Mike Adams and Alec Zek’s episode explores Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodi rejecting Pentagon demands for AI-driven weapons, risking U.S. contracts amid potential shifts to Chinese models like DeepSeek. It ties AI workforce cuts—seen in Jack Dorsey’s 4,000-employee purge—to geopolitical tensions, where Trump allegedly pressures Israel to strike Iran first, framing it as a defensive move while dodging legal risks. Adams links suppressed health knowledge (glyphosate, vaccines) to censorship by intelligence-backed groups like CCDH, claiming millions died from restricted COVID-19 truths, and promotes their documentary Censored (Feb 27, 8 p.m. CET) and upcoming Confluence event (April 23–27). Zek’s work on water’s "hydroglyphs" and speculative consciousness hints at broader implications for reality, while Adams frames their lawsuits as a fight to dismantle the "censorship industrial complex," warning failure could erase free speech for all. [Automatically generated summary]
Welcome to Bright Videos News for Friday, February 27th, 2026.
I'm Mike Adams, and today I'm going to bring you the first part of an interview with Alec Zek.
And I have to apologize to him because I've held that interview for more than a week.
But I really want to get part one out for you today because I think you're going to find it truly, truly fascinating.
It'll give you some really interesting things to think about over the weekend, like consciousness, the cosmos, the structure of the simulation that we are currently inhabiting.
You know, things like that.
It's going to be very interesting.
Also, there's news from Anthropic.
The Claude Code company has denounced, well, no, I can't say denounced.
They've told the Pentagon no, that they will not allow their technology to be used for autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of the American people.
So I've got a special report coming up about that.
And I'm very happy that Dario, the CEO there, I'm very happy that he made that decision.
I've also got another report about how Jack Dorsey, the former CEO of Twitter, who, in my opinion, was a totally evil bastard pushing censorship.
Yeah.
Well, anyway, he has a fintech company that has about, I don't know, 10,000 employees or so.
He just fired 4,000 of them just like that all at once.
Almost half his workforce.
Like, bye-bye.
You know why?
He said it.
He said it publicly.
He said, we're replacing them with AI.
So yeah, that just happened.
And then his company stock price went up 23% because the investors said, that's awesome.
We're cutting costs.
Yes.
Okay, so I've got a report coming up on that.
I told you this is going to be a wild year.
Seriously.
In case you missed it yesterday, my interview with Ty Bollinger was a hit.
People love that.
And I'm almost tempted to include it again today.
But I do have part two of that coming up next week.
Ty has created a powerful new film called censoredfilm.com.
And it's a film that I'm also featured in.
And it begins, you can start watching it tonight for free.
So just go to censoredfilm.com.
And registration is required.
I think you put your email address in there.
And you'll be able to watch the film later on tonight.
I'm not sure what time, but he's launching it tonight.
This is a film that documents our lawsuits against big tech.
My company sued big tech and the U.S. government, and so did Ty.
And we have the same attorney.
And what's interesting about this is my company filed a lawsuit first almost two years ago.
And then about six months later, Ty's company joined.
Well, there's actually more to this story.
We found a lot of interesting stuff that ended up being in our lawsuit documents that pertained to the truth about cancer and Ty and Charlene Bollinger.
So we forwarded that information to them.
And during this time, by the way, all the tech people were openly admitting to all their censorship.
It was wild.
Just through all these TV appearances and tweets and everything, they were admitting what they did.
It was like, oh my God, we're going to win this case because they've admitted to everything that we've accused them of doing.
So anyway, we turn this information over to Ty and Charlene Bollinger.
And then Ty is like, can we sue them too?
And like, well, of course, join the party.
So they ended up filing a totally separate lawsuit because what big tech did to them was even worse than what they did to us.
It's insane what happened between the government, the NGOs, MI6, British intelligence, you know, and big tech.
What they did to Ty Charlene Bollinger will blow your mind.
So that's all covered in the film, which is free.
So censoredfilm.com is where you find that.
And I think I will, after the interview today with Alex Zek, I'm just going to put the Ty Bollinger interview one more time here because I don't want you to miss that.
I don't want you to have to go find that file.
It's mind-blowing.
Israel And Nuclear Weapons00:15:16
Trust me.
Wow.
Okay, what else do we have?
I've got a couple other reports.
We'll see.
Let's talk about what's going on with Iran quickly.
So it's very clear now.
I have listened to everybody on the, I mean, every prominent analyst, including Colonel McGregor, of course, who I admire, and many other people.
I've heard people that say they don't think there's going to be an attack, and some that think there will be.
You know, I've heard Larry Johnson and Andre Martyanov, you know, former Soviet Union citizen, but also I've interviewed him.
He's been an American for decades, most of his adult life, actually.
And he's also an author that's written some really astonishing books about war, about military strategies.
So anyway, I've heard what I think is a very good cross-section of the experts.
And what's apparent to me at this point is that Trump is waiting for Israel to initiate the attack on Iran.
And then Trump's waiting for Iran to retaliate against Israel.
And then the U.S. will say, oh my God, we've got to jump in now because we can't let our friends in Israel take a beating.
And then that's going to be the trigger for the U.S. to go in full force.
That's the lineup that Trump is looking for.
Because you see, when Trump, if he were to initiate an attack on Iran just from America, it's obviously illegal.
It's blatantly illegal.
It's even unconstitutional because there's no declared war.
And it's extremely unpopular.
Trump will be denounced.
He will be impeached.
The GOP will lose the election.
I mean, the midterm's coming up in a huge way if Trump has America initiate the attack.
So he's waiting for Israel to do it first.
Because then the messaging is better.
It's like, well, we didn't start it.
No, you just had half your Navy floating nearby for some reason and all your Air Force there and all your soldiers.
And it just randomly happened to be nearby when things got hot and heavy.
But, you know, Trump will say, well, we didn't start it.
But we had to protect our friends.
The other thing that could happen is that Israel could launch a false flag attack on a U.S. naval vessel, which, of course, they've already done before, USS Liberty.
Wasn't that 1967?
And they were trying, at that time, Israel was trying to blame that on Egypt because Israel is the king of false flags, of course.
I mean, you just go through the history books.
Almost everything that was significant in U.S. history that involved explosives, gunshots, assassinations, or violence was carried out by Israel, you know, one way or another, from JFK assassination to 9-11, you know, whatever, and other things.
Various assassinations of journalists, etc.
So we know Israel is capable of this, and that might be the excuse that Trump is looking for.
Oh, our ship was attacked by Iran, but actually it was attacked by Israel.
But how are we going to know?
We're not over there.
We're sitting here halfway around the world, most of us, depending on where you're listening from.
But you're not there in the Red Sea or the Sea of Oman or wherever, the Mediterranean.
You're not there.
The Persian Gulf?
No.
We don't know.
Whatever they tell us.
But of course, I'm going to interrupt myself.
I don't believe anything they tell us.
Do you?
Whatever they tell us, you have to question it.
But they'll push a narrative for the mainstream people through Fox News and CNN and whatever.
And most people will believe that.
Oh, we were attacked.
We have to respond, you know?
So that's probably, again, it's either Israel attacks first, and then we do a follow-up, or Israel attacks America with a false flag, and then we blame Iran and use that as a justification.
One of those two things is very likely to occur within days.
Because if Trump backs off, which he may actually want to back off, because he knows how dangerous this is going to be for his future.
I mean, you know, he'll be impeached.
He'll probably be criminally prosecuted after 2028, you know.
If he proceeds with his war, you know, he'll be known as a war criminal for the rest of his life.
And also, probably thousands of U.S. soldiers will die and their blood will be on Trump's hands.
And I don't think Trump wants that, actually.
I'm guessing, but I don't think he wants to be the guy that gave the order that killed 10 or 20,000 American troops.
But if he backs off, then America loses reputation power.
America loses credibility because then the world learns that, oh, so they were bluffing the whole time.
So Iran just stood up and said, no, we're not going to negotiate with you.
We're not going to give in.
We're not going to give up our missiles.
We're not going to give up our enrichment program.
No.
And Trump backed off.
That's going to set a precedent for other countries to say no, which is exactly what the Pentagon wants to avoid.
You know, when you're running around the world as the bully and threatening everybody, you want your threats to have an impact.
You want people to be afraid, you know?
Sailing in the aircraft carriers.
We're going to kick your ass.
I mean, that's the message from America right now.
And you want countries to be afraid and then to bow down.
Oh, please don't attack us.
We'll agree to anything.
If it doesn't work, then America is shown to be a paper tiger at that point.
A Navy that can't really carry out a long-duration war.
Now, sure, the Navy can do a lot of short-term damage.
No question about that.
The Air Force can as well.
Lots of damage from the Air Force.
But they can't sustain it.
They just don't have enough missiles and bombs.
And they don't have any way to replace them quickly.
So they can bomb for one or two weeks or something, maybe.
Depending on how long they try to stretch it out.
But at some point, they're done.
And they got to go back, you know, the ships have to sail back somewhere to a port where they can reload everything.
Meanwhile, Iran is just opening up secret caves and just launching missiles by the hundreds.
Iran doesn't have to go back anywhere to reload.
They've already got hundreds of thousands of missiles underground ready to launch, you know.
So some people are suggesting that maybe Israel will use nuclear weapons.
I actually wouldn't be surprised if they did.
But can you imagine the blowback?
If Israel really wants to turn the entire world against it, even more than is already the case, if they start dropping nukes on Iran, oh my goodness, man, talk about, I mean, wouldn't most countries denounce Israel and cut off trade and have a total embargo?
And maybe that's what the Zionists want because they want, you know, they're end times accelerationists.
They want the apocalypse.
They want to be nearly destroyed because they think God is going to jump in and save them.
No, he's not.
Because, you know, Israel's run by Satanists.
I mean, that's kind of obvious.
So, no, if anybody shows up, it'll be Satan to save Satan's colony, which is Israel at the moment.
At least that's who's running it.
So they're all delusional, right?
But maybe they want the end of the world.
And if they start firing nuclear weapons, then things could get super dicey.
At that point, it's like, well, okay, so you open the nuclear Pandora's box.
And guess what?
Pakistan has nukes.
India has nukes.
Russia has nukes, obviously.
North Korea, China.
It's not just you, Israel.
It's a bunch of countries.
And then the questions are going to be, where did Israel get those nukes?
Who gave them to Israel?
And it turns out that's all illegal.
And a bunch of people should go to prison for that because it's wildly illegal for the United States to provide weapons to countries that are engaged in crimes against humanity.
Mass killings, genocide, ethnic cleansing, etc.
It's expressly prohibited under U.S. law.
So if they fire nukes, then, oh my goodness, that's going to open up global condemnation and all kinds of investigations.
And who knows where that goes?
You know, military coup against the Trump regime at that point?
I don't know.
And Israel's a small country geographically.
It's amazing they can fit so many Satanists in such a small area, but they do.
My point is that Israel, you know, one giant nuke could destroy the whole country.
So if Israel starts the nuclear exchange game, they're on the losing end of that.
You know, and I don't want to see any nukes fly, not even into Israel.
