Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 14, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:56:43

BBN, Feb 14, 2025 – RFK Jr confirmed while Trump takes aim at THE FED...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
	Alright, welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News for Friday, February 14th, 2025. Happy Valentine's Day to everybody.
	Our Valentine's Day sale ends tonight at midnight, by the way, healthrangerstore.com slash valentines if you want to take advantage of that.
	Now, coming up today, we've got the interview with Dr. Sherry Tenpenny.
	I recorded that just a few days ago.
	She's got an announcement about a new webinar about the dangers of AI in medicine.
	We had a really great discussion about that.
	And then I was also interviewed a few hours ago by Maria Z about the subject of AI also.
	And that was a great discussion.
	I'll play that for you next week.
	But she's broadcasting that on her channel, I think, sometime today.
	Of course, the big news today is that RFK Jr. Has been confirmed as head of HHS. So, apparently, we now need to call him Secretary Kennedy.
	I'm never going to get used to that.
	I had a hard enough time changing from Senator Marco Rubio to Secretary Rubio.
	Now I've got to say Secretary Kennedy?
	I don't know.
	I'll try.
	I'll do my best.
	Maybe it'll sink in over time.
	Anyway, he's confirmed huge congratulations.
	And it took an extraordinary effort for us to get to this particular moment, I should say.
	And it took all of us.
	It took you and me and so many other people in the health freedom movement, Robert Scott Bell and Dr. Sherry Tenpenny and Ty and Charlene Bollinger, who have a new film, by the way.
	Coming out next week, you can see the trailer right now at unpackingthelies.com.
	And we're going to be featuring it on brighteon.com as the featured free stream.
	I think Monday, but maybe Tuesday for sure.
	And I wrote the music for that film.
	I mean, I wrote it just a couple of days ago because I didn't even know about the film until a couple of days ago.
	But anyway, what I was saying is all these amazing people that it took for us to get to this moment.
	Dr. Joseph Mercola, for example.
	Liam Sheff, who passed away a few years ago.
	Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, who also passed away.
	So many amazing people.
	Ed Group.
	Just so many amazing people over the years.
	And I did notice that there was a tendency from some of the people that were really close to RFK Jr. I saw a tweet from a man named Jamal today, I think he's a member of Congress.
	I'm not sure.
	He was tweeting out, I remember three years ago when we started this and we built the Maha movement and we got RFK confirmed and we did it.
	Myself and Sayer G and a bunch of others were looking at it like, what do you mean you did it?
	What do you think you're talking about?
	Folks, we all did it.
	We all did it, and it took 25 years, if not longer, to do this.
	I mean, you could go back to the 1990s, William Falloon, you know, Bill Falloon, right?
	And the other authors and the other books, Dr. Gary Knoll, for example.
	So many people.
	I mean, my work stood on the shoulders of giants that came before me.
	And then the work of a younger generation today stands on the shoulders of people like me, now considered the OGs, the old guard.
	And I guarantee you, RFK Jr. could never have been nominated or confirmed in this position without the decades of effort, grassroots effort, all the moms, all the autism moms, especially who worked just tirelessly in the work of Children's Health Defense and Dr. Brian Hooker and Mary Holland and Andy and so many amazing people in this movement over all the years.
	All of whom have been attacked and smeared and blacklisted and called lunatics and accused of harming children while we were all simply trying to protect children and tell the truth about vaccines.
	So, you know, RFK Jr., or Secretary Kennedy, is the guy and he is the perfect man for this moment in history.
	And he is, I believe, a champion of health freedom.
	And I honor His effort, and he put in a lot of work.
	You know, he did multiple books, like the book about Fauci, etc.
	And he founded and ran CHD for all these years, etc.
	But he did not do it alone.
	And the people right around him did not do it alone.
	It took all of us.
	And I'm not going to say it takes a village because I hate that phrase.
	I say it takes a grassroots movement.
	And this movement took time.
	It took decades to form, and it took consistent telling the truth, fighting against censorship, and having the determination and courage to say what needed to be said.
	This was not a three-year effort.
	This was not an effort conducted by just five or six people.
	This was an effort involving millions of people.
	Over...
	And that is what has culminated in this historic moment of RFK Jr. now being confirmed as head of HHS. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and I just want to make sure that credit is widely distributed and decentralized among you and me and all of us,
	everybody in this movement who Played a role in getting us to this point because it has been an exhausting and treacherous path to get to this point.
	To oppose vaccines is the single riskiest thing that you can probably do in your professional life in America other than opposing Israel.
	I mean, if you oppose vaccines, you will be censored from YouTube and all the platforms, and I was.
	And I was the first.
	Or among the very first to be censored, I was blacklisted and deplatformed even before Alex Jones, for the record.
	They started knocking me off the platforms in 2014, so I have been blacklisted for over a decade.
	And yet, with your support, I've been fighting tirelessly this entire decade to help bring us to this point.
	So, it's a movement of all of us, and I thank you so much for your support.
	Again, shop at healthrangerstore.com slash valentines if you want to help support us because this fight has now really, I mean, the next chapter has only just begun.
	The real question now is, what does RFK Jr. do next?
	What can he do next?
	What does he need to do?
	What will really break the corruption and fraud, end drug advertisements on TV, stop the FDA from becoming the Militant enforcement branch of Big Pharma, and we'll actually protect children from toxic vaccines or toxic ingredients in vaccines.
	So I've recorded a special report on this very topic, and I'll play that for you now.
	It's called RFJ Jr. Confirmed as Head of HHS, Why the FDA Should Be Split into Two Agencies.
	And actually, as I explained in this report, the better option is shut it down.
	really, it should be why the FDA should be shut down and dismantled brick by brick, completely eliminated and banished from existence.
	But barring that, it should be split.
	So check out this special report, and we'll continue on the other side.
	Well, the confirmation of RFK Jr. as head of HHS, Health and Human Services, this is history unfolding today.
	This is a pivotal moment for our republic that many of us have worked Literally decades to achieve, to get to something like this, this opportunity where not only do we have an administration,
	the Trump administration, that is tearing apart the fraud, the waste, the corruption, USAID, all the slush fund money, firing the corrupt prosecutors, demanding government workers actually show up and work, you know, things like that.
	But on top of that now, to have RFK Jr. as head of HHS is, this is a once-in-a-lifetime moment.
	And the very future of this republic, in many ways, arguably, is riding on the health of our people.
	And RFK Jr. is now in a position to dramatically help turn that health around.
	And myself, as the health ranger, this is something that I've been fighting for for about 25 years now.
	A quarter of a century, I have been tirelessly working to educate people about health, to reform health habits, to teach people about the dangers of pharmaceuticals and the dangers of vaccines, to help save lives, and to teach people about...
	The healing potential of nutrition and foods and superfoods, herbs and natural medicine.
	And like many of you, I have been, of course, for the last decade, censored and smeared and blacklisted by a criminal cabal of government and deep state operatives and NGOs.
	And officials at the FDA and the CDC, etc., who conspired with big tech to achieve mass censorship of the truth about vaccines, the links between vaccines and autism, or the truth about the cancer industry and how it profits from cancer and doesn't cure cancer, doesn't even want cancer to be cured, things like that.
	The FDA... has functioned and continues at this moment to be a criminal organization.
	RFK Jr. is going to change that, I believe.
	Now, my preference is that the FDA should be ended.
	I half-jokingly said that, hey, if you make me head of HHS, which of course would never happen, this is a joke, but if you did make me head of HHS... My job would be done in 24 hours because I would go in there and I would say, you're all fired.
	Goodbye.
	Pack up your sh** and leave.
	And I would shut down the FDA. I would shut down the CDC. I would shut down the NIH. I would shut it all down because it serves no positive purpose for America whatsoever.
	It has been weaponized and it stands as a threat to the American people.
	So that's my default opinion.
	However, RFK Jr. is probably going to take more the route of reform to say, well, how can we change these agencies and make them work better for the American people?
	Can we turn them around?
	And that's, again, that's not my preference.
	I think the FDA will always be dangerous if it's large and powerful.
	And so the number one thing that has to happen, in my opinion, is that the FDA needs to be neutered of its power.
	The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act has to be completely revamped.
	The agency needs to be heavily defunded, stripped of its personnel, stripped of its powers.
	And that is going to happen.
	And I know that's going to happen because I have interviewed the people that are going to Well, one attorney in particular who is going to be filing a flurry of lawsuits to take away the FDA's power to censor people who tell the truth about nutrition, for example.
	So that's one of the key things, is the FDA engages in censorship against manufacturers and marketers of nutritional supplements or herbs or superfoods.
	You're not allowed to tell the truth about what these products can do, even if it's backed up by government-funded studies.
	You know, the FDA has banned the First Amendment in America, and that's got to stop, and that's going to be challenged very quickly.
	The lawsuits are ready to be filed.
	So let me explain something that nobody in the corporate media understands at all.
	Here's what's about to happen.
	You're going to have lawsuits filed against the FDA. Now, lawsuits about the censorship, lawsuits about emergency use authorization approval for the COVID vaccines, and many other lawsuits.
	And there are a number of attorneys, Jonathan E. Moore, Thomas Renz, and many others who are going to be filing these kinds of lawsuits.
	And also organizations, nonprofits, and some corporations will sue the FDA. RFK Jr., as head of HHS, In my view, and I haven't had any communication with him about this, by the way, this is just my own analysis, but in my view, RFK Jr. is going to cooperate with these lawsuits.
	So when the lawsuits say, hey, we demand discovery of, let's say, FDA collusion with big tech, where the FDA demanded that big tech censor anybody talking about the dangers of COVID vaccines, as an example.
	RFK Jr. is going to order the FDA to cooperate with that, to order the legal team to say, yes, you must produce this documentation, do not fight discovery, cooperate with the court's orders, provide all this information.
	In essence, RFK Jr. is the people's man on the inside who is going to, well, let's use a metaphor.
	If the FDA was a castle, RFK Jr. is going to Lower the bridge across the moat and let the marauding attorneys come right on in to see everything.
	That's my belief.
	Again, just for the record, I don't have any inside information.
	I don't have any intel from RFK Jr. or anybody else.
	To me, this is the logical way to get reform to happen.
	Not only will RFK Jr. himself be firing people and changing rules and changing interpretation of the rules and all kinds of things.
	Hopefully even working to end direct-to-consumer drug advertising on television.
	That's got to stop.
	But at the same time, I believe he will be cooperating with this flurry of lawsuits that's going to be coming in to tear down the FDA's fiefdom of a power monopoly that opposes the First Amendment, among many other things.
	So this is what you're about to see.
	And this is historic.
	And I know for sure, I've interviewed Jonathan Emord about this very topic.
	And I know that ANH USA, with Dr. Robert Verkirk, is keen to be active in achieving health freedom for nutritional supplements and herbs, dietary supplements, etc., you know, natural products.
