MyronGainesX - Feminist Psychologist Testifies And Exposes Red Pill Truths In Diddy Trial!

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 21, 2025 - MyronGainesX

02:24:16

Feminist Psychologist Testifies And Exposes Red Pill Truths In Diddy Trial!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Every single crime, every single lie, a really lie Every single hour, every single day, every single night, a really lie I know it's hard to believe it's the whole forest, not one tree And it's every branch and leaf, they're born to the sea But I'm telling you the truth It's not just one or two, it's every single Jew.
	They all hate you.
	And it really breaks my heart.
	But their lies are off the charts.
	And they only bring us far.
	You've got a dance mine.
	So if you want to be safe and don't want to get replaced, it's best you start being based every single time.
	Every single crime, every single lie.
	Early lie.
	Every single hour, every single day, every single night.
	I know it's hard to accept that all the ones you've met lie with every single breath.
	They want you dead.
	But you must not be weak.
	Just open your eyes and see.
	They always exploit the me.
	See their vampire tea.
	And it's to make you cry to learn.
	Your life is full of lies.
	And the face was a disguise.
	So if you want to live and protect all of your kin, you have to grow thick skin.
	Every single time, every single crime, every single one.
	Early life.
	Every single hour, every single day, every single night.
	I'll be right.
	Hopefully, it shouldn't be too much of a lag now, but I think we fixed the problem.
	I think we fixed the problem, chat.
	Are we on auto?
	Oh, I think the thing's muted.
	The mics?
	I'm not muted.
	Okay.
	Cool.
	All right.
	We're back.
	We're back, guys.
	Welcome.
	Welcome.
	Holy crap, man.
	This goddamn technology is fucking me up, man.
	You guys enjoy that song?
	Early life.
	You guys like that?
	I saw a couple of y'all were like, what the hell is this music?
	This shit is trash.
	And then y'all heard them lyrics and you guys knew what time it was.
	You guys knew every single time, man.
	So, so yeah.
	First thing I'm going to do is I want to introduce you guys to my man on the ones and twos.
	He's a very humble guy.
	Harvard grad.
	Chad.
	Hello, hello.
	Hello, once again.
	Anyone who missed it, this is like the third time we've done this, right?
	We got to do it for the people that are going to catch us on the replay.
	That's true.
	That's true.
	We got to do it for the replay, people.
	Yeah, so I'm Chad.
	Like I said, he said the other thing, but very important to know that I'm on the APA, American Psychiatric Association, and the American Psychological Association, member of both, which will come into play later.
	A member of a couple of caucuses on both.
	So we'll talk about that.
	Like I said, I'm here.
	It's like you're here for the perfect episode, bro.
	Yeah, yeah.
	It's great.
	Like, this is very important that we have you here because you're going to be talking quite a bit about the APA psychology, feminism, how it's come into the play, because it's very relevant to what we're going to talk about today.
	So I'm going to go through the testimony, guys, of what went down today, and then we're going to talk about the red pill stuff with the psychology of psychiatry stuff, which we didn't get to talk about before.
	But we should be good now with sound and audio.
	I don't think we're going to get any lag problems, guys.
	We switched it up.
	We're just streaming on one thing right now.
	We should still be live on, I think we're live on Rumble, Fresh to Fit, but not live on Fresh to Fit on YouTube.
	I don't think I'm live on Fresh of Fit YouTube, unfortunately.
	But it's okay.
	I'll just put a community post right now and tell them to come on over.
	So, well, we are live on Rumble for Fresh and Fit.
	So, let's see here.
	Yeah, I'll just do a community post for these guys.
	So, anyway, Chad, do you mind doing me a quick solid and kind of going through the testimony for the agent that I missed in the morning?
	And we're going to speed through the agent's testimony.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Take it away.
	So, basically, with that, dude, that was pretty cool.
	Special Agent Gannon from HECI Miami, guys, actually.
	My own stopping grounds.
	Yeah, Special Agent Gannon was a trip.
	Basically, what they tried to do, so they showed that they were the red heels from yesterday, the red heels.
	They used that to establish the fact that there were heels next to the Gucci bag, which had drug paraphernalia in it and drugs.
	They also zoomed in on, I didn't mention this earlier, they zoomed in on, or they tried to hone in on the fact that they're Balenciaga boots.
	The Valenciaga boots had three cell phones in them.
	We didn't really get any significance of the three cell phones.
	Maybe that'll come into play later.
	But they did that during the direct.
	And then the defense team, what they tried to do was establish some sort of tampering.
	So they tried to see if he, they tried to bring into question the validity of the photos that were taken, saying that, yeah, you had stuff here earlier.
	There was stuff here earlier.
	Like there were 12 boxes of shoes, let's say, and now there are none there, but there's no before picture.
	But the picture that we have from before shows that there were that many pair of shoes there.
	So what happened to that?
	Did you fix this evidence, tamper with this FMCO?
	Things like that.
	They didn't say those words exactly, not verbatim, but they were alluding to the fact that maybe the evidence was tampered with.
	A standard issue play.
	It didn't really seem like there was anything to it.
	They were just trying to throw something out there because they had to say something, it seemed like.
	And then they also talked about whether or not they kind of insinuated the fact that he may have kind of sort of had something to do with the gun serial limits being scratched off.
	Obviously, he didn't.
	We all know that.
	But they said that you could have swapped for DNA, that you could have dusted for fingerprints.
	Why didn't you do that?
	Why did you do that?
	Why'd you have to look for serial numbers?
	Like, you know, a little dumb nonsense.
	There is one thing that I forgot to mention, though, earlier.
	One of the biggest things they did talk about, and I should have said this earlier.
	They were saying how the guns and the gun and the ammunition that was found that were brought up, like the .45 caliber ammunition and 45 caliber weapon, they were saying that that was in the security corridor of the house.
	So, you know, a felon is not allowed to have firearms.
	However, a security team or a person that's not a felon is allowed to have firearms.
	And then the secure area of the house where the security would be stationed at would have the right to defend themselves, depending on the jurisdiction and location, stuff like that.
	So they tried to bring little things into play.
	Nothing really was shaking out.
	And then Gannon kind of just got off there.
	They're saying you're a little low.
	Maybe turn up your mic.
	Yeah.
	Let's see if I can turn this up a little bit.
	All right.
	Yeah.
	That should be, should that, is that?
	Is that better?
	Yeah.
	All right.
	That should be better.
	All right.
	So, yeah.
	So they tried to bring that into question.
	And then to finish it off, he said, the defense attorney said, do you have guns?
	He said, yeah, you know.
	And he tried to be funny with that, saying that he had guns.
	And I guess trying to show that everyone protects themselves down there because you're allowed to protect yourself with weapons down there.
	And, you know, they tried to leave it off like that.
	It's kind of, you know, it was loose testimony.
	It wasn't anything crazy.
	The psychiatrist is, the psychologist rather, was a lot more in-depth.
	Bam.
	And I also want to note, guys, thanks, bro.
	For some odd reason, I don't know why we're not up on Rumble.
	I don't know what's going on here.
	Because we check the boxes, right?
	So weird.
	I'm going to go to the next episode.
	All right.
	Well, huh?
	Yeah, yeah.
	He's using the Harvardverse.
	The other thing, also, guys, that's important to note with this guy.
	This guy's been on the job for five years.
	You know what I think, bro?
	All the agents that are on this case that have been assigned case agents or whatever, the guy out of New York that's running it, Sean Quinn, the agent Vinda out of New York that ran the search warrant in the hotel, and then the agent that ran out of Miami, Gannon, they all have five years.
	What I predict is all of them went to the same academy class.
	They probably knew each other, and they said, hey, I'm going to send this collateral to this guy because I know him.
	So they probably were all there at the academy at the same time, since they all pretty much have five years on.
	And the other thing I will say, guys, if an agent says they got five years on, a lot of the times, remember, about one to two years of that is going to be waiting to go to the academy and then the academy itself.
	So realistically, I would say they probably only have about three years of investigative experience.
	This guy was a U.S. Marshal before, but the thing is with U.S. Marshals, they don't execute search warrants and they're not affians.
	They don't really do investigations.
	So three most, guys, these three agencies right here are the three most overrated agencies, okay?
	So number one, Secret Service.
	People think Secret Service is cool.
	It's really not.
	You're guarding garbage cans.
	The protection details aren't as good as you think they are.
	You're not going to be protecting the president.
	And even if you do, that's going to suck.
	You're standing outside of a door eight, 10 hours.
	Great job if you're single.
	Great job if you want to make a lot of overtime because they make quite a bit of overtime.
	But you don't get to do investigations that much.
	They have a ridiculous attrition rate.
	They're the number one most divorced agency.
	So if you're married, being a Secret Service agent is only going to hurt your relationship more than likely and lead to you getting divorced.
	Okay.
	Next one.
	Can I get a side angle here, Judd?
	We've got multiple camera angles for you ninjas too, by the way.
	Right here.
	Yeah, no, it's not that.
	It's not that.
	It's not switching.
	It's not.
	The other one.
	No, it's not switching to the last one.
	Oh, there we go.
	Perfect.
	The other one that sucks, guys, is the Marshall Service.
	Now, a lot of people don't know this when it comes to the Marshals.
	The Marshals have three main jobs, okay?
	They got courtroom security, fugitive operations, and courtroom.
	Yeah, fugitive operations, quorum security, and winners protection.
	Winners protection, very few of them actually engage that because it doesn't come off and it's very hard to get winners protection.
	The courtroom security is what you're most likely going to do quite a bit.
	And then the fugitive stuff, typically that goes to the senior guys are the most productive guys, and it's on rotation.
	So if you're a newer guy, you'll probably get in there for six months.
	Then they rotate you back into courtroom security.
	And then winners protection, they almost never do that because it's so hard to get.
	So with the Marshalls, guys, not as sexy as you guys think it is.
	You guys, Chad, you want to say?
	No, no, no.
	Oh, okay, okay.
	And then the last agency is going to be DSS.
	This agency, a lot of people think it's great, but the reality is it's basically secret service, but abroad.
	And you're protecting, you know, the Secretary of State, of course, when he travels, but foreign dignitaries and all that other stuff.
	So not as fun of an agency as you think it would be.
	But I would say those are the three most overrated agencies by far.
	So what else here?
	Okay, let's get into our girls' testimony, right?
	We covered Gannon and we covered how they tried to beat him up on.
	Basically, they didn't do a good job of taking pictures of stuff in place, which again, I explained that before.
	A lot of the times you won't be able to take pictures of evidence in place because you moved it from a specific area so that you can actually actively search it with light, right?
	Let's say you pull a box out of a closet.
	You pull it out the closet, you open it up, and then you find gun parts in there.
	Well, it's going to be very weird for you to put that box back up there and then get on a fucking ladder and then take a picture of it in place.
	It doesn't make sense.
	So a lot of times you're going to move it somewhere and do your best to take a picture of it in place when you find it.
	That's what's important, when you find it.
	So, of course, the defense's job is to sit there and try to hurt your credibility or whatever.
	The other thing that I thought was interesting too, Chad, was he only had five years.
	Excuse me.
	He only did five search warrants.
	Yeah, yeah.
	That was a big thing.
	That's crazy, bro.
	And then he even got tripped off on that because when they said the five, she asked him, she was like, so you executed like five or whatever it may be.
	Yep.
	And then he was like, well, I kind of, well.
	Yeah, I think this is my fifth one.
	This is my fifth one, I think.
	He's been on the job like five years, he says.
	I'll say, let's say four.
	He's been on the job.
	I mean, granted, you know, when I was on the South House border, I was doing search warrants like fucking all the time.
	But, yeah, man, it just goes to, it's crazy to me that, like, I'm watching the trial, right?
	And I'm like, oh, God damn, you guys are fucking up.
	Like, you know what I mean?
	Like, bro, you know, like, I wanted to answer the questions for him on the stand.
	You know, when she's saying stupid shit, like, oh, you had a special response team go in there?
	Like, why'd they knock the gate down?
	They made a big stink about them knocking a gate down.
	Huge, huge stink.
	Because they went in and they crashed the gate and they destroyed it.
	Why do you need to do that?
	This is what I would have said.
	For tactical reasons, they need to get in extremely quickly and clear the house as fast as possible.
	Because whenever you're dealing with search warrants, you don't want to allow any potential suspects that are in the home to arm themselves, destroy evidence, or create other types of problems or barricade themselves worse yet.
	So that is why when they come in, they have to come in quickly, aggressively, and swiftly clear the home.
	That's how our SWAT team operates.
	That's what I would say.
	Like, it's very simple.
	It's from a tactical perspective.
	It has nothing to do with legality.
	It has nothing to do with evidence.
	They're going in and it's their house for that part of the raid.
	There's two parts.
	SRT comes in, they do the raid, they clear the house.
	Once they clear the house, they give possession of the home to us, and then we actually search it.
	That's what I would have said on the testimony, right?
	And I would have said, if you have a problem with the way that the SRT conducted the search, feel free to call one of them to testify, and they can explain to you tactically why they do what they do.
	Done.
	Done.
	You know what I mean?
	But, you know, he's over here like, uh, well, you know.
	It's very simple, man.
	It's like, this is tactics.
	This is tactical strategy.
	This is not legality, none of that stuff.
	They're going in quickly, and they're coming in from other ends.
	The defense also tried to say, why did they come in from a boat and from the front with the gate?
	Because they also didn't like how they came in on the dock.
	Did he has a dock at his house, guys?
	He's on the water.
	So I'm pretty sure it's probably CBP Office of Air and Marine, AMO.
	They probably came in through the boat side, and then SRT hit the front, and then they collapsed on the house from both sides.
	And that makes perfect sense to do that.
	And that's what I would have just been like, yo, they're running it from a tactical perspective to get in the home as quickly as possible, clear the home.
	And then we come in after the fact to search and actually collect evidence.
	They're not there to do anything from an investigative standpoint.
	They're there to make the house safe and clear for us so that we can come in and do our jobs.
	Boom.
	That's it.
	And if you have questions on tactics, feel free to subpoena one of them to come here and answer your questions.
	That's what I would have said.
	You know, sometimes you got to like, you know, tell these defense attorneys to fuck off.
	Because I've been cross-examined by them a million times.
	And I've talked to them.
	Their job is to try to make you look bad on the stand.
	That's their job.
	Or the other thing with the forensic fingerprint stuff, because they try to beat him up.
	Guys, so they found upper and lower receivers of the AR-15s in the house.
	And they were trying to beat him up like, hey, why didn't you fingerprint it or whatever?
	Right?
	Yep.
	Or like, because they try to say, so you didn't do fingerprint analysis, whatever.
	I would have answered like this.
	Well, that's not my expertise.
	I can give it to an agent to do fingerprint analysis, but it was found in his home.
	And no one else, to my knowledge, has access to that room except for him.
	It was in his bedroom.
	You know, we could do fingerprint analysis, but that's not my expertise.
	I'd have to submit it to a lab.
	So, you know, that's how you deal with these fucking idiots, man.
	But anyway, I get it, though.
	He just, you know, he's a newer agent, so it's probably the first time he's ever, it's probably one of the first times he's probably ever testified.
	Yeah, yeah.
	It was, it was, yeah.
	So, anyway, okay.
	So the main witness for today, guys, was a woman named Dawn Hughes.
	Okay, she's a psychiatrist slash psychologist.
	Do you have any other background on this chick besides, like, I don't know if you had, like, looked at her before the trial or after the trial?
	I looked at her a little bit after the trial.
	I mean, she's a psych, she's a psychologist.
	That's it.
	Just a psychologist.
	She's a board-certified psychologist.
	Can you explain that real quick to them?
	Because that is like her claim to fame.
	There's only 40 of them in New York City, which is why they called her.
	Yeah, yeah, because what is the difference between that and like another psychology?
	You don't have to become board-certified in order to become a psychologist.
	So board-certified means you went the actual step, and then you did some sort of something akin to residency for medical students.
	You did something akin to that to get this high level of certification, so to speak.
	So that's why she's lauded.
	She's trying to seem like she's lauded for that.
	I mean, it's a big deal, relatively speaking.
	But outside of that, no, she has a lot of accomplishments as far as papers submitted.
	However, the papers that she submit doesn't mean that the papers that she submit are substantial to the growth of the field of psychology.
	So they threw a lot of word salad out there, pretty much, to try and set some sort of validity to her, her person.
	Gotcha.
	Okay.
	Guys, I don't know why Rumble is not working.
	I don't know why.
	We're live on YouTube.
	And let me see if we're live on Fresh and Fit.
	I think we're live on Fresh and Fit Rumble as well right now.
	Let me see if it's...
	No, it's not.
	So it's not working on Fresh.
	It's only working on YouTube.
	Yeah, on YouTube it's working and it's not working anywhere else.
	Which is really fucking weird.
	Yeah, it's not working.
	Mm-hmm.
	Yeah, on X, we're live, right?
	X-Refine?
	So fucking weird, dude.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Locals, I think, were good, too.
	It is?
	How?
	We're using Rumble Studio.
	Rumble Studio.
	how's that happening when we got rumble studio going doesn't make sense bro So fucking weird, man.
	Yeah, this is a...
	I never said anything up like this.
	This is, you know, this is a new setup for me.
	Yeah, so I can touch anything.
	Yeah, YouTube's only working right now.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Nothing else is working.
	That's so fucking annoying.
	All right.
	Well, it is what it is.
	I'll tell the guys on Rumble to come on over.
	All right, we'll just keep.
	The show goes on.
	Sorry, guys.
	I don't know what it is, why it's acting like that.
	I'm literally using Rumble Studio, and it should be working, and it's not.
	You figured it out?
	Permissions?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Hold on.
	All right.
	Should I keep rocking or wait?
	Okay.
	Shout out to Chad in the back.
	All right.
	So the next witness, guys, that came after Special Agent Ganner from HSI was witness Dawn Hughes, aka Dr. Hughes, okay?
	Clinical and forensic psychology.
	She has a bachelor's from Hamilton, got her doctorate from Nova Southeastern, did her residency at Yale.
	Currently independently practicing in New York, she works two and a half days a week.
	She's also involved in Cornell as a voluntary perspective.
	She specializes in interpersonal violence and trauma.
	And she also went ahead and explained PTSD.
	She spent 30 years dealing with PTSD and thousands of victims, spent 20 minutes going over her qualifications alone.
	The USA did.
	So they spent a significant amount of time going over her background.
	She testified something called an SME, guys, aka subject matter expert.
	When you testify as a subject matter expert, you come in and you testify and you talk about certain things.
	Like, I'll give you an example.
	I've testified before as a subject matter expert for human smuggling.
	Explain what human smuggling is to the audience.
	You kind of explain what human smuggling is to the audience.
	Can you explain how I have the audience?
	It's kind of like a message.
	Remember how I gave my talk, guys, on human smuggling and how it's an illicit or illegal information that comes from it.
	All illegal typically comes from.
	That's basically what you are when you're a subject matter expert.
	That's basically what you are when you're a subject matter expert.
	So the AUSA, this is on direct examination for the government.
	So she says she doesn't have personal information on the case.
	She did not study the case.
	She's not aware of the case.
	So her role is to provide personal information.
	Blind testimony.
	And blind testimony, guys, is basically where her role is to provide blind testimony.
	And blind testimony, guys, is basically where you are providing information as an expert in a subject without understanding or knowing the facts of the case that you're testifying on.
	because you're supposed to come in as an objective expert and you provide the information.
	And then that allows the jury, the defense, and the prosecution to better understand the problem here.
	So in this case, we got a psychologist coming in and talking about domestic violence and trauma.
	That was what she specializes in.
	um i guess i'm not getting hit more than uh actually leaving the relationship um victims do is what she was saying.
	How can psychological abuse make people stay in relationships?
	Basically, what she was saying is it's a proverbial walking on eggshells feeling.
	And that's why they typically it's hard for them to leave the situation.
	It's dropping frames again even on Rumble Studio.
	God damn it.
	God damn it.
	What's the speed test?
	Wasn't that like 200 yards a second ago?
	Let's back up now, guys.
	Um, guys, this has nothing to do by the way, just so you guys know, this has nothing to do with Chad, man.
	Uh, this is like uh, this is just the internet thing.
	The internet's just fucking up.
	Yeah, I can't control the internet.
	Yeah, you can't control the internet, bro.
	One Wi-Fi, man.
	Yeah, no more dropped frames.
	I lagged for all of that?
	God damn it.
	Ah, yeah, this is the internet.
	I don't know what's going on with it.
	It's randomly dropping frames in and randomly.
	I'm gonna have to just pre-record it, bro.
	Yeah, that might be the move.
	What do you think?
	That might be uh, the pre-record might be the way to go.
	Yeah, yeah, guys.
	Yeah, the internet here sucks.
	The internet here sucks, bro.
	The internet sucks.
	Guys, this has nothing to do with Chad whatsoever.
	This is strictly an internet problem.
	This is strictly an internet problem.
	God damn it, man.
	auto jump?
	Could be the storm.
	It's so weird, bro.
	Thank you.
	What are these niggas hearing?
	I don't know.
	It's kind of like that phantom shit you heard earlier.
	I don't know.
	turn off the fan no it's not there's no audio guys i'm I'm just not talking because I'm so fucking pissed off that this shit isn't working.
	That's that's the fucking problem.
	Yeah, it's strange.
	It's strange.
	I'm thinking we pre-record this shit, bro.
	The delay seems by like a minute and a half.
	Minute and a half delay?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, it's cooked, man.
	Because it'll not drop frames, and it'll be cool for it'll be cool for a while, then it'll drop frames.
	Then it'll be cool for a long time, then it'll drop frames.
	Yeah, it's just not consistent enough, man.
	There's a yeah, there's a storm in Jersey, guys.
	You know why the Rumble stream probably won't start?
	Because it's so slow.
	Yeah, it is.
	That's probably what it is.
	All right.
	Fuck it, man.
	We'll end it and we'll pre-record this ship.
	God damn.
	All right, chat.
	We're going to pre-record this shit and drop it for y'all.
	Audio back now.
	It's good, bruh.
	Yeah, guys.
	This is Academic Studio.
	Internet's cooked, bro.
	I don't know what it is, man.
	Yeah, they're way behind.
	They're way behind.
	We don't have really bad here, bro.
	Should be.
	Yeah, you're synced now.
	They're on Wi-Fi.
	You should be synced now.
	Synced up?
	Well, what?
	Should be synced up.
	You're one black screen.
	Yep, and then you should be synced up right after that.
	Let's see here.
	Okay, guys, give me O slash there, chat if we're good.
	We're going to get into the testimony from the first person.
	Give me O slashes.
	If I see O slashes here pretty quickly, then I'll then keep going.
	And then what I'll do, bro, is I'm just going to cut that whole part out of the stream.
	And I'll repost this shit on other platforms.
	All right, I see O slashes.
	All right.
	Yeah, my boy, Evan said you're good.
	All right.
	All right, we're back.
	If it fucks up again, I'll just pre-record it.
	And then what I'll do is I'll edit this video after, and I'll chop out that bullshit.
	Okay, how long are we?
	We're about 34 minutes in right now.
	Okay.
	Yeah, chat.
	Sorry, man.
	Guys, there's a storm going on in New Jersey.
	You know, it's cold as hell.
	So I got my vest and my hoodie on.
	I was still freezing.
	So it's just absolutely wild.
	All right, let's go into this witness.
	Her name is Dawn Hughes, okay?
	Clinical and forensic psychology.
	Bachelor's from Hamilton.
	She went to Southeastern, Nova, did her residency at Yale.
	She is a volunteer over at Cornell, right?
	Volunteer at Cornell, yep.
	She has 30 years of experience.
	She's worked with thousands of victims, according to her.
	We spent about 30 minutes just going over her qualifications, guys.
	So obviously quite a bit of background.
	She doesn't have personal info on the case.
	She was not allowed to talk to any witnesses.
	Her role is to provide blind testimony as a subject matter expert, aka an SME, subject matter expert.
	And basically, she would talk about why people stay in domestic violence relationships despite the abuse.
	And the prosecution asked her, how much are you being paid to be here?
	$600 per hour and $6,000 just for the day, guys.
	You heard that right.
	$600 per hour, $6,000 for the day.
	And I think she was on the stand for roughly two hours.
	So what?
	She walked away with like $7,200 or something like that?
	It's a lot of money.
	A lot of money, you know.
	And as you guys are going to see, the defense came in later and definitely attacked her on that.
	So they asked her, is it common for victims to stay in abusive relationships?
	She said yes, and then...
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Also, you guys can thank Chad because Chad fixed everything for y'all.
	Also, she talked about what makes it harder for people to leave.
	Basically, number one, not just because they're just getting hit.
	Number two, they almost always love the abuser.
	And then number three, psychological consequences.
	And then she said that it's not just about getting beat.
	The abusers also have other tools that they use to keep the person from leaving in the abusive relationship.
	And then she says sexual abuse.
	So they asked her about, can sexual abuse keep them to stay?
	She said yes.
	It's one of the highest forms of PTSD.
	They get humiliated, shame, and they don't want to get outside help in the relationship because of the shame from sexual abuse.
	Then, basically, the partner gets their self-esteem lowered.
	That leads to depression, and then that prevents them from also coming forward and trying to get help.
	And then she also mentioned financial dependence.
	The tangible resources to leave make it harder to leave because you don't have the tangible resources to leave.
	And the person that's abusing you has those resources.
	And then she also mentioned trauma bonding.
	Someone basically needs a partner and they get a strong bond.
	It makes it harder to leave.
	She gave the analogy of a slot machine, right?
	You know, when you play on a slot machine, you lose often, but that one time you win, you get that really good high.
	That's the good parts that you have with your partner.
	And that's the analogy that she gave where it's like, it's almost like when you had this abuser boyfriend or partner or girlfriend.
	See, look, now I'm even going to buy it from my sister testimony.
	Basically, when you have this abuser partner, you're cranking that slot machine and you're hoping that you win.
	And if you win, it feels awesome.
	It's big.
	And you're honestly playing to, basically you're playing to keep getting that high from there.
	And that's what ends up happening with these people.
	I'm talking about, by the way, the dopaminergic release.
	That's what she basically was alluding to the fact that your dopamine, your receptor is good.
	They like that feeling.
	So it's going to keep you coming back for that feeling because you get the high of rush.
	Similar to people with ADHD, you take a lot of risk.
	Something similar to that.
	Gambling.
	Yep.
	And then she talked about love bombing.
	It's basically the honeymoon phase where the abuser showers them with gifts and praise and shows them a lot of love.
	And typically it's to keep them to stay.
	That's like the clinical, I guess.
	Yeah, they call that love bombing now.
	Yeah.
	Isn't that crazy, bro?
	And then coping mechanisms.
	She tried saying coping mechanisms are trying to talk to family and friends, trying to talk to your partner, counseling, and then fighting back.
	And she gave the different types of defense.
	There's active and passive self-defense.
	Passive self-defense is protecting oneself.
	You know, blocking punches, going in a fetal position, curling.
	Active defense is punching back, hitting back, yelling back, standing up for yourself.
	And she was saying how this typically hurts them more because in a female-male heterosexual relationship, the woman is weaker and the man might retaliate with more force, which might end up hurting her.
	Which is crazy because, you know, what's really crazy about that?
	Yeah.
	It's only coming from the female perspective.
	Yes.
	So she made sure to make that only outlined it from the female perspective.
	She was like, well, you know, the males are going to be stronger.
	But you didn't designate or specify whether or not we were talking about a male or female.
	So you have now an inherent bias.
	I called that earlier and when she did it, I was like, hit that shit on her nose, man.
	Yep.
	And then she gave avoidance where people avoiding the person.
	Then she talked about minimization, which is like, oh, it's not that bad that he punched me in the face.
	He only does this once a week.
	So minimization is something that she talked about.
	People also have.
	Disassociation where you don't feel like you're there.
	Something bad is happening to you and you might focus on something else to stay away from those negative thoughts.
	And also drug use happens with that as well.
	You've heard the phrase, oh, it's like my soul left my body when the abuse was happening.
	That's kind of what this association is, and it makes it harder to remember things.
	And then they said, how common is it for victims to discuss abuse as happening?
	Oh, okay, like delayed, how long does it take typically for them to finally come out?
	She said days, months, or years.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Delayed abuse.
	And then she talked about victim cases, first disclosure.
	On the first disclosure, when they meet with a psychologist, well, I guess in this case, it'd be a psychiatrist, right?
	Yeah, a psychologist.
	Yeah, okay.
	Or a therapist or whatever.
	She said that they never tell the full story the first time.
	They piecemeal it.
	Like, you have to have multiple meetings to get the full story.
	Let's see here.
	And then impact of trauma on memory.
	She said trauma impacts memory.
	Neurobiology of stress makes it harder to remember, but whatever is associated with significance gets remembered.
	She gave the example of like maybe if someone's abusing you and you remember the perpetrators always has alcohol in his breath, right?
	Or you're looking at the drapes and something bad is happening to you and you're focusing on that to kind of take away from what you're dealing with.
	That's what the victim a lot of the times will remember.
	And this is common a lot of times.
	Like if a woman's like assaulted, like she'll remember like, oh, he smelled really bad.
	Right.
	So she was mentioning that.
	And then abuse, if it's frequent, they can't recall all of it, and the events start to blend together.
	So if they're frequently getting abused, they can't remember all of it because it starts to almost come all together like one thing.
	So cross-examination comes in now, right?
	This is the funny part.
	So cross-examination comes in.
	And before I get into this cross-examination thing, let me make sure that everything is good.
	Chat, give me O slashes.
	Is everything good now?
	Is it all good now, chat?
	Give me O slash in the chat if it's good.
	And also like the video, guys.
	We're over here fucking third time trying now.
	Man, I'm so pissed, dude.
	I can't wait to get back to Miami, man.
	Makes me appreciate my setup so much more, dude.
	Yeah, your setup is nuts.
	Yeah, man.
	I'm over here shooting at 4K.
	Now I'm down here streaming at 720.
	I can't even fucking...
	Bruh.
	I appreciate my setup so much more, man.
	Okay.
	And I'm definitely going to edit this video after and clean up some shit.
	Okay.
	Anyway, so now the defense comes in on cross-examination, okay?
	So she's been practicing since 1997.
	So she's been 30 years in here.
	Bro, the attorney was hilarious.
	He said, so you were practicing psychology since the 20th century.
	Yeah, yo, when he said that, I was bugged out.
	Because everyone started laughing.
	Yeah.
	Because when he said that, he was like, because she was like, I don't want to date myself.
	And he was like, well, yeah, you know, you've been practicing for quite some time.
	I can go for it.
	I'd say the 20th century.
	And then he had to.
	Yo, when he said that she's been practicing since the 20th century, I was like, what the fuck, bro?
	And then he withdrew it, which made it even worse because he withdrew it on some passive aggressive shit.
	He was like, nah, I don't.
	Because they were like objecting.
	He was like, yeah, I was drunk.
	I was drunk.
	That shit was funny.
	That was funny, bro.
	That was actually funny.
	Okay.
	So he asked her, hey, when you interview these people, you clearly pay attention to detail.
	And she said, yeah.
	And they said, well, you can't diagnose someone without talking to them, right?
	And she was like, yes.
	And they said, so you do clinical and forensic work.
	She said, yes.
	For the forensic, people might have certain motivations to, you know, talk to you when it comes to forensic, when it comes to forensic psychology.
	And she said, yes, and she agreed.
	You have something, Chad?
	No, I was agreeing with you.
	Okay.
	And then people might have certain motivations since it's legal.
	So she has to do a bit more of be skeptical, right?
	So when she's talking to people normally, right, it's not that big a deal.
	She's trying to help them and talk to them, hear their stories out, whatever.
	But when it's forensic, well, now they might have motivations to lie.
	And this is where the term malingering came in.
	You want to define the malingering?
	Basically, malingering is someone falsifying emotions or feelings in order to get a result or during psychological evaluation or something like that.
	So they'll say like they'll falsify a feeling or an emotion they're having so you empathize with them and get on their levels.
	That's essentially what it is, like a breakdown, surface of a breakdown.
	So, and they were saying that malingering is far more common when the forensic psychology is being done, right?
	Right, right, yeah.
	Let's see here, what else?
	And then there's a built-in validity scale.
	So she was saying that she has a built-in, or there is a built-in validity scale with some of these tests that they employ to avoid the malingering, right?
	Because I'll give you guys an example.
	When someone's being assessed for are they insane enough to stand trial, what they'll do is they'll pretend to be insane so they can be found, you know, innocent, they'll be found insane as a self-defense, and then they'll go to prison for life.
	So that's an example where people might, you know, practice some malingering so they can avoid consequences of their crimes.
	So then they brought up that she did a webinar in 2015.
	And this webinar in 2015 was of much contest.
	They actually had a couple of sidebars on it.
	And guys, the sidebar is basically where all the attorneys meet on the side with the judge to discuss it.
	The defense wanted to bring in her entire webinar in as evidence.
	The judge didn't want to do it.
	The prosecution obviously objected to this.
	And the judge said, well, look, we won't bring the whole thing in, but you can ask her questions about it.
	And, you know, if needed, then you can show parts of it as needed to the jury.
	So she had this webinar that she did in 2015 with another woman where they taught people how to testify in court.
	Okay.
	So the angle they started to show here is like, yo, you're just a professional testifier for the government.
	Right?
	And they asked her, where does a majority of her come?
	They said, well, a majority of your income comes from testifying as an expert witness, doesn't it?
	And she said, no, that's not true.
	And they're like, well, really?
	What percentage comes from it?
	Then she was like, 60%.
	And they're like, well, that would mean it's the majority.
	You know, 60 is higher than 50.
	And she's like, okay, blah, blah.
	So that was kind of funny when they caught her there.
	So, and remember guys how I told you guys that she only works about two and a half days a week?
	Bam.
	So she only sees patients for two and a half days a week.
	But the other days of the week, what is she doing?
	She's testifying as a legal expert.
	And she gets paid quite a bit of money, bro.
	Quite a bit.
	What do you think she makes off testifying, bro?
	Or testifying?
	Yeah.
	Oh, man.
	I think when you did it, probably about.
	There was some on camera.
	Maybe.
	Just off testifying.
	Not seeing patients.
	It's got to be at least 200 grand a year.
	You think 200 grand a year?
	At minimum.
	At minimum.
	At minimum, yeah.
	Shit.
	That's all she's doing is testifying.
	I mean, she's charging $6,000 a day.
	said it's her rate is commensurate with the current going rates at the time so if you adjust for the fluctuation in rates over the past couple years where they were and she said she hasn't changed her rate in a few years in a few years In a few years, that's what I was going to say.
	So yeah, that's at least $200,000 a year.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Damn.
	Just off testifying.
	Just off testifying, right?
	Or even offering help, which you'll get into, offering help to the prosecution or the defense and then testifying lightly even.
	Oh, okay.
	So thank you for bringing that up.
	So the next thing they beat her up on, guys, and I'll tell you guys this.
	This was a really good cross-examination.
	The prosecution had to call for sidebar, what, three times?
	I think they called for sidebar three times.
	It was three times.
	So once the fence started cross-examining her, they called for sidebar three times, chat.
	So basically they said, hey, they cornered her on 60% of her income comes from testifying as a witness.
	And then they said, back in the 20th century, she wrote books and articles.
	They made fun of her again on that.
	She hasn't done, she hasn't written an article in 25 years.
	So she doesn't do scholarly articles anymore.
	And she does mostly testifying.
	Can you talk about a bit about that on the scholarly articles and why that's important in the psychology world or psychiatry world?
	Yeah.
	So you need scholarly articles to not only contribute to the world of psychology or psychiatry, but in this case, let's just focus on psychology.
	But you have to do articles in order to show your competency level, so to speak.
	And some people do continuum education courses and things like that, but to show competency and for certain certain accomplishments, achievements, and for certain, like board certification and things like that.
	So she was contributing scholarly articles.
	Here's the thing, though.
	Some people submit articles just because they have to submit them.
	Some people submit articles because they're required.
	Some people submit.
	And she did a lot when she was doing her PhD.
	She did it a lot for her PhD.
	Some people do it to change the world, though.
	So they tried to frame it as she was a world changer, but she was really just submitting these because she had to do it pre-dissertation and post-dissertation.
	Yeah.
	To get her to get her doctorate.
	Let's see here.
	And then they retained, she's been retained hundreds of times as a subject matter expert.
	So the defense was asking her, how many times have you been retained as an SME?
	She said hundreds of times.
	And then this was the fucking, this was like a death shot.
	They said, you've never come in to testify on the behalf of men.
	And then she responded, I don't speak on offenders.
	Bro, that shit had me weak.
	Bro, did they call a sidebar after that one?
	No, it got quiet.
	Remember?
	Oh, yes.
	Yes.
	It got quiet.
	Nobody said anything for like two minutes.
	I thought it was a damn near sidebar.
	Our side?
	Yeah.
	And in the courtroom, on the defense, everyone, quiet.
	Yep.
	Security guards, quiet.
	I'm going to say that again for y'all.
	So this lawyer that cross-examined her did a really good job.
	He goes, in all the times that you, because she said, I've been retained hundreds of times and I've testified hundreds of times.
	And he said, is it not true in all the times that you came and testified that you've never come to testify on the behalf of a man or a male defendant?
	And she said, I don't speak on offenders.
	Bro, mic drop moment.
	Yeah.
	Because when she was giving her testimony, chat, also something else.
	Can you talk about that real quick, Chad, about how she always referred everything from the dynamic?
	She referred to all the victims as she when she was speaking.
	Even when she was testifying, it's like she subconsciously kept saying she, she, she as the victim.
	Yeah, I actually wrote that in my notes.
	I was speaking to Myron about it as we were sitting down before we even got to this point.
	She only referred to the victims as she or the people that could possibly be affected by abuse as she.
	So anyway, and she would be scared and she would have to get into fetal position and she would guard herself some punches and she would feel compelled to fight back.
	But there was this one time where she really messed up doing that.
	And what she did was she said, like, one of the things that a woman in distress would have to do would be to, well, you know, she would have to stop from her laptop being taken away, which.
	Oh, and then they immediately objected to that.
	Right.
	Because it came with the financial, the tangible, the Economic abuse because she talked about economic and financial abuse.
	And she said the reason why people don't leave or women don't leave is because when they get economically or financially abused, they get their laptops taken away or whatever.
	And when she said that, the defense objected, obviously, because in this case, they made the allegation that Diddy took her laptops away and shit like that.
	Or he took her things away.
	But it's interesting because the iPad and the laptops and everything else like that, who did it come from?
	It came from Cassie.
	All the freak off videos came from Cassie.
	So, but anyway, the defense objected to that.
	So then they went over, then they said that you went over questions and answers with the government six times.
	So for her trial prep, guys, the government met with her six times.
	And then some of the meetings were after the trial started.
	Okay?
	So they had her come in and be prepped after the trial started and they met with her six times.
	Now, here is the key point, chat.
	She was supposed to not know the facts of the case.
	So the defense was like, if you're only coming in here to testify as a subject matter expert, right?
	And you're not going to be privy to the case or to the victims or the circumstances.
	You're coming in as a blind witness.
	Why the fuck did the government meet with you six times?
	Which is a good question.
	That is a good question.
	I mean, what do you think, Chad?
	Like, why the fuck would you come in six times?
	So, from what I thought...
	And let's take our side here.
	Let's play devil's advocates.
	Let's do that.
	Why the fuck would she come six times to meet with the government on this?
	Oh, another thing, before you answer this, the other thing.
	Some of the meetings were after the trial started, six to eight meetings with the lawyers.
	He asked that.
	And then they said, did you help them write them there?
	Did you help them write their briefs?
	That's when the objection?
	We need a sidebar.
	The AUSA said that because that kind of put them in a bad spot.
	Because first he says, okay, you're coming in as a blind witness.
	You don't know any of the facts and circumstances on the case.
	You're just coming in to testify on domestic violence.
	Cool.
	And you're being paid to do so.
	Cool.
	Why did you meet with the government six to eight times?
	Right?
	If you're coming in only to testify as a subject matter expert, that doesn't make sense.
	Then they said, did you help them write their briefs?
	And then the AUSAs were like, whoa, what the fuck is going on here?
	And then they said the government made drafts of the subject matter of her testimony.
	But again, the meeting in six to eight times, and then they made the accusation or they insinuated with their line of questioning that this woman, Dr. Hughes, helped the AUSAs with writing the briefs.
	And the other thing also that they got her on was because she said that she comes in and she educates the AUSAs on the subject matter.
	So that's why they said, well, did you help them write their briefs since you are coming in to educate them on the subject matter?
	So she almost put herself in a corner by doing this.
	And can you explain to them real quick what a brief is and the other stuff that you want to say from before going?
	Yeah, well, one of the things I wanted to say was really funny because he said, so you needed to come six to eight times to educate them.
	Like that shit was funny.
	The attorney was kind of roasting her.
	But yeah, so she was basically what we found out was that she was helping prep their attack, their strategy.
	And she was giving them psychological, psychological tricks, profiles.
	This is what they're insinuating and terms so that when they have someone on the stand, a witness on the stand, they can use certain terminology to askew your view and to make it kind of fall in line and fall in empathy, or the jurors fall in line and fall in empathy with the case as far as the court of public opinion.
	But this isn't like a televised case.
	The point is that she was doing this so that she could sway the opinions of the jurors.
	And they're really going for tugging the heartstrings, invoking a sense of shock, a sense of fear, and like extreme empathetic response.
	And so that's, but she was doing this ahead of time and after the trial started, which means the defense announced what they were trying to do, what they were trying to establish, and she had time thereafter to then craft even more psychological tricks and more psychological railways and help the government figure out a way to make these witnesses,
	well, to make Diddy look worse and to make these witnesses answer their line of questioning in a way that satisfied their needs.
	And let me tell you guys why this is especially pernicious.
	So I told you guys this before, but a lot of you guys might be new reviewers.
	On the first day, there was opening statements, guys.
	Opening statements is when each side presents their case, right?
	They give you a quick summary of what their evidence is going to be, what their intention is.
	When the government came out, they said, did he use his power, influence, coercion, violence, etc., to run an empire and, you know, be able to do it with little impunity.
	And he was able to do it basically unchecked.
	And he had his people working for him helping him do this, right?
	And he's a monster.
	Cool.
	Then the defense came in and said, look, the government is taking a domestic violence case and trying to make it a sex trafficking case.
	We're not condoning domestic violence, but what we are saying is that this is domestic violence.
	This is not a RICO sex trafficking case that the government's trying to spin up.
	This is a relationship between two toxic individuals in a toxic relationship that were beating on each other and abusing each other.
	That's what the defense said.
	So I find it interesting that after both parties gave their opening statements, then the government has this witness, and they met with them after opening statements, and they knew what the defense was going to do, that now this witness is coming in with the domestic violence angle.
	That's why the defense was going after her.
	Like, hold on one second.
	So you bring this witness in who's a domestic violence expert, and she's conveniently talking about the things that the government's star witness is being attacked on.
	What's everyone attacking Cassie on?
	Hey, why did she just leave?
	Why didn't she just leave?
	Like, she was with Diddy for 10 years.
	She had the ability and the resources to leave.
	Why didn't she leave?
	And then, and that's a valid question.
	A lot of people were asking that.
	So then they bring this psychiatrist in or psychologist.
	And what does she say?
	Oh, well, there's all these reasons why people might not leave.
	So the defense caught her in that.
	They said you met with the government six to eight times.
	You gave them certain terms.
	Did you help them write their briefs too?
	So what they're able to do was insinuate that this woman, this expert, had a bit more of a invasive role in this trial as a subject matter expert.
	That's what they were able to insinuate.
	And I think they did a good job of it because the government had to object multiple times and call sidebars.
	They called sidebars three times during cross on this guys.
	So they had them on the ropes for sure.
	Yeah, that was actually, to your point, that was really interesting because the way they called the sidebars was dramatic, too.
	Objection.
	Yes.
	Sidebar.
	We need a sidebar.
	He asked a tough question.
	He made a good point.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Whenever he made a good point, they immediately sidebar her.
	It's heavy.
	And they also said they made a point.
	Look, you're not getting paid by the National Institute of Science because she said, I'm here as a scientist.
	I'm here to, you know, get, I'm here to testify as an expert.
	Provide scientific facts.
	And I'm here off of science, right?
	My experience comes from science.
	And they said, well, who are you being paid by?
	You're being paid by the Department of Justice.
	You're not being paid by the Institute of Science.
	The prosecutors who work for the Department of Justice are the ones that are paying you.
	And I think they did a really good job of hurting your credibility a bit.
	Remember, it's remember Johnny Depp, Amber Heard.
	Yeah.
	She tried the same thing.
	Johnny and I think, I don't, I believe they threw her testimony out, but with the.
	But didn't the psychiatrist actually help Johnny?
	No, the psychologist was for Amber Heard.
	Same exact song and dance.
	Okay.
	Same exact thing.
	Oh, yeah, you know, abuse.
	But didn't Johnny get his own psychologist too?
	He did, to refute.
	Okay.
	And that's what the defense said today.
	That's what they said they wanted.
	They were in preparation.
	She used on the stand today, the psychiatrist.
	Yeah.
	She used on the stand today that she was helping the government prepare.
	Because remember, she got tripped up in that line of questioning.
	She said she was, eventually she said they were going to refute with another psychologist.
	So I was helping to prepare for what he was going to rebut with.
	Okay.
	So she tried to use that, but it was too late in the game by the time that happened.
	Yeah, the defense should have got a psychologist.
	Because here's the thing, bro.
	It's so subjective.
	It is.
	It's subjective.
	And yeah.
	So then the government went ahead and redirected, right?
	So after they had the defense did a fantastic job of hurting her, her making money, her meeting with the government six to eight times, even though she's supposed to be someone who's a blind witness, the fact that they use certain terminology in their briefs that is in the psychiatry world.
	And then they met after the trial began, and they met after opening statements were made where the defense had stated their position that this is a domestic violence case.
	Then all of a sudden she's talking about domestic violence.
	So I think they did a really good job of kind of like illustrating this story where we have this psychiatrist in here that might be suggestive, that might be biased, okay, that might not like men, okay?
	Then the government redirected and they said, okay, everything that you submitted was relevant to your testimony, not facts of the case.
	The meetings were about educating the government.
	She can only testify in what's related.
	The presentation 10 years ago.
	She hasn't done it since.
	Now, presentations are for psychologists and doing forensic analyzation in trauma cases and sexual assault.
	That's what she does now.
	That's all of her presentations.
	She goes to all the psychology conferences in the United States.
	Board-certified forensic psychology is hard to get 40 in the United States.
	Or sorry, 40.
	There's only 40 of them in New York City.
	Did we already define board-certified?
	Yeah, we already defined board-certified story.
	But on the good stream or on the fucked-up stream, on the good stream.
	Okay, okay.
	But what I should mention is that we did speak about the when I showed you my credentials, and I was showing you how I also attended the meeting.
	Yes.
	I also have 30, you know, like 30 CMEs or whatever, like the same shishu's.
	I have a bunch of CMEs.
	Yeah.
	So do I. Can you tell them what a CME is?
	Yeah, so like the it's continuing continuing education credit, but it is the APA does sign off on it.
	And, you know, so it's legitimate.
	It is, it is, uh, it's basically by an accredited board mixed with the APA saying that you took this course or you studied this or you completed or contributed enough hours to satisfy a need for you know for whatever you're going for as far as it deal as far as it deals with uh psychology or psychiatry um and then there's that the annual meeting which is a meeting that everyone attends and that not everyone but a lot of people go to the annual meeting and at who the who's who of
	the mental health crowd is at these annual meetings.
	Although I will say it's infiltrated lately by only women, but that's something that he'll get into in a little bit.
	Hell, let's get into it now.
	Let's see here.
	Okay, oh, last thing before we get into it.
	So they asked her, have you been retained by any of the attorneys here?
	And she said yes.
	So the government thought that they had it, right?
	The government says, hey, have you ever been retained by any of the attorneys here?
	She says yes, one of the defense attorneys.
	So then the defense comes back on the stand and they say, who retained you?
	And she said, Brian Steele or Steele, right?
	And it was a case where a woman shot her husband five times in the head and Steele didn't consider her an expert and he didn't want to use her.
	So she wasn't actually retained.
	And I think it's probably because she has this very pro-female thing and she never did anything for the benefit of the guy.
	And it's interesting because she was, the defendant was a female.
	Yes, in that case.
	And he still didn't want to retain her.
	Yeah, he didn't want to retain her.
	So let's see here.
	Okay.
	So let's go ahead and go over.
	I think this is very, very important.
	So what this testimony basically proved, right?
	And I was listening to it.
	Basically, abuse is a very nebulous, opaque term that can be attributed to anything.
	Right?
	If you're in a relationship with a girl and she misbehaves or she does something you don't like and you withdraw attention or you withdraw money or you withdraw whatever, she can now consider that abuse.
	And they clinically look at it like that.
	That's where we are now, chat.
	Okay?
	It is so, it's subjective.
	And I mean, the Johnny Depp case kind of proved that what you were saying.
	So they bring one psychologist and they say, oh yeah, Amber, Johnny Depp is evil.
	And then they bring another one and she says, oh yeah, Amber Heard is evil.
	Right?
	She has BPD or whatever.
	So what you're, what I'm realizing is, is that the APA, psychiatrists and psychologists is being infiltrated by feminism.
	And when you infiltrate it with feminism, now we're talking about the feels before the reals.
	Now we're talking about, oh, well, now they can't get away from their abuser.
	You know, the honeymoon phase, love bombing, whatever.
	You know, and here's, to give you guys a double standard here, let's say I had a girl.
	Right?
	And my girl would tell me all the time that I'm a loser, right?
	And she would be abusing me.
	If I went and said, yo, my girl's abusing me, blah, blah, blah.
	Let's be honest here.
	People would laugh at me.
	What the fuck?
	Get the fuck out of here, bro.
	Just leave.
	You can leave.
	No one's holding a gun in your head.
	Leave.
	Right?
	But when it comes to women, not only do they have all the authority and all the privilege by being a woman because they're able to double dip and act like a man when they want, but at the same time be able to get the same privilege as a female, now they don't have to take responsibility for making poor mating decisions and getting with losers.
	They could go in and attribute to abuse instead of just finding another partner or finding whatever.
	And this is another example of what I mean when I say we have this society now where it's literally a gynocentric society, guys.
	Like, women don't take accountability for their actions, and now we are legislating them not being able to take accountability for their actions.
	And they can sit there and say, I'm being abused.
	Well, how about you just leave, right?
	This is why arranged marriages have been a thing for so goddamn long.
	Because when you leave women to their own devices, they pick terrible men.
	And then they pick these terrible men.
	They don't take accountability for it.
	And then they come back later on and say, oh, I was being abused.
	No, you should have left.
	Whose fault is it to stay in a bad relationship?
	Is it your fault or the abuser's fault?
	I think it's your fault.
	If I go on a date with a girl and she doesn't smash me or she uses me or whatever, and I say, this is financial abuse, everyone's going to laugh at me.
	They're going to literally, like, you took her on 10 dates and you didn't smash and you spent $10,000?
	You're a fucking idiot.
	Ha ha.
	Retard.
	No sympathy.
	But if a woman's in a relationship with a guy and he treats her poorly, oh my God, you're such a victim.
	Ridiculous, man.
	So this is an example of what I mean when I say feminism, guys, has now seeped into psychology and psychiatry.
	And it scares me because we're going to get into a feels before the real world very soon if we're not already in it.
	Take it away, man.
	I know you could talk about this a lot more.
	Can you define for them real quick the difference between psychiatry versus psychology and then how you, from your, just you being going to these board meetings and seeing everything that you've seen, how feminism has seeped into this world?
	Yeah.
	I mean, so pretty much what you're dealing with.
	So psychology does not require any residency or it doesn't require you to become a doctor and do a psychiatric residency.
	Psychiatric residency is required for you to become a psychiatrist.
	And generally speaking, psychiatrists give out, they're associated more.
	Those are the people you see that, oh, I went to the shrink and I got medication.
	That's a psychiatrist.
	That's what that's associated with.
	Psychologists hate to say like this is more of a, unless they are producing papers and producing changes that result in a shift in the way that things are perceived or they're participating in adjusting the DSM as it pertains to scientific phenomena and it changes in scientific phenomena.
	They're basically glorified therapists.
	I hate to say it like that.
	Psychologists are glorified therapists, basically.
	Psychologists.
	Hey guys, like the video.
	We're giving you a lot of sauce.
	I got someone here that's, you know, that's in this world just for you guys.
	This is like the perfect episode.
	Keep going, bro.
	Keep going.
	Yeah, of course.
	Yeah.
	So that's the difference.
	What's happened is we now have people who are able to become psychologists who have zero brain power, zero knowledge, zero actual interest.
	See, what happens is this.
	We used to have people who cared about science in the brain, namely men.
	I hate the saying like that, but that's what it was.
	So they wanted to drive life-changing things.
	They wanted to drive changes and they wanted to understand the brain.
	Now, I'm not taking it all the way back to Sigmund Freud.
	He was a psychopath.
	But, you know, after that, there were a good amount of people who had a good amount of experiments and contributions that tried to influence how psychology could affect the world.
	Now, it is a flawed science.
	I will say that.
	It's a flawed science because, like, as my boy Evan frequently brings up, that it can't be replicated, really.
	So it's hard to replicate psychological science.
	And things change way too much.
	There's fluctuation like depression.
	Depression one day is real, then depression the next day is not real.
	Depression, well, these pills are a placebo, but then these pills work.
	But now we have new studies and new verifiable studies that are coming out in alarming rates saying that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, basically antidepressants don't really work because they don't really do anything for your serotonin levels.
	It is absolute madness what this field has turned into.
	Now, it has turned into that.
	Real quick, before you tell them about the madness of this field, please give them your educational background and what it is.
	Because some of these people I can see in the chat, they're, like, wondering, like, who's this guy?
	What's his background?
	And I think that some of them missed it from the before.
	Just real quick, Chad, give them your educational background.
	Oh, yeah.
	I know you don't like to brag about it, but just real quick.
	Yeah, so I went to Harvard.
	I'll say that's great.
	I went there.
	But my background is in psychology and studying psychology, things like that.
	And I will say I did IT for most of my life.
	And then I got interested in psychology afterwards.
	But and I'm on the American Psychiatric Association, District 32, Massachusetts branch, the Massachusetts district of the APA.
	And I'm part of various caucuses, multiple caucuses.
	And I actually do.
	And what's a caucus?
	A caucus is it's almost like the division that she was talking about in the American Psychological Association.
	I got to have divisions, APA Division one, two and three.
	And the American Psychiatric Association, there are caucuses that you can join that are similar to those.
	Yeah, you bitch ass niggas in the chat.
	Yeah, he's a Harvard grad.
	Yeah, yeah.
	You think he's just here just yapping like there's a reason he's here, man.
	Sorry, bro.
	Keep going.
	Keep going.
	Even if it wasn't Harvard, I'm smarter than most of you niggas anyway.
	So the whole thing is so, yeah, that's that's my background.
	But yeah.
	You were talking about the caucuses.
	You're a member of the APA.
	Yeah.
	So you go to these meetings.
	I do go to these meetings.
	What is the breakdown there?
	So basically, when you go to men and women, you go.
	Well, nowadays, the breakdown is kind of crazy.
	You see a lot more women than you do men.
	Yeah.
	The APA meetings are.
	They're they're scheduled in such a way that there's a topic and every year you go.
	It's based around that topic.
	Yeah.
	So like I forgot it was last year, but let's just say it's the ethno cycle pharmacological influences on impoverished communities.
	Yeah.
	Some bullshit like that.
	Use some strong name like that.
	Basically, they go there and they verge a signal a lot and they go, hey, well, you know, black people need help and girls need help because they're getting beat a lot.
	And all these misogynists is Myron.
	There's this guy.
	My heard of Myron.
	Like, yeah, do shit like that.
	And then everyone sniffs.
	Or they'll or they'll take the victim narrative.
	Just so you all know, he's based on the race thing, by the way.
	This is not a DEI guy.
	He's a.
	Yeah.
	No, far.
	He's racist just like me.
	Yeah.
	I don't know if I should be saying that out loud.
	Yeah.
	No, I'm pretty racist.
	Yeah.
	Everyone knows.
	Yeah.
	We make fun of niggas, bro.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Basically all the time.
	So basically that's what's going on.
	And then after the ass sniffing and everything happens, you then you then get to actually meet people, some people who actually want to do the work and forward the science, some people who just want to hear themselves talk, some people who are just trying to get up, you know, politically and within the reins of the APA.
	But yeah, so it's essentially it's really heavily influenced by women.
	Now you have women who think that they're introduced, that they're interested in the field, but they're not really interested in the field.
	What they're interested in is it's like, oh my God, it's so cool.
	I get to learn my fucking emotions, like shit like that.
	And then they go there, they realize, oh shit, I don't really get to learn about my emotions.
	And then they end up being a therapist or they end up being a psychologist because it's too hard to be a psychiatrist because you have to do extra work.
	And by the time they graduate, they can.
	they can become a psychologist.
	You can become a forensic psychologist with minimal work.
	Like easy bachelor's.
	And then you don't have to even have your bachelor's in anything medical related.
	You can just take your master's in forensic psychology.
	And that's it.
	Then you can become a versus being a psychiatrist.
	You're actually a doctor.
	You're a medical doctor.
	You have to go through med school, pretty much.
	Yeah, you're an MD when you're a psychiatrist.
	It's pretty wicked.
	So the field has become infiltrated because it's like 13th grade.
	Kind of like nursing school.
	I hate to say it.
	Sorry, nurses, but being a nurse is like 13th grade for most women.
	It's the same thing with psychology.
	It's now become 13th grade and it's become heavily infiltrated by people who don't give a shit about it and who aren't intellectually sound enough to actually make any impact on the field.
	Now, how is this impacted?
	Because when she came in there, I just heard a bunch of feminist propaganda bullshit here, right?
	Where, you know, it's abuse this, abuse that.
	And, you know, it's interesting because these terms of abuse that she was utilizing in this trial, a man would never be able to use that shit, ever.
	We'll just get laughter.
	Like, what do you mean you can't leave?
	You're being economically abused.
	Get the fuck out of here.
	So how have you seen the trajectory of...
	...of the psychology world, even the psychiatry world, like become more and more...
	...feminist-centric and...
	you know, kind of, you know, appeal more to female emotion versus facts.
	Now it's appealing to female emotion because everything has to be about how the woman is feeling and how they can get empathy across.
	So, something going on over there?
	Uh-oh, hold on, hold on, hold on.
	We're getting a mosaic attack?
	Bro, bro, as soon as we start fucking cooking, what do they do?
	We get on this topic and the nigga, bro.
	It's back now?
	Thank you.
	All right.
	I'm checking YouTube right now, see if it's back.
	I'll cut this part out as well when I edit.
	That's about 116.
	Some niggas said this guy's not a hard regret.
	Okay, digger.
	Yeah, it'd be like that.
	People get upset all the time.
	There's nothing you can do about it.
	Let's see here.
	We might be back.
	Let me see here.
	Chat, give me O slashes if you guys can, if we're back.
	Give me O slashes if we're back, guys.
	Okay, so this is where we're at right now.
	Yeah, I see.
	It should be you on the screen.
	Yeah.
	I said the Mossad attack.
	They're there.
	They said you're back now.
	They had people saying you back.
	Okay.
	Yeah, that attack was wild.
	All right.
	God damn, man.
	As soon as we start cooking about this shit, bro.
	All right.
	So 34 minutes and 116.
	That's where I'll have to clean it up.
	All right.
	Go ahead, bro.
	All right.
	So you were on.
	You're talking about it being infiltrated, 13th grade.
	Shit.
	Yeah, I was talking about it being infiltrated.
	Basically, I was saying that women don't have.
	Oh, yeah, feels versus feelings.
	You're talking about feelings.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	So the reason the field is kind of Scarred and marred and torn to shit right now is because They're taking the most malleable of people and introducing them to the psych psychological fields.
	Okay.
	And because they're doing that, they're able to sway the opinion of other people, namely women, because women are easily persuaded, you know, with opinions and stuff like that.
	So like, let me clean this up.
	So they're taking women who come out from high school saying, hey, you should be a psychologist.
	It's a great job, whatever.
	Those women are extremely malleable when they come out because they want a job that's going to pay a lot and what they think is going to pay a lot, but they're going to be affecting lives.
	But they also need to get smarter.
	And they think because they're a psychologist or a therapist that they're going to understand men and be able to counter what men say, things of that nature.
	And then these women get into the field, but they don't actually care.
	Gotcha.
	Not only do they not actually care.
	They find out that the field is, it's kind of difficult, you know, depending on which road you want to take.
	Yeah.
	A lot of girls have an undergrad psychology degree, but very few of them actually go through and get the fucking full.
	The undergrad psychology degrees, like I said, that's why I call it 13th grade.
	I'm not trying to shit on them like that or anything, but you don't really need to do much to get it, and you don't have to be smart to get it.
	That's the thing.
	Facts.
	You know what I mean?
	So bimbos, I know they got psychology degrees.
	Yeah, and they don't know the first thing about it.
	They don't know the first thing about the brain.
	They don't know the first thing about human interaction.
	So it being oversaturated with women now, it was always heavily saturated by women.
	Let's just get that straight.
	It's always been more of a female field, but there was a lot of, how do you say, there was a lot of heavy male influence involved to keep it within bounds.
	Okay.
	But now the bounds are gone.