I just, no, let's not start nuking each other.
That's a horrible idea.
But as Tucker Carlson said recently, Israel is in a desperate situation.
Israel realizes that Trump is their last shot.
Trump's their last president.
You know, they own Trump, clearly.
But after the midterms, Trump's not going to have the power he does now.
And also, obviously, after 2028, that is, if we make it that far, then, you know, the GOP is not going to be in power.
The Democrats are going to be in charge again.
And although many Democrats have been bought off by the Zionist billionaires, there are a lot of them that, a lot of Democrats that oppose Zionism.
And certainly a Democrat-run White House is not going to Be obedient to Netanyahu's demands, not in the way that Trump is.
So Netanyahu realizes this is his last opportunity.
This window between now and Election Day, this is it.
And he thinks that if they can get the United States to destroy Iran within the next few months, that that will be the greatest thing that ever happened to Israel, and then they can proceed with their greater Israel project that will make Mike Huckabee happy because he says Israel has every right to take all the land, all of it, from what is it, from the river to the sea.
Is that the Euphrates?
Is that what that is?
I mean, it includes a big chunk of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, what else?
Lebanon?
Yeah, I mean, part of Egypt.
You know, I mean, this is what Israel openly says they want: they want to just take all those countries, kill all the people, pillage, you know, steal everything, and then occupy.
But to do that, they have to destroy Iran first.
And to do that, they have to get the United States to do all the heavy lifting.
That's what this is all about.
So if Trump goes along with this, then his political career is over.
The GOP gets destroyed.
But Netanyahu is happy.
So here's the question: Will Trump put Israel first or America first?
Right?
Or, I mean, even his own career, even his own freedom.
And it's pretty obvious that Trump is always going to put Israel first.
His entire administration is run by Zionists.
They're all Zionists that surround him.
So they're going to put Israel first, and Trump is going to betray America and betray his own party, the GOP, and he's going to hand the GOP a total blowout loss politically in the midterms coming up later this year because he's going to go all in in one way or another, I believe, with an attack on Iran.
Which makes you wonder, how much dirt do they have on him?
You know, Epstein files, videos, allegations, how much dirt?
How much blackmail?
Compromat, right?
How much do they have on Trump?
It must be a pretty thick folder, I would imagine, if he's been this obedient to Netanyahu.
Very sad.
So anyway, when that happens, whatever form it takes, when the attack gets underway, all hell is going to break loose.
And if they start using nukes, oh my God, man.
Can't even imagine what that's going to do to the world and to the economy and to the price of gold and to the panic to purchase emergency supplies and everything.
And iodine will be all blown out again and nobody will have any iodine.
I mean, I don't want to go through all that, folks.
I don't want to go through any of that stuff.
I'm praying for peace and sanity, but it's also clear that the only way to have peace is to halt the philosophy of Zionism.
Because Zionism itself, which is based on ethnic supremacy, and by the way, Zionism is not Judaism.
And I'm not conflating those two.
Zionism is a philosophy that's completely separate from the Jewish faith.
And I don't consider all Jews to be Zionists because clearly that's not the case at all.
And by the way, Israel also doesn't represent all Jews.
Israel is a political entity created in 1948.
The Jewish faith is thousands of years old and transcends the existence of modern-day Israel, which is not the same as the Israel mentioned in the Bible, of course.
Two totally different things.
But Zionism is the perversion of Judaism combined with Satanism to murder and kill and pillage and coerce and lie and deceive in order to get what you want, which is to take everybody's land and resources.
That's Zionism.
And that is incompatible with human civilization.
It's incompatible with peace.
It's incompatible with compassion.
It's incompatible with Christ and the teachings of Christ.
It's incompatible with love.
Pentagon's AI Ambitions00:17:21
Obviously.
So Zionism needs to be stopped.
But Judaism needs to continue to coexist with all the other religions in the world, which I think most Jews are on that path anyway.
Again, most Jews don't support Zionism.
Most Jews are just trying to get through life like the Hindus and the Buddhists and everybody else.
The Christians, whatever.
So that's my take on it.
Zionism is a danger to humanity.
But Judaism is just one valid faith among many valid faiths that every person has a right to express and to worship and to follow in whatever way suits them best.
And what's really crazy is the Christian Zionism.
Like, we follow Christ except we put Satan first.
You know, it's like, what?
How does that work?
I don't know.
That's a weird thing.
Christian Zionism.
It's a contradiction.
But anyway, that's what's going to happen in the Middle East is my guess, but I'm praying for peace.
I've got to pray for Trump right now.
Actually, I pray that he has the strength to say no to the Zionists in this case.
Can you imagine his donor class being so angry with him?
We gave you $100 million and you didn't bomb Iran?
Trump should say, well, what more do you want?
I gave you guys billions of dollars in handouts and weapons.
I looked the other way while you bombed women and children in Gaza and blew up civilians in Lebanon with secret exploding pagers.
I mean, what else do you want from me?
Trump might say, I've done enough already.
But for them, it's never enough, is it?
Never enough.
There's always somebody else that they want to kill.
And right now, that's the Iranian people.
I'm praying for the Iranian people, too, because I'm praying for their safety and peace.
I'm praying for the people of Israel, too.
I don't want them to suffer under Iran's missiles.
Yeah, I'm praying for everybody.
I pray for peace.
I'm praying for humanity and for life.
And I'm praying that the Satanists are stopped.
Okay.
So let's change topics now to some of the special reports here.
Let's talk about AI, which some people also think is totally demonic.
And the Anthropic Company made a choice today to be less evil, or maybe even not evil.
And that's a good choice.
So let's go to that report first.
It's about Anthropic versus the Department of War.
Here we go.
Okay, there's been an historic announcement from Anthropic, the company that makes Claude Code.
Dario Amodi has basically told the Pentagon to go pound sand.
Now, just as context, you may recall that the Pentagon gave Anthropic until, I think, 5 p.m. Friday today to give the Pentagon essentially unrestricted use of its technology, which of course means that the Pentagon wants to use it for killing purposes, you know, autonomous weapons, Terminator, Skynet, kamikaze drones, plus targeting and surveillance, mass surveillance, of course.
And also to write cyber hacking programs, probably the modern version of Stuxnet, things like that.
And Dario Amodi had said previously over the last few years that he's interested in AI that can serve humanity's interests.
And of course, I agree with that, although I have also been rather critical of Dario for his just absurd beliefs.
For example, he thinks the U.S. actually adheres to restrictions on biological weapons development.
He thinks the U.S. gave up bioweapons decades ago.
He literally believes that.
Talk about a gullible person, right?
It's crazy to be high IQ, but so uninformed.
Anyway, but today he made the right decision, and I applaud him for this decision.
And Dario decided that his values and his ethics were more important than all the riches in the world.
And so he told the Pentagon to go pound sand, like I said.
And in a statement that he issued, he wrote, in a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine rather than defend democratic values.
Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today's technology can safely and reliably do.
Two such use cases have never been included in our contracts with the Department of War, Department of Defense, and we believe they should not be included now.
And they are, number one, mass domestic surveillance.
He says that AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties.
Yeah.
He's absolutely correct.
So good for him.
He made the right decision.
And I'm shortening this.
You can read his letter at anthropic.com slash news.
And the second point is fully autonomous weapons.
He says today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons.
We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America's warfighters and civilians at risk.
Notice he said civilians because, yeah, the military could deploy these against the people.
Let's see.
He says, in addition, without proper oversight, fully autonomous weapons cannot be relied upon to exercise the critical judgment that our highly trained professional troops exhibit every day.
So anyway, he says these are the two exceptions and therefore he will not concede to the demands from the Pentagon and he will not write those two use cases into the contracts.
But of course the Pentagon is at war with America's tech companies that refuse to build Skynet Terminator killing machines.
And as Dario writes, quote, they have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards.
They've also threatened to designate us a supply chain risk, a label reserved for U.S. adversaries, never before applied to an American company, and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards' removal.
These latter two threats are inherently contradictory.
One labels us a security risk.
The other labels Claude as essential to national security.
Regardless, Dario writes, these threats do not change our position.
We cannot in good conscience accede to their request.
Wow.
So number one, I'm surprised.
I was asking the question yesterday, what will Dario do?
And honestly, I didn't know the answer.
And I said so.
But I thought he was going to eventually say, okay, we'll work with the Department of Defense.
It's better to be part of the conversation than to be excluded from the conversation.
Because, of course, that's what Elon Musk did.
Elon Musk is all in with the Department of Defense.
Oh, yeah, use Grok for anything, you know, killer drones, mass surveillance, spy on the people, you know, kamikaze, you name it.
Build bioweapons, engineer, you know, cyber attacks, whatever it takes.
And of course, Google is all in because Google's totally evil.
They're like, where do we sign?
Can we please start killing more people?
Because, you know, Google's all into that.
Microsoft is all in.
You know, OpenAI, all in.
But only Anthropic said no, only Anthropic.
Makes me feel a little bit bad for criticizing Anthropic yesterday for their accusations against Chinese companies.
They stole our stuff.
You know, it was so lame.
But for this, Dario Amodi deserves applause.
This is a decision that very few people could make.
I know that I would have made the same decision because I've already made similar decisions to say no to large amounts of money and wealth and promises and whatever because I'm not willing to work with a suicide cult satanic death system.
So I've already said no many times, but most people have never said no when it matters.
And this is another important point.
It's easy for people who have never been offered $100 million or $100 billion in the case of Anthropic, let's say, over time.
It's easy to say, oh, I would never take the money when you've never been offered the money.
That's easy.
What's hard is when the money's there, there's a contract in front of you, they're ready to wire the funds, $100 million, let's say, just theoretically, and they say, all you got to do is sign this and give us your technology or even just allow us to use the tech for this purpose.
Most people would take the money.
I'm guessing maybe only one in 100 would say no.
Maybe it's less.
Who knows?
But Dario said no, and he probably now his company will be destroyed.
His company will be destroyed.
I'm guessing.
I mean, I'm not hoping that.
I kind of like Anthropic now all of a sudden.
I mean, I like them more.
They have principles.
Wow.
We should support that.
And of course, I use their product.
You know, I use Claude Code every day, just using it, you know, 10 minutes ago.
I use Opus 4.6.
Of course, I'm happy to switch to other models if they're better.
I don't really have brand loyalty to Claude, but this might change that for me.
Because this is the first time I've seen Anthropic have like real moral principles in contrast to X or Google or Microsoft or whatever.
So maybe I'll recalibrate that decision and choose to do business with Anthropic because of this decision.
They need our support.
Clearly, they're not going to get government contracts anymore.
And you know, if their product is designated a supply chain risk, you know what that means, right?
That means that no government contractor will be allowed to use Anthropic.
That means Boeing, you know, Raytheon, it's 100,000 corporations that sell anything to the government, including paperclips.
They won't be able to use Claude Code.
And guess what they will do instead?
See, this is the unintended consequences chapter of this conversation.
Guess what they will do instead?
If they can't use Anthropic, they're going to download DeepSeek from China from Hugging Face.
