MyronGainesX - Fed Explains Why The Georgia RICO Indictment Puts Trump In BIG Trouble...

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 17, 2023 - MyronGainesX

01:27:49

Fed Explains Why The Georgia RICO Indictment Puts Trump In BIG Trouble...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	And we are alive.
	What's up, guys?
	Welcome to Fed Reacts.
	Excuse me.
	Today we're going to be covering I lost my voice from yesterday.
	Guys, today we're going to be covering the Trump indictment out of Georgia.
	Let's get into it, my friends.
	We got a lot to talk about.
	I'm a special agent with Homeland's investigation.
	Okay, guys.
	HSI.
	This is what Fed Reacts covered.
	Defender Jeffrey Williams, an associate YSL did commit the felony.
	So here's what 6ix9ine actually got.
	This attack shifted the whole U.S. government.
	This guy got arrested.
	Espionage.
	Okay.
	Trading secrets with the Russian.
	John Wayne Gasey, aka the killer clown.
	Okay.
	One of the most prolific serial killers of all time, killed 33 people.
	Zodiac killer is a pseudonym of an unidentified serial killer who operated Northern California.
	They really get off on getting attention from the media.
	Many years, Jeffrey Epstein sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls at his home.
	It was OJ working together to get Nicole killed.
	We're going to go over his past, the gang time, so that this all makes sense.
	All right.
	And we are back.
	What's up, guys?
	Welcome to FedReacts, man.
	Today, we got a pretty important episode, something I've kind of been looking forward to talking to you guys about anyway, because this is really important stuff we're going to discuss today as far as Trump's indictment.
	Real quick, I see I got a chat here.
	We got here.
	Zay Works goes, why was yesterday Chris appreciation?
	What did he do?
	Well, we were just trolling.
	I mean, we wanted to put Chris on a panel and surprise him and see how he would do.
	But no, it was a good time.
	It was a good time.
	Of course, he drank the Henny like he normally does, and it is what it is.
	So, yeah, it was entertaining.
	Very funny.
	Let's see here.
	Okay, I don't think there's anything else.
	But yeah, guys, um Yeah, a little bit different today.
	We're doing a live stream on a Saturday on a Thursday.
	We normally don't do this.
	We normally do the live streams on Sundays and do a pre-recorded video.
	I'm gonna have to, I guess, be more selective on which videos I pick to uh react to as far as like um documentaries and stuff like that because sometimes you might get hit with content IDs and all this other YouTube jargon that you guys don't need to know about.
	But yeah, so I might live stream on Thursdays uh a little bit more now frequently uh versus reacting to documentaries, but uh we'll see how that goes and uh depending on what news comes comes out and what we can do.
	Um so oh, you guys said the hair transplants working.
	Appreciate that.
	Yeah, the hair's uh coming back, guys.
	Coming back slowly but surely.
	I probably gotta wolf another week and a half or so and just keep brushing, and then this thing will probably it'll you know the stuff will start connecting.
	You know what I mean?
	Uh I've had waves before, it just takes forever.
	So it's just a pain.
	I feel like I'm back in 2007.
	But anyway, without further uh Edgie, introduce yourself to the people.
	Uh Angie.
	Hi, people.
	It's me again.
	Um yeah, today we're gonna do Trump.
	This is gonna be interesting.
	Myron was explaining me a lot before we we started the stream.
	Well, way before.
	And yeah, you're gonna have a lot of content today.
	You're gonna learn a lot.
	I think he's gonna get like very explanatory.
	So I hope it's like a good stream for you guys.
	What happened to the Columbine shooting?
	Can you explain to him?
	Uh yeah, so guys, I filmed the Columbine shooting, but YouTube took it down.
	So you gotta love that.
	Yep.
	It happened again, it happened with the Menendez brothers.
	Melinda's brothers, too.
	I filmed that.
	They took that down.
	Yeah.
	So, yeah, so don't worry, guys.
	I'm working right now on something where I will get because I got like three or four episodes that you guys have never even seen.
	I also got like a Russian spy episode that I that I um did that YouTube took down as well.
	So don't worry, guys.
	I'm gonna find a way.
	I'll probably I'll probably make a rumble for Fed Reacts so that y'all can go ahead and watch it over there.
	So uh coming soon.
	I actually was uh gonna talk to the CEO today, so I'll um chat with him and figure out a way to bring Fed Reacts over.
	So shout out to Rumble, shout out to Chris, shout out to everybody over there because Rumble really is the future, man.
	Um, but anyway, without further ado, let's kind of get right into it, okay?
	Um, and we're gonna kind of go over a couple of things.
	You know, who's uh so here's kind of the outline for today, right?
	Uh we're gonna go over who is Trump, who's the DA that's prosecuting him.
	Um, what is an indictment uh through a grand jury versus uh you know a jury trial?
	Two different things which people tend to confuse.
	Um we're also gonna talk about uh Trump surrendering, uh, what is Rico, who are the defendants, read through the indictment, actually have the document here.
	Um, and then uh we're gonna talk about you know what comes after this.
	And um questions too.
	Uh and then answer questions at the end.
	So this is gonna be I predict the stream will be around an hour, maybe.
	Uh so yeah, let's go ahead and get right into it, man.
	Anything you want to say to the people before I get into this?
	Um, I didn't bring the list.
	Uh I don't have my notebook with me.
	But you guys keep requesting I'm gonna make uh another uh question box, probably today or tomorrow.
	So you guys keep like dropping your cases.
	Unfortunately, we won't be able to cover uh the Melendez Brothers or the Columbia shooting anymore because yeah, we go here with that with that thing.
	Like we did it already.
	The episode we're gonna post it.
	Don't worry.
	We're gonna find a way to get it to get it to you guys.
	Um it's just a matter of time.
	It's not a matter of if it's a matter of when.
	Also, my Osama bin Laden video, they took that down too.
	So yeah, I got like three at least at least four videos that I can recall right now off the top of my head that got taken down.
	So four or five.
	So don't worry, we'll get those out to y'all.
	Um, all right.
	So uh first, let's start with who is Donald Trump.
	So, unless you guys have been living under a rock, uh Donald Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.
	Trump graduated from University of Pennsylvania with a bachelor's degree in economics in 1968.
	Uh UPenn is an Ivy League school, so uh obviously Trump is uh pretty smart guy.
	He became president of his father's real estate business in 1971 and renamed the Trump organization.
	He expanded his operations to a building and renovating skyscrapers, hotels, casinos, and golf courses, and later started side ventures mostly by licensing his name.
	From 2004 to 2015, he co-produced and hosted the reality television series The Apprentice.
	He and his businesses have been plaintiff or defendant in more than 4,000 state and federal legal actions, including six business bankruptcies.
	So yeah, no stranger to he's definitely no stranger to uh criticism, uh, very polarizing guy.
	You know, Donald Trump is one of those guys, you either love him or you hate him.
	Um, I ain't gonna lie, uh you know, I told you guys before I like Trump a lot.
	Um people talk a lot of smack and you know, people hate him, but I think he did a good job when he was in office.
	People can hate as much as they want, but um the economy was definitely in a better place when he was in.
	Um so we're gonna go ahead and uh watch this video.
	This kind of gives you guys a quick little overview of what's going on, and we'll watch a few more news articles, then actually go through the indictment itself.
	So uh let's go ahead and play it.
	Our worlds revolve around food.
	But food impacts our world on the low curve indictment.
	All right.
	All right, Faye, thank you.
	The Fulton County Rico indictment now is a big one.
	And 11 Alive has been pouring over the details since it dropped just before nine o'clock last night.
	At five, you might recall.
	We broke down the key parts against former president Donald Trump.
	Investigative reporter Zach Merchant is back now with what you need to know about some of the other co-defendants here.
	You're right.
	Attorneys we have talked to over the last 24 hours say that the scope and the breadth of this indictment is one of its defining features.
	Former president Donald Trump is the highest profile defendant named in the indictment.
	And there it is right there with all the different defendants.
	You got Donald J. John Trump, uh, Rudolph William Giuliani, which is crazy to me.
	We're gonna talk about Giuliani uh specifically as well, guys.
	Uh John Charles Eastman, Mark Randall Meadows, Kenneth John Cheesebro or Chesbro, Jeffrey Um Bursur Clark, and then another like 10 plus people.
	Crazy.
	But he is far from alone.
	A Fulton County grand jury returned a true bill of indictment, charging nine Okay, so pause it real quick here.
	She said a if you listen, right?
	And we'll rewind that one more time.
	But he is far from alone.
	A Fulton County grand jury.
	Okay, a Fulton County grand jury returned a true bill of indictment.
	Return a true bill of indictment.
	Let's let's break that down.
	Um, because I think for um a lot of people get confused between what a grand jury is versus what a trial jury is.
	Okay, I'm gonna explain the difference right now for you guys.
	So get your notebooks out, all right.
	So A jury trial is a try a jury composed of your peers that you know listen to the evidence, etc.
	and then come deliberate and then come to a conclusion as to whether you're guilty or not.
	But their standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt.
	A grand jury is a group of your peers that convene and listen to cases and indict you, aka formally charge you in the United States under um under probable cause is a standard.
	So you have in one situation, probable cause, which is down here, okay.
	Then you have beyond a reasonable doubt, which is right here.
	Here, this is a grand jury, probable cause.
	Here, you got a jury trial, which is beyond a reasonable doubt.
	The threshold for be reasonable doubt is way higher than probable cause.
	Now, when you talk about a grand jury and you talk about getting indicted, etc., this is the way it works, okay?
	Whether it's the federal system or the state system.
	The grand jury convenes is somewhere between 10 to 30 people, right?
	Of regular citizens.
	And what they do is they'll spend a day listening to cases all day, right?
	This they typically hold a grand jury once or once or twice a week, depending on the jurisdiction, how busy the caseload is, etc.
