All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 30, 2023 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
56:44
Professor Valentina Zharkova explains why solar cycles will lead to GLOBAL FAMINE...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's interview on Brighteon.com.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon.
And today we are joined by Professor Valentina Zarkova from Northumbria University.
And she's also a professor of mathematics there.
And her website talks about the grand solar minimum Which refers to, of course, a super cycle of solar activity that affects all of us here on planet Earth, including the, quote, climate.
So this is going to be a fascinating discussion.
Our website is solargsm.com, which stands for Grand Solar Minimum.
Welcome to the show, Professor.
It's an honor to have you on today.
Yes, a pleasure to be with you.
Well, we appreciate you taking the time to join us, and I was really impressed by an interview I saw you conducting with another media outlet.
And I was intrigued by the fact that you were speaking so eloquently and rationally about the impact that the Sun has on us here on Earth and the entire solar system.
Could you start out by telling us a little bit about what you do and your website, SolarGSM, and why are you intrigued by this topic?
Well, I am a mathematician and mainly I was doing plasma physics, solar plasma physics, and I wrote a couple of books, about 200 papers and so on.
But doing solar activity, we started in 2002 when my team got the European grant, European Grid of Solar Observation, so we got funding.
To investigate sunspot active regions and produce solar feature catalogs, which we produced by 2005.
So we had a big database.
And on top of all the plasma physics and applied mathematics, suddenly I got this nice statistical row.
Which I wanted to explore.
So when Grant was finished, we wanted to obtain some interesting results.
We actually planned to automate producing the average transport numbers, which now done by observers from different observatory.
And then we discovered we cannot do this because They put not very precise algorithm how they do this average transport number.
It depends on each observer and they put some coefficients, which is very difficult to calculate when you do this programming in your computer.
So this is what we discovered that we need to do something else.
So this is how I got hooked in 2002-2006.
Looking at the statistical analysis.
At that time, I was teaching statistics at the university, so it was good coincidence.
It was nice to know what you're doing.
So we started slowly doing statistics.
We discovered that probably a better look not at the sunspots.
But the whole magnetic field, because we have a luxury, the magnetic field of the Sun was observed from 1976 until now, and the full-disk observations and the data are very good.
And so this is how, basically, we started doing the research.
And it was, I think, 2008, 2008.
9 and 10 when we've done exploration of our database with any others we have and suddenly we discovered that sunspots actually appear not when they want.
They actually modulated where they appear and when they appear by the background magnetic field.
This one which I started investigating because I thought the data very good because it has 1020 4x1024 pixels, so you have very good quality of the data.
But it turns out this magnetic field defines where the sunspots appear and have them migrate on the surface.
The published paper in 2008.
Okay.
And this is how I started doing the solar activity, which is not plasma physics.
It is interesting, like, everyone now doing solar activity.
So this is what I came from different side, from scientific side.
I started doing solar activity.
So how profound, I mean, in terms of your findings, what you've seen so far, How profound is the Sun's impact on weather and climate and crop yields, for example, on our planet?
Because personally, I find it astonishing that our press, our governments, our people, they focus on just what's on Earth, and they don't look at the primary driver of energy cycles, which is, of course, the Sun, and they ignore the Sun somehow, which seems bizarre to me.
What's your take?
It's absolutely bizarre, I have to say, because everything is designed and defined by the Sun on Earth and other planets.
And at the peak of the Kyoto Agreement, I was given a talk in Yorkshire to different companies.
I discovered that Hoyt and Schatten and others, they showed that the other planets have similar global warming like we have.
The Ice on Mars was melting, similar when ice on the Earth was melting.
And Jupiter had a typhoon, which it never had before.
So basically, it proves that we cannot affect neither Mars or Jupiter.
It has to be Sun which affects.
Well, I asked this satirically, but are you sure it couldn't be the coal-fired power plants on Mars that are causing it?
This red spot, which is there, it might be a coal-fired plot.
You never know, you never know.
2010, I discovered.
And then we started working...
We started applying high mathematics.
We decided how we can extract what the Sun gives.
Normally, at that time, I was teaching my students, students of astrophysics and physics, the course which is called Waves on the Sun.
And with these waves, I teach them that each system has own oscillations.
They're called natural frequency.
Yes.
And suddenly it struck me, why nobody calculated this natural frequency for the Sun?
Yes.
We have this huge amount of data for three solar cycles by that time, 2010.
And no one calculated.
So I thought, okay, I put my team together and said, guys, let's do principal component analysis because this is the only mathematical tool which gives you precise...
I have to say that calculation with principal component, it is not artificial intelligence.
This is the precise calculation.
Calculate eigenvector, eigenvalues.
And then this eigenvector gives you waves, split like if you put white light on the triangle glass pyramid.
A prism, yeah.
Yeah, a prism.
You put from the left white light and from the right you get...
Spectrum rainbow.
Yes.
You get from red to UV indigo.
So the same effect on the magnetic field does principal component analysis.
So I managed to split this very complex magnetic field for the whole Sun.
I split in separate components, so two highest components which we used.
And what we discovered is that basically these components come in pairs.
So you have two highest with the variance, 39% and 38%, and then another two with the variance about 18%, and then another two and another two.
The Sun tells me that these waves come in pairs, which became a complete surprise.
I've never seen the principal component gives you pairs, but voila, it gives you pairs.
So this is why we added these pairs, the first pair, and we applied a dynamo model for this pair.
We thought, okay, we got a clear wave.
It is natural oscillation of the Sun.
And because Sun has North and South Pole, obviously we can apply normal dynamo model, don't we?
Because this is what they do in the Sun, dynamo formed by these dipole magnetic sources.
As soon as we apply dynamo model from these two eigenvectors and join them together, suddenly dynamo model started describing these magnetic eigenvectors very nicely.
Very beautifully.
Like one to another, like this.
Well, a couple of questions.
And let me help, I think, maybe help translate some of that for our audience.
I mean, it sounds like you're using mathematics to deconvolute oscillation data in order to identify multiple frequency patterns.
Yes.
That...
Normally, when they're all together, it looks like chaos, but when you deconvolute them, you can identify the separate oscillations.
I have this principle component analysis.
So, I didn't do much.
All the tool of PCA did.
PCA, principle component analysis.
Okay.
Alright, so then with these data that you have now extracted, I take it then you've been able to identify key periods of oscillation cycles?
Yes.
Which have predictive value, correct?
Yes.
What we manage to identify now, because my two eigenvectors with the highest eigenvalue Actually, now corresponds to the model developed by people in solar dynamo.
It started fitting very well, this model.
All other magnetic field does not fit, but this, because we clean it up from any other influences.
So it started fitting very well, and we discovered that these two waves, which are traveling on the Sun, they have Close, but not equal frequencies.
So one has like 10.5 years and another has 10.9 or 11.2 years.
Interesting.
Yeah, so this is the frequency period.
Of frequency, it will be one divided by two periods.
So what we discovered, these waves, like one wave runs away from another wave.
Yes.
And we thought, oh, interesting.
So first of all, when these waves started fitting very nicely dynamo model, in our paper in Nature 2015, we produced correspondence of observed eigenvectors And simulated.
And first time we could produce simulated dynamo model for 2000 years.
At the moment, dynamo model cannot produce even one cycle ahead, because they use the whole magnetic field, which is polluted.
With our clean-up wave, which is on oscillation of the Sun, we could produce the similar Waves for 2,000 years.
So as soon as we managed to produce them in solar dynam, we thought, oh, maybe this wave, if you put them into a specific artificial intelligence package, at that time it was available, called Eureka, done by Schmidt and Lipton, It can identify analytical expression for this formula which runs as eigenvector, right?
So we put it and we got formula with about series about five, six cosine functions which are published in our paper in 2015.
So we got this formula which gets accuracy to the One we derived from PCA about 97%.
So with these formulas then we can calculate the current solar activity and also where it's going.
Yes, and we calculate for 1,000 and we calculate it for 120,000 years.
As long as you can run your computer, if you like your computer run for a week or month, you can calculate a million years.
The only problem is you need to keep your array serious somewhere, so you need to split it because the capacity of computers cannot Keep large amount of arrays.
But theoretically, yes.
Let me jump in then.
So if you're saying that one of the periods of the solar magnetic activity is 10 point something years and another period...
It's approximately, if you can read that paper in Nature, we give comparison.
How to get period 10.7 years, which we have now.
Okay.
So we give some options.
Alright, and then there's another cycle happening that's a little bit longer, 11-something years.
Yeah, it's a normal cycle, 11 years.
Okay, so then, obviously, I mean, I'm just estimating, but somewhere between 90 and 100 years, these two cycles are going to peak together and have, you know, a lot of solar activity, and then somewhere else in that whole long cycle, they're going to trough together.
You probably haven't seen my pictures.
But the 11th cycle runs every 11 years.
So 11 cycle years, 11, 11.
But to get this 11th cycle, we have two waves.
So one wave runs another.
Both have nearly 11 cycles.
But because they have different amplitude and different phase, after about 350 years, these two waves Turn out to be in antiphase.
So, one wave has maximum, another has minimum, and this will have ground-solar minimum.
So, one wave runs away from another, but both of them are close to 11 years.
And the resulting summary curve is about 10.7 years, which we measure right now.
Oh, I see.
So, this describes then you're going to have periods of climate stability, and then you're going to have other periods of climate chaos, in essence.
It is not CAS, it's called destructive interference.
So the waves can have constructive interference.
So if my two waves have phase, they both come in maximum, the amplitude of this cycle will be double, because both amplitudes are added.
It's called constructive interference.
And then when you have another period, when one wave runs from another, Then one wave is in maximum and another wave is in minimum.
This is called destructive interference.
Summation with amplitude gives you nearly zero, and this is what we are having in ground solar minimum, especially in cycle 26.
Okay.
Subtract this amplitude, and this resulting amplitude becomes small.
So that was my next question, is sort of where are we right now on planet Earth in these cycles that you described?
But you just said that the minimum is reached in 2026.
Is that what you just said?
No, the ground solar minimum started already in 2020.
It started slowly moving.
But at the moment, the maximum minimum will be in cycle 26, which will be 2031 to 2043, something like that, during that.
So the old ground-solar minimum will start showing after Sun passes maximum of cycle 25 in which it is now.
Okay.
We need another two years, maybe three, to Sun passes cycle 25 maximum and start going to the descending phase.
Oh, okay.
In the descending phase, this is where everything will start happening.
Alright, so you're saying then cycle 26, and I'm not sure where that number comes from.
We cycle now 25, so we are at maximum.
It will be finished by another six, seven years, so it's 2023 plus 2030, 2031.
So by that time, cycle 25 will be finished.
When it goes to descending phase, it will be after three years.
From 2026, it starts declining, solar activity starts declining.
And this is when solar activity is declining, we get less radiation, we get less particles, not only to Earth, but to all other planets.
And so we have less heating.
And this is when we start feeling this ground solar minimum.
So, yeah, I want to ask you about the effects on Earth, of course.
Cooling, crop yields will be impacted, obviously.
Ocean, you know, thermal effects.
But how long does this, then, minimum last?
Maybe we should just be looking at your charts, but...
Beginning in early 2030s.
The previous Grand Solar Minimum was Mount Minimum, which was 17th century.
Probably you read a lot what happened.
They had six cycles when the solar activity was depressed.
So we know that all rivers, including Donabe, Thames, are frozen.
They had ice.
They had ice going to the...
To the villages and from the mountains.
So it was very cold.
People felt very cold.
Because it was six cycles, it was an absolute minimum, much bigger than this one.
The current one, ground-solar minimum, will last only three solar cycles.
It is cycle 25, which is now.
Then after 2031 to 2042, it will be cycle 26.
And the next cycle is 27.
From 42 until 53.
So this is when...
And after 53, sun returns back to normal.
This wave started running with constructive interference and the solar activity will be again the same for another 300, 340 years.
Now then, historically, whenever something similar to this has happened, we've seen the fall of civilizations, correct?
Well, yes.
In the...
The Europeans managed to survive during Mount the Minimum, but previously it could be very cold.
They're not ice, period.
They're not completely ice like the When the dinosaurs die, it will be much softer.
The temperature decrease is about 1 Celsius, so it is not that dramatic.
To get this ice period cold, it happens in 100,000 years, it's called the Milankovitch cycle, and it is defined by the orbit and inclination of the Earth towards the Sun.
So everything defined how Earth moves around the Sun and how nicely it's inclined towards the Sun or outside the Sun.
If Earth would be standing vertically, it will be a different story.
So we are very lucky that we have some inclination and at the moment we have 22.4 degrees inclination and this is why we have Yes, absolutely.
It's not ice age.
It is a grand solar minimum.
It's only one degree drop.
But when you say one degree, first of all, that's a Celsius degree, which is, of course, much larger than a Fahrenheit degree.
And then secondly, that's the global average temperature dropping by one degree, which is a very substantial drop.
Absolutely.
And the implications on crop yields, especially in countries that have marginal food production, where the growing seasons are already very short, this will cause those growing seasons to be substantially shortened, correct?
Yes, but even the countries who have very long production for crops, like Spain and southern countries, They will be affected by the cold.
Remember we had, I think a couple of years ago, we had snow in April in Spain when all the green greeneries were frozen out.
Or we had snow in Morocco last year when we had supplies of all our salads and everything.
We didn't have this supply for a month until they found another one.
So this is when What was happening during the grand solar minimum, the reduction of UV radiation from the Sun, because of reduction of solar activity, because of this grand solar minimum, will cause a reduction of ozone in the Earth's atmosphere.
This reduction causes these northern jets from Arctic, And we've seen this northern jet last year when it was a huge frost in Canada and North-West America.
Or in Russia, they had frost minus 50, minus 60, which they never had before last year.
They will be increasing more and more, and this is because Sun does not send us enough radiation which we used to have, and this is why the North makes excursions towards the lower latitude.
And the further it develops, the deeper to the lower latitudes these excursion jets will be, so they will catch Spain as well.
This is why, I don't know if you're aware, but very entrepreneurial Chinese businessmen, they're buying the land in Africa because possibly the only African land will be able to produce all the greeneries and all the food which is required when the most of the grand solar minimum will come.
This is really alarming what you're saying because, of course, many of the crops that are grown in Spain, let's say, or coastal regions of France and so on, they cannot handle a deep freeze, right?
Exactly.
And so all it takes is one cold jet from the north to come in and freeze out crops and orchards that can take a decade to restore, right?
I mean, even in the United States, in Florida, you know, we have citrus orchards.
And in California, we have avocado orchards and so on, and macadamia nut orchards all over even North Africa and so on.
But those can be destroyed and devastated.
And it sounds like what you're saying is that the Europeans, even though they may be able to heat their homes, the question is, where is the food going to come from globally to feed all these populations?
Exactly.
Good question.
And I really feel that those who promote pertaining global warming and denying the existence of a grand solar minimal because their cords cannot reproduce even mount the minimum.
So the temperature cords run by the IPCC, they cannot reproduce ground solar minimum.
They don't have the tools.
So they say, oh, it didn't exist.
People exaggerated.
This is what.
But it did exist because there were many mentions about Mount Minimum and this one, it is upon us and we cannot do anything.
They can say it could be hit, but But when you come to the winter, the further we do, we will see snow, and in some years, in the 30s, we will see snow possibly in May and June.
Well, in fact, let me ask you then, what could exacerbate this issue?
Because, of course, we are all told by the establishment press and the governments of the world and the IPCC, which, by the way, in my opinion, is engaged in data fabrication.
The IPCC tells us that the issue is global warming, and so there have been suggestions to do things like to engage in stratospheric aerosol injection, which is to block solar radiation, and Under no circumstances because it's a huge pollution and people get These diseases, breathing this, whatever they put into the atmosphere.
It should not be allowed.
Exactly.
No, no, no.
But, yeah, exactly.
But on that point, what I want to ask you is, should they succeed in stratospheric aerosol injection or blocking the sun, or perhaps a supervolcano goes off during this time and, you know, ejects additional particulate matter into the atmosphere, further blocking solar radiation from reaching the surface, What are the implications of that if it happens during the grand solar minimum?
It will become even cooler, much cooler.
By the way, we published also papers on that website that cycle 26 will have maximum of volcanic eruptions.
Not only the Sun goes into the hibernation sleeping mode, But volcanic eruptions become maximal, whatever we haven't seen before, and they contribute to the reduction of the temperature very dramatically.
Good that you mentioned it, but this paper was also published, and you can find it on our website under the publications.
And this paper was accepted twice, once to the Nature, and we got Accepted, proofread, paid the fee.
Suddenly they've seen that I'm predicting ground-solar minimum, they decided to withdraw the paper.
Of course.
The same what happened with Astrophysical Journal.
Paper was accepted, proofread, and suddenly The editor-in-chief, Vishnia, came to me and said, oh, we don't publish an astrophysical journal statistical analysis of Vulcano.
And they also decided to withdraw the paper.
So obviously they're very, very afraid to Hear or see the truth.
Well, we have witnessed the same thing, by the way, in medicine, medical journals recently, very selectively censoring conclusions that they don't want to see.
But I want to ask you about the Hunga Tonga volcano eruption, right, which is relatively recent.
And apparently that ejected water vapor particles very high, I think, into the stratosphere, if I'm not mistaken.
Yes.
And that had a measurable effect on cooling of certain regions that were covered by that, right?
Absolutely, absolutely.
It's only the small One volcano.
And imagine when it will be a series of volcanic eruptions.
So it will be much more effective.
But you're absolutely correct.
I agree, Paul.
So is there a link then between volcanic activity and grand solar minimums?
Or is it just coincidence that these two things are happening at the same time?
We've done statistical analysis between curve of frequency of volcanic eruptions and variation of these Summary curve of our magnetic field eigenvectors and correlation is 67%.
Wow.
67%.
So it is not random.
It is basically induced by the Sun.
What's the theory of the mechanism by which volcanic activity is increased during Grand Solar Minimum?
It is what I understand.
I'm not a specialist in volcanic eruptions, but We found that the increase of volcanic eruption is when the eigenvectors summary curve has southern polarity.
And it means that it is a much stronger geomagnetic interaction between solar magnetic field and Earth magnetic field, which causes a lot of geomagnetic disturbances.
It's not magic, it is absolutely physically defined.
So you get magnetic field of particular polarity, which interacts much more effectively with the magnetic field of the Earth, It is inclined, the Earth is inclined to the Sun, and then if it interacts very effectively, it means that we have more disturbances on the Earth, we have more sunquake, we have more volcanoes, and you name it, we have geomagnetic storms, you name it, everything.
So this will be coming.
So is there a point where you believe the evidence of the grand solar minimum cycles and especially temperatures dropping in years ahead will overwhelm the current narrative of global warming and at some point authorities will have to acknowledge reality?
Definitely after three years we start seeing this.
Global warming will be in more history.
This is why they're saying, quicker, quicker, do it.
Contribute, put all this thing, because they know after three years, everyone will see.
It is not true, to say softly.
What will be the impact, in your view, of the carbon sequestration projects that are being constructed to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere?
It is a disaster.
You know, carbon is a very good gas.
Every garden center...
They put carbon to increase greenery growing in the garden center.
So the more carbon, the greener the planet.
That's true.
At the moment, our carbon is very low.
The planet was much greener in previous million years, so we are not even remotely close that it is dangerous.
And moreover, increase of the carbon is the consequence of increase of the temperature and not the reason.
You know, this is completely twisted, you know, reason and consequence.
Obviously, they had very poor education.
They cannot find the The links between reason and consequence.
It is not only my opinion, it is opinion of the man who founded the Greenpeace.
It is Patrick Moore who wrote the book about it and many others who confirm and there's even cosmic rays, the guys who during the minimal selectivity increase cosmic rays and they also say that Everything is defined by the sun.
So we need carbon.
We don't need to remove it.
We need it more because it is not bad for the planet.
It is very good for the planet.
We need more greeneries.
We don't have the desert.
Let me add to that.
It's very clear.
We've covered a lot of this published science where higher concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere not only produce higher crop yields, but they actually increase the nutritive quality of the food that is grown, right?
So if you're talking about a grand solar minimum that's going to take us from essentially now through the year 2053 in various areas, Degrees.
And food shortages around the world.
The last thing that the world should be doing is taking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, which would further reduce crop yields.
It will be reduced anyway because the temperature drops.
So it will be enough harm that it is reduced.
But now they won't artificially reduce it.
So I think this is a special program to reduce the population of the Earth.
Because I don't see any other reason what they're doing, putting these idiotic electric cars which cannot be run in the hot, in the cold or long distances, which cannot repair because our car insurance company refused to actually insure electric cars because the repair is very expensive and so on.
And this is what they now want to do, Even this small amount of carbon that we have now in the anticipation of grand solar minimum, this is a disaster.
They want to kill more people.
This is what my perception is.
Well, I agree with your conclusion.
It's an inescapable conclusion.
And I knew this when I saw their war on carbon dioxide.
I was in the 10th grade in high school.
It was a high school biology class when I first learned about photosynthesis.
And it seems like everyone has forgotten that one of the inputs is carbon dioxide and another is sunlight.
And the third is water.
And if you take away two of the three, you don't get photosynthesis.
If you reduce two out of the three, even you reduce them a little, you get sharp reductions in botany, plant physiology, which drives the ecosystems of the oceans and the land and the animals and human civilization, correct?
Right.
Correct, yeah.
So the man with basic logics and understanding, you understand the harm they're doing.
So obviously those who are working with IPCC, they lack of these basic logics.
It's incredible.
Or they deliberately deny it to get funding.
This is what, if they have big purpose, To get funding and become rich beyond comprehension.
It doesn't matter what happens in 30 years because they will be gone and then humankind needs to deal without them.
So these two versions, either they do not understand and this is beyond their comprehension or they do understand it very nicely but deliberately still do it to promote themselves.
Because everyone wants to be famous.
Famous and rewarded by Nobel Prize, like Al Gore for the rubbish.
Right, right.
But famous for genocide, perhaps, is kind of what they're heading towards.
But I also get the feeling that if the public had more...
Knowledge of science and mathematics, they wouldn't be bamboozled, as we say, by claims that carbon dioxide is a pollutant.
Because again, like I said, I learned photosynthesis in the 10th grade.
I don't think they teach that in the 10th grade anymore.
Exactly!
They reduce the program.
We have these jokes in the United Kingdom where they teach mathematics from 50 years ago until now.
It is simply ridiculous.
I think they've done it deliberately.
Reducing the knowledge of people allows them to rule those people much easier.
And this is where they can put any rubbish because people cannot deny only fuel.
Those who educated well and who still remember, like you and me, mathematics, what they told, and we say, no, no, this is not going to happen.
And it is much easier to shut down a few.
Either they throw them out from job or start rejecting their papers and so on than to have a pressure from many people.
This is why I'm doing popularization through the website and these talks.
I'm trying to educate people.
I obtain every day possibly about 10, 15 emails, and I try to reply to people, explain.
They ask questions.
They don't have answers.
They have, like, your natural curiosity and some basic logic, and they understood what they were said is not what they see.
And they're asking, what do you say?
And I explain to them, this is what you see, and this is what the difference between what is said and what is going on in reality.
I'm really glad you said that, of what's going on in reality, because here on Earth, dominated by the psychological warfare, you might say, of the establishments and the so-called authorities, they can fake a lot of things.
They can fake data, they can fake scientific studies, or they can censor Legitimate papers, or they can lie to the public, they can count on people being ignorant about photosynthesis, for example.
They can do a lot of fakery, a lot of propaganda, but they can't fake the sun.
They can't change the sun's activity.
Exactly.
And so, eventually, reality arrives.
Yeah, this is what we would never be able to prove they're wrong.
This is why they're afraid of so grand solar minimum, because whatever I was saying, if we wouldn't come into a period of grand solar minimum, I wouldn't have evidence that the sun rules our planet.
But when the temperatures start dropping and snow coming in May and June, it will be live evidence.
It doesn't matter what they say.
They may say, we reduce CO2, this is why snow coming in June.
Because they're twisting the truth.
But I'm telling you, before they reduce CO2, it will be snow, it will be cold, because it's ground-solar minimum.
And only ground-solar minimum proves that the Sun is the only boiler in the solar system, the only source of heating, nothing else.
Alright, very important point, that giant fusion generator in the sky without which all of us would die.
What are the implications of the grand solar minimum on ocean ecosystems?
Oh, we just prepared the paper.
Hopefully, it will be published soon.
Actually, the level of the ocean follows the temperature variations.
So, it will be It will be probably reduction a little bit of temperature because Some water will be frozen, but not much dramatic.
So it will be more snow, but still water will be there.
But I'm thinking about the solar radiation that's penetrating the surface and providing energy to the ocean life, the plants, and the whole web of life of the ocean ecosystems.
What are the implications there?
Well...
It will probably reduce the radiation, but I did mention here, on top of this ground solar minimum, which actually activity on the sun is reduced, we have a different effect which causes real global warming.
So, the global warming increase of the temperature is real, but it doesn't come from CO2. It comes because the sun It's dragged in from its position in the center of ellipse, in the focus of ellipse of the Earth's orbit.
It's dragged in by the gravity of large planets towards the direction of the spring equinox for the northern hemisphere in some way in March.
So in March, April, May, June, July, the Sun is much closer to the Earth's orbit and it becomes closer and closer with every year from 1600 to 2600.
This is why we get global warming and this is why we have heating of the ocean in the southern hemisphere because when the Sun comes closer to the planet it Earth looking to the Sun with the southern hemisphere so that all the Pacific Indian Ocean are heated and we got this ENSO and others forming there.
So this is why we got this global warming.
So we have two effects.
One is on the Sun itself and another is orbital motion of the planet Earth and the Sun itself.
So Sun is not sitting in the focus of the ellipse, but it migrates.
It's like, look to it.
It's called the Flicking, flickering.
And these astrophysicists know this effect of wobbling stars because how do they look for exoplanets?
They look at the stars which have this flickering of the luminosity.
If they have the current luminosity, it indicates that possibly this star has a planetary system which also moves the star from the focus of the orbit I'm very curious about how much impact that has, but let me help translate that to the audience.
So the oscillations of the Sun out of the focus of the elliptical orbit path of Earth, yeah, you're right, that's well known.
There are, in fact, two star systems out there where the two stars orbit each other.
Essentially, they wobble each other, and the sun moves towards the earth as the earth moves around the sun.
But I'm curious about how much impact that could have, because we're talking about enormous distance, and small perturbations in that location wouldn't seem to make that much of a difference.
I publish a book chapter.
If you go on my website, It is called millennial oscillation of the solar radiance.
Okay.
And I've shown how much distance.
The distance between sun and earth is changing from about 0.11 thousandths of astronomical units.
It's a big distance, about 2 to 4 radios of the sun.
So it's much closer.
It is not a small amount.
Okay.
All right.
Well, I'm fascinated by that.
I would love to read that.
We have this global warming.
This is why when we published paper in 2019, again in The Nature, when we discovered that magnetic field of the Sun changes with the period of 2,100 years, and we suggested this is because Sun and Earth's distance is changing.
At that time, I didn't have ephemerates of the Sun.
And anthropogenic global warming people made campaign against our paper and within half a year they made the editors retract the paper on the basis that the distance between sun and earth doesn't change.
Oh, well, obviously it does change.
I'm just wondering how little or large the change is.
At that time, it started COVID, and we put everyone on the lockdown, and I was sitting at home doing nothing.
So what I thought, I download ephemerides of the distant sun and earth.
Within two millennia, from 600 to 2600.
And this is how my chapter appeared.
I've proven the distant changes.
I came back to the editor and said, excuse me, write me an apology and restore the paper.
I said, no, we will not do it.
You can write a new paper and so on.
So they're afraid to do it.
But they basically lied.
But this paper is the most accessible paper.
You know how many people access this paper because it's been retracted?
It's already 20,000.
None of my paper has read it because they did biggest advertising because obviously I found something Relevant.
And now I've proven these distance changes.
And because of these distance changes, now we measured how much the temperature, how much the solar radiation changes.
We put these solar radiation points, how much it changes onto the temperature, and it follows very nicely the measurements.
I see.
Okay.
This is the paper's first coming.
Well, yeah, I'm going to have to obviously take a look at that paper because this is fascinating to me.
And I would also point out to the audience that, you know, the distance between the Earth and the moon is also not a constant.
Yeah, absolutely.
Yeah, I mean, I think even NASA would admit that.
Yeah, yeah.
They look at the exoplanet, they know this wobbling star, they know the star wobbling.
Again, we come back that only solar physicists, whatever, Gavin Smith and his team, they don't have basic education, they don't know basic physics, basic astrophysics.
It's extraordinary.
I am shocked by just the lack of basic logic that we now see across society.
Not just mathematical illiteracy, but I'm talking about the abandonment of cause and effect, the abandonment of logic, just the unwillingness to engage in reason.
Yeah, this is...
I can understand.
But, you know, I was born in Ukraine, in the former Soviet Union, but everything was suppressed.
We were not allowed to have opinions.
We grew up to have our opinions discussed in the kitchens and pick what required in the official sites.
And I thought, when I moved to the West, I thought, okay, at least here I can openly say what I'm thinking.
And it turned out to some extent.
Now, I can't.
They're just restricting the truth.
This becomes very, very unpleasant, I would say.
Well, the West has borrowed...
The West has become the thought police of the former Soviet Union, that's for sure, and including in science.
They have a war there, war after war, they have this ideas, oh my god.
I'm Ukrainian, by the way, native, so I'm struggling for my country and hope we win eventually.
But these are all intertwined, isn't it?
Because I think humanity cannot find peace and abundance if the world has abandoned reason.
And so it's all kind of a bigger picture.
And also, think about, although we do have to wrap this up, we're almost out of time, but think about how many people will be suffering from starvation and famine.
Oh, absolutely.
Right, the destruction.
By mines and others, we cannot put crop because you need first remove the mines and allow people to come with the equipment there.
Absolutely.
So you cannot do this.
People will be And the same other countries where they have the war.
My heart is now with Israel and everything.
And everything bad comes from Russia and Iran, their friends Iran.
I believe, by the way, the main promoter of the anthropogenic global warming are Native Russians who now work in the Western institution.
Really?
It's strange.
Somehow it's coincided.
Well, that's interesting because I would add to your list what we call the neocons in America.
The neocons are pushing the global warming hoax and, of course, all kinds of other programs that harm humanity.
Instead of thinking about ways, how can we help human beings become more abundant, more self-reliant, have better nutrition, better food, better health, better peace?
I think they sit in their dungeons and they plot the destruction of our world, frankly.
I think that's what they do.
Absolutely.
I believe, it is my personal opinion, I do not accuse anyone, but I believe it is a special program by Russia and China to destroy Western economy and put these two countries above any other countries.
Well, it's working.
It is absolutely working.
The West is committing economic suicide because of all this nonsense.
Exactly.
Okay, Professor Zarkova, I apologize we're out of time, but I want to give out your website, solargsm.com, and I really want to thank you for joining us today because this has been a really fascinating discussion.
I very much enjoy speaking with you because you and I can have an informed talk, which is so rare these days.
I'm happy to speak with you.
And if you have further questions, you can send me an email.
I'm happy to explain any further issues.
And give me a link later.
I will connect it to my website.
Okay.
Listen to our talk.
We will do that.
Yeah, we'll get this out in a few days.
We'll send you a link.
And again, thank you so much for taking the time to join us.
And we wish you well.
We'll talk again.
Thank you very much.
Ciao.
Thank you.
Bye-bye.
And thank all of you for watching today.
Of course, Mike Adams here, brighteon.com.
Hope you enjoyed that fascinating interview.
Feel free to share it everywhere.
And you can just, you know, copy and paste the whole video if you wish.
Put it on other channels and other platforms as well.
And remember, the link to her website is SolarGSM, which stands for Grand Solar Minimum.
So thank you for watching today.
God bless you all.
Take care.
Thank you for all your support of our platforms and healthrangerstore.com.
And we have a new certified organic product that is very practical and important right now given world events.
It is a certified organic version of our nascent iodine.
Here it is, nascent atomic iodine.
Our Groovy Bee brand.
And it's made with certified organic glycerin.
So, of course, iodine itself, being an element, can't be organic or inorganic.
I mean, the organic certification doesn't make sense when talking about just an element, just iodine.
But the glycerin, which is the bulk of what's in this product, and it makes it very delicious to taste, by the way.
Iodine can be pretty harsh when it's in alcohol, and iodine itself can taste pretty wild.
In this glycerin format, at the right concentration, and it's organic glycerin, it's very easy to take.
People love this formulation.
And it's also easy for children to take, and even where appropriate for animals, you can mix it in with their food very easily in this way.
No alcohol, and the glycerin is all organic.
So this is the nascent atomic iodine formulation, available now at healthrangerstore.com.
Here's the three-pack.
We've got it available in different quantities.
And believe me, as things start to really pop off in the Middle East, Everybody's going to want to have the additional protection of iodine for thyroid support, among other purposes.
And I use iodine for a number of applications, including, I use it topically, but I use the alcohol version for topical applications.
This, with the glycerin, is best for oral ingestion.
Just use it as directed.
Iodine is a heavy element, which means you can overdose on it, so don't go chugging bottles of iodine.
That would be crazy.
It's always a good idea to check with your naturopathic practitioner of how much iodine is appropriate for you.
Maybe they can check your levels and determine how much that you need on an ongoing basis.
It's not much.
It's, you know, micrograms per day technically is all that a human being needs in terms of iodine.
But if you're not getting it from other sources, i.e., if you're not eating a lot of seaweed, then you're probably not getting much iodine in your diet.
Like Japanese do, because they eat so much seaweed, they get a lot of natural iodine.
But for most of us, we don't get much.
Even the iodized salt is only given enough iodine to just barely prevent obvious diseases caused by iodine deficiency.
So iodine supplementation can be very, very beneficial.
And this is the first form we've ever had available that is the nascent atomic iodine in a certified organic, USDA organic format.
And it's also lab tested in our laboratory to make sure it doesn't contain heavy metals, glyphosate, microbiology.
I don't even see how microbes could live in this substance, by the way.
But we do all the testing, so we have all the internal lab certifications for safety in addition to all the label claims and the organic certification as well.
So check it out at healthrangerstore.com.
Get yourself prepared.
This will be a really powerful barter item as well, depending on What takes place next in the Middle East or elsewhere, maybe involving Russia, who knows?
This will be a very valuable barter item to have, probably better than cash, at least for anybody who knows the value of iodine.
And we will be completely blown out of this when events start to happen.
We don't price gouge, so we're not going to make the price ten times higher as some operators do.
Instead, we'll just sell everything at the same current price, but it'll be sold out very, very quickly, and it'll be a long time before we'll be able to get additional iodine once world events take place.
We may never get iodine, depending on what happens.
We'll see.
We'll do our best to bring it to you, but thank you for your support.
Again, HealthRangerStore.com.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection