Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 5, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:34:42

Situation Update, 10/5/22 - American Medical Association demands DOJ prosecute journalists...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right, welcome.
	Mike Adams here.
	Situation Update, Wednesday, October 5th, 2022.
	Just wow.
	Let's start with the following that's going to blow your mind.
	And believe me, we have a guest tonight that's also going to blow your mind.
	We've got news.
	We've got analysis.
	Let's start with this.
	Did you know that at Berkeley, law students have created No-Jew Zones?
	Okay, and I didn't misspeak.
	And, you know, you're pulling your hair out.
	Like, what do you mean?
	How can leftist law students at Berkeley create a no-Jew zone?
	Well, they don't call it a no-Jew zone.
	The media is calling it Jewish-free zones.
	And this is covered by humanevents.com, by the way.
	Berkeley law students exhibit new leftist anti-Semitism with creation of Jewish free zones via new anti-Zionist speaker rule.
	Oh, you can't make this stuff up.
	You can't make it up.
	So they have nine different student groups at Berkeley that have adopted a new bylaw that basically prohibits Jewish people from speaking at Berkeley.
	Let's see, it will not invite speakers that have expressed any interest or hold views or promote events in support of Zionism, comma, the apartheid state of Israel, they say, and the occupation of Palestine.
	So this is the Jew-free zone policy at Berkeley.
	Now, by the way, this is not a debate here about Palestine and Israel and Zionism and all of that.
	What I'm saying is, isn't it fascinating that the, quote, inclusive left, that they want transgenders to invade women's locker rooms and everything?
	And they say they accept everybody, but you have to be either gay or lesbian or bisexual or transgender or, I don't know, self-identify as something else.
	But they have no tolerance for Jews.
	And so I reached out to one of my friends after I saw this headline.
	I texted it to him.
	I said, can you believe this?
	Because this friend of mine is a Jewish person.
	And he said, oh, yeah, yeah, we...
	We, in the Jewish community, we know that the worst anti-Semitism comes from the left, Democrats.
	Democrats, not all of them, but there are certain groups of Democrats that hate Jews, and they're just the worst anti-Semites.
	I said, you're kidding me.
	How can that be?
	He said, oh, you have no idea.
	So I gave him examples of all this discrimination against Jews by leftists.
	And remember, the leftists ran, you know, Democrats ran the KKK, so they were discriminating against black people as well.
	So let's see, they hate Jews, they hate blacks.
	Sounds like the left are the Nazis and the fascists, doesn't it, right?
	But yet they always attribute that to conservative white people somehow.
	I don't know any conservatives that are anti-Jew, nor even anti-Black, for that matter.
	I've never met a person, I've said this before, it's true, I've never met a person, and all the people I talk to in the state of Texas, you know, supposed to be a conservative Southern state, I've never met a person that used the N-word.
	Never met a person that said they hated Blacks, or they hated Jews, or nothing like that.
	But you're getting this from university law students who are radical leftist Democrats Californians.
	That's where the hatred is coming from.
	And it's a hatred that also includes, by the way, anti-white hatred.
	They don't just hate Jews.
	And they don't just hate black people, too.
	They hate white people.
	It's like, is there anybody you don't hate?
	You hate everybody you discriminate against Asians, too.
	They block Asians from college entrance acceptance by penalizing Asians for being Asian.
	It's like, is there anybody you don't hate?
	And there's an answer to that, by the way.
	Yeah.
	There are a couple of groups that leftists do not hate.
	It's illegal immigrants and violent criminals.
	They love those two groups.
	And here's a story out of Rare Foundation, R-A-I-R, rarefoundation.com.
	Moving over to Europe, but same principle.
	Quote, Netherlands, migrants celebrate living on five-star cruise ships while citizens cannot afford groceries and energy.
	So a, quote, luxurious, expensive five-star cruise ship arrived in Amsterdam's port where 1,000 asylum seekers were received, i.e.
	illegal immigrants.
	The MS Galaxy, which the Dutch government has hired with its citizens' money, will remain in port for at least six months.
	The ship is housing...
	You know, a thousand-plus asylum seekers who are on this five-star cruise ship basically getting a cruise experience while the farmers of the Netherlands are being bankrupted by the government, forced to cull their herds, forced to pay sky-high prices for electricity and food and face starvation and face potentially freezing to death this coming winter.
	So you see, the governments of the world, at least Western governments, are at war with their own people, but for illegals, i.e.
	migrants who don't have documentation, they have the red carpet rolled out for them.
	Oh, they're the special ones.
	They're the special ones.
	Remember, they're the replacements.
	Oh, yeah, Western government's going to mass murder their own people with vaccines and starvation and bankruptcy and destitution and, you know, bioweapons and everything else, hormone disruptors.
	But don't worry, there's a replacement plan.
	The replacements are surging into the country illegally, whether we're talking Europe or the United States, across the open border.
	The replacements, oh, there's no vaccine requirement for them.
	The replacements have the red carpet rolled out.
	Oh, you get to stay on a five-star luxury cruise ship while our own citizens freeze and starve and die.
	This is Western civilization in 2022.
	People ask me, why do I say that Western civilization will crumble and collapse?
	Well, I present my case.
	There it is.
	These governments can't even do anything for their own citizens.
	They are at war with their own citizens, but they're welcoming the illegals to come in and replace their own citizens.
	These Western governments, by the way, are at war with the rule of law.
	They're at war with, obviously, the Constitution and even freedom of the press.
	And there's a very important development that just happened today involving Alex Jones' Infowars and his court case in Connecticut.
	And I'm not going to spend tons of time on this, but as background, you need to know that Alex was denied his day in court.
	This was a civil trial that accused Alex of making money for falsely claiming that no children died at Sandy Hook.
	And in the civil trial, discovery was demanded.
	He turned over, well, his company turned over literally millions of records of emails and documents and financial transactions and so on and so forth.
	The judge, the Connecticut judge, who is a left-wing tyrant, simply decided that Alex was guilty without a jury trial because she declared that he was in default because she claimed that he didn't give the court some other documents that they demanded that did not exist.
	That did not exist.
	Like market research stuff that InfoWars doesn't even do.
	So the judge finds him in default without a jury trial.
	Which is entirely unconstitutional.
	This whole thing should have been nullified by the Supreme Court long ago, by the way.
	And then they move into the damage phase where the jury decides how many millions of dollars Alex Jones has to pay to the parents of the Sandy Hook children.
	And the judge is now ordering Alex Jones to lie on the stand.
	He's supposed to be on the stand today, in fact.
	The judge has ordered him to lie.
	Saying that if he claims he is innocent, he will go to jail.
	She will have him arrested for contempt.
	Or if he claims that he turned over all the discovery documents that were requested, she will throw him in jail.
	Or if he claims that he did not profit from saying that nobody died at Sandy Hook, which he only said a few times, and then he very quickly apologized for it, by the way, and he's not even the originator of that theory, it turns out.
	There were other authors and academics and so on who were talking about that first.
	But the judge says she'll throw Alex in jail if he says anything other than what she wants him to say.
	In other words, the judge has ordered Alex Jones to lie, to entrap himself, to admit to things he did not do, or she will throw him in jail.
	Now, no matter what you think about Alex Jones or his style or his Infowars.com or anything else, The principle of justice in this country is that every single person, even someone condemned or accused of mass murder, Even a serial killer is allowed to have a defense in the court.
	Even a serial killer is allowed to have a jury trial.
	And by the way, Alex didn't kill anybody.
	Alex didn't kill the children.
	Adam Lanza killed the children.
	It wasn't Alex Jones.
	He was sitting in a studio in Austin, Texas when that whole thing went down.
	Alex didn't do any of that stuff.
	But the principle is that every American gets the right to defend themselves.
	And if you are ordered to lie by a judge under threat of being sent to jail, what are you supposed to do in that circumstance?
	You could say, well, I take the fifth.
	But then the judge would say, you're not allowed to take the fifth because this is a civil trial, not a criminal trial.
	Oh, you can't take the fifth unless it would incriminate you, but this is not a criminal trial, so you must speak.
	Essentially, you must lie.
	The judge is ordering you to lie.
	Is this America?
	Again, no matter what you think of Alex's The principle, the entire legal system, the justice system, I should say, is on trial here, and it is failing.
	It is failing like never before.
	And have you noticed that the New York Times can lie about Sarah Palin, or they can lie about Nick Sandman?
	And the corrupt courts, you know, the corrupt judges will throw out those lawsuits.
	Oh, it's dismissed.
	The New York Times has the right to lie, they will say.
	They actually say that it was, quote, protected opinion.
	When the New York Times says it, it's protected opinion.
	When Alex Jones says something they don't like, oh, then you're guilty, guilty, guilty by default.
	You owe a billion dollars.
	You have no right to even say you're not guilty.
	You have no right to have a trial by jury, no right to defend yourself.
	You're going to be thrown in jail no matter what you do.
	What?
	This is the entire freedom of the press is under attack.
	And it's the independent media that is actually doing the only real reporting in this country with people like James O'Keefe at Project Veritas, right?
	I think one of the most courageous and effective independent media journalists ever Not only just living today, but perhaps ever living in American history.
	He's really on that caliber.
	Extraordinary what Project Veritas is doing.
	And it's extraordinary what InfoWars is doing on a day-to-day basis.
	But this attempt to shut everybody down just because they don't like their opinion, this is so anti-American.
	It's completely insane.
	And we cannot stand for this.
	Oh, and by the way, it's going to get way worse because there's another breaking story along these lines that will blow your mind.
	And here it is.
	The American Medical Association has written a letter begging the DOJ and big tech to not just censor everyone who disagrees with child mutilation surgeries carried out by hospitals and surgeons, but Okay.
	who question this practice of hospitals and surgeons profiting from the genitalia mutilation of children through transgenderism and, quote, gender-affirming surgery, which is just another name for child mutilations, okay?
	And they're claiming that, oh, this is disinformation, and the DOJ needs to get involved and prosecute journalists Is this America?
	The American Medical Association?
	What, has to silence anybody who questions what these people are doing to children?
	I mean, first of all, the mutilation of children is...
	It's demonic.
	That should be a crime.
	If the DOJ is going to investigate and prosecute anyone, they should be prosecuting the surgeons who are mutilating children.
	This was explained in a series of tweets here that has the following quote.
	So children's hospitals say, quote, we give children puberty blockers, hormones and gender surgeries, end quote.
	And then conservatives come along and say, hey, they give children puberty blockers, hormones, and gender surgeries.
	And then the medical regime and, you know, the DOJ regime, the Biden regime says, oh, that's harmful disinformation, and it should be censored and criminalized and suppressed.
	Well, wait a second.
	We just said what you said.
	You said you're doing...
	You know, surgeries on children, you're doing puberty blockers and hormone disruptors and chemical castrators.
	That's what you said.
	We just said what you said.
	Oh, no, that's hate speech when you say it, but it's love when we do it.
	That's Democrats.
	It's love, it's inclusiveness when we castrate children with chemicals, but when you say we're castrating children, that's hatred and intolerance.
	That's what it has come to, complete and utter insanity.
	Utter insanity.
	Since when did a medical association, and by the way, this just proves the AMA is run by a bunch of lunatic communists slash fascists slash child mutilators and groomers.
	Let me tell you.
	One of the most evil organizations on this planet that, by the way, pushed COVID and COVID vaccines.
	Now they're pushing child mutilations and saying the DOJ has to make sure that they're protected in their ability to continue to mutilate children for profit.
	Thank you.
	Which one of the advocates of this said last week that it's a revenue model for hospitals and big pharma because, you know, the children that they mutilate have to keep coming back for checkups and things go wrong, you know, in their new, what do they call it, the front hole and all the different anatomical changes have problems because, you know, they're just ripping organs out of children and it causes long-term problems.
	Well, that's revenue for the hospitals.
	It's money.
	It's profit.
	And they admitted this, or at least one of their advocates admitted this.
	But if you point it out, oh, then you're a hater and you're anti-trans or you're whatever.
	No.
	You people are demons.
	You people should be locked up.
	You should be in insane asylums.
	You're mutilating children for profit.
	Should be investigations of all those hospitals and all those surgeons.
	They should be, in my opinion, arrested, prosecuted, locked away and In prison after a fair trial by jury, by the way.
	See, I always insist on trial by jury, not just some judge declaration.
	Trial by jury.
	Let the American people decide.
	Should it be okay for doctors to mutilate children for profit?
	Well, let the jury decide.
	Is it okay for school teachers and counselors and medical professionals to brainwash children into thinking that they're the opposite gender so they can all profit from gender reassignment surgery?
	And they can parade the child out as their latest demonstration trophy of transgenderism and transitionism and all the other isms they come up with.
	Is that okay?
	Let's let a jury decide.
	Because morally, it is so evil and so wrong.
	And by the way, I don't think the American people are going to stay silent about this just because the AMA says they want the DOJ to silence people and they want big tech to silence people.
	If anything, this is 100 percent proof why you should fire your mainstream doctor.
	If you still have one, fire them.
	If they're a member of the American Medical Association, you might as well just call it the American Medical Dictatorship regime.
	So I'm not going to work with you.
	If you're a member of the AMA, I'm not working with you because you are part of pure evil that is mutilating children for profit and weaponizing the justice system against those who are trying to speak out and save children from this untold suffering and genitalia mutilations.
	Fire your AMA doctor.
	Now, by the way, this request to censor anyone who speaks out against child mutilations, this is just the latest category to be added to the other categories where big tech has been implored to silence the opposition of the left.
	One of the other categories is climate change.
	So big tech has been told by all these climate groups, you have to censor anyone that disagrees with climate change consensus.
	If anyone thinks that carbon dioxide is a good molecule, they have to be silenced and deplatformed and oppressed.
	If anybody thinks that the planet is not warming at an insane speed, oh, they have to be silenced.
	And they even come out and they argue these climate lunatics.
	They say, well, we can't let the other side be heard.
	There's no other side.
	There's only one side.
	It's our side.
	Our side is the consensus.
	No science disagreements shall be allowed.
	No data may be presented from the other side.
	No arguments from the other side.
	No logic.
	No rationality.
	No reason.
	No speech.
	No voices.
	No platforms.
	Nothing.
	The other side isn't allowed to speak.
	Yeah, because we're the science now.
	We're the, quote, science.
	You know, said with an evil grin.
	Science!
	And that's the way they feel about everything.
	Everything.
	Oh, you're not allowed to disagree with child mutilations.
	You have to agree that mutilating children is a good thing.
	You have to agree that carbon dioxide is an evil pollutant.
	You have to agree that hurricanes are worse now than they've ever been, which is a total lie.
	You are forced to agree.
	This is the new science totalitarianism.
	The medical dictatorship or scientific dictatorship, whatever you want to call it.
	And there are other topics like this as well.
	Oh, did you disagree with something Joe Biden just said?
	Oh, you're anti-government.
	You must be an extremist.
	Did you quote the Bible?
	Oh, you're definitely an insurrectionist then.
	You're a bigot.
	Oh, you're anti-trans, anti-LGB. You quoted the Bible scripture for real?
	Oh, you're an evil person.
	That's the whole effort of this on the left.
	To shut down the other side of every argument that they can't win.
	Because they can't win a debate when their side is pro-mutilating children.
	They can't win that debate.
	It's absurd.
	Even abortion.
	They can't win the debate on abortion.
	So what does Google do?
	Oh, they censor people looking for alternatives to abortion.
	They censor all the search results.
	So you can't find adoption agencies or pro-Christian alternatives.
	You can only find instant abortion on demand mobile roving abortion vans.
	It's an abortion factory.
	The mother and child go in one end of the tractor trailer and out the other end comes just the mother and then some fetal tissue for the vaccine industry.
	How amazing is that?
	It's like an on-site factory for child murder and abortion.
	And you can't disagree with it or you're a bigot.
	That's what we're hearing now.
	Not allowed to disagree on anything.
	Well, you might be an extremist.
	So you understand what the Connecticut court is doing to Alex Jones is what Big Tech is doing to all of us, right?
	They're saying to Alex Jones, oh, you're not allowed to say anything that we don't want you to say.
	You are required to lie in order to not be prosecuted, in order to not go to jail.
	You have to lie.
	You have to say what we say you must say.
	Same thing on big tech.
	Well, you have to lie.
	You have to agree to speak a lie.
	You have to agree to join Satanism and go in with child mutilations and be pro-groomer and trafficking and everything else and open borders.
	Oh, yeah, you have to hate God but love Satan.
	You have to be anti-gun but pro-violent criminals.
	You have to be anti-police.
	But somehow support Democrat-run cities, even though they're collapsing.
	It's all completely insane.
	And those who refuse to go along with that are the real Americans, by the way.
	Those who refuse to bow down to pure evil and pure Satanism are the real human beings on Team Humanity, saving children from these mutilations, saving babies from serial murder abortions.
	Saving each other.
	Saving each other from Satanism.
	Saving the world from evil.
	I mean, if the position of conservatives was so wrong and so weak and so empty, why do they go to so much trouble to make sure that no conservatives are allowed to speak?
	If it was a silly idea that it's wrong to mutilate the genitalia of children, why do they have to force you to not bring up that point?
	If the data of global warming and climate change were so strong, why would they have to censor people who present opposing views?
	If vaccines work so well and are so effective, like the Pfizer CEOs is 100% effective and then he's sick twice with COVID, if they're so effective, then why do they have to silence people who question Why?
	Why are they working so hard to silence those with whom they disagree?
	And the answer is obviously self-evident.
	They have to silence you because you are right.
	They have to silence you because your words are powerful.
	They have to silence you because their own positions are so weak and so fragile that they would fall apart at the merest questioning.
	They have to silence you and me and people like us because they, on the left, their positions have no basis in fact or rationality or reason or compassion or humanity or anything that makes any sense.
	They are satanic child mutilating lunatics who profit from their systems of control that try to enslave and destroy humanity.
	They are annihilators who Of truth.
	They are destroyers of worlds.
	They are enslavers of souls.
	They work for Satan.
	And that's why everything that they present is upside down.
	Everything that they do is inspired by hell.
	Literally hell.
	And they want to create hell on earth while destroying everything that represents the image of God.
	Now, just as they are shutting you off of tech platforms, they also want to make sure that you can't engage in business or even have a bank account if you don't bow down to all of their demands.
	This story from Newspunch.com, how the Federal Reserve is using climate change as a pretext to build an American social credit system.
	Oh, that's right.
	Chinese-style communist social credit system.
	It's all about man-made climate change.
	So if you don't agree with climate change narratives, you won't be able to have a bank account.
	Your bank will start to grade you on your adherence to climate change narratives.
	They'll scan your social media accounts.
	They'll watch for any public statements, any videos, anything that you've posted.
	Maybe they'll scan your secret emails.
	If you say anything against the climate change narratives, they'll say, well, we're going to shut down your bank account.
	We're going to freeze all your money.
	We're not going to let you engage in transactions.
	This is the system that's being built.
	And the ECB is doing this in Europe.
	They're going to, quote, limit the share of assets issued by entities with a high carbon footprint.
	So if you don't do something to reduce your carbon consumptions, you won't have access to, that's right, financing for your business.
	No moolah for you?
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, you burned natural gas for heat?
	Oh, no.
	Don't you know you're supposed to have, like, mice running in circles in little hamster cages with electric generators or something that we can call green?
	Can't be actual energy.
	Can't use fossil fuels.
	You're supposed to have, like, wind turbines on the roof of your building or something in order to get any kind of financing.
	So this is how Europe is going to collapse its economy on top of all the other systems of collapse that have been put in place.
	But they're bringing that to America.
	Federal Reserve has a pilot program to do the same thing.
	And they're eventually going to extend this to the individual consumer to monitor everything you say and do, to monitor probably your phone text.
	That's been suggested by leftists, that all your texting should be read and should go into a database and it should be scored to make sure that you don't commit, you know, wrong think, to make sure you're on board with the leftist narrative, you know, pro-abortion, you know, pro-transgender surgeries and mutilations and the whole deal.
	If you disagree with any of that, oh, your credit score collapses, you get no financing, your bank account gets shut down, you can't engage in transactions.
	And heck, if you're under a digital wallet system like they want, you might be denied the ability to spend the money you already have.
	Oh, sorry, you've reached your spending limit because your social credit score is too low today.
	It's like an episode of, what, Black Mirror?
	Is that what that show was called?
	Yeah, that's coming.
	Because it's all about control and forcing you to conform to their insanity.
	They can't allow you to be a normal rational human being.
	They have to get you to submit to their distorted, demonic, twisted narratives and lies of the world.
	That's how they're going to do it.
	Now, when you look into the way that the intolerant left actually wants to treat conservatives, it's not just they want to deplatform you financially, they want to silence you, they want to destroy you and bankrupt you.
	They really just want to mass murder all conservatives.
	They want to carry out just total death, genocide against Christians, conservatives, gun owners, Trump supporters, you name it.
	And if you don't believe me, check out this headline from Remix, which is rmx.news, which covers Europe.
	UK, conservative voters, quote, shouldn't be resuscitated by NHS, which is the National Health Service, claims left-wing ex-nurse.
	So this nurse, who's a radical leftist, of course, made this comment during a political debate broadcast on national television in Britain.
	And from the story, it says, this nurse sparked outrage for claiming that people who vote conservative do not deserve to be resuscitated by those working for Britain's publicly funded health care provider.
	This is on Jeremy Vine's Channel 5 show called Britain on the Brink.
	She said that if you vote conservative, you don't deserve to be resuscitated.
	So this is the compassion of the left.
	Ultimately, that's what they want is mass murder.
	And they would love to link your medical records to your social credit score so that Before they try to resuscitate you or administer first aid or, you know, maybe stop the bleeding and engage in life-saving activities, they would first like to check your social credits.
	Go, oh, look, you're anti-climate change.
	Oh, you're opposed to, you know, child gender-affirming surgeries.
	Oh, look at this.
	Oh, you used to be a fan of Margaret Thatcher.
	Oh, well, can't let you live.
	No resuscitation for you!
	This is what left-wing nurses want, apparently, in the United Kingdom.
	And believe me, this one is not alone.
	There are a lot of leftists, I would say the vast majority of them, that literally want to just mass murder conservatives because the hatred has been pushed by the media.
	The hatred.
	They've pushed hatred against Trump, hatred of whites, and now hatred of DeSantis.
	That's what they do.
	They vilify and spread hatred.
	And then they use that to justify deplatforming people or to justify maybe not resuscitating people.
	You notice, by the way, that during COVID, you notice what happened, that the most dangerous vaccine lots mysteriously got sent to the red states.
	Isn't that fascinating?
	How did that work?
	That there were more hospital ventilation issues Murders in red states, you know, per capita anyway.
	Interesting, huh?
	So yes, these left-wing demons are all about death and destruction, but they want conservatives to suffer.
	They want to destroy conservatives above all else.
	And yet, I think the joke is on them because they, the leftists, the Democrats, the intolerant lunatics, they're the ones who took all the vaccine shots, right?
	Not all, but more than any other group.
	They took the vaccines, right?
	Which means they committed vaccine suicide while they were hoping to kill others.
	Be careful what you wish for.
	Be careful if you wish medical violence upon others, and then it turns out you believe the vaccine industry that was committing medical violence against you!
	Oh, you sad, sorry, pathetic sucker!
	You took the death shot!
	And you bragged about it on social media.
	And you thought you were going to outlive the conservatives because they were anti-vaxxers.
	And it turns out you died of clots, heart attacks, and myocarditis and neurological damage.
	Because your evil vindictiveness got the best of you.
	You thought, oh, you thought that you could trust big pharma?
	The joke's on you.
	You thought you could trust big government?
	Oh, the joke's on you.
	You thought you could trust Joe Biden?
	Oh, my God.
	The cosmic joke is on you.
	And now a lot of those people are dead.
	Millions are dead already from the vaccine.
	And it's the people who said no that are still breathing, that still have hearts that are working, that still have blood vessels that aren't clogged with fibrous clots.
	You notice that?
	We're still here.
	A lot of the intolerant, lunatic, violent, pushing, criminal leftists, they're dead.
	They're going to stay that way, it turns out.
	Because, you know, vaccine death is permanent.
	They took themselves out.
	What an amazing phenomenon.
	They took themselves out.
	Darwin Award time.
	We didn't have to lift a finger.
	All we had to do was say no.
	Amazing.
	Let's shift gears here real quick into food for a minute because obviously we all have to eat.
	And food scarcity and food inflation are things that are affecting the world in a huge way right now.
	And by the way, we're going to cover some other financial issues after that.
	But here's a headline you may not have seen from Food Dive.
	The headline is JBS shutters Plantera brand after two years.
	So Plantera is the name of a U.S. plant-based meat.
	Well, it's not meat.
	It's plant-based like fake meat.
	It's of the meat giant called JBS. But Plantera is ceasing operations this year.
	According to a notice, it was given to the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment.
	The news was reported by the Denver Business Journal.
	And JBS USA confirmed the closure.
	An estimated 121 jobs will be lost from the brand's corporate headquarters.
	The business will be completely shut down by December 20th.
	The closure from the report here is the latest blow to the plant-based meat sector, which has seen slowing sales stymie its once meteoric growth.
	Plantera started as an offshoot of JBS in March 2020 and then launched products under its Ozo brand.
	So, look, that's the summary of the story.
	Basically, people don't want fake meat, it turns out.
	Why?
	Well, number one, people who are concerned about what's in their food typically read the ingredients.
	And if you look at the ingredients of these fake meat products, you find out that's full of GMOs and MSG, by the way.
	I mean, across the board, generally speaking.
	I'm not reading the ingredients of this particular product.
	They're shutting down anyway.
	But I'm just saying artificial meat, fake meat, everything that I've seen is loaded with yeast extract or other forms of MSG plus the ingredients or GMO.
	And, you know, they're taking components from here and there.
	This ingredient's from China.
	This other ingredient is from, you know, cellulose from the lumber industry.
	And then this other ingredient's from South America.
	And they're putting those ingredients together and saying it's better than beef.
	But it doesn't taste good.
	It just doesn't even taste good and it's not really green.
	It's more like green washing, if you ask me.
	And it's GMO. So across the board, I mean, I have not seen, have you seen an organic plant-based meat alternative that has no MSG in it?
	I have not.
	I have not.
	And I've looked because, you know, I'm in the food industry.
	I'm a food scientist.
	This is of interest to me.
	I've looked.
	They all contain, at least as far as I can tell so far, everything that I've seen contains some form of MSG. So then almost by definition, the only people who would consume these products are people who don't care what they eat.
	Right?
	Otherwise, why would you eat GMOs and MSG and pesticides and everything else?
	Well, if you don't care what you eat, why would you choose plant-based meat alternatives?
	Why wouldn't you just eat a Big Mac?
	Right?
	Their whole market segment is wrong.
	I mean, who came up with a marketing plan for these companies?
	Like, let's create a product that has no audience.
	What do you mean no audience?
	Well, the people who care about what they eat would never eat this product because it's full of GMOs and MSG. The people who don't care about what they eat also would never eat this product because those people would just be eating fast food hamburgers anyway.
	In other words, we have a product that we've created that has no audience.
	Like, no one would ever want to buy this product.
	And it tastes like crap on top of that.
	And then they wonder, gee, how come sales are so bad?
	Have you noticed that Beyond Meat has collapsed something like 87% in its stock price?
	And every trial that they try to run with all the fast food restaurants is like, let's have Beyond Meat Burger King Whoppers!
	We have to cancel it after a month.
	Nobody wants that.
	It tastes horrible.
	Let's try Beyond Meat Pizza Hut pepperoni.
	Nobody wants it.
	Cancel it.
	Beyond Meat at Hardee's?
	Thumbs down.
	Beyond Meat at McDonald's?
	That sucks.
	Beyond Meat Taco Bell?
	Really?
	It's just on and on.
	They keep canceling all the trials.
	Turns out nobody wants to eat that garbage.
	Because, again, they're trying to push their plant-based meat alternative product to people who they think are health conscious.
	But if you're health conscious, are you eating at Taco Bell?
	Are you eating at Hardee's and Burger King in the first place?
	Like, again, we've created a product with no audience.
	It's amazing.
	Let's create a product that has zero demand.
	And let's just see if we can shove it down people's throats by creating enough guilt to About beef.
	It's just not working.
	At some point, people are just like, you know, frankly, you know, the quarter pound hamburger tastes better.
	It's just something about real food.
	Not to say that McDonald's is serving real food, per se, but you understand.
	You get my point, I hope.
	Because, of course, we have to ask a lot of questions about that McRibs sandwich.
	That has no ribs in it, but it's shaped like ribs.
	This is some kind of weird Halloween prank in the form of a sandwich?
	What is this thing?
	It's McRib.
	Oh my.
	Now, staying on the subject of food, but shifting our focus here slightly, I've noticed that leftists who tend to be into things like the slow food movement, they are completely opposed to fertilizer, it turns out.
	And of course, they also hate carbon dioxide, which makes no sense since that's what grows food.
	So, you know, first of all, if you're a leftist and you're into growing food and you hate CO2, you're a moron because carbon dioxide is what makes your food grow.
	Without CO2, you have no food, you have no tomatoes, you have nothing.
	You have no wheatgrass, you have no sprouts, you have absolutely nothing.
	You can't have regenerative farming without carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, folks.
	And if you didn't know that, and if you're anti-CO2, again, go have an IQ check because you needed education in reality.
	Without CO2, you can't grow food.
	So the reason that the slow food movement people are opposed to, let's say, nitrogen fertilizer is because they say, well, nitrogen fertilizer requires fossil fuels to create through the Haber process.
	And they say it's bad to use fossil fuels to create fertilizer because that releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
	But again, they need to go get their IQ checked because the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere is bad.
	It's the fertilizer for plants.
	I mean, it's the molecule that they need for photosynthesis.
	So actually, the use of natural gas, which is clean energy...
	In fact, some European countries even call it green energy now.
	They've had to recategorize it so they don't starve to death or freeze to death.
	But...
	When you release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, that benefits food crops.
	Okay?
	That's why they have CO2 generators in greenhouses, folks.
	Because it grows the crops more quickly.
	It grows flowers, it grows everything in the greenhouse more quickly.
	And you get nitrogen fertilizer out of the deal, too.
	Such as urea, or calcium nitrate, or other different forms of nitrogen.
	I mean, it starts with ammonia, then it becomes different nitrogen fertilizer.
	So what could possibly be wrong with this process?
	You're releasing CO2 food for plants, and you're creating nitrogen food for plants.
	Both of these things, both of the outputs of this process grow food.
	How could you be opposed to this process that grows food?
	Well, some of these slow food movement people, they say, well, you shouldn't use tractors, you know, in farming.
	Because tractors, they burn, you know, diesel, fossil fuels, releasing more carbon dioxide.
	Which, again, the CO2 is good for plants, by the way.
	But, let's say, okay, tractors are dirty.
	Oh, yeah, they require grease.
	Yeah, okay, well...
	So what do you want to do?
	Just have everybody out there with shovels?
	You want to go back to an agrarian society where every other person has to be a farmer and the world's population that's supportable by that is about 1 billion people.
	So really you are advocating global depopulation.
	Same thing as Bill Gates who promotes GMOs.
	So if you are opposed to using combustion engines in farming, then you are opposed to about 7 billion people living on planet Earth.
	In other words, you want 7 billion people to die from famine because, again, you can't support the current population of nearly 8 billion people without using some combustion engines along the way.
	You know, tractors.
	Now remember, I'm an advocate of clean food.
	I'm an advocate of organic food.
	Organics, right?
	I don't agree with the use of synthetic pesticides or glyphosate.
	My lab specializes in testing for glyphosate and testing for heavy metals and producing clean food.
	And by the way, I don't hear any of these slow food people talking about heavy metals in the food supply.
	They don't really care that much about pollution.
	They're just talking about CO2 and they think CO2 is bad, which is insane.
	But I'm a clean food advocate, right?
	But I own tractors.
	Why?
	Because shoveling your way around a couple of acres of farm field is an incredible amount of work and you can't feed the current population using that method.
	Look at the history of agriculture.
	Sure, when the population was really tiny, people started out with hand tools and then they figured out how to use animals.
	Guess what?
	Have some oxen, beasts of burden, or some workhorses.
	Actually drag some plows through some dirt.
	And then you can plant papas or potatoes.
	I visited the Indians in the high-altitude farms of Peru.
	I saw it with my own eyes.
	That's what they did.
	They had a wooden plow, you know, giant ox, and planting papas and quinoa.
	Yeah, that's great.
	Using animals, you can increase the population a little bit more.
	Maybe you could support 2 billion people on the planet.
	Maybe.
	Probably less, but let's just give it, let's say it's 2 billion.
	Well, then how do you feed 8 billion people?
	You have to have amplification of effort.
	You have to use combustion engines.
	Combustion engines, tractors.
	So now you can plow larger amounts.
	You can have a smaller percentage of the population being farmers that produces food for everybody else.
	But yeah, you have to burn some fossil fuels in order to do that.
	But today's tractors, you know, the emissions are so clean.
	It's like Tier 4 or Tier 5 emissions controls.
	I don't know if you know this, but today's diesel tractors are so clean, you can just inhale the exhaust.
	I mean, there's almost no emissions whatsoever, except some CO2, which is good for the crops.
	So if you're actually driving a tractor, doing crop rows or something, the CO2 coming out of the engine exhaust at the top of the tractor, that's actually fertilizer for the crops.
	But all the diesel engines have incredible emissions controls right now.
	There's virtually no pollution from them whatsoever.
	And that rule has been in place since 2011, by the way.
	You have the DEF, diesel emissions fluid.
	It's a form of urea mixed with water that then neutralizes some of the exhaust, quote, pollutants and makes it so that the exhaust is practically pollution-free.
	Well, you don't hear that from the slow food movement people.
	They just don't like engines.
	They just don't like tractors or something.
	They just want everybody to use horses and donkeys and, you know, animals, I guess.
	And then they say, you know, it's bad to use chemical fertilizers.
	That's bad, they say.
	Chemical fertilizers.
	Well, you know that when you have fertilizer from animal manure, that when it contains nitrogen, that's a chemical too, right?
	Yeah.
	That's also a chemical.
	That's a molecule that came out of an animal.
	The animal fixed the nitrogen, which is kind of similar to what the Haber process does.
	I mean, slightly different, but similar result.
	So you want nitrogen in animal feces and animal urine.
	That's a chemical.
	Or you could get nitrogen from the Haber process through a giant ammonia plant that burns fossil fuels like natural gas.
	Okay.
	Either way, I mean, the animal does the process, or a factory does the process, or you could plant legumes, and you could get nitrogen fixing at the roots of the legume plants, so the plant does the nitrogen fixing.
	Either way, it's the same chemicals.
	You're still getting chemicals, nitrogen-based chemicals as a result.
	So there are different ways to produce nitrogen, or really, frankly, to harvest it out of the atmosphere.
	But in order for plants to do this, they have to have CO2, which the slow food movement hates the existence of.
	Or you could do it through animals, which outrages the animal rights groups.
	Or you could do it through ammonia factories, which outrages the anti-fossil fuel groups.
	So here's the question.
	Is there anything that sustains life that left-wing groups don't hate?
	It's kind of like our earlier conversation.
	Is there any group of human beings that leftists don't hate?
	I mean, they hate Jews, they hate blacks, they hate whites, they hate women, they hate children.
	They hate everybody.
	They hate Asians.
	And they hate all the molecules.
	They hate animals producing nitrogen.
	They hate factories producing nitrogen.
	They probably hate plants producing nitrogen because they hate CO2. They also hate the sun.
	They say the sun is bad.
	Too much sun, you know, global warming.
	Too much sunlight.
	They want to dim the sun.
	That's what Bill Gates is working on.
	Stratospheric aerosol injection.
	Got to dim the sun.
	Got to block the sun.
	The sun's bad.
	So, I mean, really, leftists are just anti-civilization.
	When they say that they want to promote the slow food movement, it's so slow that everybody starves to death before they get any food.
	That's how that works.
	It's so slow, you die of hunger.
	That's not a really great solution for the world, frankly.
	Yeah, it's really slow to grow food with rakes and pitchforks and shovels and hoes.
	That's real slow.
	It's too slow to keep 8 billion people alive, that's for sure.
	So if you're advocating really, really slow small-scale food production, you're advocating depopulation.
	Let's not beat around the bush here.
	Now, I am opposed to large-scale corporate monoculture farms.
	I'm opposed to that.
	I love the idea of decentralized food production in small-scale farms, but I'm not about slow food.
	I'm all about using natural elements like nitrogen to grow food quickly.
	I'm about really fast, natural, holistic, organic food.
	Can we grow organic food quickly?
	Fast organic food.
	Not organic fast food.
	I'm saying fast food that we grow.
	We grow food quickly.
	And how do you do that?
	You use nitrogen.
	Where do you get nitrogen?
	Again, a few different sources.
	You can use animal manure, animal urine, human urine.
	Or you can get it that came out of a factory that used natural gas.
	You can get urea.
	You can get pelletized nitrogen.
	You can get NPK fertilizers.
	And without the nitrogen...
	You don't get half as much yield.
	And again, the nitrogen came out of the air, folks.
	How can you say that nitrogen is bad when 78% of the atmosphere is nitrogen?
	78% of what you breathe is nitrogen.
	And yet, the radical leftists are at war with the atmosphere.
	They're at war with nitrogen.
	You're like, nitrogen is bad, and carbon dioxide is bad.
	Well, what's left?
	I mean, what's left in the atmosphere?
	Oxygen and a little bit of argon, I think.
	So I guess they're not at war with argon, because argon would be the neutral force, right?
	The noble gas doesn't really combine with anything.
	It's the Switzerland of gases.
	Oxygen, they figure they need that to breathe, but they're at war with nitrogen and carbon dioxide.
	How can you be at war with nitrogen?
	How can you hate nitrogen fertilizer when it came out of the air?
	Do people even know that the Haber process takes nitrogen out of the atmosphere and then turns it into a solid, like, pelletized form?
	That's nitrogen from the air, folks.
	Geez, and then when the plant is done using it, if there's extra, eventually it goes back to the air.
	Did you know that?
	There's a nitrogen cycle.
	It's the same nitrogen.
	It just cycles through the system.
	Plants need it, but they can't pull it out of the air unless it's fixed in different forms that are available to the roots.
	That's what nitrogen fixing is all about, and so on and so forth.
	It's unreal, right?
	So when Sri Lanka came along a couple years ago and the president said, we're going to go all organic.
	We're going to ban nitrogen fertilizers.
	And then the whole farming system collapsed, and then the government collapsed, and the debt collapsed, and then the medical system collapsed, and the whole country collapsed into chaos, which is where it currently stands, by the way.
	Why?
	Because the farms failed.
	Because they banned nitrogen.
	Because some lunatic said, oh, let's go organic, and they thought that meant banning nitrogen fertilizers, which it doesn't.
	That's what always baffled me.
	It's like, okay, you want to go organic?
	I understand.
	Let's not spray all these toxic pesticides and herbicides and glyphosate.
	Why did you ban nitrogen?
	How can you say that nitrogen fertilizers are not organic?
	They're in the air.
	It's the most natural thing in the world.
	Every breath you take, it's filled with like four-fifths nitrogen.
	Do you understand there's nitrogen in your car tires right now?
	About 78%.
	People.
	So as luck would have it, I had the chance recently to sit down with Ruben Flamer, who is, well, he's one of the founders.
	He's a natural foods certifier company.
	That's the name of his company, I believe.
	And he is a USDA organic certifier.
	And I got the chance to ask him this very question.
	And I'm going to play a few minutes for you here.
	I was asking Ruben, I said, hey, what about fertilizer?
	I mean, if people have nitrogen that came out of the Haber process, can they use that on organic farms and still be certified organic?
	And we had a very interesting conversation about this.
	And what's interesting to me is that I've never heard anybody else really talk about this issue.
	Why did the Sri Lankan president think that nitrogen would prohibit farms from being considered organic?
	If nitrogen is in the air, nitrogen is in animal manure, nitrogen is in the roots of legumes, and nitrogen is part of the cycle of plants.
	Why do you say it's not organic?
	So anyway, I want you to listen to a couple of minutes, a few minutes of this recent interview I did with Ruben Flamer.
	And by the way, the full interview was posted yesterday on my channel.
	If you want to check it out, it's a fascinating deep dive into food and organics and agriculture and so on and so forth.
	And I want to encourage you to listen to this because this is a great conversation between two people who are genuinely into clean food.
	He's into clean food.
	I'm into clean food.
	But I also want to make sure we can feed the world.
	I'm not into slow food that's so slow that everybody starves to death.
	I'm into organic, clean food that we can grow efficiently so we can keep people alive, okay?
	Is there something wrong with that?
	I don't want people to starve to death, okay?
	That's just my ethics.
	I would rather not see massive human suffering on the scale of billions of people dying from starvation.
	I don't want to turn planet Earth into a giant concentration camp-looking thing where people dying with, you know, looking like skeletons walking out of a Nazi camp or something, okay?
	I want people to have food.
	I want it to be clean.
	So listen to this conversation and For just a few minutes here, see what you think.
	What's happening with Russia and Ukraine and the pipeline and the shutting down of natural gas, and that natural gas is used to create ammonia, which is used to create nitrogen-based fertilizers that feed about half the planet, roughly 4 billion people.
	I was shocked to find that a lot of people, including those in vegan and vegetarian communities, were not aware That natural gas was used to create the fertilizer that grows most of their food.
	And that if you shut down all fossil fuels...
	Most of their non-organic food.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	But then we go back to the animals.
	But wait a second.
	Most of their non-organic food.
	Because you're talking about fertilizer.
	Yeah, fertilizer.
	So you're the right person to ask this question.
	Can't they fertilize organic crops with...
	Nitrogen-based fertilizers that came from natural gas?
	It's more of...
	What's your organic system that you're creating?
	The way I understand it, the way I see it is...
	What's your entire ecosystem of your farm?
	What is your organic plan?
	Okay?
	So...
	What's your organic plant based on?
	It's not based on fertilizer and inputs.
	And whatever inputs you can use is not your first approach.
	Your first approach is soil.
	What's in the soil naturally?
	What kind of environment is allowing all the microbes to grow?
	And so on and so forth.
	And that's going to come from natural sources.
	So you're not going to need the NPK that everyone's using, the nitrogen and so forth, and the potassium, that you're going to put in from sources that are really from outside your system.
	And that's, we go back, by the way, to animals again.
	Because the animals contribute to a lot of that.
	But does an organic farm...
	If they use nitrogen-based fertilizers, like urea, for example, does that prohibit their organic certification?
	Put a stop.
	I want to read.
	So let me just read directly from the National Organic Program's standards, and anyone can get this on the web.
	It's published.
	It's public.
	And it's section 203, soil fertility and crop nutrients management practices for your land that you're growing food in.
	So let me just, besides what I already said, which is you have to base your system on natural inputs, which includes manure again, but listen to what you're not allowed to use.
	Any fertilizer or composted plant and animal material that contains a synthetic substance that's not on the list.
	Now there is a list that goes through a lot of research by lay people as well as government officials, because it's the National Organic Standard Board which is a combination of both lay and professional people, or government people I should say, that decides what is allowed.
	Let's say copper.
	Like, is that allowed?
	How much of it is allowed?
	When is it allowed?
	So, number one is it can't have a synthetic...
	Okay, but would urea?
	I mean, that's not a synthetic substance.
	Right.
	Sewage sludge.
	Well, that makes sense.
	Okay, well...
	Or burning as a way of disposal of your crop residues.
	Okay.
	Okay, now...
	So you can't just burn the crop out.
	So let's now...
	Now we're going to...
	If we go to...
	What you're asking, which is what about that list?
	This is going to get us into Sri Lanka, by the way.
	I'm going to have to ask you about Sri Lanka.
	I don't know if I know about Sri Lanka.
	Well, you know, they banned what they called synthetic fertilizers, which is natural gas-based fertilizers in, I think, 2020.
	And that's what caused massive crop failures in 2021, which led to the revolutions and the fall of the Sri Lankan government and their financial collapse and so on.
	Some folks are blaming that on the banning of the nitrogen fertilizers, by the way.
	And myself, as, you know, I'm a food scientist and I'm a pro-organic person, but I'm not afraid to use urea or, you know, some form of nitrogen fertilizer that came from natural gas, in my mind.
	But the question is, why are you relying on it?
	Right.
	Maybe it's an augmentation and maybe you couldn't get enough animal manure or something and you augmented it.
	But I'm curious if this would knock a farm out of organic status.
	Not that I'm an organic farmer or anything.
	That's not what we do.
	But on my own basis, I'm an organic grower of my own foods and stuff for my smoothies and things.
	Right.
	If you go to the National Organic Program Standards and you go to Section 205-601, you can look it up.
	Those synthetic substances allow for organic crop production.
	But there's a preamble to it, so to speak.
	And it is that you're allowed to use synthetic, some synthetic materials, provided that use of each substance does not contribute to A, contamination of crops, soil, or water.
	Oh, interesting.
	Substances allowed by this section, except for disinfectants and sanitizers, may only be used when the provisions set forth in another section prove insufficient.
	So what does this mean?
	So in other words, whatever we're going to list now is that if you don't have, if you have your own, let's say on the best of scenarios, I have a farm, 10-acre farm, I have a few cows, I have a few pigs, and I have a couple of acres of vegetable garden.
	I'm going to have most of my cycling of nutrients that go flow through my system are all within my system to begin with.
	That would be ideal.
	That would be ideal.
	But that's not always possible.
	Of course.
	Of course not.
	And that's why I said before about the vegans, because then you're going to use these kinds of things like bone meal and fish meal and kelp and other items that are going to help the soil be built back up.
	But let's go to a couple of lists here.
	Let's go through the list.
	From a farmer's perspective, though, if I'm growing crops, those crops are pulling up elements from the soil.
	Which could include forms of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, trace minerals, everything.
	And then I'm shipping those out.
	So my soils are losing nutrients.
	So obviously these nutrients have to be replaced.
	I know this is what you're talking about, just clarifying for our audience.
	But the system can't be self-contained.
	There have to be external inputs to replace those elements.
	Okay, but you can have cover crops?
	Okay, so they can fix nitrogen out of the atmosphere, yes.
	But the phosphorus and the potassium aren't going to come in.
	Oh, there's no way to replace it?
	You'd have to bring in some material, physical material.
	No, physical material, but where is its source?
	Right.
	Well, it could be animal feed that goes to the animals and then the animal manure.
	Correct.
	So what I'm saying is that relying on manufactured fertilizer is not part of that thinking of a holistic system that is, we'll call it as organic as possible.
	All right, fascinating conversation there, wasn't it?
	Again, you can listen to the entire interview with Ruben Flamer at my website, you know, my channel page on brighttown.com.
	We get into a lot more details.
	I just want to be clear what I stand for here, and then we're going to move on.
	I am all in favor of, I mean, I'm a strong lifetime advocate of clean food.
	Clean, organic food, tested for heavy metals, tested for pesticides.
	I don't like anybody using glyphosate, pesticides, herbicides, and so on.
	But fertilizer?
	Fertilizer, as far as I'm concerned, fertilizer that comes out of the Haber process that comes from ammonia is just as natural and just as environmentally friendly as fertilizer that comes from urine or manure.
	Why?
	Because releasing CO2 into the atmosphere helps crops grow.
	It helps rainforest grow.
	It helps trees grow.
	It helps grasses grow.
	It helps flowers grow.
	It helps pollinators grow.
	I mean, flowers for pollinators grow.
	The higher CO2 we can get on the planet, the more lush and green the planet's going to be.
	CO2 is the green molecule.
	So if we have a process that creates fertilizer and releases CO2, that is a bonus.
	It's good for plants.
	It's good for crops.
	It grows food more efficiently.
	Again, I'm all about growing food efficiently, but making sure it's organic.
	I just want to be clear about that.
	And finally, I also want to add, and then we'll go on to finance here, But I want to add, it is well known that the nitrogen that comes from, well, the ammonia that is NH3, nitrogen-hydrogen-3, that comes out of the Haber process, it is well known, widely documented, this feeds 4 billion people on planet Earth because of the food produced out of that fertilizer.
	If you stop that process, 4 billion people have to die, okay?
	Okay.
	So again, anybody that comes along and says, well, let's stop all the nitrogen coming from the Haber process.
	Let's stop that.
	Let's stop using natural gas to make nitrogen.
	They are calling for genocide of billions of people, which is nearly a thousand times larger than the Nazi Holocaust.
	Okay?
	So just be clear.
	You can't be pro-human and anti-nitrogen fertilizers.
	Okay?
	Because, well, for the obvious reasons.
	If you want people to live, they've got to have fertilizer, they've got to have food.
	Actually, you know, I have to ask one more question.
	Why do all these leftists hate the sky?
	Why do they hate the sky?
	They hate the atmosphere.
	They hate nitrogen, and they hate carbon dioxide, and they hate the oceans.
	They think oceans are bad.
	They think liquid water is bad.
	They want it all locked up in ice shelves and frozen water.
	They don't like liquid water.
	They always complain about the ice melting.
	They complain about oceans rising.
	Shouldn't we love more ocean?
	Why do they hate the ocean?
	Why do they hate the sky?
	Why do they hate humanity?
	Why do they hate food?
	Why do they hate carbon dioxide?
	Why do they hate plants?
	They hate photosynthesis, and they hate the sun, for God's sake!
	What is it with these lunatics?
	Everything that they're opposed to are things that keep humanity alive.
	It's like they hate the whole biosphere, frankly.
	They just hate Earth.
	But they claim to be protecting it.
	No, they're anti-Earth.
	Which is, frankly, the position of Satanists.
	Anti-Earth.
	Anti-life.
	They hate babies.
	They hate the atmosphere.
	They hate molecules.
	They hate the elements.
	They hate carbon.
	It's beyond belief.
	I've done a whole documentary on that, by the way.
	The War on the Elements of Life.
	Watch that on Brighteon.
	It's amazing.
	I think it's called The Globalist War on the Elements of Life.
	It's a really good mini-documentary about the war on carbon and nitrogen.
	And it explains all this in a lot more detail.
	Just mind-boggling.
	Alright, we've got to move on to finance here because there is more insanity to cover.
	You notice from my interview from Aaron Brickman that was conducted Sunday night, and in that interview he said that the markets would likely surge Monday and Tuesday, which is exactly what happened.
	I was astonished watching the markets just skyrocket on Monday.
	I was like, yeah, Brickman said that would happen 12 hours ago.
	Now it's happening.
	Well, Brickman has been saying then that today, sometime today, markets could fall substantially and that he would know whether we're in, quote, the crash based on how much the markets fall today.
	I think he said that if the Dow goes under 28,000 or 28,500 today, that means we're entering the window of the crash.
	But he also said that It's not an exact date.
	That window could be anytime between now and November 8th.
	But watch the markets today.
	Let's see what happens and see how closely this might match the warnings from Aaron Brickman.
	He's been right so far Monday and Tuesday.
	So let's see what happens today.
	If it goes down substantially, then it's right on track with what he was saying.
	We'll see.
	Interesting.
	But now there's another story from CNBC. Unrelenting inflation is taking a toll.
	It says, leaving more Americans living paycheck to paycheck.
	Turns out that 60% of Americans are now living paycheck to paycheck, according to a report from Lending Club.
	That's the August number.
	Wow.
	60% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck.
	So what's going to happen as inflation continues to take away the value of the dollars that they have?
	I've tried to explain to people that you're losing about 2% of your purchasing power each month if you're holding on to dollars.
	About 2% a month!
	People don't get that because for some reason they believe the government's official inflation numbers, you know, 8% or whatever it is.
	No, it's more like 20%.
	It's close to 2% a month.
	Not quite, but it's real close to that.
	Think about it.
	That's crazy.
	The Federal Reserve is basically stealing 2% of your wealth every month.
	And you're letting them do it if you're still in dollars, by the way.
	So check out this headline on kitco.com.
	That's K-I-T-C-O. Good site for a lot of financial news.
	Buying opportunity before Fed pivot.
	Silver price is going to $500, comma, U.S. dollar will crash.
	Robert Kiyosaki.
	So yeah, this is from Robert Kiyosaki, the author of Rich Dad, Poor Dad, pretty wealthy guy himself, offers a lot of financial advice.
	I actually recorded a separate podcast covering this because I think Kiyosaki's advice is so critical.
	So Kiyosaki, well, let me just read you his tweet.
	Buying opportunity, he says, if Fed continues raising interest rates, U.S. dollar will get stronger, causing gold, silver, and Bitcoin prices to go lower.
	Buy more, he says.
	When Fed pivots and drops interest rates as England just did, you will smile while others cry.
	Take care.
	That's Robert Kiyosaki.
	And I think he's 100% correct on this.
	100% correct.
	As gold and silver and Bitcoin are getting cheaper, and I'm not into crypto, I'm not going to tell anybody to buy Bitcoin, because Bitcoin's not backed by anything that's real, physical, in the physical world, and it doesn't work when the power grid goes down.
	By the way, the whole power grid in Bangladesh just collapsed, by the way.
	There's no power in Bangladesh.
	As of this moment, we'll see if they fix it, I guess.
	Yeah, they'll find a way to fix it, but very inconvenient.
	Nevertheless, gold and silver may continue to get cheaper for a little while.
	It just means it's a better bargain.
	Because in my view, silver is a bargain.
	Actually, gold and silver both are bargains right now.
	They are way below their intrinsic value, in my opinion.
	And if they get cheaper, it just means it's a better buying opportunity.
	I think Kiyosaki is absolutely correct.
	At some point, the Fed is going to be forced to pivot, which means instead of raising interest rates, which is quantitative tightening in a sense, they're going to have to reverse and start lowering interest rates and pushing quantitative easing, which is flooding the markets with more money.
	When they do that, then these big trends will reverse.
	Gold and silver will probably skyrocket.
	The dollar will get weaker.
	And more investment money will flee the United States as it's currently fleeing Europe, by the way.
	And Kiyosaki believes that the dollar strength that we're currently seeing as investors flee Europe will not sustain itself much longer.
	He tweets out the following, quote, Which has been collapsing, by the way.
	He says, Those are my comments, not his.
	He continues, quote, to profit from crash of U.S. dollar, I bought many more U.S. silver buffalo rounds.
	Silver is a bargain, he says.
	I will not be a victim of the bleeped Fed.
	And the bleeped word starts with F. I didn't realize Kiyosaki could be so vulgar.
	And he says, take care.
	Okay, but he's right.
	Yeah, the Fed is bleeped.
	He's absolutely correct.
	And then, here we go.
	He says, quote, To me, this means the end of fake dollars is here, or fake money, fake currency.
	As stated in an earlier tweet, silver is going to $100 to $500.
	Get some.
	Protect yourself.
	So he's saying that, yeah, gold could go to $500 and everybody should be getting more gold and silver and it's getting a lot more difficult to get silver.
	Just for the record, our sponsor, the Treasure Island Precious Metals Company, they have silver because they have private sellers who are, for various reasons, selling large collections of silver coins.
	It could be buffaloes, it could be eagles, it could be, I don't know, Krugerrands or whatever else is out there.
	There's a lot of different silver coins.
	You can reach them.
	I don't earn any commission on this, but they are a sponsor.
	You can reach them, metalswithmike.com.
	You can get real-time pricing on gold and silver coins.
	Physical stuff delivered to you.
	You're going to find they have some of the best pricing around, but more importantly, they have inventory.
	They actually have the inventory.
	Just know, if you're trying to buy silver eagles from the U.S. Mint, the premiums on those are insane across the board.
	Some of those are like $15 an ounce over spot price, which is unheard of, by the way.
	It's unheard of.
	But that's why some people who hold these coins are willing to let them go because the premiums are so high.
	Or they just need the cash for something else and they're willing to let go of silver.
	So anyway, Kiyosaki is correct about this, but I just want to point something out.
	That when he says silver could go to $500, he's talking about over time, obviously, not instantly.
	But if the dollar is crashing, then what does that $500 mean?
	See, the dollar is going to collapse.
	I know that as a mathematical fact.
	Just like I know nitrogen is in the atmosphere, and carbon dioxide is good for plants, and photosynthesis is what makes plants grow.
	Not Brondo, but photosynthesis.
	It's what plants crave, you know?
	So, Kiyosaki is saying, yeah, silver's going to $500, but the dollar's going to lose so much value, that may not mean what you think it means.
	The dollar may lose 90% of its current value.
	Well, it's inevitable.
	It's going to.
	It may lose 99% of its current value.
	In which case, what, silver might be $2,000 an ounce.
	But it doesn't mean That it's as valuable as you're imagining.
	It's just the dollar is becoming worthless.
	Even Bitcoin.
	Could Bitcoin go to a million dollars of Bitcoin?
	Sure it could.
	Because the dollar is going to be worthless.
	And I do know this.
	That anybody left holding dollars...
	Even in a bank account, I'm not talking just cash, but in a bank account, you're going to lose it.
	You're going to lose probably 95%.
	Because there's going to be a day where, you know, you wake up and they say, well, the dollar has been repudiated and all the banks are frozen.
	We're on a holiday.
	You know, we've been through this before.
	You can't have access to your cash, and we're going to have this forced trade-in with the new currency, whatever.
	And you're going to get this much for that much.
	And by the time you do the math, you crunch the numbers, you're like, wow, they're screwing us for 95% of the value of what we had.
	Yep, there you go.
	Welcome to history repeating itself.
	It's happened over and over again.
	It's about to happen again.
	Now, Kiyosaki thinks the Fed is going to pivot in January.
	Okay, could be.
	But don't forget the Fed is also at war with Europe.
	And in order to make Europe suffer even more, you know, the interest rate increases are freaking out the United Nations.
	It's begging the Fed to stop raising interest rates.
	We covered that yesterday.
	They're like, stop raising interest rates.
	Just use price controls on everything to deal with inflation.
	Price controls everywhere!
	Which never works.
	Just creates scarcity and, you know, black markets, basically.
	But I think the Fed is going to keep raising rates through the winter because they really want Europe to suffer.
	They need to break the European banking system and the euro currency.
	Only after the euro is broken, then I think the Fed will pivot back to lowering interest rates and more quantitative easing.
	That's my theory.
	We'll see what happens.
	But I think that's more like April or May of next year.
	We'll see.
	It's just a guess.
	Might be wrong, but it's just an observation.
	The euro is going to break.
	Heck, Credit Suisse might break tomorrow.
	It might fail.
	The Bank of England might fail tomorrow.
	This might all happen before Christmas, for all we know.
	But the point is, if you have your assets in physical gold and silver, then that's safely out of the system.
	That's what I call off-grid money.
	It's off the grid.
	Can't really be easily confiscated.
	They can seize your bank account.
	They can rig the system.
	They can halt your withdrawals.
	They can cancel your ATM card.
	They can do all that stuff because it's not really your money unless you physically control it.
	Physical gold and silver, you physically control, right?
	That's why the establishment hates it when people buy gold.
	They'd rather have your money in their system that they control so they can exploit you and they can have bail-ins and bank freezes and they can convert your deposits into non-fungible, non-withdrawable investment instruments with limited restrictions or whatever where you can't get...
	Basically, it's like, we stole all your money.
	And here's a contract that explains how we stole your money, but we pretty much stole all your money.
	Welcome to the banking system.
	But gold and silver allow you to prevent them from stealing your money.
	And I guess crypto advocates could argue that Bitcoin's the same way.
	It's really hard for governments to steal people's Bitcoin, it turns out.
	Even Justin Trudeau found that out in Canada with the trucker convoy.
	It couldn't really loot people's Bitcoin wallets, could they?
	They can only kind of segment the transactions or harass certain hubs that had jurisdiction in Canada.
	They couldn't just loot people's Bitcoin wallets.
	So yeah, maybe that's what Kiyosaki is talking about, that Bitcoin is out of the central bank system as well.
	And it's got fast transaction speeds, that's for sure, you know, compared to even like wire transfers and things like that.
	So yeah, everything's got to roll.
	But physical gold and silver, being that they're elements, like nitrogen is an element by the way, physical gold and silver are not going to vanish.
	You can't destroy them.
	You can't destroy gold.
	You can't destroy carbon.
	You can't destroy nitrogen.
	You can't destroy silver.
	Or hydrogen, or helium, or copper, zinc, strontium, anything.
	They're elements, folks.
	They're elements.
	Unless you have a fusion reactor, you can't even make them vanish if you try.
	They're still going to be around.
	Even if Russia launches nukes against the United States and has the doomsday radioactive tsunami apocalypse drones, your gold will still survive that.
	It won't even become radioactive because you can't just make gold radioactive by hitting it with a...
	A nuke, believe it or not, unless the nuke is really close, you might transmute some of the gold into something else that I guess could be some radioactive isotopes come to think of it, but that would have to be a detonation really, really close to your gold, like ground zero or something.
	And if that's the case, you're not going to care about your gold because you're going to be vaporized anyway.
	Anyway, I'm getting off track.
	Sorry.
	Too much geeky physics entering the fray at the moment.
	The point is if you get nuked, finances are not your biggest problem.
	But short of that, if you're not nuked, then it would be nice to not lose all your assets, which means you've got to get out of the banking system at some point because the dollar is going to collapse.
	So Kiyosaki, I think he knows what he's talking about.
	In fact, I should have my staff reach out, invite him on for a short interview, see if he's interested in that.
	He's probably a busy guy, but I think he's got some good information to share with everybody.
	We'll see if we can get him on.
	But even if we don't get them on, you know, the principles that he's talking about, because he tries to teach financial literacy to the masses, you are going to learn those principles here.
	We're going to cover them even in higher level detail, because my audience here, you listening, you are more informed, more intelligent, more aware.
	Than, you know, any kind of mainstream audience.
	We don't have to go back and cover the basics of what is compounding interest?
	How does it work?
	No, come on.
	We're all old enough to know how this thing works.
	We've been around the sun a few times.
	So we can talk about advanced topics here and advanced asset protection, which is what I've been, you know, advocating and trying to teach here for quite a while.
	And we all know that we've got to be prepared in every way possible for what's coming.
	You've got to be financially prepared.
	Talk about off-grid money.
	You've got to be medically prepared.
	You've got to be prepared with self-defense tools, firearms, maybe ballistic vests if it's right for you, and other things like that.
	Well, let me bring in one other solution provider here.
	I'll probably cover them in more detail tomorrow.
	But this is a sponsor that has seeds.
	Heirloom seeds, non-GMO, open-pollinated seeds.
	And this is a new seed solution provider that is sponsoring us partially for the month of October.
	So I just want to give out the web address.
	I'll cover it in more detail tomorrow, but the website is hhseeds.com.
	And HH stands for Heaven's Harvest.
	So it's hhseeds.com.
	If you use discount code RANGER, you're going to get free shipping.
	They've got the heirloom seed kit.
	It's $139.99.
	It's 39 different varieties.
	It's enough seeds to plant a three-acre garden.
	The individual bags are resealable after you've opened it.
	It's got about 4,500 seeds in it.
	It can last up to 10 years.
	So if you want some seeds, that's another option to check out, hhseeds.com.
	But whatever you do, you know, I advocate getting high-quality garden tools, by the way.
	I advocate having water filters, iodine, growing your own food.
	I'm all about growing your own clean food.
	That's actually, you know, the best way to be off-grid and be more sustainable, self-reliant, the whole deal.
	So I talk about the grow boxes and the hydroponics and all this stuff and compost.
	You know, black gold is compost.
	In fact, I need to do a whole special report about all the different forms of gold.
	It's one of my memes that I put out there.
	You know, blue gold is like rainfall and yellow gold is sunlight and black gold is dirt and so on.
	Yeah, well, compost.
	But you've got to have seeds to make it work as well.
	But think about every area of your life where preparedness can help you and shore up all the weak spots in your plan, whatever that may be.
	You know, Brickman warns that we may be in a crash before the end of this month.
	Markets might go down 35% or they might go down more than 70%.
	You know, Gregory Manorino has been warning for quite some time that markets could plunge 80% from the highs.
	I mean, they're already down like 20% or more, but it could be an 80% plunge overall.
	It's going to take some time.
	It's not all in one day.
	But losing 80% over a few months is still a crash.
	That's very, very bad.
	Kiyosaki is saying here, you know, the Fed is going to pivot maybe in January.
	Okay.
	Well, everybody's got different timelines, but those who know what's happening, they all have the same conclusion about where this ends up.
	It ends up with a currency collapse.
	Massive devaluation of the dollar.
	Banking systems freezing up.
	Probably the collapse of the euro, the collapse of the yen, and then eventually the dollar.
	And most people getting wiped out if they're still holding fiat currencies when the music stops.
	So wherever you think the timing is, is up to you.
	Different experts, different cycles, different dates, different analysis.
	But we all know this is where it ends up.
	It's just a matter of when.
	When that day comes, and I don't think it's too far off, when that day comes, you want to be holding gold and silver, seeds, ammo, land, Buildings, vehicles, hard assets, folks.
	As you know, we've been over this a lot.
	And this information is not going to change because the principles are immutable and they're timeless.
	These things, these hard intrinsic assets, they survive financial collapse as they always have.
	And then you will be positioned to be able to re-emerge from this collapse completely.
	With an incredible advantage, you'll be one of the few who didn't get wiped out.
	Imagine the advantage that gives you.
	Like, you're the only person on the block with cash.
	Everybody else is selling.
	Like, here, I have to sell my car.
	I have to sell my tractor.
	I have to sell my horse.
	I have to sell my house.
	And here you are with all this cash, i.e.
	gold or silver or whatever you use, whatever vehicle, maybe Bitcoin, I don't know.
	You've got this actual value still remaining and nobody else does because they're 95% wiped out.
	You realize what an opportunity that is to acquire assets while also flooding liquidity into the system so that other people can have money they can use to buy food and not starve to death, by the way.
	You're setting aside assets that you plan to insert back into the system at the appropriate time in exchange for acquiring assets while providing liquidity to others who desperately need money in order to engage in transactions for the basics that they need because they lost everything in the banking system.
	That's the reality of where this is going.
	We can't save everybody.
	I mean, I'm a humanitarian.
	I have compassion for people.
	I've stored all kinds of supplies to give away when the crash comes.
	I got extra food, medical supplies, iodine, all kinds of stuff.
	I'm going to give away to the churches and the food banks, whatever.
	But I can't save everybody, neither can you.
	We try to warn people, but we're heavily, heavily censored.
	Mostly by people who don't want to hear any of this.
	So they're going to end up losing everything and then they'll be begging for help and, you know, we'll do what we can.
	But we can't store enough assets and food for everybody.
	So there's a limited amount of bandwidth of what we can do to help people recover after this.
	And some people just won't make it, period.
	But I want you to make it.
	I know I'm going to make it.
	In fact, I think all of us, all of you listening, if you've listened this far into the podcast, you're pretty much dedicated to this podcast.
	You're going to be fine.
	You're going to make it.
	You're squared away.
	You're light years ahead of people.
	Well, I'm sorry, that's a measure of distance.
	That's not a good unit to use for that.
	You're way ahead.
	You're way more advanced than people, than most people.
	We'll just say it that way.
	So you're going to be fine.
	It's just that you're going to be surrounded by people who aren't.
	So that's where we have to remember to shore up our readiness.
	To be able to help others where we can, but also to set our boundaries where we can't.
	You know?
	Save lives, but also be willing to retain enough resources for yourself, your family, your community.
	You know, your coworkers, whatever your unit is that you're protecting so that you can remain alive and viable and can continue to function.
	So that's the big ethical tightrope that we all have to walk here.
	As humanitarians, people who care about others, people who have compassion, how do we balance that knowing that we can't save everyone and that most people refuse to prepare?
	I don't have all the answers on that, but I know that we have the right motivations.
	We'll do our best to help as many people as possible, and then we'll pray for those that we can't.
	And that's where we're going to have to wrap it up, especially in this podcast.
	I'm a little bit over time.
	We did not interview the scheduled guests for this evening because we had a scheduling problem.
	And I think actually that person is engaged in a travel problem at the moment, which is fine because we ran the excerpt from Ruben Flamer.
	But we do have more guests coming up tomorrow and the next day and so on.
	And each evening I do an interview or I plan to, and most of the time that works out.
	But stay tuned because tomorrow we have a special guest and the next day as well.
	It's going to be an action-packed week of information.
	And I thank you for listening.
	I thank you for your support.
	One reminder, healthrangerstore.com.
	We will have the Ranger Buckets next Tuesday, October 11th.
	And I believe they'll be released into inventory at 11 a.m.
	Central Time.
	Tuesday the 11th at 11 a.m.
	And there'll be some supply available that will be gone very quickly.
	So if you want some Ranger Buckets, they're coming out.
	If you want some other products, nutrition, personal care, don't forget we've got a brand new amazing toothpaste that you're going to love.
	Check out the ingredients.
	Ultra clean.
	And of course, lab tested.
	We've also got body soap.
	We've got laundry detergent.
	All of the stuff we formulated.
	We've got dish soap.
	You know, automatic dishwasher detergent, I should say.
	That's also environmentally friendly, formulated.
	No fragrance in anything that we formulate, obviously.
	No synthetic dyes and perfumes and all that garbage.
	So Read the ingredients on everything we sell.
	You're going to be amazed because it's ultra, ultra clean.
	And yes, some of it is food grown with nitrogen.
	Imagine that because nitrogen is in the air and grown with carbon dioxide.
	Yeah, we should put a label on our food products made with photosynthesis, you know, just to freak people out.
	Oh my God, is that bad?
	No, that's how plants grow.
	That's what plants crave.
	I think we should just put that label on every nutrition product.
	Freeze-dried, organic, lab-tested strawberries.
	Grown with photosynthesis.
	See what happens, you know?
	Grown with sunlight.
	Oh my god, sun's bad.
	Grown with carbon dioxide.
	Grown in soils that have nitrogen.
	You know, just mock the illiterate Anti-food people out there who don't know how food grows.
	They don't know anything about photosynthesis.
	I don't know.
	How are they alive?
	I mean, I don't even get it.
	If you don't understand where food comes from, maybe you should stop eating it, frankly.
	Let's see what happens.
	We'll put them on a slow food diet.
	How slow is it going to be?
	We'll give you your next meal in 2023.
	How about that?
	You can eat when the Germans eat.
	That's how slow it is.
	Super slow food.
	Also, it'll be frozen.
	Because...
	There's no energy to run the microwaves.
	This is not a laughing matter.
	I don't know why I'm laughing.
	It's just so insane.
	I can't stop.
	It's so insane.
	My God, we need basic chemistry education for everybody.
	They don't even understand where food comes from or how it grows.
	I learned photosynthesis when I was in the 10th grade or something.
	Biology class.
	Yeah, we learned about flowers and pollination and photosynthesis.
	I mean, it's not that difficult, folks.
	You've got to have sunlight.
	You've got to have water.
	You've got to have carbon dioxide.
	Boom.
	Then you have plants.
	Then you have crops.
	Then you have flowers for pollinators.
	You have nuts and seeds and roots and stems and bark and medicine and all this stuff.
	It's not that difficult.
	I don't know why human society has forgotten how anything works.
	It's just unbelievable.
	Do you feel like the rest of humanity has been subjected to that men in black flashy thingy?
	It's like...
	All their memories are wide.
	Where does food come from?
	Well, I don't know.
	Go through the drive-thru lane at McDonald's and ask them.
	See if they know.
	Where does food come from?
	It comes from the freezer.
	That's where we get the chicken nuggets.
	Why do they all look the same?
	There's only three unique shapes.
	They're oppressed.
	It looks like particle board that's deep-fried in canola oil or rapeseed.
	My goodness.
	We are living in a world gone mad.
	I actually heard Gregory Manorino, because I like to watch his videos too, he says that after some of his updates, he'll do like a 15-minute market update, he says he rolls around on the floor screaming after finishing the video.
	And I understood that.
	I was like, I get you, Greg.
	Right there with you.
	I'm not saying that I roll around on the floor screaming, but I understand if you do.
	I mean, I just laugh about it, right?
	I make jokes and I laugh and I laugh my head off.
	Some people have to roll around and break things.
	I get, you know, like furniture.
	What do you do?
	What do you do?
	All right.
	We'll be with you tomorrow.
	Thank you for your support and your patience.
	God bless you.
	Stay informed.
	Be safe.
	Get prepared.
	Talk to you tomorrow.
	A global reset is coming.
	And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