Zach Vorhies reveals blueprint to DEFEAT Google once and for all
|
Time
Text
So stopbitburning.com is the website for this and I really hope we can, I'd like to interview you again if you're open to it in the near future.
I'd like to ask you some additional questions about, for example, if Section 230 were nullified, What would that look like the very next day?
How would Google internally begin to alter its own ranking algorithms?
How would they even begin to re-monetize accounts or bring people back or would they just resist it?
You know what I mean?
There's so many questions about how can they even reverse this even if they're acting in good faith and I'm not sure they would act in good faith.
Because the damage they've done, the number of businesses they've destroyed, lives they've destroyed, the demonetization, the censorship, the changes in the culture, the rigging of the 2018 midterm elections.
How do you reverse all of that?
Because this has been going on for years.
And, you know, to me, I think, I mean, my opinion is you abolish Google.
You abolish it and say that that can never be allowed to rise up again in our society, just like the Third Reich.
That's just my personal opinion.
I don't think you can reform Google because, as you've even said, the culture is so devastatingly authoritarian and Marxist.
You can't have a government force ethics onto immoral people who are biased and bigoted themselves.
That's what Google has become.
There's so many different nuances here.
So many different ways that I can sort of answer this question.
So, you know, you say that, well, Google's got to fall.
And I want to bring on that thread, right?
There's a saying in Silicon Valley, which is, if the product is free, you are the product.
Okay?
So, the search engine is free, you're the product.
What does that mean?
That means you're being tracked, and the data that you're generating as you go through these websites has value, and it has value because someone's buying it.
Who's buying all of this data?
Everyone is buying this data.
All the intelligence agencies around the world, China, Britain, Israel, all of these intelligence agencies around the world, And this is my opinion and it's based on a lot of data, but they're all buying your data.
You know, your location data, what you're typing, what you're clicking.
You know, whenever you think that there's a line in the sand that they won't cross, they always cross it.
And that's what Google's business model is.
It's called surveillance capitalism.
That's usually why they're so hungry for grabbing up all of the data they can possibly grab and offering all these products for free.
It's because they're selling it.
If you want to talk about the destruction of Google, what you have to talk about is how to cut off their major funding supply, which is the selling of this data to the Chinese and to the various intelligence agencies around the world.
You cut that off, you cut off the revenue stream, and then everything else around Google collapses because the revenue stream collapses as well.
And that can be done with just one law, a law that says you can't sell surveillance data on American citizens to enemies of America, for example.
That's right, right?
Or at least, look, if you're going to sell it, then they've got to sell their information back to us.
So, hey, look, China, you can buy our citizens' data if we are allowed to buy your citizens' data.
Guess what?
China's going to not take that offer.
And as a result, we're going to be like, hey, look, you can't export it.
So basically, it's going to be a data export embargo to certain countries.
That's going to wipe them out.
If you understand this systemic weakness of Google, which is their occulted revenue stream, then you're going to understand why Google's doing this last stand To try to prevent Trump from winning the election at all costs.
Because essentially what they are is they're a front for China's acquisition of America's data.
Okay?
And so that's the overarching thing.
And so now that I've said that, if we drop back in and we go back to the reality of censorship, Let's go back to that.
Okay, so what does a post-Section 230 world look like?
Well, that sort of world is a world where censorship does exist, right?
And censorship, and people think that I'm against censorship and I'm a radical.
I'm not.
I believe in censorship.
Let me be clear.
And the censorship that I believe in is community-based censorship.
And what that censorship looks like is, well, whenever you see like a report button on Facebook or Twitter or Google or YouTube or whatever, that's community-based censorship and it works really well.
Hey, this is really offensive to me.
I'm gonna report it and If there is some sort of threshold where there's enough people reporting something, then maybe there's some sort of banning or some sort of takedown, and then you can have a recourse where you say, hey, this shouldn't have been taken down.
And then there's some sort of authority figure that comes through and says, oh yeah, like an arbitration, okay, this is fair, this is not.
The standards are known.
They're put out and they're fair.
And if we have that, then we can have a system that works and can move from culture to culture to culture.
Because the same cultural standards that we have in America are going to be different than the same cultural standards that are going to happen in China.
And China's allowed to have censorship based on their cultural values.
The American can have a more liberal cultural standard, or censorship standard, than another country.
And we should have that right.
And I think that a community-based censorship regime would release Google from their liability and allow them to have Section 230 protections.
Well, that's interesting.
That game can be rigged, of course.
For example, Big Pharma can hire armies of trolls to flag anybody criticizing vaccines, for example.
We know for a fact that Big Pharma hired people to subscribe to our email newsletter so that they could dishonestly flag our incoming emails as spam I'm
just throwing that out there.
I'm not...
I'm not saying that's an overall bad approach, but it definitely can be gamed.
I'm sure you're aware that it can be.
It 100% can be gamed.
The thing is that you want to make it harder to be gamed, not eliminate the game itself.
It's the difference between a click farm that will automatically report BS stuff and a hired troll sitting in a workroom doing the reporting.
One costs 50 cents to farm out bots and the other one you have to pay someone minimum wage.
And the barrier, it's basically how much cost are you going to make a corporation pay in order to do this censorship.
Yeah, good point.
And finally, just getting back to what you said about Google selling data to even strategic enemies of the United States.
It seems like that really is the Achilles heel here, to cut off that revenue stream.
And Google deserves to have that revenue stream cut off, in my opinion, because they are betraying, in essence, the American people by surveilling Americans, selling data to enemies of America, strategic enemies, Countries like China, which are engaged in chemical warfare through fentanyl, that is killing 60,000 Americans a year, that's a form of warfare.
Arguably, they engineered the Wuhan coronavirus that has killed 110,000 Americans so far, according to official statistics and so on.
It can be argued that China is on a war footing with the United States, so why is Google deriving revenue from China and other enemy states?
And I think the first step to reversing all this is disclosure.
And they need to come clean about what they're doing.
They need to come clean about their AI transfer to China.
And this is one of the biggest things.
AI is one of the most powerful military weapons out there.
And Google has been very open about sharing it with their Chinese counterparts.
And if you put together what they've said, this is coming from the AI VP of their cloud services, Fei Kei Lei, who said that when it comes to AI, Google does not have borders or boundaries.
It's almost an exact quote.
Wow.
Sounds like something Skynet would say.
Right.
And then the president of the Chinese Communist Party, I'm going to butcher his name so I won't say it, he stated that anything that had a military application that was developed in the civilian space would be acquired by, would be shared with the People's Liberation Army.
And so you put those together.
What that means is that Google is transferring AI to China's military.
Because that's what they have to do by law.
And so Google needs to come clean about this.
And we need to basically cut off This giveaway to the Chinese military.
And I think that's going to become very obvious as the Cold War between our two countries, because that's what it is right now.
We're entering into a Cold War with China as that heats up.
And so I think a lot of these things are going to come out.
I think it's going to be one of the most interesting periods of time that we've lived in America coming up in the next five months.
Let me ask you this.
How would Google engineers, who are these sort of radical left-wing, you know, bigoted people who hate America for the most part, and they hate the founding of America and so on, wouldn't they feel proud to have written code, AI code, that would help drive, for example, Chinese cruise missiles that would attack the U.S. Navy and kill American sailors?
I mean, wouldn't that be something that Google, many of these Google extremists, would actually celebrate internally?
Not yet.
No, no.
I mean, here's the thing is that you have to realize that these people that are the operators of Google believe that they're really great people.
And if you go to a criminal and you ask the criminal, like, are you a bad person?
No, no, no.
They'll never say that they're a bad person.
They've got this really complex methodology that they've applied through the years that convinces them that they're in the right.
And so right now...
I don't think that the radical leftists at Google want to see America destroyed through military invasion by China, but they could get there.
Like, it only takes a couple months to move these people to whatever position that the deep state wants them to go to to justify it.
So right now, they would be against that.
But give them two months and the proper MSM talking points, pumping propaganda into their soft heads, and they'll cheer on a Chinese communist invasion in China, you know, in the matter of just those few months.
But they're not at this point right now.
Well, that's extraordinary.
Obviously, we have a lot more ground to cover in future interviews, but this has already been incredibly fascinating.
I want to remind our viewers to check out your website, ZachVorhees.com, as well as StopBitBurning.com.
Are you taking donations for the Stop Bit Burning project, by the way?
We are taking donations, and there have been some people that have been donating.
We're going to do a really big push when the timing is right for this crowdfunding and disclose this.
And so, you know, if you want to help stop censorship, please go to stopbitburning.com.
Check out the donations tab, and you can leave us a donation.
All the money is being used to, you know, fund this campaign.
It's going to be used for, you know, our crowdfunding campaign.
It's kind of funny.
There's the saying that, hey, can we do a crowdfunding for a crowdfunding?
And that's kind of where we're at right now.
And we appreciate every one of you that has supported us so far.
And, you know, appreciate everyone that's contributed videos.
This is really the best shot.
And it's basically going to be my final act in this whole Google disclosure is to bring this and birth this, you know, this class action lawsuit.
And then after this is done, I'm going to hopefully go back to what I love, which is coding and building things.
Well, thank you, Zach.
I'll just add, I believe you're a real hero for humanity, a great humanitarian.
You have tremendous courage in what you're doing.
We will support you.
We will lend you an audience and a voice in every way we can because we believe in humanity's right to have access to human knowledge without the intervention of malicious censorship by, frankly, evil corporations that are Thank you for watching today and thank
Thank you, Zach, for joining me.
This video was made possible by Brighteon.com.
After being deplatformed by YouTube, I built Brighteon.com so that we can speak.