Or Quinn, the new Quenn 3.5, is really good.
They're going to download the Chinese models and run those instead.
So in other words, the Department of War will be forcing supply chain companies to switch to using Chinese models instead of an American company model because they're going to designate the American model to be a supply chain risk.
I mean, how insane is that?
Or you might say, well, no, they'll switch to open AI.
Okay, maybe now, for a little while.
But when you need to write code and you can't use Anthropic, you're going to use the Chinese models because they're better.
Okay, or you might use Google for a while.
But what happens a year from now when the Chinese models are significantly better than Google?
If you want to use the best models, they're going to be the Chinese LLMs.
Clearly, that's where this is headed.
So that means that all these government contractors are going to be forced to use second-tier technology if they are told you can only use U.S. models.
Whereas the rest of us in the private sector who don't have government contracts, like me, we use whatever we want.
I just go with the best stuff, whatever it is.
Right now, it's Opus 4.6 from Anthropic.
Next week, it might be DeepSeek version 4.
Who knows?
Who knows?
And I have written a bunch of code with Quinn 3.5, the 122 billion parameter model.
It's kind of slow, but man, it's good.
Actually, you know what?
Their 35 billion mixture of experts model is quite good.
And their 27 billion dense model is also good with code.
You know, with like basic code.
It's not good enough to handle complex projects, not yet, but that's coming.
Did I tell you that the code base now that runs brightlearn.ai, that it's now over 100,000 lines of code?
It's like, how did it get to 100,000 lines of code?
This is crazy.
But anyway, this is history in the making, and we're watching the Trump administration and specifically the Pentagon, the Department of War now under Pete Hegseth, who does not understand AI technology at all, clearly, make decisions that will have really damaging effects down the road.
It's clear that they want to use AI to weaponize it.
They want to make Terminator, Skynet, you know, the T1000 models or whatever.
They want to make Terminator drones.
They want to use AI for mass surveillance of the American people, of course.
And they want to use AI to more effectively murder people.
So I wish more companies would say no.
But, you know, this is the world in which we live.
By the way, I share Dario's sentiment about the fact that AI technology should be used to protect and enhance humanity.
And of course, that's how I deploy it with my AI projects.
It's all about education and learning, empowerment, bypassing censorship.
And that's why our AI engines and platforms are so incredibly popular.
So if you want to use our deep research AI engine, that's found at brightanswers.ai.
And if you want to use our book creation engine or download the nearly 40,000 other books that people have created, they're all free.
You can find that at brightlearn.ai.
And if you want to use our news analysis engine, which is really amazing, keeps you up to date on all the news, that's found at brightnews.ai.
And then finally, if you want to hear more of my analysis, as I'm going to be talking a lot about AI and the new models and the implications, macroeconomics and geopolitics and so much more, you can find all my videos and interviews at brightvideos.com.
And then finally, my articles are published at naturalnews.com.
So thank you for listening.
And, well, I guess we have to say thank you to Anthropic for saying no.
That's the right answer.
All right.
Take care.
All right.
Welcome back to the broadcast.
We've got other reports coming up for you here that I think you'll really enjoy.
I want to remind you first that our online store is healthrangerstore.com.
And there, you know, we have storable foods.
Might be useful if there is a world war or something.
We've got high-end nutrition, nutritional supplements, and personal care products that are expertly formulated with ultra-clean ingredients.
No filler, no synthetic fragrances, no synthetic colors, no garbage, no GMOs, nothing, none of that garbage.
Check our site.
It's amazing.
We do lab testing for nearly everything, heavy metals testing, glyphosate testing, and so much more.
I've shown you my lab tour video recently with our MassSpec lab.
That impressed a lot of people.
Like, whoa, I didn't know that your lab is that large.
It's a lot of instrumentation in there.
Yeah, yeah, I know.
Tell me about it when we have to pay for the preventative maintenance on all those equipment.
Yeah, that's like the cost of a car every year.
But anyway, yeah, HealthRangerStore.com, thank you for supporting us.
Good News, Bad News00:14:04
Without your support, we couldn't do what we do.
We couldn't offer these platforms for humanity and for public education, bypassing censorship, etc.
So thank you for shopping with us there.
And don't forget that you can find all my recommended affiliate partners at rangerdeals.com.
RangerDeals.com.
And there we have some partners that are carefully selected.
It's a small set, and some partners have discount codes.
The discount code is usually the word Ranger.
And by typing in Ranger, you can typically save 10 to 15% after you click through the link there.
So just go to RangerDeals.com.
We've got goldbacks and gold and silver retailers.
We've got de-googled phones and laptop computers and so much more.
It's all there at rangerdeals.com.
Even the therapeutic peptides as well.
So check it out.
Now, after that second special report, I've got one, I think one more report for you.
Oh yeah.
Yeah, I've got a report how toxic people promote toxic herbicides and other chemicals.
You notice how good people promote natural health and nutrition and clean foods and things like that.
And then bad, nasty people promote toxic everything, glyphosate, you know, vaccines, psychiatric drugging of children, things like that.
So that's an interesting report.
I think you'll find that useful.
And then I'm going to do, of course, the first part of my interview with Alec Zek, which I think you'll find really fascinating.
And then I'm going to put in the part one of the Ty Bollinger interview as well, just in case you missed that yesterday.
All right, enjoy the rest of the show.
Well, former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, you know, he's got a fintech company that is the parent of Cash App and Square and Title.
They just announced they're laying off almost half their workforce, about 4,000 employees all at once.
And why?
Because they're replacing them all with AI.
I mean, he just came out and said it.
Jack Dorsey stated, quote, intelligence tools have changed what it means to build and run a company.
And he says that a significantly smaller team using those tools, quote, can do more and do it better.
Well, that answers the question, doesn't it?
I mean, what question?
Well, the question of whether AI will replace human jobs.
4,000 just today.
And after he did that, his stock price surged 23%.
Imagine that.
It went up because the investors saw this as a cost-cutting measure that would improve profitability.
The company's already profitable.
It made almost $3 billion last year.
That's wild.
I don't even know where all that money's coming from.
I mean, who's spending money on these, I guess, Square?
I guess that's a popular thing.
I've never used it.
But cutting human employees is considered a wise financial move by investors.
All right.
So this move is, this really demonstrates the pivot point that I've been warning about.
You've heard me talk about this for the last few months or more.
Jack Dorsey has predicted that within a year that most other companies are going to reach a similar conclusion and they're also going to fire about half their people.
I'm paraphrasing, but that's essentially what he said.
Wow.
With his stock price going up 23%, it's also going to put pressure on the boards of other public companies who are going to consider drastic cuts if they believe that AI can replace human labor, which it can.
Now, I remember hearing a lot of people over the last few months say that, no, companies are just using AI as an excuse, but actually they're cutting jobs because of the contracting economy.
Well, okay, maybe, but AI is absolutely replacing lots of coders, lots of engineers, even system administrators, et cetera, security experts.
In the tech sector, AI, it's like a raging wildfire burning through the employment sectors of this whole industry.
And I've warned about this.
I've said it numerous times that this was coming.
And here it is.
And it's just getting started, actually.
This is going to accelerate dramatically from here.
So that ends the debate, I would think.
I don't suppose there's any informed person out there who's still saying that, no, AI, it's a hoax.
It's not going to replace any jobs.
Although there were people saying that even recently.
It's all a hoax.
It doesn't work.
I've heard that.
It's crazy.
If you had any idea what I'm doing with AI right now, like eight feet away from where I'm sitting, if you saw what I'm, the screens I'm looking at, you couldn't believe it.
Your mind would be blown.
You would, I'm not even going to tell you what it is.
Maybe one day I will, but it's so advanced.
And it's, when I'm looking at these screens, I know that middle managers and corporations are about to be cut like never before.
There's, I mean, it's obvious at this point.
It's not even a debate.
There's just people who are ignorant, who don't know, and then there's the people who do know.
And I hope that you know, because I know it's coming.
And the AI models, even the open source models, I'm talking about just Quen, Quenn 3.5, which is only two days old now.
Quen 3.5 alone is going to replace millions of jobs in the United States.
Mark my words.
Well, unless something better replaces it, which is possible.
But let me reframe that.
Quen 3.5 or better open source AI will replace millions of jobs in the United States.
How about that?
That's my reframe.
That could include DeepSeek version 4 or maybe Quen 3.6 or whatever comes out, or other models.
There's lots of models.
But the job replacements are real, clearly.
Now, importantly, when you're slashing almost half your workforce in a corporation, which half do you slash?
Now, as a rule of thumb, I would imagine that you're cutting the half that don't know how to use AI.
Yeah, for real.
So the people they keep are the people who know how to use AI because they have to.
They have to use those tools because now one person has to do the work of two people, which with AI tools is not difficult.
One person can pretty easily do the work of five people right now, if you're in the right career, like writing code, let's say, or even accounting or whatever.
And if you're really good at using AI, you are 10xing this thing right now, like what I'm doing.
I'm 10 times more productive than I was without AI.
And you may have noticed all the articles, all the infographics, all the videos, and all the platforms and everything.
You're like, how does one guy do this?
And literally, I am the one doing all those things almost by myself.
I do have a video and podcast editor who does a great job.
He edits these.
And I'm not replacing him.
I'm giving him access to AI tools.
He's going to be doing videos with Seed Dance.
And actually, as he edits this podcast, that might be the first time he's hearing it.
But yeah, that's what's coming.
Dude, you're going to be using so many AI tools.
It's going to blow your mind.
But see, that's the pattern.
So companies that, even when they're firing a certain group of people, they are augmenting the ones that they keep with AI tools to make them way more productive.
That's what you're going to see over and over again across corporate America and frankly all around the world.
Now, the macroeconomic implications of this are, of course, rather dire because these coders, these are people who used to be so employable that right out of college, they would all have jobs.
Oh, you know how to code?
Oh, join us.
We'll start you at 100 grand and then you go up to 200 grand in three years.
That's the way it used to be.
Now it's like, oh, we don't need you because you don't have 10 years of coding experience.
Thus, we can replace you with clawed code.
So, yeah.
So now learning to code is not a guaranteed job at all.
It's almost guaranteed unemployment at this point, sadly.
And the macroeconomic implications, like I said, are huge.
So you're going to have ultimately millions of people laid off who will stop buying things because, of course, their discretionary income is cut off.
And then as they stop buying things, then the other corporations lose revenue, and then they have to downsize, and they cut more jobs, etc.
I've called this the AI doom loop.
And it's beginning.
I mean, it's actually well underway.
We are in the doom loop right now.
And I don't know how far this goes.
Not sure.
But I did post something interesting today.
I'll read it for you.
The bad news.
AI will probably take your job, leaving you with less money to spend.
The good news, AI will also cause deflation in the prices of many goods and services, meaning you theoretically won't need as much money to spend.
The bad news, the deflationary effect of AI will allow the Treasury and Federal Reserve to print more fiat currency without spiking inflation.
And they will exploit that, meaning prices on consumer goods actually won't fall.
The good news, the incoming wave of robotics will, within a few years, help you grow your own food at very low cost, drastically reducing your cash outlays for food expenditures.
The bad news, the robots will, of course, also be used to spy on you as they report to the cloud and surveil your entire home, just like the video doorbells do right now.
The good news, the open source community will quickly hack the snot out of the robots.
I will be part of that effort and mind wipe their Skynet brains to replace them with home on the range instructions that don't talk to the cloud.
The bad news, stuck with large UBI payments to non-working citizens, governments will accelerate their mass extermination plans to reduce human populations to rescue their own currencies.
And I'm not joking, by the way, that's not hyperbole.
The good news, local open source, agentic AI LLMs will allow you to far more easily live off-grid, away from the cities where the extermination efforts will focus.
Local machine cognition will help you build off-grid power systems, sustainable housing, food production, natural medicine, etc., all while trading with others in a private crypto ecosystem that cannot be surveilled by any government.
So yeah, the future is going to be awesome and terrible at the same time.
You get to pick which future you're going to experience by planning ahead today.
So that's my take.
Yeah, it's the good news.
There's good news and there's bad news.
Which one do you want to hear first?
Well, that's what that was all about.
A lot of good news, a lot of bad news.
Crazy times.
But the bottom line here, don't be surprised.
Don't be surprised when companies announce massive job cuts, like 30, 40, 50% of the workforce.
It will happen.
In the meantime, by the way, if you want to use my AI platforms to help enhance your life and lower your costs and live off-grid and be more independent, etc., well, hey, check out our book creation engine.
It's free to use.
It's at brightlearn.ai.
You can generate any book on any topic in minutes.
And you can also download the nearly 40,000 other books that other people have generated.
And the way to find those books is just go to books.brightlearn.ai and start downloading.
And again, they're completely free to download.
And this engine is going to have a significant upgrade in March.
I've got some really cool ideas for it.
And we'll be rolling out audio books more and more because, yay, I have a lot more of my workstation infrastructure in place for text-to-speech audio generation.
It took a while.
I had to buy a lot more hardware to make that happen.
Turns out you need a lot of compute to do, you know, a 10-hour audio book is no joke.
I mean, it takes a lot of compute to generate all that audio.
So anyway, the audio books will also be free, as are all the books.
And I can't wait to bring you some of those coming up soon.
So check that out again, brightlearn.ai.
You can catch my videos and podcasts at brightvideos.com, or you can read my articles at naturalnews.com.
So thanks for listening.
Toxic Promoters, Toxic People00:07:24
Take care.
Have you noticed that people who promote toxic herbicides like glyphosate are themselves very toxic people?
They have toxic personalities.
And actually, this is consistent across the board of people who promote fluoride or if they promote chemotherapy, they promote a lot of prescription medications or glyphosate or other pesticides or herbicides.
These are toxic personalities and they're attracted to the toxicity of the things they promote.
There's a natural resonance.
And that's why so many of the people who push things like glyphosate are themselves arrogant.
They, you know, many of them claim that only they know the truth and you don't know.
And we have to spray the crops with poison.
Otherwise, we'll all starve and, you know, other similar nonsense.
But they do so in an extremely toxic way.
Whereas people who promote clean foods, good nutrition, natural sunlight, natural medicine, natural therapies, etc., they tend to be just good people.
Just better personalities, more pleasant to be around.
They have more compassion.
They have more empathy for other people.
They have more of a pro-human outlook on life.
Whereas all the toxic chemical pushers are like, you know, we don't care if people die.
We have to make the corn, you know, 5% cheaper.
It's like that.
That's who they are.
And so the first lesson in all of this is that you can tell almost everything about a person by just listening to what they advocate.
And if they're pushing poison, they are poisonous people.
Now, you might wonder, did they start out as toxic people and then they got attracted to the toxins?
Or is it the other way around?
They started eating the toxins and using the toxins and then it poisoned their brains.
And I tend to go with the second explanation there.
I think that a lot of people started out as decent people with maybe decent morals and values.
And then they started taking vaccines and they started eating glyphosate and they started drinking fluoride, etc., taking a lot of prescription medications.
And then they became toxic because of the toxic effects of all those substances, of course.
Now, we know, for example, that fluoride damages neurology.
We know that vaccines damage the brain.
We know that many prescription medications, especially psychiatric drugs, also alter brain function and can make people more depressed, more moody, more angry, or more prone to emotional outbursts.
Whereas people who get sunlight, people who touch the soil, people who eat natural, healthy foods, who have a more natural, simpler lifestyle, they tend to be more wholesome people.
And because of their lifestyle choices with food and nutrition, et cetera, they're eating neuroprotective substances.
That's right, neuroprotective substances.
And that's key.
So when you're eating broccoli, you know, it contains sulforaphane, which is neuroprotective.
And there are a hundred more examples like that in the food supply.
You know, turmeric, for example, also neuroprotective, many other things.
When you are eating healthy, not only is your physical brain healthier, but your mental health is also protected because they are related.
When you have brain damage, it tends to cause personality changes or personality disorders.
Or if you're in cognitive pain all the time, let's say, high stress, high frustration, because your brain's being poisoned and assaulted all the time by these chemicals, then you're going to become more of a negative person in life.
And you're going to become an arrogant pusher of all the toxic chemicals, which is what we see.
And thus, my point here is that this isn't coincidence.
When you see people pushing poisons, they are poisonous people.
And you should recognize that right up front and steer clear of those people in terms of friendships or personal relationships.
Even if they claim, oh, no, we're backed by science, but their personalities are still very toxic because they've been brain damaged.
Now, there's a zombie effect in all of this, which is that even though these people have been brain damaged themselves, they want to spread the brain damage to others, like zombies.
They want to, you know, bite you and spread the zombie disease to you and turn you into a zombie.
And that's the way glyphosate pushers operate.
And vaccine pushers, it's not enough that they damage their own brains.
They want to damage your brain too.
They want you to be forced to take the vaccine.
They want you to eat the toxic herbicide weed killer chemicals that are traced back to Nazi chemists and the development of nerve agents and the original research into organophosphate chemicals, which became VX nerve gas and sarin chemical weapons, etc.
All of that gave rise to glyphosate, which is not exactly the same molecular structure, but it's based on that original research.
So the people pushing glyphosate are actually pushing Nazi science, a dark, evil body of science that was focused on how to kill things.
And beyond the zombie comment, it's also war.
Look at who promotes war.
Toxic people promote war.
I mean, look at Mark Levin.
Just always screaming for war.
Totally toxic person.
Angry all the time.
You know, always accusatory towards anyone who wants peace, etc.
Those are toxic people.
Whereas the peace activists tend to be very friendly people.
The kind of people you'd want to hang out with, the kind of people you'd want as friends or neighbors or family members.
They're more kind.
They have compassion.
They care about humanity.
They care about ending human suffering.
So this is why the war pushers and the glyphosate pushers and the vaccine pushers are all the same people.
And the fluoride pushers, they're all the same people.
Whereas those who want natural food and who want peace and who want kindness, who want compassion, who want health and abundance and joy, those are all a different group of people from the warmongers.
But the pro-peace people, they're also consistent in their ideology.
Because if you think about it, eating clean food is kind of an expression of peace.
It's an expression of love.
It's also an act of resistance against the chemical, agricultural, industrial complex.
So stay healthy and your mental health will also stay intact.
But if you start pushing and ingesting a lot of poisons, you'll become toxic.
So be careful of all that.
Ice Response Theory00:15:33
You can catch my articles on all this and more at naturalnews.com.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
You can watch all my videos and interviews at my new video site, brightvideos.com.
And you can conduct all your own research on these topics and more at my truly amazing AI deep research engine, which you'll find at brightanswers.ai.
So thank you for listening.
Stay healthy.
Take care.
I think the overwhelming majority, if not all, of the so-called alternative schooling systems pertaining to medicine, whether it's chiropractic school, traditional Chinese medicine school, naturopathy, whatever it is, are also coming from a severely flawed biochemical basis for how the human body works.
So to answer your question, I'd say that we're just scratching the surface on what it truly means to be a human being, on our true potential, and on our true power, again, individually and collectively.
Welcome to today's interview here on BrightVideos.com.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, now Bright Videos, because Bright Videos is not censored by X, not yet, but maybe after our guest today, it will be.
I'm not sure.
We've got Alex Zek joining us.
He's an influencer, a podcaster.
He's into a number of things.
He's organized an event on regenerative agriculture and much more.
His website is called, well, his podcast is called The Way Forward.
We'll give out the specifics of the website URL later, but welcome to the show, Alec.
It's an honor to have you on today.
It's an honor to be here, Mike.
Thank you so much for having me.
Well, this is the first time that we've ever met, actually, and I don't know why it's taken so long because you and I are into so many of the same things.
And, you know, I see you as a critical thinker.
You're an independent thinker.
You're not fooled by the stuff that's going on out there.
And you're also kind of pissed off at what's going on in the world right now, but you're looking for better solutions to share with people.
So we are on the same wavelength doing all that.
But for our audience, why don't you give us a little bit of background of who you are and what you do?
Yeah, I'll try to be brief with this.
There's a much longer explanation.
But so I grew up in a pretty chaotic, tumultuous environment.
And because of the nature of my parents' relationship, my mom was prescribed multiple psychotropic medications back when I was around 13, 14 years old.
And we were just doing what we thought was best because we thought the doctors knew best.
And for nearly 10 years, she was under the care of these different psychiatrists.
We were prescribing her multiple benzodiazepines and SSRIs.
And by the time 2016 came around, I was a senior at the United States Military Academy at West Point, about to commission as an Army officer.
And we were looking at permanently institutionalizing my mom.
And by chance, she was seeing a therapist in one of her sort of up moments that was reading a new book that had just come out called A Mind of Your Own by Dr. Kelly Brogan.
And Kelly still had her practice in New York at the time.
So my mom made an appointment to go see Kelly.
And that changed the whole trajectory of my mom's life.
And then my wife, who I'd just gotten married to after commissioning as an Army officer, was under the care of multiple rheumatologists the entire time that I had known her for multiple quote-unquote autoimmune conditions and was chronically ill.
And after seeing my mom begin to drastically heal, adopting what the mainstream calls pseudoscience and quackery, we decided to try the same approach with my wife.
And in a matter of a few months, she drastically healed.
And so seeing these two real world scenarios where two people that I loved were under the care of the conventional allopathic system and were chronically ill, my mom almost dying, drastically heal by adopting just a natural approach to health, what the mainstream calls pseudoscience and quackery, put me in a lot of cognitive dissonance.
So I had just become an officer in the Army, just graduated from West Point, what I now call the world's preeminent government indoctrination camp.
And so I started going down all the rabbit holes.
And by the time 2020 came around, I had already done so much research on a variety of things that I could kind of see what was coming without really knowing exactly how it would pan out.
But I could just see the writing on the wall, so to speak.
I started using my platform while I was still an officer in the Army at the time in 2020 to just share my perspective, which was really risky.
And I ended up getting out of the army in 2021.
And this is sort of what I do now.
So I'd like to say that to borrow a line from a mentor of mine, Dr. Larry Palevsky, I've just followed the proverbial bouncing ball of life.
And my real life experience has showed me a better way to do things with respect to health on the individual level, the collective level, our relationship with nature, our relationship with each other, and our relationship to authority and government as well.
So that's kind of what has led me to this position.
So if people listen to your podcast, what kind of topics can they expect to hear and see?
Oh my gosh.
I would say that to summarize it as best I can, it's classified as alternative health, but I actually cannot stand that term because it's not alternative.
This is the ancient way of health that human beings, whether it was Ayurveda, traditional Chinese medicine, or a variety of other health approaches from across the world have thrived for years and years and years.
But with that being said, I cover stuff related to natural sort of holistic health, but also libertarian, anarcho-capitalist, voluntarist philosophy, ancient history, consciousness, some sort of esoteric spiritual topics, a good variety of things.
And I'd like to say that it's we look at the current trajectory of mankind right now, and there seems to be a massive split occurring.
And there are a lot of people that know that there are a lot of issues with the mainstream paradigm, but don't know of a better way to do things.
And we like to showcase predominantly a better way of doing things in all facets of life, a different, sort of more harmonious, coherent approach to life on the individual and collective level.
So that's typically what we cover.
And it spans a variety of things.
So what's extraordinary about what you do, and I'm just assuming you must have uncovered many, many cases of the suppression of knowledge of indigenous medical systems, for example, of natural health alternatives, of energy medicine, different medical systems from Tibetan medicine to Amazonian to traditional Chinese medicine.
I mean, it just goes on and on.
And we live in the West.
We live under a system of organized suppression of human knowledge.
Google, I call it an anti-knowledge engine.
It's not a search engine.
But what have you seen along this way?
Or what's your big picture about what I just said?
Like, how much knowledge about health and healing has actually been covered up, lost, or suppressed in Western civilization?
I'll tell you the degree to which I think it's been covered up.
I think the overwhelming majority, if not all, of the so-called alternative schooling systems pertaining to medicine, whether it's chiropractic school, traditional Chinese medicine school, naturopathy, whatever it is, are also coming from a severely flawed biochemical basis for how the human body works.
So to answer your question, I'd say that we're just scratching the surface on what it truly means to be a human being, on our true potential, and on our true power, again, individually and collectively.
So I don't even think we realize how much we've been conditioned to believe that we're limited, that our body's broken, that we require man-made suppressing symptom-suppressing chemicals and things like this.
Well, and I think you're right that, for example, naturopathy in America has become what's called green allopathy.
It's still an allopathic approach, right?
There's a symptom and then there's a molecule that treats the symptom.
But I think if you go back far enough, if you go back into ancient traditional Chinese medicine, you know, it's an energetic system, the flow of qi, right?
And also Native American medicine and, you know, Native Tibetan medicine, if you and even Aborigine Australian medicine, for example, they believed in spirit.
They believed in the mind-body, the soul connection and how that, how health is, physical health is an expression of psychic health, mental health, spiritual health.
You want to speak to that for a moment?
Yeah, I'll give you an example of that.
So the Kiru people of Peru, which is an indigenous lineage coming from Peru, they talk about what's called the Kaose Pakpo, which is their descriptive term for the quote-unquote energy bubble that surrounds and permeates the human body.
Now, in modern times, we call that the human biofield.
That's actually a term coined by the National Institute of Health.
Funny enough, my logo that's just behind me, that could be a top view representation of the human biofield.
So it's the energetic field, the electromagnetic field, and consisting of other fields, so to speak, like things like scalar waves and unmeasurable fields that permeates and surrounds the human body.
And I think the thing that interests me most nowadays, which I'm really excited to discuss this, is how that field relates to water of our bodies and water that permeates all facets of reality,
sort of interplaying between our human biofield with ether and water and how that relates to the quote-unquote control structures that the government and the media have sort of set up and how they're manipulating us through that to help enable them to continue their agendas.
But how we can sort of flip that to come back to a more coherent position within ourselves and with the collective.
So we have to, this is so great that I can go so deep with you on these topics, but I've done experiments here in my lab and in my studio about the consciousness of the structured formation of images as xylitol crystals are freezing in real time at room temperature, that the interaction between conscious intent actually affects the images that are sketched out in the xylitol.
Now, that's kind of the same experiment as Dr. Emoto and water, right?
The messages from water.
I basically recreated that using xylitol because I didn't want to sit in a freezing room.
And xylitol freezes very slowly, so you can watch it under a microscope.
I've got videos of this.
I've published many, many images.
People freak out.
They can't even believe it's possible because I've got xylitol sketching out like Rams and B2 stealth bombers flying over the desert as clear as day who are like, that's not possible.
It couldn't be possible.
Oh, but it is.
That's the thing.
So our consciousness impacts everything, especially near us, water, other molecules, like I mentioned, simple sugars, et cetera.
Can you speak to this and what is yet to be discovered about the fact, about this interaction between consciousness and 3D physical structure?
So Veda Austin, I'd like to say that she is taking the work of Dr. Masaro Moto and other water researchers and expanding upon it and making it more accessible to lay men and women.
And what I mean by that is Veda's method to sort of demonstrate, I would say, pretty conclusively, for lack of a better term, I would say that this doesn't have any peer-reviewed studies backing it at this point.
But in terms of being repeatable and observable, her method that I'll get into in a second is being taught to other people across the world, both on Zoom and in in-person workshops.
And they're getting the exact same results that Veda is getting repeatedly.
And Veda herself has over 40,000 documented examples of the method that I'm about to share.
So essentially what Veda does is she takes water in a Petri dish and will set it over the top of an image or a written word, no matter the language, or set it next to a song that's playing, or set it next to a painting, or set it next to her bedside at night and set the intention for water to sort of show what she's dreaming about.
Right.
Or set it just next to her as she's feeling a really deep emotion or even have a friend thousands of miles away think of something very specific with the intention to project what they're thinking about onto the water that Veda's holding.
So then Veda will take that water and freeze it using this unique freezing method, meaning that she freezes it for a certain amount of time.
And then visible to the naked eye in the ice is water's own artistic interpretation of what it was just exposed to.
And I'll just share some examples.
So this is one of, again, tens of thousands of examples that Veda has documented.
I want to emphasize again that she is teaching this in workshops virtually and in person where people are getting the exact same results.
And it gets pretty specific too, which I'll share at the end.
But here's an example.
This is a photo of a face.
Veda set water in a petri dish over the top of the face.
And you can see very clearly in the frozen imagery and the ICE's response, what she calls crystallography, is a profile image of that exact face.
And then again, written number four.
And then on the right side there is ICE's response very clearly in number four.
Again, a photo of a braid, ICE's response of a braid.
Ginkgo leaves, ICE's response, an amethyst pyramid set in the water, ICE's response there very clearly, sort of triangle pyramid shape.
Her son's hand, ICE's response there.
And it goes on and on and on to the point that I'm going to go ahead and stop sharing just for a second.
I'll bring up some more later.
To the point that Veda has documented what she calls hydroglyphs.
Now, hydroglyphs, and I don't remember the exact number that is required, but if Veda tends to see the same image, the same sort of pattern displayed in the ice over and over again, let's say if she writes the word gratitude, whether it's in English or in Mandarin or in Spanish, if it's a picture that's representing gratitude, if it's a song that is embodying or expressing gratitude in the lyrics, or if she herself is feeling gratitude, when she takes that water and freezes it,
it will show a six-pointed leaf consistently.
So she's identified that that is water's symbol for gratitude.
And she's identified a number of these hydroglyphs, I think over 30 at this point.
I don't remember the exact number.
But the point is, it's so specific that, again, other people are repeating and getting the same results, getting the same hydroglyphs in their crystallography.
So it seems to be that water has its own sort of language.
And now, what I like to think about with respect to this is what Daniel Reuters, I don't know if you've had him on your show yet, but I highly recommend interviewing him.
Water's Hidden Language00:05:09
He just wrote a book recently within the last two years called Can You Catch a Cold?
I interviewed him recently, actually.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So in tremendous book.
And Daniel is such an incredible human being, so brilliant.
And towards the end of his book, as he's describing other possible explanations for the phenomenon colloquially known as contagion, and I want to differentiate here.
So there is no evidence, and Daniel covers this extensively, as have a number of people.
There is no evidence that healthy people become sick when exposed to sick people or their bodily fluids.
In his book, Daniel covers over 200 attempts at demonstrating this throughout history.
And the most frequently occurring result is that zero contagion is demonstrated.
Now, in those studies where two or more people did get sick in the same space, they didn't account for the placebo-nocebo effect.
They didn't have a control group.
And in no case was there an actual infectious particle identified, whether a virus or a bacteria.
Obviously, bacteria and fungi do exist, but that's a whole separate category.
And in no case was a double-blind randomized placebo control trial conducted.
But what's interesting is when Daniel goes into the other possible explanations for this phenomenon of two or more people getting sick in the same space, he highlights a number of examples of what are called mass psychogenic illness or mass social contagion.
So just to give an example of one of them, this one stands out.
It's really incredible.
So in New Zealand in 2017, an antidepressant had just gone off patent, which meant that a bunch of companies could make their own generic version of it.
Now, one of the generic versions of this antidepressant, a lot of people began reporting adverse events related to it.
And there are 27 common adverse events being reported across the board to whatever New Zealand's adverse events reporting system is.
The mainstream media decided to run a story on this off-label antidepressant that was causing adverse events.
And for whatever reason, they decided to only share six of the 27 common adverse events that people were experiencing when they're broadcasting this message to the masses.
What then followed was adverse events reports skyrocketed by, I think, 370 or 470% or something like this.
But only in those six that the mainstream media had reported on.
Of course.
And Daniel highlights countless examples of this in his book.
Okay, so now going back to the water thing where my mind goes, and again, this is pure speculation, but if what Veda is indicating has any relevance, and then there's a whole separate category related to water, researchers like Dr. Gilbert Ling, who has unfortunately passed away, and then of course Dr. Gerald Pollock, who I'm sure you're familiar with with fourth phase water, we can set that aside and come back to it if we want to.
But what just Veda's work alone and Dr. Masara Amoto's work alone indicates that water will change its physical orientation based on what it was just exposed to physically or metaphysically.
And again, Veda has demonstrated this repeatedly with respect to, for example, what I like to call thought energy, thought and feeling when aligned.
What's interesting is Veda has said, and this is according to her own experimentation, if you will, that if you just try to think something and impress it upon water, but you're feeling something different, water is not going to impress.
Water is not going to change its physical orientation.
It's going to go with what you're feeling, which lends credence to the idea that our thoughts are sort of electric and our feelings are more magnetic and emitted through our field, if you will.
So thought energy is what I like to describe as when our thoughts and feelings are aligned, for better or for worse.
So if water permeates our body, we're 70% water by weight, 99% water molecularly, for lack of a better term, and water permeates all of biology and water permeates basically all facets of reality.
Given what Veda is sharing, given the countless examples of mass psychogenic illness, mass social contagion, and given on the flip side of that, a phenomenon known as the Maharishi effect, which I can get into in a minute, is it that far-fetched to think that the primary or one of the main ways that the powers that shouldn't be or the parasitic class, whatever you want to call them,
is able to carry out their agendas is by getting us, the collective, the rest of society, to collectively focus our thought energy on them to where our body is actually responding physiologically.
And then maybe not only our body responding physiologically, given that thought energy has been shown to impact water, and given water permeates all facets of reality, the likelihood or the possibility rather that our thought energy individually and collectively when aligned actually has measurable effects on the nature of reality itself to where if we're all focusing on one thing collectively,
Falcon's Remote Viewing Perception00:09:32
we actually bring forth the conditions for that thing to continue and to occur in reality.
Well, 100%.
That's exactly what is happening.
And I've got to share this with you because it's more than water.
Now, I wasn't even familiar with Mrs. Austin's work when I started this experiment not quite a year ago, but it was June 1st that I sat down.
And can you show my screen?
Yeah, do you see that screen?
No, I don't see it yet.
I see it now.
Okay.
So this is a xylitol that I heated and melted, put on a piece of plastic, and then I simply wrote a prompt by hand, depict the scenes of summer 2025 in the Middle East encompassing geopolitics, war, commodities, finance, and humanity.
So I just wrote a prompt.
Okay, now it's xylitol, not water, because I knew that xylitol can freeze at room temperature.
Guess what it sketched out?
First, it sketched out a one-horned ram on the right there.
And the one-horned ram, the ram is key in Islam.
The lack of one horn indicates a decapitation of the leadership, which is exactly what happened two weeks later in Iran.
But it gets more.
Then it sketched out this falcon perched in a branch surrounded by flames, a falcon with a white face.
You can see the claws.
You can see the feather pattern.
There's a falcon on the left.
I didn't even know what's a falcon all about.
And then I had to look it up.
Turns out the falcon is the bird of Persia.
All falconry originated in Persia.
So this was telling me that Persia would be surrounded by flames, but the leadership of Iran would survive the attack.
And then I did other experiments.
I put frozen or melted xylitol on a circuit board here, and it sketched out microchips and a circuit board with the exact shape.
And I actually have, I can bring this to you.
I can show this to you.
Of course, this is zoomed in like 300x, by the way.
So these are really small.
Same thing with what Vita is doing.
Well, what's crazy is Veda is with an iPhone, but still, the point still stands.
Okay, the point still absolutely stands.
And there's more to this.
See, there's the falcon.
Let's see.
Oh, yeah.
Stealth bombers.
Then it sketched out freaking stealth bombers flying over the desert.
Wow.
Yeah.
With flames over the desert dunes, even like little bomb fragments down here, et cetera.
And that's a piece of dust that fell on the xylitol right there.
So it's sketching out, and then it sketched out Tel Aviv, these buildings in Tel Aviv that were taking missiles from Iran.
This later became broadcast two weeks later.
It was broadcast on to the world.
And I don't have it side by side, but there's a building that looked exactly like this that was in the foreground as missiles were coming down out of the sky in the background.
So what this showed me, and again, like nobody understood this, Alec.
You understand it, but nobody else understood it.
What this shows is that there is a level of consciousness in physical matter where it can also perceive, it can remote view the future.
Yeah.
And it can sketch it today.
Yeah.
It's incredible.
I mean, and folks, I'm not making, how could I make this up?
I'm not making it up.
I actually, I've saved the slides.
I can show you under a microscope.
But anyway, that's my experience.
And after that, I found out about Veda or Vita.
How do you say her name?
Veda.
Veda Austin.
After that, I found out about Veda because I did an interview with some other guys from Austin who were like, oh, you got to talk to her.
I found out about her, but I haven't had her on the show yet.
But we are doing the same thing, just in different medium.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And it almost leaves you speechless, really.
It does, because it's such a beautiful view into the mystery of this realm.
And for me, yes, there's been a variety of things where I'm like, what are they covering up and like trying to hide from us?
And that leads you down a lot of dark rabbit holes.
Don't get me wrong.
But when I look at this type of stuff, it leaves me with a sense of childlike wonder and awe.
Yeah, doesn't it?
Yeah.
Wait a minute.
There's way more out there.
Yes, exactly.
And we've been so indoctrinated into a hyper-materialistic point of view on the world, especially with modern quote-unquote sciences.
And this just indicates that there is so much more going on than we've ever been led to believe.
I mean, we know that we only perceive with our senses 0.005% of the available electromagnetic spectrum.
But what's interesting about that statement is that presupposes that human beings with our instrumentation have been able to determine what the full electromagnetic spectrum is.
Yes, yes.
To think that we know for sure all there is to know within this realm is absolutely absurd.
Oh, here.
I'm sorry to interrupt, but I found the image.
I got to show you this.
Yeah, let's see.
Okay.
So on the right is what my Xylatal sketched out on June 2nd or June 1st, actually.
And then on June 13th, this is what was broadcast of the missiles hitting Tel Aviv.
It's the exact same thing.
It's a tall building.
That's uncanny.
That's uncanny.
With a short building beside it.
It shows the vertical stripe.
It shows the roof having a taller part.
I mean, Alec, this isn't coincidence.
No.
No.
It's knowing.
Yeah, it's knowing.
And absolutely.
And the thing is, I didn't hold in my mind or my heart, you know, bombing Tel Aviv.
I wasn't thinking that.
I was writing a prompt of tell me what you see happening.
And then the Xyla, a simple sugar.
I bought it on freaking Amazon.com.
Okay.
A sugar becomes a sketch artist and it starts sketching out these scenes.
It's incredible.
And anyone.
It's incredible.
Yeah.
But yet, there's nothing in mainstream science that would accept this.
They wouldn't even attempt the experiments because they would say it's impossible.
But it's not.
Anybody can do this.
Yeah, anyone can.
And that's what I really love about what you're doing and what Veda Austin is doing is that she's teaching it in workshops across the world and people are getting the exact same results repeatedly.
And it's really incredible.
And so like where my mind goes as it pertains to what's sort of going on in the world, especially with the whole Epstein files situation occurring right now.
And I have a lot of thoughts on it at a lot of different layers, but where I sort of sit right now is a question of what happens when these files,
which highlight that many politicians, world leaders, bankers, multinational corporation executives, and other quote-unquote leaders amongst society have been engaging in some of the most heinous,
wicked, really satanic acts imaginable, accompanied with they're being expressed by this current administration, no accountability coming, no prosecutions coming.
And basically they're just closing the book on it.
What kind of effect does that create on the collective psyche, if you will, for the people who are pouring through and scouring through all these files?
It's psychic terrorism.
It is psychic terrorism.
Exactly.
That is a perfect term for it.
The whole point is to put out the horror and the fear into the minds, into the conscious minds of everybody that's paying attention.
And that's what they're doing.
So even by releasing the Epstein files, they are still achieving their satanic agenda by imprinting that.
Exactly.
And it's such a weird catch-22, right?
Because of course, we want the truth to come out, right?
We want the truth to come out.
But the problem is when the overwhelming majority of even quote-unquote truthers don't have the self-awareness to understand what you and I understand, what we're talking about in this session right here is that what we consistently give focus to impresses upon the waters of our body and possibly, I would say, very likely the waters of reality, thus bringing forth more conditions for that to occur.
I'm not saying to spiritually bypass and completely turn away from what's being revealed right now.
But the problem is that the overwhelming majority of people who are engaging with this right now don't understand emotional regulation, nervous system health, don't understand that what they perpetually give focus to gives rise for more of those conditions to occur, both again, according in their own physiology and also in possibly the nature of reality.
And that's the issue right now.
Yeah.
Alec, let me interrupt you real quick because we're almost out of time for part one, but hold that thought because we're going to continue that in part two.
Finding Global Connections00:03:10
But first of all, I want to give out your web address.
So the podcast or the broadcast is called The Way Forward, and the website is theway, FWRD.com.
So it's just a shortening of the word forward.
So theway, FWRD.com.
And there you can see Alec's work and his shows, his podcasts here, videos, mission, et cetera.
And before we go, Alec, tell us about, you've got an event coming up as well.
Tell us about that before we wrap up this half.
Yeah.
So I want to first comment on just the website very briefly.
So we've created through a private membership association, a website that allows you to instantly find like-minded people near you, practitioners, farms, schools.
And now we've just added restaurants as a category for all the health and freedom community wherever you are across the world.
So we have a lot of members primarily in English-speaking companies or countries right now.
They are ultimately companies at the end of the day, but English-speaking countries right now.
But wherever you are across the world, it allows you to instantly connect with community that is local to you, that is like-minded.
And I think it could evolve to be a tremendous resource for the health and freedom community.
Is that a different website?
Nope, that's the way forward.
It's on the way forward.
Oh, okay.
Yeah.
That is onthewayforward.com.
And we have members who are finding each other across the world.
And it absolutely warms my heart.
Members are doing meetups across the world, finding like-minded people near them.
And then in addition to that, we have our annual festival called Confluence.
It's kind of like a blend between a conference, farmer's market retreat and music festival all in one on a regenerative farm outside of San Antonio.
And if you use code Ranger at checkout, I'm sure some of the information on it will be in the show notes.
You can get 10% off your tickets.
And we have Catherine Austin Fitz speaking this year as well as Charles Eisenstein.
We'll get Mike Adams to come speak and one of the future editions.
Now, wait a minute.
When is that event taking place?
At the end of April, April 23rd through the 27th.
Yep.
So just outside of San Antonio, Texas.
Yep.
And they can find tickets on your website?
On confluence event.com.
Oh, okay.
ConfluenceEvent.com.
All right.
Let me just bring that up if I typed it correctly.
Hold on.
Yep.
Little typo there.
Hold on.
ConfluenceEvent.com.
Let's bring it up.
Okay.
Show my screen, please.
Here we go.
So here it is: confluence event.com.
Be more free.
And this is about regenerative farming and much more, huh?
Okay.
Yep.
Very cool.
Basically, everything that we're covering on this and a lot more.
We cover so many topics pertaining to a new yet ancient way of being, let's say.
That sounds fantastic.
Okay, awesome.
So 10% off, you said, with discount code Ranger?
Yep.
Okay, cool.
And that's coming up in April.
Sounds great.
It's good to have it in April before it gets too blazing hot in Texas.
That's why we do it in April.
I can imagine doing it in like June or July.
No, no, it would.
Especially because people are glamping and camping during the events.
Yeah, that makes sense.
Okay.
Perfect.
Started Questioning COVID00:06:19
All right.
So this is part one of our interview, folks.
And Alec, just stand by.
We'll continue with part two.
And for those of you watching, part two will get into more of the intersection of consciousness and physical reality and how we can alter our future timelines by our conscious intent.
That's what we're going to go into next.
And you can find part two at brightvideos.com.
So thank you all for watching today.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighton and Bright Videos and other platforms as well.
And this continues in part two.
Take care.
When COVID came around and we all became outspoken, yourself included, about the potential dangers of the vaccine and about the origins of COVID-19, just questioning the official story as we've learned to do over the years because basically everything the government tells us is a lie.
We've learned to question the official story.
And when everybody's repeating the same story, you're like, hmm, I'm not sure I'm believing this because everybody agrees in the media.
So they've been given a script.
The real thesis of the documentary is that we're not going to take this line down.
If it goes to discovery, it's over for them because then we will see all of the skeletons in the closet in addition to what's already been admitted.
And the reality is, what's been admitted is insane.
Welcome to today's interview here on BrightVideos.com.
We are an uncensored video platform, and that's the topic of our interview today because there's a powerful and important new film that's just being released by Ty and Charlene Bollinger.
And we're joined today by Ty Bollinger to talk about this new film, which is called Censored the Fight for Freedom.
I believe that's the name.
Ty, welcome to the show.
Did I get the name right?
Is that the film?
It was close.
You're 90% there.
Censored the fight for the First Amendment.
Oh, the fight for the first amendment.
It is about freedom of speech.
So, yeah.
100%.
Well, I haven't seen the film yet because you're just finishing it up.
I've seen the trailer.
It's powerful.
I also contributed to the film.
So thank you for using some of my clips.
But let's set the stage here because you and Charlene are two of the most maliciously censored and blacklisted people in the entire history of our country.
And that's what led to the creation of this film.
So you want to give us the backstory and why this film is so critical, and then we'll tell people how they can find the film.
Yeah, sure.
You know, and you, I'm one of the most censored people in the world, speaking to another one of the most censored people in the world.
True.
So, yeah, you were actually the OG of censorship.
Yeah, I've got like badges and medals for all the deplatforming I've endured.
Yeah.
Yeah, you know, we mentioned that in the film.
And thank you for your contribution, by the way.
Fantastic interviews that you did for the film.
But we mentioned in the film that you were the OG.
And the reason that you weren't in what was called the disinformation dozen, which is what really prompted this film, was that you'd already been so censored and deplatformed that you hardly had a presence on any of the they'd already banned you.
So but yeah, back in 2020, 2021 time period really is when the censorship really hit us hard.
We'd been censored heavily on Google and YouTube before that.
But when COVID came around and we all became outspoken, yourself included, about the potential dangers of the vaccine and about the origins of COVID-19 and just questioning the official story as we've learned to do over the years, because basically everything the government tells us is a lie.
We've learned to question the official story.
And when everybody's repeating the same story, you're like, I'm not sure I'm believing this because everybody agrees in the media.
So they've been given a script.
So what happened with COVID is we started questioning, you started questioning, people started questioning.
And in 2021, they came out with a list that was created by what was called the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
And that was a group out of London, England.
And they put out a list called the Disinformation Dozen.
And Charlene and I were listed as number three behind Bobby Kennedy and Dr. Mercola in the 12 most dangerous people online spreading disinformation about COVID and COVID vaccines.
And all you were doing was trying to show people to question what's in the vaccines, to question the emergency approval process.
You were just actually encouraging critical thinking.
We were actually citing CDC and FDA websites that said that the vaccines might not be safe.
Right.
You know, it wasn't like we made this stuff up.
We didn't know much about the vaccines.
And so the information we found was literally on government websites.
And we found documents from a meeting from 20, I think it was October of 2020 before COVID.
I think didn't COVID get released in December 2020?
I think, was it 2020?
I can't.
The years ago.
No, no, no.
Was it?
I think it was late 2019.
It was in China.
Okay.
Was it late 2019?
Yeah.
And then 2020, it spread through the United States, supposedly spread.
That's right.
And then 2021 is really when the vaccine came out and got pushed.
Yeah, yeah.
You're right.
So the meeting that we, and we got a hold of documents and we published these documents and we talked about them online.
And this is one of the things that we got blasted for, but it was FDA meeting.
What's their biologics committee?
Oh, I can't think of the FDA Biologics Committee that looks at vaccines.
But anyway, they came together to meet in October 2020, which is right before I think they released the vaccine for COVID.
And all these side effects that we are seeing that we knew that we were going to see, they had them listed in a PowerPoint presentation.
I remember that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Sudden death, stillbirths, miscarriages, cardiovascular problems, you know, cardiomyopathy, all the things that we're seeing.
They knew that that was going to happen because of the vaccine, but they still authorized it for emergency use.
Reporter's Visit Revealed Targeting00:02:41
And so because of some of these things that we were saying online, we got blasted as part of the disinfo dozen.
And then shortly after that, a reporter showed up at our house.
I didn't even know it had happened, honestly.
COVID was a weird time.
Remember, it was just, it was almost like COVID was a blur during some of the time.
I know, but real quick, though, before you continue, I want to say that CCDH was tied to intelligence services.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, there's a tie-in.
This is the deep state that was behind all of this to push this in order to suppress voices so they could convince more people to take these deadly jabs.
That was the whole point of this.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They were deeply tied to both both U.S. and British intelligence.
Yes, British intelligence.
Funded in part by George Soros.
So, you know, it's the dark money that is behind CCDH was pretty phenomenal.
And Sayer G did a great job of exposing that.
Yep.
But we had a reporter show up on our property shortly after we were listed as part of the disinfo dozen.
And as I mentioned, we didn't even know that we had been mentioned until I started getting emails and texts and a bunch of calls from people and people that I didn't know.
And I'm like, this is weird.
What's going on?
And then I think Erin Elizabeth, who was part of the Disinfo Dozen, contacted Charlene and she's like, oh, my goodness, look at this.
And so at that point, we realized that we'd been targeted.
And so then shortly after that, a reporter from a local news station here in Nashville showed up on our property.
They were trespassing.
They were filming on our property, scared my little girls half to death because there was two men on the property filming.
And I, you know, I hopped in my truck.
You've been to our house.
We have a long, a big hill that our property is on.
And so I had to drive down to the base of the property to where they were.
And, you know, I was, I'm always packing.
So I'm like, I don't know if I'm going to have to shoot these guys or what's going on, but they're trespassing on my property.
And so I drive down and they're filming.
They're filming on our property.
And they're like, hey, Utah Bollinger, we'd like to get an interview with you about the disinfo dozen.
And at that point, I'm like, well, I can make two choices.
I can do the interview or I can tell them to take a hike and they're going to spin it to where Bollinger was hiding something.
We were on his property ready for him.
He refused to speak with us and they were filming.
So I went ahead and gave him the interview.
But the interesting thing was during that interview, Mike, is that even though we were part of the disinfo dozen and we were accused of spreading information that was killing people, they couldn't name a single reporter, could not name a single thing that we had on our website that wasn't true.
Fighting for Freedom of Speech00:13:30
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
And let me add too, basically you were named as enemies of the state.
I mean, and there's a movie by that name, Enemy of the State, right?
And you were named as an enemy of the state.
And there are repercussions for this.
Can you talk about some of those repercussions?
Not just being silenced, but the inability to conduct business.
I mean, some people have been debanked.
Some people have been denied e-commerce accounts.
Some people have been denied investors or business relationships.
Can you talk about the cost that the real cost of this?
Yeah.
I mean, it cost us tremendously because what happened is because, and we had huge followings on the social networks.
We had huge followings on our YouTube channel.
Biden actually mentioned us from the podium.
He mentioned the DisinfoDozzen, said the DisinfoDozen are killing people.
And within 24, 48 hours, if I remember correctly, YouTube took down our channel.
You know, we had hundreds of thousands of subscribers, and that was a way that we were reaching people.
We had millions of subscribers on the social media.
Those were taken down.
So it really hampered our ability to conduct business because our whole business model is sharing this information with new people that haven't heard.
And then, you know, we have DVDs, books, things that we've produced that they can buy on the back end, you know, and that supports our business.
That supports the way that we are able to continue to share the truth is by people buying stuff.
You have to generate revenue somehow.
And that's the way we did it.
And before the disinfo dozen, and it drastically hampered our ability to make any money.
I mean, it has over the years.
Since that happened, the last four years, five years, it's devastated our company.
We recently had to lay off almost everybody that we'd employed for the last 10 years because we just can't generate the revenues anymore because nobody hears the message anymore.
And that's all by design.
That's what it was designed to do.
So it literally financially hamstrung us for years.
If you were willing to sacrifice your principles and to tell people to take the jabs and eat the glyphosate, drink the fluoride, oh man, you'd have 100 million followers.
You'd be super wealthy by now because you have a very strong work ethic.
But you refuse to compromise.
You know, we did.
And that's one thing I can say that Charlene and I have always tried to tell the truth no matter what.
And we've not been overly concerned about the ramifications financially from it.
And so as a result, we just told the truth.
And we kind of knew after the disinfo dozen hit, man, this is going to really hurt business, but it doesn't matter because who cares if it hurts your business if people are dying because they can't access this information.
And that's kind of the dirty secret that a lot of people don't talk about is not only did they censor us and kill our business and hurt us financially, way worse than that.
I mean, we're still fine.
I mean, you know, we're living in a country where we haven't missed any meals because of it.
You know, we're still fine.
But there's people, millions of people, I would say, that are dead because they didn't have access to the information that we wanted to share with them or that you wanted to share with them because we were so banned.
We were so censored.
And so think about the families of the people that are now six feet under that could have been still alive maybe if they'd had access to the information that big tech, that the government colluded with big tech to censor and to stop them from getting information that could have saved their lives.
That's the real travesty in this whole thing.
That is a really critical point.
I've said that, for example, Google is complicit in the mass slaughter of over a million Americans.
So are other big tech companies.
So are elements of the government, the FDA, the CDC, and big corporate media, et cetera.
Now, let me mention the site for your film.
It's called censoredfilm.com.
And we're going to show people the screen and we'll show the trailer at the end of this interview, by the way.
But folks, if you want to watch the trailer and get the film and also help support Ty and Charlene Bollinger with the truth about so many things, then you need to see this film, censoredfilm.com.
Do you want to add anything about what else people can find on the site?
Yeah, so they go to censoredfilm.com.
Going to see the trailer.
Just sign up to watch the film.
And then we're going to release it.
We're planning on releasing it Friday, February the 20, what is it, the 7th?
Friday the 27th.
Let me look at my calendar here.
Yeah, Friday.
We're going to release it Friday, February the 27th at 8 p.m. Central or 8 p.m. Eastern, 7 p.m. Central.
So Friday, and we'll send people a link to watch it.
And it's just going to be absolutely free.
It's a one-hour documentary.
It's not like our past documentaries that have been multiple episodes.
It's one hour, and it really chronicles our case and your case.
And the real thesis of the documentary is that we're not going to take this line down.
We're going after the censorship industrial complex, and we're suing them because of the way that they have harmed us and the way that they have violated our constitutional freedom of speech by censoring and banning us.
And so it really focuses on our two cases.
I'm glad you mentioned that because, yeah, your company and my company are both suing the whole censorship industrial complex, as you say.
They are fighting it like crazy.
They've been fighting venues.
They've been fighting, they don't want it to get to discovery because they know, as you know, if this case can't be dismissed and if it goes to discovery, then my God, it's over for them.
It'll all be exposed.
That's where this is headed, right?
