All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 20, 2023 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:44:11
Situation Update, 1/20/23 - Biosphere destruction reaching EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT (ELE)...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to the situation update for Friday, January 20th, 2023.
Mike Adams here, the Health Ranger.
Thank you for joining me.
I just had an extraordinary interview, a one-hour interview with Dane Wigington of geoengineeringwatch.org.
I think there's no question this is the most important interview that we've ever done, and I'm including that here.
So I'm going to keep the rest of this relatively short because I want to save time for that interview.
We had, as always, an amazing conversation, but we have some new information that is relevant that supports, well, almost everything that he's been talking about.
In fact, let me just jump right into that.
You know how Dane Wigington has been warning for years about all the technology of weather control and weather weaponization and the tech that exists in order to steer storms and control the trajectory of hurricanes and storms that are flooding crops and so on.
And a lot of people thought, that can't possibly be.
We can't control the weather.
Well, I asked him today, he said he has nearly 200 patents listed on geoengineeringwatch.org that are U.S. Patent Office approved patents on weather manipulation.
And then just in the last 24 hours, a new article, a new science paper actually, was published in the journal Nature Photonics.
And it was covered by the Wall Street Journal.
And it describes using high-powered lasers that are beamed from the ground into the sky in order to steer storms and control lightning bolts so that lightning can be directed to intended targets on the ground.
Okay?
So to anybody thinking that it was all just a conspiracy theory, no, it isn't.
This just came out in a science paper.
In fact, the headline from the Wall Street Journal is the following, quote, lasers can guide dangerous lightning strikes to a safer path, study shows.
So you see how they're trying to position this technology as something to, you know, keep us safe from lightning.
But what it really does is it allows ground-based lasers to control where lightning strikes.
So in other words, lightning can also be a weapon, and it can strike wherever they want it to strike simply by ionizing the atmosphere above the intended strike point, creating conductivity.
And this is done using ground-based lasers.
So look, let there be no question whatsoever that ground-based weather control systems do exist and have existed for a very long time, and there are hundreds of patterns.
That demonstrate this and, you know, recent studies as well.
So we're going to have a very interesting conversation with Dane.
I've already pre-recorded that.
It's coming up shortly.
Let me cover some breaking news headlines and some of the other relatively big news of the day, although, frankly, everything pales in comparison to the extinction-level event that Dane and I talked about, which is the engineered destruction of the biosphere.
An attempt to destroy the planet.
But we've got to go through some of the headlines.
I know a lot of people are interested in what's happening with Alec Baldwin.
Yeah, he was charged with involuntary manslaughter, a felony charge.
He and one or two other crew members on his, you know, the Rust movie crew.
You know about this.
And he shot and killed a guy, what was her name?
Hutchins, I believe.
Shot and killed Hutchins, but did not mean to.
So it's involuntary manslaughter.
He's being charged.
And he could go to prison over this.
And I just want to say on the record, and I've recorded a separate podcast about this with more detail.
I do not think that Alec Baldwin should go to prison over this.
And here's why. - Yeah.
Yes, he was negligent, clearly, and he was a co-producer of the movie and so on.
He was in part responsible, and there were other people responsible, you know, the armorer on the set and so on.
And they all messed up.
They all didn't pay attention, and Alec Baldwin pointed the gun at Hutchins and pulled the trigger, although he did not believe there was a live round in the gun.
So, yes, he killed her.
Yes, it was negligence.
But...
Prison is supposed to be a way that society isolates violent, threatening people from the rest of society.
Frankly, a vengeance by society.
Like, make you suffer.
Throw you in a cell because we don't like what you did.
Prison's supposed to be keep extremely violent people away from the public because they might run around and kill people.
Is Alec Baldwin...
But is Alec Baldwin a violent lunatic running around, waving a gun around, pulling the trigger, shooting people, or threatening to do so, or a violent person in his day-to-day life?
Absolutely not!
Not!
Alec Baldwin is not a violent person, even though he inadvertently carried out this act of extreme violence and took another person's life.
But we need to be fair about this.
We need to look past his politics or his political views or how much he hated Trump and how much he hates conservatives and Christians.
Look, I think Alec Baldwin is a...
He is an immature, nasty human being, okay?
But doesn't mean that society should throw him in prison just because of vengeance, like make you suffer.
No.
I think what needs to happen here, I've explained this in a separate podcast, is Alec Baldwin needs to be forced to pay X number of years of his annual income in a kind of financial punishment and that that money should go to the family or the relatives of the person he killed, Hutchins.
I think that's her name.
And that it should be enough money to send a serious message.
It should be enough money that it gets the point across to Alec Baldwin that he destroyed someone's life and he needs to lose many years of his own income or assets.
He needs to lose a significant portion of his earning income for whatever number of years the jury decides that But that's the way that you morally and ethically try to set the record straight over a horrific, unintentional tragedy.
I think our system of justice is completely warped, and I think that many people in society view prison as an act of vengeance against someone, kind of a way to get back at people, and I think that's completely wrong, and I think that Alec Baldwin is going to have to live For his whole life here,
with incredible shame and guilt over what he did, and if he's required to pay a very large sum of money, let's say three to five years of his total income, maybe he makes $10 million a year, I mean, I don't know, I'm just guessing, but have him pay $50 million, five years of his income, let's say, and then let that money go to, again, the family of the person that he killed.
I think that is the moral ethical way that society should treat these things, understanding that it was an inadvertent shooting.
It was an accident.
Now, in summary, I do not like Alec Baldwin as a person, but I also do not think that the justice system should be weaponized against people with whom you disagree.
So that's my take on it, and I would hope that the charging authorities, the district attorney, whoever it is, they would be able to exercise some discernment and perhaps come to a financial arrangement which would be more meaningful, and it would help the victims or the victim's family members more than just throwing Alec Baldwin behind bars where he can't do much of anything to help them.
Now, do you agree or disagree with that?
I welcome your opinion.
Please post your comments beneath this video on brighteon.com.
And we are, by the way, still working on a new comment system that should be rolled out in the coming months.
And the current system is not the best system.
And some people have been banned from that system outside of our control, by the way, just so you know.
Our new system will be a system that we control completely.
And there will be a whole lot more free speech under the new system.
So I'll tell you about that when it comes.
Okay, let's talk about Campbell's tomato soup.
And the prices for it.
Tomato soup has been an indicator of inflation for many, many decades since, let's see, the 1930s or 40s, it looks like.
I'm reading from politicalcalculations.blogspot.com, and Zero Hedge had linked to this story, and I think it's worth mentioning.
If you track the historical price of a can of Campbell's condensed tomato soup, Oh, look here.
1898.
Wow.
Okay, further back than I thought.
Through January of 2023, what you're actually tracking is not just food inflation, let's say, but you're tracking the devaluation of the dollar.
Because it's almost like this is a unit of food that is very stable.
You know, Campbell's tomato soup.
And people have been buying this, obviously, for generations, for well over a century.
Now we're going to show you this chart, so take a look at your screen if you are able.
And you'll see that in the late 1800s, this was 10 cents a can.
10 cents for a can of Campbell's condensed tomato soup.
And this 10 cents held stable, relatively stable, throughout the 1910s, the 1920s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and all the way up to early 1970s.
And from there, there is a very large inflection point.
From there, the cost or the price of this can of tomato soup begins to skyrocket.
And it's now going parabolic in the modern year, you know, 2022 and 23.
What happened in the early 1970s related to, oh, I don't know, the value of the dollar and inflation?
You already know, Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard.
And this began now over 50 years of mad money printing.
Just insane money printing.
So from there, the value of the dollar began to really deteriorate to the point where this can of tomato soup in 1990, it cost about 35 cents.
In the year 2000, let's see, it was right around 40 cents.
In 2010, it was 60 cents.
In 2015, it went up to 80 cents.
In 2020, it It was about $0.85, and now in 2023, right now, it is $1.23.
Yeah, so what used to be $0.10 is $1.23.
So that is over a 90% loss in purchasing power for your dollar.
And, of course, watch this over the next two years until we get to 2025, and this thing is going to be way more than $1.23.
It's going to be probably...
$2 plus.
It might be $2.50 by the end of 2025.
So this is very instructive.
To look at this, you're actually tracking the history of the devaluation of the dollar just by comparing it to this kind of base unit.
This is kind of the widget of food is Campbell's condensed tomato soup.
Because the ingredients have been the same over all these years, basically, and the size of it's been essentially the same.
It's the same thing that it was in 1898.
It just cost a whole lot more now.
So, in essence, this can of tomato soup now costs over 12 times what it costs in 1971.
Over 12 times.
So again, you have over a 90% loss in the value of the dollar since 1971.
But before that, when the dollar was on the gold standard, the price was relatively stable because the currency was relatively stable.
So, Anyone who says there's no inflation, anyone who says the dollar is a store of value, Is an idiot.
I'm sorry.
The dollar is not a store of value.
The dollar has lost 90% plus since 1971.
And by the way, this is true across other things, not just Campbell's Soup.
But since 1913, the Federal Reserve, the dollar has lost something like 98, maybe even 99% of its purchasing value across the board.
Isn't that something?
Okay, let's get through some other news from The Defender, which is childrenshealthdefense.org.
