Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 11, 2023 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:34:15

Dr. Paul Cottrell drops bombshells on the "turbo cancer" following covid and the jabs

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to today's featured interview with Dr.
	Paul Cottrell, who returns with us because, well, he was going to teach us about cancers and hyperacceleration of cancers due to COVID and also COVID vaccines, and we kind of ran out of time last time.
	It was a fascinating interview a couple of weeks ago, but he's back to pick up where he left off there.
	His website is TheStudioReikivik.
	We'll put that on screen for you.
	And welcome, Dr.
	Cottrell.
	It's great to have you back on.
	Thank you for having me, Mike.
	Well, you know, we ran out of time last time, but you were just about to jump into the issue of cancers.
	And let me start off with the hint that you mentioned offscreen that you are talking with physicians and oncologists and so on, cancer specialists, who are telling you, as I understand it, that they're seeing crazy acceleration of cancer or even people are dying more quickly who have been diagnosed with cancer.
	Is that what you're telling me?
	Or please clarify.
	Well, individuals that are reaching out to me are saying that they are seeing higher incidence of cancers, especially at a younger age group, and that these cancers are staged at a higher level than normal.
	So instead of seeing it at stage 2, they may be seeing it at stage 3.
	Instead of seeing it at 65 years old, maybe they're seeing it at 45 years old.
	So this thing is happening.
	It's an ongoing event.
	And it's going to get worse over time as we move into what I call the chronic phase post-COVID era.
	So then you research and document this at a physiological level, and you've posted documents, I understand, on your website, which we'll get to.
	But you are, as I understand it, what you're going to explain here today is how both SARS-CoV-2 itself and the mRNA vaccines are both accelerating cancer growths in people?
	Yes.
	This issue is happening at the virus level and at the vaccine level.
	And the mechanisms are different, so it's important to explain those different mechanisms.
	Alright, and before we get started, let me just real quickly.
	You're currently in medical school.
	You have a doctorate in another area.
	At some point, you will also be a doctor of medicine here.
	But I consider you to be a brilliant researcher.
	You have a lot of financial charts behind you.
	You've done a lot in finance and money throughout the past.
	I just want people to know a little bit of your background.
	Yeah, well, you know, I used to be an automotive engineer when I was born and raised in Michigan.
	So, you know, I had a lot of years in automotive design and engineering and decided to go into finance.
	Ended up getting a PhD in finance, modeling markets, using chaos theory.
	I managed a decent-sized portfolio for Catholic Charities for many years.
	And when my brother passed away from heart disease, I decided to go into medicine.
	Wow.
	I'm sorry to hear that.
	I mean, I'm sorry to hear about your brother, but I'm glad you went into medicine.
	Maybe there's a divine purpose for everything, perhaps.
	But before we get into the cancer issue, can I just ask you your thoughts on the current banking system and how there's so much unrealized losses in the banks, and we're seeing that banks that have made loans to real estate investors have They're facing a $1.5 trillion loss in real estate loans over the next few years.
	I mean, I know we didn't plan for this, but do you mind just taking that off the cuff there?
	Yeah.
	Well, I mean, you know, banks are having problems because they had to shore up their balance sheet buying treasuries.
	And they bought treasuries at a higher yield, which is, you know, so that basically means at a lower price because it's inversely related.
	Well, as the The bond market is being disrupted from the Federal Reserve.
	It's causing stress on their balance sheets.
	On top of when COVID happened, a lot of individuals, especially in New York, a lot of companies haven't reached 100% of capacity of their workforce working at the office.
	And probably never will.
	On top of we're going to be moving towards recessionary conditions and people are going to get laid off.
	We're already starting to hear that with Amazon and Apple and everything.
	So what's going to happen is that these real estate companies that need to roll over their debt won't be able to because they won't have leasees.
	No one's renting.
	And this probably is another shoe that will drop in around 2025.
	So then, this is an important segue into what you did want to talk about, because the cancer acceleration that you're about to really lay out for us here, this also, this takes...
	Productive lives out of the workforce.
	And so there is an economic impact, which you may know Ed Dowd.
	I interviewed him last week about this very issue.
	They've attempted to really kind of nail down the economic costs of the disabilities, the injuries, and the deaths.
	And it's something like $149 billion so far, I think, that has accrued according to his math.
	But the economic implications of what you're talking about here are absolutely enormous, almost immeasurable.
	Exactly.
	What are your thoughts on that?
	Oh, absolutely.
	Absolutely.
	You know, with long COVID and individuals getting vaccine injury and this chronic phase that I'm talking about in the post-COVID era, there's going to be less people that are as vibrant and they're not going to be able to perform as well.
	So, you know, we're going to have a labor force that will be declining in health.
	Unless we radically find a solution to all these problems that are starting to pop up.
	Long COVID is a very real thing, and it affects someone's employment.
	Not only that, you know, if other pathogens start to arise, which I think they will, that are forcefully released from labs, when that does happen, there are new pathologies that start to take hold, and people will be fearful, and we'll have another round of these vaccine mandates, and that will cause more strife within the society.
	Okay, so you're getting into...
	People may back out of the labor force just to prevent being vaccinated.
	I see it a lot in medicine.
	There's a lot of people that are saying, I am not going to take a booster or be forced to do all these vaccine shots just to get a check in the box by the admin so I can work at the ER. I'm just going to check out.
	At the end of the year, I'm going to retire or whatever.
	A lot of people are leaving medicine because of it.
	You're seeing that even in New York City?
	Because that's where you're based.
	Yes.
	I mean, I've talked to people that are gastroenterologists that have very good practices, and they said they're tired of the administration burden and the CDC forcing how to practice.
	No kidding.
	And they're checking out in five years.
	Okay, so...
	Let's get to the core of what you wanted to present, but can I ask you, Dr.
	Cottrell, try to translate this into simpler terms for everybody, because you're nerding out on all the physiology day in and day out, and you could talk for hours on this, but kind of give us the overview of how these viruses are causing cancer or accelerating cancer, and then how the mRNA vaccines are doing so as well.
	I mean, I know you want to take us down the rabbit hole, but do the best you can to keep it in a summary format.
	All right.
	Okay, I'll try.
	Okay.
	It starts with people realizing that these cancers can be caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the S1 subunit by the coded vaccines.
	All right?
	So there's two lines of thought here.
	So let me start with the easier one, which is the vaccine...
	When someone gets a vaccine, these coded vaccines, it's starting to code within the cytoplasm.
	And there are perturbations that take place in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus that will lead to a change of how the cell is supposed to work.
	There's research that already has been published and people that...
	You know, have discussed that even on your show about this, and how there's an integration of these coded vaccines that go right into the genome.
	Right.
	And, you know, it's through line one, there's reverse transcription, there's an integrase capability that we didn't know that cells had, do have, if they have enough, you know, inflammatory signaling.
	So, Integration of this code can happen and disrupt tumor suppressor genes or activate oncogenes.
	Another method is that these coded vaccines, their code, especially the messenger RNA one, is single-stranded.
	And when it's single-stranded, it can break apart and act as a microRNA.
	When a microRNA happens, I'm trying my best.
	It's okay.
	But the microRNA is a complement to other messenger RNAs that your cell makes that needs to prevent cancers.
	So what that means is that the micro RNA from a messenger RNA vaccine, if broken up in such a way, can act as as a inhibitor of messenger RNAs that we need to prevent cancer.
	So it's that's the that is another method of acceleration of these cancers.
	So it's the genomic integration and also the micro RNA complement that shuts down our tumor suppressor pathways.
	So let me let me offer this context for listeners.
	There are cancerous cells in everybody's body, right?
	Cancerous cells are, I don't know if you could say, an organic part of the process of running a complex physiological organism.
	But normally your body can seek out and hunt down and eliminate those cancerous cells.
	And you're saying then that this anti-cancer mechanism is being suppressed.
	By the single-strand mRNA.
	That's one mechanism.
	That messenger RNA breaks apart.
	It doesn't stay completely one unit.
	It breaks apart.
	And those segments can act In some cases as a micron RNA that will inhibit tumor suppressor pathways.
	I see.
	Okay.
	And it doesn't take many because one vaccine injection contains what?
	How many billion strings of mRNA?
	A lot.
	Okay.
	A lot.
	Not just that.
	We know that the vaccine and the virus can perturb the virus Our immune system will start to do recombination, right?
	To come up with the topology for the actual antibody that it's trying to create.
	And it goes through antibody switching and it does a lot of recombination.
	Well, when you inhibit the DNA repair mechanism, all right, then you're Your immune system starts to go down.
	When your immune system starts to go down, this is another vector of how the cancers are allowed to continue.
	So you have cytoplasmic through microRNA that will shut down the tumor suppressor pathways.
	You have genomic instability that's taking place that may lead to tumor genesis, either through oncogenes or turning down The tumor suppressor genes.
	And then you have the perturbation on our immune system to not seek, preventing ourselves from seeking and destroying cancer cells.
	And this, when all these things are happening, you start to see what we call in the modern parliaments a, you know, this super tumor growth or, you know, I can't even say it now.
	Cancers will increase at a much faster rate.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Let me put a marker there.
	That's a little edit marker.
	We'll edit that out for you.
	Okay, so then a couple of questions, Dr.
	Cottrell.
	Is there an estimated percentage of suppression of the anti-cancer capabilities of the immune system?
	Are we talking just a minor suppression of 10% or more like 50% or 90%?
	And then my second question to you so far is, people are familiar with a lot of anti-cancer lifestyle choices, diet, Vitamin D, superfoods, you know, all kinds of phytonutrients that are known to boost immune function and help prevent cancer, for example.
	What's the interaction there?
	I mean, can people make healthier food choices and compensate for this, or does that not necessarily overcome this?
	Well, you know, when you say in terms of percentages...
	You know, not everyone is going to get cancer from the vaccine or from the virus, but there are people that have a predisposition, right?
	And our lifestyle in the modern day has added to that predisposition, all right?
	So the way I describe this is that we had pre-COVID a baseline for cancer.
	Everyone will get cancer if they live long enough, right?
	Hopefully you catch it early and you get treatment.
	Usually it's, you know, surgical treatment of some sort, right?
	But if you live long enough, you are going to get cancer, right?
	Some people get cancer much earlier because of their predisposition.
	So everyone has an individual risk curve throughout their life that usually starts to move upward for cancer.
	Because of the COVID era, and a lot of people have been forced, vaccinated, right?
	And, you know, and or have contracted SARS-CoV-2.
	Everyone's risk curve has gone up.
	Now, we can try to lower that risk curve closer to baseline, but I don't think we'll ever get to baseline.
	Because I think, and this is where we go into the naturopathic means.
	I think that there are a lot of supplements and herbs and diet and exercise and proper mental health.
	If you look at this thing more holistically, you will most likely bring your risk curve down.
	This is why the MDs and the DOs that are listening to your show, and I know they do listen to your show, quite a few of them, We need to be more vigilant during the screening phase, especially colon, right?
	Especially blood cancers, you know, the leukemias, especially the lymphomas.
	So, you know, we have to be hypervigilant.
	You know, when we might have seen something happen more at age 50 or 60, We need to start in the medical field, we need to start thinking instead of 50, let's start thinking 40 for screening.
	We need to move that window of screening.
	Okay, let me jump in here, Dr.
	Cottrell, because I want to respond to some of that.
	See, we know that, yeah, you talk about this cancer risk curve that exists, but we know, even from my own study and many guests I've had over the years, that you can dramatically lower that curve With healthy choices, anti-cancer nutrients in foods like sulforaphane from broccoli sprouts,
	I already mentioned vitamin D, less stress, higher quality sleep, better mental health, better oral health, by the way, because bad bacteria in your mouth can actually help promote cancer, but also reducing your risk of exposure to toxic chemicals.
	That are cancer-causing chemicals in personal care products.
	There's also ionizing radiation and mammograms or high-altitude flying and hanging around near Chernobyl, let's say, or drinking Fukushima water.
	There are so many things that can change people's risk factors.
	I think that most of the people that cancer doctors see are people who don't take care of themselves.
	They have a pro-cancer lifestyle.
	You know, they're eating on barbecue all the time and not taking vitamin C to counteract that, right?
	Or they have processed food diets, not a lot of fiber to eliminate the toxins.
	They have highly inflammatory lifestyles on diets and they don't partake the nutrients in superfoods that can help fight against cancer.
	You know, it just seems to me that the cancer industry has a very distorted view of what's possible because almost everybody they see...
	No, I totally agree with that.
	I totally agree with you.
	And this is what I was saying, that, you know, with that baseline curve moving up in the post-COVID era, you know, if they don't change their lifestyle, they're more susceptible.
	Yeah.
	You know, so, you know, the way I look at it, when people say, what do you do, Paul, to kind of, you know, try to mitigate these risks?
	Because I was forced vaccinated.
	I had to take, you know, a vaccine to stay in medical school.
	I chose the Johnson& Johnson because at that time, you know, with the data that we knew, that seemed to be the least...
	You know, dirty shirt in the closet.
	Right.
	It wasn't mRNA, right?
	Right, right.
	Yeah, I definitely do.
	I would not take a messenger RNA vaccine.
	Period.
	Well, I think you made the right choice in that circumstance.
	Yeah.
	Well, and what's interesting is a lot of people that were high up in the organization of warp speed chose to take Johnson& Johnson, not the Moderna.
	So, you know, I find that very telling.
	But there are vaccine injuries that can take place with the Johnson& Johnson.
	It is a coded vaccine.
	It's through an adenovirus.
	It's a DNA. But it's not as problematic, such as Moderna, because of the whole messenger RNA package.
	But ones that are listening...
	You know, let's take, I don't know if you know Dr.
	Cole or not, but, you know, I think he's right.
	Yeah.
	You know, I think he's right.
	You know, all right, we're past the Rubicon.
	A lot of people were forced to take the vaccine.
	Or we're convinced to take the vaccine on faulty data.
	And, all right, let's learn from that and not get a booster.
	Do not, I mean, I know this sounds dangerous to say, especially with me being at medical school, but I do not recommend people getting boosters because what's going to happen is you're increasing your chances of these things that I'm talking about, these long COVID, you know, type syndromes or, you know, turbo cancers or whatever, right?
	So, I totally agree with you, Mike.
	It's about trying to mitigate the risk and bring down that risk curve that I'm talking about back to baseline.
	I don't believe at this moment in time, until further data comes out, that we'll be able to get our risk curves back to baseline.
	But maybe, maybe something will happen and we can.
	The way I look at this is a three-pillar process.
	A lot of research has happened in the last 20-30 years in the aging research world, anti-aging world, however you want to phrase it.
	We can learn from that how to slow down the aging process to try to bring our risk curve back down closer to baseline pre-COVID. And those three pillars are basically this.
	Reduce inflammation, neutralize pathogens so you're not chronically fighting infections, and very strong antioxidants.
	Now, you can hang a lot of other stuff, you know, vitamin Cs and, you know, and B vitamins and...
	Anthocyanins, man.
	Anthocyanins are, you know, the purple pigments in your food, very potent against the spike protein, I understand.
	You know, so the point that I'm making is that if your body is chronically inflamed, if your body is constantly fighting infections, If your body is constantly in stress, then your immune system is lowered.
	We already have an immune system that is somewhat truncated because of the vaccine and or contraction of the virus.
	It just makes sense to me just to follow You know, individuals' protocols, and you interview a lot of people that have some great advice on, you know, how to do this.
	You know, I have a certain perspective on it, and it's a three-pillar system where it's basically reduce inflammation.
	You know, basically what that is, the two key ingredients from that is turmeric and ashwagandha.
	The ashwagandha controls the blood glucose levels, so you don't have the inflammatory response because of high sugar levels.
	And turmeric is known to be anti-inflammatory.
	And a very strong antioxidant that could be recharged as it's working in the body is C60. So I'm a big fan of taking C60 as a strong antioxidant.
	It's a lot stronger than vitamin C. And couple that with resveratrol because resveratrol can get rid of synest cells.
	So when you can get rid of the synest cells, the bad cells, then your adult stem cells will start to generate new cells with longer telomeres.
	So at the tissue level, you are actually younger if you base cellular age on the length of telomere.
	So I'm kind of like following what...
	The aging research has been saying in the last 30 years and trying to apply it to individuals that have chronic problems, such as cancers and other diseases that are of a chronic nature.
	So that's the way I take a look at how to approach the problem.
	It's not a cure-all.
	I think that the MDs and the DOs that are listening, please, screen your patients and More regularly for these cancers or inform your patients, you know what?
	Do self-assessment.
	Start feeling around your body, especially the lymph nodes.
	You start feeling something that is larger than you noticed before, go talk to a doctor.
	Maybe it needs to be biopsied.
	If you catch it early, you've got a lot better chance of surviving this.
	Well, that's an excellent explanation.
	If only more doctors would promote an anti-cancer lifestyle, which the DOs tend to do, by the way.
	But people need to realize, the average person, when they walk out of their house in the morning, they've already slathered 20-plus cancer-causing chemicals on their skin with their shampoo, deodorant, laundry detergent, dryer sheets, personal fragrance, skin lotion, all that stuff.
	It's all cancer-causing stuff.
	It goes right through the skin.
	And then they're eating fried foods and toxic foods and homogenized garbage.
	It's like, hey, what did you expect?
	This is what I say to people.
	What did you expect?
	Look at your pantry.
	Look at your products in your bathroom.
	Look at what you're eating.
	Look at your microwaving all your food.
	What did you expect?
	I mean, if you believe in cause and effect, of course you're going to get cancer.
	Stop leading a pro-cancer lifestyle.
	Exactly.
	But very few doctors teach people anything about cancer.
	Yeah, I think there's a new crop of doctors that are coming out.
	And it's just starting where there is more integrative medicine.
	It has to be.
	Yeah.
	Try to prevent disease progression by proper diet, exercise, supplementation.
	And, you know, if you do have patients that, you know, have further complications, then you may need to go down the route that's more the allopathic route.
	So, but, you know, but the whole point here is that it's not all doom and gloom, right?
	Not everyone is going to get cancer and their life is truncated by 10, 15 years.
	But the point here is that we are at a change in system dynamics.
	All right.
	And our pre-COVID social dynamics, especially when it comes to health care, right, is much different or was much different than where we're at today.
	This post-COVID era is a very real thing, and so we need to start being more vigilant, all right?
	Yeah, fair enough.
	So another point here that I want to make is that we talked about the virus, the vaccine through the S1 subunit, what sort of mechanisms can happen To accelerate these cancers, these turbo cancers.
	I want to talk about, really quickly, what's going on with the virus.
	SARS-CoV-2.
	Okay, go for it.
	On the previous episode, I explained how Dr.
	Baric, the whole arc of SARS, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 going all the way back to 2001.
	This is a multi-decade virus.
	Weapon system that the United States government has been working on.
	There are different proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
	And there are NSPs, there's like 13 or 14 of them, non-specified proteins.
	So NSPs, and you have ORF proteins, the open reading frame proteins, and you have other proteins like the S protein, that's the spike, the E protein, which is the envelope for the coronavirus.
	You have the M protein.
	These proteins And I don't know if you want to show one of the links from my website, but there's a chart that we can take a look at.
	Yeah, sure.
	I'm on your medicine page right now.
	Which link is it?
	Yeah, is that it?
	Yeah, that's it.
	This is an interactome.
	Interactome basically means how does certain proteins interact with other proteins, such as proteins from the virus, interact with proteins that are in our cell.
	Now, this is why The virus is causing these turbo cancers and these accelerated cancers.
	We have certain proteins in our body, for example, LARP, L-A-R-P, 4 and 1, that actually are important with cell division.
	The There are proteins within the actual virus.
	I believe LARP is NSP12, right, for 4B. That will interact and help with cell division and help with the acceleration of these cancers.
	So my point here is that there are proteins within the virus that interact And help with cell division or turn off tumor suppressors like DDX10. DDX10 is known that if it's knocked out, leukemia start.
	We are starting to see case studies being published in PubMed about leukemias and SARS-CoV-2 patients.
	So not only do we have this interactome that's taking place with the proteins, With these other pathways within the cell causing cancer, but we can also have pieces of the genome integrate just like how the vaccine is happening,
	where human line one is activated and there's an integration of pieces of this larger 30,000 nucleotide genome coming in and perturbating our genome and causing disruption.
	There are Two really important NSPs that I am very concerned about.
	That is the NSP5 and the NSP8. They are both tied to epigenetics.
	So when you're changing the epigenetics, because we can turn on and off genes.
	Our DNA wraps around histones, right?
	But we can unravel those histones by turning on and off certain Methylization or acidulation.
	If you methylate, then you can turn off a gene.
	If you acidulate, you can turn on a gene.
	But these NSPs, 5 and 8, interact in such a way where it disrupts the epigenetics.
	When you are turning off tumor suppressor genes, you are turning on that cell to go down a path of cancer.
	Same thing.
	You can turn on Oncogenes, all right?
	So through this NSP5 and NSP8 interaction, you're changing the epigenetics of the cell.
	So even if you don't get any integration from human line one.
	So I think hopefully the crowd understands now that vaccines can cause cancer through microRNA, through disruption of the actual genomic code, through integration, right?
	Or you have SARS-CoV-2 and you have these proteins that are being created, right, from the virus, right, and interacting in such a way in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus that are disrupting tumor suppressor pathways.
	Okay.
	So hopefully people understand.
	I know the MDs would understand.
	It's like, whoa, wait a minute.
	NSP 5 and 8?
	Changes the epigenetics, then they understand genomic instability, and then they see, okay, the cell is going to move towards cancer.
	And I find it very telling that when NSP8 interacts with DDX10, it is very similar to a leukemia pathway.
	Okay, you did go down the rabbit hole there a little bit, Dr.
	Kutcher.
	So what our audience heard is that the NSPs are at war with the NPCs who took the vaccine because they believed the CDC. And they're all LARPers.
	It's a live-action role-playing game that's going on right now because it's a giant Truman show.
	That's the pop culture translation of what you just said.
	Jokes aside, a serious question for you is...
	How much of this is obviously engineered into the system?
	So we know, we talked about this last time in our interview, the gain of function, Ralph Baric, the Wuhan lab and so on, the funding from the NIAID under Fauci, clearly was intended to create a biological weapon and to have that weapon released upon humanity.
	And then clearly the vaccines are engineered or the mRNA instructions are engineered so they can choose what goes into it and what doesn't go into it.
	Based on what you know, do you believe that the cancer effects of these things are inadvertent?
	They're just side effects of this?
	Or is it possible that these immune system suppressing artifacts of what you're describing are in fact part of the engineering of these systems?
	To answer your question, I always apply the mosaic theory.
	I think the problem with ones that are in medicine or in science or the PhDs, they only focus on their own discipline and they are only focused on the tree and not the forest.
	The data point that's really important to see is what is Pfizer and Moderna talking about post-COVID era?
	Messenger RNA or cancer treatment?
	And that is leading me towards the thought process that they knew this was going to happen.
	And because it is a slower process, it's a more chronic process, it's a more latent process, then you catch SARS-CoV-2 and you have respiratory infection.
	It's a chronic kind of situation and people have goldfish memories and then once someone heals from that, Somewhat, right?
	They forget.
	Cancer, it's, you know, it's slower progressing.
	It's also a lot more lucrative than just killing people, by the way.
	There's a long-term revenue model in cancer.
	if they can keep people alive and keep extracting productivity from them via Medicare.
	Frankly, the government's paying for a lot of these treatments.
	The government's paying for the vaccines.
	Medicare is paying for the interventions, the chemotherapy, the surgery, and so on.
	So the human being, now I know I'm going deep down another rabbit hole.
	You can respond to this.
	You may not agree with all of it, but the human being is being exploited, like in the matrix, as an energy source for the economic dominance of the drug companies and the medical industrial complex.
	That's the way that we see it out here.
	What's your answer to that?
	Well, I mean, I would agree, but I would just twist it just slightly differently.
	Instead of an energy source, a revenue stream.
	Well, yeah, that's what I mean.
	Yeah, a revenue stream, just a matrix metaphor.
	Copper tops.
	Yeah, we are paying economic units to this Uber class that only cares about money.
	And not only that, I find it very odd that, okay, it's not even odd.
	I mean, I think there's a correlation here.
	They are going to start to push back Social Security when you can start to collect it.
	They're like age 72 or 75.
	They just did this in France too, right?
	Retirement age, yeah.
	Right, right.
	And we know that the data points that are starting to come in through case studies and some smaller studies show that there are truncated life expectancies.
	On top of, insurance companies are saying there's excess deaths.
	Yeah, people are going to die before they can ever collect on Social Security or before they can collect what they're owed.
	That's my point.
	So not only are we going to be paying for the messenger RNA cancer treatment that they caused the cancer, right?
	So we're going to be paying for that.
	And then not only that, we won't even reach the age 72 to be able to collect our Social Security that we spent our whole adult life paying into.
	So we get it by both ends, Mike.
	Well, exactly.
	This is an economic pruning of the entitlement system by the government, right?
	This is what you're saying.
	I'm just rephrasing it here.
	But I've said much the same thing in the past, that in order for the United States government to remain solvent, they have to solve the entitlement obligations problem, which is a multi-multi tens of trillions of dollars problem.
	It's over $100 trillion, actually.
	And the only way to do that is to find a way to kill people off before they can collect, which is what you're describing here.
	So this weapon system, I mean, that's my characterization, is also designed to help make a broke government solvent financially.
	I totally agree with you on that.
	I totally agree with you.
	They're trying to solve the whole petrodollar problem in a multi-pronged approach.
	One is going to be create more war, create more strife.
	Another one is to turn into the digital dollar.
	Once you do digital dollar, people can't do bank runs.
	Then things are tracked and traced and people are fearful.
	Then truncate the life expectancy.
	Then AI is going to be a major disruptor.
	How that all shakes out, I'm not sure.
	I have an economic theory on it that needs to be I think there's a decoupling of labor and capital.
	I mean, you're an entrepreneur.
	You have a lot of businesses and stuff.
	And the whole idea of a good working economy, a good middle class, is that you have individuals that are willing to take risk.
	Deploy capital and hire people, and these employees start to have families, and there's economic clustering that takes place.
	When you have artificial intelligence decoupling labor and capital, I see the destruction of the middle class.
	Yes.
	And so there's another factor there that's all played out.
	But let's see...
	Let me jump in because you've really hit upon something really critical here.
	We're moving into the era where AI systems can replace perhaps 70% of white collar jobs and then AI infested robotic systems that are under development.
	will be able to replace some percentage of the labor jobs, right?
	Warehouse workers, truck drivers, floor sweepers, shelf restockers at grocery stores and so on.
	But what the chat GPT system has done is it's shown that white-collar jobs can also be replaced by these systems.
	So we're entering this era where the powers that be say, well, we don't need the people any longer.
	And, Dr.
	Cottrell, let me add this, I've seen calls for giving AI systems human rights, which means voting rights.
	So this means the Democrats don't even need robotic human voters who just vote the way they're told.
	I'll take one more step.
	Go for it.
	You don't even need Dominion machines being hacked to change the votes.
	Now you can just have your robot pre-programmed to vote Democrat.
	Of course.
	It can even easier.
	My point is that even the Democrats realize they don't need people much longer.
	They've wanted all these easy voters to flood into the country so they vote Democrat.
	But now it's going to be just eliminate the humans and have the AI systems keep the regime in power.
	They don't need the people much longer.
	You watch some, even in academia, even in the prestigious universities, especially the prestigious ones, there is a student body in the undergrad world being trained through their professors to think anti-human.
	Yes.
	Destroy history, forget history, destroy the family unit, and, you know, promote a very anti-human agenda.
	So, you know, and there's some people that just hate humanity.
	Why are they that way?
	I'm not really sure.
	I don't know if it's a soul kind of thing or if it's, you know, the way they were, you know, raised in their household.
	I don't know why they hate humanity so much, but there are people out there in very important positions in In our society, especially teachers are really important.
	They're training the next generation.
	And they are training these young undergrad students an ultra-liberal agenda that is very disruptive to the economy and the family unit.
	Well, yeah, and to human reproduction.
	But you mentioned something here.
	The timing of this is not a coincidence, in my opinion, that just at this moment in history, this tipping point where the powers that be decide they no longer need humans in the next 20 years, this is a transition phase, they're going to have automated systems take over a lot of things.
	Just at that same time, there happens to be a binary weapon system developed in the laboratory, gain-of-function SARS-CoV-2.
	Oh, it slips out.
	It gets released upon the world, and then it has to be treated with this vaccine.
	And then this combination of things that happened had kind of a fast kill happening.
	That we've already lived through.
	A lot of people dying from the infections or from the economic lockdowns or from the vaccines early on.
	But then this slow kill, the long tail of depopulation is now what you're talking about, which is the cancers.
	This could go on for 25 years, just kind of pruning the human population from here forward.
	Maternity wards are being shut down nationwide.
	Did you know that, Dr.
	Cottrell?
	They're shutting down maternity wards like never before because there just aren't as many births anymore.
	The depopulation is here.
	You're bringing a good point.
	You know, pre-COVID, even the hospitals had financial problems, right?
	And especially, you know, the community hospitals, right?
	So they go through the COVID era and they're getting supplemental funds from the government, right?
	It filled the hole, but not fully.
	They had a structural deficit.
	So now we're past the whole COVID funding phase.
	And now the community hospitals are having the funding problems again.
	So we're going to probably see not just different wings of a hospital being shut down, but we're going to be seeing community hospitals in general either being bought out by hedge funds or they're actually going to just be closed.
	And that to get good care is going to diminish.
	So that's another vector point on where it's going to be a weakening of our population, a weakening.
	Like I said early on, we need to screen more.
	But if you have community hospitals starting to shut down, then where are they going to go to be screened for cancer?
	So this is a major problem.
	I think a lot of doctors are starting to see this.
	You know, what's sad is that it takes an awful lot of effort to become an MD. Yes.
	More than I ever imagined.
	You know, it's a lot of testing, a lot of hoops to go through.
	There's a lot of regulatory things that, you know, there's insurance and a lot of problems.
	And a lot of people get to a point after practicing maybe three, five, ten years, they're saying they're fed up with it.
	You know, and they want to just check out.
	So there's another leg down.
	You don't have enough doctors out there that want to treat, but they've created a system.
	The liberals have created a system in such a way where a doctor can't run his practice the way he wants to.
	The insurance companies are basically holding everybody hostage.
	And people are just checking out.
	So it's a sad thing.
	It's going to be a problem going forward.
	In a post-COVID era, like you said, we're going to see...
	These deaths are going to start to pile up, but they're going to be piling up at a much slower rate than we saw in the first wave during COVID. Right, so the slow, steady erosion of the human knowledge base.
	And the thing is, these cancers are affecting productive people in their 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s, including many in the medical profession.
	Everywhere you go right now, it seems like it's difficult to find a competent, qualified person who has any availability, whether it's a doctor or an attorney, an electrician, an HVAC specialist, you name it.
	The qualified people, many of them are dead or they're disabled.
	They've been maimed or harmed to the point where they can't work any longer.
	I mean, I'm seeing that across the side, and then that affects the supply chains.
	Go ahead.
	I have seen, you know, through my channel and covering COVID, there are nurses that call me on a regular basis across the country, right?
	And during 2020, many of them contracted SARS-CoV-2, even though that they were vaccinated.
	And some of them are long haulers.
	Well, they're long haulers to an extent that they can no longer be nurses, right?
	Wait a minute.
	What do you mean long hauler?
	What do you mean exactly?
	Long COVID. Long COVID. Right.
	So they contracted SARS-CoV-2, and they are still having tachycardia problems.
	They're still having respiratory problems.
	They're probably starting to show the signs of pulmonary fibrosis.
	They're fatigued.
	They have memory fog.
	They just can't be on their feet 10 hours during their shift.
	And, you know, they have to check out and not, you know, not practice nursing.
	Isn't some of that so-called long COVID, isn't it just vaccine injuries?
	Well, some of it...
	See, this is the thing that I think that as we're working through the different ages, the pre-COVID, COVID, and post-COVID, the words that we're using to describe what we're seeing may be not very accurate.
	So, long COVID... Long COVID is a syndrome, right?
	I apologize for my dog.
	So the syndrome is a plethora of different problems.
	Cardiac problems, neurological problems, hepatic problems, vascular problems, right?
	And this can happen from the vaccine or from SARS-CoV-2.
	I think that most of the medical community is focusing more on the virus side that causes long COVID and not shining a light on the vaccine injury side of long COVID. And that's why I'm saying that I think as we move towards the post-COVID era, we will fine-tune our definitions.
	Here's another example.
	Messenger RNA platform wrapped in this whole PEG2000 lipid nanoparticle was coined by the community as a vaccine.
	Now, if you use the Webster dictionary definition of a vaccine, it's something that will elicit an antibody, that was designed to elicit an antibody.
	Well, if that is the definition, then it's a vaccine.
	But the problem here is that it's a new type of vaccine.
	It's this coded vaccine that is in a messenger RNA form that can do a lot of disruptive things in the cytoplasm, as I was talking earlier in the show.
	So it's also gene therapy.
	So it helps.
	Our definitions of things are changing because of the technology.
	At first, I felt more what the medical community was saying about the messenger RNA, even though I was always against the messenger RNA platform, always.
	But I use the term vaccine because that was kind of the medical definition of it.
	But I think as we're moving on and we're seeing the vaccine injury and understanding how the messenger RNA platform will be used for, quote, treating cancers, I think it's moving more towards the bucket of gene therapy that can elicit antibodies.
	And we don't have a good term on what that is.
	And there's where people get confused on the subject.
	People like black and white kind of definitions.
	Right.
	But that reminds me that the same companies that manufacture these mRNA vaccines are expecting a windfall of profits treating the cancers that may have, in fact, been accelerated by the vaccines that they already gave people.
	And they're going to use mRNA technology to treat cancer.
	And what if the side effect of that is something else, like liver damage or neurological damage?
	It is not a mistake.
	It was on purpose that Moderna and Pfizer try to have a court order to hide the clinical data for 75 years.
	Because what that would have done is that if that stayed, if it wasn't for the FISO document release, right?
	But if they had, if they received what they wanted, which was to hide the clinical data for 75 years, We would have had 75 years of cancer, a lost memory of COVID, and people would lose the association or the causation.
	And during those 75 years, there would have been messenger RNA being used to treat these cancers.
	And people would say, oh, I got melanoma.
	Oh, well, okay.
	You know, give them a messenger RNA from Moderna for melanoma, right?
	That was the trajectory of this.
	So they knew.
	They knew.
	There was a game plan here, and there was a specific desire to hide the clinical data on the vaccine injury and what was going on, you know, at the cellular level and the things that I'm talking about.
	These interactions with these proteins and the shutting down of the DNA repair mechanisms and the integration, in some cases, into the genome.
	These things were known, and they were trying to hide it for 75 years.
	That's telling.
	That's another data point that's saying that there was a nefarious thing that was going on and they were going to make a bundle of money.
	They were going to make more money If this keeps on continuing, Moderna is going to make more money on the cancer treatment than it ever did on any vaccines.
	Right.
	For sure.
	So a clever way to get billions of people to become high-profit cancer patients is to inject them with cancer-causing vaccines.
	It's important because I'm in medical school and they watch me.
	It's important to state that not everyone that gets a vaccine and not everyone that gets SARS-CoV-2 is stamped for sure that they are going to get a cancer.
	Of course, right.
	But I think the point here is that everyone's risk curves have gone up and that there are case studies And anecdotal evidence at the clinical level that people are just starting to see now that there are turbo cancers that are starting to take place and higher incidence of cancers at a younger age group.
	In this post-COVID era.
	That makes sense.
	And what's really important, and I don't know if you can do this or not, but there was a CDC chart that I wanted to kind of show.
	I don't know if you...
	Yeah, well, let's bring it up.
	But first, let me just comment here, Dr.
	Cottrell, if they do kick you out of medical school, I hear there's a very high demand for imaginary doctors.
	You don't have to comment on this.
	Imaginary doctors are needed to be OBGYNs for transgender women who imagine that they have a cervix and so on.
	So there's this whole field of imaginary medicine now.
	You're studying reality.
	You're studying actual physiology and molecules and proteins and so on.
	But there's this whole field of imaginary medicine where doctors are going to have to pretend to treat Biological men who think they're women now and pretend to do a pap smear and so on.
	That's a real thing.
	I mean, that's a real imaginary thing, I should say.
	But there's going to be a whole field of imaginary medicine, Dr.
	Cottrell, that probably you don't have any interest in that, but that's coming.
	Trust me.
	I have to navigate it with certain patients that may have gender dysphoria.
	It's more of a psychological problem.
	You're dealing with someone that has some sort of psychosis.
	It's a problem.
	You can get sued if you don't navigate it properly.
	This is another reason why doctors are getting out.
	They're going, hey, I was taught You know, karyotype, X, Y, X, X, right?
	You know, and a phenotype, you know, it's what, you know, what kind of genitalia one has, you know, and that's the operating parameters.
	Now it's whatever you feel, you know, on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, you know, and, you know, it can get into a lawsuit and people are saying, hey, I don't need the aggravation.
	No, no, it's crazy because doctors are supposed to be rational, reality-based people.
	A patient comes in, a man, a biological man comes in and says, Doctor, would you look at my cervix?
	What do you say?
	Yeah, if you get your scrotum out of the way, I can do that.
	What do you say to people?
	No, you're in the wrong department.
	It's very delicate because you have the experience.
	You have to explain that I can't do this procedure because you don't have the equipment.
	There you go.
	You don't have the equipment.
	You don't have the equipment.
	Or you have extra equipment.
	But then it gets a little bit more complicated because then what happens is they feel as though they have this gender dysphoria and then it pushes them going to a new sex reassignment kind of thing.
	Okay, well, I don't want to get you into more trouble, Dr.
	Cottrell, so you don't have to even talk more about this.
	But I'm just saying, there's a whole field of imaginary medicine that is really expanding.
	Yeah, you know, it's a problem.
	It's definitely a problem.
	The emperor wears no clothes.
	You know, in a sociological perspective, this is another leg of this destruction of the family unit.
	You know, this is another way of Slowing down the productivity of a society.
	Another way to rewrite history.
	Another way to just say...
	Because the ones that follow this kind of logic, they're also anti-God.
	They're anti-religion.
	True.
	Yeah.
	So this is another leg of an anti-religious, anti-family unit agenda.
	Yeah.
	But seriously, following the logic, why does anybody need a cancer treatment or following the lack of logic?
	Because if they show up and they have cancer, can't the doctor practicing imaginary medicine just say, all you have to do is self-identify as a person who doesn't have cancer?
	If you can alter your physiology, just decide to not have cancer.
	And that's it.
	You don't even need treatment.
	Well, you can't say that because let's say they do get cancer and they end up...
	Pretty good point.
	You know, they go through the gender reassignment, they're going through hormonal therapy, and they end up getting cancer because of the treatment.
	True, true.
	You know?
	Right.
	So, you know, they're causing other diseases because of the gender reassignment.
	But you can't get testicular cancer if you don't have testicles, right?
	So, what if a woman comes in and says, I'm a man, and I think I have testicular cancer, and the doctor's like, well...
	All you have to do is self-identify as someone who doesn't have testicular cancer, and you don't even have testicles, by the way.
	But is that a lawsuit at that point?
	Where does this go?
	It's getting into a muddy area.
	There are probably going to be departments within hospitals.
	Imaginary departments.
	Well, how to deal with imaginary problems.
	That used to be called a psych ward, man.
	But they're normalizing psychosis, right?
	So that's a whole separate building down the road.
	That's the psych ward building.
	No, it's going to get to the point where a doctor won't be able to do anything and they have to check a box and say, okay, I have to talk to X department.
	You know, dealing with this problem with this patient, you know, because of the psychosis.
	It's not, you know, because they're trying to rewrite, you know, psychological disorders.
	You know, gender dysphoria was a psychological disorder that I believe is being written out of the psychological textbooks.
	That's true.
	So, you know, it's a touchy subject on how to deal with these types of problems.
	Well, if there's any transgenders watching, just wait for Dr.
	Cottrell to get his medical license and then go visit him.
	Let's give them a challenge here.
	Now, you're never going to be a GP. You're not going to do that.
	I just want to survive medical school.
	I mean, I'm an old guy now, and I'm just tired of the testing.
	But there's a link on that page.
	It's Cancer Trends 2017 to 2019.
	This is really important because I think the public and the ones that are the MDs, DOs need to pay attention to this.
	Because what I have to say is, you know, I'm in a unique situation because what I did in my PhD was dealing with chaos theory.
	And chaos theory is really tied to looking at things like a changing dynamic, the beginnings of a changing dynamic, the changing of the wind pattern and how that could evolve.
	Everyone's heard the butterfly can flap its wings and let's say Africa and a hurricane can happen somewhere else in the world.
	So something very similar.
	And there are things called jump diffusions and parameterization of models and stuff.
	But that link, on the right side, this is really important.
	So the ones that are not MDs and the ones that are, really pay attention.
	On the right side, It's dealing with cancer cases, annual cancer cases.
	Okay.
	These are real numbers, not projected numbers.
	So just like in economics, we hear like a GDP number and then it's revised, you know, after three quarters.
	All right.
	So the CDC does projections.
	We have an estimated number for 2023 based on growth rates.
	For different cancers in different regions of the United States, and then they build up the model based on a parameterization.
	So this number that is up there on that bar chart on the right, those are real numbers that have come in.
	And if you look at the last three years, they have been almost flatlined at about 1.76 million, something like that.
	1.7.
	Yeah.
	1.7.
	Okay.
	So last year is 2019.
	So they're all been flatlined.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Now the 2023 data that came out is at 1.95.
	Oh my.
	That's not even reflected on the chart yet.
	Right, right.
	Because what you're seeing here is actual numbers, all right?
	They do a model.
	They parameterize a model based on several years of growth for different cancers, okay?
	And it could be going up or down, right?
	So it's a moving window.
	But because COVID era is a change in the dynamic, this is where the chaos theory comes in.
	The change of the social, the whole social dynamics of that system, right?
	That there is an increase in cancers, right?
	They changed their modeling method in 2022.
	Oh, really?
	Yes.
	And to prove my point, all you have to do is go down and you can click cancer rates for cancer.
	2022.
	You go to, on the PDF page, it would be number 6.
	Okay.
	You see 1.18 million for new cases?
	I see 1.918.
	I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
	1.9, yeah, 1.
	Okay.
	Yeah, 1.918.
	Yeah.
	So those are new cases for 2022.
	The new number for 2023 is 1.95.
	Now, in 2022, the model was redone.
	And the paper that proves that point...
	So are these numbers artificially low or artificially high compared to...
	I think that they're actually artificially low.
	Wow.
	I think it's going to be a lot higher, is my point.
	But in the reference section...
	It goes into detail on the modeling method.
	We don't have time to go into the detail, but the point is they re-paramorize the model because the system dynamics are different in a post-COVID era.
	Right.
	So they've reconfigured the model to try to say that cancers aren't exploding as much as they really are, is what you're saying.
	I think they're trying to play kind of a little bit of the middle ground.
	If they use the old model, then they would be way underestimating.
	If they use the new model, they're capturing the higher incidents that are taking place in the post-COVID era.
	But I still think that the numbers that they're coming up with, with the estimate, are underestimating.
	The actual amount that will come in.
	Now, the unfortunate thing is to get the 2023 real numbers, we're not going to see that until 2025, 2026.
	Right.
	So it's like a three-year lag.
	But the point I'm making here is that there is a difference in the number of incidents in America.
	It was starting to flatline.
	Our population was somewhat growing, right?
	A little bit, somewhat growing.
	We're at about 330 million people.
	For three years, pre-COVID, we were basically flatlined on new cases of cancer.
	That meant that the treatments were better, the screenings were much better, and it seemed like we had a hold on it.
	We were being able to control it a little bit better from the medical community.
	The problem has come, is that this The vaccines and the virus has created a whole new dynamic where they had to change the model and that we have a blip up of higher incidences compared to this kind of static number of incidences in 2017 all the way to 2019.
	So I think the MDs here is another data point, but just using an epidemiological data point that is showing that That, hey, we need to start paying attention to these post- COVID-era cancers that I'm talking about.
	And early on in the show, I tried to explain, you know, as best as I could, you know, with the time limit that we have on the dynamics of that.
	And it's happening with the vaccines and it's happening with the virus.
	And it's for different reasons.
	There's different pathways that this is happening.
	So we just, in the medical community, you know, we need to have a little bit of imagination here And start realizing that, you know, we have a government that's doing nefarious things.
	They developed a weapon program that has a sword and a shield.
	The sword is the virus.
	The shield is the vaccine program and the therapeutics.
	And they're porous.
	They cause problems.
	And that now, since we're past the acute era, the acute phase, we're in this chronic or latent phase of Of COVID. And we're going to start seeing pathologies at a higher incident, like leukemias, like colon cancer, like brain cancer.
	You know, you've done lots of shows about the cardiovascular problem that's taking place with the vaccines, you know, the clotting and the, you know, the being able to control the barrier receptors and all this and the tachycardia problem and the Parasympathetic feedback system that's disrupted.
	So a lot of things are happening and the medical community needs to pay attention.
	Take it from someone that has studied chaos theory.
	We are seeing a different dynamic and you can't assume based on your work experience 20 years ago that you're going to be able to understand this change.
	You'll be able to understand it when there's a lot of more data points When we start to publish, you know, high-powered papers, right?
	But that's not going to happen until 2028.
	Not going to happen until 2029.
	So we have to be vigilant.
	Yeah, I mean, you've reiterated that point critically, but if traditional doctors, mainstream doctors, are just going to treat this the same way they've always treated cancers, which is mostly just, you know, radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery...
	Two out of those three, well actually all three, spread cancer, by the way.
	Radiation spreads cancer, chemotherapy causes cancer, surgery usually spreads cancer seeds throughout the body.
	If we're going to have much higher rates of cancer and they're just treating it the same way, then we're not going to get any better results here, is my point.
	They're just going to have more treatments.
	Right.
	I think this is where the old-style allopathic method Needs to really borrow from the naturopathic knowledge.
	There's a coupling that needs to take place.
	I'm at a point in my life, and maybe I change, I don't know.
	But I'm at a point in my life that I believe that there is a coupling between the naturopathic means and the allopathic means.
	There is a time for one...
	And there's a time for the other.
	There's a lot of research that's now coming online.
	If someone is going through chemo, the chemo is trying to kill the good cells and the bad cells.
	They're trying to kill the bad cells at a faster rate.
	So it's really like, you know, can it kill the cancer before it kills you?
	You know, method.
	Yeah.
	That's chemotherapy.
	Exactly.
	But if you can offset some of the negative effects of the chemotherapy using naturopathic means, that's a win-win.
	Yeah, completely agree.
	I don't see, you know, we are treating cancer Like we are in the Stone Age.
	Even though we seem technological, we are in the Stone Age.
	It's very barbaric.
	But understand, a lot of oncologists, they will tell patients, don't you dare take nutrition because that will interfere with the chemotherapy.
	I think that's kind of an older school.
	I hope so.
	I think the students that are coming online, they're newly minted.
	From DO or MD schools, I think they have a much more open mind to a CAM, you know, a complementary alternative medicine approach to dealing with disease.
	I hope so.
	I mean, that sounds...
	That's great to hear that.
	And if that's the case, I'm very enthusiastic about that because I agree with you, Dr.
	Couture.
	Allopathic medicine can treat acute situations very effectively in many cases, like a heart attack or what have you.
	But then the chronic conditions is where allopathic medicine usually falls flat, and you need to bring in the complementary medicine to stay.
	Stop the long-term risk factors that people are, every day, people are giving themselves, you know, cardiovascular disease.
	Exactly.
	You know, in the case of the heart attack, okay?
	You know, someone gets a heart attack and you want to, you know, maybe do a PCI right away, you know, within the first three hours or something, you know, to get the clogged artery opened.
	Right.
	And then, you know, you give them nitro, and then you, you know, nitroglycerin, you may give them a beta blocker, an ACE inhibitor, right?
	So, you know, that's the allopathic need, all right?
	But the natural or the supplemental route is also giving them the K2 and K7. Giving them strong antioxidants to reduce the LDL oxidation.
	Giving them the D3 and putting them on turmeric and ashwagandha because it's anti-inflammatory.
	You're reducing that inflammatory Tearing of that intima of the vascular lining, so you're reducing plaque buildup.
	Right, right.
	And telling them, stop eating raw shortening off the shelf.
	You know, partially hydrogenated, genetically modified soybean oil.
	Why are you sucking the icing off the cake?
	And, you know, change your food choices, people.
	It's so simple.
	And then you don't need to have an emergency, or at least your risk goes significantly down.
	You're bringing up a great point.
	Even in the pre-COVID era, people, if their diet and exercise is poor, then they have a risk curve for disease, heart disease and cancers and everything else, much higher.
	It's a very simple...
	It's a very simple philosophy.
	But people, here's the problem.
	When you look at clinic and you try to convince a patient, change your diet, change your outlook on life, and you can have better outcomes.
	But they don't want to listen.
	That's so true.
	That's absolutely true, yes.
	Frustrating for doctors who want to teach patients to change, and then those patients, they show up and they're like, fix me, doc.
	They show up with all the problems they caused with their own choices for 50 years.
	They're like, fix me.
	So we have to do clinic, right?
	We work up patients and present to a physician.
	We're being watched and we do PE, physical exam, do the history, right?
	So in clinic, We had to go out into the lobby and we had to, for that day, we made a PowerPoint and we tried to convince people to eat properly to prevent diabetes.
	So we would go in the lobby trying to ask, would you like to learn about how to cut your risk factors for diabetes?
	I would say 99% of the patients that were waiting in the lobby did not want to hear anything about how to improve their health.
	They just want a simple pill to fix the problem.
	There's probably a vending machine in the lobby serving diet soda too, by the way.
	And the hospital cafe probably has pro-diabetes causing foods.
	As well, right?
	So that's part of the problem.
	But I get you.
	Patients often don't want to take responsibility for their health.
	But see, our viewers are different.
	Our audience, they're well-informed.
	They want to do what's right.
	They want to know a strategy.
	And so in the last few minutes, we do need to wrap this up, Dr.
	Cottrell.
	I want to be respectful of your time, too.
	Given everything that you've said about the Suppression of immune system, the pro-cancer factors of both the spike protein, the vaccine.
	What do you think, what are the most powerful things that people can do who are willing to take action to protect themselves from both of these vectors?
	Well, get informed.
	Listen to your show.
	Listen to my show.
	And listen to other people.
	And I personally think that it's the three pillars.
	You can take control of your risk curve.
	My risk curve elevated.
	I'm around patients that could have SARS-CoV-2.
	I have not contracted SARS-CoV-2 that I know of.
	I've never tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.
	But I have been vaccinated with the Johnson& Johnson.
	So just for me, my risk curves have gone up.
	So anyone, either SARS-CoV-2 or vaccine or both, reduce the inflammatory response in your body.
	You can take a lot of different supplements.
	What I use is turmeric and ashwagandha, a strong antioxidant.
	There are many that are available.
	I use C60 because it's a buckyball.
	It's a carbon molecule that looks like a soccer ball.
	The way it can neutralize the reactive oxygen species is about a thousand times more or more than a thousand times more than vitamin C because vitamin C's molecule can only neutralize one reactive oxygen species while C60 can neutralize multiple And recharge itself.
	So, you know, strong antioxidant, and then products that can neutralize pathogens.
	You know, I use the nanosilver products, right, to neutralize pathogens.
	I think that's the best way to try to convey to the public, on a legal standpoint, on, you know, what I'm doing, right, right?
	Three pillars.
	Reduce pathogens by neutralizing them.
	Bring down the inflammation and strong antioxidant.
	And you can hang other things like good gut biome type stuff, good probiotic, The vitamin C's, the B vitamins.
	I'm a big fan of listening to Dr.
	Group and getting kidney cleanses and liver cleanses and colon cleanses maybe once a year or every other year.
	I think if you listen to people that are in the naturopathic realm, you can most likely bring down your risk curve closer to baseline.
	But there's no magic bullet.
	And just be vigilant.
	I talk to family members and, you know, friends, and it's like, oh, you know, pay attention.
	You know, pay attention.
	Don't be, you know...
	You know, don't assume that we're out of this crisis just because you don't hear it in the news.
	Oh, no.
	We are nowhere near out of this crisis.
	So, look, Dr.
	Cottrell, another fascinating conversation with you.
	Thank you for taking the time here with us.
	And I want to give out your website, the Studio Reykjavik.
	We'll put that on screen for people.
	They can check out your website and see all the documents that we were just clicking on there.
	That's under medicine.
	Here we are on the slash medicine page here, actually.
	Is anywhere else people can follow your work?
	Well, I have a Brighton channel that I really like people to subscribe to, so it's Dr.
	Paul Cottrell and Brighton, so please follow me there.
	You know, I have multiple channels.
	I'm heavily censored on YouTube, so anything that's SARS-CoV-2, bioweapon-related, you know, can't stay up.
	It gets shot down.
	So, you know, to see my old work, which I've been covering this for three years now, Please go to Brighton, and I publish regularly my new stuff, too.
	So please subscribe to my channel on Brighton.
	Okay, that's awesome.
	Yeah, Dr.
	Cottrell, if you just would practice imaginary medicine, they wouldn't censor you on YouTube.
	Use the imaginary physiological doctor, launch a whole new channel, and just talk about made-up stuff, and there would be no problem there.
	What they have a problem with is real stuff, which is what you actually talk about.
	Real stuff.
	You bring up a good point.
	And I think that by covering SARS-CoV-2 for three years, I've kind of like, this is not my first rodeo kind of thing.
	And you have a community that is like the MD, AMA community that tries to shut you down because you're trying to expose a weapons program and all the nefarious things that could happen in the human body.
	And, you know, the data points are, you know, moving into what I've been saying, you know, over time.
	There's also a component to this that is disheartening.
	And you have people out there that will go, oh, don't listen to me because I don't have my MD yet.
	You know, but I've been covering in very high accuracy...
	All the way from January 2020.
	We've done many interviews.
	We've done a lot of interviews.
	It's a shame that some of the very first shows only had 5,000 views.
	It's really telling on how accurate things evolved over the last three years.
	We have pretty good viewership on the new stuff in the 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000 mark.
	I want people to realize that There are many individuals that have kind of a multidisciplinary approach to problem solving.
	And that is what I have to offer.
	I'm not the only one.
	I'm not the only one that does kind of a mosaic.
	There are many.
	But I think that there are too many people that put their hat on a one-trick pony.
	Sure.
	And what happens is that They either just hang their hat on one MD that's focused on just the anti-vax movement.
	But yet, they're not paying attention to all the other things that are happening at the virus level.
	And then you take it even further, why the virus was made and all the Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So, you know, I just wish that people that are watching these other doctors, you know, I'd like to mention their names if you don't mind.
	But, you know, but, you know, but these other doctors that they are hanging their hat on, I think that you've got to question them.
	And so, well, wait, why are you only focused on this?
	If you're only focused on the virus, then there's a problem because there's definitely vaccine injury.
	If they're only focused on vaccine injury and not on the virus, then that's also a problem.
	And it has to be questioned why.
	And so there are individuals out there Inventors of messenger RNA. Yeah, I mean, look, you can name names.
	I'm not going to prohibit you from mentioning people's names.
	It's your choice.
	Yeah, I think, you know, in parting, I think it's really important to get to the bottom of all the things that have been happening by the U.S. government.
	And one of the inventors of the messenger RNA platform, Dr.
	Robert Malone, that I've interviewed for two hours back in August of 2020, It was August 2021.
	And he comes onto the scene and he's talking about antibody-dependent enhancement, which is happening.
	Vaccine injury, which is happening.
	But he was on the committee in 2020 at the DOD. It's on his website.
	He's already talked that he worked in biodefense.
	I have him on camera saying that.
	So...
	So, you know, this individual that is only talking about vaccine injury and not the weapons program that came out of Barracks Lab and other labs that have been sanctioned by Congress, there's about 11 of them that have gain-of-function capability for bioweapon development, right?
	Why this individual that has such a large platform, multiple millions of followers, he...
	He has a following that he can actually state that, you know what, it's not just the vaccine problem and all the negative things that happen to it, but also a weapons program that should be shut down.
	Instead, when people like myself ask him this question, he's not willing to answer it.
	He's not willing to, and the reason being, and this is why the public really needs to understand why some of the, not all, But why some of these doctors do this.
	They make money on contracts, especially when they're in research.
	And they get contracts to repurpose drugs.
	And they were tied to the S.H.I.E.L.D. program that was part of the biodefense.
	And Malone is one of those people.
	Malone was on a committee at the DOD and repurposing drugs.
	Yeah, I think that's accurate, but let's give the man a chance to respond to that.
	He's not here right now.
	How about this?
	I'll have my crew reach out to him and see if he wants to come on and answer some of this.
	I think he's been asked these same questions.
	Right.
	I think people are starting to wake up and go like, well, wait a minute.
	Why aren't you taking it at another step?
	And you're going to shut down the root cause, which is the weapons program.
	The problem he has is that he is a contract kind of researcher.
	And that work is coming from government.
	Tangential or directly from the DOD. So he doesn't want to bite the hand that feeds him.
	Well, I don't think he ever wants to get government money in this area again, is my impression.
	No, I don't think so either.
	But the thing is that he works in biodefense pre-COVID era, before 2019, and during 2020.
	For sure.
	I mean, he meets this.
	Alright, Dr.
	Catrulli.
	All I want him to do is just stand up on a podium and say, I'm Dr.
	Malone and the American government is making weapons that they shouldn't be and SARS-CoV-2 was one of them and that we need to shut down the weapons program.
	And so we get to the root cause and stop additional weapons from being released and then the medical community can figure out a way to try to solve these chronic issues.
	Such as the vaccine injury and such as all of these, you know, other pathologies that are coming from SARS-CoV-2.
	But we've got to stop the bioweapons.
	Yeah, no, I'm with you on that point.
	We have to get to the root cause.
	You know, and now shut up.
	About Malone.
	I'd go after other people.
	But, you know, the problem here is that there is a community out there that is hanging their hat on these types of physicians because they have, quote, credentials.
	Important credentials, but they're not going the other step to prevent what the government is doing to us.
	And so what he does is he just kind of like puts it on the back burner and just says that other people are talking about it, so I don't need to talk about it.
	But the reality of the situation was he benefited from bioweapon defense.
	And he omits it.
	He omits it.
	So, you know, it's not like, you know, we're saying things that are just like, you know, out of the blue, right?
	It's not, you know, it's just, I am, I don't think he is a evil person at all.
	I don't want to misconstrue this idea, you know, that he's not evil.
	He's not an evil person.
	Fauci?
	He's an evil person.
	Yeah, clearly.
	But, you know, Malone, I think, you know, he has a lot of good in him.
	I just don't think he's carrying it.
	All right.
	Dr.
	Cottrell stirring the pot of controversy here.
	You're going to have to put out a recipe book for all the controversy you're stirring up.
	What do you think?
	To the viewers, post your comments below this video or share this video if you can.
	It's still censored on Twitter, by the way.
	Twitter won't let us share brighttown.com videos, but...
	Let's let readers chime in on that.
	We'll reach out to Dr.
	Malone, see if he wants to pop in and talk about that issue or not.
	And let's see what happens.
	Is that fair enough?
	Yeah.
	You know, I'd be interested.
	I'd be interested to watch it.
	Yeah, for sure.
	Okay, well, me too.
	I mean, I think we should all denounce the bioweapons development program.
	Right.
	Because it would save lives.
	It would save lives.
	And the thing is that a lot of people have loved ones that have been harmed either through the vaccine or through SARS-CoV-2.
	And I lost my mother from Omicron in January of 2022.
	So I have a dog in this race.
	All these doctors that have big platforms to start to get up on stage and start denouncing the actual weapons program that the United States government has been doing that's related to SARS-CoV-2.
	Okay, well, I'm with you.
	I'll tell you what, we'll do an article on this segment of our talk here and put this out as maybe a standalone video and just see what the response is and if Dr.
	Malone wants to chime in on it.
	But I think Dr.
	Francis Boyle is correct about all this, that this should all have stayed banned, you know, illegal...
	I mean, it's supposed to be illegal to do this, but they did it anyway, obviously, and then they handed it over to China, and now we're all paying the price, and as you talked about today, we're going to be paying the price in terms of cancer for decades to come.
	This is a horrific negative turning point for the human race on our planet.
	You've been given a gift to build up a platform.
	It took some years to do, but you built up a platform and a following, right?
	So if we have people like Malone And other MDs foul suit and shine a light on the weapons program in the United States, then it's going to open up the window to have congressional hearings.
	And when we do that, then we have a chance.
	It's a small chance because Congress is captured by the national security state.
	Yes.
	But the point here is that it elevates the conversation and more people will start to say, well, wait a minute here.
	You're harming me through the vaccines and you're harming me through a virus that you created in the laboratory to have spectral dominance on a battlefield.
	And people need to be held accountable.
	Everyone.
	The researchers, the ones that released it, the ones that funded it, everybody.
	That's at the shield level and that's at the sword level.
	And that's what's important.
	Because if we do that, then there's going to be a family member That we saved.
	Because we're reducing the chances of another release.
	Okay.
	I'm with you, Dr.
	Cottrell.
	We're way over time, as you know.
	But I appreciate you spending the time with us.
	And you've thrown out a lot of intriguing ideas and some challenges here.
	So I would encourage folks to share this interview and visit your website, the Studio Reykjavik.com.
	I thank you for being so courageous and so forthright with your words here, Dr.
	Cottrell.
	I'm glad that medical school hasn't captured you and squashed your massive intellect into the size of a little allopathic pea or something.
	You have resisted the brainwashing, and you're still with us.
	It's awesome.
	I'm glad you're in medicine.
	I'm glad you're going to teach other doctors about complementary medicine and help open some minds along the way.
	So thank you for what you're doing.
	Thank you for having me.
	Absolutely.
	It's always fun.
	Always interesting.
	All right, Dr.
	Cottrell, have a great day.
	Thanks for joining me.
	This has been really fun, very intriguing.
	And for those of you watching, as always, feel free to share this.
	You can repost the entire video or segments, if you wish, on your own channels on other platforms.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon.com, the platform that we built so that we can have, obviously, uncensored talks like this.
	Obviously, I throw things out there to make sure you know it's uncensored.
	I do that on purpose.
	Thanks for watching today, everybody.
	Take care.
	Mike Adams here.
	Today's interview is brought to you by HealthRangerStore.com and I'm always excited to talk about all the different solutions we have for personal health.
	Today, check this out.
	We have black cumin seed oil here, which is really potent.
	It's just an amazing product and it tastes great, unlike a lot of black cumin seed oil products.
	This one actually has a very nice taste.
	Check it out.
	In fact, if you go to the website, healthrangerstore.com, I've got that page up here.
	You can see you can buy a six-pack of this if you wish, or you can buy it in smaller quantities.
	You get the full description and the ingredients here.
	And some of the ways that it supports your natural body functions as well.
	So check all that out at healthrangerstore.com.
	We've also got here an amazing instant coffee.
	This is really delicious.
	It's a great barter item, and of course, it's fair trade coffee.
	Of course, as you know, we test all our products for heavy metals and glyphosate and microbiology and much more.
	Did you know that coffee can often have high cadmium in it?
	It's true.
	In fact, cadmium is one of the things that gives coffee its kick.
	Yeah, I know it's crazy, but actually ingesting cadmium can make you feel temporarily energized even though it's poisoning your system.
	The same thing is true about mercury, by the way.
	Interesting history about toxic elements.
	But we run all the tests in our mass spec laboratory, ISO accredited, audited, inspected, and this is all certified organic, of course.
	So lab tested plus organic plus fair trade instant freeze-dried coffee.
	You can get it right now at healthrangerstore.com.
	Here's a three-pack.
	You can get it, or you can get single packs if you want, or we have number 10 cans of this as well, as you can see here on the right.
	So a great barter item.
	It's also just really delicious and really portable, and we thank you for your support.
	Again, HealthRangerStore.com.
	A global reset is coming.
	And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