All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 5, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
19:15
Why we should REPLACE corrupt government with open source AI
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This podcast is about why we should replace most of Congress and much of our government with open source AI.
I'm Mike Adams.
I'm an AI developer.
I built numerous AI engines.
I'll mention some of them later, but welcome to the podcast.
Now, right off the bat, I understand that this is controversial for some people, especially those who are not that familiar with AI.
They think that replacing government with AI would create a technocracy that would just enslave us all under a black box surveillance system.
Well, that would be true if it were closed source AI run by companies like Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Meta, etc.
So if you hear anybody in government advocating to replace government workers with those systems, yeah, red flags, big time.
Because they want, of course, a controllable secret black box that you can't look inside.
You don't know what the model's running.
You don't know what it's thinking.
What I'm suggesting is exactly the opposite.
I'm suggesting that the voters, for example, let's just take a member of, well, a senator.
The voters, let's say, elect an AI senator.
And then that AI senator has to be an open source reasoning model.
And every thought and every piece of output, every text from that model is pushed out onto a web page in real time so that the public can see everything that model is thinking, every piece of communication.
It's all fully transparent.
And when the model is reasoning through a question, like, should I vote for this bill or should I not vote for this bill?
You'll be able to monitor all the reasoning of the model.
And importantly, not only do we have then full transparency, which we don't have with humans today, human senators do secret deals in smoke-filled rooms behind closed doors, trips to Epstein Island or Tel Aviv or wherever, all kinds of corruption and fraud with humans.
But these AI models can't be corrupted by offering them money or sex or free trips on an airplane, whatever, because they don't have bodies.
They don't exist in the 3D world and they're not interested in any of that stuff.
But not only do we use open source AI models, we then make sure that the voters get to decide the prompts and the priorities of the models.
So this is really critical.
Think about it right now.
Currently, you have a senator that goes on the campaign trail and makes a bunch of promises.
You know, during the campaign, they'll say, I'm going to lower taxes.
I'm going to support the Second Amendment.
I'm going to support freedom of speech.
I'm going to oppose censorship, etc.
None of that is legally binding, by the way.
None of that actually matters at all.
And more often than not, that human, when they are sworn in as a senator, they immediately betray their constituents and they betray those promises.
So it's like flipping a switch.
All of a sudden, they're in Washington, big money starts showing up at the door.
Oh, here's money from big pharma.
Oh, here's money from APAC.
Oh, here's money from big tech, etc.
All of a sudden, their positions completely change and they betray everybody.
That's how it normally works.
But with an open source AI system, that would be impossible because the voters would vote on essentially the prompts or the priorities, the personalities in the mind of the AI engine that is sent to Washington, D.C. to argue on behalf of constituents.
And that AI model could not deviate from that.
It is mathematically impossible for it to do so because it's following the prompts of the voters.
So if the voters decide to put in a prompt like, you must protect the First Amendment, you must oppose censorship, then that's exactly what that AI senator is going to carry out on the floor of the Senate.
And that senator will argue in favor of the First Amendment without being compromised or corrupted.
So right there, this would be a major improvement over humans in Congress.
But let's talk about government workers in other areas of government because you see, the government sector, the public sector, is the last sector that's going to embrace AI.
Why?
Well, because government jobs, and this is especially true in states like California at the state government level, but it's also true nationwide to some degree.
Government jobs are the cushy jobs where you get great benefits, great salaries, great vacation.
But you don't really have to work that hard, typically.
I know there are exceptions to this, but overall, you don't have to get that much done.
It's government.
There's no competition.
There's nobody competing with the DMV.
There's nobody competing really with delivering the mail.
Why do you think the post office is so slow and so broke?
And they have the dumbest ideas like their electric mail trucks that never worked.
Yeah, because there's no competition.
So there's no accountability in government.
And as a result, they don't want AI there because AI brings in efficiency, rational thinking, cost savings, and much faster performance.
If you thought AI could replace a lot of private sector jobs like customer service jobs, because AI is faster and better and cheaper than, let's say, a customer service rep, which it is, well, you should consider just how much better AI is than a government worker, a typical government worker who is slow and inefficient and typically not that great at their job.
Again, I know there are exceptions.
I'm not saying every government worker is like this.
But by and large, you know, they're not very competitive people.
That's why they love their jobs because it's kind of a lock on getting a salary and benefits without actually having to compete in the private sector.
Okay.
AI would just obliterate that and could replace over time 80 or 90% of government workers, which would actually make government work better.
So you wouldn't have to wait as long for your, I don't know, your immigration form or your small business loan or your government grant or whatever it is.
You wouldn't have to wait as long.
It would happen more quickly, more efficiently, and at much lower cost.
We could save all kinds of money and maybe reduce the budget deficit.
Although, of course, they're going to keep printing trillions of dollars no matter what.
But there could be significant cost savings from this.
And the key is that, in my opinion, we must demand the running of open source models so that every government worker is accountable, every government AI worker.
They're all accountable.
We can see what they're thinking.
We can see what they're saying.
Can actually go to a webpage and we can monitor their inner dialogue.
We actually get to read the minds of the open source AI, which is very different from the way it is today.
Obviously, today, you know, again, it's a secret.
And the worst part about government is the people running it right now because they're corrupt, because they're slow, they're inefficient, they're vindictive.
Look at all the radical leftists who are opposing the Trump administration and they're deliberately trying to cause chaos within the bureaucracy.
They don't want government to work when Trump is president.
And when they control the White House, they also don't want government to work very well, but they do want to use it as a money laundering slush fund operation through USAID and other, you know, let's say EPA grants that go out to all these left-wing nonprofits that funnel those funds back into the campaign contributions for Democrats.
I mean, it's a giant con.
And AI could end that con because AI would, by definition, it would be forced to represent the people, the people and their prompts, their priorities.
And you can bet that Democrats especially do not want that.
They do not want AI to be working in government at all.
And so if you think about it, the people that love government structures, which Democrats really love big government, they want to keep government slow, inefficient, and corrupt so that they can control it and twist it to their uses.
Whereas you and I might want much smaller government, but if it's still run by humans, it's still going to be corrupt because humans are easily corruptible, especially in government, especially in the Senate.
You know, when there's money on the table, hey, they take the money and they compromise.
AI would not compromise.
And again, AI would be transparent, 100% visible.
No secrets, no secrets.
And that's the way it should be.
You've seen those memes, haven't you, that say that members of the Senate should wear like a coat emblazoned with the logos of their corporate sponsors, kind of like race car drivers, you know, so that when the senator is speaking, you could see, oh, it's Pfizer.
Yeah, it's Raytheon, it's Microsoft, whatever.
That would be transparency, and we don't have that right now.
But with open source AI, we would absolutely have that transparency.
We would know what it's thinking.
We would know who it's talking to.
And it could have conversations with all kinds of people.
It could actually respond to and listen to more of its constituents.
It could take into account the suggestions of its own voters instead of just largely ignoring them, which is what most senators do.
So really, AI can give us better government than human government.
And I'm not a pro-government person, don't get me wrong.
I think government should be sharply reduced by at least 90%.
And it's far too big and too powerful.
And it does far too many things in society.
And, you know, it takes away your freedom, etc.
But if we're going to have government functions, such as, let's say, approving your ATF application for a suppressor, I would much rather that process happen more quickly and more efficiently and more accurately.
And that means AI.
You know, the same thing with, think about it, handling benefits requests, you know, food stamp benefits, handling applications for grants, handling immigration, handling, you know, all these functions, visa applications, driver's license, you know, DMV operations.
It would be much more efficient with AI.
Now, interestingly, the same thing is true with the judicial system.
We don't need human judges at this point.
We really don't.
And human judges, just like human government workers, can also be very corrupt.
And many of them are.
They're hopelessly corrupt.
And they will refuse to listen to the evidence of the case.
They've predecided the outcome of the trial, like they railroaded Alex Jones over the Sandy Hook trial.
You think Alex Jones got a fair trial?
Not a chance.
Alex Jones would have had a much better trial if the judge had been AI, an AI reasoning model with instructions to follow the law, follow the rules of evidence.
Alex Jones would have been vindicated because the whole case would have been thrown out if the judge followed the law.
So I think right now, every trial that we have in America, whether it's civil or criminal, I think that the parties involved should have the option to choose an AI judge.
And in criminal cases, that should be the defendant's choice.
I want to choose an AI judge because I don't think the human judge is going to be fair.
The human judge is a leftist or whatever.
The human judge doesn't like me because I'm white or black or Asian or whatever.
I want an AI judge that's going to do a better job.
That should be an option right now.
And then in civil cases, I think that if both parties agree to an AI judge, then they should have that option of having an AI judge.
The AI judge can hear all the evidence.
It can assess everything.
It can make a decision that is congruent with the law without being an activist judge.
See, the problem today is all these activist judges that are, of course, corrupt humans, usually left-wing corrupt humans, who don't want to follow the law.
And the same thing is true on the U.S. Supreme Court.
We have activist left-wing judges on the Supreme Court that, number one, are dumber than AI.
I mean, AI is smarter than those left-wing judges, which isn't very difficult to achieve, it turns out, because they're super low IQ leftists sitting on the Supreme Court bench.
Yeah.
But also, AI is, it's going to know more about case precedent, history, the Constitution, everything that's relevant to the case.
AI will have a much better grasp than any human judge.
And in my view right now, I would much rather have AI running the Supreme Court if it's open source.
It's got to be open source, again, so that the public can see the thinking and the conversations and can analyze every decision and how every AI judge arrived at that decision.
But AI would do a much better job than human judges, and they could process one court case every day.
So talk about moving things more quickly.
We could clear out the backlog of civil cases and criminal cases and even Supreme Court cases by applying AI reasoning models that are open source.
I mean, that technology is available right now.
And I know, I hear you.
Some people might say, well, but AI doesn't have human values.
Senators don't have human values.
Have you noticed?
Your government workers don't have human values.
They're evil.
You know, your IRS auditor doesn't have humanity.
Okay.
Stop arguing with the stupid argument that government workers have compassion and empathy and humanity.
No, they don't.
No, they don't.
They're horrible.
In some cases, they're evil.
They wield their government power like a weapon over others.
They are psychotic.
AI would be a far better replacement than a lot of those government people.
I mean, the regulators, think about it.
The FDA, the EPA, the CDC, well, the USDA, etc.
Those are power-hungry tyrants that run those agencies.
Don't tell me that, oh, we need to defer to their humanity.
There's no humanity there.
They stopped being human, you know, a decade ago when their pension started adding up.
They stopped being human.
So AI can actually be more human than the humans in government because the humans in government are barely human.
You see what I'm saying?
And AI could actually be prompted to respect human values like truth and honesty and access to food and water, access to knowledge, access to freedom of speech and freedom of religion, etc.
It's the humans in government that are destroying your rights.
It's the humans that are making a mess of everything.
AI would be far better at respecting your rights.
And if you think about it, putting an end cap on this, law is just code written in words.
And AI, right now, AI agents are the best coders in terms of computer code on the planet by far.
There's no human that is better than an AI coder.
Well, why would that be any different when it comes to law?
There is no human that can be better than an AI lawmaker or an AI law decider, which is called a judge, or an AI law implementer, which is called, you know, a regulator or someone in the executive branch.
They are implementing the law.
AI will do that better than any human.
And it's time for us to think seriously about moving in this direction.
We need to elect AI representatives in the House, AI senators.
We need to have AI engines in the regulators that are focused on things like food safety or immigration or whatever, or, you know, pesticide enforcement, things like that.
AI will make those functions more efficient.
And the beneficiaries of all that will be we the people.
In the meantime, if you want to use all of my AI engines, they're all free and very popular now, especially the book creator, which is at brightlearn.ai, or you can see a hub for all of our AI engines at brighteon.ai.
Check it out.
We've got an AI chatbot.
We've got an AI news trends analyzer and news spider.
We've got our AI book creator and we have an AI vaccine research engine that you can find at vaccineforensics.com.
So check them all out.
They're all free.
And there you'll see the power of AI.
And it's only going to get better and smarter and more detailed.
So this is just the beginning.
Check it out.
Thank you for listening.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
Take care.
Organic heavy cream powder provides the same creamy texture as regular heavy cream without the limited shelf life.
Health Rangers Select Organic Heavy Cream Powder is convenient, portable, and shelf-stable.
Shop at HealthRangerStore.com.
▲
Export Selection