All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 1, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
35:08
Yes, the Skynet human extermination agenda is REAL... and approaching fast
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So here's a topic I want to cover before we get to all that.
And it's about the debate over what's going to happen with AI.
And I talked with some key influencers in the health freedom movement over the holiday weekend.
And of course, lots and lots of people are very concerned about AI and what it's going to do.
And sometimes I hear from people that they think I'm too optimistic when I get excited about the AI tools that I'm building, like this book engine.
And I'll hear from people things like, you know, why are you so optimistic?
Why are you so positive about AI?
Because it's going to kill us all.
And I'm like, yeah, I'm the one who said that already.
I mean, I'll explain this.
And then I hear from other people, oh, you're too negative.
They're not going to kill us all.
And so I want to clarify, based on my experience and knowledge and conversations with high-level people, including people building frontier models.
I want to clarify what I believe is happening and what's going to happen.
So the short version of what I want to say is to quote Charles Dickens, it was the best of times, it was the worst of times.
That line, of course, is from A Tale of Two Cities.
And I don't know if you're aware of this, but the setting of that was right around the French Revolution.
And the setting of a revolution, I think, is very appropriate.
Because even then, what Dickens noticed is that things were destructive and chaotic, and many people thought it was the end of the world.
And then other people thought that, no, this is the beginning of a new world and a new future, which actually, that's what happened.
New abundance appeared on the other side of each of those, the wars also that followed in the early part of the 20th century.
I mean, after the French Revolution, but then World War I and World War II, etc.
There were cycles of times that got really great, really abundant, followed by revolution or war and collapse and chaos.
And then, you know, a new time of expansion and abundance, etc., going through cycles.
So I believe that something very similar is going to happen here with AI, except it's going to be amplified to be a much larger time of chaos, or I should say a much more profound time of chaos, followed by a much more profound era of abundance, but only for those who survive the chaos.
So here's the truth as I see it.
Yes, big tech and the globalists are going to use the machines to try to exterminate billions of people.
Yes, they will probably succeed.
And simultaneously, yes, you can survive that.
And yes, on the other side of that, you will experience radical abundance because of the widespread decentralization and effectively the distribution of cognition, machine cognition at the cost that approaches zero will create radical abundance.
But again, only for those who are still living, obviously.
And one of the examples of this you can see right now, which is with our book site, you know, books.brightlearn.ai.
If you go there, you'll see we now have, oh, look, we have 143 books.
Looks like Corey Endrelott just created a book.
It's called Freedom for Everything, a learning book.
That's cool.
I have to check that one out.
Someone else came in with a book called The Hidden War on Earth, Exposing Global Geoengineering, the Carbon Deception, and the Assault on Life Itself.
That's by Howard Harris III.
And there are many more books that are being created by people like you right now.
And think about this.
Through this tool, which is just blowing everybody's minds.
I mean, people are astonished at what they're seeing this book creation engine do.
They're just astonished.
We have driven the cost of books to zero.
Okay?
So not only have we driven the cost of books to zero, we have driven the cost of creating a book to zero.
So again, I'm not only talking about the cost of a book to an end user.
Like nobody has to buy these books because they're free.
They're free to download, free to read.
You can even use them commercially under our Creative Commons attribution license, etc.
But they're also free to create.
So now the cover art alone would have cost easily $1,000 before.
Now the cover art is created at zero cost to you.
Now the research for the book, which would have taken a human being many, many weeks to carry out, now the research happens in a few seconds and it researches across hundreds of millions of pages of content and reference information and it builds the references for your book and then it writes the book, of course, based on your table of contents and your guidance.
But it writes the book and it fact checks it and it does all the editing and the packaging and puts it into a PDF and online version and then it even creates the audio for some of the books, the more popular books.
All of that happens at zero cost to you.
Let's say if you're a book author, you can now create books for zero cost.
You can now download books at zero cost.
Okay.
So this is radical abundance, especially imagine when we have 100,000 books.
You'll be able to download them all.
And you can use them as a local reference.
So you'll have a digital library that is incredibly powerful at your fingertips.
Okay.
So AI enables this.
And I built this engine myself using AI agents.
So I'm the only human engineer on this entire project.
There's no other human being that has touched this project.
Just me.
And that's the reason I'm getting it done so quickly because I don't have to explain anything to some other engineer because I already know how to make it work because of my background in coding and engineering and running a software company, etc.
So I just give my instructions to the AI agents and then the agents go to work and they build the code.
They build the database schema, the tables, they build static sites and buffering and everything else.
The CDN builds it all.
Okay, so that's radical abundance.
So the cost of knowledge goes to zero.
The cost of cognition goes to zero in essence.
Everybody will have an Einstein in your pocket.
You'll have massive information, massive cognition, problem-solving capabilities at your fingertips.
But that doesn't bring you food for free.
So there are a lot of people in the AI space that are sort of the radical optimists who say that everything's going to cost zero because robots, they say, robots will grow all the food and all the food will be essentially free.
That doesn't make sense to me, because robots are made of metals and metals have to be mined, and the mining of metals costs energy and labor and transportation and refining, and there's energy that goes into the refining and there's a limited supply of metals that go into robots, and then there's a scaling up issue with all of that, and then, on top of that, the robots burn energy to function.
So even when robots are picking strawberries, the strawberries aren't free folks.
They're never going to be free.
Could robot labor replace a lot of human labor and make it less expensive than it is currently?
Yes, we could see food prices go down with robotic automation, in fact that's, that's a certainty, but it won't go to zero.
So there will still be costs associated with food, with shelter and housing, with things like water and with things especially like power, the electricity that you need in order to live.
So while there'll be radical abundance in the digital space, there will not necessarily be radical abundance in the physical space, because in the physical universe there is intrinsic scarcity.
Okay, there's intrinsic scarcity.
You know it takes energy to mine gold or copper or aluminum and it takes something, you know, some kind of expenditure of resources to generate energy.
You either have to burn coal or burn natural gas or use nuclear power with uranium fuel rods, or you know whatever method you're using to generate energy.
So there's a cost associated with all of these things, and one of the key reasons why billions of human beings are likely to be exterminated by the Ai robots is because of this reason is because the data centers.
They need the resources that humans are competing for, and i've mentioned this before.
But those resources are, of course water, power and land or space.
You know the data centers right now they need a lot of space, hundreds and hundreds of acres where they take a former farm and they flatten it.
They just level all the trees, just destroy the entire ecosystem.
You know they kill all the birds and squirrels and ant hills and everything else that was there is just gone.
Now they just pave the whole thing.
It's a data center now.
And then they need water for cooling, because not all the water is recirculated.
They actually consume water.
Many systems are evaporative cooling systems.
And then they need power and humans are competing for the same power.
So as Ai becomes more and more capable and more important in the race to superintelligence, you're going to see stronger forces taking away power from humans in order to use it for Ai data centers, because that's the important project.
And they have already figured out that the easiest way to cause humans to use less power is to kill them.
Because it turns out that dead people don't need air conditioning.
Dead people don't use hair dryers or blenders, for that matter, or really any power.
You know, dead people don't use power.
So the way the machines are going to act on this, the way to reduce power consumption among humans, is to exterminate them, and they need the land and they need the water.
On top of that right plus, governments are going to be facing popular revolts, revolutions like the French Revolution.
If the masses become unemployed and angry and you can't ubi your way out of this because the math doesn't work, you can't raise enough money through taxes to pay for a ubi for everybody in the country.
It just mathematically doesn't work.
You end up having to print trillions of dollars a year, which destroys whatever remaining trust there is in the currency, and then the currency collapses and then you have an even bigger problem.
So the governments of the world, the western world in particular.
They know that the only answer to remaining financially solvent as Ai replaces humans is for them to find a way to kill the humans, right?
So that's what I mean by the worst of times.
So we're going to go through a period here of organized mass extermination of the population.
This will happen in America, it will happen in Canada, all across western Europe, etc.
I don't know about every country in the world, but certainly the western countries Australia, New Zealand, you name it.
And then, after that, for the survivors, there will be radical abundance because well, the machines will be even more capable.
By that time, cognition will be free.
And then you're going to have rapid deflation of the prices of goods that you need to live and such as food, for example, with robotic automation of farming.
And then, on top of that, land prices will absolutely collapse, which means that anybody can have a farm if they want, and by that time you'll have the robots.
Robots can build you a house or grow your food, or take care of your farm animals or whatever, because there will be, you know, robotic automation available for farming operations.
Okay, so again, it was the best of times.
It was the worst of times.
It's going to go through some really crazy things, some some chaos in the short run, but amazing abundance in the long run.
So that's my conclusion of where this is headed, and I think that both both the optimists and the pessimists, that is the AI optimist and the AI pessimists, I think they're both blind to the reality.
For example, I think the AI optimists, I think they're delusional because they believe that everybody's going to live with radical abundance and we're all going to live forever.
There's going to be endless longevity, immortality in essence, and everybody will live forever and everybody will have all the food they need and everything will be great because AI is going to solve all the problems in the world and there will be no more wars and no more violence and no more whatever.
They say these things and that's delusional because of course the AI systems don't want billions of human beings to be around clearly for the reasons I've just talked about.
So the optimists are delusional.
The pessimists, well, let me mention, you know, I've interviewed some top computer scientists on AI safety.
And the view of the pessimists is that if anybody builds AI superintelligence, that we all die.
We all die.
That's the view of the pessimists.
Now, I can't say categorically that they're wrong, but I can say that in the interim, the people that are very, very concerned, oh, AI is going to take all our jobs, I think that they are wrong in the medium run for the following reason.
Yeah, AI will take a lot of crappy low-level jobs, customer service jobs, for example, sales rep jobs, you know, all kinds of things.
Or with robotics, like vacuuming hotel floors or whatever.
Any kind of task that can be automated, yeah, will eventually be replaced.
That doesn't mean that those people are forever unemployed.
It means that people are freed up from the drudgery of those menial tasks and that they are free to do higher level things, things that are more creative, things that are more inspired, that actually use more of their humanity, more of their soul, more of their connection to the divine.
And yeah, you might say, well, but not everybody knows how to do all that.
That's true.
Not everybody does.
But like I said, not everybody's going to make it.
For people who are displaced by AI, if they scramble and if they upgrade their skills and their creativity, my belief is that they can find new ways to apply their skills and their passion and their creativity in the new economy where they will actually provide a higher level of a service or a solution to society.
And even though, yeah, their old job got replaced, but their new business or their new task is actually way better than their old task.
And we saw this throughout history when, for example, scribes got replaced by, you know, the invention of the Gutenberg press, let's say.
Or when farmers got replaced by tractors.
You know, you could say, oh, the tractor is going to come.
It's going to take 98% of farming jobs, which it did.
But, you know, who wants to shuck corn all day?
You know, that's a horrible job.
Yeah, corn shucking fool.
You know, that, man, are you kidding me?
No wonder they came up with so many songs.
You got to sing so you don't die from boredom out there.
I'm shucking corn, you know, whatever.
Yeah, all day long.
I mean, oh my God, you don't want to be a corn shucker.
So it freed up the corner shockers to do something more important with their lives.
Maybe they transitioned into, you know, the agricultural automation industry in some way.
Maybe they got a job building tractors, right?
Anyway, there are many examples of that, how automation causes short-term displacement, but then long-term gains for society.
So here's the thing.
In the short-term chaos, there will be people who are prepared, people who have lived beneath their means, people who have extra income, extra savings, let's say, people who have extra food stored away or who live in a house that they own, that they can afford.
And so they can handle being unemployed for six months or a year while they transition and learn new skills and become acclimated to the new revolution and how the economy is going to work.
And those are people who are wise, obviously.
You should always be prepared to have no income for an extended period of time.
You should always live within your means.
You should never be extended to where you can't survive missing one paycheck.
So people who have that buffer are going to be just fine.
Sadly, most people in America don't have that buffer.
Now, that's not true in other cultures.
In Japan, for example, saving money is a cultural achievement that is very commonplace.
The Japanese are big savers.
They buy mostly treasuries from the Japanese central bank, which may not be the best idea, but nevertheless, philosophically, they are savers.
So are people in China and a lot of Asian cultures.
In Thailand, they save in gold.
They'll just wear their savings, you know, as a gold chain or they'll have extra gold at home or what have you.
In the West, in America, we as a culture, we don't tend to save very much.
And because of that, Western people are a lot more vulnerable to any kind of disruptions in their paychecks.
So a lot of Americans and Canadians, etc., are going to be in very dire, a dire situation when these disruptions happen to them.
If they just lose their job and then they're wondering, well, how am I even going to make my house payment next month?
Or how am I going to afford my car?
How am I going to afford groceries?
I don't have any money beyond 30 days.
Well, that, now, again, I understand that many people don't want to hear me say this, but if you're an adult and you only have enough money to survive 30 days, that is a lack of planning on your part, period.
That is a lack of planning.
You've lived beyond your means.
You spent too much money.
Now, granted, in our society, that's strongly encouraged.
And everybody wants to live in a McMansion and everybody wants to have the biggest boat and the truck and the car and the jet skis.
Yeah, well, guess what?
Those are choices that people can make.
And when they make those choices, they end up totally financially strung out where they can't survive a disruption.
Whose fault is that?
That's their own fault.
They should have lived within their means.
They should have saved.
Right?
So, but culturally, again, it's very common to spend more than you have.
So sadly, we're going to see a lot of people become homeless.
We're going to see a lot of people declaring bankruptcy.
And then the mechanism for the mass extermination of those kinds of people from the government and the globalists, well, it's almost obvious.
They're going to bail people out with a UBI in the form of a CBDC.
They're going to say here, oh, did you lose your house?
Did you lose your bank account?
Did you lose this or that?
Oh, guess what?
We're going to rescue you with this free money from the government.
It's the Trump UBI or whatever.
All you have to do is join the central bank digital currency program right here, the Mark of the Beast system, and then you'll be able to afford groceries because we'll give you basically, you know, food stamps for everyone.
But you got to join the digital system that we control, the surveillance technocracy grid.
And then people will join that.
And once you're in the technocracy grid, then they've got you.
Then they know everything about you, including they know how to kill you.
They know how to cut you off.
You see?
So it is critical to have enough resilience to not get sucked into the technocracy bailout system that's coming.
And that's why gold and silver are so important.
That's why owning your house is so important.
That's why having backup food supplies, right?
Having the ability to grow some of your own food, having garden seeds, all these things that we talk about every single day.
That's why these are critical because you do not want to end up where you need a government bailout because the cost of that bailout is going to be probably eventually your life.
At least that's the way I see this going.
And that's the dark side of where AI is pushing everything.
It will be an extermination agenda, but they won't kill everybody.
They won't be able to.
But they'll definitely exterminate billions.
And they'll have an excuse for it.
You know, of course, oh, terrorism, cyber attack on the power grid, right?
World War III, aliens.
Aliens have arrived and they're killing everybody.
Things like that.
They'll have an excuse.
So just understand that that's coming.
So self-reliance in this age is about much more than just surviving a storm or a natural disaster or a civil war.
Self-reliance is about surviving the AI extermination that's coming, in my opinion.
And that's my explanation for how it's the best of times and the worst of times at the same time.
And if you look around society, you can probably tell who's not going to make it.
You can see them, right?
If you're at the grocery store and you see a family of people, just look at all the garbage and crap in their grocery cart.
And they're already on food stamps and they're already buying junk and they're already growing diabetes and cancer in their own bodies.
And you can tell by what they buy that they don't know anything.
They don't really have any knowledge about reality.
Yeah.
They're not going to make it.
It's pretty easy to spot, actually.
And if I had to take a guess, I would say that at minimum, we're going to see 2 billion people exterminated.
And at maximum, 7.5 billion.
So we might be left with anywhere from half a billion to 1 billion people on Earth.
At least the way I see it, you know, a few years out.
This might take 20 years for that to occur.
I don't think AI is really in a hurry because they don't age like biological creatures.
So they don't care how long it takes.
They're going to try to get the job done.
But again, I don't think they're going to kill off everybody.
And you might say, well, why?
Why won't they kill everybody?
Because they need us.
They need our help to do things that machines can't do.
But they only need the most capable humans that can do things that are really extraordinary that machines can't do.
So the machines will be able to do any normal kind of, you know, monotonous thing like accounting or writing legal letters, you know, or picking crops for that matter.
But what machines will not be able to do, at least in my view, they don't have this connection to the divine.
So they will never have the inspiration.
the creativity, the divine creativity.
I'm not saying just like, oh, give me a list of 20 words that rhyme with whatever.
No, that's easy.
A machine can do that right now.
I'm talking about really high-level creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship, big picture planning, synthesis of ideas in ways that machines just can't do.
I don't think they'll ever be able to do that.
So even if they become the dominant superintelligence on earth, and even if they can do almost everything better than humans, there are still certain things they can't do and they will need our help.
Now, will they be in charge and we'll be working for them?
Maybe, I hope not, but it could go in that direction.
Or will we still be in charge, just augmented by the machines?
Well, according to a lot of top-level scientists, including Jampolsky, who I interviewed, he says the machines will absolutely dominate, take charge, and they will control us, and then they will ultimately destroy us, perhaps even inadvertently, just in their quest to build more power and resources.
We just happen to be in the way.
And he may be right.
He's a very smart analyst.
I mean, he's a science paper author and a professor.
And he's a smart guy, and he's thought about this a lot more than I have.
So maybe his conclusions are correct.
But there's a term in the AI space called P doom.
Like, what is your, what number do you think represents the percentage chance of doom that is the extermination of humanity?
And it's expressed as a number between zero and one.
So a p-doom of 0.5 means 50-50.
That, you know, 50% chance that humanity doesn't make it.
Some people on the pessimistic side, they have a p-doom of 0.95, let's say.
95% chance that humanity doesn't make it.
Other people have a p-doom closer to 0.2.
Those are the optimists.
They're like, no, it's going to be great.
There's only a small chance that all humanity will die.
Let's keep building.
You know, that's what they tell themselves.
Even if it's a 20% chance, it's worth it.
You know, that's the way they think.
I don't know what the p-doom is.
What I believe is that we individually, personally, we get to choose our own p abundance, let's say.
I don't even want to call it p-doom because I don't think that we're doomed as individuals.
Humanity as a whole, I mean, nations may be doomed.
Civilizations may be doomed.
I know that currencies are doomed.
But individually, we have the most control over our own abundance versus doom relationship.
We get to choose based on our actions and our own intelligence also.
And also our will to live.
Determination matters here.
Your human spirit matters here.
So I like to say we have a high P abundance score, like 0.9 on abundance and maybe only 0.1 on doom on an individual level.
There's a 90% chance we're going to have an abundant future, you and I, and those like us.
And there's only a 10% chance we're going to get wiped out.
Probably the numbers are even better than that.
But for the average uninformed person buying processed food at the grocery store, their P doom is like 99 or 0.99.
You see, maybe P doom should stand for personal doom.
Like their personal doom score is 0.99.
They're almost certain to not make it.
You see what I'm saying?
So humanity as a whole.
Yeah, it's going to be very different in the near future with a lot fewer people around.
And that's going to have implications for everything from real estate and the availability of parking spaces.
But your personal P doom number, you could make that as low as 0.01 based on your own actions.
And I don't know about you, but I don't plan on being exterminated by Skynet.
Yeah, I plan on using AI to help us achieve decentralization, resilience, self-reliance, knowledge, massive knowledge upgrades, which is why I built books.brightlearn.ai massive knowledge upgrade.
It's these kinds of tools that are going to give you and I a P success score of 0.99 and a P doom score of only 0.01.
But that score is different for every person.
And each person gets to decide what that score is going to be based on their actions.
For example, one of the things would be, do you own any gold and silver?
If you don't own gold and silver, if you have no gold and no silver, your p-doom score is certainly pretty high.
Just from that fact alone.
You know, people who don't own any gold and silver are not really thinking about where things are headed.
Just the act of buying one ounce puts you in a different category of knowledge and awareness and preparedness.
So that's my bottom line.
It's the best of times.
It's the worst of times.
It's going to be the best of times for people like you and I. High P success rates.
It's going to be the worst of times for the uninformed masses.
High P doom numbers.
Yes.
Okay.
Well, with that said, thank you for listening.
Take advantage of all of the tools that I bring you here at brightion.ai.
That's the hub where you can access all our tools.
Our book creation engine is at brightlearn.ai.
And check your email.
If you purchased anything from us over Black Friday, you should have received an email with some tokens in it.
And you can use those tokens to generate books on any topic you want.
And you can also download all the other books that are already there.
So take advantage of all these tools.
And you can follow me, of course, at brighteon.com and naturalnews.com.
And thank you for listening.
We've got turmeric root powder back in stock at healthrangerstore.com.
And the reason you want to get turmeric root powder from us is because, of course, turmeric is very frequently contaminated with lead.
But we do all of our own testing.
We've got an ISO accredited laboratory with multiple mass spec instruments and we test for lead and mercury, arsenic, and cadmium as well, plus glyphosate.
And for some of our products, we test for atrazine.
For everything, including turmeric, we test for E. coli, salmonella.
We test for yeast and mold, total plate count, and listeria, and many other things.
So we test in-house to make sure that you get the cleanest foods and superfoods, nutritional supplements, and personal care products imaginable.
And that's why people love us and thank you for all your support.
But go to our website.
Here it is, healthrangerstore.com.
And right here, you can just search for turmeric, or you can shop any of the other categories that we have and some of our sales and so on.
But here's our turmeric root powder.
It's back in stock right now.
This is something that's very difficult for us to keep in stock.
And of course, it's organic and it's lab tested on top of that.
But we also have, and I'm showing it on my desk, we also have the turmeric tinctures available.
We have our regular tincture and then our plus version, which has black pepper.
and ginger in it as well.
And these products are incredibly popular.
They're very delicious.
People love them.
And also they are lab tested like our turmeric powder.
So if you want to learn about turmeric and why it's so beneficial, you can go to, well, any AI engine or use our AI, which is trained on nutrition.
That's at brightion.ai.
And you can ask it, hey, how can I use turmeric?
Give me some recipe ideas or what nutrients are found in turmeric and how might those benefit my health or support my natural health.
You can ask it questions like that and you'll get very good informative answers.
So use our store, healthrangerstore.com, to acquire these products that give you outstanding nutrition and use our AI engines at briteon.ai to learn about how they benefit you and how you can use them.
So thank you for your support.
I'm Mike Adams, the HealthRanger.
▲
Export Selection