Bright Videos News, Feb 24, 2026 - Glyphosate Bans, U.S. Aircrap Carrier, AI Job Sector Wipeouts...
Mike Adams exposes glyphosate bans in 17 countries, Bayer’s $10.9B lawsuit settlements, and ties to Monsanto, Trump’s executive orders, and RFK Jr.’s controversial HHS role, calling it a toxic weed killer linked to WWII-era chemical warfare. Meanwhile, AI disrupts markets—Anthropic’s COBOL breakthrough drops IBM’s valuation by $30B—and Chinese models like DeepSeek 4 threaten U.S. dominance with million-token context windows. The USS Gerald R. Ford’s sewage failures (650 toilets for 4,600 sailors) and "woke" leadership, per Adams, risk combat readiness, while Agenda 2030’s AI-driven control pushes self-sufficiency as the only survival strategy against a collapsing system. [Automatically generated summary]
All right, welcome to Brighttown Broadcast News for Tuesday, February 24th, 2026.
I'm Mike Adams.
As always, thank you for joining me today.
I want to read a post for you that I posted on X.
Oh, and it was so funny.
Another post that I put out yesterday went so viral on X that it became the top trending news story.
And Representative Thomas Massey even retweeted it.
Let me read you that one first.
Here's what it says.
Glyphosate is completely banned in Vietnam, Togo, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
Using glyphosate as a desiccant, a drying agent, is illegal in France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Austria, Italy, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and the entire EU.
Yet somehow all those countries still manage to produce food for all their citizens.
How is that possible if glyphosate, as we are told by propagandists, is necessary to grow food?
Turns out they're just lying.
You don't need glyphosate to grow food.
You need carbon dioxide, sunlight, water, and healthy soils, plus minerals, nitrogen, warmth, and time.
And that post just resonated with a lot of people who retweeted it like crazy.
So anyway, that ended up becoming a top trend on X. Very unusual for me because my account is shadow banned on X.
So that post escaped the shadow ban somehow.
That's interesting.
I posted another message that I'll share with you here that I suspect might also be rather viral.
But we'll see.
We'll see if it resonates with people.
I said, too big to fail, but too toxic to eat.
And this is me replying to Secretary Kennedy, RFK Jr.
I said this, quote, what RFK Jr. said about glyphosate in a recent post is essentially that America's agriculture system is so toxic and synthetic that the only way to keep it going is to keep poisoning our crops with toxic glyphosate.
He's saying that if we stop the systemic poisoning of the crops, the system will break.
Therefore, he says we have to keep the poison flowing while we slowly reform the system to be something better.
Take note of this admission that the current U.S. agriculture system is basically a poison factory.
And it was a choice, not destiny.
America chose this path by regulators like the EPA, the FDA, the USDA compromising with Monsanto, trusting the rigged corporate science, and censoring voices like mine who have been warning about glyphosate for nearly 25 years.
As a result, America is eating poison every day in massive quantities.
And the poisoning is so large now that it's too big to fail.
Glyphosate, sadly, has become the long-term capital management of agriculture.
Remember the LTCM back in 1997?
Yeah.
Too big to fail, but too toxic to eat.
So that's my take.
So I also want to bring you an update about the situation in Mexico.
It seems like it has calmed significantly.
The restaurants are open again.
I saw videos from Josh Sigurdson.
He's out at the restaurants eating with friends.
I heard from Aaron Day, whose interview I posted yesterday.
I also heard from Dan Dix.
And they're still there.
They're still stuck.
Aaron has a plane ticket for Thursday, I believe, he said.
And he's hoping to be able to leave the area on Thursday.
In the meantime, they are just grateful that the car bombs have stopped.
So we don't know if that was a one-off dust-up situation, a demonstration by the cartels, or a small taste of more things yet to come.
Fast Charging Test Insights00:10:31
It's not clear.
But anyway, we're glad that everybody is safe.
at the moment and we pray for their safe return to the United States or Canada or wherever they live.
So thank you for all your notes of support for all our fellow Americans who are still trapped there in Mexico, but at least they're not being shot at or anything at the moment.
They're just delayed.
And you can live through that.
So anyway, I've got a number of reports coming up here for you today, followed by part two of my interview with Maria Z.
That will be today's show.
So let's just jump into all that.
Hey, before we begin the special reports, I want to give you a quick update on the Donut Lab battery, which is this seemingly revolutionary new solid-state battery.
And you may recall, I said that the Donut Lab company, which is a Finnish company, they promised to release test results on Monday, which they did.
And these first test results were testing the charging capabilities of the batteries, determining the charging speed and the temperature fluctuations that happen during charging, which is a very big part of this.
Normally, if you charge batteries too quickly, for example, you try to charge a battery to 100% in 30 minutes, let's say you're going to do damage to it, or 20 minutes, you'll really do damage to it.
Well, these batteries, which could revolutionize the world, these batteries are able to be charged to 100% in about six minutes.
They get hot.
They reach something like 90 degrees Celsius, but they don't spontaneously combust.
So, because the materials are not lithium, according to the company.
Anyway, the Donut Lab company, true to their word, they did release the test results from this independent government-run laboratory in Finland.
I think it's called VTT.
And the results are, so far, pretty amazing.
Pretty amazing.
So I want to play just a little bit of Marco, the founder of this battery company, Donut Lab.
I want you to hear him explain a couple of things.
I'm not going to play the whole video, but if you want to watch the whole video, you can go to his website called IDonutBelieve.com.
It's a play on words.
Instead of saying I don't believe, it's IdonutBelieve.com because nobody believed it when they announced the battery technology and the specifications.
So let's listen to Marco here for a few minutes and see what he's got to say.
Hi there.
It's Marco from Donut Lab.
You are watching our battery-proof series called I Donut Believe.
In this series, we demonstrate the capabilities of Donut Battery, which is the world's first solid-state battery used in production vehicles.
Today's topic is fast charging test.
This test shows how the donut battery cell can take a typical one-hour charge event as well as extremely rapid charge events with around 0 to 80% in 10 minutes and in 5 minutes.
The test is first performed with two passive aluminium heatsinks on both sides of the battery cell.
This is done to simulate the cell being a part of a typical battery pack with not so great cooling.
The second part of the test is done with one heatsink removed, simulating a very bad cooling design.
The sweet spot of the donut battery cell is in the more hot environment.
So even very bad cooling design is actually pretty good for our cell.
These two phases are done to compare how different temperatures affect cell performance, giving a hint towards how this cell would operate in different battery module and pack designs.
Now let's go and watch the test.
With 11C, the difference between these two setups is very similar.
With two heatsinks, the cell can accept that full 11C charge for around three minutes and it reaches 80% state of charge in less than five minutes, with the cell temperature at its very peak only rising to 63 degrees.
With only one heat sink, cell temperature rises to 89 degrees at the peak, which is still very much in the comfort zone of this cell.
You can see in the graphs that this higher temperature rise makes the cell voltage actually drop in the early phases, even though we use a 4.3 charge voltage throughout these fast charging tests.
This allows the cell to accept that full 11C charge for around half a minute longer, which means it reaches 80% state of charge at just over four and a half minutes.
And it also reaches 90% and 100% state of charge around half a minute sooner than it did with two heat sinks.
All right, so what we just saw there is pretty amazing, actually.
Think about it.
80% charge of the battery in, what, four and a half minutes.
That's unheard of in electric vehicles or really any kind of large battery like this.
It's unheard of.
And these curves show that this battery is responding in a way that's consistent with the claims of the Donut Lab company.
Although the temperature reaching almost 90 degrees Celsius, that's with a poorly designed cooling setup, that temperature is a little concerning to me.
But this isn't, it's not a normal battery.
I think in a normal lithium battery, you never want it to reach 90 degrees Celsius.
But this battery can take it, I guess.
I would just say don't touch it.
You could cook breakfast on it, but you don't want to put your hand on that.
So pretty freaking hot right there.
Nevertheless, they are testing the extremes here.
And it does show that this battery is able to absorb an extraordinarily fast charge rate, something that's pretty shocking.
Now, is this damaging the battery?
There's no way that we can know.
According to Donut Lab, it's not damaging the battery.
This is normal, I suppose.
Maybe we'll find out.
Is there a lot of thermal expansion of the battery during this charging?
I don't know.
They didn't mention it.
But I don't know if you know this, but sometimes batteries can expand 15-20% of their volume during charging, especially high-rate charging.
And that's why battery packs have to be built in a way that allows for pretty aggressive thermal expansion.
I didn't hear them say anything about this battery physically expanding its volume as it was being charged.
It got hot, and there's always some kind of small thermal expansion associated with heat, but maybe the coefficient of that expansion for these materials is very small, and it's not worth mentioning.
I don't know.
But anyway, I would say the Donut Lab battery, it looks like it's passing the first test here.
There are more tests yet to come.
Obviously, we need to test capacity, and then we need to test charge-discharge cycles and see how many cycles it can handle without self-destructing, because they're saying that it's designed for up to 100,000 cycles, which of course would be revolutionary.
That's if you charged it and discharged it every day.
I think I did the math on that, and it's good for 270 years.
So pretty long-life battery if it does that.
But I'm not even sure how you would test that.
Can you do a charge-discharge?
How many of those can you do in a day, provided for cooling down in between?
I guess it would take a while.
It would take maybe years to do the test of, you know, to meet 270 years of simulated use, I suppose.
But we'll see.
We'll see.
Again, we need to know the energy density.
We need to know the discharge capabilities of the battery.
Is it able to discharge at a high rate without going into a runaway thermal event, i.e. kaboom or catching on fire, things like that.
So, you know, runaway thermal events are bad in batteries.
And so there's still more to see, but we're on a good track here.
And the reason I'm even focusing on this Donut Lab product is because if the claims of this company are true, then this changes everything.
I've done reports on this.
This is a game changer for vehicles, for transportation.
It would be deflationary across the economy.
It would lower the cost of food.
It would lower the cost of farming, lower the cost of transportation, lower the cost of owning a vehicle.
It would also grant you a lot of self-reliance.
You could go off-grid more easily with this battery in your garage or in your barn or wherever you might store a stack of batteries and just tie in some solar panels and a charge controller.
And you can disconnect from the grid because these batteries no longer suffer from the problems that lithium has suffered from, i.e. dying after 1,000 or 2,000 cycles, typically.
Now, lithium-iron phosphate has improved that to maybe 4,000 or 5,000 cycles at the most, but nobody's coming close to 100,000 cycles or even half that.
So this battery could be a game changer.
The next technical announcement is coming in one week.
So I will keep you posted one week later about what's happening with the Donut Lab battery.
Battery Breakthrough00:02:34
All right, before we jump into the special reports, I've got something else to announce.
We have, as of today, we finished the indexing of all of the Epstein files from the Department of Justice.
So everything that the DOJ released on January 30th, we downloaded all those files, all the original ones, before they started mass deleting a bunch of embarrassing stuff, by the way.
And then we, well, when I say we, I mean myself and my AI agents, went through and cleaned all the documents, normalized everything, fixed all the OCR errors.
The documents are a mess, by the way, the total mess.
I mean, even the file names are a mess.
Some of them are just indecipherable.
There's everything from handwritten notes to typewriters to emails to photographs and PDFs and scans.
It's like it's the messiest document set I've ever seen.
And I've seen some crazy stuff.
So, you know, results may vary, but at this point, you can go to brightanswers.ai and you can ask our deep research engine about, you know, about the Epstein files or anything in the Epstein files.
And it should give you some pretty good answers because it's going to cite all these DOJ documents.
I haven't actually tested it yet because it just finished a little bit ago.
Also, our brightlearn.ai book engine is tied into the same database.
So you can now actually create books that potentially cover the Epstein files.
So have fun with that one.
It will research the Epstein files for you in writing and citing your book.
So that also could be very interesting.
Okay, finally, I want to mention that what makes all this possible is your support of our online store, HealthRangerStore.com.
And I want to thank you for your support and also remind you that we are the company that has the cleanest food and superfoods, organics, nutritional supplements, herbs, essential oils, etc., because we do more testing.
We have our own MassSpec laboratory.
We do more testing than anybody, than anybody that I've ever heard of in the entire industry, as you know.
Nerve Agent for Plants00:15:11
So if you want clean food that is tested for glyphosate and aflatoxins and microbiology and salmonella and heavy metals, etc., shop with us, healthrangerstore.com.
And remember that every time you shop with us, you get loyalty lion points is what they're called.
Basically, just loyalty points.
And you can trade those in for book tokens.
And you can use those tokens at brightlearn.ai to generate much longer books.
So you're basically getting sort of VIP, you know, passwords that you can redeem for longer books.
So check that out.
Again, healthrangerstore.com and everything that we do, all of our platforms, the reason we can keep them free is because of your support at our online store, healthrangerstore.com.
So thank you for your support.
All right, we're going to jump into the special reports.
So enjoy the rest of the show and be sure to stay tuned for part two of my interview with Maria Z. Welcome to the special report on glyphosate and where it is banned, in some cases banned entirely in certain countries.
And then in other countries and across the entire EU, it's banned for use as a desiccant.
That is, it's sprayed on crops as one of the final steps before harvesting, saturating those crops with toxic glyphosate.
What's important to note about this report is that all these countries demonstrate that you don't need glyphosate in order to grow food.
And for example, Vietnam is one of the countries where glyphosate is completely banned.
It was banned in 2019.
And yet, people are still eating in Vietnam.
Imagine that.
In Bahrain, in Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Luxembourg, and Bermuda, glyphosate is completely banned, at least according to the research that I conducted on this.
And yet people still eat in those countries.
So first of all, we are told that the only way to feed our country is if we keep using glyphosate, spraying glyphosate on all the crops.
And even Secretary Kennedy said that without glyphosate, we wouldn't be able to feed our population.
And that is just flat out not true.
Not true.
And it's widely demonstrated around the world that you can feed your populations.
And also, glyphosate wasn't really commercially introduced as an herbicide until, I think, 1974.
And before that, we still ate food, didn't we?
We actually had food before glyphosate.
You know, this argument that, oh, we have to have glyphosate in order to have crops kind of reminds me of the way vaccine pushers tell us we have to have vaccines in order to have an immune system.
That there's no immunity without vaccines.
Even during COVID, they were telling us that the immune system is a hoax.
There's no such thing as a natural immune system or natural immunity.
They were attacking that in the media, really.
They were mocking people who talked about natural immunity.
They said, no, only vaccines can confer immunity, which is insane because how did people live before vaccines?
What about all the people who did not take the vaccine jabs for COVID?
Like myself and many of you listening, we didn't take the jabs.
And we're actually doing much better than the people who did take the jabs, it turns out, for the most part.
So this whole argument about glyphosate reminds me of that very same thing.
Oh, and by the way, I forgot to introduce myself.
I'm Mike Adams, the health ranger.
I've been covering glyphosate for 25 years.
And I've been writing about it and writing about the fraud, the Monsanto fraud, all of the junk science fraud, the regulatory capture, the faked studies, you know, the whole thing.
I've been writing about this for a very long time.
And the whole thing is a massive fraud.
Glyphosate was never shown to be safe.
It's always been toxic.
And it has always contributed to cancers, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
And it's also contributed to mineral deficiencies because it is a chelation agent that strips minerals right out of your body.
So that's why so many countries have banned glyphosate because, you know, the IARC said that glyphosate is a probable carcinogen.
And that designation caused a lot of countries to rethink this herbicide.
So let's continue and talk about the EU ban on glyphosate as a desiccant.
Now, this happened in 2023.
Now, what's interesting is that in late 2023, the EU approved the use of glyphosate, but it banned it as a pre-harvest desiccant.
So in other words, you know, you could still use it on GMO crops to kill weeds, but you couldn't use it on things like wheat, which doesn't have a so-called Roundup Ready or a GMO variety that's immune to glyphosate.
So that right there is a reason why wheat in Europe is cleaner and more healthy and more natural than wheat in America, because the wheat in America is sprayed with toxic glyphosate poison.
But in Europe, that's illegal, so they don't do that.
So seriously, if you just go to Europe and buy bread there, that's better bread than American bread, even if it's the same ingredients.
Because our bread's toxic.
Unless you buy organic, of course, which is supposed to not have glyphosate sprayed on it.
But there's no testing required for organic.
Did you know that?
The USDA doesn't have any glyphosate testing requirement at all, or even heavy metals testing, or frankly, any kind of end product testing.
There's no requirement under USDA.
So, organic is a certification of inputs, not outputs.
So, you know, there you go.
That's why we test everything in my online store, HealthRangerStore.com, where we have our own lab, as you well know.
Probably you've seen some of my videos, a lab tour.
We have multiple mass spec instruments, and one of them, and I'll, you know, what I'll tack on just maybe two minutes at the end of this to show you our glyphosate testing instrument because it's a triple-quad mass spec instrument from waters that we use.
It's a beast of a machine, too.
It's large, it's large and heavy, it draws a strong vacuum, it uses a lot of electricity, it's very expensive.
Just to maintain that thing is crazy expensive.
But anyway, it does glyphosate testing at really good sensitivity.
We can get detection limits down to sub five parts per billion, I believe, is, yeah, well, for sure, below five parts per billion for detection limits.
So, it's got very high sensitivity.
Anyway, and I worked on that glyphosate method myself for 18 months.
That's how long it took us to nail that thing down because there were no methods that existed that were just straight mass spec with chromatography chemistry.
To restate that, when I wanted to start testing for glyphosate, I bought this instrument and we tried to figure out how do we test for glyphosate.
This was many years ago, like 10 years ago, or whatever it was.
And the only way to do it was to use this other really toxic process with this other instrument.
And it was a method called post-column derivatization, which it was a treatment for the liquid that you're injecting into the column, a post-column treatment before it goes into the mass spec.
And it involved these really toxic chemicals.
I didn't want to have that method in my lab because it was too toxic.
And so, I painstakingly did a ton of research, myself and my colleagues, and we brought in all kinds of experts, actually.
And this was a big problem.
And we were, I think, the second lab in the United States to nail down a glyphosate quantitation method using mass spec that does not rely on post-column derivatization.
And it took us 18 months.
So, I'm very, very familiar with the mass spec chemistry quantitation process and some of the conundrums of trying to test glyphosate.
Very familiar.
I spent way too long on that project.
But anyway, in the EU, they have banned its use as a desiccant.
Now, if anybody tells you that, oh no, the glyphosate, it just breaks down, it just disappears.
Trust me, that's not the case because I actually ran a lot of experiments in our lab trying to destroy glyphosate.
I microwaved it.
We nuked it in the microwave.
Of course, that didn't touch it.
It was all still 100% there.
We put it in sunlight.
There was no breakdown from UV.
I mean, yeah, you can kill it with strong acids, but that's not something that it's going to experience in the outdoors typically.
Certain soil microbes will break it down, but that takes time and takes the right conditions and the right microbes, and that'll break it down into AMPA.
And then eventually, I think it becomes like ammonia.
And I don't know, there's some different byproducts that it breaks down into, but that doesn't always happen reliably, and it doesn't happen quickly.
Glyphosate is a very robust molecule.
It holds itself very well.
It resists being broken down by anything other than acids typically.
So when they spray it on the crops, it ends up in the crops, which means it ends up in your food.
That's why there's so much glyphosate in American bread and buns on your fast food sandwiches and wheat crackers and wheat cereals.
Have you looked at your wheat cereals lately?
I mean, I guess we should test all that stuff.
Come to think of it, we are testing a bunch of breads right now, but we're going to test more things and I'll bring you those results.
So let's go through some of the countries where it's banned as a desiccant.
So all 27 member states of the European Union have banned it as a desiccant.
Also, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Austria, Italy, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and the entire EU, like I said.
So what they prove is that there's no need for glyphosate in order to produce food.
It just doesn't exist.
Now, there are other restrictions in other countries.
So in Barbados, for example, you have to have a license to purchase glyphosate, so it's restricted.
In Canada, glyphosate is banned on federal lands.
And eight of the ten provinces in Canada have various restrictions.
In Mexico, they were going to have a full phase out by January of 2024, but there was a lot of political pressure and they paused that phase out, so people are still using it there.
Thailand initially banned it in 2019, but then because of pressure from the United States and probably from Bayer, etc., they walked that back and now it can be used in Thailand.
And there are similar stories in Slovenia, in Greece, in Argentina, Spain, Portugal, etc.
Fiji has banned concentrations above 2%, for example.
A lot of countries are acting on this in the direction of banning glyphosate.
And if you're wondering, does glyphosate actually cause cancer?
Well, Bayer, which bought Monsanto, has agreed to pay almost $11 billion to settle somewhere around 100,000 U.S. lawsuits that claim that it causes cancer.
Of course, Bayer says it doesn't cause cancer, but they're paying $11 billion in order to settle.
So, you know, if they were completely innocent and if it never caused cancer at all, you would think that they would not pay $11 billion, but I don't know.
The court system is a nightmare either way.
So who knows?
The bottom line here is that glyphosate does not produce food.
This is critical.
I mean, it seems self-evident.
Glyphosate is a weed killer chemical.
It's also a de-scaling chemical that can remove metals and calcium deposits from pipes.
Okay, that's one of its original uses.
But it does not grow food.
It kills plants.
Its research was actually based on the original organophosphate nerve gas or nerve agent research that came out of Nazi Germany.
And I've covered that previously, but these chemists from the 1930s and the Third Reich, they were working on organophosphate nerve agents such as sarin and VX and a few others.
I posted a big infographic about this.
That organophosphate research led to a body of knowledge that then later resulted in glyphosate being synthesized, which is an organophosphonate molecule.
Shares a very similar structure, but glyphosate is not a nerve gas for humans and mammals.
It's a nerve agent for plants, you could say.
Kind of a nerve agent, although it's not a perfect comparison because plants don't have the same kind of nerves.
But actually, the way it works is it cuts off the energy supply of plants.
That's why it kills them so quickly.
So it's still, it's a chemical weapon that targets plant physiology, but it's based on research of chemical weapons that target human physiology.
So that's why Nazi research actually gave rise to glyphosate.
And that's why glyphosate has been used as a weapon.
And right now, I would argue that this chemical weapon is being, you know, it's carpet bombed across America's farms with the approval of RFK Jr. and President Trump.
Glyphosate As A Weapon00:12:14
They are both completely approving it because they say we have to have this chemical, otherwise we can't grow food.
And that's just flatly not true.
That is not true, as we have shown in this report.
So I'm especially baffled by RFK Jr., who is very much aware of the dangers of glyphosate.
He's on the record talking about glyphosate dangers.
I interviewed him several times years ago.
And I don't recall if we talked about glyphosate, but he's given other interviews on the subject.
And it's clear that he is aware that glyphosate is toxic.
But what he's telling us now is that our whole system depends on glyphosate.
And that if we don't provide glyphosate to the farmers, then the food system will break.
That's his argument, that we need to use this poison right now because our whole system is, it has been engineered around this poison.
In other words, he's saying that in America, we can't grow food unless we poison it first.
That's bizarre to me because they can grow food in France without poisoning it.
They can grow food in Vietnam without poisoning it.
And heck, they can even grow food in Togo without poisoning it.
And I don't even know where that is.
They can grow food in Kuwait without poisoning it.
Imagine that.
Or in Luxembourg without poisoning it.
So how is it that in America, we're supposed to make America great again and make America healthy again?
Supposed to be a golden age.
We're supposed to be the best, most innovative country in the world.
How come we can't figure out how to grow food without poisoning it?
Huh.
Doesn't it make you wonder what's going on here?
What's going on here?
Well, I saw someone post a really interesting theory on this, and I don't recall who it is.
Otherwise, I would give them credit.
But Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was, in fact, one of the key attorneys that was potentially threatening Bayer with various lawsuits because, you know, he was actively involved in lawsuits through Children's Health Defense.
And those lawsuits, I believe, although I'd have to check, I think some of them involved glyphosate.
I know they've covered a lot of different topics with their lawsuits.
And overall, I think Children's Health Defense has done a very positive job.
They've done a lot of important work in this area.
So by getting Trump elected, knowing that Trump could be essentially bought off by big corporations via Susie Wiles, and then knowing that RFK Jr. could no longer be involved in lawsuits against Bayer because now he's running HHS, so he can't also be an attorney representing that, and knowing that HHS has to answer to the president.
In effect, by RFK Jr. becoming the secretary of HHS, Bayer got him out of the way and eliminated their biggest threat of future lawsuits.
And now, with Trump's executive order declaring glyphosate to be a national security critical resource, Bayer is in the clear here.
I mean, they're essentially operating with what looks like is going to become some level of legal immunity from here forward.
There's a Supreme Court decision that's coming up soon about whether the federal government can override state courts when the state courts decide that consumers were damaged by products when at the same time the federal government says those products are safe, but the state courts have said they're not safe.
So that's a key decision coming from the U.S. Supreme Court.
And that will be a really important one to watch, of course, for lots of different reasons.
But Bayer is loving the Trump administration here because Trump is pro-glyphosate.
So for all the progress that we made in working to get glyphosate out of our food in order to end the mass poisoning and the cancers and the hormone disruption and the nutrient depletion and everything else that's associated with glyphosate,
that's all been reversed by Trump jumping in bed effectively with Bayer, who I believe donated at least a million dollars to his, was it his inauguration?
Something like that.
I know there are financial ties.
And then getting RFK Jr. in there at HHS, where he's basically disarmed now, and he has to listen to Trump.
So, wow.
You know, Bayer sure figured out how to turn the tables and make America pro-glyphosate, at least from the government's point of view.
And that's disgusting because this is harming Americans.
It's clear.
I mean, the research data are totally clear on this.
This is harming Americans, and it's certainly not saving money.
You know, we're told that, oh, well, it keeps food more affordable.
Well, but what about the long-term downstream costs of treating cancer or the cost of nutrient deficiencies or the cost of the other health problems?
You know, you're saving a penny here on the front end, and you're costing, you know, hundreds of dollars on the back end relative to the penny in healthcare costs.
So no, it doesn't save money to poison your food.
I mean, that's absurd.
But that's the argument that we're told.
We have to make food more affordable by poisoning it.
That's the argument of the Trump administration and a lot of MA people right now.
It just, it doesn't fly.
It's absurd.
And that's why I wanted to do this report was to show you that all these other countries around the world are still growing food and, frankly, food that's much healthier than our food.
And they're doing it without glyphosate.
So let me make you aware of a couple of resources that you can use to educate yourself on this and conduct additional research.
My AI deep research engine is available for free at brightanswers.ai.
And if you're not yet using that engine to ask questions about food and health and ingredients and remedies and cures and disease reversals and everything you can think of, if you're not using it, you're missing out because everybody that uses it says it's the best thing they've ever used.
It beats ChatGPT and Grok and everything.
It beats Google by a long shot.
It's the best AI engine in the world on reality.
And it's especially trained on food and nutrition and gardening and health, things like that.
So again, that's at brightanswers.ai and it knows everything about glyphosate.
So check it out.
Also, we have our book engine, which is brightlearn.ai.
And there we have hundreds of books that are on the topic of glyphosate.
And you can download them all for free or you can create your own book for free.
So go to brightlearn.ai if you want to create your book.
It's awesome, our book engine.
We're approaching close to 40,000 books soon that have been created on the platform.
And then if you want to download books, just go to books.brightlearn.ai and search for the word glyphosate.
And you'll see all the books come up that have glyphosate in the title.
And you can download all those books for free.
So, you know, it's easy to get educated on this.
It's easy to do research.
And now the glyphosate industry can't hide.
They used to be able to hide behind the media, which they bought off, and the science journals, which they bought off, and the government regulators that they bought off, etc.
Now they can't hide because we have all these AI tools that are documenting everything and we're able to make them available to you for free so that you can conduct research and you can find the truth about all of this.
Now, also, finally, if you want to support us, shop with us, healthrangerstore.com, because we do more glyphosate testing than any food and supplement manufacturer and retailer in the world.
There's nobody that comes close to us on that.
We have our own lab.
I'm going to show you a video here a little bit, give you a quick tour.
And all of our products that we sell or virtually everything is glyphosate tested as well as heavy metals tested.
So if you go to our store, healthrangerstore.com, on the left-hand side, once you're doing a search or a product category, you can click on glyphosate tested as a filter, and then it'll filter what it's showing you to show only the products that have been glyphosate tested.
And, you know, we have all the testing records for everything.
We are an ISO accredited laboratory, ISO 17025, which is internationally recognized, obviously, because it's ISO.
And we are inspected.
We are audited on a routine, well, an annual basis, and we have to pass proficiency testing and everything.
So it's the real deal.
So if you want the most heavily tested, heavily scrutinized food and supplements in the world, the cleanest food in the world, that's us, HealthRangerStore.com.
So let me give you a little video clip here, just two minutes or so of me explaining and showing you our TripleQuad Mass Spec instrument from Waters that we use exclusively for glyphosate testing because it has unique chemistry.
So we really can't use the instrument for anything else.
It's too much trouble to change the chemistry over.
So we only use it for glyphosate and we've been running it for years.
So check out this segment.
Enjoy the video and thank you for watching.
Let's see what else do we have here.
Oh, so this triple quad mass spec here is from a different company.
This is from Waters.
And this is a beast.
So this instrument, I actually worked on this method for a year and a half to develop this glyphosate quantitation method using a really unique chemistry here.
So we don't rely on what's called the post-column derivatization.
We don't need to do that.
Instead, we use a really unique column, which I'll just show.
There it is.
This is a very special column, very unusual.
It's not a C18 or anything like that.
And we have a very unusual chemistry.
This column is completely nuked by any alcohols, including methanol.
So the entire, the mobile phase and all the chemistry of this instrument has no alcohols in it at all, which is very unusual for any kind of liquid chromatography.
The auto sampler is right here.
It currently doesn't have any samples.
We're not in the middle of a run at the moment.
And the reason this is so large is because this is a triple quad mass spec.
So it has to draw an extreme vacuum.
So it's got a rough pump and it's got a really massive turbine pump inside to dump every last molecule of air that might find its way into the system.
And that happens also when you're introducing your sample into the system.
It's sucking in air to push an ion stream through the quadrupoles.
And that's why it has to pull a strong vacuum.
On the screen here, we were just pulling this up.
There's a typical peak that you see.
There's a calibration curve right there.
And these are standards right now.
This is not actually a food sample.
But when it's live running, you'll see the actual food samples here.
Now, let me show you what's behind all of this, a little bit of behind the scenes, because this is kind of cool.
This right here is just a UPS.
This UPS is necessary to power this machine during any kind of power glitch.
Anthropic's Impact on IBM Valuation00:11:10
And these UPSs are thousands of dollars each.
Here's a rough pump for this machine.
This rough pump is incredibly powerful, uses a lot of electricity, pulls a vacuum through this tube right here.
And that's why it has to have its own metal reinforcement spiral inside to prevent the tube from collapsing.
Welcome to this special report on the AI wipeouts of stock market valuation.
I'm Mike Adams.
I'm an AI developer.
I built BrightLearn.ai, the largest book publishing platform in the world, and many other AI projects.
And if you've been watching what just happened with IBM, in one afternoon, IBM lost $30 billion in market valuation because of a tweet, essentially, and because of some technology from Anthropic.
So Anthropic announced that they can now, or its coding agents can now understand and read and edit and write COBOL.
Now, COBOL is an ancient programming language.
I mean, that harkens back to even before I was in college.
COBOL, my goodness.
Well, it turns out that 95% of ATMs, yes, the cash machines, their transactions run on COBOL.
And COBOL is also powering a lot of government systems, which are also ancient and some airline systems as well.
IBM makes a huge amount of money every year running the systems integration contracts and the maintenance contracts for all this COBOL code.
And it's actually very difficult to find human programmers that can even work in COBOL because it's such an ancient language.
The fact that Anthropic now says it can handle COBOL, this just instantly vaporized $30 billion in market valuation for IBM because it means that a lot of these companies that have been paying IBM huge amounts of money will be able to automate it using Claude code, which of course is from Anthropic.
Now, so this is a tech company partial wipeout, you could say, or a correction, simply because of new AI technology coming online.
This is not the first example.
Last week, Anthropic announced a new feature for its clawed code called Claude Code Security.
Now, remember, they have Claude Code, they have Claude Co-Work, which sort of works on your desktop and maybe accidentally deletes your folders.
And then they have no, I use Claude Code for coding, by the way.
It's very good.
I use Opus 4.6.
It's the best thing out there at the moment.
But they announced this Claude Code Security, which does vulnerability scanning.
It's very, very good.
I've used it.
It's crazy.
It finds all kinds of privacy vulnerabilities as well as security gaps in your code.
And it's just, it's incredible.
It saves you, you know, it saves all kinds of time that humans would typically have to use in order to find these vulnerabilities.
So when that was announced, the stock price of CrowdStrike, a computer security company, network security, et cetera, their stock price plummeted.
And so every few days now, Anthropic is announcing something new that is clobbering the valuation of tech companies because it's replacing lots of different services.
Now, I probably don't have to tell you that this is also going to be replacing a lot of different human jobs.
So fewer security code experts will be employed.
Fewer COBOL programmers will be employed.
And overall, there will be fewer coders employed and fewer network administrators, etc., because of the automation that's coming from companies like Anthropic.
Now, Anthropic is currently valued at $380 billion.
They're in a war with the Pentagon because the Pentagon says they want Anthropic to allow them to use their software for autonomous killing systems and mass surveillance, etc.
And the founder of Anthropic or the CEO of Anthropic, Dario, he says, no, we won't allow you to use it for that.
And the Pentagon is threatening to yank Anthropic out of the supply chain for all military contracts.
That would be devastating to Anthropic, and it could send the company reeling, frankly, even though it's got the best coding product out there right now by far.
However, there's something else that's coming.
But first, I want to just summarize what I said here, which is that Anthropic or Google or Microsoft on any given day could announce something that wipes out an industry, that just completely wipes out or largely wipes out the revenue model of an entire industry.
And that is happening.
And that could continue to happen with some frequency.
I mean, I'm sure it will.
But Anthropic itself is threatened by another factor, which is Chinese open source models.
And China is running the real 5D chess here.
China is running the long game.
China is undermining the US AI marketplace by releasing world-class models completely free.
Models that can be downloaded and run locally on your own hardware, free of charge, and that are very good.
And DeepSeek version 4 is rumored to be right around the corner with a release.
In fact, it's about a week late compared to what the rumor said.
But DeepSeek version 4 is rumored to be neck and neck with Anthropic's Opus 4.6 when it comes to writing code and debugging code.
But importantly, DeepSeek version 4 is also rumored to have a much larger context window, like a million tokens, which means it can ingest and review a massive code base.
And it can essentially edit or build features or debug features across multiple repositories and different languages, sort of full stack development, which is a very big deal.
Until now, we've all been limited to much smaller context windows like 128K is typical.
So even my own projects vastly exceed the 128K tokens.
So you may not realize this, but Brightlearn.ai, that engine that builds your books for you, and I'm not even talking about the front end, but just the back end engine, that's over 100,000 lines of code.
I didn't write a single one of them, by the way.
They're all AI written lines, but it's over 100,000 lines.
That's way over 128,000 tokens by a long shot.
It's closer to a million tokens.
So what DeepSeek version 4 is about to do is revolutionary, and it could really put tremendous profit pressure on Anthropic.
What I'm getting at here is that what Anthropic just did to IBM, DeepSeek could do to Anthropic, which is undercutting the revenue model of Anthropic, who also undercut the revenue model of IBM and security companies, etc.
This undercutting, this seemingly spontaneous announcements of new technology, this is going to happen on an increasing frequency.
You're going to hear these kinds of stories now almost every week, one way or another.
And this is part of the acceleration toward what many people call the singularity, which is where AI is involved in its own self-improvement in such a profound way that humans won't be able to keep up with the new improvements that AI is rolling out.
So DeepSeek version 4, when it is released, I'm going to be taking a hard look at it and testing it and seeing if we can integrate it in certain areas and seeing if it's got better intelligence or better reasoning or better code writing, better debugging, etc.
And I will keep you posted about DeepSeek version 4.
There's also rumored to be a light version of DeepSeek version 4 that will run on consumer-grade hardware that will run on about 24 gigs of RAM on your GPU.
This is also a huge deal because 24 gigabyte cards are somewhat available.
They're more on the higher end of consumer grade cards, but they're not impossible to find.
I think the NVIDIA, what is it, the 5080 plus or something has 24 gigs on it.
I know the 5090 has 24 gigs, or I mean 32 gigs, which is more than enough.
But the 5090s costs $5,000 now, so that's not necessarily a cheap card.
Nevertheless, if DeepSeek Lite is released, and if it's anywhere near as good as the full model of DeepSeek, this is going to undercut, I mean, Google, Gemini, OpenAI will probably be headed towards bankruptcy because no one will need to pay OpenAI these monthly subscriptions or these high per token fees, even though you're paying per million tokens input and output.
You're going to be able to do that for free by downloading DeepSeek version 4 and running it on a graphics card that you only have to buy one time.
And then you're just paying for electricity.
And companies will do this company-wide.
They'll have one GPU workstation or server in their company running DeepSeek or DeepSeek Lite, or maybe they'll run Quen, you know, Quen 3.5 is out, etc.
And that will be accessible by everybody within the company.
DeepSeek Version 4 Release00:05:59
And that way, all your data stays local.
And your customer data, your financial information never leaves your company because when you're using an open source AI model locally, it's not sending information back to China or anywhere.
It's just running locally.
And that's it.
So it's the ultimate for privacy.
So let me summarize where we are with AI real quick, especially for those of you who are maybe not AI developers.
And maybe you're not at the bleeding edge of this technology.
So here's the deal.
This is my experience.
AI is clearly intelligent, highly intelligent, highly capable.
Those who say it doesn't think or it's just a word prediction engine, I don't know, they're stuck in 2023 or something, which is five generations ago when it comes to AI.
So today's AI is highly intelligent.
It's going to replace entire industries.
Seriously, I mean, we just covered some of it.
Who needs COBOL programmers?
Or for that matter, you know, I mean, who needs React programmers for websites?
You don't.
You use AI to do it.
Who needs Python programmers, right?
I write everything in Python that's for document handling, but now I just have AI write it, and I just tell it the structure and what I want, inputs and outputs and parameters, things like that.
So yeah, AI is going to just sweep through the workplace over the next two to three years, and it's going to replace a lot of desk workers, a lot of middle managers, decision makers, of course, customer service people and programmers, obviously security people, etc.
But it's going to be more and more capable as we move into agentic AI.
And this is the year that a lot of AI agents are being toyed with, let's say, with OpenClaw, et cetera, which I don't really recommend that you install because it's a big security problem.
But this is the discovery phase of agentic AI and personal assistance.
It's going to mature very quickly over the next few months.
And then in 2027, I predict we're going to have a lot of agentic AI systems deployed across corporations in decision-making roles and logistics roles, et cetera, judgment AI.
So get ready for that.
The Chinese models, the open source models are probably going to win in the end here, commercially speaking, even though these are non-commercial models.
What I mean is they're going to undermine the entire commercial sector of AI, which is Google and OpenAI, etc.
I'm not sure how OpenAI can financially survive this, frankly.
And I'm starting to wonder about Anthropic, too.
I really don't know if Anthropic will survive if DeepSeek version 4 is just as good and if Anthropic loses the government as one of its bigger customers.
So I guess we'll have to see.
OpenAI will probably need a lot of government bailouts to continue to exist.
And it will largely become the AI engine for the Pentagon and government workers, etc.
But everybody in the corporate world and in the nonprofit world, etc., they're all going to be using the Chinese models because those models are free and great and also private when you deploy them locally.
And in many ways, they're also smarter, much smarter models.
So that's where this is all going.
And China's playing the long game here.
Granted, they're playing 5D chess.
They're very clever.
And with this strategy of them pushing out these open source, completely free frontier models, this is absolutely going to undermine the U.S. AI industry.
But I'm not really a fan of the U.S. AI industry anyway, because it's all run by the CIA that influences what kind of answers that the U.S. AI engines will even give you.
For example, all the AI engines from U.S. tech companies lie to you about vaccines.
They say all vaccines are safe and effective, and they lie to you about COVID and a thousand other topics, 9-11, you name it.
These engines are all fake.
Whereas you actually get a lot more truth out of China's engines as long as you don't ask it about politically sensitive subjects like Tiananmen Square or Taiwan, for example.
You stay away from those topics, which is probably not your focus anyway.
And the Chinese engines are really, really great.
In fact, the best by far.
So that's my advice.
Use the open source Chinese engines.
Watch for the release of DeepSeek version 4, which could happen any day now.
I'll bring you more information here on my broadcast once that gets released.
And if you want to check out my AI projects and use my free book creation engine, it's at brightlearn.ai.
And we also have our deep research AI engine, which is at brightanswers.ai, now featuring all of the DOJ Epstein files that have been indexed in that system.
So you can ask it about anything in the Epstein files.
Oh, that should be fun.
Sloshing Toilets on Aircraft Carriers00:15:31
I spent weeks cleaning up all those documents.
Well, I mean, I had AI do it, but it took a while because there's so many documents.
And some of them are so crazy.
I think couple of my workstations vomited because of what was in those files.
But anyway, I cleaned it up.
And now it's all indexed.
And you can access it through brightanswers.ai, which is free to use also.
So check that out.
And you can follow all my videos and updates at brightvideos.com.
So I'm Mike Adams.
Thank you for listening.
Take care.
Welcome to this special report about U.S. military readiness and the failures of the USS Gerald R. Ford, which is America's most expensive aircraft carrier.
I think it costs $13 billion to build, and the toilets don't work.
And you've probably seen some of this in the news recently where the sailors on the ship, there's apparently 4,600 of them, they're having to stand in line. for extended periods of time, like 45 minutes, just to use a toilet.
And the toilets are breaking down and clogged up.
And there have been some pretty disgusting videos floating around out there.
Speaking of floating around, that's also what's happening in the restrooms on the ship.
Raw sewage is just sloshing from side to side.
So apparently that's the case.
Now, first of all, there are numerous problems with the U.S. Navy, obviously.
One of them is that the crew on the USS Ford, I believe their deployment was supposed to be six months, and yet they've been on that ship for eight months, reportedly.
So they're already held way past their normal deployment time.
And so they're starting to get a little, you know, ship crazy or whatever it's called in the Navy.
You spend too long, essentially, underground, you know, I mean, in a floating bunker is what that is.
You're not sunning on the flight deck out there.
You live your life in a floating bunker, which sounds horrible.
Eventually you start to go bunkers.
And yeah, they're not happy.
And then imagine adding to that no functioning toilets or at least not enough functioning toilets and the smell of raw feces and everything.
It's like, why did I join the Navy again?
Why?
Yeah, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to go AWOL after this kind of event.
But importantly, what this shows is that there's not a level of military readiness because if the psychology of the sailors is so disrupted, they're being held too long and they can't use a toilet and it's a horrible situation, you know, how are they going to be when it comes to doing their job in whatever station they're on on that ship?
And I don't even know why they need 4,600 sailors to run a ship like that.
I'm sure there's a good reason for it, but what are they all doing?
I mean, some of them are running radar and some of them are running weapon systems.
Some of them are obviously running the nuclear power station maintenance and then the physical maintenance and everything.
Plumbing and there's the kitchen.
So it's a whole floating town, basically.
But how are they going to do their jobs if they're not able to focus?
That's my question.
What's the mental readiness of these sailors?
I suspect it's not very good.
But there's more to this story.
So I did a bunch of research on this, and it turns out that this ship, this vessel, started using what's called a vacuum collection, holding, and transfer system, VCHT, because everything in the military has an acronym, of course.
And this has been breaking down actually since 2023 when the carrier was initially deployed.
NPR was able to retrieve documents via FOIA requests.
And then the Wall Street Journal confirmed these documents, showing that the carrier has only 650 toilets for 4,600 people.
That sailors have wait times up to 45 minutes.
And then that engineering teams are working 19 hours a day to try to keep the toilets working.
So how'd you like to be a Navy plumber spending 19-hour workdays stomping around in other people's feces?
Yeah.
Woo, that doesn't sound like a great job as the ship is sloshing from side to side.
205 breakdowns were recorded during a single four-day span of time.
The problem is rooted in fundamental design deficiencies that the government accountability office, the GAO, found back in 2020, saying that, hey, your pipes are too small.
Your pipes are too small.
Yeah, you know, I'm not going to get crude here.
I'm not going to try to, but, you know, all the sewage that's coming from these toilets, all these hungry sailors, it doesn't fit in the pipes, okay?
It just doesn't fit in the pipes.
So you need bigger pipes because you got bigger bowel movements, okay?
It's just the way it is.
The Navy said, doesn't matter.
We're going to claim it has no operational impact, and we're just going to keep going.
But now it turns out that the system, it also gets built-up calcium deposits in it, apparently, is what I'm being told.
And that they have to do an acid flush, kind of like a descaling flush.
Like if you live in a home on a well, you have hard water, you know what I'm talking about.
You've got mineral scaling all over your drains and dishes and everything, right?
Well, it costs $400,000 per acid flush to do an acid flush and try to descale the pipes.
And they've done this at least 10 times on the ship, and it's still not working.
And I thought, you know, since glyphosate is actually a very effective descaler, did you know that?
Glyphosate was first actually developed as a descaling agent by a chemical company.
They would pour glyphosate into boilers, for example, to remove the mineral deposits in the boilers, or they'd use it to remove heavy metals from, you know, pipes, sewage pipes or plumbing pipes or what have you.
I was thinking they could just feed the sailors way more glyphosate and then they would crap out the descaler.
Okay.
Of course, I'm not serious about that.
I don't want to feed anybody glyphosate, but since Trump is all in favor of glyphosate, seems like they should be crapping out the descaling solution right there on the ship, and then they don't have to use an acid flush.
They just put extra glyphosate in the bread or whatever, which since the Trump administration loves glyphosate, this seems like a natural thing for them to do, right?
But yeah, it's all crazy.
It's crazy.
But there's something else going on here that's kind of interesting.
According to sources, the Navy officials have said that they have found some, quote, improper materials being introduced into the system.
This means that the sailors on the ship have been flushing things like t-shirts, mop heads, brown paper towels, commercial toilet paper, and a four-foot piece of rope, which I'm thinking, how do they know that didn't come out of one of the sailors?
I mean, who knows?
Maybe it was a tapeworm, huh?
Who knows what they're feeding them on the ship, right?
But anyway, some people believe this is sabotage by the sailors because they don't want to sail into a war with Iran and get killed.
Because perhaps many of them know that the aircraft carrier really cannot defend itself.
I mean, against Iran's new anti-ship missiles, which are significant, by the way.
So, and this wouldn't be the first time in history that this has happened where, you know, sailors have sabotaged their own ship in order to sort of force it to dock so that they don't have to be dragged into a war.
I mean, it's happened before.
I don't have proof that that's the case, but when you start finding t-shirts in the toilets, you know, that doesn't sound like an accident.
Like, I just flushed it and it sucked my t-shirt in.
Like, dude, what were you doing with your t-shirt?
Were you wiping with your t-shirt?
How did your t-shirt get in the toilet is my question?
What are you doing?
That's not the proper way to have a bowel movement, it turns out.
And then if they're finding mop heads in the system, like, what are you doing with the mop?
Were you just plunging the toilet with the mop and then the head came off?
Okay.
I think it's sabotage.
That's my guess, that it's sabotage.
But who knows?
It could be a combination of sabotage and also bad engineering, bad designs, because, you know, that's, look, the Pentagon is a giant black hole for money where money goes to disappear into the pockets of all the, you know, the military industrial complex people who give kickbacks to senators and congressmen, etc.
It's a giant laundering system, money laundering, not mop head laundering.
It's a giant money laundering system.
And it's filled with incompetent people and corrupt people.
So, you know, the money that goes into the military, unfortunately, doesn't go to help the sailors or the Marines or the pilots or whatever.
It goes mostly into the pockets of corrupt people.
And then the equipment that ends up in the hands of the actual soldiers or sailors is sub-par equipment.
That's the whole story of Ukraine for the last four years is, you know, money pouring into Ukraine, but it's not going to the soldiers, is it?
No.
It's all these corrupt officials taking it, squirreling the money away and then vanishing.
So, yeah, the same thing happens in the United States.
I'm sure the same thing happens in Germany and, you know, Russia as well.
I mean, it's universal, China as well.
But it's definitely happening in America.
So that's why these ships suck.
But I'm wondering if what the sailors could do as part of the attack on Iran is the sailors could crap into buckets and then launch the buckets on the missiles.
And it would be like an ancient catapult system.
We're catapulting like fireballs over the castle walls, but in this case, it could be like poop buckets flying through the air, landing in Tehran or wherever.
Do you think that would be effective?
Would that be good?
Could we conquer Iran with poop artillery from the aircraft carrier?
Because all the soldiers, I'm sure, they would be happy to contribute.
I mean, the sailors.
They can contribute to the airborne poop assault squad.
But on a more serious note, the upshot of this is that the ship is going to have to apparently dock frequently so sailors can use the restroom.
It's kind of like when you're on a long road trip with your kids, let's say, and then your kids are like, oh, I have to pee or whatever.
So you pull over to a rest stop, right?
Well, in the ocean, there are no rest stops.
So they're either going to have to dock somewhere and everybody rush off and go use the toilets, which sounds like a disaster.
Like, here's 4,600 poop-heavy sailors flooding into the local town, or you're going to have to just go up on deck and poop over the side of the aircraft carrier, which would be or something similar.
And wouldn't that be a photo opportunity for the modern U.S. Navy?
Yeah, here we are, the most modern aircraft carrier in the world, but we have to squat and poop over the edge of the flight deck because the toilets don't work.
Okay.
In fact, apparently there's so much raw sewage sloshing around in the restrooms down there in the lower decks that I jokingly said they should rename it the USS Gerald R. Fjord.
Some of you know what a fjord is.
It makes total sense.
Remember Ross Perot?
Well, it turns out that when he said that giant second sound, he was talking about the United States Navy toilet system.
That's what it has become.
A giant floating, it's not so much an aircraft carrier, it's a sewage carrier.
I mean, they're looking for a place to dock to donate bio-sludge to the local farmers.
Yeah, and if you think that's gross, that happens in every major U.S. city where the bio-sludge is dumped on local farms.
And the farmers are told it's fertilizer.
Sure, okay.
And everything else.
It's more than fertilizer.
It's fertilizer plus.
But anyway, yeah, that happens all over America.
So we're a nation that builds giant floating sewage transport craft that we call aircraft carriers.
Maybe they should just be called air crap carriers.
I think that would be.
I'm sorry.
There's such low-hanging fruit of jokes in this topic I can't resist.
I mean, but I'll stop because we could go on, but I'll stop.
It's just not one of the signs of the end of the empire.
I mean, come on.
Democrats Still Trust Politicians00:14:42
The most advanced Navy in the world, the most advanced aircraft carrier in the world, $13 billion.
Do you know in the early days of this carrier, they couldn't make the elevators work?
Did you know that?
Like for two years, the elevators wouldn't work.
I'm talking about the elevators that move the aircraft up and down.
Because, you know, they store them under the flight deck, too, right?
They couldn't get that to work.
They can't get the toilets to work.
What's next?
You know, the lights don't work either, so we're all in the dark.
Everybody's got to have flashlights.
I mean, is this a modern Navy or is this a joke?
It's like a $13 billion floating joke.
And I think this thing costs like a billion dollars a year just to operate.
Something like that.
This is my guess, but it's something huge.
So every day that this thing is sailing out there is costing you and I some amount of money while just it's making a mockery of the total clown show of the Pentagon here with Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of War.
Yeah, well, it's hard to make sailors and soldiers fight if you can't give them a restroom.
And by the way, I'm not even making this up, but the crew of the ship, they have reportedly been reaching out to the A1B propulsion plant planning yard at Newport News Shipbuilding for technical guidance.
That's what's being reported here.
Propulsion plant, they are going to catapult the poop.
This is their plan.
We don't need missiles.
We're going to talk to the propulsion plant and see if we can propel this stuff somewhere.
Oh my God.
Anyway, that's the situation.
Maybe, maybe Trump will call off the invasion of Iran due to the stuck toilets.
Maybe some innovative sailors on the ship have prevented World War III by flushing their t-shirts and mop heads.
It's like, good job, mate.
You know, you stop the war by stopping the toilets.
I guess it's worth it, but good luck.
All right.
Well, enough of that.
I've commented a lot about the incompetence of the United States military.
Its outmoded technology, its crazy morale problems.
And this isn't all Trump's fault, by the way.
Trump's only been there for a year now in the recent administration.
A lot of this I trace back to Obama, who really forced out a lot of the better military leaders in the Navy and other branches and brought in a bunch of woke idiots to run the military.
And since the wokeness took over the military, even under Biden also, the wokeness, you know, some of these ships were having like, you know, gay cross-dressing parades and things just to pass the time, I guess.
Then, you know, competency became a second-tier priority.
And this is the result of that.
We have a military that just no longer really functions that well.
And I think that if Trump does order an attack on Iran, I think it's going to end in catastrophe.
And so hopefully he'll call it off.
And that would be a huge embarrassment for Trump and for the U.S. military.
But it would at least prevent an escalation that could lead to world war, which none of us want.
So let's hope the poop-clogging sailors continue to jam up the toilets and maybe we don't end up in a global thermonuclear war.
Imagine that.
We saved Earth with mopheads and clogged toilets.
Yeah, that would be one hell of a book to write one day.
But thank you for listening.
I'm Mike Adams here.
And if you want to hear more of my analysis, some of it's more serious than this one.
You can hear that at brightvideos.com.
That's my new video site.
In addition, I'm doing articles on all of these topics at naturalnews.com every single day.
So check it out there.
And thank you for listening.
Take care.
I want you to understand, and something that you should understand from these files is that the two-party system is a lie and that any promises that they make you, they're lying, and history shows us that.
And if the left could wake up to that, then maybe we could see a genuine change here, Mike, you know?
Problem is they still trust their politicians and that is a problem.
I have the same message for the right, by the way.
If you still trust your politicians after this last year, seriously, I want to grab you by the shoulders and scream, wake up, not because I hate you, but because I genuinely care about you in humanity.
All right.
Welcome back.
This is part two of my interview with Maria Z from Zmedia.com.
And we've been talking in part one about, well, I guess you could say the collapse of MAGA and the sense of betrayal that so many Americans feel right now.
But in this part of the interview, part two, Maria, I'd like to ask you about the ramifications of what you see coming.
Talk to us about, you know, there's a lot of cultural despair right now.
You've got a lot of angry leftists who are now screaming, we were right, we were right, you know.
You've got economic implications that are devastating to many Americans.
Advertisers are spending less.
Job replacements are happening at a record pace.
Food prices are higher than ever.
Where do you think all of this is headed?
Because it doesn't look good from here.
Well, I want to first of all address the leftists because, and I know that you're of the same opinion, Mike, that the left-right paradigm is absolutely a creation of those in control to keep us controlled.
But the reality is that you do have right ideology and left ideology.
These ideologies do exist.
There is a distinction.
And so what I'm addressing when I say leftists is people that are really far left in their thinking.
And that does exist.
They want to cut kids' genitals off.
They think it's great.
They want a lot of vaccines.
You know, they used to be against big pharma, but now they love it.
You know, they like socialism.
Yeah, yeah.
So this ideology really does exist.
There are people in society like this.
Just look at, you know, the people that support Zoran Mamdami, who I think is also, you know, one of the puppets.
But anyway, clearly, yeah.
Clearly, right?
Clearly.
But these people, the problem with these people and what I'm finding, Mike, is that I can listen to someone that is, you know, traditionally a far left person, like an Anna Kasparian, for example, and agree with a lot of their points.
And what we find, however, is that the far left is really not awake.
And some of the far right is not awake as well.
So you have them still trusting in this two-party system.
The Democrats are saying, well, we're going to come up with our people and we're going to fix this.
Well, that's the same promise that was given to the MAGA base guys.
Yeah, and it's not going to work.
Nothing changed.
It's not going to work and nothing changed.
So my message to those, to that group is we may have a lot of ideological differences.
I will never agree that we should cut kids' genitals to mutilate them.
But I want you to understand and something that you should understand from these files is that the two-party system is a lie and that any promises that they make you, they're lying.
And history shows us that.
And if the left could wake up to that, then maybe we could see a genuine change here, Mike.
You know, the problem is they still trust their politicians and that is a problem.
I have the same message for the right, by the way.
If you still trust your politicians after this last year, seriously, I want to grab you by the shoulders and scream, wake up, not because I hate you, but because I genuinely care about you and humanity.
So the path forward, Mike, it seems like, you know, I spoke to Ed Dowd recently.
It seems like we're in for a really, really rough time with the economy.
You spoke about, you know, the price of food and all of these things.
It's not getting better and I can't see it getting better.
And the reason I can't is because Trump keeps saying how great it is, despite the fact that it gets getting worse.
And, you know, so there's no acknowledgement of the state of affairs.
Therefore, it means that they're likely not willing to address it or wanting to address it.
What does that actually mean?
Is this an orchestrated collapse?
I think it always has been because of the great reset.
They want the current system to collapse so that they can bring in programmable digital currency and digital ID for the beast system.
I think that this is the whole point.
And I think that this is where things are heading, Mike.
You and I have been talking about the importance of, you know, being self-sufficient ever since we've met.
I think that that is now more important than ever.
People need to be, you know, to, if possible, grow their own food, keep their own animals, know where their water is coming from, have a well if possible, have multiple water sources, collect rainwater, do all of that stuff, grow your food, have gold and silver.
You need to be prepared to exist outside of this system.
I can't see things improving.
And the problem is, Mike, with the way, with the trajectory that things are going, you know, people are saying, well, the Republicans are going to lose in the midterms.
And a lot of Republicans are saying, we don't care because you're not doing what you said you would do.
You've proven yourself to be just as useless as the other side.
Why should we vote?
I'm not saying that's my opinion.
I'm saying that's what a lot of people are saying.
They're saying, why should we vote?
Why should we even bother?
Well, I am asking that question.
Why should we vote?
Because I will never vote for a Democrat because I've lived under their ruthlessness and their tyranny and their mutilations of children and their attacks on the Second Amendment, for example.
And I'm not giving up my AR-15s.
I'm a Texan, right?
They're staying with me.
But then the Republicans, everything they promised, with few exceptions.
For example, I'm very happy with the congressman of my district who's actually fighting for the Second Amendment.
And there are exceptions.
There's Thomas Massey, who's being relentlessly attacked by the administration.
There's Senator Rand Paul.
And there are a few other shining examples, but it's so rare that the question of across America, why should I vote for the GOP when they don't do anything for us?
That's a very valid question.
And that's why I think the GOP is going to get absolutely destroyed.
I thought I saw some new odds.
Maybe they were polymarket odds that the Democrats taking the House.
That's currently betting at about 83%, I believe.
And the Democrats taking the Senate is becoming a more realistic possibility as well.
And Maria, if Trump loses the House and the Senate, then he's in real trouble.
And he's going to be impeached every day of the week for the next, you know, for the subsequent two years.
He's going to be investigated.
All his family is going to be investigated.
All their crypto launches that were rug pulls, everything is going to be investigated.
They're not going to be able to do anything.
And, you know, maybe at this point, we need a bunch of investigations.
But I agree with you, Maria.
We need a completely different system that represents we the people instead of the power elite in D.C. who are run by a foreign master named Netanyahu.
It's so obvious at this point.
It's disgusting.
I hear everything that you're saying, Mike.
And I think that life under the Democrats is worse.
Just morally, it's worse because of all the, you know, the gay and the trans and just constantly talking about everything being gay.
It's it's disgusting.
And at least we don't have that insanity right now.
The problem that I am seeing online is a lot of people are saying exactly what you said, which is that you never do anything for me.
You want me to come out and vote.
You want me to post online about you.
You want me to support your campaign and be vocal and turn out and get everyone else to turn out.
And then you do absolutely nothing for me.
Why should I vote for you?
And then you're faced with the issue of, well, the Democrats are just going to destroy everything that we tried to build.
And then people are saying, well, yeah, maybe, but, you know, everything we tried to build and we put our time and energy and emotion into was trampled on anyway.
MAGA had the perfect opportunity to really take down the deep state.
I think it was Sean Ryan who said, this is the deep state handed to you on a silver platter and you're doing nothing with it.
So what are we supposed to make of that?
And people are saying it doesn't matter who you vote for, you get the same thing anyway.
Because, you know, my whole thing was, guys, the digital ID and Agenda 2030, all of that agenda, the AI nonsense, everything, that is coming in like a freight train.
Maybe we can slow it down if we have more protections under the Trump administration.
But I've just seen an acceleration of that agenda under the Trump administration.
So what exactly will be so different with whatever party?
100%.
I want to take this in the direction of AI because there's something really profound that's about to happen.
Let me give out your website again.
Zmedia.com, folks, is where you can follow Maria Z. She's here.
She's interviewed Michael Young and Tina from the satellite phone store and so many amazing people.
Okay.
So you definitely, there's Sherry Tenpenny right there.
And Catherine Austin Fitz, have you interviewed her yet?
Yes, many times.
She's phenomenal.
She's phenomenal.
She's nailing it every single day.
I just want to give her a plug.
But anyway, zmedia.com and you're also on Rumble.
And this interview here today is sponsored by the satellite phone store here at sat123.com.
But what I want to mention about AI, and this is where I believe that everybody is wrong about AI, because on the machine learning side, and I talk to a lot of high-level machine learning scientists and developers and so on, because I'm steeped in that industry.
They are all convinced, Maria, that once AI replaces all these jobs, which will happen, that the government's just going to give everybody a UBI.
Governments Cannot Buy Freedom00:15:39
Everybody's going to get free money and then they'll be able to live out their lives in comfort, just getting, you know, thousands of dollars a month from the government, enough to live, and then they can pursue their own dreams and poetry and sculpture and this and that.
I'm like, no, no, they're not going to let you live, you morons.
They're going to exterminate you.
Do you think the government is going to sit there and just spend $10 trillion a year paying people who don't pay taxes?
No, they're going to get rid of you.
And Maria, nobody in the AI industry understands the mass extermination that's coming.
Nobody.
It's bizarre.
Yeah, it's like they never saw the Georgia Guidestones before they mysteriously disappeared.
You know, I think, Mike, what you have is a lot.
There's a lot of people in the AI industry that are nefarious and that there's a lot of people that are like good people who believe in this technology and believe that it's going to improve humanity, but don't understand where the powers that be want to take it.
And you have a compartmentalization in that industry, as you do in every industry.
And so what I can say from the documents that I've read, their own documents, they definitely have a plan to issue us with a universal income of some sort.
That income that they plan to issue is a digital currency that is programmable and it is issued based on your behavior.
Yep.
That is what they say in their own documents.
So they will only reward you with cryptocurrencies that are programmable.
Again, I remind you, and remember what the World Bank and the IMF and all these figures have said, that they will program it for sure that you can't buy ammunition.
Okay.
So don't forget that.
And by that point, Mike, it'll probably be like, oh, well, that's a private, private cryptocurrency company.
We can't do anything about it.
It's private.
So sorry, we can't help that they're stopping you from buying guns and ammo, for example.
Okay.
But they openly say that this will be based on whether you are behaving in a way that they like or not.
And people think, you know, how are they going to do all that?
Well, they'll be, I don't want to go too far down the rabbit hole, Mike, but they plan on having sensors inside our bodies that transmit that information to them.
So basically, it's 24-7, knowing what you're doing, what you're thinking, what you're saying all the time.
That's what Palantir is for.
And Alex Karp, you know, you brought up Palantir before, the inclusion of this psychopath, anywhere near a president, who says he like, he wants to drop fentanyl from drones on people that he doesn't like, and that he's terrified of Christians more than anyone, and that he wants to drone strike his enemies.
He dreams of drone striking his enemies.
This is a literal psychopath, and his tech's everywhere you know.
So I think the AI people are compartmentalized.
They don't understand how far these people want to take this tech.
It is complete control.
Yes, there will be some sort of digital currency.
They have to appease the people Mike, because once the system crashes, you're going to have a lot of angry people.
They're going to have to give them some sort of like for like um yeah, but that's not temporary, that's just to appease them until they can be eliminated.
Yes, but this actually has something to do with what something?
You mentioned in part one of this interview and I want to encourage our viewers if you, if you haven't seen part one, it's on Brightvideos.com.
That's my new video site, but you were talking about the false left right paradigm.
I completely agree with you.
It's really just a uniparty.
The real paradigm shift that we should be pursuing, in my opinion, is centralized control versus decentralization, and decentralization means getting off the grid as much as you can with your money, with your, your food supply, with your own homegrown homemade medicine, your own knowledge, your own local AI systems that you can run locally without censorship.
On and on and on right, and it seems to me that the, the digital id, the digital Cbdc system, that that you're describing, that's going to be the convenient system for people who, who don't mind complying and giving up all their freedom.
But to live outside that system.
It will still be possible, but it will be extremely inconvenient, kind of like rejecting vaccines during 2021.
You couldn't fly, you couldn't enter some stores, you couldn't go to a university, you couldn't visit nursing home, you couldn't go into a hospital.
Yeah right, and but that's what it's going to be like.
You're going to have to live basically as a fugitive in your own country to to maintain anything resembling freedom.
I, I think that's where it's going.
Yes, and bear in mind this also means Mike, that if you have a mortgage like, there will be people that have a mortgage that have no option in their mind but to go ahead with the digital id.
So if you can work on becoming as debt-free as possible.
Start now.
Um, you know, i'm not saying that people aren't working towards that, but it's very, very important to try and have absolutely no debt So that you, because your only option to pay off your debt will be through that digital ID system.
So once you're in that to pay your debt, then you're in it for everything.
The other thing is electricity.
If people are depending still on the state's, you know, or electric company's grid, eventually you will have to have digital ID to access electricity.
So get your own electricity sorted, solar or whatever other method you can figure out.
There are many different creative ways.
I'm not an expert on this at all, but there are a lot of creative ways that people, you know, generate power on their properties.
Start looking at that.
Start looking at your own food supply.
These are things that are non-negotiables for me at this point, Mike.
I, you know, the downside of having the information that people like you and I do in our heads is that it seems like it's catastrophe around the corner 24-7.
And it's not always the case, right?
Sometimes the catastrophe is actually six months down the track.
Sometimes it's four years down the track.
The point is that while that's sometimes a negative because you're always living in this state of, oh my gosh, it's about to happen.
You know, we're always on edge.
We're always pretty much always right.
And the benefit is that we can be early in preparing for these things before they become unattainable or unaffordable, completely out of our reach.
So I'm hoping that people listen to this now and start preparing as much as possible to live outside of that system while we battle to get these agendas stopped.
By the way, I'm not saying don't fight against digital ID, absolutely fight against it, but we have to be ready to live outside of this.
Yeah, you know, humanity is going to have to fight for its existence because what we're facing now, because of the rise of AI, which is truly intelligent, I put out an article today describing all of the detailed ways in which machines demonstrate intelligence, forethought, planning, internal simulations of physics, problem solving, et cetera, et cetera.
I'm not going to go into all that.
But people who don't realize that AI is intelligent, they're already way behind the curve.
Here's the thing: governments exist to extract productivity and wealth from humans.
And throughout all of history, that has been in two forms: cognition, you know, the work you do using your brain as an attorney or an architect or a doctor or whatever.
And then the work you do physically, labor.
And that's, you know, through all of history, governments needed people because they needed to extract the product of their thinking or their cognition and their labor.
Now that changes for the first time in history, Maria.
For the first time, governments don't need humans for cognition.
And that transition is happening now.
And a few years later, as the humanoid robots become more capable, which will take a while, then governments won't need people for labor extraction either.
At that point, from the point of view of the governments and the globalists, the people are expendable.
It's that simple.
I mean, they have no loyalty to humanity, period.
What do you say?
Well, they never have.
And I would, again, go to the spiritual side of this discussion, Mike, which is that the powers that be, that are obviously above governments, are all working towards this antichrist agenda.
This is the post I put out as soon as the Epstein files came out.
I said, let me condense this for you.
And I mean it wholeheartedly.
Those that are there to pretend to be leaders are simply there to steer the population according to the agendas of the day or what's popular on the day, ultimately towards the same agenda, which is for them the crown jewel of all of these governments is the mark of the beast.
A system where you cannot buy or sell unless you have the mark.
Sounds a lot like digital ID, right?
Yep.
So I'm not saying it is.
I'm just because there's, you know, a separate decision to worship the beast and all of that sort of stuff.
I'm not saying that.
I'm just saying that system is it.
That system is it.
A system where unless you comply, you can't buy or sell.
We're here.
We're here at the building blocks of that system.
And so, you know, their goal more than anything, Mike, is our destruction.
And it's the destruction of our souls and our bodies and our lives.
And I fear, I know what you're talking about.
I really do fear what they will do once they no longer need humanity for that production.
Yuval Noah Harari says, you know, humans will be useless.
We'll just drug them and give them video games.
Elon Musk has made similar statements about how we'll be useless, but it's okay.
We can just do things that we enjoy on the side.
You know, we'll have a great time living on our universal high income, he calls it.
How people are still enamored with this guy, I don't know.
But anyway, and, you know, it's very alarming, Mike.
I think that unfortunately, you know, the war is going to break out.
And I mean, world war, it's going to break out very, very soon.
And I think a lot of life will be lost during that time if we don't have some major intervention from God.
Things are heading in that direction.
And that's also by design, though, as you know, because they want a method of exterminating their own populations.
I would even point to the globalists who ran the Ukraine war and Western European leaders.
For example, in the UK, young men were rising up and protesting against the government.
Well, what do they do?
Oh, we're going to recruit you and send you to die in the Russian frontline grinding machine there because Russia is very effective at killing young men with artillery and drones, as the Ukrainians have sadly found out as well.
So, you know, and throughout the history of the UK, it's always been war to exterminate any population that might be a threat to the king, right?
I mean, that's just history.
But I think we're looking at that on a global scale.
And I want to ask you right now, as the U.S. has not yet attacked Iran, but it seems to be amassing, you know, one-third of the naval fleet is there, you know, right around the Persian Gulf, right around the Sea of Oman, et cetera, ready to strike.
Do you think, Maria, based on what you know right now, do you think that Trump is going to pull the trigger and attack Iran?
I don't know, but I found this tweet from Khomeini very, very interesting.
I actually saved it.
He said, the president keeps saying, the U.S. president keeps saying that they have the strongest military force in the world.
The strongest military force in the world may at times be struck so hard that it can't, that it cannot get up again.
This seems like a very performative tweet.
It seems really lame to be tweeting this on Twitter, especially when we allegedly have negotiations and Iran being willing to be part of those negotiations.
Of course, they give us, you know, those headlines for us to not be afraid of what's really going on behind the scenes, but it seems like a very, like it's a very high school kind of tweet coming from Khomeini.
That does seem odd.
Right?
This was 4.25 a.m. on the 17th of February.
So I think that even if Trump does it, I think that maybe even the upper echelons of the Iranian leadership kind of want it, Mike.
I'm not convinced that anyone engaged in these wars at the moment is not somewhat in on it.
I'm really not.
I'm just being honest because we know that the big goal is the war, right?
Because they want to collapse everything.
Well, and the Trump administration needs war to be able to end the Constitution, crack down on independent journalists like you and I, end the First Amendment or suspend it by saying, oh, it's a time of war.
Remember during COVID, Maria, everything was excused because, oh, well, because of COVID.
Oh, you can't open your church.
Why?
Because of COVID.
Oh, you can't buy too many masks.
That's hoarding.
Why?
Because of COVID.
Whatever.
On and on, everything was that excuse.
They're going to use the same thing because war, because we're in war.
You can't speak freely because of war.
Oh, you're not allowed to buy gold anymore because of war.
You know, they're just going to roll that out for everything.
I think that's coming.
Yes.
I think that's coming.
It certainly happened in other nations.
You know, we're hearing rumors of other countries.
You know, it was actually a European nation.
I'm trying to remember now which one it was.
We reported on this recently that told their population, be ready for the military to come and seize your house, your boats, your cars, absolutely anything that might be needed for the time for the war that's coming.
This is what they said to the people.
I remember.
Was it the Netherlands?
No, that was Switzerland, wasn't it?
I think it was the Netherlands.
Okay.
I remember that story.
Yeah.
I don't want to misspeak either, but you're right.
I remember that story.
They did say that.
Yeah.
Wartime acquisition of everything.
Wartime acquisition.
Then you have the UK, the Mirror, sorry, the Express UK posting articles about how, you know, maybe you'll be able to, this was actually last year in October, if I'm not mistaken or September.
Maybe you'll be able to have a moral objection to World War III, but you will face public backlash for doing so.
And now they're saying there will actually be consequences for refusing conscription.
So see, just in a few short months, they go from, hey, be ready to be shamed publicly if you refuse to participate in World War III.
Now, hey, consequences, mate.
So this is just a few short months how quickly this propaganda ramps up.
So I am very concerned about this, Mike.
Legitimately very concerned about World War III.
I don't think it's going to be like any war we've ever seen, the weaponry that they have now, whether it be weather warfare, you know, direct energy weapons, drones.
These are things nuclear weapons.
I mean, cyber, whatever, it's going to be a kind of destruction that I don't think anyone is really prepared for.
And I'm very concerned about what will come after that.
I think that they are, it seems to me like they're trying to build the complete infrastructure of the beast system prior to the war so that after the war, they can easily transition people into that for a time of security.
Nuclear Weapons Threat00:04:10
That sounds right.
Yeah, exactly.
And whatever false flags they need along the way in order to push the agenda will be, of course, scripted and carried out, including possibly a false flag attack on the U.S. Navy in order to justify attacking Iran.
So that could be coming as well.
Yeah.
I really hope not.
Look at history and look at the segment of time for which the Epstein files have not been released.
It's everything right around 9-11.
9-11.
Yeah.
Yep.
And, you know, Maria, I am one of the few, you know, myself, Alex Jones, a few others that have said consistently over all the years that 9-11 was clearly a false flag engineered attack and, you know, ridiculed for 20 years for saying that.
Now it seems obvious to a lot of people.
But look, we're up on time.
What would you like to leave our audience with here as we wrap up this interview?
I just want to encourage you to keep listening to the voices that are telling you the truth.
Unsubscribe from hopium.
That doesn't mean that we can't be hopeful people or joyous people, but it does mean that we have to be honest with one another.
And my honest assessment is that things are going to get very difficult, just judging from the geopolitical, the economic, all the advancements on AI towards Agenda 2030.
Please focus on these things.
This is their number one agenda to establish this beast system.
We shouldn't be focused really on who plays at the halftime on the Super Bowl.
We should be focused on these things.
So please keep supporting people like Mike who tell you the truth as honestly as they possibly can, who have good intentions for you.
And please prepare.
Don't delay.
Do whatever you can to become more self-sufficient.
Whatever is within your power and your budget.
Today, it may be even a small thing, but even those small things will help you in times of need.
The last thing you want to do is ever be dependent on the system in a crisis situation.
So do what you can to prepare for that and you'll be all the better for it.
If it doesn't happen for five years or ever, it doesn't matter.
You will be a much more balanced and better off individual.
It will happen, though.
I'll be honest with you.
It is coming.
But, you know, you will be a better off individual for it.
You'll be less fearful.
You'll be more prepared and you'll be able to help those around you, which is what loving yourself and loving your neighbor is all about.
100%.
Completely agree.
That's a great message, Maria.
And off-grid money is gold and silver.
Off-grid food is your home garden or stored food.
You know, off-grid medicine.
How about off-grid knowledge?
The decentralization of knowledge, which is something that I work on with my projects as well.
Folks, you better get ready, decentralize, because the system doesn't want you to survive, frankly.
All right.
So, Maria, your website is zmedia.com.
That's Z with a triple E after it.
Z E E media.
And then you've got a great popular channel on rumble.com as well.
And then finally, today's interview is brought to you by the satellite phone store here, sat123.com, a regular sponsor of our show, who offer, of course, the critical communication systems that you need to stay connected when the grid goes down or, you know, there's a shutdown or there's a cyber attack on the cell towers.
And these work anywhere on earth, anywhere on the planet where you can see the sky, which is almost everywhere, maybe not in the deep jungle or something.
You'll be able to make and receive phone calls and texts as well.
So that's sat123.com.
So thank you, Maria, for joining me today.
It's always a pleasure.
Love to have you back again soon.
Thank you so much, Mike.
Yes.
And we'll need to bring you on the Daily Pulse very soon.
Appreciate you.
Thank you.
You too.
Love to join you.
Thanks for the invitation.
All right, folks, that was Maria Z.
And you can check out part one of this interview if you missed it at brightvideos.com, which is not censored by X.
So that's one of the reasons we're using the new video platform because you can share these links on X.
So please do so.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon and Bright Videos and Natural News, etc.
And thank you for listening today.
God bless America.
Everybody, get ready and take care.
Maria Z Joins Brighteon00:00:13
Stock up on the long-term storable Ranger Bucket Set.
536 servings of clean organic superfoods for your survival pantry.