Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 7, 2024 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:14:47

BBN, June 7, 2024 – Vaccine spike proteins, fibrous CLOTS and radiation fallout...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to Bright Town Broadcast News for Friday, June 7th, 2024.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for joining me today as we are building the infrastructure of human freedom.
	We appreciate your support.
	We've got a lot of breaking news today and an interview with Andy Wakefield about his new film called Protocol 7.
	Protocol 7, starring Eric Roberts and many other top-notch acting talent.
	And this is a bombshell film.
	I've seen the trailer, but I haven't seen the film yet.
	But I was there when they were filming part of it, so I'm not sure.
	I may actually be in the background.
	Well, myself and a bunch of other people, we actually set up a mock trade show in Austin one Saturday in order to create the background for this film.
	And Robert Scott Bell was there, Brighty on TV was there.
	A lot of people were there setting up booths and doing the trade show, and they shot a So that was kind of fun.
	Got to see Andy Wakefield being the director of the film.
	He's very good at it.
	And so anyway, we'll interview him today and we'll play the trailer for you for this film.
	And I think you'll find it to be incredibly compelling.
	We've got news from Germany today.
	Germany rolling out new plans for war with Russia, including...
	Bunkers, underground bunkers and food rationing and a compulsory draft, a military draft, for all young men.
	But I find that odd because Germany doesn't believe there's such thing as gender that's fixed.
	So since there's like 97 genders in Germany, why don't they just draft all 97 of them?
	Why only men?
	I mean, obvious question, right?
	I've also got a special report for you called Financial Catastrophism vs. Gradualism, the Tectonic Shifts that Happen Without Warning.
	And in that report, which we'll play here shortly, I compare financial events to geologic events.
	And in geology, there's a very vigorous debate between gradualism, i.e. things happening slowly over time, versus catastrophism, which is all of a sudden there's a mountain there, which is, of course, involves a massive earthquake and tectonic involves a massive earthquake and tectonic plate shifts.
	And my argument is that what happens when financial systems collapse is usually more along the lines of catastrophism rather than catastrophism.
	And that's why it catches people by surprise.
	That's why people tend to lose everything and they can't get out.
	There's not enough warning because, well, it's all of a sudden.
	So we'll get to that special report here shortly.
	There's something else that I want to cover first.
	In the last, I would say, two weeks, I have had three credible sources reach out to me and tell me that in various ways that the vast majority of people who took multiple COVID jabs are going to die.
	Now, you may be familiar with the predictions of Dr.
	Dolores Cahill.
	She has said, I believe, that something like...
	Wait, didn't she say everybody would be dead in three to five years?
	Something along those lines.
	I don't recall the exact details.
	Well, like I said, three other people, two of whom I'm planning on interviewing...
	Because they are authorities in their fields.
	Three other people, well, one of them is a group, actually.
	So two people in one research group, we'll say, has contacted me and told me that this is a massive die-off event that's underway.
	One of them said this is an extinction-level event, an ELE. The other one, well, one of the other ones told me, I think they said 80% of the population would be dead within, what was it, like 8 to 10 years?
	I'm sorry, the numbers, you know, they're all over the map, but the overall emphasis is the same, that we haven't seen the end of the COVID jab deaths, and it's going to get a whole lot worse from here forward.
	Now, my understanding is that this is only among people who, number one, continue to receive jabs or who took several jabs, and then secondly, people who do not protect themselves using the detox methods or the spike protein defense methods that we now know.
	And some of those are very straightforward.
	And they're becoming common knowledge among alternative media, but for those in the mainstream media who don't know about nicotine, or how to block foreign proteins, or they don't know about detox methods, or what have you.
	They don't even know about ivermectin, for that matter.
	For those people, they're probably going to die according to these three sources.
	And like I said, I'm going to interview two of them in the coming weeks or month or two, and we'll see what's the reasoning behind all of that.
	At the moment, I don't know on what basis they are saying this, and I do want to be clear that Other people in this space, like, let's say, Dr.
	Peter McCullough or Steve Kirsch or Ed Dowd, who is more on the numbers and math side, none of these people are saying that this is an extinction-level event.
	So analysis and opinions do vary widely, obviously.
	Then again, A lot of the people out there who are right now talking about how dangerous these vaccines are, initially they took the vaccines.
	They were kind of late to the game here.
	They were late to realize just how dangerous it was.
	So it might be that they're still kind of late in realizing the large fatalities that this is going to extract from the human race, possibly.
	The point is that this situation may be far worse than what we've seen so far.
	And I do want to remind you that back in, was it 2021, I think, that Dr.
	Jane Ruby reached out to me and she connected me to the embalmer, Richard Hirschman.
	Richard Hirschman sent me the fibrous clots that had come out of the bodies of people who died after taking the vaccine.
	And these fibrous clots were very, very strange.
	And they were appearing in the blood of or the circulatory system of many, many people who were dying suddenly.
	I did the I was the first person to do microscopy photographs of these clots.
	And many of the photos that you see circulating on the Internet since then are photos that I took.
	That's the vial of the clots that Hirschman sent me that Dr.
	Jane Ruby coordinated, and she was talking with Hirschman and interviewing him first.
	So she was actually the first journalist to break this story because she knew Hirschman.
	Or she met Hirschman and she was willing to tackle the story.
	Anyway, Hirschman sends me the clots.
	I end up doing a show live on InfoWars.
	I forgot the exact day.
	Where I take the microscope, my roughly $100,000 laboratory digital microscope.
	I take it into the InfoWars studios.
	And it has a digital out, a DVI out.
	And so we plug it into the broadcast.
	And then live on the show...
	At some moments with Harrison Smith sitting there right next to me, grossing out by the way, we were using tweezers and we were manipulating the clots under the microscope live on air and I was showing people what these look like and some of those photos have also since gone viral.
	Well, what many people seem to have forgotten is that I also ran ICP-MS tests on those clots.
	The ICP-MS tests They measure the elemental composition.
	And as I recall, the ICP-MS test results, which are very, very accurate, by the way, in terms of laboratory instrumentation, ICP-MS, which is the elemental analysis, is very accurate.
	It has a very narrow window of standard deviations, plus or minus.
	You can get Very often within 5% of the actual number.
	And we very often do that in our testing for our certification, our ISO certification.
	So as I recall, now I'm just going from memory on this, we found that the clots that came out of the bodies of the dead people, the clots were unusually high in three conductive elements.
	Those were, as I recall, tin, sodium and aluminum.
	And there may have been one other element.
	I forgot what the copper levels were, but I seem to remember there were significant copper levels in them as well.
	But anyway, so tin is used in soldering material to solder circuit boards together.
	Sodium is a highly conductive metal, actually.
	A lot of people don't think of sodium as a conductive metal.
	But that's because they haven't seen it in its elemental form.
	I assure you, it's a conductive metal.
	You're thinking of salt, which is sodium chloride, and that's totally different.
	But sodium element is very conductive.
	Aluminum, obviously, is used in electrical wiring.
	It's used as a replacement for copper.
	So these three elements are all elements that would be used in nanocircuitry, or could be.
	If you were going to design electrically conductive nanocircuits that interface with human cells, you would probably use nanoscale circuit lines using conductive elements that could be harvested from the blood.
	So what our ICP-MS test showed was that these clots were somehow...
	Remember, these are supposed to be blood clots, right?
	But somehow, they contained much higher concentrations of conductive elements than does normal human blood.
	And I know this because we tested normal human blood and we saw high iron and we saw the high, well, relatively high magnesium and so on.
	But we did not see in just regular blood.
	We didn't see the tin.
	We didn't see the aluminum or the sodium at these levels.
	So what that told me at the time, and this is what we released early on, is that something was happening with these clots where they were self-forming or self-assembling, some people said, and they were using conductive elements that were clearly harnessed from the blood, because where else could they get them, And since you can't synthesize elements, you have to gather them.
	So they were gathered from the blood, and they were put into these clots, which some people believe are some form of a hybrid biological and electrical conductive nanocircuit type of system.
	And then we talked about the patents of Dr.
	Charles Lieber.
	Wait, hold on a second.
	Before we talk about Charles Lieber, I'm finding the article now on Natural News about the results that we found from the ICP-MS. So we found tin at 588% higher than what is seen in human blood.
	Aluminum was up to 40% higher.
	Sodium was 50% higher.
	So that's one thing to pay attention to.
	And then we have covered on naturalnews.com, we've covered Harvard scientist Dr.
	Charles Lieber, who is an expert in nanowires, carbon nanotubes, nanocircuitry, and interfacing nanocircuitry with human cells.
	And we list some of his patents.
	His patents include, let me see here, patent, we actually list his patent numbers.
	His patents are the scaffolds comprising nanoelectric components for cells, tissues, and other applications.
	Nanoscale wires, nanoscale wire FET device, and nanotube electronic hybrid devices for sensing and other applications.
	Controlled synthesis of monolithically integrated graphene structures, and so on.
	In any case, he was arrested.
	He was the Department of Chemistry...
	He was the chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University.
	But he was arrested, and he was indicted, and he was found guilty of sharing these nanocircuitry secrets with the Communist Chinese.
	In fact, there was another person, a Chinese national named Ye Yangqing, 29 years old, was charged with visa fraud, false statements, and acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy.
	And then there was another Chinese person, Zhao Song or Zheng, I guess Mr.
	Zheng, was arrested attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China.
	So what you need to understand is Dr.
	Charles Lieber, he was the world's foremost expert in nanowire technology.
	And he was being paid, apparently, to hand over that technology to the communist Chinese that were also, of course, involved in the Wuhan gain-of-function research of SARS-CoV-2, the weaponization of that, which was used by the vaccine industry to build the vaccine bioweapons.
	Dr.
	Charles Lieber...
	His research reveals, and again, this is all patented, so it's public information in the U.S. Patent Office.
	It reveals that you can combine nanocircuits with human cells.
	But to do that, you need to be able to conduct electricity in the cells or in the tissue.
	And did you know that water does not by itself conduct electricity?
	So a lot of people think of water as conductive, but it isn't.
	It's only ions in water that can conduct electricity.
	In fact, we have in our lab, we have something called a deionizer that treats the water and removes all electrically conductive elements and molecules from it, rendering the water as an insulator.
	And the level of that insulation is even rated.
	For example, our deionizer, which we also use to filter Texas rainwater, and to turn that into deionized water that's used to generate colloidal silver for our silver first aid gel product, by the way, and our silver mouthwashes and sprays.
	Our nasal spray products at healthrangerstore.com.
	We use this every day.
	So we take rainwater and then we filter it even more.
	We deionize it before we use it to make colloidal silver because when you're making silver, you have to really control the conductivity of the water because you're trying to Sorry, I'm not trying to make this too technical, but you're trying to encourage positive silver ions to leap off the silver plates and to go into suspension in the water.
	And that's why it's called a colloidal solution.
	It's a suspension in the water of positively charged silver ions.
	Once you have a bunch of silver ions in the water, that water conducts electricity.
	But if you don't have ions in the water, and you could have calcium ions, you could have magnesium ions, zinc ions, sodium ions, etc.
	If you do have ions, it's conductive.
	If you don't have ions in the water, it's an insulation.
	And so, when you look at the ICP-MS results that we achieved on the clots that came out of these dead people who were vaccinated...
	You find that this is consistent with Dr.
	Charles Lieber's research, which is apparently the self-assembly of conductive nanowires in the clots, somehow, that Somehow build themselves using the tin, the sodium, and the aluminum that's circulating naturally in the blood.
	And I don't know how that works.
	I don't know what mechanism that is.
	I don't even know if it's human technology, frankly, at this point.
	But it's this synthesis of biology and nanotechnology.
	Together in these clots.
	So something is going on way beyond the normal, you know, this isn't just the flu or just normal, what people would call, you know, infectious disease or viruses or anything like that.
	This is something far different and far more advanced, far more exotic, you could even say.
	There's something to this that I never got to the final answer of what this is.
	After I released all these results, a lot of things went crazy in the whole show.
	I don't know, the whole nanotech sector of commentary on these vaccines, and everybody was asking me to put everything under my microscope and send them photos, and I just couldn't do it anymore.
	I couldn't get anything else done.
	And also, people started asking me to handle a lot of things that I thought might be dangerous to handle.
	I made an executive decision.
	I don't want that stuff, whatever that is that you want to send me.
	I don't want that in my lab.
	I don't want to touch it.
	I don't want it round.
	I don't want it under the microscope.
	I'm not running a level four biohazard facility here.
	You know what I'm saying?
	So I don't want to touch all that stuff.
	And people always want to send me blood and urine and things.
	Come on.
	No.
	No.
	I don't want your pee, okay?
	This should be my lab slogan.
	If we don't want your blood, your pee, or other body liquids, please keep them to yourself.
	So I stopped covering it, but a lot of other people continue the research in different ways.
	A lot of theories out there A lot of different commentary, and I've interviewed some experts like Dr.
	Alfonso Monzo, who is an expert in nanotech and sort of resonant energy and frequencies and so on.
	But there are other people who say, well, that's all woo-woo, and it's not...
	You know, it's not hard science, and so they want to use electron microscopes, but you look under electron microscope and you don't even know what you're looking at because, you know, you destroy the sample in the vacuum, typically, of the electron microscope.
	So there's all kinds of problems, and I had other things to do, you know, like build platforms and work on AI systems and Briteon and so on.
	But looking back on all of this, I'm beginning to believe that I was really...
	I was onto something.
	Something very dramatic and important.
	But I didn't have the laboratory equipment to be able to delve further.
	For example, I didn't have protein sequencing equipment.
	I do have a time-of-flight mass spec that can run deconvolution algorithms, but it's a guess.
	It basically blasts apart complex protein sequences.
	It measures the mass-to-charge ratio using very accurate mass to 0.001 Daltons, by the way.
	And then it runs a deconvolution algorithm to try to determine what the original protein looked like before it was blasted apart.
	Like, yeah, I don't know.
	I'm not sure I trust those results 100%.
	So that wasn't, in my book, that wasn't conclusive.
	Some people think that labs work like Star Trek technology.
	Like, wasn't the medic on Star Trek, wasn't his name McCoy, the original series, you know, the good one?
	Some people think you can take a sample and just hand it to McCoy.
	Say, hey McCoy, I run this down to the lab and run it on your tricoder and your super scanner thing, whatever, with the dilithium crystals.
	Tell me what this is.
	And, you know, Star Trek...
	Sort of communicate the idea that that kind of magical analysis exists, and it doesn't.
	It doesn't exist.
	There is no equipment in any lab anywhere in the world that I'm aware of that you can just take a sample that you don't know what it is and just pop it into a little oven chute or something, and then you hit a button, and then it tells you, oh, this is what it is.
	No, that doesn't exist.
	No such thing.
	And you have to use different instruments to look for proteins, which are huge, versus pesticides, which are much smaller, versus elements, which are, of course, super tiny.
	And there's all kinds of different instruments for that.
	And there's all kinds of different methods.
	You have to use different columns for chromatography.
	You have to use different solvents, different chemistry.
	And, for example, we spent, I don't know, six months to a year refining our method for atrazine.
	Just to test atrazine.
	It took a long time.
	We spent over a year doing a method for quantitation of cannabinoids in hemp extracts.
	I think that was 18 months on that one, actually.
	Sometimes I'll have people call me up and they'll say, hey, I have this sample.
	Don't ask me where it came from.
	Can you tell me what's in it?
	And that's when I have to explain, this isn't Star Trek.
	Like, no, I can't tell you what's in it.
	I can tell you, like I can blast it apart.
	I can tell you the elements that are in it.
	But I can't tell you what the molecules were before that.
	I can't tell you what proteins are in there.
	And if you don't even know what you're looking for in terms of chemicals or contaminants, if you don't know what's in there, then we don't know what to look for.
	And even if we did, it might take 18 months to develop a method.
	And one time I had a group call me up and they were like, oh, we really need this.
	We need you to test this for...
	What was it?
	It was some kind of...
	I don't know.
	It was like a pesticide or something that they wanted tested in their food production.
	And I told them, look...
	We don't currently have that method, and so in order to develop that method, we have to research it, research all the chemistry, find out what the EPA recognizes as the normal method, then we have to replicate the method, and then we have to validate the method for precision and reproducibility.
	And I said, this is about a 12- to 18-month process.
	If I charge you only $100,000 to do that, we would lose money on that.
	So think more in the realm of a couple hundred thousand dollars just to develop the method before you get your first results.
	And they were like, oh, okay, never mind.
	Yeah, because again, everybody thinks they can send a sample and it's like five minutes, you pop it in the oven and then it tells you everything that's in there.
	No.
	It costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to develop methods to look at one thing.
	My point is, I didn't have any way to analyze what's in this random, gross-looking worm blob that somebody sends me that they say they pulled out of some guy's artery.
	Sorry to be crude about this, but this is the way it goes.
	Now, by the way, as a tangent, there are some things that are really easy to do.
	Like, for example, you know that Goldbacks is one of the sponsors of our show through the affiliate program we have with them.
	And Goldbacks were really easy for me to measure the purity of the gold and the mass of the gold because all I had to do was use a kiln and melt down the Goldbacks and I got the gold...
	BB out of it, like a gold pellet, you could say.
	It melted down to a pellet.
	I got that out and then I dissolved that in a combination of What was it?
	Nitric acid and hydrochloric acid, actually.
	Yeah.
	Very toxic brew, which will cause gold to go into solution.
	And then you take that and you run it through the ICP-MS and it can tell you exactly the elemental count of the impurities in the gold.
	And from that, we're able to determine that the gold in goldbacks is greater than 24 karat gold.
	And I even published it.
	It can tell you how much nickel is in it, how much iron, aluminum, zinc, whatever, everything else.
	We publish the numbers.
	So that's easy.
	I can break stuff apart and tell you the elements, but I can't tell you the molecules and the tissues and the proteins before we broke it apart.
	And by breaking it apart, I mean dissolving it in nitric acid, typically.
	So, you know, you can take somebody's, like, a hair sample, let's say.
	Or let's say a fingernail or something.
	You know, some kind of body tissue.
	And depending on what part of the body tissue you have, you might have intact DNA in that.
	Well, once you chuck it into the nitric acid vial, there's no more DNA. It's gone.
	It's radically oxidized into solution.
	But we can tell you how much lead was in that person's hair or fingernails or whatever else.
	Does that make sense?
	So the bottom line is, we still don't have good answers of what's in this.
	And everybody that I've talked to in this industry, the doctors, the researchers, and so on, they keep telling me that every time they try to go to a university, they To look at this stuff, or they try to go to some other private lab with a scanning electron microscope, for example, the minute they tell them these are human samples, everybody freaks out and says, nope, we won't run that.
	We won't look at that.
	And so what people have to do, even to get labs to look at this, is to say that it's something else.
	It's like, these are samples, these are like insect tissues, and I'm an entomologist, or whatever, you know?
	We're looking at crickets as a food source for George Soros.
	Yeah, what company are you with?
	We're with the Licketts Crickets Company, yeah.
	Mmm, super delicious.
	Licketts Crickets.
	Will you run the sample?
	Will you look at it?
	And then, of course, they find out They crank up the microscope or whatever.
	They're like, this looks a lot like human tissue, you know?
	And then it's over.
	So there's this boycott on research involving these clots.
	There's like a global science blackout.
	Nobody's allowed to look at these clots.
	Nobody's allowed to talk about the clots.
	Not in mainstream academia or medical science journals or anything like that.
	No one is allowed to talk about them.
	A total blackout.
	Why is that?
	If this was just a normal thing, which is what they tell us, they say, oh, these are totally normal, nothing to do with vaccines, certainly not exotic alien nanotech systems.
	No, it couldn't be that.
	Why would they black out all the information about these clots and And delist, deplatform everybody talking about them.
	Why?
	That's my question.
	If it's all totally normal and totally natural and totally it's been around forever, if that's the case, then why are they banning everybody talking about this?
	And then you get into other patents and you find out that certain external radio frequencies could cause nanostructures to release payloads inside the body.
	Yeah.
	So, you know, certain signals...
	Maybe 5G, maybe other signals, maybe targeted signals.
	They direct like an electromagnetic cannon at you, let's say.
	And then if you've had the vaccine, then all the nanocircuit payload systems in your body that have been holding on to molecular payloads, they release them when they're exposed to frequency.
	And then suddenly you've got VX nerve gas molecules in your body or whatever was in the payload.
	That's all patented.
	We did stories on that.
	And they've even done studies of altering the behavior of mice using that kind of mechanism, as I recall.
	So the deeper you dig into this, the crazier it gets.
	And I haven't even talked about this for maybe a couple of years now, but it's still out there.
	And the mysteries have not yet been solved.
	And people keep dying.
	And some people are gullible enough to keep taking these jabs.
	And I get the feeling their lifespan is not very good at this point.
	And I'm also beginning to suspect that the global vaccine die-off event is still underway, but that there's an attempt to accelerate it.
	And there's a mechanism I mentioned the other day, the binary weapon mechanism.
	And you may recall this, which is that ionizing radiation from a nuclear war event causes chromosomal breaks, double-strand breaks of the chromosome.
	And there's a normal repair mechanism in human physiology and also in animals and plants, by the way.
	In humans, it's called NHEJ. It's an end-joining mechanism.
	It reconnects broken strands of your chromosomes.
	That process is inhibited by 90% in the presence of the spike protein.
	So what it means is that people who suffer ionizing effects radiation exposure and DNA damage as a result in the fallout of a nuclear war.
	If those people have been vaccinated, they will die even from very low level radiation exposure.
	So there was another person the other day that had contacted me and said, you know, I'm not worried about Small nuclear weapons being used, like tactical nukes.
	If Russia were to use tactical nuclear warheads, for example, against military bases or air bases in Poland or Romania, both of those seem like likely targets.
	And Vladimir Putin just announced the other day that a lot of their tactical warheads are 70 kilotons.
	Now remember that Hiroshima was, I think, 16 to 20 kilotons, something in that range.
	So we're talking about three to four times more powerful than Hiroshima.
	And these are considered battlefield tactical, well, artillery rounds in some cases.
	They actually have what you would call tiny nukes in the tips of the artillery rounds.
	Seriously, they can launch artillery, and when it hits, it's a nuke, like bigger than Hiroshima.
	So this person was telling me, you know, humanity can survive a nuclear exchange if it's just battlefield tactical nukes.
	It's not going to kill the world.
	It's not going to cause a global nuclear winter.
	And this person is correct in that.
	However, it will cause low-level radiation fallout all across especially the northern hemisphere.
	That low-level radiation fallout will cause ionizing radiation exposure Even if you say it's a low level, the vaccinated people have an impaired ability to repair their DNA. So their DNA will begin to just fall apart.
	They will be genetically dismantled by the bioweapon combination of the vaccine jabs plus the radiation fallout.
	And it's not a pretty thing when people's cells start to disassemble.
	And they can no longer replace damaged cells.
	Basically, what that looks like is what you see depicted in high-intensity radiation poisoning, a lot of blood, a lot of nausea, vomiting, and then at some point, people's skin just starts to fall off.
	And it's also happening internally.
	Their organs are just sloughing off in their chest cavity, and of course, they don't last very long.
	But imagine that happening across some significant percentage of the people that you know who have already been vaccinated.
	Well, you're fine because you can still repair low-level ionizing radiation damage, you see.
	Not a lot of people are thinking about this.
	Now, that brings me to this report out of Germany.
	And this was covered by the UK Daily Mail and a bunch of other papers as well.
	Let me read you their headline.
	Germany reveals plan for citizens if Russia attacks, following threats by Putin.
	Putin is the aggressor here, didn't you know?
	Okay.
	Subway bunkers, food rationing, compulsory conscription, and evacuations.
	So, the federal government of Germany has presented shocking new changes that could see Germany return to compulsory conscription, mandatory draft, the evacuation of citizens, and food rationing if war breaks out on the continent.
	In the event of a war, Germany would look to protect its civilian population by facilitating makeshift bunkers in the subway, Oh boy, that sounds just wonderful.
	Preparing hospitals for a sudden spike in the number of patients and storing emergency food reserves in secret locations.
	So the government's plan is to have a food supply, emergency food supply, and to have an underground bunker, the subway systems, and to have emergency medicine.
	But they're not telling the people to do those things, you see.
	They're doing it It says here, the government is prepared to ration and stockpile food to ensure civilians receive one hot meal per day while stockpiling water for firefighting purposes.
	One hot meal per day.
	In Germany, that's two hot meals short of a normal day.
	And in America, it is too.
	One hot meal per day.
	What do you do for the rest of the day?
	You hunt for grasshoppers and crickets, I think.
	The new plan would also impose outright bans on people quitting their jobs in key sectors.
	It would force the media to publish updates and it would order companies to produce goods for defense purposes.
	Can you imagine that?
	So, I mean, you can't quit your job under this plan.
	You're forced to show up and work and you're forced to make whatever they order you to make.
	Might be bullets, bombs, band-aids, beans, bandages, bungee cords.
	Who knows?
	A lot of other B's.
	Hey, it's Germany.
	It might even include Volkswagen vehicles.
	Who knows?
	But they can force you to work.
	They can force you...
	I mean, doesn't this sound like...
	Does this sound like the Third Reich in Germany, too, by the way?
	So they'll force you to work.
	Basically, they're turning the entire country into a giant labor camp.
	Forced labor and forced conscription, you see.
	Now, Germany pushed these vaccines very aggressively.
	Everybody that is drafted into the German military, and this also goes for the UK and France and Romania and so on, they will be force vaccinated, which means force injected with the kill shots.
	And then they'll be sent to the front lines to die.
	At the hands of Russian artillery or FPV drones.
	So think about this.
	If you're an anti-human globalist leader and you want to exterminate humankind, but you especially want to get rid of all the white people in Europe, how do you do it?
	You start a war with Russia by pushing east, pushing east, provoking Russia, moving rocket sites closer to Russia, deploying F-16s that can carry nuclear weapons and so on.
	Provoking Russia with threats like Macron does in France, you know, France troops and British troops to essentially do all the weapon system targeting that destroys, you know, Russian ships and hits targets in Russian cities and so on.
	So you provoke Russia and then you launch a mandatory draft to take all your local citizens, like German citizens, but not the illegals because they're not registered for the draft.
	So the illegals that came in from the Middle East, well, they're not going into the draft.
	Just your German citizens are going in.
	Then you jab them with the death jab.
	And if they survive the death jab, then they're probably going to get killed by Russia.
	Anyway, this is an extermination campaign to exterminate generations of European men.
	That's what this is.
	Vaccines play a key role.
	But I ask you this question, given everything that I've said here today in this podcast.
	What happens when they inject them With the mRNA vaccines, so their bodies are spike protein factories, which, as I said earlier, block the NHEJ and joining technology for double strand break repair in the human chromosomes.
	And then they provoke Russia into launching tactical nuclear weapons against targets in Europe.
	then you're going to get higher levels of radiation fallout across different European countries, depending on which way the wind is blowing that day, obviously.
	You're going to get a lot more fallout, which means these troops are going to be exposed to radiation fallout.
	And as they die, because their bodies can't repair the damage because they've been vaccinated, the Western European leaders can blame Russia and say, look, these people are dying of radiation.
	Poisoning, which is kind of true.
	But someone who wasn't vaccinated wouldn't die from that same level of radiation poisoning.
	You see what I'm saying?
	So this is a very convenient way for the West to exterminate their own people, to replace those people with illegal migrants, and to put the blame on Russia for doing all the killing.
	And that's why nuclear war has to be provoked.
	I know it took me 45 minutes to get to this point.
	This is why the West must provoke Putin into launching nukes.
	And if Putin will not comply, well, the West, they will launch their own nukes and blame Putin.
	So this German plan, by the way, according to the report here, it says that all private companies in Germany will have to allow the Bundeswehr, which is the military, To use all their vehicles and infrastructure.
	So if you have company trucks, guess what?
	Military gets them.
	The story also says that doctors, psychologists, nurses, and vets may also be repurposed in military and civil service roles.
	So if you're a professional in the medical system, you're going to be pulled out of whatever you're doing.
	You know, like cosmetic surgeons making a bunch of money doing reconstructive breast surgery on Hollywood actresses or whatever.
	Oh, you thought you had the life and then boom!
	One day, oh, now you're stitching together, you know, German military men with their legs blown off.
	That kind of thing.
	That's what they're going to do.
	And they're going to have compulsory service for all young Germans.
	Young German men, I should say.
	The story also says, quote, the public may be expected to tolerate rationing of food.
	With the Ministry of Economic Affairs responsible for setting prices and introducing ration cards.
	Oh boy!
	Really?
	The government's going to set the prices?
	Oh, that's always worked out so well in history.
	And ration cards.
	Yeah, great idea.
	So if you're in Germany listening to this, Don't you want your own food supply at this point?
	And actually, wherever you are listening to this, don't you want your own food supply?
	Think about it.
	Or you could use government ration cards.
	And from the story, it says, wheat, rye, and oats may be withheld in secret locations with emergency reserves in place to be able to feed the population with one hot meal per day for an undisclosed period of time.
	And the military is expected to take priority.
	In other words, you get to starve, or they might give you some kind of moth-infested, half-rat-eaten oats.
	Here!
	This is unfit for military consumption, but you can have it.
	You know, that kind of thing.
	This is what's coming.
	I mean, they released the plan.
	This is official German government policy as of today, by the way.
	This is all official.
	It's not me making this up and just saying that, no, no, this is official German policy, government policy.
	And you can bet that every NATO nation has something very similar in the works.
	You can expect that If the West is successful in starting this war, and they're desperately trying to start this war, they will confiscate food.
	They will hoard it for themselves for continuity of government operations.
	They will hoard it for the military.
	They may even outlaw you having your own food supplies, which is why it's important to be able to know where to hide food, unless you just want to die of starvation.
	Where do you hide food, or where do you get food, wild-crafted food?
	We just interviewed Daniel Vitalis again, the expert on wild foods, and he's talking about the whole issue of, you know, if there's a food collapse.
	He says, the people who are able to survive are those who know how to catch and eat grasshoppers.
	Like, why is that?
	He said, because there's plenty of hunters around who are going to hunt all the deer, all the elk, All the turkey, you know, anything huntable is going to be gone.
	Squirrels, even.
	It's all going to be gone in no time.
	But most people don't know how to eat grasshoppers.
	And that could become a staple of the survivors.
	I'm not pulling George Soros here and telling you to eat the bugs.
	But I am saying that if you know how to eat the bugs, Then maybe you don't have to go into the government food line and use their food ration cards and get some half-moth-eaten oat crumbles or whatever's left.
	Here, make a stew out of this.
	What is that?
	We don't even know what it is.
	We lost track of it.
	Let's just call it mystery grains.
	We don't know what it was.
	We just know there's a lot of insect webbing in it now.
	A lot of moths flying out of it.
	And there's little black specks in there.
	We're not sure if they're moving or not, but you can have this stuff.
	Okay.
	Yum, yum.
	Or you can have your own food supply.
	It's a good time to order emergency food before this comes down.
	Woo!
	Can't wait for the government rationing cards.
	Oh, yeah.
	And one hot meal per day.
	Daniel Vitalis was telling me, he said, when this happens, there are going to be people who boil leather belts and leather shoes and eat leather soup because they don't know there's food in their own backyards, because they don't know anything about natural food, wild food, foraging.
	You know, there could be acorns right in the backyard, dandelion greens, you know, all kinds of foods.
	He was talking about...
	Eating iguanas if you live in Florida.
	He said, yeah, so many iguanas down there, they're like the chicken of the trees.
	You know, because they like to climb around in the trees.
	It's like iguanas.
	It's white meat, man.
	It's really good.
	Do you know how to catch and cook iguanas?
	Because that could sustain you, actually.
	You could have iguana nuggets way better than cricket McNuggets, huh?
	Or the moth oatmeal.
	No, seriously, wait for the Daniel Vitalis interview.
	I think you're going to really enjoy it.
	We've got to talk about a lot of interesting stuff, as we always do.
	But this is a real plan in Germany.
	It's coming to America.
	It's coming to France.
	It's coming to the UK, Poland, Romania, Austria, many other European countries, probably Denmark, Norway, and so on.
	So get ready.
	And by the way, if you do want actual...
	Non-bug food, like real food right now that's certified organic and lab tested, get it from us, healthrangerstore.com.
	We've got a lot of it.
	We've got the ranger buckets.
	We've got number 10 cans with freeze-dried fruits and vegetables and superfoods and miso soup, instant miso soup, which is really great.
	It was used by the Japanese after Hiroshima, by the way.
	A lot of them use miso.
	You should do some research and find out why.
	We got a lot of stuff in stock and ready to ship right now, healthrangerstore.com.
	And, you know, get it from us while you can before the government declares war, confiscates all the food supplies.
	You know, warehouses like ours will just be taken over by the government.
	There's nothing we can do about it.
	You know, we're not going to fight.
	We're not going to have, like, a firefight with government officials.
	If they're coming for our food, you know, it's like, well, okay.
	Are you going to pay us for this?
	Give us a receipt?
	I mean, you know, how do we get compensated for this?
	But you're not going to stop them in a wartime scenario.
	They're just going to come take it.
	They're going to load it up onto their military trucks, and I'm just going to shoot video and ask for a receipt.
	That's pretty much all I can do.
	So get it while you can.
	Of course, if things get dicey, believe me, I'll tell you, and we'll go on like double shift fulfillment or something if we have to to get these out to you.
	I'll probably load up trucks and get some extra at my place.
	I'll do donations to local churches.
	I'll try to distribute it locally.
	I've got a bunch of people that I know that could get it in the hands of a bunch of other people.
	I'll just push food wherever I can.
	But at the end of the day, in a time of war, we'll be taken over.
	That's what history tells us.
	All right, with that said, let me play this special report for you here called Financial Catastrophism vs.
	Gradualism.
	Tectonic shifts happen without warning.
	And this is about financial asset protection and understanding why If you wait for the banks to close, it's too late to save your assets.
	You will be financially destroyed.
	So the only time to be able to get out from under that is to do it before the emergency arrives.
	That's the point of this podcast.
	But give it a listen.
	We'll be back on the other side with the interview with Andy Wakefield.
	In the world of geology, there has long been a debate between gradualism and catastrophism.
	And this podcast today is drawing parallels between that debate in geology and financial systems.
	So let me just set it up here briefly.
	So most of the establishment in money and finance and currency in history, they believe that currencies only shift slowly over time.
	Gradualism.
	My argument is that actually what tends to happen is economic or currency catastrophism and that that's what's coming.
	So let's back it up.
	Let's talk about geology and what this debate actually means.
	So For most of modern Western history, geologists have believed in gradualism, and they really arrived at this conclusion through just having a very limited short lifespan.
	You know, human beings don't live that long compared to the time of geology.
	Geological catastrophes may happen, you know, once every 500,000 years or a million years or millions of years.
	And so it's not obvious if you're just living 85 years that, hey, these mountains were formed all of a sudden because you never saw it in your lifetime.
	And erosion is easy to observe in your lifetime and erosion is a process of gradual wearing away of rocks and stone and mountains and hills and soil and what have you.
	So erosion, yes, erosion is a gradual process.
	But the formation of mountains, and sometimes the formation of rivers, the formation of islands, the formation or the shifting of continents is, in fact, these events happen radically, suddenly, and catastrophically.
	For example, The Hawaiian Islands.
	These are formed out of volcanoes.
	Volcanoes that happen to be taller, you know, giant mountains in the ocean that happen to be taller than the depth of the ocean, so the tops of the mountains stick out, and those are the Hawaiian Islands.
	I think...
	Is it the Big Island, or one of the Hawaiian Islands is actually the tallest mountain in the world?
	It's just that most of it's underwater.
	And it's a giant volcano.
	Now, volcanic events there...
	Are pretty catastrophic when they happen.
	It's not like there's a little bit of lava seeping out every day over 100,000 years.
	It's like, no, all of a sudden it blows, and then there's a giant, big, new piece of land sticking out of the ocean.
	And if you look at mountain ranges, like, let's say, the Grand Tetons, or whatever mountain ranges you want to talk about, the Himalayas...
	It's clear that these mountains were thrust up out of the ground rather suddenly.
	You can't build a mountain slowly, day by day.
	You build mountains by actually lurching a giant piece of a tectonic plate.
	Thrusting it upwards as two plates are being crammed together.
	And you can only imagine the earthquakes that would have been felt at the time that giant mountain ranges were thrust out of relatively flat land into, you know, kaboom, 12,000 feet high mountain ranges.
	Or even higher in some cases around the world.
	So some mountains are formed by volcanoes, of course, like Mount St.
	Helens.
	Other mountains are formed by catastrophic, sudden events of the Earth being thrust upward as two tectonic plates are jammed together, and then they finally give way, unleashing all this kinetic energy and pushing trillions of tons of Earth into the sky and forming a new mountain, in essence.
	I mean, some of these mountains are so tall that you would consider them the sky, Before they were there, and then they just, boom, they thrust up, and now they occupy what was the sky.
	I mean, some of these mountains are, what's the tallest mountain, like 29,000 feet, something like that, Mount Everest?
	Anyway, you get the idea.
	Gradualism does not explain geology.
	It explains part of it.
	It explains erosion.
	It does not explain the formation of mountains, and in some cases, rivers, and in some cases, how the continents shift around.
	And of course, there have been other catastrophic sudden events like asteroid impacts.
	That's not gradualism.
	That's like giant fireball engulfing the planet or something similar to that.
	And that's why those have been extinction-level events.
	Now let's talk about money and finance.
	Again, my premise is that the Western financial system will collapse suddenly.
	Not gradually.
	It will be catastrophic and it will be a tipping point of a sudden collapse.
	Why do I believe that?
	Well...
	Look at history.
	Look at the history of collapsed currencies.
	One thing that nearly every collapsed currency has in common is that the people had no time, no forewarning, no ability to get out of the currency before it collapsed.
	You see that throughout the history of the world, in Mexico, in Venezuela, in African nations, in European nations, and so on.
	People never had time to get out.
	Why?
	Because it was so sudden.
	If currency collapse was gradual, then there would be no history of people being wiped out by it, would there?
	Because they would have been able to shift out and get into something else.
	But in every single case that I've seen, currency collapse left the people high and dry.
	Because it was sudden.
	There was often a tipping point.
	Something broke.
	Faith in the currency broke.
	Often in history, wars broke out and caused the currency collapse.
	Or, in many cases, the governments decided to just go hog wild with currency printing.
	And that was what broke the currency.
	You know, Zimbabwe, for example.
	Or Weimar, Germany.
	And some would argue, well, the German mark didn't collapse all of a sudden.
	It took time.
	Well, not that much time.
	It didn't take long.
	It collapsed so suddenly that most people were left losing most of their assets, their value, the people who held German marks.
	So yeah, in the timeline of history, it's pretty darn sudden.
	So today when I hear people talking about, oh, don't worry about the dollar, the dollar is still going to be the world reserve currency all the way through 2050 and 2075, I'm just shaking my head.
	Like, what planet are you living on?
	The dollar is not going to be the world reserve currency even probably by the year 2027.
	Are you kidding me?
	Turkey is joining the BRICS nations now.
	They just announced Thailand is joining BRICS nations.
	You've got nearly 100 countries around the world now saying that they want to be part of the BRICS system.
	And almost all the countries on the planet They know that the dollar system will be weaponized against them if they ever disagree with the U.S. empire on anything.
	So they don't want to use dollars.
	They are actively looking for a way out of dollars.
	The BRICS currency is the most obvious way out that nations are choosing.
	And that's why people like Andy Sheckman of Miles Franklin have been accurately warning about this global de-dollarization trend, and it's now accelerating.
	I remember three years ago when Andy Sheckman would talk about BRICS currencies, and people were like, what's BRICS? Is it spelled B-R-I-C-K-S? Nobody knew what BRICS was.
	Today, everybody knows what it is.
	I mean, among those paying attention, it's widespread knowledge.
	And then you have Saudi Arabia saying, we're in, we're in with BRICS now, and Turkey, we're in with BRICS. Numerous countries, of course Brazil, of course China and Russia, and economies that represent, I think the last statistic I saw was, what, 40 or 45% of the world's oil production, 35% of the world's population, and growing.
	I mean, especially if you start adding Turkey into that.
	You're going to see just a massive acceleration toward BRICS. Why?
	Because the dollar, number one, it's being printed into oblivion by the U.S. regime, which is destroying the value of the dollars that other people hold.
	But secondly, the dollar is being routinely weaponized.
	And it can be counterfeited by the U.S. So who would want to hold dollars?
	Who would want to use dollars?
	Using dollars is like Hit yourself in the face with a hammer over and over again.
	Like, I love to use dollars!
	And like, bam, bam, breaking your teeth out.
	Nose bleeding.
	I love dollars!
	You know, that's how insane it is to use dollars.
	That's why even Americans are trying to get out of dollars, get into gold, get into silver.
	Some people are getting into Bitcoin and Bitcoin ETFs.
	People are trying to unload dollars like it's Ebola or something.
	Like, how fast can I get rid of dollars?
	And one of the important practical points in all of this, in my view, is that just like in history, when this present-day dollar really goes into a parabolic collapse scenario, it'll be too late to get out.
	You won't be able to get out.
	Why?
	Because the banks will be closed.
	Bank holiday, we're on holiday.
	Bank accounts will be frozen, assets frozen.
	There'll be a government-announced shutdown, followed by a bailout, and then a restructuring plan, and then they're going to reopen the banks in one week, and then when they reopen the banks, there's going to be a revaluation of the old currency to the new currency, and basically, you're going to get royally screwed.
	That's probably how it's going to go down.
	You know, the banks are going to reopen, and people...
	Open their bank accounts.
	It's like, oh, good.
	We have the same numbers in the new currency.
	The same numbers.
	Yes.
	Yay.
	Like if you had $25,000, you'll have 25,000 new Ameros or whatever they are.
	But then you'll find out that a hamburger costs like 200 Ameros.
	Now, wait a second.
	These don't seem to have the whole value still there.
	Yeah, that's how it works.
	That's the scam.
	It's a massive looting of the system.
	So yeah, you'll have your, quote, currency or your money.
	It's not even really money.
	You'll have your currency.
	It just won't be worth much of anything.
	You know, a car will cost like a million ameros and a house will be...
	I don't know what the ratio should be.
	A house will be like, you know, 500 million ameros.
	And you're like, what?
	So...
	That's why the only way to protect yourself from this catastrophic collapse that's coming is to get out of the dollar before the mass awareness occurs or the big announcement occurs or before the bank close downs take place.
	This is what's necessary.
	And it's hard for people to do that because you have to, in essence, get out of the dollar during a time when it seems like you don't need to.
	When you're looking around like, hey, the banks aren't closed.
	The dollar hasn't collapsed yet.
	Why should I get out of the dollar?
	That's the time to insulate your assets because that's the time when you can still move dollars around.
	That's when you can still get something out of your bank account, you see?
	And that's when the transactions are still functioning.
	So you could buy land, you could close on a home, or you could invest in something, whatever you're investing in.
	You could move money around, the system still works.
	That won't be the case once the tipping point has been reached.
	And there are numerous events Shaping up right now that could destroy the dollar overnight.
	One of those being, for example, the United States being nuked.
	It could be a nuclear false flag, self-inflicted type of attack, or it could be Russian nukes striking Washington, D.C. and trying to take out the United States military.
	I mean...
	It could be a cyber attack on the financial infrastructure, either self-inflicted or maybe from somebody overseas, maybe North Korea, who knows?
	Could be a solar flare, just an act of God, an act of nature.
	Could be an EMP weapon attack, like an orbital EMP weapon that North Korea does have, by the way.
	Dropped out of orbit into high altitude and then detonated to take out the entire power grid infrastructure of the United States.
	What do you think the dollar will be worth when there's no electricity functioning, when no bank can function, no grocer can function, no markets are functioning?
	You know, what's the value of the dollar?
	It's zero in that scenario.
	Everybody just has to hold on and hope that something comes back online so you can log back in and see that your digital dollars are still there.
	Meanwhile, the people who have real things, gold, silver, ammo, land, a roof over the heads, whatever, firearms, diesel fuel, tractors, people who have real things are going to be doing just fine.
	And that's why people with wisdom, in my view, are transitioning from digital dollars into real physical things that are in their custody and under their control, because those real physical things do not vanish in a massive, sudden, catastrophic banking collapse.
	You know, when the banks collapse, the gold that you have in your home safe or wherever you're hiding it, that gold doesn't vanish, obviously.
	It's still there.
	When the dollar melts down, your gold doesn't melt down.
	Now, if you have cash sitting around at home, which is a good idea to have some cash at home, your cash may become worthless, so do be prepared for that.
	But in the interim, it might have value.
	You might be able to take cash to a grocery store and buy some food with it, even if they're Electrical transaction systems are offline.
	All their computers are offline.
	Maybe they'll have...
	Eventually, they'll have like a cash-and-carry type of situation.
	You know, we'll take cash for beans.
	Or whatever.
	So it is a good idea to have some cash.
	But at some point when the financial system really breaks, it won't be long before local communities and local merchants and so on start accepting gold and silver.
	Why?
	Because they'll have to.
	That's what works.
	That's what's there.
	That's what a lot of people have.
	And that holds value.
	And it doesn't depend on electronic systems.
	Now, crypto may be a really great choice for a lot of people in a lot of circumstances.
	It's very portable, for example.
	But also, crypto, of course, depends on the power grid functioning.
	It depends on the internet being functional.
	And in some scenarios, you can't count on that.
	So that's why it's good.
	Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
	You know, have some diversity.
	So I want you to notice, if you're watching any kind of financial news that's mainstream, you know, CNBC or what have you, what they always say is that any kind of correction, it's going to be gradual.
	There's no risk of the dollar collapsing.
	There's no risk of treasury default.
	There's no risk.
	You know, buy more stocks.
	Buy more treasuries.
	Buy more bonds.
	Because CNBC is a cheerleader for the Ponzi scheme.
	CNBC is never going to tell you the truth about what's happening.
	They didn't during the dot-com crash.
	They did not during the subprime mortgage collapse.
	There's an example of financial catastrophism right there.
	Both of those events, dot-com crash, subprime mortgage collapse, 2007-2008.
	And you have to ask yourself, if you're wanting to confirm everything I'm saying here, ask yourself about that, the subprime mortgage collapse.
	Did everybody get out?
	No.
	Was there plenty of warning?
	Nope.
	Was it gradual overtime?
	Nope.
	It was all of a sudden.
	Boom.
	Pretty much in one day.
	You know, Bear Stearns.
	Kaboom!
	Just Goldman Sachs.
	Kaboom!
	Bank of America.
	Almost gone.
	Watch the movie, The Big Short.
	It's one of my favorite films, by the way.
	Really great film.
	And you will see.
	You will see.
	Because that movie is, in essence, just a dramatization of reality.
	And you saw that the collapse was all of a sudden...
	Today, the financial collapse scenarios will be even more accelerated because we have more rapid trading.
	So the response times are shorter and a lot of trading is automated.
	Did you see the other day when Berkshire Hathaway lost 99.97% of its value almost instantly on the New York Stock Exchange?
	I don't recall the exact amount, but I think it might have been $1.4 trillion or something.
	Gone.
	Wiped out.
	Zeroed out.
	In essence.
	New York Stock Exchange, what did they do?
	They halted trading.
	And then they said, oh, it was a glitch.
	Okay.
	And then they manually typed back in the price that it was supposed to be in their minds, and then they turned it back on and forced everybody to start trading at that price.
	So in other words...
	It could have been just a bunch of automated trading systems that were actually selling all those stocks, and somehow they got triggered into a cascade of selling.
	It might have been that the price really did go that low.
	I don't know for sure if that's the case.
	Maybe in this case it wasn't, but that could happen with other stocks on other days.
	What's the New York Stock Exchange going to do?
	Halt trading on every stock that's crashing?
	Yeah, probably.
	They'll try that for a while.
	But they can't stop the international markets from selling off dollars or dollar debt, such as treasuries.
	That can happen overnight.
	Granted, the government will try to manipulate the market as aggressively as they can, but there's a limit to how much they can do.
	And at some point, it becomes obvious that they're desperate.
	And that only creates more distrust of the system or more panic to get out.
	And this is how a lot of these financial panics are self-reinforcing feedback loops of financial doom.
	And believe me, you and I will be the last to know that that's happening.
	Most of that panic is going to be happening behind closed doors before anything ever really gets out to the stock exchanges.
	So when the collapse comes, we're all going to be really hurt badly, myself included, because I have to have millions of dollars in cash.
	I don't mean green cash.
	I mean in bank cash in order to pay vendors.
	At any given time, I might owe food vendors and natural raw materials vendors, I might owe easily over a million dollars that's just in the process of being paid.
	Accounts payables.
	Just because of the volume of business that we do, I have to meet payroll.
	I have to pay utilities, all kinds of things.
	So I've got...
	In essence, you know, I've got millions of dollars of accounts payables to meet.
	And so I have to have a certain amount of cash for that.
	And I know that when the system collapses, I'm going to lose all that.
	Whatever I have in the banks is going to be gone.
	And I've already resigned myself to that fact.
	So I'm doing what a lot of you are doing.
	I'm vaulting gold or silver.
	Or, you know, crypto, or doing other things that will help preserve assets so that I can reinvest those back into the business or the economy on the other side of this collapse.
	So that's my summary of this.
	Financial catastrophism is going to define our rapidly approaching future, not gradualism.
	In terms of sponsors here, if you want to get gold and silver for yourself, go to metalswithmike.com, metalswithmike.com.
	That's our gold and silver sponsor, the Treasure Island Coins and Precious Metals Company.
	They offer very competitive pricing, guaranteed, insured, discreet delivery.
	They're easy to work with, and they don't run bait and switch tactics, by the way, either.
	They get you what you want at really great prices to help you stack gold and silver, and they also have vaulting services that are really high-end.
	I use their vaulting services.
	A lot of our customers use their vaulting services.
	It's strongly recommended that you check that out.
	In addition, if you want a different form of gold, which is highly divisible and very useful for local barter or trading in a post-collapse type of scenario, then check out verifiedgoldbacks.com.
	And you'll be looking at goldbacks there.
	And goldbacks, I've interviewed the founder Jeremy Corden several times.
	Goldbacks are really unique.
	They've got physical gold embedded in the polymer layers of the goldbacks.
	And we've done the lab test to confirm the amount of gold and the purity of gold.
	So check that out again at verifiedgoldbacks.com.
	And finally, if you want to stay informed about all of this with the best research newsletter in the industry and also an affiliate sponsor of our show, it's Gerald Salenti.
	Go to trendsjournal.com.
	If you go to trendsjournal.com and you subscribe there, Use discount code RANGER and you will save 10% and you'll get access for just a couple bucks a week to the best financial newsletter that's out there.
	We earn a little bit off of that as an affiliate.
	Mostly you're supporting the Gerald Salenti operation and his outstanding work to help people keep their assets safe.
	Seriously, this is one of the best things that you can do right now for a couple bucks a week.
	It's crazy how little that costs.
	But thank you for listening.
	Mike Adams here, the Health Ranger, naturalnews.com, and brighteon.com.
	Be safe.
	Take care.
	All right.
	Welcome back to the show.
	Definitely take advantage of the Treasure Island Gold and Silver Company if precious metals are right for you, or take advantage of the goldbacks.
	That's verifiedgoldbacks.com if that's right for you.
	Okay, now we're going to jump into the interview with Andy Wakefield and his new film called Protocol 7.
	The website is protocol7.movie.com.
	And it's the digit 7, the numeral 7, not spelled out, just the number 7.
	So protocol7.movie if you want to check out the trailer.
	We'll also play it for you during the interview.
	So enjoy the interview, and I'll have special reports for you this weekend.
	Get ready.
	Times are for sure interesting.
	Welcome, everybody, to today's bombshell interview here on Brighteon.com.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and today we are joined by Andy Wakefield, who is, of course, well, he doesn't need an intro, but his new project is Protocol 7, the feature film, and is at the website protocol7.movie, and this thing is, this is a history-changing film, and joining us to talk about it today is Andy Wakefield.
	Welcome, Mr.
	Wakefield.
	It's always a pleasure to have you on.
	Mike, thank you so much.
	Great to be back on again.
	It's great to have you here, Andy.
	You have been busy.
	You've been doing extraordinary work on this film, and it's now out.
	What was the official launch date?
	Tell us what's happening with the premieres of the film right now.
	Well, it premiered in New York last Friday.
	It screened over two days in New York.
	It's screening there Until Wednesday.
	And then we have our Austin premiere.
	Why Austin?
	Because we shot the movie here in Austin, in this wonderful city.
	And then we have our LA premiere starting next weekend.
	So we're busy, busy, busy.
	Then we go to, in mid-July, we have just secured a contract with Regal Cinemas across the United States and with Cineplex Cinemas in Canada, so very exciting times.
	Wow!
	So when is it going to be in those theaters?
	I think the start date is mid-July, so it'll be in the middle of the summer vacation, which is great.
	Okay, fantastic.
	What I'd like to do for the audience here is just play the trailer, and then we'll continue our discussion on the other side.
	He was an orphan of conflict in Africa.
	He was smart and bright and then we got him home and he crashed right in front of us.
	Apparently, we're in the midst of a month's outbreak.
	Another?
	Some people, some very important people are saying our vaccine does not work.
	We have a U.S. monopoly and a major share of the world market for MMR. And we own the only one that works.
	Except that it does not.
	We all sign contracts, Chapman.
	Company interests above all others.
	Make it work.
	They fake the data.
	It's all there.
	They cheated on every level.
	You said you're a lawyer.
	Family law.
	And you want to understand why?
	Let me see it.
	They couldn't get the result they wanted, so they re-engineered it.
	Not objective to improve the vaccine, but find something that gets Fix it, gentlemen.
	Ninety-six percent.
	If the vaccine fails, we're all out of a job.
	It has failed.
	You need to get what's going on here.
	Is he in danger?
	Internal memos were released.
	Quote, we may have to seek them out and destroy them where they live.
	Shelly knows.
	And yes, he is in danger.
	What about Shaw?
	Your son and every other son and daughter depends on whether or not you choose to live by their rules.
	Incineration.
	Immediately.
	Can we trust him to keep it together?
	Were you aware?
	Some tests included the weakened strain, I believe.
	And did you approve?
	I guess so.
	Were you aware of the lab's failure to demonstrate efficacy of the mumps vaccine, a level required by the FDA? No.
	To respond to the FDA's concern.
	And leave a dangerous vaccine on the market.
	Dangerous?
	Objective.
	Strongly recommended booster shots.
	Of course you did.
	What have they got?
	Right, nothing's what they got.
	Would you please identify this document for us?
	Please identify Exhibit 2 for me.
	We've got stuff.
	Don't wait, wait, wait!
	This is a confidential doctor.
	Objection.
	These were shredded.
	It's a protocol.
	They've got the sheets.
	They've got the evidence I was told they didn't have.
	No one will ever believe them again.
	We're all making films all the time, Andy, aren't we?
	Okay.
	Very powerful medium, Mike.
	When I was in the clinic, I could...
	Help one child at a time.
	But when you make a movie, you can get that message out to thousands, hundreds of thousands of people at one time.
	It's a great medium.
	Absolutely.
	And in your case, I think that this film is going to reach tens of millions of people.
	I mean, there's no question.
	This is going to be one of the most sought-after films among people who are beginning to ask questions.
	In my view, anyway.
	What are you hearing so far in terms of the feedback from those who have seen the full film?
	Well, exactly as you say, Mike.
	It's two groups broadly.
	It's the people who already know.
	Those mums who've got vaccine injured children, families who are affected, and then there are the people who've woken up during the COVID era.
	They've realized that they've been lied to, they've been deceived, and that there is a very different message out there and that they should invest their trust in those people who've been trying to bring them the truth all along.
	And then there's the group that we really want to reach, and those are the people who are still undecided, still unaware of the deception.
	People say, well, okay, there may be a problem with this COVID vaccine, but the childhood vaccine schedule is perfectly safe and effective.
	And what this film does is take them back over the bridge and say, no, actually, this has been happening for many, many years.
	The behavior of the industry, the behavior of the regulators has been the same for many, many years.
	Recently, Fauci testified before Congress just a few days ago.
	I'm sure you saw at least the highlights of that.
	And he was accused by several lawmakers, especially Marjorie Taylor Greene, accusing him of essentially, I'm paraphrasing, but crimes against humanity and that he should face prosecution.
	What's your reaction to Fauci's testimony that he gave and then the fact that we now have members of Congress calling him out for his role, his complicity in all of this?
	You know, Mike, I reached a point in that when I had to turn it off.
	I'm so incensed by the practiced bureaucrat deceiving, misleading, lying to Congress.
	When you watch someone, particularly in medicine you learn to do this, in filmmaking you learn to do it as well, and that is your response to people is visceral.
	You know when they're telling the truth, you know when they're lying.
	Fauci is a liar, and Fauci is a very, very dangerous man.
	The problem comes, and when I watch that it becomes manifestly obvious, is that there is no accountability.
	Fauci's going to get his huge pension and move on and to hell with the rest of the world.
	And that, to me, is something that cannot be allowed to happen.
	And that was what was in danger of happening with this story and this film, Protocol 7.
	And I thought, whatever the consequences for the filmmakers, this film needs to get out there right now so that those who were responsible for this fraud are held accountable.
	And not just allowed to move on to another job, you know, continue getting paid a vast inflated salary while the people who've really been deceived are left to deal with the consequences.
	Absolutely.
	And when your film, when I first knew that your film was coming out, I knew it would be very powerful, and I also knew that it wouldn't be widely embraced by the establishment, even though, this is the interesting contrast I want to ask you about, there are films about Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family,
	and there's a very broad willingness among mainstream media, even Netflix and others, to condemn what Purdue Pharma did in terms of the over-prescribing of these dangerous opioids.
	Do you think that that kind of opioid moment is coming?
	Or maybe your film is starting to break out that opioid moment for the harm caused by vaccine manufacturers and their concoctions?
	It's a very good point, Mike, and I think that their moment is coming.
	I think films like series like that, like...
	The revelation that they deliberately got people hooked on these drugs, which they knew to have disastrous consequences.
	People for a long, long time thought, well, maybe the drug companies behave that way in the context of regular pharmaceuticals, but not vaccines, surely.
	Surely these are for children.
	They wouldn't do harm to children.
	Now people are realizing that There is no difference between what happens on the 10th floor and the 11th floor of Merck or whoever else it may be.
	The policy is the same and that is the bottom line is everything.
	The stock price is everything and everything else comes second and in particular in this case children.
	So people are now coming to realize that I think with the vaccines they've made a huge error.
	With the COVID shot, they've heard a lot of people and that is becoming manifestly obvious, even on the front page of the Telegraph, saying, you know, Is the excess mortality down to the vaccines?
	Using language which they would never have used before.
	That's right.
	There is a huge groundswell, a change in people's perception.
	So this film could not come at a more important time.
	Again, I think this film is absolutely pivotal in the history of understanding what I would call the widespread weaponization of medicine against the human race.
	So, a question I have for you on this.
	How did you fund this film?
	Because the film, this is not some low-budget thing.
	I actually participated that one Saturday in Austin.
	I was part of the background scene of the trade show scene for your film.
	Robert Scott Bell was there, and we had a Breitian booth set up there and everything.
	That was fun.
	I met a lot of great people that day.
	And you were filming that day.
	And I saw how professional this was.
	You know, professional...
	Photography, all the extras, the director, everything.
	How did you fund this?
	Very good question.
	We've had some very loyal funders.
	I mean, I've made, this is number five in the sort of sequence of films I've made.
	And each time it gets a little easier because people say, okay, you've proven you can do this.
	Here you are, go and do it again.
	And this was such a compelling story.
	That people came alongside.
	We had donors, but this time we did something different as well.
	And we had people invest in the film.
	People should get a return.
	Whether they choose to invest that return back into a charity or into another film in the same genre...
	That's their choice.
	But it enabled us to reach a budget of, what, $5.5 million that it took to make a film that looks like a $25 million film.
	Absolutely.
	Having the right team is everything.
	And, you know, you really have some very notable actors in the film as well.
	People who are professionals, who are well recognized for their body of work.
	I think that's really remarkable.
	Yeah, we had a really interesting combination.
	I'm so glad you asked that.
	We had Eric Roberts.
	There you are, an established actor.
	I think he was nominated for an Academy Award.
	He was wonderful.
	He played the part of one of the villains.
	He played it perfectly.
	And then you have people like Rachel Whittle, who played the heroine.
	And she was a girl who came to us from Lafayette, Louisiana.
	She had Virtually given up on her acting career.
	She couldn't get the job she wanted.
	She said, I'm not going to touch the COVID vaccine.
	This was the same for so many of our actors that they'd said, no, we are not going to have, we're not going to be forced into taking this vaccine and it's going to cost us our career, but that's the choice we're making.
	And then they found this film, which really appealed to them on so many levels, but allowed them to come and act without the constraints Of testing or demanding that they're vaccinated or they stand within a specific radius of the...
	And Rachel was outstanding.
	And I think that...
	I hope this film launches the careers of a number of individuals, not least of which was a young English guy.
	It's called Harrison Tipping, a Shakespearean actor from the stage who came and played the young, the third in the hierarchy at Merck, the young guy who is ultimately duped into a major part of the fraud that took place.
	So watch out for these names because I think that the younger guys will really make a name for themselves.
	Matthew Marsden was there.
	Matthew's a seasoned actor and he played the doctor character in the film.
	Very, very good.
	It was a joy to work with these people.
	They were truly professional.
	That's really extraordinary, and I love to see your focus and your career and your life journey Really transitioned so powerfully into being a filmmaker.
	You know, I mean, from your past in medicine and in research and then as an outspoken advocate for the health of children and pregnant women and so on, and now as a filmmaker, but it all fits together.
	It's actually the perfect arc for your life, I think.
	What do you think?
	You know, I could never have predicted it.
	I could have got to the point where as a surgeon I'd taken out 5,000 gallbladders and Decided it was time to retire.
	So I could never have predicted that this was going to be the course.
	But I've absolutely loved it.
	I started screenwriting back in 2004.
	And one of the reasons for doing that, Mike, was that over the years, because of the position I'd taken, people had come to me from the industry or from the regulatory agencies like the CDC, FDA, and said, we've done a terrible thing, and here is the evidence.
	And initially I would hand that off to lawyers to be dealt with according to its merits, you know, people dealing with false claims act litigation.
	And then I thought, well, these would make extraordinary stories.
	They're the kind of thing that, you know, screenwriters would die for.
	The insider, Erin Brockovich, you know, Silent Spring.
	And here they are.
	So the time has come to tell this particular story.
	The original screenplay was...
	Written in 2012.
	I then finished it some years later with input from my great friend Terry Rossio.
	People say, who's Terry Rossio?
	Terry's written some little-known films like Shrek and Pirates of the Caribbean.
	Godzilla vs.
	King Kong.
	A man at the top of his game and a wonderful sort of guide through this entire process.
	It's been a real journey.
	It's been such fun.
	May I ask, what's the final duration of the film?
	Around 145.
	That seems perfect.
	I bet it's hard.
	It's hard to cut it to that.
	It is.
	What you do when you write, you write a whole bunch of scenes you never get to use.
	You write them because they seem to fit at the time.
	Then you get to the cutting room and you realize that they sometimes have the effect of Slowing down the pace, the necessary pace of the film.
	The story sort of accelerating to the key point at the junction of act two and three.
	And so you take them out and you realize that you don't miss them when you do take them out.
	Some are redundant.
	You put them in there for fanciful reasons and you can't even remember why you put them in there.
	They just naturally fall away.
	Others, you really love them as a scene.
	But actually removing them allows the sort of dynamism of the story, the telling of the story, to unfold in a better way on the big screen rather than on the written page.
	Now, I don't mean to get you into trouble with this question, but it's possible that might happen.
	But do actors push back on the script?
	Because I've heard of this happening in Hollywood a lot.
	Not that you represent Hollywood, of course.
	But do actors push back, like on the day of filming, they're like, I think my character should not say this exactly.
	They should say it this way.
	Does that happen?
	Yes, in a way, the girls, and I don't mean this to be just a fact of life.
	The girls who are not in the principal female role say, Andy, when can we sit down and discuss me having more lines?
	Every one of them.
	It's the same.
	I say, I love you.
	I love you.
	This is the standard line.
	And the other is, yes, Eric Roberts.
	There was one line, he said, I wouldn't normally say that, and I say, you do today.
	The potential is there to be intimidated, because these people, their season, they've been there, many of them, for a while.
	They know the games to play, they know the tricks to pull, they appeal to your sense of justice and fair play.
	But you have to be...
	In fact, they were a joy to work with.
	We'd never had any conflict at all, but they were just those moments where, oh dear, what do I say now?
	And the best thing is to do is to just use some humorous aside to sort of lead them off into how...
	Wonderful they really are, and they don't actually need extra lines, and it's perfect for them just as it is.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Good answer.
	I had to ask.
	A sufficiently diplomatic kind.
	Well, but that's, you know, as the director, you have so many hats to wear and so many roles to play.
	You know, on the financial side, it has to meet a certain budget requirement, but there's the human side, there's the creative side, so many things to manage.
	I would imagine that it's very stressful, and you have early morning calls, too.
	I mean, you know...
	Don't you have to get up at 4 a.m.
	some days to shoot this?
	Sure.
	It comes down, Mike, to preparation.
	I mean, I've read and read and read, and I've been on courses to study direction with actors, and it all comes down to preparation.
	If you go onto the set 80 to 90 percent prepared, you know the script, you know what you want, you know the shots you want, you know how you want the inflection to be in the dialogue, You know what adjustments you're going to offer to your actors to try this or try that.
	Then it looks as though you know exactly what you're doing.
	You go on set.
	You say these things.
	People say, wow, he must have done this before.
	You've never done it before in your life.
	You're terrified.
	You're the most frightened person on set.
	You manage to carry it off because you're prepared.
	So if I had any advice for young aspiring directors now, it would be preparation.
	The other is having the right cast, knowing that you've got people with whom you can work, people who have a great reputation for professionalism, and I was lucky in that.
	Also had great producers.
	They were wonderful.
	A great first assistant director who just keeps the whole set moving forward.
	He's rather like the disciplinarian.
	I think I met that person.
	He was very much in charge of the floor.
	It was, you'll be here and you'll be here.
	That's right.
	It's like, fine, that's great.
	We need a coordinator who knows what they're doing.
	Let me ask you, at what point, the website is protocol7.movie, and that's the numeral 7, by the way, protocol7.movie.
	At what point will people be able to purchase it digitally or stream it online?
	Well, in the contracts that we have for theatrical screening, they want a 30-day window.
	So once we start in mid-July, you can predict that sometime around 30 days beyond that, it'll be out online, and it'll be out I think, you know, you go to protocol7.movie and you'll be able to stream it from there.
	Okay.
	Okay, great.
	So we'll look for some time in August for maybe that to occur.
	Is it possible that other theatrical chains might also pick this up after you mentioned a couple there?
	Any more that you're looking at?
	Oh, yes.
	Yes, both small sort of theater groups like the Alamo Draft House that we're approaching them for example, the Lemley in Southern California.
	And because we've got a non-exclusive contract, then yes, any number of different theaters, small or large theater chains can pick it up.
	Okay.
	And so here's a question.
	The movie specifically talks about, I believe, Merck or Pfizer.
	I mean, does it mention Pfizer or is it mostly focused on Merck?
	It's Merck.
	This story is all Merck.
	Okay, I'm sorry.
	I haven't seen the full film yet.
	I've only watched the trailer.
	Given that you're naming the pharmaceutical company Merck, how closely does this script follow the Sort of the factual events that you can prove versus how much is a dramatization, if you can address that.
	Right, no, sure.
	It's obviously an inherent risk in naming names.
	You know, you've got a small production company versus a huge multinational pharmaceutical industry, and that's taking a risk.
	A number of documents upon which the film was based.
	It is based in fact.
	There were elements of the fraud that were committed by Merck that we were confident could stand up to scrutiny if we were ever threatened with litigation for, for example, defamation.
	Nonetheless, the court case is still going on and there were thousands and thousands of pages of documents To which we did not have access.
	They were sealed by the court.
	Sealed until very recently.
	And so we had to...
	And the other thing is we could not be in that meeting in Merck where they were discussing the fate of this vaccine or in the deposition hearing room where this interchange was taking place.
	And so that's where the dramatic license fell.
	And when we came to...
	Because we had to...
	It's to read all of those thousands of documents as they became available.
	The fear is, well, this is going to completely undermine the integrity of the film.
	We're going to be guilty of defamation and we'll be sued if we release this film.
	But quite the opposite happened.
	What in fact happened is that we realized that when reading the expert reports from, for example, the ex-head of the FDA, Dr.
	Kessler, at that time, who was testifying on behalf of the whistleblowers, then he was even more damning of Merck's behavior than we portrayed in the film.
	So, you know, you could argue that Merck are getting off lightly in this movie.
	We'll see where they go with that.
	This is the good version of Merck depicted in your film.
	That's not the good.
	That's the reality.
	Okay, that's really fascinating.
	So ultimately, there's been a lot of documentary support for the narrative in your film.
	But I also think, from a legal perspective, if Merck were to sue you to try to stop the film, the Streisand effect, you couldn't have better marketing if that were to happen.
	You know what I'm saying?
	Like, please, don't throw me in that briar patch, right?
	Yeah.
	Yes, it's right.
	It could be like our film Vaxxed with De Niro at Tribeca.
	You know, having it censored from Tribeca.
	Right.
	Got it global publicity.
	And I think they'll try and avoid that.
	The least of which is if they do come after me, then we have access to all of those documents, that discovery that they perhaps have been trying to keep out of the public eye.
	That's right.
	It becomes a very, very public case.
	And the question is...
	Do Merck and their lawyers want that to happen?
	Especially given that you can make more films.
	Yes.
	Will there be a sequel?
	Right.
	Okay.
	Well, that's one of my questions for you actually today is what do you have in the works next if it's not too early to ask that question?
	No, we have a slate of films.
	In fact, what I'm going to do, Mike, I said I would never write a movie about COVID. Why?
	Because there are 2,000 screenwriters in Hollywood and elsewhere doing exactly that at the moment.
	However, we do have access to a compelling and most unusual aspect of that story, which we're going to make a movie about.
	Then, after that, we have Another movie which is very, very dear to my heart.
	I won't say too much about it now, but it's about another aspect, a critical aspect of the autism crisis that we face at the moment.
	And then, Mike, I'm going to make a rom-com.
	You say a rom-com, and the answer is yes, because everything I've done for the last 30 years has been so dark and so sort of sinister and such a reflection of the bad side of No kidding.
	I mean, okay, so that's a whole different genre to pull off effectively.
	I mean, you know how critical timing is in documentaries, but in comedies, the movie fails or succeeds on timing alone, it seems, right?
	That's right.
	It's a challenge, right?
	It's a challenge, but I love a challenge.
	You do indeed.
	Alright, well, I think myself and our audience, we're open to any creative works that you're planning on putting out.
	We'd love to have you back to talk about all of those.
	So, getting back to Protocol 7, again, let me remind the viewers.
	Protocol7.movie, is there anything that viewers can do to try to sort of request that local theaters carry the movie?
	Is that an effective strategy to, you know, grassroots support?
	Grassroots is going to be absolutely essential to the success of this film.
	We've done our bit, we'll continue to work hard on it, but please, please, please, everyone who sees it, if you feel this film has merit, if it means something to you, bring 10 people to the next screening.
	Bring those 10 people, and if they like it, get each of them to bring 10 people, that multiplier effect.
	Bring those people who've Agreed with you, who disagreed with you, the people, the family members you fought with over Thanksgiving's dinner about, you know, whether we should vaccinate or not vaccinate, whether it's all conspiracy theory and made up.
	Bring them to see this film.
	And when you do, don't say, I told you so.
	Just say, I've seen this film.
	It's very interesting.
	I would value your opinion.
	Would you come and watch it?
	So please, pack the theaters out.
	That will drive people back to the movie theaters, and it's a wonderful collective experience, because so many people in this arena have felt for many years, and we saw this with Vax, have felt that they're alone.
	They're completely alone.
	When they came to that theater, they realized that they were among friends.
	They spoke the same language.
	They had suffered in the same way, and they were fighting back.
	In the same way so please do that and yes there is a way and that is you can have theatrical on demand and if you go to the website you scroll down it says how to book a screening and you click on that button and it will take you through how to have a screening in your town.
	If you're a small town and maybe you don't have a major theatre chain there You can still get a screening in your town, and it won't cost you anything.
	It's all laid out there for you to do.
	So theatrical on demand.
	Here it is.
	Host a screening, sign up, pick a theater, invite and earn.
	Yep.
	Okay, great.
	Book here now.
	And then you also have a pay it forward button on the site here.
	Pay it forward, buy a ticket, gift a ticket.
	How does this work?
	Well, this is something we were inspired by watching Sound of Freedom.
	And when the Sound of Freedom did this, they said, look, you know, for people who can't afford to go to this movie or might not otherwise be inclined to go to this movie, buy them a ticket.
	If you've seen it and you've enjoyed it, put some money into this pool that will allow us to provide tickets to those people, as I say, who might not be able to afford it at that time or anything.
	Might not have been inclined to watch it.
	And they did that and it seemed to be a great success.
	So we've tried the same option.
	Okay, well, I will check this out myself just to see if I can contribute to help people get tickets who otherwise may not be able to afford to go see it themselves.
	But I'll check that out after this interview.
	Now, I noticed that the film is rated R over language, apparently.
	Now, Andy, if you had only made a cartoon transgender demon film trafficking human children, that would be G. But apparently you've got some bad language in this film.
	How did it get an R rating?
	For language.
	And this is such an important point because people ask me about this, is that filmmaking is about the faithful replication of human behavior.
	That's what we do as filmmakers.
	The faithful and authentic replication of human behavior, often under the most extreme circumstances.
	So you take a family, they can't have a child, they adopt a child, the child is vaccine injured, and their life falls apart, their marriage falls apart.
	And people are then put in extreme situations, which most people in the world have never experienced.
	Fortunately experienced.
	Under those circumstances, it is essential for the filmmaker, the writer, and the director to reflect their sincere, authentic behavior.
	How would people behave under these extreme circumstances?
	And sometimes people curse.
	And it would be hypocrisy to say that Any of us have not, under extreme stress, cursed.
	So my job as the filmmaker is to appropriately and in context place language that reflects the extreme situation in which those people, those actors live.
	Well, I love the way you just explained that.
	That is the best explanation I've ever heard of the use of profanity in film.
	And if you don't do that, Mike, here's the thing.
	Audiences are very intelligent.
	And if you avoid that, because it may offend 5%, whatever it does...
	Then people say, that's not honest.
	The audience say, that doesn't ring true.
	Even though, you know, they may not say it, they may not articulate it, but they just think, no...
	No, that doesn't work for me.
	And it is my job to be honest with people.
	Yeah, you can't have a line where the father's speaking to his wife and their child is vaccine-injured, autistic now.
	They just discovered that.
	And the father says, oh, those gosh darn knucklehead vaccine doctors.
	Exactly.
	No, come on.
	That's not what you're going to say.
	No, it doesn't work.
	And so you have to be honest with your audience.
	Well, it's funny that we're having this conversation because there's something, of course, our world is becoming more intense.
	So, I mean, lives are at stake now in ways that are absolutely more ferocious and more emotionally charged than ever before.
	It's not only happening with vaccines and COVID, but also war and other things.
	And I'm finding it increasingly difficult in my own podcast to avoid profanity.
	And sometimes, occasionally, I just use it where I feel like it's necessary to And, um, do you find that that is, is that also your sense about what's happening in the world that where you, do you see people who maybe never use profanity now it's way more appropriate to use it because of what's happening or is that just in my mind?
	No, I think it's true.
	I think that it, it's manifest in a number of different behaviors.
	So profanity is perhaps the lesser end of the spectrum and Sort of meltdowns that you have.
	You see people on social media having extreme meltdowns, whether they're on an aircraft or they're put in a stressful situation on top of all the other stresses that occupy their lives, and suddenly they can no longer cope.
	And at the sort of worst end of the spectrum, that may manifest as violent behaviors.
	And of course, none of this has helped I completely agree with you.
	Well, I want to ask you about the trends of autism.
	But just a comment to what you just said.
	I have seen video clips of people losing their minds on airplanes, like you mentioned.
	I saw one clip of one woman that was screaming crazy.
	I thought she was going to crawl on the ceiling and the captain was going to come on and say, do we have an exorcist on board or something?
	It was that insane.
	Like, what is going on in this world?
	But there is a lot of neurological damage.
	I'm not saying that's the cause of that particular incident, but there's neurological damage Autism is one of the presentations of a certain type of neurological damage.
	There are other forms of, obviously, neurodamage and exposure to chemicals and environmental pesticides and organophosphates and so on.
	But tell us about autism.
	How much worse is it getting in terms of the trends?
	Because we used to say a few years ago it was like 1 in 50 children.
	It's not that anymore, is it?
	When I was at medical school, it was one in 10,000 as an estimate.
	When it's that rare, it even becomes difficult to provide an accurate estimate because there's no system of ascertainment.
	They're just occasional cases.
	But it was so rare that it did not appear in textbooks of childhood developmental normality and disorders.
	Then it came on the scene as a new disease and has accelerated dramatically dramatically.
	In the last 50, 60 years.
	And this has paralleled the increase in the childhood vaccine schedule.
	Is that coincidence or is that actually a causal relationship?
	And I have every reason to believe it's a causal relationship and we can go into that.
	But the numbers that we approach now, if you look at the latest data from Northern Ireland, from Scotland, from England, Then we're talking about 1 in 20 to 1 in 25 children in the US. The numbers are very similar in New Jersey.
	And you say, well, is New Jersey unique?
	Is it just a toxic wasteland?
	And the answer is no.
	I don't believe that.
	I think that New Jersey has had the same system of ascertainment in place using the same diagnostic criteria, the same people making those diagnoses for a length of time.
	And what that does is lead to an accurate record of the rise in autism over time.
	So I think that other states are very similar.
	It's just that their system of ascertainment is not as sophisticated as that in New Jersey.
	So we're looking at an extraordinary number.
	When you bear in mind it's four to five boys to every girl, that's a huge number of the male population of developed countries.
	That number shows no sign in slowing down and so it will approach 1 in 2 by 2032 has been predicted.
	I don't know how accurate that will turn out to be and that will depend upon clearly what we decide to do and other factors like the introduction of recommended COVID shots for children.
	What is that going to do to this extraordinary number?
	No country can sustain that level of injury to its children any longer.
	It is absolutely extraordinary.
	Sorry, Mike, go ahead.
	No, I get the sense from many of the guests I've interviewed and also from our reader base and fan base, I believe we're approaching a time of the end of Western medicine as the institutions of Western medicine.
	And I think COVID was a pivot point where so many people are now opening their eyes and seeing the harms of Western medicine and the failure of it.
	And we even have admissions now that the COVID vaccines, which to our audience recall, they were initially not approved by the FDA.
	They were emergency use authorization only EUA, which is not the same as clinical trials, long term trials and risk assessment studies.
	But we even have now, Andy, the the weaponization, I would call it, of the vaccine industry against parents.
	We have SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome.
	In some cases, moms or parents have been charged with murder for a child that was clearly, in my mind, vaccine injured or killed, killed by vaccines.
	We have parents being victimized when the child has a vaccine injury and they attempt to share that knowledge, then they are called anti-vaxxers and they are victimized and censored.
	So we're starting to see more and more this weaponization of the system against parents.
	What are your thoughts?
	Yes, they've become so desperate that they've had to turn it into a weapon to use threats, to use force, to coerce.
	When you do that, Mike, you've reached the end of your sort of legitimate lifetime.
	You've got nowhere else to go because people don't trust or believe you anymore.
	And that has happened par excellence.
	The example of COVID is...
	We're safe and effective.
	No, it's absolutely not.
	It's there to generate a huge profit for people who will never be held accountable.
	And it is dangerous and it's dangerous in the long term.
	And as you point out, those studies of safety were never done.
	So the idea that it's safe and effective is a lie.
	It was a lie.
	They've only got themselves to blame.
	They've only got themselves to blame for the attrition of public confidence in public health and the pharmaceutical industry.
	They have only got themselves to blame.
	And now they're in this parlour situation where they're having to use coercion threats, taking the child away, bringing in CPR, whatever it may be.
	It's on a road to nowhere.
	It will fail.
	It's just a question of helping it fail.
	Do you have any comments on SIDS, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome?
	Yes, indeed.
	I mean, I looked at this many years ago and I looked at it with that Australian lady who brought it out, the researcher.
	She presented on this a very long time ago showing she did sleep studies.
	You'll know all about this, Mike.
	She and her husband, nothing to do with vaccines at all.
	She did sleep studies in babies to look at sort of were there any predictors of abnormality that might prevent And what they found, quite to their surprise, was that there was this effect, this apneic effect, this effect on breathing after the DPT vaccine that was so consistent that ultimately she reported it to her bosses and lost her job as a consequence, became a pariah.
	We're all used to this now.
	We know how that manifests and became a sort of voice in the wilderness for many years.
	But I have absolutely no doubt that What she was reporting was not only a sincere and honest, but genuine reaction.
	I don't recall the actual study, but there was a piece of news just recently of a university that Under tremendous pressure forced its researchers to retract a paper that had shown an increased risk of fatality after taking the COVID vaccine versus those who did not take it.
	And when I saw the story, I thought, okay, business as usual.
	They will force retract the studies that they don't want the public to see.
	But they will never scrutinize the atrociously structured fake studies that they do want the public to see.
	I'd like to have your comments on just in a general sense.
	Throughout COVID, and you saw some of the studies, one study pushed out on, I think, hydroxychloroquine saying that it would damage the heart.
	And it turns out the data set was a fictitious, made-up group of people.
	From a company run by an adult entertainment person and a fiction writer or something.
	The stories sound insane, but this is what passes as peer-reviewed science in many journals today.
	What are your thoughts?
	Well, it's interesting.
	When I started this, Mike, 30 years ago or so, and I lost my job, it was a kind of one-off.
	Who is this guy?
	And let's just...
	We're huge.
	We're...
	We're the drug companies and we're the World Health Organization and the governments of America and the UK and the American Academy of PDA. We can dispense with this person very, very easily and that was easy, but now it's not.
	Now there are many, many doctors standing up against it and many, many people like Peter McCullough, an extraordinary physician, published over 750 papers, the most published, the most experienced cardiologist in the world without parallel and He comes out against COVID and says, no, this is not what it appears to be.
	And of course, he loses his job.
	You can only do that so many times.
	And then those who know him, those who his colleagues saying, hang on, I know this guy.
	And no, you're wrong.
	But it's happened to a lot of us.
	But it's happened to so many of us now that we're a band of brothers.
	We come together and offer a A perfectly plausible scientific explanation for what's happening, and the public are beginning to believe it in vast numbers.
	So if you look at when I got involved in this, there were a handful of people worldwide prepared to discuss the thorny issue of vaccine safety.
	Now it's more than half the adult population of the world, I would suggest, are reluctant to get the Next booster, and the next booster, and the next booster, and therefore are, in the words of the mainstream media, anti-vaxxers.
	Are the anti-vaxxers now really the majority?
	If they are, then you as the industry and you as the regulators only have yourselves to blame.
	Let me expand that and ask you a question that I know is beyond the normal topics upon which you focus, but I'm going to ask you about national security.
	And military readiness, given that all of these vaccines are mandatory for military personnel, not just in the United States, but also in Britain, in France, in Germany, and so on.
	Most of the NATO countries, not all, but most of them mandate these vaccines.
	Whereas in Russia, and of course NATO is at war with Russia right now in Ukraine, in Russia they have different vaccines, not the same ones that we are using.
	In China they have different vaccines.
	Do you believe that the vaccines that have been pushed on, especially U.S. military personnel, have inflicted a readiness cost that will affect our national security?
	Without a shadow of a doubt, yes.
	I think that firstly the military are first in line as the sort of experimental model, the lab rat for any number of vaccines.
	I've spoken to so many people in the military who say we are simply lined up, soldier, put your arm out, and it's one vaccine after another.
	No knowing what they've had, what dose they've had, what they're getting at the same time, what mixtures they're getting.
	And they're getting very, very sick.
	And I know, you know, you know that when you're ill, you're not combat ready.
	You've got influenza.
	You're not combat ready.
	There's no way you can...
	You can fight at all.
	You can barely think.
	You certainly can't get out of bed.
	So I think that there's no doubt that we've impacted our military in that way.
	And the other thing is that when one in 20 or one in two children are affected by a serious neurodevelopmental disorder like autism, and that is for the most part boys, you don't have an armed force anymore.
	You don't have a police force.
	Well, this is why the U.S. military cannot meet its recruiting goals at all right now.
	Because they cannot meet, the applicants cannot cognitively achieve the levels that are necessary to come in even at the most basic level of private in the Army.
	So that's deeply, deeply worrying.
	Wow.
	I mean, you really hit upon a critical point there, because the ability to defend your nation in this very kinetic world right now does depend on the viability of your, especially your young male population.
	I don't know if you heard this, but in the UK there's talk now of mandatory conscription of 18-year-olds.
	And across other EU countries, in Germany, there's talk of activating reservists, mostly young men.
	And all of these young European men are supposed to go fight Russia, apparently, is what we're being told.
	And they're all going to be vaccinated as part of that.
	First, it's like, here, take all these vaccines, then we'll send you to the front line.
	If you survive the vaccines, well, then there's Russian artillery there.
	This seems like a suicide pact, in my view.
	It does.
	You become very alarmed when you realize that, way back to the story with the smallpox vaccine and the military, that the commander-in-chief or one of the senior military commanders, generals, was actually a stockholder and sat on the board of the company that made the vaccine.
	When you see that kind of conflict of interest, it really makes you begin to doubt the sanity of Yes.
	How do you maintain your relative calm and a sense of sanity?
	And also, actually, you have a sense of good humor.
	I know you personally, you know, you and I can chat and chuckle about things, but how do you maintain that, given that the world appears to be falling apart?
	I've asked myself this question many times.
	I mean, there have been times, Mike, along the way, along the last 30 years, when it's been difficult, very difficult, particularly difficult on my family.
	A lot of time spent away.
	But whenever I sort of get into those doldrums, I reflect upon the fact that I'm fine.
	You know, the children affected by this disorder had no voice.
	It's up to me, and people like me to give them a voice.
	And So stop complaining.
	Stop sulking.
	Get over it.
	Get on with the job.
	And when you take yourself out of the equation, it becomes actually very much easier.
	It's a huge weight taken off your shoulders because it's not about me.
	It doesn't matter whether the attacks look like they're focused on me as an individual, as a person.
	They're not.
	I mean, these people don't know me.
	They don't know me at all.
	They don't know what motivates me.
	And so I tend to I tend to think, you know, this child has a problem.
	Your job is to act on his behalf since that ability has been taken away from him.
	Let me ask you about coordinated government and big tech censorship.
	You probably are not aware of this, but on Memorial Day, we filed a major lawsuit against the Department of Defense, Homeland Security, State Department, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and so on.
	And it also names some overseas NGOs, some out of the UK, by the way, and they're engaged in censorship laundering in order to silence certain voices.
	As you know, one of the key issues that's targeted for censorship is anyone criticizing vaccines.
	How do you think...
	And the trends of censorship are worsening.
	More government collusion with big tech to silence anybody who disagrees on several key points including vaccines or climate change or elections being stolen or any of these issues.
	What are your thoughts on this worsening censorship and how it will impact how it will ultimately, if you agree with this, harm more children by preventing an honest debate?
	Censorship is a measure of how much they're losing.
	They need to censor because they are losing in every other domain of this particular debate, this argument, this discussion, this issue around vaccines, which is the one that I know and understand perhaps better than any other issue.
	But it is a measure of the fact that they're losing.
	And I want you to try and imagine what it's like in those expensive offices on K Street in Washington, D.C., where they're sitting around This table and their job is to represent in the media and in public relations and everything else, the pharmaceutical companies making these vaccines.
	They're in total and utter chaos.
	They're saying to themselves, we're putting all this money out there, we're putting all this information out there, and people don't believe us.
	Why do they not believe us?
	They don't believe you, sir, madam, because you're not telling the truth.
	You're not being honest.
	And so when you are losing, you have to It's rather like coercion and threatening of parents and bullying and mandatory this and mandatory that.
	You have to censor because you have no other way of dealing with the honest message.
	And so it's a painful issue to deal with in the short term because, as you say, it's accelerating in pace and affects all of us.
	It affects you, it affects me.
	But in the end, it is a measure of how Destitute, how redundant, and how utterly worthless their arguments are, and what an extraordinary violation of the First Amendment, and I think that's becoming manifestly obvious to people as well.
	Well stated there, Andy.
	And as we're wrapping this up today, I just want to thank you for your contributions to humanity.
	I think in the hearts and minds of our viewers, and I share this, you're more than a filmmaker.
	You're more than a doctor in the classical sense of a teacher, of a healer, someone who empowers people to heal themselves, because you're humbled.
	In this role that you've taken on, but you are a true treasure to this world, and I just want to thank you for all that you've done, including this latest film.
	Make you very kind.
	Pleasure to be on.
	Thank you.
	Thank you very much.
	And the film website, folks, is protocol7.movie.
	Be sure to go there, watch the trailer, and you can request it in local theaters.
	You can buy a ticket for others.
	You can pay it forward.
	You can spread the word.
	You can bring people with you to the local theaters.
	But get the word out because this can change history.
	And Andy Wakefield has put years of his effort, time, money, and expertise into making this film so that we would have something to share with others.
	So again, God bless you, Andy Wakefield, and thank you for your time today.
	We appreciate you.
	Thank you, Mike.
	All right.
	Take care.
	And for those of you watching, thank you for watching.
	Wow, what a powerful interview.
	What an incredible human being.
	We're just privileged to have Andy here on the show with us today.
	And be sure to watch this film.
	It will change your life, and it may change the lives of others around you.
	Feel free to repost this interview on other channels and platforms.
	You have our permission to do so.
	Just link back to protocol7.movie.
	Back in stock at the Health Ranger store, we now have the Elderberry Echinacea Tincture Combo, which is outstanding for the immune system.
	That's in the middle there.
	Back in stock.
	We've also got Quercetin available, which is a very popular item, as everybody's learning about the supportive benefits of Quercetin.
	We have broccoli sprout powder in capsules now back in stock.
	We also have a little bit of the actual powder as it's shown there in that canister.
	All these available at healthrangerstore.com.
	Go to the website, find out what we have there.
	We've got a lot of new products, a lot of products back in stock.
	And then also we have the pea protein.
	Back in stock.
	Now, for those who like plant-based proteins, pea protein, it's very smooth.
	The texture here is very smooth.
	It's also one of the cleanest, well, I think the cleanest plant-based protein you can get in terms of lab test results, whereas rice protein sometimes, depending on the source, can have arsenic in it.
	We've seen that in rice protein, some lead, some cadmium.
	But pea protein is very, very clean.
	Some people prefer a whey protein taste, but if you're used to doing vegan proteins, then pea protein is more in your wheelhouse of what it's supposed to taste like, and that's a really great, clean, smooth product right there.
	That's back in stock at our store.
	But check out our hundreds of other products at healthrangerstore.com.
	And remember...
	That every purchase helps us with our big lawsuit that we filed.
	We're suing Google, Meta, we're suing Twitter or X, we're suing the Department of Defense.
	We're also suing Homeland Security, News Guard, and various NGOs for censorship collusion.
	In our lawsuit, we're exposing the censorship industrial complex, and we're working to dismantle it, to compel the court to actually dismantle this censorship complex so that the free speech rights of the American people can be restored, as is supposed to be guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Bill of as is supposed to be guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights under But we have to fight for it, and we need your support in order to carry out and fund that fight.
	So shop at HealthRangerStore.com and help us take this fight to the censors to dismantle the censorship industrial complex while at the same time enhancing your health and nutrition with laboratory-tested, certified, organic, ultra-clean products that we offer.
	Again, healthrangerstore.com.
	Thank you for your support.
	A global reset is coming.
	And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