	But typically it's once every one to two weeks, they held a grand jury.
	And everyone that has a case that they're trying to get indicted and charged, right?
	They go the the investigator and the prosecutor that's aligned with him, go to the grand jury and present their case.
	After they present their case, the investigator walks out along with the AUSA and the grand jury deliberates.
	If they think that there's probable cause, they will return what's called a true bill of indictment, which is what she um Fannie Willis here was saying.
	Okay.
	And what that will do is that's going to generate an arrest warrant for the individual that was indicted from the true bill.
	Okay.
	So just and just to recap it, investigator and prosecutor walk in.
	Investigator and prosecutor present their case to the grand jury.
	Grand jury hears the case.
	Investigator and prosecutor leave the room.
	Grand jury deliberates.
	Grand jury returns either a true bill of indictment or they decide not to indict.
	And if the true bill of indictment is actually pushed forward, uh that gets signed by the clerk, et cetera.
	And then what ends up happening is the judge over it sends uh gets uh issues arrest warrants for all the individuals that a true bill of indictment was returned on.
	But remember, the threshold is simply probable cause, guys.
	Okay.
	And probable cause is the American standard for which someone will be arrested.
	Okay.
	Now you might be wondering, but wait, hold on, Myron.
	I got arrested on the side of the road.
	Like, I didn't get indicted.
	What are you talking about?
	I got arrested before.
	So it's very important to delineate, guys, that a probable cause arrest is not the same as being indicted.
	However, they both have the same threshold of probable cause.
	I'll explain.
	Scenario one.
	Someone gets arrested on the side of the road for getting caught with a brick of cocaine, right?
	Or for uh, you know, maybe some maybe uh police officer or witness saw them punch somebody, or you got arrested for domestic violence, etc.
	Wait, hold on.
	A grand jury didn't convene and indict me.
	I just slapped my wife yesterday, right?
	Like, what the hell?
	No.
	So the way it goes is this.
	I'm kidding, guys.
	The way it goes is this.
	When you're arrested on the spot through a what's called a probable cause arrest, once up happening is the investigate the law enforcement official arrests you, puts you in jail, goes back to the office and files something called a criminal complaint.
	Okay.
	I've ran hundreds of these, and we've actually read a bunch of them on this podcast, right?
	And a criminal complaint, guys, think of it as a band-aid, right, in the justice system that will kind of get the judicial process started, right?
	To buy the investigator and the prosecutor time to indict you.
	Okay.
	So you may so let's say the police officer makes a probable cause arrest on you after they find you with a brick of cocaine, right?
	They drop you in the jail, they go back to the office, they call the prosecutor.
	Hey, I caught this guy with such and such.
	Uh, are you guys gonna prosecute?
	Yeah, we're gonna prosecute.
	Cool.
	Uh, type up your reports and type up your criminal complaint.
	Boom.
	They type up their police reports, which you know, go to the agency, and then they also type on their criminal complaint, which goes to the court.
	They file that criminal complaint ASAP, typically within 24 hours.
	Once they file it, that will get them an arrest warrant, and that will hold you over, right, for a week or two.
	Every jurisdiction is different.
	When I was in the feds, it was about 14 days.
	So if I made a probable cause arrest, right?
	We call someone at the border trying to smuggle drugs in or trying to smuggle legal aliens in or guns or whatever, I would arrest them, file a problem uh criminal complaint, which outlines all my probable cause.
	That I get an arrest warrant for the individual.
	We uh he he sits in jail for about a week or two, and I have two weeks to indict him, almost two weeks, right?
	I go to the grand jury, I present my case.
	Now the case is officially uh indicted, and the person's been formally charged.
	So the point is this.
	If you file a criminal complaint, the person still needs to be indicted.
	But if the person is indicted, you don't need to file a criminal complaint.
	Okay.
	Give me once in the chat if that made sense with how a probable cause arrest works, how an indictment works, and the difference between a grand jury that files indictments versus a jury trial that uh a jury a grand um excuse me, a trial jury that go uh goes off of uh beyond a reasonable doubt and listed the cases.
	Give me ones in the chat.
	If it's if you don't type a two and tell me what's confusing.
	And I'm going to look at the chat here because I really want y'all to understand this is really important stuff.
	Thank you.
	No, it's mostly once.
	All right.
	Yeah, uh, I I I um I really like um making sure that people know this stuff because most people don't know.
	You know, they don't know the difference between a grand jury and a jury trial.
	All right, cool.
	Well, I do have some questions.
	Uh are you gonna explain what January 6 means?
	Yeah, I'll cover what uh happened on January 6th as well.
	All right.
	Um but okay, I don't see any twos.
	I think this is that's a Donna Marco.
	Okay, I think this is the first time I'm gonna do that.
	I saw two twos.
	Yeah, man, never mind.
	I spoke too soon.
	Um does defense get to void void direct.
	Yeah, they do, of course.
	Of course, and guys, um void here.
	Someone asked that.
	Um that's for a trial, guys.
	But um, but that oh, I get what you're saying.
	There's no Vor deer in the grand jury process.
	The grand jury process is considered secret, right?
	For obvious reasons because there's pending investigations being done.
	That is in the trial when they're picking out the uh the jury.
	So it it um so yeah, someone put a two just got here.
	Then rewind, bro.
	Uh let's see here.
	Let's see.
	I just showed uh use fake one.
	Two, why would they choose to indict?
	Um, they would choose to indict because they they found that there's probable cause.
	And remember, guys, probable cause is not beyond a reasonable doubt.
	There's still more evidence needed for probable cause.
	The threshold for probable, that's why I was trying to illustrate that with my hands.
	Probable cause is here, beyond a reasonable doubt is all the way up here.
	Okay.
	So just the the burden of proof to indict someone isn't that much.
	You know, there's a famous phrase that's used in the United States saying you can indict a ham sandwich.
	That's what it is.
	So let's see here.
	I think any other twos, Angie, that you saw or questions.
	Yeah, but uh they just want you to explain again.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Okay.
	So they okay.
	All right, cool.
	They they just didn't hear it.
	All right, so because people are filing in now, we're almost at 1,000 live viewers.
	Guys, do me a favor, by the way.
	Can you please like the video, subscribe to the channel if you haven't already?
	Um, I hit the chats real fast.
	Wants LDA, still know YSL prosecution, but a new Rico case case, WTF.
	Well, they are prosecuting YSL.
	And that funny story, guys.
	The prosecutor that's charging young thug is the same exact prosecutor that's going after Donald Trump.
	So uh if that doesn't show you, I mean Young Doug is if they went after the president foreign president of the United States, then young thug is probably not in a good spot.
	Uh Top Gear 149.
	Uh, it's the prosecutor that's that's had like one old Eureka cases.
	No, no, no, no.
	But it's her office.
	Oh, okay.
	So Fanny Willis, guys, is so okay.
	Let me explain this too.
	Fanny Willis is the district attorney for that county, which means she is the top attorney in that county.
	However, she does not actually prosecute cases herself.
	She doesn't go to the courtroom and litigate and everything else like that.
	No, she has a bunch of attorneys underneath her called assistant district attorneys that prosecute the case.
	It's just that it's her office that files all the criminal cases.
	So she's the face for the DA's office.
	Okay, it's a political position, guys.
	Yeah, it's just a district attorney term.
	So it's it's a political position.
	Um if they actually stop Trump from running, we the people ain't gonna do ish the constitution was not created for folks to be this soft.
	All right.
	Um and I think he's alluding to January 16th.
	Yeah, Simonis in the house.
	How to you, bro?
	Um, all right.
	Let's uh keep watching this thing.
	But I um I'm glad that that makes sense for you guys now.
	You can you know what a true bill of indictment is.
	Get the better drive and better deals with Volkswagen.
	Sorry, guys.
	We're gonna skip this thing as soon as it gives me the chance.
	Let's see here.
	These ads are brutal.
	All right, I'm gonna just play it, play the whole thing through.
	I'm gonna try not to stop it.
	All right, Faye, thank you.
	The Fulton County Rico indictment now is a big one, and 11 Alive has been pouring over the details since it dropped just before nine o'clock last night.
	At five, you might recall.
	We broke down the key parts against former president Donald Trump.
	Investigative reporter Zach Merchant is back now with what you need to know about some of the other co-defendants here.
	You're right.
	Attorneys we have talked to over the last 24 hours say that the scope and the breadth of this indictment is one of its defining features.
	Former president Donald Trump is the highest profile defendant named in the indictment, but he is far from alone.
	A Fulton County grand jury return there.
	She is that's Fanny Willis, guys.
	That that is a district attorney for um Fulton County.
	And also keep in mind, guys, this woman, uh you if you guys watch my podcast, you guys know and probably recognize her.
	She's the same person that brought those YSL charges.
	And she also did a press conference just like this.
	Charging 19 individuals with violations of Georgia law.
	Other prominent defendants named in the indictment include former white Holy, look at all those people.
	All people from um that were basically Trump aides here.
	Okay, everyone here is pretty much a politician.
	They're being all charged by uh for Rico.
	To include Rudy Giuliani, which we're gonna talk about Rudy Giuliani uh a bit as well in this podcast because I'm very familiar with him, and this is probably one of the craziest things I've ever seen, as far as like someone like Rudy Giuliani getting charged, and you guys are gonna see here why it's crazy.
	House chief of staff Mark Meadows and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, Emory Law School professor John Acevado says it's about more than those who were charged.
	These are going to be the major political figures of the day coming through the city to testify to be defendants.
	Meadows faces two charges, including one count of solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer.
	In connection to his participation on a now famous January 2021 phone call between then president Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensburg.
	Okay, so this is a phone call between these two individuals.
	Um this is gonna be a big part of their case, guys, which you guys are about to hear now.
	Um so uh pay attention.
	Look, really I just want to find uh 11, 78 votes.
	One more than we have.
	Other boom book.
	Man, you already know, and and you guys are probably wondering what how'd they get that recording?
	More than likely, uh that governor probably secretly recorded it, man.
	AKA less prominent figures are also among the 19 named defendants, including Scott Hall, a local GOP activist accused of giving Trump.
	Guys, um, GOP is basically just a fancy uh it's it's another term for the Republican Party.
	Uh, I've had people ask me, yo, what is a GOP?
	It it's um what what is the acronym stand for?
	I for something this the grand old party or something like that is what I think it stands for.
	But the GOP is just another way to say the Republican Party.
	Trump operatives access to a secure location within the Coffee County elections office.
	I'm the guy that chartered to get go down to Coffee County to have them inspect all the time.
	Yeah, it's Grand Old Party.
	I went down Randall Party, yeah.
	We scanned every freaking ballot.
	Now, despite being named in this indictment, it is very important to remember all defendants are presumed Innocent at this point.
	And we just got word moments ago that former Trump chief of staff, Mark Meadows filed a motion to move his case out of Fulton County and into federal court.
	Okay.
	So as y'all can see, um, they got charged with RICO.
	Now you guys are probably wondering, Myron, what the hell is RICO?
	So before I get into this, there's two different forms of RICO, guys.
	There was REC, there's a federal RIC RICO laws, and then you got state RICO laws.
	In this case, I want to really emphasize this is a state RICO investigation.
	Okay.
	So it's a little bit different than the normal federal one.
	All right.
	So Georgia Lico Raw law, right?
	It's basically a charge under the RICO Act is severe.
	Um, hold on.
	Let me enlarge this for the so y'all can see it.
	Okay.
	And I like these um these websites because what this is a law a lawyer's website, but they explain it very well.
	So, like, you know, if someone just got charged with something and they don't know what to do, they kind of explain it here in a very easy, concise, matter of fact, way for the average person to understand.
	So these um, anytime you don't understand the law, a lot of time going to the like uh a lawyer's website will explain it very simply for you.
	Yeah, somebody asked that the Rico.
	He he helped enforce it.
	So yeah, he was one of the biggest implementers of it, which is gonna, we're gonna talk about that.
	A charge under the RICO Act is a severe crime and does not need to be taken lightly.
	It can have lasting effects on your life, so it is important to hire an attorney from the very beginning, blah, blah, blah, right?
	So OCGA 1614 outlines four ways a person could be charged of violating the racketeering statute by directly or indirectly acquiring or maintaining any interest in or control of any enterprise, real property or personal property through the pattern of racketeering or the proceeds derived from the activity.
	Okay, what do they mean by this, guys?
	So an enterprise, okay.
	This is key because whenever you're charging someone with RICO, you're charging not just one individual, you're charging a group of individuals who are conducting criminal activity for the furtherance and or benefit of a criminal enterprise.
	Any RICO indictment you look at, whether it's a state one or a federal one, is always going to refer to something called as the enterprise.
	Okay, guys.
	So uh understand that that's the bottom line, and that is the um the foundation from which every single RICO case is going to be built because they need to articulate that not only are crimes being committed, but the crimes are being committed in the furtherance of an organization.
	Okay.
	So in this case, there they would say that they would consider the enterprise Trump's political party.
	Uh, sorry, uh the Trump campaign is what they're probably gonna try to insinuate, right?
	Two, by directly or indirectly participating in an enterprise through pattern racketeering activity while being employed by or associated with the enterprise.
	So um racketeering activity, guys, can be a multitude of different things.
	It could be fraud, it could be violent crimes of violence like murder, extortion, um, bribery, uh, you know, um drug trafficking, okay?
	Umtimidating witnesses.
	It there's a bunch of different crimes that could be considered racketeering activity, but racketeering activity is simply just a fancy way of saying criminal activity that in furtherance of the enterprise or the organization by conspiring or endeavoring to directly or indirectly acquire or maintain any interest or hold of any enterprise real estate property or personal property through a pattern of racketeering activity or the proceeds derived from a pattern of racketeering activity by conspiring or endeavoring to directly or indirectly participate in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity while being employed by or
	associated with the enterprise, okay?
	Rico is a crime that has federal uh that has a federal statute, it's federal and a Georgia statute.
	The Georgia statute defines racketeering more broadly than the federal one does.
	So, what does this mean, guys?
	So what that means is it gives Georgia more latitude to charge you with RICO, okay?
	Because some of y'all might be wondering, well, hold on, Myron, hold on, wait one second.
	Why didn't the feds charge Trump with RICO?
	Like, isn't RICO on the federal level a lot more um uh stiff?
	Yes, but the federal racketeering laws, guys, are a lot more a lot more strict and difficult to prosecute than the state one does.
	The state one allows the prosecutor to have more leeway and more latitude in charging someone for more different uh for more crimes that could be considered racketeering activity, okay.
	In addition, it takes a less approved uh less approve of a pattern of racketeering activity under the Georgia statute than the federal one.
	However, the largest difference between the two is that Georgia does not always require an existence of an enterprise to constitute racketeering.
	So I didn't even know that.
	That's really important, guys.
	Okay.
	And the federal one, if you look at any federal RICO indictment, there's always going to be an enterprise in there.
	But Georgia does not necessarily require an enterprise to charge individuals racketeering, right?
	Because this uh this Georgia Rico is getting a lot of um criticism for being too ambitious, right?
	Which I ain't gonna lie to y'all, it is a little ambitious.
	This is kind of OD.
	I think it's gonna they they definitely got the work cut out for them proving this in the in the court of law beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump is running uh uh you know uh a criminal organization uh that's conducting a bunch of racketeering activity.
	They're gonna they might have bit off of a bit more than they can do, but according to the Georgia laws, it allows them to charge it.
	And remember, guys, the reason why you're presumed innocent until proven guilty is because you can indict anybody, you can indict a ham sandwich.
	Um at the state level, it's a lot easier.
	You know, if you get indicted by the feds, okay, that's a problem.
	You're probably gonna lose.
	But if you get indicted by the state, eh, you got a chance.
	So, what is a pattern of racketeering activity?
	There are many crimes that could be used to show a pattern of unlawful conduct, they predicate crimes that fall under the Rico statute in Georgia to include uh drug offenses, homicide, bodily injury, arson, burglary, forgery, theft, prostitution, obscene materials, bribery, window sampering, perjury, evidence sampering, commercial gambling, distilling liquors and alcoholic beverages, firearms violations, security violations, credit card fraud, commuter crimes, kidnapping, carjacking, and making terroristic threats.
	The courts have concluded that a pattern uh consists of at least two acts of racketeering activity in furtherance of one or more incident schemes or transactions that have the same or similar intent, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents.
	This is do not have to occur at the same time, but the court has stated that at least one of the incidents must be within four years of the prior incident of racketeering activity.
	So, what does this mean, guys?
	This means that they can daisy chain offenses against you down the road as long as they're committed the criminal activity is committed within four years of each other.
	I'll give you guys an example in this situation.
	If you guys remember last year, right, young thug got indicted by this same uh DA's office, right?
	For RICO.
	Guys, they've been looking at Young Doug in that case since 2011, way past the statute of limitations, right?
	Or 2012.
	But, and and the murder, right, that stimulated this entire case started in 2015.
	So we were way past the statute of limitations on a lot of the different patterns of racketeering and crimes that they use, right?
	Obviously, murder never has a statute of limitations, but all the other crimes, right?
	Uh, the drug trafficking, the um the drug positions, the uh firearms violations, etc.
	All that stuff had passed its statute of limitations.
	But the reason why they're able to bring all that evidence in, even though it's past the statute of limitations, is because that crime occurred within four years of a crime prior.
	So, what they're the a they're able to effectively do, guys.
	This is why I tell y'all don't join a gang, don't do any types of crimes with other people, because what's up happening is if you committed a crime 10 or 15 years ago, right?
	And you're past the statute of limitations, but you committed another crime that could be constituted as racketeering activity that benefits the organization, they can marry those two crimes together, come back at you later on for that crime through RICO, okay?
	And even worse, let's say you get arrested for a crime, right?
	Because I know I remember this in the Young Thug indictment.
	One of the defendants in that in that indictment had like uh like a car theft charge or something like that, right?
	Or a drug trafficking charge, like some some minor charge, but it got thrown out.
	But since he committed another crime, they used that old car charge that got dropped against him to substantiate their RICO claims.
	So this is how bad this is how bad it could go for some of y'all, man.
	Like or like I'm telling you guys, don't commit crimes and don't commit crimes under a gang.
	Because things that you thought that you beat in the past can come back to haunt you because they're gonna string it together and say, oh, well, this was a pattern of racketeering activity.
	And then you get hit with a new charge.
	So that is the power of the RICO laws, guys.
	And if we're gonna go back a little bit, right?
	You guys are probably wondering, well, hold on, Myron, how the hell did this law come into place?
	Like, what's going on here?
	All right, we gotta go back to 1970, all right.
	Back in the 1970s, guys, well, back in the in in the well, we gotta go all the way back to the prohibition area if we're gonna explain this correctly.
	And I have a whole series on this in the on the mafia, guys.
	I did an entire series on the five crime families, etc.
	It's on this channel.
	Feel free to go back and watch it after this um podcast.
	But you're probably wondering, like, yo, why these laws are really strict, like they can really shrink together anything.
	Where did these laws come from?
	Well, guys, the Rico laws came from the 1970s, okay.
	Mafia times uh they were created in the 1970s, and but they really had the impetus to be created after the prohibition era in the 1920s, right?
	So when Prohibition came, which was the banning of alcohol in the United States of America, what it ended up happening was it created a flourish of criminal activity in the United States and gave organized crime an opportunity to make a lot of money.
	So once they ban alcohol everywhere in the country, organized crime, whether it was the Italian mafia, the Jewish mafia, um, and other other um criminal organizations came in and started selling liquor illegally.
	They started bootlegging, and they made billions of dollars in today's dollars, right?
	If you account for inflation from 1920 all the way up into the uh into the 70s, the US government had no remedy to combat organized crime in the United States.
	So what ended up happening was they created RICO laws that would be able to attack an organization as a whole or as an enterprise versus charging individuals, okay?
	So they made these laws to go after the Italian mafia, and um they actually implemented and successfully did it in the 80s.
	We're gonna talk about that Rudy Giuliani in more detail later on, but that's why the Rico laws were created was to go after the Italian mafia and topple all the power they had because they had a 50-year head start basically on law enforcement because they had built up massive amounts of wealth through prohibition, which allowed them to take that money from prohibition, invest into other endeavors such as loan sharking, illegal gambling rings, drug trafficking, um extortion, arson, theft, all this stuff.
	They were able to take that old money and then boom, go ahead and invest into other criminal endeavors, and they couldn't do anything.
	So, like, yo, we gotta be able to charge these guys as an organization because omurta, aka the code of silence, no one's talking, no one wants to cooperate because I just got them on this one charge, but I don't have them on racketeering.
	So that's why the laws were created.
	All right, give me ones in the chat if that makes sense to all you guys, and that explanation uh may helps you understand what Rico is.
	Okay, or twos if you're confused.
	Uh, do you know what that law standed for?
	Like prohibition prohibition one prohibition?
	Yeah, like why did it like what did this start?
	Um, if I'm gonna be honest about it, it's basically uh, excuse me.
	A lot of women got together and said we're tired of our husbands always being drunk and beating on us.
	That's really like one of the biggest pushers for prohibition.
	I swear to I swear.
	That was really what it was.
	It was the prohibition movement was like um pushed heavily by uh by females and and religious people, but but women definitely were a very strong contributing factor to the creation of prohibition.
	Uh okay.
	Misagony.
	Yeah, yeah, misogyny.
	Uh let's see if they're pointing out women in the chat.
	Yeah, because they were saying that alcohol was leading to domestic violence and stuff like that.
	So I think that's cool though.
	But I I get I I get the uh yeah, I get why you say it because you see all those uh mafia movies and the mafia series, it explains it all like they were all drunk and like doing cocaine back then, so yeah.
	Yeah, that was and then obviously also um for religious reasons as well.
	It wasn't just women that pushed it, but women were one of the biggest um contributors for sure for it.
	So uh all right, cool.
	So let's go ahead and keep going here, guys, with explaining this.
	Oh, and give me ones in the chat if you know you guys understand uh the Rico laws.
	Like I explain how Rico came, but give me ones in chat if you guys understand how Rico laws work now.
	After that explanation, yeah, I really want to make sure all you guys understand before I continue to move on.
	I know some of you guys might be like, yo, this is annoying.
	What did Rico stand for again?
	I was gonna uh racketeering influence uh corruption or corrupt organizations.
	Let me hold on.
	Let me you know what?
	Let's just um let's double check it.
	Raketeering racketeering influence corrupt organizations, I think is what it's saying.
	Corrupt, I thought it was conspirational.
	Racketer influenced the corrupt organizations act.
	Yep, I had it.
	Yep, that's what it is.
	Okay.
	Um, cool.
	I think I see mostly ones.
	I don't see Angie.
	Do you see any twos?
	No.
	All right.
	So we will proceed.
	Okay.
	I saw two, but just trolling, probably.
	Yeah, yeah, of course.
	Uh, okay.
	So now, okay, guys, we're gonna get into uh who is Fanny Willis, okay?
	Fanny Willis is a DA out of Georgia that's charging this, okay?
	And Fanny Tefia Willis, uh, born 1971 is an American attorney.
	She is the district attorney of Fulton County, Georgia, who contains most of Atlanta.
	She's the first woman to hold the office, okay?
	Uh she was but she's from Inglewood, California, right?
	Uh oh, her father was a member of the Black Panthers and a criminal defense attorney.
	So, okay, so that's who she is, right?
	And there's some uh rumors.
	I think Trump had made it said that she used to date a gang member back in the day.
	Of course he's gonna say that.
	So uh so here's the indictment here, guys.
	Okay, this is it.
	This is the actual indictment itself.
	You can see here, Fulton Superior Court.
	Hold on, let me there we go.
	Okay, um superior court, state of Georgia versus Broom.
	You can see Donald Trump here, right?
	The two most notable names, uh Donald Trump and uh former mayor of New York, Rudolph Giuliani.
	Um, and then you got all these other individuals, right, that were a part of the Trump organization, right?
	So, and then look, see, here's a grand jury four person.
	So, remember how I told you what a grand jury is, the four-person is the leader for them that speaks on behalf of the jury, just like you would have a four-person in a jury trial, you also have a four-person uh for a grand jury.
	Okay, so and then obviously Fannie Willis is the district attorney, so the document all the documents are gonna go through her, right?
	And this is that's just some uh this is some administrative bullshit.
	This is like uh for their for their own records.
	Um then you go here, table of contents, right?
	So they have here everything that's in the um indictment, right?
	The different chapters.
	We're not gonna read the entire thing.
	I'm just skimming through it with y'all just so you guys understand, right?
	So the grand jurors, uh for said in the name and behalf of the citizens of Georgia, do hereby charge and accuse Donald John Trump and then all these other individuals, right?
	With the offense of violation of the Georgia Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act, OCGA 1614, for the set accused individually and as persons concerned in the commission of crimes and together with unendited co-conspirators in the state of Georgia and Fulton County, and uh on and between the 4th of November 2020 and the 15th day of September 2022.
	Okay.
	Now, you guys are probably wondering.
	Well, hold on, wait, my what are you talking about?
	November 2020 and all this other stuff.
	Well, guys, this is all stemming from January 6th.
	What is January 6th?
	To summarize it for you guys without going into a whole situation, because this obviously is a very um sensitive topic for a lot of people.
	January 6th occurred when um it became out that Biden had won the election and Trump challenged the election.
	He delivered a speech, right, which some people say he was a call for violence, etc.
	And then there was um a cat uh uh a riot allegedly at the Capitol, where a bunch of Trump supporters charged the Capitol building, went inside and walked around, right?
	A bunch of those people got arrested by the FBI um for those January 6th situations.
	Now I want to make it very clear, guys.
	The feds and the state are not charging Trump for the rioters.
	What they're charging him for is for using his presidential powers to try to overturn the election.
	One more time.
	Okay, they're not charging Trump for the speech he delivered or for the people storming the Capitol and walking inside.
	They're charging Trump for trying to challenge the election and using his presidential powers allegedly to overturn the election and not allow it to be uh considered as valid.
	Okay, that's what they're charging him with.
	However, and I want to make this really important distinction, all right?
	I would be foolish and a liar to not tell you guys that the riots did not precipitate the feds and Georgia and get them into a position where they're like, we need to charge this guy.
	Okay.
	So even though they're not charging him with the actions of the rioters, the actions of the rioters brought a light to Donald Trump, where it's seen that the government had an axe to grind with him.
	Okay?
	Does that make sense, guys?
	Give me ones in the chat if that makes sense.
	Because there tends to be a lot of misconception that he's being charged with January 6th riots.
	No, he's being charged with January 6th election interference.
	The riots were a byproduct of it.
	Awesome, awesome.
	I see a lot of ones.
	Guys, if you're gonna type a two, you need to put immediately after the two.
	What confuses you?
	Don't just put a two to troll.
	You need to put a two in exactly what confuses you.
	Thank you.
	All right.
	Awesome, awesome, awesome.
	All right, cool, cool, cool.
	You guys give me a lot of satisfaction when I when I feel like I'm teaching y'all.
	And you guys are able to like really understand this stuff.
	Because a lot of people are on the news are like, oh, well, yeah, the jury were sick, right?
	It's like they don't really know what's going on.
	Uh question here, real quick.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Uh what is it?
	Can you read it?
	Yeah, here.
	Grand jury question.
	And guys, um, get your super chat questions in.
	Um is it like a normal jury trial or just the majority of jurors to pass on an indictment?
	Uh it's it's um, it's a whole different group of people, but they're just like jurors.
	They're they're your peers.
	I explained this in more detail, Steve, earlier in the show.
	You might have missed it earlier.
	Um, but feel free to rewind.
	It was one of the first things I explained.
	And time stamps will be up here later on, guys.
	Um, introduction.
	All right.
	Defendant Donald John Trump lost the United States presidential election on November 3rd, 2020.
	One of the states he lost was Georgia.
	Trump and other defendants charged in this indictment refused to accept that Trump lost, and they knowingly and willfully joined a conspiracy to unlawfully change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump.
	That conspiracy contained a common plan and purpose to commit two or more acts of racketeering activity if Fulton County, elsewhere in the state of Georgia, and in other states.
	The Enterprise.
	Okay.
	Now, see, guys, um, even though it's not required for Georgia Rico, which I just learned, they still have an entire part talking about the enterprise.
	Okay.
	So at all times relative is a countertment of defendants, and then they put all their names, which I'm going to skip, okay?
	And uh others known and unknown to the grand jury, constitute a criminal organization whose members and associates engaged in various related criminal activities, including but not limited to false statements and writings, impersonating a public officer, forgery, filing false documents, influencing witnesses, computer theft, computer trespass, computer invasion of privacy, conspiracy to defraud the state, acts involving theft and perjury.
	Okay, so now we know, right?
	Stop the short.
	Now we know what crimes, okay?
	They're trying to try, they're trying to say we're a part.
	Let me highlight this.
	Sorry, guys.
	All right, now we know what the crimes are.
	False statements and writings, impersonating a public officer, forgery, filing false documents, influencing witnesses, computer theft, computer trespass, computer invasion of privacy, conspiracy to defraud the state, acts involving theft, and perjury.
	So what I'll do here, guys, is I'll kind of go through some of these crimes for y'all.
	Okay.
	False statements of writing, that's that's a that's a catch-all.
	That's very easy to you know to throw.
	Right?
	Impersonating a public officer, forgery, filing false documents, influencing witnesses.
	This one is a big one.
	If you guys listen to that phone call that we had earlier with uh Trump saying, hey, I just need to find 11,000 votes, that's considered influencing a witness, right?
	Computer theft, as you guys know, people that are in the Trump team went and double checked the computers.
	Wait, impersonating a public officer?
	Yeah, that was one of the guys that we saw in the article before.
	They said that he was impersonating a public officer, which I don't know how they're coming to that, but that was one of the charges.
	That's crazy.
	Um computer theft, computer trespass, computer invasion of privacy.
	So since they went ahead and like recounted some of the votes and looked at those voting computers, that all constituted as violations from the computer theft, computer trespass, computer invasion of privacy.
	And then conspiracy to defraud the state.
	Okay.
	So this charge right here, guys.
	This conspiracy to defraud, all right.
	This charge right here.
	That is the same charge that the feds are charging Trump with as well.
	Okay.
	Now you guys are probably wondering, what do you mean conspiracy to defraud the state?
	What does this mean?
	Well, by Trump using his presidential power to try to get a recount or whatever he tried to do, right?
	They look at that as he's undermining the democratic process of the United States during elections.
	And by doing so, he is defrauding in the federal side, the United States of America, but on the state side, the front of the state of Georgia, of their civil right to vote, and the voting process in and of itself.
	Does that make sense, guys?
	So they're saying he conspired to defraud the state of its right to have the election process unhindered.
	Okay.
	The feds charge him with the same exact thing, but their argument is that he did it to defraud the United States.
	Georgia's saying he did it to defraud the state of Georgia.
	Right?
	Give me once in the chat if that makes sense.
	So they talk about this is a criminal organization.
	And then they say the enterprise operator Fullen County, Georgia.
	Um, but not limited to they also did this in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and District of Columbia.
	The enterprise operator for a period of time sufficient to permit its members and associates to pursue its objectives.
	Okay.
	So false statements solicitation of state legislatures, false statements and solicitation of high-ranking state officials.
	Um creation of distribution of false electoral college documents, harassment, intimidation.
	Now, um, guys, you know what?
	I'm gonna let y'all decide.
	Give me once in the chat if you guys want me to go through how many of these crimes are there?
	16.
	It's eight.
	No, it's eight crimes.
	Okay.
	Give me, give me uh one in the chat if you guys want me to go through these crimes and read it.
	Or two if you guys want me to go back to the news article.
	Well, was it that he was like a hundred and something?
	Yeah.
	Those are the acts, yeah.
	That's another thing.
	Another thing.
	But these are the actual like uh more explanation of each crime.
	Let's see here.
	You know what?
	Mostly ones.
	Mostly ones.
	All right, this is what I'll do.
	I'll play a news article and then we'll go into the um, and I'll read and I'll and I'll read this after.
	Give you guys a break from looking at these documents.
	All right, so let's go ahead and look at uh Trump's response to the Georgia indictment.
	Donald Trump has responded to his fourth indictment, claiming he has proof that will exonerate him from criminal charges in Georgia.
	Trump and 18 others were charged in connection with efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
	He is going to have to prove that Donald Trump subjectively knew that his claims were false and that he was therefore committing fraud.
	He legitimately believes he won the election here in Georgia.
	And that is the entire linchpin of the prosecutor's case.
	So in a social media post, Trump promised to unveil a new report showing voter fraud in Georgia.
	This comes as the first Republican presidential debate is just a week from today.
	Joining us now with more on this case is Doug Lou Zader in DC.
	Hi, Doug.
	Good morning.
	So what is the former president's strategy here to get exonerated?
	Well, we don't know what he's going to unveil on on Monday, which is when he's promised to uh take the wraps off this report that somehow pertains to allegations of voter fraud uh in Georgia.
	This is an effort to refute this latest uh indictment that came down from Georgia from the uh the uh the district attorney there.
	Um, you know, this is something that's been pretty well litigated up to this point, so we don't know what new may be part of this, but the uh former president is certainly raising a lot of expectations ahead of doing this.
	And you know, his schedule is getting Quite full.
	I mean, this is coming on Monday, we think.
	Uh, we've got this first Republican debate in Milwaukee on Wednesday of next week, and then on Friday of next week, the former president has to uh turn himself in.
	That's the deadline of to uh respond to these all right.
	So um uh Tim Cast, Tim Poole, which uh by by the way, announcle for y'all, we will be on Timcast next Friday.
	Timcast IRL next week, next Friday.
	Uh we'll probably be talking about this case and other things as well.
	Um Tim put out a tweet saying what happens if Trump doesn't um surrender because uh uh Fannie Willis gave all the defendants, I think 10 days to surrender.
	I think they have to surrender uh by next week, right?
	So what will happen, guys, if he decides to not surrender, which he will, but if if you know in a hypothetical situation, what would happen?
	What would happen, guys, is since he's not in the state of Georgia and he's campaigning all over the United States, the state of Georgia doesn't really have the authority to go arrest him in another state.
	They would have to do something called delegating and arrest warrants, okay?
	And what that means is they would have to take that arrest warrant that the st uh in the state of Georgia and delegate it to the United States Marshal Service, okay?
	United States Marshal Service is responsible for apprehending fugitives in the United States of America.
	So whether or abroad, okay.
	So once they give that warrant to the Marshals, now it's the Marshall's warrant.
	It oh, they own it.
	It's still a state warrant, but the marshals are gonna be the ones responsible for fulfilling it.
	So they're gonna go and they're gonna pick up Trump and bring him back to Georgia.
	Okay.
	Now, when you try to evade prosecution, there's something called unlawful flight to avoid prosecution.
	Also known as UFAP.
	L O LA.
	Okay.
	The people in the in the audience are gonna know what why that's funny.
	All right.
	But there's a UFAP warrant, okay?
	And a UFAP warrant is often um administered, right?
	And it's a federal charge, by the way.
	So like let's say the state investigator can't get somebody, right?
	They'll go to the feds.
	Hey FBI, hey Marshals, I need your help.
	This guy ran away to avoid prosecution, and we know that he did, right?
	Which in this case, you can argue that Trump knows that he's being uh charged, and he if he doesn't turn himself in, he's unlawfully fly fleeing prof prosecution.
	So uh, so what'll happen is the the Fulton County, they'll go to the feds, right?
	Uh down there in this, you know, district of Georgia and say, hey, we want to unlawful flight to avoid prosecution warrant, UFAP, and they're gonna file that, and they're still gonna go ahead and go get him with the U.S. Marshalls.
	So does a UFAP warrant always get filed?
	No.
	Normally it doesn't.
	But in a case like this where you can clearly see that they got a hard arm for Trump, yeah, they're probably gonna file a UFAP warrant as well against him if you were to try to not turn himself in, and everyone else involved in this case.
	Wow.
	Yep.
	And you do you really think he's gonna show up?
	Of course, he's gonna show up.
	But what's her name?
	Uh Fanny Willis said that they're going to fingerprint him and they're gonna take a mugshot.
	Oh my god.
	No one else has done that.
	So this is insane because uh Myron told me that um Trump is the first president or former president of the United States that's been like prosecuted, like extremely like you know, big time prosecuted, and that that will like look very bad to the country, right?
	Like it will look very good.
	Yeah, it's banana republic type activity here.
	So yeah, this is unprecedented, guys.
	But yeah, they're gonna because it just so you guys know.
	Um when he was arrested in New York, and when he was arrested by the feds on those two occasions, right?
	Three occasions total, if you include New York, they fingerprinted him, but they didn't take a mugshot.
	In Georgia, they're gonna take a mugshot.
	I think Fannie Willis has an axe to grind with with Trump man and his political charges uh that are the the most recent ones filed in Georgia.
	So we've got four you know big criminal cases pending against the former president.
	And we're gonna get back to that debate in just a second.
	But so far are these two charges impacting the former president's campaign?
	Well, we don't know yet.
	Um we we do know that there was a poll that recently came out just before he's going up in the polls every time he gets charged, man.
	So it's definitely influencing him, but from a good point.
	These charges were filed, indicating that there's support among Republicans had actually gone to the city.
	I have a question.
	Um this is probably a dumb question from me, but how does like the voting system works in this country?
	Like, how how do how do you vote?
	Like, do you vote?
	Is it electronically?
	Because in Venezuela it's like old times, it's like old school.
	You write in the paper and you put it in a carbo box.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So um here it's it's done, you win by states.
	And then and then um based on each state's weight and of importance and uh amount of people that live there to simplify it.
	Um, that shows if you win the election.
	Yeah, but like how do you do it?
	Do you go on a website and you um they do it with computers now?
	I haven't voted in a long time, but uh they do it with computers now.
	You go to like a voting booth, yeah.
	Okay.
	You go to like a voting location and uh and they do it with computers now.
	I haven't voted since 2008, guys, so please maybe someone in the chat can um oh okay, can uh can do it like uh but yeah, it's basically like an electoral college, which means you need to win state by state.
	And in this case, Trump lost the state of Georgia, which has quite a bit of weight in the compared like a state like Florida is gonna have more influence than the state like Wyoming, for example.
	Yeah, because there's more people that live here.
	Yeah, of course.
	And they're five people.
	Yeah.
	So uh, but yeah, that's basically typically what it is.
	Yeah, I did vote Obama guys back in 2008.
	Uh I did, I did.
	Um, but yeah, it is what it is.
	Why haven't you voted anymore?
	Uh, because I'm registered to vote in Connecticut and Connecticut is kind of a waste because you're always gonna go blue.
	Oh, yeah.
	But now I'm registered to vote in Florida, so I'm I'm 100% gonna vote for Trump on in 2024.
	Okay.
	Oh my god.
	He just said it.
	Definitely gonna vote.
	Yeah, I'll tell you I'm gonna go vote for Trump, man.
	I also like Vivek Ramaswamy a lot too, but I don't think he's gonna win.
	So um how how often do people uh like contented population here in America?
	Like for its state.
	Do you know?
	Uh they do a U.S. census every 10 years.
	Every 10 years, every 10 years they do a U.S. census.
	Okay.
	Now, you know, will this factor into into his decision, for instance, as to whether to take part in that debate?
	We don't know uh because he's undecided at this point, but he is the clear front runner still for the Republican nomination.
	And if anything, uh these indictments seem to uh seem to bolster his status.
	They definitely do.
	You just said he's undecided.
	Do you know the likelihood he participates next next week in that debate?
	Well, you know, look, he he's got a few things to consider.
	Um, one is the fact that that front runners generally don't like to participate in debates.
	Uh there's there's there's a lot of potential downside, and there's not necessarily a whole lot of upside, especially if you're leading with the kind of margin that Trump is enjoying right now among Republican voters.
	Uh, the other issue has to do uh with a requirement that the National Party uh has kind of grafted onto this debate, which is that you you you cannot participate in the debate unless you agree to support the Republican nominee, whoever that person may be.
	And and this has been difficult for a number of Republicans, but especially former President Trump, uh, who says that he's just not going to sign that kind of a pledge.
	And absent that, it's not clear how he would participate in the debate on Wednesday.
	All right, Dr. Louis Sader, thank you so much for your time this morning reporting to us live from Washington DC.
	All right.
	So um let's go ahead here and um move on, move back to the indictment itself, right?
	Because you guys want to hear those charges.
	So let's read it real quick.
	So, number one, false statements and solicitation of state legislative late uh lectures.
	Members of the enterprise, including several defendants, appeared at hearings in Fulton County, Georgia before members of the gener uh Georgia Grand uh Georgia General Assembly on December 3rd, 2020, December 10th, 2020, and December 30, 2020.
	At these hearings, members of the enterprise made false statements concerning fraud in the November 3rd, 2020 presidential election.
	The purpose of the false statements was to persuade Georgia legislators to reject lawful electoral casts, a voter uh votes cast by the duly elected and qualified presidential electors from Georgia.
	Members of the enterprise corruptly solicitated Georgia legislators instead of lawfully appoint their own presidential electors for the purpose of casting electoral votes for Donald Trump.
	So that's number one.
	That's where they're saying they came in and testified and get made false statements, right?
	False statements to the solicitation of high-ranking state officials, members of the enterprise, uh, right, and they always start with members of the enterprise.
	Basically, what they're saying here.
	Members of the enterprise also corruptly solicited Georgia officials, including the Secretary of State and the Speaker of the House representatives to violate their oaths to the Georgia Constitution And to the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the outcome of the November 3rd, 2020 presidential election in Georgia in favor of Donald Trump.
	Three, creation of distribution of false electoral college documents.
	Okay.
	After the false electoral college votes were cast, members of the enterprise transmitted the votes.
	The president of the United States, Senate, the uh Archivists of the United States, the Georgia Secretary of State, and the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
	The false documents were intended to disrupt and delay the joint sessions of Congress on January 6, 2021, in order to unlawfully change the outcome of November 3rd, 2020 presidential election in favor of Donald Trump.
	Harassment intimidation of Fulton County election worker Ruby Freeman.
	This was a big one.
	And I think Trump actually mentioned this woman's name a few times, right?
	Saying that she's corrupt and she had uh mess with uh with the vote numbers.
	Um let's see here.
	I'm trying to summarize it for you.
	And uh Georgia officials in an effort to persuade them to unlawfully change the outcome November 3rd, presidential election in favor of Donald Trump.
	Uh and further members of the enterprise traveled from out of the state to harass Freeman, intimidate her and solicitate her to falsely confess election crimes that she did not commit.
	Solicitation of high ranking United States Department of Uh Justice officials, right?
	Um let's see here.
	In one instance, Donald Trump stated to the acting United States Attorney General, just say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican congressman.
	Oh fuck, bro.
	Oh my God.
	Solicitation of the vice president of the United States.
	Okay, as you guys know, Mike Pence, right?
	Um, members of the Enterprise also corruptly solicited a vice president, the vice president to reject votes cast by the duly elected and qualified presidential electors uh from several other states.
	Unlawful breach of election equipment in Georgia and elsewhere.
	Um members of the enterprise uh in Georgia, members of the Enterprise stole data, including ballot images, voting equipment, software, and personal voter information.
	The stolen data then distributed to uh uh other members of the enterprise, including the members in other states.
	Then the last one obstruction, uh, obstructive acts and furtherance of the conspiracy and cover up.
	Members of the enterprise, including several defendants, filed false documents, made false statements to government investigators, committed perjury in judicial proceedings in Fulton County, Georgia, and elsewhere in furtherance of and to cover up the conspiracy.
	Crazy.
	Now, now that we know the uh charges, who is the second individual that's also notable?
	Rudy Giuliani, okay?
	Rudolph William Lewis Giuliani, born May 28th, 1944, as an American politician and a lawyer who served in the 107th uh as the 107th mayor of New York City from 1994 to 2001.
	I actually remember being a kid when he was mayor.
	He did clean up the streets a lot.
	He previously served as the United States Associate Attorney General from 1981 to 1983, and United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York from 1983 to 1989.
	So, guys, he was the functional equivalent to Fanny Willis, okay.
	Functional equivalent to her, but at the federal level.
	Okay, so obviously more prestigious here.
	So it's kind of crazy that she's prosecuting him now.
	Giuliani led the 1980s federal prosecution of New York City Mafia bosses as U.S. attorney for the subdistrict of New York after a failed campaign for mayor of New York City in the 1989 election, he succeeded in 1993 and was re-elected in 1997, campaigning on a tough-on crime platform.
	Yes, I remember when he did that.
	Um he was really focused on cleaning up the streets.
	You were seven.
	I was I was a kid.
	Yeah, I remember it though.
	Um he led New York's controversial civic cleanup from 1994 to 2001.
	Mayor Juliana appointed outside of Wilton Brand as New York City's new police commissioner in effort to reform police department's administration and policing practices.
	They applied the broken windows theory.
	All right.
	So um, so let's go ahead um and play this.
	This is what we know about Trump's charges, right?
	And then we'll play Rudy Giuliani's part, which where'd I put it?
	I think I I think uh wasn't he that the one that um this guy mentioned he when he that he got prosecuted for.
	Um, yes, um uh Michael Michael Francis did mention Giuliani.
	Grand jury indicting former President Donald Trump and 18 of his allies in the Georgia 2020 election case.
	This is his fourth criminal indictment in less than five months.
	Trump faces 13 criminal counts related to his alleged efforts to overturn the presidential election resident.
	hey, real quick, guys.
	We got 1400 of y'all watching right now.
	Uh, I just need you guys to like the video real quick.
	I would really appreciate we can get up to 100% engagement.
	It would help a lot because as you guys know, we're on YouTube Joe for two weeks.
	I couldn't post on Fed Reacts.
	So just like the video, man.
	Smash that like button.
	Let's get up to 1,400 likes.
	Results in the state.
	There are 18 co-defendants, including Trump's former lawyer and the New York City Mayor, Rudy Giuliani, and former White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows.
	Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis spoke about the sweeping indictment late last night.
	The indictment alleges that rather than abide by Georgia's legal process for election challenges, the defendants engaged in a criminal racketeering enterprise to overturn Georgia's presidential election result.
	In a statement, the former president's attorney said, quote, the Fulton County District Attorney's Office clearly decided to force through and rush this 98-page indictment.
	CBS is Nicole Scanga joins us now from Atlanta.
	Nicole, great to see you.
	We know you've been there since uh late last night into today again.
	Uh break it down for the uninitiated in plain English.
	What exactly is the former president now accused of doing?
	Ed Meg, good to be with you too.
	And the former president is being accused of serving as a ringleader of sorts of a criminal enterprise designed to overturn the 2020 presidential elections here in the state.
	And we explained that earlier that guys that he um they're they're looking at this from an enterprise standpoint.
	Georgia, and before this latest charging document was handed up to the Fulton County Superior Court, the former president had already faced 78 charges in other indictments.
	But this is the first time that Trump faces racketeering charges.
	Now RICO cases, as they are called, were uh first used in the 1970s against the mob.
	And if you've been hear us hearing us refer to them as sprawling, it's because, well, it is sprawling.
	This indictment, 97 pages, 19 defendants.
	You mentioned 41 felony counts.
	It collected 161 separate acts in total.
	Now, some of those accusations can stand alone in the court of law here in Georgia conspiracy.
	And what and remember, guys, I explained this to you how laws can stand alone.
	Uh, and then or they don't have to necessarily be wrapped, you know, in a RICO conspiracy, but winds up happening is it's it's subject to statute limitations.
	So here, these are all the acts that they're talking about.
	Acts of racketeering activity and overt acts of furtherance of the conspiracy.
	And you can see here, they go all the way from you know, 2020 to pretty much almost present day, and there's 100 plus of these things.
	Look at this act up to the what 40s now?
	86, sorry.
	Keep going.
	All the way, man.
	Holy Act 113, and then this one is a longer one.
	And then Act 114, 115.
	And it just keeps going and going and going.
	So, yeah.
	And remember, guys, the reason why is because they have to, for each of these 18 people, each of them was involved in different acts.
	So they have they're outlining each individual, you know, and what act they were involved in, right?
	You can see here that Trump isn't obviously in every single act.
	One act might pertain to only one individual.
	So that's why there's so many.
	It's not that Trump did all 200 plus these acts.
	It's Trump and all those other 18 individuals, etc.
	Did all those uh activities.
	All right.
	So that's why it looks there's so much.
	which is not necessarily all Trump.
	To commit election fraud, for instance, forgery, filing false documents, that now notorious call that the president had made to Georgia's Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger.
	But there are other acts that could not stand alone in a court of law here in Georgia.
	The president's tweets, for instance, or some of those efforts by Trump operatives to influence election results in other states, Michigan, Arizona, Pennsylvania, namely, but prosecutors using those overt acts to paint a picture to tell a broader story of election conspiracy that took place here in Fulton County.
	And Nicole, we're talking about 18 co-defendants.
	So walk us through what they allegedly did.
	Yeah, Meg, some prominent advisors of the former President that our viewers will recognize Rudy Giuliani, the uh former president's former personal attorney, Mark Meadows, his uh former chief of staff who uh sat in that role during the election.
	There are those who spoke at hearings here in Georgia uh to convince state lawmakers to overturn those 2020 elections, folks like lawyer Ray Smith.
	There are three so-called fake electors who are serving as co-defenders, those who claim to be official, like former chair of the Georgia GO that's that's why they're getting called fake a fake um uh proposing as a public official, those fake electors.
	P. David Schaefer, there are individuals who traveled from out of state to harass and intimidate Fulton County election workers like Ruby Freeman.
	There are officials involved in efforts to illegally access election data in nearby Coffee County, a rural district outside of Atlanta, folks like GOP official Kathleen Latham.
	Nicole, uh, it was a late night there in Atlanta.
	You were in the room last night during the press conference with the DA.
	Yeah, they indicted him at like like uh damn near midnight, I remember on on Monday.
	What did she have to say about the situation with the charging document?
	Or they made the announcement, excuse me, they made the announcement that late night that some may have heard went around before the indictment was unsealed.
	It suddenly copped up online, it looked like it did, then it went away.
	Her office disputed uh its authenticity.
	Uh, but it seems to have contributed to the rush to get this done late last night.
	Ed, no doubt a tense moment during that press conference last night.
	Uh, the question should be what didn't the Fulton County DA say?
	You know, she told reporters no, I can't tell you anything, adding that she's not an expert in clerk or administrative duties.
	You know, this after uh the former president's attorneys blasted the Fulton County DA for what they called a mishap here.
	Now, the Fulton County DA did say during that press conference that she would give defendants until August 25th to surrender at the courthouse, mentioning that arrest warrants have been issued, uh, as is typical under Georgia state law.
	It remains to be seen in the coming days when exactly the former president will appear for his initial arraignment at the courthouse behind me.
	We know that he is planning to host a press conference in Bedminister, New Jersey uh next week, and we'll potentially discuss some of the allegations here.
	We do know there is already a significant U.S. Secret Service footprint on the ground here in Atlanta.
	They have been doing site evaluations for weeks.
	Already Atlanta, uh a big hub for U.S. Secret Service nearby former president.
	And also, guys, the reason why they're gonna give him more time is because obviously a lot of people are politicians, and then the Secret Service needs to coordinate.
	You know, it's gonna be a huge you know situation to get them over there.
	So they need to coordinate it from a security perspective, etc.
	That's another reason too why she's giving them extra time.
	Um, do you explain specifically why he's getting indictment in at in Georgia?
	Because uh the he called he tried to overturn the votes in this county.
	So that's why.
	Okay.
	And and uh Fulton County covers uh Atlanta.
	Atlanta is in Fulton County.
	I think Jimmy Carter, uh, but I am told that that a federal law enforcement presence is expected to grow into next week, and perhaps a sign of when we could see the former president pop up here behind me.
	All right, yeah, they have to Secret Service has to go do a site evaluation as well, guys.
	So, like anytime the president travels, the Secret Service got to be there pretty much like a week before.
	So that's another reason why the ADA the DA had to give them extra time.
	So yeah, it's gonna be a spectacle, guys.
	You guys remember when he got indicted in Miami and he showed up there, it was a whole mortarcade, it's a whole thing.
	So they have to prepare whenever he comes.
	It was crazy.
	Who covers all things Homeland Security and Justice for us in today's in Atlanta.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	And the former president's legal troubles go beyond the indictment in Georgia.
	Trump's co-defendant in the federal classified documents case has played it.
	Okay.
	So that goes into the federal document case.
	Now, let's take a quick look here.
	I got a video for y'all.
	Um on Giuliani.
	Which, man, it's crazy how they they indicted him, man.
	And good thing though, uh, that article I just closed out, guys.
	Basically, it shows that you know, there are most of other Republican candidates, Ron DeSantis, Vivek Romaswamy, they're even saying, hey, even though Trump is our opponent, uh, you know, it's unacceptable that the Justice Department and Law Enforcement Generals being used to weaponize the justice defense against Trump.
	So this is a legal deep dive on Trump's fourth indictment, and this covers a little bit of Rudy Giuliani.
	So you guys can see here, look at this.
	The commission of Lacosa Nostra, this is Rudy Giuliani right here, guys.
	A young Rudy Giuliani, and this is when they went in the hood mafia and families.
	Now they're using the same statutes that made him a famous prosecutor against him.
	That's insane.
	I think that the work in my office and other parts of the Justice Department has changed the definition of the problem of crime in America.
	We're gonna have to attack it as a business, not just as individual crime.
	We have followed up with civil RICO cases.
	There'll be some point in the future in which we will really destroy the power of the mafia.
	Hard to believe seeing those videos.
	Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani is one of the 19 people, including Donald Trump, indicted yesterday on racketeering charges.
	But nearly four decades ago, Rudy Giuliani was U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, and he used those very same Rico principles to take down the leadership of the infamous five families of New York's organized crime.
	Tonight Giuliani called the RICO charge against him.
	And guys, we um have those mafia videos on this channel for y'all.
	So if you guys want to go check those out, go watch them, and you you it'll you'll see why it's so shocking that he's being charged with this.
	It's in a playlist.
	Yeah.
	New York's organized crime.
	Tonight, Giuliani called the RICO charge against him.
	Ridiculous.
	Back with me tonight, Neil Cotell, Department of Justice veteran and former acting solicitor general during the Obama administration.
	His podcast courtside has a brand new episode out on this indictment, and you must listen to it.
	Neil, we keep hearing about racketeering.
	Can you explain exactly what that means and how it applies in Georgia?
	Yeah, so the racketeering comes from a 1980 Georgia law and indeed a 1970 federal law.
	And the idea was to take the conspiracy doctrine, which is a flexible tool that prosecutors use to go after bad guys, and apply guys, a conspiracy is nothing more than an agreement between two individuals and one overt act being committed in furtherance of that conspiracy.
	That's how easy it is to prove conspiracy in American law.
	Apply it to criminal enterprises.
	And so, in order for it to apply, you've got to have committed two or more predicate acts that are criminal in nature.
	Um, so it can't just be a one-off kind of thing.
	And, you know, in a way, Steph, it's just it's so sad to see how far Rudy Giuliani has fell.
	Like when I was in law school, and of course, after 9-11, he was someone that we all looked up to.
	And to go from that to four seasons landscaping, let alone a criminal indictment, is just you know, unfathomable.
	This guy has been suspended from the bar.
	The DC bar has recommended his disbarment last month.
	Um, it is uh an unimaginable fall.
	It is especially for New Yorkers who there was a period of time where that guy wanted to be president.
	Ten years ago, people thought he could have had a bridge named after him in New York.
	And now look where he is.
	Um, let's talk about this case.
	Yeah, he really did a good job when he was mayor of New York guys.
	He really reduced the crime in the 90s significantly.
	And some are predicting that Trump is going to try to get this move to federal court.
	Meadows already wants to do that.
	Do you think Trump's going to be successful?
	And even if he is, it's still it's still in Georgia.
	You still have the same prosecutor.
	A president would not be able to pardon someone convicted here.
	That's very important, guys.
	The president cannot pardon himself or someone else on a state case.
	I think only the governor can do that.
	So there's definitely, I think Trump is going to try and move this case to the federal court, and if for no other reason than in the federal courts, that the televis televised trials have never happened.
	Oh, yes, that's another thing I forgot to mention, guys.
	This trial could be televised.
	It's a state case.
	Feds are not televised, but state cases are.
	So this thing might get televised.
	I think that's another reason, too, that this is going to be a problem for Trump.
	To go to the chief justice And get a special order from the judicial conference.
	Otherwise, I think that should be granted.
	But that stands in stark contrast to Georgia, in which tell in which televised criminal trials are the norm, and this trial would be televised in Georgia.
	And so Trump, who's afraid of sunlight, the way vampires are afraid of sunlight and garlic, I think, is going to do everything possible to try and have this case in federal court.
	It doesn't mean that it's federal prosecutors or the United States Justice Department who will run the prosecution.
	doesn't mean that a future president could pardon, but it does change the rules like televised trials and the like.
	I think, Steph, that these removal actions will fail.
	It's true there is a law passed after the Civil War that gives federal employees in certain circumstances the right to move a case to federal court, but it doesn't apply here, I don't think, for three reasons.
	One, One is you have to be performing a federal function.
	And Donald Trump as president or Mark Meadows as his chief of staff are not performing a federal function.
	The president in our constitution has huge sweeping powers.
	But the one place our founder said the president has no role is with the electoral college.
	And for the best of reasons, because who's actually pretty valid what he's about to say, guys?
	And he's right with that.
	The person who has the most self-interest in the Electoral College, how it functions, how votes are counted, the president, the sitting president, They're the ones who were after all running for re-election.
	So our founders cut the president entirely out of the electoral college.
	And in order for this case to be moved for any of the defendants, they have to be performing a federal function.
	These folks just weren't.
	The second thing is there's no federal colorable federal defense.
	That's that's debatable.
	I can I can see his argument for Trump, but the other 18 people, that's that's debatable.
	I don't think there's any immunity claim or anything like that that's gonna cut the mustard.
	And lastly, in order to remove a case, Neil Katia case to federal court, you can't put too burden too much of a burden on state court, estate uh officials.
	That's what the Supreme Court said 30 years ago.
	And here, obviously, moving the trial to federal court would impose that burden.
	So I don't think that's going anywhere.
	It's a long answer.
	Sorry for all the detail, but basically, bottom line, this move I think will fail.
	No, we want the detail.
	We need it, especially tonight.
	Fonnie Willis wants this thing to go to trial within six months.
	Let's let what happens to All right, guys.
	Here's here's his uh stuff right here.
	He's Indian, it looks like he looks like so.
	Yeah, um, his parents he's born in the United States, his mother is a pediatrician, his father died in 2005.
	But yeah, immigrant parents from India.
	Trump's campaign, if he gets convicted while he's actively running for president.
	Yeah, so you know, I think that there's a very strong case that if he's convicted under the Georgia trip, thank you.
	Come again charges, he cannot serve.
	He's then eligible to serve as president under the 14th Amendment section three, again passed after the civil war, barring insurrectionists from running for office.
	A group uh, you know, a couple of very conservative Grammaswami's a better Indian than this guy.
	Very prominent law professors last week wrote a long article about this that's gotten a lot of attention.
	So I think that just as a legal matter, he will be ineligible at that point.
	But separately, you're asking about the political consequences.
	And I know that Donald Trump says every time he's indicted, it helps him, and all this stuff helps him.
	If so, then I don't know what he's complaining about.
	I mean, then why is he saying you know, Biden or the district attorney in Georgia's act?
	This dude a hater.
	All right.
	Yeah.
	So um, that's actually that's actually a very good question.
	Like, what happens if he gets indicted?
	Uh I mean, if he gets charged uh when he's actually the president, like uh that's a good question.
	If he becomes president and he has these charges over him, uh that'd be interesting.
	I would I would assume he would ask the governor to pardon him.
	Is what I think he would do.
	Well, happen if we if he don't.
	But I mean, this hasn't happened to the case.
	You would serve, I guess he'll go into go to prison after he serves in four years.
	Yeah.
	Wow.
	You know, yeah.
	Goku Kakara, do a reaction stand of wounded knee Russell means.
	Uh I don't know what that is.
	Love free Jeffrey Young, Thug Williams.
	Okay, so it's UTRC23.
	Zaza goes, what do you think the future for Trump supporters?
	Will we make it to 2024?
	I think we can, guys.
	I think he can make it to 2024.
	He's just got to make it through to the election.
	And uh he can part himself on the federal cases.
	The New York case, I'm not worried about.
	It's a BS um falsifying business business records, so it's a barely a felony.
	Uh, he'll probably get a fine for that.
	And then um, this Georgia one, uh, if he can get the governor to pardon him.
	This one is the one that he can't save himself from.
	He has to have someone else come in.
	Once LDA, can they record him legally without his knowledge?
	I mean, no Y cell conviction now prosecution, but the same DA going for another Rico, ridiculous.
	Yeah.
	Um yeah, they can absolutely record him without his knowledge, guys.
	Um, what I'm willing to bet is that the governor that he spoke to on the phone, he said, Hey, I need you to find 11,000 votes.
	Probably recorded that conversation and gave it to the prosecution.
	That's insane.
	He's probably cooperating, that's why they have it.
	After I was overrated, Fed Reacts Daytime shows where the good content is at.
	Keep up the good work, Myron.
	Appreciate the Oscar.
	If more people had your mindset, my friend, we wouldn't have so many brokies.
	Yeah, love your content, keep it up.
	Shout out to Angie, shout out to you.
	Apotheasus intent.
	Why 45 get all this for wanting to count the votes?
	Then them them's uh Democrats do the same in 2004 with Kerry and Bush.
	I remember them counting Florida votes like two weeks.
	Yeah, you're right.
	Good point.
	JTK, Fab Fat Fap.
	Okay, Kyrie Sosa.
	A dollar.
	I don't you don't want to know.
	Uh you ever thought about bringing Vivek Ramaswamy on the podcast?
	What do y'all think about him?
	I like Rivek a lot.
	Um I don't think he's gonna win the Republican nomination, but if he does, I'm gonna 100% vote for him.
	100%.
	If he wins the Republican candidacy, I'm gonna vote for him.
	I think he's a businessman, Indian guy, really smart.
	I've watched a couple of his um talks.
	Uh he's a he's a businessman first, which I also like he's anti-establishment, just like Trump.
	He think of him, he is the best way that I could describe him is that he has the charisma and charm of speaking capabilities of Obama while also having the same capitalistic anti-establishment um mindset of Donald Trump.
	So I like Vivek.
	Uh let's see here.
	And he's young too, which is which is good.
	You know, he's in tune with with the times.
	Jay Meta, how are they indict under Rico for using a First Amendment right?
	Clowns be going after him like he's John Gaudi, Trump be living rent free.
	The reason why, bro, is because they're saying that he could say the election is rigged all day, but once you start using your presidential powers to get things looked into, that's when it becomes a problem.
	That's what they're going after.
	Whatever you see, and in the federal case, the same situation.
	True political hypocrisy being played out in real time.
	Why don't they just slap Rico charges on all and every fraternity is dead?
	Might as well.
	This is crazy.
	I know, man.
	It's wild.
	Uh TJ, I've never voted for Republican in my life, but I promise you I'll be voting for Trump just because of how the government is abusing his power against him.
	Facts.
	I find it funny that even though he uh uh this is from come on, he goes, I find it funny that even though he is on tape saying the things he is accused of, you don't care.
	He can't be held accountable using using your words, Myron.
	Let that sink in.
	Well, my friend, what I am saying is that Trump.
	My thing is this.
	I'm not saying that they don't that they don't charge Trump.
	What I'm saying is that they're not doing this to other politicians that have done the same thing.
	That's that's my that's my issue.
	If they went and did this with Biden, if they did this with Hillary, if they did this with all the other uh politicians that did a bunch of BS, I wouldn't care, but they're not.
	That's the problem, my friend.
	That's the problem.
	If you're gonna go ahead and go after politicians, cool, I'm all for it.
	But make sure you do it equally across different political parties.
	Yeah, there's a lot of people that don't want him in power.
	Yeah, so that makes sense.
	You know what I mean?
	I'm not saying you shouldn't be charged, I'm saying that they need to charge everybody else as well.
	And they're I mean, you're delusional if you don't think that this is not a part of a bigger political plot, right?
	So yeah, but it's scary though to think like there's a lot of people going after him.
	Yeah, this is the this is absolutely absolutely the weaponization of the Justice Department and law enforcement against a political candidate to stop him.
	Where were these charges a year ago?
	Two years ago.
	Yeah, like he they as soon as he they didn't start charging him until he said I'm gonna run in 2024.
	Yeah, so come on, man.
	What are you talking about?
	Come on, Mr. Come on.
	Um who else has done these before?
	Jeremy Thompson.
	Uh done what?
	This highlighted this things that Trump did.
	Uh like coding bows and shit.
	And I don't can't think of anybody.
	Well, oh no, wait.
	Uh they just talked about it.
	Carrie and then in Florida.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, it's been other instances.
	There have been Democrats that have been in a similar situation that challenged the election just like this, guys.
	And nothing happened.
	But uh anyway, guys.
	Uh I'm gonna go ahead and uh, you know, I think that's it right there.
	We're gonna kill it there.
	I'll probably jump on Sneeko's stream later tonight.
	Wait, let me see if I got more questions here.
	No, no, it's gotta be super chats.
	No, uh that's not fair for the super chatters.
	Oh, your questions.
	Oh, okay, okay.
	I thought you meant like the I know we we we covered them all.
	Oh, the January 6th.
	Oh, yeah, I explained it, yeah.
	Okay.
	Well, you're not paying attention, woman.
	Yeah, stupid.
	Uh yeah, we're good.
	That's it.
	Yeah.
	All right, cool.
	Guys, I'll probably jump on stream with Sneeko here in a bit.
	Um, in probably like an hour or something like that.
	Uh but yeah, love you guys.
	Like the video, man.
	I'll catch you guys tomorrow on Fresh Effit.
	We got Psychacks in the house.
	Um, and then we got uh next week, I think we're gonna have Jackson Hickel come in and then Tim Cast more than likely Friday.
	So yeah, guys, we're back in the algo, it looks like you know.
	Um we had like 27,000 of y'all watching right uh last night on after hours, and we had like 16 or 17,000 of you guys watching the Logan Paul podcast yesterday.
	So looks like we're back.
	We just need to get Fed Reacts back, guys.
	Please like the video, man.
	Get it up to 1,000 plus.
	I see that we're still at only 867.
	I didn't want to stop the show too many times for the likes, but do me that solid.
	Angie, you got anything for the people?
	Yeah, follow Fred React at Fred Reacts on Instagram.
	We'll post it more actively there.
	And yeah, keep up the stay tuned, guys, and keep up the, you know, stay active there, voting and posting your view cases.
	And like the yo, follow the channel.
	The sorry, follow the Instagram guys and engagement so we can grow it.
	Uh Angie's working really hard behind the scenes, managing that Instagram put it posting reels.
	She's doing them all herself, by the way.
	She's editing them all herself.
	So she's learning.
	Some of them, yeah.
	I'm learning how to edit videos and shit.
	So um, so yeah.
	All right, love you guys, man.
	I'll catch you guys.
	Let me make sure I didn't get any other chats that came through.
	Okay, nope.
	All right, we'll catch see you guys tomorrow for Fresh of Fit.
	Peace.
	We'll catch you guys on the next one, man.
	Like the video.
	Special agent with Homelands investigation.
	Okay, guys.
	HS is what Fed Reacts covered.

▲