All Episodes
Previous Next
April 25, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
58:00
Pete Santilli interviewed about Antifa terrorism and the corrupt FBI
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome everybody to this fascinating interview on Brighton Conversations.
Today we're interviewing Pete Santilli, an independent media journalist who was designated a domestic terrorist under the Obama administration.
And he's got a lot of important information about the contrast between what happened to him and how the radical left wing Antifa terrorists are being treated today, celebrated even by the left wing media and the tech giants.
So this is going to be a truly fascinating, innovative conversation.
Welcome to the show, Pete Santilli.
It's great to have you with us.
It's an honor, Mike.
It's an honor.
Well, I want to let people know they can find you on PeteLive.tv and you do, what, two broadcasts per day now?
Is that right?
Yeah, at least five hours.
9 a.m.
Eastern, 6 p.m.
Eastern, and when news breaks, of course.
But, yeah, five hours a day.
How do you do five hours a day?
You know, it's actually, I come away from those five hours with the amount of information that's flowing.
I say that, you know, it's like drinking out of a fire hydrant, trying to keep track of, you know, the events in the world that we're living in today.
It's tough to cram all that information into five hours.
And also, we're a social media broadcast, so we let everybody, we've got call-ins, you know, chat rooms and stuff like that.
Everyone's really, really engaged in the conversation, so...
Oh, and speaking of conversations, you also have a channel on Brighteon.com.
What's the channel's short URL for Brighteon?
I think it's Pete Santilli Show.
That sounds right.
Okay, so people can find you on Brighteon.
Let's start at the beginning here.
Is it true that you were designated a domestic terrorist under the Obama administration?
Yeah, you know, if you were to ask me that question, the answer to the question, people would have been confused if I tried to describe why they designated a bunch of, and then they didn't call us deplorables.
That name didn't even exist.
But the reason why we were designated, we really, protesters, and peaceful protesters, I might add.
Back in 2014, during the Bundy Ranch incident, when Clive and Bundy He had a dispute actually dating all the way back to 1993, but it came to a head in 2014.
Barack Obama's brown-shirted Bureau of Land Management agents, National Park Service, the Department of Interior, they set up a $6 million military compound.
And they went to get $300,000 worth of cattle.
What they did prior to that was they tried to provoke and find out what kind of support he was going to get because he said he would take a stand.
He would do whatever it took to make his issue that he's had since 1993, that he wasn't going to be paying grazing fees to the federal government, that the state deserved to get those grazing fees.
So anyways, the government, through the Bureau of Land Management, He said, well, you know, it'd be easier for us to go get Clive and Bundy and scoop him up and then go get the cattle.
We could avoid conflict that way.
Our natural tendency is to do that because this guy's kind of belligerent.
And he was.
He said he was going to take a stand.
But they said, let's be patient and lure in all of his supporters.
So they essentially, through the course of, you know, 2014 or 2016, they wanted to designate us as domestic terrorists because they wanted to surveil I'm not even exaggerating, in the same fashion that they did through a FISA warrant to surveil all of our audio recordings, all of our bank records, all of our contacts, all of our social media contacts.
So by getting that terror designation, they could have full access to all of our contacts.
Wait a second.
Before the surveillance state even weaponized itself against President Trump, which started in probably 2015 or maybe even earlier, you and people related to the Bundy Ranch incident were also being targeted by the same surveillance infrastructure that we now know was deep state corruption, a total criminal fraud by the Obama administration and the FBI at the time.
But they were doing to you what later they did to Trump.
Basically, is that correct?
We were basically the minor leagues in their surveillance mechanism, and they used contractors.
They had also the FBI in open court.
They admitted that they had 1,000 online covert investigators.
That we're in our threads, getting IP addresses and doing all that stuff.
And through that terror designation, they basically, without a warrant, they could just go in and do that.
They submitted a subpoena to Facebook and said, give us all of their contacts.
And Facebook responded to that search warrant, that subpoena.
Lawfully, I might add.
It was so broad.
They provided a huge database which included all of our contacts, all of our instant messaging, and all of the contacts and instant messaging of all of our contacts.
Oh my gosh.
It actually surveilled everybody.
It was in the millions and millions of people without a search warrant.
So for people listening, anyone using Facebook should understand you're really just handing over to a corrupt deep state information that will be used against you, weaponized against you to criminalize you.
Yeah, you know, after I came out, after I was released after 619 days of being a political prisoner, I knew that there were some issues with the Facebook service.
Basically, they had just released the database.
For instance, an open court said that General Mad Dog Mattis, who you're hearing about, that's not getting favorable treatment these days, but they said that even Mad Dog Mattis clicked on a Bundy Ranch photo.
He was considered an unindicted co-conspirator because he was supportive of propagating the social media messaging that was going on out there.
I wanted to file a class-action lawsuit against them, and I discovered pretty quickly that Facebook was in their Legal means because they responded to essentially a broad search warrant.
So it was legal what they did.
They just provided the database because the government asked for everything and they responded to it.
Well, yeah, it's legal because the state protects the state.
That's correct.
I mean, all the laws are for the state to protect the state.
So you were incarcerated for over 600 days.
Were you ever officially charged?
Obviously, you weren't convicted of anything.
What was the situation?
What happened there?
Well, you know, up in Oregon, and as you remember, I was broadcasting on Talk Radio Network.
Well, it's no longer in existence, but I had gone out to Oregon to cover...
What the Bundys were doing was going up to support a rancher up in, what is it, southeastern Oregon, the Hammond family.
Same issues, but the Bundys wanted to offer support, and we had a protest up there.
So we traveled from Cincinnati to Oregon.
Essentially, this is what happened.
They had been, quote-unquote, surveilling us and trying to build an indictment, went to a grand jury in Nevada from the 2014 case.
Nobody broke any laws in the Nevada case.
And the grand jury could not indict.
They, you know, they tried to present that Pete Santilli was rabble-rousing and recruited a whole bunch of gunmen to, you know, to Nevada in 2014.
There was no evidence of that.
All I was doing was calling for constitutional, lawful, peaceable assembly and contacting the sheriff in 2014.
Well, when 2016 happened, since we were all declared to be domestic terrorists, well, now all of a sudden there was a protest that turned into the takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.
They basically took the protest and a group of people went over there and occupied the Mallier National Wildlife Refuge.
This was just this tiny federal building out in the middle of nowhere.
It wasn't a building.
It was actually, it's literally, it looked like a camp.
It was a bird sanctuary.
I mean, it looked like a camp that you go to, a summer camp.
Lots of buildings.
They had a firehouse, and it's just 30-something miles away from civilization.
Nobody was there.
The protesters went out there, specifically, knowing that nobody was going to be there.
Nobody was going to get harmed.
But they basically occupied the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.
At that time, when that quote-unquote takeover took place, they did the same exact demonization that you're seeing today.
Oh my goodness, it's the equivalent of today.
They were wearing red hats, they were white nationalists, they were racist, they had guns, they're dangerous, they're domestic terrorists, so on and so on and so on.
Yeah, I remember people saying on social media that Oregon has been invaded by a Nazi army.
I mean, an invasion.
It was crazy.
Just to be clear, you weren't burning 50 cities across America.
No, as a matter of fact, well, what I was doing, actually, believe it or not, And I'll tell this part of the story.
I went out to cover the protest for the Hammond family.
So there was a march and there was all this stuff.
And all of a sudden, a small group of people spun off and drove 30 miles away to go take over the Mallier National Wildlife Refuge.
So I was covering this story.
But we discovered that there was a lot of federal law enforcement in town.
And I was really, really concerned that the people that took over the refuge were going to get shot and killed.
I was really, really concerned about that, especially because of the rhetoric in the media.
They said that these were dangerous armed gunmen, domestic terrorists.
It simply wasn't true because I knew the Bundys.
They're a bunch of God-fearing people.
So I stayed there actually for the entire month of January.
What they accused me of, this is what they did.
They tied a couple of stories together.
They went back to another grand jury in Nevada and said, see, we told you you should have indicted them after Bundy Ranch.
Now look at what they're doing.
They're going to be taking over federal buildings.
That was the term they were using.
They scared the grand jury, and I was literally indicted in Oregon and in Nevada, essentially, long story short.
But they made up A 302 report and said that they had a witness that I was actually conspiring to take over the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.
Well, we caught them fabricating 302 reports.
By the way, it's the same cabal that you hear about today that are fabricating 302 reports and trying to get indictments.
Andy McCabe and all of those people had actually done all of that to me, specifically.
All of us.
Back then, the idea, you know, a lot of people never even heard of FBI 302 reports.
And now people know the FBI doesn't record their conversations with potential witnesses.
They make notes.
They write up a form.
So it's very easy for them to alter the 302 or to fabricate a 302.
Now, after what they did to Trump, And we know the total fraud and corruption of James Comey and others in the FBI. I think now it's common knowledge that the FBI fabricates 302s.
But back when it happened to you, no one, I think, had really heard that that could be the case.
I think trust in the FBI was much higher at that time than it is now.
I mean, it's collapsed now.
You know, I mean, if you don't mind, I want to interject here because I've heard this story that, oh my goodness, we don't record anything.
And we just handwrite our notes.
And that's just a flat out lie.
Really?
That's just a lie.
I mean, I've literally listened to...
I've watched hundreds of hours of audio recordings.
I've watched many, many hours of video recordings.
What they don't want to do is reveal their interrogation techniques, so they don't make that public.
I see.
Okay.
So they do have that opportunity to, you know, to present a threat to your report and say, oh, these are just from our contemporaneous notes.
It's literally concealing the fact that they don't want to reveal what their interrogation techniques are all about.
And I've listened to those recordings because it was part of my discovery, which, by the way, are all under seal, protected by these federal judges, because they say that they want to protect the federal agents, of course.
They just don't want the public to know their tactics.
But, anyways.
So, wait, wait.
How long will that information be under seal?
You know, until somebody has...
You know, like the media has spent a lot of money trying to, for First Amendment grounds, to try to get, you know, discovery released to the public.
And they've always used the excuse they wanted to protect the names of their agents.
They can redact that stuff.
It costs a lot of money to do that.
When somebody has, I guess, enough incentive or a reason to do it, they'll remain sealed until somebody wants to go challenge it.
And I will say this, I'm making every effort to get that released to the public because it was one of the biggest cover-ups in some of the biggest cases in American history.
They spent over $100 million to prosecute both of those cases and they lost both of them.
So talk about that.
How did this end up being concluded?
You know, with my case, my personal case, I caught them fabricating 302 reports.
By the way, my arrest warrant was signed off on by Loretta Lynch.
Wow.
And I was arrested on January 26th.
Loretta Lynch had signed off on it.
It was 10 hours after I had broadcast that Hillary Clinton had taken, you know, at the time I reported $130 million from Uranium One.
And I was really the second journalist out there broadcasting to, at the time, millions of people that Hillary Clinton had an incentive in southeastern Oregon because the BLM was bragging about it on their website.
But 10 hours after that broadcast, I was arrested and They brought the indictment.
I spent, shoot, probably seven months in solitary confinement with the exception of working on my legal case.
But it resulted in us catching them fabricating 302 reports.
And they offered to give me a...
They said, we'll give you a misdemeanor and you can walk away.
And I said, I'm not taking a parking ticket.
I'm backed up by a credible threat of Pete Santilli on the stand for a week and a half.
I had 365 exhibits.
And I said, we're going to trial.
We're going to beat you.
Well, they dismissed me on the eve of trial.
But ultimately, through the work that we had done digging into this discovery, they got an acquittal, by the way, in Portland, which is left to Central, by a Portland jury.
A Portland jury determined that the only people that broke the law during the Malheur National Wildlife Takeover were actually the deep state federal agents that we hear about today.
They were the only ones that did.
And they acquitted, a jury acquitted them.
Then I went down to Nevada.
They were, same thing, prosecutorial misconduct, withholding evidence.
They had accused me and Cliven Bundy of broadcasting on my show for the purposes of recruiting gunmen.
To Nevada.
That's what they accused us of doing.
By saying that there were snipers in the hills and that they were brutally, you know, they were treating their family members brutally.
They said, we did that for the purposes of, you know, propagandizing and recruiting gunmen to come assist up against the BLM. Well, the judge dismissed the case.
After successive trials, by the way, they had a whole group of us put together, all declared to be domestic terrorists.
They had to dismiss the case because they withheld evidence.
The FBI got hammered.
Same exact scenario that you're seeing now.
All these people that have been breaking the law and violating people's civil rights, all the way on up to President Trump and General Flynn and all these people, same exact thing.
They've been practicing this for years.
So the treatment of Roger Stone, let's say, or General Flynn, none of that surprised you because you had actually experienced it directly.
No, in fact, what's funny about it is Roger Stone and I built a very, well, a close professional relationship because we started, I wanted to help him out.
He was advocating for me when I was behind bars.
When I came out, all of a sudden, here he was into the mix getting ready to be, quote-unquote, indicted.
They had the Mueller team after him.
So I helped expose...
A lot of the stuff that their team was going to be doing in order to reverse engineer an indictment, and I can discuss that pretty at length because I understood what their techniques were.
They used some very sophisticated software technology to build and reverse engineer these indictments.
So I shared that with...
With Roger Stone, all the way up until his SWAT, we knew that he was going to be indicted, and I was communicating on his phone directly to the Mueller team saying, we know about how you're doing this.
We're going to take you down, knowing full well that they would get all that messaging when they recovered all of his electronics.
Right, right.
What happened was a court said that Roger and I aren't allowed to speak to each other because we're both just common criminals, of course, so they stopped us from talking to each other.
You know, it's extraordinary the level of total fraud and criminality by the government and then how the judges protect the criminal cabal that exploits and abuses surveillance powers that were initially intended to be used only against international terrorists like Al Qaeda.
Those weapons of surveillance are used against American people.
Is there any recourse?
I mean, you were incarcerated for 600-plus days.
You must have incurred extraordinary legal costs.
You were exonerated.
You know, did they just say, well, good luck.
We ruined years of your life and cost you a lot of money.
Bye.
What happens?
And in the end, I just want to make sure that I correct something.
In the end, after 619 days, what I ended up doing was, quote-unquote, pleading out to what I actually did.
I actually did get in front of the convoy at Bundy Ranch.
But we were concerned that Clive and Bundy and that group were not going to get a fair trial.
I knew I wasn't going to get a fair trial.
I told Clive, and I said, we need somebody on the outside of this thing.
I was actually in charge of handling all of our discovery for our legal team.
And besides the fact that my mom was actually about to pass away, so I said, I'm going to go on the outside.
I took a plea agreement, which was very exact.
When I raised my right hand, I said, yes, I did get in front of that convoy.
I just chose not to go tell a jury why I did that, and it was to get law enforcement to come investigate why they were tearing up infrastructure and killing cattle.
Wait, wait, I'm sorry, hold on a minute.
So you stopped traffic.
That's it.
You stopped traffic.
Antifa does that every minute of every day.
Okay, well, and it relates to what you're seeing today.
We wanted to stop that Bureau of Land Management convoy that we knew, that we suspected them of killing cattle and suspected them of tearing up Their water rights, which existed dating all the way back to the 1850s, they were pulling up all their water rights because the Bureau of Land Management has been doing this.
They did it as much as 5,000 water rights they've stolen from Nevada landowners and ranchers because water is, as you know, a very valuable resource in the state of Nevada.
So we knew they were tearing up infrastructure.
We went to stop the convoy to get the sheriff to come out to investigate them, to say, you're using backhoes to kill cattle and to tear up water infrastructure.
So, yes, I went up there, and I was a journalist.
I was going to record the whole thing.
A whole group of us with signs went up there as protesters.
We were going to stop them and say, hey, hold on, we're going to call the sheriff.
By doing that...
That is called impeding a federal agent in the course of their work.
I plan to it.
I'm very, very proud that I got in front of that condo.
I just chose not to go tell a jury why I did it to contact law enforcement because I faced multiple life sentences as a result of doing that.
Multiple life sentences.
Oh, yeah.
Now, by the way, they held me for 619 days.
There was no catch and release.
I faced multiple life sentences if I had gone to trial without any chance for a fair trial because of the judge that was assigned to the case.
And now I look at these people that have committed arson.
They're known terrorists, terrorizing cities in America.
They're just being cited and released.
And they have done far worse than any of us had ever been involved in.
That's actually the point I wanted to get to.
It seems like your only real crime was that you're not a 19-year-old snowflake soy boy with an Antifa mask setting fire to, you know, black-owned businesses in a Democrat-run city.
Had you done that, or even, let's say, thrown bricks at cops, you'd be celebrated by Hollywood, you'd be celebrated by Facebook, they would stand with you.
You know, especially if you were black and you were We're good to go.
Truly terroristic, violent things now.
Killing cops, stabbing cops, lighting buildings on fire, blowing up ATMs, destroying private property.
They are being celebrated in the media.
Oh, they're so loving and so filled with love for our world.
It's incredible.
You know, all of our original intentions overall for both the Oregon and Nevada case, we okey-doke deplorables were really wanting to take the U.S. Constitution and say, hey, look, the federal government should not be...
They're owning land that's not delegated to them or authorized by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17.
So we're trying to make that issue about land issues.
Here's Hillary Clinton coming in and extracting wealth.
We're talking about $150-something trillion in natural resources wealth that the federal government's been extracting right out from underneath us.
Well, that land belongs to the states.
So we were protesting it.
Clive and Bundy stood up and said, listen, I'm the last rancher here standing.
You don't have entitlement to this, and I'm going to go by constitutional law, and I'm going to have and ask the state to protect my land, this land out here that's Nevada land.
So we were protesters.
We're protesting and standing up and wanting to enforce the U.S. Constitution, constitutional law, whereas, now you take a look at this, and let's fast forward to today's.
There are organizations such as the Revolutionary Abolitionist Movement, Right now that has 10 points of action that say that there should not be any property rights.
They're literally out in the open saying that they're going to destroy our system.
I think item number 10, here it is, militant networks will defend our revolutionary communities.
Liberation begins where America dies.
They're out in the open talking about killing our nation.
They say land is not property.
It is alive, communal, and must be protected.
So these people are communists.
They've been practicing stealing land in China for decades now, and it came here to the United States of America.
So we protesters were fighting these issues over the past couple of years against the Obama administration, who is a known communist regime.
No question about that.
I would say Obama was a sleeper cell who had done things.
He's the real terrorist against America.
I don't even have time to go into all the things that happened under Obama, but Uranium One is just one of them.
You talk about total corruption and the Clinton Foundation and the theft of money from Haiti.
And weapons technology being transferred to, you know, Iran and China and North Korea, all the billions of dollars in internationally laundered money delivered on pallets to Iran so they could build more nuclear weapons to threaten, you know, Israel and the Middle East.
I mean, wow.
But Obama's a hero, you know, to the left-wing media.
While you are or were, you know, behind bars, I mean, the double standard is beyond grotesque.
It is...
You know, I'm extremely biased, obviously, in favor of the U.S. Constitution and the American people.
And I'm going to say this.
Like, if you...
I don't care what your political persuasion is.
What side...
Really, would you want to be on?
A group of people, you know, that I was a former United States Marine, I swore an oath, and I wanted to be protective of the Constitution, and I believe that that $150-something trillion in natural resources wealth should belong to the people in the states, respectively, right?
And that's what is in the law, in the Constitution, and being protective of that.
and to make a point and take a stand and say we're not afraid of the Obama administration pointing guns at us.
You can point guns at us.
We'll bring guns to a barbecue party and be there standing by waiting, defensively, of course, lawfully and constitutionally.
You want to point guns at us?
We're not afraid we'll point guns back, not offensively or to harm anybody, but to take a stand.
Now take a look at these other people that want to extract wealth from the land.
They want to take land away from people.
They want control through mechanisms like Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.
This is an international communist body that wants to come in and take away everything that we've built up on in our nation's entire history.
So what side are you going to choose?
Right.
What would you want to be fighting for?
Taking stuff away from us or protecting what we've fought and died for?
Well, so here's a question maybe out of the blue.
Was former Senator Reid involved in a conspiracy with BLM to seize public lands, you know, to seize land and use it to extract uranium to sell to Russia?
Is that, because I've heard those kinds of accusations, does that ring a bell at all or is that totally off the wall?
Chief Judge of Nevada, Gloria Navarro, was Harry Reid's crony.
Period.
He had appointed her.
Barack Obama had basically, well, he recommended her appointment.
Barack Obama put her in that seat.
She was specifically designed to our case to put us away forever to protect his interests and the Obama administration's interests.
And Hillary Clinton's...
I mean, this entire cabal has literally been benefiting from things like Uranium One deals in southeastern Oregon.
And we were exposing that stuff.
We wanted all those mineral rights to go back to the people.
So Harry Reid has been directly involved...
With his hand in the Bundy Ranch cases, they spent $100 million to try to prosecute us.
And I'm proud to say that it went right out the way.
Unfortunately, it's the taxpayers' money.
But they dedicated $100 million to try to prosecute us.
And Harry Reid and his entire cabal absolutely failed.
The answer to your question is, absolutely, Harry Reid was directly involved in all of this.
So what was the story, remember when Harry Reid showed up with a black eye and he said that he was using like rubber band exercise equipment and it smacked him in the face and nobody bought that.
What do you think really happened to Harry Reid?
Did they rough him up or what?
That was just a weird thing that went on there.
I don't believe any of Any of that story.
I think that's where really, you know, the forces of, you know, darkness and light were at battle there.
And I think he got caught up in that whole thing.
You know, there's a lot of stuff that had been happening behind the scenes that they can't fully admit.
But I do not believe that story that it had anything to do with the exercise equipment.
Okay.
Pop quiz.
Who's more corrupt?
Senator John McCain or Senator Harry Reid?
More corrupt?
Or is it hard to know who's more corrupt?
Geez, I know so much about both of them.
My life was personally impacted by Harry Reid, but I had been investigating John McCain.
John McCain, he's been running guns through Operation Zero Footprint, working in concert with Barack Obama to fund and fuel ISIS in the Middle East.
John McCain was involved in the overthrow of the Ukraine.
Harry Reid himself, was he directly involved per my investigations?
Nobody sure profited an awful lot.
Maybe he's a higher level crony that just reaps the financial rewards.
Harry Reid has been involved in some of the most corrupt dealings out of Las Vegas.
Passing legislation to allow online gaming operations that he's had his hooks into.
He's made hundreds of millions of dollars as a result.
Both of them are equally corrupt and evil.
Absolutely.
John McCain was directly involved with shuttling the bogus Russia, Russia, Russia steel dossier.
He was, yeah.
We know that.
And in an attempt to overthrow a duly elected president of the United States.
That's us.
63 million people.
That's treason.
His name is Trump, but it's actually the front face of 63 million people that voted for him.
What about Operation Fast and Furious?
Was McCain involved with Obama?
Who ran that?
Oh, that was Eric Holder.
Eric Holder.
Yeah.
What do you know about that?
I think I've told you that I have a friend of mine that I was in the Marine Corps with.
He went on to actually become a pretty high-level security guy with diplomatic security, started working for the CIA. And he did some pretty sophisticated cleanup work, as you refer to it.
He was directly involved in cleaning up Fast and Furious on behalf of Obama and Eric Holder.
Literally down there just taking out witnesses, period.
Wow.
Oh yeah, this entire administration was involved with Fast and Furious.
McCain is a known international gunrunner at a very, very high level.
I'm sure you know this.
Do you?
Well, no, I mean, I've not heard that particular fact.
I was just thinking about how the media just celebrated McCain so much for betraying Trump and being part of the dossier effort.
But, I mean, the media hates Republicans unless they're traitors like McCain.
You know, John McCain was connected to, and I forget his name, I don't have his name off the top of my head.
I had researched this.
There is a gun dealer in Arizona that was running guns in the Middle East.
As well as Fast and Furious.
Out of Arizona.
He was a whistleblower, came forward.
They were about to prosecute him, and he had so much information that the indictment miraculously went away.
McCain is implicated for running guns in the Middle East as well as down in Fast and Furious.
So, I mean, in the big picture, what we really see here is the media and the federal judges and the FBI and intelligence communities are really all about just protecting the criminality of the insiders, the swamp.
And the swamp, which includes senators and former presidents and so on, are people who, you know, traffic in guns.
They probably traffic human trafficking, you know, children trafficking, pedophilia.
Drug trafficking.
I mean, everything you can imagine.
Wherever there's money to be made doing evil, you can bet that some U.S. senators have their hands in that pie.
That's right.
I... I think dating all the way back to Iran-Contra, they tried to figure out ways to, you know, develop black budgets to fuel the Central Intelligence Agency.
And I think they became so successful at it that they became addicted to the profits from, you know, I mean, you know, we know that cocaine had fueled the Clinton political dynasty.
Mena, Arkansas.
Mena, Arkansas.
Barry Seal.
We know the cocaine.
Well, cocaine, you know, I guess the consumer snorts cocaine.
It's gone.
They shifted up to sex and human trafficking.
The NXIVM trial.
This is not a conspiracy theory.
There is human and sex trafficking.
It's in open court.
It was running out of South America and Mexico.
And it helped fuel Hillary Clinton's 2008 run.
They have become addicted to, especially with human trafficking, it's the gift that keeps on giving.
You keep these women out on the circuit, it's like being able to recycle your cocaine sale.
You know, they just keep making more and more money.
Child trafficking, sex trafficking, drug running, they have become, the Central Intelligence Agency has become addicted to the trillions of dollars in profits that they've been able to earn worldwide.
And I think they've gotten caught.
That's what the swamp is that President Trump is trying to drain.
I don't know if you heard this.
I read an article in The Intercept that was dated back in 2017.
Glenn Greenwald owns The Intercept.
We had some sources that said that Eric Prince and Ollie North had made recommendations to Trump and the administration was seriously considering setting up their own intel operation, reporting directly to the president.
To do all of this, you know, high-level intelligence work to find out who these deep staters are, because the FBI and the CIA had become so corrupted.
I sure hope so.
I sure hope so.
Well, this just gives our viewers a glimpse of what Trump is really up against because, you know, the average American is just completely oblivious to what's going on.
Maybe they're more awake now that, you know, the pandemic has taken place and the riots are obviously engineered and all these things.
But, you know, a year ago, the average American thought, oh, the CDC is trustworthy and the drug companies love us and, you know, the FBI should be trusted, you know.
And now I think...
I'll ask your opinion on this, but in my take, the average American, their faith in institutions such as the FBI, the CDC, the media, and so on, that faith has just shattered.
It has collapsed.
Yeah, because, and I'll highlight the contrast between the Obama administration utilizing tools against deplorables like me, abusing their power for political purposes.
We meant no harm.
They were using surveillance tools and techniques and methods that are designed to go get the bad guys.
And we weren't bad guys.
We were their obstacle to them achieving their goal to keep the profits from Uranium-1 sales and, of course, taking land.
Those tools are very valuable when you're going after the bad guys.
For instance, those same exact tools, domestic terror designations of Antifa allow them to do the same level of surveillance that they did to us But these people are evil.
These are bad people that want to destroy the United States of America.
So the American public's trust has been shattered because of the Obama administration's abuse of power and using these intelligence tools for political gain.
They pointed these weapons at their political opponents.
It gets to the concept of that book, Three Felonies a Day, and I think the old Soviet, I don't know who said this originally, but show me the man and I'll show you the crime.
Or, you know, give me the man and I'll show you the crime.
When the surveillance tools are directed towards American citizens, you know, any person...
Who is active in society can be accused of three felonies a day.
Any person.
It's just who they're looking at, who they're surveilling.
You maybe have failed to check a checkbox on your tax form or something inadvertently, or you forgot about some licensing fee for your local business.
You may have committed multiple felonies without even knowing, completely inadvertently, but they can get you on those because you're in the crosshairs.
That's the danger of using these tools against American citizens.
I'll give you a specific example.
We touched on it in a conversation we had recently, that they have the ability, through surveillance, to get your audio recording, video recording.
Obviously, I'm right out in the open.
They can just go tune into the Pete Santilli show.
Yeah, it doesn't have to be surreptitious.
You post it.
They can slice and dice your words.
I'll give you an example.
In the indictment they brought against me, they essentially took my words, which, taken into context, I didn't mean any harm.
If I said gun, I'll give you one example of what they did.
They literally used and imported into a system called Palantir Mint.
They listened to all of our audio recordings.
They took a look at all of our context.
They analyzed all of that stuff.
And they reverse engineered an indictment.
And they were able to take my words and line them up and slice and dice them.
To basically suit a narrative, which was the indictment that I was assaultative towards federal agents.
So, if I said something like, we're going to stand and fight!
Against these, you know, against whatever.
And dot, dot, dot.
But they leave out the most important part.
Even to make sure that the safety of the officers, you know, we're going to protect them as well and ask them to stand down in favor of the context.
They literally deleted all of the good words that I said.
Took me out of context.
Now, they can do this to anybody through these surveillance techniques.
They can reverse engineer an indictment.
You have said words throughout the entire day that they can line them up to make it look like you're the common criminal ready to, you know, assault a local police officer.
Yeah.
It is very dangerous for our political opponents to have this technology in their hands if they're going to weaponize it and use it against their political adversaries.
And that's exactly what the Obama administration is doing.
Well, and the media does that, too.
So the media takes things that you say or I say, right?
They snip out a little piece out of context, they wrap it around some other story, and then they do a story like, oh, the FBI should arrest these people.
Look what they said, but it's all contrived.
And frankly, with all the technology today, they could actually write a script, feed it into their voice enunciation system, and have a recording of you saying something you never said.
That's right.
And they can do what they do to, you know, they've done it to talk show hosts where they'll generate all of a sudden, miraculously, 500,000 articles show up because of words that you said.
They use AI technology to script the narrative, put it out there, and disparage you in the mainstream media.
But what are they doing?
Is it to attack you?
