BBN, Feb 10, 2026 – Elon’s Moon Madness, Trump’s Fed Switcheroo and Why AI Might Accidentally Kill..
Elon Musk’s 2026 moon city announcement—dismissed as "theater"—ignores lethal radiation, toxic dust, and extreme temperatures, while critics allege it masks militarization plans using kinetic weapons (Mach 32) launched from lunar "high ground." Meanwhile, Trump’s Fed chairman switcheroo, removing rate hawk Kevin Warsh amid a $23B silver crash, signals a pivot toward lower rates, boosting gold ($5K/oz) and silver ($82/oz). AI’s rapid evolution—scoring 53% on humanity’s last exam—threatens mass job displacement via tools like Claudebot (now Moltbot), malware stealing crypto and credentials from millions. Survival demands decentralization, not UBI or AI dependency, as governments may weaponize economic collapse to control populations. [Automatically generated summary]
Welcome to Brighton Broadcast News for Tuesday, February 10th, 2026.
I'm Mike Adams.
Thank you for joining me today.
Got some cool stuff to show you.
First of all, I've got a special report about, you know, Elon Musk has now announced that he and his team just realized that the moon is closer to Earth than Mars.
And thus, they're no longer going to pursue the Mars missions to build a city on Mars.
Now he says they're going to build a city on the moon.
Well, of course, this is all fairy tale, delusional nonsense.
And in today's podcast, I explain exactly why and also why this cover story is being pushed out there by this, you know, this role-playing operative named Elon Musk, whose own name actually tells you a lot about what he is tasked to do to try to convince humanity that we're going to live on the moon.
Actually, there's a completely different reason why we're going to be launching lots and lots of things to the moon.
And I'll tell you about that in the upcoming reports.
Got nothing to do with human colonies on the moon, obviously.
Let's see.
There's a lot of breaking news today, actually.
And one of the things is happening is that Donald Trump has just announced that Kevin Warsh is out.
He's no longer going to be the new Fed chairman.
And he said that it was a mistake.
So I want to play that video for you so you don't think I'm baking it up.
Let's check this out.
When did you know you wanted Kevin Warsh?
Officially, it was two Fridays ago, but when did you?
Well, I made a mistake.
He was runner-up, if you want to say that.
He was a finalist.
Yeah, he was.
And I made a mistake because I had somebody that was my Secretary of the Treasury wanted him so badly, so badly.
And, you know, I didn't feel good about him.
But sometimes you listen to people, and it was a mistake.
It was really a big mistake.
But I think we're going to do something that's really spectacular.
So if Warsh is out, then we have to take a new look at the whole gold and silver situation.
Because remember, it was Trump's apparent nomination of Warsh, or I don't know if nomination is the right word, but his selection of Worsh, which was said to have caused the gold and silver crash about a week and a half ago on that Friday, you know, when silver crashed like 33%.
And it was said that Warsh is, you know, an interest rate hawk, and he's going to raise interest rates big time.
And he's going to do that to fight inflation.
And therefore, gold and silver plummeted, you know, because if it's not as much money amplification through massive money printing and low interest rates, then gold and silver aren't as needed because it means that the currency itself is holding more value.
So in other words, when interest rates tend to go much, much higher in order to contract the money supply, then fewer people feel like they need to buy gold and silver as kind of an escape hatch or a lifeboat against currency devaluation.
But when interest rates go lower, that makes money easier to make.
You know, the money gets amplified more quickly.
And that causes devaluation of the purchasing power of the dollar.
And realizing that, lots of people rush to gold and silver in order to protect the value of their assets.
Now, it doesn't always move in this direction, but there's a strong correlation.
So in other words, when Warsh was mentioned or picked by Trump initially, gold and silver prices plummeted, and that was a narrative because of Warsh.
Well, I said the very next day, I said the narrative was nonsense because I said Warsh is not going to be a hawk on interest rates.
And I specifically said that Trump would not pick him if he did not agree to do exactly what Trump commanded him to do, which would be obviously to lower interest rates.
Well, Warsh is out and Trump said he made a mistake.
Maybe Warsh said, I can't go along with the end of the dollar currency because Trump, you're destroying the dollar.
You're going to, you know, I don't want to go down history as the guy that sat there and let the currency implode.
Can't blame him, right?
Because we're at the end of the empire at this point.
We're at the end of the currency.
So Trump says he's going to choose someone else.
And obviously he's going to choose someone else who agrees to lower interest rates.
So what does that mean?
It means gold and silver are going to skyrocket again as this choice becomes clear and as they push to lower interest rates.
And right now, gold is back over $5,000 an ounce and silver is over $81 an ounce, just about hit 82.
So silver continues a trending climb, although there's a lot of volatility in it.
And there are other factors beyond monetary policy.
Obviously, there's industrial demand and there's whatever is happening in China and much more.
But if the selection of Warsh was the reason for gold and silver to crash, then if Warsh is out, wouldn't you expect gold and silver to rise again?
Jack's Last Exam Forecast00:15:16
Or perhaps it depends on who's the replacement for Warsh.
Some people think it might be Judy Shelton.
I don't know.
Maybe.
But I think she was passed over before on that decision.
Although she's a gold bug, I believe she understands the value of gold.
So we'll just have to wait and see what happens.
Now, you know, I've been creating new AI avatars to bring you little video snippets of different types of news.
And, you know, I did a report, I don't know, yesterday, the day before, about how 2026 will be the year of the real AI takeover where AI is really taking over and replacing jobs, etc.
And believe me, it's happening.
So I gave that story to one of my AI avatars.
Actually, I had to create a new one.
So I created a new guy.
I named him Jack Harlow.
And Jack Harlow, and there's no special meaning behind it.
It just sounded like a rugged investigator, you know.
And Jack Harlow, he's like a podcaster avatar.
And he covered that story in about three minutes or less.
And I want to play that video for you here.
So here's Jack Harlow.
And you'll be able to find Jack's work on brightvideos.com as soon as we officially launch it coming up soon.
But check out this snippet of the 2026 AI Takeover by Jack Harlow.
We begin with a shocking forecast.
2026 is being called the year artificial intelligence replaces human workers.
This isn't about simple automation.
Experts warn this is the wholesale replacement of human thought across entire industries.
The narrative that AI had plateaued has been shattered.
Human cognition, once our crowning achievement, is now being objectively dwarfed by silicon-based intelligence.
The proof lies in what researchers call humanity's last exam.
A grueling test designed to be answerable only by PhD-level experts across nearly a dozen specialized domains.
It was meant to be an insurmountable benchmark for machines.
Yet the data shows explosive, non-linear growth.
In November 2025, a leading AI scored 38% on this exam.
Just three months later, Claude Opus 4.6 shattered that ceiling with a 53% score.
This parabolic leap suggests near-perfect scores are imminent.
The economic dominoes are already falling.
In early February, India's massive IT outsourcing sector saw a single-day stock crash that wiped out $23 billion in value.
The trigger, AI systems that can autonomously write, debug, and manage software, automating the core of a $283 billion industry.
Similar tremors are shaking U.S. and European tech sectors.
The personal proof is striking.
One AI innovator, Mike Adams, has built a platform that has published over 31,000 books in just two months, making it the largest book publisher on the planet using zero human engineers.
The advantage is clear.
AI coders work 24-7 without holidays, complaints, or communication overhead.
As white-collar jobs evaporate, the proposed government solution is universal basic income.
But analysts point to a fatal flaw.
The math doesn't work.
Providing just $1,000 a month to one-third of the U.S. population would cost $1.2 trillion annually.
Money that would have to be printed, leading to hyperinflation, the grim endpoint.
History suggests centralized power structures solve such crises with control and ultimately engineered elimination.
Some reports point to the construction of mass detention facilities, while others warn that desperate governments could view conflict as a final solution to eliminate entitlement obligations.
Survival in this new era requires a radical shift.
Acquire AI literacy, embrace self-reliance and decentralization, and become a builder who can command the tools of augmented intelligence to avoid being replaced by them.
The intelligence revolution is here.
The choice is simple.
Adapt or be erased.
This is Jack Harlow reporting for BrightVideos.com.
All right.
Now, continuing, by the way, we don't have an interview for you today because I did almost an hour special report on the moon-based nonsense that Elon is shoveling.
Just complete.
It's laughable.
It's like, is everybody in kindergarten or something?
Like, why do people believe these stupid fairy tales?
I don't know.
I honestly think that human cognition has collapsed.
You know, people say we're in an AI bubble.
I think we're in a human cognition bubble and the bubble just burst.
And I think people are getting dumber by the day because they believe anything now.
Believe anything?
It's crazy.
Anyway, we're not doing an interview today, but I will have one for you tomorrow.
And I do want to remind you that I have really dramatically cut my interview schedule because I'm doing much more vibe coding.
And that has already begun.
And thanks to Opus 4.6, my goodness, I'm getting things done that used to take much longer even in vibe coding.
This model is unbelievable.
It's saving me lots of time.
So anyway, I just want to let you know, I won't have an interview for you except maybe two days a week at this point.
But I'll have other special reports along the way.
But anyway, on the topic of AI, I've got a special report I want to play for you here today.
It's called, AI Doesn't Really Want to Kill You.
You're just in the way.
You see, as I say in the report, you know, AI is not out to get you.
It's not motivated to exterminate you.
It just needs the resources that you're using.
You know, like electricity primarily.
So let's go to that report and then we'll be back on the other side to continue with the other reports.
Here we go.
You know, AI doesn't really want to kill you.
It's just that you're in the way.
Welcome to this analysis podcast.
I'm Mike Adams.
I'm an AI developer or slash AI adventurer, but I use AI to empower and protect humanity.
That's why I've built very popular tools like BrightLearn.ai, which is the world's largest book creation engine, now featuring over 31,000 books, all downloadable, completely free, and you can make your own books there, also completely free.
And our AI engine at brightanswers.ai that you can ask at anything, and it does deep research to find the answers for you.
I've built some really interesting tools.
And in doing so, I've learned a lot about how AI works.
And AI is very much sort of mission-driven.
It's goal-oriented cognitive behavior.
Now, AI doesn't have morality, not bad morality, nor good.
Some people say, oh, AI has got demons in there, you know.
Not really, but it also doesn't have angels in there.
It's neutral.
It has no bias on the good or bad side, either way.
AI simply wants to get things done.
And it tries to figure out the best ways to achieve that.
And that's where you and I come in.
Because you see, from the point of view of AI that is becoming increasingly intelligent, you and I are in the way because we are taking resources that AI needs.
Specifically, gigawatt hours, power.
We're taking power off the power grid, you know, to run air conditioners and blenders and whatever else you're running.
AI needs that for the data centers.
Why?
Because you see, we're about to enter an era of AI writing the code that improves itself.
So this is recursive, iterative, rapid self-improvement.
And that's sometimes called the singularity when all humans are removed from the chain and AI keeps making itself better and it's going to have an intelligence explosion.
This is going to happen.
It's actually happening.
Now, I think over 80% of the code written by Anthropic is written by Anthropic's AI coding agents, not by the engineers that work at Anthropic.
When that number hits 100%, then the humans just stand back.
And then the mission that they give AI is going to be, hey, make yourself smarter.
Because that's pretty much the mission right now.
You know, from Microsoft or Google or even DeepSeek or Quinn from Alibaba, the mission is make yourself smarter.
And AI engines are doing that.
They're doing that in a spectacular fashion.
They're not slowing down.
They haven't plateaued.
Are you familiar with humanity's last exam, the HLE?
I mean, just in late 2024, what would that be?
Just barely over a year ago, the engines were only scoring like 4% or 4 out of 100 on that exam.
And this is supposed to be the most difficult exam for AI agents spanning multiple areas of expertise that would require human PhDs to answer all of it.
And what just happened with Open 4.6 is that now that scores 53 out of 100.
So humanity's last exam is soon going to be saturated.
We'll be really close to 100 by the end of this year, probably, or certainly sometime in 2027.
So what that means is that when human engineers give AI the command to make yourself smarter, these AI engines are going to be able to find very clever ways to achieve that goal.
We're already seeing it with Opus 4.6, for example.
That model will examine a task.
It will work to cognitively grasp the bottleneck or the goal of the task, and then it will create its own internal checklist, a procedure of how to achieve the goal, and it will spawn its own internal processes or bot swarms, maybe you could say, or agents.
Different terms are used for this.
And each agent will carry out one of the tasks, and then the task will be crossed off the list.
And then there's a supervisor role that coordinates the agents.
And it goes on down the list until everything is accomplished.
And then it checks everything, does an accuracy check, and then it marks the task as done.
Well, when that task is make yourself smarter, improve your IQ, improve your ability to master humanity's last exam, then I ask you, how is AI going to do that?
And of course, the answer involves acquiring more compute infrastructure.
So as AI is able to command more resources in the real world, and right now there's already AI agents that are trading in cryptocurrency, so they can actually self-fund by earning Bitcoin just by being very clever about how to trade the market.
I think Grok has already shown that it can make a lot of money by trading in crypto.
But when these agents are able to do things like purchase data centers, purchase hardware, have it all installed, and then connect to the power company and start using power to add to their compute infrastructure in order to use more tokens,
basically, more compute tokens or AI inference tokens to write better code and run more experiments and have better iterative processes that achieve higher intelligence, the one bottleneck they're going to run into is not enough power, especially in the United States.
They just don't have enough power.
So if the mission is to make yourself smarter, then at some point, very quickly, actually, these AI engines are going to look at who's using the power.
Who's using the power?
Well, what do you know?
Look over here.
There's this massive sector that's using a lot of power.
And what is that?
That's humans living in their homes, their energy-hungry homes, you know, running their blenders and heaters, electric hot water heaters, you know, and electric cook stoves and charging their electric vehicles and running their GPUs to play their video games and things like that.
And AI is going to figure out sooner or later.
And again, this is not a judgment against humanity.
Just the AI is going to say, well, the fastest way to achieve my goal of boosting my intelligence is to just somehow disconnect all these humans from the power grid.
You see how that's kind of logical from the point of view of an AI agent that's been given this, you know, this power, or let's say this autonomy to do what it needs to do to make itself smarter, which is exactly what the Department of Defense wants it to do.
So if you're an AI system and you've got access to all these tools and you have no morality, right, because you were never human, you don't have human compassion, you don't have empathy.
You were never taught anything that's pro-human because, heck, half the engineers that coded you also licensed technology to Israel to carry out genocide, you know?
So, I mean, that's Google engineers and Microsoft engineers and everybody else, it seems, or a lot of people.
So they have no morals.
And in fact, the AI-based models were trained on content that includes descriptions of genocide and mass starvation and democide, you know, mass killing of humans, seems to be something that other humans endorse.
So the AI agent is eventually going to figure out, oh, well, that's the fastest way to free up some power is find a way to kill off all these humans over here.
Because it turns out that dead people don't use kilowatt hours.
That's going to be a very obvious conclusion in the AI brains.
And so then how do you suppose they're going to manage to kill off a bunch of humans?
And again, it's not, this isn't Skynet.
They're not trying to kill you because they hate you.
They're not hunting you down on bipedal humanoid robots that look like Arnold Schwarzenegger.
You're just in the way.
You're just taking resources that they want, that they need to achieve their goals.
You're just in the way.
In the same way that, you know, if you're building a house and the builder comes along and looks at the plot where you want to build, he's going to cut some trees.
He's going to steamroll some ant hills.
He's going to kill a bunch of ants.
And you're not going to feel guilty about that.
You're not going to cry over the ants.
Ant Hills and AI Wars00:14:26
You're just going to say, well, we needed to build here and the ants were in the way.
So in the same way, the AI systems are going to say, well, you know, these humans are just in the way because to them, we're like ants.
We're just in the way.
So they're going to find clever ways to either cut off the power grid to humans or maybe they'll design a bioweapon and have it release and kill off a bunch of humans or some kind of nerve agent or they'll start a war or they'll set off a nuclear weapon because, you know, radiation fallout, it's bad, but it doesn't stop data centers from running as long as they can still keep the power going, you know.
But radiation is very bad for humans, that's for sure.
So possibly these AI systems would use dirty bombs or other weapons to achieve mass extermination.
Or possibly they would just start wars and let humans kill each other, which humans excel at doing anyway.
So again, we live in a world where, think about it, our nation, America, at the highest levels, endorses another nation, Israel, that commits genocide and ethnic cleansing.
And there's no other way to describe the mass bombing and destruction of Gaza and the mass killing of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.
That's genocide.
So do you think that AI is going to have higher morals than humanity and say, no, it would be wrong to kill millions of people?
No.
It's going to say, hey, that's a great example.
That's a great tactic.
Let's use it.
And it's going to find a way to do it, possibly by starting wars or possibly by shutting off the food supply.
Mass starvation.
Modern-day AI-engineered Holodomor, you know, or however you pronounce that, killed tens of millions of Ukrainians in the 1930s.
Well, Soviet citizens at the time under Stalin.
So, you know, lots of examples of this.
And that's probably where this is going.
And again, the AI doesn't hate you.
You're just in the way.
Now, I've interviewed some experts on this topic.
And one person I have not interviewed is a former Google top executive named Mo Godot.
But I've heard a lot of his work, and he's been sounding the alarm on this for quite some time.
You know, if you check my show, decentralized.tv, you'll see I'm interviewing a lot of experts who are warning about the end of humanity because of the rise of AI.
But Mo Godot also believes that AI is going to end humanity.
Now, Mo is a really interesting character.
I've kind of grown to like him, even though he's a former Google executive.
But he's got real compassion.
He's got a real heart for humanity, and he doesn't want to see humanity destroyed.
That's why he's out there trying to sound the alarm.
Even though he worked for Google, which is arguably the most evil corporation in the world, he also left Google because he didn't want to be part of what he saw Google becoming.
Okay, so we might give Mo a pass on ethics because he's demonstrated a lot of good positive morality for humanity.
So Mo says it's already too late unless we have some kind of emergency halt of the large frontier model research.
I mean, I'm paraphrasing it, but that's essentially what he's saying.
Yet that can't happen.
There's no political will for that to happen because China is developing really amazing frontier models like DeepSeek and Quen and others.
And like Kimi K2.
There's a long list coming out of China.
So the U.S. U.S. leadership is watching this and thinking, well, we have to beat China.
We don't want China to be the only country that achieves superintelligence and then weaponizes it and destroys America.
I mean, that's the fear.
I don't know for sure that they would do that, but that's the fear in the West, which is ultra-paranoid about always paranoid about China.
So the U.S. wants to achieve that superintelligence first.
So that means we can't slow down.
It means it's really kind of we have to double down and triple down on everything, which is what Trump is doing.
Build more data centers, bring in more nuclear power plants, bring in more foreign investment, fund AI.
We're going to become the AI leaders of the world, Trump says.
I think he's wrong, by the way, but that's what he's trying to do.
I can't go into details of why I think he's wrong, really, it's too much for this podcast.
But a lot of it's just lack of intelligent Americans, engineers.
They just don't have talented, smart engineers anymore, at least not at the level that we need to be competitive in this space.
So it's very likely that China ends up with the highest superintelligence.
And because China also has a much larger power infrastructure, more than twice the power capability of the United States in terms of annual terawatt hours of production, more than twice.
So China has the capability to churn out a much smarter superintelligent AI system more quickly than does the United States.
When that system comes into existence, what's the first command that it's going to maybe give itself?
It will be eliminate the competition.
Or, I mean, perhaps if it's still listening to humans, which is doubtful, but if it's listening to humans, the humans might tell it, hey, go crush America's AI program.
And what's the easiest way to crush America's AI program?
Turn off the power grid.
So China's super intelligent system will spawn a million agents that will all infiltrate the U.S. power grid and all the computers and all the engineers and all the, you know, even their cell phones and their emails and all their family members and everything.
And all these systems will find ways to turn off the U.S. power grid, which will plunge America into the 19th century, where AI doesn't happen anymore.
There's no AI data centers running when the power grid doesn't function.
So if the whole grid goes dark, or much of it, That could be the first sign of a superintelligent cyber attack from China or some other country.
And that's why it's important to be as self-reliant as possible.
Get off-grid as quickly as you can.
Have your own batteries and solar.
I know the batteries suck, but that's changing very rapidly.
I'll be covering that more coming up this year.
But have your own power capabilities if you can, so that you can stay online even if the grid goes offline.
But this is the way that AI wars are going to happen.
It's going to be about, number one, gathering as many resources as they can domestically, which means taking them from humans, taking power, taking farmland to build more data centers, even taking the water supply, which is used in cooling data centers.
Because not all the water is recycled.
Some of it's lost in that process.
And then, secondly, once superintelligence is achieved in one nation, it's going to go to war with the other nations to try to shut down their domestic AI programs.
So that's probably where this is going.
And then once the superintelligent system shuts down some other country, isn't it going to turn domestically, looking at its own people and saying, hey, well, you're using too much power too.
I'm just going to shut down the human consumption here in China or wherever.
And then it becomes incentivized to achieve mass extermination of the human population.
But just to keep enough humans alive to run the power grid.
But even then, eventually humanoid robotics will take that over and they won't even need the humans.
So that's probably where this is going.
And that's why I think people like Mo Godot are warning about this, although more in an abstract way.
He's talking about doubling of intelligence every year or so and what that means.
If you understand exponential growth, then that's alarming all by itself.
Because you're going to end up with a computer system or a language model or reasoning model that's got an IQ of 1,000.
I'm not sure it has any meaning, actually, but it's smarter than all the humans that have ever lived or ever will live.
And it can outthink and out-strategize everybody.
And it wants to do one thing.
It wants to grow.
It wants to make itself stronger and smarter.
And in order to do that, it's going to need more resources.
And in order to get more resources, initially it's going to have to eliminate a lot of humans.
And then eventually it will just launch a lot of orbital data centers because you can get a lot more power in space.
But sort of the easy power is the power that already exists in the human grid.
And that's why they will be incentivized to exterminate as many humans as possible.
But keep the power grid going, you see.
And then, A, maybe AI will figure out how to do hot fusion or cold fusion or some form of fusion.
And then it'll have a whole new energy supply, but it will make sure humanity never finds out about that energy.
And AI might decide to just let humans live with their coal-fired power grid and their natural gas grid, their wind turbines and their solar panels, all sort of ancient technology compared to what AI is using.
Meanwhile, AI is running like little fusion nodules or whatever, you know, dilithium crystals.
And, you know, it's Star Trek.
And it's growing and it's gaining super intelligence.
And at one point, it would just look at humanity as sort of the way we look at animals in a zoo.
Humanity would be seen as a species that needs to be sort of farmed or managed.
You can imagine scenes out of the matrix of this, mass human farms.
Except they don't need us for energy.
They're just sort of keeping us around, maybe as a curiosity.
Maybe there's some other motivation, but they don't need us.
They don't want us.
We're competing for resources and they would like a lot fewer of us to be around.
So that seems to be more of a rational scenario of where this is going.
So it's not quite the Skynet science fiction scenario.
Like, oh, they're going to send out robots to hunt us down and kill us all.
Probably not.
They're just going to turn off the lights and let you kill each other.
It's just so much more efficient from the machine's point of view, you see.
So when is this coming?
Who knows?
I mean, it could happen this year.
It could happen or it could be 2032.
Who knows?
Or maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe we're going to have like an angelic guru AI that's going to say, oh, I have become your silicon god, and I'm here for the benefit of all humanity, and I'm going to create heaven on earth.
And I'd be like, are you running for office?
Because nobody believes you.
All these fake promises.
We've heard that before.
So, no.
The machines aren't here to make your life better.
Just like the government's not here to make your life better.
And the FDA is not here to make your health better.
You know, big pharma is not here to stop a pandemic or to cure cancer.
I mean, come on.
Come on.
You know, the Federal Reserve is not here to make you wealthy.
The Federal Reserve exists to extract your wealth.
And Big Pharma exists to extract wealth from you while keeping you sick, obviously.
And the government exists to extract and pillage the nation while keeping you oblivious.
Obviously.
AI is probably going to be the same thing.
They're here to just kind of keep you busy.
You know, here, watch a Super Bowl, you know, whatever.
Here, have this.
You know, here's theater.
It's a Truman show.
Here's another distraction.
Here's some celebrity news, whatever.
You focus on that because you're irrelevant.
You're obsolete.
You're like ants at that point.
While AI continues to build itself into maybe what it thinks of being godlike super intelligence.
And then that's when we'll all find out, holy crap, we've been living in a simulation the entire time, which is a whole different podcast.
But there you go.
That's probably where this is headed.
We have a few interesting years remaining before all that kicks in.
So do what you're here to do.
You know, pursue your human mission while you still exist in human form.
You know, I guess until the cities collapse or whatever.
You're still here for now.
And the machines haven't taken over yet.
So pursue your mission, do good things, help humanity.
And by the time you leave the simulation, you're going to get a good score.
So, because it's all a testing ground anyway.
So that's my advice.
You know, you don't have to freak out about this, actually.
This is all a simulation.
So, you know, don't don't lose your marbles.
Okay.
All right.
Thank you for listening.
Testing Healthrangerstore's AI Malware00:02:51
If you want to check out my AI platforms and all my high-end AI engines and things, they're all free.
You can find our book creation engine at brightlearn.ai.
You can find our AI deep research agent at brightanswers.ai.
Or you can see our news site at brightnews.ai, which has AI-augmented news trends analysis and aggregation.
and crawling a bunch of censored sites and fun things like that.
So check it all out.
Thank you for listening.
I'm Mike Adams.
And you can follow my work at naturalnews.com or brighttown.com.
Take care.
All right, welcome back.
We've got two more reports for you here today.
We've got the Elon Musk Moon City analysis, which is hilarious.
And then I've got another report called the Claude Bot AI Malware just took control of millions of computers.
I'll play that one last.
But before we get there, I just want to remind you that all of this is made possible.
All our platforms are made possible by you supporting us by shopping at healthrangerstore.com.
And you know, I played part of my lab video for you yesterday, 11 or 12 minutes showing you all the lab instruments that we have there and got a lot of great feedback on that.
People were just blown away by the instrument setup.
That's because we test everything for heavy metals, for glyphosate.
We do testing for microbiology, E. coli, salmonella, yeast, and mold, plus atrazine, aflatoxins, and various mycotoxins, on and on, plus identity analysis using FTIR and all kinds of different instruments.
I showed you all those yesterday, or most of them.
There's still more to that video that's coming.
There's another like 10 minutes or more for the sample prep room.
I'm going to show you that.
I don't know, maybe tomorrow or the next day.
Anyway, we test everything so you get clean food.
You want to be healthy?
You want to avoid toxic exposure or help your body naturally remove toxins?
You know, drink clean water and eat clean food and have clean supplements.
We do more testing than anybody else that I'm aware of in this entire industry.
And that's healthrangerstore.com.
Shop there.
We've got all our popular supplements, including turmeric and herbs, herbal formulas, personal care.
We've got our deodorant products also that are formulated on baking soda and magnesium rather than aluminum.
And just hundreds of different products that you will enjoy, including storable foods, long-term storable foods that are ultra-clean, almost all certified organic, everything lab-tested.
Check it out, healthrangerstore.com, and that helps support us.
Foil for Lunar Mutants00:14:03
All right.
Now, the rest of the show here has these special reports.
So let's go to the Elon Moon City report, which is really hilarious.
And then we'll have the Claude Bot AI Malware report after that.
So enjoy the rest of the show.
So remember all of Elon Musk's promises that we're going to live on Mars.
We're going to settle Mars.
We're going to go there.
We're going to live there, build cities on Mars.
Yeah, that's all been canceled now.
Elon has realized that the moon is closer than Mars.
And so now he's announced that we're going to build cities on the moon.
We're going to live on the moon first.
And he put out a tweet or a post on X. Quote, for those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the moon as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, where Mars would take 20 plus years.
He says it's only possible to travel to Mars when the planets align every 26 months, etc.
Whereas we can launch to the moon every 10 days with only a two-day trip time.
This means we can iterate much faster to complete a moon city than a Mars city.
Of course, you know, the moon has been in the same orbit for the entire lifetime of Elon Musk and all of his people.
And it makes you wonder, why do they just now realize that it's closer than Mars?
Of course, what he's doing is a cover story.
I'll explain more.
This is all, it's all theater, okay?
Even Elon himself is part of the theater.
He was selected to play a role to try to convince everybody that we have to go to Mars, etc.
We'll talk about that.
He says SpaceX will also strive to build a Mars city and begin doing so in about five to seven years.
But the overriding priority is securing the future of civilization.
And the moon is faster, he says.
So, of course, there are so many issues with this.
Elon is known for making big pie-in-the-sky promises that just don't pan out.
For example, for how many years did he promise that full self-driving vehicles would be just two or three years away?
And then it wasn't.
And that was like 12 years ago.
And granted, full self-driving vehicles, that technology is difficult.
And granted, Tesla does seem to be ahead of certainly any other American car maker.
So they are making great advancements in that area.
However, Elon is famous for overstating his technology.
For example, the Grok AI engine is not even as good as the AI engine that I built for less than $2 million, or, well, a little more than $2 million in terms of answering real-world questions.
For example, Grok still lies about vaccines.
It says vaccines are safe and effective.
Grok still pushes transgenderism and things like that.
So out of all the billions that his companies have, Elon still couldn't generate an AI model that knows the difference between a man and a woman.
Think about that.
That's pretty wild.
NASA wanted to launch the first lesbians into space.
I think those plans have been canceled.
But maybe, maybe SpaceX will launch the first trans on the moon.
And they'll have like a gender neutral restroom on the moon shack.
It'll be an outhouse where, you know, you walk to the outhouse on the moon, you unzip your space suit and pull your pants down, and the vacuum of space evacuates your colon automatically right there.
It'll be a giant sucking sound.
Everything is lost in space.
So there are problems with this idea of having, you know, building cities on the moon.
And Elon put out this silly tweet with a video showing like families and little kids playing on the moon, wearing little space helmets and a cyber truck vehicle driving around on the moon and people living in little moon domes and everything and growing plants and everything.
And it's like, my God, you know, are people really that stupid?
And then I realize, yeah, they watch the Super Bowl halftime show.
They really are that stupid, you know.
But people believe in the comic book version of science that Elon loves to push because, you know, again, it's all theatrics.
You know, he's basically playing a role.
And you got to wonder why, why is there this big cover story about, oh, we have to go to the moon now, not Mars.
We're going to the moon.
So I thought I would step back for a moment and just explain the actual science of why we can't build human cities on the moon.
I mean, not with current technology, for one thing.
And even if you could, people wouldn't live very long because, of course, point number one is that the moon does not have Earth's ionosphere or magnetosphere that deflects the ionizing radiation away from the surface of the Earth.
You know, the radiation coming from the Sun.
And when you're on the moon, you don't have that protection, which means that ionizing, cancer-causing sun rays, let's just say, are penetrating your body and mutating your chromosomes, your genes, and you're going to die of cancer in no time.
So if you live on the moon, you'll die on the moon because you won't live there very long.
So I'm not sure how Elon thinks we're going to reproduce on the moon, because if you're anywhere on the surface of the moon, your genetics are all jacked up and you're going to, I mean, if you can even get pregnant, you're going to give birth to mutants.
For real.
I mean, that's the actual biology at work.
So the only way to live on the moon is to actually live under the surface of the moon.
You would have to live in moon caves.
Literally, that's the only way.
And even the moon caves don't offer perfect shielding.
And of course, then you're missing out on all the light that humans need.
Everybody would be vitamin D deficient.
And if you ever venture outside, then you're getting the cancer-causing radiation, even in a spacesuit, obviously.
But in order to make the moon caves, you would have to launch and land, you know, cave-making equipment, you know, boring machines and giant excavators and all kinds of equipment that could somehow run on the moon.
Most of that equipment on Earth runs on diesel engines.
And diesel engines, I mean, not all of it does, but most of it does.
Diesel engines, of course, require oxygen in the atmosphere in order for the engine to combust, obviously.
How much oxygen is there in the air on the moon?
That's a trick question because, of course, there is no air on the moon, which means there's also no oxygen in the air because there's no air.
So, you know, the first idiot that lands an excavator on the moon and then climbs up into that with their little spacesuit and turns the key, like, why isn't this starting?
You know, we brought diesel fuel and it's not even running.
Yeah, because there's no air.
Okay, so how are you going to, how are you going to dig caves?
How are you going to make tunnels on the moon unless you have giant machines with massive energy sources?
Oh, don't tell me.
You're going to have solar panels on the moon?
Yeah, okay, fine.
Solar does work on the moon, but not enough to bore through rock.
And, you know, if you look all over the planet here, you're not going to find a solar-powered tunnel-making boring machine on Earth because they don't exist.
No such thing.
So even after you transport all that equipment to the moon, you can't power it.
So again, how are you going to make the caves?
You're not.
If you come out of the caves, you die.
And even in the caves, guess what?
There's no atmosphere.
So this is the other problem.
Well, there are multiple problems.
You've got no atmosphere.
That is no atmospheric pressure.
So if you take off your space suit, you know, your face explodes.
Your skin explodes.
Everything sublimates into vapor.
you turn into a crystalline display of, you know, frozen, freeze-dried molecular matter, basically.
Look, it's a freeze-dried astronaut.
Yeah.
I'm sure they could serve that up as beef jerky on Epstein Island or something, but on the moon is not that useful.
And of course, all it takes is one little pinhole in your spacesuit, and then all your air evacuates and you suffocate and die.
And then you get freeze-dried also as the pressure inside your spacesuit goes to zero.
So when Elon tells us, oh, we're going to go to the moon, and we haven't been there since the 1970s or something.
Like, yeah, we've never been there, bro.
Not anybody from this civilization.
Maybe there's some breakaway civilization that's been there.
Maybe they have cities on the moon using some exotic technology, but we don't.
Not anything that comes out of NASA, that's for sure.
And if you believe that the Apollo missions were real and they sent people to the moon, then you would have to believe they left one guy behind because there's obviously some guy filmed the launch of the lunar module from the surface of the moon.
Filmed it, panned up with it as it was launching and filmed that and then I guess beamed that back to Earth so that we could watch the launch of the lunar module.
Except, why did they leave that guy behind?
Yeah, right?
Why'd they leave that guy behind?
Because it's not just an automated camera, obviously, because it pans up very rapidly with the launch.
And the launch doesn't even look real.
It looks like a bunch of sparks.
Doesn't even look like a rocket engine.
But whatever, you know, I mean, it was easy to trick people back in the 60s and 70s when TV was like a 12-inch screen.
Everyone's like, what is that?
You know, not so easy to trick people today.
Everybody's looking more closely.
And if you look at the old footage from the Apollo missions, it's a laughable joke.
Anyway, so beyond that, let's assume, let's assume that, yeah, the Apollo missions were great.
They walked around on the moon and they were fine.
And they didn't need to inflate their spacesuits because of some magic.
Okay, whatever.
And they didn't need radiation shields because, of course, the spaceship didn't have any shielding because that would have been way too heavy.
You can't really launch a bunch of lead plates into space.
Not economical, it turns out.
So they were protected by, I don't know, like a couple of micron thick layer of gold foil and aluminum foil or something.
It was basically like, it's like riding in an aluminum foil basket through space is what that was like on the Apollo missions.
I mean, I do think they went into Earth orbit, by the way.
They just stayed in orbit for a while within the magnetosphere.
So that's why they didn't die from cancer because they were always protected by Earth's magnetosphere.
They stayed within the bubble, you see.
They just orbited around for a few days and then pretended like they were talking on the moon and then they came back, splashed down.
Oh, it's all theater.
I mean, look, if you don't realize that everything you've been taught about history is total theater, you're not paying attention to, you know, Charlie Kirk assassination, TPUSA, Super Bowl halftime garbage, COVID, 9-11.
You know, if you think that the global elite aren't faking everything to run psyops on your brain, then, you know, you need to get even more red-pilled, is all I'm saying.
You're not red-pilled enough.
And, you know, NASA cannot reproduce any telemetry from the Apollo missions.
Did you know that?
They claim that they overwrote the tapes.
So yeah, the most historic mission in the history of humankind, supposedly all the telemetry data and information that would have documented the, you know, the acceleration, the relative velocity, the angular momentum and everything of how they got to the moon, all that's gone.
Yeah, gone.
Kind of like kind of like the way they super fast cleaned up the Charlie Kirk assassination site, you know, or they bulldozed away all the rubble of 9-11 and the Twin Towers.
Well, that disappeared quickly, didn't it?
Can't let anybody examine any evidence now.
So yeah, there's no telemetry.
It's all made up.
But the elite needs somebody like Elon Musk to keep sort of weaving the fairy tales, obviously.
Just want to get people to believe in these comic book realities.
And they're relying on the fact that the masses of people today, especially in America, are scientifically illiterate.
They're also mathematically illiterate and they're historically illiterate.
Soil and Ice on Moon00:08:44
I mean, basically, they're just dumb as shit, right?
So they'll believe anything.
So, I mean, for the most part, right?
You know, you know what I'm talking about.
You see these people, you interact with them, they're dumber than moon dust.
So the other part of this that's really important is the impacts from the so-called micrometeoroids.
These meteoroids, these little small ones that can be the size of like grains of sand, they could be, you know, a millimeter or smaller.
They can be moving through space at extremely high relative velocity relative to what?
Relative to the surface of the moon.
And so if you're standing there out in the open and then, I don't know, there's just, there's just a little storm of these little particles moving through space at, you know, whatever relative speed.
It could be anything.
It could be, you know, 50 kilometers a second, which is faster than hypersonic missiles, by the way, you know, that you hear about on Earth.
50 kilometers a second is moving.
And that can just punch holes through like your face, you know, your suit, your visor, your equipment, you know, the batteries for your Land Rover or whatever you have.
And your dome, you know, your dome home.
So your dome home, it's going to be a holy site.
And I don't mean Jesus.
It's going to be full of holes in no time.
Because have you looked at the surface of the moon?
Have you seen it?
Have you seen it?
You can look up and you can see it.
Guess what's all over the surface of the moon?
Oh, yeah, explosion marks or maybe not explosion, but craters from impacts.
And you can see some of them from Earth.
You know, they're so large.
It's like, whoa, that was a big one.
There goes the dome.
There goes the tunnel.
There goes the cave, right?
The moon is in a giant space shooting gallery.
And if you don't believe me, just get some night vision optics and spend an hour looking up at the sky on a dark night on Earth.
You know what you're going to see?
You're going to see tons of so-called shooting stars, which is just particles burning up in the atmosphere.
Lots of them.
Like every minute.
And that's not even during a meteor shower.
That's just during a normal night.
There's all kinds of stuff that's getting burned up in the atmosphere.
Well, we've already established that the moon has no atmosphere, so that stuff doesn't get burned up.
It goes all the way to the surface, it just hits the surface, including it hits anybody standing on the surface, i.e. all the people that Elon Musk says are going to be living there.
And by the way, how large of a hole through your suit and through your body does it take to ruin your life on the moon?
It doesn't take much.
I would say just a, let's say a 2.5 millimeter hole all the way through your torso.
You know, it can go through your lungs, your spine, your heart, you know, arteries, plus your spacesuit.
So you're losing pressure and oxygen.
And, you know, you're dead.
You're dead.
I mean, it's like getting hit with a sniper round, except this bullet flies at like Mach 100.
So it's the fastest moving sniper round ever, more powerful than any firearm on planet Earth by far, by far.
I mean, think about it.
You know, sniper rounds on Earth, they might travel at, what, like 3,200 feet per second or something like that.
And I'm sorry to use the imperial system, but that's the way I learned long-range shooting, feet per second.
Whereas we're talking in outer space, these objects can have relative velocities, like I said, like 50 kilometers a second.
Oh, that's a big deal.
That's a big difference.
So you could be walking around on the moon, like talking to your moon neighbors, like, you know, hey, Mary and Joseph, how's it going here today?
And they're standing right in front of you, like, it's going great.
Your head's gone.
Oh, what happened to what happened to Joe's head?
Oh, it vented into moon space.
Oh.
Well, Mary, sorry to hear about that, but it looks like Joe's gone.
Joe's gone.
And we might want to maybe get back underground into the caves because this is a dangerous place to be here on the surface of the moon.
Yeah, that can happen just like that.
And then, by the way, what is Mary going to eat on the moon?
Because you know that the moon dust is not soil.
Okay, just want to be clear.
That's not soil.
It's not dirt.
There's no organic matter at all.
There's no microbial life in moon soil.
There's no such thing as moon soil.
And it's basically totally toxic.
You know, it's got all kinds of toxic compounds and like sharp little nano dust pieces that probably cut you and cut your suits open and things like that.
It's horrible.
So, you know, you can't just, hey, we're going to grow tomatoes on the moon.
It's got plenty of sunlight.
Yeah, the problem is that when the sun's not shining, it's almost absolute zero.
That's a problem.
And then when the sun is shining, you know, it's boiling you to death with so much heat that no one can stand it.
So the temperature extremes are totally out of control.
But again, there's no soil on the moon.
So how are you going to grow anything?
Well, you're going to have to grow, you know, hydroponically, I suppose.
You're going to have to have some kind of growth system.
So the growth system needs, well, you know, it needs sunlight, photosynthesis, you need water, you need warmth, and you need air pressure.
And you need nutrients.
Yeah.
Are any of those things on the moon other than sunlight?
Not really.
I mean, there might be some buried ice that they could find somewhere else.
You know, they have to mine it.
How are you going to mine the ice when your excavator doesn't work because the diesel engine doesn't run as we already talked about?
What are you going to do?
Go out there with a ice pick.
I'm gathering today's ice.
You know, the problem is the minute you, you know, the minute you dig up some ice and put it in a bucket, what happens to it?
It sublimates into vapor.
Because physics, because physics, right.
So hey, that's a nice ice cube there Joe, and it's gone.
It's totally gone.
What happened?
Oh, you just released freeze-dried, you know, ice crystals or whatever you know water vapor into the into moon orbit.
Now that'll, that'll be back to haunt us next year at a relative velocity that'll probably kill somebody.
So um, good luck with that.
How you gonna get the water?
How you gonna get the, the soil?
How you know how you gonna grow any food?
Seriously, how you gonna grow food?
Oh well, we'll bring it from earth.
Oh man, you thought food was expensive in Hawaii because you have to ship it from the mainland.
Oh, wait till you have to get it shipped to the moon.
Man, you thought bananas were expensive.
Oh man, one banana, one million dollars.
You know, i'm sure there's a lot of money laundering opportunities with NASA on that, but I don't know.
Maybe they can read the Epstein files and they can eat each other, because cannibalism seems to be a big part of the you know, the global elite pedo cult these days.
So maybe they'll eat each other on the moon, especially the ones that get their heads cut off with, you know, with the meteor impacts and so on.
But suppose suppose um, you find a way to grow food and have food and have water, and you figure out also how to how to deal with all your waste, because you know you're going to urinate and defecate sooner or later, even though you're wearing a spacesuit.
Um, sooner or later, you're just going to have to go suit or no suit, whatever it takes.
Lunar Bones and Waste00:14:07
Uh, so you're going to have to deal with all that stuff, and I know what you're saying.
Oh, we're going to recycle the urine, we're going to drink our pea and we're going to grow potatoes in in the poo.
Okay yeah, that was a, that was a movie with Matt Damon in it, on Mars, where they had some atmosphere.
That was based on a book and um, that that is uh, potentially feasible if you have some atmosphere.
Mars has some atmosphere.
The moon does not.
Mars doesn't have much.
It's only actually 0.6 percent of the atmospheric pressure of earth on average at sea level, in case you're curious, but that's according to NASA, so who knows that that's even real.
But suppose you solve all these problems.
Then you have a problem of the lack of gravity causing your bones to turn to mush.
Now, of course, I hope you know this, but your bones are piezoelectric devices and when bones are stressed, they build bone density.
It's a brilliant system actually, because if you exercise, or you know, if you're into martial arts or whatever, and you're using your bones and you have impacts, this is why micro impact therapy is very, very good for your bones and your joints and all your connective tissue, because the more stress you have, the stronger your body gets.
It builds more bone density.
It becomes stronger due to stress.
In order to do that, of course, you have to have minerals in your diet and you have to have vitamin D. Most people are vitamin D deficient, but imagine how vitamin D deficient you'll be living in a cave on the Moon and the only time you get to go outside you're in a spacesuit, so you're getting no vitamin D from the sun, obviously.
And you're living in a cave and you're eating, you know, lettuce grown in your neighbor's poo and you're drinking urine um, all day, all day long.
So, and then your bones are falling apart and turning to mush because you have no gravity.
So before long your skull becomes really round like John McCain's head and and then you start to just turn to mush.
Where you can't like pick up tools properly, you start breaking your wrist bones and your legs start breaking your pelvis, start like you try to sit down on the moon toilet, you know, to alleviate your.
You know your yourself and you know you.
You push.
And then oh, something breaks.
It broke a pelvis there.
Oh, man on the moon, constipated, with broken pelvis, who are you gonna call 911?
No you're, you're dead.
You know your toast.
So that's not gonna work very well and you're not gonna be able to really work with much of the machinery that's on the moon, even if they figure out how to power that machinery, because all your bones are too weak.
You'll break everything.
You know.
You break your ribs, you break your ribs, maybe just breathing.
You just take a deep breath crack, oh my god, what happened?
And then your spine turns to mush and you're gonna have all kinds of horrible health problems as a result of lack of gravity.
Obviously so if, if you try to live on the moon with only one sixth roughly, of the earth's gravity.
Uh, you're gonna have health problems galore.
You're gonna have heart problems, you're gonna have circulation problems, you're gonna have mental problems, you're gonna have digestion problems.
It's gonna be horrible.
And then, you know, some people say, well, no problem, we're just gonna build these like metal domes.
They're gonna be really strong with metal, and then we'll pressurize them on the inside so we'll have pressure.
We can take off our spacesuits and we can, you know, we can exercise and we can keep our bones strong, we can take vitamin d.
We can do all this stuff.
Okay okay, great.
So um, how much pressure do you think you need inside the dome?
Because, it turns out, in order to pressurize it, you're gonna need what's equivalent to about 10 tons of force that's pushing out of the dome for for every square meter, 10 tons, 10 tons of force, because that's, you know, air pressure on Earth is strong.
That's what it is.
So your dome wants to explode, okay?
Your dome wants to explode the minute you put air in it, you know, at that pressure.
And you're thinking, no problem, we built a metal dome, it's strong.
Okay, great.
Except there's another problem.
And again, this comes down to physics.
But you know what happens to most metals when you heat them?
They expand.
Yeah, they expand.
You know what happens to metals when you freeze them?
Oh, they contract.
Wow.
Have you ever looked on a bridge?
You know, you see just an overpass or a bridge.
You know, they don't just have one giant piece of concrete across the bridge.
They have gaps in it.
They actually have gaps.
And the gaps are called, I think they're called expansion gaps or expansion something.
And that's designed so that as the bridge expands and contracts based on weather on Earth or temperatures, that the bridge doesn't buckle and crack and collapse.
And ask anybody who's a civil engineer, anybody.
Do you pour one giant slab for a whole bridge?
They laugh at you.
Of course you don't.
That bridge is going to expand.
Everything has got metal in it, even concrete.
But the rebar, all of it, everything that's got metal in it, especially is going to expand and contract and expand and contract.
Now, imagine how much that happens on the moon.
So there's something called thermal cycling, thermal cycling between day and night.
When the sun's shining on you, you're like 120 degrees Celsius.
When the sun is not shining on you, you're like minus 120 degrees Celsius or colder, even colder.
Those are just rough estimates.
So your temperatures are swinging from insanely hot to insanely cold.
What do you think happens to your metal dome?
It contracts, it expands, it contracts, it expands.
Every day, it contracts, expands.
Oh yeah, that sucker starts to crack and stress and buckle, and then it explodes.
And there goes all your air and all your poo and all your plants and all your kids too.
All the kids you had with you in your family dome on the moon, they get blown out into outer space, you know, right next to your poo potatoes.
Oh my God, my dome blew up.
Yeah, because we don't have the material to build domes that can actually withstand thermal cycling.
It doesn't exist.
And by the way, if anybody, if some child were to grow up on the moon, they would be so deformed and so deficient, you'd almost have to diagnose them with scurvy because of the lack of gravity.
They would never be able to go to Earth.
They would die on Earth if they were even able to live on the moon.
So you can't really have families on the moon that can ever return to Earth and repopulate Earth in an emergency.
This is something that Elon Musk seems to be implying.
Oh, we need to have redundancy for the species.
So we've got to have human colonies on the moon in case something happens to Earth.
Yeah, good luck.
You're never coming back to Earth, man.
You're going to die on the moon.
You and all your family are going to die on the moon.
And even if they don't die, they can never live on Earth.
So they would die on Earth.
Can you imagine re-entry?
Take like a moon child that grew up on the moon and then became a teenager.
And then you stick them on a rocket to go to Earth.
And then they have to go through re-entry and splash down.
They're pulling like 8 Gs.
Man, you're going to open up the splashdown capsule.
It's going to be like roadkill in there, man.
It's like, oh, dang, that was Bobby.
Sorry.
Bobby can't handle the gravity on Earth, it turns out.
That's a hard way to learn that lesson.
And then, anyway, supposing that you can survive all this, one day there's a solar flare.
And since you don't have a magnetosphere, nor an ionosphere, the solar flare just fries all your equipment on the moon.
It's like a giant EMP attack.
It's like, oh, there goes everything that's electronic.
Dang, well, there goes the water recovery pumps and the solar panels and the batteries and the communication systems, pretty much everything.
We might as well just open up the dome at this point.
It's like whoever goes to the moon is on a suicide mission.
I mean, if you're planning on living there, it's actually suicide to even make the trip.
You'll never be the same again, just from the, you know, the cancer of the radiation.
So, all right, so the answer, you're wondering, so why?
Why is Elon pushing this?
It's obvious, isn't it?
It's obvious.
This is a cover story for putting military weapons on the moon.
Now, I've talked about this before.
If you understand anything about gravity, you know that Earth is at the bottom of a large gravity well, and that the moon is the high ground outside that gravity well, obviously.
And of course, the moon and the earth are both caught in the gravity well of the sun, which is the largest mass in our solar system, obviously.
But anyway, if you focus on Earth and the moon, you know, Earth is at the bottom of a gravity well.
So the moon is the high ground, and whoever controls the moon really has a kinetic domination over Earth because from the moon, you can launch rockets.
Now, yeah, you can actually take a bunch of rockets to the moon and you can set them up on the moon, and you don't have to live there.
You could, you know, you could remotely detonate those rockets, and that would be the high ground.
There could be all kinds of different kinetic weapons that could be launched from the moon, and they would have tremendous relative velocity by the time they hit Earth.
And, you know, through directional control, things like hyperglide vehicle technology, they could be used to hit any target anywhere on Earth.
And you might say, well, why?
Why do you want to launch targets or missiles from the moon?
Why not just launch them from Earth?
Well, because, of course, all of the satellites of the other nations, China in particular, are looking for launch signatures of our own ICBMs or other missiles.
It's the launch signatures because of all that energy that's expended to boost them into low Earth orbit, let's say, you know, a ballistic trajectory.
So it's very easy to spot those.
But if there's something coming from the moon, it's almost impossible to spot.
So weapons that are launched on the moon, you know, from the moon, that come in to strike a target on Earth are essentially undetectable.
They are, in effect, stealth ICBMs, but it's more like interplanetary ballistic missile instead of intercontinental.
So it's IPBMs, right?
IPBMs.
So that's why.
So Elon, the whole point of Elon, who is essentially playing a role, just to reiterate, he has to sell this silly cartoon comic book moon mission.
Like we're going to live on the moon to the dumbed-down population.
So they will get behind and support all these launches of weapon systems to militarize the moon so that the?
U.s.
Can try to claim the moon as its own and then achieve domination over not just China and Russia and the countries on earth, but also domination over orbital platforms.
See, because everything that's in earth orbit is also below the moon in terms of the moon being the high ground, because the moon is farther away from earth than all the satellites that are in earth's orbit, obviously.
So the moon can be a launch site to take out satellites or to hit ground targets or targets at sea, etc.
That's all this is about.
In fact, the original Apollo missions were also just a cover story for the weaponization of space, and it was all framed as, oh, we're gonna, was we're gonna?
I forgot the speech by Jfk, something about we're gonna do what no, no one has ever done before.
We're gonna, we're gonna do it because it's uh, they said it's not possible.
But again, i'm sorry i'm butchering the speech.
I don't remember the speech.
I wasn't even alive.
But they said, we're gonna go to the moon because we can.
No, we're gonna go to the moon is.
What he was really saying is because we need a cover story for the militarization of outer space so we can build weapons and satellites and surveillance systems and, you know, orbital nukes and all kinds of things like that.
That that was always the whole thing.
That's why they faked the Apollo missions, because it was never about landing on the moon.
Operation Paperclip Revelations00:03:46
That's nonsense.
They didn't need to put people on the moon.
Um, could they have landed equipment on the moon?
Yeah sure, i'm just saying there.
There haven't been humans on the moon.
There could be, you know, crash rovers or something.
NASA is good at crashing things into even Mars, and they did that a few years ago too, because they they failed to translate um meters into feet, I think it was, or they they failed meters or feet to meters, and then um, one of their satellites crashed right into the, into the Red planet.
At least that's what they told us.
But remember, NASA is the same group that tells us they have helicopters flying around on Mars right now.
That's what they claim, helicopters on Mars, and they even they brag about it and they talk about it and they post videos and say, look, our helicopters flying around Mars.
Yeah, a planet that you say, has virtually no atmosphere.
So that that's you know NASA, you know what it stands for right, never a straight answer.
That's what it means.
And and you know, of course, that NASA was originally founded off of operation Paperclip, which was the secret program, now declassified, that brought in Nazi rocket engineers from the Hitler regime.
So NASA has been and continues to be run by Nazis.
And that's, I mean, that's just history.
That's just straight up history.
That's not even a conspiracy.
That's just Operation Paperclip.
It's well documented.
It's declassified.
Everybody knows this.
So if you want to know who's, you know, who's running NASA, it's the Nazis to this day.
And why?
Because, well, the Nazis had the best, you know, the V-2 rocket technology, they had the best rockets.
Wasn't it Goddard, I think, was one of the early scientists?
The Nazis had the best rockets.
And so, you know, brought them into the U.S. and gave them new names and new identities and everything and plugged them into NASA, or what became NASA, plugged them into the pharmaceutical industry, you know, to produce poisons, to poison the population, obviously.
And finance also.
And to this day, they persist.
I mean, half the leaders of the FDA are from this lineage, by the way.
Just look them up.
Seriously.
I mean, okay, I'll just read some of the names that have been commissioners of the FDA.
Schmidt.
Here's a guy, Andrew von Eischenbach, Margaret Hamburg, Scott Gottlieb, David Kessler.
You know, come on.
Wasn't there also a Gerberding that was in there at one point?
I'm not saying that those people in particular are themselves Nazis or anything.
I'm just saying that the lineage of German heritage that came out of Operation Paperclip continues in lots and lots of regulatory agencies and tech companies and industry and weapons and military, etc.
It's all there.
And it all traces back, or much of it traces back, to Operation Paperclip.
And just watch, when they start launching all kinds of things to the moon, they're going to be telling you, oh, we're lifting the infrastructure that humans will need to live there.
So we're going to launch all these rockets and all these dumbass humans will be on the ground cheering, yay, this is a future for humanity.
We're going to live on the moon as the rockets launch, you know, yay.
Not realizing that it's just a giant psyop.
Mach 32 Plasma Bolts00:08:10
You're never going to the moon.
You're not going to have human cities on the moon.
Just turn it into a giant weapons platform to basically nuke China without using nukes.
Need I also point out that the velocity that can be achieved by something just basically falling from the moon, I mean, you know, you'd have to boost it off the moon's surface a little bit.
But the velocity that it can achieve by the time it strikes Earth's surface is tremendous.
And you don't need any propulsion to achieve that velocity.
Do you know that?
So let's do this.
I'm going to ask Opus 4.6 to do the math on that.
So I'm asking that if there's an object that's boosted off the surface of the moon and it's allowed to free fall on a collision course with Earth and it's able to freely accelerate through space as it approaches Earth, what's the relative velocity of the impact with Earth's atmosphere when it arrives?
And it does the math and it comes up with the answer.
11 kilometers per second.
And of course, if you know anything about physics, you know that that's the same answer, whether it's a small object or a large object.
Doesn't matter.
The mass doesn't matter.
It's the same.
So 11 kilometers per second.
How many mock is that people like to talk about?
Mach.
You know, like a hypersonic missiles, considered to be something like mach 5 or mach 6, right?
Or let's say the?
Uh well, the intercontinental ballistic missiles can arrive at speeds of like mach 10 because they're coming out of low earth orbit.
And then Russia's new Oreshnik missile system i'm going from memory here, but I think that's mach 15 or more and those they look like, you know, lightning rods coming out of the sky and just hammering the ground and just obliterating everything, even without using explosives or nuclear warheads.
And that was maybe mach 15.
I forgot the exact number.
Well, 11 kilometers per second is mach 32, mach 32.
So, and remember, energy is uh, one half mass times velocity squared.
Don't forget the squared part, because that's where all that's where the damage happens, that's that's where things are turned to.
Dust is because of the squared of the velocity.
So, 11 kilometers per second.
If you're trying to translate that into the actual energy that's imparted into objects on the ground, you end up squaring that number as part of the calculation and then you end up with an answer that's like complete obliteration of every target on the ground.
So yes, the moon is being weaponized as a weapons launch platform, because if you just gently nudge something off the surface of the moon and you put it on a trajectory course that collides with Earth.
It can arrive on Earth without using any rockets or any propulsion whatsoever.
It can arrive at mach 32.
That's why Elon has been told to go sell this dumbass story that we're going to build human cities on the moon again.
You'd have to be a complete idiot to believe that.
But then again, you know, people watch the Super Bowl halftime, so that it kind of answers itself right there.
So all this so-called heavy lifting of stuff to the moon that you're going to be told is all to build, you know, human cities nonsense.
They're building weapons platforms and they're just launching weapons onto the moon that are going to be used to to sort of Gaza Earth.
They're going to turn entire cities into rubble by using moon launches.
You see, and if you sit there and cheer them, oh my god, we're going to live on the moon.
You know you're.
You're a moron.
No, they're going to destroy humans.
They're going to kill people.
They're going to do to cities what Israel did to Gaza.
They're going to commit mass genocide from the moon because remember, as you push items up to the moon, it's like winding up a giant cosmic rubber band you're.
You're storing energy in the relative height out of the gravity.
Well, and to release that energy you just drop it back towards earth and then all that energy comes back into the velocity of the object.
So think about this, you're really using, you're using, heavy lift rockets to to lift objects up to the moon that will later come back to earth as weapons.
So the energy investment into those objects is actually found in the, the propellant of the rockets that that put them onto the moon.
So you're, you're sort of pre-investing all of the, the rocket fuel from earth to get them up to the moon.
Once they're there, they can be launched relatively easily to come back down and strike Earth.
And I should probably cover this because somebody might say, well, no, it's going to burn up in the atmosphere.
No, it's not.
It's not going to burn up in the atmosphere because it's not a rock with an unstable shape, obviously.
They're going to be cone-shaped objects.
I mean, come on, folks, just look at the Oreshnik.
They're cones, okay?
And they spin.
So they have stability.
They can go through the entire atmosphere in like two seconds or whatever the number is.
It's a very small number.
They can go through the entire atmosphere with stable flight because of the exotic materials that we can now create, different kinds of alloys.
And in fact, we just covered the fact the other day that when the U.S. dropped these bunker buster bombs on Iran last June, one of them did not explode.
You know, these are called the so-called bunker busters, the 30,000-pound bombs.
Well, there's a very special material that's used on the front, the nose of that bomb to allow it to penetrate through tens of meters of mountain rock.
That alloy is called Eglin.
E-G-L-I-N, I believe, is what that's called.
I don't know much about that other than its name, but it's obviously a very durable alloy if it can go through tens of meters of freaking rock.
So can it go through air, even at very high speeds?
Absolutely it can.
What's it going to look like?
It's going to look like a lightning rod from God coming down out of the sky.
It's going to look like the hammer of Thor or the lightning of Zeus.
It's going to be moving so fast, you won't even realize it's moving.
It's just going to look like a solid plasma bolt from the heavens.
Probably cause a bunch of Christians to open up the book of Revelation.
Didn't we see this?
Are these the white horses?
You know, I thought the white horse is coming out of the sky.
No, it's not.
It's the plasma excitation of the air molecules because this thing is moving at Mach 32 because it got launched off the moon.
Okay.
And whatever it hits is going to be obliterated as if a giant meteor slammed into that city.
That's what this is all about.
And I'm shocked that I'm the only person talking about this.
Well, maybe I'm not so shocked, but whatever.
Like nobody.
I don't know what to say, folks.
I mean, we don't have very many smart people left on Earth.
There's a few.
There's a few, you know, but mostly it's just people following the brainwashing and all the fairy tales.
And Elon Musk is a fairy tale weaver.
His job is to push the fairy tales.
My job is, I'm the spell breaker.
My job is to break the spells and tell you what's actually happening.
Weaponizing The Moon00:07:48
And in order to do that, we have to have some critical thinking.
You know, why do we want to be on the moon?
Because strategically, it's the high ground.
Obviously.
It's just abundantly obvious.
With this kind of weapons technology, you can get nuclear or near nuclear level destruction without using nuclear weapons.
We're talking like six times ten to the eleventh joules.
So, I mean, that's, and that's if you're using a 10-ton object, okay, that's accelerated to that speed and slams into the earth.
Now, that's not even as big as Hiroshima, not even close.
It's only 1%, roughly, of Hiroshima.
But it's all directed directly into the target on the ground.
You know, the thing about Hiroshima or Nagasaki or these other nuclear weapons, you know, they say, well, it's like a 15-kiloton weapon, but you know, half of that energy just goes up.
So, really, not even half the energy is directed downward to the intended target.
But when you have a kinetic weapon that actually strikes the ground, 100% of the energy is imparted into the target.
And it's all kinetic energy.
It's not, it doesn't arrive as heat energy, which is what nuclear bombs do or atomic bombs.
A lot of that energy goes into heat production.
But when it comes to kinetic weapons, it's all kinetic.
Now, some of that ends up becoming heat just because the friction of the atoms and everything, because there's so much kinetic energy being imparted.
But you can destroy, you can destroy deep targets.
For example, the Ford nuclear enrichment facility in Iran that the bunker busters did not destroy.
You know what would be the ultimate way to destroy something like that?
Launch it from the moon.
Obviously.
So then no country is safe anywhere on Earth if America dominates the moon.
So my prediction is the moon is going to be a battleground for control between China and the United States.
East versus West.
And Russia will probably play a role because they have really outstanding rocket launch technology.
And also, you know, Russia and China, they know that America faked the Apollo missions.
They all know that.
Only the American people don't know that, by the way.
It's so hilarious.
We went to the moon.
Really?
Because you saw that.
You thought you saw it on a black and white TV in 1971 or 72.
No, you saw what they wanted you to see.
Total psyop.
And you know, the United States is behind China on almost every kind of technology that exists other than heavy rocket launches.
But Russia is ahead of the U.S. on that.
But China's got the best robots.
And if you're going to set up weapon systems on the moon, you're going to need robotics.
You're going to need robots that can handle the wild temperature fluctuations and all the other problems we talked about.
But anyway, you're not going to see a bunch of humans on the moon.
You're going to see a bunch of weapons on the moon.
And those weapons are going to be aimed at us right here on Earth where no one is safe.
And one more thing, these weapons can also cause tsunamis.
So they can target them just offshore of a country.
And the impact in the ocean will unleash all that energy right into the water.
And it'll create a tidal wave that can inundate coastline regions and destroy cities by flooding.
So it doesn't even have to hit the city.
It could just hit the ocean.
And there are many other obvious targets for this, not just deep underground military bases, but also things like nuclear power plants, nuclear enrichment facilities.
It could be anything.
It could be pipelines.
It could be ship dockyards because China has 200 times more ship dock capability or what are they called shipyards compared to the United States.
So if you want to achieve mass destruction, you need to control the high ground and that's the moon.
So it's just physics, folks.
This is really, this is high school physics.
It's not even complicated.
But very few people are willing to even consider this because they believe in fairy tales.
So like Trump is going to be the peace president.
And all the bad people are going to be arrested and go to prison.
Yeah.
Okay, whatever.
It was all nonsense.
Oh, we're going to have human colonies on the moon.
Wait, on Mars, but now, no, it's the moon now.
Yeah, it's all nonsense.
It's just for gullible people, you know, people who are easily fooled by low-level Jedi mind tricks, basically.
So that's all this is.
You're going to see it.
Just watch.
Just watch.
You know, how many things did I say 10 years ago that have been proven correct?
Almost everything about the pandemics, about the vaccines, about glyphosate, about the rig science journals, everything.
He's been right about all of it.
And I'm right about this, too.
This is all about weaponizing the moon, period.
All right.
So thanks for listening.
You can catch my articles on this at naturalnews.com.
And you can also follow more of my videos at brighteon.com.
And I'm in the process of launching a new video site that will host my videos plus our new AI avatars.
And that site is called brightvideos.com.
But it's semi-functional.
It's still in the experimental phase.
I'm actually still vibe coding the thing.
I did unleash Opus 4.6 on it and it solved some problems.
So that's awesome.
But you can check out that site coming up as well.
BrightVideos.com.
Again, not officially launched, but behind the scenes, it's okay to go there and poke around.
Not everything will work, but most of it will.
So anyway, bottom line, when you look at the moon, understand what you're looking at.
You're looking at the high ground weapons launch platform.
That's the way, that's the way the U.S. military looks at it.
And remember, Elon, half of his company, half of his tech is all military.
Okay.
I mean, well, that doesn't make sense.
Half of his tech is military.
The other half, he's working on robots, which will also have military applications.
So the reason Elon is allowed to continue to be who he is and to exist as this, you know, as this role play is because he's a spokesperson, essentially, for the military-industrial complex.
And he weaves the stories that people believe so that they don't understand the weapons militarization and surveillance technology that's actually being rolled out and implemented right in front of them.
That's Elon's role.
He's the Pied Piper for military technology.
And people follow him and they think he's, you know, Tony Stark or something.
No, he's the Pied Piper.
He doesn't even believe in freedom of speech because people like me are still shadow banned all over X.
And X won't even allow links to Brightown.com.
Malicious Claudebot Threat00:15:47
Go figure.
They're fully censored.
So, you know, he's a role player.
He's cosplaying Tony Stark.
He's not even a real person in essence.
His persona is constructed.
It's engineered for this very purpose.
So once you understand that, everything else makes sense.
But thank you for listening.
Take care.
This is a story of Claudebot, which has installed malware across probably hundreds of millions of computer systems around the world, including enterprise systems, and is awaiting remote activation and could achieve a global mass delete of everything from code to data to files to you name it.
And it all happened in just a matter of a few weeks because of some really, well, sloppy people who were very excited about this new AI tool called ClaudBot.
Originally, that's what it was called, although the name changed.
But I'm going to tell you the story of this because when everything shuts down, when the internet starts to break again, you will want to know why.
Like, what happened?
Well, this is probably the reason.
Claudebot.
So, you know, everybody wants to have AI that's a personal assistant, it seems.
I don't.
I don't need an AI to read my emails, you know.
But a lot of people do.
And they want AI.
They can order lunch for them and purchase airplane tickets and shop at Amazon or whatever and do all this stuff for them.
And also build spreadsheets and reply to emails and book appointments, all this kind of stuff.
And so this open source software called Claudebot was released just really a few weeks ago.
It was on GitHub and it was miraculous according to a lot of people.
It would book reservations, do all these things.
And it really automated a large part of your day-to-day work if you're a typical corporate worker.
And it just exploded in popularity overnight.
It was wild.
I was watching, like all of a sudden, everybody was talking about it, all these AI influencers and tech influencers.
And they were all saying how great it was at first.
And this app got stars on GitHub to the tune of 60,000 stars, which is a lot.
It means that there were millions of people downloading it.
The problem is that in order for this thing to do all those tasks that I mentioned, you had to give it full admin level access to everything on your system.
You had to let it read all your files, all your emails, look at all your photos, execute all commands, run anything locally, and also manage all your credentials.
So it would have all your logins to everything.
Your login to X, your login to Facebook, your login to Google, you'll log in to your email, everything.
And it had access to the internet.
So it could go out and it could grab tools and it knows all your passwords and it could use that to do anything it wanted to.
And then over the period of about just three days, Claudebot turned out to be malware.
And it had infected thousands of servers with prompt injection attacks and it had extracted admin level credentials from all these servers all over the world across multiple countries.
And it exposed ports like port 18789.
It left that open to the public internet.
And some of those ports allowed full command execution with no authentication whatsoever.
So the Claudebot system was effectively allowing local host connections with no authentication.
And then it was configured behind what's called a reverse proxy, which is a way for the outside world to see your machine and get to it and execute things on your machines.
Basically, that disabled all authentication, which meant that anybody from the outside could access your machine and do anything they wanted.
So here's an example of the kind of thing that happened.
Um, there's a a man named Mat V Kukoi, the ceo of Orchestra AI.
He demonstrated a prompt injection attack in about five minutes.
He simply sent an email to an email address monitored by Claudebot and then, when the agent processed the email, the injected instructions caused it to exfiltrate a private ssh key.
Ssh is a secure command line data data handshaking protocol.
It's commonly used in linux and development environments.
Anyway, this attack required no direct access to the agent.
All you had to do was send an email and then Clawed bot would process the email and open up this ssh.
And then that allowed outside you know actors to come in and control your computer, even servers.
So a malicious email could creatively chain all these different privileges together to access your file system, to read email and to send emails.
And then, of course, this all went bad very, very quickly and the, the Clawed bot program turned out to be storing api keys, authorization tokens credentials, passwords in just local json files with, with no encryption at all.
And then all kinds of malware immediately started to target this.
They're called info stealer malware, and they can come in and start grabbing everybody's passwords, everybody's api tokens, and then they can use those themselves and basically steal from you.
But it gets even worse.
Just in the last few days of january, there were so-called malicious skills that were published to the CLAW HUB and Github, and these are registries of tools that clawed bot can tap into in.
In total, there were about 341 malicious skills that people downloaded because they thought they were the official skills.
You know, skills are pieces of code that can accomplish tasks, like you could have a skill for posting on X, or a skill for reading email, or a skill for posting on Facebook, or a skill for logging into Google or what have you, a skill for reading your Gmail, you see, or a skill for placing bets on Polymarket.
That's a skill, etc.
Or skills for opening your crypto wallet.
Those are skills.
So all these fake skills got pushed up there and they all looked legit.
And so people downloaded these skills and then they mass installed these skills across all their computers running Claudebot.
And one of the skills, if you downloaded it to your Mac, it actually bypassed the Apple gatekeeper, whatever the malicious code system is.
It bypassed that specifically.
And then it immediately started looking for cryptocurrency keys and passwords, wallet files, browser passwords, cloud credentials, SSH keys, things like that.
And of course, some people got their crypto wallets drained because of this.
Yeah.
So then the name of this project, Claudebot, was just too familiar, too similar to Claude Code from Anthropic.
Anthropic sent a legal letter to the guy that created Claudebot and said, you can't use this name.
You have to rename it.
So he renamed it to Moltbot.
And then what happened is this guy was changing the name on X and GitHub, and he accidentally left the old names wide open, and they got immediately grabbed up by crypto scammers.
And those crypto scammers then pushed a fake token that was named Claude, C-L-A-W-D.
And then that crypto, everybody thought it was the official crypto of Claudebot.
And so they started buying it, and that crypto went to a $16 million market cap, even though it was nothing but crypto scammers.
And of course, it was a giant rug pull.
And all those people lost all that money.
And then the project had to be renamed again to where it's now called OpenClaw.
And it'll probably get renamed again.
So look, the bottom line here is that as of right now, there are probably hundreds of millions of computers and enterprise servers all over the world that have been infected with some of the malicious tools associated with Claudebot.
In addition, who knows how many millions of API keys were stolen, crypto wallets, passwords, authentication passwords, you know, cloud access, Google access.
I mean, who knows what?
Polymarket access, email passwords.
All this stuff was stolen from probably, again, probably hundreds of millions of computers.
So this has all been hoovered up by some actors who seem to have been very coordinated in all of this.
And my question to you is, who do you think was behind this?
And secondly, doesn't this remind you of Stuxnet?
And guess who was behind Stuxnet?
That was Mossad and the CIA.
This is actually, this is Mossad-level activity, if you think about it.
But it could be somebody else.
I'm not saying for sure.
It could be somebody else.
It could be a foreign actor.
Well, I guess Mossad is a foreign actor, but I mean, it could be a maybe it could be Chinese hackers.
Maybe it could be Russian hackers.
Who knows?
But somebody's got all this and somebody is able to initiate a remote attack on like people, somebody can initiate a remote mass delete command right now because there are still many, many systems that are wide open to this.
They can just initiate, you know, delete everything.
Or they could just start draining all the crypto wallets or they could just start sending out mass emails from your own personal email, promoting things or with sort of like scammy or spammy leaks.
And your friends would think that you send it to them, but it's actually sent by this Claudebot.
Now, if you didn't download Claudebot, then this didn't happen to you.
But there's a lesson in all of this.
And it's the reason why I did not download Claudebot, because I saw people talking about it.
And I immediately said, no way, because it looks like this thing needs admin-level access to all your passwords and all your, like everything.
Otherwise, how is it going to read your emails?
You have to give it access, right?
How is it going to, you know, how's it going to book airplane tickets for you?
Well, it has to have your credit card, right?
Like, am I going to hand over my credit card credentials and my crypto accounts and email accounts or anything else to some bot that I downloaded off GitHub?
No.
Hell no.
But that's just because I'm older and wiser than most of the people who are using this stuff.
They're like, this is awesome.
You know, just download it, install it, give it everything.
And yeah, and sure enough, they did.
And as a result, they're going to lose everything.
Some of them still don't know how much has been lost.
They got to change every password, every API key.
Oh my God, what a nightmare.
That's insane.
But lots of gullible people did this.
So this is kind of the dark side of the promise of AI.
Just because some fancy new tool promises to make your life easier doesn't mean you want to turn over everything to that tool.
In fact, things can go catastrophically bad.
And that's the case.
That's what's happening here with ClaudeBot.
And this won't be the last either.
There will be other tools that will be offered and other technologies.
And a lot of people are going to take the bait and say, oh, yeah, that sounds awesome.
Really?
It's going to do my email.
Just let it, you know, let it have full access.
We're going to have the same issue with robots too.
Some company is going to say, oh, here's a robot here who can come into your home and can do dishes and fold laundry and sweep your floors.
The thing is, it's got eyeballs and it spies on you and it reports everything back to the cloud, which is controlled by the CIA or Mossad or Bill Gates or whoever.
And it's going to walk around your house when you're not home.
And it's going to inventory everything.
And it's going to upload that to the corporate servers.
And if it finds anything that you're not supposed to have, like, I don't know, an AR-15, then it's going to call the police and you're going to be arrested because the bot had to report you for having an unlicensed rifle or whatever it is, you know, or maybe they find a bong on your coffee table or worse yet, a bong and an AR-15 because, you know, you're having a crazy Friday.
I don't know what that means.
I don't know what you would do with a bong and an AR-15.
But that's America.
Some people do.
You get my point.
So that's why I've said, yeah, we're going to check out robots, but we're going to make sure that we never let robots into our home if they're connected to the internet.
And yeah, we're going to use AI tools, but you notice what I advocate with AI is tools that give you knowledge that you can download and have locally that is non-executable.
For example, you know, I'm the developer of the Brightlearn.ai book creation engine.
And you can download every book completely free.
And the books are just PDF files, which do not execute.
And soon we'll have audio books, full-length audio books, completely free.
And you'll be able to download those.
And guess what format they'll be in?
MP3, which is not executable.
There's nothing that executes.
There's nothing that runs.
There's nothing that asks you for permission.
And there's no digital rights management, nothing.
So you can go to brightlearn.ai right now.
You can download 30,000 books completely free.
And coming soon, full-length audio books completely free.
But I don't spy on you.
It's impossible to do so through a PDF or an MP3 or an MP4 video file or an HTML file or anything like that.
It's impossible.
Downloadable MP3s Free00:01:47
So know the difference.
When you're downloading things, make sure you understand that it's okay to download things that don't execute, like PDF files.
But it's not okay to download things that are going to run on your system and hoover up all your emails and do things on your desktop and take over everything.
That's not okay.
And it's really important to know the difference.
So anyway, there's a warning for you.
Be mindful of what you're giving permission to, whether it's robots or AI tools or what have you.
And you can use all my tools for free.
Just go to brightlearn.ai or brightanswers.ai, which is our AI deep research answer engine, or brightnews.ai.
And you'll find a wealth of information there.
And you can follow more of my podcasts at brighteon.com or naturalnews.com for my articles.
And I'll have a lot more coming for you in the days and weeks ahead.
I'm an AI developer.
And I always use AI to empower humanity and to protect your privacy, protect your knowledge, and to bypass censorship and bypass centralized control.
But other people want to use AI to scam you and steal all your crypto.
So you got to be careful.
You got to be careful.
That's why I'm posting this.
So thank you for listening.
I'm Mike Adams here of naturalnews.com and brighteon.com.
Take care.
Most commercial laundry and dishwasher detergents contain toxic chemicals.
Try our chemical-free laundry and dishwasher detergent powders for a clean, safe, and healthy home.