All Episodes
Previous Next
July 29, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:19:15
Situation Update, 7/29/22 - 90% of pharmacology, psychiatry, vaccine science...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, welcome to the situation updated.
It's Friday, July 29th, 2022.
Mike Adams here, and the primary topic today, it's an economic topic.
It's about the perversion of incentives.
And it's just a fascinating look at how all the wrong outcomes are incentivized in America, which explains why things are going horribly bad in terms of the economy.
As you know, the new GDP numbers that were released showed that we are now officially in a recession, two back-to-back quarters of GDP shrinking, and But of course, so in response to that, the White House changed the definition of a recession, and so did Wikipedia.
They changed the definition of recession so that it's no longer considered a recession.
When a Democrat is in the White House, it's not a recession.
So the new definition of a recession is two back-to-back quarters of shrinking GDP when a Republican is in the White House.
If it's not a Republican, it can't possibly be a recession.
So we're going to talk about that, the perversion of incentives and also the incentivization of perverts.
So both of those are happening in America right now.
We're going to get to all that.
It should be a fascinating show.
I've got some intel for you also about the truck industry and railway transportation problems that are leaving tens of thousands of Dodge diesel trucks sitting in a parking lot in Mexico.
Yeah, I'm going to explain that.
You're going to be fascinated about that.
And then we'll have a clown world today where NASA says it's sending two more helicopters to Mars, a planet that NASA claims has only 0.6% of the atmospheric pressure or we say density altitude of Earth.
And of course, you can't fly helicopters with no atmosphere or virtually no atmosphere.
So the question is, what is NASA like?
Where are they lying exactly about this when they claim to be sending two more helicopters to Mars?
But first, a science update for you, and I think this is the conclusion of the mystery of the nitric acid.
And I posted a video that's about 30 minutes, actually.
It's a little on the long side, but I had to do it completely uncut.
For reasons which will become obvious, but you know how people have been freaking out about the nitric acid reacting with this clot, this post-vaccine death clot, and how within seconds of the nitric acid hitting the clot, it was popping and cracking and smoking and Kind of sort of exploding.
And, you know, there's been this kind of raging debate ever since then.
And quite a few people were like, no, man, that's the reaction with the isopropyl alcohol.
And I said, no, it isn't.
There's no way that's the reaction with isopropyl alcohol.
Because I tested that, and it doesn't do that.
It's no violent, quick reaction with isopropyl alcohol.
So, I have solved the mystery, and it turns out that everybody's right, which is a nice outcome.
Isn't it nice when everybody's right?
So allow me to explain.
But I posted the video.
You can watch it yourself.
It takes 17 minutes For this eruption to occur, this runaway chemical reaction takes 17 minutes.
If you combine nitric acid with the isopropyl alcohol that I used on the clot, my mistake is I neglected to mention it was 70% isopropyl alcohol, not 100%.
It's only 70%.
And so that's why it slowed down that reaction a lot.
It actually takes 17 minutes to So, number one, I'm correct in saying that when we saw the nitric acid added to the clot and we saw that eruption, that that wasn't isopropyl alcohol doing that.
That was not.
But also, the trolls or the critics were in a way also kind of right in the sense that they say a reaction will occur.
And at this point, I will concede that, yes, it eventually does occur.
It just takes 17 minutes.
And I got it on video.
And I posted that video.
And I actually had to sit there for 17 minutes and talk and move my hands in front of the camera and stuff in order to make sure that everybody knew this was real-time, uncut, like, you know, real duration stuff.
And so I was trying to figure out what to do on camera.
I ended up singing Another One Bites the Dust and doing little hand movements.
And we had a little rotary, like an orbital shaker going for the vial.
And at one point I kept tapping the vials like, come on, come on, like erupt now, do it.
I mean, just like I promised you, if you combine this 70% isopropyl alcohol, which is what I use, and nitric acid, it's the most boring thing ever.
You're just going to sit there and sit there and sit there, and eventually you're going to lose interest.
But I had to stick to it to prove this to people, and eventually it paid off.
17 minutes later, it erupted.
So, you know, sometimes science is boring.
It's just slow, boring, nothing happening, but sometimes you have to prove a point.
I'm just glad that we showed that what I was saying originally was absolutely true.
That it was the clot reacting in seconds, not the isopropyl alcohol.
But the other lesson learned from this, I mean, I made a mistake.
I should have talked about that I was using 70% IPA. And I failed to mention that.
That's on me.
That's my bad.
I should have been more specific about that.
Because, you know, there's different percentages of IPA. You can get like 70%, 91%, or like nearly 100%.
And it does matter, because the rest of it's water.
And that can slow down the reaction.
So, okay, fair enough.
But I was using 70%, and that takes 17 minutes to react.
But the other thing I learned is that people will argue with you when they have no real world experience, but they are convinced that there's chemical equations describe everything in the world, and they don't.
So you can take a chemistry equation of what happens when you combine nitric acid and isopropyl alcohol and some amount of water.
You can take that equation, and if you're just looking at chemistry, you can say, oh, yeah, that's going to react.
That's going to react, and you can demand it's going to react right away.
It's going to be a bomb.
It's going to explode.
The problem is that those equations don't tell you how long they take.
laughing Do they?
Do they?
No.
There's no timing in it.
And the timing also depends on your ambient temperature and the air pressure.
Are you at sea level?
Are you at altitude?
Are you on Mars with NASA's helicopters?
Because everything's different there.
You know, water boils at different temperatures at different elevations, right?
So everything is different.
So chemical equations, or shall we say the theoretical approach to the world, that's where academics live, right?
Like, well, according to my theory, this should erupt.
According to my theory, this is a bomb.
And they talk about their theories all day long, and look at my math, and look, I did the equations.
With the double bonds and everything, whatever.
But have you ever tried it in reality?
Because there are all kinds of examples of things that look good on paper, but in the real world, it's different.
It's different.
Like, reality is different from your scientific theories.
And the reason is because scientific theories can't account for everything that happens in reality.
Now, I covered this in my book, The Contagious Mind, and it talks about how crystals actually learn how to form in various labs around the world, and then they somehow transmit that information to other solutions and other labs that then are able to form the same crystals, but they couldn't before.
And there's a great example in the book, I think it's about xylitol, Xylitol used to be liquid at room temperature everywhere in the world.
Now xylitol freezes at room temperature everywhere in the world.
And that change happened, I don't know, a few decades ago.
And once it began to crystallize in one lab, that crystallization, quote, pattern or habit of nature, it spread to other labs instantly.
And then suddenly xylitol was freezing everywhere in the world.
And I've actually put xylitol under the microscope and shown you the crystals that are formed as it freezes at room temperature to show you this process.
And if you want, you can download my book, thecontagiousmind.com, and you can see, you can hear all about that.
But there is no scientific theory that describes these patterns of nature that are called morphic resonance.
There are no theories, there's no mathematics to describe it.
It's not encapsulated in chemistry.
In fact, you know, in chemistry they say water is what?
H2O, right?
But did you know that if you actually look at water, you know, up close in a microscope and so on, it's not really just a bunch of H2Os at all.
It's a substance that is connecting and disconnecting bonds in a very, well, fluid manner, billions of times a second.
It's not just little isolated H2O balls floating around each other.
It's making bonds, recreating new bonds.
It has multiple bonds and then no bonds and then several bonds.
It's very fluid even at a chemical elemental level.
It's fluid.
And the equations of chemistry don't capture that at all because the equations of chemistry are locked in time.
They're frozen in time.
And they don't look at how things happen over time.
Which is why someone can look at an equation of nitric acid and isopropyl alcohol and they can say, oh, it's going to explode!
But it doesn't.
In reality, it doesn't.
It sits there for 17 minutes and does nothing.
And in other cases, there are unexpected results that can't be described by the equations.
So the big takeaway in all of this, I think, for all of us is that reality...
Reality is the true master.
Reality is the real answer of what's possible and what's happening.
And chemistry and physics and mathematics and medicine and so on, these are just models.
These are theories that try to model reality.
But they don't really.
They just try.
They try to get there.
And their models always change.
For example, did you know that the table of elements...
Before the Table of Elements existed, what was the scientific theory of what were things made of, right?
And in ancient Chinese civilization, there were different explanations for that.
It's like, oh, everything is made out of wood and stone and fire and water.
Like, you know, four basic elements or something like that.
And then over time, with more and more investigation and more modeling, Then there were some early attempts like in the, I don't know, early 19th century, or maybe even the late 18th century, of how to organize substances based on their properties.
And, you know, eventually they came around to this atomic bottle where they came up with this explanation of protons and neutrons and electrons.
And this is the current model, which, of course, is...
It's got some usefulness in terms of predictive value, but it's also kind of a joke because there really aren't little electron balls orbiting around a nucleus of an atomic element.
There aren't, like, electron particles just flying around at the speed of light.
There are no particles that are electrons, folks.
Electrons are probability waves, and they only appear as particles if you take a snapshot At, you know, just one little slice in time or interfere with it somehow, but normally they are, you know, probability waves or orbital shells of different kinds of geometry in 3D space.
There are no electrons.
They aren't real.
They don't exist.
It's just that pretending that there are electrons makes it convenient to discuss chemistry because using that model...
And using protons and neutrons in the nucleus, you can say a lot of accurate predictive things about chemistry and about radioactive decay, for example.
And, oh, this thing, it throws off gamma rays and then it loses mass and then it transmutes into this other element and then you check the results and it's a pretty good model.
But it's not reality.
It's a model of reality.
And If you're doing real world experiments and the real world contradicts the model, trust me folks, the model is wrong.
Not the real world experiments.
So when there are two people debating something, which is kind of what I just experienced the last couple of days, trust the real world experience over the chemistry model because the model is not reality.
In a similar vein, a map is not the territory.
Okay?
Right?
So if you...
I know this is going to sound silly, but let's say you have a big map of the state where you live.
Or let's just use the state of Texas, since it's a big state.
Let's say you have a big map of Texas.
And you take that map, it's a paper map, and you fold it out, and you've got the whole state, and it's like six feet wide.
And if you put that map on the ground...
And then you step on the map where it says Houston.
Are you now in Houston?
No.
You're stepping on the Houston representation on a map.
You are not actually in Houston.
You are on a map that is describing Houston.
But you didn't teleport to Houston.
I know this sounds silly.
But a lot of people who are real science worshippers, they think that the map is the territory.
They think that their equations are reality.
And they think that if they alter their equations, that reality alters.
They do.
They actually believe that.
And they'll talk like that.
Like, if they have to rework a theory, they'll say, oh, we're going to have to destroy the universe and start over.
You know, things like that.
Because they think their equations are the real world.
They're not.
They're models.
And they're incomplete models.
And this is why it's so hilarious when they have these super colliders, you know, CERN, which is probably a vortex to hell or something.
But they have super colliders, and they keep claiming, you know, if we just collide them more and more and more, we'll finally find a god particle.
You know, this is literally what they say.
And they're in the quest for the god particle.
And then we need more energy and faster speeds.
Yeah.
And they want bigger and bigger.
If we could just smash it apart more, we would find out what's in it.
And they're so blinded by their theories that they can't see reality.
In reality, there is no God particle.
In reality, there are no particles at all.
What are they smashing?
They're smashing their own minds is what they're actually smashing.
They're not smashing anything that's real.
And then when they claim to find the God particle, you know how they made that claim?
It's a statistical analysis of the trajectory of Of these subatomic particles that flew off in different little directions.
Oh, that one spiraled to the left.
I think that's what the God particle would do.
It would spiral to the left.
And then when they keep smashing and then enough particles spiral to the left, that's a God particle.
That's right there.
That's God.
It's like, you're delusional.
And then they're so insane.
They're looking for particles that they claim give...
Matter, mass.
Like, they think there's going to be a particle that gives an atomic element mass.
I mean, you know what I'm saying?
It's like thinking that consciousness is only an illusion of the biochemical brain.
They're trying to find the part of the brain that creates the illusion of consciousness.
You see the parallels here?
They're trying to find the part of the subatomic particles that gives mass to the element.
It doesn't even make any sense.
It makes no sense at all.
Because, of course, consciousness is not part of the brain.
Consciousness transcends the physical brain.
And mass is a property of Of our 3D space-time construct that transcends any matter in it.
You can't find the mass part.
Just like you can't find the consciousness part of the brain.
There's another great metaphor to understanding this.
It's like the following.
Let's suppose you have a really amazing grand piano sitting in a room.
And then you have an amazing composer and performer.
Who writes just an amazing song, a moving song, and performs it with incredible energy and precision.
And everybody's like, oh my god, I'm so moved, and that's amazing.
Oh my gosh, where did this music come from?
And then, at the side of the room, a scientist will raise his hand, oh, I can tell you where the music is coming from.
We just need to disassemble the piano.
Okay, first we're going to take all the black keys and we're going to separate them from the white keys over here.
And we're going to take all the pieces and parts apart.
We're going to take all the piano wires and the piano wood and we're going to take all of it apart and we're going to categorize it into a table of piano elements.
And these are keys and these are strings and these are woods and these are pedals.
Okay, now we need to smash them.
To get the music out, you know?
We've got to smash.
We need to build a giant piano smasher.
We need a couple of billion dollars from the government funding.
Please, please, government funding billions of dollars.
We're going to smash piano parts and find where the music comes from.
And then like 10 years into it, you're like, how's your progress?
Well, we've been smashing and we still cannot find the music.
We need to do more smashing.
We need more energy and more budget for more piano smashing colliders.
And this will go on forever.
And then they'll have theories like, well, the music must be smaller than we thought.
The music must be inside the molecules and the elements.
It must be subatomic, tonality, harmony.
It must be like harmony quarks.
Inside, like smaller than we can see.
If we do that, if we smash that, we're going to find the music.
You know, you might be laughing at that, but this is exactly the way the antidepressant pharmaceutical industry has been operating for decades, right?
Did you hear about the new research out of University College London, which is astonishing, well, the field of medical science research.
Concluding, quote, there remains no clear evidence that serotonin levels or serotonin activity are responsible for depression.
And what have we been told for decades now?
Well, if you've got depression, it's a chemical imbalance in the brain.
You must have not enough serotonin.
You must need an adjustment.
And you have a chemical imbalance.
It can only be balanced with these antidepressant drugs, these pharmaceuticals.
That's what we've been told.
That's what the TV ads have been saying.
That's what the FDA has been saying.
That's what the psychiatrists have been saying, largely.
Turns out it's all just complete hogwash.
It's all a complete joke.
In fact, this study concludes, it quote suggests that depression is not likely caused by a chemical imbalance and calls into question what antidepressants actually do.
Because SSRI drugs were supposed to be working by correcting low serotonin levels.
They were trying to say that depression was just a chemical imbalance.
That's like saying the music from the piano comes from the keys.
You understand, this is a mechanistic Western point of view of the world which misses the entire point of reality.
And this study even concludes, there is no other accepted pharmacological mechanism by which antidepressants affect the symptoms of depression.
So, It turns out, in this study and some other similar studies, they tried a couple of things.
First, they looked at a bunch of people who had low serotonin versus people that had, quote, normal serotonin.
And they asked, are these low serotonin people depressed more so than other people?
And the answer is, nope.
They're not any more depressed.
Okay.
Then they tried to take people with regular serotonin and reduce the serotonin.
Does that make them depressed?
And the answer, guess what?
Nope.
Doesn't make them depressed.
If you lower people's serotonin levels, they don't get depressed.
They might get annoyed.
It's like, why are you screwing with my brain chemistry?
But they don't get depressed.
And then if you take a bunch of low serotonin people who are depressed and you raise their serotonin levels, are they suddenly happier?
And the answer is no.
They're not happy either.
Because depression has nothing at all to do with serotonin levels.
Nothing at all.
And you ask, well, how do these drugs get approved by the FDA? Oh, do you need to ask that question?
Because they're lucrative.
Because they make money for Big Pharma, and Big Pharma funds the FDA, largely.
And lots of bribery and kickbacks and so on to FDA decision makers.
I mean, after the COVID vaccines, does anybody have to ask, Like, how could the FDA have done that?
We know.
They're corrupt.
They're fraudulent.
It's all junk science.
But the other thing that's fascinating about this is that the placebo works just as well as antidepressant drugs.
Yeah, you don't need any drugs.
You can be happy just by deciding to be happier.
You can be less depressed by taking placebo.
Now, there's another effect that happens in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that's quite fascinating.
And this shows you the total brainwashing into the pharmacological indoctrination of the masses.
So, you know, when people sign up for these clinical trials, they don't know whether they're getting the drug or the placebo, right?
And supposedly, the doctors don't know either, or the clinicians.
They don't know.
Nobody knows.
It's blind.
It's a blind study.
So the patient is always wondering, and usually the patient is hoping, like, oh, I hope I get the real thing.
I hope I get the pharmacological chemical.
I don't want the placebo because that's useless.
That doesn't work.
So they want the drug, okay?
This is the way most patients are because they think that drugs always work.
So they're told about side effects up front.
It's part of the disclosures of going into a clinical trial.
So they're told things like, okay, if you get the real drug, you might suffer all the following things, like loss of sexual function, loss of bowel control, nausea, hair falling out, hair growing on your palms, whatever it may be.
Flatulence, bad breath, the whole deal.
And whatever the results are.
Reduction in kidney function combined with mass urination on an hourly basis.
But, you see, the patients remember this list.
And then, if they start to experience those side effects that were on the list, they get happy.
Because they tell them, oh my gosh, I must have the real drug.
Because...
I've lost all sexual desire and my hair is falling out.
Oh my God, this is wonderful.
I had the real drug.
And then they make themselves happy the more they're suffering from the side effects.
And then that happiness comes out in the scoring system as, oh, well, the depression has been, quote, treated.
You see how that works?
So patients are convincing themselves to be happy because they're suffering the side effects of drugs.
Which convinces them that the drug must be, quote, real.
Do you realize that you could just be happy anyway without suffering flatulence and bad breath and everything else that goes with it?
And headaches and sleeplessness and whatever.
Loss of sexual activity.
You realize you could just be happy without suffering all that simply by deciding to be happier, by the way.
You don't need a drug.
You don't need a doctor.
You don't need a pharmacy.
Everything you need is right there with you right now because God gave it to you.
You were born with it.
And you know, one of the most prominent side effects of antidepressant drugs because they do mess with brain chemistry.
They don't help you, but they screw with you.
One of the most common side effects is suicide or suicidal ideation.
You know what that is?
That's when you spend a lot of time thinking about how to kill yourself.
Suicidal ideation.
Maybe that's what they call it.
So when these people are in these randomized, blind, you know, placebo-controlled studies, and then they're like 10 days into it, and they might have a moment like, life sucks, man.
I want to kill myself.
And then they go, hey, wait a minute.
That must mean I got the drug.
Oh, my God.
I'm so happy.
Like, they go from wanting to kill themselves to realizing, well, that's a side effect.
And then they're like, thrilled.
Oh my god, I must have a real drug!
And then suddenly they're happy and their depression is cured, according to the studies.
So is that real science?
Is that real pharmacology?
No, it's all BS. It's all illusion.
It's all a result of just pharma advertising and brainwashing and gullible people.
You don't realize they already have the power to change their brain chemistry within themselves.
Frankly, all they got to do is find a way to laugh a little more, which is kind of what I do.
I can laugh about almost anything.
I can laugh about the end of the world.
In fact, I think we do that every day, come to think of it.
You got to find a reason to laugh about stuff.
Or you can just wait till you want to kill yourself and then realize how awesome it is that you got the real thing.
And you're like, oh, that's awesome.
Went from suicide to like happiness just immediately.
That's an amazing drug.
But let me just say for the record, the entire antidepressant pharmaceutical industry is a massive fraud.
It is a criminal fraud.
And it's the dosing of children with these antidepressants that leads to most school shootings.
Something like 70% or more of school shootings occur among people or are initiated by young men usually who are either on these drugs or have recently stopped taking them.
Including the famous shooting that kind of started it all, at least in the minds of many, Columbine.
Columbine, Colorado.
So not only is the antidepressant pharmaceutical industry a massive fraud that wastes hundreds of billions of dollars a year globally, and in the U.S., tens of billions a year just from the government, but the entire industry of psychiatry is a massive fraud.
When it depends on pharmacology to solve problems.
Okay, now understand that's a qualified statement.
Psychiatry, when practiced holistically, can be very helpful to people.
There are some totally messed up people who can use some help, but just drugging them because you're a psychiatrist who can write prescriptions and get kickbacks from big pharma, that's not medicine.
That's just abusing the person who's already been abused, usually.
That's another form of professional abuse.
And the other thing I want to mention on the record here, since we're talking about this, to all psychiatrists and psychologists and counselors, especially counselors, how come you never look at people's diets and You know, you're always trying to talk through people's problems.
You know, because I've been listening to this audiobook by this psychologist that deals with all kinds of supposedly revolutionary approaches to PTSD and veterans having psychological problems and stuff.
I find it a fascinating subject.
But...
The common theme that I've noticed even in the media and the press reports among psychiatrists and psychologists and counselors is they never think to ask somebody like, are you eating tons of junk food?
That screws with your blood chemistry.
When was the last time you had a superfood smoothie?
Or are you deficient in magnesium or copper?
Or do you have copper toxicity?
Or are you exposed to toxic chemicals in your life?
I would guess that maybe 80-90% of the people that are in insane asylums or their psychiatric patients My guess, I can't back this up, but I'm just taking a professional guess here, is that probably 80-90% of them really just suffer from toxic exposures and nutritional imbalances.
And that's why their brains are screwed up, because the brain, remember, runs on the blood, and what's in your blood depends on what you eat, because your blood is made in your bones, largely, or Not entirely, but largely.
Your blood is made by your bones and it's made out of the stuff that you've been eating and drinking and absorbing through your skin.
So if you're eating junk food and using junk personal care products and all these toxic lotions and shampoos and aluminum-filled deodorants and toxic fragrance, laundry detergents and fabric softeners and all these things, your blood is a toxic brew.
Right.
Unless they're blocked by the vaccine clots.
You have carotid arteries.
Blood is pumping to your brain to power your brain.
So your brain's running on blood, right?
Running on what's in your blood.
It's running on the oxygen and the nutrients and the hydration and the trace minerals and everything else that's in your blood, right?
That's irrefutable.
If your blood is garbage, your brain function is going to be garbage.
It's so obvious.
It's so obvious.
And Yet, counselors and psychiatrists, they just want to talk to people all the time about it.
Well, tell me about your multiple personality problem or whatever.
Tell me about the voices in your head.
It's like, why don't you address the source of the problem?
Maybe the problem is not that that person is crazy.
Maybe the problem is that person lives in a house with ongoing toxic exposure to black mold.
And if you get enough crazy black mold in your brain, you're going to lose it too.
Maybe the problem is copper exposure.
Maybe the problem is lead exposure.
Maybe the problem is not voices in your head.
Maybe voices in your head is just a symptom of the problem.
So we have a whole industry of counseling that is oblivious to the real causes of the vast majority of people's mental problems.
And I suppose you could say at some level, even some of these big mega churches suffer from the same kind of delusion, right?
Because you show up at church and they're like, God wants you to be healthy.
Here, have a donut, you know?
Have modified, bleached, white flour fried in canola oil that's genetically modified because we're having a Sunday donut festival after service.
You know, it's like...
You talk about God and then you feed your flock garbage.
Are you for real?
Why don't priests, you know, pastors and psychiatrists and counselors and doctors for that matter, why don't you all start with the basics?
Like, hey, hey, what are you eating?
Like, how clean is the water you're drinking?
What kind of products are you putting on your skin?
Because if they're toxic, you're going to be toxic.
If the food you're eating is toxic, you're going to be toxic.
And this is not about body weight even.
You can be lean or overweight and have a clean diet.
In other words, you can be lean and toxic.
This is not about obesity.
This is about how clean versus how toxic your intake is.
That's what it's about.
But yet, the medical establishment defines health as like you have to be this certain thin body style.
Even if you're eating junk food, they say you must be healthy.
Oh, because you're thin.
Even though you're snorting cocaine and chugging sodas all day or Alcohol or whatever.
You're partying with Hunter Biden.
They say, you must be healthy because look at your body weight.
Your body weight ratio.
They've got it all wrong.
It's not about being super thin.
It's about being clean.
Clean in your food.
Clean in your personal care products.
Clean in what you absorb.
What you put into your body.
Which brings us to vaccines.
If you put vaccines in your body, then You should expect all kinds of horrible results, including neurological results.
I mean, you get neurological inflammation from vaccines.
What could be the side effects of that?
It could be voices in your head, couldn't it?
If you get neurological inflammation, you could be diagnosed with all kinds of psychiatric disorders, the DSM, and it could be schizophrenia, it could be...
What was that one?
Oh, obedience defiance disorder?
ODD, remember that one?
Like, if there's a doctor in the room, a doctor says, we think you're suffering from obedience defiance disorder, and you say...
Oh, heck no, I'm not.
No way.
Then they say, oh, okay, that's confirmed.
Then that's the diagnosis.
You just rejected authority.
Now you are diagnosed.
See how that works?
It's like if a cop comes up to you and says, you're under arrest.
And you're like, no, I'm not.
And they say, now you're under arrest for resisting arrest.
Same thing.
But folks, there's so much fraud in pharmacology and psychology and psychiatry.
So much fraud would blow your mind.
Here's a story from the Star Tribune.
University of Minnesota scientists responds to fraud allegations in Alzheimer's research.
While defending results, the university researcher said it is, quote, devastating that a colleague might have doctored images.
So a senior University of Minnesota scientist, who's named Dr.
Karen Ashey, defended the authenticity of her groundbreaking work on the origins of Alzheimer's disease, and she declined to comment about a U investigation into the veracity of studies led by Sylvain Lesney,
a neuroscientist that she hired and a rising star in the field of Alzheimer's research, She criticized an article in Science Magazine that raised concerns this week about Lesney or Lesney, let's call it Lesney, because she said it confused and exaggerated the effect that the U's work had on downstream drug development.
Basically, questions have surfaced, says the story, about 10 papers written by Lesney and co-authored by Ashy and other authors You, or I guess university scientists, of whether they use manipulated or duplicated images to inflate the role of a protein in the onset of Alzheimer's.
So, you know just how the pharmaceutical companies, they said that, well, depression is caused by low serotonin levels.
Well, the Alzheimer's industry has said Alzheimer's is caused by this protein.
Yeah, and how do they know?
Well, they have images.
Well, the images were faked.
So, there were efforts by another doctor here, a researcher in Tennessee, who colorized and magnified images from Lesnay's studies in ways that revealed questions about whether they were doctored or copied.
And then expert consultants agreed in the article that some of the images appeared manipulated in ways that elevated the importance of a protein called A-beta-56.
You got that?
A beta, I guess alpha beta 56.
So many of the images were of Western blot tests showing that alpha beta 56...
Also called amyloid beta star 56.
Oh, I guess that's A beta, amyloid beta, were more prevalent in mice that were older and showed signs of memory loss.
And then, what do you know, Lesnay, the same person accused of this, was named a recipient of $774,000 in NIH grants involving amyloid beta 56.
Okay.
You know, from 2008 through 2012.
And then he subsequently received more than $7 million in additional NIH grants related to the origins of Alzheimer's.
Huh?
What do you know?
So, wait a second.
Wait a second, Doc.
Are you telling me that the very person who got millions of dollars to study amyloid beta-56, who claimed that this was the cause of Alzheimer's, Is also the same person accused of doctoring the images that were exaggerated to show that amyloid beta-56 was the cause of Alzheimer's?
Say it ain't so, Doc.
And Dr.
Ashey has received $28 million in NIH grants.
And who controls the NIH grants?
Well, people like Fauci.
And in some cases, Fauci himself.
$28 million in grant money is a lot of grant money.
Huh.
Is it enough money to convince people to fudge the images?
Folks, let me tell you something.
The vast majority of so-called science that's carried out in the world today is completely bogus, made-up fraud.
The vast majority of it, especially in pharmacology and, well, also in, quote, climate change research.
It's all fraud.
Here's the way the scam works.
Okay.
You're a researcher at a university.
You need to publish papers to further your career in the hopes of one day getting hired by a wealthy corporation that will pay you millions of dollars.
But you've got to get published first.
So how do you get published?
Well, you have to write papers that the regime wants you to write.
So you have to find out, what does the regime want?
Well, the regime wants to push climate change and antidepressant drugs and Alzheimer's drug therapies and all kinds of other similar things.
It's all politicized agendas, right?
The regime wants to push the idea that biosludge is safe.
But that the climate change is breaking up marriages.
So as a researcher, then you apply for a grant from the NIH.
And in the grant, you basically say that you're going to perform a fake study that achieves the results that the regime wants.
Basically, your grant says, oh, I'm going to find that climate change is killing the turtles on the coast of, you know, Georgia or wherever.
Then you get awarded the grant.
Oh, here's a million dollars to study the turtles!
And then so you spend six months or a year faking like you're studying turtles.
And then you come up with like turtle photos and turtle biopsies and turtle footprints.
You know, turtle teeth or whatever.
You do all kinds of imaging and, you know, dismantling stuff like they did talking about with the piano earlier.
You know, you separate the piano keys, you take apart the wood, you undo all the strings, and then you write up your paper.
And then your paper says, well, climate change is destroying the turtles on the beaches.
And then you get published because the science journals, they don't care what they publish as long as it is consistent with the regime.
So it's like the climate journal.
And the climate journal, every article is like, climate change causes this.
Climate change causes constipation.
Climate change causes hair loss.
Climate change causes unhappiness.
Which, of course, contradicts the SSRI journals, which says depression is caused by a brain chemistry imbalance.
But no, it's actually climate change.
And then you get published in that journal, and then other scientists cite your study as if it's fact.
And the media cites it and says, well, climate change has been proven to cause infertility and hair loss in turtles.
New York Times, right?
And then using those articles, you as a researcher, you're able to apply for new grants.
For more topics that are completely bogus, made-up garbage.
And the NIH will give you even more money.
That's the scam.
That happens every day.
It's happening right this minute.
The vast majority of the so-called science conducted in America is complete fiction.
Totally made-up fraud.
The vast majority of FDA-approved drugs do not work on most people.
That's a fact.
I mean, that's the kind of fact that's been written by publishers of medical journals in the past, like the British Medical Journal.
Have you read some of the quotes by Dr.
Marcia Angel, or I don't know if it's Marcia Angel, I don't know how you pronounce it, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine?
Have you seen some of her quotes?
She's written a lot of books, too, by the way.
She talks about total corruption of drug companies and doctors.
She says things like this, which sound like things that I say.
But she said them first, quote, She continues,
quote, I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Yeah.
Folks, you think pharmacology is based on science?
Give me a break.
What a pathetic joke.
It's based on fraud.
If your vaccine industry is based on science, well, you don't believe that if you're listening to this.
No, vaccine industry is based completely on fraud.
There is no real evidence that COVID vaccines do anything to help anybody reduce their risk of COVID. And they harm people.
In the meantime, they actually destroy your immune system, as you know.
And most other vaccines are in the same category as well.
Not all of them, but most of them.
Psychiatry is largely a fraud.
A lot of modern physics is just completely fraudulent nonsense, like the supercollider subatomic particle search for the god particle and all that nonsense.
They're blind to reality.
I've heard mainstream physicists describe gravity as a force.
It's not a force.
You don't even understand the basics.
Of the cosmos.
Gravity is not force.
Oh, you can simulate it as a force.
I understand that.
But it's not an actual force.
It's a distortion of the fabric of space-time.
It's a 3D distortion.
It's not a force.
But there is perhaps no greater fraud in the field of sciences, so-called sciences, than what we find with economists.
And you know, economists...
And I'm speaking of mainstream economists here, not the good kind of alternative economists like ShadowStats and so on.
There are some good independent economists out there.
So this doesn't apply to 100%.
But for the most part, economists are delusional fiction writers pretending to be scientists.
So because they work with numbers, they convince themselves that they're working with science.
Even though they're making it all up, like with MMT, Magical Monetary Theory.
And you know what MMT says, right?
MMT says that any government can print unlimited amounts of money and it will never cause a problem and it will never cause inflation.
That's MMT. And that's what they're operating on and they call themselves scientists.
And they give each other doctorates.
Well, you're a doctor of economics.
You must be brilliant.
No, you're full of bunk.
You're just imagining nonsense and giving yourself all kinds of credentials for your nonsense.
You have a very sophisticated type of stupidity that is rare in this world.
But most economists don't understand numbers.
They don't understand the basics about what happens when you expand the money supply.
They don't understand price inflation, monetary devaluation.
Much less other, more complex topics, like the role of taxation in suppressing economies and so on.
They're just completely twisted and they don't understand anything.
And this gets to the main point that I started off with today, which is the perversion of incentives.
So there's a fitness center in Boston.
And the fitness center...
Charges starting out, if you want to be a member of their fitness center, you pay $300 a month.
However, your monthly fee is reduced by $10 for each day that you show up at the gym.
So in a given month, you would normally pay $300, but if you showed up 10 days, then you get $100 off, and for that month, you only pay $200.
If you show up for 20 days, obviously, you end up only paying $100.
And if you show up for 30 days, you get it for free.
So this is a gym that has an incentive for people to use the gym and get more physically fit and get more healthy.
So that incentive is consistent with a goal of health, is it not?
That's a pretty cool idea.
But yet, what we have in our pharmacological world of Big Pharma is an incentive to keep everybody sick.
Because they make more money when people stay sick.
If people get well, Big Pharma loses them as a customer.
If they get well, then the FDA doesn't get more money from drug companies because they won't develop more drugs.
Too many people are getting well.
So Big Pharma has an incentive to keep you sick.
In fact, Big Pharma has an incentive to release pandemics.
Look how lucrative that has been.
And it's not just Big Pharma.
The incentives have been perverted everywhere in society.
So for example, what about protecting the borders?
Well, the illegals are incentivized to cross the border and then collect all kinds of free stuff.
Here, free housing, free phones, free food, free transportation, blah, blah, blah, free insurance, free education for your children, everything.
Well, if you're wondering why more illegals keep coming in...
There's your answer, right?
Because the incentives are there.
And although I think it's awesome that Texas Governor Abbott is busing these illegals to New York City and to D.C., the District of Criminals.
And in the District of Criminals there, Mayor Bowser, I think that's her name, she has now invoked the National Guard saying, oh my God, it's a crisis with all these illegals showing up in D.C. How horrible it is.
And in New York City, Mayor Adams there, he has said that Texas Governor Abbott is a coward, is a coward for sending illegals to New York City, creating a nightmare in New York City.
He's like, well, all of a sudden, Adams in New York City and Bowser in D.C., all of a sudden, they've figured out that having a whole bunch of illegals dumped on your doorstep is actually a bad thing.
All of a sudden, they don't like illegals anymore when they're in their cities.
But as long as they just invade Texas and Arizona and California, oh, that's fine.
Just don't send them here.
So what Governor Abbott is doing is actually brilliant.
He's creating a disincentive...
For more illegals to come into the country.
He's like, hey, we're going to make this your problem in New York City.
We're going to make this your problem in D.C. And frankly, he should bus illegals to Boston and Los Angeles.
Well, Los Angeles is already mostly illegals anyway at this point.
But you get my point.
He should send them to Chicago and all over the country.
Make it a national problem and there will be an incentive to solve the problem.
It's like, oh my gosh, we got to do something about this border.
Too many illegals coming in all over the place.
Now, another perverse incentive in America is the welfare state.
So governments pay people to not work.
This is a horrible idea.
Especially given that, well, almost every employer in America is desperately trying to find people who are willing to work.
Even the railroads.
This is why Union Pacific is on a strike, actually.
I mean, it's still being negotiated, but 95% of the employees voted to strike because they're being overworked because they can't find enough people.
And if you go across America and you look at businesses and what's going on and why they're shutting down and what's happening, you can't find anybody that wants to work.
Why is that?
Well, because they're being paid to not work.
So this is the, you know, the economic PhD solution for society.
It's like, well, we don't need anybody to work.
We'll just pay people to not work at universal basic income, UBI, and then we'll just print the money and hand it out and everyone will be a consumer.
No.
In reality, the economy collapses because nobody works.
Nothing gets done.
Nobody drives the trucks.
Nobody restocks the groceries.
Nobody works at the factories.
Nobody delivers boxes from Amazon.
Nothing gets done.
Nobody runs the trains.
But the economists, well, that can't be.
My theory says that everything will be fine.
But in reality, everything's falling apart, you see.
You want to solve the labor shortage problem in America overnight?
End all welfare among able-bodied people.
If you've got two legs and two hands that work, get off your ass and do some work.
Put these people back to work.
You want to get free money?
Well, guess what?
You're going to have to earn it.
Now, of course, if you're physically injured or disabled, a veteran with an injury, I get it.
I'm not saying you've got to force those people to work.
We do need some level of safety net, especially for veterans and people injured on the job and so on.
I get that.
I understand financial support for disabilities.
I get that.
I'm not opposed to that.
But I'm saying, what about all these people that can work, that could do something?
They just don't want to.
They're just lazy.
They're just incentivized to do nothing and collect free money and sit around and watch The View, you know, a bunch of hags on TV. Insulting America's intelligence on a daily basis.
That's all they do.
The incentives are perverted.
And the perverts are incentivized.
As you've seen from too much drag queen story time.
So I've covered this in a separate podcast.
And I'll keep it short here.
But one of my contacts is in the auto industry.
Specifically works with a lot of commercial.
But also private diesel trucks.
And they deal with brands like Dodge and GMC, Chevy, and so on.
And he told me today that in Mexico, which is where Dodge diesel trucks are made, apparently.
I didn't know that, but they're made in Mexico.
And there's a parking lot in Mexico right now with 21,000 Dodge Ram diesel trucks.
Or it did have 21,000 trucks four weeks ago, he said.
But over the last four weeks, they've been able to move 1,000 trucks a week out of that parking lot.
And the reason there are so many trucks sitting in that parking lot, I mean, trucks that are ready to sell in America, is because they can't get the transportation, which is normally done by rail.
So normally these trucks go on trains from Mexico to different distribution hubs in the U.S.
And then they come off the trains and they go on to trucks for the local distribution or what we might call the last mile, even though it's more than just a mile.
So.
The trains don't have enough capacity to carry the trucks.
And this particular parking lot that Dodge uses in Mexico, I'm told, has a limit of holding 24,000 trucks.
That's a pretty big parking lot, by the way, just saying.
Pretty good-sized parking lot there.
But if Dodge hits 24,000 trucks sitting there, then they have to stop the factory, because they have no more place to park the trucks.
So fortunately, they've been able to move about 1,000 trucks a week out of there, and they've got that parking lot down to something like 17,000 trucks.
But it's not clear if this is going to – if they're going to be able to get all those trucks out of there, especially if Union Pacific or other railroads go on strike.
Then you don't have personnel to run the trains to move the trucks.
And so what happens then?
And what about the diesel engine oil shortage that's coming, too?
Given that, you know, both trucks and trains need diesel engine oil because they all run on diesel engines.
What's going to happen in September, October, November as that oil dwindles in supply?
I mean, at that point, it's going to be even harder to get these trucks shipped out of there.
I was also told that the Chevy Tahoe A Z71 model, as an example, there's a shortage of parts and chips and things, and so normally I'm told there's a steering wheel lock that is in the Chevy Tahoe Z71, and that Chevy can't get the parts to make the steering wheel lock.
So they're selling the trucks or the Tahoe, whatever that is.
I'm not a big car officiant.
I don't keep track of all this stuff.
But they're selling these vehicles.
I guess it's a truck.
They're selling these vehicles without the steering wheel lock.
And then they're telling the dealers that, oh, we're going to get you the parts eventually.
And then when we get you the parts, you just contact the customer and you tell the customer, bring that truck on back.
And then you, the dealer, you install the parts to make the steering wheel work correctly, and then we, the car company, will reimburse you, the dealer.
All you've got to do is just call all your customers and tell them to bring those trucks on back in.
And I was told by my contact that this whole thing, this whole fiasco, is, quote, kind of a nightmare.
Kind of a nightmare.
He said that in a normal dealership, some of the ones that he's involved with, they'll have a thousand vehicles on the lot normally.
Right now, they have 180.
So, you know, less than 20% of the inventory they used to have.
And he said most of the trucks were sold before they even arrive.
So the people who want the trucks have to buy them, you know, sight unseen.
He's like, oh, I want that one.
They do the paperwork, they buy the truck, and then they wait.
It's like ordering a truck online, and then eventually, hopefully, they get it to you if the trains run, which they may not much longer.
So that's what's happening in the automobile industry.
I didn't know all that until I talked to my source in that industry.
I thought a lot of the downward trend in automobile sales was because, of course, rising interest rates.
And he told me that may be a factor, but he thinks the biggest factor is just a lack of inventory.
They just can't get the vehicles.
So there's not much to sell.
But hey, getting back to the science topic here, we've got to cover this story.
NASA is going to launch two more choppers to Mars to help return rocks, says the Associated Press.
So, okay, here we go.
NASA's launching two more mini-helicopters to Mars to return Martian rocks and soil samples to Earth.
So, just in the opening sentence, how dumb is this?
You know, the average reader, first of all, is going to read this.
They're going to, like, fly helicopters to Mars and pick up rocks and fly helicopters back?
And that's not what NASA is saying, but that's the way people are going to think that this works, because First of all, just to explain this to the average person, we'd have to explain how rotors work on helicopters.
How is lift generated?
What is lift?
What is altitude density?
Why do rotors rotate?
Why are rotating rotors called rotors?
Why?
And how thick is the atmosphere in outer space?
You know, like these kinds of concepts, we would have to first educate people a little bit about how helicopters work.
So if you were able to achieve that, if you were able to explain to somebody, you know, to really get it through their thick skulls, like how helicopters work, They would eventually realize that, well, you can't fly helicopters at high altitude even on Earth, can you?
Nope, you sure can't.
You know why?
Because you can't generate enough lift because there's not enough, shall we say, air density at altitude because the air gets thinner and thinner the higher you go.
And then you look up official NASA data on Mars.
And NASA has been telling us for decades that Mars is a dead planet that basically has no atmosphere, no water and no life and no microbes and all that.
It's all lies, of course, but that's the official story.
I mean, they discovered microbial life on Mars in, I think, 1976, and they just covered it up, you know, covered it up.
They had a mass spec instrument that proved it, and they just rewrote it.
It's like, gotta censor that!
Can't let there be life on Mars!
Even if it's just little microbes or what have you.
But anyway, so they've been telling us that the atmosphere is 0.6% of the density of Earth's atmosphere at sea level.
And I'm going from memory on this, but I think that that's the equivalent of Earth's atmosphere at an altitude of something like 186,000 feet or something.
So then NASA tells us, oh, and we're flying a helicopter around Mars.
That's been the story for a couple of years now, by the way.
And they've even...
They said they sent this helicopter to Mars, and then they said they launched it, and they say it's flying around Mars.
And they have, like, CGI videos to, quote, prove it.
Like, deepfake NASA videos.
Now they say that these new helicopters are sending to Mars are going to transport rocks on Mars.
These are going to be heavy lift rock helicopters.
That's what they're telling us.
So from the Associated Press, quote, under the plan announced Wednesday, NASA's Perseverance rover will do double duty and transport the cash to the rocket that will launch them off the red planet a decade from now.
But then they say if Perseverance breaks down, the two helicopters being built and launched later this decade would load the samples onto the rocket instead.
So they're saying that they're going to carry rocks across a planet that has essentially virtually no atmosphere using helicopters that can't possibly fly.
And this is NASA, of course, which stands for Never a Sane Answer.
Oh, and if you want to see an example of NASA fakery, you got to watch my interview with Bart.
Now, Bart Sabrell, we did a fascinating interview about a month ago, and it's on my channel on brighttown.com.
Bart Sabrell has this footage from one of the Apollo missions.
I forgot which mission it is.
And this footage shows NASA faking like they're looking out the window as they're traveling to the moon.
And they claim they're halfway to the moon.
And they claim to be looking back at Earth.
And they show this planet in the window.
And this is supposed to be a video of Earth from afar.
And then it turns out that NASA accidentally filmed too long.
They forgot to stop the cameras.
And then the lights come on.
And then they take...
They take, I don't know, paper off the window.
And it turns out they were only faking the Earth Circle.
And actually, there's a much larger window with a much larger planet in the background.
Whatever is supposed to be the planet.
And the whole thing was faked.
Completely staged.
And this is part of the official record now.
These are official films from NASA, which they couldn't get rid of.
Although they tried.
So NASA's in the business of faking everything.
Now, you know, I'm not saying that the Earth is flat or anything like that.
I'm just saying that NASA has been faking science long before pharma was faking science.
NASA, they kind of pioneered science fakery, and they're still doing it with these helicopter stories.
So, I mean, think how crazy this is.
If you went to, let's say, an aerospace company, You went to an aerospace company and said, I have a billion dollars, and I want you to design a rock-lifting helicopter that can transport rock loads, but that flies on a planet that has almost no atmosphere whatsoever.
Can you build that for me for a billion dollars?
And they would say, no, because that defies the laws of physics.
You can't build that.
It won't fly.
Because you have to have some, you know, some density altitude.
You got to have some atmospheric air pressure for a helicopter to work.
So no, that's not going to fly, literally.
But NASA, knowing that the public is completely ignorant of science, and NASA's like, well, ah, screw it.
Let's just say it did work.
Let's just say that we sent a helicopter to Mars and it's been flying around and it's working so well, we're going to send two more helicopters.
That's right.
This is from the same government that can barely make F-35s fly on Earth, by the way, without falling out of the sky.
Because it's a military project.
And now they're going to claim to have three helicopters on Mars.
A planet with virtually no atmosphere.
Oh, and I forgot to tell you the best part.
How are these helicopters powered?
Get this.
Solar panels!
Solar panels.
They claim to have a solar-powered helicopter flying on a planet with no atmosphere.
A planet that gets a lot less sunlight than Earth.
So, folks, even if you try to build a solar-powered helicopter on Earth, you couldn't do it.
It wouldn't work.
Because you need a lot of energy to lift off and carry loads like rocks around, by the way.
You need a lot of lift.
They think that the average consumer is going to, yeah, solar-powered helicopter on another planet with no atmosphere?
Carrying rocks?
Sure, makes total sense.
Why not?
And vaccines are safe and effective.
Sure, why not?
And back on Earth, we can understand everything by smashing things into smaller and smaller bits.
And the economic scientists claim we can print money forever and it won't ever be a problem.
So just keep on printing, buddy.
And so on and so forth.
And depressions caused by a serotonin imbalance in the brain.
You know, just on and on.
Fraud after fraud after fraud after fraud.
Just endless.
So folks, you're living in something way beyond the Truman Show.
You're living in an artificial reality.
You're living in a kind of matrix.
And...
In this matrix, the less you listen to, quote, authorities, and the more you observe the real world around you, the more truth you're going to find.
But if you listen to the authorities, you know, the official experts, it's just lie after lie after lie.
But that's what most people feed on.
They live on a diet of endless lies.
But if you cut all that off and you observe reality, which I say spend time in nature too, which is something that I do daily.
Spend time in nature.
Observe truth.
Observe reality.
Do experiments like I do and see what actually happens.
Not what someone's theory says is going to happen, but see what actually happens.
Turns out it's often completely different from the, quote, theory theory.
Explore the real world.
And you'll have a lot more success navigating reality.
And realize that almost everything that's done to control information, you know, the control of Wikipedia, the control of big tech, the censorship, the deep platforming, the silencing of alt media, the labels of disinformation and fake news...
All of that is designed to protect the official lies of the fake science industry, fake science of pharmacology, the fake science of psychiatry, fake medical science, fake vaccine science, fake astronomy, fake archaeology, fake anthropology, fake history, on and on and on.
It's almost all fake.
You've been fed a world of lies.
Fake timelines, fake history, fake cause and effect, all of it.
And to the extent that you believe that, you've been living in an artificial world.
Fake economics as well.
Fake money with fake news and a fake government rigged with fake elections.
You get the point, right?
It's all fake.
Most people will live out their entire lives living on nothing but lies.
They will rarely encounter a truth, and if they do, they will reject it because it contradicts the lies that they've grown comfortable with.
So one of our goals should be, I believe, that as we journey through this life is to peel away the lies and slowly, methodically uncover the truths of the universe in which we live.
And this is a universe that is completely different from the way it's described by NASA or modern science, published science journals, the biomedical industry, the vaccine industry, pharmacology, psychiatry, all these areas.
It's almost all lies.
And you will never know truth until you cut yourself away from those lies, which takes a lot of courage and inner strength and a lot of mental fortitude because the truth is very unpopular and it's frightening to most.
People believe lies because it's comfortable.
People believe in these lies because they're popular, because of social pressures, because of conformity.
Most people would rather die than to lose their conformity.
To them, consensus among their social circles is more important than their very existence.
So they are incapable of breaking away from the lies and ever discovering the truth.
And yet, you are different by definition.
If you're listening to this, you're different.
I'm different.
We are the explorers of the cosmos.
We are the explorers of reality.
And we report back to the oblivious, clueless masses sometimes of what we found in the real world.
And they just can't believe it.
Kind of like, you know, the journeys of Christopher Columbus and other Spaniards Who journeyed to, well, what they thought was India, and they would go back to Spain and report, we found, you know, like gold everywhere, and the natives, and they wore headdresses, and people are like, you're making that up, that's impossible.
Well, when you're an explorer, you're going to find some truths that are unbelievable, that are shocking to most, that are beyond the mental grasp of the masses.
But that's exactly where you need to be if you want to truly understand the fabric of this reality in which we exist.
The great psychic shock is coming to the world.
It's going to happen through a number of means.
There will be economic collapse.
There will be global conflict.
There will be mass starvation.
There will be global depopulation.
Governments will fall.
Constructs of lies will be shattered.
There would be a great psychic tectonic plate shift.
And then out of that, there would be a great psychic awakening and even a spiritual awakening to the fabric of the cosmos, the nature of reality, involving things like the Contagious Mind, one of my books.
It's a free downloadable audio book if you want to hear it.
What's coming is going to make our current reality look prehistoric by comparison.
Because the true nature of reality is far beyond the imagination of even science fiction writers.
Morphic resonance is just one starting point.
Understand what that is and then you'll have a little inkling of a clue of where this is going.
But I will say this.
There is enough knowledge and there are enough solutions in the cosmos that are within reach right now that no human being needs to suffer.
No person needs to die of degenerative disease.
No person needs to live in poverty.
And no person needs to feel hunger.
No person needs to be enslaved or to suffer under enslavement.
We have solutions for all of these things and much more.
We have the knowledge within our reach to set humanity free and to end the global governments that are the slave masters of modern human populations.
We must defeat these evil, demonic globalists in order to set humanity free.
And that's the process in which we are engaged right now.
Part of the process of doing that is to expose their lies, which is what I focus on today.
The other part is to connect you to the truths that are innate, cosmic, really divine truths that will set you free.
But it's a journey.
It's a day-by-day journey, and we are getting there together.
So I thank you for your time today.
I thank you for listening.
I want to wish you a wonderful and productive weekend, and I will have additional updates for you over this weekend, and I'll be back with you again, God willing, next week.
So thank you for your prayers and blessings.
God bless you!
And I hope I put a smile on your face from time to time here and shared some knowledge that you find valuable.
Have a great weekend.
Take care.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection