All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 27, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:56:31
Situation Update, 9/27/22 - UN food chief warns of "Hell on Earth" from FAMINE...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Situation update for Tuesday, September 27th, 2022.
Mike Adams here.
Thank you for joining me.
As if your life wasn't exciting enough already, being that we're on the verge of nuclear war and also global famine and potential financial collapse and all that, well, we have a monster storm heading into Florida.
So all of you Floridians listening to this, you're probably double-checking all your preps.
The breaking news on this is a little bit disturbing.
It shows that people really aren't prepared.
You know, it's the strangest thing.
Every time there's a storm approaching, Americans rush out to the store to buy water.
It's like they think water only comes in bottles, plastic bottles.
Folks, everybody should have a water filter, which means you can get water out of the tap and just filter it and you have your own water supply.
That shouldn't be difficult.
I don't know why everybody thinks the only place to get water is at the store.
That's crazy.
I mean, you have pipes that go to your house.
I assume, I mean, I assume you have running water and maybe electricity, too, at least until the storm hits.
But here's a story out of the UK Daily Mail.
The chaos before the storm.
Panic buying sweeps Florida as supermarket shelves are stripped bare of water and toilet paper and canned goods ahead of monster tropical storm Ian with 130 miles per hour winds.
Bad Ian.
Bad, Ian.
How dare you make people buy toilet paper and water?
So the supermarket shelves are getting all stripped bare.
Let's see.
Lines of Floridians stretching back from supermarket registers through aisles stripped bare of bottled water.
It's expected to strengthen into a hurricane on Sunday.
Let's see.
It's going to hit Cuba sometime today.
The storm strengthened into a hurricane on Sunday, reached hurricane strength.
On Tuesday, let's see, it's supposed to hit Cuba, and then it's going to hit Florida midweek, either late Wednesday night or early Thursday morning.
So people are out, you know, prepping for things they should have already had, frankly.
Not that it's a bad idea to stock up, you know, just kind of top off your supplies, but this just shows you that, by and large, people are not ready for anything.
Well, how do you think it's going to go down when the banking system collapses or nuclear war begins or there's a cyber warfare attack or a grid down scenario?
The average America is not even ready for a hurricane.
Not even a huge one either.
This is not a big, big hurricane.
Not yet, anyway.
It might get larger.
But folks, it looks like it's going to hit somewhere near Tampa, too.
But you've got to be ready all the time for this kind of thing, especially if you live in Florida.
And, you know, more the east side of Florida than the west side, but, you know, this can happen too.
These hurricanes can roll up into, you know, Tampa or Panama City or that area, or even obviously the Gulf Coast, they can hit Texas or New Orleans or Houston or what have you.
So everybody that lives in that area, or all those areas, should be prepared at all times with extra food and water and, you know, a grid down scenario and all of that in order to survive without electricity.
Now, it's too late, probably, for most of the folks there to order something that could help them through this, like a solar generator.
But it sure would be great if you had already acquired some of the things that I recommend, like the backup satellite communication systems or the...
The solar generators, the power stations with solar panels and so on, you could charge electronic devices, flashlights and things like that, or cell phones or laptop computers, and keep your life online as long as some other components of infrastructure are functioning.
But for those of you in Florida listening to this, use this storm as another practice run for the preparedness that You're probably already doing, and maybe you can do more of it, but use this time wisely.
Frankly, I think most people are going to be okay here.
I know there's been an evacuation ordered in certain areas, and I know that Governor DeSantis has issued an emergency declaration, and you should heed those warnings, but almost everybody listening to this, you're going to be fine through this.
Just use it as practice for preparedness.
Make sure you can function without electricity.
Without working water systems and without grocery store food or any kind of, you know, power grid functioning that would allow you to cook, okay?
So use this as practice for a much bigger hurricane, a global storm that's coming.
And also, finally, those of you in Tampa, if you get a chance on Wednesday, go outside, face to the west, and start blowing.
Because we could use the rain in Texas.
Thank you in advance for that.
Now, speaking of storms and food shortages, last Thursday, the United Nations food chief warned that the world is facing, quote, a perfect storm on top of a perfect storm.
It's kind of like what I said before.
It's a gang of black swans flying into a super storm.
That's going to meet an atmospheric wave.
I mean, it's bad.
So let's see.
He says, this is David Beasley, talked to the Associated Press.
He says that we have to tackle a crisis with the fertilizer supply to prevent widespread food shortages next year.
Wow.
So the United Nations says in late September of 2022, what you heard me say in what, November of 2021.
It's like, wow, the UN has finally caught up to natural news and the health ranger.
Yeah, going to be food chaos, going to be starvation, going to be famine.
Why?
Because fertilizer is collapsing.
Folks, you know, we've been trying to alert everybody this whole time.
Folks like myself and David Dubin, Ice Age Farmer, Steve Quayle.
By the way, I have a brand new interview with Steve Quayle, just posted yesterday.
Check that out.
We've been warning everybody, and now the UN has caught up to our warnings.
So David Beasley says if they don't solve this fertilizer supply crisis, quote, there's going to be chaos all over the world.
Yeah, really?
You think?
Huh?
He said that there are 50 million people in 45 countries knocking on famine's door.
And that's before the gas got cut off from Gazprom, by the way.
That's before the ammonia shut down all across Western Europe.
He continues, if we don't reach these people, you will have famine, starvation, destabilization of nations unlike anything we saw in 2007, 2008, and 2011, and you will have mass migration.
We've got to respond now, he says.
Does this ring a bell?
Does it remind you of anybody I interviewed recently?
Another Michael.
Yeah, Michael Yan, who said, oh, what are we going to have?
Let's see, pandemics, famine, and war, and then human osmotic pressure of mass human migration.
Yeah, I love it when the UN officials talk like they've been listening to us, because I'm pretty sure that's where they get their information.
They know the independent media is the only people telling the truth.
I mean, let's face it, everybody out there knows that independent media journalists and, you know, the people that we talk to, like Michael Yon, war correspondent and others, we are the best analysts on the planet.
We, the independent media, we, all the independent podcasters and so on, we're the ones doing the research and we're the ones telling the truth because we can't be politically silenced.
So, of course, we have the best information.
Of course, we're the most accurate about what's coming.
And it always just takes time for the rest of the world to kind of catch up and say, oh my God, it's coming?
Yeah, really?
When did you finally figure that out?
So let's listen to what Beasley says even more.
This is interesting.
Okay, quote, It's a perfect storm on top of a perfect storm.
I said that earlier.
And with the fertilizer crisis we're facing right now, with droughts, we're facing a food pricing problem in 2022.
What he means is inflation, but he's not using the word inflation because he doesn't want to anger the Democrats in America who claim there's no inflation.
So he calls it a food pricing problem in 2022.
That's like saying if you've been shot in the carotid artery, you have a blood pressure problem.
Like, Your blood vessels can't maintain pressure because there's holes in them.
He's saying it's a food pricing problem.
No, it's food inflation, man.
No one can afford to buy the food because of food inflation and food scarcity.
Anyway, he's a bureaucrat, so he has to kind of water it all down.
He continues, quote, So by food availability problem, he means famine.
It's starvation.
He's just calling, ah, there's no food available.
So you mean people are starving?
Well, it's just not available.
So there's famine?
Ah, we can't say famine, it's just there's not any food available.
So you're saying nobody's eating?
Ah, it's just not available.
Again, trying to water it down.
But it's fascinating to me that this guy thinks that the answer to all of this, he says that the wealthy Gulf states should just donate more money to world food organizations and whoever is distributing food.
Hey, man, like the World Food Program, the problem is not a lack of food.
The problem is a lack of freedom.
The problem is a lack of free markets.
And you know who caused this problem, Mr.
Beasley, at the United Nations?
Your people did it when they shut off Russia from the SWIFT system.
These are economic sanctions against Russia that cut off the free markets, that caused the fertilizer collapse and the food collapse and the natural gas collapse that's caused an ammonia collapse across Western Europe, which is leading to crop failures worldwide.
It's people like you, Mr.
Beasley, people that you work with.
They are the problem.
Don't run around the world trying to guilt trip people and give us more money.
If you just give us money, we could solve the world food problem.
No, you caused the world food problem.
I mean, people like you, when you committed economic sanctions against Russia.
You want to feed the world?
Free the world.
Let the economy function.
And guess what?
Independent entrepreneurs will move the fertilizer for you.
Why?
Because there's some profit in it.
They will move the seeds, they'll move the fertilizer, they'll move the food, they will make the world functional.
Again, you just got to stop the suicide sanctions and stop trying to micromanage the entire world.
See, this is a freedom issue.
We have a lack of liberty more than a lack of food.
Of course, the lack of liberty is causing scarcity of food, but the solution is more liberty, and then the free market will solve this problem all by itself.
Isn't it amazing?
You know, the governments caused this problem in the first place.
Get the governments out of the way, get the United Nations out of the way, get the WHO out of the way.
You know, most of the world solves all of its problems all by itself.
It's like automatic.
If governments weren't involved, almost nobody would be starving.
And by the way, a lot of the starvation is because of the UN climate change bullcrap that tries to shut down the energy infrastructure of the entire Western world to say, oh, it's bad for the planet.
Hey, you know what?
You know what's bad for the planet is 4 billion human beings starving to death and dying.
That's bad for the planet.
Maybe we should figure out how to set people free so they can feed themselves.
There's an idea.
But speaking of food, a very important realization hit me today I want to share with you.
It's come to my attention that we're all going to have to learn how to hide our food effectively.
Because the governments of the world are coming for your food.
They're going to initiate price controls.
They're going to initiate food rationing.
And then they're going to demonize preppers by labeling you hoarders.
And they're going to do what governments have always done through the history of scarcity and famine and revolution.
They're going to reward neighbors who narc on preppers, basically, to put it bluntly.
They're going to say, hey, do you know somebody who is hoarding food?
If you report them to us, the government, we will reward you with food credits or food stamps or an extra case of food or what have you.
And, of course, the worst the famine gets, and it's going to get very, very bad across Western Europe in particular, but into next year in North America as well to some extent, is that.
As it gets bad, more and more people will be incentivized to try to tattle on their prepping neighbors.
And they'll call the government.
Come in.
I saw my neighbor with a case of butter.
Must be a hoarder.
How dare you hoard food?
Even though if you bought it two years ago or you bought a little bit at a time during normal times when nobody was panicked to go out and buy food, even if you just bought it when the shelves were fully stocked, it doesn't matter to them.
They look at you As someone who planned ahead, it's your fault that I can't buy whatever baby food, toilet paper, Pop-Tarts, whatever the case may be.
I'll add a hamburger helper because my neighbors are preppers.
So basically, with apologies to actual Karens, there's going to be a bunch of new, like, food tattle Karens calling the government, calling 911, I saw a food hoarder on my block.
So you're going to have to learn how to hide your food if you don't want to starve to death.
So in this little special section here, I thought I would go over with you some practical tips on how to hide your food.
And remember, there's nothing illegal here.
You have every right to hide your food.
If you want to hide food, let's just go for it.
Nothing illegal about it whatsoever, obviously.
But this is a skill set that can serve you well.
And if you want even more advanced methods of hiding food, then be sure to download my free audiobook.
It's called Resilient Prepping.
And the website for that is resilientprepping.com.
It's a completely free download of all the MP3 files and a printable PDF transcript.
And there's...
At least one section in there that's all about hiding food, you know, caching, things like that.
So let's start with just level one food hiding skills.
This is just basic stuff, and it's not going to serve you very well.
All throughout history, people have tried to hide food under the bed, in the closet, sometimes under the floorboards, somewhere around the house.
They put extra food on a shelf, and then they put books in front of that, or what have you.
Well, if you're using those kind of simple techniques to hide food, it's not going to be very effective because the food search teams will come in with, of course, food-sniffing dogs, and they'll be able to sniff that out in no time.
So, level two food hiding is what I call outdoor above-ground caching.
And, of course, this works better if you have more land or more space, you know, bigger yard, more property, etc.
And this is where people tend to hide food inside things that are above ground.
Could be in a barn.
Could be in a barrel in a barn.
Could be in a trunk of a car that looks all broken down.
Could be under the hood of a tractor or something like that.
Just look around in a typical rural environment.
Oh, look at that.
It looks like a horse-feeding trough, but actually there's food hidden underneath it.
Underneath the hay, let's say.
But just look around.
There can be above-ground structures.
There can be tool sheds or what have you.
And people are, you know, chucking food into these kinds of places.
I call that level two food hiding.
And number one, it's not very effective.
And secondly, it really subjects your food to a lot of heat in the summer.
And of course, freezing cold in the winter, which...
You may not want for your food.
You don't want it to freeze and thaw and freeze and thaw and freeze and thaw over and over again because that ages the food very quickly.
So level three food concealment is typically outdoors below ground caching or widely distributed to other properties.
So maybe you're wealthy enough to own multiple pieces of property.
You might have food hidden on different pieces of property or you can store it below ground.
And there is a redneck method for this that someone told me about years ago.
And you take an old refrigerator or freezer that doesn't work anymore, and you just bury it on its side.
And then, you know, you open the door, throw a bunch of food in there, close the door.
And then cover it up with dirt.
And you better make that food critter-proof or you're going to end up with nothing but, you know, spoiled, worm-ridden food, what have you.
That's kind of the redneck way to do it.
And you're probably going to need a machine to dig that hole.
You try to dig that with a shovel.
It's going to take a lot of work.
So you may want to rent a backhoe or something to get that done.
But that's one way to do it.
You can also bury a lot of other containers.
You can bury barrels.
You can bury tubs, although they're not typically very strong.
You'd want something that's much stronger.
I've heard of people using septic tanks.
You can buy a septic tank, drop it in, and then store a bunch of food in the septic tank instead of using it for septic purposes.
So that's one thing that people do.
There's all kinds of things.
You could have a hidden cellar.
Oh, it's for tornadoes, but actually there's a bunch of food in there.
But you'd have to have it, of course, well hidden.
Because that's the whole point here.
You don't want your food to get confiscated.
So that's what we call level 3 food concealment.
Level 4, this is where it gets interesting.
I call this encasement.
So if you want to hide food in a more effective way that really is resistant to confiscation, but also takes a whole lot more effort, One of the ideas that I saw used in Ecuador was to hide things under a rainwater collection tank that's full of water.
So in other words, you take a piece of ground where you're going to put a rainwater tank, and then you bury something there.
And then you cover it up with gravel.
And then you put a tank on top of it that's going to collect water from the downspout of the roof.
And then you let it rain.
And then you've got, I don't know, a thousand gallons of water sitting on top of your food stash.
So probably nobody's going to try to get that.
But if you want to get your food, you're going to have to drain the water and then hope it rains again because you have to drain the water in order to move the barrel, obviously.
But you see, that's one trick that is worth thinking about.
Another trick is to bury stuff.
And again, you're going to have to do some research on the right containers and so on.
You've got to make it airtight, watertight, depending on where you live.
A lot of people in Florida can't do this because nothing stays buried.
It all pops up out of the ground, you know.
So it kind of depends on where you live and how dry or wet the climate is.
But a lot of people bury food items or maybe other items.
I don't know, gold or what have you.
Hidden treasure...
Under pieces of equipment.
Like old, abandoned pieces of equipment.
It's kind of an interesting thing.
Let's say you have an old car, an old truck that no longer works.
I don't know.
Here's a good one.
Go get an old, broke-down school bus.
A big yellow monster that doesn't even run.
And before you park it, you bury all your super-secret stash in that spot, and then you tow that bus and just park it Right on top of that, and then let all the air out of the tires, if it even has any air, and just that thing's all broke down, but it's on top of your stash, okay?
So if you ever want to get your stash, yeah, you're going to have to move that bus, but so is everybody else, you see.
And if you were really clever, you might have a little trap door in that bus where you could get down through the floor, and you could get down into the dirt, but that would take a lot of time.
That's That's getting super secret right there.
Yeah, it's going to take a lot of effort.
You have to really want to hide food or whatever you're hiding in order to do that.
But people use old equipment that way.
If you don't want to drag a bus out there, if you live in a rural area, you can get things like an old rusted plow or something or a disc attachment.
That goes on a tractor, you know, but it's all rusted and broken.
Half the discs are just shattered, and you can park that on top of something.
It's hard to move that, you know?
It takes effort to move it.
So think about...
I call this encasement.
Oh, and the most secure encasement idea ever, which is also expensive and kind of difficult to pull off, but you take your food bin, whatever you really want to have in food, and you find a reason to pour concrete around it.
Yeah, I know.
Let's say you're pouring a concrete bench around On your little walking path and your concrete bench or maybe you have a concrete table or, I don't know, a really big concrete birdbath or something.
But inside the concrete, you put a bunch of your food stash, maybe super secret garden seeds.
I don't know, maybe your crypto wallet thumb drive or something with all your passwords on it.
Whatever you need to hide, you put it inside the concrete.
That's encasement.
Or you pour a giant concrete ball or just a giant concrete block, you know, like a piece of yard art.
What are these blocks?
It's just yard art.
It's this new age thing.
We have squares and circles and triangles of concrete in the yard.
Yeah, it's just decorations.
That's what you can tell people.
But inside, you've actually got your super secret stash.
That is, I mean, you've got to have a sledgehammer to get to your stuff.
But believe me, no one's going to try to haul off a 1,000-pound giant block of concrete just to see if there's any food in it.
They're not going to do that.
Now, of course, you can also hide food out in nature.
You might have a half hollow tree somewhere and you can stuff a bunch of food in that tree and then cover it up with some bark and Maybe a little bit of spray paint or something.
A little camo pattern.
I don't know.
Dark brown bark paint.
Use your artistic skills.
Hide stuff out in nature.
But dogs can sniff that stuff out.
They can find it pretty easily.
Whereas if you have food in concrete, dogs are probably not going to sniff that.
That's very secure, but obviously very costly and very difficult.
Putting things underground is a very practical option for a lot of people.
And if you want to throw off dogs, and I know this is going to sound kind of gross, but there are lots of ways to throw off dogs from the scent of some food you may have buried.
Let's say you've buried, I don't know, something really pungent.
Like, what would be storable pungent food?
Like, I don't know, like chili powder instant meal with Tabasco sauce or something.
You got chili powder food.
Dogs are going to smell it.
So what do you do?
You got to put something...
Really odiferous on top of that and have a good reason for it.
Like, for example, again, sorry for being gross about this, but something like a dead raccoon or half of a dead deer or roadkill.
Oh, you driving along?
Somebody ran over an armadillo.
Do you want to mess with it?
I mean, wear gloves if you do.
I know, this gets weird, but you throw a roadkill on top of...
Or, human feces also works.
I know, it's crazy, right?
But hey, you know, half of San Francisco already smells like that, so it might be a familiar thing to a lot of Californians right now.
You can literally...
Go in a bucket and then dump the bucket on top of the area where you want to conceal the smells and that will throw them off as well.
Look, animals and humans, they don't want to nuzzle their way through human feces.
Nobody wants to do that.
Nobody wants to do that.
In fact, one of the things...
No, I'll tell you what.
There's another strategy along those lines, but it's too gross to mention here.
It involves a septic tank.
And you can hear about that in the book if you want.
That's if you really, really, really want to hide something that nobody's going to mess with, there's a place for that.
Just beware.
It's gross.
So let me give you an alternative to all of that because it gets pretty sick.
What if you stored seeds and bags of fertilizer?
They're probably not going to confiscate fertilizer bags, and they're probably not going to confiscate compost, which is, you know, your compost soil that's ready to grow food.
Compost is a form of what I call black gold.
It's food potential.
And fertilizer is also a kind of gold.
It's a kind of asset because it, especially nitrogen-based fertilizers like urea and so on, that's the potential to grow food as well.
And garden seeds are so small and compact, you can hide them almost anywhere.
I mean, they're real easy to hide.
They don't give off a special smell that dogs are going to locate somewhere around your home.
You can find a place to hide those.
So what if you engaged in guerrilla gardening?
You know, you grew your tomato plants and your okra and your lettuce and whatever in some secret locations out of the way, not visible from the road.
Or what if you did indoor sprouting?
What if you had a bunch of sprouting seeds and you did sprouting to keep yourself alive with a form of protein and some chlorophyll and some good stuff from the sprouting seeds, you know, like alfalfa, for example.
Get yourself some sprouting seeds and you can keep yourself alive.
It may not be the best thing in the world long term, but at least you won't starve to death.
Think about sprouting.
Think about also what you can grow quickly that you can eat quickly.
And what can you grow that's largely underground, like potatoes, for example.
And if you grow these gardens, practice concealment.
So don't grow them all in a row.
Oh, it's a straight line.
That's recognizable from satellites and helicopters and low-flying aircraft.
So you're going to plant a potato over here, another potato over there, and then a tomato plant over here, and then an okra plant over here.
And you're going to mix and match.
You're going to have one plant here and there.
By the way, it's going to be more resistant to pests doing all of this.
You know, it's a good gardening technique.
And it's not going to be recognizable.
From anybody that's snooping around, unless they take a much closer look.
So this is called guerrilla gardening, and I want to encourage you to learn how to grow food, learn how to sprout, have some extra stockpiled fertilizer, which lasts forever, by the way.
Have some seeds, have some compost, start making more compost.
Make sure you've got your water sources all squared away, because people aren't going to come to your house and confiscate water, probably.
It's because it's heavy, right?
So you can actually set yourself up with all kinds of assets or asset potential to grow food as you need it, which can help you through all of this that's coming.
And then if you manage to hide some food at the same time, or you're able to do something like capturing squirrels, And then eating the squirrel before anybody knows you have it, you know?
I mean, I'm almost sorry to bring this up, but look, it's a survival thing.
If you're in this scenario and maybe you shoot a wild pig or you shoot a squirrel or a rabbit and then you cook it, you know, you clean it, you cook it, you eat it, and then it's in your belly and they can't confiscate it out of your belly.
So Think about all of these things.
I know you might be thinking, wow, are you serious?
You think it's going to get that crazy?
Yeah, only because I know a little bit of history and it always gets like this.
In the middle of pandemics and famine and scarcity and war, it's going to happen like clockwork.
It's going to be following food inflation.
There's going to be price fixing.
Price controls by the government, and then there's going to be rationing, and then there's going to be confiscation.
This is coming, just like clockwork.
So you need to start thinking now about how to hide your food, how to hide it not only from humans, but also from food-snipping dogs, and the different levels of hiding food.
Because in some cases, if you get caught, they can take you away to prison.
So, if you're in that kind of scenario, you want to make sure you hide it extremely, extremely well, because getting caught can mean death, whereas not having food can also mean death by starvation, by the way.
Also, be sure to go to a second-hand clothing store, buy some clothes that are too big for you, big baggy clothes, because that's what you're going to need to be wearing around, because everybody's going to have clothes that are too big as they're starving to death.
Bodies are getting smaller.
But the clothes are still the same size.
So you're going to want to over time, since you're actually feeding yourself, you're not starving to death.
You don't look like you've been in a concentration camp.
So what do you want to do?
You get some clothes that are too big.
Start wearing bigger and bigger clothes.
And also, there are some things you can do with cosmetics to make your cheeks look more pronounced, make your face look more hollow.
You can put darker circles under your eyes or on your cheekbones, I mean underneath your cheekbones, to make yourself look more, I don't know, look more like you belong in a Halloween costume party, basically.
The sicker you look, the more you're going to fit in with a population that's starving.
If you look healthy and big Santa Claus belly and big rosy skin, you got all kinds of wonderful nutrition, you're going to stand out.
So you're going to want to practice looking quite disheveled.
And malnourished, okay?
Seriously, these are skills you need to think about.
I'm not joking about any of this stuff.
You want to be able to move in society during famine, starvation, and food confiscation.
You need to have these kinds of skills.
If you want to learn more about all these topics, I already mentioned resilient prepping as one audio book.
There's another one too that has even more tips and techniques about this.
It's called the Global Reset Survival Guide.
And you can get that at globalreset.news.
And it's also a free downloadable audio book, nine hours of audio, MP3 files, plus a PDF completely free of charge.
Listen to that.
You'll learn a wealth of information.
And if you want to learn how to survive in the post-collapse economy, download my book called Ghost World.
And by the way, you can find all these audio books.
Just go on to naturalnews.com and click on audio books.
Or frankly, the direct URL is audiobooks.naturalnews.com.
And you'll have links to, what is it?
Six books right now that you can download for free.
It'll teach you how to survive.
And of course, I've held back some of the top techniques that I use.
So I can't give all my secrets publicly.
But trust me, if you start to think about the principles of what I've taught here, you'll find other ways, other places to hide things that you need to stay alive.
There are plenty of examples.
Let me just give you one more simple example, so just a taste of what I'm talking about.
So you know you can take lots of canned food and And you can can, you know, meats and there's canned butter and canned cheese and everything.
And you can stuff these cans into a PVC pipe, a long one, like a 20-foot piece of PVC. And I forgot the best diameter for standard canned food, but it's either a three or a four-inch pipe in diameter.
And take these long pipes, dig some trenches out in your backyard, lay these pipes in there.
If anybody asks questions, oh, you're building a septic field.
Right?
Building a septic field.
And you have caps on both ends of these pipes.
You put them in the ground, cover them back up.
Boom.
You got a bunch of canned food and a bunch of PVC pipes in the ground.
And it's waterproof.
It's weatherproof.
You just have to remember that it's there.
So if you're really, really starving, you know, you dig up a pipe and have a feast and then get rid of the cans as quickly as possible.
Yeah, think about that.
Oh, we see evidence you ate food!
You know, it'll be a crime in some places because the food police will be running around making sure that everybody's starving to death.
That's where this is headed.
All right, so I hope you found this information valuable.
That's the wrap-up of this segment.
Okay, moving on to other topics.
We've got big breaking news about the Nord Stream pipelines.
From Reuters, gas from Russia's Nord Stream 2 pipeline leaks into the Baltic Sea.
And it turns out that there's also a leak in Nord Stream 1.
So these are both undersea gas pipelines that go under the Baltic Sea.
They connect from Russia to Germany.
And normally both of these pipelines are under pressure.
There's internal pressure in the pipeline.
And they're kept that way.
One reason they're kept that way is physics, by the way, because...
Well, the ocean water is heavy and it's trying to constantly crush the underwater pipes.
So the best way to protect the integrity of the pipes is to keep them under pressure internally so that, right, the gas pressure is pushing outward from the inside, hopefully equal to the water pressure pushing from the outside inward.
And, you know, then your pipes don't get crushed.
Well, there was a loss of pressure in both pipelines recorded over the last day or two.
So Reuters has been reporting this and others have reported the same thing.
And it's happening near the economic zone southeast of Bornholm Island, right?
Said Danish authorities.
You got that?
Okay.
So, the operator of Nord Stream 2 said, quote, overnight the Nord Stream 2 landfall dispatcher registered a rapid gas pressure drop on line A of the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline.
And then there was a large bubble field near Bornholm, which is, of course, the gas bubbling up through the sea, from the bottom of the sea.
I said that normally the pressure inside the pipeline is 105 bars.
It's now only 7 bars on the German side.
Nobody is claiming knowledge of what's causing this.
But it's clear that both pipelines are offline.
And let me give you my analysis.
I think that this is sabotage.
I think someone took an undersea vessel, went down there and just punched some holes in both these pipelines.
And there are two parties that I think would be motivated to do this.
It's either the United States or Russia.
I know, you might say, well, how can that be?
Well, the United States would have a motive to do this because the U.S. wants Western Europe to collapse from a lack of energy.
They do, yeah.
The U.S. and the Federal Reserve, they're trying to destroy the ECB and the Euro because the U.S. wants to be the one left standing after the annihilation of Europe.
And that's why the U.S. is sending all this money and weapons to Ukraine to keep Ukraine in the fight as a proxy nation in order to keep Europe involved and keep Russia – well, to make sure that Russia keeps the gas turned off.
But the best way to turn off the gas long term and ensure that Western Europe suffers through this winter without heat, electricity, industrial capacity and so on is to just sabotage these pipelines.
So yeah, America has every incentive to do that, or at least I should say the deep state players of the Pentagon have that incentive.
But also Russia has an incentive to do the same thing.
See, Russia needs a convenient excuse to keep the gas turned off without it looking like it's a political play.
Because Russia doesn't want to be condemned of causing the massive wave of human suffering that's about to be unleashed across Western Europe.
That is, freezing to death, mass starvation, famine, you know, civil unrest, revolutions, collapse.
That's all coming.
Russia doesn't want to take the blame for that.
Sure would be convenient if the pipelines were somehow...
You know, damaged, wink, wink.
Somehow those pipelines are no longer functional.
So we cannot send gas to NATO countries.
They are broken.
Kind of like Joe Biden's head.
Yeah, and by the way, why would Russia want to send Germany natural gas to run the industry in Germany that would be used to build more munitions and weapons to fight against Russia in Ukraine?
I mean, think about that.
It makes no sense whatsoever.
So Putin wants a reason to keep the gas off.
Could Russia have gone in and sabotaged their own pipelines at the bottom of the Baltic Sea?
Absolutely.
Could be America.
Could be Russia.
But somebody punched holes in those pipelines.
And then the question becomes one of...
actually going to cause long-term?
I mean, I don't know.
I guess they have some kind of valve control systems, obviously, in these pipelines, but if seawater gets into one section, does it end up intruding in another section?
And seawater is highly corrosive to a lot of materials.
Are these pipelines made of corrosion-resistant aluminum or what?
I don't know.
I would love to have an expert on who could answer some of those questions.
But I suspect that if these pipelines get ocean water in them, then their life can be seriously compromised.
Anyway, the point here is that even if Russia wanted to send gas to Germany now, can't do it.
Pipelines have holes in them.
Hmm.
So, what's Germany going to do for the winter?
You know, Western Europe can't even at this point sit down and negotiate with Russia and beg to have the gas turned back on because gas lines don't work.
Shucks, huh?
That's what Putin's going to say.
Shucks.
Darn it.
Too bad.
Otherwise, we would have been happy to send you the gas.
It's just there's too many holes in the pipes.
What are we going to do?
Wait till the spring, I think.
By the way, do you get the sense that all hell is going to break loose sometime around the 1st of October?
You get that sense?
I mean, the Vatican demanding all their money come back by September 30th.
And did you see this thing about in the UK... The deadline for the old money is September 30th, and they're switching over from paper currency to polymer currency.
Yeah, all the money in the United Kingdom is going to become plastic Starting September 30th, and probably there's something in bed, probably little RFID chips or something in these things, who knows.
But this was reported by the Washington Post, by the way, UK banknotes going from paper to polymer.
The new rule applies to 20 and 50 pound bills, and you have to use up all your old bills by September 30th Or they will no longer be accepted.