New research links glyphosate to DNA damage, cancer, and oxidative stress.
Mm-hmm.
New research by top U.S. government scientists found that people exposed to this widely used weed-killing chemical glyphosate, which is a key ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup, have biomarkers in their urine linked to the development of cancer and other diseases.
So this research has been published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, and it measured glyphosate levels in the urine of farmers and other study participants and determined that the presence of high levels of the pesticide was associated with signs of a reaction in the body called and it measured glyphosate levels in the urine of farmers and other And this was authored by 10 scientists with the NIH and then two from the CDC, if you can believe that.
They concluded that this study contributes to the weight of evidence supporting an association between glyphosate exposure and oxidative stress in humans, And they note that this accumulating evidence supports the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of hematological cancers.
That's basically blood cancers, lymphoma, myeloma, and leukemia.
So glyphosate is the number one used herbicide in not just history, but in modern day agriculture.
And this is why we test all of our agricultural products, by the way, for glyphosate at our store, healthrangerstore.com.
And in fact, several years ago now, I worked with my lab chemist to develop a quantitative mass spec method for glyphosate using a triple quad mass spec instrument.
And we did the full validation of the method.
It uses this crazy chromatography column that can't even go into because we call it the voodoo column because the chemistry of it is crazy.
But we developed this quantitative method that uses no what's called post-column derivatization, which means it's a more reliable, more precise method.
And we have limit of quantitation down to, I think, less than five parts per billion concentration.
And we use this to test All of our agricultural products for glyphosate.
So anything you buy from healthrangerstore.com that is a food, a superfood, a supplement, gets glyphosate tested.
And where do we see glyphosate at the highest levels?
Well, you're going to find out soon because we're going to be publishing some of the results we've seen over the last year or so.
We have seen high glyphosate in lentils and in oats, among other places.
But for some reason, lentils and oats is where we find a lot of glyphosate.
Oh, and by the way, of the 2,310 urine samples that the CDC took from Americans, that's a lot of pee, by the way, 1,885 were laced with detectable traces of glyphosate. were laced with detectable traces of glyphosate.
So almost everybody, I don't know, that's approaching 80% have glyphosate levels in their urine that can be picked up by these instruments.
That's interesting.
Now, glyphosate is in foods, but also some people go out and they actually buy it.
And they spray it on their lawn for some reason.
I mean, they spray it on the weeds they want to kill.
And in the process of spraying it, you're also getting it on your skin because, you know, the wind blows.
There's dispersion.
And you're probably inhaling it, which can't be good.
And then also sometimes people go out and they buy glyphosate concentrate.
And then they mix it.
And in the mixing, there's splashing, there's spills, there's droplets, there's whoopsies, and people get glyphosate all over their skin.
And guess what?
Glyphosate is a very tiny molecule.
It goes right through the skin.
I guarantee you, it goes right through the skin.
Glyphosate passes through tissues, organs, skin.
If you put your hand in a bottle of glyphosate for some reason, if you're suicidal...
It instantly begins to be absorbed in your bloodstream and then circulated throughout your body.
So probably don't eat it, don't touch it, don't drink it.
Because it is one of the chemicals of Agent Orange, by the way.
That's right.
Agent Orange is basically glyphosate and 2,4-D. No, don't think to yourself, oh, I'm only ingesting half of a chemical weapon.
Like, this must be the safe half.
No, it's not.
Both halves are bad.
And by the way, I don't know any other retailer in the world that tests all their agricultural products for glyphosate.
I don't know that any exists at all other than us.
I'm just saying.
Because it's a pain.
It's expensive.
The triple quad instrument is the most expensive one in our lab.
It has to draw the strongest vacuum for the triple quad mass spec analysis.
And the extraction of glyphosate from samples is also a major pain.
It's just, it is a lot of work.
And I think we're the only ones who are willing to go through that expense to make sure that our products are safe.
All right, moving on.
Here's a great story from climatedepot.com.
I love this site.
Mark Morano, he's a champion of truth and freedom.
Here's a story.
The British Parking Association is warning that the weight of electric cars is causing the collapse of parking garages.
Did you know that?
So electric cars, apparently, they weigh a lot more than non-electric cars.
Why?
Well, you know, the batteries for the most part.
So they weigh up to 500 pounds more than a combustion engine for the same basic size car.
So Chris Wapples, a structural engineer and member of the British Parking Association, It says that, quote, So
I wonder, as more and more people buy electric cars and then they start parking them in these garages, are we going to have an overweight parking garage collapse, like a multi-floor, you know, a pancake-style collapse of all the electric cars smashing, sadly, people.
And, of course, causing all those electric cars to catch on fire.
Fires that cannot be put out using water because, well, they're lithium fires.
This is not a good situation.
So All Car News was reporting on what cars used to weigh, such as a Ford Cortina MK3 in the 1970s, which weighed, what, 960 kilograms, they say.
But a modern-day Tesla Model 3 weighs almost twice as much, 1,819 kilograms.
This is America.
Even our cars are overweight.
Imagine.
So if you're filling up with gas or diesel at a gas station, and people ask you, why are you still driving a combustion engine?
Your answer can be, because I'm trying not to smash you beneath me with my heavy EV. By the way, doesn't this also mean that EVs being heavier are going to cause a lot more kinetic damage when they crash into things, including, you know, each other or other vehicles or buildings or utility poles and things like that, right?
Because kinetic energy imparted is one-half mass times velocity squared, is it not?
And so the mass, well, you've got more mass now.
More mass in the EVs, so you're going to do a lot more damage And that's if it doesn't catch on fire.
At least a normal car, a combustion engine with, let's say, a gasoline fire, you know, you can put it out when the fire truck arrives.
They can spray the gasoline fire and they can extinguish it.
You can't just spray a lithium fire and just expect it to go out.
Doesn't work that way.
Ask any firefighter.
They will tell you all about the horror stories.
Okay, moving on from the Epoch Times, Congressman Matt Gaetz introduces Bill to abolish the ATF. Yes, after it declared braced pistols illegal.
And we've talked about the arm braces here a little bit, but it's a crazy new overreach by the ATF saying that all these millions of Americans who purchase these AR-15 pistols with arm braces, perfectly legal.
The ATF on multiple occasions said that the arm braces are fine.
It doesn't turn your pistol into an SBR. And then now suddenly they change their mind.
Oh, we've changed our position.
Now you're a felon.
Or you're going to be a felon in 120 days.
This is what they're saying now.
And I own a couple of these as well, so I've got to watch this, make sure that I dismantle these pistols before 120 days, or I'm watching the lawsuits as well, gun owners of America and so on.
They're suing the ATF, and hopefully the Supreme Court will step in and kind of tell the ATF to go pound sand.
But Matt Gaetz has the real answer.
Abolish the ATF. And the NFA, by the way, the National Firearms Act, ended because it's absurd.
It's stupid.
It doesn't make any sense at all.
Why is a legal rifle, why does it have to be 16 inches?
What's so special about 16 inches in length on the barrel?
What's wrong with 15 or 13?
I mean, why does any of that even matter?
What is this all about?
Look, the bottom line is, the more guns you have in the hands of law-abiding citizens, the less crime you have.
Why?
For obvious reasons.
Law-abiding citizens stop crime when they are sufficiently armed.
And if there's anybody who's not going to turn in their pistol to the ATF, it's the criminals!
It's the criminals by definition.
They do not follow the law.
So the ATF says, oh, you got to register or you have to destroy it or you have to give it to us.
They literally say that's one of the options.
Just give us your guns.
Are criminals going to do that?
No.
Only law-abiding citizens will bother to follow the law.
That's why I think that If this law goes through, we should all replace our short barrels with a 12-foot barrel, make it so long that it won't even fit into the vehicle of the ATF if they try to confiscate it.
Oh, how are you going to fit that in there, huh?
Mr.
ATF, I got a 12-foot barrel.
Look like you're carrying fishing poles around or something.
That's a long fishing pole, too.
And by the way, if you do put a 12-foot barrel on it, you might as well also attach a 1,000-round drum magazine just to make the proportions look correct.
And somehow that would be legal.
All of that would be legal.
A 12-foot barrel, a 1,000-round drum magazine AR would be perfectly legal.
But a 15-inch barrel would not.
Just think about that, how crazy that is.
Okay, the New York Times is warning that the Biden regime is warming to the idea of, quote, helping Ukraine target Crimea.
This is the New York Times way of saying that Biden and his handlers are trying to start World War III. So what happened to the Minsk agreements?
What happened to the promises that NATO would never expand to the east?
What happened to all that?
Of course, that's all long forgotten.
And now the U.S. is just looking for ways to try to start World War III, try to fight with Russia more and more.
Oh, we'll help Ukraine take back Crimea.
Well, Crimea has been in the hands of Russia since 2014, I believe.
And do you think Russia is just going to Hand it over.
Here, NATO. Have this territory.
Not going to happen.
This is how the Biden regime is going to put us in a direct conflict and set off the global war, if they don't find another way first.
But this should be a warning sign because the Biden regime and the U.S. State Department, which I've said is run by woke idiots, is getting more emboldened, but in a retarded kind of way.
They're becoming really arrogant and kind of John Wayne in their stride and just thinking that they're the big honcho on the ranch.
But actually, they're morons and they don't have munitions and they don't have what it takes to defeat Russia, especially over there in Russia's backyard.
So you have woke idiots who are arrogant and But stupid, and they're trying to start a war, probably in order to get America nuked in return.
This is not a good combination.
But the New York Times loves it.
The New York Times...
Don't you love it when these U.S. State Department people, they...
They talk to the New York Times or they're talking at the WEF meetings and they get up there and they speak with complete hypocrisy.
And they say things like, oh, we have to make sure that we stop nations from conquering their neighbors and invading their neighbors or threatening their neighbors.
And like, have you looked at the history of the United States?
Have you looked at how many countries the US has bombed?
What about Desert Storm?
What about Iraq?
What about Libya?
What about Panama?
I mean, what about Somalia?
What about the Sudan?
Just on and on and on.
Since the end of World War II, the US has been the bully on the world stage, running around the world bombing at will, seizing assets at will.
Economic hitman-style activities, assassinating world leaders, blackmailing world leaders, compromising them, getting nations in debt.
And then the U.S. wants to lecture Russia about operating as a moral nation.
Oh, how dare you treat your neighbors badly?
Wow.
That's really something coming from the U.S. Let me tell you.
Jeez, like, oblivious to the history of this country.
And then on top of that, they say, oh, we've got to protect Ukraine's borders, but not America's borders.
Can't protect America's borders, because that would be racist.
But then they want to murder Russians.
You know, they want to kill all the Russians.
That's not racist.
That's just protecting the borders of Ukraine.
Well, what about America's borders?
Why is that racist?
And you notice everything the State Department says about Russia is actually, it's things that describe the U.S., They say, the Russians are unethical and can't be trusted.
They're so mean.
They're so evil.
And they're incompetent.
And their military is entirely incapable.
And they don't know what they're doing.
And they've run out of missiles.
And you realize they're describing the Pentagon.
They're describing the Department of Defense, the woke DOD under war criminal Austin.
Who is just a product of the defense manufacturing profiteering industry.
If there's anybody that's incompetent, it's these woke leaders of the Pentagon and the DOD and the Biden regime.
But I guess we're going to find out soon.
Because I guess we're going to war with Russia in Crimea or somewhere else in Ukraine.
And so I guess we're going to find out real quick.
Who actually has munitions?
Hint, it's not us.
Okay, moving on.
Crypto giant Genesis is days away from bankruptcy.
I did mention this yesterday, but there's some new numbers here.
This is from the UK Daily Mail.
Genesis owes apparently $3 billion to creditors, including $900 million to the Winklevoss twins.
You've heard of the Winklevoss twins.
They run Gemini.
So you have Genesis about to go under, and then it's going to drag Gemini down for a loss of $900 million.
So this is all part of the FTX contagion fallout that is bad news.
Now, there's another really important story that almost nobody has covered.
This is rather extraordinary.
BASF, B-A-S-F, you know this company.
The big chemical manufacturer, they make, what, 40,000 plus chemicals and they make ammonia and they make urea for nitrogen-based fertilizers and they make pesticide chemicals and they make medicine chemicals and everything else.
They have just written off an investment in Russia, well, a business unit in Russia known as Wintershall Dea.
I don't know how they pronounce it.
They're writing off $7.9 billion as they're pulling out of Russia.
And this is causing a 2022 net loss for the entire company of Basif.
They are writing off Basically an $8 billion facility that they had in Russia that was tied into the Nord Stream gas pipeline.
In fact, this company, Wintershall Dia, had a stake in the Nord Stream gas pipeline.
And they were engaged in joint ventures with Russia's Gazprom.
And this was reported by Reuters, by the way.
I'm reading this from a Reuters headline.
Basif takes huge write-down as Wintershall Dia exits Russia.
So the CEO of Wintershall Dia, Mario Meherin, I'm not sure, Meherin, said, quote, Continuing to operate in Russia is not tenable.
Well, that kind of ends it, doesn't it?
He said that limitations imposed by Russia on Western-owned assets had made it impossible to operate and resulted in an economic expropriation of the joint ventures in Russia.
So this is interesting because what's not stated in this story is how Western nations appropriated something like $300 billion of central bank currency reserves that belonged to Russia.
So let's see.
Russia's international banking reserves were stolen by the West.
And so then Russia took over some corporations such as this one, you know, certain assets there related to Gazprom and the Russia natural gas exports via Nord Stream.
But it's a small fraction of what the West stole from Russia.
So here's the obligatory statement from Meren, you know, pandering to the West.
He says, quote, Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine is incompatible with our values and has destroyed cooperation between Russia and Europe.
He said...
That's a serious dose of propaganda.
You know what destroyed the cooperation between Russia and the world?
De-platforming Russia from the SWIFT system, which of course boomeranged back on Western Europe in a very bad way and has resulted in now this energy deficit that is rather critical.
In fact, it would have been far worse, except it's been a relatively warm winter in Europe so far.
They've lucked out to this point.
But we're not going to have fertilizer there in the spring.
And energy prices are not going to come down for a decade, if even then.
And you've got the de-industrialization of Europe taking place.
Hey, Mehran, is that consistent with your values?
To plunge Western Europe into poverty?
Is that consistent with your values?
Because that's what your countries did.
The UK, NATO countries, Germany, the United States.
That's what you did.
You stopped international trade with Russia and you caused the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline.
You cut off energy to Germany and Poland and Austria and all these other countries.
You caused this.
So as a result of this, BASIF is losing a fortune and they're shutting down in Germany and they're moving to China.
So good job, NATO countries.
Good job, Western civilization.
You just committed economic suicide yet again.
You seem to be really good at that.
Basif is going to China.
And then, of course, when China declares war against the West, China will just take over the Basif facilities in China, just like Russia did to these facilities in Russia.
And Basif is going to end up holding nothing.
Absolutely nothing.
Which perhaps may be fitting, given that Basif was founded by a bunch of Nazis.
Or, I should say, people who became Nazis in World War II. But that's another chapter of history.
IG Farben and that whole saga.
But folks, the industrialization era of Western Europe is coming to an end.
And this is part of it.
By the way, if the leaders of NATO countries were Alec Baldwin, then the people of Europe would be the Hutchins producer camera person who was killed.
It's that bad.
It's like the governments are pointing their weapons not so much at Russia, but at their own people.
Russia is actually just a proxy excuse for Western nations demolishing their own infrastructure, shutting off the energy, which is what they wanted to do under the crazy green agenda anyway.
Okay.
Now they just have another excuse.
Why do you think they blew up the Nord Stream pipeline?
That was blown up by the US and the UK. Western nations blew up the pipeline.
An act of sabotage against a civilian infrastructure.
Why?
Well, isn't it interesting that nobody in the media is asking, well, who blew up Nord Stream?
Nobody's talking about that now in the mainstream media.
Yes, in the alternative media, but not in mainstream.
Isn't that one of the most critical questions of our time?
Who blew up the Nord Stream pipelines?
Who destroyed the gas supply to Germany and much of Western Europe and effectively has caused 1,000% increases in electricity prices, which has resulted in deindustrialization and food inflation and mass joblessness and increasing homelessness and destitution across Europe?
Who did that?
Are they curious?
No, they don't want to know.
Just like the Supreme Court just announced after an exhaustive investigation, we don't know who leaked the news about the Roe vs.
Wade decision.
We have no idea.
Isn't that amazing?
How they can't find the person who leaked it.
But now, when it comes to them attacking, let's say, Trump...
Well, they can find anything they want, or if they can't find it, they'll fabricate it.
Oh, need evidence?
Look, here's an evidence factory.
We'll just have the CIA pay off these, you know, steel dossier people, and they'll just come up with anything we want.
But when it comes to actually finding out real things, like who leaked Roe vs.
Wade, or who blew up Nord Stream, we have no answers.
It's just a mystery.
So mysterious.
We just don't know.
Speaking of mysteries, by the way, don't let it be a mystery what's in your storable preparedness food.
At the Health Ranger Store, and yes, this is our plug for the day, healthrangerstore.com, certified organic, laboratory tested, glyphosate tested, long-term, storable, We're called Ranger Buckets, and we have Mega Buckets, and the Mega Buckets have multiple individually sealed heavy-duty vacuum packages of the organic lab-tested raw materials that are found inside.
You know, different beans and legumes, and again, legumes without glyphosate, right?
Because we do the testing.
So don't let it be a mystery.
When it comes time to live off your stored food, You don't want to have a big question mark in your mind like, what's in this really?
I've got it on sale.
Is it clean?
Who knows?
It's not even organic for most so-called survival food.
But we have organic, lab tested, in inventory, available now.
Because we ramped up production.
Finally.
Took us two years to ramp up production to where we could just keep things in stock.
But we are there right now.
So check out our inventory, healthrangerstore.com.
We've got Fairtrade Organic Freeze-Dried Instant Coffee, which is a great barter item.
And we even have automatic dishwasher detergent powder.
And all the ingredients are highly rated by the Environmental Working Group, the EWG. Because we care about what goes into runoff and water systems and streams and rivers and so on.
We have the cleanest, the best formulated detergents and soaps.
We have laundry detergent like that, personal care products, nutrition, superfoods, and survival foods or storable foods.
Check it all out, healthrangerstore.com, and thank you for your support.
And now, drumroll please, Dane Wigington with geoengineeringwatch.org talking about the extinction level event, class destruction of the biosphere on planet Earth, and what can we do to survive it or maybe stop it.
So here we go.
Enjoy this interview.
It's about an hour in duration.
All right.
Welcome to today's featured interview.
And we have returning Dane Wigington from geoengineeringwatch.org.
And Dane is truly one of the most frequently requested guests on our show.
And we have two big breaking news items that we're going to run past Dane.
First of all, of course, the crazy California storms that struck in the last week or so.
And Dane is right there in California.
So we're going to get a You know, from the ground report from him on what's going on, what's behind that.
But then we have this other breaking news.
High-powered lasers are steering lightning bolts.
This has been reported by the Wall Street Journal in just the last day.
It's a study published in the journal Nature Photonics, and they were able to actually steer lightning bolts with terawatt lasers by beaming lasers from the ground up into the sky.
So anybody out there who thinks that it's all nonsense talking about steering storms or controlling weather, read the journal Nature Photonics or read the Wall Street Journal because there it is admitted yet again.
So Dane Wigington is our guest.
Again, geoengineeringwatch.org.
Dane, it's an honor to have you on, sir.
Thank you for your contributions to humanity.
I really look forward to this conversation.
I do as well, Mike.
And the same gratitude right back to you and all the work you've done over so many years to try to pull back the curtain and expose the insanity which is metastasizing into every imaginable aspect of our life, our society, on what's left of our environment.
It is truly a train that's off the tracks.
So thank you for all your work with bringing it to light, Mike.
It seems obvious now.
It's not just people like you or myself or others talking about the weaponization of the ecosystem, the biosphere.
It's obvious now to more and more people that there is an engineered biosphere collapse or destruction that is in play right now.
Would you agree that more people are finally waking up to this reality?
I do agree, but it's very perplexing that it has taken so long when our skies so often look like something from a science fiction film.
Blue skies are almost gone.
In any video you see of anywhere, Africa, China, Anyplace other than India, Asia, the skies are white or dirty white.
You rarely see blue sky anywhere, even commonly in backgrounds.
I know you've seen this, Mike, of advertisements.
You have the crisscross skies with climate engineering, aerosol dispersions everywhere.
And we live in societies that are trying to convince themselves that this is normal when it's anything but.
And aside from the visible trails, Mike, what we're trying to convey at geoengineeringwatch.org is the other facets of climate engineering.
A very key core aspect is chemical ice nucleation for weather modification, so So when we have these flash cooldowns, and you've seen that, right, Mike?
You've seen these temperatures now.
You've seen even the climate engineering cover-up crews like Weather Channel, which are paid disinformation people at best.
You see them now talking about weather whiplash a lot, don't you?
Yes, yes.
They use that term a lot.
And they use the term rain changing over to snow and the warm side of the, quote, winter storm and the cold side of the winter storm.
Since when does a winter storm have a warm side with tornadoes and thundershowers?
Again, they make it up as they go.
And unfortunately, we have too many in the population that are willing to accept whatever narrative is thrown out.
And that needs to change.
Yeah, that is extraordinary and that goes way beyond, you know, climate and weather.
People are accepting all kinds of crazy narratives right now.
It's rain washing or psychological operation in play.
But the thing about weather is, just as you said, people can look at the sky.
And people our age, I don't know how old you are, but I grew up in the 70s, and I can remember as a kid looking at the sky.
Not only were the skies blue, but they were full of tens of thousands of birds also.
I mean, there was life everywhere.
And I lived in a suburb.
And today, you look around, and it's mostly dead.
It's just the life isn't there anymore.
Even the insects.
I don't hear the locusts like I used to hear them.
I don't see the bumblebees like I used to see them.
I mean, we are under attack, it seems.
And the entire world of life is collapsing.
I grew up in the 70s as well.
That every tree was full of birds, where I was anyway.
And we had every rock, every log, anything you could turn over.
There was legions of insects of various kinds, and now they're almost non-existent.
And what people need to understand is that when these aspects of the web of life perish, we will perish with them.
And we see...
With other organisms like trees, Mike, without which I know you know, we would not be here.
And how many are blowing over when the wind blows now everywhere?
And if you look at their root balls, their root systems, because we know the rain is toxic, we're not guessing.
In fact, we have a recent period of study to prove there's not an uncontaminated drop of rain anywhere in the world.
That's true.
You saw that.
I know you follow that.
North Pole, South Pole, top of Mount Everest, doesn't matter.
All contaminated.
So when we see the root balls of these trees tip over, their feeder roots are largely gone.
When you have summer now in California, in the region I live, that was three months long 20 years ago, now it's nine months long, the feeder roots all die off.
So once the trees lose those, the whole root ball system begins to die back, just like the canopies are dying back.
When the ground then becomes saturated and the wind blows, there's nothing to hold that tree up.
It falls over.
So there are so many aspects affecting these core pillars of life on which all of our lives depend.
And we have official agencies lying to us, telling us it's just the beetles killing the trees, which is their final fallback excuse.
We're drowning literally in a sea of deception.
Now, talk to us about the recent storms that really devastated certain parts of California.
Were you in the area that was hit by all that heavy rainfall?
No.
And in fact, that region was not that big.
That was another mass deception.
Let's rewind back, Mike, to December 2021.
We had similar circumstances.
Lots and lots of sensationalized headlines.
The rainpocalypse coming in, the big snow levels in the Sierras that we were told were going to put a massive dent in the drought.
What happened during that winter leading into the summer of 2022?
Drought just deepened further.
Worst drought based on paleo data in at least 1,200 years.
So all that rain didn't mean much when they turned off the spigot, and they did at the transition from 2021 to 2022, which would be last winter.
There was no rain in my region on the east side of Lake Shasta, which normally gets 70 inches a year.
After late December, there was not a drop of rain until April.
Literally the entire winter season, not a drop.
We should have received about 50 inches of rain where I live.
Nothing.
And again, we have to consider this, Mike, with all the snow.
And you've seen the sensationalized headlines about all the snow in the Sierras and parts of the Sierras, right?
Yes, right.
So what happens with a chemically...
Artificially nucleated frozen material.
That's what we're dealing with here.
There's no question.
We've tested the precipitation.
So the artificial ice nucleating elements are in this precipitation.
It tends to sublimate.
I know you know what that means, but for your listeners, it, to a large degree, converts from a solid to a gas, bypassing the liquid phase.
So there's not nearly as much runoff of this frozen material.
artificially nucleated as there would be often naturally nucleated material.
So that's, again, one more reason that that snowpack doesn't mean that much, not to mention the fact that it's toxic.
So we see one section of California, Mike, from the Bay Area, slightly north and then south, Portola and other regions along a specific corridor where they trained in most of that moisture.
And we examined photographs from a CNN expose on the flood area in California.
They made it sound like the entire state was underwater, which was a blatant glaring lie.
Nothing unusual in my area.
In fact, on the east side of Lake Shasta, which is a big normal rain area, we didn't get that much here.
But 33 of 35 pictures on a CNN photo expose of the California rainpocalypse, 33 of those pictures were from the same exact corridor in central California.
So it's- See, I'm so glad we're talking to you about this directly because even I was under the impression that it was a much larger area with much more inundation.
And I'm- I mean, of course, that's why we have to talk to you actually being there.
It's just incredible the level of deception.
It's massive.
They want people to go back to sleep thinking that the drought has been put to bed.
Couldn't be further from the truth.
So you see these reservoirs you might have seen in the news?
They show specific reservoirs in that same corridor that are now at full pool.
Did you see that?
I mean, not specific reservoirs, but just overall narrative, yeah.
They showed some that are full now in that specific corridor.
Those are very small, shallow reservoirs.
What about Lake Shasta?
It's in my backyard, literally.
Lake Shasta is my backyard.
Biggest reservoir in the state.
It's half empty right now.
Wow.
Wow.
So what that means then is unless there's a lot more widespread rain between now and late spring, then this summer is going to be absolutely brutal for California.
You're completely correct.
That's exactly what it means.
And what people don't stop to think about and agencies certainly don't tell them about, you can't just make up for A loss of 500 inches of rain, which is what the loss is where I live.
Since 2007, we're about 500 inches of rain short.
You can't make up for the fact that the atmospheric relative humidity over that period has been getting lower and lower and lower.
And in fact, that drop in atmospheric RH, which creates a VPD scenario, vapor pressure deficit, I think we've talked about in a previous exchange, which means the trees can't open their stomata, their respiratory ports, breathing ports.
They can't absorb CO2.
They can't expel oxygen.
They're simply dormant.
And that's even harder on trees like doug fir, which is the primary tree here, even harder than the lack of water and the toxic rain.
You combine all those factors over 15 years, they can dump as much toxic rain on us as they want.
The forests are done.
In regard to doug fir, they are all dying off here.
I can't express how grave the situation is with the doug firs and the official agencies blame it on the Beatles, but that is not the case.
And again, back to the rain that we have had, nothing significant in many parts of the state.
And we watched them with radiofrequency microwave transmissions on the SAT radar loops.
We watched them Manipulating the rain into that corridor because the frequency transmissions have a repelling effect on the aerosolized storm moisture.
So it repels it away from that transmitter.
So the transmitters on either side of where they funnel this water were activated.
Does that make sense?
Yeah, but bring our audience up to speed about this idea.
For those new listeners, talk about the ground stations that are located in various areas, including, I believe there exists some mobile or ship-based transmission stations that can operate, for example, off the coast of Florida or in the Gulf area.
And give us an overview of kind of how this works.
And then we'll bring in that new science about steering storms, which showed up in the Wall Street Journal.
You're correct on all fronts, and that's why you're able to get so much data out, Mike.
I appreciate that you keep track of many battlefronts.
And the ground-based transmission facilities, the NEXRAD facilities gridded throughout the U.S., used to steer storms from the west in California to hurricanes in Florida.
The transmitters, when activated, energized, have a repelling effect on the...
Atmospheric storm moisture that's been saturated with electric conductive particles, the climate intervention elements.
So by those means of repelling, as that moisture is coming in, if they activate transmitters on either side of that moisture, they can push it toward the center, if you will.
And then, as you correctly mentioned, SPX radar, sea-based X-band radar, that looks like, if your listeners want to look that up, SPX radar looks like a giant golf ball on top of an oil derrick.
And those are the biggest SPX platforms.
You have SPX also on military vessels.
So again, with these means, their ability to manipulate storm moisture is absolutely profound.
And it's inarguable.
If your listeners search geoengineeringwatch.org hurricanes, and they can find our coverage of hurricane...
Ian, which I know we went over last time, and Nicole, Harvey, Maria.
You can really see the transmitter manipulation of those storms because we go through painstaking effort to record each loop as it happens.
It's hours and hours of that.
So the bottom line is between saturating the atmosphere with the electric and conductive particles, ionizing the air mass, they can then manipulate that with the ground-based transmitters.
And Their ability to control the spigot, the flow of rain, where it rains, how much it rains, how toxic that rain is, is absolutely staggering.
So they're trying to create a situation, in my opinion right now, where people think, okay, California's had all this rain, everything's fine, drought's over, couldn't be further from the truth.
I remember the first time I heard this idea of weather control, I was very, very skeptical.
I thought, that's impossible, that weather is so powerful and large-scale and so far beyond the reach of humans to directly manipulate.
And then, I remember years ago, I saw that your website, geoengineeringwatch.org, you had collected a series of published patents all about weather control.
What's the number of patents that you've documented so far?
I forgot the number.
We're adding to them every year, and we're getting close to 200 now.
Oh, wow.
Every year, there's many more patents right now being added to this skyscraper of insanity that is this list.
When you have...
Once you interfere with the systems, and again, the climate system is far more malleable than most people would ever imagine.
Let me rewind back to the commencement of Project Cirrus, which was the U.S. military's first intervention with hurricanes, 1947, with a very, very small addition to the equation.
It was...
I believe, I can't remember how many kilos of dry ice.
It was a very small amount.
It was 40 or 50 kilos of dry ice or even less.
The effect on a hurricane from that was so profound that it changed course, and there were many lawsuits that were initiated because they felt the military had actually negatively affected this hurricane, caused it to make landfall in a place where it did a lot of damage.
That's an extremely small intervention.
So what's interesting to me is, Mike, you know the vast majority of people know of, quote, weather modification programs, right?
A single engine propeller driven airplane with a few flares in the wings, right?
Most people know about that.
And they think – Somehow that that has an effect.
But then when you bring up the fact that militaries around the globe, with our U.S. military being the biggest player of all, can profoundly affect the weather.
When you have a military tank or like a KC-135, that can carry a hundred tons of material and dump it in the clouds.
Then they think, no, that would never happen.
Our military would never do that or our government would never do that.
What an incredibly naive notion.
Also, now, when you have these ground-based stations, they don't have to carry the payload with them.
They can be tied into the power grid, and they can beam actual electromagnetic energy that can cause ionization, or In the case that we're going to talk about here, lasers, they can literally push terawatt laser beams into the sky, and doing this, they can steer storms.
And again, folks, this is right out of the Wall Street Journal, and if people want to look that up, it's called, Lasers Can Guide Dangerous Lightning Strikes to a Safer Path.
You see, that's the Wall Street Journal title.
Now, Dane, your reaction to the fact that, yeah, they're admitting this now, but they're kind of They're kind of trying to hide it and say, oh, this is about moving lightning away from airports and things like that.
Isn't that interesting?
It is.
Anytime you interfere with a system, you have a negative result when you interfere with natural systems, as I know you know.
And in the case of lightning, it's a very profound phenomenon.
It only needs a path.
It will always take the easiest path.
Thus, I'm sure many may have seen on Discovery Channel and Another documentary shows if you fire a small model rocket with a very fine thread of wire that's connected to it that spools off as that rocket goes up, if you do that during a thunderstorm, you're very likely going to get a strike there just from that very thin wire because it simply creates an easier path.
Lightning will find that path and come down.
I actually did lightning suppression work for Bechtel Power.
And that's one of the things that's so far kept me safe on my mountaintop in Northern California because I'm off-grid.
It's a prime spot for lightning to strike.
I've taken one direct hit here, but I have the whole hill gridded off with lightning rods and a grid on the perimeter of the mountain to take that charge to ground.
Lightning's always trying to go to ground.
So them conducting this is not that hard for them to steer and manipulate the strikes because that...
That disbalance and charge wants to get to ground.
But I would argue this is just one more means of taking people's eye off of the tankers that are dumping literally millions of tons, tens of millions of tons of particulates into our skies every year.
And just as they did, Mike, I'm sure you saw all the media coverage Of the few balloons carrying a few pounds of material that may have gotten up to the stratosphere that was launched from Baja, right?
Right.
Wasn't that the Make Sunsets company doing that?
Thank you.
Yeah, polluting the skies for money.
And they pump that story up as if that had any significance other than being a publicity stunt.
And again, all of it takes everybody's eyes off of the tankers that are crisscrossing our skies, dumping tens of millions of tons annually.
Right.
So there's a lot of distraction going on.
But on the climate intervention scenario and the various aspects of that, because many people think if they don't see a sky that's got very visible trails from horizon to horizon, there's nothing going on.
And that couldn't be further from the truth.
These engineered winter weather scenarios are a core part of climate engineering, and the conditions they create in the ground are unimaginably destructive for whatever life forms are left.
When you drop temperatures...
Literally, in the case of Denver recently, I'm sure you saw this, they dropped 75 degrees in hours from 50 plus above to 24 below.
And you're talking about a chemical that's chemically frozen material that's so cold to the touch, it flash freezes, flash burns, and it just destroys the ecosystems, Mike.
And they're wreaking havoc with the engineered winter events.
Yeah.
Oh, clearly.
And causing massive crop failures, which is the next thing I wanted to get to.
But before we go to that, you know, the winter wheat wipeout has already happened across the Midwest, you know, the breadbasket states of America.
We'll get to that.
But let me read you...
Just three sentences from this study about lasers guiding lightning because it is exactly what you just said, Dane, where they can ionize the air, they can create electrically conductive channels to guide lightning.
This means that they can guide lightning into intended targets.
They can literally weaponize lightning strikes to hit where they want them to hit.
So here it is.
Number one, this is from the study published in that journal, what is it, Nature Photonics.
Number one, a laser beam is focused through a telescope and short, intense laser pulses are sent towards clouds above the tower tip, right?
So they have a tower where they want the lightning to go.
Number two, the pulses ionize the air beyond the tower tip, creating an electrically conductive channel that can guide lightning to the rod below.
And then number three, a rod Atop a tower helps provide a, quote, safe path for lightning to follow to the ground.
So they're admitting it.
They can use lasers to have lightning strike wherever they want, but they can also move storms with the same technology.
It's right there in the study.
Amazing.
It is.
Let me take this to another level, if I can, that they are not alluding to in any of these reports.
Because all that...
Imbalance an electrical charge needs is a conductive path to make it initiate that strike.
From an airborne platform, it is certainly well within current technological realms, and there is data to back this up, that they can, in the right atmospheric conditions from an airborne platform, i.e.
an aircraft, With a laser to the ground, not a powerful laser.
It doesn't need to be a powerful laser.
It only needs to be a conductive path for that imbalance of charge.
They can, in theory, and based on the technical data that's already available, initiate a cloud-to-ground strike from an airborne platform, which would be quite a weapon, wouldn't you say?
Yes, absolutely.
Again, it's not like they're generating the power of that lightning strike.
No, that power is already there atmospherically.
They're simply putting the key in the door that allows it to make that transition to ground.
And again...
What they have at their disposal, Mike, is absolutely shocking.
It's shocking, and there are certain aspects of this they don't want to disclose, but that is technologically well within current parameters.
A cloud-to-ground initiated strike with a conductive A laser beam.
It's extraordinary.
I like how you described that.
The energy already exists.
They're just directing it to where they want it to go using a lot less energy than what is actually being released.
Same with the ionosphere heaters.
Just to add to that, people don't really want to accept that you could have a transmission from a ground-based facility that could actually heat the atmosphere to extraordinarily high temperatures, so much so that it causes a bulge in the atmosphere that, in theory, an ICBM so much so that it causes a bulge in the atmosphere that, in
That's the military stated purpose of an ionosphere heater like HAARP, to create resistance for an incoming ICBM. And that they can do that from a ground-based facility is very difficult for many people to comprehend.
But as you just correctly highlighted, that this small, infinite energy has an extraordinary output.
Same with the ionosphere.
It's an electrically charged layer of the atmosphere.
And when you...
Beam 3.5 million watts of power, which is what HAARP can produce into the ionosphere, causes an electrical chain reaction.
So small input, massive output.
Yeah.
I want to ask you about the food wipeout scenario, but there's something else.
First, I just want your take on this.
The UK Daily Mail did a bizarre article, or I should say an article on a bizarre thing that happened at the Davos World Economic Forum thing earlier this week.
Here's the headline.
Biden's climate envoy John Kerry says an extraterrestrial force brought select people to Davos to, quote, save the planet in bizarre World Economic Forum speech.
And here you have John Kerry talking about he's part of a, quote, select group of human beings that have been brought together by an extraterrestrial force to save the planet.
What do you make of that?
Because we've not heard that before.
I looked at some of Kerry's statements, and just John Kerry in general, if we look back at his history, his involvement in these types of weapons of mass destruction, And he is neck deep in all of it.
And we published at Geoengineering Watch a fairly lengthy report that relates to everything we're talking about now, the frequency transmission, weapons of mass destruction, their potential to create seismic activity.
And John Kerry, for example, going to Antarctica, even in the midst of an election, a presidential election, I know you know about that, then going back to Christchurch, New Zealand, leaving with other U.S. diplomats literally hours before a massive quake hit. leaving with other U.S. diplomats literally hours before a massive Same thing happened in Haiti.
U.S. personnel pulled out just prior to massive quake hitting Haiti and then a second time in Christchurch.
It's quite obvious that they knew this was coming.
How could they know?
And again, this is where we're into a realm where people think, how could you possibly create seismic activity with the frequency transmission?
And the science is very clear on this and not disputed.
When you microwave a seismically sensitive region directly, You will, if you do it long enough, likely create seismic activity.
And I'm not sure we've discussed this in a previous exchange, but I would encourage your listeners to search MIT atmospheric heating Fukushima earthquake.
And they'll note that MIT recorded what they called, quote, For three days, directly above the Fukushima epicenter.
Now, again, if that's not a massive red flag, what is?
They can bounce a signal off the atmosphere, back down into the strata, seismically sensitive zone.
And this is not the first time we've seen this activity.
But when you have institutions like MIT acknowledging this, that shouldn't be ignored.
So I just searched what you said, and you're absolutely correct.
It comes up from the MIT Technology Review, which is at technologyreview.com.
Atmosphere above Japan heated rapidly before M9 earthquake.
Infrared emissions above the epicenter increased dramatically in the days before the devastating earthquake in Japan, say scientists and geologists are puzzled.
Over reports of strange atmospheric phenomena in the days before big earthquakes.
So there you go.
Unreal.
Big red flag.
Big red flag.
And they're grabbing at straws because they're not willing or able to tell the truth.
So they're somehow trying to hypothesize that the stress on that...
The seismically sensitive zone was creating the heating in the atmosphere.
That's completely backwards.
And yet, we see the same...
It's just like saying safe and effective in other arenas, right, Mike?
I mean, it couldn't be further from the truth.
No, I mean, that's crazy.
How could they think that...
Just what size pressure in the ground would heat the sky.
Exactly.
It's completely off the rails, baseless.
But if we look at the medical industry, and I know this is your wheelhouse, how could using neurotoxins in injections not do harm?
And yet we have the entire medical community pretending that that's the case.
So we are dealing with science that is what the matrix controllers say it is.
And we have a public that is all too willing to gulp down whatever they're fed.
Now, Now, I've been focusing a whole lot more on food and agriculture and engineered scarcity of food inputs and also, you know, the weather weaponization of food crop yields, you know, to disturb food crop yields and so on.
So let me ask you in that area, One of the major side effects of these freezes, floods, droughts, almost anything that veers from a spring-like condition causes food destruction.
And you're in California, you know that a lot of the orchards there could be avocado orchards, could be almond orchards, could be any kind of orchard.
When you destroy those trees, you don't get a new crop coming back next year.
It could be 10 years.
Before you get harvest from those crops.
So these are decade-long effects when they are sufficiently devastating.
Or the citrus crops in Florida, for example.
So talk to us about the links between weather weaponization and food destruction.
And do you think that this is an intended effect or just a side effect of what they're doing?
The consistency with which agricultural regions are being targeted Can only lead to the conclusion that this is an intended part of the agenda.
Agricultural producing regions are absolutely being targeted and they were already collapsing even without that targeting, but now it's exponentially worse.
When we see citrus fields in California being shaded Because of the UV being so intense and the almond crops and so forth, they are spraying leaves with UV protectants to try to block the scorch that is occurring from the excessive UV because of the disintegrating ozone layer, climate engineering, core causal factor with that.
And I know people may have seen the recent completely false UN publication that the ozone layer is fine now.
It's going to be all better in 20, 30 years.
How long have we seen that?
And how many science reports have they swept under the rug like one six months ago that acknowledged that a huge percentage of the world, the world's populations were being exposed to dangerous levels of UV and the matrix media immediately did damage control on that, trying to sweep that report under the rug.
And then they just pump out a report stating something that's patently false, that the ozone layer is recovering when it's not.
And people go back to sleep.
Back to the agricultural regions, UV already destroying agricultural production.
We're talking about not just extraordinary levels of UVB, but UVC, which is the last spectrum of UV radiation before x-ray.
It's a DNA damaging spectrum of radiation.
We're seeing leaves in the forest, Mike, like a big leaf maple, leaves that are stunted.
They're about a third of their usual size.
Bark scorch on the cambrian layer of specific tree species is being fried from tip to trunk.
It's baked clear down to the core wood.
We're seeing plankton populations slaughtered from the UV because they feed in the upper layers of the water column.
So again, relating all this to food supply, no plankton, no fish in the oceans.
I know you know that.
Polygic fish populations of food fish are plummeting.
And we're seeing orchards ripped out in California, Mike.
They're literally...
They're tearing them out with excavators.
And again, we have to add all these factors into the equation.
The UV scorching the organisms from the top down, toxic rain, killing soil microbiome, killing roots.
We have subsidence happening now in the Central Valley because they're pumping so much groundwater out.
The ground is literally subsiding.
I mean, we're talking about extraordinarily high rates of subsidence, and that's literally compressing the former aquifer.
It will never recover.
And some of these aquifers, by the way, are left over from the Ice Age, literally.
I mean, they don't just recharge.
Some do, but many don't.
So the consistency with which we see agriculture regions targeted with either flooding, drought, hail, flash freezes, all of it across the board, it has to be considered a target.
And, you know, a listener might say, well, people can build greenhouses and then they can grow food indoors.
And to some extent, that may absolutely be necessary.
But, folks, do you realize the cost of that food?
and Most of the world would starve to death because they wouldn't be able to afford to buy it.
Not only do you have to build the greenhouse, then you have to control the atmosphere.
You have to heat it or cool it.
You have to probably provide supplemental CO2 inside the greenhouse because the plants will use up all the CO2 that's in there without some strong circulation.
You can't just buy your way out of this.
That's the thing.
No matter how much money you throw at this, If you destroy the biosphere, you can't feed 8 billion people, period.
Right, Dane?
Oh, you're completely correct.
Absolutely correct.
The notion that we can sustain the current paradigm with that type of micro-production, it's not going to happen.
And this is where the so-called solutions that some people are putting forth would be literally like trying to stop a tidal wave with a Dixie cup.
It's not going to work.
And so to some degree, many in the ranks of the human race at this point remind me of, Mike, you may have seen after the Sri Lanka tidal wave, an earthquake.
Remember seeing that man out on the beach with the ocean subsiding?
He's just standing there staring at the tidal wave coming out of him.
Yeah, wondering like, where'd the water go?
Exactly.
And I see so many that appear to be in that state as if they shouldn't be able to recognize the tidal wave looming above their head.
And in regard to the flash freezing, which is doing a lot of damage, An article that your listeners, I would encourage them to look at because they can see the whole patent with the important sections highlighted.
The title of the article is called Creating Snowstorms, the Nolenberg Patent.
Nolenberg with a K. K-N-O-L-L-E-N-B-E-R-G. Geoengineeringwatch.org, Creating Snowstorms.
That's under the engineering winter section.
And that patent is very revealing at the elements that can be used To artificially nucleate cloud moisture, which causes ice to start forming at far above normal temperatures.
And that endothermic reaction starts to cool down that air mass, which sinks to the surface eventually because cold air is more dense.
And this is what's going on on a scale that's incomprehensible.
Here's some of the elements named in this patent.
I'm looking at it right now.
If you're listeners, they want to look at the patent directly, it's US... 3613992A. And some of the elements, potassium nitrate, ammonium nitrate, urea, artificial urea.
And these are nucleating elements that barium as well.
Again, highly toxic, but the climate engineers don't care.
Do they care when they detonated 2,400 nuclear bombs all over the world, contaminating every living thing?
Project Starfish in the magnetosphere, hydrogen bombs detonated in the magnetosphere, the reverberations of which are still doing damage.
When we look at patents like this, we see these ingredients showing up in the snow, and the damage on the ground is so profound, and it should be clear at this point.
We don't get winter storms out of the Gulf of Mexico.
That's not historically normal or an occurrence that we would have ever seen, and that's what we see almost every time now.
We just had winter storm Iggy, the named winter storm by the climate-adjuring cover-up crew at the Weather Channel.
Straight out of the Gulf of Mexico.
And as it moves north, we have tornadoes and thundershowers.
And as it circulates counterclockwise around that low-pressure zone, and they're circulating that over the Great Lakes because the Great Lakes are still largely ice-free.
They're at record warm temperatures.
They're picking up that moisture.
They're chemically nucleating it all, and they get some snow on the backside of that.
So now we have a winter storm again with a warm side and a cold side.
Historically unprecedented in the last decade.
Now it's the norm.
So we hope people connect the dots that there are many, many layers to climate engineering and creating artificial winter weather events, key part of that.
And they can search.
I think I've mentioned this in our exchange before, but just in case, Chinese scientists create engineer winter snowstorm, I think, or create snowstorm.
It should come up.
And anything along those lines, Popular Science covered it, MSNBC, The Guardian, everybody covered it.
But yet, when we bring that up here, We're treated as if some were out on the fringe, which is ridiculous.
This is hard science.
Yeah, and actually there are so many signs now of what is going on.
For example, and also tying this back to food, we've seen over the last 12 months a very aggressive push by the globalists for indoor, insect-based food production.
So it's crickets and it's mealworms.
And if you look at the mealworm factories, like there's a massive mealworm factory being set up in France, There's a giant cricket factory that's funded by the Canadian government being set up there.
And all the stories talk about the same thing.
Oh, we're going to grow your food indoors.
It's going to have protein, and it's going to have fat, and of course it's going to have chitin and all this other stuff you can't digest, but they're going to grow it all indoors.
And you think, why?
Why are they going to do all the food indoors?
The answer is clear.
They're building kind of food arcs for themselves, the select few elitists, as they destroy the skies and destroy the biosphere and destroy the ability to produce crops under the natural sun and sky.
I mean, that's what it seems like to me.
What's your interpretation?
Well, I agree.
I agree that that's the trajectory they are on.
We're on the same page there.
I would just argue that if we remain on this trajectory, no one gets out alive, including them.
They may last a bit longer than the rest of us, but not much longer.
But I agree that that's their agenda, their motives.
We know they're building underground facilities.
But there's a delusion there that Based on psychoanalysis, straight from the manual, with the types of deficiencies that those in power inevitably have, the common thread, a near total lack of comprehension as to the consequences of their actions, even to themselves.
So we are painted into a very dark corner at this point.
And we at Geoengineering Watch are trying to point out this biggest hole in the bottom of the boat.
Planet stops supporting life.
It's game over.
And that's happening from many directions.
We see the power structure maneuvering to cool the herd right now, Mike.
And I know you're neck deep in that equation.
You know what they're doing.
And they are, I would argue, the biosphere beat them to the intersection.
They thought they could play God with the weather indefinitely and stay off the consequences of doing so.
And that's not the case.
And now they're frantically at warp speed In that arena of their attempt to cull the herd, trying to catch up.
And it's not going well.
It's a very non-linear equation.
Once you have co-extinction kicking in, and for your listeners that aren't familiar with that term, when certain species perish on which other species depend, those species then perish as well.
It's a domino effect.
And it's...
It's been activated on many fronts.
I wanted to ask you that exact question.
Everything you're describing here sounds like an ELE, an extinction-level event.
It doesn't mean that every species goes extinct.
That's not going to happen.
But just like you said, we coexist with other species.
And for example, pollinators, just the biomass of insect pollinators, if that continues to plunge, and it's already down 70% or 80% in some areas that I've seen, Which is already red alert time.
But if that plunges even more, you know, humanity doesn't really have a functioning food supply, nor does the natural ecosystem upon which everything else is built.
I mean, you lose the pollinators, you lose the planet, basically.
Oh, you're completely correct.
And your statistics are correct as well.
That's the realm we're in right now.
And if your listeners search bees aluminum, they'll see the part of the equation that no official source has told them, that bees are dying of symptoms that resemble Alzheimer's and dementia in a human being because they're packed full of aluminum.
In some cases, 200 times more aluminum than it takes to cause those ailments in a human being.
And this is taking place a thousand miles away from any agriculture or urban area.
So where is this coming from?
It's coming from the sky.
We know climate engineering elements, one of the primary patents, the Wellsbach patent, it's stratospheric aerosol seeding for reduction of global warming.
Specifically, aluminum oxide is named in that patent.
And it is, again, ubiquitous all over the world now when they're dumping tens of millions of tons of it.
And so, yes, there's many things affecting the bees, glyphosate, frequency transmissions, other farm chemicals.
And it's not just the bees.
It's all terrestrial insects.
But when we have a study that directly links bees and aluminum, Mike, wouldn't you think that somebody would be screaming about that?
And yet we see a very concerted effort to suppress that kind of data.
No, and that's what's extraordinary.
Governments around the world, like New Zealand, is focused on banning nutritional supplements, not banning the toxicity that's killing the planet, right?
That's my note.
It is.
As you know, Dane, the corporations hold so much sway over the regulator's That's why they can still spray glyphosate or organophosphate chemicals that do cause Alzheimer's.
And frankly, we have a bunch of honeybees out there that are lost and wandering around and not sure where they are.
I'm going to call them Biden bees, by the way.
And it's just like buzzing around like, what am I doing here?
Sorry to throw that bad joke in there, but this is a serious issue.
I mean, this threatens the planet.
Now, just in the interest of being respectful of your time, Dane, I do want to ask you about solutions.
But first, how can people support your efforts?
I know you have an email.
Sign up at geoengineeringwatch.org.
What else can people do to help support your efforts and your work?
What they can do from their own home computer is to, that's the reason for our site, to find reports from the site, whether it's the engineering drought section, engineering winter section, engineering wildfire section, but for whatever appropriate environmental article or environmental group,
agricultural group, send the appropriate link to them or send our groundbreaking documentary, The Dimming, which is a very complete A to Z on the climate engineering issue and the cover-up of the same.
And that's a form of a flaming arrow.
We metaphorically call it a flaming arrow.
If you start enough spot fires of awareness and those spot fires begin to expand as people connect the dots and they merge into a bigger blaze that the power structure can't put out, then we can put this issue on the radar.
And I would argue if we can expose it, it will cause a shockwave all over the world if people understood that they are literally under assault from the skies right now.
So by sharing those links, that's a huge help for the cause.
We do have the printed materials that we pass on for less than our cost at GeoDreamWatch.
That's our 20-page booklets, which I think I've sent you before, Mike.
And those are very effective because it's a photograph and satellite images and copies of the federal gag order.
I mean, I know you know that that's on our National Weather Service and NOAA, Mike, the legal federal gag order.
Why would you gag the weatherman if you didn't have something extraordinary to hide?
We have our...
We just put our...
Because we had so many people requesting it, we have now shirts and hoodies that have a really clear four-color image of a military...
A C-17 Globemaster descending on the planet, spewing out his dispersion, and with the caption, Stop Climate Engineering, Investigate, geoengineeringwatch.org, so people could find more data.
And that's a good conversation starter.
We have a lot of those being put to use now, too.
So by these various methods to start the conversation and feed that fire of awareness, and if we can reach a critical mass of awareness, Mike, and that's why I'm so grateful to you for, All you've done to help bring this issue to light.
If we can reach a critical mass of awareness, I would argue the fur will fly.
That people will be taking to the streets with their proverbial pitchforks and torches.
No weather event, nothing at this point, can be considered, quote, natural.
Nothing.
And Mike, if we look at...
Sorry to ramble here for a minute, but this is important.
If your listeners search, for example, a document at geoengineeringwatch.org titled Massive Senate Document, 800 pages long, outlining the scope and scale of the climate intervention operations going back decades.
Within that document, there is...
Sorry, I had an earphone drop out here.
But within that document, There is a specific provision for blanket legal immunity for anyone and everyone involved.
Because the liability that these programs have created is so immense.
If the public ever wakes up to this, there will be a paradigm shift.
Well, they're going to have to get in line behind the vaccine industry, I guess, if there's going to be class action lawsuits.
But do you have a browser open in front of you?
I do.
Okay, bring up censored.news.
And I just want to show you, I just put your January 14th global alert at the top of censored.news in our hand-picked news section.
Do you see that?
Kind of slow browser here, but coming up now.
Yes, thank you.
Thank you, Mike.
Okay, great.
So what I just did, I just sent some messages to my team.
We're also going to index geoengineeringwatch.org Uh, on this site so that it automatically spiders your latest, uh, alerts because your alerts, that's what people send to me.
Like every time you put out a new alert, I get about 10 copies of it sent to me by, by people like, have you seen this?
Um, so I don't know why we didn't index your site earlier, but we got to do it now.
Thank you for that.
Thank you for that, Mike.
Yeah, we've got to get the word out.
If I can just give a little history on what that broadcast is about, and I just completed my 388th in a row.
And we pay for that airtime out of pocket.
We're on 21 stations AM and FM on air throughout the country that we pay for out of pocket with no advertising at all to the tune of it's well into five figures monthly.
And our only goal Is to expose the insanity, as I know is your only goal as well, Mike.
And so again, that's a commercial-free, non-political broadcast.
And it's been an ongoing effort for seven-plus years now.
I've never missed a week, but that's as much as I can pack into 55 minutes.
And if I could...
One quote that puts this into context, Mike, I know you know this quote from Lyndon Johnson from 62.
He's on film and on the record.
It's the start of every single global broadcast.
He who controls the weather controls the world.
You know that quote.
Let me give you another one from four years earlier when Johnson was just a senator, but clearly the direction he was heading.
We've just recovered this off of...
A archival transcript.
Direct quote, Lyndon Johnson.
Here it is.
From 1958.
How about that?
Wow.
Wow and that was decades ago.
Direct quote 1958.
Yeah, and you think they have more advancements.
Since then, you better.
That's just extraordinary.
Okay, last question, and again, thank you for spending this time with us.
I know people are going to share this interview, and folks, you can repost it on your own channels as well, or you can post snippets of this interview.
Just give credit to geoengineeringwatch.org.
And if you're just listening to this and you're wondering why there's no video, we did not record video.
This is just an audio-only conversation that we do late in the evening, or at least my time is late.
Not quite as late your time, Dane.
But what is the most effective thing that people could do to...
To try to stop this madness.
I mean, is it worth the effort to contact your representatives, you know, or should they just spread awareness at this point and try to help get a critical mass of consciousness about this?
It's all important.
Thank you for asking that question.
That's very key.
People need to know what they can do.
We have an activist suggestions link on the homepage of geoengineeringwatch.org to add much more information But in regard to contacting so-called elected officials, yes, it's important.
But when you send an email to their contact, it's important to CC as many of that elected official's constituents as you can so that they know many are seeing this exchange of data.
When you send something like the dimming, a link to the dimming to an elected official, and they know that A hundred of their constituents knows that they got that, and they may have to answer for why they didn't act on it at some point.
Now you start to hold them accountable.
And when you reach again farm groups, ag groups, and you land this material in their lap, it takes a while for that seed to grow sometimes.
This is a shattering of a person's entire perception of the paradigm they live in, complete shattering.
And it takes time for that.
But for example, when we have elected officials like Gavin Newsom, who serves the matrix completely and entirely and is certainly pushing towards a presidency at some point.
He has absolutely been put on notice, as I know I've stated on, I think with exchange with you before.
I met with Gavin in his office, top aides, presented data they couldn't refuse.
It's all in the record.
And if we can bring this to light, Mr.
Newsom will have some explaining to do to the whole world.
Again, we can start to put these people on notice.
We need to.
We must.
And we can, at the same time, raise legions of the aware amongst our own ranks as they begin to have to face this issue.
And that's key.
Mike, I know you know this.
You've been at this so long.
You know there are so many that won't face reality until they have to.
But that moment, I would argue, is very close.
And if we give them enough pieces of the puzzle so they understand what's happening and why, At that moment when they can no longer remain in denial.
Because hiding in your cabin on the Titanic doesn't save you, does it?
Well, no.
You can't go anywhere else because the whole planet is affected.
Exactly.
Unless you think you can have a colony on Mars or something.
Forget it.
Yeah, I know.
That's a whole other subject.
How much have we been lied to in regard to...
Does anybody think it's a little bit preposterous that we were...
We're told driving a dune buggy around on the moon in the 60s and nobody's been back.
That's interesting to me.
So again, a whole other subject and how far does deception go on many fronts.
But in regard to the climate and any discussion, and this is key, no matter what side of the political fence anybody's on, No matter what their perspective is on the climate or the state of the climate, this is key.
How can there be any legitimate discussion of the climate from any perspective without first and foremost addressing the single greatest climate-disrupting factor of all, climate intervention operations?
Yep.
Hard to argue that.
This is...
This is a cosmic level importance discussion, and you notice how the powers that be, they want to distract us with politics, left versus right, or this person versus that person, or sports, or oh, this football player passed out on the field.
Let's everybody talk about that for 72 hours.
What about the skies, the rain, the soil, the things that grow our food, that keep us alive?
Without that, we have nothing.
We are dead without that.
And yet, I mean, it's all around us.
You can just look up.
You can open your eyes and look up instead of looking at your screen and being propagandized and brainwashed.
And yet...
Most people won't look at the world around them.
I would encourage your listeners to try this.
Very simple test.
If they can go to someplace where it's dark, no light pollution, on a still night when aerosol operations have been happening, you have the hazy skies, and you can tell when the lower air column is saturated because the visibility is not that great.
If you're looking across valleys or the distant mountains, there's just a haze in the air.
But if they go out on a dark night, brightest light they can find, Somewhere where there's no light pollution, aim it straight up and look straight up through that beam.
And you have to see it to believe it.
The amount of material comes down.
It looks like you're in a blizzard.
It's that bad.
Yes, there can be pollution particles and dust particles, but not that quantity without the aerosol spraying operations.
Again, we've extrapolated from rain tests working with one of the world's top ag institutions that there appears to be somewhere in the range of 50 to 70 million tons.
Of nanoparticles being dispersed into skies all over the globe.
That's an extraordinary amount of material.
So much so, Mike, so much of that material has fallen on our forests in Northern California that it has changed soil pH values 10 to 12 times toward alkaline.
I know this is your wheelhouse.
I know you know what a profound change that is.
10 to 12 times toward alkaline.
We've gone from 5.4 to 6.6.
The organisms can't take that on top of the toxin itself, on top of the UV, on top of the lack of rain in general.
But if they shine that light up and consider they are breathing what they are seeing coming down through that light, with every breath they take, in fact, current science data indicates we may be inhaling as many as 20 million nanoparticles with every single breath we take.
Think about that.
Yeah, and microplastics in the air in the cities and probably everywhere as well.
But what you...
Yeah, I mean, we're going to end up...
Those of us living today, when we expire...
If we're buried and our bodies decompose, there will be left an imprint of our lungs in plastic.
It reminds me...
It'll be like a plastic lung tree.
They're still left behind.
It's crazy.
I'm sure the pictures of the albatrosses and so forth that have died because they're decomposing and they're literally full of plastic that they have consumed.
We've seen those pictures, and yeah, the amount that we're absorbing is truly extraordinary, building up in all of us.
It's a wonder any of us can walk and talk at this point, but our bodies can only take so much.
And again, that flashlight test is very, very shocking for those that are willing to take the time to do it.
Yeah, I would just add to that, folks, if you have night vision goggles, put on a pair of night vision, look up at the night sky where there's no light pollution on a clear night.
There's all kinds of stuff flying around up there, by the way.
And way higher than airplanes because I know what an airplane at 30,000 feet looks like from the ground or 5,000 feet or what have you.
I'm a former aviator.
I'm trained as a pilot.
And this stuff that I see with night vision cruising around, way higher than airplanes.
So just saying, there's stuff happening that you're not being told about.
There's a lot happening.
And what I would, again, encourage people to prioritize, if the boat's sinking, we need to deal with the biggest hole in the bottom of the boat first, as we stated, humangearingwatch.org, short of nuclear cataclysm.
The overall ramifications from the climate engineering operations, aka weather and biological warfare, are the most dire and immediate threat we collectively face, again, short of nuclear cataclysm.
And even on that front, I know, as we've discussed before, because climate engineering is decimating the planet's protective layers, making us much more vulnerable to a large CME, coronal mass ejection of solar flare, which would shut down grids around the globe and prevent nuclear plants from cooling themselves.
Now we have Fukushima times 100, 200, 300, game over.
So even in the nuclear realm, climate engineering is pounding the nails into our collective coffin.
It's the most insane single human endeavor ever deployed by the human race, Climate Intervention Manhattan Project.
We need to deal with it.
Well said.
Well said.
Okay.
Dane Wigington, everybody, from geoengineeringwatch.org.
Just type that into your browser's URL box there.
Just go straight to the website, geoengineeringwatch.org.
And as always, feel free to repost this interview on other channels and platforms.
And just give credit to Dane Wigington at his website.
And Dane, stand by.
Don't disconnect yet.
I just want to thank you for joining me.
Dane, it's been a pleasure.
Gratitude's mine, Mike.
I am extraordinarily grateful for your voice in this battle and on other battle fronts.
I know you've been marching forward in the fight for the greater good for so long, and it's a pleasure and honor to march with you and all your listeners and followers.
Team Humanity, folks.
That's what we're all part of.
Be part of it if you're not already.
Team Humanity.
We are going to help humans survive and navigate this apocalypse.
So, again, I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon.com, the free speech video platform.
Notice nothing has been censored here.
In fact, we have no edits, no censorship, none of that whatsoever in this entire conversation.
Nothing was off limits.
We covered it all.
So thank you again, Dane, and thank you all for listening.
God bless you all.
Take care, and we'll have more updates from Dane later this year on brighttown.com and other platforms.
Take care, everybody.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection