All Episodes
Previous Next
April 16, 2025 - MyronGainesX
02:59:51
Trump NY Prosecutor Commits FRAUD? Nick Fuentes EXPOSES Darryl Cooper!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And we are live.
What's up, guys?
Welcome to the stream.
Wow, awesome.
We're here with a black screen.
We're here with a black screen.
Hold on, one sec.
I'll fix that chat.
Oh, it's because the camera's off.
Okay, awesome.
I bad chat.
Camera should be back on here in a second.
All right.
We're here.
What's up, guys?
Welcome to the stream, man.
Welcome to the stream.
Sorry about that.
Yeah, it just went right into flashing lights right after.
But anyway, guys, what's up?
Welcome to the stream.
I got my hat on here because it's cold as hell in here, bro.
I got to keep the goddamn AC up so that the cameras don't turn off, but it's cold as hell in here, man.
So what's up, guys?
Welcome to the stream.
Welcome to the stream.
We are here.
Obviously, we got Fresh of Fit later.
So, you know, it won't be as long of a show as usual.
We're going to be doing Fresh of Fit at 8 p.m. tonight, ladies and gentlemen.
And then we're going to be doing a Zoom call after that.
So definitely got some interesting topics to talk about.
What I'll do right now is I see that there's something going on right now.
Looks like there's a press conference right now.
So let's go ahead and see and jump on that.
As you guys know, anytime there's breaking news.
Ooh, there's a transgender lawsuit against Maine.
Okay, that's interesting.
Oh, okay.
Here's a 17-year-old suspect.
It looks like that might.
We are back to breaking news.
This is from Overnight, an important update on the shooting of Wilmer Hutchins High School just a few hours ago.
This was a high school from yesterday.
The suspected shooter turned himself in.
Yeah, this is a scene we've been following.
You can see the aerial footage from the aftermath of that shooting yesterday.
Lacey Beasley joining us live.
And Lacey, we know that three students were shot, another injured in that shooting on campus.
What's the latest?
And especially in light of the fact that the shooter has now turned him, or the alleged shooter has now turned himself in.
Good morning, Carmen and Madison.
We're just now learning the name of that suspected shooter, 17-year-old Tracy Haynes.
The Dallas Morning News report said he turned himself in with the help of an organization called Urban Specialists and they advocate against violence.
Apparently, a family member called their helpline.
Now, here's some video of Haynes surrendering last night in Dallas.
Video never fails.
Was taken by Smash the Topic and shared online and shared online shows officers puffing the suspect.
Dallas ISD confirmed that the suspect was arrested but did not share any additional details.
He's charged with aggravated assault, mass shooting, and is in jail on a $600,000 bond.
Now it's important to note, Dallas ISD police tell us this was a student on student shooting, not an intruder.
You can imagine the chaos and fear here at Wilmer Hutchins High less than 24 hours ago.
Take a listen to some students and parents' reactions shortly after the gunfire.
Got her like six shots and the teacher ran to the door and closed it and told us to hide in the corner.
We don't need a shooting at the school for me to go up there.
So I just jumped up out of the band.
You can see hundreds of people running across the lawn in panic.
Yeah, for those of you that are unaware, maybe you didn't catch yesterday's episode.
We were live and a school shooting happened literally while we're on air, pretty much.
So I went ahead and jumped on and we talked quite a bit about gun control in America.
We talked about school shootings and how things have changed.
And I actually actually proposed a solution to the school shooting problem that we have that's literally dominating the United States now over the past 20, 30 years, man.
There's been like a fucking surge in school shootings.
According to police, four boys were hurt in the shooting.
Three of the four were hit with gunfire.
The Dallas Fire Department says injuries range in severity from non-life-threatening to serious.
We also know the high school does have metal detectors, which every student should pass through at the beginning of each school day.
Though during Tuesday evening's press conference, DISC Assistant Police Chief Christina Smith says this was not a failure of safety protocol and the gun got in somehow another way.
Gun did not come through during regular intake time.
So it was not a failure of our staff of our protocols for of the machinery that we have.
The district says there will be no class here through the end of the week and there will be mental health experts for students and staff who need them.
Harmon Johnson.
All right, Lacey, a story with a lot of moving parts.
We're going to be on top of all of those continuing details later today and throughout the morning.
So you can find the latest coverage on CBSNewste.com.
All right.
Interesting.
What is this?
So they got someone in custody.
Okay, and then here we go.
Trump holds situational meeting on Iran amid nuclear talks.
Okay, let's see this.
And then obviously we'll talk.
I'll go into a little bit more detail with Iran.
The maximum pressure campaign on Iran continues.
But as you know, the president has made it clear he wants to see dialogue and discussion with Iran while making his directive about Iran never being able to obtain.
This was literally earlier today.
Or no, this was yesterday.
This was yesterday.
During the White House press conference.
Is there still a White House press conference right now?
Let me look.
The maximum pressure campaign on Iran.
they're done let's see here
Okay, so this was today, so I don't think she's live anymore.
Because I remember seeing that they were live earlier when I had this thing.
All right, so we got Law and Crime Network.
All right, we'll go back to Maine a nuclear weapon quite clear.
So here we go, standing firm right now.
The Trump team on nuclear talks with Iran reiterating its demand that Tehran eliminate its nuclear program.
There was action on this.
I'm going to bring in retired gentleman Jack Keen, Fox News Senior Strategic Analyst and General.
Thank you for your time.
Good morning to you.
There's been one meeting already.
There's another one scheduled in the coming days in Rome, Italy.
We'll see how that goes on Tuesday.
So yeah, guys, we're covering some of the news stories that are popping off right now at the moment.
And then obviously we're going to cover the main ones, which are going to be the New York Attorney General.
Her name is Letitia, by the way.
We're going to be covering her and potential mortgage fraud, Letitia James.
And we will also be covering the beef.
I want to say beef, but there is a back and forth going on with Nick Fuences and a guy named Darryl Cooper, aka Martyr Maine, which I think is important.
First is discussed for a couple of different reasons when it comes to a certain topic.
Today, Axios reports that the White House had a situation room meeting on the fate of Iran.
In that room, Vance, Rubio, Hegset, Wipkoff, Ratcliffe, Waltz, all the players, including the president.
Now, the president said he can solve this through diplomacy without taking military action off the table.
Where does Trump 2.0 now stand with Iran and the possibility of going nuclear?
Yeah, I don't think the president's policy has changed one iota.
I mean, I even had a conversation with him about it just prior to the inauguration, and he was unequivocally clear.
And he has been very clear on this issue, like he is on a lot.
His policy is simple.
Iran is not going to have a nuclear weapon.
And he has put together a negotiator, the personal envoy, to the Middle East to be the implementer of that.
And he has issued an ultimatum to back that envoy up.
The ultimatum is pretty simple.
Iran, you voluntarily dismantle your program, eliminate the enriched uranium, hand it over, destroy the centrifuges that are deeply buried in those secret facilities and destroy the intercontinental ballistic missiles or ballistic missiles, excuse me, that could deliver them.
Yeah, and that's not going to happen, bro.
See, and like, so basically what they want is they want for what this administration wants is they want Iran to basically neuter itself, okay, and completely remove its capability of defending itself.
Now, the missile program that they have, guys, right?
And we can actually talk about this because I didn't get to talk about this yesterday.
But the ballistic missile program they have, guys, is very good, okay?
And not only is it good, they have very good air defense, all right?
A war with Iran wouldn't be a good idea for us.
And not only that, let's go ahead and pull up a map here and go through this and really break this down.
So if we're going to go ahead, right?
Okay.
So here we are on the world map, right?
Let's talk a little bit of, you know, geopolitical stuff.
So here we are, right?
We're over here, United States.
Now we got to go all the way over to the Middle East.
Bam, Iran is right here, right?
Now, as you guys can see, it borders Iraq and it shares bodies of water with the Gulf states, right?
And the Gulf states, guys, are like, you know, your Qatars, your UAEs, Oman, Kuwait, et cetera, right?
Saudi Arabia, of course, the big one, right?
And here's Iran right here.
Now, the thing with Iran is if the United States were to attack Iran, okay, we would win the conflict, all right?
And we're going through a, you know, a game day here of what would happen.
We would win the conflict.
We would be able to defeat them.
But it would be so painful and so costly that it would not be worth it.
Okay.
And one of the biggest things that Iran will do, there's two big things that Iran will do if we were to actually attack them with their ballistic missile program.
Right here is called the Strait of Hormuz.
Okay, guys?
The Strait of Hormuz.
And this area, and you can see it right here on the thing.
I don't know if you can read that.
Okay.
This area is a critical choke point to get something like 30% of the world's oil into trade.
All right.
And what they would do is they would effectively close this down and fuck everything up.
They'd close it down, destroy it, whatever it is, right?
And basically, that would send the entire world economy into catastrophic levels of decline, okay?
Because 30% of the world's oil goes through this little narrow thing right here, okay?
That's one.
Two, they would attack all of our allies, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Oman, all these, Kuwait.
There's military bases in some of these countries.
They would attack all of them and destroy them.
Okay?
So not only would trade be significantly hindered for the world economy, we would also get our American bases destroyed because they have hypersonic missiles that would literally, and they're made in Iran, by the way.
They're not like, they're domestically made.
They're not Russian.
They're domestically made.
Then on top of that, they have a very good air defense system.
Okay?
So our Air Force would need to be able to get around the air defense to be able to bomb these nuclear sites that they have, which are all underground, by the way.
All their nuclear facilities, guys, are underground.
Why is this?
Well, because you go back in time, roughly 1981, Israel bombed the fuck out of Iraq because Saddam Hussein was pursuing a nuclear program.
One mistake, though, the nuclear program facilities that Iraq had were above ground.
So Israel found them and destroyed them, right?
So obviously Iran realized, oh, if we want to run a nuclear program or want to be able to, you know, enrich uranium, et cetera, we need to put everything underground.
So the only way to destroy these facilities is with bunker buster bombs, okay?
That really Israel doesn't have.
United States has them, but Israel doesn't really have them like that.
And not only that, you have to do multiple bombing campaigns to be able to truly ensure that you destroy all of the different facilities all across Iran.
Okay?
So, again, number one, we'd have to fight their air defense, Iran's air defense, to be able to get in in the first place.
We would lose a lot of jets.
That's number one.
Number two, it would basically halt 30% of the world's oil trade with the Strait of Ramus and other trade as well.
Okay?
That would send the economy into a free fall globally.
Then, third, our bases in the Middle East would be absolutely decimated by Iran.
So, would we win the war?
Yes.
But at what cost?
And that is currently what we are potentially facing, chat.
All right?
Give me ones in the chat if that all makes sense.
Give me ones if that makes sense.
I don't think I've explained this before to you guys, so this is very important that you guys know what we're looking at if we actually do go to war with Iran.
I'M GOING TO GO TO THE PEOPLE.
And also, keep in mind, Iran is a much bigger country than Iraq.
They have a bigger military than Iraq.
It wouldn't be like the Iraq war of 2003.
It would not be.
Iran does have a strong military and a big military and very capable of weapons to defend themselves.
So it wouldn't be a cakewalk like it was Iraq in 2003.
Terribly dismantle and eliminate the program, then we, meaning Israel and the United States, will destroy the program.
That's pretty simple.
And this got off message somehow, I think.
Iran has 300,000 missiles, chat.
300,000 missiles.
Oh, and I forgot what else they would do.
They would literally rain hell on Tel Aviv.
They've already shown that they can strike Israel.
So as you guys know, Israel's over here, right?
The Gaza Strip is down here.
Tel Aviv is over here.
Right?
So what would happen is they would also, not would they only only destroy the American military bases, they would also launch fucking hell into Israel.
Okay?
So, and they would destroy all the major cities.
Okay?
So, yeah, dude, that's another thing as well to keep in mind with Iran if they were to attack.
And they've already demonstrated for anyone that says, oh, Myron, what about the Iron Dome?
For those who aren't aware, the Iron Dome is a missile defense system that Israel utilizes to shoot down rockets that are coming into Israel from, you know, Hezbollah up here in the north or the Houthis down south over here in Yemen, right?
The thing is, is that Iran already proved that they can hit Israel despite the fact that they have an Iron Dome.
They've already proven that.
They bombed them late last year.
And how they basically do it is they have a bunch of cheap drones and other missiles that they send in to basically take a lot of the attention off of those missiles.
They basically, long story short, this is what they do.
They flood Israel's airspace with cheap drones and cheap missiles.
The Iron Dome has to respond and shoot these missiles down.
When these missiles are shot down, then Iran shoots the real stuff in.
Does that make sense, chat?
Because here's the problem.
The cost of defending is more expensive than the cost of sending.
I'm going to say that again.
The cost of defending is far more expensive than the cost of sending.
So for Israel to shoot down these cheap drones or these cheap missiles that Iran shoots over, kind of as like decoys, is going to cost them quite a bit more money and being far more intensive, okay, than it would be for Iran to shoot cheap missiles in and then follow up with more sophisticated, more damaging missiles.
Okay?
And that's why the last time they had an escalation, Iran and Israel late last year, and Iran launched their first ever attack into Israel.
They did this to show Israel, because many of the missiles actually hit their targets, chat.
Many of the missiles actually hit their targets in Israel.
So they did this to let Israel know that we can touch you.
Despite your Iron Dome, despite all your support, despite you scrambling jets in the air from Jordan and the United States and Egypt, right?
Because that is what Israel did because Iran told them that they were going to attack them.
So what ended up happening was Jordan, Egypt, and other allies, and the United States, of course.
We had an aircraft carrier.
We all scrambled to help Israel, and they still were able to get missiles to penetrate into Israel.
Okay, and that was the warning.
And it costs them so much money to reload the Iron Dome to be able to shoot these missiles down versus doesn't cost Iran anything to shoot the missiles.
So, anyway, a little bit of warfare strategy there for you guys.
Okay, oh, yes, thank you, Brett.
I see your message.
Okay.
What else do we got here?
Soft life.
Let's read some of these chats.
When Trump said shalom after deporting the student, does that mean Trump has converted to Judaism or was he just being petty?
Below, see slide for looks like Trump has converted.
No, he did that to be petty, bro.
He did it to be petty.
Brett Oceka, reminder to put me.
Yep, got you on that one.
Shout out to my guy, Brett.
Soft life says, No, I read that already.
What the hell?
Okay, bear with me here, chat real quick.
I gotta fucking.
This always happens.
There's always some tech stuff going on.
My stream elements thing is acting funny.
God damn it.
All right.
Okay.
Kumo DTV.
He said he killed him because they were going to kill him.
Okay.
Self-defense?
All right.
It was probably some gang shit.
Maga Loso.
Martin, when you close the show, you should end W the three camera angles in each view.
You kill it with your points.
What?
I don't know what you're trying to say here, Loso.
Resend that, bro.
Like, guys, please spell check before you send in chats so that I know what you guys are saying.
Cardaman says, yo, Myron, is it mirror?
Does it seem like your channel growth has been halted a bit?
We're still grinding, bro.
I mean, you're always going to have ups and downs.
The views are still going up.
Thank you.
Thank you.
So, okay, let's see here.
So, and then AJ Sanding Ball says, Thank you for the show, sir.
Appreciate that.
Got you.
Let's see here.
Slide Dog says, Hey, hi, Martin.
Are you with Passport Bros?
Because women are their high body count and fuck all types of men?
No, I'm not a Passport Bro.
We got here, F. Da Ari says, Have you watched the recent podcast of Avoiding Babylon about Father Sharon speaking about the woke right?
Lots of negative comments.
People starting to wake up about Israel.
No, I did not see it.
I will tell you this: Rogan had some fucking pro Zio idiot on, I think, yesterday or some shit.
And I was like, oh, you must have got the call.
Hugh Animals, W My, appreciate that.
Knightly Wisdom says, like the video, ninjas.
I appreciate that, my friend.
I listened to the space.
You hosted with Simon about four times last week.
Last one hour is where all the sauce is at.
Highly recommended.
Yes.
So, guys, what I'm going to do is I'm actually going to put that space on Castle Club.
All right, I'm going to put that space up on Castle Club for y'all.
I just need to upload it.
But yeah, lots of really interesting stuff on finances in that thing.
Let's see here.
Making sure I don't miss any of your guys' chats.
And I appreciate you guys.
As you guys know, if you want to get involved in the show, guys, superchatmyrongainsx.com.
As you guys know, that is the way to get all your chats right on air and shown on screen.
Because every time you donate, it pops up on screen.
And that's how you support the mission because we are demonetized because YouTube fucking sucks, bro.
I mean, I keep it real with y'all.
It's fucking trash.
So, you know, we might make an announcement about it in a little bit.
Not right now, but in the near future.
Let's see here.
All right, let's go back to the Iran stuff.
As a result of the first talks and subsequent interviews on television, I think yesterday's meeting was to get input, but also, most importantly, get clarity.
And it seems to me when the negotiators go before the Iranians this weekend, it's about implementing the president's policy.
And that is more show us your plan to eliminate voluntarily your nuclear enterprise and show us the milestones to do that.
Show us the sites that this is going to take place at.
And we reserve the right to go anywhere anytime to conduct inspections because we know full well the Iranians would retreat.
It seems to me the meeting is more about getting an implementation plan than there's negotiating some terms about how much of this or how much of that.
And I think that's how it got off message.
And recall this.
In 2019 in Hanoi, when the Trump team went in to negotiate with Kim Jong-un and they were expecting to see an implementation plan to dismantle his nuclear weapons and he didn't provide that, they got up and left.
That's right.
And I think that's where we are.
General, on the Middle East, there is movement here on a ceasefire that's really not been joined by the other side.
Hamas is rejecting that.
Here's a statement from the Israeli Defense Minister.
Israel's policy is clear.
He says, no humanitarian aid is set to enter Gaza.
A mechanism must be built for the use of civilian companies as a tool that will also prevent Hamas from accessing this issue going forward.
Israel believes there are 59 hostages, of which 24 are still alive, including Edon Alexander, an American Israeli.
And then, well, I guess two things happened.
There was a proof of life video given of him recently.
And then Hamas came out a few days later claiming it lost contact with those who were keeping Edon hostage.
You wonder if anyone's going to come out alive, General.
Well, certainly we're all hoping and praying for that.
But the reality is here is that Israel has put on the table certainly the release of the hostage in exchange for prisoners.
But they also have been very clear to Hamas that they don't want them to remain governing, and they also want them to disarm.
And they are not going to discuss the afterday of Hamas until those objectives are achieved.
So Hamas is pushing back on that because as we know full well, keeping those hostages is all about keeping Hamas alive and also in power.
So we're at loggerheads here.
I think more negotiation.
Yeah, well, see, look, even he's saying that, and I told you guys this before, bro.
This is why these lies about like Hamas killing the hostages or whatever, it's not true.
It's all cap.
Because at the end of the day, the hostages are the only political bargaining tool they have, okay, for them to get a permanent ceasefire.
Because Hamas does want a permanent ceasefire, but they know that they need to negotiate with the hostages.
They have no other leverage besides that.
Negotiations will take place.
Because if people always say, oh, yeah, Hamas kills the hostages, blah, blah, blah.
The hostages get killed by the IDF when they bomb Gaza or through the starvation.
Listen, the pressure on Hamas is pretty significant now because new chief of the IDF military, and he is posing a different plan.
He is occupying parts of four different parts of the Gaza Strip, and he's going to expand that occupation.
And he's moving the civilian population out of those four areas so he can focus on destroying Hamas in those areas and taking away any hope that they can govern in that.
And they are now referring to that as the security zone of the state of Israel.
And that is very different than what the former chief of the IDF conducted largely tactical raids and then left the area.
So this occupation is increasing over time, and there's considerably more pressure also on Hamas to release those hostages.
Thank you, General.
It's good to have you back on, and we'll watch both of them carefully.
Important stuff.
So yeah, so we'll see what happens.
But just so you guys know, they had a meeting.
So they had a, okay, so let's go through this timeline, right?
So Trump takes office, makes it very clear.
Iran, you cannot have a nuclear weapon.
And this has been the status quo for decades with many different presidential administrations.
The president that came the closest to stopping this was Barack Obama.
Despite the fact that, you know, I've been very critical of Obama, we've made fun of Obama on this podcast a million times.
One of the things that I think Obama did that was fantastic during his presidency, despite the fact that he was one of the main presidents that standardized drone warfare, by the way, that's why they call him Odrono, Barack O'Drono.
A lot of people don't know that.
He basically cultivated the first Iran nuclear deal, which basically was a deal where you would remove sanctions, create sanctions relief for Iran to allow them to get their economic, get their economy back on track in exchange for them basically lowering their uranium enrichment and basically bring it down to levels where it's so low that they'd never be able to actually weaponize.
Obama was able to secure that deal in 2015.
And it took years for them to do it.
After Trump came into office in 2018, at great pressure from the Zionist lobby and Benjamin Nanyahu, he tore up the deal.
And the reason why is because Nanyahu and Israel did not want this plan to be put in place because they hate Iran.
They want a regime change, chat.
They want a complete regime change.
All right?
So, and there's been many beefs between the United States and Iran for a very long time, but Israel has always been involved in it and they've tried to start false flags.
I talked to you guys about Jundullah and how they tried to do a false flag there, where Mossad agents pretended to be CIA operatives and funded this basically this terrorist group of diaspora people, the Baloch people, and they gave them weapons and resources and they told them, hey, go attack this area in Iran.
And they were pretending to be CIA operatives, but in reality, they were Mossad operatives.
And when Iran captured them, at first they thought that they were being backed by the United States.
Well, why is that a problem?
Well, that's a problem because basically terrorists that are caught in their country would have been backed by the United States and they can use that to escalate tensions against us and potentially get us into a world war.
But what ended up happening was the person that was caught, the head of Jumdullah, that was caught before he was executed.
He admitted that, hey, look, I don't know if it was really Americans.
I think they were Jews.
I think they were Israelis.
And what ended up happening was they figured out that those CIA operatives that gave them instructions, though they thought were Americans, were actually Mossad agents.
So this is not anything new, chat, that where they try to sabotage peace talks or whatever, because they want a complete regime change.
They want the Ayatollah gone.
They want some type of happy Western power there.
And they haven't had that since 1979 when Iran had their revolution.
Okay?
So first, in the 50s, they had their Mogadesu, I think his name was.
I think I showed you guys this yesterday.
They had their first democratically elected president, right?
Thanks to a CIA operation from the United States and MI5 or MI6, we got him out of there.
All right.
Once he got out of there, the Shah came in.
They didn't like the Shah.
So then the Shah got overthrown in the 1979 revolution and the theocracy that's currently in power now took over.
Right?
And that's a very, again, I'm going to do an episode for you guys on Middle Eastern history.
I'm going to cover all this in one nice podcast where I cover Iran to Saudi Arabia to Palestine to Syria and cover everything for you guys.
Because if you guys truly want to understand them boys, okay, and the history of them boys, you need to understand the Middle East.
Okay?
Because the war on terror, the conflicts we have in the Middle East, it all stems back to Israel, but you need to understand Israel's role with each of these Arab countries.
And Israel does have a unique relationship with each of these different Arab countries, even the ones that they're adversarial with, right?
They have different rules of engagement with them to a degree.
Okay?
And some of them are allies because we pay them, like Jordan Egypt.
I described this to you guys before, how Jordan Egypt, we literally basically play them to play nice with the Israelis.
What else?
There was something else I was going to tell you guys.
Okay.
And as you guys know, we got FreshFit coming up later tonight as well at 8 o'clock.
Gonna cover some.
And we're gonna have a Zoom call after that as well, chat.
Gonna have a Zoom call after that.
Rookie Band says, Hey, Marin, it would be cool if I did a stream touching your experience as a federal agent, why you decided to pursue that career.
It might help people better understand the roles of the feds.
If you did a stream on your experience as a federal agent, I mean, I've done streams like that before.
What specifically, though, do you want to know?
TBC Phillips.
TBC Phillips says, just want to say fuck the viewership bouts about the message and quality of the content.
That is the most important because your show is by far the best, most easiest, political, and tending creator.
I appreciate that, bro.
Even my wife enjoys watching to get a non-biased perspective on political views.
And if you can make it easy for women to understand the United States 100% winning, in my book, Keep with the Great Work, The Fight, Brother, and Work, we need to link up and do some real-ass dope-ass intro and outro videos for you.
Yeah, I appreciate that, bro.
We got to definitely get that going.
I looked at Spacey Osida.
Okay, that one's from before, read that one.
Let me make sure I just didn't miss any of you guys.
Sandiga Towelhead.
Okay.
Hey, Marion, this clip has been going viral, 45 million views.
If Frank was being attacked by another dog like this, would you have interviewed?
I didn't mean intervened.
All right, let me get this X clip here.
Bro, Frank was getting attacked, bro.
You already know.
I'm jumping in there, man.
Let's see.
It's like a clip here.
I probably might not be able to play this on YouTube.
It might be too.
Oh, shit.
That German Shepherd is fucking that dog up, bro.
Wow.
Yeah, I don't know if I could show this on YouTube, bro.
But yeah, basically, it's a German Shepherd attacking another dog, and the people are not putting in enough effort to stop.
That's basically what it is.
Yeah, sorry, bro.
Saying, I probably can't show that on stream, bro.
Yeah, 47.2 million views on this.
Kingsbury, Rowe, yeah.
I don't know if I can show this on YouTube.
I'm looking at it right now.
Damn, that dog will not let go.
Pssst.
Psss.
Thank you.
That's shit crazy.
Did he kill him?
Alright.
Yeah, see, this is the problem when you can't control your dog, which a lot of people can't, bro.
It's amazing to me.
Chat, now that I got a dog, I realize like how many people can't control their dogs.
It's actually really bad.
It's really bad.
Speaking of Iran, let's go ahead and watch this video.
This comes from PBD.
They dropped this video yesterday.
Iran's last chance.
Trump's final warning amid explosive nuclear deal negotiations.
Face.
Okay.
Rob, if you got a clip on this, U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and the Iranian foreign minister.
Since we're talking about the Iran thing, and then we'll get into the next story, which is going to be the Attorney General of New York, or well, yeah, of New York City, Letitia.
Abbas Al-Ghaji, Al-Ochi held the first face-to-face talks since the Obama era with the White House stating.
So check this out.
First, face-to-face talks with Iran were held basically this past weekend, guys.
There were indirect talks, but they were done.
I forget where they met exactly.
Somewhere, I think, in Europe or the Middle East.
Members of the Trump administration and members of the Iran's regime.
Special Envoy Witkoff's direct communication today was a step forward in achieving mutual beneficial outcome.
Trump's commented on Air Force One.
Is this one that you have, Rob?
Yes, I have two.
I have President Trump and then I also have Pete Hegset discussing what would happen if they don't come to a deal.
Go to Trump first and then we'll go.
Hey, guys, do me a favor.
We got 600 likes right now.
Let's get to 1,000 and just go to Hexer.
Go for it.
Can't have nuclear weapons.
And I think they're tapping us along because we're so used to dealing with stupid people in this country.
And I had Iran perfect.
You had no attacks.
You would have never had October 7th in Israel, the attack by Hamas.
Because Iran was broke.
It was stone cold broke when I was president.
And I don't want to do it.
Yeah, he had very high sanctions on Iran.
Have to be a rich, great nation when he was in.
The only thing that's one thing, simple.
It's really simple.
They can't have a nuclear weapon.
And they got to go fast.
And that's because of Israel.
They can't have a nuclear weapon.
Fairly close to having one.
Because the United States basically figured out that when countries have nuclear weapons, they can start to bully you.
Kind of like what Israel did to us in 1973 when the Yom Kippur War was going on and they were losing.
And Golden Meyer called Nixon and said, if you don't give us aid, we are going to hit the Arab world with nuclear weapons.
And obviously, that would have affected our bottom line in Saudi Arabia and the petrol dollar that Nixon had just literally just put into effect.
So yeah, we ended up giving them the biggest airlift of aid ever.
Okay?
That is the real reason why they don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
When you have a nuclear weapon, it forces other countries to think twice before they attack you, and it would force Israel's hand to the table to negotiate.
More than likely, a two-state solution, which we know Israel does not want to do.
I told you guys this before, I'll say it again.
Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, is not interested in a two-state solution whatsoever.
He is more interested in having Palestinians operate as controlled opposition so that he can continue to say, look, I can't do negotiations with these people.
They want to kill us.
They're savages.
And as long as he can maintain that status quo, and as long as the United States gives them aid, what incentive do they have to make a two-state solution?
They have none.
That is why they keep expanding the settlements, the illegal settlements, by the way, which the international world has condemned.
And that is why they continue the blockade.
They continue the occupation because we don't hold Israel accountable for anything.
So they know that if Iran were to get a nuclear weapon like they have, that would mean that Israel would have to concede as the world power in the Middle East.
They would not have the hegemony like they're trying to get.
The Greater Israel Project would be halted and they would be forced to the negotiation table to have diplomatic relations.
And one of the things I guarantee you that Iran would probably want, they'd want a lifting of the sanctions, that's for sure.
And they'd want Israel to come to the table about a two-state solution for Palestine.
And Israel does not want that at all.
And they're not going to have one.
And we have to do something very harsh.
This is why Trump ripped up the nuclear deal.
We'll do it.
And I'm not doing it for us.
I'm doing it for the world.
For the Israelis.
I'm doing it for the world.
No, you're doing it for Israel.
Come on, Donnie.
We know why you're doing it.
I love you, man.
But we all know why you're doing it.
Radicalized people.
Thank you.
They cannot have a nuclear weapon.
You had a fantastic nuclear deal that President Obama negotiated where they would not have the nuclear weapon.
And you ripped it up.
Why?
Because of pressure from the Zionist lobby and pressure from Netanyahu and Israel.
Nuclear weapon.
Eric.
Thoughts.
I think he's being very nice.
I think Iran is a state sponsor of terror.
They've always been.
They will never not be.
I think he's right.
October 7th wouldn't have happened if Trump were president.
I don't think Russia would have taught Ukraine if Trump were president.
I don't.
Yes.
Try and prohibit.
That's debatable because people got to understand why October 7th happened.
The reason why October 7th happened, chat, was because the Gulf states in the Arab world was on the cusp of recognizing Israel as a as a nation, formally recognizing Israel.
So that would have normalized relations between Israel and the Arab world.
Now, here's the problem, okay?
Here is the problem with that.
The reason why the Hamas and the Palestinian people had a big issue and they invaded on October 7th was because they wanted the Palestine question being solved for many years.
One of the biggest reasons why the Arab world, right, Saudi Arabia Qatar, UAE, et cetera, would not normalize relations with Israel and become a full partner and ally is because of the problem with Palestine, the blockade, the occupation, et cetera, the lack of a two-state solution.
So many Arab countries and monarchies, et cetera, would say, look, Israel, we will normalize relations with you once you give the Palestinians their sovereignty and the right of self-determination, right?
Now, this has been the status quo for decades.
But obviously, over time, they get weaker and weaker in their stance.
You know, what maybe you should just, you know, normalize relations.
We can make some money.
Right?
So basically, they were supposed to have a meeting to kind of finalize things.
And what ended up happening was the Hamas and the Palestinians realized, oh, shit, they're about to start normalizing relations without coming to the table with some type of two-state solution.
So they knew that if relations were normalized, they would be stuck in that position forever.
Now, I want to be clear about this.
I'm not justifying what they did on that day at all.
I'm just telling you why they did what that day, okay?
Because I think it's very important to understand why people do the things that they do, right?
Nothing just comes out of nowhere randomly.
There's typically very serious geopolitical reasons as to why military insurgent groups commit attacks or terrorist attacks or whatever it is.
And in this case, and there were other escalation things as well in Jerusalem and everything else like that, with the Alex mosque.
But the big one, one of the biggest reasons why, that's not the only reason what I just told you guys, but one of the biggest reasons why, biggest reasons why was because they were going to normalize relations with Israel without answering the Palestinian question.
So they were like, okay, if we're getting removed from the table and we're no longer a part of the discussion and these Arab countries are going to go ahead and normalize relations with our oppressor, we're going to take action.
And that's why they ran that military operation on October 7th, right?
So this is very important, guys.
And especially in Western media, they don't talk about this.
They never tell you guys about the why.
They just tell you what happened, but they don't tell you the why.
And I think it's extremely important to understand, even if they're your enemies, right?
Why they do what they do.
Because once you understand why they do what they do, you can predict the next thing.
But many Americans are not told the truth when it comes to this matter and why they did what they did.
A lot of people think it's just a bunch of bloodthirsty savages that ran into the kibbutz and started killing people, and they were just like there to create pandemonium.
But the reality was it was a military operation to kidnap as many hostages as they could to use as political bargaining chips to negotiate the release of Palestinian prisoners in the Israeli jails, okay?
Because a lot of these people have no due process.
A lot of them are being held illegally in Israel for a multitude of different crimes.
You know, some have been convicted.
Some have never even had a trial.
So that's why they did what they did.
Again, not rationalizing it, not justifying it.
I'm just explaining to you guys why they did it.
Okay, and I think it's very important to understand why people do things.
Let's see here what we got.
Softlife says, when you get a chance, what are your thoughts on this Trump's conversion?
Bro, you've been spamming me with this fucking stupid ass article, bro.
Like, dude, you could, look, I don't think, even if he did convert to Judaism, he would never be looked at as a real Jew, bro.
Soft life.
So please stop spamming me with this article, bro.
I looked at it.
Trump is undergoing.
I've heard this rumor for literally years of him trying to convert to Judaism.
You guys got to understand Judaism is not a religion, bro.
It's not an inclusive religion.
They do not really actively look to convert people like Christianity and Islam does.
It's a very exclusive religion versus an inclusive religion like the other Abrahamic ones.
So even if, let's say, let's assume this article is right, which I don't think it is.
Literally comes from the Jewish press as a blog.
Like, come on, dude.
You think that's reputable?
Even if that is true, he's never going to be a full-fledged Jew.
He just won't.
He's not ethically Jewish.
His mother isn't Jewish.
So therefore, he will never be considered a full-blooded one.
And from getting a nuclear weapon at all, cost.
I'm not sure it's going to happen, but I think the smarter thing to do is continue the massive sanctions on that country until they, I don't know, Patrick, they're, they're, They're run by religious fanatics and they hate the West.
They hate everything we're about.
I don't think there's any changing their mind.
That's our fault, though.
That's our fault.
We removed their democratically elected president, which led to the 1979 revolution where it became a theocracy.
So we got to also be honest here with how the Ayatollah came into power and why they're a theocracy now.
Not in our lifetime.
I think a tough hand with Iran is better than trying to negotiate with him.
Here's Rexet.
And of course, I'll come to you.
Go ahead, Rob.
We've had direct talks yesterday.
They began.
In the past, it's been indirect talks with a mediator, but there's Steve Witcoff meeting with the foreign minister of Iran.
What can you tell us?
Well, I can tell you that President Trump is dead serious on this issue.
He's dead serious that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
He's said that for 20 years.
He's been consistent.
That is clear.
He's dead serious that he wants it done at the negotiating table.
He wants it done peacefully.
And that's why he's going straight to these talks.
He set that deadline.
These were productive talks yesterday.
I don't want to get ahead of our skis.
Steve Witcoff does a fantastic job, but it was a good step, and they're going to go at it again on Saturday.
But he's also dead serious that if we can't figure this out at the negotiating table, then there are other options to include my department to ensure that Iran never has a nuclear bomb.
We hope we never get there.
We really do, Maria.
But what we're doing with the Houthis and what we're doing in the region, we've shown a capability to go far, to go deep, and to go big.
And again, we don't want to do that.
But if we have to, we will to prevent the nuclear bomb in Iran's hands.
Amen, brother.
Chris, one.
I have thoughts on this, but.
Well, let's do this.
You have a different set of perspectives.
I want to hear it first, then I'll tell you.
Okay.
For me with this, obviously, right now, everybody is thinking.
Remember how I said the whole thing with negotiating with China?
Okay, here, here's the terms.
This is how it's going to work.
You're going to do this, and we're going to agree to this.
Oh, okay, yeah, yeah.
You're going to do this, and we're going to do this.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure.
And you're going to do this, and we're going to do this.
Oh, for sure, absolutely.
All right, here's a deal.
Let's sign.
And we leave.
We hold our end of the bargain.
You don't heal you.
You think Iran doesn't already have one, if not close to it?
If you don't think they have one, or they're not close to it, you're part of the naive community.
Of course they have it.
They're saying the number they were looking at was the limit said, Rob, if you can pull up the limit for nuclear negotiation with Iran is at 3.67%.
I think it's the number for enriching uranium.
They're at 60%.
Okay, and the negotiation was at 3.67%.
Over the last 15 years, Iran would reduce the stock low in rich uranium by 97%.
They haven't.
They're not listening to you.
So, well, maybe they're taking time because they really want to negotiate this.
Khomeini said, I'm neither overly optimistic, neither pessimistic.
So here's the reality of it.
Let's just say you do deal with them.
How are you going to hold them accountable that they're not doing it?
Let's actually find that part out.
Okay.
Yeah, we're not building a nuclear weapon.
How do you know?
How do you audit them?
How do you find them?
I remember we tried to do that with them once.
How do you do that?
Well, they did it before.
With the Obama nuclear deal chat, they had international inspectors constantly going to Iran and checking.
So they had outside and independent people coming in to look.
That's how they did it with the Obama administration.
But we had inspectors.
And they shut the door.
They shut the door.
So how do we know anyways?
They don't.
This isn't about negotiating with Iran.
This is about saying, cut the shit.
We put a second nuclear strike force in the region sitting there right now.
We're going to show force and have them.
I don't know.
I don't, Pat.
Maybe Israel goes in and does what they did in 19, what is it, 82?
Or we're playing games with Iran and Israel in the middle of the night when wipes out their whole nuclear.
Well, here's what happened.
A lot of people that have.
Well, they've built underground bunkers now, and this is in the 80s.
I mentioned this to you guys earlier with Saddam when they did this, when they bombed Saddam in 81.
Israel doesn't have the capability to destroy their nuclear program by themselves.
They don't.
They need our help.
That is why they're constantly saying, hey, we need aid.
We need this regime change, et cetera.
Israel cannot do it themselves.
They cannot do it themselves.
Trust me, if they could do it themselves, they would have done it a long time ago, chat.
A long time ago.
I have foreign nationals, a lot of people that have folks living in Iran right now for deals.
They're moving their folks out.
They're saying, come home.
Whether it's Europe, Asia, Middle East, they're saying, come home.
Tensions are too high.
They may be attacking the nuclear facility that they have.
That threat is there.
The ships are already out there close to Iran anyway.
So it's like they're closer.
Okay.
This chat came in from Magaloso.
Magaloso, bro.
I'll be honest with you, bro.
I'm going to read what you said verbatim.
Myron, when you close the show, you should end with the three camera angles in each view.
You kill it with your points.
You did it once, devastating, bro.
You killed it.
I don't get what you mean by doing that to close the show, though, bro.
Please, man, do a spell check.
Use some periods.
Use some commas.
Because I just read what you said verbatim out loud, and it doesn't make sense.
It's enough to be able to say we can do something, but it's one of two things.
Either you know they got a nuclear weapon, and you're not negotiating.
You just need this as an excuse to attack.
Either that's one, okay?
Or two, you are naive and you believe they have nuclear weapons or getting close to it, and you're trying to find a way to negotiate with them to get something done.
I don't think that's the case.
So which one is it?
Is it, are we opening up for Israel to do what they want to do?
Does Israel want to do something?
Would Israel like to attack their nuclear facilities?
Do you think Israel, as strong of an intelligence unit that they have, that they claim they have, that we've all seen it and read about it?
Do you think they already have some insiders that know exactly where?
Like, what do you think are the chances of them knowing exactly where the facilities are?
100%.
Perfect.
I'm going 100%.
I'm not saying it's going to take the over.
Yeah.
Okay.
So let's say we're sitting there saying they know.
All right.
Do you think Israel is going to wait on U.S.'s lead on how to negotiate this?
Or do you think Israel's reputation is they may be saying, let's put this out there, give us the permission to go in and do the job.
No, they're going to attack anyway.
So I think it was the Wall Street Journal or one of these news publications kind of put this out already that they were going to attack no matter what this year sometime.
So I don't know, chat.
I'll be honest with y'all.
I think some kind of conflict with Iran is inevitable this year.
I truly do think that some type of some sort of conflict with them is inevitable this year.
So it is what it is, man.
Permission.
Give us the support.
Give us everything we need.
Just give us the wink.
We're not going to put your fingerprints on it.
We'll take care of it like we did in the fine support.
Oh, and assets, intel, everything.
Whatever they need to get it done.
The intel, they already have the intel.
Okay, so yeah.
So they already have the.
So this is all, I would agree with if your thesis is, or if your conclusion is that this is doing all the diplomatic steps that they need to take and then figure out the best.
The CIA can't do it.
They're too exposed right now.
If it happens, it would have to be through Israel.
Iran needs somebody to get behind because even with this, let's just say they do something.
Something happens to Khamenei.
Who's going to replace him?
Somebody else from the same executive regime.
So they need, like, someone within Iran needs to step up or from the outside.
Someone with a strong backbone who wants the job has to rally and win the people over or something.
That'll never happen.
they'll get assassinated beforehand.
One needs to come to...
There's no democracy in these Arab countries, man.
Well, these Muslim countries.
Especially under a theocracy.
People need to come.
Like, who were we talking to the other day?
Oh, J.D. Vance's brother was here yesterday.
And we're having a great time.
We're giving a tour to property.
He wanted to see the place.
Corey, we're having a conversation together.
And they said for many, many years.
Albo A says here, the only option is complete denuclearization of the Middle East, including them boys.
If Iran can't have them, neither should they, because in my opinion, I think it's more dangerous for them boys to have it.
But we know that'll never happen.
SMH.
Yes, bro, I agree.
And I think Iran actually said that we would stop our nuclear program if Israel gave up their nukes.
But we know Israel, number one, is never going to give up their nukes.
And then, number two, they'd have to acknowledge that they had them in the first place, which would fuck them up.
So to this day, Israel will never publicly and officially acknowledge that they have nuclear weapons.
It's implied, but to this day, it's still not been formally admitted.
There's the family.
And there's a big reason for that.
I've spoken to you guys before.
There is a law on the books that Jimmy Carter signed back in like 78 where countries do not qualify for foreign aid if they run uranium enrichment programs, nuclear programs, et cetera, that isn't sponsored or overseen by the United States.
And we know that Israel has their nuclear weapons.
They definitely didn't get oversighted by us.
They did it illegally and they did it behind our backs.
This is why JFK got killed.
A big reason why JFK got killed.
And we never talk about this in history.
So that is another big, big reason, chat, why they can't acknowledge a nuclear program.
It would hurt their bottom line with getting aid from the United States.
And a lot of people don't know that.
If you guys want, I could pull up the law for y'all here, but I've shown it on air many times.
But it's a law that was put into place by Jimmy Carter in 78.
Somebody was saying, JD, you ought to run.
And JD didn't want to run.
But for many years, like, yeah, I'm just a business guy.
No, you ought to run.
You ought to run.
Finally, it's like, listen, I'm getting so much support that I'm running.
You know, sometimes guys like really, really want to run and you can feel the ambition.
Then there's the guys that don't want to run, but you're the white guy for the job, right?
Okay.
Iran needs to get behind somebody to rally to change the flipping climate that's in Iran.
FYI, if Iranians are watching this, you only have three and a half years left.
That's it.
You have three and a half years under him, Trump.
He's not going to do the job for you guys.
He said it on the podcast.
But the climate is ripe right now that if you guys do your part and you get behind somebody and somebody with courage that's willing to come and do something in Iran, you guys have a fighting chance right now.
Maybe you haven't had a chance like this.
You had a couple in the last 15, 20 years.
This is a chance for somebody in Iran to step up a voice or for you to rally behind to say we want things to change.
President's not going to do it for you.
Trump's not going to do it for you.
No.
Yeah, but if the Iranian people did that, bro, they'd literally get put in jail and shit, man.
Somebody else is going to do it for you.
It has to be internal.
If you get close to the finish line, then somebody can help you.
But you have to show that you're getting close to the finish line.
Nobody else is going to do that part.
You got to go that close to it.
Then if you do, then the other person's going to be like, great, it shows that you're interested.
It shows that you're committed to it.
It shows you willn't go through the pain.
But I think if Iran, similar story for me with China, the reason why I'm supportive of the tariff stuff that we're doing right now is because I know somebody else has to deal with the terrorist with China in the next 5, 10, 15, 20 years.
You're not going to have another guy like Trump in a while.
You're not.
You got one right now.
And it's not, hey, come cause a war.
No.
Why don't you guys do something there to want to change the revolution?
Get up there again, start making some noise.
This is the time for Iranians to want to do it.
I don't say it's an easy thing.
I'm not sitting here saying, hey, how come you're not thinking about the livelihood of our families and all this other stuff?
I don't say it's going to be easy.
All I'm saying to you is if you want Iran to change.
So when we think about the Middle East pre-79, the Middle East was pretty peaceful.
They didn't have a lot of issues in the Middle East pre-79.
Khomeini coming in.
Ever since 1979, Khomeini came in.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard came in.
The Middle East has been in shambles.
Not Iran, the Middle East has been in shambles since 79.
It's been 46 years now.
What if some of the folks out there start rallying behind some names?
We'd love to know some of these names.
Right now, if I told you who's the voice, who would you say?
We don't have a lot of names.
Who is it?
Who's going out there?
Who's holding meetings?
Who's going across out there at Dubai holding meetings with a lot of different leaderships coming through?
Who's doing that?
I don't know.
I don't think a lot of it's happening or else the rest of the world will be talking about it.
But I think Iran has a chance to do something with it right now.
And this discussion, I think at any point, if the speculation is that these guys, Israel, is hoping to kind of like set it up for us to attack, at any point, something can happen there.
And I don't think it's going to be, we're trying to negotiate a nuclear deal.
I don't think so.
That's my opinion.
I may be wrong.
That's why I'm at the end.
I mean, great.
It's just, and I, and again, we talked about it, what, two podcasts ago?
It's about the people.
And everybody's always talking about, we talk a lot, we criticize Israel.
You criticize Iran.
It's not the people that are living there.
It's the government.
So for when you're saying, like, for people to step up, that's a really dangerous thing.
Like, meaning, because like imagine going against that government, but I think it's a necessary thing.
Easier said than done because we're here and you guys are over there.
But it has to happen.
Okay.
I feel, dude, my mom and dad are from Iran.
Jacob says, I think he is saying that you should normalize what you did once in ending your stream.
You cycle through each camera.
I don't remember doing that.
That's why I'm so confused, Jacob White.
Hood Data says another boomer from the Bombs Away Club, SMH.
Check out Douglas McGregor.
He's real knowledgeable on Iran and the border topic.
Yeah, I've watched a bit of Douglas McGregor.
That's fair.
From Iran.
I love, like, you guys already know how we feel about you guys, but somebody, a movement, something has to spark or else it's never going to change.
And what a great freaking point.
This bull that's in this Matador Trump, he's, who knows what's after him.
But right now, right now is a thing.
And I just pray to God that, you know, you guys have the support and it'll come.
But you guys have to step it up.
It'll be nasty, though.
Oh, it's going to be ugly.
You probably have to lose one or two or more people.
Oh, no, in Russia.
I mean, they lose them.
You go every day.
They lose him every day.
Last night I had Giselle Sharmaad on.
Her father was stolen.
She's falsely convicted, tortured, executed.
Biden couldn't get him back.
Trump wasn't here.
And they then sent the body back.
His tongue was cut out.
Parts of him are missing.
These are terrorists, okay?
So to Pat's point, can't be trusted.
I will say that political payback is sometimes gratuitous.
Well, the other thing, too, is that they can't trust us, man.
Like, we had that nuclear deal in place and we literally tore it up, bro.
Like, the problem is that there's no trust between either country, right?
We don't trust them.
They don't trust us.
And, you know, Trump ripping up the nuclear deal for Israel definitely didn't help.
Definitely didn't help.
Hurt us quite a bit.
That's why they said in the first place, we don't want to meet with y'all.
Trump sent a letter, said, hey, you guys got to get rid of your nuclear program, sent it directly to the Iranian government.
And they said, well, we're not meeting with you guys directly because this is a non-starter.
And a big reason why is because they can't trust us because of us ripping the nuclear deal from before.
So both parties are guilty for doing some sneaky shit, both, right?
Being very fair here.
Leaving that deal was a mistake.
It was all you had.
And now you'll be lucky to agreed.
Get a deal that looks like that.
To your point, it probably won't be a deal at all.
You don't know any names because they'd be dead.
This is true.
Rare W for Kumo.
Why?
You don't know any names about who may be bubbling up to have a populist revolt because this is an oppressive regime.
I don't know what the answer is.
Israel needs American support because they don't have the munitions that we call those bunker busters to go deep enough to get where it has to go.
America has them.
So we would be involved militarily on it.
If you keep them from getting a nuke now, do you keep them from getting a nuke forever?
No.
There has to be regime change there.
And I don't think we know what to do.
I don't think Trump knows what to do.
I think talking can't hurt, but to your point, they can't be trusted.
No way.
No way.
No, I mean, look, I put Iran and China in the same place.
I put Iran and China in the same place.
We had Richard Warner the other day, and he's talking about the fact that, you know, Deng Xiaoping, who was a guy back in the days who was a pragmatist, he went to Japan and said, hey, I know we don't have the best relationship right now.
How did you kind of fix your economy?
And he says, hey, we've got 5,000 banks, 5 million loan officers doing 35 loan applications per week.
What do you call it?
Deng comes back, starts working on the banks, the economy changes, everything changes.
Xi is not Deng.
Deng is willing to go talk.
Xi is not that guy.
If Xi wants to do something with U.S., Xi would have come to US, sit down, and have a conversation with.
If we get that meeting taking place, okay, then maybe sentiment changes.
Situation changes.
But hey, if I'm Trump, you know what else I'm doing?
You want to kind of fix the tariff?
Allow all our social media companies into China.
Why are you worried about it?
Allow our social media companies into China.
Allow Facebook, Google, YouTube.
Allow us in China.
Why are you worried?
Let's kind of make this thing work.
It's not going to be happening.
So the way they're negotiating, there's a lot that can be done, but we'll see what's going on.
I'd rather deal with China than Iran.
Yeah, meeting.
Iran has absolutely no upside to the world.
No, China doesn't say death upon America.
China just doesn't like the Western ideas that we have, and they're still clinging on to communism.
And the sanctions squeeze the people.
That's the one problem with the sanctions is you squeeze the people.
Life becomes horrible for the people that you want to help.
Yes.
It's hard to do.
It's hard to do the right way.
A lot of you have been asking about the cigar lounge.
Do you want to come to it?
And we've been having back-to-back-to-back.
This last Friday was the biggest event we ever had at the cigar lunch, which was fantastic.
However, let's see here.
So this is that.
All right.
So we're going to get into, so we covered some stuff.
We covered the update on the Iran situation.
Now we are going to go ahead and go into the next topic, guys, which is going to be the Attorney General, which this is crazy stuff.
Fox News reports this literally 28 minutes ago.
First, let's go ahead.
This comes from the New York Post.
Today's cover, Trump administration refers New York Attorney General Letitia James for potential prosecution over alleged mortgage fraud guys and this is fucking crazy and for those of you that don't know who she is she is the attorney general for the state of New York okay Letitia Ann James born October 18 1958 is an American lawyer and
Politician serving since 2019 as the 67th attorney general for New York State, NYAG.
Having won the 2018 election to succeed Barbara Underwood, a member of the Democratic Party, James is the first African-American and first woman to be elected New York attorney general.
So now I know you guys are probably wondering, well, wait, wait one second, Myron.
What's going on here?
So this woman, guys, was one of the main people that was behind the prosecution of Donald Trump a couple of years back for the falsifying business records.
Okay.
Her alongside this guy.
Alvin Bragg.
Put a face name for you guys.
Also a lawyer, American politician and lawyer who serves as a New York City County District Attorney covering Manhattan.
Okay, so the Attorney General, I've described their duties for you guys before, but the Attorney General's job, guys, basically is they are think of her as the she is the Pam Bondi for the state of New York.
So Pam Bondi is the attorney general.
She oversees all the law enforcement agencies under the Department of Justice to include the prosecutor's office, right?
In the state of New York, similar structure, she oversees all the law enforcement for the state of New York, okay, and prosecutorial offices.
So she basically is Alvin Bragg's boss, okay?
And Alvin Bragg, um, you know, is the main New York County district attorney.
He runs the office out of Manhattan, okay?
This is through the state system, of course, not the federal system, all right.
Now, the reason why this is important is because Alvin Bragg and Letitia James led the charge to going after Donald Trump for falsifying business records, as you guys know, with the Stormy Daniels case.
Basically, long story short, Trump had some type of situation with Stormy Daniels.
This woman right here, okay.
This woman, who is a porn star, right?
She basically hooked up with Trump sometime in like 2006 or something like that, and Trump paid her off.
But the way he paid her off, allegedly, was illegal and falsifying business records because they made it seem as though them paying her off was, you know, during the course of everyday business.
And basically, his guy, Cohen, where is he?
So basically, okay, so an alleged one-night stand, one-night sexual encounter took place in 2006 between Bisman and later U.S. President Donald Trump and pornographic film actor Stormy Daniel, followed by a conspiracy on the part of Trump to cover up the story in a month prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential election and Trump's falsification of business records as part of the conspiracy.
The story broke in 2018 when the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, paid $130,000 to Daniels as hush money to buy her silence during the 2016 Trump campaign.
And so to make this clear, also, Cohen basically fronted the money himself.
He took out like a home equity line of credit or something.
He paid her off and then he bailed Trump for it as legal expenses.
Okay.
And the reason why Trump did this, paid this off, was because back in 2016, when Trump was running for president, if you guys remember, the scandal with the grab her by the pussy thing broke.
Now, when that story broke, obviously it impacted Trump's ability significantly to be taken seriously.
It really hurt his campaign.
So he needed to ensure that any other ugly things that would rear their heads to mess up his campaign would be handled.
So he basically got his lawyer/slash aide, Kent Cohen, at the time, to pay off Stormy Daniels so this wouldn't come back and blow up in his face, which ended up coming back later after he was president, right?
And Trump, I think, got someone else that he was friends with out of the National Inquirer to pull the story.
Right now, when you're a famous individual with a lot of money, you have guys like this.
This is called like professional fixers, right?
Where you want to run for some type of public office, you want to maintain a certain image or whatever.
You deal with these people where they dead stories before they get out, right?
That can hurt your image.
This is just something that the rich and wealthy have, right?
As a matter of fact, Kanye West had one of these guys for a while.
And the loser actually posted a video after Kanye said the things he said about, you know, them boys.
He put out like an image of Kanye, like high on some drugs while he was like during a video where he hooked up with some chick in Vegas like 10 years ago.
And he said, look, remember when you paid me to get rid of the story, blah, blah, blah.
So the point I'm trying to make is high-level security, high-level celebrities typically have fixer people that they pay to get rid of shit like this, right?
And make sure it never hits the media.
It's a very common tactic with the big celebrities.
So this scandal, okay, this scandal between Trump hooking up with Stormy Daniels and the payoff led, because he paid her through his business, the Trump business.
This led to the state of New York pursuing a criminal investigation against Donald Trump, which ended up getting him indicted later on.
And this led to a historic event.
It was the first time that a president or a former president of the United States was charged with a crime in American history.
Okay?
So obviously, Letitia James and Alvin Bragg, being the first ones to bring these charges against Donald Trump, set history.
Okay?
Because I told you guys this before when he originally got charged that this was a political witch hunt and people were trying to make their names off of going after Donald Trump because this falsifying business records investigation or charge that they used is typically a misdemeanor.
But what they did was they upped it to a felony, which is very rare and pretty much unprecedented.
But again, like I said before, they wanted to get to the table first and charge him.
Because after he was charged by the state of New York for this falsifying business records case, the feds followed up and did a search warrant at his house in Mar-a-Lago.
Okay.
And they ended up going after him for the document case.
Then Georgia followed up and charged him for the RICO.
Then Washington, D.C. followed up and charged him for the insurrection.
So you guys see where I'm going here?
Four different jurisdictions, four different entities wanted to prosecute Trump.
So New York was the first ones to do it.
They did it with a bullshit charge.
They did it with a weak case, but they did it.
They charged him and they actually went to trial and won.
Okay?
So Trump was convicted.
Now, with that said, I lay the ground there for you guys because now how the tables have fucking turned, man.
So this leads us to our story with Letitia James faces legal peril over alleged fraud.
Let's get into it.
Sandra, a lot to get into with this, and you've got the perfect guests.
We've got the perfect guest to talk about it with.
He's here.
Retired NYPD inspector and Fox News contributor Paul Morrow, who reported on this back in early February.
We'll get your thoughts on the Speeding Bridge in moments.
First, this is an incredible story.
Oh, the irony.
Yeah, what a turnaround.
So the irony doesn't even do it justice.
Fucking incredible, bro.
Holy.
Sam Antar, as Eric mentioned, was arrested for a financial fraud himself about 40-something years ago.
The infamous Crazy Eddie case that he was part of the architecture of.
But that said, he subsequently, after pleading and testifying on behalf of the government, went to work for the government, helping them make white-collar cases.
So he knows what he's talking about.
He brings this thing to me on my Ops Desk blog, and he lays it out, and he's got documents.
And it was very compelling.
It's very hard to argue that, to me, at least, to my eyes, the evidence that he's uncovered here really looks like there's a pattern of obfuscation, stuff that she has signed and notarized that does not seem to be accurate.
And so the story has been bubbling up.
And then when Laura Ingram breaks it nationally, it gets attention.
And as you mentioned, it's been referred to DOJ for a criminal referral.
And that is no joke.
That is the top of the prosecutorial food chain.
Yep.
So obviously, it's going to the feds, basically.
I'm going to have to answer this out.
And you were on this very early as well with your substantive.
Let me pull up call four number one right here.
You had the headline, Sunday report, a Tish James scandal.
Is the New York Attorney General guilty of exactly what she sued Donald Trump for?
You then go into the details of.
It's fucking wild, bro.
Now, obviously, it's different, right?
Trump was to kind of pay for a cover-up, right, and use business funds to do it.
Her is real estate fraud, which I'm going to talk about that here in a second with you guys.
It's actually a big reason why I tell you guys to do the things that I tell you guys when it comes to real estate.
Let me what she's potentially accused of now.
So what's it like for you to now see that there are potential criminal charges being referred to DOJ when you had this a couple months ago?
Yeah, I mean, it's gratifying that it's getting attention.
And we have to be careful.
Look, she's a public figure right at that, but she gets her chance to answer this out.
She has it.
There hasn't even been a complaint or an indictment.
So, you know, she might have answers.
But as I said, it's really, really compelling.
And I have to give credit to Sam Antarct because he just kept digging away on this.
People have thrown all kinds of shade at him here.
Oh, you're working for the Trump administration.
All of that's completely not true.
He hasn't worked for the government in a long, long time.
But there were two really salient aspects of this that if you have any kind of an investigatory mind, you have to say to yourself, it looks like there's some real smoke here.
She's claimed these Virginia houses, at least one of them, as her primary residence, when she's the attorney general.
In fact, some of that paperwork was filed when she was about to bring the case against Donald Trump.
So I took real chutzpah.
So the other thing, though, and I think this is real trouble, is that her Brooklyn residence, she has a residence in Brooklyn, that she has repeatedly claimed over the course of the ownership that it's only four residences.
Why?
Five or above is commercial, and that's going to be a higher rate.
And so she's...
So, and I also have the criminal referral right here for you guys as well, which we'll go ahead and take a look at this.
Okay, we will go ahead and take a look at this as well.
Let's watch the stories, then we're going to go through it.
Always claimed.
She's the attorney general.
In fact, some of that paperwork was filed when she was about to bring the case against Donald Trump.
I took real chutzpah.
That's crazy.
Damn, imagine going after Trump for falsifying business records while you're committing mortgage fraud, bro.
Oh, man.
The pot calling the kettle black, quite literally, in this case.
So the other thing, though, and I think this is real trouble, is that her Brooklyn residence, she has a residence in Brooklyn, but she has repeatedly claimed over the course of the ownership that it's only four residences.
Why?
Five or above is commercial, and that's going to be a higher rate.
And so she's always claimed through a series of paperwork filings that it's only four residences, but the New York City certificate of occupancy, which is a determining factor, says that it's five.
And you got to say to yourself something.
Oh, Lord, bro.
Oh, man.
Now, okay, you guys are probably wondering, well, Myra, why does it matter?
So as you guys know, I'm heavily into real estate and I literally just closed a commercial deal.
So in the real estate world, there's two different entities, okay?
You have residential and you have commercial.
Residential is typically a single family home, a duplex, a triplex, or up to a fourplex, okay?
And then commercial is anything above four units.
Now, why is this important?
Because you're able to get significantly more favorable terms, right, with a residential loan.
Why is that?
Because with a residential loan, a lot of the times there's more programs and more things put in place with residential loans to allow Americans to be home buyers.
There's programs for first-time homebuyers.
There's programs for people that are lower earners.
Hell, they just literally put out a program like a year or two ago where Bank of America was literally giving you out a loan if you were a minority.
Okay.
So even though that's insane, basically reverse racism, the point is that there's a multitude of programs out there for you to procure your first home as long as it's residential.
And they tend to have better rates, better terms, better payoff options, et cetera.
All right.
So there's far more ways to fund a residential deal.
Now, on the commercial side, winds up happening with the commercial side is you are more evaluated on the property's ability to generate money.
Okay.
So when you do a residential deal, they look at you, the person that's trying to borrow the money, and a lot of stake is put on your credit score, your debt to income ratio, et cetera.
A lot of that is put on the line.
But the positive is, is that you're able to qualify for more programs.
You're able to get away with putting down far less money, maybe 3.5% down, 5% down, 10% down.
You can go ahead and get away with it.
However, when you do a commercial deal, you have to put a significant amount of money down, typically somewhere between 10 to 25%, right?
Because most of the time, if not all of the time, when you buy a commercial property, you're buying it as an investor.
And when you buy as an investor, you're not going to get the same level of good interest rates in terms as you would with a residential deal, especially if you live in it.
If you live in it, right?
You can get and negotiate better interest rates, lower down payments, et cetera.
Now, with a commercial deal, right?
We talked about the positives with the residential and the negatives, where, yes, you get these good terms, but they start to look at you as the borrower more with a commercial deal.
They don't look so much at you as the borrower.
Rather, they look at the property and how the property performs.
Okay.
So if the property cash flows, that's really all they care about.
They just want to make sure that the income from the property covers the debt, okay, of whatever loan you get.
But typically, you have to put a significant amount of more money down, okay?
Like I said, 10 to 25%, 30% in some cases for these commercial loans.
And I'm keeping this very basic so I don't like confuse you guys, right?
There's adjustable rate mortgages, all this other shit, which a lot of people do for commercial loans.
But the point I'm trying to make is pursuant to this conversation here with her, why she would go ahead and try to do everything in her power to make a commercial property be listed as a residential property is because you get far more favorable terms, better interest rates.
You could get asked for more money.
You could put less money down, et cetera.
And in New York City, especially, guys, okay, real estate is very expensive, extremely expensive.
You're not going to be able to get that fourplex that she has, or fiveplex in this case, is probably worth a few million dollars, okay?
And it's probably a piece of crap, too.
It's probably not even that nice, but it's worth millions upon millions of dollars.
I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't up into the $3 to $10 million range, even though it's in Brooklyn, because Brooklyn is going through hardcore gentrification right now.
Brooklyn used to be the hood, but thanks to the skyrocketing prices of Manhattan and the city in general, a lot of those people that can no longer afford Manhattan go to Brooklyn instead, and has been going through gentrification for the better part of the past decade, and property prices have increased significantly.
So it would make sense why she would try to get residential-type terms on her contract or on her paperwork over a commercial.
Okay.
So give me ones in the chat if that makes sense, guys.
That's a quick little glimpse of how real estate works, but from the commercial versus the residential side.
But yes, there are heavy incentives to try to get properties under a residential loan or label as a residential over a commercial property because you do get better, more favorable rates in other conditions.
Give me ones that that make sense, guys.
Obviously, that's a very condensed explanation.
But I'm doing this for the purposes of you guys simply understanding it in relation to this topic.
Mel, she's been on a government salary.
Where's she getting all of this property?
I mean, you know, she's quite the real estate tycoon.
Seems like a significant.
Yeah, let's actually look at what her salary is.
Let's see.
Governor Kathy Hochel, quarter million.
Attorney General, okay, $220,000 a year.
Ryan, this comes from Ballotpedia.
Let me double check and make sure.
Oh, what the hell?
Social media post, inflate net worth of NY Attorney General.
Okay, Lisa James, New York City Attorney General, has a personal net worth of about $2.7 million according to her recent financial disclosure statement and accounting required of all state officers and employees whose annual salary exceeds $108,000.
Let's see here.
She could be investigated for fraud immediately.
Okay, let me see if I can.
Okay, so in 2022, she made roughly...
What the hell, bro?
Just tell me how much she made, man.
This is shit, bro.
Because I remember I looked at this for Mayor Adams.
Seems as though, like, New York State has like some type of situation where they obviously have to disclose how much money they are worth for transparency reasons.
Let me...
Okay.
So the New York Post reports, okay, $220,000 roughly.
Okay.
And this just broke out this morning.
Okay, here's her.
Is this her property right here?
Oh, this might be it right now.
Okay, let's okay.
And this is from the Twitter thing I showed you guys earlier.
Embattled New York Attorney General Letitia James, Duck reported outside her Brooklyn home Wednesday, refusing to answer questions about her simmering mortgage fraud scandal.
Well, yeah, obviously.
Oh, here she is right here.
James, who infamously declared no one is above the law, would prosecute a former President Donald Trump, Fain talking to her on her cell phone as reporters peppered her with questions about getting slapped with a federal criminal referral alleging mortgage fraud.
So yeah, here's her house right here.
And you guys are probably saying, like, bro, what the hell?
This looks like crap.
Well, this is New York City for you guys.
According to a letter obtained by a post, James, who draws an annual salary of 220,000 allegedly falsified records to get sweetheart home loans for a Virginia property she claimed as her principal residence in 2023 while she was still serving as a New York state prosecutor.
Remember what I tell you guys all the time?
That if you're going to go ahead and get one of these loans where you're putting very little money down, right, FHA or whatever, how many times have I told you guys on air?
Do not get these loans if you don't intend to live in a property and make it your principal home.
I tell you guys this all the time.
You guys see why I tell you this?
How many times, a lot of you guys in the chat right now, some of y'all are my witnesses.
How many times have I told you guys?
Do not, do not lie on these forms, get a favorable loan term, right?
Under the premise that you're going to live in that property as your principal residence and lie.
Why?
Because of shit like this.
Now they're probably going to cook her for this, guys, because it's pretty fucking black and white.
Right?
So she got a sweetheart home loan for Virginia property she claimed as her principal residence 2023 while she was still serving as a New York state prosecutor.
And here's the form, right?
And I'm going to go ahead and show this.
We're going to go through this form here for you guys as well.
Right?
This came from the U.S. Federal Housing.
We'll keep watching this the news article.
Oh, hold on.
Alright, so niggas actually went and showed up to her house.
So she purchased it in 1983, it looks like.
Yes, she purchased it.
Okay.
Yo, that thing is worth a bunch of money now, bro.
Looks like a good neighborhood in Brooklyn.
Let's go.
Let's go.
All right, so here it is.
Yo, Chad, what's the address?
Can one of y'all give me the address real quick in chat?
I want to Google this thing and see how much it's worth.
I can't see make out that sign.
God damn it.
Let me see if I can up the quality here.
All right, 1080p.
Chat, can one of y'all do me a quick favor, Castle Club guys, or one of you guys get the out of here.
I want to put it into Zillow and see how much this house is worth.
It's got to be worth a few million, bro.
Got to be worth at least.
I'm going to say somewhere in the range of $2 to $10 million.
At least.
No, it's not doxing, bro.
of public knowledge now.
See, I can't make out this sign of If I knew what the fuck this sign was, I'd be able to look it up.
Can't make out of that sign once again.
Bro, this nigga camera trash, bro.
New York Post can't get better cameras?
Oh, what did that say?
Bro.
Inwood?
I can't even...
fucking...
Foxwood chat?
What's the number?
Okay, let me go back.
I'll show y'all the number.
It looks like 14.
Well, this one is 11402.
11402 right here.
So this one's probably 1140 or 11404.
It's one of those two, probably, or 06 or some shit.
It looks like 04.
It's a bit faded, but it looks like 11404.
All right.
You know what, chat?
Let's go ahead and try this.
We are going to try this.
See what happens.
11404, Foxwood, Brooklyn should be New York, New York, but let's just try Brooklyn so we know we don't get something else Illinois.
Bruh, it's not Foxwood.
God damn it.
Midwood?
all right let's try midwood is this it Oh, we might be close, chat.
We might be close.
Nope, this is not it, chat.
But it looks like we're in the right neck of the woods, even though all of Brooklyn kind of looks like this, to be honest with y'all.
Softwood?
The noticer found it.
Someone said Jamaica, New York.
No way, bro.
1140 in Wood Street, Jamaica, New York.
No, Jamaica is Queens, bro.
The hell?
I'll punch that address in, but there's no way that's it, bro.
Yeah, bro.
This is fucking Queens, bro.
The hell, nigga.
Wait, what?
Hold on.
Oh, shit.
is it what the fuck Why does it say Jamaica?
On the White House in the corner.
Let's compare it.
Yeah.
This is it.
We found it.
That's weird.
Shout out to the Rumble chat for finding it.
I'll give Derek 156, Derek I56.
He got the address.
Bro, what the fuck, though?
This is Jamaica is Queens.
Why are they saying Brooklyn?
That's weird.
All right, whatever, bro.
Fuck New York City, man.
So confusing.
Okay, so this is it right here, right?
So now that we got the address, let's go ahead and put this shit into like Zillow, right?
Let's see what this property's worth, bro.
Hmm.
There's no way it's that cheap, bro.
Especially if it's a five-unit, like they're saying.
Something's off here.
Something is off.
Is this one of her other houses?
Okay, this might be where she lives, but the other property in Brooklyn that they're talking about might be the real estate property that she rents out, chat.
Because this might be, what is this?
It doesn't even tell you what the fuck it is.
Alright, whatever.
Yeah, that might not even be what it is.
Significant detail in all of this.
You mentioned that this was broken on the increment.
Where she lives in versus the property in Brooklyn that they're talking about is more than likely probably an investment property.
That's what I'm thinking now.
Trump's at real time.
So she lives in Jamaica.
This is what I'm thinking.
She lives in Jamaica, Queens.
That might be like a single-family home, but she owns another property in Brooklyn that she says is a four-plex when it's really a five-plex.
So the other thing, though, and I think this is real trouble, is that her Brooklyn residence, she has a residence in Brooklyn, but she has repeatedly claimed over the course of the ownership that it's only four residences.
Why?
Five or above is commercial.
Okay, someone said I super chatted her.
Okay, the Brooklyn house.
All right, shout out to the chat, man.
We got FBI niggas in here, bro.
Okay, I got the address for the Brooklyn house.
All right, let's see here.
Let me pull this up on the side for you guys real quick.
All right, here's the Brooklyn crib.
Okay, yeah, this makes way more sense.
Okay, yep, this is definitely fucking Brooklyn.
Okay, let me see here what it's worth.
All right.
It's worth 1.886 million, chat.
1.86 million.
It's in Brooklyn.
I won't put the address out because I don't want to dox her.
But yeah.
Built in 1905.
It's listed as a...
What is it listed as?
Is it listed as a 5plex or a 4plex?
Multifamily, but it doesn't tell you how many.
Interesting.
Very, very interesting.
Very, very interesting.
Okay.
Let me try this on Redfin then.
bear with me chat nope doesn't tell you That's weird.
It just calls it a multifamily home.
Does not say how many.
Interestingly enough.
And that's going to be a higher rate.
So basically, her crib is worth like $2 million, chat.
So I was right.
It was right around $2 million.
I said it would be somewhere between $2 to $10 million.
She's always claimed through a series of paperwork filings that it's only for residences, but the New York City certificate of occupancy, which is just so you guys know, this is two problems.
So one house that she owns, she claims is a residential property.
We haven't even talked about the other crib that she bought in Virginia.
This referral, guys, doesn't come from this Brooklyn property.
We're just kind of going in the weeds of it.
But the Brooklyn property isn't even really the problem here.
Her lying about that is a whole other issue.
We're talking about her getting a home loan on a house in Virginia, which we're going to get into that here in a second.
The determining factor says that it's five.
And you got to say to yourself something else.
She's been on a government salary.
Where's she getting all of this property?
I mean, you know, we know that she makes $220,000 a year.
That's not enough to be buying houses like this.
She's quite the real estate tycoon.
Seems like a significant detail in all of this.
You mentioned that this was broken.
You would have to say for years.
Spoken on the Ingram angle last night.
Here's Jonathan Turley on the criminal referral against James.
Listen.
This is really for James the very case that she most famously brought.
She insisted that these technicalities matter and that the powerful should not be given a free pass.
Well, that bill has come due in this case.
She's going to have to deal with this filing.
I'm honestly just not sure how you defend against this unless you say that these are fraudulent documents.
So what are we talking?
What does this mean for James?
So exactly what Jonathan said there, he's exactly right.
It's precisely what she brought against Donald Trump, which is to say that you overinflated the value of your properties in order to get more mortgages than your building was worth.
Her Virginia property, one of them, by her own disclosure, which I have to disclose as a public figure, as a public employee, she puts it around $150,000.
It's mortgaged, according to the paperwork, over $500,000.
Now, it's not at the level of what Donald Trump did, because in Donald Trump's case, you're talking about buildings on Fifth Avenue, et cetera.
But her building is at least four to five times overinflated for the purposes of mortgages.
And some of the mortgages are in the public record.
Some of them are not.
They look like phantom mortgage.
The whole thing is for Gezi.
And you've got to look into it.
They're going to have to go into the Virginia records.
The feds are drop subpoenas, do search warrants, pull out all kinds of stuff.
And there's one left, one big question left I think that a lot of us are wondering, which is who's living in the Virginia buildings?
Wow.
And are they paying rent?
And are you reporting that rent?
Are you paying the taxes on that rent?
There's a lot here.
And it's probably out of the statute of limitations at this point, but you were saying like decades ago she bought a property and put her dad down as her husband, essentially.
When she was about 20.
So we're going back a ways.
She put down that her father was her husband for the purposes of getting her first mortgage.
Bruh.
Holy.
Apparently.
And apparently there is some financial advantage to that that I'm not clear on.
Excuse me.
But she's never been married, according to what we can discern here.
And as a result, it does look like her father went down as her spouse about 30 years ago.
A lot of smoke.
We'll see if there's some fire, right?
Wow, a lot there.
Thank you very much.
Oh, Speeding Bride.
Should she be let off the hook?
I wasn't there.
That's absolutely nuts, bro.
Absolutely nuts, man.
Holy.
Hold on one sec, chat.
And I had another video as well on this.
Important that attorneys general representing our respective states stand up and enforce the rule of law.
The president of these United States is not above the law.
No matter how rich, powerful, or politically connected you are, everyone must play by the same rules.
Please sue him for us.
Oh, we're going to definitely sue him.
We're going to be a real pain in the and now the Trump Justice Department may be a pain in her, you know what?
The Angle has obtained shocking allegations leveled by the Trump administration against New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency has sent a criminal referral to the DOJ accusing James of mortgage fraud.
In a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Director Bill Pulte says James appears to have falsified records in order to meet certain lending.
And just so you guys know, here is a criminal referral right here.
So look, you can see that Honorable Pamela J. Bondi and Todd Blanche, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue.
So they sent this over to them.
So this comes from the U.S. Federal Housing FHFA Constitution Center.
It goes, criminal referral, dear attorney general Bondian Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.
Pursuant to my authority as director of the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency, I am referring the matter below regulator of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks.
We take very serious allegations of mortgage fraud or other criminal activities.
Such misconduct jeopardize the safety and soundness of FHFA's regulated entities and the security and stability of the U.S. mortgage market in the course of exercising U.S. federal housing authorities under the federal housing enterprise that blah, blah, blah.
Right.
So, okay.
So this is the House in General, 604 Sterling Street, Norfolk, Virginia.
Let's go ahead and pull this one up real fast.
Okay.
This is the property in question here, chat.
So we haven't even, we went over the houses that she has in New York.
This is what, this is the property in question here.
So this one right here, okay, in Norfolk, Virginia.
All right, looks like a small single family home.
Let's go ahead and put this thing into Zillow real fast.
Let's see, get a rough estimate.
And again, Zillow is not that accurate, guys.
Neither is Redfin.
What I normally do is I put in both and try to get to the middle ground.
Okay, so it's worth quarter million dollars.
Okay, three bedroom, one bath, quarter million.
So on August 17th, 2023, Ms. James granted Ms. Shamise Thompson Harrison power of attorney to make a Virginia property her principal residence, see exhibit A. And on August 30th, 31st, 2023, through her attorney, Ms. James, purchased this property in Norfolk, Virginia.
And if Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, formed 3047, and in mortgage documents, she reaffirmed this would be her primary residence.
Okay, now you guys see why I tell y'all not to lie about this shit.
You guys are witnessing it right now.
Myron Gaines always gonna protect y'all from going to jail, bro.
Because a couple of you guys call onto the show, Byron, yo, what do you think about me getting a primary residence loan, bro?
Only put 5% down and not a living, bro.
And I just gotta go back and forth.
And what do I tell y'all niggas every single time?
Nope, don't do that.
Don't do that.
You guys see now why?
You see now why?
I told you guys all the time, do not lie on your fucking mortgage forms.
Do not try to get a FHA loan on a property you're not going to actually live in.
You guys see why?
I got y'all back, bro.
I don't want you guys to go to jail.
I've been saying this for years because a bunch of you guys call into the show and say, Myron, I want to do this.
And I always tell you guys, don't fucking do that shit.
Don't be stupid.
Okay?
In fact, a building permit issued on her New York property on July 15, 2024 lists her New York property as the James residence and states remains occupied.
Okay?
So her primary residence mortgages receive favorable loan terms, including lower interest rates than secondary residence mortgages.
Lenders view secondary residence mortgages as significant riskier as a borrower is more likely to continue paying off a primary residence mortgage during any financial hardship.
Interest rates on secondary residence mortgages are typically between quarter to half a percent higher than their primary residence counterparts.
So in other words, guys, let's say you get a primary residence and you secure, you know, a 5% interest rate.
Well, if you want to get a secondary property, you're going to have to be paying a lot of the times a 5.2 to 5.5% interest rate.
So it's going to go up a couple of points, right?
It's going to go up a couple points because they look at it as like, hey, your secondary house, you're more likely to default on that loan than on your primary residence.
And when they give out these loans, guys, these home loans, they have a bunch of people that crunch the numbers and figure out statistically speaking how common it is for people to default loans, et cetera.
At the time of the 2023 Norfolk VA property purchase and mortgage, Ms. James was a sitting attorney general of New York and is required by law to have her primary residence in the state of New York, even though her mortgage applications list her intent to have to have the Norfolk VA property as her primary home.
It appears Ms. James' property and mortgage-related misrepresentations may have continued to her recent 2023 Norfolk VA property purchase in order to secure a lower interest rate and more favorable loan terms.
Oh, okay.
So 296 Lafayette.
Okay, so they mentioned this in here as well.
And this is the property, just so you guys know, since it's public record now, we can show this shit.
Let's try not to dox her, but hey, it is what it is.
Niggas got it on a thing.
This is the home I told you guys about before, worth $1.8 million.
Okay, and it doesn't show how many units are in it.
Let's go ahead and get a map view of it for you guys.
This is the property.
Looks like the fucking where they shot Gunmo and shit.
But yeah, this is it.
Right?
And anyone familiar with Brooklyn knows this is kind of what it looks like all across the area.
So this is it right here, more than likely, I'm guessing.
Or here, one of these two.
Can't see the number.
Whatever.
You guys get the idea.
All these houses look the same anyway.
You've seen one, you've seen them all.
On January 26, 2001, a certificate of occupancy lists this property as having five units.
See exhibit C. On February 14, 2001, Miss Letitia James purchased this five-family dwelling.
Ms. James secured a conforming loan through the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac form 3033.
Conforming loans are only available on four-unit or less structures.
Spanning the last two decades, Ms. James has consistently misrepresented the same property as only having four units in both building permit applications and numerous mortgage documents and applications.
Okay, so these niggas are going hard.
They're not just talking about her Virginia property.
They're listing this one too.
This even includes a 2011 application for the Home Affordable Modification Program, HAMP, see Exhibit D. And most recently, a 2019 mortgage financing refinancing through a Freddie, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac lender, see Exhibit E. Conforming loans, or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac-backed mortgages, have favorable rates in terms of traditional private market mortgages for the explicit purpose of availability to lower and middle income borrowers.
Conforming single-family loans are subject to a cap of four dwellings per property.
A building that exceeds four units must be treated as a multi-family property and typically has larger down payment requirements and higher interest rate terms, with interest rates being 0.75 to 1% higher due to lenders being multifamily loans is significantly riskier.
And this is what I was describing to you guys earlier: why people would want to, you know, try to secure a residential home loan over a commercial home loan.
Residential home loans give better terms.
Now, though it does give better terms, they look at the borrower more harshly.
But if you have good credit, it works out being better.
Okay?
So analysis.
Ms. Jones for both properties listed above appears to have falsified records in order to meet certain lending requirements in favorable and receive favorable loan terms.
U.S. Federal Housing believes this and other alleged misconduct could be violations of a criminal code under 18 USC 1343, warrior fraud, 18 USC 1341, mail fraud, 18 USC bank fraud, and 18 USC 1014 false statements to a financial institution.
Holy, bro.
For your reference, I've also attached documentation which shows in 1983 that Ms. James and her father signed mortgage documents that stated that they were husband and wife in order to secure a home mortgage.
Then on May 4th, 2000, Ms. James was listed again as husband and wife in documents, see exhibit G. While this was a long time ago, it raises serious concerns about the validity of Ms. James' representations on mortgage applications.
There are unfortunately too many examples of individuals who commit fraud or mortgage fraud.
Just last year, a federal jury convicted Marilyn J. Mosby of Baltimore, Maryland on the federal charge of making a false mortgage application when she was in Baltimore State, when she was Baltimore City State's attorney relating to the purchase of her property in Florida.
Just last week, after the hard work of our agencies, IG and DOJ, a St. Louis man pledged to fraudulently obtaining home mortgages.
As always, look forward to cooperating with the Department of Justice.
Holy, this comes from William J. Poulti, director of the federal housing.
Yep.
And here are the documents showing what they're talking about.
The different exhibits, deeds of trust, et cetera.
It looks like for the Virginia home, they lend it out roughly $220,000.
Yep, bros came with the receipts, man.
Holy city of New York Department of Buildings Certificate of Occupancy.
This is from 2001.
Yep.
Yep.
Robert James and Letitia James.
This is the mortgage here.
Seems like that's her father.
May 19, 1983.
Okay.
Bros pulled out all the receipts, man.
Man.
Cooked.
Yep.
Chad, this is pretty black to white.
I ain't going to lie to y'all, bro.
This is cooked.
Because the thing is, man, is that you can't really avoid this.
It's like you claim that it's your home.
It's going to be your primary residence.
And here's the thing.
The fact that she's Attorney General, she has to disclose where she lives and it has to be her primary residence.
So for her to say, no, I live in the state of New York because I'm Attorney General and I have a residence here, she cannot then go ahead and say, oh, well, I have a primary residence also in Virginia.
So in other words, her career choice actually is what incriminates her.
The nature of her job, the position that she holds, requires her to live in the state of New York and to be affirmed a lot of the times under penalty of perjury.
So for her to get the AG job that she currently has, that in itself incriminates her for fraud in the Virginia case.
Wow.
Yep.
She's cooked, bro.
She's cooked.
This is very black and white, chat.
This is very fucking black and white.
Requirements.
There's no real defense I could even think of here of her claiming the Virginia address and also claiming that the New York address, the Lafayette house, that she, clearly that's her investment property for her.
She doesn't even live in it.
How she claims that it's a four-unit when it's really a five-unit and receive favorable loan terms.
He cited a property in Virginia that she's allegedly claimed as her principal residence and a property in New York that she claimed as a four-unit structure instead of the required instead of a five, which Pulte says means she was able to get a different type and more favorable loan.
Joining me now is Jonathan Turley.
Yes, residential loans are better than commercial loans a lot of the times, especially if you've got good credit.
Fox News contributor and law professor at GW University.
Jonathan, mortgage fraud is rampant in the United States.
There's all sorts of fraud that's rampant.
There's disability fraud that they've vowed to crack down on in the Trump administration.
But this is another thing that they have vowed to crack down on because it costs real money.
Your reaction to these allegations.
Well, obviously, the irony is perfectly crushing.
This is a person who prosecuted Trump for everything short of ripping a label off a mattress.
And among the charges that were brought in New York in not just the civil, but the criminal case was making false or misleading statements to financial institutions.
And one of these sections, Section 1014 of the federal code, is prosecuted.
It took me about 60 seconds of a search to find cases that the Department of Justice brought against people who falsely claimed that property was their principal residence in order to get loans.
So this is well tread areas for the Justice Department.
As for James, if we applied the Letitia James standard that she created, there'd be little question here.
This seems pretty straightforward.
What the administration is saying is this was not her principal residence.
In fact, as a New York elected official, she had to say that her principal residence was in New York.
This was an out-of-state residence.
But also, they claim that in some of these forms, she actually states that her father is her husband in order to file as a married couple.
So there's a lot of those questions.
And as you know, the Supreme Court just stated earlier in March in a case called Thompson that they want to see knowing false statements under sections like 1014, not just misleading statements.
These are misleading statements.
Either it's your principal residence or it's not.
Yeah, it's black and white, bro.
Very black and white.
And again, by her being Attorney General, that solidifies that she must live in the state of New York.
If she was like a private citizen, this wouldn't be a big problem.
You know, it wouldn't be that big of an issue.
But the fact that she's Attorney General and she has to lock herself down in the state of New York by virtue of her work and her employment, that's what fucks her up.
It's not.
Either you're married to your father or he's your father.
So they can get her, this can satisfy the Thompson standard.
Yeah, well, Jonathan, we reached out to the DOJ and they have no comment on this referral.
We also reached out to Attorney General James, who did not respond to us either.
So again, everyone wants the best interest rate.
I got a funny story for you guys after this.
You can get.
I understand that.
But, you know, she's a lawyer.
She knows that when you sign a mortgage application, that mortgage application, if you're borrowing money, if you're not borrowing money, nobody cares whether it's your principal residence except where you file your taxes.
But she.
Yeah, no one gives a fuck if you don't use the banks.
It's only when you get loans that it becomes a problem.
Bro, a rapper named Tayke just got 80 years and they use one of his songs as evidence against him.
Can you do one of the hilarious breakdowns of the song where he uses lyrics against him?
I mean, bro, that nigga cooked himself, bro.
I'm not surprised.
Why do you get?
I mean, didn't he have life before?
Why did they put him on trial again?
He decided to state that that was her principal residence, knowing it was not her principal residence.
I didn't even know she had property.
I mean, I guess she had property.
Someone says here, Abdu says, Mari, why don't you cover the proxy war in Iran considering it was more catastrophic than any other conflict in the 2020s?
It could cause a larger regional conflict in Africa, and it's your people.
It's also a proxy between UAE and Iran and whatever.
Abdu, you must be new here.
I've covered the Sudan war a couple of times.
I have covered it a couple of times.
So, yeah.
Property in Virginia, and she has rental or investment property in New York, that's fine.
But in the New York matter, to get the favorable rate, the building could only have four units.
But for it looks like its entirety, the entirety of this building, it had five units, meaning it was in violation of the actual loan agreement.
And again, this is not a novel application of the law, Jonathan.
As you stated during the persecution of Donald Trump, she was using all these novel applications of law to go after him.
This isn't novel.
This is a black and white issue.
You either did or you didn't.
Right.
And this has been prosecuted in the past.
Now, we have not heard her side of this, but these documents themselves are quite damning.
It's hard to see how the residences listed were her principal residents.
The business about her father is just bizarre.
Now, I'll note that one of the things that Letitia James stressed in her case against Trump is that Trump had to review documents that were filed in his name.
And so she dismissed the argument that this was something that Trump's people put together.
She said he's ultimately responsible.
So they allege that she gave a power of attorney in a couple of these instances.
But according to her own standard, that's not enough.
Well, Professor, the referral cites the case against the former Baltimore City prosecutor, Marilyn Mosby, because she was sentenced to a year in home confinement for lying about her finances to make early withdrawals from retirement funds during COVID and then fraudulently claimed that her own 5,000K was a gift from her then husband as she closed on a Florida condo.
So the idea that, again, this is just no one ever, no one ever goes after politicians for these types of, which may seem like small amounts, and they add up.
They do.
And this is really for James the very case that she most famously brought.
She insisted that these technicalities matter and that the powerful should not be given a free pass.
Well, that bill has come due in this case.
She's going to have to deal with this filing.
I'm honestly just not sure how you defend against this unless you say that these are fraudulent documents.
Jonathan, I have to raise this because the Democrats, you know, when this really starts to blow up, which it should after the show, they're going to say, look, aha, see, this is a revenge presidency.
They're weaponizing the DOJ against Democrats, so it's a tit for tat.
Do you see that as a potential vulnerability here?
Well, we are certainly living in that age, but the fact is, James herself rejected that argument made when she brought, in my view, a ludicrous case in New York.
That case was something that ultimately resulted in a grotesque ruling.
By the way, the timing here is not good.
We're waiting for the appellate decision to come down.
It's been a very long time.
Each day we're looking for the appellate court to issue the review.
Many of us expect that it will crazy shit, man.
Let me read some chats real fast.
She's cooked, chat.
She is cooked.
All right, we got here.
Could all this BS that Carmelo Anthony is buying be used against him at court?
Well, speaking of Carmelo Anthony, guys, look at this shit.
What in the niggery is going on here?
They are now selling merch.
You gotta fuck with Carmelo Hitler, man.
Justice for my dog.
Website coming soon.
You gotta tap in, man.
Yeah.
Bruh, niggas are selling merch.
You know what it is.
Tweet a tapping in.
Anybody who fuck with me, fuck with my music.
You gotta fuck with Carmelo Hitley, man.
Justice for my dog.
Website coming soon.
You gotta tap in, man.
Yeah.
Bro.
So he now has t-shirts with his face on it for sale.
His family and friends are pushing this merch, bruh.
What in the fucking niggery is going on?
Tap in, man.
Bro.
What the fuck is going on, bro?
Niggas are selling t-shirts for somebody that killed a fucking 17-year-old kid, man.
That is wild.
They got to go fund me.
They bought a new house.
And now they're selling shirts.
And they bought a brand new car, too, bro.
This is not.
You know what it is.
This is not how you deal with a big fucking criminal case, chat.
What the fuck, man?
What in the niggotry is going on, bro?
Oh, my God.
Incredible.
In fucking credible, honestly.
I don't even really even have words for this shit.
Mike, bro, you already have an iffy case, right?
For those of you, again, like they get into an altercation under a tent, right, during a track meet.
Witnesses were there.
Some people say that Carmelo used self-defense.
Some other people say it wasn't proportional, right?
Because you can always make the argument that, hey, he put his hands on him in self-defense.
But what the question is really going to be is: did the use of force that Carmelo Anthony utilized, which is a knife to the fucking chest, was that proportional to the threat that he felt?
I've talked to you guys about self-defense before.
And that self-defense and use of force a lot of times comes down to what would a reasonable person do given the circumstances, right?
Now, at face value, off the facts that I have, someone telling you to get out of a tent and pushing you is not justification to pull out a knife and stab him, right?
That's why I stand on it right now with the way that the facts are.
Now, clearly, a lot of people in America agree with me on this.
And this caused a lot of outrage.
Now, there's some others that are like, yeah, well, you know, Austin certainly started it.
You know, he was bullying him, blah, blah, blah.
Wherever you stand on, that's fine.
Some of you think it's self-defense.
Others think that this was murder.
I think we can all agree that selling fucking t-shirts in the wake of this event is not appropriate from an opportunity standpoint.
And having this idiot right here promote it.
Tweet a tampon in.
Anybody who fuck with me, fuck with my music, you gotta fuck with Carmelo Hitler, man.
Just was for my dog.
Website coming soon.
Pants sagging.
Can barely speak proper English.
Holding up the t-shirt.
Wearing a dumbass jewelry.
Sunglasses outside at night.
Tap in, man.
Right?
Like, this is crazy, bro.
This is crazy.
This looks terrible optically.
If I was fighting for my life, right?
And I was going to go ahead and potentially be, and I was going to go to trial and fight this thing.
I don't want things like this on the internet to make me look like a moron.
But his family's trying to cash in on this, clearly his family's trying to make a buck on this, and it makes it look even worse.
Public sentiment is going to go down because this isn't about defending yourself anymore.
This is about profiting.
Like, that money was supposed to be used for his defense fund.
And what did they do?
They used it to fucking buy a house and buy a car, bruh.
When they Chappelle said shit like they should have never gave you niggas money, this is what he's talking about.
This stupidity right here.
Should have never gave you niggas money.
Yep.
Holy, bro.
So inappropriate.
Given the circumstances and the sensitivity of the case and the and you know the volatility and the coverage that it's getting.
It's caused quite a bit of a war, a race war in the U.S. So, okay, guys, do me a favor.
We're going to cover the last story here with our boy Martyr Maid and Nick Fuentez.
So I want you guys to like the video.
I'm going to take a quick piss.
I'll be right back.
All right, like the video.
I want to get to 2,000 likes before we hit the next story.
Give me one.
Give me one sec, Chad.
Thank you.
We're only at 1,100 right now.
We should be at least at 1,500, ninjas.
So, uh, all right, let's get to let's get to 1500, chat.
So once it gets to 1500, I will cover the next story here.
Seven o'clock.
Alright.
Alright.
So, so Martyr Maid.
Okay, for those that don't know, Martyr Maid, a.k.a.
Daryl Cooper.
appeared on this podcast right here, the Tucker Carlson pod.
So this guy blew up from doing this interview right here.
I'm American.
I'm not English, so I don't have any weird motive in asking this.
I'm American.
I'm not English, so I don't have any weird motive in asking this, but how would you assess Winston Churchill?
I got in trouble with my podcast partner, Jocko Willink, one time, because he's a New England Dutchman who's his family, it's near and dear to their Dutch, but very near and dear to their heart that Winston Churchill is a hero, right?
Well, everyone.
Everyone thinks that.
He really thinks that.
And I told him that I think, and maybe I'm being a little hyperbolic, maybe.
But I told him, maybe trying to provoke him a little bit, that I thought Churchill was the chief villain of the Second World War.
Okay.
And this statement, this statement right here, chat, sent the internet into a fucking frenzy, bro.
Play that one more time for you guys.
Blank one time because he...
I'm American.
I'm not English, so I don't have any weird motive in asking this, but how would you assess Winston Churchill?
I got in trouble with my podcast partner, Jocko Willink, one time, because he's a New England Dutchman who's his family, it's near and dear to their Dutch, but very near and dear to their heart that Winston Churchill is a hero, right?
Well, everyone.
Everyone thinks that?
He really thinks that.
And I told him that I think, and maybe I'm being a little hyperbolic, maybe.
But I told him, maybe trying to provoke him a little bit, that I thought Churchill was the chief villain of the Second World War.
Now, this statement literally created a bomb drop all across Twitter.
Because by Daryl Cooper saying that Winston Churchill was the real bad guy, again.
But I think, and maybe I'm being a little hyperbolic, maybe.
But I told him, maybe trying to provoke him a little bit, that I thought Churchill was the chief villain of the Second World War.
Now, we know who everyone thinks is the chief villain of World War II.
And to question that will always put you in hot water.
Okay?
Always.
I remember when this interview dropped back in, what?
Yeah, it was like the summertime.
When this interview dropped and he made this statement, it sent Twitter in a frenzy.
Nazi became one of the most popular search terms for like two weeks.
It reinvigorated a very uncomfortable conversation.
Okay?
And reinvigorated conversation that a lot of people can go to jail for, guys.
And it brought up the uncomfortable topic of World War II revisionism.
Now, here's the reality, guys.
Engaging in World War II revisionism, especially a certain event, which I'm just going to call the Cookie Monster Event.
You guys know what that means.
All right.
Questioning the Cookie Monster event and how many cookies were baked will always get you in trouble if it's not a certain number.
Six million cookies, to be correct.
To be exact.
So if you say that six million cookies weren't baked, you can go to jail for that shit, chat.
Literally, there's multiple countries that will put you in jail for engaging and talking about The cookie monster event.
So to say that Winston Churchill was the main bad guy basically kind of pushes back against the narrative that Mustache Man was a bad guy and that maybe the cookie monster event didn't happen the way that we were told.
And this is called revisionism, okay, or denial.
And what Daryl Cooper effectively did by making this statement on Tucker Carlson, who I would argue is probably the biggest conservative podcaster in America right now, I would put him even above Rogan because I don't consider Rogan a conservative at all.
I consider Rogan a centrist.
Okay.
Tim Poole too, I consider Tim Poole a centrist as well.
But it's pretty common, you know, I'll say Thor Carlson is an actual real conservative.
He's actual, you know, obviously it's light right wing, but it is right wing, right?
For him to platform someone like this and for him to make a statement like this on a platform this big obviously was huge.
So Daryl got a lot of slack for this.
A lot of people came after him, called him a World War II revisionist, called him a cookie monster, bakery denier, right?
So this put him in a lot of hot water.
Obviously, put him out there, but put him out there with a lot of hot water.
Okay.
And after this interview with Tucker Carlson, he appeared on Joe Rogan.
Let's play a little bit more of this from the Tucker stuff while I find you guys at Joe Rogan stuff.
He didn't kill the most people.
He didn't commit the most atrocities.
But I believe, and I don't really think, I think when you really get into it and tell the story right and don't leave anything out, you see that he was primarily responsible for that war becoming what it did, becoming something other than an invasion of Poland.
Or just, I mean, at every step of the way, like people are very often, I find, surprised to learn.
There's a two-step process.
Why don't you just make the case for that?
Okay, so you've made your statement.
A lot of people are thinking, well, wait a second.
You just said Churchill, my childhood hero, the guy with the cigar.
Yeah.
Well, and the next thought that comes into their head is that, oh, you're saying Churchill was the chief villain, therefore his enemies, you know, Adolf Hitler and so forth, were Stalin, the protagonists, right?
They're the good guys if you think he's a villain.
That's not the case.
That's what I'm saying.
You know, Germany, look, they put themselves into a now he has more context, obviously, but people didn't care about all this stuff that he's talking about.
They just cared that he said that Churchill might have been the chief villain.
Okay?
That set the internet ablaze.
Then, a few months later, Daryl Cooper appeared on Joe Rogan.
Okay.
And once again, sparked up the internet going crazy.
Now, Hitler didn't like the Soviet Union, you know, all the way back in Mein Kampf and everywhere else.
I mean, it was central to his ideology that communism, socialism were the enemy and everything.
He may have invaded the Soviet Union someday and gone and gone after all the Jews when he did.
When did Hitler start going after the Jews?
You mean in terms of rhetoric?
Oh, so yeah, like if you take him at his word in Mein Kampf, which is, you know, it's a piece of political propaganda, you know, that he wrote as a sort of a politician in Germany in 1924.
And so you have to take it with sort of a grain of salt, but it's also one of the few sources we have.
Like, given his audience at the time, he probably didn't have a lot of reason to make this part up.
And he had been from like small town Germany, right?
And he was from a middle-class family.
His father was a civil servant, respectable people.
And nationalism back then was very much like a middle-class ideology.
And the middle class people, nationalists would complain about the workers, proletariat, how they don't want to be socialists.
None of them have any national feelings.
Now, I think it's important to note that after he appeared on Joe Rogan, he had this discussion, okay, kind of echoing some of the sentiment from his previous interview with Tucker Carlson, a lot of people went crazy.
You can see here, look at this, okay?
Both people on the left and on the right went wild.
You got to hear secular talk from Kyle Kalinsky, Joe Rogan, Nazi apologist experience, right?
Hassan Piker.
Joe Rogan platforming Daryl Cooper's dangerous ideas, right?
With the trying to say that he's a Nazi.
On a first name basis.
You take a guy like, you know, good guy.
You know, you take a guy like, right?
He's just a guy.
Oh, Jesus Christ.
He's a good guy.
He volunteered for the German.
See, so even these people that are critical of Israel, what are they doing?
They're, and I'm using Hassan and Kyle specifically because they're left-wing political commentators, big left-wing political commentators, and they're critical of Israel.
But what are they doing?
They're coming in after Daryl Cooper trying to say that Joe Rogan platformed the Nazi, right?
The more, you know, those people pop off.
And it's interesting.
It's interesting to think about, and it's something that I've been thinking about quite a bit, especially as Joe Rogan has had like numerous, Joe Rogan has had like numerous people on his broadcast when he's not talking about when he doesn't have, when he doesn't have like a like a billionaire who, you know, literally drinks the blood of children, like not blood libel.
I'm talking straight up.
Billionaires who are doing, unironically, doing the blood rituals to, I guess, maintain their youthful nature while simultaneously inventing new ways of children overseas.
He then turns his crosshairs on to he dern.
He then will have these guys who seemingly are very anti-Semitic.
And this is Hassan does all the time.
He points to other people and tries to say that they're anti-Semitic to try to get the ADL crosshairs off of his own back because he's a bit because he's a bitch.
And then you got this guy over here, Kyle Kalinsky, right?
Ely face after sucking the blood of a baby like a vampire.
Bro, it's like these niggas say the same thing over and over.
Oh, Joe Rogan interviews billionaires that suck blood.
Or Mark Zuckerberg.
If he's not talking to disgusting.
Yo, these left-wing niggas are all identical.
How is it that I just go back and he's saying the same shit that this motherfucker said?
Robber Baron, he's talking to a corrupt Republican politician like J.D. Vance or Donald Trump and giving them a hot stone massage throughout the entire interview, as we've seen.
When he's not talking to them, he's talking to some right-wing MMA fighter or some right-wing comedian.
It's humiliating is what I would describe it as.
It's humiliating.
But somehow, ladies and gentlemen, somehow, it has gotten worse.
It has gotten worse than the suck off the robber barons experience.
Now, we are looking at Joe Rogan, the Nazi apologist experience.
Now, you might say, come on, Kyle, that's hyperbolic.
That goes a little bit too far.
Well, I'm going to let you decide.
So, there's this guy by the name of Daryl Cooper.
Now, I must admit, Daryl Cooper had many people fooled, including me, for a while.
He has this podcast called Martyr Maid, and he did this retelling of the history of Palestine and Israel.
And, you know, if you don't know anything about the guy and you listen to it, you're like, I don't know.
This seems really like high-level, really well thought out, really interesting.
Chris and I listen to the whole thing, and we thought it was relatively good.
But the more I followed this guy's work, the more there were red flags.
The more it was like, oh, that doesn't sound like, that's a little more line.
And then eventually, as you're about to see it, I'll demonstrate for you, the mask totally came off.
But it's a cautionary tale that I'm giving you right now.
All right, so why am I showing you guys this?
Because I want to paint the story for you guys so this all makes sense.
So first, he goes on Tucker.
He makes that statement about Churchill, sends the internet in a fucking uproar.
Goes on Rogan, sends the internet in an uproar again because he talks about Hitler's past and talks about history that no one talks about.
Then, people like Hassan Piker, Kyle Kalinsky, and many others, by the way, I'm just using them because they're left-wing, right?
Outrage.
Nazi apologist, ah, Joe Rogan experience, ah, okay?
And this sets the stage for this podcast right here, where Joe Rogan brings on Dave Smith to talk with Doug Murray.
Now, the conversation was supposed to be about Israel-Palestine, but what transpired was the entire beginning of the conversation.
It's pretty hard to listen to somebody who says, I don't know what I'm talking about, but now I'm going to talk.
Or I don't know about this, or I'm not capable of debating this historian, but I'm going to just tell you what I think.
Yeah, but that's not exactly.
That's not exactly what Daryl was saying.
I mean, Daryl's point of view, however you feel about this.
What Daryl was saying is he doesn't really like doing debates.
He likes to do long, but you disagree on a lot of things.
It'd be fascinating to see your perspectives on these things.
So that's why you're here together.
Okay.
So instead of them going into a debate, this is what Douglas Murray does.
Ask you something.
Yes, sir.
Since the war in Israel began, and since the war in Ukraine began, you've had quite a lot of people who are very against both in different ways.
Yes.
Do you think you've had enough people on who are supportive by the war?
I don't know that word enough, if that's a good word.
Let's say enough people are on the side of Israel instead of wild critics.
So it starts out with good intentions.
He's asking, like, hey, have you brought an equal amount of people that support either side?
So it's kind of fair.
Let's see what happens next.
I've had a few.
I mean, I believe Godsad is on the side of Israel.
Ah, fuck, God Sad.
Godsad is the biggest pussy on the internet.
The dude is literally a Mossad agent.
He literally was recruited by the Mossad.
Why?
Because he's a Lebanese, if I'm not mistaken, I think he's Lebanese, but he's a fluent Arab speaker.
And he's also one of them boys.
Hardcore Israel supporter, fucking bitch.
All he does is cry about anti-Semitism on X, and he won't debate anybody.
Fucking coward.
Real?
For sure.
Jordan is on the side of Israel.
Mike Baker, Colin News.
Yeah.
I implemented it by 20 minutes.
That wasn't why he was here.
No.
I mean, none of them is why they're here.
You know?
It's a good question.
Do you think you've tilted one way?
Here we go.
See what he's doing?
Me personally?
No, no, no, just with a guess.
Just a guest.
Yeah, probably more tilted towards the idea that perhaps the way they've done it is barbaric.
But why do you think that is?
Just out of interest.
Interesting, you'll selection of guests because you'll get the world's not on the podcast.
Yeah, it's not.
I don't.
I don't think about it that way.
I just think I'd like to talk to this person.
But can I just.
Here we go.
Matt's about to come off of why he's really fucking here, by the way, chat.
You're going to interview historians of the conflict or historians in general.
Why would you get somebody like Ian Carroll?
Yeah, but Ian Carroll, I didn't bring him on for that purpose.
I brought him on because I want to find out.
Yeah, he only talked about Israel for 20 minutes on the Ian Carroll interview.
I watched it, which, by the way, we're going to bring Ian Carroll on the show very soon.
Probably, maybe potentially this weekend or next week.
Like, how does one get involved in the whole conspiracy theory business?
Because his whole thing is just conspiracy.
Sure.
You know, but do you have any?
I mean, there's been a tilt in the conversation, both conversations in the last couple of years.
And it's largely to do with people who have appointed themselves experts who are not experts.
You mean like Ian?
I don't think he appoints himself an expert in anything.
Who's that other dude who thinks he's an expert on Churchill?
See where we're going here, chat?
And mind you, this guy is British.
The Brits don't like when you talk about Winston Churchill, chat.
They really don't.
I've noticed that about British niggas.
It's like the only thing they have, this only claim to fame, is Winston Churchill.
If you talk shit about Winston Churchill, the Brits go mad.
Oh, Daryl Cooper does not think he's an expert.
In fact, I think everybody else is always calling him an expert.
And he's like, I'm just a historian.
Have you ever absorbed any of his material?
You ever consumed any of his podcasts or anything?
I've tried.
Yeah.
It's pretty hard to listen to somebody who says, I don't know what I'm talking about, but now I'm going to talk.
Or I don't know about this.
Or I'm not capable of debating this historian.
All right.
And what ensues from here, guys, is basically Douglas Murray questioning the credibility of Rogan's guests.
Are they experts?
Are they qualified to speak on things?
And then he also challenges Dave Smith's credibility as well.
And I broke down this interview already on another episode if you guys want.
It's up on our channel.
Feel free.
I do a deep dive on it.
It's mostly on Rumble because I have to edit parts of it out on YouTube because of fucking copyright.
Joe Rogan is hitting niggas with copyright now.
So if you guys want to watch the full breakdown of that, it's on my Rumble, Myron Gains X Rumble.
Okay.
Mods, can you put the link in the chat for them, please?
The full breakdown of this?
Because I'm sure you guys probably want where I systematically go through this interview and debunk a bunch of the stuff that Doug Murray talks about.
Now, with that said, I wanted to paint a picture here for you guys from late last year, the summer, up until now.
Okay?
Daryl Cooper has obviously opened up a conversation about a certain event that everyone thought was taboo, untouchable, and quite frankly, you can't talk about.
Okay?
World War II and the cookie monster event.
All right?
So this, the reason why it has been such a problem is because this is history that's never been really challenged.
Right?
And just by Daryl Cooper inferring that we might have not been told the truth about World War II has created an uproar.
So Daryl Cooper went ahead and made this post on Substack.
Right?
The Road to Hell of New Substacks on the emergence of anti-Semitism on the right, right here on his Twitter.
Right?
And in this article, which is extremely long and lengthy, okay, he talks about how he feels as though that there's a rise of anti-Semitism, right, on the right wing.
So basically, he started the conversation, grand opening, and now he wants to close the conversation, grand closing.
Okay.
So he goes, Sammy, if you heard this one, three Jews walk into a barn before they even order a drink, blah, blah, blah.
Make some jokes, right?
We'll go here.
If you're a follow of the substack, you already know I don't need to be lecturing the history of Israeli atrocities, the abuse of the Israel lobby, and other Jewish organizations, or the preponderance of Jews in subversive cultural and political movements.
I don't think the Israelis kill JFK or Pullov 9-11, but I don't run away screaming when someone tells me they do.
I get the arguments.
I don't agree, but I get it.
I know why I know about Weimar Germany and the Soviet secret police and Jeffrey Epstein.
I know that you were viciously attacked for asking simple, obvious questions about after October 7th.
And I know you watched people you thought were intelligent and humane transform before your eyes into bloodthirsty lunatics baying for Palestinian blood.
I got myself denounced by the White House and banned from several European countries for making what I thought was a mild, qualified criticism of the usual World War II narrative.
So I know and I get it.
I told you guys before, if you talk about this shit, you will get in trouble.
Why do you guys think I didn't go to London on the last fucking go?
Calculate.
Okay?
The rest of the world is fucking cuck chat.
That's the reality.
They're absolutely cucked.
You can't have free speech in these other countries.
And to talk about the cookie monster event will get you put in jail in many places, unfortunately.
So for all these reasons and more, it's easy to get caught up in the J thing.
I've seen it happen a hundred times.
And one of the things that you notice is that you almost never meet a moderate anti-Semite.
You know, someone who goes about their day like anyone else, almost never thinking about the Jays, except when he's looking for an account and he filters out the Steinsbergs, Gold Silver, Silversteins, and Goldbergs.
If that guy exists, I've never met him.
And he continues on here, right?
And the thing I want to kind of discuss here is there was mention of our guy, Nick, right?
And if you go on his Twitter, right, after he posts this thing, obviously some people didn't like this.
Was prepared to hate it, but he's basically talking about Fuentard.
It's because this article was an indirect shot at Nick and the Gripers.
Let's be honest here.
It was slightly boomer-coated with the joke, but he's right in that some people don't get that.
Everything is funny even when it's true.
Blah, blah.
You understand once you grow up and have a family, an abstract involving people you'll never meet.
So they kind of were roasting him on Twitter for posting this thing.
Right?
Right.
And it mixed message.
And he's responding to every single comment here, as you guys can see here.
All right, he's responding to every comment.
So clearly he has a vested interest in what people think about this article.
Because he did get some heat for it.
Right?
Let's see here.
So let's go through his timeline.
I'm trying to find it here.
Okay, the Gropers have never liked me and I have never cared.
This article just says what I think and is no different from what I've always said.
Hatred and anger poisoning regardless of whether your targets have it coming.
People who don't like it know where the door is.
Shapiro is never going to play that role.
He's literally just the other side of Nick Fuentes.
Well, that's not true.
Why?
They are both agitators who actively try to increase the level of animosity among people.
People who listen to them often become vulgar, arrogant, angry, resentful, obsessive.
They play the same role for opposing causes.
And that's someone, because as someone said here, calling Fuentes opposite of Shapiro is lazy, probably the worst take to date.
I agree.
Yeah.
Let's see.
Okay, so here we go.
So no doubt.
So someone here defends Nick and says, Nick makes rational arguments and he genuinely cares about the future of this country.
You obviously haven't watched this show.
You should give it a shot before attacking him, right?
And then Marta made response to that and says, no doubt, Nick is very talented.
I'm sure there's a core genuine belief beneath the show he puts on.
But he starts pointless fights with well-intentioned people like my friend comic Dave Smith, even though Dave has exposed more people to the ideas that supposedly animate Nick than 99% of people, including Nick himself.
After a while, you realize that the fights, not the ideas are the point.
I don't have time for that bullshit.
And then it goes here.
Nick's issue with Dave does not seem to be rooted in disagreement with his ideas or his character, but because Dave happens to be born as a J. A great example that shows, that goes to show why the concept of collective guilt is BS that only leads people to a dark place.
And this guy responds, you're just an idiot.
Nick respects ethnic Jays that embrace America first, just as Ron Uns and myself as a supporter, follower of the movement, but not those who keep their tribal identity and loyalties to the detriment of the Christian faith in America.
Yeah, Ron Uns is actually a very good example.
Okay, so Dave has had a conversation with Nick.
He's been a gentleman and doesn't ever even return an incentive Nick throws at him, and he's taken a lot of shit for it for Nick to start shit one of the main mainstream people willing to treat with him openness and respect just shows a lack of character.
Okay, that's what he's saying.
That's what he's trying to claim here.
And then someone says here, I'll donate $150K to a charity of your choice if you sit down and defeat Nick Fuentes in the debate.
And then he goes, I'll gladly debate.
Oh, where to go?
Oh, did I just lose the spot?
Where the hell did it go?
I'm glad to debate him if you'll make that donation, but not on the condition that you decide who don't want to see him defeat me anyway, make the donation, and I'll oblige you that day.
So he basically ends up backing out from this.
I'm trying to find the tweet where he backed out because he says, oh, I'm not going to debate Nick because he's an asshole.
Okay.
Okay.
So, what is this all kind of what do I, where am I going with this?
So, first, I talked about, and we got to get Fresh of Fig going here in a little bit, guys.
First, I talked about him going on Tucker Carlson and basically starting the match and getting this discussion started.
A discussion that is illegal in multiple countries, a discussion that is forbidden, a discussion that people, quite literally, them boys have used to their betterment for many decades.
Okay?
Where do you think the term never again comes from?
Where do you guys think the victim narrative comes from?
It comes from World War II, and it comes from the Cookie Monster event.
All right?
So, for Daryl Cooper to go on the Tucker Carlson podcast, the biggest conservative podcast in America, because I don't consider Joe Rogan or Tim Pool right-wing conservatives.
I consider them more centrist, which is cool.
For him to make that comment over there about Churchill and reopen this conversation, which has been literally banned forever, is a big deal.
Then, he went on Joe Rogan and kind of doubled down, caused a massive amount of outrage.
Then, on top of that, Dave Smith and Doug Murray had that viral interview where the first 45 minutes of the interview of the Joe Rogan podcast is basically Douglas Murray questioning Joe Rogan's guest selection and questioning Dave Smith's credibility.
Okay?
And I watched Nick's broadcast yesterday where he covered this, and he talked about how when something is being blown open and the truth is coming out.
Someone in the chat, can you guys give me the use a very interesting term for it?
Someone in the chat give it to me real quick.
But basically, I'll give you guys the deaf what it is.
Basically, it's where the truth basically is at a point where you're compromised, the truth is out there.
So, you will go ahead and concede and give some of the truth out, but leave key points away, right?
And I think, right, when it comes to limited hangout, thank you so much, the bad boy.
Thank you so much.
It's called limited hangout, which I actually think it's a great way to describe what's going on here.
Because what basically happened was Darryl Cooper opened up the conversation, got heat for it, and now he's trying to close down the conversation.
Okay?
And even if you look at Joe Rogan, he just interviewed recently.
We go to his channel.
Who was his last guest?
Pretty much this fucking weirdo, Rich Voss.
Okay?
And she opens.
And he comes in with a fucking Star David.
So clearly, Joe Rogan got the call and brought this guy in, who is a pro-Israel personality.
I don't even know who this guy is, to be honest with y'all.
But I do know that this guest election wasn't by mistake, right?
And basically, what happened was you have the conversation in a controlled format where you can talk about Israel-Palestine.
You can talk about what's going on geopolitically in the Middle East, but you can't talk about the why and how we got to this point, right?
And I agree with Nick on this, where he's saying, Look, you guys can have the conversation here, but you guys aren't taking it to its logical conclusion, which I actually agree with.
And I've talked about it on this show many times with you guys, right?
Where we didn't just get here out of nowhere.
We didn't just get to October 7th out of nowhere.
We didn't just get to APAC out of nowhere, okay?
This is decades upon decades of history where a certain group infiltrated America from all the pressure points to exert control: politics, culture, music, TV, Hollywood, news.
At every single pressure point of American society, one group has prevailed and maintained a ridiculous amount of influence.
Okay?
And they've been able to attain this influence through the cookie monster story.
Never again.
Six million cookies.
And to not be able to go all the way back and have a real discussion on this is a big problem.
Now, Daryl Cooper opened the door up a little bit, but now he's trying to close it back down.
And this is where I think Nick has his gripes with the limited hangout.
Because as soon as you get into this topic, well, guess who comes up?
People like Nick, people like myself, people like Candace Owens, people like Dan Bilzerian, people like, you know, Elijah Schaefer, a lot of people that are questioning how we got to this point.
Because my thing is, the people that are getting on these big podcasts and talking about this stuff don't go all the way.
They scratch the surface a little bit and they're like, ah, okay, now we're getting a little too hot now.
I don't want to talk about the cookie monster.
That topic is forbidden.
I'll flirt with it a little bit so you guys think I'm based, but I'm not going to go all the way because I'm not ready to deal with the backlash.
Give you all a little bit, but we're not going to go all the way.
But if you go all the way, you'll figure out that everything stems from the cookie monster event.
Because the cookie monster event is the event that can't be questioned.
This is the event that's illegal.
This is the event that gives the victim status.
This is the event that allows for unquestioned support.
The Sunborn Institute, which as you guys know, I've talked about the Sunborne Institute quite a bit.
It was a combination of businessmen, gangsters, and politicians.
They're early creators of the state of Israel, all working together to gather money and funds to ship weapons and then eventually uranium to Israel.
Those weapons that went over to Israel were critical because those weapons are what the Ergun, Haganah, and other militia groups utilized to win the skirmishes in what was back then British Mandate Palestine.
So for all the people that sit there and say Palestine never existed, actually it did.
It's called British Mandate Palestine.
It's quite literally what it was called before it became the state of Israel.
These weapons and resources were not just sent from the United States.
They were sent from Europe as well.
So you have Jewish gangsters, businessmen, and early politicians like Ben-Gurion, Menachem Begin, and others that would eventually become higher ups in the Israeli government sending weapons, money, and resources over to Israel.
And their counterparts in Europe did the same thing.
This is how the state of Israel is in existence today.
Okay?
But no one ever figures out how are they able to pull this off.
I'll tell you why.
Because they utilized organizations which were cookie monster remembrance organizations.
Okay?
I don't want to use a certain term because you guys already know we're on YouTube and shit like that.
So I'm using code words.
You guys get what I'm saying.
But after World War II and the Cookie Monster event, people were very sensitive to them boys' struggle.
And what ended up happening was they would create organizations, cookie monster organizations, cookie monster remembrance organizations.
And these organizations would basically not be audited or looked at by the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agencies, especially the United States, like the Sunborn Institute.
So they would gather money, gather resources with this organization that they thought was for to combat the cookie monster event.
But in reality, it was a shell corporation that was utilized to funnel guns, money, resources, and eventually uranium to Israel.
Right?
And what people don't understand is that the cookie monster narrative has been the shield and the veil that them boys have utilized to be able to do what they do.
This is why they're able to operate with impunity where they are killing indiscriminately tens of thousands of children in Palestine.
This is how they've been able to wage war and do false flag operations for 60 to 70 years with no consequence.
This is why they've been able to bomb the entire Middle East and destabilize it with zero consequence.
You want to know why?
Because every time they're questioned or point a corner, they say this.
We have a right to defend ourselves and never again.
We have a right to defend ourselves and never again.
That is what they use every single time they're caught with their hand in the cookie jar.
No pun intended.
So, if you question the cookie monster event, that is the base for the house of cards.
And if you find out that the cookie monster event wasn't as though they claim, and the history books claim, everything else that was built on top of it, the victim narrative, shatters.
This is why it's illegal in multiple countries.
This is why it's problematic to discuss in multiple countries.
This is why it's taboo.
Now, Daryl Cooper flirted with it.
Now, grand opening, grand closing.
He created the limited hangout, but once people that really have a knowledge of this topic and have the ability to discuss this topic come in, like your boy Nick and others, he's ready to shut it down.
Oh, shit!
Shut it down!
They know what's going on here.
Bumbucka!
And then for him to say, first he'll say, Yeah, I'll debate Nick.
Then he says, No, I'm not going to talk to him because he's an asshole.
Come on, man.
That's just a cop out.
But again, you know, this is just an effort to censor him.
Because, like, I've told you guys before, I support Nick.
I support his movement.
I think he's waking up a lot of people.
And people fear him because he's very good at what he does.
And he understands the names.
He knows the history.
He can make the links.
And the truth is very harmful to people that have been lying for a very long time.
So I thought it was very interesting for him to open up the conversation.
And then when a real opponent shows up, he closes the conversation.
And that conversation centers around the cookie monster event, how legitimate it is, and what really went down in World War II.
But anyway, with that said, it is 7.55 chat.
So we are going to go ahead and start up Fresh and Fit here in a minute.
I hope you guys enjoyed that little discussion there.
Thought it was very interesting to see the beef between him and Daryl Cooper play out on Twitter.
But the great noticing will continue.
The great noticing will absolutely continue.
Someone's talking about the soap and lampshade stuff.
I know, bro.
The cookie, I'm telling you, bro, the cookie monster event is crazy.
All right, let me read some of these chats.
We're going to close this thing out.
Dick insider says, Dom Lucer breaking.
It's been revealed that Carmelo Anthony has not withdrawn cash from Give Send Go fundraiser and that Andrew Kay House was leased for $3,750 by the family in 2022 source.
Okay.
Interesting.
Kumo DTV.
I'm sure Israel has killed way more than 6 million Palestinians.
King Leopold killed 8 to 21 million Congolese, and that's just one colonizer.
It's fucked, I know.
Jack Lockhart says, I'd love for you to react to the Napa trying to do a hit piece on Angie.
Some dude made a video on Angie.
Bro, people are obsessed, bro.
If that's true, like these niggas got way too much time, bro.
Not too long ago on this sh...
Not even gonna pay attention to haters, bro.
Good.
Don't forget the 40 beheaded cookies.
Yeah, you know it, Casey.
Lufrog Myron, what would you, if you were Carmelo's father in a situation?
Obviously, this kid has no correct guidance.
Curious how he handles this actions.
I mean, it's wild, bro.
Fun fact: watermelons are made in North Sudan Myron's fam, so I guess that makes Myron a super watermelon ninja.
Okay.
Myron, I was watching some parts of your Israel 9/11 video, and it was really insightful.
What resource can I use to learn about geopolitical issues?
Well, I'm going to be watching my videos, bro.
I cover Israel ad nauseum, and I'm going to do, like I said, a deep dive on this stuff Very soon, yeah,
bro.
Um Look, what you guys got to realize, bro, like, don't send me fucking hit pieces, niggas talking shit about us, bro.
Like, I'm not gonna, like, I really don't give a fuck a lot of the times, man.
Because these dudes, a lot of times, make their platforms talking shit about us.
And outside of us, they really can't get no views, bro.
Half these niggas, man.
So, anyway.
Like, it's incredible how many people, like, make videos on us.
It's absolutely ridiculous.
Just the amount of people that want attention.
Let's see here.
uh...
Let's see.
Okay, guys.
So let me pull up.
We're going to be talking about UK Woman of Voice Prison after forging a paternity test, man.
So, this is a video that we're going to, this is what we're going to cover, guys.
So, come on over.
Watch on YouTube or on Rumble, wherever you guys want.
I'll drop the YouTube link for you guys.
And for the Rumble Ninjas, I could go ahead and drop the Rumble one for you guys.
Fresh and Fit.
Boom.
Here's the Rumble link for you guys that are watching on Rumble.
I'll give you guys both links.
So Rumble right there.
YouTube version here.
Giving it to the YouTube guys so you guys can continue watching on whichever platform you guys want.
Castle Club Ninjas, you guys already know.
So we're going to go live right now, guys.
Go ahead, jump in there.
I'm going to end this stream right here.
Thank you guys so much for joining the show.
Hope you guys enjoyed it.
And I'll be back tomorrow, 5 p.m.
Gonna cover some more news.
I think tomorrow what I might talk about, guys, is the 15 aid workers were killed in Gaza and the autopsies recently came out, which I do want to cover this.
So we'll definitely talk about this that happened a couple, it happened on March 23rd, but the autopsy just came back.
All right, so we'll talk about this more than likely tomorrow as a part of our stories and the other stuff as well.
So anyway, love y'all, ninjas.
I'll catch you guys tomorrow, 5 p.m.
Peace.
Go watch the stream right now.
Fresh of it on Rumble, Fresh of Fit on YouTube.
Come on over.
Womanizer Wednesday, Red Pill Wednesday.
▲
Export Selection