In other words, your 20-pound and your 50-pound banknotes will no longer be legal tender, says the Bank of England.
So this is a financial, or let's say a currency swap-out.
So we're encouraging anyone who still has these to use them or deposit them at their bank or post office before September 30th.
How much you want about this is some nefarious scheme to try to get people to turn in a bunch of cash that they've been sitting on?
Everybody that's been sitting on the old cash is going to have to figure out a way to, I guess, if they're a criminal enterprise, they're going to have to launder it or something.
Again, maybe they probably laundered it once already to get it into that cash.
Now they've got to get it into a new cash.
But just ordinary people could be sitting on maybe a few hundred dollars or a few thousand, well, pounds worth of this paper cash.
And now that's about to become worthless.
It's kind of an interesting sign of things to come.
That is your paper currency becoming worthless, even announced by the Central Bank there or the Bank of England, right?
There's going to be a day that the dollar is worthless.
And that will count.
That'll be true no matter what the currency is represented in, whether it's, you know, paper money, which is not really technically paper anyway, or digital money or what have you.
But anyway, in the UK, it's going to be polymer money.
It's all going to be plastic.
Okay.
Now, switching gears to the United States, over the weekend in Austin, Texas, there was a heavily armed black rights group, or several of them, actually, that were marching through Austin, chanting anti-illegal immigrant slogans, and they were demanding that Biden close the border, and they were calling for reparations to be paid now.
So let me just set the scene here, okay?
So it's heavily armed black self-defense groups, And it was called the Second Amendment Unity Walk on Saturday in Austin.
They marched to the State House, but they're also demanding reparations and to close the border.
So I think they're just messing with everybody's heads, trying to get people to think about, well, which side are you on, man?
You know, it's like, you got guns, but you want reparations, but you want the border to be secure, and you hate Biden, but you also hate Trump, and what...
Tell me who you are.
One of these groups was led by the, what's it called?
The Elmer Geronimo Pratt Pistol and Rifle Gun Club, which I've never heard of.
But it's got the name Elmer in it, so it's got to be good.
And then there are a lot of photos in the UK Daily Mail.
It was saying some of the activists chanted, quote, close the borders and, quote, take your ass home as they marched towards the Texas Capitol.
on Saturday.
Their demands included reparations for descendants of enslaved people and a hate crime bill protecting black Americans.
Well, this is interesting.
And then there's a bunch of photos of some people marching, you know, black folks, pretty much kitted out in what looks like paintball gear, actually.
There's a lot of paintball helmets in these photos because those are a lot easier to get a hold of, by the way.
But, yeah, there's some serious-looking dudes holding shotguns and You know, rifles and...
By the way, they did not shoot themselves as some other groups have done in the past.
That's always a bonus.
You know, don't shoot each other or yourself when you're racking the bullet carrier group or, you know, checking whether you have a round in the chamber, things like that.
I can't tell if they all practice good trigger control or not, but they didn't shoot each other, so that's good.
And, you know, frankly, there are some aspects of this group that...
That I think you and I would agree with.
So I find this really fascinating.
So, number one, they are complaining that, I mean, they say they want reparations.
But in demanding reparations, which is highly complex, obviously, because, you know, what percent of a descendant of a slave were you, and did your grandfather ever work with the slave masters, and what have you, right?
So it's this moral quagmire combined with finances and going back through...
You know, hundreds of years of slavery and so on.
But they have pointed out why is the USA sending so much money to Ukraine, but not spending money on the American people?
For example, why are American soldiers now living on food stamps?
And frankly, why are the black communities in America, why do they suffer the worst water systems, the most broken down roadways and bridges and infrastructure?
And often the water systems are poisoned with heavy metals and things like that.
So why is Joe Biden spending all this money on Ukraine?
And it's crazy.
It's a billion dollars a week.
And I think it's another 12 billion that's being approved right now, by the way.
But no real money on the American people, whether they're black or white, but especially black communities.
Where's the money for that infrastructure?
And where's the money for the border?
We don't have good border protection, obviously, in America, even though there's, I mean, if they're willing to spend the money, we could protect America's border.
And a lot of black folks, I would suspect, are saying that, hey, these illegals are coming in and taking away, in some cases, jobs from black Americans, taking away opportunities from black Americans who are legal American citizens.
So, hey, protect the border.
And what this group is saying is invest in America instead of investing in this grand money pit in Ukraine, which frankly that money is not going to help the people of Ukraine.
It's not helping the soldiers of Ukraine.
It's going into Zelensky's pocket and all the people around him that are parasites on the system.
So So this group, again, what was the name?
Elmer something?
I'm sorry.
Elmer Geronimo Pratt Pistol and Rifle Gun Club.
There we go.
That's going to take me a while to remember that.
Oh, here's another group called the Black Riders Liberation Party.
So this group is absolutely correct about the fact that we're sending too much money overseas and not having enough money invested back in the American people.
I totally get that.
They're also right about the Second Amendment and whether or not you enjoy the scene of sort of kind of militant looking, demanding black folks in paramilitary gear marching around with shotguns and rifles.
The truth is, folks, as long as they are not shooting people, that is their right to do that.
And I'm one of the few people, I think, who has said that even as a person who most people would say is a white guy, although they never asked me if I self-identified as white, and a lot of my ancestry, as you know, is Native American Indian, but I say that more black folks should be armed.
Why?
Well, because we want more of everybody armed, including black folks who are law-abiding citizens and want to help keep their communities safe because, of course, a black man or a black woman has every right to defend their home, their family, their community, their state, their nation.
Against violent criminals, against, you know, drug cartels and gangs and illegal gangs that are coming across and engaging in child trafficking and drug running and all of that.
I mean, how many black Americans are being destroyed by fentanyl right now?
Of course, plenty of white Americans, maybe even more white, but there's a lot of black folks that are getting destroyed by these drugs that are being shipped in by these drug cartels and the border crossers.
So To me, I don't look at a group like this and freak out and get all scared.
Oh, the black man with a gun?
No, I'm like, I love people expressing their right to speak and their right to be armed.
So that aspect of what they're doing, I completely agree with it, by the way.
I don't have any argument at all.
Now, the reparations part...
You know what I think?
Here, I got an idea.
And if anybody from this group is listening, hear me out.
I think that a better thing than just reparations would be, you know, the central bank has stolen from all of us.
Since, well, 1913, you know, the creature from Jekyll Island and the creation of the Federal Reserve, we've all been looted.
In a sense, we've all been enslaved.
And in a sense, if you don't mind me saying...
All Americans who have ever worked, who have ever had a paycheck, who have ever paid taxes, who have ever saved money in the U.S. dollar, all Americans, black or white or any color, any ethnicity, have all been to some extent enslaved under this central bank currency ripoff system.
We've all been looted.
We've all been stolen from.
And I would say we all deserve reparations, which means how about the central banksters who And the money cartel, all those wealthy elite people that just print money for themselves and bail themselves out and bail out their banks anytime there's another financial crisis.
Oh, too big to fail.
Print more money.
Here's another trillion dollars.
For the rich people, how about this?
How about we all agree that they take their money and give it back to the people from whom they stole it?
We could call that reparations.
And the truth is, reparations belong to every man and woman in America who ever worked an honest day in their life.
If you ever earned a paycheck, you've been stolen from.
And you deserve compensation or reparation from the central bank that has stolen from you and from me and from all of us this entire time.
So my position is, yeah, this black group or a couple of different black groups, They're talking about reparations.
They're kind of, they're on the right track.
They just got to think bigger.
Because this is a multi, multi-trillion dollar looting spree by the central banks that has taken place since 1913, over 100 years of this.
And we all deserve our money back.
And we all deserve money back for our fathers and mothers and grandfathers and grandmothers and great-grandfathers and so on.
All of us.
Who have ever worked, we've been stolen from.
And of course, these groups are correct about securing the border.
And they're also correct about the fact that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the Democrats are doing absolutely nothing to secure the border.
And frankly, Democrats are doing nothing to protect the interests of black Americans.
It's like the Democrats automatically expect black people to vote for them, and then they throw those same black folks under the bus right after the election.
Like, I remember all those promises we had for you.
Yeah, forget it.
Yeah, we'll make new promises again in two years or four years when we need your vote again.
Until then, go away.
That's kind of the message from the Democrats.
And so I think, frankly, here's what I think.
I'm guessing there's going to be not just black folks rising up and having more marches and more, you know, speaking out and maybe more demonstrations like this being armed, kind of pro-Second Amendment stance.
I think that you're going to see more of this all over the United States and all over the Western world, especially as winter hits in Europe.
You're going to see an uprising of the German people against the German government criminals, an uprising of the British people against the British government and all those criminals.
Same thing in France, same thing in many other countries, same thing in the United States.
And so this process is an organic extension of the mass suffering and the repression and the looting and theft of the people that has taken place by this kind of fascist combination between corporations, governments, and central banks where we, the people, no matter what our color, we're always getting screwed.
We're always getting the You know, the short end of the stick on all of this.
And, you know, I got to tell you, I would love to interview somebody from one of these groups that marched, welcome them to my show, because I'd like to ask them questions about, you know, what they stand for, what their principles are, what they want, what they mean by reparations, and so on.
I think it'd be a fascinating conversation.
So if anybody's out there from the Elmer Geronimo Pratt Pistol and Rifle Gun Club, you know, please reach out to me.
And we can talk firearms, we can talk Second Amendment, border, we can talk reparations, we can talk about race and, you know, First Amendment, freedom of speech, freedom, liberty, community protection, all those things that matter.
And you notice, I mean, my stance on this is I'm pro-humanity.
I'm a humanitarian.
I think everybody's got the right...
To seek out prosperity, to seek out happiness, to have a family, to protect that family.
Everybody's got a right to earn a living and keep that money and have that money actually hold value instead of it losing value.
Everybody's got a right to self-defense.
Everybody should have the right to speak out.
And so anytime I see groups doing that, that's what I see are different expressions of, you People voicing their grievances, which is a form of the First Amendment, which is a form of liberty.
And let me just wrap this up by saying this.
I am not afraid of a group of, let's say, 100 black people carrying guns.
You know what I'm afraid of?
Is 100 government thugs who have disarmed all the people.
As long as I see people with guns, we still have a chance at defending liberty.
If those people are black, if those people are white, Asian, Hispanic, Latino, whatever, it's all good.
As long as the people have their Second Amendment, we have a shot at freedom.
If the people lose their Second Amendment and we end up just seeing corrupt government tyrants and thugs with all the monopoly of firearms and the people are disarmed, that's frightening.
That's frightening.
A march of 100 people with guns, not pointing them at anybody, not shooting off, not actually starting a battle, that doesn't scare me at all.
All right, that said, a couple of announcements here.
My videos and podcasts are now available on band.video.
Which is part of the Infowars platform and community.
So you can check them out.
Band.video as well as, of course, Brighttown.com, BitChute, Rumble, and a couple of others out there as well.
In addition, I wanted to mention, remember that interview I did last week with the border operator, part of the units, that's all I'll say, the units that are on the border acquiring illegals and interdicting human trafficking and weapons trafficking and drug trafficking and all that.
Remember that?
Yeah.
Someone I know, one of my contacts who's in that space, and I'd gotten them some satellite gear, and he did that interview.
A lot of people really enjoyed that interview.
Well, I'm happy to tell you, the satellite phone store is now donating not only the 15 bivvy sticks that this operator had requested for his team, So yes, we're going to get them 15 bivy sticks, which are the satellite communication devices.
You can send and receive text via satellite.
It doesn't use any cell towers.
You can send text to other people's cell phones or sat phones or other bivy sticks, by the way.
So they're getting 15 of those, and they're getting five push-to-talk satellite radios.
Which all that gear is coming to me first and then I'm going to connect with that team and we're going to distribute all that gear to them.
They're going to deploy it on the border for all the things that they do and then they're going to give me a report maybe a month later.
I'll do another interview with the same individual there.
Same operator, and he'll tell me how they're using the satellite comms, the push-to-talk satellite radios and all that.
If you want to support this company, the Satellite Phone Store, because they're making mega donations, not only to this group, but other groups and first responders and so on, You can just go to the website, sat123.com.
That's S-A-T-123.com.
And I know with this hurricane about to hit Florida, I know that the satellite phone store is geared up to donate some gear and to have some loaners or to lend out satellite phones to first responders during that emergency response as that hurricane strikes Florida.
The satellite phone store is always donating water We're lending out or giving out gear to all kinds of groups that are helping America and helping to keep people safe.
So I just want to say thumbs up.
To the satellite phone store.
They're really great.
Real patriots.
Just humanitarian.
Helping people.
Left and right.
Anywhere that people need help.
The satellite phone store is stepping in.
Again, the website, sat123.com if you want to check out that gear for yourself.
The bivvy sticks.
B-I-V-Y. That's what you want for satellite comms.
Get yourself some backup bivvy sticks.
Because how much you want to bet, the power grid goes down in certain areas when this sucker hits this hurricane, right?
And cell towers are probably going to go down.
You're going to have no comms, going to have no electricity, no working water systems for a while.
You know, it'll get back on its feet, but it's going to be a while, maybe a few days or even as long as a couple of weeks in certain areas where, you know, you're going to need some backup communication systems.
So that's what that's all about.
I'll keep you posted.
Should be interesting.
And then here's one more story I wanted to bring you on this from Reuters.
U.S. Congress negotiators set nearly $12 billion in new Ukraine aid.
I mean, this is just insane.
This came out over the weekend.
Negotiators of a stopgap spending bill in the U.S. Congress have agreed to include nearly $12 billion in new military and economic aid to Ukraine, sources familiar with the talk said on Monday.
So basically, $4.5 billion of that is just U.S. taxpayers paying all the salaries and all the expenses of the corrupt Zelenskyy Ukraine government.
Like, when did we sign up to pay all the payroll of all the government of Ukraine?
We didn't vote for Zelenskyy.
I'm not even sure that the Ukrainian people voted for him in a majority either.
A lot of shenanigans with all these elections these days, but suppose they did.
Well, we didn't vote for Zelensky, and we don't support Zelensky.
We support the people of Ukraine.
We want the people to be safe, and we want the people to be free and prosperous, but we don't support this corrupt regime.
So, you know, $4.5 billion of American taxpayer money going to fund the government, while America has $31 trillion in debt nearly?
And we don't have a secure border, which is what the black groups just pointed out in their march.
And we don't have infrastructure that's reliable in a lot of areas, especially black communities, by the way.
And, you know, I think America needs to invest in America.
Shouldn't we have working infrastructure here?
Shouldn't our soldiers be able to afford to eat without going on food stamps?
So another $12 billion to Ukraine.
This Ukraine situation, this is a money pit.
This is a vortex black hole sucking away America's economy where it's disappearing down this black hole called Ukraine.
Nobody knows where this money goes.
There is zero accountability.
There are no receipts.
Nobody has any clue.
It's just gone.
So they're printing this money and sending it to Ukraine while the American people are being essentially looted by Through devaluation of the dollar because the central banks are printing all this money and wasting it overseas and handing it out to a bunch of corrupt bureaucrats and politicians and money launders and skimmers and weapons traffickers and who knows what else.
It's all a giant scam.
But of course, we the people get screwed in the process.
I don't know about you, but I've had just about enough of sending money to Ukraine without any accountability of where this is going or why isn't this getting to the soldiers or the people.
Where is all this going?
I mean, it's a joke at this point.
It's a crime and a joke.
It's pathetic.
We need accountability for this money.
I mean, as Americans, we're compassionate.
We're not afraid to help people around the world, but we want to know where it's going.
Show us the people of Ukraine getting this help.
Or show us even the soldiers of Ukraine getting this help.
Show us that.
Because so far, we're not seeing any evidence that this is going anywhere except into the pockets of a bunch of corrupt officials, sadly.
And Joe Biden and the Democrats are just throwing around billions of dollars like it's nothing.
Oh, it's another $10 billion this week, $12 billion next week, it'll be $15 billion.
These are billions of dollars, folks.
Do you realize the entire savings and loan scandal in the 1980s was something less, I think it was only a billion dollars or so, or a couple of billion.
Even the long-term capital management bailout in, was it 1998?
I thought it was somewhere around $5 billion.
And now we're just, oh, another week, another $12 billion.
It's insane.
It's just beyond insane.
They're just printing money like mad until the system collapses.
And that's coming.
And they know that's coming.
It's like they're just trying to carry out the last desperate chapter of looting before the system implodes upon itself, you know?
So get ready, folks.
Convert your dollars into something that holds value because dollars certainly do not hold value.
All right, let's jump into the interview segment for today, which should be quite fascinating.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, wait for this one.
Welcome, folks.
This is a critical interview that some, it seems, don't want us to actually get accomplished.
But here we are.
I am joined by attorneys Daniel Watkins and also Michael Hamilton.
And these attorneys are fighting for humanity in one of the most important ways.
You're going to be blown away by what you're about to hear about the medical abuse of patients during this COVID crisis and the protocols of treatment slash abuse that have been I would say inflicted on patients.
Well, these two attorneys who join us now have been fighting for the rights of patients, and they've filed suit against, I believe, three hospitals in the California area.
And they're here to explain what this is all about, what are the merits of their case, and what happened during COVID. Please welcome Mr.
Daniel Watkins from Watkins and Litovsky, and also Attorney Michael Hamilton from Cornerstone.
Thank you, gentlemen, for joining me.
It's an honor to have you on.
Thanks, Mike.
It's really a pleasure to be here.
Well, thank you so much for having us.
Absolutely.
I'm just glad you could join me.
Thank you for taking the time.
It's greatly appreciated.
So, for those who aren't familiar with your lawsuit and the claims, and also since this is the first time that you and I have been able to talk about this, please walk us through the claims and the merits of the lawsuit that you have filed.
I believe you filed it on September 6th.
Is that correct?
September 7th.
Okay.
Please go ahead.
Well, so I'd like to start with kind of a big-picture overview of what's happening with remdesivir and the protocol that surrounds it.
And we're seeing it all over the country, Mike.
We're seeing it.
In multiple states, I was already seeing it in at least five states and seven or eight hospitals, an identical type protocol.
Someone comes into the hospital, they are told that, and they come in for a variety of reasons.
I mean, they may sprain an ankle and they're told they have COVID pneumonia.
They're immediately separated from their loved ones.
Their loved ones are told you can't see this person.
They put them in a COVID ward.
They may put them directly into ICU. And as soon as they get them in there and away from all human contact, they put a BiPAP oxygen machine on their face, and they crank the oxygen up so high that it's hard for the person to breathe on their own.
When they try to take the machine off their face, their hands are often zip-tied to the bed rails, so they can't bite it.
Usually a psychiatrist or a doctor will come in or often they will come in and say, well, the patient appears to be agitated and they start a morphine drip.
Now it's harder for the person to breathe.
We know that remdesivir has a horrendous effect on the kidneys.
Wait a second.
I'm sorry to interrupt, but what you're describing, and I know that you're aware of how horrifying this would be, but let me just try to translate this for our listeners.
You're talking about physical restraints and chemical restraints being inflicted upon patients.
You said their hands are zip tied to the hospital bed and then they can be given morphine without their consent.
Is that what's happening?
Morphine, fentanyl, there's a wide variety of sedatives that are given to them.
So they can't fight back.
They can't articulate for themselves.
But they have no one, because the family's been isolated from them, they have no one to advocate on their behalf.
And that's critical, too.
Obviously, you know, everybody needs a family member in the hospital to keep an eye on the doctors and help make decisions.
But, I mean, this seems like an incredibly abusive situation.
And worse than if someone were a prisoner in, you know, like a maximum security prison situation, almost.
Mike, I gotta tell you, man, what's happening to people all across the country in identical type protocols is nothing short of torture.
I mean, they're being tortured to death.
It would be far simpler to just, if you wanted to take somebody out, why not do it humanely?
But they're not given any food.
They're not given any water.
They're not given any hydration through the IVs.
They're only given remdesivir.
And then a variety of other medicines often that are indicated for use with remdesivir.
So remdesivir, we know one of the most common side effects is a loss of kidney function, I think typically followed by fluid in the lungs, correct?
That's right.
That's right.
And doctors are saying, and I've heard it over and over, and I have it on recordings from multiple hospitals.
The doctor says, well, we can't give them fluids because their lungs are filling up with fluids.
And if we give them nutrition, if we give them hydration, It's just going to exacerbate what's happening in their lungs.
But the reality is, it's the remdesivir that's causing...
And I should let my experts speak to this.
We have wonderful experts, Dr.
Peter McCullough, Dr.
Brian Artis, Dr.
Jancy Lindsay.
We have a number of really top, world-renowned experts who will speak to the medical side of this.
But...
We know that the remdesivir is causing the issues that it claims to be fixing.
They're telling people, hey, you've got COVID pneumonia, but they're giving them nothing that treats pneumonia, and we don't even know if COVID pneumonia is a thing.
So your, yeah, that could just be a label they give to the side effects, but your, let me ask you a couple of kind of rapid questions here.
How many people are you representing in this lawsuit?
Mike, we have 14 families in the Fresno area spread out among the three different hospitals, but they are just a small sample of the people that have been impacted by these protocols.
One of the things that we're trying to do with this lawsuit is make people aware so when they go to the hospital as a patient, they can fight back against what the hospital is going to do with remdesivir and the protocol.
But also we're out here trying to raise awareness so that other attorneys will step forward and help people across the United States that are facing these same problems.
When I first started looking at this, when I met Michael, there were a couple of the families we talked to and I heard the stories of the restraints and giving remdesivir despite objections to the patient.
And I thought maybe there's a little bit of an overreaction by the family members.
And as we talked more, it went from one family to two to four to 10.
And then we filed the lawsuits and now we've received thousands of emails and phone calls from across the United States and others.
I think my last count, we had about 32 states that we received information from.
We've had people from Australia...
Australia have reached out with similar claims of the protocol that we're describing here.
So are you representing families who have had family members die under this protocol?
That's right.
All of the plaintiffs in this case are family members of patients who became decedents under the protocol.
Oh, wow.
Are you also representing anybody who was harmed but survived?
Not in these lawsuits, but we are gathering those folks.
There's a lot.
And we'll look to bring a suit for them as well.
Let me give out your website for those who want to learn more right away.
It's DeclareTruth.us.
And folks, if you want to help financially support these two attorneys in their work, there's a GiveSendGo.com that you can use.
And the URL for that is GiveSendGo.com slash Fresno Remdesivir Death.
All together, obviously no spaces, no dashes, anything.
Fresno, as in Fresno, California, remdesivir death.
And just be sure to spell remdesivir correctly there.
And that'll get you right there.
Or just go to declare truth.us and you can find all the links there.
Now, Mr.
Watkins, what about the maker of the drug, the remdesivir drug?
I know, well, I believe, isn't remdesivir the generic name and there are different brand names associated with that?
Is that correct?
If we can jump in here, Mike, on that.
Veclari is the name of the drug.
Remdesivir is how most of us know it.
We know that it's also been farmed out to Some company in South America who's producing something along the same lines.
But I can tell you that remdesivir was tested in these Ebola trials several years ago.
And it was discovered to have such a high mortality rate.
So many people that were given remdesivir died that they pulled it from the study and banned its further use.
Wow.
And now it's...
And of course, then the European outfit back in, I want to say 2020, said, you know, don't give this to anybody.
They did a study.
They concluded, don't give this to anybody with COVID-19.
And the World Health Organization, a couple of months after that, Did their own study, and it was quite a substantial study, and they said, don't give remdesivir to anybody with COVID-19, regardless of the severity of their symptoms, because it does no good.
Well, and let me point out, if they pulled it for being too dangerous for Ebola patients, and Ebola has a very, very high mortality rate, I don't recall the exact number, but I'm thinking somewhere around 70-plus percent, Then how could they justify remdesivir for something that has, as you say, a 99.97% survival rate of COVID-19?
Yep.
And so here's where the money trail starts.
We've got a group of panelists that go before the CDC and they say, we want this to have emergency use authorization.
We know it's not FDA approved, but we want it to have emergency use authorization.
Nine of those panelists not only worked for the NIH, but had financial ties to Gilead Sciences.
Oh, my.
Remdesivir.
And they're making money, of course, hand over fist, if they have any financial tie to it, because it's being given out so...
To so many people, and now they're asking for approval to give it to babies, of all things.
So when did the medical establishment suddenly say that if there's something declared an emergency, then we can abandon all medical ethics, we can abandon clinical trials, we can abandon anything resembling science, we can just do anything we want because there's a declared emergency?
That doesn't make any sense.
You know, Mike, that's a great question.
When did this start happening?
And like I said, I've been practicing in medical and dental malpractice defense for 30 years, and I thought that this is something new.
But as I talked to more physicians that have been practicing medicine, actually practicing medicine for some time, they've started to provide light into this subject.
And there's really been When a person goes to medical school, they don't learn to think independently.
They learn to follow exactly what they're told.
And if you don't follow that regimen, you don't get out of medical school.
And so that indoctrination carries over.
And if you allow yourself to be victim to that, you're going to find yourself 15, 20 years down the road answering to whomever's calling the shots for you in whatever hospital you're in, and you just do it.
It's how you continue to move upward.
It's how you make your money.
It's how you pay back You know, your debts, if you have them from medical school, and then you live a nice life.
And I think it's just a slow takeover of their own independent judgment and what they went into medicine for in the first place.
And so I think it's been going on a while.
And there's been a setup in some respects to be able to do something at this grand level.
And it's really surprising to me to see how the medical establishment, the physicians in particular, have responded to this Draconian implementation of one protocol to fix COVID. When we know for sure there are more efficacious treatment remedies out there, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, both have proven track records against COVID, very effective, very few side effects, and the doctors are disregarding that.
They're intentionally not telling the patients about it.
They're intentionally withholding the information of remdesivir and the fact that there was a 53% mortality rate when it was used in the Ebola studies.
They're not giving it to the patients.
Well, this reminds me, by the way, of the excuse, justifications of soldiers of East Berlin, of why they shot people who were escaping.
We were just following orders.
And I'm wondering, too, that you have sued, I believe, three hospitals and some individual doctors.
I would imagine...
That their first response, maybe in an effort to dismiss this lawsuit, would be, well, we were just following orders, essentially.
But who were they following orders from?
Any thoughts on what that's going to be or look like?
That's the question.
I mean, the question that we hope to get to the bottom of is, is there a written protocol?
Where is it coming from?
We know that the financial incentives are massive.
And it varies from state to state, but in California, there are three sort of categories of treatment for COVID-19.
Outpatient, inpatient, non-complex, and inpatient complex.
If you treat somebody outpatient, the average charge rate in California is about $3,200.
Give them some ivermectin, send them home.
And I'm oversimplifying, but do something that works, $3,200.
But if you treat them as a non-complex inpatient, you give them a room and you start taking care of them, now the average charge rate is $111,000 and change.
Now, is some of that subsidized by the federal government because of a COVID designation?
Well, yeah, it gets subsidized even beyond the numbers I'm giving you right now.
If you treat them as a complex patient, and to be identified as complex, you have to intubate them or put them in the ICU, one or the other, or both.
Oh, wow.
Now, the average charge rate in California jumps to about 450,000, plus or minus, a little bit.
I'm giving you round numbers.
On top of that, the federal government has said...
They've given a code that can be used if you treat them with remdesivir to the exclusion of other remedies.
You have to treat them to the exclusion of other remedies.
Now you get a 20% NCTAP bonus.
You have a code, and 20% on a charge rate of $450,000 is in the neighborhood of $90,000.
So now we're over half a million.
Give them some work and send them home for $3,200, or bring them in, intubate them, and put them through this protocol, and now your average charge rate tops $500,000.
Right.
Unbelievable.
They've hit the medical money train jackpot lotto.
So somebody created these incentives in the federal government, seemingly perverse incentives.
It seems like Just philosophically speaking, our medical profession should be rewarded when people are well, not dying, for one thing.
But the key question is, are many of these deaths induced or otherwise avoidable?
Are there people, and I guess this must be the premise of your lawsuit, that these people would have been fine if they had just been perhaps given ivermectin and sent home, but instead they were intubated and put into this money factory system, and as a result of that, they died?
Is that essentially the premise?
I don't know that we're in a position to say that they would have been fine.
However, we do know that 99.97% of people across the population, and if you go into the age of 70, it becomes 99.98, they survive COVID. In Kentucky, it's the ninth leading cause of death, and it's way behind the flu.
For example.
But we're giving them something that had a mortality rate of over 53% that makes no sense whatsoever.
Yes.
And one of the main things that I'm concerned with and I think the clients are concerned with and any patient in a hospital should be concerned with is This isn't just a mistake.
Oh, oops, I forgot to tell you this important fact about the medication.
This is intentional.
They are fraudulently concealing information about remdesivir.
They are intentionally withholding information of other types of treatment.
You know, the patient cannot make informed consent decisions.
They're not giving informed consent because they don't know the alternatives.
They don't know the risks.
They don't know the benefits.
They don't know any other consequences.
And so...
When they're being intentionally deceived, that deception is the violation that we're after.
That's what we're really trying to attack.
And I want to circle back to something we said earlier about the medical establishment of physicians.
One thing is clear.
There are a lot of people that have resisted this protocol, lots of good healthcare providers who want to actually practice medicine, treat each patient individually, look for the results, the treatment remedies for this patient versus the next patient based on their comorbidities and their physical health and all of those things. the treatment remedies for this patient versus the next patient And we want to encourage those physicians to reach out to us as well.
Go to DeclareTruth.us, enter your contact information in.
We're trying to match up, and they're out there practicing, and we're trying to match them up with people in the lawsuits across the country to help out as expert witnesses and to testify what should have happened.
Well, so you are in touch then with other attorneys who are filing similar lawsuits across the country?
No, that's the template we're trying to create.
I see.
And we have had a handful, maybe a little more than that, reach out to us.
We need a lot, lot more.
And I would just encourage them, you know, Michael and I are both in this fight because we feel like God has kind of It's important to help people be aware,
help them fight back.
And it's not just, I would say to our audience here, it's not just fighting for those who have already died from this, but the medical system needs to be put on pause here, and there need to be repercussions for this kind of behavior, or they will repeat it time and time again, damaging or killing who knows how many future people in future emergencies, or Right.
I mean, we've got to reestablish some kind of repercussions or medical ethics responsibility for this.
I think, isn't that just as important as representing the families, the 14 families that you're representing right now?
Absolutely.
Yeah.
So I can tell you that our families, what they care about is stopping this.
And I want to emphasize to your listeners, because I know how committed they are, because I'm one of them.
But I want to emphasize to them that donating, say, through our Give, Send, Go!, You're not paying Dan and I's salaries.
That's not what that money's for.
It's to support these people.
The expenses of a lawsuit like this are quite significant.
And these people have the courage to relive their grief in public for the sake of others.
That's what they're in it for.
And so the money that donated supports them.
They don't have the resources.
Dan and I aren't in this for the money.
We We both believe strongly that God called us into this fight, and there's a great evil afoot, but our God is greater than evil, and we're going to do the fight.
But when people give, they're supporting the families.
Yes, absolutely.
I do want to encourage everybody, go to your website also, DeclareTruth.us.
And folks, if you know someone who lost a family member that you believe may have been subjected to this kind of, well, protocol that could have cost them their lives, please reach out to these attorneys and spread the word.
We need more people involved.
And here's a question for both of you, Mr. Watkins and Mr. Hamilton.
The Department of Justice recently filed charges against, I believe, 47 people, mostly in Minnesota.
It was part of a Somali community.
It was charges that they had...
Defrauded the government of $250 million in funding, largely through the USDA, for food programs that were supposed to feed the children, and that the rules for these grants had been somewhat relaxed through COVID. So through a network of friends,
these individuals were allegedly able to Fake like they were feeding children thousands of meals a day, and they were able to collect $247 million, or $250 million, and now they've been charged.
Well, why wouldn't the DOJ go to a network of doctors and say, you know, you've committed fraud, you've pretended to treat these people with medicine, you've collected how many millions of dollars through the federal government, these incentive programs, and And yet, instead of just having fake meals for children, this is real poison, you could say, that's killing people.
Where's the DOJ in the criminal investigations of this network of apparent fraud?
Great question.
I don't have an answer for it, but I am asking the same question.
I'm saying, where are they?
You know, what's happening here is, in our lawsuit, it's clearly battery, which is criminal.
Right.
You know, a number of things that we've alleged are criminal in nature.
And, of course, to...
Yeah, so, I mean...
I'm beside myself over this question because it needs to be asked and it's the one we should all have at the front of our minds.
Well, let me ask you this question.
If I'm not a doctor and I walk up to somebody and I say, hey, I'm diagnosing you with magical pineapple disease and I have this, in this needle, I have a poison.
I mean, I have, excuse me, I have treatment.
That will treat your magical pineapple disease, and I inject you with it and you die.
That's fraud.
That's medical battery.
That's chemical violence.
If I have a medical license and I do the same thing, that does not excuse me from those same actions, does it?
Well, that's exactly what we're arguing in the lawsuit.
I mean, a little different scenario than what you described there, but the idea is it's not the practice of medicine.
It's not treatment with a lack of informed consent.
It is the concealment of information.
It's the intentionally fraudulent concealment of information.
It is the intentional administration of remdesivir in many of these cases over the objections of the patients.
It's that intentional conduct that we're really trying to target.
And I'm not sure why there isn't a bigger effort afoot in the federal government to go after these facilities and take a look at it, but I will tell you that because it's so widespread across the United States, It suggests to me that there's something behind it that's much bigger than an individual hospital making a decision here or there.
There is something else going on.
It is across the whole country, at least from what we've seen.
And it's just too similar to the exclusion of other really efficacious medications.
It makes no sense at all.
And...
I think that's a large part about what the families are trying to accomplish with this lawsuit and what Michael and I are trying to accomplish, and you're letting us do that by being on your great show, is to bring awareness to this so we can push back.
It sounds almost impossible to make any real impact against that large effort, that nationwide effort that's so dark and evil.
But what we are seeing too is that when people step forward, if enough people do, and we're united in it all, and then we bring God in as...
You know, the commander in chief of this fight for us, that we can win.
We can stop the use of remdesivir.
We can, and with that, stop the use of the next big effort to control us in another way.
Can I ask you this question?
Because I think this is really relevant to your case, but...
In America, we've been told, in fact, we've been ordered by Fauci and others that you cannot argue with, quote, the science.
You cannot question a doctor, which is the worst medical advice ever, by the way.
If you don't question your doctor, you're probably going to be killed by your doctor.
That's my experience in dealing with family members in hospitals.
You better question your doctor.
That makes you a better patient.
But...
Isn't part of this stemming from the demanded obedience where when people lose family members, someone dies?
And too often even, they would say, well, the doctor did their best.
that's not the case?
What if the doctor actually took an action that was irresponsible and resulted in the person's death?
It seems like in our culture, people are very reluctant to blame members of the medical profession, even if they've engaged in wrongdoing or fraud or misrepresentation.
Would you say that's true?
I would say it's true.
I mean, there's no question about it.
We as a people have been conditioned to accept authority.
I mean, if you look at what's happening in the public schools and has been for decades, children are being conditioned to be obedient.
And when you go into the doctor, you take off your clothes, you put on the gown.
Everything is designed to make you understand that you're in We're good to go.
But none of that was true.
We knew that it had a high mortality rate.
It hadn't even been studied at that time.
I don't believe the study from the WHO had even come out.
But when that study did come out, don't give it to anybody, regardless of severity of symptoms.
Now, they've moderated that.
Since then, but during the time that every one of our decedents died, the recommendations across the board were, don't use it.
But hospitals are still saying, well, this is the protocol and we're going to do it.
And people, that's the reason we have to raise the awareness because people are going into the hospital assuming they're going to be helped, trusting the doctors to have their best interest in mind.
And that's not what's happening.
It's not happening anywhere.
Right.
Here's a fascinating question to interject here.
What about, have any doctors contacted you or other medical professionals, perhaps nurses or physicians assistants?
Have they contacted you, perhaps not even in a legal way, but just in terms of a conversation, and said, yes, we were forced to do this protocol against our maybe vocalizing skepticism about it.
Have you heard from anybody like that?
Absolutely.
One of the most well-known objectors to this protocol, Dr.
Merrick.
We spoke with him just last week, and he's testified to these facts.
He was against it.
He was told this is all you're going to be able to do, and he was run out because he refused to follow that directive.
And there are many others that have come forward, not necessarily to get involved in the litigation, but just to tell us about what has happened and what's going on in these facilities across the country.
Yes, because I know that, see, especially younger doctors, at least this is my opinion, they come out of medical school with a tremendous amount of debt, obviously.
And the only way to pay their student loans is to continue to get paychecks from the hospital.
They would be bankrupt if they put that in jeopardy.
And so they're more willing, perhaps, than older doctors, at least this is my experience, to go along with the program, even if they object to it.
Would you agree with that kind of overall characterization, or have you seen that to be true as well?
Well, I'll answer it this way.
way, the people that have come forward, the physicians that we've talked to are older.
They've been practicing in excess of 15, 20 plus years by my memory.
And again, it hasn't been a lot of people, but those that have come forward are older and they look back and reflect on what happened in medical school.
They saw how they were conditioned to operate a certain way.
And as they have a more broad view of things with the experiences that are behind them, they can see it more clearly now.
And that's why they're willing to step up against it, I think.
Can I ask you to stay a few more minutes with me?
Would that be okay?
Absolutely.
You're doing okay.
Okay.
I know it's getting late and I apologize, but I've got so many questions and people need to hear this.
People need to know how important this critical issue is.
Let me ask you in terms of your lawsuit.
One of the things mentioned in your press release is that there was allegedly constructive fraud carried out misrepresentation by the these hospitals of what they were actually doing or what what drugs they were administering or not getting the required consent from patients and so on.
In a legal sense, I'm not an attorney, but I have general knowledge that, in a legal sense, if you can establish this fraud, Then doesn't that mean it doesn't matter who told these hospitals to administer this protocol?
Well, if they committed fraud, then doesn't it mean that it doesn't matter who told them to carry out these protocols, that the fraud alone is a violation of the patient's rights and the that the fraud alone is a violation of the patient's rights and Absolutely.
That's part of what we're alleging.
And that's how I think we get around some of the immunities that I think they're going to argue they're entitled to.
But it's intentional conduct.
And when the doctors, they may be given the directive to do that, but when the doctors exercise on that, they're as wrong as the ones given the directive, in my opinion.
And so you've named several doctors in your lawsuit.
Are you sharing how many doctors that is?
No, and the number will grow as we go forward.
We're still reviewing all the medical records to make sure we understand who, in fact, gave those orders.
We want to make sure the right people are listed in that respect.
Okay.
Have any of these hospitals responded publicly to your filing of the lawsuit?
No, they're staying quiet, just like most defendants would in response to a lawsuit.
Do you anticipate they're going to move to dismiss this lawsuit soon?
Almost certainly.
Okay.
Just because they have to.
They definitely have to give it a try.
I'm sure the people behind it are going to have them do that.
Do you anticipate you being able to achieve further discovery in this lawsuit to get medical records and such or internal hospital protocol records?
That is one of our very top priorities, is to use discovery to uncover what is behind this type of protocol, and more importantly, why it's the only one being offered.
Well then, let me ask you, if you were given that discovery, then probably that same court would give you the power to compel You know, interviews and recorded testimony from some of the people in the hospital as well.
Is that something that you anticipate achieving or attempting to?
Yeah, the normal course of things in the litigation process, like the one we're in, would be to request by way of effectively a subpoena all of the records that we want to see.
And then when they come in, we would go through those records and identify those individuals.
It seems to me gentlemen that If this lawsuit succeeds, it could create a template for many other similar lawsuits across the country and, frankly, bring into question the entire medical industry's response to COVID, which could have liability in the multiple trillions of dollars.
We're talking about potentially something way beyond even, let's say, the glyphosate lawsuits against Monsanto, which were in the, I think, hundreds of billions of dollars.
Couldn't this be the biggest can of worms ever for the medical industry if you succeed in your lawsuit?
That's an interesting way to look at it.
I think there's some truth to that for sure.
But honestly speaking, and I'm sure Michael is going to be right here with me on this, I've never looked at this lawsuit in that way at all.
What we want to do is first and foremost on behalf of the clients, stop the use of remdesivir.
And it would definitely require that this lawsuit be formed as a template and for others to be filed across the country.
And if other families were to be compensated for their losses as a result of that, that would be amazing.
But ultimately, what we want to establish for our clients and for the American people in general is reestablish, I guess, their right to control the decisions that are made for them about medical care and to push back.
And the more lawsuits that we can have go forward and have, if this can have success and others have success, the more likely we are to accomplish that and help us as a society going forward with other types of compelled medical treatment.
Because, you know, they're coming.
Additional vaccines are coming.
Additional care remedies for those vaccines are going to be jammed down our throats.
If we can establish right now the strength to push back and be unified.
Maybe we can do that as other attempts to control us are pushed out.
I really think that's how we view this more than the money side.
Let me ask you about, isn't one of the main difficulties of this the fact that the very people who would offer the strongest testimony to support the merits of what you're saying, that those people are dead?
They've deceased.
And isn't that to the benefit of the hospitals that you're suing, that their treatment that you say was fraudulently conducted or carried out against these people, that it also managed to silence the very witnesses who could speak up in a most qualified way?
You know, the thing that was really important for me as we looked at these cases initially was the amount of evidence that were saved by the family members in the form of videos, pictures of their loved ones strapped to the bed.
I mean, how do you deny that when you have the picture?
So the type of care that Michael described earlier, We have that in the form of video evidence, photographic evidence, and then the testimony of many of those family members as well who may have been outside the room, but of the 14 families, half a dozen or so have healthcare professionals that are in there, nurses, physicians, assistants, and the like who are in the hospital and who witnessed the hospital's resistance to them being with their loved ones, who witnessed the implementation of this protocol.
So actually, there's a lot of evidence regarding the protocol and how it was implemented.
We were just on a show the other day, and the host, he has video of the exact type of thing we're talking about.
So there's lots of evidence out there, and it's going to help.
In essence, you can go back and audit the medical records, and you can question, was this treatment justified based on the test results or patient status results that the hospital had in their position at that time, correct?
That's right.
I have a client, Mike, and this is Michael here, but I've got a client in Kentucky, just to give you an example, who went in because he was feeling a little poorly.
This was a 77-year-old gentleman who was doing more chin-ups than I can do at the age of 53 every day, very fit, healthy.
He went in, and after three days, he was breathing hospital room air.
He had no elevated white blood cells, nothing to indicate that there was anything wrong with him.
And you can just look at the medical chart and see that it's as plain as day.
But they announced that he had COVID pneumonia.
They isolated him from his family.
They strapped him down.
They did the protocol that I talked about.
They gave him 27 doses of Tylenol in 24 hours.
They put him on a steady drip of Benadryl, which further exacerbates the problems.
And they gave him no food or water.
And when his family finally said, enough is enough, we're coming to get him, they gave him a fatal dose of something that would have killed you or me or Daniel.
It would have just killed us.
And they just, in that case, they just put him to death.
But if you look at the charts, you can see he was in there for three days.
He should have been released.
Instead, they started this crazy protocol and they starved him and they And when he died, I have the pictures.
It's horrible.
His hands are not tied to the bedrails anymore.
But they're out like he was crucified.
Like he was laying on a cross.
He's down to skin, stretched thin over bones.
His mouth is open, gasping for air.
And he was choking to death on his own fluids.
And then they gave him this fatal dose of...
And I forget what it was they gave him, but we have the charts.
We have gone over it with our medical experts, and it's so clear to see.
You know, they're...
Simply put to death.
So your lawsuit, of course, is in civil courts, but in the world of criminal prosecutions, I can think of another case, the DOJ prosecuting a cancer doctor, I believe, in the Detroit area, who was falsely diagnosing people with cancer so that he could treat them with chemotherapy, which was also damaging kidneys, damaging brain and heart tissue.
And that individual...
I forgot his name at the moment.
We've written about it over the years.
But there was a whistleblower in his office who saw that happening, called the FBI. That was the only reason they caught it.
But that doctor was prosecuted and ultimately sentenced to prison because he was profiting from this.
And so there is criminal precedent for this, but in the civil courts, what is out there in terms of precedent for holding doctors responsible for their decisions based on the patient records, saying, do these records and these test results and these conditions match up with the decision that you made to intervene in these ways that resulted in the patient's death?
Do you have a court precedent on your side in the civil courts?
In that type of case, Mike, every medical malpractice litigation involves just that, looking at the records and analyzing what the provider did and measuring what the provider did against the standard of care, what a reasonably prudent physician or healthcare provider would do under similar circumstances.
And that is proven by experts.
So both sides have an expert.
They look at the records.
They say this was warranted, this wasn't warranted, and then the jury makes the decision.
So we have that in this case, and we can use the investigation process and the use of experts to establish a standard of care.
Beyond that, though, we have the intentional act of withholding information, which we know happened through the requirement of only one remedy being given to the patient, you know, one option in terms of remdesivir.
And then we have the unconsented to medical treatment.
And that's in the records to the extent that it shows remdesivir was provided.
And in some of the cases, it's actually charted that the patient objected to remdesivir.
So the chart will help us in that respect.
I see.
Where the chart says remdesivir was provided, and we have a nurse, for example, who's a family member who objected to remdesivir up front, you know, we'll have that presented to the jury, the testimony versus the chart.
And maybe in that case, actually, the chart helps us prove our point.
So we'll use the charts, the charting from the hospital to help us, and the other side will use it to help them, and the experts will go at it.
I think the thing that makes this case compelling from our client's perspective Is that we know, and the health industry knows, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are effective in treating COVID. And it's not even given to the patient as an option.
It's intentionally withheld from them as an option.
And that is wrong.
It's not even really within the standard of care.
It's fraud.
And so we're going to attack it from that angle.
All right, we're getting close to wrapping this up, and I've got one more question for you, perhaps a tough question, but let me give out your website first.
Folks, go to DeclareTruth.us.
Just type that into your browser, DeclareTruth.us.
You'll find links and information, including a donation link, if you want to help fund this effort.
But my question to you both, gentlemen, is sort of about that funding.
You've already said that the families want to see this practice, which they consider to be an abusive, fraudulent practice.
They want to see it stopped.
I would imagine that if you have enough compelling evidence, then at some point...
These hospitals that you've sued are going to come to you and they're going to offer some kind of settlement and it's going to involve a non-disclosure agreement.
And there's going to be a lot of pressure, perhaps, on you and the families to take a couple million dollars so the hospitals can make this go away.
But then that doesn't solve the big problem of stopping this practice, necessarily.
What...
Can you talk publicly about, do your clients intend to take this all the way, or would they consider a settlement, or is it too early to even talk about that?
I think it would be premature to talk about settlement at this point.
We haven't even heard from the hospitals and their defense team yet.
But again, if that were to happen and there were compensation to the families between now and that time, we're doing everything we can to make the public aware of this situation.
And if we can use this as a template and we can get attorneys to respond to the call to action that Michael and I are putting out Oh, good point.
Right.
So it'll have a multiplication effect if we can get it out and get people interested in filing these suits.
And, you know, as we get ready to close, this is not an easy case.
It's not a slam dunk case.
A lot of people don't think that we have really much of a claim to be made.
I disagree.
I think we do.
And good faith have a very solid case.
But it's got to be fought.
The fight's got to be fought.
If we just lay down and let the medical industry do what they're doing and wipe out good people, good people are dying.
You know, then that's wrong, too.
And so that's why Michael and I are in this fight, because someone's got to step in the breach and make it happen.
And hopefully we can learn from other attorneys.
We can get other attorneys involved and multiply this effect so that it has a much broader reach than Fresno, California.
Yeah, absolutely.
And also for the attorneys of these hospitals that may review this recording, let me state, I invite you.
I would be happy to invite you to an interview.
I'd love to ask you questions.
Some of them might be tough questions as well, but to give you a chance to publicly respond to this lawsuit if you choose to do that.
So that's an open invitation right there.
And to some of the families as well, if you If you feel it is appropriate and they wish to speak out, or perhaps families that you're not representing who don't want to be part of a lawsuit but do want to go public with their story, that door is open as well.
Mike, let me just say, in addition to what Dan said, yeah, I'm not going to talk about our clients and what they may or may not do, but I can tell you that I have talked to so many people around the country who would never consider being bribed I'm
hearing that story over and over and over.
Absolutely.
What is the value of the life that was taken?
You can't put a number on it, especially if there's suffering involved or torture or medical abuse or battery.
How do you even begin to put a number on that?
But these are very complex issues.
years, I'm so glad that you're out there arguing this case and representing these families, because this is exactly the kind of discussion that we need to have in modern medicine, or it becomes ever more abusive against innocent people.
At least that's what I'm observing.
So any final thoughts, gentlemen, before we wrap this up?
Thank you.
I just want to thank you for giving the voice of not just our clients, but everyone in the country who's experiencing this for allowing it to be amplified through your platform.
I want to ask your listeners to pray for us.
That's the first thing.
We need prayer.
We're standing in the face of a great evil.
Our God is greater than evil, but pray for us and pray for our clients and pray that this is stopped through these efforts.
And then if your listeners feel led, then support the families financially.
But first and foremost, prayer and our thanks to you, Mike, for amplifying this voice.
Michael, thanks for having us.
One thing I would just encourage people to do is to listen to the leanings of the Lord and if He's pushing them or giving them some direction and guidance and to step in and get involved in whatever way, my recommendation and request would be to say yes and give it a try.
I started This movement in my life about a year ago.
I've been in practice 30 years, and this year has been more gratifying than the 29 years preceding combined.
Yes.
And, you know, this is the time to fight.
We're representing just a little bit beyond the remdesivir cases.
We've got thousands of people in California that have been fired because they stood up for their religious values and said no to the vaccine.
And...
They're fighting back.
So this isn't just about taking away your medical decision to make, or excuse me, the autonomy to make your own medical decisions.
It's about something so much more.
There's the taking away of your religious liberties, and we're seeing the stripping away of our rights and our privileges across the country.
So the time is now to step in, and whatever way the Lord's leaning and pushing you to go, think long and hard and pray about saying yes.
You know, from what I've seen, he'll use you and he'll use you in great ways.
And that's how we can reclaim what's been lost over the last, you know, decades here.
Well said.
Well said.
And God bless both of you for standing up for humanity and for medical ethics, if we have any remaining in this country.
Maybe that's not fair.
I should say there are good doctors out there.
There are many who do care.
They're doing the best they can.
But there's also a very, obviously, dangerous, fraudulent system at work as well.
So we've got to shut that down and return medicine into the hands of more honest operators.
Because there are good people out there.
So thank you both for joining me.
Thank you for all your patience and spending the time, especially late in the evening here.
And folks, if you want to support this effort, go to DeclareTruth.us and consider a financial donation to the families here as well who are putting everything on the line to try to make this effort count.
So thank you both for joining me and thank you all for listening today.
I'm Mike Adams here, Brighteon.com.
Take care.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection