Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 27, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:25:38

Situation Update, 12/27/22 - CLIMATE INSANITY: Geoengineering scheme launched to DIM the sun...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right, welcome to the Situation Update for Tuesday, December 27th, 2022.
	Mike Adams here, and wow, the universe works very rapidly in bringing people together who need to share ideas publicly.
	As you know, yesterday I was talking about Graham Hancock's work, An Ancient Apocalypse, and And the comet impact theory of what destroyed ancient civilizations.
	And I mentioned that in 2023, I'm going to put a lot of emphasis on this and that I wanted to reach out to many experts in this area for interviews.
	And so quickly, already I've got two interviews lined up for you.
	Of experts who I've met, actually, a few years ago, but I haven't interviewed them since.
	So I want to give a shout-out right now to three people.
	Actually, Brad Cummings, who I have interviewed, was texting me and telling me that I've got to talk with Timothy Albarino.
	Timothy Albarino is the author of a book called Birthright, The Coming Post-Human Apocalypse and the Usurpation of Adam's Dominion on Planet Earth.
	I had met Timothy Albarino in 2019 before this book came out, so I have not read this book.
	But it's something I'm going to read.
	And so I reached out to Mr.
	Albarino via text and invited him on for an interview.
	And he said, yes, absolutely.
	So we're going to schedule that and get him on.
	If you want to check out that book, it's called Birthright.
	And it looks very promising because he ties together so many of the themes of ancient civilizations and transhumanism and depopulation, annihilation, but also biblical themes as well.
	So that's going to be a fascinating book.
	And then also Jamie Walden reached out.
	Jamie Walden I also met in 2019 thanks to Steve Quayle.
	He's the author of a book called Omega Dynamics, equipping a warrior class of Christians for the days ahead.
	And Jamie Walden is spoken of so highly by so many people that I know and trust.
	And Jamie is well regarded by so many people that I know, including Steve Quayle.
	And so I reached out to Jamie via text and invited him on for an interview, and he also agreed.
	So we're going to have, so far then, Timothy Albarino and Jamie Walden.
	And then I also told Brad Cummings that I'm going to be quoting...
	Matthew chapter 24, you may have guessed, in today's podcast.
	You know what's in Matthew chapter 24.
	You knew I couldn't leave it alone.
	Yeah, we're going to get to that here in a minute.
	And so we're going to have all these people on and so many more in 2023.
	We are really getting to big, big picture stuff.
	I'm not going to spend much time in 2023.
	Talking to people or even talking to myself about so many of the little domestic small things when this big looming cosmic picture is what we, I think, need to be focused on.
	I mean, we'll see where that goes.
	But we're also reaching out to Graham Hancock and his team and Alan West and I believe Randall Fitzgerald and others to see if they would like to come on and talk about their scientific findings about the comet theory and the Younger Dryas boundary or the Younger Dryas impact event, as it's called.
	And in fact, if we have time here today, one of the things I'm going to cover for you is part of a presentation that was made several years ago by the Comet Research Group.
	And their website is cometresearchgroup.org, although it appears they have not updated anything for several years previously.
	Perhaps they ran out of funding, which is shocking to me because this is one of the most important things that should be funded if humanity wishes to survive.
	So we're going to get to that and so much more, but it's going to be a very exciting time, that's for sure.
	Now, something else also happened in the last 24 hours that is related to all of this.
	And it comes from technologyreview.com, which is known as the MIT Technology Review.
	And you should understand that MIT is part of the science deep state.
	So it's conventional scientists.
	They're all pro-pharmaceuticals, pro-GMOs, pro-genetic engineering.
	And it turns out they're also pro-climate engineering because they've just released a story.
	Actually, this came out on Christmas Eve here in 2022.
	Author is James Temple.
	And here it is.
	Quote, a startup says it has begun releasing particles into the atmosphere in an effort to tweak the climate.
	Now, what they mean is that they're engaged in geoengineering.
	In fact, that's the subhead.
	So here it is.
	Well, yeah, that's an honest assessment.
	So yeah, of course, widespread criticism.
	Geoengineering is a term that was considered a conspiracy theory.
	Until maybe just now, actually.
	If you mentioned geoengineering in an article, or if you interviewed Dane Wigington, which I have several times at Geoengineering Watch, or if you talked about weather control, right, then you were accused of being an Alex Jones conspiracy theorist.
	Well, turns out Alex Jones was correct about all this, by the way, and a lot of other things.
	But weather control has been taking place for decades.
	And geoengineering is simply the application of weather control to alter weather patterns, rainfall, droughts, and to weaponize those systems against targeted nations.
	And of course, if you understand the relationship between weather and food production, and then the relationship between famine and revolution or political instability, I believe that the floods over the last few years in China were the result of geoengineering.
	I also believe that the droughts that have afflicted the western half of the United States over the last several years are the result of geoengineering.
	Dane Wigington put out an alert just over the last few days talking about this deep freeze, this Arctic blast that came into the continental United States and ended up freezing half the country, if not two-thirds of the country.
	That, he says, was the result of geoengineering.
	Well...
	For the first time, we have geoengineering admitted to by the science establishment.
	In this case, MIT Technology Review.
	And they're saying in this article, again by James Temple, that this is an effort to tweak the climate.
	Well, what does that mean?
	It means they're working to alter the dynamic between sunlight and photosynthesis.
	And how much light reaches the surface of the Earth, which they say is necessary to prevent global warming, which is all nonsense, by the way, because carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, which, you know, you already know that if you're listening to this.
	But they are involved in geoengineering, which is a kind of terraforming.
	So terraforming is the process of altering a planet's atmospheric chemistry and climate conditions over time in order to make the planet more amenable to a species or perhaps a collection of species that wish to inhabit the planet.
	That's terraforming.
	Earth is undergoing terraforming.
	And this is part of it.
	Geoengineering is one of the methods to achieve terraforming.
	And the terraforming that's taking place on Earth, which is alluded to in this article, is designed to block the sun, to reduce photosynthesis, to freeze the planet.
	In other words, to cause another major ice age.
	And this ice age would cause ocean levels to drop Perhaps hundreds of feet lower than where they are now, back to where they were, let's say, in the last Ice Age, which was, what, roughly 13,000 years ago or in that timeframe.
	And this would create more land mass, but a lot more ice.
	And the planet would be, you know, drier.
	There would be far fewer rainforests.
	It would not be lush.
	It would be more like, I call it the ice planet Hoth from The Empire Strikes Back.
	It would be more of a frozen ice ball with less ocean habitat because the oceans would be smaller.
	And not as deep.
	More shallow, in other words.
	So that's a reduction of aquatic habitat.
	And this is what the climate cultists are pushing for constantly.
	They hate warmth.
	They hate the sun.
	And they're trying to block the sun, which is what this article is about in technologyreview.com.
	But if you think about it, they hate warmth.
	They hate liquid water.
	They hate rainfall.
	They hate rainforests.
	They despise aquatic ecosystems.
	They think that the earth should be more frozen, more lifeless, inhospitable.
	Because plants don't grow in ice, by the way, right?
	To have plants grow, you have to have liquid water.
	So the climate cultists want all the water locked up into ice where plants can't get it.
	They want a frozen, dead planet.
	And in order to achieve that, they need to engage in terraforming.
	They also want to eliminate carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
	And that's what carbon sequestration is all about.
	That's another method of terraforming or geoengineering.
	So you have carbon sequestration and then you have what's called stratospheric aerosol injection or releasing particulate matter, i.e.
	pollution, into the stratosphere in order to reflect sunlight away from the planet, thereby dimming the sun from the point of view of the plants on the surface of the Earth, which would also reduce the efficacy of solar power, So all the solar systems would be a lot less efficient.
	Food crops would fail worldwide because you would have shorter growing seasons and you would have less photosynthesis taking place, which is plant biology, obviously, to produce food crops.
	And with a reduction of food crops, but also natural foliage and also phytoplankton in the oceans, you would have a massive die-off.
	So it's an extinction-level event that the world's scientists are trying to achieve in the name of climate change or let's say mucking around with the climate.
	They say they want to stop global warming, but actually they're trying to put in place an extinction-level event to terraform the planet and make it inhospitable to current human life.
	All right?
	So from this article in MIT Technology Review, a startup claims it has launched weather balloons that may have released reflective sulfur particles into the stratosphere, potentially crossing a controversial barrier in the field of solar engineering.
	Now, there's a lot of wishy-washy words in that paragraph, aren't there?
	They've launched weather balloons that, quote, may have released reflective sulfur particles.
	Really?
	May have?
	Pretty sure that was the experiment, was to launch them.
	And then it says, oh, potentially crossing a controversial barrier.
	Oh, really?
	Potentially?
	You mean altering the climate for all the world's populations and all the world's nations without getting permission from all those people?
	Oh, that's controversial?
	Really?
	You mean to the third world or developing nation people who are barely getting by on subsistence lifestyles, who cannot handle even a 5% reduction in crop yields, you think it's controversial to dim the sun and cause their crops to fail?
	Oh, hmm.
	Yeah, you bet that's controversial.
	They're going to starve out third world nations with this.
	And they're calling it solar geoengineering, which means dimming the sun, by the way.
	Now, here's what's interesting.
	In this article, MIT Technology Review admits that this process of terraforming or geoengineering can devastate crop yields and cause mass global starvation, mass death.
	And here's where they imply that.
	They don't say it directly, but they imply it.
	Here it is.
	It's the next paragraph, quote, geoengineering refers to deliberate efforts to manipulate the climate by reflecting more sunlight back into space.
	Mimicking a natural process, they say, that occurs in the aftermath of large volcanic eruptions.
	Yeah, mimicking, they call it a natural process.
	No, it is a natural disaster.
	It is a cataclysm when a massive volcano erupts.
	And releases particulate matter into the atmosphere that circles the earth, dims the sun for one to two crop seasons and causes crops to fail and causes people to starve to death all over the world.
	Now yesterday I was just going off memory and I was trying to remember the name of the volcano and what year it was and I thought it was Mount...
	Mount Tamboru in 1817.
	Alright, that was my memory.
	Well, today I have fact-checked that for you, and it's actually Mount Tambora in 1815.
	Alright, so I was off by a syllable and two years.
	Anyway, Mount Tambora in 1815 unleashed what was called The year without a summer, because it ejected so much particulate matter into the atmosphere that it dimmed the sun and it caused massive global crop failures.
	And I'm going to read for you from NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
	This is the division known as the National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service.
	What would that be?
	NASDIS. Okay, it's nesdis.noaa.gov.
	And it says that after Mount Tambora exploded in 1815, quote, the volcanic winter caused crop failures, food shortages, and flooding for most of North America, Western Europe, and parts of Asia.
	Oh, is that all?
	Only most of the world?
	Most of the population?
	At that time, according to historical climatological sources, the death toll of the 1815 event was 11,000 from the pyroclastic flows.
	That's people who were close to the volcano and just got caught in the outflows.
	And then 100,000 from the resulting food shortages over the following decade.
	Well, you got to remember the population was much smaller in 1815.
	It was a fraction of what it is today.
	And this 100,000 is just a wild guess.
	It could be a lot more.
	And then it quotes NOAA's Earth Systems Research Laboratory, the ESRL, on volcanic eruptions, saying that in New England, that's in modern America, snow fell in July of 1816.
	So it was snowing in July, and temperatures reached the 30s.
	And of course, if you look into this, there were crop failures all over Western Europe and around the world, including in Asia, because of this volcano.
	So yeah, you can call this a natural process, but it's actually a natural disaster.
	It's apocalyptic.
	And so when MIT Technology Review says, oh, we're going to release particulate matter into the stratosphere, quote, mimicking a natural process that occurs in the aftermath of large volcanic eruptions.
	Yeah.
	Not so natural if you're starving to death, is it?
	No, it's a disaster.
	But they're downplaying this.
	You know, they're trying to act like messing with the climate and geoengineering or terraforming is a natural process.
	No, it's not.
	It's a disaster.
	I mean, look, you could argue that the Earth getting struck by a giant comet is also a natural process in a sense.
	Because, well, the comet comes from the cosmos and it's all...
	In other words, humankind didn't launch the comet.
	So it came from natural phenomena, you could argue, in the sense that an earthquake is natural or that poisonous berries in the forest are natural or poisonous mushrooms that destroy your liver.
	That's natural, too.
	It doesn't mean you want to make spaghetti sauce out of it.
	Oh, look at these delicious mushrooms.
	Let's have spaghetti sauce.
	No, probably not a great idea.
	Earthquakes can be devastating.
	Tidal waves, floods, that's all natural and it's all apocalyptic.
	So just because you're mimicking a disaster doesn't make it right, by the way.
	They're mimicking a disaster by spraying sulfur particles into the atmosphere.
	Now, do you recall, I don't know if you remember some of the news reports back in the 1980s when they were trying to raise the alarm over something called acid rain.
	Do you recall that?
	You know, when there were only three channels on TV because you didn't have the internet?
	And I remember specifically, I remember the news.
	I remember some of the images.
	They would show you trees in the fall turning yellow.
	Yeah, I know, right?
	Who knew trees, that their leaves would turn yellow in the fall?
	Well, I remember on the news, the trees were turning yellow and they said, it's acid rain!
	It's acid rain!
	And you're like, what's acid rain?
	And they would tell you with all these scare stories.
	This was kind of the warm-up before global warming.
	This was the warm-up round.
	Let's scare everybody with acid rain.
	Well, what caused acid rain, they said.
	Well, it was sulfur in the atmosphere.
	The sulfur particles, they said.
	And what caused the sulfur particles to be in the atmosphere?
	Oh, it was the coal-fired power plants that released the sulfur.
	And they were trying to scare us about acid rain in the 1980s as a justification to shut down fossil fuels.
	Well, the acid rain narrative kind of bombed.
	No one believed it because they remembered that, you know, leaves turn yellow in the fall anyway.
	No one believed it.
	So that's when they started to push very heavily global warming.
	And then soon after Al Gore came along and said, we're all going to die by the year 2000 or 2010 if we didn't stop fossil fuels.
	And then when global warming didn't pan out, they changed it to, of course, climate change, which is where we are now.
	But it was all the same psychological operation to convince people that something is wrong with your planet and we have to shut down your energy infrastructure in order to solve these problems.
	They tried acid rain, global warming, and now climate change.
	And now they blame CO2.
	And then in Europe, they're blaming nitrogen too somehow.
	Like nitrogen is bad.
	We have to seize 3,000 farms in the Netherlands because nitrogen is bad, huh?
	Wow, wait until they find out what's in the atmosphere.
	78% nitrogen.
	Don't tell the Europeans.
	They'll probably try to shut down the entire atmosphere.
	They'll probably try to vent Earth's atmosphere into outer space or something.
	Like, you've got to get rid of the nitrogen!
	It's like, well, maybe we should vent you into outer space and save the planet from you.
	How about that?
	Let's try that first.
	So with all these mad climate scientists running around, they are dangerous, dangerous, psychotic individuals.
	And at least MIT Technology Review acknowledges that there might be risks associated with this.
	Here, they say in this article, little is known about the real-world effect of such deliberate interventions at large scales, which is admitting, like, we don't know what we're doing.
	But it continues, but they could have dangerous side effects.
	Oh, you think?
	Messing with the sun?
	Messing with photosynthesis?
	The impacts could also be worse in some regions than others, which could provoke geopolitical conflicts.
	Oh, you think?
	Really?
	And then the story goes on.
	Some researchers who have long studied the technology are deeply troubled that the company make sunsets better.
	Because they couldn't call themselves solar darkness, right?
	Make sunsets.
	Like, doom and gloom for real.
	No.
	They call themselves make sunsets.
	Appears to have moved forward with launches from a site in Mexico without any public engagement or scientific scrutiny.
	It's already attempting to sell, quote, cooling credits for future balloon flights that would carry larger payloads.
	So, wait.
	Wait a second.
	Wait a second.
	Is this part of the carbon credit scam, just kind of a new addition of that?
	Where you can buy, if you're a corporation, you can virtue signal by saying that you're buying cooling credits and you give money to this company called Make Sunsets, which is all about dimming the sun, and using your money, they pollute the skies.
	On your behalf, you know, so if you're Pepsi or Nike or Adidas, you know, you want a virtue signal because you were founded by Nazis in the case of Adidas.
	And so you buy cooling credits and then the company pollutes the skies on your behalf.
	And sure enough, the sun grows dim if enough companies pump money into this scheme and then the crops fail.
	And you have more famine, more starvation, more civil unrest, more uprisings, more geopolitical instability.
	And you have more die-offs of more animal species, more die-offs of the rainforests and all the pollinators and the butterflies and the orchids.
	Everything.
	The insect biomass collapses, but it's all because these climate lunatics are virtue signaling and claiming that they're saving the planet by blocking the sun.
	These people are freaking insane!
	Which turns out I'm not the only one who believes that.
	From the story, quote, several researchers that MIT Technology Review spoke with condemned the effort to commercialize geoengineering at this early stage.
	Some potential investors and customers who have reviewed the company's proposals say that it's not a serious scientific effort or a credible business, but more of an attention grab designed to stir up controversy in the field.
	Yeah, you're getting paid to pollute.
	That's their business model, is getting paid to pollute the skies.
	Now, haven't we done enough pollution on this planet already?
	You know, I'm the creator of the film called BioSludged, which is all about the EPA's approved pollution of the soils.
	Now, we're not allowed to pollute the waterways because we have the Clean Water Act, but you're allowed to pollute the soils by taking all the feces and sludge, the toilet sludge, from every city in America, and you just dump it on farm fields and school fields and city parks and so on.
	It's a practice that happens every day.
	And it's called BioSludge.
	And that's why I created the film BioSludged, which you can see for free at BioSludged.com.
	And in that film, I interviewed EPA whistleblower Dr.
	David Lewis, who is another great hero for trying to tell the truth about this.
	But that's just one example of pollution.
	What about microplastics pollution in the oceans all over the world?
	Haven't we polluted the oceans enough?
	What about lead arsenate pollution of agricultural crops and orchards back before that was banned in North America?
	There was spraying lead and arsenic all over the croplands.
	What about pharmaceutical pollution?
	There's pharmaceutical runoff from the pharma factories and people are flushing birth control pills and HRT drugs and everything else.
	And that goes into the waterways.
	Massive pharmaceutical pollution.
	What about other heavy metals that come from industry?
	What about China's massive pollution of its rice fields with irrigation water contaminated with toxic heavy metals like lead and cadmium arsenic and maybe a little bit of mercury in there as well?
	And understand that I'm the scientist that has tested more of these food and nutritional products probably than any other living scientist in the world today, I would dare say, because my lab has done tens of thousands of such tests over the last few years in this industry of raw materials and finished products and everything else.
	I'm not aware of anybody that has done as much food science testing for toxic elements in the food supply.
	I don't think anybody has.
	I come to think of it, I think I'm actually the most prolific tester of food products for heavy metals on this planet.
	Nevertheless, I can tell you there's a lot of toxic pollution in the food supply because we've seen it.
	So humanity has become a, well, it's a pollution species.
	And I was kind of half-joking about this yesterday, that after the collapse of this civilization, when future archaeologists dig into this layer, it'll be called something like the trash layer.
	This was the trash epoch of former human existence.
	Look at all this trash.
	They had landfills.
	They built mountains out of trash, you know, a la Idiocracy.
	They had trash avalanches, for God's sake.
	Look at all this plastic.
	Look at all these AOL CD-ROMs that say something about a thousand free hours of internet, whatever that was.
	Look at this crazy stuff.
	Look at all these toxic heavy metals.
	Why did they dig up all the mercury and just disperse it in the air and let it fall on the ground again?
	Why did they do that with lead and cadmium?
	Anyway, this current layer that we are living in will be called the trash layer.
	It's the layer of contamination and mass pollution.
	The clean layers are the ones older than us, beneath us, in terms of geology or archaeology.
	You know, the deeper you dig, the older it gets.
	But we are the trash layer.
	And then this company, Make Sunsets, wants to add more pollution to the whole planet.
	By polluting the skies, which sounds like science fiction.
	It sounds like a scene out of The Matrix.
	Oh, they destroyed the skies.
	They darkened the skies, right, to try to kill the robots.
	Remember that scene?
	We're doing that through this company called Make Sunsets.
	And you do realize, by the way, that pollution will also fall onto...
	Antarctica.
	It will fall onto every continent.
	It will fall onto areas that aren't even part of modern advanced civilization.
	It'll fall on ancient tribes in the Amazon, you know, or ancient peoples in Papua New Guinea or Southeast Asia or wherever they may be in Africa and so on.
	They don't even have any idea what are combustion engines or iPhones or anything, but they're going to get polluted and Because corporations in America want a virtue signal by buying, quote, cooling credits to pollute the skies.
	As if that's green.
	It's not green.
	It's beyond stupid.
	It's insane.
	It's insane.
	It's like planetary scale suicide.
	And it's like these people are crazy, insane suicide cultists.
	And ironically...
	The co-founder and CEO of the Make Sunsets company is a guy whose name is Luke Iseman, like Iceman, actually.
	That's what's funny.
	It's spelled I-S-E-M-A-N. I'm just going to call him Iceman because he wants the planet to be a giant ice ball.
	He was interviewed by MIT Technology Review, and he said the following, and I'm not making this up.
	This is in the article.
	We joke slash not joke that this is partly a company and partly a cult, he says.
	Iceman?
	He's saying it's a cult!
	It's a suicide cult!
	It's a suicide cult!
	And he says that it's morally wrong not to pollute the skies.
	He says that what's important is to, quote, do this as quickly and safely as we can because he wants darkness to saturate planet Earth.
	earth.
	He wants the sun to be dimmed.
	He wants the planet to be cold.
	He wants obviously crops to fail from a lack of photosynthesis and shorter growing seasons and all these things.
	Of course, his name is Iceman.
	It's like a Marvel comic book series here.
	I mean, it's like we're watching some kind of theater almost.
	You can't make this stuff up.
	If he were a global Bond villain and his name was Iceman, or let's say Batman, you know, instead of the Penguin, he's the Iceman.
	And what is his weapon?
	To freeze the planet by dimming the sun.
	By releasing pollution in the entire atmosphere.
	In a Batman episode, this guy would be the villain and Batman would stop him.
	And Robin would help, too.
	Holy cattle prod, Batman.
	Stop Iceman from freezing the planet.
	But today, in our twisted, upside-down, Luciferian world, Iceman will be paid by virtue-signaling left-wing corporations.
	That are all in with the Bond villain trying to freeze planet Earth and turn it into an ice ball, a project led by the Iceman.
	Now, at this point, I have to give credit to MIT Technology Review for writing, I think, a very balanced article on this.
	They quoted Iceman, and they've quoted a lot of critics.
	And they continue about the critics, dedicated experts in the field think that these efforts are wildly premature and could have the opposite effect from what Iceman expects.
	Janos Paztor, executive director of the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative, which sounds like a WEF type of thing, but I don't know what it is.
	They're criticizing this, Janos is, saying, quote, the current state of science is not good enough to either reject or to accept, let alone implement, solar geoengineering.
	In other words, whatever you think about Janos here, Pastor, they're probably all on board the climate change lunacy and the cultism, and they think carbon dioxide is a pollutant, and they hate liquid water and all these things.
	But at least they're not insane enough to say, let's just try this on the whole planet and see what happens.
	Because that's insane.
	That's what Iceman wants, though.
	He's like, let's just do it now!
	Let's just do it!
	And, you know, we'll see if it works!
	Except you're messing with everybody on the planet.
	Eight billion humans.
	And then how many trillions of other life forms?
	And you know, when you talk about insects and animals and all of it, they all depend on the sun too, by the way.
	And you take away the sun from us, you're taking away the sun from them too.
	But check this out.
	The company's behavior, this is from the article, the company's behavior plays into long-held fears that a rogue actor with no particular knowledge of atmospheric science or the implications of the technology could unilaterally choose to geoengineer the climate without any kind of consensus around whether it's okay to do so or what the appropriate global average temperature should be.
	And that's because it's relatively cheap and technically simple to do so, at least in a crude way.
	Well, this gets to a really critical question.
	What should the temperature be?
	What should the ocean levels be?
	What should carbon dioxide be in terms of its concentration in the atmosphere right now?
	It's a little bit over, what, 400 parts per million, which is very scarce, by the way.
	There's hardly any CO2 in the atmosphere.
	And in times past, it has been much, much higher.
	It has been, you know, thousands of parts per million.
	I think at one point, over 10,000 parts per million.
	When the planet was very green and very lush, and it was like a giant greenhouse, which is why it's called a greenhouse gas, right?
	One of many.
	But if you want green, you want CO2. Whereas right now, these anti-CO2 climate cultists, they want carbon sequestration to pull all CO2 out of the atmosphere, to hide it, bury it below ground in liquid form.
	That's what these pipelines are all about, you know, the carbon sequestration projects in the Midwest.
	Like, what's it called?
	Like Greenway, Heartland Greenway or something was one of the project names.
	That's what they're doing.
	And it's a horrible idea because...
	You've got to answer the question, what's the right amount?
	What's the right amount?
	Should the oceans be 400 feet lower?
	What about all the ocean creatures?
	What about all the coral reefs?
	You do know, right, that the coral reefs are really close to the surface of the water.
	And if you start freezing the planet and then the ocean level drops, you're going to kill off all the coral reefs that are currently close to the surface of the ocean.
	You do know that, right?
	I mean, I hope these marine biologists would be aware of this simple fact.
	You would think that somebody would think about consequences here.
	You do realize, too, by the way, just from a geopolitical point of view, this is fascinating to point out that if the ocean levels drop substantially, introducing new coastline, every government of the world will claim that coastline to be their own.
	And so all the citizens who currently own shoreline properties or beachfront properties, they will no longer be beachfront.
	And the state of Hawaii has already proven this because any time a volcano goes off and lava flows down the volcano and goes out into the ocean and forms some new acres of land, the state of Hawaii says, that's ours.
	It's not yours.
	It's not anybody's except ours.
	It's the state's.
	Think about every country being surrounded then by a ring of new state-owned property, which would put the government in charge of every beach, every shorefront property around the world.
	No wonder they want to drop ocean levels.
	It would give them total ownership over the entire perimeter of every nation.
	Not a lot of people have thought about that.
	But it would also make a lot of the current ports, by the way, including military ports and all kinds of ship ports, transportation ports, and transportation hubs and loading and unloading containers and so on, would make them, certain ones, unusable because they're not in very deep channels currently.
	So you don't want to drop ocean levels dramatically very quickly.
	You don't want to freeze the planet for lots of reasons.
	I'm just naming a few.
	But these people that want to alter the climate, they're completely insane, mad scientist, lunatic cultists.
	That's what they are in my opinion.
	Anyway, I could go on.
	I'm not going to read you the whole article here from Technology Review.
	But if you want to read it yourself, let me give you the title.
	Here it is once again.
	A startup says it's begun releasing particles into the atmosphere in an effort to tweak the climate.
	So you can check that out.
	See what you think.
	It's fascinating.
	It's fascinating that this is already underway.
	So if any of your family members give you the eye roll when you say geoengineering is happening, just point them to this article.
	Like, see?
	But, you know, for most people out there, the oblivious masses, facts don't matter.
	They don't care that it's happening.
	They just want to pretend it's not happening.
	But it's already begun.
	Now let me just mention there's some good news in what you can do to help counter this effort.
	So this company wants to release a bunch of balloons that release sulfur particles into the stratosphere.
	Well you can idle your car engine.
	counter, to help counter the effects.
	I mean, CO2 doesn't cause more sunlight to reach the surface of the earth, but CO2 does allow plants to succeed more.
	You know, it allows them to grow more quickly in a shorter amount of time to help compensate for the shorter growing season.
	So if you really want to help the world, you should release carbon into the atmosphere, which would cause more rainforests to flourish, and desert areas could be converted into farmlands or grasslands naturally on their own.
	More CO2 is actually pro-life on all the life of planet Earth.
	The ecosystems, the animals, the honeybees, the pollinators, the insects, the amphibians, even the marsupials on the continent of Australia as well.
	More CO2 is good for all the plants and all the animals on the planet.
	So release more carbon into the atmosphere if you want to help planet Earth.
	That's what we should be doing, frankly, is releasing more carbon.
	Let the plants have access to it.
	By the way, did you see some of the videos of the crazy looting in Buffalo, New York during the snowstorm?
	There's a sign of society crumbling.
	The rule of law is just gone.
	Massive ransacking and looting of these stores.
	It's just off the charts.
	I've recorded a separate podcast on that, so I'm not going to talk about it here.
	But if you want to hear that, you want to see some of the videos and hear my analysis of what that means for what's coming in 2023, because I think it's a sign of more lawlessness and violence yet to come, you can find that on my channel on brighteon.com and everywhere that we post videos, you know, bit shoot and rumble and band.video as well.
	Now, I want to mention something else here that's just a quick, bizarre story.
	So it turns out that Roomba, you know, the robot vacuum that Amazon purchased, the iRobot company and owns the Roomba brand.
	Well, so Roomba devices, they have a camera on them, right?
	And as they're roaming around your home, vacuuming your floors, they're also taking pictures of everything in your home, including you.
	Including you on the toilet and you undressing, you naked, You dancing naked, if that's what you do.
	Whatever you do naked, pretty much Roomba has a picture of it.
	Now, the way this was discovered is because, well, the Roomba company has been forwarding these pictures to one of its contractors that is training...
	It's AI system using workers who look at the pictures and then they categorize what is in the picture, again, in order to train the AI. And this company is called Scale AI. And they have contract workers all over the world.
	And they label data, including audio and photo and video data, to train artificial intelligence.
	So they're using humans to train the machines.
	Well, what's interesting is that, once again, MIT Technology Review, which is just coincidence in this case, had obtained 15 screenshots of some of the private photos that Roomba had captured of people in their own homes, because these photos had been shared by some of the humans,
	the contract workers working for Scale AI, and they were sharing these images on social media groups and so on, and I have just one of the images here, and it shows it's a person on the toilet with their pants down.
	It looks like a woman on the toilet with her pants down, from what I can tell.
	It's a little grainy.
	I said grainy, not granny.
	Just to be clear, it's a little grainy in the picture.
	And it's like, whoa, yeah, your vacuum is vacuuming up images of you naked.
	So apparently there are 2 million images stored by this company, Scale AI, and other data platforms that are being used by tech companies.
	So, just to be clear, remember when it was a conspiracy theory that your TV was spying on you?
	Well, at least the TV... Was not mobile.
	The TV was only pointed in one direction.
	The TV didn't wander into your bedroom and take pictures of you having sex or whatever it is that you do in your bedroom.
	The TV didn't wander into your bathroom and upload images of you on the toilet to the cloud.
	For people in, you know, developing nations to pour over and try to categorize, ah...
	A weird-looking dude on a toilet or whatever.
	At least your TV never did that.
	This is way worse than your TV spying on you.
	This is your mobile robot spying on you while it's claiming to be vacuuming.
	Now, there's so many implications of this.
	It's just mind-blowing.
	But number one, the robots are mapping out the inside of your house, right?
	A lot of these vacuum robots have mapping features.
	And they use LiDAR, some of them, but others use actual cameras like this one.
	And they upload all the maps and the images to their cloud systems.
	And as you know, Amazon cloud systems also power the CIA. And other government agencies.
	So if you think that the NSA isn't spying on you through your home vacuum robot with a camera on it, then you're crazy.
	Of course they're spying on you through your robot.
	Why would they not?
	They're spying on you through your Nest temperature-controlled thermostat devices.
	They have audio microphones in those.
	They've got microphones in the Amazon...
	What's the device called that you talk to?
	I don't have one, obviously.
	I would never put a spy device in my house.
	But you talk to the Amazon device and it gives you propaganda in return.
	And you can order stuff on it, right?
	Or cameras on the robots now.
	Of course they're spying on you through your mobile phone and all of this stuff.
	Oh, Alexa, that's what it's called, right?
	Your Amazon Alexa.
	It's a spy device.
	Of course it's listening all the time.
	Otherwise, how does it know when you call its name?
	Duh!
	Just, it's common sense.
	Of course it's listening all the time.
	And all the stuff is getting uploaded to Amazon, and then they apparently, like, shuffle this off to third world countries where people get to pour through images of you on the toilet.
	What if your robot is wandering around your house and sees an AR-15?
	Can the Amazon Roomba robot call 911?
	Can they call the police on you?
	Even though it might be perfectly legal for you to have a rifle, but what if you're in a jurisdiction where it's not legal?
	What if they see a normal capacity magazine?
	In a state where those magazines are banned, huh?
	Will Amazon call the police on you because Roomba spotted a 30-round mag attached to your AR, huh?
	Is that day coming?
	Of course it is!
	Of course it is!
	You don't even have to...
	You don't have to imagine.
	It's probably next week, you know?
	There'll be a headline next week, you know?
	Amazon robot nabs gun owners who were about to attack the power supply or the power grid substation.
	No, they weren't.
	They were just shooting paper targets for the fun of it, and they wanted to have a convenient robot sweep the floors.
	That's all.
	They're not criminals.
	They were just lazy.
	Now, if you already have a Roomba robot with a camera on it, there's two things you can do.
	One is you can put a piece of gorilla tape over that camera.
	Just tape it on there.
	Of course...
	The robot won't be nearly as effective since you're blinding it.
	The other thing you can do is you can just decide to sh** in the dark.
	Yep, you can do your business in the dark to make sure that no cameras can see what you're doing.
	Which kind of makes life inconvenient, doesn't it?
	Stumbling around the house.
	What are you doing, honey?
	Knocking on the doors.
	Stubbing your toes.
	I'm trying to use the toilet without getting seen by the rest of the world.
	I don't know where the robot is.
	I heard it creeping around, being stalked by Amazon.
	The other thing you can do is every time you have to change clothes or use the toilet, put on a Halloween mask, like a Joe Biden mask or something.
	And that way, if you're snapped in a photo, it looks like Joe Biden taking a dump, which might be the campaign slogan in 2024 for all we know.
	You know, a little sub-slogan, but he said, this is America, under Biden, pointing to the toilet, you know?
	Anyway, there's some workarounds, or you could just buy a broom and a dustpan and clean your own damn floors, you lazy person.
	What?
	Really?
	Really?
	You know you have to pick up before you launch the robot anyway.
	Why don't you just sweep the floor and get rid of the thing?
	eBay that Roomba.
	That's what I'm saying.
	No dustpan ever spied on you.
	There are advantages to low tech.
	All right, we're going to move on, before that gets crazy, into predictions by Dmitry Medvedev, who is the Russian government official deputy chair of the Security Council of the Russian Federation.
	And he was actually the former president of Russia, by the way.
	And he's now basically the equivalent of, what would that be?
	The Secretary of Defense, essentially, of Russia.
	And he has posted some predictions that are quite intriguing, to say the least.
	So we're going to go through these.
	What does he have?
	Like, what is it?
	14?
	No, 10.
	10 predictions from Medvedev.
	Is that how you pronounce his name?
	I've heard people say Medvedev, but that sounds like a very English version of it.
	Medvedev or something.
	It's probably more...
	I'm just guessing.
	I don't speak Russian, but I wish I did.
	Anyway, here we go.
	Number one, he says oil price will rise to $150 a barrel, which is significantly higher than it is now, and gas price, he's talking about natural gas, will top $5 per cubic meter.
	That's okay.
	Energy is going to get a lot more expensive, he says.
	Number two, the UK will rejoin the EU. Whoa!
	Would that happen?
	Would Nigel Farage allow that to happen?
	I don't know.
	I'm kind of doubting that one.
	And then he says, number three, the EU will collapse after the UK's return.
	The euro will drop out of use as the former EU currency.
	Well, I do agree that the Euro is on the path to annihilation.
	And I also agree that the EU is going to collapse, by the way.
	I'm not sure the UK is going to rejoin the EU, but hey, this guy's got more contacts than I do.
	He knows more than I do about what's happening with the dynamic in Europe, so maybe he's right.
	Okay, number four.
	He says, Poland and Hungary will occupy Western regions of the formerly existing Ukraine.
	I think he's right about that.
	I think Poland is ready to occupy Western Ukraine.
	Because a lot of the territory of Western Ukraine used to be Poland.
	And, you know, everybody remembers the old boundaries of It used to be ours.
	We should take it back.
	That kind of thing.
	Yeah, I think that's coming.
	And Hungary?
	I don't know.
	Maybe.
	Alright, point number five.
	This is really intriguing.
	He says, the Fourth Reich will be created, encompassing the territory of Germany and its satellites, i.e.
	Poland, the Baltic states, Czechia, Slovakia, the Kiev Republic, and other outcasts, he says.
	I would argue the Fourth Reich is already here.
	And we are being ruled by the Fourth Reich in Western nations, NATO nations, including Kiev and the United States.
	Remember we saw the Nazi swastika symbol published by the New York Times, what was it, two weeks ago, in the crossword puzzle?
	It was the crossword puzzle.
	Giant swastika basically saying, yeah, the Nazis are still here running everything.
	And then how often is Zelensky in Kiev, how often is he accidentally photographed with Nazi symbols all around him?
	His guards, the tanks, you know, the vehicles, the insignia.
	There's always Nazi stuff, Nazi bracelets on his bodyguards and so on.
	And they have to keep covering this up.
	But Zelensky's surrounded by Nazis.
	Like actual, active, present-day Nazis who still think Adolf Hitler, in their view, was some kind of hero or something.
	So the Fourth Reich is already here.
	In other words, Medvedev's prediction has already come true.
	All right.
	He says, number six, war will break out between France and the Fourth Reich.
	Europe will be divided and Poland repartitioned in the process.
	Now, I think he's on to something here.
	I think that Russia's current strategy is to cause a civil war among the countries of Western Europe.
	I think Russia's trying to break up the EU. And the way they're going to do that is to probably start selling energy to Germany.
	And then Germany would lose its cohesion with other NATO nations.
	And there'd be a lot of internal arguments because NATO would say, hey, Germany, what are you doing?
	Why are you buying energy from Russia?
	And Germany would say, if we don't, we're going to lose our entire economy.
	Massive deindustrialization and layoffs and collapse is here if we don't get some energy into the mix.
	And then I think there will be a war among Western nations.
	So Russia is actually pitting the nations of Western Europe against each other.
	Now, why they're saying that France will go to war against the Fourth Reich, I'm not sure about that, because it seems to me that France is run by the same globalists who are running the Fourth Reich.
	You know, France is not...
	Some bastion of liberty and freedom at this point?
	Give me a break.
	Certainly the UK isn't either.
	So I'm not sure how that takes place, but I do agree that Russia is trying to cause a lot of chaos and internal strife among Western European nations.
	His seventh prediction is that Northern Ireland will separate from the UK and join the Republic of Ireland.
	Yeah, I think there's a pretty good chance that that could happen.
	Absolutely.
	Especially as the UK gets weaker due to the British pound sterling currency collapse and the debt collapse, the pension collapse, and also the military collapse of the UK because the UK essentially has no functioning military or I should say very little military might.
	It wouldn't last two weeks in a war with Russia.
	And what, do they have one aircraft carrier that sometimes can sail and other times not so much?
	Right?
	Isn't it called the Queen Elizabeth, too?
	I mean, fact check me on that, but I think they only have one aircraft carrier, and I think it barely works.
	That's the United Kingdom.
	Not much of a kingdom anymore, is it?
	All right.
	Point number eight from Medvedev.
	Civil war, he says, will break out in the U.S., California and Texas becoming independent states as a result.
	Yay, Texas.
	Texas, okay, wait, let me comment on that.
	There's a pretty good chance he may be right about this.
	And I do see Texas becoming its own state as the collapse of the dollar kicks in.
	So we could have a Soviet Union-style collapse of Washington, D.C., but instead of 1991, it's 2023.
	Or 24, whatever year this happens, we could see a collapse of the ability of centralized command and control from Washington, D.C. because, well, the currency has collapsed and Washington would no longer have any ability to project power over the states.
	So yes, in that scenario, you could see California declaring itself to be its own nation, but what about new California?
	What about the pro-liberty, you know, the Jeffersonian type of movements in California and Oregon and so on?
	I think California could become two countries.
	There's the West Coast Socialist Communist Republic or whatever they call it of California.
	And then there would be new California, the free states or the free country of California.
	And I've interviewed Paul Preston about that as well.
	So Medvedev may be correct about this.
	He goes on and he states that Texas and Mexico will form an allied state.
	And I'm thinking, whoa, but then I remember that Texas Governor Abbott has done deals with Mexican regional leaders.
	They've done deals to try to suppress the drug cartels.
	So there actually is geopolitical cooperation between the leaders of Texas and certain regional sovereign entities in Mexico right now.
	It doesn't mean that they're going to form one giant state, but it's not implausible.
	It's not a crazy idea.
	It could happen.
	I could see...
	Actually, I could see Texas joining up in some kind of a free trade zone with certain parts of northern Mexico where there are a lot of, what do they call it, maquiladoras, the factories.
	A lot of labor and production of textiles and automobiles and so on.
	I mean, Dodge trucks are built in Mexico, right?
	A lot of things are built in Mexico.
	So you could see something like a free trade zone and maybe labor could cross the border.
	I mean, I could see that happening.
	Not out of the picture.
	Now, you can decide whether you think that's a good thing or a bad thing or the implications, but I'm just reading for you the predictions of Medvedev.
	All right, then he says, he goes on, this is still number eight, he says, Elon Musk will win the presidential election in a number of states, which after the new civil war's end, will have been given to the GOP. Now, there's a lot to unpack here, and we don't have time to do it all.
	First of all, do you think Elon Musk is going to run for president?
	I don't think so.
	I don't think that's his ambition at all.
	And what does Medvedev mean that after the civil war is over, the states will be given to the GOP? I don't know what he means by that.
	Given to the GOP? I mean, first of all, does anybody still trust the GOP? After they've proven themselves to be...
	You know, losers over and over again.
	All they know how to do is lose.
	Lose politely, you know, Mike Pence style, Mitch McConnell style.
	We're really good, polite losers.
	We don't want to, you know, rock the boat when we're losing.
	That's the GOP. The Grand Old Party.
	Or the Amazon Roomba version of that.
	Get off the pooper.
	Yeah, that's what GOP means.
	Prediction number nine.
	All the largest stock markets and financial activity will leave the U.S. and Europe and move to Asia.
	Well, aside from the word all, this is not a crazy idea.
	Because once you have the launch of the new world reserve currency from the BRICS nations, which will be backed by commodities such as gold, And this is why China is buying up crazy amounts of gold, thousands of tons of gold.
	When the dollar collapses, yes, I think a lot of the financial trade and the transaction clearing and asset protection will move to Asia.
	Some of it will move to Russia.
	Some of it will exist on just the BRICS system, whatever that looks like exactly.
	It could be a blockchain type of system backed by commodities that's recognized by 100 plus nations.
	And yes, I think Wall Street is done at that time, whenever that day comes.
	Wall Street's done.
	The derivatives collapse.
	The U.S. banking system collapses.
	The debt collapses.
	The pensions collapse.
	It's like financial Armageddon.
	Western civilization, but the United States in particular.
	And then at that point, China and Russia and India and even Turkey for that matter, and even Iran and so on, they emerge.
	And the Saudis, of course, as the anchor, they emerge as the new world financial system.
	I do believe that day is coming.
	And I've interviewed Andy Shekman, who I think is one of the top experts talking about that very point.
	So Medvedev isn't totally bonkers to have that prediction.
	All right, number 10.
	This is his last prediction.
	The Bretton Woods system of monetary management will collapse, he says, leading to the IMF and World Bank crash.
	Euro and dollar will stop circulating as the global reserve currencies.
	Digital fiat currencies will be actively used instead.
	I think Medvedev, with this point number 10, I think he's been listening to my interviews with Andy Shachman, because this is pretty much exactly what's going to happen.
	So I think on this one, he nailed it.
	Totally nailed it.
	So there you go.
	Ten predictions from Dmitry Medvedev.
	Some of them a little wild and others plausible.
	But this is what Russia, or at least, you know, the defense secretary, so to speak, of Russia thinks is going to happen in America next year.
	Wow.
	Now, one of the things I find interesting about those predictions is that a Reuters story says the following, quote, Russia ready to resume gas supplies to Europe via the Yamal-Europe pipeline.
	Now, this is the pipeline that is not yet destroyed.
	Nord Stream 1 and 2 are blown up.
	But the Yamal pipeline remains intact, although it doesn't have the same capacity.
	But from this story, the summary is Moscow is ready to resume gas supplies.
	They're discussing additional supply via Turkey, but some infrastructure would have to be constructed with Turkey.
	They're in talks to supply Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan, and then Moscow may ship gas to Afghanistan and Pakistan in the long term.
	And the Yamal Europe pipeline, let's see, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak told the TASS news agency that they could restart the Yamal European pipeline, says it was stopped for political reasons and it remains unused.
	And the story says it flows westward, but it has been mostly reversed since December of 2021 as Poland turned away from buying from Russia in favor of drawing unstored gas in Germany.
	Now, just going from memory, I believe the Yamal pipeline goes through Ukraine and then parts of Germany and then Poland.
	I may be incorrect about that exactly, but it's somewhere in that vicinity.
	In other words, it's a pipeline over land instead of underwater, which was the Nord Stream pipeline.
	So the Yamal pipeline goes over land.
	It may even go through Belarus.
	I'm not sure.
	I'd have to look at a map of it.
	In any case, they could push a lot of gas through that pipeline if countries like Germany were willing to buy gas from Russia.
	But that would break the embargo of Western nations or NATO, and it would require sort of tearing down the SWIFT banishment or the deplatforming of Russia from the SWIFT system – Otherwise, Germany would have to buy the gas with, I don't know, gold or something.
	Here, we'll ship you pallets of gold and you ship us gas in the pipeline so that our economy doesn't collapse.
	You know, that kind of a deal.
	So this is actually consistent with one of Medvedev's predictions, which is that there could be war within the EU and that the EU would break up and eventually fall and the euro would fail.
	Why?
	Because I think Germany in particular is going to get so desperate that they may do a deal with Russia and tell NATO to go pound sand.
	It's like, hey, NATO, what have you done for us lately?
	Russia is willing to give us energy to prevent our people from starving and freezing and collapsing into destitution because of all the deindustrialization.
	So, you know, at some point, you got to have energy.
	I have a prediction for 2023.
	Millions of people stop using the bathroom around Roomba robots.
	There's my prediction.
	I was going to read from Matthew 24, but I'm realizing I'm kind of out of time.
	So I'm going to save that for tomorrow.
	In case you want to know, we're going to talk about Matthew 24, and of course, verses 29, verses 36, and 37, as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man, the return of Christ. so it will be at the coming of the Son
	And we're going to get into that and some kind of parallels between a comet impact and some things that have been described in the Bible, not only in Matthew 24, but elsewhere, And then, of course, we're going to bring on Jamie Walden at some point here soon, maybe next week, maybe this week, to give us more details about that.
	And as I mentioned earlier, Timothy Albarino as well, who's an incredible researcher, by the way.
	And, you know, I am a, I don't know, you could say I'm a generalist in the sense that I know a little bit about a lot of things, but I'm not the greatest expert in any one thing, let's say.
	Although I'm not the most well-educated or research expert in any one thing.
	But I can talk with people in lots of areas about lots of things.
	Archaeology and anthropology and science and physics and astronomy and science.
	History and geopolitics and all kinds of things and, you know, food science, lots of stuff like that.
	But in every area, there's someone else out there who is way more advanced and well-researched than I am.
	And Timothy Albarino is one of those people.
	In fact, I know a lot of people like that.
	I know experts in lots of different areas.
	But I'm reminded, I'll tell you this story.
	This is a true story that just gives you a sense of how oblivious or ignorant most, well, I don't want to be insulting to all of society here, but let me just tell you this story.
	You can reach your own conclusion.
	This was a couple years ago.
	I was at a company function where we had invited our employees to like a year-end celebration, I think it was.
	And it was a plus one thing so they could bring their spouses or significant others.
	And I ended up in a conversation with the boyfriend of one of our employees where I started out, like, so what do you do?
	And he said, well, I'm an archaeologist.
	And I immediately replied, that's fascinating.
	What specific cultures or time periods of human activity do you study?
	And he was shocked because he said, wow, you're like one of the few people who knows that archaeology is the study of human activity.
	He says, because a lot of people I talk to, when I tell them I'm an archaeologist, they're like, oh, are you digging up dinosaur bones, man?
	Dinosaur bones?
	And that's not what archaeology is, it turns out.
	That's paleontology.
	Archaeology is the study of human civilizations or, you know, prehistory, before modern history, but not dinosaurs.
	And then there are some members of the public who think that humans and dinosaurs coexisted at the same time, like Fred Flintstone riding a brontosaurus, you know, like a horseback style.
	And that was not the case, it turns out, not by a long shot, not by tens of millions of years, you know, at least according to the official record, however you want to interpret that.
	But it was just shocking that I was shocked that this guy was shocked that I knew what archaeology meant.
	And I'm thinking, are we living in a society of such ignorance that people don't know what is archaeology?
	You know, what if you're asking, what is anthropology?
	What is paleontology?
	What is, I don't know, cartography?
	It's just on and on and on.
	What is geology?
	And it just struck me as odd that, you know...
	In the general public, for whatever reason, these are all the same things, I guess.
	It's just like study of stuff, you know?
	It's got to be like temples and pottery and mastodon teeth and dinosaur toes.
	It's like, okay, whatever.
	You've been reading comic books and watching cartoons.
	But in the real world, these are all different fields.
	So anyway...
	I enjoy talking with very informed, intelligent people.
	And the reason that I can ask questions that are intriguing to all these experts is because I am genuinely curious about what they're doing.
	Why are you digging there?
	What are you looking at?
	What are you finding?
	What are the surprises?
	You know, what freaked you out when you got to 50 feet deep or whatever?
	Maybe not that deep, but however deep you're digging there, you're excavating.
	What are you finding that's freaking you out?
	Tell me.
	Or even, you know, astrophysicists are like, let's talk about gravity, man.
	Let's talk about gravity.
	In fact, I want to talk to you about gravity for a second because I was thinking about what I said at the end of yesterday's podcast about steering comets.
	And you know how easy that would be if you had the kind of technology at a civilization level for FTL drives, faster-than-light drives?
	And you know, FTL drives work by...
	Essentially distorting space-time with a very, very strong gravitational warping of the space in front of your ship.
	So you could essentially accelerate your ship to...
	You know, multiples of the speed of light in theory, obviously using an enormous amount of energy, crazy amounts of energy, but you would not feel the acceleration because gravity is not a force.
	And it always drives me nuts when people say gravity is a force.
	It's a force of acceleration.
	No, it's not.
	Gravity is not a force at all.
	That's why you don't feel it.
	You don't feel gravity.
	If you step off a building, you don't feel yourself being pulled down.
	You feel weightless.
	This is why astronauts in orbit In a space station that's orbiting around the Earth, moving at very high velocity to maintain its orbit, essentially it's turning a curve.
	It's in a curvature path.
	Why aren't the astronauts themselves thrown to the outside of the spaceship?
	Why do they feel weightless?
	Because gravity's acceleration is not a force.
	You don't feel it.
	Gravity can accelerate you and you feel nothing.
	And so in order to steer comets, a civilization would merely have to alter space-time, essentially project artificial gravity or a warping of the structure of space-time in front of the comet or to the side of the comet to kind of nudge the comet in a certain direction.
	And if this is done way ahead of time, i.e.
	years ahead of time, it doesn't take much energy.
	You could find a comet that's kind of Close to intersecting with Earth, you nudge it a little bit with this advanced technology, and that nudging multiplied over a decade of travel can alter the trajectory substantially over time.
	And cause it to strike Earth.
	So it really, in terms of cosmic technology, it doesn't take that much tech.
	Again, I'm not talking about Earth tech.
	I'm talking about advanced civilizations that can distort spacetime using enormous amounts of energy.
	But they could easily steer comets if they have anything even approaching an FTL drive technology, which theoretically should exist in our cosmos.
	But gravity is not a force, folks.
	Gravity is not a force.
	It is a distortion of space.
	And when you fall into gravity, you're actually...
	Your body thinks you're traveling in a straight line, which is why you don't feel the acceleration.
	And every planet and every star exists in the bottom of a gravity well, which makes it kind of a dangerous spot to be in, in terms of cosmic...
	Targeting, let's say, using comets or large rocks or things like that.
	Because you're at the bottom of a gravity well, anything that's kind of flung in your direction will accelerate in terms of its relative velocity, gaining energy, a lot of energy, so that when it collides with your planet, it releases that energy upon impact, which is why the comet strike of 12,800 years ago was so devastating.
	But remember that in space, the high ground is being outside the gravity well.
	So in other words, the high ground relative to Earth would be orbiting above Earth, which is the position that the Moon occupies.
	So the Moon is the high ground over Earth.
	So if you had a weapon system on the Moon...
	That you could launch from the moon and target the earth, that would be a very devastating and very effective kinetic weapon system because the earth's gravity would pull that kinetic projectile into its own gravity well, gaining energy.
	Which would be released upon impact.
	And in a similar fashion, of course, the Earth is orbiting around the Sun.
	So the Earth is at the high ground compared to the Sun.
	The Sun is at the bottom of the solar system gravity well.
	And then in the Milky Way galaxy, there is a giant black hole in the center of the galaxy, which is at the bottom of the gravity well of our galaxy, the Milky Way galaxy, which is one of many galaxies.
	So you've got to keep all this in mind.
	That whoever has the high ground in space is whoever is outside of the gravity effects of stars and planets.
	And you can't really escape the gravity effects of galaxies because they're so large, you probably can't even get out of a galaxy.
	Do you know how thick the Milky Way galaxy is, by the way?
	Even if you're traveling at the speed of light?
	Yeah, if you're moving at the speed of light, it would take you a thousand years to traverse just the thickness of the Milky Way galaxy, which is kind of a spiral disk shape.
	And according to mainstream science, it would take you a hundred thousand years traveling at the speed of light to traverse the...
	The diameter of it, from one end of one spiral arm to the opposite on the other side of the disc.
	100,000 years traveling at the speed of light.
	So unless you're going at something like...
	You know, 100c or 100 times the speed of light or 1,000c or 10,000c.
	And at that level, you're probably consuming stars as energy sources in order to distort gravity that much.
	Unless you're traveling at those speeds, you're never going to leave the galaxy.
	You might be lucky to go from one star to another in some normal human lifespan, and that would require some very exotic, obviously, non-Earth technology.
	I'm not going to get into all that today, but those are some of the topics we're going to delve into a little bit more in 2023.
	3.
	Oh, but one last thing.
	I'm sorry, and I'll wrap this up, but I forgot to tell you yesterday that I did watch the obligatory Christmas movie on Christmas Day, which is Die Hard.
	Of course, everybody knows that.
	It's Die Hard with Bruce Willis.
	And something struck me about that film, which was that there's a scene where the police officer, what's his name?
	I think he's, what, Powell, Officer Powell?
	And I think he's played by an actor named Val Johnson.
	Is that his name?
	Anyway, where he looks up at the Nakatomi Tower, and you can see the gas prices, because he's at a gas station, and the gas prices, when this movie was released, which I think was in, like, what, 1988 or something like that?
	87?
	Something close to that?
	The gas prices were 75 cents a gallon for regular and close to that for quote unleaded.
	But remember when there was regular gas?
	And you know what regular meant?
	It meant that lead was added.
	And unleaded meant no lead.
	And why was lead added to regular gasoline?
	Do you know the answer?
	Because lead helps engines run better.
	So all over the country, throughout the 1960s and 70s and 80s and up to whatever day it was banned, every car was emitting lead.
	And there was lead pollution across the country because it was coming out of the tailpipes.
	Now, that was actual pollution.
	There was lead coming out of the tailpipes and settling on all the farms that were next to the highways.
	And there was actual brain damage in this country, which should be obvious at this point, from all the people growing up with all the lead poisoning because it was added to the gasoline.
	And yes, lead makes engines run better.
	Now, a lot of you may not know, That lead is still added to the fuel that powers small aircraft.
	So anytime you're flying around in a Cessna, that's also emitting lead.
	Because, well, it's considered essential for the aircraft engines to function better and not fail during flight.
	So they still have lead in the...
	Well, it's not jet fuel.
	It's airplane fuel.
	I don't know what they call it exactly.
	But when you fill up with fuel...
	In your Cessna, you're putting it in the wings, because remember I trained in Cessnas and did a lot of flights and refueling and landing and takeoff exercises and so on.
	You're refilling from the fuel that's right there at the airport, and it's a special fuel for airplanes, for small aircraft.
	And it's got lead in it.
	Anyway, the other thing that struck me about the Die Hard movie was that The terrorists, so-called terrorists, who were actually thieves, played by the leader Alan Rickman, the late Alan Rickman, one of the greatest actors of all time.
	And his group in the movie was ripping off bearer bonds from the Nakatomi Corporation.
	And guess what the value of the bearer bonds was?
	I had forgotten this because it just seemed like an ungodly large amount of money back in the 1980s.
	They blew up the whole building.
	They killed a bunch of people.
	They hired a bunch of crew.
	They did this whole thing to take out this vault or to open up the vault and steal the bearer bonds.
	Guess how much they were?
	Only $640 million.
	That's not even a good day for Zelensky.
	In terms of receiving donations from the U.S. these days in 2022.
	But back in the 1980s, $640 million, oh, it was worth blowing up buildings over.
	It was a lot of money.
	Today, not so much.
	But think about it.
	It wasn't even a billion dollars.
	They went through a lot of trouble just for $640 million.
	I found that shocking.
	It seemed like a lot of money back then.
	Not anymore.
	See, inflation even affects terrorism, it turns out.
	And then one more comment on Die Hard.
	I don't know if you recall this, but there's an opening scene where Bruce Willis gets off the airplane and he's at the luggage claim section of the airport in L.A.
	And they show the scene where, I don't know, this young woman in ski pants, which we might call today yoga pants, jumps on her boyfriend and they're kissing.
	And the Bruce Willis character is looking at this and shaking his head.
	He's like, oh, L.A., California.
	How crazy is California?
	Here's a woman in ski pants in the airport.
	Now, L.A.
	Imagine, fast-forwarding to 2022, if you were to film Die Hard today, you get off the plane in L.A., you're going to have, like, drag queen story time, like, shaking their junk in the faces of children at the luggage claim, you know?
	you're going to have all kinds of bizarre grooming, probably children in cages right there at the luggage claim sponsored by the Democrat party.
	You're going to have total craziness and purple hair and blue hair and nose rings and all kinds of weird body piercings.
	You're going to have like radical left wing Antifa protesters, probably people wearing masks, people all jabbed up somebody dying from a heart attack right there after they got off the plane, And then you're going to have some weird, crazy Biden administration transgender creature stealing your luggage from the luggage claim, right?
	That would be L.A. today in 2022.
	They should remake Die Hard.
	They should depict modern-day Los Angeles because that would be the craziest scene ever.
	But the sad conclusion to this is that Bruce Willis can't play that character any longer because he suffers a cognitive speech problem now, which some people believe might be associated with the vaccine.
	I don't know for sure, so I can't say for certain.
	In any case, we don't wish negative impacts on anybody, and we wish Bruce Willis well for an incredible career in Hollywood.
	But Celine Dion also apparently is suffering a, what's it called, stiff person syndrome.
	And many people believe that's due to these vaccines.
	So the sad truth of the matter is today, you've got this ABC News journalist just died at age 37.
	Just kaboom, keel over dead.
	37!
	You've got UFC fighters that are in their 40s that are dying.
	Vaccines are wreaking havoc across our society.
	And it appears that a lot of very talented people who were really cherished people of at least my lifetime, you know, stars like Bruce Willis and singers and performers like Celine Dion and UFC fighters from the early days of UFC and so on, it appears that they are being injured or in some cases killed following these COVID-19 mRNA jabs slash vaccinations.
	It's very sad.
	It's very sad to see that.
	And we've tried to warn people this entire time.
	We've tried to save lives.
	And yet, we're all under assault from this vector, this bioweapon vector.
	Now, I'm not going to spend a ton of time talking about vaccines in 2023.
	At least, that's not my plan, because I think I've said it all already.
	But I will talk about The effects of it.
	And we'll talk about the excess fatalities.
	And I do have an interview coming up with Ed Dowd, by the way, who I believe will have a lot of new information, the latest information on all of that.
	So in any case, it won't be a boring year.
	Not 2023, not by a long shot.
	Especially not if some of Medvedev's predictions come true.
	That's going to be crazy times.
	In any case, that's a wrap of the podcast for today.
	I want to thank you for your support.
	And if you choose to support us, check out healthrangerstore.com and be sure to visit some of our sponsors.
	We've got the seed kits from arcseedkits.com.
	That would be great for spring planting to grow some of your own food and save money on groceries.
	That's arkseedkits.com.
	Use discount code Ranger.
	I think that gets you free shipping there.
	And then also check out the satellite phone store, sat123.com, sat123.com, for the satellite phones and the two-way text messaging devices.
	So thank you for your support.
	And have a great week.
	I plan to have another update for you tomorrow, but it's possible I might skip a day or two this week.
	We'll see.
	But check my channel page on brighttown.com and other platforms to see what's posted.
	Thank you for listening, and I think tomorrow we'll talk about Matthew 24 and some other scripture as well and what that has to do with all this.
	So thank you for listening.
	God bless you.
	Talk to you tomorrow.
	Take care.
	A global reset is coming.
	And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