All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 16, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:23:21
Situation Update, Aug 16, 2022 - Crop failures now at CRISIS LEVELS worldwide
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, welcome to the situation update for Tuesday, August 16th, 2020.
I almost can't stop laughing already because the first headline to share with you today is just too funny.
This is from phys.org, as in physics, P-H-Y-S, phys.org.
Check this out.
All systems go in Houston as NASA prepares return to the moon.
But if you read this story, you find out that NASA is sending...
An unmanned, quote, crew-capable craft to the moon, but with nobody in it.
Like, wait a second.
Wait a second.
We're told that NASA went to the moon all these times back in the 1960s and 70s.
And by the way, if you watch my interview with Bart Sabrell, On that, you'll find a lot of interesting questions about NASA fakery over the years.
But supposedly NASA is going to go back to the moon, but now they're doing it by sending a crew-capable spacecraft with no crew.
Is that the craziest thing you've ever seen?
So they're literally going to send an empty capsule to the moon.
And here's how the media reports it.
Here it is.
They're quoting Labrodi, who's, I guess, a NASA scientist.
Labrodi is the lead flight director for Artemis I, set to take off later this month.
And get this.
This is an exact quote.
The first time a capsule that can carry humans will be sent to the moon since the last Apollo mission in 1972.
You catch that subtlety?
The first time a capsule that can carry humans will be sent to the moon.
But there's no humans in it!
And they continue.
It will propel the Orion crew capsule into orbit around the moon.
The spacecraft will remain in space for 42 days before returning to Earth.
And they should add, with no astronauts in it!
Now, what's hilarious about this is, yeah, I absolutely believe they can send unmanned capsules to the moon or to Mars or wherever.
Why aren't there people in it?
Maybe because of the radiation zone?
That would fry the astronauts.
Oh, man.
But the best part is that at the NASA facility, they have a moon pool.
This is the largest indoor pool.
It's 200 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 40 feet deep.
And in the moon pool, they're practicing for the mission, the mission that will have no astronauts.
What are they practicing for?
So here it is.
In the pool, quote, the lunar environment is gradually being recreated at the bottom of the pool with giant model rocks made by a company specializing in aquarium decorations.
People, I can't make this stuff up.
I can't make it up.
They are decorating a pool to look like the surface of the moon.
The astronauts are not going to the moon.
They're in the pool.
The article says they're eventually going to the moon, which is why they need to train in the water, we're told.
In the water, quote, astronauts can experience a sensation that approaches weightlessness.
To train for eventual voyages to the moon, simulations must replicate the moon's one-sixth gravity.
Except, of course, it makes no sense because the moon supposedly has no atmosphere, so there's no atmospheric density.
But in the bottom of a pool, in the water, you have all this fluid around you, which is very difficult to move through.
Whereas on the moon, you're not moving through anything because, as they tell us, there's no atmosphere whatsoever.
So the training is all jacked up.
They're simulating the gravity, but not the vacuum of space.
Aren't these astronauts getting all the wrong training?
But who cares?
It's decorated to look like the moon.
How much do you want to bet we're going to be given pictures of astronauts in the pool and it's going to be implied that they're on the moon or something?
You know, they'll be releasing all these photos in the year 2025 or something, and then somebody online will point out, hey, there's bubbles!
There's bubbles in the photo!
Why are there bubbles on the moon, you know?
And then there'll be fact-checkers, those aren't bubbles, those are artifacts of the sunlight bouncing off the camera lens or whatever.
This is going to be a real fun one to watch, folks.
This is going to be a fun one.
At least right now, they're admitting that the crew-capable capsule they're sending to the moon has no crew.
Which, of course, begs the question, why?
Why are you sending an unmanned, can I use the word man, or an unwomanned mission to the moon?
And if you can do that, this is the bigger question, if you can do that, why send people later?
Are they just along for the ride?
I mean, if you can send a spacecraft to the moon and you've got robots and stuff that can land and walk around and take samples, according to NASA, they say they've got helicopters on Mars, a planet with virtually no atmosphere, by the way.
They've got rovers and robots and helicopters on Mars.
They're sending more helicopters, they said recently, that are going to carry rocks around Mars in the air that has no density to it.
Virtually none.
0.6% of Earth's atmosphere at sea level.
But they're going to heavy lift rocks all over Mars.
We're told.
That's what we're told.
And then we're going to have an unmanned mission to the moon in a crew-capable capsule with no crew.
I can't make this up.
I mean, even somebody who believes everything that NASA says must at this point be asking the question, why are there no people in that capsule?
What are you doing?
All right, but folks, the comedy never ends.
From thesmokinggun.com, here's the headline.
Police boyfriend jailed after a felonious cheeseburger battery at Burger King.
This man, 41 years old, he assaulted somebody with a Burger King cheeseburger.
During an argument at Burger King, quote, a Florida man...
Oh, there's your first warning sign.
A Florida man.
What's wrong with these Florida men?
They're always doing the craziest things.
Quote, threw a cheeseburger at his girlfriend with such force that when the sandwich struck the back of her head, the woman fell over a curb onto the ground, police said.
I think this has more to do with...
What's in the whopper than this particular man?
man, a felonious cheeseburger assault of his girlfriend.
The dispute turned violent, cops say, when the 53-year-old woman began to leave the restaurant.
And that's when Hunt allegedly threw a cheeseburger at the victim, striking her in the back of the head.
And what's the real evidence in this case here?
Here it is.
and shorts and cheese on her shirt and in her hair.
So there you go.
Um, I'm just wondering why they didn't bring in the FBI on this one.
This is obviously a very serious incident.
Shouldn't the FBI be involved?
Shouldn't they have a warrant, kind of like the Mar-a-Lago raid, but the felonious cheeseburger assault bust?
Shouldn't they swat the Burger King?
There might be more felonious cheeseburgers in the back.
Aren't they hoarding weapons?
I don't know about you, but Burger King just serving one of their burgers is kind of like a felonious assault of the customer, given how gross their burgers are.
But that's just my opinion.
Moving on.
Remember how I said the other day that all the food recalls, or at least many of them, are actually the federal government hoarding all this food, putting it in their bunkers?
Remember that?
They just issue a recall.
And then it's like, here, give us all the peanut butter and jelly and everything.
And I said, watch, just watch.
They're going to have frozen pizza recalls because the government needs more frozen pizza.
Here it is.
Here's the headline from Food Safety News, August 14th.
Quote, frozen pizza recalled over metal pieces.
I told you.
I told you this was coming.
Home Run in Frozen Foods is recalling 13,099 pounds of frozen meat pizza.
I don't know where they came up with that number, but they say it, quote, may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically metal.
It's like, what are your extraneous materials?
Um...
Metal shavings?
They could be frozen in there.
So, apparently, if you purchase 33.5-ounce cartons containing, quote, get this, this is the name of the pizza.
Check this out.
Quote, home run in Chicago's Premium Pizzeria Deluxe Sausage Classic Pizza.
You may be eating metal shards, they've said.
And this all has to be recalled, which means it's going into a government bunker because they needed frozen pizza.
And get this, I love this, they say, quote, there have been no confirmed reports of injuries or adverse reactions due to the consumption of these products.
In other words, no one's been harmed.
No one has apparently eaten metal shards.
Raises some questions, doesn't it?
By the way, this pizza, despite the funny name, I checked out the ingredients label.
And again, the company's called Home Run Inn.
That's I-N-N. You know, like a hotel or something.
Home Run Inn Frozen Foods.
They're in Woodridge, Illinois.
Their pizza actually is way better than almost everything out there that's frozen because, check this out, they don't use sodium nitrite or nitrates.
So they have, one of their ingredients is all-natural, uncured pepperoni.
No nitrites or nitrates added except for naturally occurring.
And then they have celery juice and cherry powder.
And then they give the ingredients for their pork, the pork sausage.
It's got celery juice and it's got cherry powder.
It's got lactic acid and so on.
Lime juice concentrate, paprika, minimally processed, no artificial ingredients.
That's highly unusual, actually.
I mean, that's actually pretty impressive.
I guess that the government wants kind of more natural pizza for their bunkers.
You know, they're shopping for the better stuff.
Now, it's not all organic, but it's way better than most of the frozen pizzas out there that have sodium nitride and all kinds of toxic ingredients and so on.
So there you go.
They're recalling pizza for metal shavings when probably in the same freezer at the grocery store, there's some other pizza that doesn't have metal shavings.
But does have a cancer-causing chemical in it because that's what's in most of the processed meat that's in most of the frozen pizzas.
Notice that the cancer-causing chemical pizzas do not get recalled.
It's like, no, that's perfectly safe.
Go ahead and eat that.
But watch out for those metal shavings or whatever it is in there, whatever they claim.
Folks, you know that prescription drugs are filled with metal shavings too, right?
You know that because it's found in pharmaceuticals all the time because it's from the machines.
Usually the augers and such that do the filling of the powder.
It's all full of metal shavings.
I mean, really, if you don't believe it, just go to, like, the Brave search engine and search for metal shavings, prescription medications, or pharmaceuticals.
A lot of the factories are in Puerto Rico.
And, yeah, there's some quality control problems in these Puerto Rican factories, it turns out.
Hmm.
Okay, for our first video today, I want to show you this creepy robot dog carrying an RPG, rocket-propelled grenade.
Yes, we've arrived at that point now where creepy little dog robots are carrying RPGs that can take out vehicles.
And they're just showing this like it's a great thing.
Like, here, don't you want to buy a bunch of these?
Yeah.
Check this out.
As you can see from this little creepy robot, by the way, this is a Russian dog robot, and it's acting like it's tame right now, but you're going to see it.
It's going to pounce on the enemy.
And look at that RPG, ready to go.
So obviously these are going to be introduced onto the battlefield.
To replace human beings.
So we're going to have these armed Terminator doggy robots with all kinds of weapon systems.
What could possibly go wrong?
But this is the future now, apparently, of the military.
Russia's got also robot-controlled tanks and armored vehicles and things like that.
And the future battlefield is going to be full of armed Terminator robots.
Not a good sign of where things are going.
Already have the Terminator kamikaze drones that are killing people right now in Ukraine and probably other places around the world.
So remember when I said you're going to have to learn how to kill robots in order to defend humanity.
And now, well, here we go.
Every week there's some other creepy robot video.
Now, remember yesterday when I was talking about the false flag dirty bomb scenario?
Where that was the most likely kind of false flag attack that was going to be alleged by the deep state, or maybe they would do it to themselves.
And, you know, I gave the whole scenario yesterday where they want to have UN troops come into the United States because they want to say that Trump supporters are dangerous extremists who are setting off bombs or what have you.
Well, sure enough, sure enough, CBS News, The FBI and DHS have observed an increase in threats to federal law enforcement and, to a lesser extent, other law enforcement and government officials following the FBI's recent execution of a search warrant, i.e.
the raid, the armed raid of Mar-a-Lago.
You know, the mainstream media just calls it the execution of a search warrant.
No, it wasn't.
It was an armed raid.
The story goes on.
These threats are occurring primarily online and across platforms, social media sites, web forums, video sharing platforms, image boards, etc.
But here's the part to pay attention to.
Quote, the FBI and DHS have observed an increase in violent threats posted on social media against federal officials and facilities, comma, including a threat to place a so-called dirty bomb in front of FBI headquarters and issuing general calls for, quote, civil war and, quote, armed rebellion. including a threat to place a so-called dirty bomb in Now, folks, folks, how much you want to bet that that threat came from the FBI itself?
Just right on cue.
You know they're going to pull a dirty bomb on this.
They're setting up the narrative in advance.
And again, the government's going to play the victim.
They're going to set off something targeting themselves, just like Oklahoma City.
They targeted themselves.
They blew up the building, the Murrah building, with an FBI office in it.
They're going to do it again to themselves and then blame extremists, right?
So as part of this, check out this narrative.
There was a story from not long ago, August 10th.
Here it is.
DefenseNews.com.
Here's the headline.
Shell companies purchase radioactive materials, prompting push for nuclear licensing reform.
So this story is about the GAO. Government Accountability Office.
And I don't know if you know this about the GAO, but every once in a while they do things like they try to smuggle weapons through the TSA onto airplanes.
I don't know why the GAO is involved in this kind of activity, but they do.
You've probably seen these reports over the years.
They always have a very high success rate.
It's like, we're the GAO and we just smuggled a 90% success rate of handguns onto commercial flights or, you know, civilian flights.
And they put out the report and it shows that the TSA, frankly, is only involved in security theater.
It's just the illusion of security.
There's no actual security by the TSA. It's all a joke so they can, you know, feel your crotch and put their hands down your pants and everything that they do.
That's the whole point.
But anyway, the GAO recently, apparently they fabricated a bunch of documents claiming that they were some kind of buyer of radioactive material.
And then they sent these documents to suppliers of some kind of radioactive material.
It's not clear exactly what kind of material or what elements.
I doubt it was cesium or anything like that.
But they were able to purchase some amount of radioactive material.
So someone here named Torres.
Let's see.
This is Representative Torres, a Democrat in New York.
Anyone could open a shell company with a fraudulent license to obtain dangerous amounts of radioactive material that could be weaponized into a dirty bomb.
Torres told Defense News in an interview on Wednesday.
And then Torres continues, quote, Disperse radioactive material in a city as densely populated as New York and it could cause catastrophic damage.
Folks, they're setting up the narrative.
I mean, this is right on cue.
The GAO is saying, well, all we had to do was forge a license and we could buy radioactive material.
It's kind of like they're almost distributing a how-to manual on this.
The opening paragraph, check this out.
Government employees forged a copy of a license to buy hazardous radioactive material.
They created shell companies, then placed orders, generated invoices, and paid two U.S. vendors.
The scheme worked.
The employees successfully had the materials shipped, complete with radioactive stickers on the side.
Then they confirmed delivery.
It's like they're telling you how to do it.
And then they say, they give you even more information.
I didn't even know this.
They say that radioactive material is divided into five categories of risk.
And then categories 1 and 2, which are apparently the most severe categories, are subject to, quote, independent license verification systems.
But category 3 materials, whatever those are, can be purchased without the independent verification.
As the story is saying, you just have to forge documents, I guess, and then send those in, and they just ship it to you.
So, as the story says...
This loophole that Torres warns about in the GAO, fear that an individual or group could exploit to wreak havoc by building a dirty bomb that combines Conventional explosives with Category 3 radioactive materials.
So, again, I don't know what Category 3 radioactive materials are, but they're talking about this as if it's something like people could use it to build a dirty bomb.
And they're trying to lock that process down.
But then there's something else in the story that says...
There won't be any changes for years.
No, here it is.
The NRC is taking some steps, but it's going to be unaddressed until at least the end of 2023.
It's like they're telling you.
They're telling the audience, hey, you could do this for the next year plus.
I don't know.
I mean...
Is this story from Defense News, is it kind of irresponsible?
Is it kind of like an instruction manual for how to acquire materials for a dirty bomb?
Are they kind of hoping?
I don't know.
I'm not accusing them of doing that.
Maybe they're just...
Not aware that they're giving people the step-by-step recipe book for how to do this.
