, it's not going to come from Israeli media or American media.
	They'll never want to admit that their F-35s got shot because it's going to impact their sales.
	Yeah, yeah, and that's significant, man.
	I mean, because F-35s have the ability to basically avoid radar detection, right?
	They're really high-end aircraft.
	Well, they have stealth ability and obviously speed and ability to be fierce in dogfights, et cetera.
	But Iran's got a pretty sophisticated radar system, an air defense system that's able to lock in, anticipate it coming in, because with the radar system, it can detect unidentified projectiles from over 1,200 kilometers away, which then gives the defense system that it communicates with instantly time to then geolocate that aircraft and then through its algorithm detect what its expected movement is.
	Because it uses a predictive algorithm based on previous patterns.
	You know how when you drive a car, you've got predictive patterns for driving?
	It's the same thing with the fighter jets.
	They use previous patterns that they've been able to document with all the time spent with the air defense systems in Ukraine, for instance, that Russia's had.
	So Iran's been the beneficiary of that, and they've obviously been inputting that data into their own air defense systems, which is what Russia also helped with while they were there.
	So this way they could detect F-16s and F-35s from well over 1,000 kilometers away, which gives them the advantage.
	And that's why Israel hasn't really been doing too many aerial attacks.
	They did one today and they got attacked.
	And for 24 hours, they didn't do any.
	So when they say that in Zionist media, they'll say that Israel has air superiority and that they're currently monitoring skies of Tehran.
	Those are just drones.
	They're not actually fighter jets.
	And they end up getting shut down by the air defense systems.
	Wow.
	So a lot of development then.
	So, okay, just so I can summarize this.
	So we got, you're saying Haifa got hit the port and one of the was it an oil refinery oil refinery.
	An illegal settlement.
	Oh, yeah.
	And also buildings that were surrounding the port as well have been destroyed, leveled.
	Like over 1,500 homes have been destroyed.
	That's what they admit.
	It's more than that.
	And then there's a smuggling operation, too.
	So Israel is doing its own human trafficking.
	Internationally illegal settlements, too.
	So Haifa got destroyed.
	Well, not destroyed, but it's been hit significantly.
	The oil refineries there, obviously a big strategic place for trade.
	We know Tel Aviv has been getting hit constantly.
	What are they targeting specifically in Tel Aviv?
	I know they hit the equivalent of what's the Pentagon over there.
	What other places have they hit in Tel Aviv?
	Because the command and control area has been struck.
	I mean, there is a Mossad headquarters over there.
	There's a police station.
	There's a lot going on in Tel Aviv, including an IDF headquarters as well.
	And it's also where some of the nuclear scientists live.
	So that's where some of the targeted assassinations took place.
	But what else?
	I mean, it's a coastal area.
	Just now I got breaking news.
	There is an explosion in the city of Kashan as well.
	That is also breaking.
	So the city of Kashan and Iran.
	Sorry, continuing truth.
	Yeah, I mean, they are targeting both economic finance.
	And they also struck the broadcasting radio agency as well, because, well, theirs got struck.
	That's besides the cyber hack, I'm told.
	So, yeah, they're not leaving much to chance, apparently.
	They're going after both military targets, of course, financial targets, energy targets, anything and everything it takes to disable, dismantle Israel's ability to be able to launch these offensive attacks that are illegal.
	Oh, yeah, nuclear research center is struck as well.
	Okay, so they've attacked the Wiseman Institute that I mentioned earlier.
	Okay, so the Weisman Institute, I saw that.
	They tried to lie and say it wasn't the case.
	But then I went and checked, and it actually is the Weisman Institute to try to give a picture of a different, like a second Weisman Institute they had.
	And they were trying to communicate with me, and they were all saying it's fake news.
	I went back and checked.
	I thought, like, I'm sure I'm right.
	And then Google checked it, and it actually was the right Weisman Institute.
	So the Weisman Institute in Tel Aviv was hit.
	We know, obviously, they're equivalent to the Pentagon.
	You're saying they hit the Mossad base, they hit the IDF base, you know, they've hit some other places because we got people like Yosef Hadad, for example.
	Base, Ramon base, Nejev base, multiple other air bases.
	They're striking all the military targets, essentially.
	And of course, David Ben-Gurion Airport as well.
	And of course, the Haifa port.
	Because people like Yosef Haddad, right, who we know is like an Arab propagandist out of there in Israel.
	He's claiming that Iran is hitting civilian areas and they're knocking down apartment complexes or whatever.
	Is there a reason why Iran has been knocking down a lot of these apartment complexes?
	Well, I mean, they're harboring terrorists for one, and Israel might be hiding its weapons there.
	Does that sound familiar, Myron?
	Is that what they accuse the Palestinians of doing in Gaza?
	Yeah, it actually is, yeah.
	Remember, everyone's down in bunkers, they've caught, like, so they're hitting these buildings, and then Israelis are coming up in the bunkers afterwards and making it out like it's Gaza, like they were in the building or something like that.
	So it is like, you know, they've got a whole bunker system and they're going down.
	Yeah, their bunker system is actually really effective.
	Like, you've got a very high survival rate in those bunkers.
	We're very well made in Israel.
	I'm noticing, guys, I know.
	I'm noticing, guys, the Samsung option is trending right now.
	So I think we are going to do a big tweet out on that, as well as Joe Joe.
	I spoke about the Samsung option to Myron previously, but there's a lot more details to it.
	Joe, jump and tell Myron and his audience.
	And in case people are listening, it's good.
	Myron's got a big audience as well.
	And so this gives us a lot of close his to hear what's happening.
	And Joe, actually, real quick, Joa, before you go in, I want to give you credit, Joa, because guys, I know you guys always ask me, like, hey, Myron, how do you know about this?
	You know, why Israel won't acknowledge this nuclear program?
	And it was actually Joah here that was the one that gave me the actual law that I always reference in the 70s with Carter about how, you know, countries that have an illegal nuclear program, like Israel can't get foreign aid, and that's why they can't, it's got to stay unacknowledged.
	So that info actually came to me from Joah, guys.
	So shout out to him.
	But go ahead, man.
	Just want to give you credit.
	Thanks.
	Thanks, man.
	Look, while all this is exciting, probably the most exciting thing to me to find out is what was released during all the fireworks.
	So there was a hacker group called Hamala, right, which actually hacked a few things that were already mentioned.
	They said they had a huge data trove that they were able to get when the war was starting.
	So today, not today, yesterday, they released documents showing the Samsung option, right?
	So we know about the Samsung option because it's the Jewish-American author Simon Hirsch, right?
	one who uncovered Abu Ghraib he's the one who also Seymour Hurst that's That's it.
	seymour hirsch um and in that book you basically i feel so bad because you're giving such important information i I'm going to basically open it up for you to say, but I just got a few important breaking news and give it straight back to you.
	The first one is the idea for claiming that there was no malfunction in the interceptor that explored a low altitude in the region.
	But obviously, we've got the videos, I don't know how they're blagging that one.
	Iranian outlets are contradicting Israeli outlets, and they have said that they've launched ballistic missiles.
	Remember, some reports were coming out that ballistic missiles haven't been fired, and it's actually only drones, and there's been no hits.
	Obviously, they did a blackout, so they're not allowing any of that information to come out.
	But the Iranians are confirming that they did launch ballistic missiles.
	Furthermore, Iranian TV has said that news was received this evening of the destruction of another F-35 aircraft belonging to the Zionist regime by the air defense systems on the Julfa border.
	Correspondent Bana Kasaba learned that the destroyed fire aircraft is the same one that attacked the Iranian radio and television organization, which was identified and targeted by the air defenses.
	The IRG said we target the base from which the aggression against the radio and television authority building was launched.
	The Israeli artillery shelling resumes in Gaza.
	Obviously, they continue to shell and kill in innocence and with the sniper shots.
	The IRG also said we talked.
	Yeah, so we said that one.
	Okay.
	And what's this?
	Iranian television employee dies from injury sustained in the Zionist attack on the building.
	So that's basically another journalist killed by the Israeli Zionists.
	So a journalist, a reporter within the building died.
	Shaman Peth Malden was meant to be a reporter and then he was encouraging this and didn't call it out.
	But yeah, sorry, those are the news.
	Go ahead, Joe.
	I think then.
	And Joe, can you tell us what the Samsung option is real quick too, for those that don't know in my audience?
	Yeah, so when the author released it, who is a Jewish American, he basically said that this was basically an option to use nukes if Israel was ever overrun, right?
	Although in that book, he did say this is not just to use against the enemy.
	This is to use against everyone.
	And no one really believed him.
	So like most of us think, okay, Samson option is, look, if Iran takes over Israel, Israel's going to nuke Iran automatically, right?
	Well, the information that was released is Seymour Hirsch was right.
	They have all the targets of where they would launch nukes if it's ever overrun.
	Those include Washington, D.C., New York City, LA, That base we had, NORAD in Colorado, Berlin, Paris, London, Beijing, Tokyo, and many other cities.
	So, if Israel's ever overrun, they have a document to basically blow up every major city around the world, even people who were their allies.
	And that information's been out since 1991.
	No one believed it.
	And as of yesterday, we now have proof that that is absolutely 100% true, which is the craziest thing out of this whole conflict to me, anyway.
	So, basically, if they're threatened, they're gonna.
	I mean, how many nuclear bombs does Israel even have at this point?
	400, supposedly, more or less, is what the estimates are: 400 or more.
	Wow, but just for your audience, Myron, I gave this example to our audience that just imagine the logic of that.
	So, imagine I back you up, Amyron, and I'm like, Don't worry, Myron, I've got your back no matter what.
	I'm gonna put my life on the line, I'm gonna put my wealth on the line, I'm gonna put my family on the line, I'm gonna put my entire following on the line.
	We're gonna go all in and support you no matter what.
	And you know, you're not that strong, you know, you don't have the same capabilities that I do, and I'm just supporting you and giving you all the support.
	And you're like, Thanks, bruv.
	But guess what?
	If I'm about to lose or things don't look good for me, I'm gonna murder you.
	But I'm supporting you, and you're like, Nah, I'm just, I am actually gonna murder you.
	But that's literally the psychology of the Zionist.
	It's sick.
	Oh, man.
	This shit's good.
	This is it.
	This isn't terrorism.
	I don't know what is.
	Like, I don't understand how American an American can look at this and not see that this is exactly what terrorism is.
	It's like a threat.
	It's a terroristic threat that if we don't win and you don't make us win, you die.
	Can you guys, can you guys give me like put that in a nest?
	You said it was a document that was released, declassified documents?
	I'm putting together a video, and either me or Saliman will share the video.
	It's only going to be like a minute and a half long.
	I'll probably be done in about another 10 minutes.
	Okay.
	And then you guys can share it.
	Nay, and yeah, who also said it's either America or die or America dies.
	So, Martin, you're aware that Iran did a cyber hack operation that went over, I don't know, might have taken a few weeks, months.
	We don't know the time frame, but they disclosed that they obtained tens of thousands of documents from Assad's database.
	And so, a few of the documents they haven't revealed at all.
	There's a ton of information there, a ton of data there.
	One of the bits was that the IAEA was actively collaborating with Israel to disclose sensitive and personal information about the Iranian nuclear scientists that they've assassinated.
	It was five of them at that time.
	In addition to that, it also revealed the secret locations of where some Israeli nuclear sites are that aren't that nobody knows about.
	Everyone knows about Demona and Neja, but they don't know about the other ones.
	Iran has that, and that's where Iran was able to find out about Israel's Samsung option and the cities that Joel mentioned that Israel intends to target.
	So, this is verified information directly from Mossad and Israel's database.
	Shit.
	Okay.
	Man.
	So, Iran, right?
	So, Iran's trying to save American lives by letting you know that if you stay allied with Israel, it could take us out.
	Shit, man.
	If you're living in those cities in Colorado, New York, LA, etc.
	So, when I was talking with Scott earlier, you know, Scott is pretty much, you know, he was saying, Look, like, Israel can't win this conflict.
	They're gonna, you know, the only chance of any type of victory is they're gonna need significant U.S. intervention at this point.
	And I know Trump is, you know, meeting with the people and trying to figure out if they're gonna do it.
	But even if we did, that would be us bringing in a B-2 bomber and bombing this facility in the mountain.
	But even then, man, I mean, to affect a regime change, you'd pretty much need boots on the ground.
	So, I'm trying to like play devil's advocate here.
	I'm trying to think of a way where the Israelis are going to win this conflict.
	Is there any other way besides, I mean, maybe dropping a nuclear bomb?
	But, you know, when I asked Scott that, he said he thinks that would create some really bad political ramifications for them utilizing a bomb.
	So, or the nuclear bomb.
	But, I don't know.
	I mean, is there clearly, I don't think that Israel can stand this for three weeks like they claim that they want to bomb Iran for.
	No, they're going to need help.
	Yeah, they won't be able to last three weeks.
	I mean, my opinion is slightly different to truth.
	I think that if this was to continue, it would harm both Israel and Iran.
	And so, the only basically, Israel definitely cannot win.
	Israel's never won on its own ever.
	If you look at all the wars in the past, whether it's 4672, every single time they've always needed the support of the actual real power, whether it was the Brits or the Americans.
	And even in this one, they can't win.
	But what if they can do is obviously they can give new damage to Iran.
	And obviously, they need still the defense of America to get limited damage, but they'll still have damage.
	So it'll end up harming both people significantly.
	But if it was one-on-one, they'd be damaged a lot more, and Iran, a lot less.
	But with the current situation where they're getting a lot of defense, it's probably a decent amount of damage to both sides.
	So all that will happen is both will just tumble into like really, you know, what the scary part is, guys, is you know, this is this is with Israel actually shooting down missiles.
	They're still incurring all this damage while shooting down a significant amount of missiles.
	So that tells me, you know, once they run out of interceptors, because it's just a matter of time until they do, they won't be able to have their interceptors won't be able to keep up with all the missiles coming in because it's just simply cheaper for Iran to send missiles than it is for Israel to shoot them down.
	You know, from financial attrition and just resource attrition, like they won't be able to keep this up.
	So, I mean, there's no telling what will happen once they run out of interceptors.
	Like, they're pretty much wide open.
	Truth, you're going to say for the air defense.
	Truth, do you want to add that context that I sent to you?
	It's very important to the discussion.
	Sure, I was going to add one point, and then I can let me see what you sent there.
	And yeah, absolutely, I can add that in as well.
	Well, yeah, I did look through that.
	So, look, with respect to the air defense systems that Israel has, we've now seen it a few times backfire on itself.
	And the missile would actually reverse course and strike, for instance, a site in Tel Aviv.
	It hasn't been striking down a lot of missiles.
	That's just Zionist media portraying that because they, of course, want to continue to maintain the invincible aura of the air defense systems that they admit themselves is only about 90% affected when swarmed with drones.
	They're not really able to strike out any of the ballistic missiles, hardly any of them, because they're usually one drained out, and two, they're not able to track the course of the supersonic ballistic missiles, much less the hypersonics.
	And to give you an idea of Iran's missile strategy, they're able to strike with their hypersonics in seven minutes, but they're aware that it takes 11 minutes to be able to reset and redeploy additional missiles, interceptor missiles, within the air defense system.
	So they know they have that four-minute advantage to strike free will at Israel once the air defense system is fully depleted.
	And they've been tracking all this data since True Promise 1.
	So they've got it down to a science when they do their separate waves of attacks, how they can maximize their targets, their successful targets on the various sites that they've been hitting.
	So you see, they've got it down to a science with respect to this.
	What you just mentioned is significant.
	Because I've watched videos on this, and correct me if I'm wrong here, Truth.
	So it seems to me, first they launch out, you know, the regular missiles, drones, et cetera, which are slower.
	And those pretty much, you know, go first.
	And then they shoot the hypersonics and the faster missiles.
	And then those eventually catch up to the drones and the slower moving missiles.
	So what you're saying, Truth, is they kind of get pushed first because they're going to get intercepted.
	Once those get intercepted, that creates that window of opportunity for the faster, more powerful missile to actually strike the target.
	Is that kind of, I guess that's a crude way of describing it, but would that be fair to say?
	Yeah, it's for the most effective missile to strike without impediment.
	Because what the drones are cheap, and it's also very cost-effective to do it this way because you don't care if they're losing out on $1,000 drones.
	It's so several thousand dollar missiles because it doesn't cost Iran a lot to make missiles.
	They make missiles like they make matches, literally.
	They have a massive depot, but they want to use their best for last.
	And apparently, their successful hits have been done with 20 to 30 year old stock missiles.
	They haven't even used their new stuff yet because they're anticipating that America and others may enter the war.
	And that's when they'll use their real arsenal.
	So what's key, strategic to this particular war of attrition that seems to be happening is information asymmetry because Iran continues to keep Israel and America guessing.
	Well, you've got Palantir tracking all the data for missiles and drones launched at particular different times of day in different waves in different batches without being able to really create any kind of pattern.
	So it's not like 50 at a time or 100 at a time.
	Sometimes it's 20, 40, 100.
	And now with cyber hacking, they're even more unpredictable because they'll tell you there's missile salvo coming through that isn't.
	So you see, it's the key is unpredictability, having steady victories.
	You cut out there, Truth.
	You said the key is to have unstability and then you just cut out there.
	So, success is predictable and have a steady access supply of both missiles, drones, and of course, access to good intelligence from the spy satellites to know what's happening and the cyber hack as well, which can mislead the public of Israel and drive them mad essentially into thinking there's missiles coming when they actually aren't.
	So, it's both cyber warfare, military warfare, and propaganda warfare with the headlines.
	The other thing Iran has done successfully is use decoys.
	So, Israel thinks it struck a lot of nuclear sites like in the Tans and Farado.
	They haven't.
	They've been decoys, and they thought today they struck F-14 Tomcats.
	Those are decoys.
	And then Iran actually put out a video showing the real F-14s and then had a good laugh about it.
	So, decoys have also been a big part of the military strategy for Iran as well to fool Israel into thinking it's winning when it's actually not.
	Interesting.
	Very, very interesting, man.
	Wow.
	Crazy, crazy stuff.
	And you guys are saying there's still strikes going on right now as we speak, right?
	Yeah, but there's media blackouts, so we can't track it because Israel is trying to hide its shame, so to speak.
	Okay, what about on the Iranian side?
	I know they hit a news building, right?
	And one reporter, Sula Manza, got killed.
	Yeah, yeah, that's just the breaking news.
	And I'll give you some more news, actually.
	Yeah, we just had it now that the Iranian television employee killed from injuries sustained in the Israeli attack on the building.
	So that's another journalist that killed us news.
	Also, we've got an update on the damage sustained by Israel over the last four days.
	The head of economic affair department, Akhan Channel.
	So this is actual Israelis, right?
	So we believe the damage is much more significant than this because they're going to minimize it in order to continue that propaganda company to give people hope.
	But this is what it says.
	Over four days, 1,500 homes and apartments in Israel have been damaged due to Iranian bombardment.
	The damage is extremely severe, not only in terms of lives, but also in terms of property, with hundreds of millions of shekels in damages from last Saturday alone.
	Senior economic official confirmed that the value of damages will reach approximately 10 billion shekels within the next week or two if Iranian bombardment continues at this pace without accounts accounting for the possibility of targeting infrastructure facilities or sensitive vital sites.
	The funds affiliated with property tax contained only 9.5 million shekels, which means the money in it is gradually running out.
	How much shekels is there to a dollar, actually?
	It's like a few hundred million.
	I'd have to check the exact number, but it's more than 10 to 1.
	I don't want to give an exact number.
	I can do the calculation though.
	Oh, it's only 3.49.
	So if there's 3.49 shekels to a dollar, according to them, it's what?
	It's already cost, what is it?
	10 billion.
	So it's basically cost them 2 billion, 2 billion dollars.
	2.86 billion.
	Yeah.
	What do you say about the 2?
	It's about 2.5 billion, right?
	2.86 billion, if it's 3.4.
	Yeah, 2.86 billion.
	That's the exact amount.
	So they've had 2.86 billion dollars of damage just from this bombing.
	And that's their estimate.
	It's probably more because you remember, I believe in the genocide in Gaza, they were spending eight, they spent 85 billion, right?
	And in the fight with Iran, you basically got where they're having to use planes and refuel and so on and so forth.
	I believe it costs them, is it 300 million?
	I can't remember.
	I was reading this earlier.
	It's 300 million, I believe.
	Whenever someone else has got a different figure, so if it's costing them like 300 to 500 million a day, which is almost half a billion a day, and then they sustained 2 billion of damage in four days, there's another half million.
	Basically, it's costing them almost a billion a day, maybe more.
	Like, how much more longer can they sustain that?
	It's just impossible or improbable.
	Remember, that was just from True Promise 1.
	It was over a billion dollars spent on all the interceptor missiles for the drones, the 300 drones and missiles.
	So now it's fully depleting their systems and it's several days in a row.
	So that's just cost of damage.
	Don't forget, then you have to include all the cost of the interceptor missiles they've used in the five-tier air defense system consisting of what Patriot, the Iron Dome, Fat Arrow, and of course David Sling.
	They're using them all, right?
	And they've actually destroyed Iran actually and for their warplanes as well.
	That costs a lot, all the refueling, keeping them up in the air.
	Billions of dollars a day to maintain those.
	Yeah, it's stupid amounts.
	This is why I'm saying, like, the damage seems like half a billion dollars a day, and then all the rest of it is probably half a billion dollars.
	They're probably spending like a billion a day at the moment.
	Man, yeah, it's this is also got that context that I sent you.
	You should have had that in as well.
	Yeah, what Nathan was able to provide for me was data on whether Israel would have any chance of winning any of its wars, what would happen in the event that it wasn't getting support from the US, UK, France, Germany, etc.
	All of its allies.
	And the bombardment would be multiples higher than what it is now, and they would ultimately lose and be conceding immediately if they didn't have help.
	They wouldn't even launch the attack, I suspect, unless there's someone there crazy enough to, because again, they just don't have the ability.
	Their air defense systems are they've now been disproven, they've been breached multiple times, and uh, you know, they're their refinery's already been destroyed, so they have to be relying on oil imports.
	But all their ports have been destroyed or destroyed or inactive or bankrupt.
	So, you know, they're in a very bad position with all the help they're receiving.
	Nathan, were you going to add something on top of that?
	No, well, basically, I just want people to be reminded that this is not just Iran versus Israel, this is Iran versus Israel versus the US versus the UK.
	Because not only are they helping them defensively, they're also helping them on offensive operations as well.
	You got to remember the Americans are helping to clear the pathway that allows them to reach Iran.
	Also, they're helping them with intelligence.
	And then you have the British as well who's helping with intelligence.
	So, and with the American defense systems that they have around the region, all that they, if I remember correctly, the F-35 can literally tap into that.
	The system, the way it's designed, it can connect to all these systems, including the ones on the ground, which allows it to extend its range a lot further than if it didn't have those.
	So, I just think this is a very important context because people keep losing sight that this is just like, oh, this is Iran versus Israel.
	And I think that when you take into account or ask the question who's winning, these important facts have to be taken into account.
	So, and I can go ahead and quickly news.
	Um, Iran just posted uh, they said Iran will launch missiles every hour until dawn.
	So, this Iran said the Iranian officials said we will launch a group of missiles every hour until dawn.
	We will not sleep and we will not let our enemy sleep.
	So, it's gonna be a long night, brother, man.
	Yo, how the Palestinians feel, bro?
	Israel around and is finding out, dude.
	Holy shit, man, they are not around, dude.
	Incredible, man.
	We've also got a statement from Peak Hexeth, which is relevant to you guys.
	During the weekend, I ordered the because they asked him about the you know the moving of the ships.
	Uh, a lot of concern about that.
	It seems like this is possibly U.S. moving and joining the war.
	He said, During the weekend, I ordered the deployment of additional forces and capabilities to the U.S. Central Command in the Middle East.
	This additional deployment aims to strengthen our defensive capability.
	So, again, he's not giving away too much about what that's about.
	Uh, in from inside the new Aska camp now, near the camp, blah blah blah.
	Large number of people decide 22.
	We mentioned that earlier 20 traffic cameras in Israel have been shut down.
	Israeli spot the regime has ordered closed circuit and traffic cameras to be turned off.
	And the reason is obviously they don't want them to disseminate.
	It says, Yeah, the Reim made extensive efforts over the past four days to prevent the dissemination of images of missile attacks and successful strikes.
	So, they shoot enough traffic cameras to make sure that you don't know exactly what's going on.
	This is the joint Arab-Islamic statement, which is Israel.
	Israel attacks constitutes a flagrant violation of international law and human rights.
	Israeli police are preventing journalists from filming in Haifa.
	Shout out to Cube with the gifted sub for futuristic guys.
	If you're watching on Kik and you're a brokey, type in I'm a brokey and uh someone will gift you a sub.
	We got what almost 300 you guys watching on kick, another 2,000 on Rumble, another 4,000 on YouTube.
	We got 6,000 plus you guys in here, man.
	So, do me a favor, guys, smash that like button on YouTube.
	I'll smash it on Rumble if you're watching on Rumble.
	And if you're watching on Kick, type in I'm a brokey, and you can go ahead and get a sub gifted to you.
	Uh, when you get a sub, you're able to go ahead and get uh, you know, use the funny ass emails that I got.
	Also, guys, just so you know, I am running a sale.
	Join the OSS, okay?
	It is the best way to support me.
	I've been demonetized for two years now at this point, and who fucking knows what's gonna happen with YouTube.
	So, the only thing I ask, guys, is you can get into the OSS right now for four bucks, ten bucks a month.
	That is how you keep the show going.
	If you enjoy this type of content, if you enjoy me being able to give you guys true crime, news, politics, uh, geopolitical breakdowns of conflicts around the world, uh, go ahead and join the OSS.
	It's only four bucks to join, man.
	That is the best way to support me by far, man, is to join the OSS.
	They can't take that from us, they can't stop us with that.
	So, make sure to get in there, man.
	That's the best way.
	Some red crescent workers, right?
	The Bazan group have confirmed that the Haifa power plan.
	We talked about this, right?
	We talked about the implications of this, the financial implications of this.
	Simon broke it down for us earlier.
	But the Bazan group, which operates the Haifa Power Plan and oil refineries, have reported extensive damage to the power plant.
	Operations at all refineries and the company's subsidiaries have now been suspended.
	We mentioned about suspended, but also now confirmation from the Bazan group that there is extensive damage.
	And this isn't fake news.
	They've put a letter out in Hebrew and it's translated as well.
	All this will be pointing out soon.
	I'm just going through it for the audience and then I'll tweet it out.
	Air defenses have been activated in Tehran.
	And the Secretary General of the Saeed al-Shahada Brigade in the Islamic Resistance in Iraq has also made a statement.
	Cub gifted another sub to BBQ cart.
	Appreciate that, Cub.
	Appreciate that greatly, bro.
	Let's speak about Myron.
	Just real quickly.
	You should have read part of that last one I sent you with the Secretary General.
	I'll just read the first paragraph because it's literally, it just backs up exactly what I just said.
	So he says the United States has shut down Iraqi radars, providing an aerial quarter for Zionist aircraft through Iraqi airspace, which it has controlled for over two decades as part of its occupation presence in Iraq to carry out its aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iraq.
	So basically, he's literally just confirming exactly what I just said.
	What I might do is make a quick segue.
	Yeah, yeah, sorry.
	I'm too busy trying to cover the Diddy case real quick because I fell behind because I was reading it out.
	Shout out to Tri Vision.
	$50 Super Chat.
	Appreciate that on Rumble Rants.
	Okay.
	Ah, everyone, hit that like button now.
	Myron is a walking W. I appreciate that, TriVision.
	I appreciate you guys.
	A lot of you guys, I'm seeing a lot of you guys come back that I haven't seen you guys in fucking years, bro.
	You guys are coming back watching the debrief.
	So it's happy to I'm happy to have you guys back, man.
	Welcome to the fucking army, my friends.
	Yeah, let's bring some people up.
	Doc, what's your thoughts about what's going on?
	There's a lot of reports coming out today that there is a possibility that Trump may join.
	On the other hand, there's other reports saying that he won't join.
	What's your thoughts?
	I think nobody knows.
	And I think people that know don't talk about it.
	So people are reflecting and promoting any posts that aligns with their particular beliefs.
	Guys, if I did Diddy, it would be like maybe what I got a 15-minute video here.
	I'll do a poll on Rumble and on a poll on YouTube and kick for you guys.
	Let's see what you guys want.
	Trump's true social coach just now says Iran should have signed the deal.
	I told them to sign.
	What a shame.
	And waste of human lives.
	Simply stated, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
	I said it over and over again.
	Everyone should immediately evacuate to Iran.
	Wow.
	He basically is backing Israel.
	And don't worry, sweetie.
	Now, if he does that, I disavow Trump and his presidency.
	IDN it to you on your updates or Trump.
	No, no, I've got it.
	I've got it.
	I've got it.
	It was one of the things I had in line to tweet out, but I was appreciate you giving the information up there.
	Appreciate it, Michael.
	Jump in, Doc.
	No, I just said that if Trump takes an active part in the attack on Iran, then I disavow him completely.
	I do.
	But pronouncements of future acts in the midst of what's happening right now, the propaganda that's flowing from both sides.
	The paid agents.
	All right, guys, poll is up.
	Vote on YouTube and on kick.
	I can't do a poll on Rumble.
	But guys, vote on their Rumble and OSS.
	I guess we could do is give me a one if you guys want to do Diddy.
	Give me a two if you guys want to stay here.
	Obviously, I'd go back and forth.
	I wouldn't just do Diddy the whole time, but I would cover just what went down for today.
	So give me yes if you guys want me to cover for 15 minutes or no if you guys want me to.
	So one if yes, two if no for my council club and Rumble Ninjas.
	I'm not going to condemn him before that.
	Yeah, guys, I can't do a poll on you and run with us.
	It doesn't have the doesn't have the option.
	That's why.
	From a military perspective, they're just not probably directly sending missiles and drugs, I think.
	But we see what has happening, guys, in the nest is the tweet that they were just talking about.
	One of you guys want me to go, or two of you guys want me to just stay here.
	Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran.
	Michael, have you been following the events today?
	What do you think about what's going on?
	I'm getting caught up through you guys, but I hope this isn't what we think it is with what Trump's saying after all the other comments.
	We'll have to see how it develops.
	But I like, again, another day of great, we've seen great cyber and great attacks from Iran.
	I mean, I just think it's scary that we could actually potentially be going up against a power that we're really outmatched for a long-term war with.
	Michael, can you mention what you told us yesterday about how America struggled with Houthis or Ansurullah's naval ships?
	Yeah, a lot of the a lot of I've been on a lot of events over the last month and a half, and a lot of Navy veterans and a lot of Navy intelligence have told me that, you know, we were really struggling.
	Like, we haven't had barrages like that since actually calling it worse than what they received in World War II.
	So he said they really couldn't handle what they had to go through.
	They eventually had to make a deal and back out.
	So, I mean, oh, shit, this is a crazy.
	Is this a threat from Donald Trump?
	Iran should have signed the deal.
	I told him to sign.
	What a shame and waste of human life.
	Simply say that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
	I said it over and over again.
	Everyone should immediately evacuate to Iran.
	This was literally 10 minutes ago, June 16, 2025, 6:30 p.m.
	10 minutes ago.
	He put this out on True Social.
	Shit.
	Fazan Group, which operates the Haifa power plant and oil refineries, reports extensive damage to the power plant.
	Operations at all refineries and the company's subsidiaries have been halted.
	Iran hit was severe.
	Iran's hit was severe.
	And there's documents there as well, guys.
	Please share that tweet in the nest.
	Please retweet it.
	And we'll be putting more breaking news in the nest.
	But the thing is, Michael, you know, this statement, right, that President Trump's made?
	Like, he's been saying, I literally can't bring anyone up.
	I'm trying to bring people up, and it's just not happening.
	Probably because the panel was full and Doc's now just dropped.
	So Dr. Ro Shanak has come up and Doc's gone.
	So it's only because the panel was full.
	But it's a full.
	I've only seen three slots available.
	You know, it's full.
	It's full.
	That's why you can't bring it.
	Chat, you know what to do.
	We need a ratio, Charlie Kirk, chat.
	We need a ratio, Charlie Kirk, chat.
	already know what time it is.
	Here's the link, ninjas.
	Thank you.
	I need you guys to go like this shit right now.
	We need a ratio Charlie Kirk, guys.
	Let's go.
	Let's go.
	No more wars for Israel, bro.
	Here's the fucking.
	Here's the link, Ninjas.
	All right, looks like we're not going to do the diddler then.
	Okay, fair enough.
	Here's the link, guys.
	Go on that Twitter.
	Like that fucking comment.
	Let's ratio Charlie Kirk ninjas.
	Let's get this shit climbing.
	No more wars for Israel, chat.
	No more wars for Israel.
	Dropping a link right now for you guys.
	Link is in the chat.
	There's a link.
	Some scenes from the impact site in southern Israel earlier.
	So that's in the nest.
	Reclimate chat.
	He's at 509.
	We're at 329.
	Bro got like 5 million followers, and we're catching up, ninjas.
	We're catching up.
	You guys know what to do.
	No more wars for Israel, man.
	He goes, President Trump gives a terrifying warning to Iranians living in Tehran.
	Everyone should know, man.
	No more wars for Israel, bro.
	These fucking dickheads.
	Truth was saying they killed the negotiator, and that's what they're aiming to do, kill the negotiator.
	I think President Netanyahu Netanyahu said today that, you know, if we can, basically, I'm paraphrasing his words, but kill Khomeini and the war is over.
	That's it.
	Literally.
	And that's crazy.
	That's crazy to me too that he comes out and states that his intelligence shows proof that Iranian proxies plan to kill Trump twice, right?
	So basically he's saying, let's try to kill Khomeini.
	If we can pull it off, we'll do it.
	And then we'll turn around and provide fake intelligence that states, well, he was trying to kill Trump, so we killed him.
	And I just think that that's such a, I mean, it's no surprise because this is how the Israeli regime operates.
	But I just think it's insane that you're basically telling them to try to agree to a deal when the Israelis currently, the IDF and their intelligence, has not stated what the clear goal of what their operation is right now, right?
	They keep posturing back and forth.
	So the advantage on that end of it, because Mossad is so legit, top intelligence agency, bar none, it just makes it extremely unfortunate because they're doing what they do best.
	And then while that continues, there's no guarantees for that to stop at any certain point.
	So I just really hope the U.S. doesn't get involved because that'll just turn this into an entire, it'll literally turn it into World War III.
	I suspect there's a bit of resistance there, right?
	From somewhere, some quarter.
	I would put on the white snake, but I want you guys to be able to hear the space and get the updates.
	So no white snake this time, guys.
	But I think some of them have realized that the electorate, the public, is not in favor of this.
	So there's some resistance there because I was going to say Satan Yahoo because that's what freaking Brother Mufit says.
	Netanyahu, I know he's just, he goes on about that all day.
	But anyway, Netanyahu, he made that statement today.
	I was like, freaking hell.
	It was like, what good is America first if it's America dead or something like that?
	It's just like, that's just disgraceful.
	You're saying literally you're there to die for me.
	What good is America first if it's America dead?
	Like, atrocious, right?
	After just saying that, you know, the United States and Donald Trump will do what's best for America and I'll do what's best for Israel.
	But then, you know, America first isn't worth anything if it's America dead.
	Like, yeah, he's on one, but unfortunately, the weapon and machinery and PR.
	Bro, these memes are hilarious.
	That props in and is stayed up is extremely powerful.
	So you can have a buffoon at the top and still be okay.
	Indeed, indeed.
	Guys, there's a tweet in the nest.
	I just got to it breaking.
	Trump is expected to present Iran with a last chance offer.
	America and European officials told the Jerusalem Post today that U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to present a last chance offer to Iran.
	The official added that the offer could even be slightly better than the previous one the government presented to the Iranians about a week and a half ago.
	These sources stress that even if such an offer were made, it would still be based on the U.S. desired zero enrichment principle.
	So that tweet is in the nest.
	And do you know what?
	This is my personal view.
	I find it so goddamn hypocritical that these nations who have got freaking full-on nukes are telling other countries in the world what they can and cannot have.
	From my personal perspective, Israel with nukes is far more dangerous than Iran with nukes, right?
	Absolutely.
	I mean, especially since they have like leaked plans with their Samsung option IDF materials stating all the foreign countries around them in the immediate range that they have all the actual nukes right now lined up to fire off at, which is a pretty crazy long list.
	But yeah, it's extremely ironic and unbelievable, really, because zero enrichment is insane.
	Like you're basically telling the entire 90 million population that they're not allowed to have civilian enrichment of an energy source.
	That's insane.
	Guys, there's another tweet just now in the nest.
	It's going in, I'm removing the Trump bond.
	We've heard enough about Trump.
	Tehran's air defense system continued to intercept Israeli attacks.
	Tehran's air defense system continues to intercept Israeli attacks.
	Truth, are you still there?
	Yeah, Truth's still there.
	Truth, do you think on balance, the Iranian air defense system has been better than the Israeli one?
	Well, I don't think there's much comparison between the two.
	I mean, with the Iranian ones, they haven't been used that often because, again, most of the attacks have been internal through those spiked missile systems that we talked about, in addition to drones on the ground.
	So our defense systems can't counteract that.
	So they've had to, again, neutralize those massage cells and labs that they've gone after.
	But what the Iranian missile system has been able to achieve is knocking down four F-35s.
	That's confirmed.
	It might even be worth that, plus the F-16s.
	Israel's not giving exact numbers.
	But the F-35s, they can't deny, plus day five, they've gotten one of the fighter pilots as a hostage.
	So that's definitely a big deal.
	But again, there's going to be fog of war.
	This is what, day three, day four, day four.
	So it's still early.
	We'll see.
	Maybe Israel will figure out a way.
	And I'm not optimistic on this at all, but they might find a way to refine or improve the algorithm within the air defense system to improve its countering strikes.
	But it's just Iran's already figured out the formula to be able to, again, knock down any target at once through what they learned from Truphalus One.
	Swarming with drones, it's going to get depleted.
	And then they've got the four-minute window between the resets to get the hypersonic missiles, which will strike any target at once.
	There's no solution for that, even if their air defense systems are optimized.
	And that's for the five-tier system, as I mentioned before: the Patriot, the Arundome, the Thought, the Arrow, and then David Sling.
	Five tiers.
	These are multi-billion dollar systems, and they've been failing miserably.
	So, you know, credit to Iran for figuring it out, but they've also shown the world the formula on how to beat these air defense systems.
	So, sales should ideally plummet.
	But we'll see.
	They're still going to lie to the world and claim that they're great.
	And that, as you had that individual, we won't drop his name come in yesterday and say, oh, they've only been struck 1% of their targets.
	It's a complete lie.
	They've missed maybe 10 to 15% of their targets at best.
	So, yeah, hands down, no comparison, which is better.
	And if I'm Iran, I'd be promoting the Bavaria 373.
	They'd be getting some really good sales out of that.
	Agreed, Doc Jumpin.
	I'm sorry, did you call me?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Jump in, Doc.
	Yeah, no, I was just thinking about how it was not that long ago that China had unveiled their J-270, J27V, which was supposed to be able to recognize and to detect, sorry, I'm so tired, F-22s and F-35s, and how China's been sharing technology with Iran.
	And there have been Chinese flights and connections to Iran during this time.
	And I wonder if there's something that's not related between how Iran has been able to knock out F-35 after F-35 and their connection with China.
	So one thing could be that, you know, China could be wanting to test out their new technology, for example.
	That's something to think about.
	In other words, there are a lot of these behind-closed doors, behind-the-curtain associations and affiliations.
	While many countries, obviously all the other countries, are not officially claiming to be part of this war, there have been assistance in the back to Israel and to Iran.
	And what do you think, Doc, about the statements made from Trump just now?
	I'm sorry, which ones?
	There's so many things coming up.
	It's literally on Suleiman's page.
	We just talked about it.
	Oh, this one, I'm sorry, about the air defense system.
	Yeah, so exactly.
	So, all I can say is that Iran has been closed off for a long time, right?
	And while Iran has been under sanctions and closed off, you have the connection between Iran, Russia, and China.
	And while the U.S. has been breaking down its infrastructure and especially its people through various means, including education and through things that would cause mental health issues, you see countries like China and Iran have been building up their technologies and the infrastructure, especially China's been going, you know, doing extremely well with their technology and their economy is just fine as opposed to the narrative and the propaganda that's been spread, not to mention Russia.
	So the kinds of things that Russia has and China has and their, you know, their access with Iran is not to be underestimated.
	So is the Tehran, the Iranian air defense system advanced?
	a lot more advanced than people would like to believe, obviously.
	Hey, I was going to comment something.
	Iran has always been a country that has really promoted education and technology, et cetera.
	So it's, you know, they've been behind so much cyber hacking.
	And there's some talk lately.
	I don't know if you guys saw that, that some of the cyber attacks are going through cell phones in Israel, etc.
	So it's unsurprising that the technology is extremely advanced at this point there.
	Some all breaking news.
	Trump is probably put a long, sorry, put a shot on crude oil because the U.S. crude future rise future, sorry, put it long on the side.
	U.S. crude oil futures rise following Trump's statement on evacuating Iran.
	Sam, are you there?
	Hello, yeah.
	Do you want to explain?
	Well, I don't know what the answer is, but just for the audience, do you want to explain that?
	So, basically, what's happened is because he's announced essentially telling everyone to evacuate Iran at Tehran, that's made oil prices increase.
	If you can explain to the audience A, why oil prices increase, B, how that'll impact the market, and C, you know, what else economically the issue, the reason for the implications behind it?
	Yeah, it's more it's more a short-term trade.
	So, um, in general, like if this was actually a formal declaration of war and U.S. was actually going to go to war with Iran, you'd expect oil prices to go up to something like $120.
	I'm just going to look at them right now and see what the latest price is.
	I don't know, Joe, have you got it in front of you?
	I just need to look it up.
	I can look it up at the same time.
	But in the short term, there's lots of opportunities for market manipulation, and we've seen that throughout Trump's using true social maps.
	Sorry?
	I said Trump loves the market manipulation and apparently.
	He really does.
	Getting on the walk, you know, Trump, you know, he's greedy.
	He's all about making money in the market.
	So as long as you know what he's going to do, you'll make money.
	Yo, can you guys hear me?
	Yeah, we can hear you now.
	Yeah.
	No, so I just sent out a tweet to what you guys had written about Trump saying that Iran should come to the table or whatever.
	And, you know, this is where we have to start being realistic here, right?
	And anyone that's in here that's an American, I think you guys can kind of empathize with me as I say this.
	The reality is that we kind of fucked ourselves up here.
	We shot ourselves in the foot.
	And, you know, they were going through rounds of negotiation.
	I think they were on the sixth round of negotiation, had a planned meeting on Oman on Sunday.
	And we basically allowed Iran to get their guard down and Israel used that opportunity to sneak attack them.
	So diplomacy is a door that's pretty much closed at this point.
	You know, I don't think the Iranians will even come to the table, let alone try to negotiate anything when it comes to a nuclear deal at this point.
	Because the whole reason why this thing was kind of doomed from the start was because enrichment, like the U.S. saying, like, you can't do any enrichment, that was a non-starter for the Iranians.
	And rightfully so, right?
	I got to be objective here and be critical of even my government.
	Trump ripped up the nuclear deal in 2018.
	So what's to stop him from doing another deal and then ripping it up later on down the road?
	So not only has Trump shown that he isn't, you know, to be trusted when it comes to a nuclear deal, but he also conducted his negotiations in bad faith and used it as a ploy to allow the Israelis to attack them.
	So there's no fucking way they're coming to the table at this point.
	And then this operation that they conducted, they did a bunch of assassinations on high-ranking people in the military.
	They killed a bunch of nuclear scientists through precise strikes.
	They had Mossad behind enemy lines.
	This has been a very embarrassing ordeal for the Iranian government.
	Granted, they were able to recover fairly quickly given the fact that they were attacked almost damn near a Pearl Harbor level.
	But there is no fucking way they're coming to the table now.
	And for Trump to even say, oh, yeah, you know, we can go ahead and maybe give you guys a better deal, but uranium enrichment is still off the table, they're going to say, fuck you, because all we've done is we've hardened their resolve to continue their nuclear program.
	We've done nothing to prevent them.
	We've only enabled it.
	And now they're looking at it like, okay, now we're absolutely going to make a bomb or we're absolutely going to enrich at a higher level because the Americans can't be trusted.
	And Israel conducting this operation has just added more fuel to the fucking flames.
	And, you know, we got to start being honest and criticizing our government here and saying, look, if you guys actually want peace with Iran and you guys want it where them and Israel can maybe come to some kind of agreement, we got to be realistic when it comes to diplomacy.
	And telling them that they can't enrich uranium is just not going to happen.
	That's a non-fucking starter.
	So yeah, just looking at the price of Brent crude oil has come up slightly to $70 off a low of about $68.
	The market's not taking Trump's tweet or true social posts as a credible threat.
	So the market's not interpreting it as a credible threat at the moment.
	Yeah, and we know that Trump likes to talk a big game, you know, whether it was the tariffs or him, you know, making comments, whatever.
	He likes to kind of say things and sees how the media reacts to it.
	But, you know, this is like, we just got to start being honest and realistic with ourselves here, man.
	The Iranians are never going to do a deal with this administration.
	That door is fucking closed for the next four years, man.
	And honestly, the Israelis only have their selves to blame.
	They're going to continue to get fucking bombed.
	I mean, hell, you just said that.
	They're going to strike them for the neck on the hour every hour, um, all day.
	So, and the Israelis are getting cooked right now, man.
	They're getting cooked, they're a glass cannon.
	Uh, you know, Iran is used to, you know, being sanctioned.
	Iran is used to economic isolation and ostracization.
	They're used to, you know, getting bombed.
	Uh, but Israel's not.
	So, you know, they will not be able to.
	Israel, Iran's a much bigger country as well.
	You know, Israel will not be able to, you know, tolerate continuously getting attacked like this.
	You know, I'm sure they're already starting to have second thoughts.
	We're trying to, you know, well, we already know that they're begging the United States to come in and intervene.
	And even if we came in, I don't know if we'd be able to save them.
	And they only have themselves to blame at this point.
	So, this is really bad diplomacy from Donald Trump.
	And I'm actually really disappointed and pissed off because I voted for him to literally avoid what we're seeing going on right now.
	I voted for him to not bring us into more wars.
	I voted for him to end the conflict in Russia and Ukraine.
	I voted for him to kneel, reel the Israeli regime in and stop the fucking wars across the Middle East because I knew that Biden and Kamala Harris could not control Netanyahu.
	And what we've seen where Trump is, you know, though there has been times where he's been able to reel in Netanyahu a little bit, you know, he still also enables them and gives them everything that they need.
	And, you know, this is just very sad to see.
	And it's funny because if I'm not mistaken, it's been a year anniversary, no, the 10-year anniversary of when he announced that he was going to become president or he was going to run for office.
	And the Trump back then, when he went famously went down that escalator and announced his presidency, that was the Donald Trump that used to make fun of Marco Rubio for taking Zionist Adelson money.
	He used to make fun of him and say, you're controlled.
	You're a puppet.
	I fund my own campaign.
	But now what's happened?
	10 years later, he's now taking Edelson money, and Marco Rubio is his fucking secretary of state.
	So how the tables have fucking turned, and he's done a 180 from the president that he used to be, man.
	And it really fucking pisses me off because there's a very high likelihood that we're going to intervene to keep Israel from being destroyed because the Zionist lobby is so fucking powerful in America.
	You got billionaires like fucking dumbass Bill Ackman rallying the U.S. government to intervene and save Israel, right?
	And there's no strategic benefit to it.
	There's zero strategic benefit to it.
	Zero.
	It's an indefensible fucking position to wage wars on behalf of Israel.
	It's only cost us debt.
	It's only caused the death of U.S. soldiers.
	No fucking benefit whatsoever, man, at all.
	These fucking Israelis, man.
	Trump's been at the G7 meeting today, so he would have been meeting with the seven largest economies in the world.
	No doubt there would have been lots of talks around plans with Iran.
	I haven't heard much yet.
	The first thing he said as he entered is he really pissed off the European leaders by saying he would like to turn the G7 meeting into a G8 meeting and add Russia, which is very interesting.
	But I haven't heard much about whether the discussions, but no doubt, there would have been a lot of discussions around what's happening in Iran right now.
	Yeah.
	And, you know, what makes this even more comical, right?
	This entire situation is that this conflict is being fought over nuclear weapons.
	And the country that's instigating this conflict over nuclear weapons has an illegal nuclear weapons program.
	It's like peak fucking irony.
	It's like comedy to me.
	You know, it's, it's, I think if the American public knew that Israel has an illegal, unacknowledged nuclear program that was sustained through the theft of American technology, support for Israel would literally drop off precipitously overnight.
	It's just that most Americans, number one, don't even know they got nuclear weapons.
	And then, number two, if they do know, they don't know how they got them and how they illegally got them.
	So for Israel to sit there and wag the finger at Iran and say, you can't have nuclear weapons, and we're going to go ahead and get the United States to also help us with making sure that you don't have nuclear weapons is comical at best because we've seen Israel start far more conflicts than Iran has, right?
	So we'll see what happens, man.
	Like, and the thing is, too, it's not illegal to have a civilian nuclear program.
	It's not, right?
	Like, Iran is a sovereign nation.
	They have a right to defend themselves, just like Israel has a right to defend itself.
	And if we're going to sit here and play the game of, oh, well, you know, we were attacked, Article 51, ah, blah, blah, blah.
	Well, in this case, Israel did the same exact shit.
	They attacked them first preemptively.
	So Iran also has every right to defend itself.
	So, you know, if we're going to play that game, then we got to play that game across the board with everybody.
	But for some odd reason, when it comes to Israel, we throw the rules out the window.
	When it comes to nuclear weapons, we throw the rules out the window.
	When it comes to security councils at the UN, we throw the rules out the window.
	When it comes to ICC arrest warrants, we throw the fucking rules out the window.
	We talk about sanctioning Israel for their fucking war crimes.
	The rules get thrown out the window because we run cover for them economically, diplomatically, and militarily.
	It's fucking ridiculous.
	And right now, we're on the cusp of what's going to happen in the Middle East for the next 50 years.
	I tweeted this earlier this morning.
	This week is going to dictate the Middle East for the next 50 years.
	This week, this week is going to determine whether Israel becomes and stays the hegemony in the Middle East or if Iran continues to survive and challenge Israel's authority in the region and stop them from becoming the greater Israel project.
	And the thing is, I don't really have a dog in this fight.
	They can go ahead and keep fighting each other.
	My problem is, I don't like the fact that we're probably going to have to get dragged into this fucking thing and Iraq part two.
	And we saw how much of a monumental failure Iraq was.
	Huge failure.
	We're talking about 200,000 soldiers going in, weeks of airstrikes, trillions of dollars spent, a million people killed between American soldiers and innocent Iraqis for what?
	To take Saddam out of power?
	And now look at Iraq.
	It's worse now than it was before.
	You know, because anytime you get rid of it, you do affect a regime change, you basically create a power vacuum.
	When you create a power vacuum, just the strongest rebel group wins.
	And a lot of the times these rebel groups hate America even more so than the dictator that was there in place.
	Look at Libya now, right?
	Shambles.
	You know, when Gaddafi was there, at least there was some semblance of order, right?
	And the other thing, too, I think the European world needs to pay attention to this.
	Gaddafi prevented mass immigration into Italy and into Western Europe.
	Since Gaddafi's been killed, what's happened to Western Europe?
	It's been completely overrun with Northern African fucking immigrants.
	And now their streets are riddled with crime.
	Spain, Italy, the UK, etc.
	All of these Western European countries have absolutely been invaded by third worlders.
	Gaddafi used to keep, he controversially, he got in trouble for this, but he used to literally say, if anything ever happens to me, your country's going to, Europe is going to be overrun by Africans.
	And he was fucking right.
	People can go ahead and make that say that's a racist comment or whatever, but it's true.
	He actually did keep mass immigration from destroying Europe.
	But now that he's gone, the past 10, 15 years, we've seen unprecedented levels of illegal aliens entering into Europe.
	So it's better to have the enemy that you know than the enemy that you don't know.
	And what we're seeing here is just fucking retarded.
	Because if we actually did affect regime change, what's going to happen in Iran?
	What, we're going to put in a fucking other retarded Shah?
	They're going to fucking uprise and get him out of there too, just like they did in 79.
	You know, U.S. intervention, ironically enough, has what's created this mess that we have.
	When they had Mogadesi in 53, their first democratically elected leader who was a secularist, right?
	He tried to want to nationalize the oil.
	UK and America and Israel couldn't have that.
	We fucking ran Operation Ajax.
	That led to him being destabilized and the country, you know, being overrun.
	And then that created the perfect vacuum for the Ayatollah that's currently in power to take over and lead to the Islamic Revolution in 79.
	So our intervention simply doesn't work.
	It creates bigger problems.
	So I don't know, man.
	Don't forget the ISIS.
	Sorry, what was that, Simon?
	Hold on, I can't hear you.
	Let me refresh my page.
	Maybe it's me.
	Give me one sec, Simon.
	I'm going to refresh my page.
	You guys were able to hear all that, right?
	I hope.
	Give me one secs on Emma.
	I'm going to refresh my page.
	Yeah, no worries.
	I was just saying the ISIS.
	Sorry, check the I'm sorry.
	Yeah, of course, I'm going to check it right now.
	I mean, I just want people to reflect on how mental the statement of Trump is.
	I put it's the second to last tweet in the NAS, but what said and how bad it is?
	Extremely, extremely mental.
	Just bang out of order.
	This guy's like more psychopathic.
	Guys, how's the audio?
	I turned up the audio for the Twitter space.
	I turned it up a little bit.
	It should be better for you guys.
	Even if you disagree.
	Sorry, even if you think you want to go over to war, Iran, or maybe you do, but to say something like that, it's flipping crazy.
	The guy's off his rockers.
	Sorry, Marin, do continue with what you're saying.
	Yeah, no, I just, you know, and I don't mean to fucking take up all the air in the room here, but I do think it's extremely important that we look at, you know, the precedent that we set in the Middle East where regime change simply doesn't work.
	Have many instances where us intervening in the Middle East has actually caused us greater problems later on.
	And it all comes down to Israel.
	And the other thing that's also very interesting to me as well is that we destabilize these Middle Eastern countries.
	We pay the price.
	And the problems that arise, whether it's terrorist attacks or mass immigration or whatever, like Israel doesn't deal with a lot of that crap.
	I mean, obviously they got to deal with the Palestinians attacking them all the time in their own borders.
	But when it comes to us getting the Islamic terror that we get or the UK or the mass immigration that hits Western Europe, like we deal with that.
	And I find it interesting that Israel displaces all these people, but Syrian refugees aren't going to Israel because Israel is an apartheid ethno state, right?
	So other countries got to deal with the brunts of the refugees, not them.
	They create the problems, and then we got to fucking deal with the, we got to become the solution.
	And ISIS was weaponized from all of those leftover weapons from the Iraqi army in the first place.
	And when Gaddafi in the United Nations, in some of his infamous speeches, he told us that Israel killed JFK in order to get those nukes.
	And then what's happened that we've received from Joe?
	Those nukes that the assassination of JFK happened in order to achieve is currently pointed at Washington, D.C. and various other cities across Europe in case Israel ever ceases to exist or they feel they're at a threat.
	So just close the whole story.
	And it's one disaster after one disaster after one disaster.
	And, you know, when you look at it, every single, damn near every single conflict in the Middle East, there is a root cause and it's almost always Israel, man.
	Almost always.
	Chief Trumpster, I see that he has his hand up.
	I don't know if you guys can see it here.
	He's in here, though.
	You're trying to say something?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, you know, it's very frustrating because America first, the whole idea of that is to do the exact opposite, to not get involved in the Middle East.
	Guys, I'm going to read chats here in a second.
	I'm going to read super chats here in a second.
	So go ahead and get your chats in, guys.
	I'm going to read rants, OSS chats, et cetera.
	About the foreign wars, the mess that the Bush has made in the Middle East.
	He even on debates and said these forever wars were a disaster.
	They're awful.
	Telling it right to Bush's face in the primary for presidency, or I guess for that in 2016.
	And to go from that to going and backing Israel to supporting this.
	And we're seeing just Trump now saying to flee Tehran.
	He's obviously there's been a very big disconnect here from what he was saying in 2015, the person he impersonally ran as in that time period to now.
	It's totally different.
	It's frustrating because you want Trump to succeed and you want him to, you know, put America first, to do all these good things, to have world peace, to go and fix problems in the world.
	But the person, the realist, the person that understands the way things are and politics and just the way this awful world is, sees the path that's going on.
	It's just not, it's not right at all when it comes to this foreign policy.
	Israel's entire goal is to get us involved.
	Like, not even said it just on TV that, you know, first it's Israel, then it's New York City.
	And, you know, talking about all these things about how we have to get involved.
	We need to go in and get involved, put our people over there, personnel, equipment, everything like that.
	It's a disaster.
	We're going to be there for who knows how long.
	And all those civilians we kill, all the people that we bomb and terrorize the Middle East, they're going to rightfully resent the United States of America.
	They resent the West.
	And we have this endless cycle of just war, of terrorism, of disaster, of suffering, of all of this, because we just cannot get out of this region.
	Israel is trying to have Gaza, the West Bank, the control of the oil of the entire Middle East region.
	They want dominance.
	And they've tried this for a very, very, very long time.
	They've claimed that Iran will have a bomb since 2001, saying they're after two weeks away from the bomb, two weeks away, three months away from a nuclear bomb.
	And now they're saying those exact same message all over again.
	And hopefully you all forget this.
	And we're going to be dragging this war trying to stop this nuclear bomb they're building.
	And it's two weeks away.
	Stop the spray of the bombs.
	It's such a joke.
	And it's frustrating we're in this loop and we're going to be stuck in this war.
	We're going to be bombing these people, killing civilians.
	We're going to be involved in this for who knows how long.
	And for what cause?
	For Israel's cause, for a foreign country's cause, causing all this needless suffering, disaster, you know, all this, just because Israel wants more control.
	It's ridiculous.
	And it's very sad to see a American First idea go from no foreign wars, no intervention, no Middle East nonsense to supporting them, moving their freights over there, getting ready to go support Israel in this war.
	It's a loop.
	And I think we're right now we're at the cusp of this forever war and it's getting worse from here, unfortunately.
	I just am very, not Molly blackpilled, but I just looking at the way things are and just see the reality of it.
	And it's just frustrating to be in this loop and kind of screams the void and say it's happening all over again.
	And, you know, just it helps us, not help us, but we're pretty much in a spot where our current leaders and government are aligned with Israel.
	All right, let's go ahead and see what Charlie Kirk has to say here.
	I'm going to read some of the chats, guys, and then I'll go back into the space because for some odd reason, it won't let me mute the tab.
	Let me go ahead and look here.
	Oh, hold on one sec.
	I have to fix the camera.
	Sorry, chat.
	All right.
	Let's see here.
	All right.
	Let's go ahead and look through some of this stuff real fast.
	Okay.
	We got here.
	Ramy, yeah, it's not about the OSS.
	I can't.
	Yeah, it's about the OSS that I can't get in.
	I don't know why.
	Yeah, Ramy, I see that you're not on my list.
	I looked it up.
	Your email is not there, bro.
	Try maybe signing up under another email.
	I know it's under the red amount, but can you take a look at this?
	I don't know if we'll have time, bro.
	Yeah, but yeah, Rami, try maybe under a different email address, bro.
	Let me go through, make sure I read any chats that I missed here.
	Way of Vic gives a dollar.
	This is from U.S. Press.
	Everyone should immediately evacuate Iran.
	Yep, I saw that.
	The Way of Vic says, what do you think Iran is thinking?
	I don't know.
	Three Diglets.
	Martin, I think we should play Heal the World by MJ Law Off Street.
	This war is crazy.
	This song is the first step in helping everything get back to normal again.
	Let's play the C, bro.
	Hey, man.
	Hey, I don't know.
	Three Diglets.
	I think we're cooked, bro.
	Martin, a Palestinian buddy of mine who's one hour away from television says actually real.
	He literally sees missiles flying mostly from Iran and said that Iran mainly attacks at night time until dawn prayer.
	It's actually real.
	He said he would have sent me videos of pics, but they checked their phones periodically since they're under Israeli control.
	He also said they heavily said they heavily lied to the public with who's winning and minimizing conflict impact.
	Crazy shit.
	Appreciate that nightly wisdom.
	A little bit of insider info.
	WMR and WFNAF Crew, huge congratulations to Iran for the sleepless night gift to Israel tonight.
	Okay.
	Ni Gas Griper says, it's funny that Israelis be all over this gram screaming out Iran is a tensor striking civilian areas.
	Like, bro, no shit, the missiles will come through.
	Civilian airs, like, blame your Zionist government for internally building their military base inside civilian areas, which are legitimate military targets.
	Yeah, that's true.
	FNA Jabbar from OSS says there were actually eight people killed when Israel attacked the Iran broadcast network while they were alive.
	Fair.
	RDub says, Iran used all their other older ballistic missiles that Israel, U.S. can intercept before the U.S. arrives.
	Then use hypersonics when they can't intercept once the U.S. shows up savvy.
	Nikas Griper, hey, Marin, have you tried to use Global Firepower 2025?
	It's pretty useful.
	I looked at it and then Trivizian earlier.
	And then let me see if there's anything else.
	And Don DeMarco to three Digletts, by the way.
	Don't deMonco.
	And we got Infantry Mindset gifted a sub to Aflak.
	My Ninja Monkey gifted a sub to Lucis.
	Desert Joe gifted five subs.
	Thank you so much, Desert Joe.
	And I think we're caught up on the chat.
	So let's go ahead and see what Charlie Kirk has to say here.
	He posted this 34 minutes ago on X. Let's see.
	Take out the mullahs.
	Knock them out.
	You got John Bolton who's getting a little excited.
	Let me translate for you right now.
	He writes in the Wall Street Journal.
	And you guys know I'm pro-Israel.
	don't think I need to prove that any further.
	Pro-Israel is an owl, Charlie.
	It's a L. We have the scars to prove that I'm pro-Israel from all the campus events.
	Iran's Ayatollahs are weaker than ever.
	Let me tell you what John Bolton is really saying here.
	He's basically saying that we should go for the throat.
	John Bolton is a retarded neocon that was one of the architects for many of the Middle Eastern conflicts.
	Here's John Bolton for you guys, by the way.
	Some of you guys might not know who this fucking scumbag is.
	This is John Bolton right here.
	Okay.
	John Robert Bowen is an American attorney, diplomat, Republican consultant, and political commentator.
	He served as the 25th United States Ambassador of the United Nations from 2005 to 2006 and the 26th United States National Security Advisor from 2018 to 2019.
	Bolton served as the United States Assistant Attorney General for President Reagan from 85 to 89.
	He served in the State Department as the Assistant Secretary for State for International Organization Affairs from 1989 to 1993 and Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs from 01 to 05.
	He was an advocate for the Iraq war as a director of the project for the new American Century, which favored going to war with Iraq, aka PENAC.
	I wonder who runs PNAC.
	PNAC was a neoconservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy.
	It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997 and founded by William Crystal and Robert Kagan.
	Hmm.
	William Crystal?
	Oh.
	Oh.
	Interesting.
	Okay.
	Who's the other guy?
	Robert Kagan?
	Okay.
	Let's see who's this guy.
	Oh.
	Wow.
	Interesting.
	Well, would you look at that?
	Okay.
	Who else was in this thing?
	So of the 25 people who assigned to PNAC's founding statement of principles, 10 went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George Bush.
	Oh, Dick Cheney.
	We know who he is.
	Oh, Donald Rumsfeld.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	Oh, Paul Wolfowitz.
	Oh, this guy.
	Who's this guy?
	Oh, again.
	Wow.
	Interesting.
	Man, every single time, huh?
	Are you guys starting to get the picture now?
	you Are you guys starting to get the picture now?
	That's who John Bolton is, by the way.
	He's also a hardcore Zionist, this guy.
	Hardcore.
	All right?
	All right, let's keep going.
	And we need to execute regime change.
	That is what John Bolton is saying in Neocon Speak in so many words.
	But did you know that we only have a problem in Iran at the scale and the magnitude that we currently have because we involved ourselves in regime change?
	America has a long history of regime change with Iran.
	Historically, Iran was then called Persia way back in the 1930s, 40s, and 50s.
	It was ruled by a Shah, an absolute monarch.
	During World War II, the British and the Soviets invaded Iran because they were worried that it would ally with Hitler.
	They deposed the ruling Shah, throwing the country into turmoil.
	The Shah's son took power, but then he space.
	I'm being called into space.
	All right, let me go back in there.
	All right, Chad, I see you guys.
	I'll go in there.
	I'll go in there.
	Gone, and obviously, he can't defend himself.
	But someone do send him a DM and maybe he'll come back in.
	And I'll send him once I made this point.
	I mean, Shiliman, let me ask you.
	I mean, do you think that the people who promoted what they are now, like at least partially conceding, was a flagrantly false series of I'm back in here, Chad, but what the fuck is going on?
	What the fuck is going on, chat?
	No, no, I'll explain.
	And the issue is this.
	You're right.
	There is only a binary choice.
	The binary choice is this.
	Because, I mean, you're wrong that there's not a binary choice.
	Because in reality, you're not choosing or having a binary choice is not voting at all.
	And in the end, the binary succeeds anyway.
	It's not like there's a real true third alternative.
	Now, with the Democrats, the issue I have is that they are very much have supported the Holocaust, diametrically opposite.
	Michael called me out.
	Who the fuck is this?
	I don't know who the fuck this guy is.
	Pro-establishment, pro-corporations, pro-war, pro-a lot of things that classically the left wasn't.
	And you've seen the complete destruction implosion in the left.
	And I thought that actually the left needs to lose, or Democrats need to lose in order for them to realign their positions a bit more and a lot more better.
	Because in reality, we're not going to change anything.
	If it was Harris or Trump, both, I would have continued the war and the genocide.
	And with Trump, there was this small hope, slightly smaller hope, that there would be some kind of peace in the situation that.
	And I'll explain.
	Hope based on what?
	I'll explain to you why.
	It's just based on the fact based on the fact that in his previous regime, he had the opportunity to go to war with Iran.
	He was pushed and pressured by his, I believe it was Bolton at the time.
	I can't remember who is the guy who was half asleep.
	I was literally about to go to bed before I had Bolton.
	Who pressured him into going to war?
	He didn't go to war.
	He obviously killed the Soleimani, but there was this direct pressure for him to directly go into conflict.
	So his history demonstrated, and this a lot of people who are anti-Trump and pro-Trump have confirmed that this was the case.
	So some part of his history has indicated that when there is this push to go to war, he's kind of said no in that situation, whereas Harris and Biden haven't.
	So that's one indication.
	Harrison Biden never went to war with Iran.
	No, Biden didn't go to war with Iran, bro.
	I mean, Biden in his regime.
	Biden was also.
	So you're giving Trump credit for, by his own telling, being 10 minutes away from the final authorization to launch bombs against Iran, like taking the country and the world up to that knife's edge is something that's supposed to redown to Trump's credit.
	Biden never got anywhere close to that level of direct U.S. hostilities with Iran.
	All right, bro.
	Let me translate for you right now.
	He writes in the Wall Street Journal, and you guys know I'm pro-Israel.
	I don't think I need to prove that in so many words.
	But did you know that we only have a problem in Iran at the scale and the magnitude that we currently have because we involved ourselves in regime change?
	America has a long history of regime change with Iran.
	Historically, Iran was then called Persia way back in the 1930s, 40s, and 50s.
	It was ruled by a Shah, an absolute monarch.
	During World War II, the British and the Soviets invaded Iran because they were worried that it would ally with Hitler.
	They deposed the ruling Shah, throwing the country into turmoil.
	The Shah's son took power, but then he was overthrown too.
	Iran came under the rule of a prime minister who had a lot of popular support.
	But to be honest, he was kind of a communist.
	He wanted to nationalize the oil.
	His name was Mossag.
	For all your retars that are saying he cooked me, bro, you want me to just sit in there and let them argue the whole fucking time, bro.
	Like, I'm, I'm, I'm just going to sit there like a fucking retard.
	Oh, let me just wait so I can talk to this fucking nobody on fucking Twitter.
	The fuck, bro.
	He's not a great.
	They're clearly in the middle of an argument.
	I'm not going to fucking just jump in there.
	Guy.
	He basically tried to make himself a dictator.
	He tilted retarded ass niggas.
	I went in there and his dumbass is sitting there arguing with fucking Suleiman.
	I'm not going to sit there and listen to that shit all day.
	Towards the middle of doing something.
	Soviet Union.
	And he was hostile to American economic interests.
	So our leaders got in their heads that they should overthrow him.
	So they said, this guy is bad.
	How could anything get worse than Mosagdek?
	But he was largely secular.
	He was not Islamic.
	So we, in our American mind, said, this guy is terrible.
	He's a communist.
	Take him out.
	What could be worse than Mossagdeg?
	Well, yeah, that was the beginning of the end right there.
	So we did.
	And by the way, our government lied about it for years.
	The CIA and MCMI6 assisted the Iranian military in overthrowing Mosagdeg.
