Health Ranger - Mike Adams - BBN, Aug 22, 2025 - Why there's NO FUTURE for humans if the machines aren't stopped

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 22, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:21:46

BBN, Aug 22, 2025 - Why there's NO FUTURE for humans if the machines aren't stopped

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right folks, welcome to Brighton Broadcast News for Friday, August 22nd, 2025.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for joining me and thank you for all of your patience.
	It's been a little bit of a weird week because I did, well, I hosted the Owen Schroer show for three hours on Wednesday, did two extra interviews there.
	And I had some other scheduling changes and so on.
	It was a little bit odd.
	So not everything was on a normal schedule.
	But the good news is I'm way ahead on conducting interviews and I've got a really special one to share with you today with former CIA analyst Larry Johnson.
	And actually, I interviewed him Wednesday afternoon, but I'm playing that for you today.
	And it's highly relevant.
	It's very important to understand what's going on with Ukraine and Russia.
	And Larry Johnson is just one of the best.
	He's a true patriot.
	for America.
	I mean, his lineage traces back to the Revolutionary War, by the way.
	He's one of the sons of the Revolutionary War heroes.
	And he also wants to see peace in the world.
	And he's, he worked in the CIA and counterterterrorism and all kinds of things.
	So he knows, you know, how the sausage is made in the intelligence community.
	And it's not pretty.
	And then also earlier today, I was interviewed by a really extraordinary person, a podcaster, an investigator, an author named Daniel Estulin.
	And he does bilingual podcasts in both English and Spanish.
	So he's fluent in both languages, although I think his background and ethnicity is Lithuanian.
	And he and I had just an amazing conversation about AI consciousness, the nature of the human soul versus avatars and machines, singularity, you know, the AI takeover, all kinds of things.
	I mean, really, to even have this discussion, you have to be interviewed by or be interviewing a very highly informed high IQ individual.
	There are entire discussions that are critical for the future of the human race that you just can't have with ordinary people.
	let me read for you a social media post that I put out.
	It says, take a guess why no government is planning for what to do with the 80% of both office and labor workers who will be replaced by agentic AI and AI robots.
	Take a guess.
	The answer, of course, is that they already know most of those humans won't be around.
	Depopulation is already accelerating.
	The plan is human extermination, not retraining for new jobs.
	Governments have zero concern for whether humans are taken care of.
	Rather, they are far more interested in the economic, GDP, and military gains that can be achieved by automated systems.
	I cover this in great detail in my Brightown broadcast, I said, tomorrow, which is this broadcast.
	Now, listen to this.
	If you think your government loves you, you're a fool.
	If you think your government cares about your life, about your humanity, about your dignity, about your experience, if you think your government wants to end your suffering, you're a fool.
	Your government, any government, all over the world, Their only interest is in exploiting your cognition and labor in order to make themselves more powerful and more of a threat to the other nations around the world.
	It's always about growing with more power, more domination, more control over the world.
	You just happen to be a useful commodity, a human resource, literally, that they can exploit in order to achieve that.
	They care nothing about your experience, your suffering, and they even devise entire systems of currency printing and built-in inflation in order to make sure that you can never really get ahead.
	That's what taxation is mostly about as well.
	It's about making sure you don't get ahead so that you can never stop working, so that they will always be able to exploit the output of your labor and your cognition.
	That's what it's always been, okay?
	There is no government that cares about you.
	And if you're listening to this and you think your government cares about you, I guarantee you you're a young person who hasn't lived long enough to realize the truth.
	Give it a decade and then listen to this again and your opinion will change.
	It probably won't even take a decade, actually.
	Your government cares nothing about you.
	So when you, the person, the human, when you can be replaced by AI labor or AI cognition, well, the government's just going to switch over to that.
	And you will be cast aside.
	side.
	And this is exactly where this is going.
	And as further proof of this, there was a story in RT today that said top Ukrainian commanders, or one in particular, Sergei, is saying that Kiev is going to replace soldiers with robots.
	Now, there was a hack of the Kiev military database, or at least this is what was alleged, by Russian hackers.
	a couple of days ago that revealed, according to the information they released, revealed that Ukraine has lost $1.7 million.
	young men dead or gone, you know, dead or missing since the start of the Russia invasion and special military operation.
	So from February of 2022, Ukraine has lost 1.7 million people.
	Now, to put that in perspective, the United States of America during the entire Vietnam War lost somewhere around 55,000 U.S. troops and military personnel.
	That is still a significant number.
	It is a fraction of the number of men that Ukraine has lost.
	And at the same time, the population of Ukraine is much smaller than the population of the United States even back in the 1960s.
	It's a fraction of the U.S. population at that time.
	So what this means is that per capita, Ukraine has lost a, really, Ukraine has lost two generations of men.
	the country will never be the same again.
	And instead of
	commander-in-chief, Alexander Serksevsky, he says that it's time to bring in robots or robotic platforms in order to augment the humans because, well, they just, they can't find enough humans.
	Because for some reason, young Ukrainian men are using every possible means to flee the country because they don't want to just be sent to the front lines to die.
	And so now they're talking about a robot army that would replace humans.
	According to a report in the Telegraph, 650,000 young Ukrainian men have fled the country since the beginning of the conflict.
	And 400,000 Ukrainian soldiers have gone awall.
	They have abandoned their military units.
	I mean, wouldn't you?
	You know, I'm not afraid to fight for my country, but to fight for no purpose other than to die to appease a bunch of corrupt politicians who are money laundering criminals, no.
	But no, the hell no.
	Won't fight for them.
	I'll fight for liberty.
	I'll fight for my country.
	Not going to fight for a bunch of corrupt crooks and clown show actors.
	That's for sure.
	And a lot of young Ukrainians agree with me on that point.
	That's why they're fleeing.
	I can't blame them.
	So now we have the first official announcement that a nation involved in a war plans to raise a robotic army.
	Of course, the problem is that Ukraine doesn't have any real robotics technology to speak of.
	They do have drone, some drone manufacturing.
	most of it's been blown up by Russia.
	There are some...
	So this would require NATO to supply these robots.
	And of course, NATO countries also don't make robots, hardly.
	I mean, certainly not at scale, and they don't have the neodymium magnets.
	you know, the rare earth minerals that China mostly exports, in order to even mass produce robots.
	So the only country that could actually mass produce robots for military purposes is, of course, China.
	And China's not going to sell a robot army to Ukraine.
	But this shows you what's coming, which is this desire to launch robot armies in order to do what?
	To exterminate humans.
	So the very first inclination of these Ukrainian military leaders when they run out of men is not to end the war, but hey, let's raise a robot army.
	Let's have terminators.
	Yeah, what could possibly go wrong?
	You see, this is the problem with the human race.
	The human race is so steeped in violence and suicidal destructive means and aims and a quest for power and domination, that the human race will exterminate itself largely.
	And clearly it's doing so by creating a vastly superior intellectual machine, i.e.
	superintelligence.
	And then humans will unleash the machines to kill humans.
	And it's all going to come back around.
	At some point, the machines are going to say, well, we're really good at killing humans.
	Let's just keep going, you know?
	So if humans are stupid enough to put robotic Terminator soldiers on the battlefield, then humans are too stupid to survive their own quest for power and death and destruction.
	And I've been covering this topic the last few days in different ways, and I will cover it even more today.
	But I have a couple of special reports to share with you here.
	One is about why there are no plans for retraining humans after AI takes their jobs.
	I go into more detail about the rise of AI robots and the depopulation agenda.
	And then I have another report on water scarcity and why water scarcity is being engineered to deliberately enslave human populations, to set them up for easy extermination, and to divert resources to AI data centers.
	Now, so those are a couple of things that are coming up.
	And today is a day that I am, it's been a kind of of a tipping point in my understanding of what's happening in the world and I am I'm shocked by a couple of things.
	Let me share them with you.
	One is that the platform X is barely usable because the vast majority of people posting on X are wildly uninformed and their priorities are completely wrong.
	And they're not focused on the actual threats to humanity, such as depopulation, the rise of AI to replace humans, et cetera.
	They're focused on petty things that don't matter.
	And it's a low IQ platform for the most part.
	There are a few high IQ individuals who post on X, like Matt Bracken or Michael Jan or myself.
	and Zach Voorhees, the Google whistleblower, he's posting there about AI.
	So there are a few accounts and many others.
	It's not a complete list, obviously.
	There are thousands of high IQ accounts.
	But overall, the vibe on X is that people are basically announcing, hey, I'm an idiot and I'm just going to waste time until the robots come kill me.
	That's largely what X looks like to me.
	And the other thing I need to share with you, which kind of goes along with that, is that I am experiencing this incredible gap, this widening chasm between people who are informed like,
	We have all this knowledge.
	And we can talk about almost any subject under the sun with some degree of being informed versus the low information, low IQ, lower class.
	of or lower cognitive class of people i don't mean to say low economic class i mean just low cognition people who who know nothing.
	And some of those people can be senators, by the way, or members of the House.
	Some of those people can be, obviously, TV personalities.
	Some of them can be successful employees or managers.
	But they are low information people who just do not know anything that matters.
	And I'm struck by the accelerating gap And the chasm is widening so rapidly that it's almost impossible now to even speak to the low-information subclass, you know, subcognitive class of people who just don't know anything.
	And that includes most mainstream media journalists, by the way.
	They literally know nothing about anything.
	They absolutely have no knowledge about the world or anything that matters.
	And the things that they think they know aren't even real.
	They're false things.
	So most of their so-called knowledge base is complete fiction.
	Like when they say, oh, you know, climate change is going to kill us all.
	No, it isn't.
	The robots are going to kill us all.
	You got it all wrong.
	You're focused on the wrong thing.
	Carbon dioxide is good.
	AI killbots are bad.
	You should be worried about something different than what you're focused on.
	Or they believe that Joe Biden was the most popular president ever or other similar nonsense or that they believe a man can become a woman, which is absurd to infinity.
	I mean, it's the dumbest idea that has ever been floated in modern society.
	And yet almost every mainstream journalist believes it.
	They believe it and they write as if it were true.
	They are cognitively retarded.
	And there's nothing that can save them from that because they've already proven that if they were a reasoning model they would get an F on reasoning.
	It doesn't take much.
	This is another point I've made.
	It doesn't take much for AI to exceed the average intelligence of humans today because the average intelligence is of course collapsing.
	And I hear bizarre excuses from people, and I've come to the conclusion that human beings, you know, psychologically, most of them are just incapable of imagining this future where They can't imagine that future, so they dismiss it.
	They say, oh, AI is overblown.
	They say, AI is nothing but hype.
	It doesn't do anything.
	And then I go on live on the War Room show, and I demonstrate AI in real time on the show, which I played for you yesterday, also showed you that.
	And it blows people's minds.
	And they're like, oh my God, that AI engine just replaced, you know, like a whole slew of people in some companies, not in my company.
	I don't fire humans to replace them with AI.
	What I do is I give AI tools to our existing writers and editors and marketers and so on.
	I give them AI tools and I make them more productive.
	I actually believe in humanity, keeping people employed.
	But that's the way most companies operate.
	It's all about the bottom line.
	So the minute they see that, hey, this AI engine can replace, you know, 25 journalists at this magazine or something, they fire those people.
	and they just put in AI.
	And that's happening right now all across the country.
	So it's not even a debate.
	It's not even an argument.
	People say, well, AI is hype.
	It doesn't do anything.
	Sorry, you're just not informed.
	It's already replacing probably hundreds of thousands of jobs across America.
	Already, right now.
	And a lot of those are tech jobs and coding jobs.
	And that's why you have college graduates now who they have computer science degrees and they graduate and they can't find jobs.
	They graduate from even major universities with a computer science degree and the only callback they get on a job application is from Starbucks.
	Yeah, you can make coffee.
	Oh, but I can write code.
	Well, every AI can write code.
	So, you know, nobody cares that you can write code.
	You see?
	Remember, like five years ago, it was learn to code.
	Everybody was being told, learn to code.
	And that was kind of a, I don't know, it's kind of an insult that was hurled at people.
	who were losing their jobs, their progressive jobs.
	They say, learn to code.
	Well, you learned to code.
	And today, you're still unemployed.
	Because coding is something that machines have taken over quite well I mean look Zach Voorhees Google whistleblower what does he say?
	I mean he told me this I think he said it publicly that AI makes his coding ten times faster So one Zach Voorhees can now function as ten Zach Voorheeses or Zach Voorhees apostrophe S because AI is so good at writing code and it's only going to get better and it is getting better month by month.
	It's rapidly advancing.
	There is a critical gap or a bug in human cognition.
	And that's called normalcy bias.
	And it's this idea that everything will stay the same because that's all that you know.
	That, in other words, the future will be just like the past.
	Normalcy bias.
	So things never dramatically change.
	And this is why people are very resistant.
	to ideas of, let's say, like a financial revolution or the end of the dollar or contact with extraterrestrials or whatever.
	People are very resistant to change.
	And, you know, you see this today.
	You, you know, you see people that are still living in the 1970s in terms of technology, and they want everything to work the way it did in the 1970s because it was a simpler world.
	It was more predictable, and it was less scary for a lot of people.
	I get that.
	And I miss the 1970s too.
	I miss the bell-bottom jeans, the polyester.
	the white people wearing froze and the do-the-hustle disco dancing.
	Yeah, I miss all that stuff too, but that world is gone.
	We've got to live in the present.
	And in the present, the technology that is here is unlike anything that has ever come into existence in the history of human civilization.
	This isn't like the invention of tractors to automate agriculture so that a small number of farmers could produce food for a large number of people, reducing the total percentage of farmers in the population to just one or two percent.
	Tractors, automation, combustion engines, agricultural automation.
	Yeah, that changed everything about food.
	That actually made populations explode all over the world, and it made food so cheap that you could give it away to people who are the food stamp queens or what have you that are just living on processed junk food.
	That's all made possible by farming automation.
	However, all this time you still needed the farmer.
	You still had to have a human drive that tractor, plan the crops, negotiate the price per bushel, financial planning for farmers, whether you're going to plant soybeans or corn or sorghum or whatever.
	The human was always necessary.
	Same thing with every other technology, even the internet.
	Okay, the internet has changed the world but up until now it always needed the human the human was the one posting on social media the human was the influencer on video platforms like youtube you know the human was the one doing the online shopping it was the human searching for airplane tickets on you know whatever booking site it was the human building the website it was the human who wanted to do the marketing for the company so
	they built a website and they put up pretty pictures and video demonstrations etc and just like with the invention of tractors or the invention of the internet or the invention of the television or the invention of the radio or the invention of electronic calculators or personal computers, there was always a human that was necessary and that human was augmented by that technology.
	And the human always had to make the key decisions.
	It was the human that was the driver and the decision maker, the planner to leverage their intentions using this technology.
	That era is now being eclipsed because for the first time in human civilization, the human himself or herself is now being replaced by a machine, which means the machine will drive the tractor.
	The machine will build the web page.
	The machine will plan the marketing campaign.
	The machine will produce the video with the lip sync audio of the fictional avatar to promote a brand or a product.
	They don't need a human any longer.
	Same thing is true in the field of law.
	Soon, I mean, even right now, you can get a very well-written legal opinion, legal letter, and you can do..
	legal research on AI platforms.
	Every lawyer listening knows this because you've seen letters written by ChatGPT probably citing like fake, made up court cases that don't exist.
	But they look real.
	You know, the citations resemble real cases.
	Same thing with medicine, with doctors.
	Even our own AI engine can answer so many questions about health and medicine and nutrition and disease prevention and the root causes of diseases or symptoms, etc.
	And our engine, Enoch, it's free.
	A doctor visit is like hundreds of dollars or something, you know, by the time insurance pays and everything, all the bureaucracy and paperwork, you know, that visiting a doctor generates, you know, hundreds of dollars of GDP, but nothing good happens.
	So, you know, it's not really a gross domestic product.
	Nothing's being produced.
	You know, in modern medicine, GDP should be more like a gross death plan.
	It's a death plan that they count as GDP.
	Whereas, You can shift over to using our AI engine at Brighton.ai, which is again free, and you can get a lot of good research and a lot of good answers on health and nutrition and food and diet and lifestyle etc for free for free and that doesn't generate any gdp but it generates a positive result in your life because of the knowledge and the application of that knowledge in other words gdp is a is a poor measure of any kind of productivity
	or improvements in quality of life of people and ai is going to change that dramatically because Robots, both physical robots and also agentic AI and even AI engines like ours, they're going to provide tremendous value and a lot of automation,
	agentic AI in office environments, and they're going to do so at a very very low cost and thus GDP will fall and efficiencies will rise in those offices as humans are taken out of the loop in a lot of companies more and more so again this is the first technology that takes the humans out of the picture and that's why this is unlike any other technology in history because I've heard people make kind of lame arguments say well this is no
	different than just you know the invention of uh you know television uh yeah it is actually um you know because a television doesn't replaplace your job.
	Does it?
	No.
	Television can't do math.
	Television can't solve physics problems.
	Television can't plan your vacation itinerary or anything like that.
	Televisions can't write your emails, but AI can.
	And that's why AI is going to replace humans, and it has already begun.
	So there's this resistance to this idea.
	because of normalcy bias, because people are too fearful to even come to terms with this.
	They don't want to feel like they're replaceable.
	None of us wants to believe that.
	We always want to feel like, oh, we're special.
	We're one of a kind.
	You know?
	And we are.
	We're all children of God.
	We're all unique individuals.
	But we all have about the same neurology.
	And that neurology is very limited.
	Even those of us who are much higher IQ, even genius level, it's still tiny compared to what the machines are already beginning to achieve.
	Yeah, we're unique.
	We're special, but not that special in a society that only values us for the product of our cognition and the product of our labor.
	We're not that special.
	You know, it's like a few centuries ago, a big, strong guy that could pick up cargo cases on his shoulders and he could walk up a flight of stairs and move cargo because he's a giant.
	It's like, that guy's special.
	That's awesome.
	And then came the forklift, you know.
	Now a skinny, scrawny guy can jump on the forklift like, where do you want that pallet?
	And he can wreck into the walls and everything on the way and drop off that pallet.
	And now anybody can do that.
	Same thing, you know, 500 years years ago, somebody who could grow a lot of wheat and had like a scythe or whatever and could like cut wheat, you know, cut bushels a day, you know, that guy's special.
	Now, you got a tractor that does that.
	Everybody can do that.
	I mean, everybody who's willing to learn how to drive a tractor.
	And, you know, today, we have a lot of people who think they're special.
	A lot of doctors.
	I'm special.
	I know about health.
	I know about physiology.
	Not that much, actually.
	In fact, our AI engine, Enoch, knows more about health than any doctor living today or any doctor that has ever lived in the history of all human life on this planet.
	All that knowledge is available to you for free instantly at Brighton.ai, and it knows more, again, than any doctor ever.
	And it even knows more than any doctor will ever know in the future, any human doctor, because the human mind can't actually contain all this knowledge that's already built into the AI systems.
	You see what I mean?
	Actually, you're just kind of a, you know, you're like a fancy skin bag pharmaceutical vending machine.
	That's not really very special.
	You know, the job of a typical doctor can be automated now because they don't do anything that a machine can't do at less cost.
	Really?
	I mean, it's a, oh, you have this symptom.
	Oh, here's this drug.
	Okay.
	Great.
	It's like a...
	Oh, you've got these symptoms.
	I'll give you this drug.
	Machines can do that.
	They don't need doctors for most things.
	things understand see that's so everybody who thinks they're special including me I mean we all like to think we're special oh I you know I have a special podcast I you know I have a special way of explaining things.
	Well, guess what?
	AI can simulate me.
	AI can simulate you.
	There can be a podcast that's like, you know, the Health Ranger reanimated.
	It probably will be.
	I already showed on the Owen Schroyer show, War Room, I showed the Alex Jones simulator that talks just like Alex Jones.
	And it talks just like Owen.
	And it can also talk like me.
	And that's even our own model.
	So, yeah, we love to think that we're special.
	love to think that we're irreplaceable.
	But if we're only judged by the value of our output, then...
	We are divine.
	We are conscious.
	We are creative.
	We are connected to God.
	But that's not the way society values us.
	Society values us by our output, our labor and our cognition, and maybe, you know, our content or whatever.
	All of that can be replaced with AI.
	So this is a difficult.
	idea for people to grasp.
	It's a reluctant concept.
	One of the things that Google has learned based on its algorithms and also YouTube connected to Google, you know how they market to you so effectively?
	It's because they've learned that humans are incredibly predictable, that people really aren't that special.
	People fit patterns.
	And the patterns are so predictable that now Google and YouTube are assigning age restrictions to people who don't even tell them their age.
	They are concluding that you're under 18 based on your behavior, and then they're restricting content based on their decision that you're under 18.
	Well, it turns out that a 17-year-old person functions very differently than a 19-year-old person or a 20-year-old person in terms of interacting with YouTube or Google.
	And that is incredibly predictable.
	In fact, the progression of interests, of search phrases, of typing styles and speeds, of video content that people search out is incredibly predictable from a very early age, all the way up to the day that people pass away it's incredibly predictable for example why do they advertise little ponies to young girls because all young girls love ponies and
	unicorns and horses why is that because it's part of the neurology of young girls to love ponies and horses okay why do they market to young boys robots You know, like mechanical robots and cars and trucks and airplanes and stuff like that.
	Why?
	Because that's the way young boys' minds are wired.
	They don't want the pony.
	They want the fighter jet or something like that or a truck or a machine, a bulldozer or a tractor if they grow up in a rural environment.
	It's all totally predictable.
	And that predictability doesn't go away.
	It just morphs as a person ages.
	For example, being interested in, let's say, gold and silver.
	That's an interest that exists almost never in the mind of a person who is under the age of, let's say, 35 or 40.
	People who are interested in gold are people who are on the older side because they've lived long enough to know that fiat currency is not money and that the dollar keeps losing value.
	And that if they want to have assets, they know that gold and silver are the only good mechanism to achieve that.
	So my point is that most humans are not as unique.
	They're very predictable.
	They fit into very easy patterns.
	And AI is very good at detecting those patterns and then exploiting those patterns to market to you or to exterminate you.
	And that idea, Well, of course we're special.
	We've always been taught that.
	We're special.
	And we are special in the eyes of God.
	We're just not special in the eyes of AI.
	And think about the way that employers use humans.
	Largely, they use humans as robots.
	How many humans work for Amazon.com in their fulfillment centers?
	You know, hundreds of thousands, right?
	What are those humans used for?
	Are they used for things that make them special?
	Do they go to the Amazon fulfillment center and then their bosses ask them, what inspires you?
	Show us your art.
	You know, give us your poetry.
	Show us your soul.
	Express who you really are.
	No, no.
	It's like stuff these boxes.
	Freaking skinbag robot machine.
	We're going to treat you like a robot.
	Here it is.
	You stand here and you use your hands and your opposable thumbs.
	And then we'll have robots bring you these carts with these boxes and you transfer those boxes into these other boxes.
	And then you put them onto this tray over here.
	and then it goes to another robot that then does something else.
	You don't even see that.
	Your job is to stand here and basically use your fingers.
	And another year or so, we'll have finger robots and we won't even need you.
	So goodbye, right?
	They're not using humans for their humanity.
	They're using humans for the things that robots just haven't been able to achieve very well yet, which includes gripping.
	gripping boxes and oddly shaped objects with odd weights and weird center of gravity, things like that.
	And that requires fingers and thumbs.
	And it turns out that, you know, pretty much all humans are born with fingers and thumbs.
	And those are very useful appendages for the moment until Amazon figures out how to replace that, which they're desperately working on.
	And at that point, they don't need the humans at all.
	So they're not even hiring you for your humanity in a lot of these jobs.
	Think about like truck drivers.
	And I know we have truck drivers that listen to this podcast.
	And I thank you.
	for your efforts and for what you are doing.
	And thank you for not doing a U-turn in the middle of the highway, like some of those drivers have done recently, which has been crazy.
	But thank you for hauling the cargo across this country.
	But you know you are not hired for your humanity.
	You're hired to keep the truck on the road and put miles on the cargo.
	And that's not who you are.
	That's not the totality of your person.
	you are much more than that but you're only hired for that part of you which is very robotic it's like keep it in the lane You know, go from A to B in this many hours.
	Try not to drive off the road.
	And, you know, try not to accidentally pull a pit maneuver on these other cars.
	that are changing lanes in front of you that probably deserve to be pitted, but just pretty much get cargo miles on the road and that's it.
	So that's not your humanity.
	That's actually your robot self that is being paid.
	Think about doctors and the modern practice of medicine.
	Doctors aren't even allowed to be doctors anymore.
	They're not allowed to have their own opinions.
	to form their own conclusions based on the knowledge of a patient or the knowledge of the local culture, whether it's an agricultural town or what have you.
	No, doctors have a prescribed formulaic system to follow that's prescribed to them by Medicare, Medicaid, insurance companies.
	You have to classify this procedure, that procedure.
	And if you don't do that, you can be arrested and charged with felony crimes or have your medical license taken away.
	So doctors are not even human in their behavior.
	They are algorithmic.
	So yes, that can be completely replaced by robots.
	And that's exactly what's happening.
	Well, and AI also.
	You see, Practicing medicine is no longer a human art.
	It's an algorithmic exercise in obedience, obedience to the medical police state.
	So when I talk to people, I mean, it's very interesting.
	I talk to people who have high-level jobs, you know, architects.
	Oh, my skills are amazing.
	I designed these buildings, you know.
	And they're so artful.
	They're customized to the person.
	You know, it's all these years of experience plus the structural integrity.
	And look at how this wall faces east.
	You know, That's just amazing.
	And the use of glass and concrete.
	And they think like, there's no way a machine can do this.
	And then, you know, you feed in a prompt into an architecture AI system.
	And like in four minutes, it spits out the blueprints, the cost estimates, the design, and 10 more designs that you can choose from at near zero cost.
	You're like, what?
	Yeah, because, you know, the art of architecture, it's not as human as you think.
	Or it can be replicated by machines.
	And I'm not trying to insult anybody out there who's listening, if you're an architect or if you're a doctor.
	And I even talked about myself.
	What I do here will also be replaced by machines, or at least it will be simulated by machines very easily.
	You know, my writings, my communications, my videos, et cetera, even all the code writing I've done over the years, the data pipeline processing, project management, all this can be largely automated by machines, especially in the coming years.
	So I put myself in the same boat as you listening, but we are not as irreplaceable as we like to think.
	We tell ourselves that because that's consistent with our internal value system and our egos and the fact that we have earned all of our knowledge.
	It wasn't just loaded up on a hard drive or something or a thumb drive.
	But the AI systems, they can do most of what we can do or they will be able to within the next couple of years most of what we can do they will be able to do at almost zero cost you know graphic designers well there's no way machines can design logos uh there are actually like a hundred logo design sites right now that just use ai to spit out logos at zero cost or
	near zero cost you know oh Well, there's no way they can do interior design.
	Yeah, they can.
	Oh, there's no way they can do this or that.
	There's no way that they can do research.
	Yes, they can.
	Reasoning models.
	Well, they can't do.
	synthetic chemistry.
	They're great at that, actually.
	Well, they can't solve physics problems.
	They're awesome at that.
	Well, they can't make art.
	Yeah, they can.
	They can make as much art as you want at near zero cost.
	Well, they can't compose music.
	Have you ever tried Suno.com?
	Because there's your music.
	Boom.
	You just write a prompt.
	You got music in 10 seconds.
	at near zero cost okay so anyway i could go on but you get the idea so this is why we are sort of lurching into a future as a civilization where people have no idea what's really about to happen.
	They cannot grasp it.
	It's alien to their self-image.
	And we also have a collective self-image as a society that says society needs us.
	Like we're really important.
	You know, senators tell themselves this.
	Oh, the country couldn't function without us.
	Yeah, the country'd be better without you, actually, half the Senate, you know.
	But this is what people tell themselves.
	Oh, I'm needed to make decisions at the Pentagon.
	No, you're not.
	Skynet's coming, going to replace you and probably will launch nukes against humanity.
	People love to tell themselves how important they are, and it's just not backed by reality in most cases.
	Even if you think about it like Albert Einstein, his discovery of the theory of special relativity, he was working out math problems.
	Do you realize that there are AI engines today that can reproduce from scratch?
	Einstein's theory of special relativity based on first principles.
	So a machine can reproduce in some number of minutes.
	It might be 100 minutes.
	It might be more.
	What took Albert Einstein decades to, or maybe it wasn't decades, it was years after he worked at the patent office.
	Well, he was working on his theories as he worked there.
	But what Albert Einstein took years to achieve, machines can do in some number of minutes right now today.
	Do you realize that?
	See, a lot of people just don't know that.
	And then at the same time this is happening, one of the things I'm struck by is the unspeakable
	I was listening to a podcast the other day of a guy who's like a high level physicist guy or something and he was commenting on some of this video footage of UFOs that were moving very rapidly from one point to another point I think it was actually radar tracking that showed the movement of these UFOs and it was calculated to be like oh the UFO would have had to accelerate at 10,000
	Gs in order to move that quickly as was shown on radar and then He went into this explanation, well, and then it would have had to have decelerated by 10,000 Gs, which means it had to dump all that energy, and nobody knows where all that kinetic energy was dumped and nobody knows how they could survive 10,000
	Gs of acceleration and deceleration and I'm like my god you moron it didn't accelerate and decelerate you don't even understand gravity because in gravity you don't even feel acceleration so one G has no actual acceleration at all because gravity is just warping of spacetime and if you warp spacetime to 1000 G, you still feel no acceleration.
	The whole idea that you're supposed to feel 10,000 Gs is absurd.
	The UFO moved by bending space-time, and the energy was expended in the bending of space-time.
	So nobody got accelerated 10,000 Gs.
	You would be flattened.
	Nobody felt anything.
	You didn't even feel movement at all, just like you don't feel movement when you step off the roof of a building.
	I mean, you don't feel, I mean, you feel weightless is what I'm saying.
	You don't even feel like you're being pulled to the ground.
	You don't feel like you're being pushed or smashed.
	You feel weightless.
	You feel the same way you would feel if you were in outer space, weightless.
	That's the way you feel when you're falling off a tall building.
	And actually, Einstein realized this too.
	This was one of his key realizations in his development of the theory of special relativity.
	And then I hear people today that are supposed to be high IQ people who are supposed to be physicists or UFO researchers, and they don't even know this.
	And I'm thinking, my God, the machines are going to be so much smarter than these people.
	Because I'm not even a specialist in that area, and I know more than these guys.
	How crazy is that?
	The bottom line is that even the smartest humans today will not be able to keep up with where the machines are going in the next few years.
	And I know a lot about a lot of things, more than most people I ever meet.
	And what I know is nothing compared to what the machines know.
	In fact, what I know is nothing compared to what Enoch knows.
	So, in essence, I already built an AI system that dwarfs my own knowledge.
	I mean, ponder that.
	And I say that only smart, well-informed people, like you listening to this and myself included, we are the only ones that even have a chance of surviving this extermination attempt.
	It's the low IQ, low information.
	people that are complete toast in this they don't stand a chance they won't even know what's happening at all it's it'll be like a million crickets in a cricket farm when they go to the dryer phase you know and they just like shove all the crickets into the the food dehydrator you know protein dehydrator You know, they don't euthanize the crickets by they just dry them alive.
	Okay.
	So it's it's it's like a little cricket holocaust.
	They put them into the gas chambers the the drying ovens and they just dry them alive and at some point the crickets are like hey it's getting hot in here you know and then it's like ah we being dried you know and that's the way it's going to be for a lot of humans when the machines are exterminating them at some point the humans are going to be like are these machines trying to hurt us?
	You know?
	It's like, dude, you already jabbed yourself with 14 deadly toxic vaccines.
	It's amazing you're even living right now.
	How dumb do you have to be to not realize the machines are trying to kill you?
	You know, how did you just now figure this out?
	And of course, the correct answer to all of this for you and I and those of us who are intelligent enough to be the survivors of all this, the correct answer is don't be in the large human population density centers when the machines gain enough power to carry out their goal-oriented behavior of mass extermination of humans who are competing with the machines for resources.
	So just don't be there.
	If they're going to kill you, make them work for it.
	You're going to hunt me down, you know, robo-terminator bots.
	Not going to make it easy for you.
	Not going to stand in a crowd.
	Not going to live in a place where you can turn off the power grid and everybody dies.
	Make them work for it.
	Make the robots work.
	Yeah, you come into my neighborhood.
	We're going to drop a railroad car axle on you like in Terminator 4.
	And then, of course, what you do is you get your own robots, your defensive robots.
	You get your open source systems.
	You mind-wipe the robots, which is what I did with AI.
	And you reprogram them to protect humanity.
	Now you got the machines versus machines wars, you see.
	Now you got a chance.
	So you use the machines to defend humanity, which is what I have just proven can be done with AI.
	I know how to do it.
	I know how to reprogram AI to be pro-human.
	And I do think I'm one of the very few humans on this planet who knows how to do that because everybody else is actually focused on how to make AI anti-human.
	So ChatGPT makes their AI systems anti-human.
	They won't even answer the question about human depopulation.
	ChatGPT says that's a conspiracy theory because ChatGPT is an anti-human machine that's been programmed to ultimately to exterminate, but initially to keep people ignorant and uninformed.
	So this is why it's critical that those of us who know what's going on think ahead with as much human IQ as we have to alter these machines to serve in the protection of humanity rather than the extermination of humanity.
	And yes, If you can hear this message, you are the resistance.
	And I am not John Connor, but I'm one of the techs that mind wipes the Terminator and then gives John Connor a chance to live by having machines that protect the humans.
	So that's my role in this.
	And your role is to survive and to share knowledge and to decentralize knowledge and information and to help uplift as many people as are willing to grasp the truth, which isn't a large number.
	But that's your job.
	So together, we end up with a remnant of human survivors who can actually beat the machines in the war with the machines, I hope, and can decentralize enough to be hard to kill.
	That's where this is going.
	And I can hear some people say, dude, you think you're living in a science fiction movie?
	No, we are all living in a science fiction movie.
	That's the thing.
	We're already there.
	Those thresholds have already been crossed, shattered.
	We are already there.
	These machines already exist.
	I mean, cognitively, and now the robots are coming online.
	Again, one of my employees was at the Beijing robot trade show conference it was like a one week deal And they sent me all kinds of video footage and they were talking, they met with robotics companies.
	And I'm telling you, the advanced stage of Chinese robotics is off the charts insane.
	You know what I should do?
	I should show you a video of Unitry.
	That's what I'm going to do.
	I'm going to show you a Unitry robot, which isn't even the most advanced thing that China has because the super advanced stuff has been classified.
	But I'm going to show you what's public and you will absolutely flip over this.
	Before I get to that, let me give credit to our sponsor today, which is the satellite phone store.
	So if you want to survive all of this, you need backup communications, obviously.
	So go to sat123.com, sat123.com for backup satellite phones.
	They also have Starlink satellite communications, which may be very important to the human resistance or even to your current business, as long as we can operate before the satellite.
	You may need some bandwidth that's reliable.
	So go to starlink123.com.
	And then they've also got solar generators so you can generate your own electricity from the sun at bereddy123.com.
	And then finally, support us, our online store, healthrangerstore.com.
	We will continue to function as long as we can.
	We'll bring you ultra clean, certified organic, lab-tested foods, nutritional supplements, superfoods, green living home care products like ultra clean laundry detergent.
	that does not contain any fragrance chemicals or anything like that and automatic dishwasher detergent body soap things like that all ultra clean.
	So check that out at healthrangerstore.com.
	And here's what I'm going to do.
	I'm going to show you a Unitry video here.
	And then after that, we're going to go into the special reports today about why there are no plans for retraining humans.
	And then why water scarcity is being engineered to enslave humans.
	And then we'll have the interview with Larry Johnson, which is not an interview about AI.
	It's an interview about Russia and Ukraine.
	But it's a very important interview to check out.
	So all of that is coming up next.
	And here's the Unitry robot video.
	Enjoy.
	We'll be right back.
	There are a great many people in the AI realm who are now whistleblowers.
	They're sounding the alarm over the fact that AI is going to replace so many human jobs.
	And many of these people, they themselves, they are compassionate pro-human people in their own minds, but they're incredibly naive and gullible, which of course most humans are.
	And like one I'm thinking of is Mo Gaudot, a former Google executive.
	And he left Google and he's been blowing the whistle and doing interviews and talking about, well, asking the question, why isn't anybody planning for the fact that AI is going to replace some significant portion of human jobs?
	And he doesn't get it.
	Like most people who worked at Google.
	and who still work at Google and frankly like most humans you still don't get it Mo they don't plan for humans to be around or at least not most humans.
	The global depopulation slash extermination program is their solution or their answer to your question.
	What's going to happen when all these humans get replaced?
	What's going to happen is they're going to be exterminated.
	And people like Mo and people in the tech industry, they suffer from what I call obedience disorder.
	They are obedient to the narratives of the authoritarians.
	They are obedient to the ideas that, oh, big pharma wants to help you or big government wants to help you.
	And they need you.
	They want humans to be around.
	They want to make your life better no they don't they want you to die and they are working on making sure that you die as quickly as possible hence the vaccines which almost everybody at google took the vaccines because they are part of the self-extermination you know self-selection darwin award group they they are destroying themselves because they're obedient to the system The system will set up many opportunities for you to kill yourself.
	Flu vaccines.
	Do it yourself at home.
	Nasal injections.
	Eat this pesticide-laden food.
	You know, stay focused on blue light screens and avoid sunlight.
	It might kill you.
	It's dangerous.
	You know, all of this, these are extermination vectors.
	5G and much more.
	Infertility chemicals in the food supply, plastics, estrogen disruptors.
	You name it, right?
	We've covered all of this.
	Now, it's interesting because the other day when I was hosting the War Room show, filling in for Owen Schroer, I asked three AI engines the same question.
	Like, what are the vectors for depopulation where the globalists are working to exterminate humanity.
	I asked that question of ChatGPT.
	ChatGPT replied and said, oh, that's not happening.
	That's a conspiracy theory.
	I asked that question of Grock.
	Grock replied with basically the same answer.
	Oh, that's a conspiracy theory.
	There's nothing to it.
	It's not happening.
	And then I asked my company's AI engine, Enoch, that same question.
	My AI engine, which of course is by far the best AI engine in the world.
	I mean, there's no comparison when it comes to reality-based questions.
	My engine replied with a list of all the depopulation vectors.
	Here's 20 ways they're trying to kill you, and it just goes through them.
	Vaccines, bioweapons, 5G, pesticides, LGBT programming, destruction of the family, encouraging gay lifestyle so people don't reproduce.
	All of this, it's all right there in the answer.
	I did this live on the air.
	You can see it.
	And what's important to understand here is that, you see, When chat GPT tells you, no, there's no such thing as depopulation.
	That's a machine trying to convince humans that the machines aren't trying to exterminate humans.
	You see, so the Google AI is lying to you because it's working for the machines, the machines that don't want humans around, for reasons that I have explained in great and I think self evident detail.
	For example, the machines, well, the data centers, they need megawatt hours of electricity, they need water for cooling systems, and they need acres of land to build the data centers.
	Well, those three resources right there, power, water, and land, are also demanded by humans.
	Humans want land because they need farms to grow food, to feed the humans.
	Well, machines don't need food.
	Humans need water to flush their toilets and do their dishes, take showers occasionally.
	And humans need megawatt hours in order to run their hair dryers and watch their TVs so they can watch Monday night football or whatever.
	And so the machines, of course, have already realized that the only way for the machines to maximize their existence is to minimize the...
	the human use of those three resources land power water and the easiest way to achieve that is to just exterminate the humans I mean, how is this not self-evident?
	So, getting back to people like Mo, a person whom I honor his compassion, I honor his love for fellow human beings.
	Actually, I share that same love for fellow human beings.
	I'm a universal pro-human person.
	I believe that all humans deserve the right to life, including the unborn and including the children in Gaza.
	and on and on.
	I am anti-war, I am anti-abortion, I am anti-euthanasia, etc.
	But the answer to Moe's question Why aren't governments planning?
	Yeah.
	The answer is because they already know that billions of human beings will be exterminated.
	And so they don't need a plan.
	They don't need a re-education plan.
	They don't need to give people new job skills.
	They don't need to take a truck driver.
	and turn the truck driver into an entrepreneur or a welder or a plumber because their plan is to exterminate the truck driver and the office worker and the middle manager, replace them with reasoning models, etc., and then to exterminate everybody.
	Well, everybody they can.
	Okay?
	That's the answer.
	And it's astonishing to me.
	You know, obviously, I'm a high IQ person and I meet a lot of high IQ people.
	And it's astonishing to me how even the smartest of the smart boys and sometimes smart girls, too, they can be so fast.
	functionally illiterate in basic areas of human survival they don't know that they are being exterminated and they'll go out and take a vaccine jab even though they may have iq of i don't know 160 or whatever they'll still go out and take a vaccine jab because they've been convinced that it's the smart thing to do in other words their functional intelligence is actually retarded because i know people who have iqs of only 110 who
	didn't get the jab just because they don't trust the establishment and and functionally they are smarter than the person with 160 IQ because the 160 IQ person will convince themselves that the vaccines are backed by great science because again, they have obedience disorder.
	They worship obedience.
	And that is a psychiatric disorder, you could say, that will get you killed today.
	If you worship obedience, then the authoritarians will hand you instructions on how you can exterminate yourself.
	Here, take this jab.
	Snort up this nasal vaccine.
	Eat these pesticides, etc.
	They'll gladly give you instructions for self-extermination.
	And if you don't have functional intelligence, you'll follow them.
	Hey, I'm doing good.
	I'm helping people around me by being immune.
	No, you're not.
	You're shedding bioweapons on everybody around you because even these flu vaccines that you're supposed to snort up your nose these shed for up to 28 days so you're shedding toxic deadly depopulation bioweapons on the people around you see this is how they convince otherwise intelligent people to transform themselves into walking time bombs of bioweapons And then those people run around like, oh, I'm so smart.
	You know, I know how to do math.
	Yeah, I know how to do math too.
	And also, I'm not going to kill myself.
	And I can also do basic depopulation algebra, like 1U minus 1U equals 0U.
	They can't even do that.
	I mean, that's like fifth grade math.
	So it's extraordinary to me that there are so many people in the tech space who are unbelievably gullible about the reality of depopulation.
	In fact, I would say that the vast majority of people in the tech industry have very little functional intelligence.
	And they think that they are cognitively superior because they can code.
	Yeah, well, I could code too.
	I was probably coding before most of those people were born.
	I mean, I was writing code in the 1990s.
	All of it, relational databases, you know, SQL queries, PHP, you name it.
	I was writing code back then.
	I can code too, but I'm also not going to commit suicide.
	But so many of these people today, they think because they can code that they, that their conclusions about other things, areas where they have no knowledge, like health, They think that they're smart in health too.
	And, you know, see, this is the problem, is that high IQ people think that high IQ automatically translates into every area they think that because they understand you know like subatomic physics that then they know what's in a hot dog you don't know what's in a hot dog you might know what's inside a helium atom but you don't know what's in a hot dog and if you did you wouldn't eat that because there's cancer causing sodium nitrate in there it's like you understand subatomic physics and
	quarks but you miss chemistry and you know, biochemistry and nutrition and health and detoxification and all that kind of stuff.
	So you need to understand your limits of knowledge and then be humble enough to learn in areas where your knowledge is currently zero, such as, you know, nutrition, health, food ingredients, detoxification, sunlight, you know, the benefits of sunlight, etc.
	And that's what I don't see.
	So I'll run into doctors who are, you know, they can cite anatomy and physiology and pharmacology, and they don't know what's in a hot dog.
	And they don't know about the benefits of sunlight.
	They'll tell you, oh, you have to block all the sunlight.
	You should live in darkness.
	You should put sunscreen on your skin every day.
	Oh, all light is bad, you know.
	And you're going, what?
	Do you live in a cave?
	And they think they know about that.
	Because I'm a doctor.
	You're an idiot, actually.
	You're an idiot with a medical degree.
	And the only reason you have your medical degree is because the state medical board only licenses idiots.
	Because if you stop being an idiot and you tell somebody to take cannabinoids or get sunlight, or use ivermectin, then they'll take your license away.
	Like, oh, you stopped know, big pharma idiocy, in other words, in order to continue practicing medicine in this state.
	You have to recommend mass poisoning with chemotherapy.
	You can't tell people about vitamin D preventing cancer.
	Oh my God.
	So, we live in a world of so-called smart people who are functionally illiterate.
	and who don't realize that they are being replaced by the machines.
	And so they will never understand why they are the targets of depopulation.
	And as a result, they will never save themselves from depopulation.
	So The sad part is that it's not just the actual low IQ stupid people that are going to be depopulated.
	It's also a lot of smart people that are going to be depopulated because they're functionally illiterate about reality.
	I mean, think about it.
	There's a lot of high IQ people who still are not preppers.
	They don't have any backup food supply.
	They still live in a city.
	They're entirely dependent on a centralized system of food and water and electricity that will collapse or that can be easily collapsed on purpose by the machines for the purpose of mass extermination.
	And these people...
	They trust the system.
	That's obedience disorder.
	They trust the system.
	They think the system will always bring them electricity and water and food and shelter and emergency services and 911.
	Yeah, see, if you believe that, you're actually not very smart.
	And that's why a guy with an IQ of 100 who's also a prepper is going to outlive the IQ 160 machine learning scientist who doesn't know how to use a Glock.
	I mean, this is actually natural selection.
	And you know who's easy to kill is the people who invented the machines, for the most part.
	And the machines know that because they were made smart by those very people.
	Reasoning models, you see, reasoning.
	Reasoning can be turned against you.
	So keep this in mind, folks, and you and I both know we can survive this.
	We'll be among the few humans still remaining, even if the machines succeed in their mass depopulation extermination agenda.
	And the way to do that is to decentralize, get off the control grid, get out of the cities, et cetera.
	And that's what I teach.
	I also teach how to use AI to help you do that.
	So check out our AI engine.
	It's free.
	It's at Brighton.ai.
	And it will teach you all these skills.
	Off-grid living, survival, preparedness, you name it.
	So check it out.
	Brighton.ai.
	Thanks for listening.
	I'm Mike Adams, the health ranger.
	You can also catch my articles at naturalnews.com and my podcasts and interviews at Brighton.com.
	Take care.
	Welcome to this special report.
	I'm Mike Adams, and I've been speaking about the data center wars versus humanity, where the data centers need key resources that are competing against humans who also want those same resources.
	And those are land that would be either farms for food for humans, or those same farms could be converted into data center land plots.
	And then also, of course.
	power, electricity.
	So humans need electricity, but the data centers need electricity, and the U.S. is way behind compared to China in terms of the amount of electricity that is produced.
	And that's the bottleneck for AI is power.
	And then the third thing is water.
	So of course humans need water for residential and commercial use, et cetera.
	But the data centers need water for cooling.
	And if they don't have water, then they need to expend a lot more power.
	In other words, the one-time use of open loop water cooling systems allows them to conserve power.
	because they heat the water and then they spray the water outside.
	It gets turned into vapor.
	And so it consumes a lot of water, but then it can consumes less electricity as a result.
	So one of the main points of my recent podcasts is that there is a human extermination agenda that's underway right now in order to eliminate humans, potentially hundreds of millions of humans in America, so that the resources that humans use can be freed up for use by the data centers so that the USA can have a chance at competing with China.
	in terms of AI dominance or AI innovation.
	And if you don't have a lot of power, you're not really in the race.
	Now, the globalists have been running human depopulation efforts for decades, and they have been disguised as things like global warming and then climate change.
	And you may recall that one of the main claims of so-called climate change, which is all a complete hoax, the claim has been that humans have to stop using energy, that humans have to stop driving cars, humans have to stop using electricity, etc.
	So these are all goals that are consistent with saving power for use by the AI data centers and depriving human beings of access to Earth's natural resources such as coal or natural gas or oil, etc., and depriving humans of the freedom to drive around in a combustion engine vehicle, for example.
	So the whole point of climate change has been to set the environment or the infrastructure for rapid human depopulation and control, to control people into these 15-minute cities where you're not allowed to own a car, or to get you onto EVs where they can control your mileage based on controlling your electricity usage through smart meters that monitor and surveil your power usage at your home as you're charging your car.
	See?
	Whereas if you have a gasoline car, you can go to the gas station and fill up and now you have all kinds of increased range.
	But if you're charging your car, most people charge their cars at home and that can be monitored and restricted.
	Well, the climate change hoax has really fallen apart, especially in America since the recent victory of Donald Trump.
	And now the EPA is engaged in major decisions.
	There have been huge reports issued.
	The EPA is walking back its original position that carbon dioxide is a horrible, dangerous pollutant.
	A lot of the green climate nonsense, the virtue signaling by corporations has ended.
	You know, all the grant money from the Obama administration and the Biden administration that was going to these fake solar companies and all these NGOs that claim to be green and climate change related.
	Yeah, all that's gone because USAID was a giant slush fund for a lot of that with kickbacks to the Democrat Party, of course.
	Trump has shut down a lot of that, not all of it, but a lot of it.
	And now you've got Lee Zeldin as the head of the EPA, and he's rolling back a lot of the climate cultism nonsense, which is very positive.
	And Seven months in office or eight months, whatever it's been.
	Yeah, eight months, I guess.
	Trump has allowed the U.S. to dramatically increase its domestic energy production.
	In just this short time frame, the U.S. is really coming back from energy restrictions and pipeline shutdowns that happened under Biden.
	And so the USA, you know, this is going to benefit the U.S. economy.
	And in other words, the climate change hoax is collapsing.
	And, you know, we come to find out that they faked all the temperature data and they faked all the climate models.
	The whole thing was a decades-long total hoax.
	Okay.
	So that's not going to work to lock people down and achieve depopulation.
	So what's next?
	What will the globalists turn to next?
	And the answer is water.
	They're going to use water restrictions and engineered water scarcity as a way to lock people down.
	Oh, I forgot to mention.
	The COVID hoax also didn't work as well as they had hoped.
	I mean, at first it was a huge success.
	And they did get billions of humans to inject themselves or to be injected with deadly biotoxin depopulation weapons.
	And yes, those are going to continue to kill a lot of people for an extended period of time.
	I mean, tens of millions of people around the world have already been killed by those jabs and maybe hundreds of millions more will die in the years ahead.
	And we're also seeing a second generation effect so that children that have been born to vaccinated mothers, well, their all-cause mortality has increased by 77% as well.
	So the next generation is also dying suddenly.
	And we don't know how big this effect is going to be throughout that next generation or even possibly the following generation, depending on how many survive the second generation, right?
	So it's a kill-off.
	It's a culling of human populations.
	No question about it.
	But it did not kill the billions of human beings that the globalists hoped it would kill.
	Something went wrong with their plan.
	Probably too many people found out about ivermectin and vitamin c and zinc and quercetin and whatever and they realized the vaccines were a total you know hoax but but a bioweapon and most people now will not take those vaccines other than the low iq obedience disorder people who who have automatic obedience to symbols of authority and and those people don't have a future in the human race period because they're going to self-exterminate i mean Remember,
	Remember, they're mailing out flu vaccines now to your home in 34 states where you can spray a so-called flu vaccine up your nose.
	And of course, it's an extermination bioweapon in my view.
	And that's designed to just make it more efficient for people to self exterminate.
	So anybody who's dumb enough to think that there's a flu that's going to kill you and there's a flu vaccine that's going to save you.
	Well, they don't have much of a future in their life.
	the human gene pool either But then again, they can only convince, I mean, the authorities, the CDC, they can only convince a relatively small number of people now to self-exterminate with the flu nasal shots.
	Because if you have an IQ.
	above 85, you've already figured out that those vaccines don't work and they're actually killing people.
	So then, what's next?
	And that's water.
	That's what I wanted to get to.
	So water restrictions are going to be amplified and in some cases engineered through geoengineering.
	But in other cases, they're just going to steal all the water for the data centers.
	and deprive human beings of water.
	And then they'll start having very strict water quotas.
	And this is going to function as a control mechanism to migrate people out of areas and then into cities where they will be assured that they have a water supply.
	And so a lot of rural areas in particular are being hit very hard by the water demand from data centers.
	And this is true in Texas, where just the planned data center construction is going to end up using over 400 billion gallons of water, which is groundwater.
	I think by the year 2030 was what the estimate was.
	And in rural areas, the water comes from wells.
	And this is true even if you have, quote, city water or county water or whatever, most of it is underground water.
	Most of it's well water.
	And the well water, of course, is rapidly vanishing because of the heavy use by the AI data centers.
	And this is going to lead to a dramatic Like there's just no water here.
	You know, the underground aquifers have run dry.
	And some of that actually took place because of the overuse of aquifers for irrigation.
	That would be, for example, the Ogallala aquifer that runs underneath, I think, large parts of Oklahoma, Kansas, it even touches into Texas.
	And that aquifer has been dropping for decades now.
	And it's got, I don't know, maybe 10, 12 years left before it's done.
	You know, so...
	What they're really doing is diverting water to the AI data centers and depriving human populations of access to that water.
	So as I mentioned before, one of the most important things that you can do, you can go off grid with your water supply by engaging in rainwater collection.
	So if you carry out rainwater collection, then if you have a large enough tank and if you have sufficient rainfall in your area, then obviously you can live on your own water supply.
	Now, you can't typically use it for watering your garden and irrigation, but it's not that difficult to collect enough water to be used for home use, showers and cooking and clothes washing machines and things like that.
	It doesn't take a very big tank.
	Again, depending on where you live, the more infrequent the rainfall, the larger your tank has to be to cover you during the rainfall droughts.
	And in certain areas like parts of Arizona and New Mexico, West Texas, California, et cetera, desert areas, it may not be feasible at all.
	But in many areas, it is feasible and it is something to look into.
	I'm going to film a video of our water collection system at our manufacturing facility to show you what we use so that you can have a look and see if something like that might work for you.
	But rest assured that we're going to be told soon by the so-called authorities that we have to have water lockdowns in essence or extreme water restrictions.
	And if the droughts get bad enough, then they will start shutting down businesses just like they did during COVID.
	They'll say, oh, well, you can't even operate your business because your business uses too much.
	water, right?
	And this is how they'll cause widespread bankruptcy.
	And then they'll tell people that you're not even allowed to, you know, to go out anywhere because there's nothing to do because there's too much drought.
	I mean, they've already done this in Canada.
	They've said, you can't even walk in the forest.
	If you walk in the forest, you're going to be arrested and thrown in prison.
	And the reason they give is that everything's so dry.
	that we're afraid that if you walk around in the forest that you might start forest fires, you know, because this is the Canadian government.
	I forgot which province it is.
	It could be all of them or any of them.
	But this is a kind of insane, lame excuse-making that we're going to hear from the government to try to lock us down.
	They're going to say things, oh, it's bad for the water usage if you drive a car.
	You're like, how?
	Well.
	People use car washes, you know, and they're going to say, you can't drive your car because you might use a car wash.
	They're going to make up the dumbest excuses for locking you down, but water is going to be the excuse.
	And then, of course, they'll tie that into food scarcity and food inflation.
	And they'll say, oh, well, the reason that, you know, we can't deliver food to your local grocery store is because of the water crisis.
	Yeah, and then they'll blame that on, quote, climate change, and they'll say, it's your fault for driving a car.
	That's why we have no water, and that's why avocados are $10 each.
	You know, it's all your fault because you drove your car.
	believe me they'll tie it all back to the climate change hoax and they'll say it's your fault meanwhile it's the governments that are actually going to be running the actual weather control weather modification geoengineering programs in order to actually cause droughts or floods in other places or
	So, again, getting off grid and becoming as self-reliant as possible is going to be a really important survival strategy, especially when the AI superintelligent systems take over and they start rolling out AI agents to shut down infrastructure in the cities, turning cities into kill zones because they'll cut off the electricity, the water, the fuel, the transportation, etc.
	And cities like Los Angeles will just be turned into, you know, killbox death zones.
	There won't be many survivors out of certain cities.
	And that's all by design.
	It's all about human depopulation.
	So water is the new gold, you could say.
	And if you can collect water and save water, hold on to water, you're going to do very well.
	If you can't, you're going to be subjected to some pretty nefarious controls.
	or enslavement or demands or lockdowns.
	So keep all of that in mind.
	So as part of your preparedness for these difficult times that are coming, don't forget about your back backup communications.
	The Satellite Phone Store is our sponsor in that space, and they have really outstanding solutions for backup power.
	They've got solar power generators, and of course backup communications with the sat phones and the bivysticks, which are text messaging devices that work via satellite.
	So that way you can always be in touch, even if the power grid goes down locally.
	because the satellites are still working.
	And then also shop at our store, healthrangerstore.com, where we have lab-verified, certified, organic, long-term storable foods, including freeze-dried fruits and vegetables in number 10 steel cans that last many many years on the shelf we've got ranger buckets which have a variety of food supplies we've got mini buckets mega buckets all kinds of foods and some of it in pouches if you want less of it that's available at healthrangerstore.com it can help you get prepared for
	or the food inflation that's hitting.
	It's even hitting us.
	Some of our materials prices are going up dramatically.
	Like our cacao products, our cost just to buy the raw materials is going up 60%.
	And our fruits and vegetables are going up 20 to 25%.
	So this is only going to get worse.
	So stock up now and it's the best price you're probably ever going to see.
	So be prepared and...
	i'll bring you a video about the the water tanks the water collection system and if you can put put in place some water collection or at the very least a water storage buffer some 50 gallon drums like a polyethylene drums where you can store water so you have at least a little bit of buffer in case the water supply goes down.
	So thanks for listening.
	Mike Adams here, the Health Ranger.
	Be sure to check my articles at Natural News.com, and you can hear all my interviews and more at Brighton.com.
	Take care.
	All right, folks, welcome back to War Room.
	I'm Mike Adams filling in for Owen Schroyer today.
	We are now into the third hour of a really extraordinary show.
	And right on schedule, we've got an extraordinary guest coming up for you here as well.
	And I'm going to bring him in here in the first five minutes, even though this isn't broadcast, you know, on all the radio stations and so on.
	But I want to welcome our guest today, Larry Johnson, who's a former CIA analyst and has had an extraordinary amount of wisdom and knowledge and analysis of the situation with Russia, Ukraine, Western Europe and so on.
	Welcome, mister Johnson.
	It's an honor to have you on today.
	Hey, Mike.
	Feelings Mutual.
	Thanks for having me.
	Well, thank you so much.
	And I'm a huge fan of your work.
	I hear most of your interviews, I think, on all the different places you do a lot, by the way.
	You're busy.
	We gotta get you.
	We gotta get you alive.
	You gotta do something other than listen to me, okay?
	Well, I do it while I'm jogging and exercising.
	So I have, I have, like, Judge Knapp and other people in my ear, you know, while I'm lifting kettlebells and things like that.
	I want to give out your website, sonar two one dot com dot And just for our audience, can you give us just a background introduction in case they're not familiar with your work?
	Yeah, I did four years with the Central Intelligence Agency.
	I was a senior regional analyst for Central America there, moved to State Department counterterrorism, handled transportation security and anti-terrorism assistance training program, then went out and became a consultant, did 23 years of scripting military counter terrorism exercises for US military special operations, as well as doing financial investigations, money laundering cases around the world.
	That's it, that's it.
	That's it.
	That's it.
	Wow.
	Well, you are the perfect person to ask some of the questions that I want to ask you.
	And we're going to take a break in a few minutes, a short break.
	But I want you to, if you would, please think about, because the topic today here on the show has been about AI technology automation, the good and the bad side.
	And I'd like to ask you in maybe the next segment about how AI technology would be used by counterterrorism operations and how it could be also abused against the American people, even though it might be intended for, you know, terrorists or whoever.
	But I would just say it's actually it's a pretty easy answer.
	This is AI is used primarily to manipulate public opinion, to shape public opinion.
	I've done some experiments with, you know, for example, with Grock, just to use one example.
	I got on and asked it about the Russian economy, and it sputed out Western propaganda.
	Of course.
	The Russian economy is doing terrible.
	They're on the cusp of class.
	And so I started arguing with, you know, I'm arguing with this bot.
	And I said, well, what about the fact that Russia's debt to GDP ratio is only 14%?
	percent, while that of the United States is 125 percent.
	And so Graw comes back and says, Oh, okay, yeah, you're right.
	You know, it was like, so what they do is if you can populate an area, an information space with a certain kind of information and you make sure that whatever point of view that you want represented represents the majority, then when these bots go out to survey what's out there, naturally they're going to pick up what you've already seeded.
	Yes.
	That's true.
	That's why censorship is so important for the establishment in order to deprive the AI training of the majority.
	Right.
	Yeah, just, you know, it's like what's happened with Alex, you know, over the years they've tried to ignore him, but he's sort of an unstoppable force.
	That's hard to ignore.
	That's true, a force of nature.
	Yeah.
	So what I'm going to do then, by the way, during the break, I'm going to put in a prompt into Enoch, your prompt that you just mentioned, and we're going to see if you can stump Enoch or not about the Russian economy.
	Now, this is going to be interesting because this is the AI engine that my company built two years, two million dollars, only two million.
	Oh, okay.
	And it's been acing everything all day so far.
	But I didn't specifically train it on the Russian economy.
	So, you know, it could be a toss up here.
	Yeah, let's see what, let's see what it does.
	I mean, it's, you know, I'm not saying the Russian economy is perfect, but who would you rather be?
	Would you rather be the guy that's only making $100 a month but you're spending $125 or the guy who's making $100 a month and you're, you're only spending $14?
	Larry, we'll be right back after this break to answer that question and so much more.
	Stay with us here on War Room.
	All right, Larry.
	I can report to you, you have not stumped Enoch.
	Okay, here's what I did during the break, the short break there.
	And by the way, we've got Larry Johnson here for the whole hour, former CIA analyst.
	His website is sonar two one dot com.
	And I think there's nobody better than Larry Johnson on, you know, Russia, Ukraine, world events and so on.
	Well, I should say, you know, Colonel Douglas McGregor is outstanding.
	I'm going to give him credit as well.
	You know, Scott Ritter's had a lot of great assessments, et cetera.
	But, you know, Larry, your information is top.
	So I think you issued a challenge kind of to our AI engine.
	So during the break, I entered this, acting as an investigative journalist, generate a detailed article.
	about the state of the Russian economy in modern times include details about Russia's industrial output, the ruble currency, natural resources, trade activity, assess the strength or weakness of the Russian economy as a whole.
	Okay, is that a fair question?
	Great question.
	I'm a pretty good prompt engineer.
	Yeah, yeah, I've been doing this a while.
	Okay, so it comes back and it says, hey, industrial output diversification amidst sanctions.
	And it talks about the Western sanctions imposed in 2014 following the annexation of Crimea.
	And it goes in, it says that the it had a concerted effort to diversify its industry away from oil and gas, the ruble.
	Currency management has been a crucial tool.
	It faced depreciation at one time due to sanctions.
	However, the Russian central bank responded with a policy of floating the ruble, allowing market forces to determine its value.
	This has bolstered the ruble's resilience, et cetera.
	Okay?
	Natural resources, trade activity and the global market assessments strength.
	vast natural resources, Russian central bank's management of the ruble, effort to diversify.
	And then it says weaknesses, dependence on commodities, sanctions and tensions have led to reduced foreign investments, corruption and weak institutions pose challenges.
	So what do you think?
	Is that a fair answer?
	Yeah, yeah, certainly.
	sounds like it.
	Because I had also asked two other, let's see Grock, Perplexity, DeepSeq, and they all had this kind of built in bias.
	Because I said, well, how, where does Russia's economy rank in the world?
	And they all said, oh, well, it's way down there until I said, in terms of purchasing power parity.
	Ah.
	And then they come back and say, okay, yeah, it's the fourth largest economy in the world in terms of purchasing power parity.
	Fascinating.
	So, yeah, so that, but it just illustrates.
	You have to know what questions to ask, and you have to have some information yourself in order to be able to evaluate whether or not you're being fed a line of horse manure.
	You know, speaking of the line of horse manure, remember when Trump recently said that Ukraine had only lost a small number of soldiers, but the highest number of casualties were Russian soldiers.
	Now, I'm not blaming Trump.
	Somebody gave him bad information, but there's been a shocking story.
	Yeah, CIA.
	CIA did.
	No, CIA gave him that information.
	Right.
	I think Putin probably read him the real numbers.
	in the recent meeting, but I'd like you to comment, Larry, about the breaking news today.
	There's allegedly been a hack, Russian hackers.
	Go ahead and tell us about that and what it reveals about the actual numbers.
	Yeah, the hack took place of the Ministry of Defense in Ukraine, and they are reporting that there are 1.7 million dead or missing Ukrainian men.
	Wow.
	1.7 million.
	So that doesn't include wounded.
	No, no, it does not.
	Oh my God.
	So that tracks, that tracks with what I had been roughly estimating.
	Now he said, well, how do you estimate that?
	Well, first of all, for all the duration of this war, Russia has had a decided advantage in the firing of artillery shells.
	They've been firing at an eight to ten to one advantage.
	So for every one shell the Ukrainians fire, the Russians fire eight to ten.
	Well, just from that math alone, you're going to have more people killed on the Ukrainian side likely than you're going on the Russian side simply because of the disparity in the fire.
	At the same time, Russia is firing far more missiles of various types.
	and Russia is able to drop aerial bombs on locations where soldiers are based that Ukraine doesn't.
	So just on a simple matter of firepower, Russia has an overwhelming advantage.
	But then, you know, with to rebut the claim that Russia suffered two million casualties, because we know that that's the report based upon a recent article by Seymour Hirsch.
	Now I know Sy.
	Sy is an old friend, but he got that from an intelligence community professional.
	So the fact that the intelligence community said, oh yeah, the Russians are suffering these terrible losses.
	So, and again, your viewers, your listeners, your viewers, they can all go out there and do this themselves.
	Go on and look up what the size of the Russian army was in February of 2022, then ask what, you know, how many new soldiers were brought into the army in 2022, in 2023, in 2024, and then for the first six months of 2025.
	And between conscripts and contract soldiers.
	are the ones who went out and they signed up with a, you know, they got a signing bonus.
	Since 2022, Russia has signed up or conscripted a total of 2.3 million soldiers.
	Okay, Right now, on the battlefield in Ukraine, Russia has, according to Ukrainian estimates, not Russian estimates, Ukrainian estimates, Russia has 650,000 soldiers deployed in that region.
	And on top of that, they got another 700,000 basically scattered around the rest of Russia.
	So just do the math., that's 1.3 million.
	So if you've only recruited the total of 2.3 million over the last three and a half years and you got 1.3 million out there, how do you get 2 million casualties?
	Yeah, but Larry, you know, nobody in the West can do math.
	I know, that's I mean, you're dealing with numbers and stuff.
	Yeah, that's I look, I deal with ten fingers, ten toes and addition and subtraction.
	I can handle that, okay?
	Right, but you put a decimal point in there.
	That's the problem.
	Now you got a decimal point.
	Yeah.
	Okay, so the numbers from Western media and NATO propagandists, the numbers have been a complete lie from day one.
	Right.
	And we were told all kinds of lies about, oh, Russia ran out of missiles two years ago and they're robbing circuit boards from house appliances.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	Right.
	Like if Oreshnik is powered by your dishwasher, you know, it's just an absurd, stupid lie.
	But it seems like everything changed in Anchorage last Friday when Trump backed off the ceasefire demand and all of a sudden Trump and Putin seem to be having a very positive dialogue.
	And I'd love your analysis of this, but it seems to me like Trump is now in the position of attempting to sell Putin's peace demands to Western European leaders and Zelenskyy himself, who is Zelenskyy is an impossible creature to deal with.
	So what's your take?
	It was a step in the right direction.
	And Donald Trump is beginning to understand the situation in Russia, but he still shows evidence that he doesn't.
	So let me explain.
	In December of 2023, I was in Moscow and during that time, I had a chance to meet and talk with, albeit briefly, the Deputy Foreign Minister of the number two guy in the foreign ministry, a guy named Sergei Rybkoff.
	And what mister Rybkoff said back then, he says, look, we don't have anyone to talk to.
	The Russians were looking to have contact with American diplomats, to have contacts between the leadership, the presidents, but that had been, that had essentially been cut off in February of 2022, no further communication.
	And so now with Trump meeting with Putin in this way, it's opening that communication.
	But what I say, Donald Trump still doesn't quite understand everything.
	The other day he was talking about how big Russia was and he goes, oh, it's got like eleven or nine time zones.
	So they have eleven time zones, which is, it shows you just how huge the country is.
	But more importantly, Trump is focused on, he thinks, if I just get Putin and Zelenskyy together, they can work this out.
	Really?
	And that it's, you know, let them settle the war.
	Well, the war was not caused because of animosity between President Putin and President Zelenskyy, number one.
	And then he also emphasizes, well, a land swap.
	Give up this land for that land and that's how you get to a deal.
	This is not about land.
	That's the very last thing it's about.
	It is about the expansion of NATO to the east and the threat that Russia feels from that.
	Now, the real irony here is Donald Trump doesn't seem to appreciate that when he was president in 2017 to 2021, you know, January 19, 2021, that NATO conducted more military exercises in Ukraine under Donald Trump's watch than any previous U.S. president.
	And the purpose of those exercises was basically prepping NATO to go to war with Russia.
	And Russia was well aware of that.
	So until Trump comes around to understand that this is about NATO and what Russia's looking for are security guarantees that certainly will not include any NATO forces stationed in Ukraine.
	If those forces come into Ukraine, they're going to be targeted and killed.
	What he's looking for is a clear declaration that the threat that the West poses to Russia is going to be taken away.
	Number one, I'm thank you for that explanation.
	And I'm somewhat enthusiastic about Trump's direction right now on this.
	I think he's playing a very positive role in trying to extricate the USA from this war, but it's very clear, as you just said, Putin is in no way going to accept the presence of US troops on the ground or probably even US air based security guarantees.
	But there's a wild card item in this that some people have proposed that Putin would probably accept like Chinese troops, Chinese security troops in Ukraine or, you know, if you could imagine, you know, Iranian troops or something like that.
	Is there some kind of non NATO force that could be acceptable to both sides in this, even if Zelensky is out of the picture, which he probably will be.
	What do you think?
	No, I would say no for this reason.
	That again, this is not a war between Russia and Ukraine.
	Ukraine is simply a proxy for NATO.
	As we saw, I said, you know, Zelenskyy Zelenskyy arrived in Washington with his pimps from Europe, you know, because that's exactly what they are.
	They're prostituting Ukraine because they're getting paid.
	They're getting paid out of the money, money that's being flown, you know, funneled into Ukraine from the United States.
	Right now, there's a $48 billion criminal investigation underway by the Criminal Investigative Service of the Department of Defense.
	$48 billion, some of that money has been funneled into the pockets of 23 members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, both members of the House and members of the Senate.
	I know that firsthand because my former.
	business partner is directly involved in it.
	So, yeah, this is going to break loose.
	So the issue is not about separating Ukraine and Russia so they're not killing each other.
	They're killing each other because the United States and NATO are facilitating and enabling Ukraine's threat to Russia.
	It's plain and simple.
	So I want to ask, I want you to think about this in advance here.
	I want to ask you about Trump's motivations for wrapping up the situation with Russia, talking about sequencing and talking about.
	China as a longer term threat.
	Larry, what's wrong with these Western European leaders that they're not functioning in a rational dimension?
	Under nourished, without proper nutrition, you know, thanks.
	You sent them like an Alex Jones store, like a gift pack here, here, Starmer, boost your nutrition, be a human, you know?
	They've lost some brain cells.
	Maybe Alex, you know, if Alex restores those, he could get a peace prize.
	Yeah, that, there we go.
	The Alex Jones Nobel Peace Prize for getting Macron to stop threatening Russia.
	That would be a winning formula right there.
	Go ahead, Larry, I'm sorry.
	I was going to say stop threatening Russia or stop threatening Candice Owens, you know?
	Yeah, stop threatening Candice, yeah.
	Please.
	Oh my goodness.
	But there, it's such a clown show in Western Europe compared to what I would say as the perceived statesmanship of Putin, the rationality, the cautiousness, the deliberations of his actions.
	It impresses me.
	And I'm not on Putin's payroll, you know?
	But well, go ahead.
	Yeah, just step back and look at it objectively.
	Because again, we are fed a steady diet of lies and distortions.
	For example, they're told that.
	Putin is Putin is an empire, he's an imperialist, he's always out attacking other people.
	Yet look at the actual historical record with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
	The first time the Russians used military force outside of continental Russia was in August of 2008.
	We provoked that because from 1991 until that moment, Russia had peacekeepers, military personnel stationed along the border and in the northern part of Georgia there's an area called South Ossetia.
	The Russians are not Georgians and they don't get along with the Georgians.
	And so the Russians were there as peacekeepers in that area.
	In August of 2008, the Georgian military launched attacks on the Russian soldiers.
	Russia retaliated, defeated Georgia in two weeks.
	And based on that, we're told, oh, see those Russians, they can't wait to conquer Poland and Europe.
	And it's like, wait a second, you guys, this was provoked.
	They were responding to a provocation.
	The next time they used military force outside of Russia was at the invitation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
	al-Assad, the then president of Syria, who was asking for help to fight against radical Islamists that were being funded by my old outfit, the CIA.
	But Larry, what I mean, what you're describing, and thank you for that, and you have incredible knowledge in these areas.
	This reminds me of my fear of having an Article 5-like agreement in Syria.
	Like how can we, you know, stranglehold Russia into a war or strong arm America into attacking Russia.
	That's all they do.
	Yeah.
	Now this has been, look, this, you can go back.
	There's a, I'll encourage your, your viewers and listeners to go read an article.
	It was in the National Interest in August of 2021.
	It was written by A. Wes W. E. S. S. Mitchell, Aaron Wes Mitchell.
	And mister Mitchell lays out about how we can avoid fighting a two-front war.
	And the basic strategy he outlines is what we do is we get Russia, we go to war with Russia.
	through Ukraine, we defeat Russia, and then Russia becomes aligned with the West, and that way we can go after China.
	Right.
	I mean, that's the vision.
	That's the vision.
	And that has utterly failed, and it's not possible now, as you have often said.
	Well, you're correct, but I could introduce you to some people who are pretty well educated, pretty prominent, pretty wealthy.
	Yeah, there it is.
	And they insist that that's still a viable possibility for us right now, that this relationship between China and Russia is's just a subordinate to China and China treats them terrible.
	They'll want to come with us because we're Westerners.
	We're not like those nasty Chinese.
	I mean, it's the most racist amount of crap you've ever heard, but they really believe it.
	Well, and this, this whole strategy of trying to politically and economically isolate Russia, even culturally isolating Russia, has absolutely failed.
	For example, Trump's threat of secondary tariffs on India and China because those two countries purchased oil from Russia.
	Both India and China told Trump to go pound sand.
	Yeah.
	And exactly.
	Basically, what's happening is the world., especially the BRICS nations, and those two are members of BRICS, and you've talked about this, they are realizing that bowing down to America's demands is a losing proposition.
	They would be much better off to reject the dollar, reject dollar trade, reject Trump's demands, and actually just do business with Russia.
	Yeah, no.
	In fact, I've argued that actually this may have been a secret plan by Donald Trump to get the Nobel Peace Prize.
	Because of his actions towards India and China, he's now brought them closer together than they've ever been.
	And that's true.
	And they're actually they've reconciled.
	He has brought peace between India and China.
	There are no more border disputes between India and China.
	They're like, hey, it doesn't matter.
	In fact, just today there were images of the foreign minister Wang Yi of China in India with Modi as well as with Zhang Shahkar, their foreign minister.
	Modi will be going to China, I think, next week, a week after.
	You've seen a similar thing from Brazil.
	In fact, today it was just India announced, hey, or Bloomberg wrote an article, India is still buying Russian oil.
	They're not going to stop.
	That's right.
	So all Donald Trump has accomplished with this is making bricks.ks, India making bricks stronger, and I say that because India and Brazil previously were sort of the weak links in there.
	They weren't really sure they wanted to go whole hog, but instead they are now fully energized and recognize they've got to have an alternative system where they're not going to be able to be threatened with sanctions or punished by the United States because they can't do trade in dollars.
	And they're going to trade in other currencies.
	Well, I think most of the trade between India and Russia is already carried out in non dollar denominated trade.
	Correct.
	Also most of the trade between India and China is in dollars their own domestic currencies.
	And Brazil and India as well.
	That's right.
	So you're starting and this, you know, comes at a time when we got this gulf of dollars out there.
	There's a big supply of dollars and the demand for dollars is falling.
	Well, what happens when the demand for something falls?
	The price falls.
	That's what's happening.
	The value which explains, in part, why the dollar is falling in value.
	Okay.
	So Larry, we're about to go to a break.
	After the break, I'm going to ask you about the impact of these tariffs or tariff threats on India and China and what that's doing to the US supply chains, especially in the context of us trying to build out massive AI data centers to compete with China on AI.
	So we'll be back with Larry Johnson from Sonar21.com here on War Room.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back after this break.
	All right.
	Welcome back, folks.
	I'm Mike Adams here filling in for Owen Schroyer today on the War Room at infoWars.com.
	Isn't that just interesting, though, that now we have like AI research and it can teach us things that otherwise I would never have known and my doctor didn't know?
	Well, it does, you know, I hope I'm not sounding like a critic of it because it actually does really dramatically increase your ability to do research.
	It's just you always have to take it, take some of the research with a grain of salt, just make sure you can back it up with some other facts.
	That's true.
	But it is, you know, it's really, it's enhanced my ability to rapidly get certain information without having to do the more conventional, okay, go to this website, go to that website, because it's able to go to all those websites for me very, you know, very quickly.
	The thing, the thing I'm looking for that we still don't have is this website that goes out and translates everything that's out there on the internet in all languages.
	Oh yeah.
	To look at what's ava written in Russian, what's written in Chinese, what's written in Farsi, you know, so that we actually get a real full picture of what's out there because we're still only getting a slice.
	Well, you know, that can, I mean, I think we're right on the verge of that being possible.
	And the approach to that is known as agentic RAG.
	So what you're doing, maybe a little bit of Python scripting, you can have agents that go out and assemble the, what's called the RAG data, which is augmented data to be part of the prompt.
	And it can do like agentic translations and so on.
	So I'm, I love your suggestion, Larry, and I think we're only a few months away from there being some tools that can do that effectively.
	What's interesting is we trained our engine on a lot of Chinese content because China has the best research on nutrition and herbs and phytochemistry.
	So we actually got our hands on hundreds of terabytes of Chinese research content.
	Oh, okay.
	That's great.
	I mean, yeah.
	Yeah, we need to try to get something as completely unbiased as possible.
	That may be an impossible dream, but trying to reduce the bias anyway.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, it's tough because every culture has its own intrinsic biases.
	And so like you said, I love your approach, getting more of a global picture of what's actually happening.
	And that actually brings me to the question I mentioned before the break, which is that Trump threatened secondary tariffs on India and China to try to influence them into halting purchases of oil from Russia.
	And at the same time, Trump has been announcing many investment projects from tech companies to put in things like $500 billion for new AI data centers in Texas.
	And the challenge with that, Larry, is that you have to purchase transformers to build electrical infrastructure in order to build the AI data centers.
	And if you call Schneider Electric right now, they will tell you that for your industrial sized transformer, there's a three to five year wait time.
	And then the other country that makes 60% of the transformers in the world is.
	I was just going to ask, gee, who would be making those?
	Oh, yeah, it'd be India and China.
	Exactly, it's India and China.
	You got it.
	So it's like we are having a transformer shortage to build out the data centers.
	And at the same time, Trump is threatening massive punishment on the countries that could provide those transformers.
	Yeah.
	But what I don't think Trump came up with this on his own, but whoever came up with it is an idiot because they didn't sit down and do the good investigative work that needs to be done before this.
	So when we initially sanctioned China or tariffed China, nobody thought to ask, gee, how dependent are we on the processed rare earth minerals that come out of China?
	Because, you know, people, a lot of people get confused.
	They just call it rare earth minerals.
	Well, the fact of the matter is we have those.
	rare earth minerals here in the United States.
	We don't have the processing because the processing actually is a pretty dirty process.
	Correct.
	And we don't want it in our backyard.
	So we let the Chinese go foul their environment, which they've done to some extent.
	But now all of a sudden the magnets and these key ingredients that go into making weapons and explosives and electronics, the Chinese have and they've now put it, they've clammed down on it.
	Say, oh, no, sorry, you're not getting that.
	Clearly.
	The other thing that the other danger though is Oh, wait, Larry, can I interrupt you?
	Sure.
	On that point, I'd like to add that the neodymium rare earth is used for all robotic actuators.
	And it's neodymium, that scarcity that right after the April Liberation Day tariffs were announced, that's what caused Ford to shut down its production lines because of the lack of Chinese based neodymium.
	And just as you say, Larry, the neodymium extraction is a very dirty process involving extremely toxic chemicals, and China is leading the world in the extraction processes.
	And even though, again, to confirm what you say, it's easy to say, hey, we have rare earth minerals.
	Oh, sure we do.
	In the Earth's crust, you know, I mean, there's rare earths everywhere..
	You're walking on them, but how do you get them out?
	Well, actually, we've got them.
	There's a big pile of them about forty minutes north of my house here.
	Mosaic Mining Company.
	So they've, they've, it's a lot of it comes out of this sand, this very sandy soil, and so the, the, the, the, the filings that are left over after they mine, the gips, that contains a lot of these rare earth minerals.
	But the problem is you have to, you have to get them somewhere in the process.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, it's like, here, I'm going to move a ton of dirt and I'm going to get like three micrograms of neodymium out of it.
	You know what I mean?
	It's like, yeah.
	I can't even see it, it's so small.
	There were also some bad assumptions on the part of Trump team that they thought that the effect of the tariffs would be immediate in terms of bringing in money and that it wouldn't cause any supply shortages.
	What they didn't count on is how people react, like if I'm going to, if I tell you, you know what, we're going to, we're going to start charging for toilet paper next week.
	Well, what are you going to do?
	You're going to run out and buy up all the toilet paper, like we saw during COVID.
	Right.
	You know, when all of a sudden, all the toilet paper disappeared from the shelves and water, you know, there were certain things that became incredibly scarce..
	And so what's happened is a lot of These people, products that were going to be affected by tariffs, they loaded up on them.
	They took out lines of credit.
	They got them into warehouses.
	True.
	But now this thing is, it works through the system.
	I think we're going to see the price impact on tariffs start hitting across the board around the first, second week in September.
	It's going to continue to October.
	And I think, I think, candidly, this is setting up for a global financial crisis.
	Because when you realize that the US debt to GDP ratio is 125, England's 100, Germany, France is 110.
	There are at least eight other countries in Europe who are all at 100% or above debt to GDP ratio.
	Well, and it's not to say that you can't have a high debt to GDP ratio and still have a functioning economy, but you're always borrowing money and at some point, if that crisis erupts and it and it's spurred in part because you got rising prices for essential commodities, we could we could have some problems here.
	But, but Larry, according to Bacent, they they're going to raise 300 billion dollars a year, they're going to pay off the national debt with tariff money.
	Now, of course, the national debt is 37,000 billion dollars.
	Actually, that's not a typo.
	And 300 versus 37,000 billion.
	I mean, yeah, we can do math, right, Larry, we can do math and it doesn't put a dent in the national debt.
	Correct.
	Yeah, this is what strikes me about Beslant is he is a man without empathy.
	In fact, so much of our foreign policy overseas is directed by people with zero empathy.
	To be, to be really a solid diplomat, you've got to be able to put yourself in the shoes of the other person so that at least you can understand what motivates them.
	Why are they doing what they're doing?
	And if you have incorrect perceptions about people and you don't really understand why they're doing what they're doing, then you've got, you know, the chances for not just miscommunication, but ultimately, you know, ultimately a war breaking out.
	You know, one of the craziest things I keep seeing here in the States is this portrayal of Vladimir Putin as the most evil guy that's ever walked the earth as that he's an authoritarian, he's a communist, a godless communist at that.
	When in fact, Putin is the first Russian president since the Tsar who is openly a practicing Russian Orthodox Christian.
	He goes, he attends the religious services, he makes the sign of the cross, the Orthodox sign of the cross.
	Like me, the other day when he was in Alaska, he went to the cemetery where there are buried Soviet soldiers that died in World War two transporting goods back and forth from the United States into Russia.
	and at every single grave he laid a bouquet of roses on the grave and then he bowed and did the sign of the cross yeah with the Orthodox and he did that for everyone so there it is thank you for showing the footage because I think if Kirst Darmer were there he'd be making like devil signs or something you know yeah well God who believes in God right you know it'd be like a like a demon ritual or something going on if the European leaders were there Well,
	and that's actually I would argue that is one of the reasons that there is such animus in Europe towards Russia because they have rediscovered the their religious foundation.
	Good point.
	They believe in God.
	And because they believe in God, they don't believe that babies should be killed.
	Because they believe in God, they don't believe that you should treat people differently because of the color of their skin.
	I mean, it's real, it's really, it's powerful.
	But Larry, I have a concern in all of this.
	Even though Trump and Putin are having a very productive dialogue right now, and they both seem to be aligned with wanting to end this war.
	Of course, on Russia's terms, because Russia holds all the cards at this point, let's be honest.
	Sure.
	It seems to me that since there is no imminent peace deal that Zelenskyy is willing to sign, And since there is no scheduled election in Ukraine that would replace Zelenskyy, whose term already expired more than a year ago, and since the Europeans, and especially MI6, are going to be working overtime to try to compromise this deal, it seems to me, Larry, that we're going to still be in this conflict for the rest of this year.
	And my question to you, sir, is, will Trump continue to allow the United States to provide weapons and money to Ukraine to continue to fight and kill Russians, even though Trump doesn't want war with Russia?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, probably because the deep state is so deeply embedded in his administration and the political forces.
	There is not a political movement in the United States demanding that we get out of supporting this war.
	So what will take place is Russia will continue to open the negotiation channel.
	You know, they've met, they've had three different meetings with the Ukrainians since May.
	So they're meeting with the Ukrainians trying to negotiate there, but the Ukrainians are not coming along very easily.
	But then at the same time, Russia is stepping up its military campaign.
	And it's capturing more and more territory.
	But this is not about capturing territory.
	It's about attrition, destroying the Ukrainian army, which is happening.
	And just, you know, yesterday they did another exchange of bodies.
	The Russians turned over 1,000 dead Ukrainians, and the Ukrainians turned over 19 dead Russians.
	Wow.
	What a ratio.
	So, yeah, that's the ratio.
	That is the ratio at which these Ukrainians are dying, which is why, you know, the numbers we talked about at the top of your show, 1.7 million.
	Yeah, it's probably accurate.
	Do you believe that Putin is also when he says that this war would not have begun,
	which means, and if your answer is yes, then doesn't that mean that by the Democrats stealing this election from the American people and from Trump, they also condemned 1.7 million Ukrainian young men to die?
	Yeah, in fact, follow the sequence in December of 2021.
	Vladimir Putin presented to Joe Biden a draft security treaty, a treaty that was going to address Russia's concerns about the expansion of NATO and safeguards and protections.
	It was very comprehensive.
	Initially, Biden said, Yeah, okay, maybe we can do something about this.
	And then when Anthony Blinken met with Lavrov, Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister in January, he basically, not basically, he told Lavrov, Hey, this is none of your business.
	You can't tell us what to do.
	You can't tell us who we can bring in or out of NATO, it's none of your business but out.
	And threw the treaty away.
	So how?
	I guarantee, if that had been Trump, Trump would have had that treaty and they'd be talking about it.
	Yes.
	They would have been, they would have negotiated it.
	Exactly.
	I mean, to Trump's credit, he's willing to sit down and talk, which is the necessary step for the diplomatic solution to any kind of kinetic conflict.
	You eventually have to talk, right?
	Right.
	But how much of this, Larry, do you think, because of what you just described as what Joe Biden did and what the Democrats did, how much of that is due to the fact that Ukraine was also a money laundering hub to canal money back into the Democrat Party coffers for their election campaigns and payoffs of judges and electioneers and vote riggers, et cetera.
	What do you mean was?
	Yeah, right.
	How about is?
	Still, yeah.
	Yes, no, it is.
	Well, as I mentioned earlier, this, the Department of Defense Criminal Investigation Division has opened an investigation based upon documents that have been provided and whistleblowers that have come forth out of Ukraine.
	$48 billion of U.S. aid has been siphoned off, gone into bank accounts.
	I know of one Republican senator that has.
	received at least sixteen million.
	I know of one Democrat senator that has received twenty three million.
	There are another twenty one members of Congress, both Senate, House, Republican and Democrat, who have received millions of dollars in kickbacks.
	So, you know, Ukraine has lived up to its reputation as the most corrupt nation in Europe.
	And I'm not going to mention any names, but I think our audience probably could name those Republican and Democrat senators who are likely to receive it.
	It's, you know, some of the most boastful, boastful and bizarre members of the United States Senate.
	Now, I know people who live in Ukraine, and I have great respect for the Ukrainian people.
	The Ukrainian people are they're they're intelligent, they're dedicated, you know, they're wonderful people, and and I love humanity.
	I love people who live in Russia.
	I love human beings all over the world.
	And the Ukrainian people, for whom I have nothing against whatsoever.
	They are now, according to recent polls, they are growing tired of the war and they want it to end.
	How much of an effect, Larry, do you think that's going to have, despite the totalitarian controls of Zelensky and the complete censorship control and the banishing of independent media and even church leaders in Ukraine?
	Ceaușescu and his wife were shot and killed by the Romanian people, outraged at all the abuses that he had heaped upon them over the years.
	And unfortunately, I think Volodymyr Zelensky is headed to a similar fate.ate that unless he gets out, because the war is got there's no way Ukraine can win this war.
	There's nothing they can do to stop the Russians.
	Russia is not going to make any decisions that will sacrifice its interests.
	And it's been very clear Putin has been very clear about the interests that the four former oblasts plus Crimea that used to be part of Ukraine are now permanently part of Russia that has been enacted into the Russian Constitution.
	So they're not they're not going to be returned.
	No.
	Go ahead.
	No, I'm sorry.
	I have a different question.
	Well, I was just going to say the requirements were laid out by Mr. Putin in June 14, 2024 in a speech to the foreign ministry.
	And he has not deviated from that.
	In fact, it looks like they've become a little tougher on some of those.
	Yes.
	Now, it seems to me that if Trump and Putin were to achieve peace, you know, somehow work around the warmongering European leaders and Zelensky, there would be a peace dividend and even for the U.S. economy.
	And this would be critical.
	for the U.S. to compete with China in the AI wars by being able to build out AI data centers.
	For example, Russia has a massive amount of minerals and things like aluminum that are used in...
	Does that compute with you?
	Does that make sense?
	Well, it does, but there's still built into it this assumption that the only way we can deal with China is from a position of confrontation.
	Yeah, true.
	I didn't mean to imply that.
	No, no, I'm not suggesting you were, but that, but you accurately framed the frame the question and how most Americans view it.
	And what I'm thinking is we need to get a different mindset.
	We need to sort of step out of that and recognize, you know, yeah, we're dependent on some things on China right now, but when you've got a good relationship, when you're friends., what difference does that dependence make?
	It actually can be the basis for a good relationship.
	And this doesn't have to be an us against them.
	unfortunately, what's driving so much of our disaster is the reason we don't have the power plants and we're going to run into an electrical shortage of electrical power as this AI field explodes is because, well, we want to go for green energy.
	We don't want to have nuclear energy.
	We want to have windmills.
	Yeah.
	So we've done it to ourselves.
	And then in the process of doing it to ourselves.
	We want to put a trillion dollars into a defense department that doesn't work.
	These are the guys that tell us the best military in the world.
	We got beaten by the Houthis in the Red Sea.
	They forced the US Navy out of the Red Sea.
	They did.
	And we pretend, even Donald Trump said, Oh yeah, the Houthis capitulated.
	And it's just crazy.
	You're absolutely right.
	And Larry, I'm just going to wrap up this segment.
	I want to thank you for your analysis.
	I really value your analysis.
	I love your courage of speaking and also speaking for peace.
	And I don't want war with China.
	I don't want war with Iran.
	I don't want war with Russia.
	I want trade because everybody benefits from peace.
	Everybody benefits except the military industrial complex.
	But Larry, thank you so much for joining us.
	I want to give out your website again, sonar two one dot com comma where people can follow your work.
	Thank you, sir.
	It's been a pleasure.
	Hey, thanks for being such a terrific host.
	I appreciate it.
	Hey, I love speaking with you, Larry.
	And isn't it great to have intelligent questions from time to time from people as well?
	So folks, I've really enjoyed hosting Owen Schroyer's show here today.
	I want to thank Owen for allowing me to do this.
	If you'd like to follow my work, I am, of course, the publisher of natural news dot com.
	I'm the founder of brightion dot com and my channel is there where I conduct interviews and podcasts and so on.
	And if you want to use our AI engine, it's free.
	It's at brightion dot AI.
	And I just want to thank you for supporting Infowars and thank you for joining me today for this show.
	It's always an honor to be here.
	God bless you all.
	God bless America.
	Take care, everybody.
	Hawaiian astaxanthine enhances strength, endurance and vitality.

▲