All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 4, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
41:40
Terawatt Tantrums - How America is 15 Years Behind China's Power Infrastructure
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, welcome to this special report that I call Terawatt Tantrums.
I'm Mike Adams, the health ranger, but today this is not about health.
This is about the power grid.
And earlier this year in July, I sounded the alarm over how far behind China the United States has become in terms of its aggregate power generation.
And at the time, looking at late 2023 numbers, I mentioned that the U.S. currently only generates about 4,400 terawatt hours per year.
Now, that number may be a little bit higher because that was late 2023.
Whereas China, at the same time, was already generating over 10,000 terawatt hours.
So not only is China generating more than twice the aggregate power of the United States, but on average, China's electricity costs are 40% cheaper than the United States.
These are critical issues when it comes to powering AI data centers, obviously.
Electricity is the single biggest factor that goes into them.
I mean, after you've built the building and assuming you have the GPUs, which we do, I mean, we can make them through NVIDIA and Taiwan Semiconductor, etc.
But we don't have the power to fire up all these data centers.
And there are right now, there are data centers in America that have been built or are near completion that have no power connections.
Some of them are sitting empty, hundreds of thousands of GPUs.
In fact, Microsoft admitted this.
One of their top executives, maybe it was their CEO, said they've got hundreds of thousands of GPUs sitting there with no power.
So they bought the GPUs from NVIDIA, but they don't have the power.
So I began to ask the question earlier this summer, how long would it take the United States to catch up to China?
Or even actually, even let's say something more moderate.
How long would it take the United States to add 1,000 terawatt hours of aggregate power generation to our power grid?
Of course, we have three power grids.
We have the East, the West, and Texas.
And the East grid is already at max.
It can't handle any more data centers at all.
If you build a data center in any of those 13 states, including Virginia, you have to bring your own power.
That's right.
You have to build a power plant or a nuclear plant before you can fire up the data center.
That's how bad it is.
They don't have that problem in China.
But even in the Western power grid, things are getting tight.
And in Texas, there's all these announcements of these companies.
They're going to build massive data centers in Texas, including Google and microchip factories and so on.
Well, where's that power going to come from?
Because the Texas power grid just a few years ago suffered rolling blackouts.
I remember because I lived through that.
That was a very, very cold day in the winter of, I think, 2021.
And we had eight minutes of power every 30 minutes.
Yeah.
Imagine that.
And some people had no power for weeks and the entire Texas power grid just about created.
The only way they kept it alive was by having major rolling blackouts across the state.
So where's all this new power going to come from?
Because Trump has a vision for America.
We're going to be reindustrialized.
We're going to be the AI powerhouse of the world, he says.
They launched a new program.
It's some new national program for making us the AI leaders.
He's got all these big wigs around the world announcing investment in manufacturing in America and in AI technology, everybody from Oracle to SoftBank and Taiwan Semiconductor, etc.
That all sounds great at the press conference.
But where's the power coming from?
Seriously, where's the power coming from?
I did a podcast maybe a month ago where I said you can print currency, but you can't print terawatt hours.
And that's true.
You know, the United States can generate or counterfeit currency, but you can't print electricity.
You actually have to generate it.
And just announcing things doesn't create electricity.
It turns out for some reason the electrons are not swayed by the White House press secretary.
So I conducted some research.
And of course, I use AI to help me with the research, as any intelligent person would do today.
But I was trying to determine an answer to this question.
Given that right now we generate in America 4,400 terawatt hours annually, how long would it take the U.S. to build out the infrastructure to add just 1,000 terawatt hours to that number so that we would be generating, let's say, 5,400 terawatt hours?
Okay?
Now, in order to do that, now remember that's an annual number.
It's terawatt hours.
And in order to get that number, you need to understand how many hours there are in a year.
Okay.
So don't confuse that with somebody saying, hey, we're going to build a one gigawatt data center.
Well, that's a gigawatt right now.
That's a gigawatt of power bandwidth.
You have to multiply the one gigawatt times the number of hours that there are in a year in order to get how much power that would use in one year.
So it turns out that there are 8,760 hours in most years, but not all years, because of leap years.
Of course, of course, it's not always the same number, but it's roughly 8,760 hours.
So if you have a one gigawatt data center, and I'm not going to make the math difficult here, so don't worry.
If you have a one gigawatt data center, you need, you know, 8,760 gigawatt hours of power, correct?
So that is 8.7 terawatt hours.
Got it?
Okay, so 8.7 terawatt hours is what a one gigawatt data center would consume in a full year, assuming it's running every day and it's not a leap year.
Now, Elon Musk brags about building a one gigawatt data center.
I don't know if it's online yet, I doubt it, but it's coming online probably early next year.
And there are many other tech companies that are taking all this stock valuation money, which is at insane levels because of the stock bubble.
But they're taking that money and they're using it to build data centers.
But then the question is, well, who's building the power infrastructure to power those data centers?
So in order to answer that question, we need to look at the current state of power in the United States.
And this is going to impact you.
This is absolutely going to impact your life.
So this is not some esoteric conversation.
This is a big deal.
And this is why China is probably going to win the AI race here, but we'll get to that.
So right now there are 94 nuclear reactors in the United States operating across 54 power plants.
Okay, but it's 94 reactors.
At least this is according to the AI research.
Currently, it's 97 gigawatts of generating capacity.
They generated 782 terawatt hours in 2024, which is about 18% of U.S. electricity.
So as you can see, if you are looking at the numbers, those nuclear power plants are not running anywhere near 100% capacity because they have maintenance, they have downtime, etc.
The average nuclear power plant reactor lasts 43 or 44 years.
Now, here's the thing.
About a quarter of the enriched uranium that runs these nuclear power plants comes from Russia.
Russia is the largest global supplier of enriched uranium for nuclear power.
They currently control 44% of the global uranium enrichment capacity.
And just in 2023, the United States, through the nuclear industry companies, spent $800 million with Russia to buy uranium, to power the nuclear power plants.
Yep.
So if we see, you know how Trump and the U.S., they like to have a lot of economic sanctions placed on Russia?
Well, there's a waiver on uranium.
And that waiver is good through January 1 of 2028.
Yeah.
I wonder why there's a waiver.
Yeah, because we would be screwed without Russian uranium.
So in 2024, imports of uranium from Russia dropped to about half of what it was in 2023.
So there are efforts to try to reduce dependence on Russian uranium.
But here's the problem.
The U.S. has almost no mining and refining capability of uranium domestically.
It's not much.
I mean, it's a little bit.
Let's see.
In 2024, the U.S. mined 677,000 pounds of uranium oxide here.
That's it.
Not even a million pounds.
There are efforts to try to increase this.
And currently there are some U.S. reserves of uranium.
It's about 1,200 million pounds of reserves.
But again, we are only mining less than a million pounds a year right now.
So if we go through those reserves, then we don't really have a way to replace them domestically.
There's only one facility in the United States that transforms uranium oxide into uranium hexafluoride, which is the form used for enrichment.
That's the Honeywell Metropolis Works in Illinois.
It's the only facility.
That's it.
It can process up to 15,000 metric tons of uranium each year.
It was restarted in 2023, and it can't keep up with demand.
Okay, so again, it's only one facility.
If that facility, if something happens to it, then we're toast.
We can't produce domestic uranium for the nuclear power plants.
Now, that's just the conversion into hexafluoride.
After conversion, you have to go through an enrichment step.
So in terms of enrichment, there are at least four facilities in the United States that are either operating or beginning to or under construction to start operating.
One of them in Tennessee, for example, is going to come online sometime in the 2030s.
Yeah.
Let's see.
There's a company called Urenco that has a good capacity right now for enrichment, although this is the big bottleneck right here.
The U.S., in order to support a tripling of the current nuclear industry, to bring us up to around 300 gigawatts of power, then we need a 10 times increase from the current domestic capacity of enrichment.
In other words, currently we're only able to enrich one-tenth of what we would need to add just 300 gigawatts of nuclear capacity.
You got that?
And experience tells us that in the U.S., we're not very good at building nuclear power plants.
Even Honeywell has had these massive problems as well.
There was a big failure in a nuclear power plant construction in a place called Vodal.
I think that's how you pronounce it.
V-O-G-T-L-E.
I think this was a Honeywell plant.
It was estimated to cost $14 billion and to take four years.
But it ended up costing $35 billion and it took 14 years.
And the cost per kilowatt doubled by the time it was actually done.
So massive cost overruns, bad engineering, supply chain problems, problems with the workforce, didn't have experienced workers.
Also, Westinghouse went bankrupt in 2017.
So yeah, there's the bankruptcy issue.
All right.
So China learned from that as well.
China, of course, has a lot of innovation in the energy space.
And they have a program kind of like the AP1000 nuclear power plant from Honeywell.
But their series, which is called the, what is it, the Sanmenhaiyang, it takes them about nine years to build a power plant instead of 14.
They have a 48% reduction, therefore, in construction duration, it says here.
And of course, they have a much more educated domestic workforce to be able to run the nuclear power plants successfully.
So anyway, to kind of get to the answer here, according to the math, which takes into account the efficiencies and the downtime and the capacity, the generation of all these nuclear power plants,
in order for the United States to add 1,000 terawatt hours per year of power production, we would need to build 113 nuclear reactors of the AP1000 type.
Okay?
113 reactors.
The problem is the requirement of uranium and conversion services and enrichment, none of those are available in the United States.
None of those.
So, you know, to power this additional 1,000 terawatt hours, we would need close to 30,000 metric tons of uranium oxide.
We would need massive amounts enrichment.
It's saying 7.5 million SWU per year.
I don't even know what unit that is, SWU, some kind of enrichment unit.
In any case, the cost of doing, just building the nuclear power plants to do that in the United States, about $1.9 trillion.
$1.9 trillion to build that.
And there's nowhere near that investment taking place.
In addition, the timeline.
According to some basic reasoning on this, we could have By the year 2030, we could have maybe 5 to 10 gigawatts of nuclear power under construction, not operating, but under construction while we work to expand the conversion of uranium oxide.
In the second phase of this plan, we could have 35 gigawatts online by 2035.
And by the year 2040, we could have maybe 60 to 80 gigawatts online.
And then in phase three, with all the supply chains and all the mining and all the conversion and enrichment and everything else, domestic fuel supply chains all in place, we could have the 125 gigawatts of nuclear power online by the year 2055.
And by 2055, then we would raise our power generation domestically from 4,400 terawatt hours to 5,400 terawatt hours.
Got it?
That's by 2055.
Where do you think China is going to be by 2055?
Yeah, right.
So China's already at over 10,000 terawatt hours.
By 2055, are you kidding me?
They'll probably be way beyond 20,000 terawatt hours and the U.S. will still be at 5,000 terawatt hours.
So in other words, there is no actual practical way for the U.S. to compete with China on energy production using nuclear power.
That's for sure.
Can't do it with nuclear until the year 2055.
And again, that's just a fraction of what China already produces.
You can't just scale up hydro because where are you going to build giant dams and how long does that take?
It's difficult to scale wind and solar because of manufacturing costs, installation, long range power transmission issues, and also wind turbine failure rates are very high.
And solar panels are vulnerable to hailstorms and also night.
Yeah, you know, when the sun's not shining.
So unless you want to have data centers that only operate for about six hours a day when the sun is shining more directly overhead, then you can't power data centers with solar.
And you can't power them with wind for the same reason because wind is also not reliable.
Sometimes the wind blows and oh, then you can have your super intelligence.
Sometimes the wind doesn't blow, then it's all shut down, you see?
So then what?
What do you do?
You could burn natural gas, but there'll be all kinds of resistance from Democrats and the climate alarmists and so on screaming about carbon dioxide.
Can't burn coal for a similar reason, plus coal actually does have particulate pollution much more than natural gas.
Can't use cold fusion because that's still suppressed by the government.
And cold fusion hasn't been scaled up in this way.
Cold fusion works.
It's called low energy nuclear reactions, but it works much more slowly than fission or hot fusion.
So cold fusion is good for heating water to heat buildings in the winter, to heat like a military base.
It's not that great at boiling water to run electricity generating turbines.
It's very hard to scale cold fusion in that way.
So what else we have?
You know, zero-point energy?
That's theoretical.
Hot fusion, yeah, that's by the year 2075, maybe they will have used enough magnets and they'll have like over-unity energy generation from hydrogen atoms or whatever.
That's nowhere in the near future.
So what is there?
You could, I mean, it's America.
You could have all the obese people ride bicycles to generate electricity and give them food stamps.
You know, for every kilowatt hour they generate, they get like a box of Pop-Tarts or something.
You know, I'm joking.
That's crude satire.
But we're running out of ways to generate electricity in America, aren't we?
I mean, to generate it soon.
And we kind of need it soon because the AI race is underway right now.
And so that brings to mind my new book that I've just published at books.brightlearn.ai.
Let me show you the cover.
It's called Terawatt Tantrums.
And as you can see from this book, from the cover anyway, it says how America already lost the AI race and is 15 years behind China on power infrastructure.
Actually, I was being generous with that title.
We're more than 15 years behind.
Trying to be nice to the Trump administration.
In reality, it's more than 20 years behind.
But the U.S. cannot compete with China on power, which means the U.S. cannot compete with China on industry or data centers.
Now, I mean, currently the U.S. has a lot of data centers, probably more data centers than anybody in the world, but that's going to change dramatically over the next couple of years.
And the advantage that the U.S. has is being lost.
It's also being lost in the realm of AI, where you have open AI, you know, Sam Altman, and that whole hot mess of a fake corporation.
I mean, a faked mission.
They were going to share everything with the world, and then they ended up turning it into a for-profit venture.
Yeah.
Giant rug pull.
Chat GPT, their engine, it's no better than the free open source engines out of China.
You can download free of charge right now models of DeepSeek or Quinn, actually like a 72 billion quin that will outperform ChatGPT on most things.
And there are larger models out of China that you can download free of charge, all open source, that you can run for free and you can train on them for free.
And they cost you nothing.
Well, I guess that's redundant, but they are just as good as ChatGPT.
And China not only has the foresight where they invested in energy infrastructure for the last 25 years, but the Chinese government is also investing in AI, AI development.
China has five times more scientists and engineers than the United States.
And most of the best engineers in the US right now working for Google or Microsoft or Amazon, they're Chinese, folks.
They're Chinese.
They speak Chinese in the AI meetings in the tech companies.
In fact, if you join a tech company as an AI engineer and you don't speak Chinese, you may not know what's happening in the meeting.
Yeah, seriously.
And I don't even speak enough Chinese to know all the special terms of AI.
I would probably be lost in those meetings who would have to learn a lot of new words.
But almost all of the innovation that's happening in the world right now in the space of AI is happening in Chinese-speaking groups.
Now, granted, there's still great innovation in France with the Meestral Group or Mistral, some people say.
And their engines are phenomenal.
And they just released version 3 of everything, I think.
They're like Meestral Large 3, Maestral Medium 3, Meestral Mini 3, etc.
And those are great engines.
Don't get me wrong, they're great.
But ChatGPT isn't releasing open source anymore.
Meta isn't releasing open source.
Google isn't.
It's all coming out of China.
And the Chinese models are rapidly surpassing anything that's happening in the USA.
So think about it, folks.
China has better, or let's say, comparable AI technology right now.
More engineers by far.
Way more power by far, way more manufacturing capacity, also by far.
It's not even close.
The only thing China lacks is access to the same microchips.
But they're solving that problem too, because they are building their own UV lithography equipment so they can domestically manufacture their own microchips to ultimately compete with Taiwan Semiconductor and to compete with Samsung and NVIDIA and the other large chip makers.
It's going to take a few years, but China will get there and China will surpass all those chip makers.
Because China, again, they have foresight.
They've got really smart people.
They've got the infrastructure that can just rock this whole project.
So meanwhile, by the year 2055, the U.S. might add a little bit more to our power.
Yeah.
And that's only if the dollar doesn't collapse before then, by the way, which of course it will.
I mean, the U.S. Empire is just about done.
According to my research, it's going to take 15 to 20 years just to achieve a 100% domestic nuclear supply chain for the nuclear fuel.
I mean, so you can count on that by, you know, 2045, let's say.
And then 25 to 35 years to build the actual power plants.
Yeah.
And remember, that's over 100 nuclear power plants that would be required.
What's the actual number here?
What did it say?
Here it is, 113 AP1000 nuclear reactors.
So out of the 113 reactors that we need to add just 1,000 terawatt hours annually, how many are we planning to build?
How many has Trump announced that we're going to build?
Anybody?
Anybody?
Bueller?
Anyone?
The answer is 10.
10.
So Trump is talking about and of course bragging about we're going to build 10 nuclear power plants.
Not 100, but 10.
10 is going to add what, roughly then, 100 terawatt hours annually, roughly 100.
That would take us from 4,400 to 4,500.
Ooh, big whoop-de-doo, as we used to say.
Yeah, whoop, whoop-de-doo is actually, that's in the Scrabble dictionary for those of you who are word sleuths.
Whoop-de-doo.
Yeah, it means there's no big deal.
Who cares?
You haven't done much.
You build 10 nuclear power plants in America, and it's a joke.
China laughs in your face while they roll out a new mega dam project in northern China that's going to add, I don't even know, what was it?
Like 300 gigawatts or something is massive.
And then on top of that, they signed a deal with Russia to bring in 50 billion cubic meters of Russian gas from the Yamal gas fields in northwestern Russia through a new pipeline called, what is it?
Yamal Power 2 or something.
And that's going to cut right through Mongolia.
And it's going to bring cheap Russian gas into China's northern cities, some of the industrial areas there.
So China will actually have gas for power as well as cheaper nuclear infrastructure for power.
China is also huge on solar, by the way.
You may not know that, but they have massive solar deployment right now, even larger than the United States.
So in the race for electricity, China is leading the entire world.
The race is over.
And that's what I'm saying in my book, Terawatt Tantrums.
It's already done.
America already lost the AI race.
And we can't catch up because we can't generate the power.
Now, the EU can't compete.
I mean, the EU has become a joke.
Collapsing nations and the EU just voted to cut off all energy from Russia by early 2027.
Yeah.
They're going to cut themselves off completely from Russian energy because, you know, EU leadership, they're running a suicide cult there.
They want to starve to death and freeze to death in the coming winters.
They want no energy from Russia.
And of course, they don't want any energy themselves either because, you know, that would anger the climate alarmists.
So pretty much all of EU is, I guess, they're going to just have a policy of no energy for you.
It's like no soup for you.
No kilowatts for you.
Good luck.
Hope you have a thick sleeping bag.
I mean, it's completely insane that Germany completely cut off from Russian energy because the U.S. bombed the Nord Stream pipelines and Germany celebrated it.
They're like, yes, we no longer have energy.
That's nothing to brag about.
Morons.
And France, you know, same thing.
Zeb is no longer.
I mean, a good thing they have a lot of wine in southern France because they're going to have to drink themselves through the winters coming, you know?
Wow.
And the British Empire is completely collapsing at this point.
And no one will miss them, it turns out.
No other nation in the world will miss the British Empire because half the nations were invaded by the British Empire throughout history.
So they will be celebrating the fall.
And the British leadership is going right along with that, committing economic suicide.
So there you go.
You've got Russia has massive amounts of energy.
China has massive amounts of industry and innovation.
The U.S. has massive amounts of debt and currency.
Of course, China has big debt right now, too.
China's debt to GDP ratio is pretty high.
I think it's higher than the U.S. and Japan's is off the charts insane, of course.
But China is growing so rapidly, they can actually grow through their debt problems.
Whereas the U.S. is imploding and collapsing and printing like crazy and can't build the power infrastructure to actually support this whole dream of making America great again.
You can't make America great again when the lights are out.
That's the reality of where we are.
And all of Trump's pronouncements and press releases and deals and plants and White House press secretary promises, none of that stuff generates gigawatts, it turns out.
None of it.
If you can't generate gigawatts, you're out of the game.
So that's the hard, cold reality of where we are.
And on top of that, the steps that would urgently need to be pursued in order to achieve domestic nuclear independence, those steps aren't being taken because we're living in a collapse, failed, decadent empire.
This is the last chapter.
Yeah, I know.
I know.
It's kind of a little bit doomsday there.
But this is why the world is also turning away from the dollar currency.
This is why the dollar will collapse and the U.S. Empire will collapse.
And as I've said before, it's not actually doomsday.
It's a necessary step.
It's a transition that will be chaotic.
It will be painful.
But it's a necessary transition to what comes next, which is the rebirth of the new America or the next America.
The spirit of America reborn out of the ashes of the collapse of the old empire and the old debt that was never sustainable.
We actually have to see the dollar collapse and Washington, D.C. collapse before there will be any changes in our future.
You may have noticed that no matter who you vote for, it's the same uniparty.
No matter who you vote for, it's still run by big pharma and big tech and the CIA.
No matter who you vote for, you still get censorship.
You know, it doesn't matter.
There's no reform that's going to happen from within.
Not real reform.
Just maybe, you know, rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, but not real reform.
Collapse is the only reform that matters from this point forward.
And the faster we get through collapse, the sooner we can start, you know, engineering and building a new nation that actually should be constructed on the ideals that our founding fathers had for our constitutional republic.
Ideals that have long since been abandoned by both Democrats and Republicans and the judicial system, etc.
And From the day, you know, Jekyll Island, 1913, from the day that Congress sold out our currency to the international banker cartel of crooks, the Rockefellers and others, to form the Federal Reserve, on that day, our fate was sealed.
The end of the empire was inevitable.
And even though at first, you know, it was backed by gold, but then Richard Nixon, 1971, took us off the gold window, the gold standard, as it was known, that just underscored the fact that the system was one day going to completely collapse.
And we are now very close to that day.
So what should we do?
We should be prepared for all of this.
And I don't mean that we should run around with doom and gloom all the time, but we should have a practical understanding of where we are in history, you know, the fourth turning and all that.
And we should understand there's going to be a period of chaos.
It will last many years.
Most people will lose everything.
Many people will not survive it.
There will be massive asset forfeiture, the great taking, bank failures, currency failures, industry failures.
The United States of America, as we know it today, will be transformed into something resembling a third world country, which certain areas already look like that, you know, such as Chicago, let's say.
It's going to get way worse before it gets better.
But then on the other side, those of us, you and I, who have innovation, who have determination, knowledge, assets, and technology, we can rebuild a new nation out of the ashes.
And my intention is to help you survive and thrive and protect your assets until we get to that day so that together we can build a new nation together.
It's going to take all of us, that is all of us who are, you know, remaining the remnant of America, because there will be a mass die-off, obviously.
But those of us who make it through, we can rebuild a great future, you know, the next America, whatever that looks like.
Let's not recreate the United States Congress.
That doesn't make any sense.
Actually, what we need is AI representing us in the Senate.
Every senator should be replaced with AI, and then the voters should simply vote on the prompts that the AI follows.
So the voters set the priorities, but the AI engine, they should do the reasoning and the debates and the voting on issues representing their people honestly and truthfully.
And every parameter of that AI engine should be open source, public domain.
Every conversation of the AI would be a matter of public record.
So no secret deals, no secret payoffs, no secret trips to Epstein Island with blackmail material on a human senator, none of that.
Just open source AI engines that are far more effective and more honest and more intelligent than just about every member of the United States Congress today.
We could replace every judge with an AI that would be more fair, more honest, less corrupt, etc.
And incredibly fast also.
Every court case could be decided in one day.
It would clear out the whole court bottleneck system.
You wouldn't have to wait years to have your day in court.
Anyway, I'll cover all this in another podcast about the future, our AI-augmented future, how we can actually restore liberty and freedom by implementing AI in our future nation to replace the corrupt humans that brought us to this point of total destruction.
Corrupt humans like Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, right?
The Bushes, the neocons, Democrats and Republicans alike. brought us to this point because they're corrupt.
They're selfish.
They're greedy.
They're dishonest, etc.
Oh, and don't even mention Joe Biden because he wasn't there.
So, and he never won also.
So anyway, you get the idea.
In the meantime, you can use all of our AI engines free of charge at brightion.ai.
And you can also view all of our books that are free of charge at books.brightlearn.ai.
And you can generate your own books there if you have tokens.
And you can get tokens from our store, healthrangerstore.com.
You can trade in loyalty lion points for book tokens and use that to generate books.
And we're going to be handing out more tokens to our customers here soon, putting in a system to keep that in place.
If you want to get prepared for everything else, let me give you two other sponsors of our podcast.
The first one is our gold and silver sponsor, and that's Battalion Metals, co-founded by Tucker Carlson.
And you can reach them at metalswithmike.com.
And then secondly is the satellite phone store at sat123.com for sat phones, obviously backup communications, solar generators for off-grid power, and Faraday bags to survive EMPs and solar flares for all your electronics, plus privacy when you're traveling, etc.
So check all that out at sat123.com.
You can follow more of my podcasts at brightion.com or my articles at naturalnews.com.
Thank you for listening.
And by the way, I want America to succeed, but I'm a realist about where we are.
It is going to collapse.
We will have to rebuild.
And I'm not here to put America down.
I'm here to help us realize where we are so that we can rebuild.
I want America to succeed.
But I also can see the future on our current trajectory.
And it's not good.
Things are going to have to change dramatically for us to have a better future together.
So thank you for listening.
God bless America.
Take care.
Stock up on HealthRanger's nascent iodine.
Highly bioavailable, shelf-stable, non-GMO, and lab-tested for purity.
A bug out bag essential.
▲
Export Selection