All Episodes
Previous Next
May 11, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:01:11
Dr. Lee Merritt joins the Health Ranger to discuss vaccine MIND CONTROL and medical MADNESS
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, we have evidence that people are dying from this shedding.
Not to mention all the irregularities of the menstrual periods and all the things that suggest that this is damaging women's reproductive health.
And they said we were crazy and it didn't exist.
It was just those kooky anti-vaxxers again.
And here we found documentation.
They knew about it since 2015 and they didn't come clean.
That's where we are today.
in a, they have clearly the pharmaceutical company has lied to us at the detriment of human health.
Welcome to Brighton Conversations.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of brighteon.com, where we have censored, banned conversations that are filled with an incredible amount of truth and wisdom of what's happening in the world around us.
And today, one of our most favored guests, Dr.
Lee Merritt from TheMedicalRebel.com.
And she has a wealth of information about what's happening with the spike protein, the COVID vaccines, the plandemic, and much more.
We're going to talk about that today, including virology.
And she joins us to just go over all these topics.
You're going to be fascinated by what we get into.
Dr.
Merritt, it's always a pleasure to be able to speak with you.
Thanks for joining me again.
Welcome to the show.
Oh, thank you.
I love coming back.
Oh, it's great to have you on.
You open up people's minds in such a way that nobody else does.
Just so many possibilities of what's going on.
What's on the top of your mind right now, let's say over the last month?
Mind-blowing things going on.
I mean, well, first of all, on a simple thing, have you been following the pilots that are dying?
Yes.
Yes.
You know, we took H1N1 vaccine.
I mean, on the most least conspiratorial, basic, standard medical care level, we took H1N1 vaccine off the market after 53 deaths.
How much more of this is it going to take?
And here we have now, these are young, healthy guys.
These are not sick, you know, they always say, oh, we looked into it, it wasn't the vaccine, that was just, you know, people die, old people die.
Well, these are young, healthy, screened people.
I mean, I was in the Navy for 10 years.
I was married to a Marine pilot.
I hung out with pilots.
Their biggest fear of pilots is their flight surgeon.
They're screened and medically cleared, and if they get anything, if they get hypertension or anything, they can be knocked out.
So these are Nazi guys, and four of them and one airline in one week.
Yes, and four of them died from blood clots.
And from blood clots.
It's all the same thing.
It's not like one of them got hit by a bus, right?
Right.
What are the odds of this being a total coincidence?
You know, one in a billion?
Come on.
And what's even more bizarre, you know, everybody realizes, and this has been known for years, that what do you do when you're on a transcontinental flight or something?
You're sitting for a long period of time.
You are at more risk of a blood clot developing your legs that could go to your lungs and cause a thrombolism and kill you.
I mean, that's always a risk of sitting for a long period of time.
So they tell you, get up, move around, maybe take a baby aspirin before you get on the plane.
They've known that.
Well, now they're seeing enough people that are having it as plane passengers, they're advising people not to get on a plane right away after you've had a vaccine, to give it a while.
How can they then mandate the pilots are taking vaccines?
I'm supposed to go to a meeting in October where I have to fly.
I'm kind of thinking of driving.
I mean, I'm kind of worried about this now.
Well, the answer to that, though, is that, you know, I call this phenomenon vax-cidents, when vaccinated people suffer side effects of blood clots that can cause many strokes or temporary loss of motor control, for example.
But there can be vax-cidents on the roads as well as in the air.
But like you, I'm wondering, how long is it going to be before a pilot dies on the flight deck during a flight and puts 350 passengers at risk because of the vaccine?
Yeah.
Are they going to mandate that at least one competent pilot be unvaccinated on the flight?
Now think about that.
That's where we're going.
It's almost like the dating service for unvaccinated.
The world is getting completely crazy.
But to mandate that pilots take it, now I understood that United backed off and said we're not going to mandate pilots get the thing anymore, which is good.
But I've heard now that Delta has some deaths that we're not being very forthcoming about.
I don't know if Yeah, and American Airlines has been canceling hundreds of flights a day on their 737 class of airliner.
And remember that pilots are checked out and rated per aircraft.
So they have a pilot shortage on that aircraft.
What would explain that?
Oh, and they're not telling us too much about that, are they?
Right.
Of course, when we talk about death, we're only talking about death.
Those are four deaths.
How many people had a stroke or had a non-fatal blood clot that they can't fly?
And unfortunately, that's probably a lifelong loss to the airline and to the pilot's career with that.
That's not something you probably get back in a pilot's seat with.
Well, right.
And I think this is related.
You've seen all the cases of myocarditis in young, healthy, athletic men, young high school boys, young college men who are, again, athletes, taking no medications, very healthy, strong cardiovascular health, health and some of them are dying suddenly after the second shot of the vaccine.
Others are being hospitalized with inflammation of the heart.
And of course, if your heart has to pump stringy blood clots around, of course it's going to be irritated and inflamed.
No one would want that job.
That's tough to work.
You know, I'm starting to get, My question this whole thing is, where are the doctors?
I don't expect the FDA and CDC to suddenly have a moral change of heart here, but I do expect some doctors to start waking up.
And where are the doctors?
Well, I have been getting some calls, you know...
Anonymously kind of thing.
But one guy does deal with this kind of problem with myocarditis.
And he told me, and tumors, and he says, you know, and all this kind of stuff.
He said, I see things now, I've seen 20 of these particular kind of tumors pop up that I've never seen in...
I've only seen two in my entire career before.
And he said the other thing about the heart, he said that he's being asked to see these patients with all this myocarditis.
He said that's about a 66% fatality rate to live past five years.
Just because they're still alive in the hospital doesn't mean they're going to be alive in five years.
This is what I said.
I wrote an article that just basically came out, I think, in the New American about, you know, is this the new thalidomide?
When bad things happen in the pharmaceutical industry, it's like an avalanche.
And our goal is to pick up that snowball at the top of the mountain before it starts rolling down and killing a lot of people.
But we're ignoring it.
And VAERS is set up specifically to look at unusual things.
I would say these pilots dying are pretty darn unusual.
Well, yeah, but the other thing that's a factor here is this mad rush to push this vaccine with a sense of urgency that none of us have ever seen in the history of vaccines.
I mean, you've been a doctor for many, many years.
Have you ever seen this kind of urgency to get everybody vaccinated by a certain deadline, July 4th in this case?
What could possibly be behind that?
Well...
See, I mean, if you want my actual worldview, I believe that we're at war, and that this is a takedown of Western civilization, if not humanity, so that it's an attack on us as humans against, I mean, they're coming after us, they're coming after our children, and they want us dead or sterilized.
And we can argue who they are, but I think it's not necessarily a nation-state war.
This is a fifth-generation war.
I don't know if I mentioned this last time I was on, but there's a book that, if people don't get this, they should read this book by Zhao and Wang.
They're Chinese colonels, and it was written in 99, and it really talks about this, about the idea of using everyday items that we think of as not harmful suddenly become lethal, because You're using poisons, you're using genetic agents, you're using whatever.
It's not characteristic warfare where you have a battlefield and you have an army and we can see what's going on.
Part of this is the psychological operation.
You've got to believe that there's...
There's clearly been a psychological operation that has gotten the American people, I'll leave out the rest of the world, I'm not going to speak for them, but I'm a proud American, and I've never seen anything in my life, where people that are skeptical about buying a car without going to Carfax are getting their children vaccinated with something that's totally experimental.
That's like a symptom of some, you know, psychological illness.
It's Stockholm Syndrome.
They've created this.
And so I think that's my world view, is that this is not by accident.
I'm glad you're delving into the psychology behind this because Dr.
Peter McCullough has described his colleagues, other doctors, and he's an internal medicine expert, one of the most cited physicians in the country in terms of published papers on cardiovascular issues and so on.
But he says his fellow doctors are in a trance, as if they've been hypnotized, and he says they're under a spell.
I mean, I'm quoting what he said.
I think that's good.
And again, this is not a guy who is prone to, quote, conspiracy theories or anything of the kind.
He's not an anti-vaxxer, so to speak.
Nothing of the kind.
And he's describing the behavior of doctors as a spell.
And he's asking, what's going to happen when they snap out of it?
When they break the spell and they realize they've been injecting pregnant women with a biological weapon spike protein.
Right.
What are they going to think?
And, you know, everybody's waking up at a different time.
So I remember being on a thing, and I love Dr.
McCullough, but he's a really well-trained classical academician.
And he and Dr.
Freeh and Harvey Risch and I were on a panel one time, and those three guys, all from Ivy League, you know, kind of think...
Thinking academic places.
They're all scratching their heads, and this was early on, and they were saying, we just don't understand what's going on.
Why would they be doing this?
That's wrong.
And finally, I just kind of blundered out, and I said, you can't understand this if you're thinking that people in the authoritarian medical societies here are acting in your best interest.
If you think about this as an act of war, it makes sense.
This is not by accident, because there's really only two.
This is right up your alley.
Okay.
Okay, I got thinking about this PCR test.
There's really only two worldviews here.
People that do labs, you know, and you know more about this than I do, but I work with the medical lab people in the hospitals, for example.
These are highly trained professionals.
The lab managers know how to run tests.
They know how to set up tests.
They know how to make sure they're not false positives, false negatives.
They know how to read the brochure that comes with the test.
So what we have happen in 2020 is either you have to believe that That every lab manager in the United States and around the world suddenly had a brain fart.
And when they were given these PCR tests, they didn't read the instructions.
They didn't set it up right.
They did it incorrectly.
All at once, they all had a brain fart and forgot how to do their job.
That's one worldview.
The other worldview is they were told by a higher power to not do the right thing.
They were told to cycle these tests at 40 to 45 cycles rather than what it says.
I looked up one of the Thermo Fisher package inserts on the test and it shows a nice graph.
It shows how you have to be in a certain zone and it should be between 20 and 35 or 25 and 35 cycles.
A lot of times between 25 and 30.
Never go over 35 and they were doing 40 to 45.
So again, It's the same question, why did the CDC not tell us one thing that was right, that could have helped the American people?
Not one thing.
They were wrong about everything.
That's not coincidence.
That's conspiracy.
I'm sorry.
The whole thing was malicious and it was engineered.
And by the way, as part of our laboratory, I sat down with Thermo Fisher sales reps to purchase.
We attempted to purchase, starting a year ago, their PCR equipment.
And we were going to use it for food microbiology testing because you can look for traces of viruses or bacteria in food, food pathogens, basically.
And I asked them specifically right up front.
I said, look...
Is this a qualitative test only that just says yes or no, it's present?
Or is this a quantitative test where you can tell me how many micrograms per milliliter of this bacteria is in this stuff?
And they said, no, no, no, no, no.
It's only a qualitative test.
We can only say that we found one fragment or more of whatever sequence is in the system, how many base pairs, and you get to define that.
And if you have a shorter sequence of base pairs, it's going to say everything's positive.
They told me this.
And by the way, what's really funny, they refused to sell us the equipment ultimately, not because of anything that I'm doing with this, but because they saw that I was a co-author of a science paper on the quantitation of cannabinoids in cannabis extracts, and they said, oh, we don't want anything to do with the cannabis industry.
I'm like...
I developed a mass spec method for quantifying cannabinoids using a mass spec instrument.
It's used in research.
I'm like, what is wrong with you people?
And they wouldn't sell it to us.
So, yes, they've gone insane, but they admitted that their equipment is useless for diagnosing COVID, whatever that is, and that was Thermo Fisher.
Yeah, that's interesting that you talk to the very same people I looked at.
Well, it's just one of the many...
So many things are coming out.
Here's the other thing that came out just in the last couple of weeks.
You know, they told us that we were crazy for talking about vaccine shedding, right?
Right.
Well, guess what?
We found that in 2015, I don't know if you knew this, that they came out with a guidance for industry.
It's called Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products.
So we've had people die.
I know of at least three deaths personally.
I mean, one through VAERS, which was the very clear cut had to be the vaccine because it was a baby that was nursing on the mother.
Mother takes a second Pfizer vaccine, transmits the vaccine in the breast milk.
Baby dies of thrombocytopenia.
Rare, rare situation.
So that's a clear transmission thing.
We've had two others that I know about where an isolated older person was living with somebody who got the vaccine just to make them safe, and then they got sick and it killed the person they were trying to make safe.
The person died of COVID. Again, isolated, not going out in the community, couldn't have really gotten it anywhere else probably.
So we have evidence that people are dying from this shedding, not to mention all the irregularities of the menstrual periods and all the things that suggest that this is damaging women's reproductive health.
And they said we were crazy and it didn't exist.
It was just those kooky anti-vaxxers again.
And here we found documentation.
They knew about it since 2015 and they didn't come clean.
That's where we are today.
Clearly the pharmaceutical company has lied to us at the detriment of human health.
Well, they've maliciously betrayed us.
And so the entire promise of the medical industry, which always claims, oh, we're looking for cures.
We're trying to help humanity.
We want people to live longer.
I'm sorry, but bullshit.
You're trying to kill everybody.
That's what's actually going on.
Or sterilize them.
Yeah, or sterilize them.
Right.
But, you know, sorry about my profanity, but sometimes you just got to call bullshit on this whole industry.
But question to you, what have you learned since our last interview about a month ago about the spike protein?
Because a lot has come out about the toxicity of the spike protein and its transmission or sharing or whatever you want to call it.
Any big bombshells in that area?
Well, first of all, just in the distribution of this, the Japanese study got translated that showed that it's distributing to the, and it's actually, they use the carrier agent, but it's the same principle, that they have made this, they can design these carrier agents, and they admit this in their studies.
If you want to use this same technology for the vaccine to make a tumor therapy where you put a genetic agent in that you can heat up, you can do things to, and you want to target a specific organ, you want it to go to the spleen, they can make the carrier molecules, these lipid nanoparticles, take it to the spleen versus take it to the liver.
Well, when the Japanese wouldn't accept the Pfizer vaccine and they had a pharmacokinetic study done, It showed that it's 65 times uptake in the ovaries versus the skeletal muscle.
Wow.
Okay?
So again, they knew how to do this.
I'm not, you know, I guess you can't prove that they purposely targeted the ovaries, but I can prove they know how to target organs.
And secondly, it went to the ovaries.
So, you know, it's hard to imagine that was completely accidental.
So that's come out.
I'll tell you the other thing is, which I think we've talked about this, that neither of us are quite on this whole thing, that there's no such thing as viruses.
However, I came across, it's a national strategy group.
That was written by a Marine.
It was an Air Force Captain or Air Force Lieutenant Colonel.
And it was about the national security issues of synthetic biology.
That term, synthetic biology, which I thought was really interesting.
Because you take a step back here.
All the problems we're trying to figure out what happened.
You know, why can't we culture, get a pure culture of isolate of the virus in these lung stuff?
Why are we having lab people tell us they can't find this?
And we have this, you know, we don't know where we are because of the PCR testing.
There's just a lot of questions.
One of the questions I had is, when this thing first came out, you know, it went up exponentially in Wuhan and in Lombardy and New York.
It looked really bad.
People were saying, and I remember you saying it, too.
I mean, we all were saying it, that it had the guys that were talking about R-naught value.
They were saying this is the worst they'd ever seen.
And it was looking bad.
I was graphing it.
You were graphing it.
This thing went up, and I thought, we're in real trouble here.
And then it just fizzled out into a normal viral curve.
Well, if it were really airborne, if this were really what we think of in our biology understanding, it was an airborne deadly virus, it should have ripped through Paris, it should have ripped through Omaha, Nebraska, it should have ripped through Boston, it shouldn't have stopped at three cities.
So What is a virus?
Well, we now know you don't need the whole virus to cause COVID. You don't even need the whole spike protein.
All you need is a very short genetic sequence called the S1 subunit that hooks into the ACE2 pathway.
So what do we call a virus?
It's a genetic material wrapped in a lipoprotein coat that is technically dead, that floats around, and when it gets into your mucous membranes or somehow into you, it can damage the host.
What would we call a genetic poison?
It would be a short, a small bit of genetic material wrapped in a synthetic lipoprotein coat of our making that when it gets into you, damages you.
That sounds very similar to me.
And I could make another one.
I could say, what would we call an immunogenic contraceptive?
A small amount of genetic material wrapped in a synthetic protein coat that I designed.
When it gets into you, it goes to your ovaries and sterilizes you.
So I guess what I'm saying here is our worldview that there are viruses, and these viruses are just acts of nature that come out and infect us and do all this damage, could be completely wrong.
We could be dealing with synthetic...
I mean, we know that DNA and RNA is out in the world, and it's in us, and it's natural.
But what we're dealing with may never have been natural.
This idea of these emerging infectious diseases and all these things could have all been lab-made.
And this, to me, in medicine, if you have a bunch of problems, we try and figure out one diagnosis that explains them all.
We try not to come up with 10 diagnoses.
The thing that explains everything that's happened here It is not a virus, but a contact genetic poison that is spread around three cities.
You get it on you, and it gets into you.
It causes some people to die.
It causes some people to get very sick.
And you then can pass it through a couple more passes to other people.
Let's say, just like the vaccine that they devised to sterilize mice in Australia, where it passes through two I get the poison on me, I pass it to another group of mice or another group of humans, and then they pass it to another group of humans, and then it kind of dies out, because it just gets diluted out.
That could have happened, and then that makes the scary part of the curve, and then what did they do?
They instituted fake tests that caused a...
Everything that was a viral illness, every other illness of the season became COVID because of these fake tests to drive the narrative, but you're not seeing the same kind of death and destruction you saw at first, so it's a different issue.
Now we're just dealing with a virals curve, and that caused this whole thing, and for what purpose?
To drive people to get a vaccine, which is the same contact pathogen.
That would explain everything, to be very honest.
Don't think of this as a live entity that came out and got us.
The bioweapon could have been a contact poison that is now in the vaccine.
You make some really important points there, Dr.
Merritt.
So the synthetic biology, as you say, can create, I would just call them toxic nanoparticles, or as you say, genetically engineered nanoparticle toxins.
Now, these, as I understand it, these operate just on a simply mechanistic principle in terms of how they interact with receptor sites or how they may strip electrons from elements of other molecules of cells in your body, for example.
You know, oxidation, oxidation reduction, and so on.
This is just like biochemistry.
These are not living things, and these...
The word nanoparticle just means the nanoscale particle.
It could be any molecule that's in the billionths of a meter scale.
I was just looking up while you were talking, VX nerve gas is a nanoparticle toxin.
Just looking at the molecule...
It's got carbon chains, it's got sulfur, it's got phosphorus, a couple of oxygens, interesting morphology, but it's just common elements that are arranged in a specific morphology that makes it incredibly toxic to the human nervous system.
Does the military make VX nerve gas?
Well, of course they do.
That's one of the weapons that has been used probably since around World War I, basically.
So can they make other types of nanoparticle toxins that can be spread through contact surfaces or even aerosolized in certain cases, like you kind of mentioned there?
And I think the answer is yes, absolutely.
And they don't like you said, they don't even need a viral replication engine inside them to achieve what they're trying to achieve, which is this mass hysteria.
Push everybody into vaccines, then inject people with the spike protein bioweapon that destroys their cells from the inside.
That's the real weapons attack, I think.
But the spike protein bioweapon could be wrapped in a.
That could be the poison, is what I'm saying, too.
That could be the genetic poison.
And, you know, in favor of that, we have our people talking about this.
I mean, we have researched this.
We've been involved in these things, in these tactile poisons.
So, in the history of warfare, I mean, this has gone back now into the 1980s, where a lot of this research has been going on.
But I think the point here is that if, you know what it is, and what got me thinking about it was this whole thing about Anthony Fauci.
You know, suddenly how they have awakened to the fact that he funded the Wuhan lab.
Now, I think maybe we had talked about this.
In February, I knew they had funded the Wuhan lab, not because I'm a really crack investigative journalist, but because I just went to the NIH website and read it.
They're throwing him under the bus, but in the process they're saying, well, he was a bad guy.
He did all this.
He funded all this.
Obviously it wasn't his money, but he did it, but it allowed this unfortunate leak to happen.
And the point I guess I'm making is when we think of this as a virus, we can convince ourselves it was accidental, it was leaked out, nobody's really targeting us, this isn't a bioweapon attack.
And it's, you know, don't look any further than Anthony Fauci.
We found the criminal, get rid of him, and this will go away because this was an accident.
You can't accidentally poison people.
That's why I think it's kind of important to think of these possibilities because there's no way this is an accident if the spike protein is the contact poison.
And that's why I'm bringing this up.
Well, and this leads me to the question about booster shots.
So we're starting to see vaccine companies saying, oh, we're going to need booster shots, which is crazy just even from a medical standpoint because at first they're saying, well, our vaccines are 95% effective.
Or even one company said 100%.
I'm like, why not just say it's 110%?
And then later on, they say, but you're going to need booster shots.
And it's like, I thought you said the vaccine was effective.
What do you think is the real function of the booster shots?
Because obviously, they want to keep injecting people.
And will that ever end?
No, it'll never end.
It's a moving goalpost.
Even what they said you needed to do to be able to travel will change.
I mean, it's already changing.
Remember, there was all those crazy conspiracy theorists, we're not going to mandate vaccines, right?
It always changes, so don't trust these guys.
In fact, the more I know about what they're able to do, this idea that they can create cells that can produce anything they want, they can position them in the body to do almost anything they want.
Charles Lieber with his nanotechnology that he gave to the Chinese, sold to the Chinese, That can wrap around your nerves and eavesdrop on your nerves.
I mean, all of this can be injected, and they've admitted that they can now do external control of what they can.
They inject things into you, especially with the graphene or the, what's it called, the SPIOs, the super paramagnetic.
The spions.
Spions.
Yeah, superparamagnetic ion oxides.
And they can be then controlled from the outside.
So I'm starting to not only, but I never take another vaccine or another injection from these people, I'm kind of starting to worry about my toothpaste.
I mean, the potential to put things into us, and this whole issue now of the magnetism that we're finding, It's just an unbelievable situation, and that we're not responding to it appropriately.
That's the other reason why I'm kind of screaming about this being a bioweapon attack, because if you know you're at war, it's like the people in Sarajevo that one day were in a normal world-class city, and the next day...
You know, weapons were being fired and bombs going off.
And if you kind of knew that was coming, you could either arm up and join the militia or you could at least be a survivor.
But if you're totally clueless about the reality of the world, you walk out thinking you're going to the mall and you get shot right out your front door.
We seem to be in.
Let me back up for a second.
What was the name that you mentioned of the person who talked about these elements that wrap around your nerves and eavesdropping?
Charles Lieber.
Charles Lieber.
Charles Lieber is an interesting guy, and I think this is what I found out in February of 2020, and I think it's important.
So Charles Lieber, this goes to intent and what's really going on.
Charles Lieber was the head of chemistry and biochemistry at Harvard.
He was being paid $15 million and had a DOD funding $15 million by...
You know, when DOD funds a chemist, it's not because he makes better tasting coffee, right?
He's involved in high-level, top security, militarizable technology research.
And it said on the...
So he's getting paid $15 million by our government, our DARPA, the Deep Arts of the Military.
At the same time, they claim, unbeknownst to them, he was working for the Chinese.
He was getting paid 50,000 a month's salary, $158,000 a year in travel expenses and expenses, and $1.5 million to go back and forth to Wuhan to set up a lab in Wuhan.
Now, what is his specialty?
It turns out, if you look at the Harvard Gazette, it says Charles Lieber is a nanotechnology genius.
And one of the things that DARPA has always wanted to do is to connect the brain to electronics.
They couldn't do it.
They couldn't connect cells, biologics to electronics until Charles Lieber came along.
Apparently, he and maybe others, but I think he was part of this...
He created these nanogels and what they call nanowire, which is really not wire, it's a nanomesh, but this nanotechnology that when it is, it can be injected into you, and it's part of this genetic therapy that we're being subjected to because without these nanogels, you can't drive the DNA or the RNA into our genome.
So he was part of that, this silver impregnated nanogel.
So what happened was he was indicted in February and arrested.
And by the way, I think maybe the reason he only got indicted and arrested was because his graduate student got arrested trying to escape through Logan Airport with some specimens.
He was going back to China with a bunch of stuff.
Well, he got arrested, so they kind of had to take down Lieber.
Now, I said to myself, okay, I'm going to watch Charles Lieber.
Because if Charles Lieber gets into a cell and they throw away the key, I'll think maybe our people are not involved.
But if they give him a slap on the hand, then I'll know that we are involved in this too, that this is a collaborative agreement with China.
Because Regardless of all the flowery words about his national, international standing and his international research, what he really did is, in a nutshell, he was in the pay of the Chinese communists.
He transferred highly technical, what they call actually what people are referring to as the Manhattan Project of today, is highly technical brain electronic interface research to the Chinese.
That benefited their national security interests at the detriment of our national security interests.
Now, in less polite circles, that would be called treason.
So the guy shouldn't be just given a light sentence, but guess what he was tried for?
He was given the Martha Stewart charge of lying to a federal agent.
That's like six months maybe in a little happy farm where you can work on your painting skills or something.
So that's worrisome.
And not only was that worrisome, is that the affidavit that was written by, I think his name was Robert Plum, the FBI agent, it didn't talk about all this nanotechnology connecting the brain, but that's clearly what the Chinese have written about being interested in and turning their attention to in their own military doctrine, is turning their attention to brain electronic interface, They didn't mention that.
What they claimed that Charles Lieber did was working on nanowire technology for lithium batteries for electric cars.
Well, that is just smoke and mirrors.
He went over there.
He didn't do that.
And he's got over 74 patents.
He's got over 200 articles.
Nothing mentions electronic cars or batteries, batteries or electronic cars.
So that's our FBI covering for this guy.
Well, let me...
Yeah, exactly.
Let me throw something else in the mix here on this, because you're going down a deep rabbit hole, but I looked at the elemental composition of these spions, and they only consist of two elements, and that's iron and oxygen.
So you can actually assemble the superparamagnetic, what is it, ionized...
Oxides.
You can assemble these from elements that exist in your blood.
So my theory is, what if the injection injects instructions and an operating system of sorts that results in a self-assembly of the nanomesh infrastructure inside your body using elements that are already present in your blood?
In other words, it becomes a parasite using your blood to build bio-circuitry.
Is that feasible?
Sure it's feasible.
And we already know that we can control cells from the outside.
And look at the people that are showing up with this magnetism, which I've tested people and found it too.
It's not always there all at the same time.
I can't remember where he was from, Barcelona or someplace.
There was a guy that was, or Lichtenstein, someplace.
He's over in Europe.
And this is a mathematician.
He's not a physician or that kind of biology scientist.
But he just decided to, he got an electrical meter and he started testing these people.
And he made the observation that when you get the vaccine, you're not as magnetic as you are later, which goes along with what you're saying about some kind of self-assembly, Wow.
Dr.
Hoth, I believe, up in Canada, he was talking about, my ears picked up when he said this, about the different, as people got the vaccines in his village, because they were targeting the First Peoples, And he'd been in that village being a primary care doctor to these guys for decades.
He'd never seen anything like it.
But people were fine with the COVID until they got the vaccine.
And as the vaccine program rolled out, he had all these people with all these side effects.
And he said it appeared to him that over time the side effects changed.
They morphed from one thing to another.
There are a lot of neurologic side effects.
So I think it's very conceivable.
And for sure we know, if you look at what they did with these particles, these kind of particles that can be directed and externally activated through frequency modulation and heat, It tells you that they can potentially do a lot of things, and of course, they don't have to tell you what's in the vaccine.
This is an emergency use authorization, so they only have to tell you what it is they're claiming is the active ingredient that they want In this case, they claim it will make antibodies to the COVID so you don't get sick idea.
They only have to tell you that part.
So they tell you they're making a spike protein, but your point is they can be coding us with lots of RNA and DNA. That doesn't have to be reported in this.
Well, and it also means, right, right, they don't have to tell you really what's in it, but if this is constructing some kind of biocircuitry, a complex system that spies on your neurology, and maybe it's a two-way street, it can also send impulses to certain neural regions in your brain or throughout your nervous system,
based on receiving external information or electromagnetic fields or frequencies or what have you, You know, conceivably, this could alter moods.
It could alter behavior.
It could serve as a lobotomy.
It could burn out, you know, nerve cells in your brain on command.
It could even...
I know this sounds like science fiction, but it could even turn you into like a bio-puppet being controlled by not an exoskeleton, but an intraskeleton.
Weird zombie apocalypse.
Yeah, like a remote-control zombie.
I mean...
Yeah, but it's not theoretical.
When you look at the studies of these magnetic and paramagnetic nanoparticles, they specifically have a test that they did in rats, I believe, mice or rats, and they could change their behavior because depending on how you heat the particles, it activates certain neurons.
So they showed where they could actually change the mice's behavior from externally after they injected them with these particles.
I read that study.
Yes, they had mice favoring a certain area that was more prone to the magnetic.
And weren't they using magnetofection techniques in that study?
That's what this is called, magnetofection.
And the other thing that we're finding is that people, now that people on the internet are showing this kind of thing, People are coming forward who have never been injected and are magnetic.
Their whole families are magnetic.
It suggests that we're getting it from other places, that this has been going on for a while.
So I had a farm family from Nebraska tell me this.
They're not around a lot of people.
The kids don't go to school yet.
They didn't take these vaccines.
And because of all this outcry on the Internet, they tested themselves and they found they were magnetic.
So I'm hoping to follow up with them, but that's...
I said to Carrie Madea and some others, I said, maybe we should get a map of the United States with stick pins, the old-time stick pin technique, and just every time we get one of those stories about a whole family finding out they're magnetic that are not vaccinated, put stick pins in them and see if there's an area, if this is aerial, if this is something by geographic location, because something is going on that's not just the vaccine.
The vaccine may be the final This is getting into weird matrix territory, but let me ask you, when I first saw the magnetic thing happening, my critical scientific brain told me, ah, it's just people hoaxing it, maybe they're sweaty, maybe they're holding their shoulder at an angle, and a spoon is just kind of sticking.
You know, that's what I thought.
I'm like, come on, come on, how could people be magnetic?
But what you're saying is you have seen that this is an actual phenomenon, and Oh, yeah.
And then you see people that have like a spoon or something that actually, you know, I saw a picture of a woman who had a spoon hanging to her forehead.
And what was most alarming about that, it was sent by her friend, and she had just gotten the first Pfizer vaccine.
She noticed this, but she's going to go back and get the second Pfizer vaccine.
What?
To me, that's the most crazy part of the whole deal.
Yeah.
No, I've actually seen it.
And my friend, I've got another physician friend, same thing.
We've tried magnets on people, and then we've tried paperclips on people, which says it's not just that they're having magnets stick to whatever's inside them.
It's that they have some magnetic quality that other things stick to them, like this lady with the spoon.
Well, but the spions, that would be a plausible explanation if their body is somehow assembling spions that have a super-magnetic quality that could attract metal objects.
But, you know, if you've ever played with magnets, even if you have just a tiny amount of physical space, the strength of the magnetic field drops off substantially.
Terribly.
Right, so they would have to have magnetic particles really, really close to the surface of the skin, effectively, which means they would have to be distributed throughout the body.
Yeah, well, and they appear to be.
I mean, what I did, first I started just doing, I did the arm, I would test people's arm, and then I would test the counter arm just in the same place because I thought that was a pretty good control.
Yeah.
And, you know, I don't have enough numbers so far.
I mean, it's just, it's just, it's low numbers because I got so busy in clinic, I just couldn't keep doing it because it took a little time.
But it was, there was clearly, there was clearly an association to the site.
Yeah.
And I didn't find anybody that had it all over, but I've seen enough, I've seen enough, I've seen doctors put out videos now that look very legit, where they show that people are having magnetic and electromagnetic signals all over.
They're not just in the arm.
And one person I did read say, that seems to develop later, so I don't know.
That's, again, this is not enough data to know, but there's something real going on here, and it's probably been going on longer than we realize.
Yeah.
Okay, so just adding to the mystery, you know, the biodistribution study you mentioned earlier out of Japan, I read that study as well, and I recall that it said there was also a high concentration of spike protein nanoparticles in the adrenals.
I think that's true, and the spleen.
The two biggies were the spleen, the ovaries, and then the adrenals, and I think it was something else that was kind of lowered down, yeah.
But attacking the endocrine system...
You think about what the endocrine system controls in the body, which include not just reproductive capabilities, but also moods and control over neurological and motor function, all kinds of things, right?
I mean, that's the traffic system of the body.
Yeah, your adrenals go down, you go down.
I mean, that's a major issue.
So, I mean, it kind of reminds me a little fluoride.
If you wanted to dumb people down, though, and you wanted to slow them down, adrenals would be a good hit.
You know, it just goes from one thing to another that you can't get a handle on, but there's certainly, it's certainly none of this, I guess none of this is for the benefit of people, and I can't believe, one of the, also the diagnoses here, one of the actual things that's happening is the clear psychological operation that's got people to do this.
You know, and this doctors, I think it's interesting, his point about the doctors being in a trance.
I've just been kind of mad at them, pissed off saying, don't they have a soul?
Have they not awakened?
Do they not know their history?
Did they not look at Nazi Germany?
We are exactly there.
Where people are turning the other way, they're not speaking out, and by not speaking, they're killing people.
What's going on here?
When are they going to wake up?
But he's got a point.
They do appear to be so committed to this program, they won't even hear.
Anybody criticizes it, you can't even talk about it.
And I had a call from a guy in a major, major research university.
He said he cannot find a 1200-bed hospital, he cannot find one other person to talk to that agrees with him about this.
Remember, though, the first wave of the vaccines were reserved for doctors and nurses.
So it was the doctors that got vaccinated first.
Now, what if, then, they've been put into a vaccine trance of some kind that we don't understand yet, and then they're unable to really control their own, you know, they're unable to stand up and say this is wrong now because they're kind of in some kind of hypnosis state.
Or they're in denial.
I mean, even without postulating some weird, you know, outside force, once you've done something to your, you know, some of the people that are the most, there are two kind of groups of people that have been vaccinated, people that are really remorseful, and now they're worried.
They really want you to tell them, how can I get out of this?
I shouldn't have done it.
I felt like horrible afterwards, lost my hearing in my ear for a while, whatever.
They had problems and they recognized it and they couldn't deny it.
But then there are a bunch of the doctors that took it, and they know they've just given it.
They've also been, even if this was early on and possibly through no fault of their own, they recommended these things to other people.
And now they just are in such denial, they can't bring themselves to admit they were wrong.
I do see that point.
Yeah, right.
No doubt that's the case as well.
And also, they can't admit to the liability that would be involved if other people were harmed by their actions.
They work for hospitals.
The hospitals have already ordered them, don't talk about vaccine side effects.
In fact, there was a story the other day where a hospital was telling all of its doctors and nurses to say that when patients appear who have adverse reactions, to say those aren't adverse reactions.
Those are just intolerances.
Right.
It's a sign that we've got the real vaccine.
Yeah.
Right.
So, I mean, they're playing word games.
It doesn't mean that that person is not having a seizure.
They're still having a seizure from the vaccine or lost the use of their hands or whatever's happening, but they just call it an intolerance.
So then they think that excuses it.
There's definitely a high degree of self-deception going on in the medical community, no doubt.
Well, and clearly it started with being bought.
I mean, the top dogs here took the money from the NIH for research, and those hospitals are paid for by that NIH grant, and they tell the people below them, it's a hierarchy.
It's like, you won't speak about hydroxychloroquine or we'll lose our grant and you'll lose your job.
Right.
Sure, that's what's going on.
Alright, so the big question, Dr.
Merritt, if you're willing to even entertain this question, so...
Looking five years down the road, I mean, do we have human civilization?
Have we collapsed because we've lost some percentage of the people and everything's falling apart?
I mean, are we living in Mad Max?
Or what's the world look like?
I know.
And that's a question.
And the first thing we have to do is define what we mean by, do we have humans?
So everybody that's taken this vaccine has taken artificial genetic material.
What does that make you?
Are you now still human?
Especially the DNA. Let's talk about, you know, the RNA may not interpolate into your genome, but the DNA could.
And even the RNA has DNA that's probably alongside it by accident, you know, from the embryonal cells that were used in production and things.
So This is synthetic genetic material that people are taking inside them.
Now, you cannot patent real biology, but you can patent, you know, Bill Gates and Perbright have a patent on the coronavirus.
It's not the real coronavirus.
It's a man-modified coronavirus, but they got a patent on it.
That's how you can patent things.
So will they be able to patent you?
And then if they can patent you, can you be owned?
I mean, this is really at the basis of what it is to be a human.
So...
I don't know, but I'm just saying we are now in a new stage where we no longer have just our own DNA in our body.
It's not just like a virus gave it to us.
It's from reality.
They have been implanting.
It's like if I had plastic bones.
Does that make me a normal human being?
And I'll tell you, along with this, there's a couple weird things that are happening.
I don't know if you've followed this.
The animal attacks.
Have you been following that?
I've had three people talk to me about this.
It's not something I picked up on the news either, but it turns out that a lot of dogs are suddenly attacking people.
Maybe those are vaccine-sniffing dogs.
Well, or they don't recognize them as their owners anymore.
I don't know, but they're attacking people.
And we had a lion that jumped over a 12-foot wall and killed the zookeeper.
Somebody sent me a whole list of these and said, do you think this has to do with these vaccines?
And I said, well, it's pretty darn weird.
You know, why now?
Why is that suddenly happening?
And then we had reports out of, it was on social media in Israel, when they first started doing that Pfizer rollout and everybody was being pushed to get the vaccine.
Wow.
Women were reporting that after their babies were born, their babies would not, if they got the vaccine, apparently, you know, sometime in the end game there, the baby would not nurse from them.
They, you know, again, why is that?
Is that because they don't sense it's their mother?
They don't recognize that it's genetically them?
I don't know.
It raises a lot of really good questions, but the one thing you can't deny is you're getting synthetic DNA put into you.
Do you think that we've reached some kind of turning point on this where so many people are now asking questions?
I saw a woman on Twitter just the other day.
Her 13-year-old nephew died three days after the second dose.
And she's a pro-vaccine person who even said in her Twitter message, like, oh, I'm totally pro-vaccine and I know these are rare, but my nephew's dead.
How many deaths does it take before people figure out what's going on here?
Right, and those people haven't read the actual, and my colleagues in medicine have not read the actual data of the vaccines they've been giving for years.
If they knew the actual data on the flu vaccine, they wouldn't have given that one either.
I didn't used to consider myself an anti-vaxxer.
My professor of pharmacology went on to become the head of the FDA. I believed everything they told me in medical school and in residency, because I was just an orthopedic surgeon resident.
I was out in practice.
This isn't my specialty.
But when they started mandating the vaccines in the hospital for nurses, I saw this chain of events coming.
And I think I was the president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons at the time.
And we're the people that are against government mandates and government medicine and free market, patient-centered ethical medicine.
And so I decided to really look into this.
And I did.
What doctors should do is I didn't just believe the, oh, it's 95% effective.
Oh, take your flu vaccine.
It'll save your life this year.
I actually read the data that was used to pass through the FDA studies.
And I read for three years on the flu vaccine.
And it wasn't at all what we were being led to believe.
It was a total...
I came away thinking, this is a total scam.
At the best, in a year, for getting damage or any injuries, and flu is the biggest injury out of the paid database up until this one, For Guillain-Barre primarily.
Beyond that, it's only a 10% chance on actual probability it can make a difference in your benefit anyway.
That's the actual numbers I came up with.
And you notice last year they said, oh, well, we missed the antigen, it was only 10% beneficial.
No, it's only 10% in a year, actually.
But that's the problem.
My colleagues are listening to what the news is saying.
You don't get your information.
Unfortunately, it happens.
We get so busy, we start getting our information from ABC News, and You know, the other person that listens to ABC News, rather than go back and actually look at the data themselves.
And the other thing people, I think, need to be aware of that are starting to wake up about this.
Even doctors.
Well, you know, my son is like, well, I'll wait until it comes out in a peer-reviewed journal.
There's a guy named Lehman McHenry who has a great video on the falsehood of peer review, and it's all about the pharmaceutical companies are paying ghostwriters.
I can't remember which drug company it was that got caught...
Yeah, it's a cartel.
A cartel.
Monsanto did the same thing for many years on glyphosate and biotech and so on.
It's well known.
You're exactly right.
But then so many doctors, I mean, I know many doctors and some of my family and friends, their doctors are so convinced that this vaccine is perfectly safe.
And, you know, I'm asking, how can they think that?
Have they even looked at VAERS? Have they even looked at the reports?
You know, of course, I don't know if they had VAERS when I was in medical school, but most doctors don't even know VAERS exists or they've never used it.
And I know that from a colleague of mine who's my age, in his 60s, and I said, you should put that patient in VAERS. And he said, what's VAERS? So the problem is doctors don't know about it.
We were never trained to use it.
It's very cumbersome for doctors.
And now that we have electronic medical records, if you start putting a lot of things in VAERS, there's a trace on the electronic medical records that might get you in trouble with the hospital.
You don't know.
I mean, so the system is set up to hide all this stuff.
I just cannot believe that, you know, doctors are generally smart people.
I just can't believe they're this gullible, like you say.
Exactly.
It just...
Without question, other people, we're having the public, people complain that anybody can put stuff in.
I say thank God anybody can put stuff in, because without them putting it in, the doctors would not be doing anything.
Yeah, and like you said, doctors tend to be academically very capable, but what good is 170 IQ if you're so gullible you believe everything the government tells you?
I mean, come on.
I mean, being intelligent needs to come with some sort of discernment, some wisdom about what's true and what's not true.
But you know, I do think part of the problem is now the older doctors that are involved in this, they're the ones on top that are being bought.
It's the older doctors like me that didn't, we kind of were the child of the 60s where we didn't trust our government and we still don't completely blindly trust our government and we're the ones kind of starting to speak out.
It's the younger doctors that have been trained to believe as they do.
And if you think about it, what do they pound into these kids?
Oh, you have to have evidence-based medicine and their qualities of studies and evidence.
Obviously, you'd want evidence.
Well, just an interesting point.
If this really is a disease pandemic and people are dying and we want doctors to help people, why would you lock up the evidence?
So they say they want evidence, but now they have all these paywalls behind what used to be open architecture, used to be able to get online, and you could read articles from different sources.
Now they've got this so-called Science Direct, which seems to buy up these articles and put them behind a paywall where you can't get at them.
So they don't care about evidence.
This is all smoke and mirrors also.
And the evidence that they only care about is the evidence that they approve.
It's evidence from authority.
It's not real evidence.
Yeah, yeah, that's right.
And then big tech and social media and the mainstream media, they all focus on, oh, you can only get information from authoritative sources.
And anything that disagrees with that is non-authoritative or has been, quote, debunked.
Remember when it was debunked about the lab leak origins of COVID? And then they had to reverse the debunking on that as it came out.
So, we're almost out of time here, but I can't believe this has gone by so quickly.
But what do you think people need to keep in mind moving forward here?
Just everything that we've covered here today, what's the most important thing that people need to be doing?
Well, I think the shedding's real, and so I think people need to protect themselves.
And the question is, how do we deal with that?
You know, it's one thing.
I could choose not to get a vaccine for right now.
Number one, we can never allow mandates because it's over.
When you can't say no to a vaccine, you don't own your body.
And that is, by definition, you are a slave.
So that's the end game.
You cannot allow mandates.
But beyond that, what do we do for our children, our grandchildren, with this whole shedding issue?
Because that's the number one question I get about how we protect our families.
If we believe all this, you know, the people that believe the vaccine is dangerous, believe in the shedding, how do we protect our families?
You know, it's a problem for our next generation.
As you said, are we going to be in a Mad Max scenario where we're depopulated?
Because nobody can have babies.
So I think we need to protect our young people.
Pregnant women, women of childbearing age, women, anybody below menopause, for sure, needs to be protected so we can have future generations.
And I think that's imperative.
I'm sorry to interrupt.
The ultimate LOL would be if only anti-vaxxers could have children.
You know, that may not be an LOL. I mean, we're already talking about it.
I met somebody today who, you know, young guy, single guy, wants to get, you know, married, have children.
But now, what's he going to do?
Is he going to date a gal that's had a vaccine, only to find out 10 years later she's sterile?
This is a really hard, we're going into a very weird world where it may not be quite Mad Max, but we may have guys selling their sperm that are unvaccinated, where we have people like Christiane Northrup calls it, these people that are not vaccinated are going to have golden DNA. They'll be the golden DNA children.
And it's crazy.
Well, don't tell guys they can make money selling their sperm, because that would be the end of working.
They've already spent the last year at home getting paid to not work.
Now, if you tell them they can get paid for sperm, it's over.
There's no more workforce.
So let's keep that on the down low.
But healthy eggs, that's a different story.
That might be true also.
Yeah, that might be true also.
I mean, it's...
I hope, you know, I think, and I do think, we're going to know things in the fall, how this is going to go, because people are now, we shouldn't be dying now.
We're dying now, and there's not a season.
The death season always comes.
It's always a winter season.
It's, you know, God's nature's way for whatever reason.
It's been with millennia, but now...
It's artificially boosted.
And so what you're going to see, I'm afraid, is people running out to get their shingles shot or their flu shot in the fall.
That might be a trigger to take them down.
They're going to get other viruses that could...
They're set up for what's called pathogenic priming or antibody-dependent enhancement.
Because they didn't do tests on humans for long term, we have no clue what's going to happen.
But I don't think it's going to be...
It's not going to be better than what it is now, and it could be considerably worse.
Well, Dr.
Merritt, it's always fascinating to talk with you.
Your website is themedicalrebel.com.
We'll put that on screen so people can check it out.
Pardon me saying this, but I feel like you should have a book with Skyhorse Publishing.
You should be releasing a book on all this.
I should be.
I've been running around trying to save...
My husband says, are you saving the world again this afternoon?
I've been trying to save people from this insanity of having a spoon attached to their forehead.
But when it calms down a little bit, I guess I'll try.
Okay.
All right.
Yeah, well, if you do want to put a book together, of course, we'll help promote that because you are very good at explaining these concepts in a way that people can understand.
And yeah, as a disclaimer, you and I both, we don't have all the answers here.
A lot of this is what-if scenarios, but we're very concerned about where this is going and some of the early signs.
So we'll just have to watch and pray for better outcomes here and avoid being poisoned ourselves as best we can.
That's where we are.
And I think the good news is, I think we're going to come out of this with some really good understanding of what's going on.
That's great.
We're going to find out that we can be much healthier than we've ever been.
Yeah, that's right.
Well said.
All right.
Well, thank you, Dr.
Merritt.
It's a pleasure talking with you.
Take care.
Take care.
In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full free audiobook as MP3 files.
▲
Export Selection