	They lied about it and finally declassified files showed that, no, we were involved and we got rid of the democratically elected, somewhat communistic Mossagdeg, interfering with the self-determination of the Iranian people.
	Because we said, what could be worse than this guy?
	Well, we reinstalled the Shah.
	And look, the Shah was an autocrat.
	He was also super sick and very weak.
	He was not able to really run the country.
	But hey, he was anti-communist and pro-America.
	But he was not popular in his country.
	And since he was America's guy, that made America much more unpopular in Iran.
	And then Brun in the 19th.
	And he also sold out his people and his resources to the West and made his country go into billions of debt.
	Jackson Nichol outlined this pretty well yesterday.
	1970s, Iran had another revolution because of us.
	And this is when Islam surfaced.
	A group of radical Islamic students launched demonstrations against the regime, and eventually they overthrew the shop.
	They recalled an exiled Islamic cleric, the infamous Ayatollah Khomeini, back from exile and they made him the theocratic ruler because America had involved itself so aggressively in Iranian affairs before these people really hated America.
	And so, thanks to our intervention in that country in the 50s, we made them an enemy for decades to come.
	This radical regime took dozens of Americans as hostages in our embassy.
	They sponsored terrorism around the world and they called us the great Satan.
	The moral here is that we should not invade Iran and we should not support regime change.
	Sometimes you get something way worse.
	Like Iraq, you get ISIS.
	Libya gets civil war.
	This has unforeseen and often disastrous consequences.
	And that's why we should avoid reckless regime change wars when we can.
	Very often, you get even worse than what you used to get.
	And right now, if you have regime change, so he's saying exactly what I said: regime change never works in Iran.
	What do you think you'll get next?
	You have a regime change in Iran.
	Yeah, you're going to get an even more radical government, is what you're going to get.
	He had two significant wars: one genocide, one war.
	It does have some kind of basis for one to make that kind of indication.
	And one would think that actually, in reality, when you look at the Democrats, I think that when you know that there's only a binary choice and you know, they're still going, bro.
	They're still fucking going.
	Gonna do the exact same thing.
	And then you know that there's hope that maybe by the Democrats losing, they can realign their position a bit more.
	There is these small little things that you need to one needs to consider doing.
	Basically, the problem is with this: both Trump and Harris are pro-Israel, are pro-genocide.
	And so, in reality, there's no choice.
	And it's not even a lesser of two evils.
	It's more of a like hope or thinking that one, what could one minimize, or is one going to be anti-war?
	And if you look at Trump, even now, he tries to make the Arban because he knows the pushbacks on him is so huge that I am anti-war and he's trying to give his incredible list of why he's anti-war.
	But if he goes to war now, he can never ever use that argument again, and his legacy is destroyed.
	So he came into office in 2017 on a campaign pledge from 2016 to withdraw from the Iran nuclear agreement, the JCPOA.
	He then did withdraw from it.
	He imposed a policy of what was called maximum pressure on Iran, which was to cripple with sanctions the Iranian government.
	He then got into this brinksmanship back and forth with Iran, where, according to his own account, he was 10 minutes away from dropping bombs on Iran.
	He assassinated the top general of Iran.
	He then campaigned in 2024 saying he was going to accelerate hostilities with Iran even further.
	So this whole thing about, oh, no, no wars were started under Trump's first term, it was total misdirection.
	There were a huge number of wars that he accelerated.
	All right, bro.
	They're still going.
	All of a sudden, they just decide all of a sudden that he's leaving.
	This was not on the schedule.
	What is happening?
	What is happening?
	This news comes an hour after he said everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran.
	Charlie Kirk looks like a sperm.
	You guys are funny.
	Ian, watching.
	I'm watching.
	Thank you for all the good content, brother.
	My brother, appreciate that.
	African Martin, someone talking smack on the Salim on Space.
	Ek Martin, subscribe.
	Appreciate that.
	Nav says, NHH, you need your intro song.
	Yeah.
	I appreciate that, gentlemen.
	Also, guys, we are at, you know, again, best way to support the show, guys.
	Link is below.
	Join the OSS, aka the O/slash squad.
	That is my community, guys.
	That is my private community where you guys can basically get direct access to me on there.
	You get all your super chats read, whether you donate a dollar, regardless of the minimums.
	And it is how I'm able to keep the show running the way that I do at a high quality, despite being demonetized on YouTube for two years.
	It's only four bucks to join, man.
	It's the best way that you can support.
	Unlike other YouTubers, they would have all been fucking cooked by now.
	But we're still cooking here because, you know, of people supporting the mission like you guys.
	Click that link.
	Join the OSS.
	Only four bucks to get in, guys.
	We're about 630 strong.
	This is really big news.
	very big news.
	And I got two discount codes for you guys, four bucks to join for the monthly and then $10 after that, Or you could join in for the year for $75.
	Big discount.
	Wow.
	Trump is going to leave tonight after dinner with the heads of state.
	Wow.
	That comes from Caroline Levitt, the White House press secretary.
	He is suddenly leaving G7 to come back to...
	What is happening there?
	What's going on?
	Shout out to Infantry Mindset with Gifted Sub.
	Appreciate you, man.
	My Ninja Monkey also gifted a sub and Cub also.
	Shout out to all you guys, man.
	Appreciate you guys on kick.
	We're live streaming on all the platforms.
	You guys can see Rumble, YouTube, Kick.
	We're all over the place, man.
	Taking over, chat.
	Wow, wow.
	If you guys want to get involved in the show, MyronGainsX.com to super chat into the show.
	$5 minimum.
	Or if better yet, you can go ahead and take $4 and join the OSS instead.
	Way better value.
	And then from there, you don't got to donate as much to be able to get your chat read on air.
	I read all OSS chats.
	Castle Club, guys.
	Also, I see there's a few chats in here.
	Guys, just going to OSS.
	We got Richie says, yo, Marin, look at, I look at it as a good thing.
	This is from Demetrius Raps.
	Demetrius, you need to get in the OSS, bro.
	Can you give a shout out from us?
	He's been giving non-stop four days.
	DeMarco, appreciate that, Druski.
	Martin, anyway, we can join the OSS without being in Castle Club.
	I've honestly just been using Castle Club to watch your debrief and nothing else.
	So I just want to join your community anyways.
	Thanks for the news updates.
	They help a lot.
	Yeah, bro.
	I mean, just join in.
	It's only four bucks, man.
	Just join in on the OSS.
	How devastated would a nuclear bomb be would be like Hiroshima Nagasaki-Widos in Iran?
	Well, yeah, I mean, and remember, the nuclear bombs now are even more sophisticated.
	Shout out to Emac James.
	Five gifted subs.
	Thank you so much, bro.
	Here, I'll join the space on the other side.
	See what's going on.
	I don't know what's going on.
	I don't know what's going on.
	But that's all I have to say is what's right there.
	Those two posts right there on the screen.
	Oh, shit.
	Look at this, chat.
	Trump has now turned on Tucker Carlson and claims that America first can also mean bombing Iran for Israel.
	This is exactly why I didn't vote for Trump in 2024 and chose to stay home, even though I was relentlessly attacked for it.
	Damn, this is not good.
	Somebody please explain to Kuki Tucker Carlson that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
	Bruh, here we go.
	Moments like this, I have full and complete trust in President Trump.
	Bruh.
	Bruh.
	This isn't good, man.
	Breaking.
	U.S. fighter just participating in airstrikes on Iran according to Israeli Channel 14.
	Oh my god.
	Oh.
	Bro.
	Bro.
	Wow.
	Wow, wow, wow.
	wow wow wow wow Wow, wow, wow.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	Ah, man.
	And...
	Chat.
	I think it's official, chat.
	I think we've officially entered, guys, if what Dom said is true.
	Wow.
	And of course, look at this shit, bro.
	Dude, you know, this is how you can tell.
	Look, you, bro, it is so crazy, man.
	Like, look at this shit.
	Okay.
	Look at this.
	Live footage of Trump's approval rating.
	Bro, it couldn't be further from the truth.
	Bro, this is what I mean when I say we got like Magatards, man.
	Bro, this is what I mean when I say we got like Magatards, man.
	Bro.
	What the fuck, man?
	All right, let's go back in here.
	Wow.
	Hold on.
	Why is this?
	Oh.
	Or cajoled into tricked into taking actions that people find objectionable.
	So rather than assign him responsibility, what you can do is point at this sort of like mythical Satan Yahoo, whatever, and then conveniently to be doing that kind of shit, to be honest.
	You're standing on the street.
	I think it's rather right quick.
	I didn't mean to do that, but silly.
	Myron's back right now.
	I can't see him.
	I would rather emasculate myself by not voting for one of two candidates who I don't.
	Michael, I didn't mean to do that to you, but Myron, are you there?
	Because this is the third time you've been up here.
	Can you hear us?
	Yeah, no, I'm here.
	I can hear you guys.
	I just joined in now.
	Yes.
	I just heard Michael call you out, and I thought it's a bit tight if you don't get a chance to defend yourself because apparently everyone has the right to defend themselves.
	So, Michael, if you want to relay your point where you said, because you did go quite long into attacking him while he wasn't here, and then he can defend himself.
	Yeah, like I'm not a regular listener of Myron's program.
	I can't imagine getting that much value out of it, frankly.
	Sorry to be curt, but I have heard him on these spaces now and then when I'm invited to participate.
	And so I just did a little bit of cursory research.
	Here's what Myron said on November 6th, 2024.
	Quote, Trump is going to finally tell Netanyahu's fun is going to be over soon or no, or else no more aid to Israel.
	He aggressively campaigned for Trump.
	He said, everybody's got to go out there and fucking vote for Trump.
	That's a direct quote.
	He said, Trump 2024, or we are doomed.
	Trump 24, fuck what you thought.
	Trump 2024 is only or else we are doomed, etc.
	Obviously, on platforms like Rumble and X, the overwhelming dominant sentiment is to be loyally pro-Trump and advocate for Trump.
	And now to act like there's some major betrayal that happened or that this sequence of events was not foreseeable is just totally delusional.
	And I just think that people in the alternate media, Myron just being one of many examples, who if they're now effectively conceding that the narratives that they were pushing all throughout the 2024 campaign and probably later were flagrantly wrong and deceptive if they created the impression that Trump was somehow secretly anti-war and was going to restrain Israel
	and that it was just unfathomable that something like this Iran catastrophe could come about.
	I think people need to take some responsibility for their deceptions.
	And if it wasn't a knowing deception, if you deceived yourself because you couldn't analyze the overwhelming abundance of evidence that was in the factual record from Trump's first term from the four-year period when he was out of office and the nature of his 2024 campaign, when, for example, he publicly called for enabling Israel to strike Iran's nuclear facilities.
	He threatened to bomb Iran to smithereens.
	He immediately stacked his incoming administration with longtime interventionist hawks such as Marco Rubio, who's now not only Secretary of State, but also de facto national security advisor and whose record on Iran policy could not be more unambiguous.
	If you're just going to overlook everything that Trump did in his first term to systematically inflame acrimony and hostilities with Iran, and if you just neglected or overlooked that he pledged to do much the same in a second term, except more extreme,
	and you projected to your audience the exact opposite impression, whether because you were audience captured or you had some commercial incentive to not be overtly oppositional to Trump or whatever the reason, you nonetheless obviously conveyed a wildly and flagrantly false picture of the stakes and of what a Trump policy trajectory would look like.
	So I just think that the people in this whole cadre, which are, again, are very overrepresented on X, which is how I'm aware of them, but also other platforms like Rumble, which I also have utilized, they need to take some responsibility for once rather than just barreling on like your authoritative sources on anything in terms of American political affairs.
	If you could have gotten this, that egregiously wrong, like have some humility for once.
	All right.
	So let me address your you said a lot there.
	So here's the reality, man.
	Now, between Trump and Kamala Harris, right?
	I thought that Trump would be the better pick.
	And I still think to this day that he would have been the better pick because when I voted for Trump, I voted for a multitude of reasons, okay?
	I don't know if you want me to go through all of them, but I guess I'll just kind of focus on the conflict portion.
	I knew that by Trump coming in, he would at least open relations back up with Russia.
	That was one of the main reasons I voted for him, okay?
	Was I wanted him to open a dialogue with Russia and try to end the conflict in Ukraine?
	Now, has he been able to do it as swiftly as he promised?
	No.
	But at least they're at least communicating with the Kremlin versus during the Biden administration, they didn't even talk at all.
	And Kamala Harris and Joe Biden absolutely caused the disaster.
	Let's take focused on Israel and Iran.
	No, no, no.
	Hold on.
	No, no, no, no, no, no.
	No, because why not?
	I mean, that's the subject.
	Because let's focus on that.
	No, no, no.
	But here's the thing.
	When I said I'm voting for Trump, it was from not getting into new wars and or stopping wars as well that we're currently going on.
	So the Ukraine-Russia conflict was a big reason why I said we need to put Trump back in because he can at least exercise some level of diplomacy with the Russians.
	That was big for me.
	Now, when it comes to the Middle East, okay?
	Honestly, at least, at least we've seen that Trump has the ability to stand up to Netanyahu.
	He ignored him for several weeks when he was going through in the Middle East when he was doing his tour.
	Obviously, we still don't know if he's going to start bombing Iran.
	We don't know that yet.
	It's still, you know, time will tell.
	Now, I think the growing sentiment in America is a lot of people don't want war with Iran.
	If it happens, look, we're all human beings.
	You know, you can make mistakes.
	But I would argue that Trump is a better option than Kamala Harris would have been, which is why I voted for Trump given the situation.
	And obviously, there's a multitude of other reasons.
	You didn't just do that.
	Dude, Trump was the master of two people or better than Kamala Harris.
	Dude, you got to let himself as a pro-Trump sweaters.
	Let you speak.
	I let you speak uninterrupted.
	You're revising history.
	I let you literally speak uninterrupted, and you're just fucking it, cutting me off.
	Again, like I said before, you're looking at some tweets here and there and saying, oh, well, look, this is why you voted for Trump.
	I told you already, bro.
	I voted for him for a multitude of different reasons.
	That's just one aspect, okay, that you're focusing in on.
	Well, yeah, I mean, because that's the subject at hand, and you're now acting like you begrudgingly.
	Do you think that Kamala Harris would have been a good person?
	You think she would have done a better job in the Middle East?
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Do you still have to throw Trump personally?
	Do you think?
	Do you think, like I said before, pro-Trump Christmas sweater?
	Why don't you put it on now?
	Here's the thing.
	I voted for Trump for a multitude of different reasons.
	I explained that to you.
	It's not just what's going on in the Middle East.
	A bunch of different reasons.
	Do you think Kamala Harris would have done better with Middle Eastern foreign policy than Trump right now?
	I didn't support Kamala Harris.
	You supported Donald Trump actively and publicly and consistently.
	Okay, so you didn't even vote.
	You're not even hurt.
	You're a paraphernalia on air celebrating him.
	I think she was a better.
	I'm sorry.
	I think Trump was a significantly better candidate than Kamala in almost every regard, especially when it comes to foreign policy.
	If you, here's the thing, you didn't even vote.
	You weren't even involved.
	It would have been one of those two that was president.
	I looked at it like he was the lesser of the two evils and he was a better candidate.
	All right?
	That's what I look at it.
	Now, like I said before, at least at least.
	What does that have to do with anything?
	What does that have to do with anything, dude?
	What does that have to do with anything?
	Because you're now trying to retroactively make it claim like it was just this.
	No.
	I'm telling you, because you don't know my position.
	You don't know my position.
	When you're out there as a public Trump advocate, you're wearing his shoes on your shirt.
	You, you are picking one thing versus a multitude of other reasons why I voted for him.
	You're picking one thing.
	You can wear his face on your shirt.
	What does that have to do with anything?
	Having a Trump candidate.
	That shows that it wasn't just a lesser of two evils calculus.
	It was you actively celebrating and promoting a particular political candidate because you had an incensive support for him.
	Yes, because again.
	Retroactively, it doesn't seem like it's just this limited, narrow, lesser of two evils decision, which is just false.
	Yes, because again, I knew that you wouldn't take any accountability.
	Holy shit, man.
	There's no accountability in these alternate media circles.
	No, see, this is the thing, dude.
	This is the thing.
	Again, I told you I voted for a multitude of different reasons.
	For one, I like the fact that he has significantly assisted with social media censorship being reeled back a lot.
	Okay.
	I like the fact.
	Also, I like Donald Trump as personally.
	So I was like, yo, I don't want him to go to fucking jail.
	So another reason why I voted for him as well was like, okay, well, I know if he doesn't win this election, he's going to go to prison and probably die in there.
	I knew that as well when it came to the federal case.
	And then also, when it comes to the foreign policy, I think he would have done significantly better than Kamala Harris.
	He at least opened discussions up with Russia so that we could potentially get an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
	That in itself makes him a superior candidate.
	Now, you're trying to hone in on the Middle East.
	We don't know if he's going to go to war with the Middle East yet.
	But what I will tell you is he was a significant, he's a significantly better candidate than Kamala when it comes to foreign policy.
	Now, if your fat ass doesn't like that, that's not my fucking problem because you've been coming in here being fucking disrespectful, trying to make ad hominem attacks saying, well, you said that you're going to vote for Trump because of this.
	Doe, dude, it's not just one reason why I voted for him.
	There's a multitude of different reasons why I voted for him, why I think he's a better candidate.
	I think most Americans agree with me.
	And most Americans agree with me, which is why he wanted a fucking landslide.
	Your fat ass didn't even fucking vote, and you're over here trying to fucking virtue signal and moral grandstand to all of us in here.
	But you didn't even do shit.
	So what the fuck are you talking about?
	Cheeto chips on your fucking beard.
	Shut the fuck up, dude.
	I'm a one day every four years go out and vote for one of two people.
	Don't fucking sit there and criticize people's voting decisions when you didn't even fucking get involved.
	You had no say in it.
	And you want to sit there and moral grandstand about, well, look, you put this guy in office.
	He was the better candidate by fucking far.
	Okay?
	That's what it is.
	If you don't like that, that's your fucking problem.
	You clearly have a vendetta against Trump.
	You're fucking honing in on it.
	You have a Trump sweater.
	What does that have to do with anything?
	Propaganda.
	What does that have to do with anything?
	You have a personal vendetta against Trump, and it's very obvious.
	You just dislike Donald Trump.
	You're going to have to give a false image to massive audiences.
	And then once this entire image that they've erected crumbles, they take zero responsibility for their own role in peddling those fictions.
	No, Trump was a better candidate.
	Kamala Harrison.
	Trump is a better candidate.
	As though you have any authority or credibility whatsoever.
	You're just a part, you know, you're just a failed.
	Okay, so what's the recourse then, fat boy?
	Tell me what should have we done then?
	There were two candidates.
	One of them was going to win.
	What should have we done, fat ass?
	Tell me.
	I don't know.
	How about be truthful?
	How about not propagandize?
	About actually explaining the record of a political candidate wearing a Trump-themed Christmas sweat.
	Okay.
	See, here's the thing.
	Here's the difference between me and you.
	Hey, Michael, Michael, I don't know if you follow my content.
	You admitted earlier that you don't.
	So let me fucking bring something up to you right now because you clearly don't know about my content.
	I've been one of the few, one of the few political commentators that has openly criticized Trump on many of his fucking decisions.
	I've criticized them on Israel.
	I've criticized them on taking money from the Adelsons.
	I've criticized them on his support of the Zionist lobby.
	I've lost millions of dollars doing this shit.
	So I've been extremely honest and critical of Donald Trump.
	I'm not one of these fucking MAGA shills that gets paid by his administration.
	Anyone in here that follows my content knows that I've been extremely critical of Trump.
	Just because I like him and I voted for him does not mean that I'm not going to be critical of him.
	You picked the wrong one, fat boy,'cause I've actually been adamant criticizing him.
	How about you take all the No, no, no, hold on, hold on, Mike.
	Hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Hold on, Mike.
	Hold on, Mike.
	How about Mike?
	No, no, no, no, no.
	Here's the thing.
	No, because you've been making fun of the Christmas sweaters, and at least I could fit in one.
	But the point I'm trying to make is: okay, you need to go ahead and look at all the truck, all the tweets where I criticize Trump.
	Because you're going ahead and picking up where maybe I will lose 20 pounds and then I could have credibility.
	Because no, you're getting embarrassed right now.
	Because here's the reality.
	You're picking one tweet I said where I said Trump is a better candidate, which I stand on that.
	He is the better candidate.
	But you have not seen all my tweets where I've been extremely critical of Trump.
	I've been saying he's a better candidate.
	I've been developed a whole persona around advocating for Trump and celebrating and mystifying Trump.
	Bro, dude, again, I picked Trump because he was the better candidate.
	I think he's better on foreign policy, and that's been fucking proven just off of him talking to Russia alone.
	He's a better fucking candidate because the Biden administration didn't do so.
	And that was who was basically going to get in where Kamala would have continued to not talk to the Kremlin.
	That's number one.
	Number two, I've been critical of Trump significantly.
	I tweet almost all the fucking, like, damn near every day.
	I cover something about Trump, and I will criticize him if I need to.
	I'm not one of these MAGA retards that sits there and says, ooh, I love Trump no matter what he does.
	You picked the wrong one, dude.
	I have been extremely critical of him.
	So if you're going to go ahead and take a tweet from 2024 and say, oh, look, you endorsed Trump here.
	How about the hundreds of tweets where I've criticized them on foreign policy?
	I've criticized them for being owned by the Jews.
	I've criticized them for being owned by the Zionist lobby.
	I've criticized them more than I've praised them.
	So you picked the wrong one coming in here saying, oh, bro, you were wearing a Christmas sweater of Trump.
	And I like Donald Trump.
	I do.
	But I'm critical of him as well.
	That's fealty.
	That's just boosterism.
	That's aimless promotion of a politician based on a totally false depiction of him that you were peddling to your audience.
	Michael, can I just give some breaking news and I'll give it a trip.
	You're being completely disingenuous here in your arguments.
	So Trump has posted a few more posts on Truth Social.
	He said, America first means many great things, including the fact that America cannot, sorry, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
	Make America great again.
	And earlier he posted, somebody please explain to Kuki Tukaka-Carlson that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
	Israel Channel 4 News have claimed that Trump is expected to sign an executive order within the next few hours to formally join the war.
	So those are just the latest and breaking news.
	It's the last one by Israeli media.
	Sorry, the other thing I want to say too.
	You said in November of 2024, not like decades ago or in some ancient times, that one of the reasons why everybody should go out and vote for Trump, according to you, is that he was going to finally reign in...
	Again.
	Wow, that was fully on the mark.
	I'm so looking forward to following up.
	Okay, let me rumble analysis because you have such an impressive record of correctness.
	You're so honed in.
	You're so honed in on the Israeli angle.
	Again, I voted for Trump.
	Let me go through this because-We're talking about a war that's erupting in the Middle East, you idiot.
	Of course, that's what we're honed in on.
	Hold on, fat boy.
	Okay.
	Hold on.
	When I voted for Trump, I voted for him for multiple reasons.
	Number one, helping with the free speech when it comes to social media platforms, which has happened.
	His being tough on immigration, which he's done.
	Shut down the border.
	We're seeing deportations, a significantly better immigration policy than what we saw under the Biden administration.
	I also voted for him because I knew that he would at least open up dialogue with Russia and try to potentially end the conflict.
	He's doing that right now.
	You keep starting over the issue, which why is it because you're ignoring the fact because you're ignoring the fact that just broke out?
	You're ignoring the fact that I voted for him for more than just one issue.
	I'm not a single issue voter.
	I voted for him for multiple different reasons.
	Well, one of the issues that you claimed you were voting for Trump based on and that you advocated others vote for him on was that he was going to constrain Netanyahu and tell him his fun was going to be over here.
	Here's the thing.
	He would have done better.
	He's doing better on Netanyahu than Kamala Harris would have.
	And I stand on that.
	So he told Netanyahu that his fun is going to be over and no more aid to Israel?
	No, I'm telling you.
	See, all of that.
	If Kamala Harris got in, if Kamala Harris got in, if Kamala Harris got in...
	...responsibility at all for the falsehoods that you spew, you then go back to this...
	What would have Kamala Harris done?
	What would have Kamala Harris done?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Mike, Mike, see, here's the thing.
	See, here's the problem.
	You're going ahead and saying, oh, well, you said X, Y, Z, blah, blah.
	What was the alternative?
	The alternative wasn't better.
	I picked the best alternative.
	Is that correct or not?
	You said you encourage everyone to vote for Trump because he was going to tell Netanyahu his fun is over and no more aid to Israel.
	So you were wrong about that.
	Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
	I never said that there was going to be no aid to Israel.
	No, now you're lying.
	Now you're lying.
	Now you're misrepresenting my position.
	I never said that he would say no more aid to Israel.
	We all know that politicians are controlled by Israel and you have to play the game to some degree.
	I have your exact quote.
	Quote: Trump is going to finally tell Netanyahu his fun is going to be over soon or else no more aid to Israel.
	Yes, he's going to look.
	Look, bro.
	Oh, my God, man.
	I mean, you couldn't be more spectacularly wrong about anything.
	Again, here you are pretending like you're just unblemished and your political analysis is totally unimpeachable.
	It's amazing.
	And then rather than defend any of it on the merits, you pivot, you obfuscate, you insult my company.
	No, no, no.
	No, because you are making a scene.
	Because you're making a scene.
	You're not going to drop into any accountability whatsoever in this bullshit, alternative media sphere where people just so you just have a vendetta against anyone in the right wing.
	You have a personal beef that's flickering.
	You simply have a personal beef with people on the right.
	It's very obvious.
	You've been mentioning Rumble.
	You've been mentioning this.
	Again, you're coming in here angry at me for one of the many reasons.
	For one of the many reasons, for one of the many reasons I voted for Trump.
	Okay.
	Again, like I said before, I voted for him for many different reasons.
	Okay.
	I still think.
	I still think he is doing a significantly better job with dealing with Israel than Kamala Harris would have and the Biden administration.
	Okay?
	Because the Democrats were doing the same exact shit.
	It's just that they were trying to look tough about it when they were out in public, but they were giving all the same aid.
	They were letting everything happen.
	We're not doing the same exact shit with Iran.
	That's just not true.
	Oh, really?
	Trump came into office and then withdrew.
	He made Iran broke.
	He made Iran broke.
	They weren't able to fund their proxies.
	They weren't able to fund their proxies.
	When Trump was in, Iran was broke.
	Okay.
	They could not fund their proxies.
	And those proxies led directly to October 7th.
	And they led directly to October 7th.
	Revenue.
	Is that what you're saying?
	What was that?
	So you were in favor of the crippling sanctions known as a maximum pressure policy that Trump imposed on Iran because it deprived Iran of revenue to fund their proxies.
	Is that what you're saying?
	It did slow them down.
	We're such weaklings that they deviated from that policy.
	Is that your argument?
	No, no, no.
	What I am saying is that he significantly impeded Iran's ability.
	Trump, this is according to Fox News.
	So we kind of ignored the Israeli news one, but the Fox News that President Trump requests the NSE NSC to be prepared in the situation room for looks like it's likely for war with Iran.
	Sorry, Duke continued.
	China just ordered its citizens out of Israel immediately.
	Well, maybe when that happens, Myron can tell us how he was correct about Trump reigning in Netanyahu, and then he can pivot to all kinds of kinds of other extraneous arguments and assertions for why nothing about what he said during the 2024 campaign in terms of fortune.
	I find it interesting how you're honing in on one tweet in 2024, but you don't look at all the times I've criticized Trump.
	I find it absolutely fucking incredible and disingenuous into your argument how you will sit there and take one tweet from 2024 and you ignore the hundreds of tweets of where I've criticized him on his support of Israel, why he needs to do better in foreign policy when it comes to the Middle East.
	You ignore all of that.
	And then also you ignore the fact that I voted for him for a multitude of different reasons that don't just concern foreign policy with Israel.
	It concerns foreign policy with Russia.
	It concerns immigration.
	It concerns law enforcement concerns, a multitude of different things.
	And you want to sit there and hone in on one fucking tweet from 2024 where I said, look, I think he's going to do a better job of controlling Netanyahu.
	You don't even admit that that one.
	Which I still think.
	Which I still think he would have done a better job than Kamala.
	Is he doing the best job ever?
	It's not about a comparison to Kamala.
	It is a comparison because there were two candidates.
	It is a comparison.
	See, this is a problem.
	It is a comparison because there were two different candidates.
	And what I'm saying is, look, it might not be the best, but I think he would have done better than Kamala Harris.
	And I stand on that.
	Now, with that said, right, is it exactly what I wanted?
	No.
	But I think, again, he did better than the Biden administration.
	He would have done better than Kamala Harris.
	It was a better candidate at the time, and that's why I endorsed him.
	And I still endorse him.
	And I think he's better than what Kamala Harris would have done.
	Now, you want to sit here and sit on your moral high ground and be like, well, I didn't vote at all.
	So you actually lied and you did XYZ.
	I still think he's a better candidate significantly, and most Americans agree with me.
	If you got a personal vendetta with Trump, because it's obvious you fucking do, as well as people on the right wing, that's fine, dude.
	But I'm not the guy because I've actually been extremely critical of Trump, and you're honing in on one tweet from 2024 instead of my hundreds of tweets in 2025.
	Why are you not looking at all my tweets?
	Why are you not in the Middle East that's being honing in on one tweet from 2024 instead of hundreds of tweets where I've criticized them on Middle Eastern foreign policy?
	You're being disingenuous right now because you're not taking my entire position into account.
	You're taking one fucking tweet from 2024 and you're not going to look at my full position.
	I talk about and criticize Trump on his foreign policy in the Middle East almost every fucking day.
	And the fact that you're in here trying to sit here and say, oh, well, look, you were wrong about this.
	No one's 100% perfect, bro.
	We're all human.
	That's why I've been critical of him extremely all through 2025 with his foreign policy in the Middle East.
	I'm not one of these fucking MAGA retards like Charlie Kirk or any other guys that are scared to criticize Trump on foreign policy.
	I've criticized them on Israel a lot.
	Okay, well, if you thought that you needed to criticize him so heavily on Israel, meanwhile, you were prancing around at a Trump-themed Christmas.
	See, this is your position.
	Because he is significantly, because he is better than Kamala Harris, and I stand on that.
	And I would have voted for him again, given the election if it was Kamala Harris versus him.
	He's still better than her in almost every regard.
	Okay, when it comes to immigration, when it comes to foreign policy, and again, again, 10 million people have been ordered by Trump to flee the city immediately.
	Maybe that'll be nice.
	Okay, like I said before, he's doing better than Kamala Harris would have done.
	Like I said, the better of the two candidates.
	And I've voted from multiple.
	I'm not a single-issue voter.
	I voted for to obviously fix the situation with Russia, voted for immigration, voted for a stronger border, voted for at least being able to deal with the Israelis in a better sense than the Biden administration did, who are basically asleep at the fucking wheel when everything happened with October 7th and the retaliation.
	So, look, dude, you clearly have a vendetta against Trump, and you think that I'm one of these guys that's scared to criticize him when I've literally tweeted hundreds of times criticizing Trump.
	But you want to hone in on one tweet from 2024.
	It's disingenuous, inauthentic, and it's a fucking, you're not debating in good faith whatsoever at all.
	Because you don't even know my position.
	You admitted that at the top of the debate that, oh, I don't even really watch your content, but I'm going to pull this tweet up from 2024 instead of looking at the hours of content that I put out where I've been critical of Trump on his foreign policy, especially with Israel.
	Okay, well, I think people might be bored by this for now.
	Yeah, so clearly, yeah, you're here for entertainment.
	You're not even here to have a real discussion.
	Oh, I think people are going to be bored by this.
	You're here to fucking just argue to argue.
	You're not even here in good faith, which just proved it just now with your last statement.
	You're right.
	I'm not here in good faith.
	You're not.
	You're not.
	I'm not a petty vendetta against random people, even though we're now.
	You know what, Mike?
	I guarantee you, I could probably go through your Twitter time in the Middle East.
	It's just my pants.
	Let me tell you this, Mike.
	How about this?
	How about this?
	Let's move on.
	Okay, how about this, Mike?
	This is what I'll do.
	I'll go through your Twitter timeline.
	I'm sure in there somewhere it's going to say, I'm going to go on a diet.
	And then I'm going to look at pictures of you now and say, oh, look, you didn't go on a fucking diet.
	You're still fat as fuck.
	I can use that same exact fucking.
	See, this is the counterpart.
	But this is how you sound.
	That's how you sound.
	This is your logic.
	I can take your dumbass logic and say, oh, look at this tweet from 2024 where you said you're going to go on a diet and you did it.
	You're still a fat Cheeto eating piece of shit with a fucking neckbeard.
	But guess what?
	I could do that too, bro.
	I could do that too.
	Let's just move on because, I mean, this is just evolving into absurdity.
	He can't defend what he does.
	I absolutely defended it.
	I absolutely defended it.
	I'm not a single-issue voter.
	That's where you fucked up.
	I'm not a single-issue voter.
	On immigration.
	It's not about the single issue that you voted on.
	It was about the systematically and flagrantly false presentation of Trump that you gave to mass audiences.
	I don't really care that much about how you personally voted.
	It was about how you contributed along with so many others in the alternate media sphere in presenting this totally distorted and now catastrophically incorrect presentation.
	No, because I tweeted about Trump being harder on immigration.
	No.
	No, here you go again, cherry picking.
	Or what politicians do you choose?
	No, no.
	Here you go, cherry picking.
	Here you go, cherry picking.
	I'm just excited how sweet and heartwarming that is.
	I tweeted about voting for Trump because he's going to be pro-immigration enforcement as well.
	I tweeted about that.
	I find it interesting how you completely disqualify all the tweets where I talked about why I was going to vote for Trump on immigration or on border security, on getting more, getting ICE more involved with deportations.
	I find that you totally leave all of that out the picture and hone in on one tweet about Netanyahu.
	That's crazy, bro.
	But you know what?
	I'm going to go find a tweet where you said you're going to lose weight and then bring it back up and say, look, dude, you didn't do what you said you were going to do.
	You're a fucking liar.
	How about that?
	I'll play your game too, Fat.
	All right.
	All right.
	Good luck.
	Guys, and I appreciate both of you guys and the debate.
	You had a significant acceleration.
	It does seem like this guy fucking came in here.
	You guys saw it.
	He just came into fucking debate on bad faith.
	Like, dude, this is incredible.
	I'm not a single-issue voter.
	Guy wants to pull a tweet where I said, I think Trump is going to do a better job of dealing with Netanyahu, which I do think to this day that he would do a significantly better job.
	Oh, my bad.
	Sorry, I'll meet myself, guys.
	I'm on stream.
	My bad.
	I mean, I had my, I was, my bad, I was on the stream.
	I'll mute myself.
	No, no, no worries, no worries, no worries.
	So, like, bro comes in, right, and says, oh, I'm going to pull this one mic.
	I'm sorry, this one tweet from 2024 where you said he's going to reel in Netanyahu.
	Okay, cool.
	What about all the other reasons I voted for him?
	Oh, yeah, no, I'm going to disqualify all that shit.
	Like, okay, so he didn't do better on immigration.
	He didn't do better on foreign policy with at least opening up dialogue.
	Guys, the Biden administration didn't even talk to the Kremlin for years.
	They didn't even talk to Putin.
	Just off immigration and the Russia-Ukraine conflict alone, that was worth the vote.
	But this fat fuck wants to come in and talk about one fucking tweet where I said, I think he's going to reel Netanyahu in better.
	Completely arguing in bad faith, as if I'm like some single-issue voter, right?
	And the thing that also is really annoying is I literally have been critical of Trump all year on his foreign policy in the Middle East.
	I've been critical of it.
	I take accountability all the time and say, yo, what the fuck?
	This is bullshit.
	Like, Trump needs to stop doing this.
	This guy thinks I'm like a Charlie Kirk or a Bongino or one of these guys that can't criticize Trump.
	I've criticized Trump hundreds of times.
	I've criticized him more than I've praised him.
	So for this guy to fucking sit here and be like, oh, let me pull this one tweet.
	Yeah, look, you voted for him because he's going to reel Netanyahu in, right?
	Yeah, and a multitude of other reasons too, which you're completely discounting, right?
	Which you're completely fucking discounting.
	Dude came in to argue in bad faith 100%.
	And then, oh, well, you got a Trump sweater.
	Well, you're fat.
	Who gives a fuck?
	Because the only reason I even made an ad hominem attack is because he was sitting around talking about I was prancing around in a Trump sweater.
	What does that have to do with anything?
	Who is this fucking guy anyway?
	I don't even know who this motherfucker is.
	Let's look at this fucking fat ass dude.
	Let's see here.
	Roving journalist?
	You guys said this guy has a fucking Wikipedia?
	Is this him?
	This is a guy?
	Bruh.
	bro what the man Hold on one sec, bro.
	Hold on one sec, bro.
	Hold on one sec, bro.
	And he's over here trying to talk shit.
	Bro.
	Bro.
	What the fuck?
	Bro.
	Tsss.
	Tsss.
	Thank you.
	Interesting.
	Very, very interesting.
	Someone said he said he would start a diet in 2018.
	No way.
	Y'all trolling, bro.
	You guys said you found a tweet where he said he would start a diet in 2018?
	Hold on, bro.
	Let me see this shit.
	Yo, if you guys are trolling, send me the fucking fucking tweet where he said he would lose weight.
	Oh, man.
	Yeah, this guy is just an agitator, bro.
	Is what it is.
	And actually, I think he said that he...
	Let's see here.
	Highly critical in 2020 supportive.
	Interesting.
	Interesting.
	In governmental action in terms of war powers?
	So I'd be curious to know what's being referred to there.
	You know, nothing is really stopping Trump from just declaring right now.
	Mike, I got a question for you, bro.
	You've supported Tulsi Gabber's 2020 presidential campaign.
	Why are you supporting her when she's in the Trump administration that you hate so much?
	See how fucking ridiculous you sound.
	See how stupid that question is.
	I'm not sympathetic to Tulsi Gabbard in 2020.
	Have you read or seen anything that I've said about her in the past, I don't know, two, three, four, five years?
	Yeah, no, I'm just playing your game with you.
	See how much you're gonna nail me on some kind of contradiction.
	Yeah.
	I came out and pointed out how she obviously did a 180 in terms of her critique of Trump in 2020 to seek power within the administration.
	Yep, including critiques on Trump's Iran policy, which I did a screenshot from just a few days ago to underscore.
	Yeah, see how fucking ridiculous it is to go ahead and try to come at somebody for what they thought before or a support of a candidate and then later on come back and be like, oh, well, look, you supported Tulsi Gabbard.
	Well, guess what, buddy?
	She's the DNI for the president that you hate.
	So why'd you support her?
	Exactly.
	Shut the fuck up.
	I don't hate.
	I don't hate personally hate.
	Exactly.
	I mean, I don't want, I'm not going to, I don't, I'm not that interested in further interacting.
	Oh, yeah.
	I'm not interested in further interacting.
	See it?
	Because I'm playing your stupid game back on you, fat boy.
	Because I'm playing that fucking game back on you.
	It's annoying, isn't it?
	Here we go.
	I mean, it's annoying.
	Your IQ is, I guess, not sophisticated enough to refrain from launching into quote-unquote fat boy.
	Oh, now you, now you backtracking.
	No, no, because you had no problem talking about my Trump sweater, right?
	Now, now I'm asking you, what, what?
	Yeah, that was that as an indication of your political preferences and your public political advocacy.
	Okay.
	I wasn't commenting on your bodily.
	And I'm commenting.
	I'm commenting on you supporting Tulsi Gabbard, but now she's the DNI for a president that you hate.
	She's a part of an administration.
	Literally about to go to war.
	You're not coming up with any novel material.
	Sorry to bring up.
	Two could play this game, dude.
	Two could play this game.
	Now you see how ridiculous you sounded from before.
	Because I'll be honest with you, me confronting you about this Tulsi Gabbard thing is stupid.
	But I'm just playing your game with you just to show you how dumb you sound.
	Gotcha, bitch.
	Fuck out of here, Pratt.
	I didn't devote.
	Anyway, that nigga got cooked.
	All right, guys, we got to go ahead and go to Fresh and Fit.
	I got to get off.
	All right.
	But yeah, bro.
	Two could play that fucking game, man.
	Two could play that game.
	Holy shit.
	Bitch ass nigga, man.
	What do you want to sit here?
	You supported this candidate.
	All right, nigga.
	The candidate you support works for my candidate now.
	The fuck?
	This fucking guy, bro.
	I would cook up longer, but I got to really go, guys.
	I got to get going.
	Mic drop moment on this dumbass.
	Calculum pawn.
	Anyway, guys, come on over to Fresh of Fit.
	We're going to do Money Monday.
	We're going to talk about crypto.
	I fucking love you guys.
	Fuck that fat ass.
	He's a fucking loser.
	Let's raid the chat.
	Let's raid the other stream right now.
	We got what?
	7,000 plus you guys in here?
	So we're cooking, man.
	And join the OSS.
	Join OSS, niggas.
	Join OSS.
	All right.
	But yeah, let's go ahead and raid the Fresh of Fit shit.
	Let's raid the Fresh.
	just water.
	I'm trying to find out how to fucking raid myself on YouTube here.
	God, I fucking suck at this shit.
	Go from mic drop moment owning a fat boy to getting destroyed by technology now.
	God damn it.
	Oh, redirect.
	There we go.
	There we go.
	Bam.
	All right.
	Save.
	All right.
	Love you guys.
	Go over there, bro.
	We're going to do Fresh of Fit right now, Money Monday with Charlie and Miguel.
	We're going to answer your guys' questions, open up the chat.
	So it's going to be a good time.
	Love you guys.
	We own that fat boy.

▲