Oh, yeah.
If it goes to discovery, it's over for them because then we will see all of the skeletons in the closet in addition to what's already been admitted.
And the reality is what's been admitted is insane.
Yeah, true.
This shouldn't even, you know, we have the same attorney, and he's told us that our cases, there's more evidence to support our cases than any cases he's ever seen in his 20 plus years of practicing law.
That's right.
It shouldn't even be a case.
But, you know, justice system is corrupt and so forth.
They're going to try to get out of it.
But we're pressing onwards.
So the real focus of censored is our cases.
And it started out, I started creating this a couple of years ago, and it's morphed into this, into that.
And in the last six months, it really solidified into focusing on our cases.
So, you know, and so all they're going to find on censoredfilm.com is a trailer that they can sign up.
We'll send you the link to watch it.
It's absolutely free.
We're not selling it.
We're not selling DVDs, nothing.
We're just letting you watch it.
We want to share it.
We want people to be aware of this, be aware of our case.
And the only ask is that if you support what we're doing, if you want to keep freedom of speech in America, we'll have a donation button that you can donate to help us out.
Oh, that's huge.
So, yeah, everybody go to censoredfilm.com and just put in your email address, watch the film, share the website.
I'm going to be plugging it for a long time here.
And I can't thank you enough, Ty, for what you've done here putting this together.
Now, it's critical for people to realize that you and I, you know, your company and my company are spending a massive amount of money to fight for the free speech rights of everybody else.
We are not here just fighting for us.
You know, we are the victims of mass censorship and blacklisting.
We are spending the money to fight this through the court system.
And probably, you know, easily this is going to cost over a million dollars.
But we're doing it in order to fight for the freedom of everybody.
You want to talk about that and your motivations behind this lawsuit?
You know, yeah, and that's a great point.
It is, it's cost a fortune for us.
And in total, yeah, pretty darn near a million dollars between the two of us.
And it's just getting started.
Hopefully it won't last too much longer.
Hopefully that, you know, it doesn't get dismissed.
I'm confident that it's not going to be dismissed.
Our attorneys have a great strategy, and I really believe that we're going to win this.
But the reason that we're doing it is because if we don't, then the freedom of speech in America is gone.
That's right.
And that's one of the reasons that I love our attorney, Jeffrey Graeber, and you do too, because we've spoken about that.
His whole, the reason that he wanted to take these cases is for his children.
He wants to have a free America for them to grow up in, and so do we, and for our grandkids.
And I know that you want the same for everyone.
It's just to have a freedom of speech.
And if we don't do this, who's going to?
If we don't take them to task, they'll continue to do it because a bully continues to bully until someone takes them to task.
That's right.
That's right.
None of us are safe if we're living in this environment where the government can collude with corporations and overseas NGOs and they can launder censorship and they can shut down the voices and the platforms of anybody they target for any reason.
And that's what they did.
So I love the fact, you know, I really consider you such an incredible friend and colleague because of how much you're fighting for this.
And I also want to point out something else.
You said earlier that your primary motivation of telling the truth was to help save lives, to help people make better choices.
And you mentioned that people that were denied access to your information, many of those people are dead now.
And that's true.
Many people are dead.
But you and I both, we are demonstrating what health looks like and what making good decisions looks like.
And I want to thank you.
You inspired me.
Because of your fitness, you went through a resurrection of fitness and weight loss.
And I've seen your gym photos.
You're unbelievably strong and fit.
You inspired me.
I've been on a fitness track for one year now with kettlebells and things like that.
I feel better and stronger than I ever have.
And I think you feel the same.
I mean, so thank you, Ty.
Oh, yeah, of course, brother.
I'm happy to inspire you.
You've inspired me and Charlene in so many ways over the years.
It's great to be able to pay it forward or give it back or whatever you want to say with you because, yeah, and it's really cool to be able to go back and forth and text about the kettlebells and what you're doing and what I'm doing.
And it's very encouraging.
And I think that, you know, we got to live.
I think that what sets us apart, and this is not in a lofty or haughty way, but it's just truthful is you have to be real and you have to walk the talk.
And so many people in government are phony.
So many people that we look up to are just complete frauds.
They're total phonies.
And so I feel good about getting back in shape, getting in the gym, eating a clean diet.
I know you do too, with your kettlebells and walking in the forest with your dogs and all the things you're doing, which is pretty incredible.
I don't know that I could do what you're doing outside.
We're both in our 50s.
So we do what we can to stay in shape and stay limber and all that.
But I'm not sure I could do your workout, but I'm proud of you for doing it.
I think you could.
It's inspiring to me.
There are very dangerous large Texas mesquite thorns that I occasionally encounter when I'm running through the forest.
That's a thong.
I saw the picture of the thorn that poked through your shoe yesterday.
Yeah, if that had gone in my foot, that would have really been something.
That was in an ounce.
They're like two-inch thorns.
But that's Texas.
And I admit, I decided I'm going to work out outside from now on.
And I was out there when it was 30 degrees, kettlebells with gloves.
It's like, hey, I'm not going to let the cold weather stop me.
Just going to keep doing it.
But my point in all of this is, you know, you eat healthy, you eat clean.
I do too.
I've got my, you know, my typical clean food smoothie here.
If people follow our information, they live longer.
They live better and healthier.
They have more joy and more abundance and more longevity.
Why would the state not want people to live longer and healthier and happier?
Well, you know, it's dangerous when you try to get it in the mind of a madman.
Yeah, yeah.
So I don't understand why they wouldn't because you and I being just normal human beings that care about other human beings can't understand why you wouldn't want someone else to have a good life.
But, you know, the more that I learn about the disgusting, perverted people that are ruling the world, it's not surprising that they want to harm us.
Silence Us At Our Peril00:07:08
They're evil.
The Epstein class.
Yeah, they're evil people that hate other people and want other people to suffer.
So I can't relate to that personally.
I don't think you can either.
I know Charlene can't.
Most people would just want the world to be a better place and for people to live in abundance.
But the people that are ruling the world don't share that same desire.
And unfortunately, the most evil people control all the doorways.
They are the gatekeepers of information, even on all the mainstream platforms.
Now, how can people follow your work directly?
What are your other primary sites besides this film site?
Yeah, thetruthaboutcancer.com and thetruthaboutvaccines.com.
Those are our two main websites.
Perfect.
What about your substack?
You have a substack.
I also have a substack, a TTAC substack.
Yeah.
No, I love your substack articles, by the way.
I share every time you send one to me, I'm sharing it.
Thank you.
Appreciate it.
Yeah, you're doing great work there.
Is it, again, that's just ttac.substack.com?
Yeah, it's okay.
It's the truth about cancerofficial.substack.com.
Oh, okay, okay.
The truth about cancerofficial.substack.com.
Yeah.
Got it.
Yeah.
Okay.
That's not a URL.
That's a sentence.
That's a sentence.
Okay.
Perfect.
And then the film is at censoredfilm.com.
Yes.
Okay.
We're about to wrap up this interview.
We're going to do another part, but is there anything else you want to add here for part one?
You know, I just, I want to thank you for participating in it.
You've always supported us ever since when we first started the truth about cancer back in 2014.
You were literally the first guy that I interviewed on our first quest for the cure.
No kidding.
Yeah, yeah.
And I still remember that interview in your, in your, it was, it was a film studio that was kind of like in a little barn area that y'all had converted.
It looked, well, it wasn't a barn, but it was just an old kind of a shack, which is really smart because no one would know from outside that it was just a shack, but it was your film area.
And I still remember doing that interview.
Oh, you're spilling all my secrets now.
Yeah.
My camouflage secrets.
You might want to cut that part, but no, no, I'll keep it in.
Yeah, no, we no longer film in a shack, but we did.
We did.
Because we don't get free money from propagandists and governments and tech companies and vaccine pushers.
You know, we got to fund our own stuff.
Yeah.
And I know you've been offered money.
We've been offered money to compromise.
And we won't.
And, you know, I don't, there's not enough money in the world to get us to compromise what we think is right because it's, in the end, we all have to give an answer to God, to a higher power for what we've done.
That's right.
No amount of money is going to make us swerve off of the road of telling the truth and doing the right thing.
It's just not worth it.
Temporal riches or fame or glory or whatever you're after, they're temporal.
They don't last.
You got to do something that's eternal.
And, you know, helping people live better lives, sharing the truth, that's an eternal thing that we can keep with us.
Absolutely.
All right.
So the site is censoredfilm.com.
And I really want to encourage you, go to the site and sign up there, but also more importantly, tell people about it.
Share it.
Go on your social media and post about this.
Again, the film is free to watch.
It's a donation model.
And if you feel in your heart that you want to help support what Ty and Charlene are doing, then go ahead and offer a donation.
But Ty, thank you so much.
Now, stay tuned.
This is part one of the interview.
We're going to continue with another part of this conversation coming up.
And I'll remind my audience that part two will be available at brightvideos.com, which is my new video site.
I had to shift over from brighteon.com to brightvideos.com because X is still banning links to Brighteon.com.
And we're suing X.
It's part of our lawsuit.
We are still suing X, and X still refuses to drop the ban of Brighteon.com links.
So imagine that.
So this is still an ongoing battle, but you can catch me at BrightVideos.com.
Thank you for watching and watch for the second part of this interview coming soon.
Take care.
What is the price of a dangerous truth?
For Socrates, it was hemlock.
For Jesus, the cross.
History's greatest truth tellers and bravest voices share one fate, silencing.
Censorship is a disease.
Freedom of speech is the cure.
Today, the weapons are digital.
The censors wear suits.
And the battlefield is your mind.
The government didn't merely pressure social platforms.
It orchestrated a coordinated campaign to transform them into instruments of state-sponsored censorship.
Witness the exposed conspiracy, an unholy alliance between government power, big tech monopolies, and billionaire-funded NGOs to control what you see, think, and say.
They took a foreign dark money-funded hit piece, amplified it from the White House podium, and across thousands of media outlets across the world, and they used it to try to erase us from the public square.
The government, its NGO allies, and big tech didn't just silence us.
They colluded in a criminal enterprise to label the truth as disinformation and silence the truth tellers.
Government is a disinformation factory running three shifts 24-7, seven days a week, churning out disinformation.
But now, the silenced are launching a counterattack.
Not with protests, but with subpoenas.
Not with signs, but with lawsuits.
This lawsuit exists to expose their crime and restore the right of every American to speak freely.
They have dragged the most powerful entities on earth into court.
This is about preserving the U.S. Constitution and our God-given right to freedom.
To demand one answer.
By what authority do you silence us?
If they get away with silencing us with our huge reach and millions of followers, they can and will try to do it to anyone.
They censored the speech.
Now they must defend the silence.
It doesn't matter if you're a conservative or liberal or an independent, because sooner or later you will utter something that offends those in power.
We were the test case.
You are the target.
Find the truth.
Join the resistance.
Visit CensoredFilm.com00:00:18
Visit CensoredFilm.com Stock up on the long-term storable Ranger Bucket Set.
536 servings of clean organic superfoods for your survival pantry.