	And I know that the industry, which has suffered for so many years under the authoritarianism and tyranny of the FDA, this industry, which I'm a part of, of course, is absolutely ready to unleash legal action against the FDA. My own company might sue the FDA. I don't know.
	We're not currently involved in such a lawsuit, but we've sued big tech over censorship.
	And we have named various government agencies, such as the DOD, in that lawsuit.
	We may add the FDA to that lawsuit.
	We may add, you know, defendant parties to the lawsuit, possibly.
	I don't know the overall strategy, but we'll see where it goes.
	Now, the bottom line takeaway from this is that the next four years are going to be really, really good.
	For the nutrition industry, for dietary supplements, for herbs, and these years are going to be very bad probably for big pharma, probably for the vaccine industry.
	Now, I don't own any stocks at all, actually, and I don't short stocks, and I wasn't paying any attention to the stock market right after the confirmation of RFK Jr., but I would imagine that Pfizer plunged, just my guess.
	And the other big pharma companies, Eli Lilly and what have you, Johnson& Johnson, I don't think they're very happy about this because they pulled out all the stops to try to block RFK's nomination confirmation.
	They were desperate to stop him because they know the dirty little secret of the vaccine industry is that vaccine safety and efficacy is not backed up by the data.
	And RFK Jr., essentially what he promised the senators during the hearings is that he would follow the data.
	That's his promise.
	He would be data-driven in his decisions.
	Well, the senators, they thought that was great because they think that the data show that vaccines are safe and effective.
	It does not.
	See, this is where they got outplayed.
	They just got owned.
	Because RFK said, All my decisions are going to be driven by the data.
	But you and I know what the data really show is that vaccines are dangerous and not effective.
	So when RFK's decisions are driven by that data, he's going to be making decisions that obviously say we need to pull these COVID vaccines.
	They do not work.
	That's a data-driven decision.
	Or we need to halt direct-to-consumer drug advertising.
	That's a data-driven decision because...
	Drug ads on TV do not enhance the health of the American people.
	We need to stop the mass prescription of antidepressants and ADHD drugs, etc., especially to children.
	You know, psychiatric drugging of children.
	That's got to stop.
	And that's a data-driven decision.
	Statin drugs don't work.
	They harm more people than they help.
	That's a data-driven decision.
	Also, there are numerous data-driven decisions here that RFK Jr. will Pursue.
	And the senators, I guarantee you, are not going to be happy about this.
	They thought that the data supports their clients, Big Pharma, but it does not.
	And you're going to have a similar reaction in the pesticide and herbicide industry, where you have the Bayers of the world, Monsanto, etc., that profit from poisoning crops.
	That is their model.
	They profit from poisoning crops.
	They're not happy about this because RFK Jr. believes in clean, safe food.
	And he understands the dangers of GMOs and glyphosate in the food supply.
	And he's going to, of course, take a very aggressive look at that.
	And RFK Jr. also understands heavy metals contamination.
	His focus for many years was mercury.
	Mercury in vaccines in some cases, but also mercury as an environmental pollutant.
	Now, RFK Jr. has long said that he's very concerned about mercury in coal, and he has been an opponent of coal.
	And I disagree with him on that point because I know that America's coal is the cleanest coal in the world, at least after it's scrubbed, right?
	The emissions are very, very clean in America compared to countries like China.
	There's no comparison, right?
	I share his concern about heavy metals in the environment, and I share his concern about heavy metals in the food supply.
	And since we are a food testing lab, you know, we have a mass spec lab and we test foods for lead and arsenic, cadmium and mercury and other toxic elements, and we also test for glyphosate, etc.
	I have very specific food industry knowledge about contaminants in the food supply.
	So I know that RFK Jr. is correct to have concerns about contamination in the food supply.
	Even if they don't come from coal, they do come from industrial output, some of it from China, for example.
	I mean, China's smokestacks end up polluting soils in America because what goes up comes down.
	And, you know, if you pump a bunch of particulate...
	Lead into the air in China.
	Some of it settles on the crops in America or in Asia, and it ends up in the turmeric herb, or it ends up in the moringa herb, you know, things like that.
	And we see that in our lab testing.
	So that's real.
	That's a real legitimate concern, and I believe RFK Jr. is going to take a really aggressive look at that, and he'll take some steps to help clean that up.
	But understand that the really big picture in all of this is that the FDA has functioned as nothing but the terrorist arm, the militant branch of Big Pharma.
	And an order went out last year from the Biden administration to the head of the FDA to try to just shut down every natural supplement company that they could.
	And they unleashed a wave of audits and inspections and actions.
	We were subjected to it as well.
	The FDA committed terrorism against us.
	And because we run such a clean operation, they failed.
	They could not find any reason to shut us down.
	But they targeted us, and they targeted others, and they tried to destroy the natural products industry.
	They did.
	And that's got to stop.
	The FDA cannot serve as The FDA needs to either be ended or split up.
	The best thing, probably from a regulatory point of view, would be to split the agency, have a drug administration, and you have to have a rule where nobody that works there can ever work for the drug industry, so you have to have a firewall.
	That whole operation there should be all about clamping down on dangerous drugs and vaccines.
	And then you should have another division, a totally separate division, that's about food and supplements.
	And its focus should be about enhancing nutrition and immune function and disease prevention for the American people.
	It should be a pro-health division.
	Frankly, my preference is shut it all down, because I don't think government can ever be trusted.
	To do anything honestly.
	But if there's going to be reform, this would be the way to do it.
	Split it up.
	And then medical devices, maybe that's a third thing, or maybe that goes under drugs and medical devices, something like that.
	But you've got to take food and supplements away from the current FDA bureaucracy because all those people in the FDA, they are enemies of nutrition.
	They are enemies of health in America.
	And as a result, they are enemies of the American people.
	They are terrorists, I assure you.
	The most evil, wicked, demonic people I've ever seen work for the FDA. They're not even human.
	I mean, some of these people, you look at them, you're like, that's not a human being.
	That's a f***ing demon that has been teleported into this realm to terrorize people and to destroy human health.
	I've seen it with my own eyes, okay?
	Face to face.
	So I know what I'm talking about.
	These are evil people, and some of them should be arrested.
	And I hope that there are criminal arrests.
	I hope that RFK Jr. cooperates with the DOJ, Pam Bondi, and issues arrest warrants for Fauci and arrest warrants for top executives at the FDA and the CDC who clearly were complicit in a grand conspiracy to cover up the efficacy of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
	In order to push mandatory toxic vaccine jabs on everybody during the COVID years, the people who were part of that decision, they need to be prosecuted criminally.
	They need to go to jail for life, in my opinion, if they're found guilty, obviously.
	And yes, they deserve their day in court.
	Yes, they deserve an attorney.
	They deserve to present evidence in their defense.
	I believe in the rule of law.
	But as an outsider, I know what they did.
	I know they are guilty of complicity in homicide.
	They committed mass homicide against the American people.
	And frankly, I'll lay this out there.
	If Fauci isn't prosecuted in some way, I know Senator Rand Paul is very interested in this.
	Let's see what Bondi does here.
	But if Fauci is not prosecuted, it's a massive failure.
	Fauci needs to be prosecuted, above all.
	And then there are others.
	There are others in the FDA. There are others in NIH. You've got to look at Collins.
	You've got to look at Barrick.
	You've got to look at a number of people who were involved in the grand COVID conspiracy that killed over 1.5 million Americans.
	This has to come out.
	Then we will know that we have truly won, that we have truly reformed or at least exposed the system.
	Then we will know we have drained the swamp.
	Until then, yeah, you know, you can rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic, I suppose.
	But if I see RFK Jr. limited to just talk of minor reforms, you know, let's just have cost savings here and there.
	That's a failure.
	I'm sorry, that's a failure.
	We need big, bold action, and I do believe that's what we're going to see.
	So pray for RFK Jr.'s safety.
	Pray for the safety of Trump and everybody in the administration that is...
	Being effective in this effort.
	Pray for them all and pray for America.
	Thank you for listening.
	I'm Mike Adams, The Health Ranger, naturalnews.com.
	And you can also find my interviews and podcasts and broadcasts at brighteon.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Take care.
	Okay, we've got a couple of really great things to share with you here.
	Now, given...
	The whole USAID slush fund situation that's being uncovered, which is pretty amazing stuff.
	You may wonder, how long has this been going on?
	And have the voters been in charge of our government, you know, in recent memory at all?
	Well, there's a book called Shadow Government by Tom Englehart.
	And, of course, we've got a bright learn.
	A summary of that book for you that I'd like to share with you here because it really explains how far back this goes and how deep it goes.
	And you're going to find out some things that, well, I guess for you it won't be shocking, but you may be surprised at how long this has been known and how many people were trying to warn about this for so long.
	But until recently, nobody really...
	I guess cared and nobody really looked at how corrupt the system was.
	I mean, I remember before COVID, I would tell people about the dangers of vaccines and their eyes would glaze over.
	Oh, I trust the CDC, you know.
	I trust my doctor.
	My doctor is informed.
	You know, really?
	So, you're an idiot, basically.
	Okay, whatever.
	Good luck, you know.
	I guess I'd have to say that to their graves today because a lot of those people are dead from the jabs.
	But check out this book.
	This is a great video.
	It's about seven, a little over seven minutes.
	Shadow Government by Tom Englehart.
	It's part of our Bright Learn series.
	You can find all these videos for free at brightlearn.ai.
	Check it out.
	Hello, everyone.
	Welcome back.
	Today, we're diving into the insights from Tom Englehart's eye-opening book, Shadow Government, Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single Superpower World.
	To start, picture this.
	What if a Martian landed in Washington, D.C.? The alien would expect to learn about the pillars of American democracy, such as checks and balances, free and fair elections, and the upholding of the rule of law.
	But instead, this Martian finds something entirely different.
	He encounters a labyrinthine structure that has grown alongside the traditional government.
	A national security state that operates with minimal oversight and an insatiable appetite for power and resources.
	This national security state, or NSS, has become a behemoth, consuming nearly a trillion dollars annually.
	Its primary focus?
	A global enemy that consists of scattered, lightly armed terrorist groups.
	While these groups can cause damage, they hardly pose an existential threat to the United States.
	Yet, the NSS operates as if the very fabric of our society is at stake, justifying its ever-expanding reach and budget.
	But here's where it gets interesting.
	What if we reimagined the NSS not as a political entity, but as a faith-based system, a new national religion?
	Picture it.
	Classified documents are sacred texts.
	Federal agents are warrior priests who serve under different holy orders like the FBI and the CIA who have made a vow to protect a sanctified homeland.
	This national security state of ours acts like a monotheistic faith with no room for alternatives that views the world through a singular lens of good versus evil and us versus them.
	The leaders of this faith-based system are fundamentalist true believers Issuing fatwas against their enemies and enforcing a set of sharia-like laws.
	Their punishments may not involve stoning or amputation, but they do involve the cutting off of lives.
	They see themselves as delivering hellfire and brimstone to the politically sinful, with powerful weapons that invoke death and destruction, like the aptly named hellfire missiles and the Predator and Reaper drones.
	The result is that since September 11th, We have been living under what Engelhardt calls a religion of perpetual conflict.
	This religion has become a lucrative global operation, rallying financial support from both Democrats and Republicans, ensuring its coffers remain full even in tough times.
	It has expanded the military-industrial complex, subsidizing warrior corporations and creating a state within a state that thrives on conflict and secrecy.
	The NSS has transformed into a global security state with ambitions that are nothing short of staggering.
	The NSA's data mining tool, Boundless Informant, is a testament to this ambition, capable of gathering billions of pieces of intelligence from computer networks worldwide.
	The goal?
	To put not just the United States, but the entire world under its penetrating gaze.
	This global security state is a far cry from the shadow government of the 1960s, exposed by journalists David Wise and Thomas B. Ross in their groundbreaking book, The Invisible Government.
	Back then, the intelligence community was a labyrinthine set of secret outfits with growing power, but nothing compared to the behemoth it has become today.
	The post-911 era has seen an explosion in the size and scope of the intelligence community.
	The National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, the National Counterterrorism Center, and the Joint Special Operations Command are just a few examples of the new players in this ever-expanding shadow world.
	The budget for the intelligence community has skyrocketed, with billions of dollars poured into building top-secret facilities and expanding surveillance capabilities.
	The NSA's global surveillance apparatus is often justified as a means of achieving omniscience, the idea that knowing everything will lead to ultimate power and security.
	But omniscience is not the same as omnipotence.
	The more the NSA collects, the more it becomes apparent that knowing everything doesn't necessarily translate into control or influence.
	The agency's efforts to monitor global communications have not prevented the rise of new threats or the spread of instability.
	In fact, the revelations have damaged America's relationships with allies and fueled distrust around the world.
	In the age of the global security state, the language we use to describe the world is rapidly evolving.
	Words like secret, surveillance, and whistleblower are taking on new meanings.
	The government's obsession with secrecy has led to a situation where nearly everything is classified.
	The U.S. military is adapting to the challenges of the 21st century by moving towards a more remote, technology-driven form of warfare.
	Drones and special operations forces are at the forefront of this new approach, allowing the U.S. to project power without the need for large-scale invasions or occupations.
	But this shift towards remote warfare raises important questions about accountability, ethics, and the long-term consequences of relying on technology to fight wars.
	The rise of the warrior corporation and the privatization of military functions further complicate the picture, blurring the lines between public and private, and between war and profit.
	The expansion of the commander-in-chief's powers, particularly in the realm of covert operations and drone warfare, has transformed the presidency into a more imperial office.
	The president now wields unprecedented power when it comes to matters of national security and foreign policy.
	Through the imperial presidency, deadly acts like assassinations have been institutionalized and become presidential prerogatives.
	In conclusion, the shadow government and the global security state represent a profound shift in the way America operates both at home and abroad.
	As citizens, it is crucial that we remain vigilant, informed, and engaged.
	We must demand transparency, accountability, and a return to the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
	Thank you for joining me on this journey.
	I hope this episode has left you with plenty to think about.
	Don't forget to subscribe, share, and leave a comment.
	Until next time, stay curious and stay informed.
	This has been a Bright Learn video from brightlearn.ai on the book Shadow Government, Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single Superpower World by Tom Engelhardt.
	Visit brightlearn.ai.
	For more fascinating videos like this one and naturalnews.com for full editorial coverage and breaking news on critical stories that keep you informed and aware of what's really going on.
	All right.
	Welcome back.
	Hope you enjoyed that one.
	Really fascinating stuff here.
	And of course, I've got one more for you today that's highly, highly relevant because there are rumors now spreading that Trump is going to nationalize the Federal Reserve.
	Yeah, what does that mean?
	Well, he's going to take it away from the global banker cabal of, you know, criminals.
	And he's going to bring it back under the control of the United States government and ultimately the U.S. Congress.
	At least this is the current theory.
	And it would mean that when dollars are created, they are assets, not debt instruments.
	Now, I want you to pull out a dollar.
	Actually, I'm going to do the same thing here.
	Do I have a dollar?
	Okay, you pull out a dollar.
	What does it say at the very top?
	It says Federal Reserve Note.
	Okay?
	It doesn't even say that it's like the people's money or anything like that.
	It says Federal Reserve Note.
	Now, if you know anything about finance, man, this is a filthy dollar.
	I think Hunter Biden used this to snort cocaine or something.
	Jeez.
	If you know anything about finance, You know that a note is a debt instrument.
	Like, if you have a note, you know, it means you owe somebody something, right?
	Like, you borrowed money from them, and now you have a note.
	And what does the note say?
	It says, pay them back.
	Every dollar in your pocket, and of course, most money is digital now, but you get the point.
	Every dollar is a debt instrument.
	And none of the dollars are owned by the people of the United States of America.
	As a result, the American people can never be free as long as the Federal Reserve exists as a foreign entity.
	It's not part of the government.
	And the leaders of the Federal Reserve, like Jerome Powell, they do not answer to the American people at all.
	I mean, he says so.
	He was asked by a reporter, like, what would you do if Trump asked you to step aside?
	And he said, eh.
	No.
	I mean, it doesn't matter.
	We don't answer to the president.
	I mean, I'm paraphrasing, but that's essentially what he said.
	So, we've got a book here, or a report on a book, by Danielle DiMartino Booth, who's a wonderful finance interviewer to listen to.
	It's called Fed Up, an insider's take on why the Federal Reserve is bad for America.
	Now, listen to this.
	It's also seven minutes.
	This is well worth hearing.
	And when you understand this, you will better understand what's about to happen.
	Because big things, big things are underway right now.
	And if Trump nationalizes the Federal Reserve, that's going to really strengthen the dollar.
	I mean, strengthen the integrity of the currency.
	It might save the country, actually.
	And if Trump...
	Revalues gold or even uses gold to partially back the new currency from the new American reserve.
	I don't even know what you would call it.
	You wouldn't call it the Federal Reserve anymore, I suppose.
	You would call it like the Republic Reserve.
	Maybe.
	I'm just guessing.
	But whatever it is, it would be assets, not debt, not owned to a bunch of International globalist criminals that run the banking system.
	Also known largely as, you know, the Rockefellers and the Zionists.
	Let's be honest.
	I mean, that's who's behind the international banking cartels.
	Go back to The Creature from Jekyll Island, 1913, G. Edward Griffin's book, and so on.
	It explains it all.
	Look at the names.
	Look who they are.
	These are international Zionist bankers that run the whole system.
	That's not a trope.
	It's not a...
	It's not a conspiracy.
	It's history.
	It is what it is.
	So we need to take control away from the Federal Reserve and bring it back to we the people.
	And Trump may be lining up to do that.
	So check out this brightlearn.ai book review of this book by Danielle DiMartino Booth.
	Check it out.
	Hello, everyone, and welcome back.
	I'm Natural News, and today we're going to take a fascinating journey into the heart of the Federal Reserve.
	Exploring a book that pulls back the curtain on this powerful institution.
	The book is Fed Up, an insider's take on why the Federal Reserve is bad for America by Danielle DiMartino Booth, and it's a gripping account of her nine years inside the Federal Reserve, offering a rare glimpse into the decision-making processes and the profound impact these decisions have on all of us.
	Picture this.
	It's a cold, sleety morning in December 2008. A group of 17 bureaucrats, mostly academics, unelected and virtually invisible to the public, are making their way to the Mariner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building in Washington, D.C. These are the members of the Federal Open Market Committee, the decision-making body of the Federal Reserve System.
	Their task?
	To vote on whether to take the Fed funds rate, the interest rate at which banks lend money to each other overnight, to the zero bound.
	This historic decision would ripple throughout the economy, affecting the borrowing costs for businesses and consumers alike.
	The room is filled with tension, as Chairman Ben Bernanke calmly but insistently argues that this is the only way to prop up a faltering Wall Street, mired in the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression.
	By the end of the meeting, the vote is unanimous.
	The FOMC officially adopts a zero-interest rate policy, hoping to keep companies afloat, employees on payrolls, and consumer spending.
	They even agree to pay banks' interest on their deposits.
	Free cash, essentially.
	But here's the catch.
	While Wall Street breathes a sigh of relief, the Fed's academic models never address the question of what happens to everyone else.
	As DiMartino Booth reveals, the Fed's decision would have far-reaching consequences, many of them devastating for everyday Americans.
	Yes.
	Rewind to the early 2000s.
	Thank you.
	The Fed, under Chairman Alan Greenspan, had been aggressively lowering interest rates to stimulate the economy after the dot-com bubble burst.
	This led to a housing boom, with people buying homes they couldn't afford, thanks to subprime mortgages.
	DiMartino Booth, who was working on Wall Street at the time, saw firsthand the deceptive practices and the looming disaster.
	She warned readers about the housing bubble, but her concerns fell on deaf ears.
	By 2006, the housing market was showing signs of strain.
	DiMartino Booth, now working at the Dallas Fed, was one of the few who recognized the systemic risk building up.
	She collaborated with economist John V. Duca to publish papers on the rise and fall of subprime mortgages and the risky business of collateralized debt obligations.
	Despite their warnings, the Fed was a big deal.
	the Fed continued to downplay the risks.
	When the housing bubble burst in 2008 and triggered a global financial crisis, The Fed's response was to bail out Wall Street, but as DiMartino Booth points out, the consequences for everyday Americans were dire.
	Pension funds faced massive shortfalls, millennials struggled to find affordable housing, and retirees saw their savings erode due to the Fed's zero interest rate policy.
	DiMartino Booth's book reveals a culture of groupthink within the Fed, where dissenting voices are often ignored or dismissed.
	She recounts her own experiences of being treated with condescension by her colleagues, who were mostly PhD economists with little real-world experience.
	The Fed's leadership, from Greenspan to Bernanke to Janet Yellen, seemed oblivious to the risks their policies were creating.
	DiMartino Booth argues that their academic training and reliance on complex models blinded them to the realities of the economy.
	One of the most intriguing aspects of DiMartino Booth's book is her exploration of the shadow banking system, a network of financial entities that operate outside the traditional banking system.
	She describes how this system, largely unregulated and poorly understood, played a crucial role in the financial crisis.
	The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the near collapse of AIG exposed the interconnectedness of the shadow banking system and the systemic risk it posed.
	DiMartino Booth also delves into the Fed's role in exacerbating income inequality.
	She argues that the Fed's policies, particularly quantitative easing, have benefited the wealthy at the expense of the middle class and the poor.
	The Fed's massive bond-buying programs have inflated asset prices, enriching those who own stocks and real estate, while doing little to stimulate job growth or wage increases.
	She cites the example of Texas.
	which has outperformed other states in job creation, despite being subject to the same Fed policies.
	DiMartino Booth attributes Texas' success to its business-friendly environment and low tax burden, suggesting that the Fed's focus on monetary policy alone is insufficient to address the nation's economic challenges.
	In the final part of the book, DiMartino Booth calls for reform of the Federal Reserve.
	She advocates for a more transparent and accountable Fed.
	One that is less influenced by Wall Street and more responsive to the needs of Main Street.
	She suggests limiting the number of academic PhDs at the Fed, bringing in more practitioners, and granting all district bank presidents a permanent vote on the FOMC. DiMartino Booth also calls for the Fed to abandon its dual mandate of maximizing employment and maintaining price stability, arguing that it is unrealistic and counterproductive.
	Instead, As we wrap up this episode, it's clear that FedUp is a powerful critique of the Federal Reserve and its policies.
	DiMartino Booth's insider perspective offers a compelling argument for reform and a reminder of the profound impact the Fed has on our lives.
	whether you agree with her views or not her book is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the inner workings of this powerful institution and the challenges it faces in navigating the complex world of modern finance thank you for tuning in If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and leave a comment.
	And don't forget to share it with your friends and family.
	Until next time, I'm Natural News.
	Stay curious and informed.
	This has been a Books Alive video from Natural News on the book Fed Up, an insider's take on why the Federal Reserve is bad for America by Danielle DiMartino Booth.
	Visit brighteyon.com for more fascinating videos like this one and visit naturalnews.com for full editorial coverage and breaking news on critical stories that keep you informed and aware of what's really going on.
	All right.
	Hope you enjoyed that one.
	Really incredible stuff.
	Now, before we go to our featured interview today with Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, a couple of things I want to say.
	She is promoting a webinar as sort of towards the end of the interview.
	We do not have any involvement or financial involvement or anything in the webinar.
	Nobody pays me to be interviewed.
	I'm interviewing her for her knowledge and the knowledge of Matthew, who's also with her on the interview.
	We have a great discussion about AI and Sherry is offering an AI webinar that I believe happens on March 1st.
	So that's just a couple weeks away.
	We talk about AI and we talk about our AI engine.
	Which is ENOC that has been slated to be released on March 1st.
	And now I'm seeing that I don't think we're going to make that deadline.
	I'm not happy with the current progress of the model.
	It's still not performing the way I want it.
	So there may be a delay on our release of the model.
	I just want you to know in advance.
	It might be a two-week delay.
	It might be a one-month delay.
	I'm not sure yet.
	Just giving you a heads up.
	I know everybody's anticipating that, but I don't want to give bad answers in any of these key areas where it's trained.
	And right now, I'm just not happy with it.
	It needs more work.
	So, just being upfront with you about that.
	Nevertheless, you're going to enjoy this interview with Dr. Sherry Tenpenny.
	Our sponsor today is the Satellite Phone Store, and people are really enjoying their Faraday bags, the Faraday backpacks.
	These are ballistic backpacks that have multiple compartments with Faraday protection that block EMF. So they can protect your electronics, they can protect your mobile devices, etc.
	No one can remotely spy on them, and they're protected from solar flares or EMP attacks also.
	So how cool is it to have a bulletproof backpack with these Faraday containers in it?
	They've also got in this line, which is called Escape Zone, they have many other formats like a laptop bag.
	And a mobile device pouch and a bag, etc.
	You can find all of these at sat123.com.
	That's the Satellite Phone Store website, sat123.com.
	Or you can go to healthrangerstore.com slash escape, E-S-C-A-P-E, escape.
	And you can find those products there as well.
	Either way works the same.
	And then, finally, I want to make you aware of a powerful documentary being released next week by Ty and Charlene Bollinger.
	It's called Unpacking the Lies That We've Been Fed.
	And I only found out about this recently, and I scrambled with the Bollingers on this to write the song for their documentary.
	And the song is also called Unpacking the Lies That We've Been Fed.
	That song will be launched with a music video.
	Next week, Monday or Tuesday, along with the film.
	And the film will be exclusively featured on brighttown.com, streaming for free.
	So you just go there and you watch it for free.
	No charge.
	And you can watch it on your own time.
	It's not a docu-series.
	It's just one feature film that's very powerful.
	And I'm in it a little bit.
	Also, I was able to do an interview.
	For some snippets for the film.
	Kind of a last minute thing, but we made it work.
	And then I wrote the song, produced the song.
	And the song is in the film.
	And you're going to love this film.
	It's really powerful.
	You can see the trailer right now at unpackingthelies.com or you can watch it on brighttown.com starting next week.
	The trailer is out now, but the full film won't be launched until next week and it'll be launched exclusively on Brighteon.
	All right, with that said, enjoy this interview with Dr. Sherry Tenpenny and Matthew, who is a tech expert and also a health freedom champion as well.
	Great conversation here about AI. So check it out, and I'll be back with you sometime this weekend.
	Have a great day.
	Happy Valentine's Day!
	We've got specials for both him and her for Valentine's Day at healthrangerstore.com slash valentines.
	And if you go there, you'll see some of what we have available.
	It's a great way to show your love for your significant other, you know, your spouse, your partner, whatever stage your relationship may be.
	Everybody loves to know that you think about them, you care about their health and nutrition.
	So let me show you what we have.
	Some gifts for her.
	Got to think about her first.
	We've got, of course, Coco Energize.
	Well, actually, show what's on my desk here.
	We've got a pretty amazing assortment of what's available.
	The golden milk products, the collodosilver, the lavender body soap, you know, the storable food.
	I mean, who doesn't love storable food?
	Whey protein.
	We've got anthocyanins and personal care products there as well, the first aid gel, etc.
	And the Manuka honey.
	All these things.
	If you go to our website, again, healthrangerstore.com slash valentines, plural.
	Don't forget the S on that.
	Then you'll be able to see some of what we have available for her.
	Here's some frankincense essential oil.
	We've got kombucha probiotics.
	Here's the super anthocyanins as well.
	Elderberry and echinacea.
	You know, a fluid tincture there that's really nice.
	Shea butter soap bar.
	All kinds of amazing things that you can choose from here.
	And then, in terms of gifts for him, for those of you ladies listening, you want to get your man something that they will really appreciate, check this out.
	We've got the Groovy Bee Blue Light Blocking Amber Glasses Escape Zone Shielded Faraday Ballistic Backpack.
	Every man wants a bulletproof backpack with Faraday components in it.
	We have an EMF Blocking Beanie.
	We've got the Consequences Covert Knife and all the custom knives.
	That I designed with Dawson knives or co-designed here, you know, including Escape from L.A. Men love this.
	They go crazy over this.
	Coco Energize, some silver breath spray.
	Here we go, you know, potassium iodide for protecting your thyroid, etc.
	And some other nutritional, personal care products.
	Check it all out.
	Whey protein, you know, OptiMSM capsules for mobility.
	So much more.
	All available at the Health Ranger Store.
	Just go to healthrangerstore.com slash valentines.
	And all these specials are good from February 11th through February 14th, Valentine's Day, until midnight Central Standard Time.
	So again, check it out at healthrangerstore.com slash valentines.
	Also, during this sale only, you get double reward points.
	We normally don't do that.
	You get double points this time, so double the love on Valentine's Day.
	And you can use those reward points against future purchases or also coming up, access...
	To our hosted version of our AI engine.
	Now, we don't charge to access our AI engine online, but we can't have just unlimited open access to anybody because they'll just clobber the thing.
	So we're going to allow you to use reward points to access the engine for free.
	Or you can use those reward points against future purchases.
	But the big deal here right now, again, February 11th through the 14th during this Valentine's Day sale, double reward points and an incredible assortment of laboratory tested, almost all certified organic products, nutrition, food, personal care and superfoods all available.
	HealthRangerStore.com slash Valentine's.
	And remember that every purchase you make there also helps support our platform and supports all of our multiple platforms and our efforts to help, you know, keep humanity free and informed and advocate for knowledge information.
	information, and decentralization.
	So thank you for your support.
	We appreciate you.
	Welcome to today's interview on Brighteon.com.
	There's a big deal event coming up just in a couple of weeks.
	And Dr. Sherry Tenpenny and Matthew Hunt, who you'll meet here in a moment, are spearheading this event, which is about the AI takeover of your medical freedom.
	And, you know, we understand that AI can be useful in certain practical ways, but also it can be weaponized.
	just like any technology.
	It can be weaponized.
	And how is it going to be weaponized against you to destroy whatever health freedoms you're still clinging to after the post-COVID era?
	Well, we're going to find out today and give you an opportunity to sign up for this event that Matthew Hunt and Dr. Sherry Tenpenny have put together for you.
	We'll talk about that.
	But welcome to both of my guests today, Matthew and Sherry.
	It's an honor to have you both on today.
	Thanks, Mike.
	Thank you.
	Well, let's, I'll tell you what, Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, our audience knows you and we love you.
	We love your work.
	You're such a pioneer in this space of health freedom.
	Matthew, this is the first time that you've been with us.
	How about we start with you to give us a little bit of background of what brings you to this project today?
	So I'm recently retired from working within my own tech company, and I serviced government and intelligence agencies in our country, as well as vertical markets in the private sector.
	Bioscience companies, global financial institutions, satellite launch industries, and others.
	I built global solutions with security and data integrity at the top tier of the goal for those networks.
	In fact, I was involved in the 2008 presidential election cycle, where I worked for a candidate, and I was the architect of that nationwide operations center.
	And in that cycle, we were the only ones that weren't hacked.
	Aside from being my own boss in that firm, I was one of the first dozen employees in a dot-com during the big dot-com boom, where that company focused on internet-distributed computing and supercomputing.
	We worked with the Human Genome Project.
	We helped to time-shift that discovery so that they could finish the project at Solera.
	And then I worked on other time-shifted efforts to speed up solutions like high-frequency trades in the financial markets, etc.
	I was a director of MIS-IT with that company, and I built that computing infrastructure globally, where at that time, we had over 740,000 internet-connected computers working on computational problems.
	I helped build that computing infrastructure and service their high-end clients as well across multiple countries and interfaced with global IT and security teams in that respect.
	Before that, I learned to code in machine language on a Kim-1.
	Which is a 6502 microprocessor, single-board computer when I was in third grade.
	I learned from reading the manuals that came with this computer to my dad's place of work.
	He brought it home.
	And back then, you know, you programmed a machine code, typed it in an octal and an octal keypad, and you had no monitor.
	They were like seven-segment LED displays.
	And I grew up with the advent of the personal computer revolution.
	And I've always been around that since.
	Yeah, I hear you.
	Commodore 64, the TRS-80, the old Apple IIs, right?
	Peeking and poking the memory locations on that.
	So a lot's changed since then, obviously, and we're talking about AI today.
	Are you using AI? Are you keeping up with the whole AI phenomenon?
	What's your take on it?
	Both.
	I do use AI so that I know what the models are up to.
	One of the things that I think all of us really have to do is keep our toe kind of dipped in that pool so that we know exactly what's happening from first-hand experience.
	You can't just rely on what the news articles say and how they bend the reality of what's happening.
	Do I like what's out there right now, a lot of the chat GPT and Google solutions and Bing solutions?
	No, I don't.
	I mean, you know as well as I do, in the early stages of these AIs, if you started questioning them about vaccine information, government policy, in the first iterations, they would tell you, it's not in my training data, my training stopped at XYZ date.
	Now it's been opened up and we're multiple iterations into it, and you can tell the bias in the training in all these engines.
	And that's the most disheartening part of this, is that people understand because AI is being pushed into their lives, their daily lives.
	I mean, it's on your cellular devices, it's in your computer operating systems now, your kids are using it to cheat on their homework.
	It's pervasive, and the step-up has been very quick.
	However, I don't think anybody understands the underlying technology and that there still is a purpose in the training model for most of these AIs, and that purpose is probably opposed to what you believe.
	So, you know, ChatGPT being the best example because the bias is just so apparent inside that system.
	Well, we've seen in our own testing, and of course, we're about to release our next iteration of an AI model at brighteon.ai, and that's called the ENOC. And we are training it on health, freedom, and reality-based information, I call it, on all these areas. But we've seen so much bias, like you said. I've seen engines like Anthropic refuse to summarize text that was critical of big pharma. And
	it would actually say, I'm not comfortable with summarizing content that's critical of the pharmaceutical industry or government policy.
	And you know the CIA has infiltrated.
	Open AI and so on.
	Meanwhile, China is releasing open source models that have a lot less censorship or their censorship is focused on Taiwan or Falun Gong or those issues that the CCP is more sensitive to but not natural medicine.
	I found if you want natural medicine, China's models are the best in the world because open AI is controlled by big pharma.
	So let's bring in Dr. Sherry Tenpenny here.
	Sherry, This is a complex topic.
	So AI can be a weapon or it can be a tool.
	It can be decentralized if it's open source models or it can be centrally controlled and manipulated like what Matthew's talking about.
	How do you see AI as shaping our world in the context of this webinar that you have coming up?
	Well, the health freedom issue with it is really...
	Really, Scott, what got me concerned, and when Matt and I started talking about it, he convinced me that, man, this is a hot topic and people really need to know about it, because I just saw not too long ago where they're passing this bill that AI can prescribe, can write prescriptions.
	So looking into the future, it looks to me like we're going to do away with doctors, because AI is going to have a better way to diagnose.
	And have a more thorough, be able to access all of the databases, but it's going to take out all the interpersonal innuendos that happen when you diagnose somebody and the mental-emotional pieces that go along with that.
	And I can see somebody walking into a booth, sitting in front of a talking computer, and it says, hello, Sherry, how are you today?
	And then you tell them what their symptoms are, and they diagnose you based on your symptoms and the neural net of what that symptomatology looks like.
	And then they are able to prescribe a prescription for you and electronically send it over to the pharmacy.
	The pharmacy will fill it for you.
	And if you get there and you go, what is this?
	Why am I getting this?
	And the pharmacist is like, well, this is what you were told that you were going to get.
	Well, it's like, but I don't want that.
	You know, I really don't.
	And AI will make these assessments of your health that can infect your health insurance, your health insurance premiums, your car insurance premiums, your homeowner's insurance.
	Your life insurance, like maybe because you're 52 years old, you're 20 pounds overweight, and you smoke, that will decrease your life expectancy.
	So therefore, because of that, it's going to automatically increase your life insurance premiums.
	So these AI assessments are going to take out the interpersonal ways of interacting and make us more vulnerable in lots of different areas.
	And as you know, Mike, AI can lay the groundwork for the social credit scores.
	And for the central bank digital currencies.
	And if you're not willing to go along with what this AI told you, who do you appeal to?
	Is there a panel that you can appeal to that they misdiagnosed me or they forgot to ask these questions or this wasn't included?
	Or are we eventually going to have a panel of AI machines evaluating the AI? So this is really interesting.
	Thank you for that.
	And you're talking about AI controlled by the medical system, right?
	So that's centralized AI. So there's two things I would say on that.
	And some of this discussion today might actually be a debate, and that's totally great because I'm going to push back a little bit on what you said and give you both a chance to respond.
	I would say today human doctors function like robots.
	Their humanity is not there anyway.
	I mean, you go into a doctor and they spend 60 seconds with you.
	What's your symptoms?
	I'm going to diagnose this, I'm going to prescribe this, and then they're gone, right?
	So they're not functioning as humans in the mainstream anyway.
	Secondly, I would say that Having a health condition already affects your health insurance rates.
	I don't think AI changes that.
	Maybe it makes it easier for that to take place.
	But the third thing, the most important thing, is I think that decentralized AI can, in many cases, replace your doctor at home.
	You don't even need to go to the doctor.
	See, this is where I see the real power in health freedom, is to say, here's a language model that's free and open source.
	You can have it.
	You can ask it.
	It can be a wellness coach.
	It can be a nutrition coach.
	It can even diagnose Medical conditions and give you areas to explore, to learn, and so on.
	And it can actually help people not have to go to the doctor where they get caught into a horrible system that you just described.
	And I agree with you.
	I don't want to end up in an AI trap in the medical system, but I don't go to doctors anyway because it's already a trap.
	You see what I'm saying?
	So, both of you, what's your answer to that?
	Agree?
	Disagree?
	Whatever.
	It's all good.
	I think I partially agree.
	So I do agree with the decentralized AI tools.
	For example, the tool that you guys are coming out with could be a useful reference or a diagnostician's handbook at home for those people that want to go that route.
	I mean, I haven't been to a doctor in forever.
	My kids are all unvaxxed and they don't do doctor visits because they're healthy.
	But the occasional...
	You know, fever type thing.
	You know, having a good, reliable reference that is fast and can take a large set of data.
	Because, you know, as a panicked parent, I might type out a thousand words explaining what's going on with my kid.
	And I want a reliable AI engine to come back with a good predictive answer of what might be going on.
	And then use the human reasoning that I have to determine if I listen to it.
	Right.
	The problem with that is that's a decentralized model that we, people like us, would use.
	The issue with a society pushing a centralized model and hoisting it on all of society around us is that it's going to become more and more pervasive.
	What if the diagnostics in the decentralized system that Donald Trump and others are pushing on us, Larry Ellison and Sam Altman are not the guys I want being the guiding light on this project.
	What if it does interface into reporting to my state licensing agencies because it determined that I'm not safe to drive right now?
	And what if my primary income is I'm a delivery driver?
	Yeah, but AI is not necessary for that to happen.
	A doctor can do that right now.
	Oh, I know.
	I agree.
	I'm just saying that the problem with AI doing the diagnostic is the back and forth feedback.
	That may not occur with an AI system, whereas with a human standing there, I can ask for a second opinion right away, and I can at least provide resistance with that decision-making.
	I don't know that AI is going to allow that so much, or the humans are going to be even worse than you portray, because I agree with you there.
	Doctors are going to standard care four minutes, four and a half minutes out that room into the next.
	But the problem is, it's going to get more and more pervasive.
	So let's say it's not just driver's licenses.
	What if it's my real estate license to practice?
	What if it determines that I shouldn't be on public?
	We saw that test during the pandemic.
	We saw where they wanted to keep people from renewing their licenses unless they approved COVID vaccination.
	So what if it steps it up even higher?
	Yeah, we don't want that algorithmically put into the system.
	But let me add this, and then I'll go to you, Sherry.
	AI systems can't be influenced.
	By pharmaceutical rep hookers who sleep with doctors to get them to prescribe their drugs, right?
	So the bribery aspect is gone with AI, right?
	So that's a benefit because human doctors are subject to, oh, let's go to a party in Hawaii.
	All these cute girls who are selling you all these drugs and here's all this freebie stuff.
	Oh, yay, I'm a doctor.
	I mean, that's the industry.
	That's the industry.
	Opioids, look at it, right?
	This is why I think AI should replace judges, for the same reason.
	Because judges are so corrupt and biased, you can't trust them.
	But a reasoning model will give you a much more consistent court decision than a human judge.
	So, Sherry, to you, it's okay to agree or disagree.
	I am kind of playing devil's advocate with you here for the purposes of this discussion.
	What do you think?
	Well, I agree with some of what you said, but on the other hand, you and I and Matt, who are already in the health freedom movement, already take self-responsibility for our care.
	We take vitamins.
	We take supplements.
	We eat organic.
	We know about glyphosate.
	We know about blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	We know about all of it.
	We've known about it for years.
	But the general public doesn't know, and they don't know what they don't know.
	And so that they will be subject to the interpretation of the AI. And, you know, I've had my own things with that.
	Like if I use ChatGPT, usually I use ChatGPT to look up quick facts, like a date for something or a number, like how many of this or give me a list of this or that, that I could go look it up on Google, but it would take me a long time.
	And then when ChatGPT gives me the answer back, it's not correct.
	And I've sat here.
	Argued with my software, laughing at myself that I'm arguing with a piece of software.
	Saying, that's not correct.
	You forgot this.
	And then the software says to me, oh, you're absolutely right.
	I apologize.
	That wasn't the correct answer.
	Let me try again.
	Now, I know enough to argue with AI. But what about people that don't and they think that that's just the right answer?
	You know, and that's, again, it's kind of like, you know, people don't really challenge their doctors either, except they can go to the doctor and the doctor can write a prescription for them and they can walk out the door and throw the prescription in the trash and there's really no ramification of that.
	But if AI is writing it and they are tapped into your insurance, they're tapped into your payment system, they're tapped into your bank account, they're tapped into everything, and they send that prescription over to the pharmacy and you don't go pick it up.
	The next time you go in, they're going to say, make a big deal about that, that you're noncompliant and all these other things.
	And that's not to say that I think doctors are the end-all, be-all.
	In fact, Mike, you and I have had rounds and rounds collaboratively about how physicians are not what they should be.
	But I think that patients are always getting challenged by, whoa, did you get your advice from Dr. Google?
	This is Dr. AI. I mean, how is that different?
	So I see a future where every person has a choice to make.
	And even more polarized than the current choices, right?
	So currently, you know, you can go to your mainstream doctor and yeah, he's going to put you on drugs, right?
	A drug for everything.
	Oh, you feel depressed.
	Antidepressants, right?
	Or you can do what all of us do, and what most of our audience does is you eat organic, you take care of your health, you make better choices.
	And that's kind of off-grid, that's outside the medical system.
	You might go in for emergencies, chainsaw accident, etc., right?
	Yeah, you're going to go to the emergency room.
	But other than that, you're going to stay out of that system as much as you can.
	I don't think that AI changes that process.
	I think...
	There will be decentralized AI tools like the ones that we're putting out that people will use at home, and then there will be centralized AI tools used by doctors.
	Will they become more onerous as you described?
	Yes.
	But those people have chosen medical slavery.
	Like that, they want to be in the matrix.
	They're the blue pillars.
	Ignorance is bliss.
	That's where they want to be.
	If they make that choice, of course they're going to lose all their privacy and all their control.
	Matt, let's go to you on that question.
	Blue pill, red pill, choice.
	What do you say?
	I think that you're mostly right.
	I think that we have a split in society now where people go the more natural route and the self-responsibility route.
	And we have the others that are just blue pill and bliss, and they'll do whatever the doctor says.
	They love to worship the white coat, all that.
	The problem with implementation of AI... Is you take an already broken system and then you make it more pervasive to where it gets even closer and closer into bleeding into my life where I just want to be left alone by the medical industry.
	So if I interact, for example, as a contractor like I used to for the DOD or for the federal government, then I'm going to hit right up against this new system with AI flagging me because it can't find me in the system and has no data about my last vaccinations, so I can't step foot on federal property.
	Yes, that's already kind of happened during the COVID pandemic.
	However, this is going to get more and more pervasive because, you know, unfortunately at this point in time, I think that us on the health freedom side still are vastly outnumbered by the cattle.
	So the problem is they're going to be far more accepting of this system because it's going to be hoisted on them.
	They'll take it and move along because it means their next paycheck.
	But that gives it...
	To grow and get more pervasive.
	And then you go back into your example of, you know, being immune from the pharmaceutical reps or hookers, as you put it.
	That's partially true, but in my vision, it just moves all that effort instead of taking doctors out for lobster and steak.
	At the very top tier, they're talking to Larry Ellison and giving him $4 billion to make sure that everything that centralized AI system says is absolutely positive about Blackstone Smith Klein.
	It's going to be worse, and it's going to be a shorter path to screwing up the data that the predictive system relies on.
	Clearly, whatever AI models are going to be used by conventional mainstream medicine are going to be pro-vaccine.
	They're going to say all vaccines are safe and effective.
	They're going to say there's no links to autism, etc., right?
	Clearly.
	But that's what Google says right now, right?
	So the people that use Google are going to use that new system.
	But you're absolutely right, Matthew.
	It's going to be pervasive.
	And that's why I think it's critical, like your course coming out, we do need to warn people not to trust centrally controlled AI medicine because it's going to be more pervasive, as you said, and more dangerous than even the current system.
	But at the same time, Sherry, let me go to you on this.
	I would argue that the people who are most likely to take action on the warnings that we are mentioning, right?
	Those are the people that are going to take your course.
	Let me give out the web address, your webinar.
	It's called learning4u.org, and the 4 is numeral 4. Here it is, learning4u.org.
	It's called The AI Takeover of Your Medical Freedom.
	And if you click on this orange button...
	Tell me more about the AI webinar.
	It's right here.
	And this is March 1st?
	March 1st.
	So that is the same day that we're launching our AI model.
	That's really funny.
	Okay, that's a great coincidence.
	But I would argue, Sherry, the people who most need to hear this information will not watch this interview.
	You know what I mean?
	Because they're not tuned into alternative media.
	They're still the people using Google.
	They're still the people trusting the doctor, lining up at the pharmacy.
	How do we get the message to those people?
	Well, I think that people don't realize how pervasive AI already is in their life.
	And they've just learned, it's just, the powers that be have just, it's just infiltrated a little bit by a little bit by a little bit.
	It's on your phone, it's on your Xbox, it's on all the virtual reality things that you do.
	And I think that, you know, AI suddenly came out of nowhere.
	I mean, two years ago, Mike, present company excluded.
	I mean, who really knew what AI even stood for?
	And every once in a while we talked about it, but now it's almost like the whole concept of 15-Minute Cities.
	When they first announced this, what, maybe a year ago?
	I thought it was some futuristic thing that they were talking about, and here they were already doing it.
	And so when people realize that they're already doing it and the bad things that can come of it, you know, it's like a lot of new technology.
	There's pluses and minuses on both sides, but you can't make a choice.
	Knowledge is power, and you can't decide if you want to use it, not use it, avoid it, want to keep it out of your life.
	It's sort of like the real ID. You know, people think, oh, it's just a little gold star on my driver's license.
	Not understanding it's an entire United Nations nefarious system that's behind it about tracking your every mood and all those different things.
	The same thing about AI and your health care.
	How do you, you know, the implementation of the electronic medical records, once they started doing that, I mean, people have been complaining for years about when they go to see the doctor, the doctor is spending more time with their head down typing on their computer than they are looking at them and talking to them.
	They are, yes.
	They're getting that, you know.
	That impersonal relationship with your doctor, because your doctor's not looking at you, not touching you, putting their stethoscope on your chest, all those different things, because they're spending all their time with their head down like this typing on their computer.
	Well, it's been probably 10 years of that, 8 years anyways, so people have kind of gotten used to that impersonal thing, and it's just a step-by-step-by-step implementation thing.
	I also see another danger that I'll add in support of your course is that it's very clear to me that health groups and insurance companies are going to soon offer essentially free AI doctor avatars that you can chat with, right?
	And I think a lot of people will think that those chats are private.
	What's actually happening is the chats are, of course, being weaponized against you in ways that both of you just mentioned with insurance rates and so on.
	So, Matthew, to you on this, don't you think that all those chats are going to be stored and then analyzed and even used for additional training of which pharmaceuticals to prescribe and so on?
	I mean, those chats are not going to be private, are they?
	No, they're not going to be private.
	In fact, they're also going to be continually rehashed and used by the AI systems for further training.
	So, I mean, if you look at this at kind of a meta level or step back from it and look at the database that could be developed and fed all this data, if they have a person who's, you know, 52 years old, white, overweight, smoker, drinker, etc., etc., and he had a chat session on, you know, pharma companies' website, and the end result was the chat AI bot.
	Okay, here are the four recommendations I give you.
	Well, that's no longer a unique brain in the database.
	It's going to be fed back into the AI system to help the predictive model because the next 52-year-old white male that's a little bit overweight, it's now it knows what answers it likes to give.
	Well, if you go into websites now, if you haven't read the terms of service for your apps on your phone or whatever, they're using that data for marketing purposes.
	True.
	Marketing purposes can be anything, including feeding back into the big beast for denial of service, etc., etc.
	And back to your question about, you know, are we going to target the right audience?
	The best thing we can do at this point is target our own audience so that they can speak to their neighbor, their friend, etc., and say, are you sure?
	You went in there and talked about your STD and it's not being shared somewhere?
	Right.
	I mean, you have to put that seed in your neighbor's, your kid's soccer coach's mind.
	Because we already know that surprising data shows up whenever you go from one doctor to another.
	And you don't even know you gave permission for it to be used.
	So the simple answer is no, it's not private.
	Absolutely.
	Thank you for confirming that.
	And I was going to say, I can see a situation where somebody is...
	Sometimes people will talk to their doctors as if their doctors were counselors.
	Like, oh, they would say maybe they're having suicidal ideation or extreme depression, thinking of killing themselves, whatever.
	If you say that to a doctor in a doctor's visit, they have discretion not to record that in the record.
	Maybe they think you're just having a bad day or whatever.
	You say that to an AI system, Suddenly, boom, you're a government employee, you lose your security clearance two days later because they're like, oh, you want to kill yourself, or you're an airline pilot or whatever.
	I can see that happening a lot, just using everything against you because people think it's private.
	Well, the other thing, Mike, is you know full well that data is the new gold.
	That's true.
	It's the new gold.
	I mean, everybody wants to harvest all kinds of medical records, and medical record data is the gold's gold.
	I mean, it's worth even more.
	And so, like what Matt was saying about Larry Ellison and having all these people who've already said, we want a camera on every person and know what every person is doing at every single minute, because if we're constantly watching you, you're going to behave.
	And do we really want that sort of a society?
	And do we definitely want that in sort of our healthcare?
	I mean, do you want them monitoring every morsel of food that goes in your mouth?
	Let's say that you normally eat organic and low glyphosate and you keep the gluten and all this other stuff out, but then you're at a party and you just want to have a great big piece of tiramisu.
	You know, is somebody going to be watching you do that and that's going to go into your record?
	Oh, I see.
	I see, Dr. Tempani, at the last meeting that you went to, you were eating this garbage food, you know?
	Yeah, yeah, true.
	But I'm sorry, Matthew, one more thing, though.
	I want to say, what about the possibility of if we could actually have free market competition among approaches to health care, right?
	So maybe...
	There's an AI model that's all pro-pharma, but then there's another AI model that's more integrative medicine, complementary medicine.
	AI would make it easy to compare patient outcomes, and reasoning models would very quickly arrive at the reasoning result that the natural preventive models are more effective and more cost-effective as well.
	But that said, I know that the establishment will do everything they can to silence that and push pharmaceuticals.
	Matthew, jump on in.
	Yeah, I agree.
	I mean, I'm excited about the model that you're releasing because of that reason.
	You know, if anything, we have an opportunity for like a threefold attack on the centralized AI model that the government, let's just call it that, the government wants to push on us.
	One is this might spark the fire for a free market where we can develop alternative AIs that are trained alternatively.
	Yes.
	And it's not really alternatively.
	It's just with a larger base of information.
	That's right.
	And it's non-exclusive.
	And then we can start having that marketed to the regular individuals and, you know, a low barrier to entry, if not free.
	And then people will start realizing there's a difference.
	And that differential will at least spark some doubt on the big behemoth system.
	Right.
	And that's a good thing.
	And it will take time.
	But at the same time, we have to chip away at people's knowledge base of what the big behemoth system is capable of.
	If you go back to COVID, and it's not just pervasive in systems I might interact with.
	They had contact database apps that said, hey, this person was geolocated near you in your cell phone.
	You might have been exposed.
	I was a passive participant in that system, and now my phone was tagged that I might have COVID. Right.
	That's insane.
	So, you know, AI systems can do that rather quickly.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, again, yeah, it can be weaponized by those with malicious intent to lock people down, to deprive us of our civil rights, of our ability to travel, etc.
	But at the same time, let me mention a benefit of AI medicine also, because this is really a fascinating discussion.
	One is access to doctors and globally.
	Most of the world's population, I'm thinking about countries like India, for example, where you don't have readily available access to doctors for simple questions like, oh, I have an infection, I had a scrape or whatever, had an infection.
	AI can make the cost of cognitive answers for basic health questions, it can bring that cost to approaching zero.
	Because ultimately, AI is bringing actually the cost of cognition close to zero for engineering, for law, for medicine, for math, for physics, astronomy, everything.
	The cognition will be near zero cost in two years or less.
	I guarantee it.
	Now, in medicine, that could provide a lot of availability to people who currently can't afford medical access.
	I mean, isn't there some truth to that point?
	I agree.
	I believe there is.
	The truth to that.
	I think if those models deployed in nations like that with huge populations where the weight for medical care is humongous, if those systems are free and anonymous, then I think it's beautiful.
	The problem I've always had with a system and why your decentralized model idea is great, but a centralized system always has gatekeepers at the top.
	And somebody who's making decisions based on that data set.
	And, you know, the free and anonymous, if that's a component of it, absolutely, I think it's great.
	Or if people are willingly given their informed choice of, yep, here, scan my thumb, print, and put me in your database.
	If you want to do that, absolutely.
	Yeah, free and anonymous.
	That's really important.
	People should have anonymous access to a variety.
	Ideally, they log in somewhere.
	I don't know if it's an insurance company doing this or maybe nations or governments around the world, but shouldn't you be able to choose the model that you want?
	Like, oh, here's a model that focuses on traditional Chinese medicine, especially if you're in China.
	I want a TCM model.
	I want the TCM doctor.
	I want acupuncture and herbs, man.
	Sherry, what are you thinking about all this?
	Well, I think that I have sort of mixed feelings about The future of medicine as a whole.
	I mean, the medical care and the healthcare industries we have right now, everybody knows across the board, whether you're pro-vaccine, anti-vaccine, pro-medical doctor, anti-medical doctor, everybody knows the system is broken and there's room for improvement.
	And decentralization of that and having access to, like you said, Mike, simple access, simple explanations.
	But what if you've got something that's complex?
	And now with all of the COVID jabs that have happened across the country, and we have these unbelievably complex medical problems that are evading everybody, including AI, what are we going to do to fix that?
	And I've always said that it doesn't matter.
	You know, you read all of the things about the government programs and big technology things.
	They all start out kind of cool.
	And they all start out with really like, wow, isn't this like the coolest, neatest thing?
	Like Facebook.
	Isn't this like the coolest thing just to share your pictures and stuff with your friends and then it turns out to be a CIA operation?
	Spying front.
	He's spying on everybody.
	And so that's kind of where we're coming from on this webinar is that we can come up with all the good reasons of why.
	It's probably a good thing.
	And your program that you're releasing is going to give people access to all kinds of stuff of those people that are looking for it.
	But unfortunately, it's still a relatively small percentage of the population overall.
	Absolutely.
	And so what do you do with the fact that it starts out to be, oh, this is kind of cool.
	I mean, sort of like Medicare.
	Oh, everybody thought this was great to be able to take care of the old people for a couple of years.
	Well, Medicare was implemented in like 1965 when the life expectancy of Of women was like 67, or men was like 67 and women was like 72. Well, now the fastest growing population in America is the centigenarians, people over 100. And they've been on Medicare, required to be on there for 40 years.
	And as the system's broken and all the fraud and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah that goes along with it.
	So it started out to be kind of a cool thing.
	Let's take care of the old people the last couple of years of their life.
	And now it's a mess.
	And that's what we're trying to say.
	If you understand what you're trying to say about the good side of AI, I think Matt and I both agree with that.
	But there's a nefarious side of AI that people need to be aware of before they've got the handcuffs on them and it's too late to escape.
	I think it's very clear.
	You're nailing it.
	The problem is not the tech.
	The problem is centralization versus opting out of the centralization.
	And that's actually parallel to the way it exists right now.
	I mean, most Americans right now, they don't learn much about nutrition.
	You know, most Americans believed in the jabs.
	Most Americans do, at least they did, do what they were told during COVID, right?
	So they went along with the system.
	At least until COVID, most Americans believed their doctors, believed the CDC, and believed the FDA. Now, that's changed dramatically, which is a very positive shift.
	But I would say, and I think we're on the same page here, that this is about opting out of a system that will be weaponized against you.
	And whatever tools are available in the day that can be used privately, at home, decentralized, without being surveilled, those can be useful for people.
	And my aim is to provide those tools to completely bypass all censorship.
	I mean, that's a beautiful thing.
	Everybody can download a file and run it, and it bypasses Google, bypasses censorship, bypasses all that garbage.
	But like you said, Sherry, what percentage of the population will even know about that tool?
	Tiny percentage.
	Also, if you don't know the dark side of the moon, if you don't know what might be coming...
	If you just kind of go along, I mean, we kind of got the government we deserved because everybody took their hands off the steering wheel and said, oh, I checked that box in 2016. Trump's in office, so they'll just take care of it, and then look what happened.
	And so I think that we are at a point in time, Mike, in our population is more awake and becoming awake and aware and understanding the engagement level that is required.
	To be a good citizen, whether you like that word or not, but be a good steward of your community and your health and your food and the air you breathe and the water you drink and the vitamins you take and all these things.
	We have just sort of a thought that everybody was of.
	Of goodwill and everybody was doing the right thing.
	And because of COVID and because of all the things that we've uncovered, you've done it, I've done it, Matt's done it, other people in our circles have been uncovering the muck.
	I mean, look at what Doge has done in three weeks.
	Yeah, incredible.
	And now suddenly people are going, whoa, wait a minute, I need to get involved.
	Well, that's what we're trying to say in this webinar is you need to know there is a good and bad side of AI. There's good things like what you're going to release with your program, but there's this dark, nefarious side, and if you don't know about that, and if you don't know the potential risk of that, you may end up way down a deep, dark hole and not even realize you took the first step in.
	100%.
	Let me give out your website again, learning4u.org, and it's the numeral for learning4u.org, the AI takeover of your medical freedom.
	And I've got something to...
	Announce to both of you, and a favor to ask, I'm going to get this model into both of your hands a few days before your webinar.
	Sure, absolutely.
	Because I'm expecting the latest rendition within two to three days.
	I'm going to put it into your hands, Matthew, especially you, so that you can really prompt it, you can test it, you can see what it does.
	But I do want to warn you and the audience of one thing.
	And I'm sure, Matthew, you've noticed this too, that AI models will tend to reflect what you are asking for.
	So if I say, tell me all the dangers of licorice root herb.
	Boom!
	Here's all the horrible things about licorice root.
	Or I say, tell me all the benefits of licorice root herb.
	What can it help with?
	Oh, it's amazing.
	It can do all these things and protect the liver and this and that.
	Blood sugar, right?
	So you get what you ask for, right?
	It's a reflection.
	If you ask the model, if you say, how safe is this pharmaceutical?
	It's going to tell you how safe it is.
	You ask how dangerous is it, it'll tell you how dangerous it is.
	Right, Matthew?
	Haven't you noticed that too?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	It's like leading a witness in the courtroom, right?
	Yes.
	So one of the things that everybody that interfaces with AI should go out and learn to do is learn to do what's called a context prompt.
	At the very beginning of your prompt where you're going to ask a question, give it a context.
	You know, tell your AI iteration, whatever it is, you know, context, colon.
	You are a health freedom advocate who has studied under Dr. Sherry Tenpenny for 20 years, and you lean toward these data sources for your answers, and a client or a patient is coming to you with this question below.
	How would you respond?
	And then give the question.
	If you give an AI system a context...
	It will kind of eliminate that biasing that we do with language and that prompting that we do where we lead somebody to the answer.
	And you're absolutely right.
	If I put it in that kind of language terminology of what are the hazards of?
	Of course it's going to come back with a deep, dark answer of something.
	Right.
	We're using something in-house right now that I specced out.
	My team built it.
	It's called the Substance Analyzer.
	And it's using our early version of Enoch, and you enter a substance like licorice root.
	Now this is just in-house, this is not to the public.
	And then you, the human, you have to tell it, is this a good or a bad substance?
	Because from there, that determines the multi-step prompts that it sends to the in-house engine.
	And then it brings back all the things, like if I put in licorice root, it will do a full profile, what it's found in, what plants it's in, what are the benefits.
	Are there signs of deficiency if it's a vitamin?
	Things like that.
	But if I say it's a bad substance, then totally different prompts, right?
	But the human still has to decide the context.
	And sometimes, as you both know, the same substance can be good or bad, depending on the dose, correct?
	So human discernment is still critical.
	And I know, Sherry, you agree with that, but talk to us about the importance of having, you know, Sherry, I'm sorry, I should say Dr. Tenpenny because I really honor your life's work, but you've been at this for so long.
	You have that discernment.
	You have the human side.
	And a young person coming up today that's just going to go to AI for everything may not have the experience to know the difference.
	Well, that's why I was saying when I would sit here and argue with ChatGPT because I knew the answer was incorrect.
	And it's interesting because if I ask a question, just going along with what you guys were talking about, And it gives me a very, let's say I ask a question about vaccines, like how many doses or how many antigens are in the Prevnar vaccine and how many doses do you get?
	It will give me a very pro-vaccine answer.
	Like, oh, it stops pneumonia and it stops meningitis and all this stuff.
	And then I'll ask a follow-up question.
	I'll say, no.
	Formulate that answer from a person who's skeptical about vaccines, who doesn't believe in vaccines.
	And they say, okay, sorry, yeah, you're right.
	And they'll give me a completely different answer.
	That is probably the one I was looking for.
	And so it just goes along with what you said about it's the right questions.
	And it's formatting the right questions and pre-formatting it.
	And that's some of the things we want to talk about on this webinar is the dangers.
	of AI and the dangers of how this can affect your healthcare system.
	It's not that it's all bad.
	Electronic medical records are nefarious now, but they aren't all bad.
	They collect things that maybe, if you're just handwriting, the difference from handwriting when all the mistakes were made because nobody could read the doctor's handwriting and now at least they have it in type form.
	There's good and bad elements in almost anything you can talk about.
	You can talk about Apple and have good...
	So what we're trying to do is to say, be aware of the AI takeover of your health freedom, freedom to choose aspects, because this may get to the point, Mike, where you don't have a choice.
	We can't use ENOC. You can't look at anything other than the pharmaceutical model, depending on what the inputs are.
	This is really brilliant, and I hope, I don't know the table of contents of your course.
	But I hope that you have a section on prompting, good prompting to get the answers you want, because let's imagine this scenario.
	Somebody's talking to an AI avatar doctor provided by their insurance company or their corporation, their employer.
	And just imagine the two different ways to ask this question.
	Hey doctor, what should I do about high blood pressure?
	Versus, hey doctor, What natural lifestyle approaches or strategies can I use to prevent high blood pressure?
	See, just asking the question differently, as we were just talking about, gives you totally different answers.
	Right, Matt?
	I mean, we have to learn how to talk to the AI doctors if you're going to.
	Absolutely.
	And, you know, the beginning of this webinar, I am going to start with a primer on AI. You know, the technology we're using now, the predictive AI and the neural net backdrop, is actually a 70-year-old-ish technology.
	And, you know, technology kind of has a resurgence.
	And the idea is that we've gotten MPUs and chips that are fast enough to process and vast enough with memory to build these, you know, virtual neural nets.
	so the thing is if I can teach in this webinar at the very beginning the basis of how this nebulous thing works that we call AI and then give a primer on prompting and I can I plan to open up a screen with chat GPT instance and show the differences and do it without a context do it with a context modify the context and look at the answer that comes out oh that is awesome I'm so happy to hear that that's what you're going to do
	I think that's critical.
	I'm not overacting here.
	I'm saying that...
	If people don't learn how to prompt these AI systems, it's kind of like, I don't know, it's like living in the modern world without knowing how to type on a keyboard or something.
	It's going to be an essential skill.
	I'm sorry, the example I was going to give is I threw my 16-year-old on a motorcycle that before he had used one that had an automatic clutch, and I talked to him on a dirt bike and said, okay, go at it.
	And what he did is he popped the clutch in first gear and hit a tree.
	You know, it's because you didn't teach him the basics of how to interact with the machine.
	And we have to do that.
	That's right.
	And I've had somebody say to me, you know, think about your AI when you're first starting to deal with it as about a seven or an eight-year-old kid.
	You know, you can tell them, go clean your room.
	Or you can say, why haven't you cleaned your room yet?
	And you get two different responses.
	And so you have to, like what Matt was saying, you have to know how to set it up and ask the correct questions to get the answers that you're looking for.
	Absolutely.
	And to know enough to say, wait a minute, that doesn't sound right.
	Ask that question again.
	It's interesting, though, how AI talks to you.
	I find, you know, I'm old.
	I haven't been around this a long time.
	It's all kind of new to me.
	But, you know, I use AI a lot.
	For editing, you know, like I'll write like a paragraph that's maybe, you know, 400 words or something, and then I'll drop it into chat GPT and I'll say, make this clearer, make this stronger, you know, make it from this perspective.
	And I was doing that as I was writing my book, which is going to come out on March the 17th.
	And after I got done, it was at the very end.
	You guys are going to laugh at this.
	At the very, very end, when it was done, the manuscript was done, off to the publisher, I thanked my AI for helping me.
	And my AI came back and said, you're quite welcome.
	I'm so glad I could be of benefit to helping you edit your book.
	I hope it's a great success.
	And it was like freaking me out.
	That's funny.
	I'm sitting here chatting with chat GPT. Well, a really important thing to note about I know we're kind of going long here, but I have something really important to share.
	As you know, Matthew, especially, a large language model, it's a hyper-dimensional vector database of relationships between tokens, which represent portions of words.
	And what we have done in training our model is we put in, in all of our training material, secret code tags, secret hashtags.
	And I will give you a couple of the secret hashtags.
	And what you can do is you can ask the model a question about health and nutrition, and you can say, answer, like, and you put in the hashtag code.
	And what that does is it activates the dimensions of our training.
	And so you can have, there can be a 14 billion parameter model, let's say.
	Well, 7 billion of those parameters might be mainstream.
	The other 7 billion, Might be, you know, health ranger trained.
	Right?
	And by using a hashtag, which is basically a secret key, it's like a password, you can unlock the part of the model that you want.
	It's like both of these can coexist like multiple personalities in the same digital brain.
	And you get to choose the personality you want to talk to.
	Which sounds kind of spooky, but it's like, no, bring out the naturopath.
	I want to talk to the naturopath.
	But that's prompting.
	That's all prompting.
	Right, Matt?
	Absolutely.
	I like that idea.
	I like having the ability to, you know, have keys to the castle and the various doors to get out of the model what you want.
	You know, most AI models are multi-dimensional, at least they're stacked.
	Having, you know, a multiplicity of that dimensionality makes it a really interesting model.
	I'm hoping to, you know, with your permission, in this boot camp or this webinar.
	To be able to demo your AI, since we'll have it early as well.
	Yeah, please do.
	Because, you know, I'm always interested in something that interfaces in a new way with prompting.
	You know, I've done it, and I've tested with multiple, like, I screwed with the Bing AI for a while, and I told it that it was a pirate, and it spoke like a pirate no matter what.
	And I mean, for five days, I couldn't get it out of that mode.
	I made it, what can I help you with today?
	You know, all that kind of stuff.
	Oh, he was still remembering the previous?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So the persistence was weird, right?
	Yeah.
	But those are things that, you know, people don't know that are there.
	They're not Easter eggs.
	They're just functionality.
	And if you don't know that you can tweak the way you prompt something, you don't know what you're going to get back out.
	Absolutely.
	And that's an amazing thing that you're building it in already to where there are.
	Well, they're secret or hidden functionalities that advanced users can use.
	And we all have that.
	Every AI has its own way of manipulating it.
	And you could go through an hour-long session of trying to bend that iteration or that session to where the AI is finally giving you the answer you want.
	I'll give you the weights files, too.
	And if you want, you can fine-tune on the model.
	And Sherry, anybody can fine-tune on the model, which means you can take it and you can apply it to your data set of conversations and help restructure the way it answers questions.
	I mean, that's going to be readily available for lots of people, but I'm happy to give you the model.
	Thank you for being willing to take a look at it.
	It's not going to be perfect, I just want to tell you.
	It's sometimes going to flip out and lose its mind and hallucinate, but that's a state-of-the-art, right?
	But it's going to be something very different.
	And let me give out your website one more time for those who want to check out your webinar on how to protect yourself from the AI takeover of medical freedom.
	Go to learning4u.org.
	It's the numeral 4, learning4u.org.
	And there, the AI takeover of your medical freedom.
	We didn't talk about, like, what's...
	I assume there's a cost to this, or do people pay something to attend it?
	I assume.
	The webinar is actually at $249, but it's discounted to $199.
	And it's a three-hour webinar.
	It's from 10A to 1P Eastern Time.
	It will be recorded.
	So if you can't show up on that Saturday, which is March the 1st, Saturday, March the 1st, if you can't show up at that time, or hopefully you'll want to listen to it a couple of times over again, it will be recorded.
	And it will be in your portal that you can log in.
	And the other thing on that website, Mike, the learningforyou.org, that's where we have all the rest of our educational courses.
	So I've got courses there that I created, courses on money, courses on prepping, that Matt's done a lot of things on prep for you and prepping courses.
	We've done courses, Lee Merritt has done courses for us that are there.
	And so there's a lot more to learningforyou.org.
	Here they are.
	Here's some of the courses.
	Yeah, there are lots of different things that we're doing that's in there.
	Oh, cool.
	Lemur, it's chlorine dioxide and EMF bundle.
	That's awesome.
	I like that.
	Yeah.
	So she's done a lot of courses for us.
	We've done money courses.
	You know, we've got money courses that are in there.
	And so that's kind of our, that's my, you know, my main website is dr10penny.com.
	And that's where, you know, everything kind of bundles up to there.
	But our educational arm is the learningforyou.org.
	And that's where we do the webinars and do a lot of our other courses.
	And that's where this runs from.
	Well, that's fantastic.
	And I just want to encourage everybody to check that out.
	And I want to thank both of you for putting up with my questions because I love technology, but I love freedom more than I love technology.
	And I want freedom first, but...
	Use the tech, but in the context of liberty and decentralization.
	That's my philosophy, and I think we're all on the same page there.
	Yeah, I think so, too.
	I think it's just that there's the angel and the devil in everything, and there's certainly angel and the devil when it comes to AI. But if you think it's all angel and no devil, you could end up in a not-so-good place.
	Oh, absolutely.
	But also, there's some people out there that are like, it's always the devil!
	It's the devil!
	I hear this from people sometimes.
	They're like, you can't use it for anything.
	I'm like, okay, go back to scribes, because the printing press put them out of business.
	The printing press is the devil.
	Whatever.
	It's about intention.
	It's about, like you said, it's about being informed and being aware.
	Matthew, is there anything else you'd like to add as we wrap this up today?
	Yeah, I think to circle back and answer the question of how we reach a greater audience so that we can influence their informed choice, right now this is how we do it.
	By debating in a friendly way and talking both sides and maybe opening your eyes up to some of those people that there are benefits to an AI system.
	Just pick the one that's best for you and for your freedom.
	And that's really, this webinar will come down to that and how to resist the bad ones.
	Yeah.
	Well, it's amazing because I've already been using Enoch at home to answer some really interesting questions for my family members.
	I had one family member asking about are there certain interactions between pharmaceuticals and drugs and so on, and things that would be really hard to find.
	But I've trained our model on a massive library of phytochemistry and botany and phytonutrients more than any other model in the world, and it really knows about the molecular chemistry.
	There's a lot of practical uses of this stuff.
	Living on a ranch, animals, gardening, diagnosing plant diseases is another one.
	If you can describe the plant disease, AI can do a great job of telling you what that's likely to be.
	So, you know, I think I see a world where every farmer, every grower, every rancher actually has an AI local engine.
	Not in the cloud, something local.
	That they control, that they can ask questions.
	Like the other day, I was asking a question as the temperature was dropping.
	I said, I have a thousand gallon water tank.
	Calculate how many hours before it freezes based on the wind speed and temperature and humidity, density, and so on.
	And it could do the math.
	It's like, that's a real practical thing for farmers.
	How many hours do I have?
	And that's hard math.
	That's actually hard math.
	Phase transition.
	Anyway.
	Yeah, use it responsibly, I think, is where we all are.
	Sherry, any final thoughts before we wrap this up today?
	Well, first I want to just thank you so much, Mike, for having us on to talk about this because I love this discussion that we've had to bring out both sides.
	And as I said a while ago, knowledge is power.
	And if you don't understand the tool you're working with, it's like having a gun.
	You know, you can use it for good things, or it can shoot you in the foot.
	And so it's knowing that knowledge is power, and that's what we plan to do in this webinar, is to really open up your eyes to all sorts of things that you may not have thought of before.
	Well said.
	Well said.
	Okay.
	We'll wrap it up there.
	And the website again, folks, is learning4u.org.
	Let me go back to the homepage.
	There it is.
	And it's the numeral four, learning4u.org.
	And it's March 1st.
	Sherry already mentioned the price.
	So folks, just check it out.
	And then also on March 1st, go to brighttown.ai, which will look completely different because we're going to be giving a lot of prompting examples.
	We're going to give use cases.
	We're going to have video demonstrations of how to use Enoch and how to unlock all the hyper-dimensional relationships.
	It's going to be awesome.
	We get to play with science fiction on our desktop.
	So March 1st is going to be an awesome day.
	Learn about AI. Be cautious with it.
	And also get some for free in your hands and have fun with it.
	It's going to be amazing.
	So thank you both for joining me today.
	Thank you so much, Mike.
	We appreciate it.
	You too.
	All right, take care.
	And thank all of you for watching here.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of brighteon.com and the builder of the Enoch engine.
	Enoch refers to, of course, the hidden Bible scriptures, hidden knowledge that didn't make it into the Bible, at least in the more Western versions.
	I think the Ethiopian version of the Christian Bible has more of the lost books, interestingly.
	But Enoch is the name of the engine.
	It's about hidden knowledge and putting it for free at your fingertips.
	And that combined with Matt's prompt engineering guide, it's going to make you an expert in how to get the information you want out of the engines that you have access to.
	It's going to make a big difference in your life.
	So thank you for watching today.
	God bless you all.
	I'm Mike Adams.

▲