	So let me ask you this.
	Would you say that the explosion in depression medication, Xanax medications, SSRIs, all this stuff, all this crap that's exploded when it comes to prescriptions and usage over the past several decades?
	Would you attribute that to the explosion of females in the field misdiagnosing people and or going to or ADHD?
	I remember growing up as a kid, we just tell niggas they're stupid or they're retarded.
	Like, bro, well, you're just a dumbass.
	But now it's like everything has a label, ADHD, depression.
	You know, we need to give you some medication to keep you more calm.
	Like, would you say that, you know, this over prescription or this over-medication of people for mental ailments, is this a product of women entering the field?
	So I would say two things.
	I would say because of the hyperadjustment to it there, there was a hyper adjustment to having to have a fix for every issue that is mental.
	And then second, on top of that, big pharma understood that.
	They were able to see that and they capitalized on that and then reinforced that.
	So they shifted.
	So two different things going on.
	Two different things going on, but they're parallel in nature.
	Okay.
	So like pharma being greedy.
	Big pharma being greedy.
	And people trying to over-medicate and have a fix for every single psychological issue when some psychological issues.
	Most people don't go to a psychologist or a therapist.
	And, you know, often, I must say, there's often confusion about who to go to as well.
	Yeah.
	But most people don't go there because they feel like they're crazy.
	Most people go there because they have an issue and they can't figure out why they can't fix the issue.
	And the issue is almost always something that they've done, but they don't want to take accountability for it because once you take the accountability, then the change has to happen.
	And the change triggers something in your body.
	Well, it's literally in your brain.
	Your brain does not like change.
	So complacency because you can get the same dopaminergic effect from doing the same shitty thing over and over again.
	So kind of like what she said today, and I do agree with her.
	And obviously she's right about that.
	That's scientific.
	Like, for instance, if I keep hitting my head against the wall like a fucking idiot.
	Yeah.
	Right.
	And so if I keep hitting my head against the wall like a fucking idiot and then I stop doing it, if my brain says, like, listen, you got to hit your head on this fucking wall at least three times a day for me to feel normal.
	You know what I mean?
	I'm being extreme, but that's how extreme it can be.
	It can feel to people sometimes.
	So instead of changing that with cognitive behavioral therapy or therapy to change your cognitive response to things, they just started medicating.
	And then when women got involved heavily over the years, because remember birth control triggers a shitload.
	Mostly I would say like 80% of the shit that's like depression, all that stuff.
	Birth control is a big contributor to that.
	So then you get, so you got three things going on.
	You got the explosion of feminism.
	Right.
	The mass production and usage of birth control.
	Women becoming whores, which plays into it.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Being promiscuous.
	Then you got big pharma coming in and cashing in on this.
	And on top of that, you got women entering the workforce as psychiatrists slash also a psychologist.
	So it's almost like a five-part tri- I don't even want to say a five-what-headed dragon.
	Five-headed dragon almost, where it's like all these different things are kind of working together in tandem to create this problem now.
	Because I remember back in the day, bro, you would say, you know, oh, I went to the shrink and everyone would make fun of you.
	They call them shrinks.
	I don't think Gen Zeros even know what that means.
	Yeah, right.
	Calling them a shrink.
	Like, being on medication now, mental medication is completely socially acceptable, right?
	To be on Riddland, to be on ADHD medicine, to be on Riddland, what's the one that they used to focus?
	Adderall.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Right?
	Riddlin, Adderall, Xanax, any of this stuff.
	Completely socially acceptable now.
	It's socially acceptable.
	And on top of that, what makes it even worse is that they're saying that it's okay to take bentodiazepines and take amphetamines at the same time.
	So for instance, they're saying it's okay to take it super upper and a super down.
	Like, yeah, dude, this is my TikTok, man.
	I'm going to take you on my fucking Adderall journey, bro.
	I'm a pussy and I need Adderall to focus.
	And then like, when I focus too hard, it hurts my feelings.
	So I got to take Xanax to calm down.
	That's what they're doing.
	So it's like up and then down.
	So you're combining two medications that really, yeah, clinically people say you should combine them, but honestly, you shouldn't because that's how Marilyn Monroe died.
	Yeah.
	And, you know, you're 37, I'm 35.
	I remember if someone pulled out like, you know, a Ritalin bottle or said, I got to go take my meds, we'd laugh at them and be like, you're a fucking ready medication, you're a retailer, right?
	We'd roast them.
	We say, you're just dumb.
	Now, like these young guys, all of them are on medication, dude.
	It's like a flex to be like, yeah, I use Xanax.
	Or, oh, I got Adderall.
	I remember they were dealing Adderall on college campuses.
	I was like, what?
	That was a big thing because it made people feel like a superhuman.
	Yeah.
	Because obviously it does elicit response, right?
	Because it is helping you focus, depending on who you are, but it does help people hyper-focus and it does help them hone in on things.
	But it also gives you an amphetamine style thing where you just feel jittery all the time and you have a lot of energy.
	But yeah, like what you were saying, yeah, we used to say people, you know, you can fix things without taking medication, but people would rather not do the work anymore.
	Yeah.
	Because there is a, what they perceive as a quick fix until they realize if you don't have that quick fix pill, when you need it, then you hit withdrawal.
	Now you're an addict.
	So would you say, so that, and that was actually a good point that you made with birth control being so mainstream that it caused a lot of the problems that they're actually medicating for when it comes to the female side.
	So with women like infiltrated, because you're saying, what, 70, 30 now, pretty much?
	They control it.
	I mean, it's probably worse than that.
	I don't know the exact numbers, but I'd say it's worse than that.
	Like 80, 20?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	When it comes to both psychiatry and psychology?
	Both?
	Psychiatry may be a little bit better, but psychology is, I would say, dominated by women all the way.
	Dominated.
	Yeah, just dominated.
	Now, would you say then that does that play a significant role into this over-medication society that we have and this kind of this, I don't know, this very, you know, participation trophy type society we got going on?
	I would say, so from my opinion, right, this isn't a scientific opinion or like a clinical opinion, but yeah, from my opinion, I think it is.
	Because listen, you introduced birth control, right?
	And then you have women in the field and then you have women empathizing with women about the shit that women go through when the stuff that women are going through is caused by women taking shit that women take.
	You know what I mean?
	Like because of feminism.
	So it's like it's a revolving door.
	So yeah, it's definitely contributing to it.
	Is that kind of why you exited out of it and you're like, man, fuck this shit?
	Yeah, I talk about this all the time.
	Like I got out of this field quick as fuck.
	As quick as I possibly could when I realized that, number one, I'm not going to have a shot, right?
	Because I'm a black male.
	I'm going to be talking to people.
	They don't want to hear that number one.
	You know what I'm saying?
	In that field, I mean.
	It's not that it's racist.
	It's just like it's dominated by white women.
	So white women, they don't want me to be like, no, you're right.
	But wouldn't they consider you like an ally to them?
	No, no, no, no.
	They would say, I don't like this black guy talking to.
	They want to control me.
	That's how it works.
	So you would only be able to come in if you're on like some cuck shit.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Sensitive, into feelings.
	You know, and here's the thing.
	Like, I know your political view.
	You lean right.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	You know, you'd be far more likely to tell someone, stop being a bitch.
	Right.
	This is all rhetoric that they probably wouldn't accept.
	No, not at all.
	They hate me.
	You know, if some dude came in and was like, bro, I'm from the streets, man.
	I'm black.
	Like, come on, man.
	Like, I'm a product of my environment.
	You probably tell him, stop being a dumbass, stop sagging your pants.
	This is stuff that probably would get you in trouble.
	Oh, yeah, you would get in a bunch of trouble because I'd have to empathize with the person to understand.
	Well, see, I ask why.
	I understand like at a foundational level, you always want to ask why to understand the baseline of a situation.
	But with this, it's more like, but he shot someone.
	You need to understand why he shot five people and why he's in and out of jail.
	Empathize.
	How's he feeling about it?
	Don't just tell him to not go to jail anymore.
	Tell him how to fix it.
	Out of your fucking mind.
	That's what they would tell you.
	Stop shooting people.
	Yeah.
	That's literally what they would tell you.
	That's how it is now.
	And they also, and people can verify this.
	They changed the DSM.
	They changed certain meanings in the DSM.
	So like, tell them what the DSM is, please.
	That is so they know the diagnostic manual.
	That's the diagnostic manual for basically psychology and psychiatry.
	It's just basically the entire diagnostic manual.
	It's like the fucking cookbook of mental problems.
	Probably for them.
	It's like the Polkadots.
	Yeah, yeah, it's the Polkadots.
	It's literally the Polkadots of mental problems, right?
	Perfect example.
	Yeah.
	Exactly what it is.
	And in that manual, they actually changed the word.
	It used to be manic depressive, right?
	Now they changed that to bipolar.
	It used to be Asperger's.
	Now that's all grouped under autism.
	You know what I mean?
	So like, those are just light examples, but they've changed things in order to make it more palatable for this fem-centric generation.
	Gotcha.
	So, wow.
	I didn't even realize that.
	So they've like adjusted names and stuff so it's not as offensive.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And then you'll hear arguments, of course.
	Like you're going to hear arguments from plenty of female.
	I'm in psychology.
	You're going to hear all these arguments like, oh, we did it because.
	Who's in charge of like the definitions and stuff?
	Is it the psychology world or psychiatry world?
	So there's a bunch of contributions that come.
	Usually you're invited as well, but there's a bunch of contributions that come from a bunch of different places and then people review it.
	It's like a long, slightly arduous process, but a lot of the stuff is carried over from way back.
	You know what I mean?
	So not much changes every time.
	We're on the DSM-5, I believe, currently.
	The last time I was involved with the field was DSM-5, but everyone was basing their knowledge or their diagnostic knowledge off of the DSM-4 because the DSM-4 held less controversial opinions and changes.
	Okay.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So I was at the five, but now I was at the five and everyone was using the four.
	Because when the five came out, that's when all the, I guess you can call it DEI stuff started happening.
	Gotcha.
	So that's when it became more femme-centric and things like that.
	The DE5.
	So would you say that the DSM-5 was literally like the turning point?
	I think that was the, as far as the DSM, yeah, I would say that was the beginning of it.
	Okay.
	And then, you know, I haven't been around it.
	But what are they at now?
	It should be still on the five.
	They might be working on a six, but they should still be on a five.
	They don't release like every year.
	It's not like Madden, unfortunately.
	Gotcha.
	Yeah, it's like.
	Every couple years they release it, update a Polkadots.
	Yeah, people have to get together, decide on things, decide of certain definitions change.
	Who's in charge of that?
	Who runs that?
	There's a governing board.
	Okay.
	And then, you know.
	Is that board run by women?
	That I don't know anymore.
	I have no idea what's run by.
	Man, watching her testify made me really worried because, dude, we're getting into a place now where anything you do as a guy that your girl doesn't like can be deemed as abuse.
	I think that's where we're headed, dude.
	I genuinely believe, like, let's say your girl misbehaves, does some fuck shit.
	You stop talking to her for like a day or two.
	They could consider that isolation abuse.
	Or she talks shit to you, doesn't do what she's supposed to do.
	You don't give her, you don't give her money.
	Hey, you fucked up.
	You made a mistake.
	I'm not giving you money.
	It's financial abuse.
	What they play on is semantics and ambiguity.
	Yeah.
	So they use semantics to try to confuse you with words and word gymnastics, word seller, whatever.
	And then there's a significant amount of ambiguity.
	So you can't actually pinpoint what the crux of the situation actually was.
	So if it was, let's say, like you just gave an example, isolation abuse, right?
	Yeah.
	Like they would just, that's, that's not talking to her.
	Super ambiguous term.
	Yeah.
	So did he not talk to you?
	Did he not do?
	Okay.
	And then he put you in a corner, right?
	He put you in a closet and say, stay there.
	And if he did that, did he do it because he thought you were going to hurt yourself?
	Or are you not going to admit that?
	You know what I mean?
	So like.
	Good point.
	Yeah, right.
	So, dude, I don't know, man.
	Like, this is, this is some wild stuff because I could just see how this can really come back and fuck anybody up, dude.
	Because now it's getting to a point where anything you do to correct bad female behavior or give them consequences can now be deemed as abuse, man.
	That's where we're going.
	And I think as women continue to infiltrate and dominate both psychology and psychiatry.
	Well, I think look, toxic masculinity.
	There you go.
	Like I forgot about that.
	Like that's a whole thing that came from who brought that term out.
	That's from the female side of the psychology, psychiatry world.
	Toxic masculinity was a term coined by a man, actually.
	Okay.
	It was not even like a real deal psychologist or scientist.
	And then that's similar to emotional intelligence.
	Oh my God.
	I hate that term.
	Emotional intelligence is also coined by a man who was playing on the proclivity of women to fall in line with tribalistic nature.
	So like if you say his emotional intelligence.
	Oh, yeah.
	So like his emotional intelligence is bad, right?
	It's his fault because he's not emotionally intelligent enough.
	He's not emotionally intelligent.
	All right.
	And you know what's interesting?
	Women almost always use that fucking term on men only.
	You never see them use it on each other.
	They're not going to use it on each other because they're not emotionally intelligent.
	By their own standards, they wouldn't be considered emotionally intelligent.
	And none of them can ever define it.
	I don't even, to this day, I still don't know what the fuck that word means.
	It's not a real definition.
	It's not a clinical word.
	It's made up.
	I think I could swear on everything, it was either in the newspaper or a magazine.
	This dude made it up and it just caught.
	I think someone can verify that.
	But I think it was in a magazine or newspaper.
	Some dude made it up.
	So it's not a real term.
	It's not a real term.
	No, it's not a scientific term.
	Because I noticed women can never define it.
	And they only use it as a pejorative term to men every single time.
	It's a pejorative term where it's a really good straw man for them.
	That's what they think.
	It's a really good strong.
	Because if you're not, that's why I said if you take away someone's academic education and you leave them with street smarts and you leave them with intelligence or intellectual capability, they're going to, every human being is going to fall susceptible to a couple of things.
	One of them is ad hominem attacks.
	That's how you can judge.
	That's a good, I think that's a good baseline judge of how you're going to interact in conversation.
	When someone throws an ad hominem out and then you either yell at them, go back at them, or you either remain calm as they say the first person to cast a stone lost the argument.
	And then something like emotional intelligence, a good straw man, as far as they're concerned, where like you say, I don't understand why you're acting like this.
	And you are saying that me reacting like a man is wrong.
	I'm reacting like a man.
	All I know how to say is how do we fix this problem?
	All you're doing is running around a circuit, running around in fucking circles nonstop.
	Well, that's because you're not emotionally intelligent enough to understand the situation, I'm in, because if you were, you understand how I'm feeling right now.
	If you did, you know, that's what they do.
	It's a term that explain to me what emotional intelligence is.
	And then after you explain to me what you think it is, describe to me what both of those words mean to you.
	And then we can have a conversation.
	But they never get to that point because they use that.
	They throw it out to try and derail the argument.
	That's what it's always for.
	And it's always used in a pejorative manner every single time to almost like disqualify your understanding of the situation.
	You interpret a situation in a certain way.
	And honestly, a lot of times you interpret it from an objective manner.
	Right?
	For example, she goes late to work all the time and they fire her.
	Well, you were going late to work all the time and they warned you twice.
	You showed up late.
	Hey, you fucked up.
	Well, you're not emotionally intelligent.
	You don't get it that you said to abuse me and all this other stuff.
	So I would show up late because they go into all this other shit.
	But you're making an objective and rational conclusion from her behavior.
	And because you don't look at the emotional side as much, she says you're not emotionally intelligent.
	Like that's how women look at it.
	Like you don't understand my feelings when said event occurred.
	That doesn't matter though at the end of the day.
	It doesn't.
	And my thing is, okay, so you're saying this is called emotional intelligence, right?
	So there should be some sort of intelligence quotient, right?
	So give me the emotional intelligence version of an IQ test.
	Exactly.
	Where can you find that?
	Exactly.
	You can't because it's not measured.
	There's no way to measure emotional violence.
	Completely subjective.
	Right.
	And the other thing, another stupid ass term they use, verbal violence.
	Have you heard that one?
	Verbal violence.
	I heard a girl, you actually use that on the show.
	Like, what are these fucking nonsense?
	Like, you heard that one?
	TikTok.
	It's TikTok.
	These are TikTok definitions.
	You know what I mean?
	Like, you're verbally violent.
	You're toxic masculinity.
	The whole inception of toxic masculinity was simply the fact that men acted like men and women were tired of men acting like men.
	But as women got more of a stronghold in different fields, now it became okay to say, okay, well, this is toxic behavior.
	Yep.
	You guys should be more emotional.
	You guys should, basically the same.
	You guys should be more like us.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And if you're not more like us, then you're not emotionally intelligent and you're also toxically masculine and we can't really, we can't really listen to you.
	We don't have to listen to you.
	And we can say that you're hurting us in any type of way, shape, or form, which brings it all home to exactly what you're talking about.
	It makes it extremely dangerous, the precedent that was sent with the testimony from this lady.
	Yeah.
	Because now it's like anything that you do to a girl that she doesn't like, can be labeled as abuse, man.
	Anything.
	Like anything.
	Because it's subjective and open to her interpretation.
	And let's say she's not fucking all there.
	Not all the marbles are there.
	Like the economic abuse thing to me was really, really hilarious, right?
	So she was talking about the economic abuse.
	I know we talked about the laptop thing.
	Yeah.
	But let's talk in a broad spectrum manner.
	So you're saying a woman, let's just use male, female.
	Let's say the woman is the one being economically abused here.
	So there's economic abuse taking place, right?
	If this woman is feeling that she's economically abused, that means she should that she's living a traditional lifestyle, right?
	Because that would mean that the man is taking care of everything.
	Yeah.
	Because if the man isn't living a she isn't living a traditional lifestyle and the man isn't taking care of it and she's an independent woman who happen to get with a guy, there's no way she could be economically abused because she had her own beforehand and during and should after.
	Yep.
	So, you know, it's like I said, it's all about.
	And not only that, you know, now that you mention it, these like stupid terms that they use, you know, economic abuse, financial, whatever, it actually disincentivizes women to become traditional housewives.
	Now that I think about it.
	Right.
	Like, because it's almost like they coined these terms to encourage women to make their own money and continue on with the feminist rhetoric.
	It is, because, you know, it's funny in court, as I'm sitting next to you and I'm laughing to myself because we laughed at something that happened in court.
	And the very next thought was, yo, everything they're saying can be applied to the money.
	Oh, and the bitches were maddows, by the way.
	Oh, yeah, the women.
	I don't know if you saw those two like fucking chicks that in the back?
	In the back that were sitting behind us, like, are you guys together?
	That wasn't them that were asking if we're together.
	They were trying to figure out why we're saying the things that we were saying.
	Yeah, they were trying to ascertain where we're from.
	The whole road, almost.
	Yeah, they were trying to, you know what I mean?
	Like, they were too upset about it.
	They were not happy about it.
	And then an elevator.
	Oh, the elevator.
	I was like, well, bro, with this abuse.
	He beat her ass.
	Like, well, she hit him too.
	Yeah.
	Two feminists in the elevator got triggered when we were having a conversation about this shit, man.
	Yeah, we're not here to, we're not talking about the morality of Sean Combs or whoever else.
	What we're here to discuss is the fact that we're in court.
	Court, we have to look at objective, you know, the objectivity of the situation, and we're trying to figure out if his charges are going to stick.
	We don't care.
	I don't give a shit if he hit her.
	I mean, you know, yeah, it's bad.
	I wouldn't hit women.
	But, you know, it's just like, it's not what I'm here for.
	And then she but into the conversation, which is the problem.
	She inserted herself into a conversation that she had no point in.
	And then she wanted to use her emotional intelligence to virtue signal.
	You know, it's like, man, this is just like, you know, the more I think about this, the more it's like, like, this is actually very, very scary.
	This is a big case.
	It's a federal case that he's looking at for effectively for him life.
	And we got a psychologist in there who's in there as a subject matter expert giving extremely fucking, you know, ambiguous definitions or using ambiguous terms that, quite frankly, you know, any woman can use.
	Because now you can like, well, okay, let's say your wife that you live with disobeys you and you say, you know what?
	No ice cream for you this Friday.
	I'm not going to give you no money to go ice cream.
	And now that's financial, that's economic and financial abuse now.
	That's true.
	It's not even exaggerated.
	That's the crazy part.
	You're not even exaggerating.
	They can use that as financial abuse.
	Almost some of the things today were borderline like that.
	I was like, what the, like, you know, when she brought up the laptop thing, that's when I knew it was like just this inherent bias that she was talking to them ahead of time.
	Yeah.
	Because there was no way she's going to get a lot of money.
	That was a very descriptive fact.
	Super descriptive.
	And yeah, well, you know, that's abuse.
	Like, what if he's going to take away her laptop?
	The bitch has a job.
	The bitch had money before Puffy and will after Puffy.
	Buy another one.
	Leave.
	You're going to stay with him because that nigga has your laptop?
	Get the fuck out of here.
	So you're going to keep getting beat and everything else that you alleged because a nigga has your laptop.
	Now, here's my thing, right?
	I think we got to get to a point now where we got to tell these women, you got two options, bitch.
	It's either we treat you like an equal, right?
	And you have all the agency and responsibility of a man, which means if you're in a bad relationship, you got to fucking leave, okay?
	You're not going to sit here and say economic abuse, financial abuse, I couldn't leave.
	Stockholm syndrome, all this fuck shit.
	Or we go back to treating you guys like fucking children with no agency where a man needs to pretty much run your entire life, which is how it's been since the beginning of time.
	Right?
	Isn't it amazing how all these different cultures kind of understood that men need to be the leaders and women need to kind of follow their lead?
	And they did it specifically because of shit like this.
	So it's like, if we're going to have feminism and we're going to have women be equal to men, which is what feminism is, right?
	Then we got to give you guys that we're going to give you guys the equality that you guys want, which means that you got to deal with the responsibility.
	But now we're getting to a point where they have all the agency with none of the responsibility and they can regress to childlike responsibility and accountability.
	And it's crazy, man.
	This is scary because who has to bear the brunt of everything?
	The man.
	And then they wonder why guys don't want to get married.
	They wonder why guys don't want to get involved in serious relationships.
	It's dangerous now.
	Yeah.
	Overcorrecting for agency actually stripped them of their agency and allows other women like this psychologist to strip them of their agency by saying that they can't make conscious decisions for themselves.
	Yeah.
	That's what this is.
	Because they're trying to double dip.
	And it's like, not enough people are calling this shit out.
	Like, I feel like I'm like a crazy man right now.
	Right.
	I've already talked about this.
	People say, oh, you're a massage, whatever.
	No, this is a serious fucking problem.
	We literally have a subject matter expert testifying in one of the biggest cases ever, taking agency away from Cassie, who is an adult, clearly had sound mind, right?
	Clearly doing what she wanted to do.
	She admitted to even the assistant who was testifying against Diddy, oh, I don't want to leave because I get an allowance and I live a certain lifestyle.
	And what happens?
	Now they're sitting here running cover for her.
	Right.
	You shouldn't have lived that lifestyle.
	Also, one other thing, you didn't really give your opinion on this, but I wanted to know what you think about it.
	The fact that they tried to, let's say, effectively manipulate her sexual nature and say that, well, effectively manipulate the way she went about her sexual nature by saying that she could have been, that she could have been trying to placate him.
	Now, I'm not saying that's not entirely false, but she was engaging to some pretty crazy shit and everything was on her, everything was on her devices.
	And she was calling these people, including the punisher, Mr. Meat Freezer.
	She was calling Mr. Meat Freezer all the time.
	Yeah.
	And from his understanding, they had a great relationship.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Diddy was doing some weird shit, smacking his meat in the corner with a cowboy hat on, whatever the fuck he was doing.
	Yeah.
	But she had, from his understanding and his testimony, they had a fine relationship and she liked it.
	You know what?
	I'm glad that you brought that up.
	She coordinated the freak offs, chat.
	Like, this is something that's very important for people to understand.
	Like, she coordinated the freak offs, okay?
	She was calling them.
	She was paying them.
	She's setting up the hotels.
	She's getting dressed.
	She's putting her manicure, doing a manicure, putting La Landre on, going to the store.
	She took significant overt steps in multiple situations for years to make these freak offs a thing.
	At some point, you can't be a victim anymore.
	You just can't.
	And I'm glad that you brought that up because it's like, at what point are we going to draw the fucking line here?
	Is it still economic and financial abuse when she's the one that's coordinating everything?
	Because Diddy's a busy nigga, bro.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	So, like, he told, he delegates.
	One thing I noticed about Diddy from this trial is this nigga lazy.
	He don't do nothing himself.
	He doesn't do shit himself, chat.
	We're going to get into that with the last guy testimony.
	Nigga doesn't do nothing himself, bro.
	So I already know after the first three freak offs, okay, you take that, baby.
	You do this shit.
	So she had a very involved role in this.
	Absolutely.
	Because she can't have it both ways.
	She said, I can't do my career because I'm so busy doing this.
	So if you're so busy coordinating these freak offs, you got to bear some responsibility for this then.
	Right.
	Because she literally complained and said, I'm doing it so much, I can't do my music or do anything else.
	So that tells me that you're heavily involved and you're making this decision.
	Correct.
	Correct.
	You can't have it both ways.
	Not to mention, like her friend, even just small testimony that ties into that, like her friend saying they all did drugs together.
	They all had fun.
	They all loved each other.
	They had a loving relationship.
	Good point.
	So it's like, oh, so what's going on here?
	If you're having this great time, loving relationships, good times, bad times, more bad times.
	Y'all went to Burning Man three times, bro.
	Niggas camping in the desert.
	Have you been to Burning Man before?
	I have not.
	Bro, it's like expensive as fuck.
	It's like a very white person thing to do, by the way.
	Bro, camping in the fucking desert with tents and shit.
	Listen to EDM.
	Wild.
	Come on, man.
	Three times.
	Yeah, I mean, it doesn't make sense.
	And listen, like, I'm not saying women don't tell the truth.
	I'm not saying that there aren't victims.
	Obviously, I'm privy to the fact that things do happen in the world.
	I'm absolutely privy to that fact.
	And I'm also, you know, not ashamed to use data to solidify points and stuff like that.
	I get it.
	And all that is relevant at some point, at some point in time.
	However, as it pertains to this case and what it can do and the precedent that it can send, it's extremely damaging and scary because you don't want someone to be able to say, this dude wouldn't let me leave the house.
	Or this time he had sex one way, but I didn't like the fact that he put it in that hole this time.
	Even if he slipped, he shouldn't have slipped.
	There's so this has a slippery slope that this can go down, man.
	And so you don't want any of this.
	Setting very dangerous precedent, man.
	And that's my biggest problem here.
	It's like, goddamn, dude.
	Like, what the fuck are we going to like, bro?
	Well, I guess we're going to see.
	And here's the other thing, too.
	Another big red flag.
	Cassie talked to prosecutors.
	Right.
	Because, and this is very important for you guys to understand.
	So when the defense would cross-examine Cassie, they would say, you sat down with agents and prosecutors.
	That means that she got something called a proffer or a 5K letter, which means she's not going to be prosecuted.
	Why do you need a proffer letter?
	You want to know why, guys?
	That means that you committed a crime too.
	And you're basically providing this information to the government of providing substantial assistance, and that keeps you from going to jail as long as you're truthful and you provide assistance.
	She sat down with prosecutors.
	AUSAs don't like to sit down with defendants.
	They will only sit down with you if you're getting a letter because they don't want to be witness to a crime, right?
	Because they got to argue.
	They got to legislate, right?
	And they don't want to be in a witness stand.
	So the fact that she sat down with prosecutors and got a fucking 5K letter in itself tells you that she should be accountable to this.
	They have to give her a proffer letter for her to not be accountable.
	Then you got this fucking psychiatrist coming in or psychologist coming in and testifying even more so saying she's not accountable.
	This is the gynocentric gynocentric society, the gynocracy at work.
	It is.
	And it's like, man, you're the only people that are seeing this.
	Yeah, it's pretty scary, actually.
	Like, I'm looking at this through a red lens, guys.
	This is a very, like, this is why I think this is one of the most important episodes because we have a trending case, the biggest case in the United States right now.
	And one of the main witnesses is a woman who feels like she was abused, but the government had to give her a proffer letter, right?
	Because she was so intertwined in the criminal activity because she was the one organizing a lot of this shit, helping the enterprise.
	She gets immunity.
	They come after Diddy.
	I'm not saying that he's an angel.
	Hell, I'm not even saying he's innocent.
	Well, what I am saying is I find it interesting that he's being prosecuted for this.
	The woman that's making the allegations had to get a fucking 5K letter, and then they bring in a psychologist to testify to take accountability from her.
	And it's like, man, you're the only ones in the courtroom that see this shit.
	It was wild.
	It was a wild experience.
	I don't understand it, bro.
	Yeah, the psychologist is.
	Yo, we're cooked.
	It's over with.
	The psychologist.
	And she's a board certified.
	40 of them in New York.
	Yeah, yeah.
	She's top.
	Would you say that?
	Like, the psychology world, like, would hold those same opinions that she has?
	Like, are we that fried?
	From what I understand, it's like, you know, and I'm throwing out numbers here.
	It's scary.
	I don't have data.
	But from what I understand, at least from what I know, people I talk to, it's like 50-50.
	50% of the people, like, she's throwing a bunch of, she's just saying a bunch of shit.
	And then 50% of the people are agreeing with her.
	Like, yeah, this all makes sense because what she's saying makes sense from a psychological standpoint.
	But once again, it leaves, she left too much room for ambiguity with it.
	So that's the issue.
	Yeah, even if you said, like, you didn't, she didn't use any scientific terms.
	So I'll give you an example of why her testimony is a little strange.
	So you know how she was talking about the fear response, right?
	Yeah.
	She not.
	Explain it real quick to audience because they're probably wondering what fear response was.
	Oh, yeah.
	So they're talking, she was talking about how you explain how you react to a fearful situation or when trauma happens.
	Her number one word, her go-to word of the day was trauma.
	So the trauma response, right?
	Yep.
	So not once did she give any scientific explanation of how it works.
	All she said was, you know, trauma.
	And then because of the traumatic experience, you know, people could be less inclined to leave or attempt to leave because they're scared.
	She never once said anything about the amygdala or how the amygdala influences fear.
	She never said anything about the hippocampus.
	She never said anything about...
	You think she did that to not confuse the jury, though?
	No, I think she did that because she didn't.
	If she started getting into the science, that she could trip herself up.
	Gotcha.
	Okay.
	Because, you know, the prefrontal cortex is like what people refer to as the governing sector.
	It allows you to carry out the shit because usually you want to stop batch from happening before it reaches the prefrontal cortex.
	And once it reaches there, it's game time.
	It's over with.
	And guys, like the video.
	We only got 1.5k likes.
	We're giving you guys this fucking big psychology red pill right now of what the fuck is going on here because guys we're on the cutting edge of this stuff right now with this case.
	This is adding a president.
	I'm sorry, bro.
	Keep going.
	No, no, no.
	Like the video, guys.
	2000.
	Yeah, I mean, that's shit like that.
	It's like you have to explain scientifically.
	If you're going to say, I came here in the name of science, you got to use science so that when people in the outside world or psychologists or people that understand this stuff or even study it with a freaking, you know, a GED even, and they understand this stuff.
	If you're going to say you're here in the name of science, use scientific stuff.
	But if you do that and you're not as well versed in it, or you may have slipped the bandwagon, you know, jumped the bandwagon to the DEI side when before you were on the other side, you might trip yourself up.
	And I think that's why she did that.
	It's just people don't people just want the truth, pretty much.
	They just want the truth straight up.
	They don't want to hear all these psychological hula hooping explanations and shit like that.
	They just want you to say what it is.
	Like this, she's acting like this because of this, this, and this.
	And this is how this works with the brain.
	Like, tell people, when she was getting beat, it was releasing serotonin because she's used to it.
	Like, say some shit like that.
	Yeah.
	That's what people want to hear.
	They didn't want to hear she was getting beat and she might have been scared.
	And then she called her cousin and her cousin told her to stay.
	No one's hear that female shit.
	Just say what it is, the science.
	So before we get into the last guy, George Kaplan, aka one of them boys, what's your prediction, bro, on the future of this?
	Like, you're in the game.
	You know, you've been to many of these conferences.
	You've shaken hands and met these people.
	Obviously, you're very familiar with this because your background in academia.
	What the fuck do you think is going to happen, man?
	In this field.
	And as it pertains to masculinity and, you know, what's going on?
	Give us the red pill.
	I think it's shot.
	Future.
	I think the field is shot.
	Unless they do something about these DEI hiring and all that stuff and all this equity hiring.
	I think the field is shot.
	I think they need to encourage men to get into the field more so we can set some boundaries.
	I don't think it's going to happen for a long time, though.
	I'm thinking maybe even 15 years because you got to remove the old guard.
	And the women are the ones hiring now, right?
	The women are the one hiring.
	So if you're not in an empathy thing, like you were saying before, cooked?
	Yeah, I mean, there's a large possibility that, here's the thing.
	There's a large possibility that if you aren't with the whole empathy gang, as I call it, if you aren't with the empathy gang, if you aren't with the letter gang and shit like that, and you're just trying to come and do your job and do the best that you can do at your job to try and help people, they don't want that shit.
	They want people that are going to kumbaya with them and shit and take their word as law, you know what I mean?
	And take their feelings as law, regardless of the science, because science doesn't always matter.
	That's one of the most famous things they say now.
	Science doesn't always matter.
	Oh, wow.
	You know what I mean?
	So, like, I think it's close.
	That's what the people say.
	That's what they're saying in that world now?
	Science doesn't always apply.
	Science is not always applicable and emotional intelligence.
	Those are the two things that you hear the most.
	So we got psychologists and psychiatrists using the term emotional intelligence now?
	Absolutely.
	100%.
	There's probably people in school right now that are their psychology or psychiatry professor is using emotional intelligence over and over and over and over again.
	It's cooked, bro.
	It's like that we're going to be talking about.
	We just call it like it is, bro.
	Like we're cooked then.
	Yeah, we are.
	So do you predict that more people are going to be on SSRIs, medication, to like, we're just going to be even more medicated?
	Because it's terrible, bro.
	I see kids, teenagers.
	Oh, yeah, I'm on Riddling.
	I'm on ADHC medication.
	What?
	Yeah, they were putting kids on Riddling way back in the 90s, but generally speaking, they would put the kids who are like real problem children, like who would go into Bose and shit.
	They put those kids on Riddling.
	Now they're putting kids on Riddling and the mechanism of action for the basically the way the medicine works is really screwing up these kids.
	Gotcha.
	And there are studies that are trying to correlate that with like the school shootings and things of that nature.
	School shootings weren't a thing before 1999.
	Yeah.
	They were not at the Columbine kicked it off.
	And that was the beginning.
	There was one girl in the United States who did it.
	Before Columbine.
	In like the 70s.
	Okay.
	Like a feminist.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Look it up.
	Well, they're sick in the brain.
	So that makes perfect sense, actually.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Bruh.
	Yeah, that's a good point.
	No, school shootings didn't exist prior to Columbine, really.
	Maybe one time in the 70s, like you mentioned, but.
	Yeah, I don't think that I don't think that the field is going to have a good time.
	I think that they're going to continue.
	Like the antidepressants, men are getting on them more, but women love antidepressants.
	Oh, yeah, they dominate the placebo, a lot of it.
	You know, because you're telling women, you're suggesting something.
	Women are suggestive creatures, malleable creatures.
	So I'm suggesting to you that this medicine should and or could work.
	But if it doesn't, you won't know the fucking difference anyway.
	Yeah.
	So take it and let's figure it out.
	And then you tell yourself, I feel better.
	But you know what really happens is they do that.
	They take the SSRIs or SSNIS SSRs.
	They take the antidepressants in combination with, let's say, a Xanax, a benzodiazepine, to calm them down, calm down the anxiety.
	So they never get enough anxiety up for their body to learn how to deal with stressful situations, right?
	So they start that.
	Not to mention they drink, they party, they don't sleep, they don't drink water.
	Bro, I don't know what it is.
	Women don't drink water.
	Yeah.
	You notice that?
	Yeah, that's a weird thing.
	They talk about it too.
	They like flex it.
	Yeah, like bitches don't drink water, bro.
	It's weird.
	It's really weird.
	They don't have enough for their bloodstream to operate properly.
	Yeah.
	They live like shitty lives.
	Guys, I'd like all of you guys to shadow a regular female one day.
	They eat weird shit.
	Like they don't eat like protein.
	They don't eat like, they don't eat healthy food.
	They eat like random stuff.
	Like they'll eat like seven fries like, yeah, I'm good.
	I'm feeling out.
	And drink water.
	Sorry, and drink like a diet, Dr. Pepsi or some shit.
	And then like they don't exercise.
	Bro, it's just crazy like how it is.
	Like, anyway, whatever.
	I could talk shit about that all day.
	Neuropsychology is not, nothing's going great.
	And I mean, they're trying to make advances in certain things, but they're going to keep taking the antidepressants because, like I said, it's either you take it.
	Do you think we're just going to continue to get even more Medicated, right?
	You're just getting more medicated and more medicated until it hits a breaking point, you know, until it hits a climax in a plateau, and then you start to go back down.
	But as of right now, no, just give me more medication.
	What I was going to say is it's not usually the medication that's working.
	It's a combination of medication and therapy, but it's really the therapy teaching them to have better habits.
	And then they think it's the medication.
	Gotcha.
	Right.
	And so that's what happens a lot of the time.
	Yeah.
	And Big Pharma's not going to stop.
	They're making a killing.
	No, no way.
	They're making a fucking killing, dude.
	They're not going to say shit.
	So, all right, let's get into the last witness here, and then we'll close this thing out.
	George Kaplan.
	And guys, shout out to Chad.
	Thank you, bro, for coming, man.
	I asked you last minute to come with me and you just came.
	So I really appreciate that.
	Thank you for having me.
	I appreciate everything, man.
	Yeah, man.
	Seriously.
	And we're working on some big shit behind the scenes, by the way, as well, guys.
	So we'll see what happens.
	George Kaplan, 34 years old.
	This was the next witness that came out.
	What's this guy?
	Number what?
	12 or some shit now?
	Yeah, 12 or 13.
	So George Kaplan, one of them boys.
	He worked for Nickelodeon for seven months prior as an executive assistant.
	Then he worked for Combs Enterprises, which is a holding company off for all of Diddy's companies.
	Then he ended up becoming Diddy's assistant.
	He worked at 1710 Broadway.
	He worked as the executive assistant.
	This was from 2013 to 2015.
	He reported to Christina Corum, KK, who ran Diddy's life.
	He basically reported Diddy's house in LA, 200 Mapleton, Los Angeles, California.
	Carried his bags, made sure everything was taken care of.
	He worked there longer.
	He worked a lot of hours.
	He worked 80 to 100 hours a week.
	He made around 100, what, 125K per year, right?
	No, not per year, 125K in 15 months.
	In 15 months?
	And then he got paid out that same rate for the last three months of his employment.
	Okay.
	He started work at 9.30 a.m. and that can fluctuate as to when you would go.
	The earliest he ever got off was 6.30 p.m., but he was also the latest.
	He would get off at 6.30 a.m.
	Also worked those slave hours, as you guys know.
	Diddy was working on a mixtape at the time when he came in.
	So they were super busy.
	He also was familiar with the security.
	Diddy had homes in Los Angeles, New York, New Jersey, Miami, and New Jersey, Los Angeles, New York City, New Jersey, New York, the Hamptons, and Miami.
	He discussed what Diddy.
	He basically got Diddy whatever he needed, food, drugs, iPads, whatever.
	Diddy threatened his job monthly.
	He claimed he only wanted the best.
	One story he gave was where Diddy told him to go to Hopefully was to get him a gallon of water.
	And he couldn't find this gallon of water.
	So he got him two half gallons of water and brought it.
	And Diddy got in his face and yelled at him and said that he would fire him, which is fucking nuts.
	But you know, I'm not surprised, bro.
	When he told that story, I was like, you know what?
	This is how this nigga really is.
	That makes them do weird shit.
	Remember making a band?
	He made them go all the way to Brooklyn for cheesecake?
	Cheesecake.
	Slap you over cheesecake.
	That shit was.
	He was really like that.
	He's really about that.
	We thought, like, okay, MTV, comedic effect, make these niggas walk all the way to Brooklyn because they're in Manhattan.
	That's a long walk.
	You live in Brooklyn.
	That's a long walk.
	Can you describe to them like how the fuck.
	Let me explain how fucking long.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	You got to cross one of two bridges, either the Manhattan or the Brooklyn Bridge.
	Think about that.
	That's a bridge now, the length of the bridge.
	Because they were in Manhattan when that happened, right?
	They were in Manhattan in the 1710 Broadway office.
	So they were brought 1710 all the way to Brooklyn.
	So they filmed it from there.
	Yeah, even back then.
	So they went to Juniors for some cheesecake.
	Juniors is downtown Brooklyn.
	That means even after you get off the bridge, you still got a little bit to go.
	Wow.
	So them niggas walked.
	That nigga wasn't playing.
	How many miles was that?
	I mean, city miles.
	You want to say 2.8, but 2.8 city miles is a hike.
	Yeah.
	City miles is a hike because you're going through different times.
	Because you're passing blocks.
	You're stopping at the thing.
	Traffic is coming.
	It's wow.
	It's a long-ass walk.
	Damn.
	It took him hours, didn't it?
	Because Long Island, yeah, because so like three miles of Long Island, I could do three miles of Long Island in like 15 minutes.
	Yeah, I mean, three miles out here could take me between 45 to an hour of 45, depending on traffic and who's on the street.
	Yeah, because every block you have to stop.
	You can't keep walking, and that adds up over time.
	That adds up over time, and then like the terrain.
	Like, you got to cross a bridge.
	Yeah.
	You know what I mean?
	Yeah.
	It's pretty crazy.
	So yeah, guys, long story short, that making the band shit was not a joke.
	That's how he really is.
	He'd be slaving niggas, bro.
	Let's see here.
	So he set up hotel rooms for Diddy.
	First, he unpacked baby.
	He would pack the ship for him.
	Baby oil, astroglide, speaker, candles, liquor.
	He purchased supplies with a corporate credit card.
	He would get told ahead of time where to go if Diddy needed him there, or he would fly private jet with him.
	Diddy stayed at the hotel for 12 hours to multiple days.
	He went to a room after Diddy left.
	Interesting thing, this guy job that Diddy had.
	So apparently, these hotels guys were selling pictures to magazines and other tabloids after a celebrity stayed at their hotel room.
	And if there was anything embarrassing left there, they would take pictures of it.
	So this guy, what he would do, and I find it interesting, this is the emergence of social media now, 2013, right?
	This is when he started working for him.
	So this guy's job was after every hotel stay, he would go in there and clean it up, chat.
	And remember, in the early 2000s, how they said that Diddy would get in trouble and they'd like charge him money for fucking shit up at the hotels.
	He would also make sure that nothing was fucked up like that so they wouldn't charge him money.
	But he said there would be baby oil all over the place and fucking Gatorades and shit.
	Baby oil, Gatorade.
	But that was his job, bro.
	Nigga would come in and clean up after a freak off.
	Yeah.
	He said baby oil everywhere, too.
	Yeah.
	Gatorade and then the Astro Glide.
	Bruh.
	And he said it would be in his bag, too.
	Yeah.
	He had to work to protect Diddy's image because he would protect the image because they would obviously sell the pictures.
	D contacted him frequently when they're at the hotels.
	It could be anything from getting him food close to drugs.
	He bought drugs for Diddy on two different occasions.
	One time he bought MDMA in Miami, gave the guy cash.
	Another time he bought him some drugs.
	It was pills.
	He didn't know what it was.
	This was in Bel Air.
	He went all the way to Hollywood, got the drugs, brought it back to Diddy, paid for it in cash.
	And that's where the testimony ended.
	So we're going to follow up the next day with this guy.
	He was walking around with HSI details, so I predict he has some shit to say.
	Remember, we're going to get an elevator, and they said no.
	I'm not going to hold you.
	That shit creeped me out a little bit.
	If you're next to me, I was like, I was like, who are these niggas?
	Yeah, they were like, oh, well, yeah.
	So guys, we're in courtroom number 20 on the 24th floor.
	They're up filming in 20, not filming, but they're up in 26.
	We're in one of the overflows.
	So we clicked the thing to go down.
	The witnesses in there and two HSI agents.
	We're about to get an elevator.
	He's like, no, no, you guys can't get on.
	And that's when you saw him, right?
	Yeah, he looked weird, didn't he?
	That posture.
	I was just going to say that posture, the raccoon eyes, like he was on cheesecake.
	He had raccoon eyes, yeah.
	Like he looked like he was on drugs for a couple or like in preparation.
	Yeah, he was on a bender.
	Like he was on a bender, like, damn, I got to testify against Diddy.
	But I will say the one correlation I can draw between both of them, James, the other assistant, the first assistant, and him, is that they do, there seems to be some loyalty to Diddy.
	Like they're giving facts out so they don't get in trouble.
	Yeah.
	But there seems to be some cohesiveness with loyalty.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, they're not completely shooting on him too bad.
	Because he knows damn well he knew what drugs are in that thing.
	Oh, yeah, bro.
	And he was like, I couldn't tell you.
	It was just a bag.
	Yeah.
	It's very obvious too that they got subpoenaed and they're forced to testify.
	Right.
	The other guy said, yeah, you guys, you guys, you know, subpoenaed me twice.
	The other girl, Carrie Morgan, straight up said she didn't want to be there.
	Like they subpoenaed her too.
	So a couple of these witnesses are actually there extremely reluctantly.
	Yeah, and it's funny because Carrie Morgan, actually, I think Daniel.
	And Carrie Morgan, just you guys know, that's Cassie's best friend.
	We didn't talk too much about her testimony because it was kind of boring.
	Like basically, she confirmed a lot of the things that they went on trips, went to Burning Man.
	Her and Diddy were friends.
	Didn't she send a big ass a long ass text to Diddy?
	She sent a long ass poem to Diddy.
	Yeah.
	She sent it along.
	Can you talk about that?
	Because I didn't get a chance to talk about it.
	So what happened was Diddy wanted to get Cassie something for her birthday.
	He wanted, what's her name again?
	Cassie or Carrie Morgan?
	Carrie Morgan.
	He wanted Carrie to get the white girl.
	She a thought, bro, too.
	She is, she looks like one.
	Yeah, yeah, obvious thought.
	Parting in New York City in the early 2000s, cooked.
	Yeah, super, super thought.
	Wouldn't want to touch that with a 10-foot pole.
	But she wrote a poem.
	Yeah, she wrote a poem to Diddy.
	Yep.
	To help him with Cassie's birthday preparations, essentially.
	But she was writing an affirmation poem to Diddy.
	So it was weird because he wanted help with Diddy's birthday with Cassie's birthday stuff.
	Then it was a blank text.
	She clarified the defense saying that the text is blank.
	And then after that, there was an affirmation poem.
	And they used that to lead and say, well, you're sending him affirmation words.
	And then she said, yeah, he was just going through stuff and she was trying to help him.
	And then they asked, you know, do you know this girl?
	Then they brought up Cassie's friend, Cassie's other close friend who used to give her drugs and do drugs with her.
	They brought her up a couple of times and they got her to send her.
	Which girl?
	Forgot her name exactly.
	She was the one on the right side of the picture.
	It's a picture of Cassie, Carrie, and then the girl.
	She was there twice.
	She went to Burning Man with them.
	She was upstate in the upstate photo.
	She was there too.
	When they were all together, when they were together with the dudes.
	White girl?
	No, she was like Asian?
	Light-skinned Asian looking.
	Buana?
	Yeah, that one.
	Is that her?
	Yeah, but she didn't testify.
	No, she didn't testify.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	They talked about her.
	That's the bitch that Diddy held over the balcony.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	They were saying that she did a lot of drugs too.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, that's the Asian girl that he held over the balcony, Bona.
	And also, the big thing, well, I don't know, you might have spoken about it, is with the $30,000.
	Oh, yeah, okay.
	I'm glad you mentioned that.
	So, guys, the main testimony that you need to know for Gary, thank you for saying that, Chad.
	Of course.
	Basically, this is your takeaway.
	Diddy shows up at the house.
	He has a key for Cassie's house in LA.
	He shows up, opens the door.
	Cassie sees him come in.
	She locks herself in the bathroom.
	Diddy's IRA over some shit.
	He hits Carrie Morgan with a wooden hanger.
	She gets a concussion from it, apparently.
	That nigga must have hit her hard, bro.
	But she said he came around, grabbed her throat somehow, and then while grabbing her throat threw a wooding hanger as she was running away.
	Yeah, something like that.
	And it then hits her in the head.
	I don't know what the fuck happened.
	This nigga, so, because, yeah, she said he flung it like a boomerang.
	Yeah.
	Where did he get the wooden hanger?
	Of all, like, whatever.
	So, anyway, guys, I know it sounds fucking far-fetched.
	I'm just telling y'all niggas what she said.
	He comes in going crazy.
	Cassie locks herself in the bathroom.
	He grabs her by the neck and is like kind of choking her.
	Then he hits her in the head with a wooden hanger.
	She gets a concussion.
	So she goes and hires a lawyer, tells a lawyer that she wants to sue.
	A month later, Cassie meets up with her at a pizza shop and slides her in the NDA and says, hey, sign this NDA.
	We'll give you 30,000.
	They're going to give you 30,000.
	What's her name?
	Takes the money.
	So her defense, what?
	This is 2008?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	She was going to be.
	So this is like, oh, wait, it's 2013, I think, or something like that.
	Oh, yeah, no, it's 2018.
	Yeah, 2018.
	2018.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Sorry.
	And then she's, and then that's why they're not friends anymore because Carrie felt like Cassie didn't have her back.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	But she got her 30K, which is the equivalent today, what, 40,000 now?
	Yeah, she got her to 30K.
	The problem with that was, I think that the problem that she had with it was that Cassie basically said to her, and in woman speak, as you oh, you're being dramatic.
	You're being dramatic about this.
	Yeah, you're being dramatic.
	Yeah.
	That she was saying that.
	That's what she didn't like about it.
	Like, she said that, and then she didn't believe her.
	And then she felt like she did the due diligence in not calling the cops on Diddy.
	And Cassie came up to her, like, yo, yeah, you're exaggerating this, bro.
	Take this 30K.
	Get the fuck out of my face.
	Basically.
	That's really what it was.
	And she slew the NDA, too, and they met at a pizza shop.
	At a pizza shop in the house.
	No lawyers, no nothing, just them.
	Yeah, that's wild.
	So, yeah.
	So that's the main thing you guys need to know about the Kerry Morgan shit.
	A lot of it was historical stuff.
	I forgot about the poem.
	Thanks for bringing that up.
	I'm trying to think, is there anything else that we need to talk about?
	I think the most important thing was talking about the red pill shit about this psychiatrist coming in that's clearly a fucking feminist 100%.
	And where we're going as a nation when it comes to criminal law and criminal procedure and witnesses.
	And guys, we're getting to a point now where any type of punitive behavior towards your woman is going to be looked at as abuse.
	That's where we're going.
	That's where I see us.
	I agree.
	And think about it.
	They literally reused the same woman who made the other woman lose one of the biggest cases ever.
	Do you remember her case?
	Oh, yes.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	They have enough gall to be like, yeah, we'll just reuse her because her testimony is important.
	Man.
	I wish y'all could have heard the testimony, but it's federal court, so y'all can't hear it.
	So we have to come in and report it for you guys.
	But yeah, bro, that's it, really, man.
	Yeah, I think that was pretty much it.
	Let's summarize it.
	There was nothing that I think was way too that was extremely crazy about it.
	You know what I mean?
	There was some stuff.
	I mean, today, outside of what you touched upon, there wasn't really anything crazy.
	And then the other stuff, for continuity's sake, there was, you know, like that, the guy, James, the personal assistant.
	He also, that story that he told that they are trying to say wasn't real.
	I think that's the only other thing.
	Because he told a story about riding around with D-Rock and Diddy with three handguns on Diddy's lap.
	Oh, yeah.
	And he was like, basically, Diddy let this nigga know in so many words.
	You're about to pull up on these niggas.
	You got to shoot something.
	On Suge Night.
	On Suge Night.
	Yesterday, yeah.
	And they're trying to say that story is fake.
	There's no way.
	Because they were like, didn't you live D-Rock?
	You didn't leave D-Rock by himself at the McDonald's or wherever the fuck they were.
	He was like, I'm telling you, dog, I didn't leave D-Rock.
	Yeah.
	Because why would I leave him, the security dude?
	So there was that.
	But then that was it.
	All right, I'll read some chats here.
	So super chats.
	We got only right wing and Callie.
	Hey, Mario, I'm 19 years old.
	Just got approved for my second credit card.
	I have 767 credit score.
	Any advice how to stay on track or what else I could do?
	Increase your credit limit.
	Keep it below 30%.
	You'll be straight.
	Make 100% on time payments.
	Mr. TT Kaka says, if he said he 39 on Wi-Fi, that means 39 wireless and his default.
	You need to have a wired connection to live stream L Producer.
	Bro, that has nothing to do with Chad, though.
	This place comes like that.
	Yeah, and I also suggested the Ethernet thing.
	Yeah, Act Studio just doesn't have Ethernet internet, bro.
	My love the show.
	Great insight and information on this case.
	Would you ever consider doing another Avengers panel with Diddy to deliver the OG OJ Simpson, Pill Cosby, R.K.L. and Glenn Maxwell Kable to go to work?
	All right, nigga.
	Dr. B84, psychiatry is a four years of residency training after med school.
	They can prescribe antidepressant, anti-anxiety, and anti-psychotic medications.
	Name a few.
	They're also trained to do psychotherapy.
	Okay, Dr. B84 is one of the docs that watch the show.
	Thank you.
	So yeah, they're actually doctors.
	Anti-Semcat goes, Charlie Kirk just got cucked.
	Okay, I'll take a look at that.
	Nikhil says, Chad, if you actually went to Harvard, what house were you in?
	And what was your go-to late-night food spot in the square?
	So I actually started off in Kennedy School.
	I'm just going to leave it at that because I don't want to give out too much stuff.
	And also, my favorite thing in the coop, well, I used to go to the coop and hang out at the coop, and then I never really ate any food square.
	I always left campus to go eat because there was a lot of, I mean, there's a couple of spots there.
	It's like the cafeteria, but I didn't really stick around there.
	I stuck around the river, and then I would go and leave to go get my food simply because, oh, I'm not even on camera.
	Yeah.
	And the Kenny School, can you describe?
	Well.
	Kenny, let's just say it's the school, the politics school.
	The political science school, right?
	Well, they call it public policy.
	Okay.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	But yeah, I never really ate on campus because I never found anything on campus too delicious.
	And as first, when I was there, I was always getting lost.
	So, yeah.
	It's a fairly big campus for only 5,000 students, bro.
	Yeah, it's a huge campus.
	I used to use the big, I guess it's, I think it's a bank.
	There's like a big bank with a clock on it.
	I used to use that to orient myself because if you orient yourself across directly from the clock, that's where the buses start.
	Yeah.
	And you got your grad degree from there.
	Yeah, my grad.
	I didn't even go to undergrad.
	Yeah, he didn't go to undergrad at Harvard, guys.
	He got his, you got your master's there, right?
	Yeah, my master's.
	You got his master's at Harvard.
	You didn't go to undergrad there, bro.
	That's right, though.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I don't know what it is that they're.
	Well, there you go.
	Does that answer your question, Nikhil?
	It's because I'm black.
	Yeah, probably.
	Niggas is like, no way I can ever went to Harvard.
	Some nigga in the chat said he got a coach at all.
	No way this nigga goes, bro.
	Oh, bad.
	That's great.
	All right.
	Psych testimony should have been more broad, ambiguous.
	Her coming to me after the case started, allowed her to tailor her testimony of Diddy and also shows more tact on her and the prosecution behalf.
	Niggas' objectivity, absolutely good shit.
	You're catching it, TR.
	Nikhail says, Chad, if you actually went to Harvard, what house were you in?
	And what was your mentioned that already?
	Manny Wilson says, Bolshevik Gaines, I've been watching your video for videos for a month now.
	I got a question for you.
	Will you ever have a Gypsy Crusader in Fresh Fit after ours or just interview him?
	I don't think you would come on, bro.
	A lot of these guys are separatists, and that's fine.
	I defend their right to be separatists, but they don't want to work with colored people, which is fine.
	It is what it is, man.
	I put in this question yesterday, but left early, but I like Gypsy Crusader.
	All those guys are funny as fuck, to be honest with y'all.
	Issy Wealthy says, I put in this question yesterday, but left early.
	What do you think about Diddy's legal team reaching out to Trump for a pardon?
	I did answer it.
	He's not going to get it.
	No way.
	I mean, what do you think about that, bro?
	Diddy's team reaching out for a pardon?
	I think this is absolutely fucking hilarious, but this is absolutely.
	I mean, it's worth a shot.
	Everything's worth the shot.
	He ain't going to get it.
	I think they were trying to play off the fact that Trump just came off cases that people would think were similar in nature, but they're not similar in nature at all.
	Yeah.
	So, yeah, worth the shot, but you know, we'll see.
	I think if this case continues to play out like this.
	Because Diddy's a lifelong Democrat, bro.
	He is.
	But if the court of public opinion says that Diddy should have gotten off, then maybe Trump will consider it.
	And that'll be a good point.
	Trump is a populist, bro.
	So enough people make, let's say, Diddy gets convicted, and enough people are like, this is bullshit, blah, blah, blah.
	Like they did with the January Sixers.
	Who knows?
	But I'll tell you this.
	He ain't going to pardon him.
	You know when he'll pardon him?
	End of his term.
	Pardoning is, guys, remember, presidents pardon at the end of their term because it's very unfavorable.
	The only reason Trump pardoned the J Sixers in the beginning is to make a statement.
	But nine out of ten times, pardons are always done at the end of the term.
	So if he's going to pardon Diddy, I guarantee y'all he'll pardon him at the end if he does it.
	Yo, can you hit on the Rumble Studio, click donations on the middle?
	I don't know if you see it or chat.
	Is there anything there?
	I know Rumble was all fucked up anyway.
	I don't see any.
	I don't see donations.
	I see.
	If it's blank, that's fine because they couldn't even watch on Rumble anyway.
	Okay, yeah.
	It's because, well, Rumble didn't work the whole time.
	So, all right, cool.
	Guys, I hope you guys enjoyed the stream.
	I'm going to actually go into YouTube right now and clean this thing up for you guys where there was lag and shit like that.
	Yo, chat, where can the people find you, bro?
	Man, I don't really, you know, I'm not.
	I know you're not a social media guy, but Instagram, whatever.
	Yeah, so I mean, on Instagram, you know what?
	There's probably guys that want to go to Harvard.
	I'll be honest with you, or want to go to the Ivies.
	So they might hit you up for that.
	Just the guy who talks is my Instagram.
	That's literally what it is.
	Just the guy who talks.
	That's all I am.
	And then.
	And if you guys say you found him through Fresh of Fit, he'll respond to your DM probably.
	Yeah, of course.
	And then on YouTube, I don't, you know, I don't have content like that right now, like that.
	I deal with the tech side of stuff.
	And, you know, if I decide to come over to this side, we'll see.
	Cool.
	Yeah.
	Very knowledgeable guys.
	If you want to get into an Ivy League school, he has connections and stuff like that.
	I tell you guys all the time, college is a scam, but I've always told you guys: if you can get into an Ivy League school, absolutely take that opportunity because the alumni network and the connections is what makes everything.
	Yeah, because, for instance, let's use a great example of the chat, right?
	Let's say, I mean, there's three to five people, saving 10 people who are upset or you didn't go to Harvard or blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	You can say that, but my credentials don't say that.
	So I don't care because I can get a better job than you can off the fact that I just visited to touch the ground.
	You know what I mean?
	You can't even, you got to.
	So it's very useful.
	I agree with Myron.
	I think college is kind of a waste now.
	Education system is kind of a waste.
	But Ivy League schools outside of Yale, because you don't want to die because the campus is ghetto as hell.
	Very useful.
	Very useful.
	Princeton has a nice campus, bro.
	Yeah, Princeton.
	I ain't going to lie.
	Princeton is fucking nice.
	I mean, you're just paying for validity, man.
	You could be the smartest guy on planet Earth.
	You still need a piece of paper sometimes.
	They have a super nice boathouse, too.
	I like Harvard.
	I mean, I never say go crimson because Harvard sucks.
	No, y'all got a good rowing team, bro.
	Yeah, very good rowing.
	I'm attention to the rowing team.
	Yeah.
	The other sports suck, though.
	Yeah, they're pretty trash.
	Yeah, everything else.
	The biggest thing out of there was Jeremy Lynn.
	For me.
	Oh, yeah.
	Jeremy Lynn did go to Harvard.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Damn.
	Okay.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, anyway, guys, hope you guys enjoyed the stream.
	Yo, Chad, thank you so much for coming out, bro, and helping out with the tech stuff, running the cameras, and giving us your background on psychology and kind of giving us another perspective.
	You know, because, you know, sometimes it can be an echo chamber and it's good to bring someone that's kind of like an expert in that field because we've always suspected that psychology is being dominated by women.
	And like to have you come and like kind of confirm it, like, yeah, bro is 80-20 right now on the psychology side.

▲