But I guess people would have to figure out where to buy this stuff from.
I don't know.
There is some technical knowledge required, obviously, to build dirty bombs.
And I suppose if you go online and start searching for Class 3 radioactive materials, where can I buy it?
You might raise some red flags, so probably don't do that.
Unless you just love to be visited by the FBI. It's like, honey, the FBI's at the door.
Oh, yeah, it must have been those searches for where do I buy bulk Class 3 radioactive materials?
Because we're going to pretend to be the GAO and see if it worked.
Yeah, right.
But do you realize, folks, you know, people are so ignorant of radiation and how it works and the different threats from radiation.
People are so freaked out about radiation that the public can be just terrorized by the media with even a very, very tiny radiation release.
For example, just go back to the, what was it, the Three Mile Island leak from, was it 1979, I believe?
A tiny, tiny, tiny amount of radiation came out of Three Mile Island, and the anti-nuclear movement went insane.
Like, we're all going to die!
No, nothing like that.
Wasn't even close to that, but that was the thing that attacked the nuclear industry in America.
And then, you know, fast forward to, what, was it 2011?
When Fukushima had the meltdown, Fukushima, that thing was built by General Electric.
So that was a GE American company built that.
And when that went into a meltdown, which was probably millions of times worse than Three Mile Island, you had the press saying, oh, everything's fine.
There's no meltdown.
There's no super criticality.
Nothing happened.
It's all good.
Whereas in 79, it was like, the world's going to end!
The media will always lie to you, but especially about things that you can't see yourself, like viruses and radiation.
So the dirty bomb scenario is actually the perfect scenario because people can be totally freaked out and horrified by something they can't see.
The media will just go out and report, oh my gosh, there's been a dirty bomb, and there's radiation, and there's how many millirems or bequerels, units that nobody understands, like how many microsiemens of radiation, and I don't know if you've ever messed with those units, but they are confusing.
So the media will just report numbers.
It's high.
It's high.
And people will freak out.
There'll be mass evacuations.
And then they'll have a scapegoat handy.
Like, look, it was a Trump supporter.
They're readying that narrative.
It's so obvious that they're readying that narrative.
They're going to probably trace somebody's search history who was searching for, you know, where do I buy Class III radioactive materials and how do I, quote, forge documents like the GAO did today?
They're going to have all that ready.
They're going to scapegoat somebody.
And then people will freak out because they don't realize, like, what's the threshold between dangerous and non-dangerous radiation and different types of radiation, by the way, ionizing versus non-ionizing and also the density of exposure.
So, you know, radiation can kill you in different ways.
If you're chronically exposed to low levels of radiation, even non-ionizing radiations such as from 5G towers, the chronic exposure can be very dangerous because it's just constant.
It never ends.
And remember that 5G exposure, which is not considered ionizing radiation, but it does generate what are called peroxynitrites in your blood, which are radicals, free radicals that just destroy the cells of your nervous system and blood vessels and other free radicals that just destroy the cells of your nervous system and blood vessels and They're really bad for your health.
But another way to die from radiation is to have a very short duration acute exposure where you're getting a whole bunch of radiation all at once that is ionizing, such as Chernobyl or Fukushima or something like that.
That could be deadly.
But if you take that ionizing radiation and you spread it out over time, then the same total dose becomes a lot less dangerous because you spread it out over time.
And this is why people who fly a lot, such as airline pilots, they're exposed to ionizing radiation every time they fly because you get more radiation at altitude, right?
But They're mostly okay, that is, unless they've been vaccinated, they're dying from the vaccines, but not the radiation, even though they're getting a ton of radiation, but it's spread out.
And then they have rest on the ground between the flights, you know?
So the public, they don't understand really how radiation works.
It's going to be very easy for the media to scare everybody.
It's like, there's been a dirty bomb!
You're like, how dirty was it?
It was as dirty as a monkeypox orgy.
That's how dirty that bomb was.
Speaking of that, here's a freaky headline.
All right, from Revolver.News, get this.
Quote, a gay couple's dog contracted monkeypox, and it's the sickest thing you could ever imagine.
Like, that's their headline.
Just letting you know.
That's their headline.
And then Andy Ngo, who's quite well known as a commentator on Twitter.
Andy Ngo tweets out the following.
The first known case of human-to-dog monkeypox transmission has been documented in medical journal The Lancet.
The dog caught it from its owners, a gay couple in Paris, and The Greyhound developed an anal ulceration and mucocutaneous lesions.
Ah, okay, that's all I'm going to say about that, because we don't want to go there.
Let's move on to the dumbest financial news of the day.
This is from CNBC. Not surprising.
Here it is.
The headline, quote, the other reason why food prices are rising.
Check out the opening line of this story.
Here it is.
The United Nations worst case scenario calculation is that global food prices will rise by an additional 8.5% by the year 2027.
You got it?
You got it?
Oh, that's the worst case!
Prices are going to go up 8.5% by the year 2027, according to the UN. Hey, UN morons, food prices are going to go up by 8.5% on Tuesday.
I mean, have you been shopping recently?
Have you seen food prices?
Have you seen restaurant prices?
Have you been to the grocery store ever?
8.5% There are some months that we're experiencing right now that are up like 11%, 12% month over month.
How do they get 8.5% between now?
What year is it?
2022, right?
So they're saying in five years that food prices are going to go up only 8.5%.
What are these morons smoking?
You know, I ask restaurant owners these questions from time to time.
I'm like, hey, how's your food supply chain?
What are the ingredients costing?
You know, this or that.
Do you have scarcity?
And they tell me all kinds of crazy things.
They're like, yeah, used to be able to get the chicken.
Now it's doubled.
We used to be able to get crab meat.
That's up 250%.
The buckets of cream, you know, to make soup-based, I guess.
The cream buckets, they're hard to get.
They've gone up more than double.
It's just on and on and on.
If you know anybody who owns a restaurant, by the way, ask them this question.
Seriously.
Ask them, number one, what are the prices actually doing compared to, let's say, I don't know, a year ago.
And then secondly, are you getting everything that you order from your food distributor?
And they'll tell you, oh no, we're not getting everything that we order.
Not at all.
We're getting like partial orders.
That's it.
And the prices are through the roof.
So, continuing with the CNBC story, this is funny.
Quote, more expensive fertilizers are contributing to those higher costs, with some fertilizers spiking 300%.
Since September of 2020, according to the American Farm Bureau, quote, last year, fertilizer was $270 per ton, and now it's over $1,400 per ton.
Says Megan Kaiser of the Kaiser Family Farms and Farmer Director of the United Soybean Board.
I didn't even know there was a United Soybean Board.
She said this on NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt.
So wait a second.
Wait a second.
So according to this Megan Kaiser, fertilizer is up, what, 500%.
But the United Nations says that food's only going to go up 8.5% in five years?
In five years?
This is almost as dumb as Joe Biden and Kamala Harris telling us that overall inflation was 0% in July.
Remember that?
It's like, it's zero!
And everybody's paying double or triple for certain things like food and gasoline, many other things as well.
Supply chain parts, you know, spare parts, whatever.
But I'll tell you, it's not just the food prices that are getting crazy.
It's also, well, how to explain this?
Let me just give you the actual story.
We sell freeze-dried broccoli.
It's just one of the freeze-dried foods that we sell at the Health Ranger store.
So we have these number 10 cans and we pack them with freeze-dried fruits or freeze-dried vegetables and so on.
And people love that because freeze-drying is the best preservation method.
And people want to augment their other stored things like grains or wheat berries or rice or what have you with fruits and vegetables.
You know, you got to have nutrients from fruits and vegetables.
So we've had freeze-dried broccoli.
It's all gone.
And then we tried to get this batch of freeze-dried broccoli.
We got a sample from this particular supplier and took a look at it.
It's like, dude, it's all stems.
There's no florets in this.
It's like freeze-dried broccoli stems.
You know what I'm talking about?
The trunks.
If the broccoli is a tree, these are the tree trunks.
There's no florets!
The good stuff is in the florets.
You're supposed to have the broccoli florets.
So we asked the supplier, like, hey, where's the flowers in there?
What happened?
This is like stumps and chunks and stuff.
And they said, well, that's all that is available in the supply chain right now.
Do you want it or not?
And we told them no.
We did.
Sorry, I don't think that our audience is going to be all thrilled about buying freeze-dried, quote, broccoli, and then they open it up and it's like, what is this?
Looks like the wood chipper went bad here.
Somebody just filled this with stumps and trunks.
There's no florets.
But see, that's what's happening in the food supply.
It's like they must have sold the florets to somebody else and they're like, hmm, what can we do with all these stumps?
Broccoli stumps.
I know.
We'll just call it broccoli.
Technically, it's still broccoli.
See if anybody will buy that stuff.
But in my mind, it's almost like if you bought freeze-dried apples and then you got a can full of shredded apple tree trunks.
These are not the apples we ordered.
This is something entirely different.
Now, speaking of food, by the way, this is crazy.
Crazy story by Adan Salazar at Infowars.com.
Here it is.
Quote, you will eat the bugs.
Major brands quietly slipping insects into your food.
Cricket-containing snacks are just some of a slew of new products showcasing insects.
As their protein source.
So they show photos in this story of this cheddar cheese puffs food product.
What is this?
This is from a brand called Actually Foods.
It says the puffs are, quote, powered by crickets to the tune of 10 grams of protein per serving.
In fact, I want to show you this here in the video.
So this bag on the front, it says that it's nutritious, sustainable, delicious cheddar cheese puffs.
And then if you read the ingredients label, it's puffs, which are organic cornmeal flour, lentil flour, fava bean flour, rice flour, organic cricket flour.
Like, what?
Oh, and by the way, this has yeast extract in it, which is a hidden form of MSG also.
So here's your future.
Is you're going to have a monosodium glutamate flavored cricket powder all over everything.
It even says on the label, it says contains colon milk comma crickets.
And it says literally the following.
People who are allergic to shellfish may also be allergic to crickets.
Just in case you were wondering, are there really crickets in this food?
Yes.
Yes.
And you might be allergic to them, by the way.
It's unbelievable.
So their parent company is called Intomo Farms, and then its mission statement says they're here to, quote, make cricket-based foods the first choice for individuals interested in high-quality, sustainable protein.
And then they have cricket protein powder.
They have roasted crickets.
Remember I was joking a couple weeks ago about cricket McNuggets?
Well, it's practically here.
There are now cricket protein bars.
One of them is called Exo Protein.
Exo?
Like otherworldly?
Yeah.
Or outside of protein?
I guess that's what that means.
Exo protein.
There's a barbecue flavor.
Because I guess you can really mask the cricket leg aftertaste with a lot of barbecue spices.
There's a Snowpiercer Cricket Protein Bars.
There's some kind of other weird cricket bar.
And then there's something called HI, HI, which they say stands for Human Improvement.
It's the No Bloat Protein Powder brand.
It's made with pumpkin, brown rice, pea protein, and crickets.
Because, obviously, why wouldn't you want those things to go together?
Yeah, I want to eat pumpkin and pea protein and crickets.
I got a question.
Are the vegans going to eat this stuff?
Because, you know, pumpkin protein is very popular with vegans.
So is pea protein.
Personally, I like whey protein a lot better.
I mean, the taste is just so much better, but now they're blending crickets with pumpkin protein.
Are the vegans going to eat the crickets?
What about the lives of the crickets then, huh?
Huh?
Okay, also featured, as promised, chocolate chirp cookies.
These are not chocolate chip cookies because they contain crickets that chirp.
So they're chocolate chirp cookies.
Yes, yes, bad puns are now part of the food supply.
I'm not making this up.
Chocolate chirp cookies, soft-baked, they say, with 30% fewer carbs, because crickets are not filled with carbs, and three times the protein.
And then finally, there is cricket bread, which contains, quote, C336 crickets, whatever that is.
Is that some genetically modified cricket strain or something?
Which are dried, ground, mixed with wheat flour and grains and then baked to become a lovely tasty loaf with a crunchy finish.
I'll bet.
Just be sure to pick out the extra legs and wings.
More about how we helped our client tell the innovative story.
This is from some PR company.
It's talking about crunchy cricket loaf bread.
Oh yeah, it's all here, folks.
It's going to be in the grocery store any day now as they shut down the meat supply and they force farmers all over Europe to cull their cattle and shut down the herds because, you know, they're urinating.
And we're told urine is bad now because of nitrogen.
Oh, nitrogen's bad and so is carbon.
So everybody's going to have to eat crickets.
So they're putting it into everything.
Cricket bread, cricket bars, cricket muffins.
But the cricket flour is all full of chitin.
Which is essentially indigestible by human beings because, you know, we're not chickens.
I have chickens.
Chickens eat bugs.
But chickens have gizzards.
I don't know if you knew that.
Chickens will eat small rocks and stones in order to grind up the insects that they also eat.
The gizzards are designed to grind up the chitin and other components that you can't digest because you're not a chicken.
So get ready.
Get ready for your favorite cricket frozen pizza.
There'll be a label on it, like minimally processed, naturally occurring, sustainable frozen pizza.
And you open the box and it's just like a piece of bread with some pasta sauce and then dead crickets all over it.
Like, really?
Why am I paying for this?
Welcome to the future of food.
If you thought anchovies were bad on the pizza, wait until you have to pick out the cricket wings!
You know, I have a brilliant marketing idea.
I was talking to my Health Rager store team about this, and I said, look, you know how we have China-free labels?
We've had those for years.
People actually teased us a few years back when we had it.
It was like, China-free!
Like, this food item is certified China-free.
Nothing from China.
Well, we've got to add a new label now.
100% cricket-free.
Yeah, and I think we should have a statement on our homepage.
I'm actually going to push my team to do this.
On the homepage, we do not sell anything with crickets in it.
100% cricket free, in case you were wondering.
No crickets.
Crickets are banned from this store.
But speaking of our store, by the way, we do have a new product called Garden Harvest, which is 100% cricket free.
And this was actually hard to source, but it's a powder.
It's a blend of organic vegetables and fruits.
It's got organic apple, cranberry, blueberry, freeze-dried acai, and then on the veggie side, organic broccoli, the actual broccoli florets, organic broccoli sprouts, organic tomato, carrot, spinach, all of these are organic, and kale.
All together, so you're getting fruits and vegetables.
It's in a powder.
You can blend it into a superfood smoothie.
It's very delicious.
It has a really great profile of anthocyanins.
It blends well.
You can check it out.
Here's the URL. healthrangerstore.com slash gardenharvest.
All one word.
Just type that in if you want to check it out.
HealthRangerStore.com slash GardenHarvest.
And just imagine when you go see that page, we're going to add a new Starburst.
It's 100% cricket free.
There are no crickets in this powder.
This is all plants, folks.
Organic berries, organic fruits, organic vegetables, green smoothies, fruit smoothies.
It's all great.
I'm putting this into my own smoothies now.
My smoothies are getting pretty dense.
You know, there's a lot in there.
I've got flax seeds and I've got whey protein and, of course, avocados and bananas and coconut water and turmeric.
And now I'm putting garden harvest in there and it's getting pretty thick.
And, folks, if you wonder why do we test foods for heavy metals and pesticides and microbiology and all this stuff, check out this headline from Children's Health Defense.
94% of baby foods, including homemade, according to this headline, contain brain-damaging heavy metals, a new study shows.
Author is Kenny Stancil.
Almost all baby foods that U.S. parents feed their children, whether store-bought or homemade, contain detectable amounts of toxic heavy metals that can impair brain function, according to new research from Healthy Babies and Bright Futures.
I would definitely want to see what's the level of the metals and are they talking about cadmium or probably arsenic in baby food?
But let's see.
They found 95% of prepackaged baby food contained rice cakes and crisp rice cereal are heavily contaminated with arsenic.
Yes, we know that because, of course, a lot of rice comes from China where it's irrigated with toxic water.
Let's see.
Lead, arsenic, and cadmium levels are high in some fresh carrots and sweet potatoes.
Well, okay, they say high, but I want to know what do they consider high.
That's what I want to know.
Because we've actually published at the website lowheavymetalsverified.org, we've published the rating system that we use.
And if you go there, you can actually see my picture there and some of the lab pictures and so on.
So we use a rating system from A triple plus down to F. And it gives you the actual concentrations of lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury that qualify for each of those levels.
So we don't just put out information that says, oh, it's high or it's low.
We give it a rating.
And in fact, by the way, over time, we're going to be rolling out these ratings explicitly for each item in our store so that when you go to the item page, you're going to see the actual rating for the four heavy metals that I just mentioned.
So when I see these articles like this one from The Defender, I want to know what's the concentration that you're talking about.
Because I know there's arsenic in rice, but...
How much are you considering, you know, to be, quote, heavily contaminated?
Are you talking like 500 parts per billion?
Because that's not heavy contamination, by the way.
We've seen way worse than that.
So I'm a little bit wary of terms that are used in this story to say, oh, it's a high level, or it's a dangerous level, or it's heavily contaminated.
Again, give us parts per billion.
Or parts per million, if it's that high, give us the numbers.
Maybe it's in the study, but this should be, in my opinion, these are the numbers that should be in the story.
Oh, I see this story was originally published at Common Dreams.
Okay, I get it.
But it's true that the FDA is moving very slowly on regulating heavy metals in food in America.
And we know this probably more than almost anybody in this industry because, you know, we're ISO accredited as a heavy metals analysis food lab.
And we're inspected and audited every year.
We have to pass all of the accreditation tests and so on, on-site audits.
And we know that the European standards are very, very strict.
Did you know that in the EU, you can't get away with Arsenic in baby food or hardly any or lead in turmeric or whatever.
And so what we observe happening is that when food producers in places like India or Mexico or China, when they have food that is too heavily contaminated for the European markets, they basically dump it on America because the FDA has essentially no standards or almost none.
They do have some standard on...
baby food, but that's about it.
I mean, they have virtually no standards and the USDA has no heavy metal standards either, not even for organic.
So if you thought you were buying organic food and you thought it's clean, hey, think It could be heavily contaminated with lead, and we found lead in organic turmeric powder and organic ginger powder and a lot of other things.
We found all kinds of stuff in organic products.
So organic is good, don't get me wrong.
It's just not enough by itself because the USDA organic program does not test foods for heavy metals, period.
There is no testing for heavy metals by the USDA under the organic program.
Does not happen, ever.
But the other thing I want to mention in all of this, and I know this is going to be controversial, I don't care.
It's a big picture kind of question.
You have a lot of people on the political left who are very, very concerned about arsenic in food, which I understand, and I share that concern, and that's legitimate.
But they're like, we need to protect the bodies of these babies.
And then, two weeks later, they turn around and But let's chop off their penis and put them on chemical castration drugs and turn them into transgenders.
I'm like, what?
I thought you cared about the baby's health.
How do you care so much about what they eat, but you want to chop off their sex organs, huh?
What is wrong with you people?
Why don't you stop the transgender assault on these babies first, and after you stop chopping off their penises and breasts, then let's talk about eliminating parts per billion of arsenic from their rice patty cakes.
How about that?
I mean, get your priorities straight, you freaking lunatics.
And it's almost like they're saying, well, children might be exposed to all this arsenic if we don't kill them first with abortion and infanticide, you know?
Like, seriously, stop pretending that you care about the health of children.
I mean, so many people on the left, they want to murder them in the womb anyway.
Which is worse, murder or a little bit of exposure to arsenic?
Um, hmm.
Stop killing the babies in the womb.
Stop killing babies after they're born.
Stop killing or maiming young children with transgenderism.
And then after that, talk to me about heavy metals.
I mean, just common sense, folks.
So, of course, I have a Babylon Bee headline to suggest here.
If anybody's listening from Babylon Bee, this would be a great headline.
Something along the lines of this...
Genitalia maimed, chemically castrated children might be exposed to trace levels of arsenic in baby food, warns Democrats.
Or warn Democrats.
Something like that.
That would be the Babylon Bee headline.
But it's real.
It's real news.
That's the way they are.
It's like if you said...
Imagine these possible scenarios for your child.
Okay, scenario one, they're exposed to lead in baby food.
Oh, that's horrible, says the parent.
They're exposed to arsenic in the rice cakes.
Oh, that's horrible.
There's a trace amount of mercury in the sippy cups.
Oh, that's horrible.
You murder your child.
Oh, that's a woman's choice!
That's a woman's choice!
It's always a woman's choice!
Remember that video a few weeks back?
It's always a woman's choice!
What about when they're five years old?
It's a woman's choice!
Maybe there should be another kind of headline Announcing, I don't know, some left-wing groups, something like this.
If the child survives attempted abortion murder and infanticide murder and survives the chemical castrations, we want to make sure that they're not exposed to heavy metals in food because we care.
You know, because lead exposure can cause a cognitive dysfunction and Just like castration chemicals and chopping off their genitalia.
You think that doesn't cause something mental?
Jeez, man.
Okay, I'm looking at this report now.
By the way, it's at healthybabyfood.org because curiosity got the best of me.
And if you scroll down to page 30 of this PDF report, they list the actual findings in terms of parts per billion.
I'm going to put on my science hat here for a second.
I already have major concerns about this report.
So first of all, most of the mercury numbers are listed as less than something, like less than 0.8 or less than 1.6, less than 0.4.
So scientifically, that is mostly meaningless because that can also mean zero.
And I can guarantee you for most of these foods, the mercury is zero.
So if I were one of these food companies, I'd be a little bit peeved at this, where they're putting, like, for example, a pear juice drink from Concentrate.
The brand is Looza, L-O-O-Z-A, or there's Gerber brands and so on.
Here's a Gerber banana product for baby food, and it's listed as less than 0.9 mercury.
Well, why not just say what it is?
I mean, if you can detect mercury, why don't you just say what it is?
Why are you saying less than 0.9?
Do you not have the sensitivity in your instruments to be able to say a zero?
I mean, less than 0.9 is actually, I mean, I would never report numbers like that because it's kind of disparaging to the brand.
Because people might assume, well, it could have 0.8.
It probably doesn't have 0.8.
In fact, look, we've tested, in my lab, we've tested tens of thousands of products using ICP-MS that's capable of detection at sub-parts per billion levels.
And we rarely see mercury in food.
Rarely.
I mean, there's mercury in personal care products, but almost never in foods.
I would say these mercury numbers are just flat-out wrong.
Just looking at this, I think they're wrong.
I don't know what lab they're using, but I don't think these numbers are legit.
I mean, this is crazy.
I do see they're using the AOAC methods.
They're using arsenic speciation, which is good.
That's important.
I see they are 17.025 accredited, which is what we are as well.
So they must have passed some kind of test on accuracy, but I don't like what they're reporting here in terms of less than 0.9 mercury.
Again, most of these foods are going to have essentially zero mercury.
And the other criticism of this, maybe I should do a whole report just on the criticism of all this, but these numbers that we're seeing for very low levels of lead and arsenic are no different from what you're going to get from growing vegetables out of your own garden, by the way, because there are trace elements in the soil.
So they're kind of saying here that There's so much danger in all these foods, but they're not saying that these are not unexpected numbers, even if you grew them yourself, by the way.
And I'm also seeing from their notes, by the way, I'm going to move on from this topic, but I'm seeing from their notes that the less than qualifier, they say, indicates the concentration was below the method detection limit.
Well, then you should say not detected.
Why are they saying less than 0.8?
They should say not detected.
I'm telling you, this chart is incredibly misleading.
I think it's highly irresponsible.
And this is my wheelhouse.
I know about this testing.
And I know the difference between LOD and LOQ and so on, you know, limit of detection versus quantification.
But this is misleading.
They're implying that there's mercury in all these foods when they did not detect any mercury whatsoever.
Man.
All right.
See, I knew there was something fishy about this.
And there's one more big question about this.
It looks like from their description, they may have been drying these foods to the solid mass content and then testing that.
It's not clear if they tested the actual raw food or if they dried it first.
They said a known mass of each sample was dried to a constant weight in a laboratory oven, and then the solids content was calculated as the ratio of the mass remaining after drying.
If they then tested that dried sample for these heavy metals, heavy metals, that would cause all the heavy metals numbers to be artificially high because you're eliminating the water content and thus your parts per billion concentration reporting is too high from what it actually would be if it were fresh and not dried. that would cause all the heavy metals numbers to be So since a lot of these drying can reduce zonchemia,
Sometimes 80, 85% of the mass, and that would tend to cause the heavy metals reporting to be, you know, it could be seven or eight times higher than normal.
So that's something that needs to be explained here as well.
Anyway, we got to move on.
We might come back to this topic later, but that is a sketchy science report in my professional opinion.
If they did not detect mercury, they should say not detected.
Instead, they're implying that all these foods have mercury in them at some level.
And that's, frankly, that's a false assertion.
Now, we're staying on the topic of food, but change the topic here.
From Michael Schellenberger on Substack.com, here's a headline that's very interesting.
UN war on fertilizer began in Sri Lanka.
And the UN Environmental Program launched its anti-fertilizer efforts from Sri Lanka in 2019.
This is what you've got to understand.
One of the main reasons that Sri Lanka has collapsed economically, the government, currency, transportation, food, medicine, energy, everything, is because they banned fertilizer imports.
But this is a UN program to ban fertilizer.
I want to be clear about this.
From the article, one month after the Colombo meeting in 2019, which generated media attention in Sri Lanka, voters in that nation elected an anti-fertilizer president, H.E. Gotobaya Rajapaksa, who claimed without scientific evidence that synthetic fertilizers were causing kidney disease.
And in April of 2021, he banned fertilizer imports.
He banned them.
Now, folks, You know I'm all about clean food.
And I'm all about food science.
I can assure you that synthetic fertilizers based on nitrogen, you know, ammonia, NH3, and then all the different variations of that, they do not cause kidney disease.
That is complete nonsense.
Ammonia is a natural molecule.
The Haber process combines nitrogen from the atmosphere with hydrogen from hydrocarbons, creates fertilizer, a form of nitrogen that plants can use.
They can access it through their roots, and then they can produce enormous amounts of food.
So-called synthetic fertilizer, there's nothing wrong with it whatsoever.
The only question is sort of how do you make it?
You know, what does it come from?
What's the feedstock of it?
Right now it's hydrocarbons, but it doesn't have to be.
You can also get ammonia from animal urine, right?
And urea and so on.
And even human urine.
This is why human urine is a natural fertilizer for your plants.
We've talked with Marjorie Wildcraft about that.
You can pee in a bucket, add water, put it on your garden, I mean, this is actually green.
This is a sustainable green living type of thing to use urine, which contains nitrogen, because that's where your body puts it, because the atmosphere that you're breathing is 78% nitrogen.
So I guess according to the Sri Lanka president, you shouldn't have nitrogen in your urine either or something.
But it makes no sense.
You've got to have nitrogen to feed the world.
About 4 billion people right now in the world depend on nitrogen in order to eat.
And most of that nitrogen is created through the Haber chemical process.
Remember from Fritz Haber, the German scientist?
Actually, he was kind of a Nazi German scientist, come to think of it.
But he came up with that.
And then after that, I think he worked on chemical weapons to kill the world.
But whatever.
He did create the Haber process of fixing nitrogen.
I mean, yeah, he was evil in his life's work.
But we're not going to get into all that right now.
I mean, that's a different conversation.
He did create the Haber process for fixing nitrogen.
So then the president of Sri Lanka banned nitrogen imports or fertilizer imports.
He said that chemical fertilizers, and of course all fertilizer has chemicals because chemicals are just molecules, right?
So all fertilizer contains chemicals including cow poop and human urine.
There's plenty of chemicals in there.
He said they all led to adverse health and environmental impacts.
He said, quote, my government took the bold step to restrict imports of these harmful substances earlier this year.
And then he said that farmers shouldn't resist the fertilizer ban, adding that quote, So after the fertilizer ban, I'm reading from the article, 85% of Sri Lankan farmers experienced crop losses.
Rice production fell 20%.
Prices rose 50%.
The nation had to import $450 million worth of rice because they couldn't import fertilizer and grow it themselves.
So in one province, families reported producing half their normal crop harvest.
And then it goes on and on.
Let's see.
COVID lockdowns hurt tourism.
The government borrowed too much money.
Oil prices went up.
But it was the ban on fertilizers that resulted in the collapse.
So tea, a lot of tea normally comes out of Sri Lanka.
They'd been producing $1.3 billion annually in exports.
And that was about 71% of the nation's food imports.
But then that crashed 18%, hitting the lowest levels in 23 years because of the fertilizer ban.
And it destroyed Sri Lanka's ability to then pay for food and fuel and to even pay the interest on its debt.
And so this is part of the UN program, is to run around the world telling countries to ban fertilizers.
Folks, are you beginning to see the picture here?
This is the global shutdown of the food supply as part of global depopulation.
If they can cause social chaos and starve people out and cause crop losses, then that's completely aligned with the globalist agenda to ultimately exterminate most of the human population.
I did a podcast on this.
I said, look, just like weed killer kills plants, you know, glyphosate.
You spray it on the plant, it goes to the roots.
It kills the roots first.
The roots are what take up the nutrients.
Once the roots can't feed on the nutrients, the plant dies.
Well, that's what the UN is doing to humanity.
They're cutting off the food supply, the nutrients that keep humanity alive and And then people die off.
And that's the goal.
It's engineered fertilizer scarcity is kind of like glyphosate being sprayed on the entire human population.
It's killing the roots so that humans can't nourish themselves and then people die.
And that's what the UN is doing.
This is a United Nations program.
Now, remember, the UN, we quoted earlier, is claiming food prices are only going to go up 8.5% over five years.
Well, they themselves are killing off the food supply, which they know is going to cause global food scarcity and massive food inflation at a level that we've never seen before.
They know that food prices aren't going to go up just 8% in five years.
Probably they're going to go up hundreds of percent in maybe just three years, the way things are going.
It's not looking good with the droughts in some areas and floods in other areas.
And food crop failures all over the place, seed shortages, diesel price increases, fertilizer price increases, on and on.
This is not looking good for humanity, but you're supposed to eat crickets and be happy about it.
And then you're supposed to worry about less than 0.8 parts per billion of mercury in some food, which probably is actually zero, but you're supposed to freak out about that number, which is nonsense.
I mean, folks, it's all just, this is globalist disinfo.
Unreal.
Let me read you this from Michael Snyder at the Economic Collapse blog.
Quote, a horrifying drought is causing widespread crop failures throughout the United States and Europe.
And he goes through this article, talks about how, according to CNN, farmers in Italy have lost up to 80% of their harvest because of the drought.
And then in France, they're only receiving a fraction of the rainfall that they normally get just 0.38 inches of rain last month.
And that's down 84%.
And then France is normally the fourth largest exporter of wheat in the world.
Well, not anymore.
It's also bad in Germany.
Because the Rhine River levels have dropped so dangerously low, and that river carries 80% of all goods transported by water in Germany.
And then in the U.S., you have the drought monitor saying that half the nation is experiencing some level of drought, that this mega drought in the Southwest is the worst in 1,200 years.
Dallas just had two months with no rainfall whatsoever.
And I can confirm just from looking around central Texas that anybody that's got cows, all the grass has turned to dirt.
I mean, it's just dust.
Really, in any cow land, any cattle grazing, it's just dirt.
Seriously.
It's like a dust bowl scenario at this point.
And they're just culling their herds.
I mean, I've talked to farmers about this.
I mean, ranchers, they're killing 80% of the cattle.
The drought is very, very bad.
Let's see.
10% of Texas' gross domestic product is agriculture.
Let's see.
247,000 farms and ranches haven't had a whole year of rain since 2017.
We're talking about massive drought across Texas.
It's apparently a drought in Utah as well.
The Great Salt Lake continues to get smaller and smaller because of the dry conditions.
And we're told by the UN that food prices are only going to go up 8.5% in five years.
I mean, give me a break.
Do they think we're stupid?
They're going to go up 8.5% again, probably by next week.
Oh, and speaking of stupid, by the way, did you know that the CEO of Pfizer, what's his name, Burla?
He's got COVID now.
Yeah, he took a bunch of Pfizer jabs.
And then he put out a tweet, quote, I would like to let you know that I've tested positive for COVID-19.
I am thankful to have received four doses of the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine.
You notice how they're always programmed to say, I'm thankful, even though they're diagnosed with COVID or they test positive.
And so I'm so thankful to have the vaccine.
Shouldn't this guy be arrested for fraud at this point?
Because, you know, if you were selling, let's say, a weight loss product, and you went out all over the world and said, my weight loss product works 100% of the time, you're going to lose weight for sure.
And then people start taking it and they don't lose weight.
The FTC would be banging on your door, probably seizing your records, seizing your bank accounts, saying you committed fraud.
You promised weight loss results that did not materialize.
That's misleading advertising and consumer fraud, what have you.
But when a vaccine company does it, it's like this is going to protect you 100%.
That's what Borla said, by the way.
It started out as like 95% and then it went up to 100.
Remember all the media reports?
100% protection.
And even Joe Biden said, if you take the vaccine, you're not going to catch COVID. And then he caught COVID. But now the CEO of the very company whose products he promised were 100% effective, he's catching COVID, proving that his products don't work.
So where's the FTC? Where's the Federal Trade Commission?
Where are the investigations and prosecutions for criminal fraud or misrepresentation, misleading advertising, deceptive marketing practices?
The vaccines are a joke!
Again, if it were anybody else, they would be probably criminally prosecuted.
By the United States government, but when it's the vaccine industry, it's like, they can just say, oh, I guess you just need more shots.
They're like, what, more shots that don't work?
Yeah, you need more boosters, clearly.
Because for it to work, you have to keep taking boosters.
But you're like, well, but the dude took four and it's not working yet.
Why should number five work?
Or number six?
And at some point you realize...
These boosters are just designed to kill the dumbest people on the planet.
It's like, dude, you took four and you still got sick.
Are you going to seriously line up for number five and number six and number seven?
Are you going to have an annual mRNA injection until you just die?
Seriously, at some point...
You've got to just shake your head like, wow, this really is vaccine-assisted suicide.
It's like a euthanasia shot.
And anybody dumb enough to keep lining up for more boosters when the previous ones never worked, it's kind of like, well, you chose your own fate.
What can we say?
Oh, and by the way, this guy, Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, he said that anybody who criticizes COVID vaccines is a criminal.
Yeah, he actually said that.
He said a bunch of criminals that are criticizing Pfizer vaccines and saying they don't work.
And then he proves they don't work.
It's like, you can't make this up, folks.
You can't make it up.
It just, it gets unreal.
Let me give credit to a couple of sponsors here and then I'll wrap up with some final comments.
One thing you may not know about Treasure Island is that they have silver IRAs.
So if you want to get out of the stock market, if it's right for you, obviously make your own decision, but you want to put your IRA into precious metals, gold or silver, they have that option available in a vaulted, inspected, insured, heavily guarded facility.
And it's all IRS approved as well.
So you can keep your IRA, but you can put it in precious metals.
Just talk to the Treasure Island Precious Metals Company.
They do this for tons of people.
And this is one way to preserve assets no matter what happens with the market.
You reach them at metalswithmike.com and I don't earn anything on the IRA conversions or anything like that.
There's no commissions or compensations like that.
They are a sponsor.
They just pay a flat fee.
But I don't know if you know this, but Michael Burry, this is the guy that was famous.
He was depicted in a movie called The Big Short.
Michael Burry has just liquidated his entire portfolio of stocks, except one.
He holds one stock.
And he liquidated everything in, looks like March of this year.
He runs the Scion Capital Hedge Fund.
And he had like Apple shares and what is it?
Cygnus and a bunch of others.
He had Apple shares and Bristol Myers Squibb and looks like Cigna, Discovery.
I don't know.
He had a bunch of shares in a bunch of companies.
He sold it all because he said, look, this market is insane.
It's all overvalued.
Here's a tweet from him.
The silliness is back after 1929, you know, the crash.
And then after 1968, after 2000, he's referring to the dot-com crash.
After 2008, referring to the subprime mortgage collapse, the strain of silliness that transformed bulls into bubbles completely and utterly disappeared.
But that familiar COVID era silliness is not dead yet.
Like 2001 before Enron, before 9-11, before WorldCom.
Remember that?
So he has sold almost all his stocks.
He's, in other words, on the sidelines because he knows these valuations are rather insane.
So if you agree with his assessment and you want to get out of stocks, again, do your own research, make your own decision.
One thing to consider in an IRA is precious metals.
Again, metalswithmike.com.
Talk to the folks there and they can set you up with that program that is IRS approved.
Now, the other thing to note in all of this is fascinating.
Zimbabwe is launching a gold coin.
Yeah, Zimbabwe, like the home of hyperinflation.
So this is from Zero Hedge.
Declaring its July launch of one-ounce gold coins a success, Zimbabwe's central bank says it's going to begin issuing and selling coins in smaller gold denominations this fall.
So they're going to have 10-ounce gold coins, quarter-ounce, half-ounce, and so on.
Why are they doing this?
Because, well, the people of Zimbabwe are tired of 250% inflation, which obviously would suck for lots of reasons.
So people are trying to get into gold and silver because, well, it's stable.
Even the government is issuing official Zimbabwe gold coins.
And believe me, they're going to hold their value because it's gold.
Think about how crazy this is, where the United States, which abandoned the gold standard in 1971, the U.S. is printing money by the trillions.
I should say currency, not money.
Printing currency by the trillions, just blowing away the value of the dollar.
Inflation just keeps going through the roof, right?
And Zimbabwe is like, we need gold.
So Zimbabwe now has better fiscal sanity than the United States of America because they understand the table of elements and the value of gold and silver and precious metals.
It's just really hilarious.
I was interviewed earlier, a few hours ago, by Dunnegan Kaiser at Liberty and Finance Channel, and we were talking about this.
We had a great conversation.
You can check out Liberty and Finance on brighteon.com.
I really appreciate the Kaiser family there and they did homeschooling and Dunnigan is also into natural health and herbal medicine and things like that.
Pretty cool guy.
So check out that interview.
It's on Liberty and Finance on brighteon.com.
But we were talking about gold in Zimbabwe versus fiat currency in America.
It's just crazy.
But Zimbabwe is one of those countries where Remember the video I did a few months back?
I was showing all of the hyperinflation currency, and I had a Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.
I had a $50 billion bill from Zimbabwe.
I have this collection of collapsed fiat currency.
You've probably seen it in a couple of my videos.
Well, that $50 billion bill, which was, I think, from 2009...
At the time, you could use that to buy two loaves of bread.
Yeah, 50 billion Zimbabwean dollars.
Two loaves of bread.
But the good news is that bread didn't have crickets in it.
So you got to give them credit for that.
Anyway, hyperinflation is coming probably to the U.S. dollar because the money printing will not stop.
And that means protecting assets is key to getting through all of this as the financial collapse accelerates.
And then I want to mention the satellite phone stores solutions for backup communications.
You've probably heard me mention these before.
The Bivy Stick is the real deal.
It's a two-way satellite text messaging, little device, a little piece of hardware.
You can fit it in a purse, in a pocket.
It goes in the glove box of your car.
You can travel with it.
They've got these available right now.
I don't know when they'll run out, probably sometime this year.
But using satellites only, you can send and receive texts online.
To other people's mobile phones or to other people's bivvy sticks or to satellite phones.
It's a great emergency backup communication system and it works obviously anywhere on the planet.
You can check that out at sat123.com.
S-A-T-123.com.
We appreciate the Satellite Phone Store, all the solutions that they're making available to our customers and users and fans.
They're helping a lot of people get squared away so you can communicate when the power grid becomes very unreliable.
I mean, look at what's happening to the Western United States.
You know that a lot of these cities are just going to be abandoned, right?
You know what happens when Lake Mead continues to drop?
I mean, I know there was a lot of rain recently in the last couple of weeks, and the lake went up two or three inches.
You know, big whoop.
It's falling like 20 feet or something.
It's going to continue to fall.
What do they do in Las Vegas when Lake Mead is just tapped out?
What do you do?
Where do you get the water?
You don't get it.
Las Vegas in effect will cease to be livable as a city without a water supply.
And what about Los Angeles?
They keep saying you have to have water restrictions.
But not enough people really pay attention to that.
They're still watering their lawns.
Like, you shouldn't even have lawns in Los Angeles.
Are you kidding me?
Everything should be, what do they call it, xeriscaped?
Is that the right term?
Is it xeriscaping or xeriscaping?
But you know what I mean?
Desert plants and rocks, stones, like things that need basically no water because it's a desert.
You should landscape according to the place where you live.
Like, try to have a green lawn in the middle of a desert.
That's just stupid.
I'm sorry.
It's stupid.
Not sustainable either.
Eat all the crickets you want.
You still don't have enough water to keep your lawn green.
So, you know, a lot of these major cities are not going to be around for much longer.
Not just the collapse of the rule of law.
You know, the total collapse of safety or even the illusion of safety.
But just the collapse of the water supply.
What do you do when there's no more water for Los Angeles?
What do you do?
Or what about Phoenix, for that matter, or Tucson, Arizona?
You can make a list.
There's a whole lot of cities and even towns in California, places in Utah that are running out of water, places in New Mexico, places in West Texas even.
Not a pretty sight, folks.
A significant portion of the United States, as we know it today, will not be habitable For much longer, unless something dramatically changes with the rainfall situation, which seems highly unlikely because we're in, of course, cosmic cycles right now, like grand solar minimum and so on.
And that's also affecting the food supply, exacerbating the shortages that are already very bad because of fertilizer prices and all the other things that we've talked about.
So folks, this is not a good scenario.
It may be time to seriously rethink about where you live, not just to get away from the blue cities, but to get to an area where you can actually capture enough water to grow some food.
And there's a lot of water capture techniques that There's permaculture, which is reshaping the earth so that it captures water.
You know, you can build ponds or tanks, as they're called in Texas.
They call them tanks.
They mean ponds.
You can't do that in Oregon.
It's illegal.
But some places you can collect rainwater.
It's very hard to irrigate with rainwater unless you have massive tanks, which are very expensive.
So well water is not necessarily reliable.
And in California, they want to tax the water you use out of your own well.
And they're probably going to put limits on that as well.
And that water also is contaminated with everything that runs off the surface water, goes down into the aquifer, all kinds of pesticide runoff and bio sludge runoff and just horrible toxic chemicals.
That's what's in the groundwater now, the well water.
That's not good water.
This situation is not looking good, folks.
That's all I'm saying.
Get to an area that's got soil, that's got enough water to grow, has enough freedom for you where you can have your Second Amendment rights.
Some area where taxes aren't too insane.
Some area where you don't have the population density that's going to freak out and become the zombie wave, you know, when the food stamps stop working.
Like, this is the time.
It's like the last call for strategic relocation, if you can.
I know not everybody can.
I get it.
But at least have a bug out plan to a location like that.
It's becoming a critical issue.
And given the fuel shortages and maybe the martial law that might be coming, there's a big question.
Can you bug out when you need to?
What if they set off a dirty bomb somewhere?
The deep state, like I talked about.
And then they lock down all the highways.
How do you bug out?
How do you get to where you need to go?
Maybe they lock down entire cities.
I don't know.
It's better to be where you want to be when it hits the fan.
Like, get there as soon as you can.
And don't wait for things to hit the fan.
It can just happen, boom, like that.
Sudden emergency.
All right, so that's my podcast for today.
Sorry I didn't end it on a positive note, but this is real.
These warnings are legit.
I don't mean to leave you in fear at all.
Take action now while we still can.
Prepare now.
Relocate now if that's appropriate for you.
Shore up your assets now.
Do what's right for you.
Take this very limited window of opportunity to get yourself squared away because what's coming is...
Well, I mean, a lot of it's already started.
You see the prices in the grocery store.
You see the prices at the gas station.
You see the scarcity.
It's only going to get worse for quite some time to come.
Because what the globalists did to Sri Lanka, they're trying to do to us, too.
And they're succeeding at some level with that intense destruction.
So keep all that in mind, folks.
I thank you for your support.
I thank you for your prayers and blessings.
I reciprocate that right back to you.
I pray for your safety.
I'm so thankful that you find value in these podcasts because we have a little fun, but we also discuss really practical things that can help you stay prepared.
And I'm honored to be here bringing you this information.
Thank you for listening.
I'll be back with you tomorrow.
And in the meantime, be sure to check out naturalnews.com.
Also, finally, one note.
I want to recommend Dave Scarlett, his glory.
He's on Brighttown.tv on Sundays.
His Glory with Dave Scarlett, I think, is one of the best Christian shows anywhere.
And Dave Scarlett's an amazing individual.
I got to spend some time with him.
I've been a guest on his show a couple of times.
His Glory, he has the best guests.
They have very vigorous discussions about Christianity and walking with the Lord.
I just want to encourage you, check it out.
I think you'll really enjoy his show.
Again, it's called His Glory.
And I think his website is hisglory.tv, but in any case, I'd have to check that out, but I know he's on brighttown.tv as well.
So thank you for all your support.
Take care.
A global reset is coming, and that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audio book.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection