All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 6, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:00:57
Dr. Tau Braun and the Health Ranger talk transhumanism, AI infiltration...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome.
Mike Adams here of brighteon.com and naturalnews.com.
And we now have a returning guest, Dr.
Tao Braun, who we had a really intriguing interview a few months ago about venom peptides and copper and a lot of the theories of what's going on in vaccines and also with just health and so on.
And he's got a great website, a great message.
He's inquisitive.
He's scientific-minded.
And he's going to bring us, I think, some big-picture solutions tonight.
So, Dr.
Braun, it's an honor to have you back on.
Thank you for joining us.
I don't even have the right words to say.
No, the honor is the other way around.
Mike, I've got to tell you, something that I've been looking forward to being able to say live on air with you is just, you have the best people.
You're surrounded by the best people.
Your followers and your customers are the best people.
When I look back at our previous interview, I knew that in you, You were relentless in terms of wanting me to explain the products that I'd brought to market.
And I could see, and when I look back on the video, I could actually see fear on my face because I was thinking, okay, this is going to lead to a lot of people wanting these products, discovering them.
I was like, that is the best business problem to have.
But when you are trying to get out a couple of hundred orders and then they go to thousands overnight, I was like, I knew as I was saying it, I was sort of playing poker face and I was thinking, what am I going to do?
And for me, a big part of sort of understanding the neurochemistry and neuroscience is In real time, our own experiences impact things like serotonin, dopamine.
And so there was a part that I realized that I was, the thing that I was going to counter the most is I just didn't want to disappoint anybody.
Disappointing people in terms of having to wait for a product that they're looking for and maybe not being able to fulfill it in time and all of that stuff.
I realized that that at my core is sort of the thing that stresses me out the most.
Big problem solving, explaining stuff.
I live for it.
I enjoy it.
I just really don't like disappointing people.
And so that was my fear moment.
And then, of course, I turned it into something positive and thought, okay, well, this is incredible.
I've got an opportunity where somebody is drilling down on the science, which is very exciting for me.
I couldn't actually hide my excitement at you being able to ask the right questions.
No.
Nobody had ever done it, right?
I mean, I built this thing with a top chemical engineer, the late Jim Laddy.
And then I think it was even off-air, he started talking to me about tannins.
And I was like, who is this guy?
I was like, this is incredible.
I really want to share.
And then I want to tell you that what happened is I ended up having to even...
Send out an email blast and just tell people, look, we got slammed.
I did a bunch of interviews at the same time.
And your people responded back with the most unbelievable kindness.
It took us a long time to fulfill those orders from June.
And every time we fulfilled them, people were waiting months.
And when they finally got their product, it was with an absolute level of appreciation.
And part of what I want to focus...
Go ahead.
No, I know.
But see, there are a lot of new listeners and they're wondering, what are you talking about?
Because it's been a few months.
So what I would like to do, if you don't mind me interrupting, is first, I've got some big picture questions to ask you that I want to jump into.
And I do want to mention, you know, you've got some solutions that I openly recommend that people check out and But I also want to have a disclaimer that you're not a sponsor of this show.
We don't have an affiliate arrangement or anything of that kind.
You just have great solutions.
And I plug a lot of companies that I think have great solutions.
And the same thing always happens that you get kind of overloaded sometimes with interest, which is great.
But can we start with sort of big picture questions first?
Sure, absolutely.
And I think something that I think is really important for people is that, and I feel like I share this in common with you, Is that when we promote something or when we get excited about it, it's because we understand that it works and because we believe in it and that we can explain the mechanism.
And I think that's very different from a lot of people.
I think that something that's important for the big picture of this is I want to highlight before I even start explaining this, explaining any of this, is why I would know some of the stuff that I talk about and where sort of this...
You know, experience comes from a very multifaceted view of the world.
And part of it is that we're now so deep into this and it's been so long that my role in trying to defeat this is starting to come clear to people.
I mean, my background is I started out academically as a clinical psychologist.
Moved to the States and got into the wellness space mostly because I just didn't want to go back to school and redo what I'd just done.
I'd graduated.
I'd registered as a South African clinical psychologist and I moved here and it didn't match up.
And so I thought, okay, well, I'm not ready to go back and sit in libraries.
I'm ready to go work with people.
And so I got into the wellness space and post 9-11, I just felt that I could have a sort of a...
A bigger role in terms of helping people to conquer and defeat what people would call evil or the dark side or negative forces.
The most fascinating part to me about psychology was working in prisons where I had to understand deep pathology as it related to Those that hurt and harmed others.
And so I moved from the wellness space over time and I went back to school eventually and actually did a doctorate in organizational leadership with a focus in violence prevention.
And specifically what I had in mind is putting this all together, this ability to integrate law enforcement, public health, and emergency management.
And over time, I became the go-to guy that could really help people to understand what does a model look like That prevents mass killings.
And what does it look like when you haven't prevented it and you're responding to it?
I had no idea that the background that I had and all the academic pursuit and everything that I'd learned would bring me to the point that the highest level of a mass killing is, of course, a genocide.
Or any form of mass killing on that scale.
And that's where we're at.
And I just want to say the last point to that is that suddenly, you know, there's much more comfort with everybody to talk about this as a bioweapon.
But bear in mind, my entry point to this and me trying to understand what is this thing and how do we defeat it, is that I was getting questions from clients.
I mean, these are state-level clients saying...
Doc, we're talking about early 2020.
Doc, what is this thing?
What's going on in China?
What's happening?
What do we have to be worried about?
And then starting to address those, starting to sift through some of the narrative that was coming out.
And being very blunt with clients right from the get-go and saying, look, they're telling you a bunch of nonsense.
This is not how this is working.
And the data is not matching what they're saying.
And so starting to alert people to a false narrative very early on.
But that was my role in it.
And now everybody is very comfortable talking about this as, okay, well, this is more than likely from a lab.
I still don't like to refer it to as a lab leak.
I believe that this is an intentional attack, not a leak at all.
And so the starting point for your audience is to say, I'm talking about this stuff because I'm taking a role of looking at a global attack with a bioweapon, and I'm looking at it from a biopsychosocial perspective.
I want to understand the biology and the chemistry of it.
I want to understand the psychology of what's happening to all of us.
And then I also want to understand, what are we doing That is hampered progress in being able to defeat this.
What level of society is playing in this?
So let me start with a whole new question, then, based on what you just said there.
You have piqued my interest here.
I would say that most of the low-level vaccine administration people are not, in their hearts, evil.
They're not trying to carry out genocide.
They don't even realize they're part of this genocide, let's say.
They believe the brainwashing, right?
So they think that they're saving children and so on and so forth, and that all needles are good and whatever.
They're brainwashed, they're gullible, but they're not evil.
But at some level in this, up the hierarchy, people obviously, the controllers, the globalists, whatever you want to call them, they know exactly what they're doing.
So my question to you, Dr. Braun, is based on your psychosocial study background, what stories do these people tell themselves about what they're doing?
Because, as you know, everybody always writes a narrative where they are the good person, right?
In whatever's happening in the world, they're the good guy.
Absolutely.
What stories are these people telling themselves right now about what's happening?
As infertility is kicking in, deaths are accelerating, depopulation is on.
How do they justify that?
Well, I think you already alluded to the core belief system here, which is twofold.
One of which is a belief system called a belief in a just world.
What Malcolm Gladwell referred to defaulting to truth.
It's a very human quality.
When you reach a level of complexity, your own intelligence has to take these sort of snapshots of every moment.
And a big aspect to what's different about, let's say, AI and human is that the human is still interested in trying to assess the trustworthiness of the situation.
The AI is not built yet to be suspicious.
Human beings by nature are inherently suspicious.
There's a part to an appraisal where even in the lowest of organisms, there's so much competition going on that's sort of built in within all of us.
And now is this level of trust.
Can we trust the information?
Can we trust the person?
And obviously, that's a hugely energetic process.
So the default is trust until...
Until something comes up to make you not trust.
And so that's a really, really vulnerability to be exploited.
And in a competitive world or when you're competing with psychopaths, that is by far the most used exploit.
The idea of...
Everybody has this idea in their head of, let's say...
Serial killer on the side of the road, you know, hitchhiking, and somebody thinking, okay, well, I'm not going to stop.
I'm not going to stop and give this person a ride.
I don't know.
I'm in the middle of nowhere.
I'm by myself.
It's dark.
And I'm suspicious about this activity.
But that's not how a psychopath would operate.
The psychopath wouldn't rely on chance.
They would use an exploit.
And that exploit would be the reverse of kindness.
A person will switch off their own good Samaritan kindness in situations, for example, when there isn't enough time to do the task, when there's a more pressing task, or when that sort of default to trust or truth is suspended for a moment.
And so what a psychopath would do is they would set up the set of circumstances.
So in other words, they would look like the kind person.
Stabbing somebody, you know, they tire...
Poking a hole in a tire and then driving up behind the person who's about to, you know, run off the road and just magically appear and go, oh wow, this could have turned out so bad for you.
You're stranded in the middle of nowhere.
So using kindness...
As an exploit is something that really we battle with.
I mean, you can tell how many times in our lives we have to rely in a crisis on somebody doing the right thing.
And for the most part, we don't believe that somebody is going to set up a set of circumstances.
Are you saying that the vaccine pushers are doing things like making the vaccines free and appealing to public health, appealing to saving the children, You know, appealing to pregnant women to have a healthy child.
So they're impersonating kindness, in essence.
Oh, absolutely.
I mean, the entire campaign is an impersonation of kindness.
And then there's some really, really dodgy tactics that are used.
For example, when the rollout first happened...
They did what a lot of nightclubs will do.
They created a shortage and a sort of VIP preferential treatment.
If you remember at the beginning of all of this, it got rolled out and then they told EMTs and paramedics, no, you have to wait in line.
You're not a priority.
Yeah.
And of course, these people went, well, how can that be?
I mean, we're going to be picking up patients.
We're the highest risk.
And so they actually made them fight for the solution.
Right?
Cabin patch dolls, yeah.
Exactly.
And so in some way, the kindness is then, oh, we've heard you.
Yes, this was an oversight, or we're fixing this problem as soon as we can.
Albert Boyler from Pfizer, for example, said, it's not my time to take this vaccine yet.
There's other people that need it before me.
You know, the fake sort of altruism.
There's all of these marketing, very, very low-level limbic tricks that they've done, including creating shortages and then fixing the problem.
And then also just the nature of EMTs and other first responders and law enforcement have taken such a beating as a lead-up towards this that the idea of suddenly becoming heroic The idea of playing a role in society, the idea that they could suddenly give people, like an EMT is not allowed to give any injectable.
That's not within the realm.
I mean, I've trained as an EMT. I've passed my tests and not once are you ever taught to administer a drug.
You're not allowed to administer drugs.
And then all of a sudden you became very special.
Because you could turn up at a clinic or on site or at a parking lot somewhere and they, you know, like deputizing a sheriff, oh, you're now qualified to give this vaccine.
So there was buy-in and everybody likes to feel like a hero.
Then the other side to this is that...
You know, people talk about Mogram's experiments of following sort of authoritative pressure, but we are really very, very, most people are driven by cohesion for good measure.
I mean, when you're part of a herd, when there's greater numbers and the whole herd has to turn, you know, the idea of defying that when the whole herd is turning left and you saying, guys, I think we need to turn right, There's obviously always only a very small percentage of the herd that's prepared to deviate.
And so that cohesion is actually neurologically programmed and people are very aware, for example, let's say in In video gaming or scrolling down your screen, clicking on a button, you get a dopamine hit.
But when you're a herd, when you're in a herd and you do the right thing and you follow the herd, that's actually a serotonin hit.
This is the whole point of the CDC funding the influencers.
In fact, this is the whole point of brand or face recognition advertising.
In fact, earlier today, I saw a bourbon brand delivery truck.
With the face of Matthew McConaughey on the side, and Matthew was saying this is the best tasting bourbon ever, right?
So that's exactly what you're talking about is, okay, celebrities are seen by people as herd leaders because people are mostly, for the most part, celebrity worshippers or herd followers.
And so that advertiser, the bourbon company, obviously is paying Matthew McConaughey for his Hurting capacity, right?
The facial recognition good vibes that goes with his face that people will follow him, even if the bourbon sucks.
But maybe this bourbon is good.
I have no idea.
But anyway...
Exactly.
That's exactly it.
And then it gets scary, right?
So in a 2022 world, we've got to consider that there's already 1.2 million AI-generated avatars.
1.2 million of AI-created replicas of human beings, sort of getting ready for the metaverse, sort of the second life kind of idea.
More and more are the free versions Or of all of this AI technology coming out.
Obviously, there's an entertainment part to it.
If you put your face on something and it gives you the Picasso version or it gives you the oil painting version or it gives you a version that you can now make a video with a likeness to yourself, but it's not you.
And they always hit you up with a Freemian version to train their AI, to get it right, to have more and more If this was research, they would be called subjects.
And your end number goes up every time you get somebody to sign up to train the machine.
And so it gets scary when you think about the fact that there's influences.
When you mention somebody selling bourbon, there are now social media influences that can push all kinds of things, and they don't actually exist at all.
They earn millions of dollars.
But you wouldn't know that it's an avatar.
I mean, they can get it to the point where you can follow an avatar and it still looks like some sort of anime figure.
But we're at the point now, and you can see this, if anybody doesn't know what I'm talking about and they want some good examples of it, you can go on to YouTube and...
TikTok, which I, by the way, I deleted the other day.
We can get into some of the oxidative stress that I think some of these apps are causing on purpose.
But I deleted TikTok.
But on these apps, you can see great examples.
And one of the best ones to see is deepfake Tom Cruise.
Now, I don't know why Tom Cruise was chosen.
But basically, you couldn't tell the difference.
And they can get that AI to do whatever and meet whoever.
And be on a screen and act out something.
And they've just had a couple of moments now where an actor dies and they replace the actor for the rest of the movie with AI. Someone's voice recently, I think it might have been Val Kilner, they replaced his voice with AI. And so we're now living in a world where this gets really interesting because one of the things that I was taught, and you can see it takes some...
Really heavily researched MKUltra type stuff to try and get somebody.
I mean, we use the word brainwash, but influence somebody to do something that they wouldn't naturally do.
We have profound neurological sort of governors or buffers that stop us crossing over our own moral thresholds.
Now, that doesn't mean to say that, you know, I've never enjoyed the concept, for example, love your neighbor like you want to be loved, because your neighbor might have a very different set of – you might have a very different set of expectations than what your neighbor wants – And so when we have a look at what we're really talking about is what is an individual's morality and their thresholds look like and how does that apply to society?
And so how do you cross over that?
Well, you cross over that by using AI. So one of the things that they did right at the beginning of this is they brought up the medical voice synthesizer companies that basically when somebody called in a number To ask questions about the COVID vaccine.
And they were, quote unquote, let's say, vaccine hesitant, which is a term that I can't stand.
I wouldn't call it hesitant at all.
I would call it extremely intelligent and using your intuition.
But they used the word hesitant.
And then they would give people these various channels, like chat to this person online or call this number.
And many people would have assumed that when they called that number and they asked somebody that they thought was a medical person and they were explaining that they were incredibly worried, they would have assumed there was a human being on that other end of the line.
And there wasn't.
There wasn't a human being.
It was AI.
Well, let me share something with you that's relevant to all of this.
There's an online AI art generation tool.
There are several of them, but one of them is called DALE, or it's at labs.openai.com.
And we've played around with this to generate art.
You give it a description of, let's say, a waiter on a train on the moon or whatever, and it comes up with that.
What I've noticed, which is kind of horrifying, is that very often the mouths of the people in the art or animals, if you say like a dog on the moon or whatever, the mouths are all jacked up.
They look like demon mouths.
And then the fingers.
There can be way too many fingers.
So the AI system doesn't see humans the way, obviously, that we see humans because the AI system's not alive, it's not conscious, and it's certainly not human.
But an AI system would look at that piece of art and say, yeah, that looks like a human.
And you and I would say, oh, that looks like a demon.
Right?
Yes.
And that barely scratches the surface of then what you were touching on, morality or ethics or empathy, compassion, the things that make us human.
AI systems have none of that.
You're getting to a very interesting part of this, which is basically this quest that started, I believe, just prior to the Renaissance, this idea of creating a humanoid This idea of creating a golem.
And if you have a look at some of the sort of alchemy and biblical texts around that, what's kind of really interesting, and we're scientists, we all think that we're so advanced and that we have great tech.
We move at absolute snail's pace.
And when you look back in history, there's really nothing new.
And we use different words for things.
There's so many great segues that we can go with this, but one of the things is that the difference between a human and a golem is the idea of a god, whatever that god is that somebody calls their god, breathing in life, giving that human spirit.
And so looking at the reference points of creating artificial life like they're doing now, I know you've covered some of the work on, let's say, the venom organoids.
Or now growing tissue or transplant.
FDA just recently approved lab-made meat.
It's now registered.
It's approved.
It didn't come from life.
So what's missing from this is very interesting, but what's missing from this is spirit.
It's what we define as human beings, that there is an intrinsic difference between something that is artificial Something that we as human beings have made that is different from an organic process that takes time and that evolves and that ultimately works within a framework.
You could think of the greatest framework of a God designing all of this and that we get to live in is an optimistic God.
We can think about the fact that over time, optimism creates a set of sort of rules that the next moment that we all get to live in is the best version possible.
But when we start tinkering with that, when we're not coming from a place where we have these sort of concerns for what would this do to the rest of us?
This idea of, you know, Elon Musk has been in the news a lot, obviously, recently.
But think about the fact of sort of the human arrogance that you can get to a point where you just shoot a car into space and For shits and giggles.
The idea that you just don't care about where your waste goes or anything else the way that we've chosen to live on this planet.
The deadly sins that all lead down to a path of non-caring, It's a very narcissistic view of the world where the being is the only thing that matters.
And the minute you do that, you're running into the territory that we are all living through, where now you can have collaboration with a few of these soulless creatures that want the rest of the world to be like that.
And they really don't see the connection, feel the connection or have a desire to even connect anything.
It's just all very, very, they are loosely connected objects.
But at any point, any of the objects are just completely replaceable.
And to go back to your point about what these people that are thinking that have pushed the vaccines are now seeing the damage.
Yeah, I was going to bring you right back to that because they think that they are the gods.
They're just your lab researchers, right?
Which is why there's such a heavy presence of academic clinicians that have never seen patients, people that have gone into research because they're just not comfortable with the societies they live in, or they don't choose to see the pain and suffering that even the finest research will have consequences.
And so when you...
We made loose and more, you know, sort of gave permission to more and more researchers to work with animals in such a grotesque way.
When we loosened up those rules where for years, animal rights activists had said, you know, guys, what are we doing?
We can now replace this with cell lines.
We don't have to be doing this.
And we've reversed all of that.
We haven't used any of the tech.
That would be available to us.
In fact, what we've done is we've given ourselves absolute permission now to use sort of the highest level organism on the planet, a human being, no differently than a lab rat, where in their minds, the people that have died so far from the vaccine, they are literally just sacrificed subjects in an experiment.
There's no consequence for their action, and nor is there any pain and suffering that comes with that.
There is, this mouse didn't make it.
We sacrifice this one, but the rest seem okay.
Well, yes, and this brings us to the Neuralink project with Elon Musk.
And we reported on this yesterday, I believe, where...
There are hundreds of horrific photographs of the monkeys who have died because of the Neuralink implants and their skulls have been drilled through and some of them chewed their fingers off.
They chewed off their own fingers because of the Neuralink stimulation driving them insane.
And, you know, then I think Elon Musk says, well, FDA says this is going to be ready for human trials in six months.
And I'm thinking, well, count your fingers, people, because if they're going to have human trials here, maybe we're going to need that AI art system to give you extra fingers because you're going to chew some of them off when this gets implanted in you.
But how do we not have a global outcry against this kind of animal experimentation and also the expectation that this is only being tested on monkeys because humans are next?
And they put this into humans.
Of course, they're going to have some kind sounding excuse like you explained earlier.
Oh, we're saving whoever, whatever group they want to say is going to help people who are paralyzed or help the blind or whatever.
Sure, that's where it starts.
And then two years later, it's like mind control slave grid, you know?
Or they diagnose you with a mental illness because you won't take a vaccine.
And what's the treatment?
Oh, Neuralink, control system in your brain.
Now you're, quote, cured.
You see, you know where this goes.
Absolutely.
And it's always the end point, right?
If the goal, if the grant writing or the intention or the ethics committee, if there was absolute truth in where the direction they're going, most of this would have higher purpose and there would be less cruelty and perhaps even there would be rethinking about it and people would think, well, there isn't actually a need for it.
There's another way to do this.
But their end point is a lie.
So, you know, you can talk about Neuralink and they can talk about helping some person who's, let's say, a quadriplegic or some other person who's, let's say, lost their ability to have speech and to bring that back.
They can claim that's what they're doing.
But from a financial point of view, there's no money in it.
There isn't enough people that they would be helping compared to what they want to be making in profit.
So what they should really be admitting straight off the bat, there would be more integrity in it, is say, yes, we're totally building this just so that you can sit online for longer and that you won't have to actually have a device in front of you and only be scrolling.
And we'd like you to start buying more online.
And so therefore, this is where some of the hedge fund money is coming from and that it all comes down to, you know, Fewer and fewer people that are actually in charge of any of this because the money is all linked and it all eventually starts coming from the same pool of resources of the profiteers who have essentially used this time period.
This is the reverse of any sort of democratic form of any form of financial opportunity where the The peasants on the manor were allowed a quality of life that came with financial security and came with the ability to make some choices using their money.
And that is now in complete reversal.
The peasants of the rest of humanity, all of us, will have fewer and fewer rights and privileges and choices because ultimately there's fewer and fewer people that are in charge.
And what they've done is they've built a human moat I think this is what's very interesting for me as somebody who has to understand war strategy and how terrorists think.
There's less reliance in the world for physical structure for protection.
The way people protect each other is with human shields.
They build up sort of the low-level people that people have to claw their way through to get to the top.
There's never any accountability all the way at the top.
I should say there's very few times where there's accountability.
You can see that with everything that happened with Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and that there's no accountability in the clients.
There's no accountability in friends and family and business deals and universities that took money.
It's just literally someone went to jail.
But ultimately, the rest of the people remain completely free.
And I think that part of that is the terrifying part to this is that the more they get the space where there's no regulatory bodies, there's no ethics committees, there's no one looking at conflict of interest, the more they just create more and more synthetic.
That's why I think that to go full circle, The thing that I was the most excited to actually talk to you about and to say online so that people could hear is that it is in the human interaction.
It's in the human kindness.
It's in the appreciation that you feel and the spirit of innovation that's what's kept my energy up during this hard time.
It's the real tangible human exchange that's deeply needed to get us out of this.
It's what they don't have.
They're not capable of it.
It's why it's so easy to make fun of them when they drink awkwardly at a deposition or at some sort of congressional hearing and they look robotic.
It's what we're spotting.
They're incapable of doing what we take naturally of what we would call be human.
They're incapable of that.
And so they're trying to create a world that they're more comfortable with, which is artificial, where they can control every aspect.
But the way that we defeat them is go back to every moment being more and more human.
Demand it.
Demand the human connection.
Demand the real thing instead of the fake thing.
Understand...
Go ahead.
Well, this is also why they underestimate the power of humanity to overcome...
Adversity.
Because they don't understand humanity.
They're not in touch with it.
Not even themselves.
In fact, they reject themselves in their quest for transhumanism.
So they literally want to discard their physical bodies And, you know, exit their system and join a computer system and live forever, they think.
But it's kind of the ultimate, you know, suicide pact, isn't it?
I mean, it's crazier than a suicide cult.
It's like killing yourself and suffering the illusion that a simulated avatar version of you is going to live forever as a piece of software, a piece of code somewhere else.
But it's not you.
But they think this is real.
I think the best way to articulate this is what you've just said.
It is a suicide pact.
I referred to it recently as sort of Masada syndrome and Masada strategy.
This idea that you can get people To the point where they are tricked enough to think that the best outcome in this situation is to end their lives.
And that you can see that Canada has now moved towards this in policy.
The idea that somebody should end their life or become non-human in some form, whether it's to be in the metaverse or whether it's to give up their rights and their privileges or to be cruel to others, they should end their rights to be human because it will be better for them. they should end their rights to be human because it And I think that that's also why it gets very, very important for people to feel the urgency of how quickly this is moving.
So the next strategy that I think is at play is I think people are well aware, you know, Europe's already going to go through a winter of coldness where places, the infrastructure has been destroyed, food shortages are now starting to happen globally.
I think the slide to all of this is basically that I think that they want us to get to the point where we completely reject forms of government and that they throw the world into complete chaos.
And it looks – it will look to us like a victory.
It will look like we – this happened in – I believe it was in Paris.
It was a short period of time, maybe 1793, where the Parisians actually took control of their own city and took out their elected officials.
But it's all a trap because basically with chaos comes the opportunity of the hero to step in.
Now, if it is truly a hero, that's great, right?
Somebody redirecting traffic.
When the lights have gone out is a wonderful thing to have.
But if you purposefully switch off the lights, if you do what just took place in one of the counties somewhere in our country where they took out the power grid, if you do that purposefully and then you show up as the hero, To switch lights back on.
That pseudo-hero is the most dangerous form of heroic action.
We've just gone through a pandemic of pseudo-heroes.
Well, it's funny that you mention that because I was explaining a very similar concept the other day where, and the way I said it, is that your slavers, those who will enslave you, your slavers will pretend to be your saviors.
And so they will cause the problem, right?
This is classic problem, reaction, solution.
They will cause, let's say, the global financial collapse.
They will cause it.
They will blame a third party.
And then they will present themselves as saviors for the solution.
Oh, here, we'll save you.
Just join this digital currency system and we'll give you all your money back and you won't lose a penny.
You just have to join this system, which is a mark of the beast.
Let's call it transhumanism from money.
Like your money soul goes into the computer.
And that's exactly what you're saying, isn't it?
Yeah, I mean, the financial side to it in terms of what you said in terms of creating the problem, fix the problem, and a form of enslavement.
And so the financial aspect, if you think about just energy exchange, right?
So we know energy cannot be created or destroyed.
And so it's the same thing with the energy exchange of goods or anything else.
And so the trick here is to get people to give up all forms of financial currency or even tokens.
I think that part of what they're doing is just absolutely pillaging every last dollar from every place that they can.
And they are transferring their wealth into tangibles.
Yes, exactly.
I mean, that's exactly what Bill Gates is doing with farmland.
And so when it comes down to it, the only thing that we'll have when all of this collapses and people want to rebuild are deeds.
You have to go back to a piece of paper that says, before the collapse, I own this.
I mean, that's what I would be fighting for the most after collapse, of proving that this was my cow.
So that deed, they're getting everybody to token their worlds more and more.
And then I think that even to create a false sense of security in a digital system, with the FTX debacle as a test, is also just another form of pillaging and influencing with money, with other people's money.
They're literally robbing us blind, whether it's taxpayers' money, whether it's digital exchanges, and they will collapse the entire thing.
And they'll only do it when they're completely secured in wherever they're choosing to be.
Now, there's a couple of places from a military point of view that you could do that.
There would have to be an island.
It would have to be large enough.
It would have to have infrastructure.
It would have to have control.
One of the places that comes to mind in terms of that's already prepped for this is New Zealand.
This is where they've built bunkers.
This is where the fastest growing prepper community has been in the world.
It was one of the most heavy-handed places on earth in terms of draconian orders and taking away people's rights.
And no one could fly in and out, except for who?
Except for the globalist scum.
They could come in and out as they pleased because they are not using public transport.
And they didn't even need to get out once they left Silicon Valley.
Mark Zuckerberg did this with Hawaii as his big island fortress.
He left the physical space of Facebook and was running the company while taking breaks and surfing on real waves, not virtual waves, real waves and learning jujitsu with a real coach, not a virtual coach.
And yet, what he's encouraging everyone to do is tokenize your world.
And yet, he's buying up Hawaii.
And so I think that part of it is to understand what they're doing and then to counter it with the same structure.
It is a time period where people need to start thinking about tangibles and resources and legacy and what they would want to leave behind.
That is what it is to be deeply human.
So I think that they shouldn't get tricked into the synthetic side.
You know, you and I talked a lot.
I think that our initial conversation, sort of the venom information was sort of breaking news at the time.
And I was absolutely thrilled that Dr.
Artis and Stu Peters had got that information out because I had gone the more traditional route.
I'm not somebody who likes spotlight or some sort of sensational focus.
And so I went my regular law enforcement routes, emergency management, public health.
I was trying to get the information out that what we were dealing with was not a viral issue at all.
Whether the virus existed or not meant nothing to me.
What I was very interested in is the conversation we're having now.
It bothered me that we were dealing with a synthetic That we're dealing with a synthetic organism, that we're dealing with something that was a parasite, as Karen Kingston will call it.
Meaning that the word parasite, I think, is very confusing for people because it sounds like it's alive.
But I think that the way that the word parasite should be best understood is that...
A parasite can't do anything without a host.
It is completely reliant on its host and it will suck the life and resources out of its host.
So the fact that this isn't even a real life creature, that this didn't emerge on its own, the fact that this is AI generated and let's drill down on that and what that really means because I think it's confusing to people.
If you wanted to design A new piano.
And you looked at an old piano and you saw black and white keys and a certain amount of them and each of them had a note and there was a pedal over here and then there was these strings that created music.
If you fed that all into AI, the AI might come up with a very different configuration because what is the issue with a grand piano?
It's size.
So if you wanted to create the same sound, if you wanted to create the same quality, but you weren't going with the old architecture, you could get a machine to rethink this.
And the machine could spit something out that would be, wait, I don't understand.
Why have you made this thing so large when you can achieve it in this way?
And so the way that AI is used with synthetic proteins is literally just understanding the molecular charges, weights, and attraction between all of these things.
And then the computer, like a Rubik's Cube or a great chess game, the computer gets to think through all of the configurations.
And the difference between a human being and a computer is a human being needs to take breaks.
Well, the computer just gets to run.
And the faster we build our processes, the faster we'll run through these configurations.
So all of a sudden, the computer can spit out, you know what?
Crate venom, this short-chain peptide over here, can live very nicely with this cobra venom if you use this form of disulfide bond.
But to do that, you need this spacer in between.
Otherwise, your molecular weights are going to be wrong.
Your human being is not...
We're capable of this kind of thinking, but you would have to literally put somebody onto the task.
That's all they would do, and they would run into their own biases that would change the way they could think about it.
They would run into problems that they would create in their head where the computer, like we said, with ethics or morality, the computer is not thinking about why something cannot work or the consequences of it.
It's just given the task to think about how to configure this.
And so when you look at the spike protein and you look at it as a synthetic object, they have achieved the computer spitting out, oh, you want this thing to be hydrophobic, meaning it will repel water?
Well, why didn't you use a rabies insert?
If you want this thing, this is the equivalent of an assassin.
You want to shoot somebody from this balcony?
Well, how about using a suppressor?
Okay, so that's your HIV insert on alpha-7.
It's going to suppress the immune and inflammatory response.
No, they don't think through the repercussions.
Correct.
So when it spits it out, and part of it as well is then the human being needs to figure out, well, how do we scale this thing up?
It's all very well that the computer...
Can spit it out.
And that's when it gets really nefarious too, because now you start introducing players that know the consequences of their action in small parts.
And the story, when you asked earlier what the story they're telling themselves, the average person is not telling themselves any story.
This is where it gets painful to think about that the average person is one so programmed, To be gluttonous and luxurious and to be tired, to come home from work and just have a couple of minutes to themselves that they don't actually have the space to be thinking about anything.
They are literally taken away from the idea of what Einstein would have had in terms of a thinking chair or Bill Gates gets to go away each year for, you know, however long he takes just to go somewhere and think.
You know, I mean, people have kids to feed, they have bills to pay.
They've got all of these problems and woes of the world.
So they're not thinking at all.
And those that know what's going on, the nefarious part to them is that the way they can get away with this is actually fairly truthful, which is Henry Ford created a system where people worked on parts.
If you never got to see the final product, you didn't get to see the monster.
If you didn't get to see Frankenstein ever, then how could you be to be blamed for the eyeball?
It's just you worked on one small selected part of a giant project.
It's the integrator, ultimately the handful of people who actually know what this is, what it's capable of, how to make it worse.
And you just saw this in real time with Boston, a university in Boston, making a more horrifying version than SARS-CoV-2.
Yeah, exactly.
And look, We are only scratching the surface in all of this.
There's so much we could go into, but I promise to give you time.
I want to ask you about the products that you have available.
Which I still have not been able to try.
So I want to ask you about the cashew nutshell oil.
You've got a product you call Anacardic.
Because we're almost out of time, but I want to give you an opportunity to talk about this.
And also you have something called copperene, which is to be inhaled, correct?
Yes.
It's a spray, a mister?
The way I always talk about these products because I'm not somebody who actually enjoys the sales side of life at all.
Sometimes I wish I was more comfortable with selling or promoting in that way.
It's not part of my fabric.
The way that I think through these is that Now talk about anacardic and coming from the cashew shell.
What you're looking at is the WD-40 of oils in terms of you have this incredible oil that can be extracted from the shell.
And the anacardium means upright or upward heart.
And so you have all kinds of amazing metabolic and cardiac consequences in terms of basically lubricating the system and doing it in a way where I always describe anacotic acid, which makes it sound like it's an acid, but that's just the name that it's given.
It's an oil and it's an antioxidant.
And thinking about it, I always look at it molecularly, is that there's some molecules that have occurred.
It's the exact opposite of what we've been talking about synthetics.
There's some molecules that are so beautiful because over time, things come together in an incredible way to help different organisms survive.
So a close match, for example, is resveratrol.
And if you think about resveratrol as an antioxidant, you're in fruits that ferment.
And so there has to be this delicate balance between the oxidative stress that's occurring through electron accumulation in a reaction and balancing that out where you need the timing of it, superbly timed, so that the organism's seed can superbly timed, so that the organism's seed can leave the fruit and eventually make more of itself.
And so it's the same thing.
Human beings need antioxidants because we're accumulating electrons.
Something that I'm very conscious of the moment within my own life is that the fastest way you can accumulate electrons is negativity.
Oxidative stress in psychological terms is really the fastest way that you can accumulate and put yourself on a death spiral is rumination over negativity.
The idea that something is eating you up inside.
My boss said this to me and I spent the whole weekend ruminating or thinking about it.
I'm so stressed by it.
It's eating me up.
Yes, it's actually physically eating you up because what's happened is that oxidative stress has set off an entire cascade, as you know, that includes the mind-body connection, the vagus nerve.
The entire system has this Intricate level of trying to balance itself.
So my products that I looked at came about in some interesting ways.
Anacotic was something that hit my radar prior to the pandemic.
I was doing some research on these brain stones that form In our minds, something that I would call, you know, sort of when people talk about the, what's it called, the thinker stone, the philosopher's stone.
And there's lots of literature about what this, you know, philosopher's stone could have been.
And what was interesting for me is that I think that I discovered prior to the pandemic that These brain stones that ultimately come from overthinking problems, this rumination that leads to calcification in the human body.
Ultimately, we don't have a ruminant system where we have multiple stomachs.
So that stress and that chewing of the cud when you chew something or when you try to find a solution and you say, well, let me think about it overnight.
You know, you're actually using up energy.
You're creating a chemical cascade.
And that has consequences.
And if that is positive, great.
But if it's negative and keeps going, the stress of it alone will cause this sort of negativity that leads to these oxidative stress on all the cells in the body.
And so one of the things that I looked at is I started looking at inflammation in the brain.
And I just so happened to stumble on Um, this, uh, this product, um, that most people aren't aware of because if you process the cashew shell, um, you actually land up with some very, very toxic chemicals.
And if you don't know how to extract the oils properly, what you land up with is you land up with, with, um, uh, toxins in the, um, in the poison ivy family.
I mean, it's, it's, it's pretty lethal stuff.
Um, you're talking about, you know, um, Tiny, tiny amounts that can bring on death.
But if you know what you're doing and you extract the oil, you land up with these incredible antioxidants.
So that's how I came across Anarcotic.
And then, of course, the pandemic hit and there was all this talk about cytokines and inflammation.
And I realized that the spike protein was causing this problem.
And I started discovering very quickly that everything that I'd been doing on On calcium and mitochondria that were dying off as it related to my work with mass killers, all suddenly started making sense in terms of what was happening in the body with this lethal toxin.
It was so disturbing to me what the spike protein was capable of.
So I was obviously excited about this anacardic and then I looked at copper and how it related to this and realized that it wasn't just copper, it was the combined copper and zinc in our body.
And so copperene is essentially a copper alloy which would be considered brass and it's inhaled as an inhalable mist and it has all kinds of wonderful benefits.
And of course, you know, the world that we live in, we can't make any claims.
I let the people using it make the claims and let them discover all the great things it can do for them.
And so that's how those products came to be.
Okay, wow.
So let me just give out the website for you.
It's biochemcience.com, right?
Is that the right site for it?
Okay, so biochem, and that's C-H-E-M like chemistry, biochemcience.com.
And I see you've got the anacardic, which is the cashew shell oil, as you just mentioned, or certain extracts from it.
You've got the copperene and a few other different formulations, a Mr. Pack and things like that.
So I look forward to – I want to try your anacardic as well.
So I'll talk to you after the show about – see if you can get me a sample of that.
I'd love to try that.
And I'm a big believer in the right minerals, the right trace minerals in the right places in the body while eliminating toxicity of lead exposure or cadmium, mercury, arsenic, those kinds of things.
It's about the right balance.
You've got to have the good ones and get rid of the bad ones.
So I appreciate what you're doing there.
I want to share something with you.
This will just take one minute, which is basically in the last time that we spoke, we mentioned silver.
And so I found this really old paper on cobra venom, and I'm still working through it.
I think it's from like 1890-something, and it talks about these various chemicals that they were looking at defeating cobra venom.
And Mike, I think this is going to make you smile, but one of the most powerful ingredients that they found that can destroy and dismantle cobra venom is silver.
Yeah, I did not know about that.
That's fascinating.
Share that paper with me, if you would, please.
I'd like to take a look at that.
Sounds interesting.
Yeah, no problem.
I'll do that.
And the other one on there that reminded me of our first conversation is another one on there was tannins.
And so it took me right back to our conversation.
And I know that you are somebody that really understands the chemistry of silver.
And I thought this was interesting because copper and zinc together would create a really nice protective layer.
But, you know, as your work has shown with these monstrous materials, Fibrotic tissue.
Another whole show, we could talk about what your findings were and what I think is happening.
But it's not only about protecting the body from them.
You obviously have to look at how you dismantle this.
If that's growing in somebody and they're still alive, you have to work out how are we going to break down That sort of metallic protein tissue, how do you break that down safely?
And silver was on there and tannins was another one that caught my attention as safe methods that allow these things to disintegrate.
Yeah, that is the key question of our time.
And we'll have to leave it on that note and revisit that on a later interview.
I also want to remind our readers that they can check out our previous interview on my channel on brighttown.com.
They can just search for your name, I think, on my channel and they'll find that.
So, look, I just want to thank you for taking the time here to chat with us about all of this.
And I thank you for doing the research and digging that you're doing.
To get into what's happening in our world today and what are the risks to humanity, you know, AI and mRNA and spike proteins and all kinds of things like that.
So thank you for all that you're doing, Dr.
Braun.
Likewise, absolutely.
I echo that straight back to you and your work.
You really are somebody that is not new to this.
You absolutely have been devoted to this for the longest time.
And so thank you from me and certainly humanity also, a big thank you.
I mean, we're all in this together.
And I think that that is another human way that we can defeat this if we work together and share the information that we're finding.
Exactly.
Great point.
Yeah.
Humanity wins in the end.
So the website of Dr.
Braun, folks, is biochemscience.com.
At least that's his product site.
His regular site, not the product site, is drtaubrawn.com.
And that's D-R-T-A-U-B-R-A-U-N.com.
DrTalBron.com.
Did I get that right?
You did.
Thank you, Michael.
Okay, great.
All right, good.
All right, great.
And also, folks, feel free to repost this interview on your own channel on other platforms.
So thank you for listening.
Thank you, Dr.
Braun, for joining me today.
My pleasure.
Absolutely.
Okay.
I'm Mike Adams, brighteon.com, and thank you for joining us, and I hope you learned something that you can apply in your life or to help other people live healthier, happier lives.
Thank you for listening.
God bless you all.
Take care.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection