MyronGainesX - Debate: Myron vs 15 Zionists

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 31, 2025 - MyronGainesX

01:46:30

Debate: Myron vs 15 Zionists

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	On the platform.
	Alright.
	Noble, you ordered it?
	Perfect Alright and we're live It looks like we're live.
	What's up, guys?
	Welcome.
	Bitnor Unorthodox here.
	We are live in Miami, Florida, man.
	We are right here in the heart of Miami, Florida, in Brickle, to be exact.
	Right here by Mary Brickle Village.
	And we got a sign, okay?
	And the sign says, women deserve less.
	Changed my mind.
	So we're opening it up for, you know, discussion.
	And we can go ahead and have a talk about why women deserve less.
	Obviously, my best-selling book, we talk about this in detail.
	It's only 90 pages or less than 100 pages because women deserve less.
	So we'll see what the people in Miami think about this.
	And we'll be able to have a good discussion.
	As you guys can see, I got the whole squad out here with me.
	Well, you might not be able to see them all, but I promise you that they're here.
	That's why it took us forever to get started.
	But, you know, we got a pretty complex setup here.
	Multiple camera angles.
	I'm sure Sean can go ahead and show you guys some of the angles.
	You guys could get a nice little view of what Miami looks like.
	And I could, yeah, we're live.
	I'm looking right now.
	Okay, sweet.
	So.
	We good, Bills?
	Good?
	All right.
	Awesome, awesome, awesome, awesome.
	So yeah.
	Oh, I'm sorry?
	Bethany.
	Bethany?
	Bethany.
	Methany.
	I don't know if we've done that before.
	Over here.
	Over here.
	No?
	Okay, that was quick.
	She must have been on the show.
	Grand opening, grand closing.
	All right, that was fast.
	Nobody, you want to hit the mic and then we'll kind of give a preamble?
	There you go.
	So your opinion's pretty extreme.
	Yes.
	How do you come to this opinion?
	Because it's very extreme.
	Why women deserve less?
	Yeah.
	So, basically, I came to this conclusion after many years of deliberation and pondering, and I kind of realized that we live in this world where we give women everything that they want without them earning it.
	We have simps all over the place, guys making thoughts rich, thoughts not having skill sets, not respecting men, not believing in men being masculine.
	And quite frankly, we just live in a deregulated sexual marketplace.
	And obviously, this has caused a lot of problems for both genders.
	I would argue that feminism has actually hurt women more than it's hurt men.
	You know, men, we're problem solvers.
	We find ways to deal with it.
	Whether guys want to go ahead and pay for some box or, you know, go to a foreign country and become a passport, bro.
	Men have been able to figure out and deal with the problem.
	But I think with women, they haven't.
	And I think the situation that we have right now where, you know, women find something like 60 plus percent of men is completely, no, sorry, like 89% of men is unattractive.
	That tells you where we kind of are.
	And that was years ago from a Cornell study.
	So I think feminism, if anything, has actually hurt women more than anybody else.
	And that's kind of where we are when I say women deserve less.
	It's more about they deserve less because it's going to protect them from themselves because they don't understand that giving them more actually hurts them.
	So that's kind of my position on that.
	And obviously lots of feminists get mad at me for saying this, but I think we need to put them back in the kitchen.
	Damn, that's a very extreme opinion.
	Why don't you blame the men?
	Why don't I blame the men?
	Well, I do.
	But the problem is, you know, society already blames men, right?
	I think with men, if you're a loser, you deal with the consequences of that.
	Women don't want to deal with you.
	Guys don't want to be friends with you.
	No one cares about you.
	You basically end up becoming invisible.
	So men have to deal with consequences for inadequacy, but women don't.
	And I think that's the biggest problem because we got a bunch of mediocre women running around.
	And they think that they're entitled to top shelf guys.
	And I think a big reason for this is because we live in this gynocentric society where we prioritize female wants and female standards over the male standards, right?
	If a woman is rude and loud, no one cares.
	But if a guy is meek and weak and doesn't have his money together, we make fun of him.
	So we don't have the same negative consequences for male inadequacy that we do for female inadequacies.
	So yeah.
	Yeah, sure.
	Oh, what's up, man?
	These guys don't count.
	What's up, man?
	Yeah.
	Hey, Myron.
	Hey, what's up?
	Hello.
	These are, you want to introduce yourself to the people real quick?
	These are allies, guys, by the way.
	Shout out to Shaney and Isgro.
	Hello, hello.
	Hello.
	Hello, hello.
	Okay, Shane, is that good?
	All right.
	Hi, Myron.
	Oh, hi, I'm Samantha McCarty.
	Hi, good to see you again.
	I work for Street Polar.
	This is Shaney's girlfriend, guys.
	Yeah.
	I have a few questions for you.
	Sure.
	Okay.
	If feminists had their own country, would they survive?
	Hell no.
	Why?
	Good question.
	They would have survived because the reality is that women can't actually defend themselves properly.
	You know, men have the monopoly of force, and women don't really have the capability to defend themselves against men that might attack them.
	This is why we have, you know, the military, police, et cetera.
	Men have the monopoly of force that allows women to be able to be safe.
	So, yeah, if we had, yeah, if we had a woman country, it would be taken over within a day.
	24 hours.
	Yikes.
	Should an IQ test be required to vote?
	You know, that's a good question.
	I've thought about that myself, whether it be an IQ test or a civic exam.
	I think for men, right, they would be able to take the test automatically and be able to obviously vote.
	But for women, I think they'd have to have some other skin in the game to be able to even take the test.
	What do you think some of those requirements or factors would be for women?
	Ooh, it would have to be public service, passing the civic test, and then being able to make a bologna sandwich properly.
	They could do those three things, I think they should be able to vote.
	What are some old-fashioned values that have kind of gone away that should be brought back?
	I think men should be the providers.
	I think they should be the breadwinners.
	I know that's kind of something that's almost impossible to do nowadays.
	And I think women should really focus on rearing the children and being at home.
	But, you know, I think we're too far gone now at this point.
	I don't think the feminists are going to yield any ground.
	Now, there's some women I think that are waking up and realizing feminism is a cancer.
	It's fucking them up.
	But it'll be very difficult to go backwards.
	But I do think if we brought simply the nuclear family back, that would handle 80% of the problems.
	Would you rather date a liberal or an illegal immigrant?
	An illegal immigrant.
	She at least knows how to make a sandwich.
	That's it?
	That's the only thing?
	Yeah, probably that.
	And then, yeah.
	Yeah, it's true, true.
	And she's not going to talk back because she doesn't speak English.
	So that's even better.
	Do you want me to go?
	Would you rather be misgendered in public or audited by the IRS?
	Hmm.
	Me being misgendered?
	Yes.
	Or audited by the IRS?
	Yep.
	Audited by the IRS.
	Why?
	I got nothing to hide.
	So you wouldn't be offended if someone, you know, called you a different type of pronoun?
	If they use the wrong pronoun, I wouldn't be offended.
	It is what it is.
	I mean, I think the whole concept of pronouns in itself is comical, but, you know.
	But that's the crazy world we're in now.
	What's the bigger threat to America?
	Drag queens or fentanyl?
	Drag queens.
	Why?
	Because drag queens basically make it seem as though it's appropriate and acceptable to cross-dress, read books to kids, and do all the other degenerate behavior that they do.
	I mean, if it were up to me, I'd give them their own little area in a town or a city where they could just hang out there and do everything that they want to do.
	Suggesting segregation is absurd.
	Well, I mean, if you don't like that, then that's fine.
	But yeah, I think.
	Yes.
	Yeah, segregation does have.
	I think segregation does work in some places, yes.
	She's a.
	Oh, yeah.
	You want to go?
	No, it's fine.
	I don't need to do it.
	I just want to make you.
	We're all one person.
	It's fine.
	Keep going.
	All right.
	She's a 10, but she has her pronouns in her LinkedIn bio.
	Sex only.
	So she's still a 10.
	Oh, no.
	She goes down to like an eight or a nine, but actually, probably like a seven.
	But she would be automatically put in the sex only category.
	Fair enough.
	But yeah.
	Thank you so much.
	No worries.
	Who's up next?
	I can see you, man.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, absolutely, bro.
	I'll share with you.
	Yeah, guys, if you want to go ahead and have a discussion, you're free to have a discussion.
	I mean, if you want to heckle from the side, that's fine.
	But, you know, if you're going to have points or whatever, just say what you got to say.
	We can have a discussion, no problem.
	Yes, what's up, man?
	Oh, no.
	I just want to see what you got going on.
	Oh, you want to see the sign?
	Yeah, let's see.
	Women deserve less.
	Women deserve less.
	Changed my mind, yes.
	Why do you think women deserve less?
	Well, there's a bunch of different reasons, but I would say to make it nice and simple, we got too many simps out here.
	What's the constant variable of what they currently have of deserving that they should deserve less of?
	Oh, look, she flipped the middle finger off.
	She's so mad.
	Can't defend your ideas.
	Just got to put a middle finger up, I see.
	So, sorry, what was that question?
	Yeah, I said, what's that constant variable that women currently deserve that have that you think they should have less of?
	What's that they have right now that they're getting?
	What is it that they have?
	That they're getting.
	Oh, man.
	Well, here's the thing: they get preferential treatment.
	They're able to be treated like a lady while simultaneously being able to behave like men with almost zero consequence.
	They could basically double dip.
	So, another can enjoy the benefits of being treated like a leak, right?
	Enjoy chivalry and traditional male standards, like men treating them like ladies, while simultaneously they can also behave rude, erratic, crass, with zero consequence.
	Can't men do the same thing?
	No, we can't.
	We're actually held to standards unlike women.
	You think so?
	Yes.
	For example, you, right?
	How old are you?
	I'm 20.
	You're 20.
	So, who do you think is going to have more value in society?
	You or a 20-year-old girl?
	Depends which 20-year-old girl, because me, physically, I work my ass off and I'm focused and do what I need to do.
	I'm sure there's a woman that's 20 years old that does the same thing.
	Okay, here's the beauty.
	You said you work your ass off, right?
	Of course.
	Why do you work your ass off?
	I mean, because I don't ever want to have my mom working a day in her life.
	That's all.
	Cool.
	So there's a burden of performance on you, right?
	You have to work.
	Have to?
	No one has to work.
	Well, if you didn't work, your status would decrease.
	Fair?
	Not necessarily.
	Nowadays, no.
	Yeah, it would decrease.
	So the reason why you're working is because you kind of know it's like an unspoken reality that men have to perform.
	But if I took a 20-year-old girl, she doesn't have to work.
	You do.
	That's my point.
	I mean, working is one thing because women, you know, they can work in other ways.
	It doesn't just have to be like a nine-to-five making money.
	They can work and supporting and doing things around the house.
	Working what?
	They don't have to work monetarily.
	You got to turn up the speaker.
	Because it's coming in very, very low.
	Yeah, let's turn up that speaker.
	Sorry.
	For example, if you have a team of people, not every single person is just bringing in money.
	Someone helps someone else to support them throughout their daily life to assist them to make that money.
	So let's say if I had a woman that was living with me and she was my girlfriend, she doesn't need to make money as long as she makes my life easier to be able to make money.
	And that's just as much as a help as me making money.
	Here's the difference.
	It wouldn't work the other way around.
	That's my point.
	If she worked and you helped her out behind the scenes, it probably wouldn't work.
	Because women don't like to provide for men long term.
	It depends on the situation.
	It depends on what.
	90 plus percent of women do not want to be a breadwinner for a man ever.
	That's not true.
	That's not true.
	That's propaganda, feminist propaganda.
	Women, if they out-earn their man or they're in a position where they're in a leadership role, there's a very high likelihood they will leave you.
	My mother's a perfect example of that.
	It's the complete opposite.
	Is she with your dad still?
	Of course.
	Okay, and how long have they been married?
	They got married, high school sweetheart, since they were, I believe, 18.
	They got married, moved here together.
	And was your mom the breadwinner the entire time?
	They were 50-50.
	Okay, and then what is it now?
	Now she's the breadwinner?
	First, it was my dad.
	Well, basically, my mom went to school.
	My dad worked.
	Then my mom worked because she got her degree.
	They put her through school.
	They went to school.
	And now they both work.
	And I would say that my mom has a more consistent and, you know, makes more money than my dad.
	And that completely discredits to a point of what you're saying because there's a degree where my dad wasn't working assisting her.
	Well, you also got to understand that anecdotal evidence, like based on your own personal experience, doesn't necessarily reflect the rest of the world.
	So though that might be your situation with your parents, which is great, a lot of the times that's just not the reality.
	And the other thing also that you need to understand is that your father was the breadwinner for a significant amount of time in the relationship.
	How do you know significant?
	What if I say two years?
	Well, those two years is where she was able to go to school, right?
	And vice versa when he went to school.
	Okay, but he put her through school.
	So he allowed her to basically be able to go to school and he put him through school, yes.
	That's very important.
	That's very, very important.
	That's a pertinent fact to the situation.
	But again, like I said before, women, right, are not going to provide long-term for men the same way that men will provide long-term for women.
	Also, I think it's important to understand that your parents had a longer relationship.
	So by the time that everything planned out and she's being the breadwinner, she's a bit older.
	She might not be able to enter the dating marketplace the same late.
	You can elaborate on the word provide.
	I'm sorry?
	Can you elaborate on what you mean by providing a majority breadwinner, right?
	Disregard what my situation was in my family.
	I want you to elaborate and describe what you mean providing, a woman providing is.
	What do you see that as?
	The reality is this, man.
	So I know this is considered politically incorrect to say this, but most women do not want to be the breadwinner for men.
	They just don't.
	Now, they'll sit there and have the feminist propaganda and say I'm a boss bitch and I'll make a bunch of money and I'll do XYZ.
	But the reality is when women say I'm independent, you got to ask yourself, who are they independent of?
	It's men.
	They do that to say, I don't need a man, and they make that money for themselves.
	When a man makes money, he says, how can I have a family?
	When a woman makes money, she says, I don't need a man.
	Completely different mindsets when we make a certain amount of money.
	So providing essentially, you're talking about monetarily when it comes to money.
	Yes, when it comes to, yes, being a breadwinner.
	Men are far more comfortable and built to provide for women than women are for men.
	If a woman is in a provider situation, the likelihood of that relationship falling apart is very high.
	Now, there's some situations like yours where it was able to work.
	But I do think it's important to understand that your dad had a bit of equity there where he helped her get to the position that she's at.
	So there's some level of reciprocity there now that she's making the money.
	But in most situations, women are not okay with providing long-term for men, especially now.
	So on a follow-up question, you're talking about providing as a woman or a man.
	It's just monetary.
	What would success look like for you as a human being?
	For me?
	As a human being, what does success look like?
	Having a nuclear family, having a woman that respects you and obeys you.
	You make the decisions, you're the head of the household, and bringing it back to what it was before.
	But this whole equal partnership stuff that we push out there, it's not true.
	It's all a lie.
	So you're saying being able to support and have a woman that supports you is what success looks like for you as a human being?
	Yes, you support financially, and obviously you're the bedrock, and she takes care of the children in the home, and have defined gender roles.
	I think that's very important.
	And as a person, Moore, what would you be happy with yourself?
	Let's say you're on your deathbed and you're looking at back.
	What would you look back on and say, wow, that was success?
	I think when you're looking at your deathbed, the only thing that matters that when you're on your deathbed, the only thing that matters looking back is, did you create a legacy and do you have a family?
	I think you want to be on that deathbed with people surrounding you that you've helped create to some degree.
	So what if, let's say, on my deathbed, I have $100 million there, and when I look back, I was like, damn, I was a shitty person.
	You know, I didn't do a lot of things.
	I wasn't so wise.
	I wasn't so kind.
	But instead, you maybe had that same amount of money, but you had a woman that instilled those values in you and your family.
	I think that's worth more than any $100 million could count on.
	I agree.
	I think less money and a family is far more important than more money and no family.
	I agree.
	And a woman brings that.
	I agree.
	All right, thank you.
	Who's up next?
	He is?
	Sure, whoever wants to come up next.
	Oh, come on.
	What's up?
	How you doing?
	Yo.
	I can do that.
	Just adjust this.
	Just adjust this.
	Hold on.
	Okay.
	I did this for a little while, no.
	You got it.
	So that's your book, Why Women Deserve Less?
	Yes.
	Why?
	Why?
	Yeah.
	I just want context.
	So as we talk, I want to understand your mindset.
	So we're going to have a debate or conversation.
	I want to make sure that.
	Well, I think men simp on women too much.
	I think that's one of the main ones.
	I think a lot of guys don't make women earn their keep.
	And we've created a pretty shitty marketplace for that.
	That's created a lot of issues.
	So you think men have created it or the women have created that?
	Both parties are responsible to a degree.
	Both have their contributions to the deregulation and the problems that we have.
	So do you think it, what specifically made you come to this whole concept of women deserve less?
	Many years of pondering.
	That's it?
	Many years of pondering.
	You married?
	Many years of pondering.
	You married?
	No.
	You got a baby mama?
	No.
	No kids?
	No.
	You don't want kids?
	Not right now.
	But in the future, how old are you?
	35.
	Okay.
	You got time.
	You got till 55 and you're good.
	So you can go crazy.
	I just need to understand.
	I'm trying to understand why, because none of your rationale right now makes sense at all.
	Because you're telling me what you think and I'm telling you what I think right now.
	So it just doesn't make sense.
	All right, you know what?
	It makes sense.
	So you talked to the young man about him, his parents.
	He had a great, because that's his world.
	His mom actually makes more money than his dad, but they've been together since they were 15, 18.
	I don't know what he said.
	I don't know how long.
	But I think the whole concept of him saying that is a lot of people who experience and there's nothing wrong with that.
	Because at the end of the day, they helped each other to get to make that beautiful young man be able to have a conversation with you.
	Yeah, but we also have to be realistic and understand that that's not the norm.
	Most women are not okay with being breadwinners in a relationship.
	And then obviously when you explained it a bit more, it made a bit more sense because his father was in a breadwinner position and then assisted his mom with being able to go to school.
	They assisted each other.
	They assisted each other.
	Yes, he was the breadwinner for a period of time to allow his mother.
	Right, she went to school.
	And then they flipped it.
	Exactly.
	Which was great.
	They had to understand it, right?
	Yes, but that's not the norm.
	And that's not what typically happens.
	I mean, you know, we have a very high divorce rate.
	We have a lot of the decline of marriage in America.
	And I don't blame the guys for not getting married because there's not really much benefit now married for a man.
	So it's not any benefit for being married for a man?
	Virtually none, no.
	I mean, I think that there's any benefit.
	I mean, I'll ask you this.
	What benefit does a guy get from marrying a woman that he doesn't get from just being in a regular long-term relationship?
	Depends on what you want.
	Okay, so what benefits are you going to be doing?
	Let's go through the, let's go.
	Some men just want an armpiece.
	Some men want somebody they can grow old with.
	Some men want somebody they can make money with.
	You can do all that without being married.
	No.
	That's my point.
	No, we're talking about benefits.
	No.
	We're just talking about benefits.
	If you decide to, when you decide to get married, let me ask a question.
	What I asked you was, what benefit do men get from getting married from a woman that they otherwise would not get from just being in a regular relationship?
	It's a trick question.
	There's almost none.
	But that's personal, though.
	It's personal why a person gets married.
	I would say that's fairly.
	I mean, like I said before, if they choose to get married, that's one thing, but they're not getting any real benefits for so they're choosing to get married.
	But they don't get benefits.
	If anything, they get married.
	You don't need to get married because you're in love with a person or you have some religious reason that you get married.
	Again, I'm speaking very pragmatically, and I'm giving you a pragmatic situation, and you're responding with kind of an emotional response.
	I'm saying that with men, hold on one second.
	There's no benefit.
	Just because I raised my voice doesn't make me emotional.
	That makes you talking like a woman now.
	No, I'm actually just telling you very pragmatically.
	That doesn't make me, I'm just talking.
	I'm telling you not pragmatically.
	Hey, I like, I'm big.
	My voice raises.
	You might get intimidated a little bit.
	I'm just having fun.
	I'm enjoying this.
	This is why I stopped because I think you're amazing.
	Yeah.
	I'm just saying, pragmatically speaking, there's no benefit to a man getting married in the West anymore.
	There's almost none.
	If anything, that's only downside.
	And I asked you, can you name one thing that a man would get as a benefit from getting married in this day and age?
	And you mentioned some things, but those things can all be attained in a regular relationship without getting married.
	But again, you can't, that's fine, you can say that, but that's a choice.
	It's still a choice.
	I get what you're saying.
	I asked you to get a question.
	I'm not answering that question.
	No, no, no.
	I'm not disagreeing with what you're saying.
	But also, on my side, that's still a choice.
	Like, if I decide to get married to her right now because she's beautiful and I love curly hair, and that's my thing, so what?
	You can't tell me no different.
	And if I feel good about that, cool.
	At some point, we get divorced.
	That's my fault because I chose her.
	I didn't talk to her.
	I didn't get to do it.
	I think we've reached kind of an impasse here.
	Who's up next?
	Oh, man.
	Okay, take that.
	Hello.
	How are you?
	What's up, man?
	How are you?
	Chilling?
	Chilling?
	Thank you.
	Yes.
	All right, you already know.
	How are you doing?
	The other day in the office.
	How'd you do that?
	Good.
	How are you?
	How are you?
	How would you define like deserve?
	When you mean deserve less, monetarily, in what way do you mean they deserve less?
	It could be a multitude of different things.
	I mean, what is your, tell me what you're thinking and what we could kind of go off what you're thinking.
	I'll go off you.
	You're the one that says they deserve less.
	Well, you came up here.
	All right.
	So go ahead.
	I would say for you, maybe it means like monetarily or love or emotionally.
	I'm raised in a Middle East.
	I mean, but money is one thing.
	I think it's a bunch of different things.
	I think it's time, attention, resources, money.
	It could be a multitude of different things.
	I think a lot of guys simply simp on women for no reason.
	Okay, I probably agree with you.
	Okay.
	But in the sense of deserve, when someone says deserve, there's a value of a man and a woman.
	Do you think it's different?
	The value between a man and a woman?
	I mean, deserve kind of comes with some, there's some, if you say, as a person, something deserves less.
	Either they're a bad person or there's something to them that means they're lesser than.
	Unless you think people are just not born equally.
	Yeah, the reason why I say deserve less is because the status quo is to give them everything.
	The status quo is to give them everything.
	Yes.
	To women.
	Yes.
	You think so?
	The accepted modality of dealing with women is being a simp nowadays.
	And I tell guys not to do that and also be an extreme gentleman.
	And I don't think extreme gentlemen to women anymore in today's day and age.
	Extreme.
	It shouldn't be extreme gentlemen to women.
	Like treating a woman like it's 1950 when she doesn't behave like it's 1950, in other words.
	So you're becoming, you're a traditional guy, you're being chivalrous, but she's not necessarily a traditional woman.
	Wouldn't it be that subjective to the women?
	It wouldn't be all women?
	Of course, every situation is different, but I would argue that most women nowadays, modern women, have some Adoption of modern feminism that quite frankly makes it in a situation where it's maybe not in your best interest to practice chivalry with them.
	I think it's earned.
	The point I'm trying to make here is that they need to earn that gentleman treatment from you.
	They need to earn that gentleman treatment.
	Absolutely, yes.
	So it shouldn't start gets lost.
	It has to be earned from the beginning.
	Yes, and there's a multitude of different ways to assess this.
	But yes, I think guys need to reserve treating women like ladies in the beginning so that they don't get taken advantage of.
	Do you think in some cases it would be better to learn the hard way?
	I mean, if you think about it, women are obviously maybe not stronger.
	Men are obviously more masculine.
	In most cases, you probably, as a man, the value is to take care of somebody, build a family, you're protecting.
	That's traditional value.
	Here's the thing: some guys, a lot of guys do learn the hard way, and a lot of guys are stubborn.
	They have to learn the hard way.
	They have to get burned a few times to realize that the stove is hot.
	Now, you know, smart people learn from their mistakes.
	Wise people learn from other people's mistakes.
	So I put the information out there.
	If they choose to want to still experiment and get burned, that's fine.
	But at least they have the ability to know that that information was there.
	And at least I could connect some dots for them because a lot of guys wounds up happening is they make the mistake, they don't know what happened, what led to it, and then they put a gun in their mouth and they want to end it all because they weren't able to figure out what's going on.
	So I do think that it's important to have that information out there.
	And if they decide to take it, cool.
	If they don't, that's fine.
	But a lot of the times they'll go make the mistake, then they'll come back and say, yeah, he was right.
	Let me go back and look at this.
	Let me re-examine this.
	So I think having that information there is very important.
	Agreed.
	But would you, wouldn't that mean it's not that women would deserve less, but rather how you choose your women or the person beside you?
	It's not instinctively the woman that deserves less.
	No, I think every guy needs to approach a woman from a position of she needs to earn her keep.
	So they don't deserve less.
	They just need to show for what they deserve.
	You can make that argument.
	But again, like I said, status quo is to come in, assuming you deserve less, and then let her prove you wrong.
	So I think that's the value.
	Absolutely.
	Okay, yeah, well, absolutely.
	I mean, this whole concept of women are the prize is garbage to lie.
	You don't think so?
	No.
	Can I ask you if you're religious by chance?
	No, I'm not religious, no.
	Okay.
	I'm not sure how familiar with the Quran, but there's a hadith that says the Can I get some water?
	Yeah.
	I'm not sure how familiar you are, but there's a.
	I'm not a religious man, so I mean, using a hadith and stuff like that isn't really the way to go.
	I know, I know, but I'm just trying to see what you think of it.
	It says that the gates of paradise behold under the foot of the mother.
	And just kind of showing the importance of a mother.
	What's your opinion of mothers?
	Well, remember that the Quran and these hadith were written at a time when women obeyed men and actually respected male authority.
	They don't anymore.
	You don't think so?
	They don't.
	Absolutely, they don't.
	Maybe on average, sure, it's a little different.
	Absolutely, they don't.
	But in that time, it was a little different.
	I would agree with you.
	But women respected male authority, so they don't anymore.
	And that's the problem.
	So what I'm saying is that we got to deal with.
	And this is the problem with religion a lot of the times: religion doesn't equip men to properly deal with modern-day females.
	Modern-day females.
	Yeah, it does not equip you to deal with it because modern-day women are not the women of the book.
	Whether it's Judaism, Christianity, Islam, the religions, unfortunately, the Abrahamic religions do not account for modernity with the way women behave now.
	Sure, there's definitely a difference between women.
	Now, if you find a religion of the book and she follows it, that's one thing.
	But that's very difficult to find.
	So there you go.
	So there's a point where a woman can show they deserve something.
	But it's more they don't deserve less.
	It's just that some of them have lost what it's true, the true nature of the world.
	What I'm saying is that men need to enter every relationship with women skeptical.
	Skeptical.
	Skeptical and assume that they deserve less unless they prove that they deserve more.
	That's what I'm saying.
	And there's nothing wrong with that because men have to perform.
	You have to come up to her, tell a funny joke, be interesting, be charismatic, be charming.
	Why can't we put standards on women?
	I'm simply telling guys to put standards on women because we don't put standards on them.
	That's why they behave the way that they do.
	So just no unconditional value to women is essentially what you're saying.
	Not that they deserve less.
	Just don't be unconditional just because they're a woman.
	What I'm saying is approach it from a skeptical standpoint and assume she deserves less unless she proves that she deserves more.
	That's what I'm saying.
	All right.
	Which, interestingly enough, I hope you know this is how women deal with men.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	This is precisely how women women deal with men from an adversarial perspective of what can he provide for me.
	Yeah, what can you do?
	What he brings.
	Versus men are so stupid to come into a relationship and say, oh, what can I provide for her?
	How can I go ahead and help her out?
	They don't come in with that same mindset.
	I'm simply telling men to treat women the way they treat us when it comes to the beginning of a relationship.
	And I would argue men have way more skin in the game when they deal with women, so it behooves us to move with skepticism when we deal with them.
	Do you think, like, the love of a woman is the best?
	Who's up next, though?
	We got a lot of people here.
	I see.
	Do we got a line?
	We got a line, right?
	All right, so let's get some other people on.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	No worries, man.
	Appreciate you.
	Hi.
	What's up, bro?
	See how it's five?
	It's crushing.
	For an argument, could you define what you mean real quick and more into context?
	Like, when you say less, less, less value.
	I literally just went over that with the other guy.
	30 seconds.
	I literally just went over that.
	15 seconds.
	Less what?
	Less attention.
	I said it.
	Just not even him said men need to approach relationships and dealing with women from a skeptical standpoint.
	That's a little different than women deserve less, but I think I agree with you.
	Yes, assume that they deserve less unless they prove they deserve more.
	Yes.
	Okay.
	That's a tough argument because I think I agree with that.
	But the thing where I disagree, because I've watched some of your content.
	Sure.
	So I'll pick on points that I think I disagree with.
	All right, what do you think?
	Do you think you value commitment to a woman?
	Can we turn up that mic?
	Do you think the music is loud?
	Sorry, say that again.
	Do you value commitment to a woman?
	If it's the right woman, yes.
	Okay.
	Can I?
	But that commitment has to be earned.
	Facts, 100%.
	You preach a message a lot right now that the masses is that women are basically like a lot of what I would consider Miami women that are going after value that are going after that are kind of going after them for basically their money in a sense for lack of better words And I think what's missing potentially part of your message is that it's like you probably don't speak enough about the fact that commitment to a woman, at least in a biblical space, which not everyone's Christian, not what is ever, there's a reason why biblical is the way it's written.
	If it goes church, church, Christ, man, woman, marriage.
	There's a reason that it's written that way.
	And I think part of your message is missing that it's like, are you married?
	No.
	Or do you want to get married?
	I will in the future.
	But not with the state involved.
	Not with what?
	Not with the state involved.
	Okay, that's fair.
	That's a whole other conversation.
	With who involved?
	Oh, just be a, I think it's a union between man and woman and God.
	But what I'm saying is that, right?
	So look.
	Okay, fair.
	I see your perspective because the other guy made a religious argument as well.
	So I agree with you on what you just said.
	Okay.
	But the problem is that most women do not observe this Christian worldview that you presented.
	Unfortunately.
	I agree.
	I wish they did.
	I agree.
	That was back when we were a superpower in the 50s.
	I agree.
	But now we live in a secularized world where most women think it's okay to kill babies.
	They don't believe in male authority.
	They don't respect men in general, masculinity.
	And most importantly, they don't respect the concept of men are above women.
	If I was to say women are supposed to obey men, most women will bucket that and say, that's bullshit.
	Obviously, you would agree with me because you come from the Christian worldview.
	But the problem is that we no longer have these things in place to keep women in check, unfortunately.
	I agree with you a lot, which is probably the problem.
	However, I will say one thing.
	I think that a root of the problem, a lot of the root of the problem, is not the women.
	The women in Miami down here that are running around and acting like the way they act is because of the weak fucking men we have in this country.
	Because men aren't stepping up and they're fit because they're not.
	Because they ain't got no wealth, because they're not stepping up into it.
	Because men aren't stepping up into the men they're supposed to be created to be.
	If more men stepped up and said, I'm going to be a leader and the man that I'm supposed to be, I'm created, I'm divine.
	I'm going to follow my purpose.
	I'm going to do the things that God's calling me to be.
	I'm going to be fit.
	I'm going to be wealthy.
	I'm going to work hard.
	I'm going to be disciplined.
	I'm going to wake up early.
	If men did more of those things, I think women would actually have more of a breed to go after and more actual men to go after.
	The problem is that for as many women as there are that are out here hoeing around, there's double as many men being weak men that aren't stepping into their purpose.
	Yeah, for sure.
	There's many problems that I've been able to identify with this, the destruction of the nuclear family, men not necessarily adhering to their roles.
	But I think something that we don't talk about, because we're so easy to criticize men, which I do this all the time as well, but we never talk about the invisible column, which is feminism.
	Sure.
	And this feminism has created a lot of problems.
	And to talk about that gets you labeled them aside, it gets you banned off social media.
	Yeah, I think that's bullshit.
	But however, at the same time, okay, let's say YouTube bans Fresh and Fit, then what?
	Fresh and Fit figures it out.
	Anybody, it's a responsibility aspect.
	So if we're preaching the concept and we're preaching the responsibility to men, I think more importantly, if men stepped up way more than the way they're stepping up today, the women in this country would respond.
	If you point the finger at the woman, the women are going to be like, oh, yeah, why?
	Because there's a bunch of fucking weak men running around.
	You step up as a man, and as you preach that message, you have a bunch of men stepping into their calling into their purpose.
	I can guarantee you the woman problem already solves itself.
	Just think about it.
	Again, like I said, for sure, I agree with you.
	Like that, the men are obviously not adhering to what they're supposed to adhere to.
	But like I said before, we already bash the men enough and say men need to step up, etc.
	This has been the...
	No, that's absolutely, they've been demonizing men for a very long time.
	I think modern feminism men do, which I think is bullshit, and I agree with.
	No, they don't.
	I don't think men, you men, me men, like men men, have men-to-men conversations and say, yo, you need to step it the fuck up.
	I don't think enough men are.
	But like I said before, we already hold men's feet to a fire to perform.
	Okay.
	We already do that, right?
	And men have been ostracized from society for being losers, etc.
	My point is that we don't hold that same level of accountability on the female side is my point.
	Now, religion used to do that.
	Religion, shame, family, society.
	Correct.
	They used to do that.
	But guess what?
	Those guardrails are now gone.
	So since those guardrails are gone, where bringing them doesn't matter, bring that.
	Girls can be horror.
	Preach that message.
	There's deregular, there's feminists, etc.
	But we're never going back.
	Bring that shit back, and I can guarantee you right now, the rest of the problem solves itself.
	And this is the religious argument that you guys make.
	Hold on.
	Look.
	You're putting your finger at a symptom, not the root.
	You say the root.
	Men, you step the fuck up and you solve your problems.
	99% of the shit you're talking about is solved.
	It's just like businesses.
	It's just like podcasts.
	Oh, YouTube demonetized me.
	You're the problem, brother.
	Fix it.
	You fix your own shit.
	You end up rising to the problem and solve and make a solution just like it would be for women.
	Again, like I said before, that's all ideal.
	That's all great.
	But the reality, like I said before, is that what's ideal versus what's real are really two different things.
	And this, you know, this religious idealism, it used to be the thing that kept women in line, but it's gone now.
	That's what I'm trying to explain to you.
	I think all girls.
	That's what's happening today.
	And I agree with you.
	Yes, that's what I'm saying.
	But I do.
	And I agree.
	I'm not going to disagree with that.
	Feminism.
	Feminism and modern feminism.
	Yeah, fucking female.
	Feminism while secularizing the country have led to this big problem.
	But that's what you can't talk about, is my point.
	We could sit here and point the finger at men all the time.
	We do.
	And that's okay.
	But to point it on the other side, that's when you start getting censored.
	That's when you start getting banned.
	That's when you start getting shadow banned.
	That's when you start.
	I agree as well.
	When you have issues.
	So that's what I'm saying: is that we never talk about that problem.
	Trust me, I've talked about men being bums and losers, et cetera.
	I tell guys all the time, you shouldn't even date unless you can provide for her and yourself.
	But we already know that.
	We don't talk about the other problem.
	Alright, last point because I think we agree on too many things to make this a...
	And there's a huge line here, too.
	Last thing is, if the message was bringing back what you just said mattered, which is a lot of the biblical times, a lot of the biblical principles, bringing back the men stepping into their calling, men stepping into their purpose.
	If that was the core message to men right now, and that was spelt louder, that was spoken more, that was spoken in a more frequent message, to me, this is my opinion, which is why I'm on this mic.
	Speaking about the woman in Kyle's eyes, which is which in a man's eyes, is like you're wasting your time, you're spending your energy on something where you're speaking about a symptom when you could be speaking about the root.
	And the root, in my opinion, is the fact that men are not stepping into their calling enough in this country.
	And if you did that shit more right now, I can guarantee you right now, a lot of it, you wouldn't be here on this corner.
	Trust me, we do.
	There'd be more shit.
	We do.
	We have episodes dedicated to guys stepping their stuff up all the time.
	Well, let's fucking go.
	I'll be on the next one of those.
	Yeah.
	Okay, who's up next?
	Thank you for coming on.
	What's up, my man?
	What's up, man?
	What's your name again?
	I've seen you before, but I'm sorry.
	What's your name?
	It's Myron.
	Myron, nice.
	I'm Justin.
	Okay, yeah, I'm sorry.
	I saw the sign.
	I have one opinion of this.
	I don't think that.
	I think deserve comes down to, I think, of merit, right?
	Like, if a woman has the same qualifications as a man in the same field, why not?
	She doesn't deserve less than a man, right?
	If a man is getting paid for more for something than a woman with less merit, then I think that becomes the argument.
	But I think that I'm not sure.
	Are you speaking from like a professional perspective?
	No, absolutely not.
	I just think it comes down to merit-based.
	I don't think it should be based on a relationship.
	Yeah, but I'm saying like you're saying like if they both have the same job and have the same merit qualifications.
	Yeah, I'm not speaking from that perspective.
	Okay, what are you doing?
	What are you speaking from?
	I'm speaking from more a relationship perspective versus a professional perspective.
	In that perspective, I think it comes down to still what do they bring to the table.
	I think historically and traditionally, men are considered to be the ones who provide, and women are the ones that are there to nurture children and to kind of take care of some of the homework while the man provides for the family.
	I actually agree with that, to be honest with you.
	And I mean that in no disrespect to women.
	I think if there's a woman in the world.
	Hold on, let me stop you real quick.
	Okay.
	Notice how you had to say I mean that in no disrespect to women.
	That is precisely why I'm here doing this because the problem is that women look at it as it's an insult to tell them to be a lady or behave like a lady.
	But if someone tells you, be a man, get a job, support a family, we don't get mad at that.
	We understand that's our duty.
	But them, on the other hand, they get angry when you say, hey, you know, I want you to be in the house and take care of the family.
	Or, hey, we want women that are going to take care of kids.
	They get angry at that.
	Fair enough.
	Right?
	I believe if a woman's in a position to take care and do the providing financially and a man stays home and takes care of the kids and she's okay with that and there's no assumption of responsibilities there.
	It's just as good.
	I think that sometimes these taboos get carried away of like, I'm supposed to do this, you're supposed to do this.
	I think it's situational with people where if you are the one and a man is just confident enough to accept your role as the provider and he stays home and he's not the breadwinner, then let him do that.
	Yeah, that simply doesn't work in most situations though.
	In most situations, I know that'd be ideal for a lot of guys, but the reality is most women are not going to be okay with being the breadwinner or coming home to a guy taking care of the house.
	They're just not going to want that.
	Well, most of the time it's because women that are the breadwinners don't want to talk to women that are broken than them.
	I'm sorry?
	I said most of the time it's because women that are usually the breadwinners don't want to talk to men broken than they are.
	They want to aim up.
	Exactly.
	Men will aim as low as they can go sometimes.
	You know what I'm saying?
	Just for the night.
	And I think that that's a disparagement.
	When it comes to deserve, that's a very situational word of do they deserve less.
	I think it comes down to a maturity of understanding your role and playing that role.
	Like, I make the most money, so I need you to do this as far as the partnership goes.
	And sometimes men are, they don't feel masculine enough to accept that.
	And sometimes women don't want to work up to that standard of being that role.
	And if they are, then usually they're dating someone much more comfortable than somebody broken than they are.
	Yeah, the point basically is that I'm telling guys to enter any type of situation with a female with a healthy level of skepticism because unfortunately most women don't have that worldview that you described of wanting to be a helpmate and follow a man and everything else like that.
	Most women would actually bucket you if you said, hey, I need you to obey me and adhere to certain things, unfortunately.
	They would be one of the ones that probably would try to ban, honestly.
	Cool.
	Who's up next?
	No, no, no worries.
	Who's up next?
	It's funny, but women get mad and they just walk by and hang them.
	They don't say anything, right?
	Is that interesting?
	Hey, what's up, man?
	Hey.
	What do you mean that women deserve less?
	Could you explain that more clearly?
	Men need to enter relationships with women with a healthy level of skepticism.
	Why is that?
	Because most women, unfortunately, don't provide a reciprocal amount of value to a man in a relationship.
	And if they enter and giving her more, well, they're probably going to take an L in the long run.
	What kind of value do you see that women aren't providing?
	What are they lacking in?
	Well, a lot of modern day women don't respect most men.
	A lot of them don't respect male authority.
	A lot of them think that men are below them.
	A lot of them think that they deserve the world simply by existing.
	A lot of them don't think that they need to cook or clean or adhere to certain traditional feminine roles.
	Basically, they can do whatever they want and their roles are malleable to whatever they want versus your roles are static as a man.
	But why should a woman have a traditional role?
	Why should she be home cleaning and doing all this bullshit that women in the past have been fucking miserable doing?
	Nowadays, there's more women doctors, AI, engineers.
	They're doing better jobs than men.
	They're getting lower suing, like they have less misthing.
	Yeah, but what's the cost of that?
	The cost of them is working and going to college and thinking, using their brain.
	But what is the cost of that, though?
	I was just trying to say, instead of sitting around and letting a man have his authority over her and tell her what to do and where she's going to be and how many kids she's going to have and how many people she should fuck and whatever else you're trying to say.
	You know, if all women deserve less, does it mean every woman or just a subset of women?
	Yeah, so what you just described is like women entering the workforce and like feminism.
	And I would argue that's a big problem with why we have the society that we have, right?
	We have marriages in the toilet.
	We have divorce rates, highest they've ever been.
	We have women on more SSRIs and anti-depressive medication ever before, despite the fact that they have more privileges and access than they've ever had before, most educated, but yet they're still unhappy.
	We have an epidemic of single mothers.
	We have a bunch of children that don't have a father.
	We have a bunch of kids that are running around being degenerates.
	We have school shooters all over the place.
	We have an enormous amount of crime.
	The economy is in the shitter.
	But that's the fault.
	That's not women's fault.
	No, what I am saying is a symptom of that, of the declining, a big component of that is due to feminism.
	Because feminism, explain.
	Let me go.
	No, no, no, no, no, no.
	You're not making sense.
	Feminism.
	They're not thrown out things and they're not making sense.
	So you're saying there's a high crime rate.
	You're saying that men are not being respected.
	And it's all because of feminism.
	Yes, because...
	Yeah, I'll explain.
	So when you look at the degradation of society, it's typically directly rooted to the destruction of the nuclear family.
	The nuclear family is the backbone of any thriving society.
	The thing that hurt and impeded, or some would even say killed the nuclear family in the West, especially the United States, was feminism.
	Because thanks to birth control and the rise of feminism and the rise of free love in the 1960s, what basically has happened is women have said, oh, I make my own money now.
	If I make my own money and I have my own status, well, I don't need a man anymore.
	And what's ended up happening is it went from— What's wrong with that?
	Well, that destroys the nuclear family.
	That's my point.
	But what's wrong with that?
	What's wrong with what?
	Destroying the nuclear family.
	Society's change.
	Things change.
	Women don't need to be sitting around being married to someone and answering someone and saying, hey, I can't have a high body count.
	They should be able to go fuck who they want, do whatever they want, and be happy.
	Okay, instead of sitting at home waiting for some guy.
	Let's just reverse things a minute, okay?
	Let's say that someone told you, you got to sit around and you got to be moral and any girl you want to fuck, you can't do it because women think that's wrong.
	And you will behave and do as you're told and live a miserable life.
	You say women are more on, what do you say, mentally ill drugs or whatever?
	That's because they're sick of their lives.
	They're sick of being told what to do.
	They want a career.
	They want to do it.
	No, no, no.
	They're not told what to do anymore is precisely my point.
	They have all the freedom, yet they're still on antidepressant medication.
	No, they have more freedoms now.
	They're just starting to get more freedoms.
	No, they've had them for a very long time.
	And they're still having higher suicide rates.
	They're on more antidepressants.
	Male Speaker 2.
	No, no, I'm saying women have higher suicide rates now than before is my point.
	Younger Gen Z and millennial women do have sex.
	So as things have gotten better for women, they've made more money, gotten more education, become contributing members of society.
	Everything has gotten better for them, yet they're less happy.
	Everything hasn't been better.
	They still judge this whole sleep around.
	They're still judges, pigs, and losers if they're women.
	I would argue they're not judged men.
	They're weaklings if a woman makes more than their judgment.
	They can't handle it.
	What'd you say?
	They're not judges horse.
	Oh, yeah.
	They are judged horse.
	If the person becomes a doctor, teacher, something that pays well, the men are automatically insecure.
	They fucking can't handle it, you know?
	No, the promiscuity is not, promiscuity is not shamed to the same level that it used to be.
	Now, going back to the whole thing.
	That's correct.
	So let me make sure I understand.
	So you don't think the destruction of the nuclear family is what led to society going and decaying?
	Wait, you're saying if a rock falls and breaks, did it break?
	You need to see what you're saying.
	What I'm saying is that my argument is the nuclear family is the backbone of a society.
	I don't believe the nuclear family is the backbone of the family.
	Okay, so that's where we disagree.
	I definitely disagree with that.
	Yeah, I think the nuclear family is the backbone of a society, a thriving society.
	Right, but if that's the case, let's imagine that you're right for three seconds, okay?
	What you're saying out here is women deserve less.
	So why would I want to be a part of a nuclear family where a woman deserves less?
	Where I'm putting in the same work or more, but I deserve less.
	You explain that to me.
	The point I'm trying to make is the reason why is because modern-day women are no longer traditional women.
	What does that mean?
	They fuck with people.
	Get more promiscuous.
	They're more rude.
	They don't have male authority.
	They fuck that.
	Wait, wait, wait.
	Why should they?
	Why shouldn't a woman sleep around if she wants?
	Why?
	There's a bunch of problems with that.
	Give me one.
	Women that sleep around tend to have more mental instability.
	They tend to have problems with pair bonding.
	They tend to be more miserable, sad, more likely to use alcohol, abuse, drugs.
	This is why women that are sex workers and porn stars almost always end up.
	Everyone goes through an immaturity stage, okay?
	People like to go off to college.
	They'd like to fuck.
	They'd like to have a good time.
	But at a certain point, they say, okay, I've had enough.
	I want someone who loves me and cares about me.
	Or I don't want anyone who loves me.
	Again, there's a lot of trauma in people's lives.
	25% of women have been sexually abused.
	There's a lot of problems out there.
	It isn't just the backbone of society, this marriage thing you keep talking about.
	And women are doing better than men and they're going to be pulling the strings.
	They're the ones that need to be neutral in AI, medical, the intelligence agencies.
	Let's not forget who got bin Laden.
	It was a female intelligence agent.
	Yeah, but who went and actually shot him?
	Who went out and shot him?
	U.S. Special Forces.
	But a woman told him why it was.
	And those were all men.
	But a woman told him why it was.
	And the thing is, that team that you mentioned, that you're talking about, that caught bin Laden, it was majority men.
	Yeah, there was a woman that headed it, but it was a majority of women.
	If it's the majority of men, but the woman figured it out, who's the smarter of the men?
	No, she was just the supervisor.
	Just the supervisor.
	She's a supervisor.
	There was a woman FBI agent who told Bill Clinton, they're going to crash planes into the buildings.
	And he laughed her off, and all the male agents laughed her off.
	Sorry, women are in intelligence agencies.
	Women are way more intelligent than men.
	And they're getting better in AI, which is the future.
	And they're getting better in medical, science, cancer research.
	Women are blowing men away.
	And they don't want to live in a traditional role where they come home.
	And you're saying down here that women deserve less.
	I'm going to ask you again.
	All women deserve less or just women who don't suck up to men.
	Which women deserve?
	Like I said before, I said it from the beginning.
	When I say women deserve less, I'm talking about from a relationship perspective.
	So I'm being skeptical from a relationship perspective.
	Most relationships.
	And then you went ahead and talked about the professional stuff.
	Look, I mean.
	No, I talked about sleeping around, professional stuff.
	Yes.
	Anti-depressed.
	I talked about it all.
	Yes, super.
	And I'm telling you that as women have become able to attend school and make money and get these careers, their depression and their sadness and their life happiness has gone down alongside that, is what I'm trying to explain to you.
	But that's a small percentage.
	And men's production.
	And men's depression has gone up too.
	But men have always been, because we have a burn of performance on us.
	Now women are starting to skip.
	Because men are weaker.
	No.
	Yeah, they commit suicide at a higher rate.
	They're more depressed.
	They can't handle shit.
	If a girl tells them to fuck off her cheats, build them like a bitch.
	Because men have a significantly harder life than women do.
	Men have a harder life than women.
	Absolutely, yes.
	25%.
	80% of all females have been sexually molested.
	It's like 8% for men.
	You're telling me that men have a harder life.
	Yes, absolutely.
	Yes.
	Okay, and give me three ways.
	Men absolutely, see here's the thing.
	At, you know, people, homeless people, drug addicts, people that are suffering, right?
	Depression, sadness.
	It's overwhelmingly men.
	And the reason why is because with men, there aren't the same social safety nets that are there for women.
	For women, they're able to Anyone that doesn't have a penny can get off the street right now.
	Camilla tells you that there's a lot of people today.
	And if there's more men, if there are more men on the street depressed, that means they're weaker.
	They can't go get help.
	Why can't they go social media?
	So what I'm saying is that men have significantly less social resources than women do.
	And here's the thing also.
	No, they don't.
	No, they don't.
	See, now we're just.
	Okay, give me one fact about that.
	move to the next person.
	We can't even have a discussion.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	You don't have facts.
	You're not saying women deserve that.
	That includes your mom?
	Does that include your sister?
	You're lying.
	That's the thing is that we can't even have an intellectual realization.
	I'm right.
	You're wrong.
	All right.
	No, you're right.
	And you're making a lot of people.
	Absolutely wrong.
	No, you made a fool of money.
	And all these little George Tate or Andrew Tate guys that think you're cool.
	These are all facts, right?
	He's a fucking child.
	He's a fact.
	He runs women.
	He's a piece of shit.
	These are facts.
	These are facts.
	What I'm saying is, like, we can't even have a discussion on facts because you're saying, oh, that's not true.
	If you can't even see that there are far more social programs for women than men, then we can't even have a discussion.
	I said that there's plenty of social programs for men and they don't take advantage of them because they're too macho.
	There are far more for women.
	Well, they're fucking pride.
	There's far more for women.
	And like I said before, men have live a significantly harder than women do because women are able to be a housewife if they want.
	They can enter the workforce.
	They have more ability to do what they want to do.
	They deserve less.
	Within the confinements of relationship, you must be skeptical, yes.
	Skeptical, you're saying they deserve less.
	Yeah, and then you're spending on women is what you're doing.
	Every woman that walks by, you deserve less.
	Look, man, if you want to be a social justice player, that's fantastic, but let's get to the next person.
	Okay, right.
	I know.
	You can't take what I'm saying anymore.
	No, because you're just virtue signaling at this point.
	I'm not virtue signaling.
	You are the one virtue signaling.
	You're virtue signaling at this point.
	You're the next person.
	You're virtue signaling at this point.
	And in the end, women are going to win.
	Okay, we'll bring on the next person.
	Thank you for your time.
	Thank you for your time.
	Who's up next?
	And that's progressive talk right there.
	The nuclear family is the backbone of any society.
	Can't even concede to that, then it is what it is.
	What's up?
	Yeah, hello.
	Nice to meet you.
	I'm Dominic.
	So I strongly disagree with your belief that America is going down based off feminists.
	Okay.
	I think America is going down for other reasons.
	I mean, happy wife, happy life.
	I mean.
	Yeah, it's more like happy king, happy king dumb.
	Because the reality is that men are supposed to lead, women are supposed to follow.
	And quite frankly, if the woman's in the leadership role, she's going to lead the relationship to the end.
	That's what it comes down to.
	Now, if you want to say, oh, yeah, men and women are equal and have this egalitarian mindset, that's fine.
	But simply put, women don't build society.
	Contrary to what people like that guy was saying, like women are entering science and technology and intelligence agencies.
	The reality is men still dominate these fields.
	What about corporate America?
	I know that women are rising in employment in terms of banking, investing.
	Sure, but I mean, women are, they are graduating college at a higher rate and they are entering these professional roles.
	But the reality is that the infrastructure that allows you to live a first world life is dominated and controlled by men mostly.
	So you actually believe that America is going down based off of feminists and women leading their relationships.
	Well, there's a multitude.
	It's not just feminism.
	There's a multitude of different reasons why the United States has been declining.
	Feminism is just one part of it.
	But there's multiple.
	I'm not saying that's the only one.
	So women shouldn't have rights.
	Women shouldn't have.
	I never said that.
	Well, I mean, what you're saying is that.
	I'm saying they're not equal to men.
	And the reality is they're just not at all.
	They're not equal to men?
	No, they're not.
	Like, in what way?
	I mean, I know physically they're not equal to men.
	We are inherently not equal Just top of what you just said right there.
	That proves my point.
	Really, in terms of what you say, knowledge and intelligence, you really think that women aren't equal?
	Well, in general, I mean, men tend to have higher IQs.
	Most geniuses are men.
	But at the same time, most idiots are also men and men of lower IQ.
	So we dominate both spectrums on the scale of excellence and media.
	But, you know, men, women are inherently different.
	I think this egalitarian mindset where women are equal is a big problem why we have the situation that we have.
	I'm just curious.
	And I would take it a step further.
	I would argue that women don't want you to think that they're equal.
	Women are not attracted to their equal.
	They're attracted to a superior.
	If we were to go on a college campus right now.
	I've done that before.
	Yeah, I've seen your videos, right?
	I think that I don't think women should have it less.
	I think right now they're, I believe in equality, right?
	But on, which is honestly on a scale, women are rising in certain fields, right?
	Let's just say not in the blue-collar workforce, but in the white-collar workforce, right?
	I mean, we could just look at the numbers and Bank of America.
	Yeah, like the useless jobs, if we're going to be honest.
	Useless jobs.
	They dominate the useless jobs.
	So you think banking, investing, engineering are useless jobs?
	That's the first thing.
	Engineering is dominated by men.
	I respect the plumbers, the power linemen, the electricians, the guys that control the sewage, the sanitation.
	I respect them far more than some woman in corporate.
	I respect the guys that do the light poles, all that stuff, because that's what keeps the country running.
	And this is absolutely dominated by men.
	Women don't do these types of jobs.
	Women want air-conditioned jobs where they can hang out and type on a computer.
	No, I believe that women don't want those types of jobs, but they do contribute a significant part of what you say America's economy.
	Sure, but they don't contribute to the same level that men do.
	All right.
	Well, agree, disagree, Woz.
	Great talking to you.
	Sure.
	No problem.
	Good discussion.
	All right.
	Who's up next?
	Nobody?
	Oh, man, people are getting...
	I guess people are terrified to come on up, man.
	I don't bite, man.
	I'll talk with liberals.
	It's no problem.
	You guys saw the guy before.
	Thank you, man.
	Appreciate that.
	So.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	I see you supporting on the side.
	Yeah.
	Nice to meet you, Alejandro.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Trying.
	What's up?
	So, man, I mean, I obviously believe that, like, I mean, everyone should be treated equally, but, like, obviously, I love learning other people's opinions.
	Like, I mean, for all the women out there, I mean, I'm on your side, but I'm just wondering, like, what do you think women deserve less of?
	Is it like in terms of jobs, like in terms of payment, or in terms of the household situation?
	Just curious.
	When I say that, I'm speaking from the perspective of a man getting in a relationship with a woman being highly skilled of her.
	Okay.
	So I think it's giving women less upfront in a relationship and less attention, time, and resources, and make them earn their keep.
	What was that?
	Could you say that last part again?
	They have to earn their keep.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	That makes sense.
	Yeah, I completely understand.
	I just wanted to ask questions as no one was coming.
	No problem.
	Thank you, man.
	No problem.
	All right.
	Who's up next?
	Oh, thank you very much.
	Appreciate that, man.
	Yeah, this is better than AFTARs, isn't it?
	All right.
	Who else is up?
	I see that there's some people in the back that are, I've seen some women pass by.
	You know, it's interesting, right?
	Because I'll set this table up and I'll say, look, you know, ladies, you're welcome to come in and debate me and tell me why you deserve more.
	But they never do.
	Or if they do come up, they can't articulate their points.
	Instead, they attack me and say, oh, you're gay, or who hurt you, or some other crap like that.
	Or, you know, be like the other guy and say the nuclear family is not the backbone of a society.
	You know, that's just, you know, liberal propaganda garbage.
	You know, obviously, when the nuclear family was at its strongest, this country was at its strongest.
	And as the nuclear family has receded, the country's been going down, right?
	And we're hoping that immigrants are going to come in and replace that.
	And that's just a problem because they don't come in and shitle identity.
	Who's up next?
	Don't worry, guys.
	I don't bite.
	You can come in, ask a question.
	Maybe if you agree, disagree, whatever it may be.
	Hey, what's up?
	How are you doing?
	How are you doing?
	How are you?
	Yeah, thank you.
	So it's not really to prove you wrong.
	I think just where we are in society, I think a two-person income takes you further in life than just one person having an income.
	Now, I do agree with a nuclear, you know, that being the relationships.
	Yeah, so with the two-person income thing, when I say that feminism is a direct cause of a lot of the problems, feminism is a big part of the reason why we need two incomes to survive nowadays.
	Because when women enter the workforce, they effectively doubled the workforce.
	When you double the workforce, the employers don't have to pay you the same wage, right?
	Because they're like, oh, we have double the employees.
	Like, we can go and just pay you less.
	And that has been a significant reason why, you know, inflation is through the roof.
	Women are entering the workforce.
	You need two incomes to make a living nowadays.
	And I think that's a consequence of feminism.
	I mean, it's a consequence of Lynx, too, I think.
	Sure, sure.
	But feminism was a significant concern.
	I tried to, since nobody coming up here, like I said, I really wasn't to prove you wrong.
	Sure.
	You know, my wife, I want to shout her out because she's a woman that we got two kids.
	She works her job and she also runs her own business while I run my own business.
	And she comes home and cooks and takes care of the family as the relationship that you're talking about.
	But it's not to hold women back as well.
	They could do both if they.
	Very rarely.
	Very rarely.
	Why is that?
	Why is that?
	Well, if women are in a position where they're contributing half, not all.
	I mean, clearly you got a wife that does something different.
	I mean, there's many of them, but I think I ought to cut you off, though.
	But again, not to even go back and forth with you.
	It's more of a that's the problem is that women need to know that they honestly are the shit.
	There's nothing better than women.
	If you don't agree with that statement, there's a problem.
	But again, I just want to say that they can't do both, but I'm saying that we've got to big up the women.
	They can't just.
	Just because they can doesn't mean they will.
	And I would argue.
	No, right, right.
	That's what I'm saying.
	So why is that?
	Why are they not doing what every woman could do?
	I mean, because a lot of women feel it insulting to go to day, you know, bring income in, and then have to go ahead and do a majority of the chores.
	Her man is also a half-time contributor.
	So that's kind of what it is.
	Now, are there so many people?
	There's weak men out here, too.
	And you've got a lot of women allowing weak men to influence their lifestyles and influence their life too.
	I don't understand.
	I don't understand.
	You understand weak men?
	No, I understand that, but what I'm saying is that I'm talking about the women.
	Most of them are not going to want to work a job and then come back and have traditional house duties.
	Like most women are not going to be okay with that.
	Correct.
	Because they got weak men.
	And that's what I'm saying.
	No, no, I'm saying I don't think they should work at all is my point.
	Well, that too, yeah.
	But if a woman wants to have her own goals, then why wouldn't she do it just because she doesn't have to, you know, since she still can do that?
	Now, and here's another big appeal for people.
	Women are not as ambitious as men think they are.
	Most of them are not that ambitious.
	Most of them, if they could, would prefer to stay home and take care of the family.
	But the problem is that they don't really figure this out until later on in life.
	They're sold the dream of go to school, get education, get a job.
	But at some point, they start to realize this was all a line of scams.
	So a lot of women are not as ambitious as men think they are.
	They're just not like us.
	They're not programmed like us.
	They don't have the same proclivity for conquering and success like us.
	This is why all revolutions were led by men and never women.
	Women follow, men lead.
	Like I said, I mean, those are all different arguments.
	Sure.
	A lot of truth to them.
	Yeah.
	I mean, look, you know, are there some women out there that are ambitious?
	Whatever they said to, just like anybody, you know, but the reality is the majority of women are not ambitious.
	Right, right.
	So you said it wasn't even to come up here.
	Yeah, no worries.
	No worries.
	Nobody's coming up here.
	So I'm not sure.
	No, all good.
	So at the end of the day, you know, every guy here, obviously, we love women.
	So, I mean, that should be the...
	I see.
	Let's formulate a line if people are terrified.
	Man, nobody.
	Oh, okay, go ahead.
	Yeah, thank you.
	Thank you.
	I appreciate that.
	What's up?
	How you doing, man?
	My name's Andreas.
	I just want to say I appreciate everything you're doing, bro.
	Bringing some real light into this culture.
	I'm a product of exactly what you're talking about.
	My mother and my father, we had a beautiful family.
	And my mom just came up, multi-millionaire in the lending industry, and made my dad actually, you know, before 9-11, he said, you know what?
	I'm making so much money.
	Why don't you just stay home?
	Why don't you just do all this stuff?
	Do some investment with real estate?
	He did.
	9/11 happened so he's like I don't want near New York she took the household made it what it was multi-millions What happened to 2008?
	It all crashed.
	Yeah.
	So she expected my dad to come back up to the level that she was at.
	It didn't happen.
	And this is in 2008.
	And this has been creeping on for 20 years.
	This is why somebody like you and me are speaking about this and making sure it's known because I feel like we live in a bubble where like OnlyFans is just rampant.
	Do we not like see what's going on?
	Am I the only one?
	Like in a society we accept this like it's like normal.
	I don't know what you think about that but I mean yeah I mean there's there's a whole bunch of different problems.
	I mean what you described did your mom end up divorcing your dad?
	Yeah they did 25 years and now she's with a really really well-off guy she said she didn't want to be alone no more.
	Yeah and you know that story acts more indicative of what typically goes on because another individual came up earlier and said oh well you know my dad put my mom through school and she made more money and now they're kind of splitting the bills and it's working out.
	But the reality is like that happens.
	That happens most of the time where if the woman ends up earning more than the guy, it's just a matter of time until the relationships can end.
	And I've said this before.
	Women get mad when I say this, but men will destroy their happiness for their family.
	Women will destroy their family for their happiness.
	And that's exactly what happened.
	So I'm a 30%.
	They initiate 80-90% of the divorces.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So actually, that's why I think it's really funny, the statistics of OnlyFans.
	The men that are watching are 90% Caucasian men who are married.
	Yeah.
	So like there's something going on and us opening up our apps like on Instagram, like seeing OnlyFans is it's so rampant.
	I don't know if you guys like understand what's happening, but there's going to be such a big documentary on this like 20 years from now about how we let prostitution be a legalized thing.
	Yeah, I mean the other thing too that's important for guys to realize is like you know a lot of guys are in sexless marriages that are married.
	Their wife doesn't respect them.
	She gets fat.
	She gets rude.
	She doesn't listen to them anymore.
	I completely agree.
	You know, it just doesn't marriage unfortunately no longer benefits men and that's a sad reality right I don't think guys should be getting married especially with the state involved in stage because quite frankly you have skin in the game a lot of the times so yeah but no I'm glad that someone else sees the sees the light here no man we we watching we support him bro just want to shout out all right thank you man all right man have a good one man appreciate it take it easy uh who's up next we got a lot of people here man we got like what like i can't even see i don't care what they say
	about OnlyFans, that shit makes the world turn round.
	Yo, people need Jesus, baby.
	We need Jesus out here, man.
	Keep doing your thing, bro.
	At the end of the day, man, Jesus doesn't matter what religion you're in.
	We all know the man did great things.
	Yeah, I think pornography is one of the worst things to ever come through modern society.
	I think it's one of the most destructive things that we've legalized.
	Alcohol, drugs, and pornography are literally gambling as well.
	But pornography is one of the most pernicious things in society that we currently allow.
	So shout out to DeSantis for banning it.
	Who's up next?
	Who's up next?
	Man, we got a lot of people here, man.
	People are terrified.
	This is great.
	I don't bite, man.
	See, I got a cute little dog.
	He doesn't even bark.
	He don't bite either.
	So...
	Anybody else?
	Why feminism is bad?
	Sure.
	I just got a question, really.
	Sure.
	So, you say women deserve less, right?
	Yes, I think men need to enter relationships with healthy skepticism.
	Okay, so my question for you, do you feel that your mom that brought you in this world deserves less?
	My mom deserves less?
	I'm asking you, do you feel your mom is a woman?
	She brought you in this world?
	When she first met my dad?
	No.
	Right now, do you feel your mom deserves less?
	Question!
	Answer it.
	Yeah, just get in line, man, and you can go ahead and get your thing.
	That's all my question is, though.
	Yeah, because here's the thing.
	I said at the beginning, it's healthy skepticism from the beginning.
	So my mom has been with my dad for 30-plus years.
	Are you talking about she deserves less now?
	Or back then?
	I don't...
	What's your...
	No, just...
	I just want some context to the question.
	Well, clearly now, no, because she's proven herself over all these years.
	But what I'm saying is going back to my...
	Because remember, you asked me, what do you mean by that?
	I defined it.
	Healthy skepticism from the beginning of the relationship.
	Then you went to me about my mom.
	My mom has been in the relationship for 30-plus years, so she's built a healthy amount of equity with my father.
	So clearly, she wouldn't need to deserve less because she's proven herself.
	So that's why there's a disconnect there with your question.
	Okay.
	you can come on the mic instead of just yelling from the side if you want.
	Oh, he doesn't want to be on camera.
	Okay.
	I got a simple question real quick.
	Sure.
	Do you fight with Donald Trump?
	Of course.
	Yeah.
	Who do you want the next president to be?
	Man.
	If you had an opinion of who.
	Well, we don't know who's going to run.
	I think J.D. Vance is probably going to make a run, or maybe Vivek.
	On the Democratic side, they're in shambles.
	I don't know who's going to run on that side.
	They're even talking about Stephen A. Smith running, which is ridiculous, but the Democratic Party is absolutely cooked.
	They've lost the young men.
	And yeah, I mean, I like Trump.
	I mean, obviously, some of his policies I disagree with.
	Like for his support for Israel, for example.
	I don't like that.
	The foreign policy could do some working, but what's your opinion on Diddy?
	Why wouldn't they show a video of him in court?
	So I was actually at the trial for a couple of weeks.
	All the witnesses have it went through.
	So there is quite a bit of evidence, but there are some things there that make me question the witnesses, too.
	You think he's fucked, or you think he's going to get through it?
	When the feds come for you, it's not a good time.
	And then, you know, it's obviously Southern District of New York, very good prosecutor's office.
	You know, they have a lot of witnesses.
	They're still not through.
	The trial is going to go into July.
	So, you know, I'm just going to wait until we have all the evidence and go from there.
	But right now, I would say that his defense team has been doing a decent job of cross-examining witnesses.
	Of course.
	Hell yeah, bro.
	That's all I had to ask.
	No worries.
	No worries.
	Cool.
	We could diversify lit.
	We could talk politics and feminism and Israel or foreign policy, whatever you guys want.
	Who's up next?
	How are you?
	What's good?
	What's going on with the Tates right now?
	I heard they're like back in trouble with the UK.
	I think right now they're in Romania.
	Obviously, it's bullshit.
	Look, I know Andrew and Tristan very well.
	These guys don't need to human traffic or grape women at all.
	It's preposterous.
	So, oh, you disagree?
	They don't need to human traffic people.
	No.
	They didn't get convicted of anything.
	You're wrong.
	What they get convicted of in what court?
	Oh, okay.
	What did they get convicted in when?
	I don't know.
	That's the problem.
	You don't know.
	They never got convicted of anything.
	They didn't get convicted of anything.
	I think you should take my spot.
	So, no, no, no.
	I just love it when hecklers talk from the side and they don't know what they're talking about and they're saying they got convicted.
	Like, the reality is, they got arrested, right?
	And they still haven't had a trial, and they haven't been convicted of anything.
	So, the real reason they're targeting them is because they have an enormous influence in a majority of young men.
	And when you tell the truth about certain topics, whether it's feminism, Israel, what's going on in the world, the corporations, they're going to try to silence you.
	Your ability to speak freely is 100% contingent upon your influence.
	I mean, I've dealt with the censorship.
	A lot of my good friends have been censored.
	Sneeko was just here.
	They censored him.
	Nick Fuent says they censor him.
	They censor Andrew Tate.
	So they only censor you when you tell the truth.
	They don't censor you when you're saying a bunch of bullshit lies.
	Who do you like?
	John Jones or Tom Aspinall?
	Oh, I'm not a UFC guy, man.
	So I'm sorry.
	Yeah.
	I don't watch sports.
	So anybody else?
	But yeah, to finish your question, bro, with the Tates, man, you know, like I said before, it's all lawfare.
	Lawfare.
	They did it with Trump.
	They did it with the Tates.
	It's just a common tactic whenever people end up having a lot of influence and they don't like what they got to say.
	You know?
	All right, thank you very much.
	No worries.
	Who else?
	Damn, man.
	The people are scared to get on the camera.
	God damn.
	We got like a bunch of people here.
	We got like 50, 60 people here, man.
	Yeah.
	All right, man.
	What?
	All right, hold on, give me a second.
	Guys, we could talk feminism.
	We can talk.
	Sure.
	Oh, is this the first lady?
	Okay.
	Welcome.
	Thank you for being brave.
	What do you mean by less?
	I mean, men need to enter relationships with women with healthy skepticism and assume they deserve less.
	But shouldn't that just be a standard regardless?
	Well, that's a good, that's actually a very good point.
	The problem is most men don't know that.
	But I think that goes for both parties, though.
	I mean, there should be a healthy level of skepticism, understanding that everybody has their everybody has a standard on what they would accept and what they don't.
	Yeah, the problem is that with women, that's kind of taught and reinforced and natural.
	With men, it's not.
	What?
	What is the skepticism?
	Yeah, men are taught to pedestalize women no matter what.
	They're taught to what?
	Men are taught to pedestalize women no matter what.
	Okay.
	Versus women typically don't need to be taught to be skeptical in the beginning of a relationship.
	Women are naturally skeptical because you guys are the more vulnerable sex.
	So you guys have to approach for many different ways.
	Okay.
	So you're saying that men have not been instilled in them to be more skeptical?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	So you think they have lower standards?
	Well, it's not that they have lower standards.
	Well, some might have lower standards for sure.
	Some might even understand that they should have standards and some might not necessarily vocalize their standards out of fear of being looked at as a misogynist or a sexist or some other pejorative term for being rational.
	So you think that operating within that system, there is that like innate fear of being judged because they don't have that skepticism?
	Or where do you think that comes from more so is my question?
	Because we live in a gynocentric society.
	So since we live in a gynocentric society, the female way of thinking typically prevails.
	The masculine way of thinking is looked at as demonic and evil.
	What do you mean demonic and evil?
	For example, I find it interesting that feminists always say that the patriarchy is evil, when in reality, the patriarchy is what allows them to be feminists in the first place.
	Do you think the patriarchy harms men?
	Hmm.
	I would argue the patriarchy is more beneficial to women than it is to men.
	How so?
	Because a minority of men run the patriarchy versus a majority don't.
	Don't they reinforce it though, the majority of it?
	Excuse me?
	So it's set by the minority of men, let's say, but then don't the majority reinforce it?
	So it creates this like big system, not just from one subset of people.
	That's why it's a system.
	Because if it was just like five people, how would that be ingrained within society?
	You would kind of need a large group of people to be echoing each other.
	I don't really understand.
	What I'm trying to say is that men, right, are not really allowed to put out their standards or their worldviews when it comes to women because it's considered taboo and misogynistic.
	But on the other hand, women are allowed to put out But in what way though?
	I mean, a man can say like, I'll give you an example.
	If I say women need to obey men, a lot of women would look at me and say, you're a misogynist.
	That's not true.
	That's evil.
	That's bad.
	That's wrong.
	But if I were to say, we need to champion women and treat them like queens, everyone would cheer.
	Just like the other guy was trying to simp earlier saying this stuff.
	So the reality is we can't be critical of women.
	I find it interesting that the word misogyny is widely used, but no one even knows what misandry means.
	Well, what do you mean we can't be critical of women?
	Wouldn't you say that both sexes are always being criticized for anything?
	Because I mean women are being held to the physical esteem of like their looks and have to be submissive.
	So they are being criticized because you're saying that.
	I would argue they're not taught to be submissive.
	If anything, they're made fun of for being submissive.
	One of the terms that you guys use to shame each other is calling each other's pick me.
	Right, because...
	Women are demonized for following a man's lead and...
	And so are men like simps, which are in essence the same essence.
	Like it's the same thing, just for different genders.
	Well, here's the difference.
	When women simp on men, the man respects that woman and cherishes that.
	When men simp on women, they don't reciprocate.
	Because the problem is that women get simped on their entire life and don't know what that means, so they don't appreciate it.
	On the other hand, as a man, we might not get our first kiss until we're 20.
	So when a woman simps on us, we actually appreciate it and treat her well.
	That's the difference.
	Women don't know how to behave when they get validation.
	What do you mean women don't know how to behave?
	You don't think they appreciate it?
	No, they don't at all.
	Well, what if they're not?
	And you can blame Instagram for that.
	But so what if it's unwarranted?
	I mean, how would you feel, switch the dynamic where someone is pursuing you, but you're just not interested, and this person is seen as a simp, but like, you just don't want it.
	Like, are you a bad person for not reciprocating that because you just didn't want that?
	Well, my argument is simply that women, right, have a privilege where they have a bunch of men approaching them, so they don't value male attention to the same that men value female attention.
	Right.
	That's a scarcity thing, but that's anything.
	No, not really.
	But if you get something of so little, the little you get is going to be valued.
	But this is like marketing.
	Okay, who has a better con?
	Let me ask you this then.
	If I took a self-made millionaire and I took a trust one baby, both of them earned a million, one earned their million at 18 years old and the other one earned their million at 38 years old.
	Sure.
	Who's going to have a better appreciation for the dollar?
	Who's going to understand the value of a dollar better?
	The trust some baby that got at 18 or the person that earned it at 38?
	But you from the outside can make that description, but you don't know what internally that person is.
	Can you please answer the question so I can kind of who will?
	I mean, I know you want me to say that it'll be the person that earned it, of course.
	Yes.
	Because we can agree on that, but again, we're not in those positions to say that.
	But no, but here's the thing: that's why it's perfectly analogous.
	The reason why is because men are self-made millionaires.
	Women are effectively trust fund babies.
	At 18 years old, a woman is able to maneuver and be around higher status men simply for existing.
	Men are not allowed to be around higher status men unless they perform to be in that position.
	So what I'm trying to say is that women are in a privileged position where all the attention comes to them and they pick.
	Men, we're not in that position.
	Okay.
	Well.
	My thing is just, I just want to ask you about this.
	I wasn't here to actually try to fight you on anything.
	No, but you know, great for you opening up the floor and discussion.
	Yeah, sure.
	No worries.
	Yeah, and just to kind of like explain that to everybody, when I make the point that, you know, women don't value validation is because they get it all the time.
	By the time a woman hits puberty, she's getting hit on by men all the time.
	The average woman by the time she's 21 years old has been approached like 70,000 times versus men, you might get approached by a girl 10, 20 times in your lifetime, if that, right?
	For the average guy at least.
	So typically, what I mean by this is women simply just don't appreciate male attention the same way that men appreciate female attention.
	We're far more likely to appreciate women doing right by us.
	Free pool shaisti.
	How you doing?
	Hey.
	You said that we could get into international talk, right?
	Sure.
	So I've listened to your talk about Israel and Zionism or not, but I want to take a different angle.
	Sure.
	You're Yemeni background, right?
	No, my family's from Sudan.
	From Sudan?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Question is: what do you think about the Houthis looking outside in and how they're affecting the war?
	Because I've listened to your stance on Israel.
	Yeah.
	And Zionism.
	Sure.
	So I think that's what I'm saying.
	So we don't need to get into that, but how they're acting in response to it, being a proxy of Iran and doing what they're doing and affecting world trade and XYZ.
	Do you agree or disagree with what's happening?
	Do I agree or disagree with what they're doing?
	Yeah.
	Well, I don't think it matters if I agree or disagree, but I understand.
	No, but I want to hear you have like an opinion on a lot of different matters.
	So what's your opinion on that?
	My thing is, my thing is, I simply understand why they're doing what they're doing, right?
	Do you?
	Yes.
	Okay, can you elaborate?
	On why they're doing what they're doing?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, well, they're trying to create an enormous amount of pressure on Israel economically.
	But it's not working, right?
	Well, it was working for a long time.
	That's why we had to intervene.
	It was working, yes.
	It's not working.
	When they were boarding the ships and they were sending the rockets in the world.
	Yeah, but you're bombing ships that are affecting trade.
	They weren't bombing ships.
	They're attacking ships.
	They're sending missiles to ships that are going through their ports.
	There are still ships.
	Yep.
	They were pirating ships and obviously affecting international trade.
	But that was creating quite a bit of problems for Israel financially.
	They were boarding ships that had financial visitors.
	It's for the world.
	I'm sorry?
	It's for the world.
	Of course, but it hurt Israel the most.
	That's why I had to shut down one of their ports, actually, as a matter of fact.
	It literally hurt.
	How did it hurt economically right now?
	No, you said any topic goes.
	You said Israel goes.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So how did it affect you?
	They're not doing well economically right now.
	Who's not?
	Israel.
	It's not because of the Houthis, it's because their workers had to go to reserve service and other things like that.
	So let me do.
	Tourism is down because people are scared to go there.
	For sure.
	So their economy is hurting.
	That is precisely why they're doing what they're doing.
	I'm not here to tell you that it's right or wrong.
	I'm just saying.
	I want to know what they're doing.
	Your opinion, though, because you have an opinion on a lot of things.
	This is a fact.
	You have an opinion on women, you have an opinion on a lot of things, right?
	So what's your opinion in there?
	Again, you have an opinion on Zionists, you have an opinion on Jews, you have to say that.
	You have a picture on the diplomatic country.
	Okay, so what's your opinion on the Houthis?
	Again, I just told you.
	Do you agree or disagree?
	I understand.
	Do you agree or disagree with what they're doing?
	I understand.
	Don't worry about it.
	I don't have a little bit of a disagree.
	That's really irrelevant.
	I understand.
	You understand.
	I understand, yes.
	Okay, we'll leave it at that.
	Thanks.
	Okay, do you actually have a position or you just wanted to get my on the matter?
	Yeah.
	I have a position, yeah.
	Yeah, what's your position then?
	I think if a group of people come into someone else's land and rape and torture and burn, they have a right to defend themselves.
	Okay.
	I also understand the other side.
	So killing 100,000 plus innocent people is defending yourself?
	Listen, when World War II happened, there was a lot of innocent deaths, also, so we can't really, really take that angle.
	I agree, there's innocent deaths.
	In war, there's innocent deaths.
	But the easy way, in my opinion, to end it, now that America's involved and you have the world looking at it, is to return the hostages first.
	And then you open dialect.
	Then you open dialect.
	Okay, do you think that's how you do it?
	That's my opinion.
	Okay, okay.
	So here's the thing.
	Number one, a war is fought between two capable militaries.
	Okay?
	Really?
	The IDF?
	Really?
	The IDF.
	The IDF is a military, a formalized military that is supported by us.
	All right.
	Okay.
	And they're coming up.
	Hamas is supported by Iran.
	They had like endless amount of rockets, endless amount of ammunition.
	And they're a ragtag militia.
	That can go in and one day and kill over a thousand people.
	That's a lot of death.
	Here's the thing.
	So let's talk facts, right?
	Sure.
	Because you're putting a lot of Israeli propaganda out there.
	No, no, I'm not speaking propaganda.
	Let's go.
	Let's talk about it.
	I just wanted your opinion on the Houthis.
	Let's go.
	Let's go through this.
	Sure.
	So, do you think Netanyahu actually wants the hostages back?
	Does he care?
	I think so, yeah.
	Okay.
	But there are political motives.
	I agree with you.
	Sure.
	Yeah, he wants the hostages back.
	Are you aware of the fact that on October 10th, a deal was put in place to get all the hostages back in return for them not invading Gaza?
	If you can't put the deal in front of me so we can look at it together, then it doesn't matter.
	No, no, no, it's irrelevant.
	See, here's the thing.
	Because there's been over 300 deals that have been put in front of both parties.
	I'm telling you, Honoraba, October 10th, this was reported by Israeli media, Horetz.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	And this is what a lot of Israelis don't know and Zionists don't know.
	There was a deal put.
	Yeah, okay.
	So a deal was put forward saying, hey, look, we will go ahead and give all the hostages back in exchange that you do not blow up and attack and invade Gaza.
	And what did Netanyahu do?
	He refused.
	Now, here's the other thing.
	Bro.
	You mentioned that they killed, what, 2,000?
	Or 1,300.
	No, this is true.
	Whatever is true.
	Whatever the Nana.
	You want to know how I know it's true?
	No, no, no.
	Here's the other thing, too.
	Here's a reason why.
	That's true.
	That comes from Israeli media.
	That comes from Israeli media, by the way.
	Your own country put it out.
	That comes from your own media.
	Now, here's the other thing as well that's interesting.
	Yeah.
	You said that thousands were killed, right?
	Correct.
	Okay.
	Are you aware that the Hannibal Directive was activated on that day?
	What's the Hannibal Directive?
	Sure.
	I'd be happy to explain.
	Sure.
	The Hannibal Directive is a directive where Israeli military basically kills their own civilians to ensure...
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	See, now they don't like the facts.
	They don't like the facts.
	Yeah, so pull it up.
	They don't like the flat up.
	Okay, pull it up.
	Hold on.
	I'll pull it up.
	Pull it up.
	I'll pull it up.
	Pull it up.
	Hold on a second.
	Documentation beats conversation.
	Pull it up.
	Anybody can say shit.
	Facts versus theory.
	Pull it up, yeah.
	Facts.
	Sit down.
	Have a.
	Listen.
	Sit down.
	Let's all sit down.
	Have documents, proven documents with information, and then you can discuss a debate.
	He says, she said, my great grandma said it's all opinions.
	Who speaks Hebrew here?
	Converted, chat GBT.
	You can translate it.
	No, no, no, no.
	I'm going to play it.
	It takes a millisecond.
	I'm going to play it in your language for you.
	I don't speak Hebrew.
	I don't understand Hebrew.
	Why is it my language?
	Just because I like Israel.
	It's not my language.
	I have a video right now.
	I'm American.
	I have a video right now.
	There's American hostages there.
	You're American.
	You're sitting here and you're okay.
	I'm not okay with it.
	It's crazy.
	So here's it.
	No, no.
	I never said I was okay with it.
	I'm saying.
	Should the hostages be released?
	Yes.
	Here's the thing.
	What's the difference?
	Should the hostages be released?
	Absolutely.
	Okay, so we agree.
	Finally, we can agree.
	No, no, no, but here's the problem, right?
	The issue is that Israelis simply don't value Palestinian life.
	Hold on, that's not.
	Hold on, hold on.
	Hold on, hold on.
	Because you guys don't.
	Because you guys have killed 100,000 plus.
	100,000 plus.
	There's Jewish Palestinians.
	We know 50,000 that have been identified.
	Then we know that there's a bunch in the rubble that are missing.
	That's not true.
	Now, here's the other thing as well.
	No, no, no.
	No army will go there and draw back leaflets saying, hey, let's go.
	We're about to come here.
	And they bombed it anyway.
	That's a bomb.
	And they bomb it anyway.
	Where anyway?
	Even if 100,000 people were killed.
	Hold on.
	Even if 100, let's go.
	We know.
	We have.
	Let's have a conversation.
	Literally data.
	And it's funny because they're all jumbling.
	Now they're going crazy.
	You can see.
	Shut it down.
	Shut it down.
	Shut down.
	So here's the thing.
	This is amazing.
	Let me finish my point.
	Let me finish my point, right?
	Because it's interesting that I mentioned the Hannibal Directive.
	Nobody knew what it was.
	What is it?
	Pull it up.
	I just explained it to you.
	Pull it up.
	Pull it up.
	It is.
	Pull it up.
	I have the video right here.
	Play it.
	Do you know who Joaf Galan is?
	Do you know who Yoav Golan is?
	Play it in English.
	Do you know who you have Golanis?
	Everyone here speaks English.
	Okay, but the problem is that the interview was done in Hebrew in Israel.
	So translated.
	Oh, I translated one.
	You want to look at the video?
	Perfect.
	Come look at it yourself.
	Come look at it yourself.
	What is the purpose of the video so we understand?
	So I understand what the video is about.
	So they interviewed him.
	See, this is a problem.
	You guys don't even know.
	You don't even know.
	You're here arguing a point that you don't even know.
	You don't know what the Hannibal directive is.
	I asked you.
	I asked you what it is.
	I just explained it.
	I'm telling you, it's when they kill their own civilians to evade them being captured by Palestinian militia groups to evade Haas's negotiations so that they don't have to release a thousand Palestinians who went Israeli like they did with Elad Lot.
	Now, with that said, Yuakalant, you're a defense minister, okay?
	You're guy that you're basically your secretary of defense, right?
	Equivalent.
	He admitted on an interview that the Hannibal Directive was activated on October 7th, and it should have been activated in other areas.
	That is why Apache helicopters killed a bunch of the concertgoers.
	That's why we know that they shot tanks into the kibbutz.
	They shot tank rounds.
	Okay, so here it says the Hannibal directive.
	The Hannibal Directive, also translated as Hannibal Procedure or Hannibal Protocol, is the name of a controversial procedure used by the IDF to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces.
	What's wrong with that?
	Who wants their soldiers captured?
	No, no, no.
	That's what it says here.
	They killed civilians as well, is my point.
	On October 7th, they killed civilians.
	They only killed soldiers.
	No, no, no.
	No, to prevent them.
	No, they killed civilians as well.
	And also, also to prevent soldiers from being captured.
	No, no, no.
	They killed civilians.
	And also keep in mind that there's mandatory military service in Israel.
	Yeah.
	So effectively, they shoot at anyone that's going to be captured.
	I got a question with now.
	Hannibal, Smannabal, just wait online.
	So anyway, why are you Palestinians and Arabs all fighting for a small piece of land?
	Let's stick to the Territories.
	The Arabs have so much land, brother.
	Let's stick to land.
	Let's stick to the conversation because first, right?
	First, you made the accusation saying, let him be on the mic.
	You guys got to control yourselves.
	One person on the mic at a time.
	So again, you made the claim that a bunch of hostages were kidnapped, which is true.
	And you made the claim that they just need to bring the hostage back.
	And I told you, said release the hostages.
	Yes, agree.
	They were willing to release the hostages, give them all back in return in exchange for them not invading Gaza and bombing Gaza.
	I don't believe that.
	I don't believe that.
	Hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Let me finish my point.
	Let me finish my point.
	Then that's fine.
	You can say what you want to say.
	No, but you.
	That's fine.
	Pull it up.
	So, anyway, with that said, pull it up.
	With that said, right?
	Great.
	Anyway, so with that said, right?
	The Hannibal Directive was activated on that day.
	And I told you the directive is.
	Who wants any of their soldiers to be captured?
	But the point is, the reason why I made it.
	There's going to be innocent lives on both sides.
	I'll tell you why.
	Because you made the argument saying they killed a thousand plus Israelis.
	And I'm saying, well, the IDF killed a lot of Israelis.
	I said they killed them.
	And on top of it.
	And then on top of that.
	Wait, wait, wait.
	I said they killed a thousand plus civilians.
	They weren't all Israelis.
	There was people from Thailand that were killed.
	Of course.
	Muslims that were killed.
	I understand.
	No, so I understand.
	Americans that were killed.
	I understand that.
	But the point is people were being killed.
	Indiscriminately.
	People were being killed by both the IDF and Hamas.
	Both of them.
	If you go look at waterfront labels.
	Both of them were being killed.
	They have five star hotels.
	That's not the argument.
	No one wants to look at that.
	That's not the argument.
	Once again, on October 6th.
	They were all chilling.
	This is great.
	On October 6th, they were all chilling, living their lives.
	There was no famine.
	Nothing on.
	Wait online.
	Yeah, get it?
	Wait online, buddy.
	Wait online.
	You're not a mic.
	Everything was fine.
	People had visas to go in and out of Israel to work.
	Things were fine.
	Yep.
	What happened?
	Yasser Arafat, when he died, left his wife with over a billion dollars.
	The leaders of Hamas, $12 billion, who are now killed, all of them.
	What happens?
	When there's war, they get richer.
	The people of Gaza get poorer.
	And then the Jews look bad on the world stage.
	That's all that happens.
	Okay, so here's the thing.
	Humanitarian goes to the top.
	See?
	And the civilians suffer.
	I agree.
	We were talking about October 7th, and you just completely agree.
	Yeah, because when you go and say a thousand Israelis got killed, that's not true.
	It was a thousand.
	Okay, let's say people got killed.
	Yeah, the point I'm trying to make is, bro, you're Muslim.
	But here's the thing.
	Are you Muslims?
	Are you Muslim?
	That's irrelevant to the conversation.
	That's irrelevant to the conversation.
	Muslims died.
	Yes.
	Christians died.
	Yes.
	And here's the thing.
	Here's the thing.
	That's why I'm critical of Israel.
	People died.
	Now with that said, should Hamas surrender?
	Yes or no?
	Here's the thing.
	Should Hamas surrender?
	No.
	Now, here's the thing.
	Because here's the thing.
	So you also agree that they're freedom fighters?
	No, no.
	Again, you are taking away.
	They're labeling the terrorist organization.
	Let me finish saying what I'm saying.
	They shouldn't surrender.
	Let me finish saying that.
	Let me finish what I'm saying.
	You should be ashamed of yourself.
	So you're just interrupting.
	Because you don't want to have a bad thing.
	You brought up.
	You brought up October 7th.
	They're terrorists.
	You brought up October 7th, and I was talking to you about October.
	You brought up the Houthis.
	No, you mentioned that.
	No, no, no, no.
	Because then you said, well, no, no, no, no, no.
	You brought it up.
	And then I'm just responding to my stance.
	Yes, and then you talk about October 7th.
	But here's the problem.
	You guys make it as if it started on October 7th and it never did.
	It started way before that.
	And the Zionist propaganda always goes off of October 7th.
	And on October 7th, in 1989, when we got it, it started before that.
	When we got into it, it started before that.
	It started before that.
	You guys were killing people.
	Israel was founded upon terrorism.
	There's killing.
	Israel was founded upon terrorism.
	Can you agree there's killing on both sides?
	Again, of course there is.
	Of course there is.
	But here's the difference.
	I value people.
	You don't know what you're talking about.
	Anyway, like I was saying, this guy, just name-calling, just name-calling.
	Anyway, the other guy over there, the old guy.
	So the point I'm trying to make is, I talked about October 7th, and I'm telling you that died on that day.
	We're not just killed by Hamas.
	Are we talking about this?
	You're talking about Native Americans.
	Look, bro, I'm telling you.
	You're talking about settlers.
	The Jewish people came.
	Yeah, settlements that are illegal.
	The Jewish people.
	Settlements that are illegal.
	They built Tel Aviv into what it is today, and all of a sudden they want it back.
	Like, bro, come on.
	Hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Hold on.
	Hold on, let me finish.
	Let me finish what I'm saying.
	The British mandate had a two-state solution, no?
	Are you talking about the Balfour Declaration?
	Yeah.
	No, after that, the British mandate had a two-state solution.
	There was going to be an Arab state, and there was going to be a Jewish state.
	Right after that, all the Arabs invaded.
	That's something that you don't like to talk about.
	Let's be honest.
	Well, it wasn't your land to have in the first place.
	It was Britain's land.
	It wasn't Ben Hu.
	Before that, it was the Turkish.
	It wasn't your land to have it in the first place.
	It wasn't your land to have in the first place.
	It wasn't your land to have in the first place.
	They chopped it up.
	Look at this guy.
	He's mad.
	Yeah, and you're pissed off.
	Look at you.
	You're triggered because you don't like the facts.
	They chopped it up.
	They chopped it up.
	Let's try to hide out here.
	They chopped it up.
	Meanwhile, you guys are being emotional.
	I'm not being emotional.
	No, no, I'm talking to this guy.
	Like I said before.
	There was a two-state solution.
	There was.
	It was given by England half to the Jewish state, half to an Arab state.
	Again.
	Immediately.
	Again.
	Right after the Holocaust.
	It wasn't theirs.
	Oh, he's bringing up the Holocaust.
	It was right after the Holocaust.
	We didn't have any sort of military institution behind us.
	Really?
	We had the Haganah the Irgun.
	It was nothing.
	It was underground.
	What are the Haganah and Ergun?
	Okay, listen.
	And the Leahy gang.
	What are they?
	They were fighting for a Jewish state.
	They're terrorist organizations.
	They're terrorist organizations, and you know it.
	was created by terrorist organizations.
	It was created because the British...
	It's crazy.
	You need to read your history.
	You killed the British.
	No, the British gave it over.
	And the British killed us, and Muslims killed the David.
	The King David Hotel?
	And the King David Hotel?
	You guys don't know your history.
	That's what I'm saying.
	You don't know my history.
	Some of these people.
	You don't know their history.
	They don't know their history.
	The Jews literally corrupted their own people.
	You killed the British.
	You can't trust them.
	No, no, no.
	This is live.
	This is live.
	You just got to go.
	You're a fucking clown, dude.
	Yeah, and this guy's angry, too.
	Look at the Zionist tears.
	They don't like the truth.
	They don't like the fact that your country was made on terrorism.
	They don't like the fact that you killed 100 innocent people.
	This is the truth.
	And the King David.
	You don't like the fact that your country, your country was created through terrorism.
	The very terrorism that you guys denounced today was created by Haganah, Leahy, and the Stern gang.
	And on top of that, you guys stole our weapons to do it.
	You stole our nuclear technology.
	You killed our president.
	You guys attacked our U.S. ship.
	It was given comical.
	Comical.
	Listen, listen.
	Comical.
	That's why JFK did not want nuclear proliferation.
	See?
	Okay.
	No.
	You guys.
	I understand you.
	You guys.
	Do you want to hear something?
	Here's the reality.
	This is what I love.
	This is what I love.
	Right?
	Zionists come here.
	Zionists come in here and argue with me and say, oh, well, you know, on this day, such and such happened.
	Okay, what's the animal directive?
	They don't know.
	They don't know that a bunch of Israelis and a bunch of innocent people were killed by a conversation.
	Then on top of that, they don't know how their country was made.
	Then they don't know that they, oh, well, the British, the British, you killed the British in the King David Hotel.
	You guys assassinated a bunch of British people.
	Then on top of that, the state of Israel dated through three main terrorist organizations that are now rebranded into the IDF that we know.
	No.
	Now, with that said, the UN.
	You don't know anything about it.
	No, I know about it.
	It's the Balfour Declaration.
	And it was read to the Rothschilds.
	You don't even know the name of it.
	Listen.
	1917, the Balfour Declaration, you don't know.
	And you didn't.
	Byron.
	What were you going to say?
	What are you going to say?
	You don't know what you're talking about.
	You're just sitting here.
	You don't know what you're talking about at all.
	Again, you Zionists don't understand your own history of your own country.
	We can argue about the past.
	You haven't done it.
	No.
	You're Israel first.
	And quite frankly, Israel is a parasitic country.
	It's a parasitic country.
	We should not become you guys aides anymore, aid anymore.
	You guys are making us look terrible.
	We give you billions of dollars of aid that you don't got to pay back.
	You guys will not exist without American aid.
	Perfect.
	Guys, quite frankly, we're built on terrorism, and it's an evil country.
	This is why we have to run cover for you guys.
	We have to run cover for you guys at the UN.
	The entire world condemns you.
	You guys are running illegal settlements.
	You guys are running illegal settlements.
	You kill innocent kids every day.
	Can I ask you a question?
	You kill innocent kids every single day.
	Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
	Actually, they went and did a study.
	Myron, Myron, wait, wait, wait.
	That was a real hey.
	You have like 200 seven of you to even formulate an argument.
	I'm gonna tell you what.
	Hand reading is real.
	Myron, Myron, Myron, listen, listen, listen.
	There is only one truth.
	Myron, there's only one truth.
	You're ready.
	Say it.
	All right.
	Listen, there's only one truth.
	No matter how much, you can hate the Jews.
	I don't hate the Jews.
	Hold on.
	See, I love that.
	Hold on.
	I'm going to finish my fucking sentence.
	I hate the Jews.
	You can't.
	You are.
	You can hate the Jews.
	You can like the Jews.
	You can hate Zionists.
	You can love Zionists.
	You can hate Israel.
	You can love Israel.
	At the end of the day, you'll not kill any Jews.
	You're not going to kill the ideology of Judaism.
	And you're not going to kill the Adiagi of Zion.
	Because guess what?
	Israel will stand in the future.
	Period.
	You can't fuck with that.
	That's it.
	That's the fucking truth.
	You cannot kill that.
	No matter what you do, no matter what you say, us Jews are going to prevail and stick together.
	And this guy wants to bring this up.
	You love the truth, though.
	That's fine.
	That's fine.
	You're not an American.
	They're not the same thing.
	They're not the same thing.
	And we will continue to see his life.
	Fuck Israel.
	Anyway, yo, can you Israel?
	All right.
	On the same topic.
	Let's go.
	You have 200.
	Let's go to the next person.
	Look.
	You have 200 people here, right?
	So here's the thing.
	You have 200 plus people here.
	Can you maybe go off script once and say something positive?
	What was I going to say?
	Can you maybe go off script once and say something positive that brings us together instead of name-calling and saying Zionists?
	Oh, you guys been doing a name calling.
	Jews that.
	All right, guys, chill for a second.
	You've had your platform, right?
	One time, can you say something positive about what?
	Zionism, Jews, Muslims, us as a people.
	Can you say something?
	Women deserve less.
	Can you say something positive?
	Israel is a parasitic state, and we need to stop supporting it.
	All right, bro.
	That's what we need to do.
	They're killing innocent people, and they're dragging our name in the mud alongside it.
	No more aid to Israel.
	Why don't you go to the bathroom?
	No more aid.
	If you love Hannah, no more aid.
	No, I'm saying we need to stop supporting Israel.
	That's what I'm saying.
	We need to stop giving you guys aid.
	Why should we stop supporting?
	Because you guys are dragging our name in the mud.
	Now, with that said, though, look, we got to move on.
	We got to move on.
	You guys, one thing to say: you said your name is Israel.
	Fantastic.
	Yo, go ahead.
	Yeah.
	I don't want our country being run by a bunch of Zionists that want to go ahead and continue a genocide on innocent people.
	You're an embarrassment.
	Okay, who's up next?
	Physical world shit is all bullshit.
	At the end of the day, this whole world is run by stars.
	Yo, yo, yo, we got to cut it.
	We got to cut it.
	Go.
	Next person.
	Next person.
	Spirituality.
	Listen.
	And the stream.
	At the end of the day, at the end of the day, we live in a spiritual world.
	We gotta switch the topic guys so we can keep the stream going.
	We gotta switch the topic so that we can, we gotta switch the topic, we gotta switch We got to switch the topic, guys.
	What?
	Look, I was telling y'all, you know what I mean?
	We got ease here.
	People are getting animated.
	We want peace, buddy.
	Sure.
	We will be.
	So you guys got to go.
	You guys got to go.
	What?
	You guys got to go.
	Like I said, we're running our stream.
	I don't know.
	You guys can stand there, but I'm saying, like, we're going to move on to topic.
	No, no, you can stay.
	I'm saying that we got to move the topic.
	We got to move the topic.
	I'm at Miami PD.
	Look, they're here.
	Yeah.
	Can we just like, we're going to switch topics.
	We're going to switch topics.
	We're going to switch topics.
	All right, we got to switch topics, guys.
	Got to switch topics.
	Got to switch topics.
	Cop is here.
	He's saying, switch topic.
	So let's move that.
	We got to switch topics.
	We got to switch topics.
	Yeah, we got to switch topics.
	We got to switch topics, guys.
	Sorry.
	Hey.
	If you're so fucking smart, what is the U.S. currency at the dollar right now?
	You got this?
	You got this?
	Yeah, it's crazy.
	Here.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	This is crazy.
	Listen, you're doing it in front of a fucking synagogue.
	That wasn't the smartest idea, no?
	Maybe go in front of a mosque, do it somewhere else, but in front of a synagogue?
	That's fucking crazy.
	On a fucking Friday night, that's the truth, regardless of where I am.
	That's wild.
	Truth is the truth.
	That's not gonna happen.
	Shut it down.
	And you know, this is crazy because shut it down.
	This is crazy.
	Look at this.
	This is crazy.
	Jews.
	Jews think they want the blog.
	This is awesome.
	This is crazy.
	I'm Israel.
	I'm not sure.
	You guys just make yourselves look worse.
	This doesn't help the cause at all.
	It just proves that you guys can't have discussion.
	This is like.
	Yeah, this is just proves my point.
	Yep.
	This is just.
	This proves the stereotypes.
	This proves the stereotypes.
	Man.
	This is crazy.
	See?
	Come in, start a problem.
	Can't even have a discussion.
	Proves all the stereotypes right.
	Well, here's the thing, right?
	You guys can't even have a civil discussion.
	You guys can't even not.
	You're yelling, being emotional.
	This is just proving my point even more so.
	I'm sitting here chilling.
	You guys are yelling and heckling.
	This is ridiculous.
	Can't even be adults.
	Can't even be adults.
	You got to yell and scream and act crazy and everything.
	And this guy's here now.
	I don't know what's going on.
	Like, you're just wild.
	Using slurs and all that other stuff.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, so this is very.
	Yeah.
	See, it's wild because now we can't.
	Look, he's saying, back your shit.
	Look at this.
	Did you say this is a public sidewalk?
	Who are you?
	Who are you?
	Freedom of speech.
	This America.
	This is America.
	Freedom of speech.
	America.
	If you don't like it, go back to Tel Aviv.
	That's why he got kicked out of 109 countries.
	So why you guys got kicked out of 109 countries?

▲