No, it's to basically propagandize and mind control the rest of the population so that every time you look at Pete Santilli, He's that guy that said Sandy Hook.
You know what I'm talking about here.
They know how to mass mind control to get you so demonized to where people won't trust a word you'll say.
That's right.
As it was described to me by another person I interviewed, their job is to make you radioactive so no one will associate with you.
That's right.
Anybody who Googles your name will just find only negative information.
I was recently talking to Zach Voorhees, the Google whistleblower.
Oh, yeah.
He's talking to a lot of people about the nature of the censorship, and it's all the same.
Everybody's been hit the same way.
So if you did 50,000 good deeds...
And had one slip-up where you said something wrong, all your search results are going to be the slip-up.
Not all the good things you did.
For what purpose?
I'm going to tell you how, and let's do it in a practical sense.
Can you imagine me, dressed up in red, white, and blue with a red MAGA hat, running out to a protest in Washington, D.C.? How would I be received?
Everyone around me would see me as that list of things that they've been told over the past three years about me being a racist or white nationalist and so on and so forth.
So all of that stuff isn't to attack me.
It's to mass mind control the millions of people that are going to be reading about me or learning about me or Googling me.
Right?
Right, right.
No, I imagine they would look at your hat, WKRP, you know, from the old TV sitcom in Cincinnati.
They would probably say, oh, white Klansman really...
I mean, they'd make up a new acronym, you know what I mean?
Oh, yeah.
Right, sure.
And my hair's too short, too, so that qualifies me as a...
You know.
No, they fabricate incredible things.
Unbelievable.
Okay, so...
Let's get to the riot situation here, just in terms of how do you think this could be solved?
I mean, you know, they've kind of laid a trap for Trump.
I think they want Trump to have the military out in the streets so they can claim, oh, look, Trump's army is firing on black people.
Trump's kind of held off on that.
How do you think Trump solves these riots?
I mean, you can't just let radical left-wing terrorists burn your cities down.
That's not a plan.
Maybe that's the Democrats' plan, but that's not America's plan.
So how does he solve this?
I heard something that I can't even talk about right now just because it's not publicly available.
And I'm going to say this definitively, 1,000%, right out in the open.
This is not going to be solved.
Okay?
Okay.
In any other way, but for President Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act and start using the military.
This has been in the planning, from what I understand.
And I was told three to five years, three to five years, and that there are some pretty high level people that have been involved.
I do have faith that Antifa and all of these organizers have been investigated over the past two or three years, at least two or three years.
AG Barr knows who it is.
I was just tipped off to something that a comment that President Trump made that AG Barr is in charge of the federal response.
He's going to be the one that's going to determine when to bring the hammer down if we use military troops, because obviously constitutionally you don't want U.S. military troops unless it's absolutely necessary.
But I'm going to say this.
It is absolutely necessary based on what I know right now.
Absolutely necessary.
Okay, is Barr a patriot or a swamp creature?
Oh, I have every reason to believe, and I'm generally very, very skeptical.
Every step along the way, I've been very suspicious of him.
Every step along the way.
I think he is so deeply entrenched in this investigation.
There's a lot that we don't know.
That they've been secretly surveilling, using all these tools to, let's say, surveil Antifa.
They've been listening to them, and they've been waiting for them to take action.
Because at that point, obviously, if they preempted Antifa and said, oh, you're organizing on Twitter, they could cite with their lawfare group that it's protected speech.
Well, if you then take their protected speech that they were planning, there were thought crimes of...
Distributing bricks all over the United States of America to throw at police and bring down the entire United States of America economic system after a scandemic.
Now they've taken action on it.
It's no longer protected speech.
They've actually taken illegal, unlawful actions as a communist insurrection would certainly do.
They now have evidence of it.
I believe that I believe Barr has no choice at this point in time.
He's listened to them so closely.
These people are so criminal that even if he was, you know...
Well, even if he's a swamp creature, I mean, the swamp has in its own self-interest to protect the swamp.
And at this point, all the people in power in Washington, D.C. are going to lose all their power if there's a communist revolution takeover.
I mean, the entire existing infrastructure of people in D.C. would be, you know, eliminated by the communists.
I mean, first thing communists do is just start mass killing everybody who used to be in power, you know, including their own supporters, by the way.
So, okay.
I think Barr is, just from what I've seen, I think Barr is, he's on the team.
He's a constitutionalist.
He's not a communist.
I know that.
Well, I know that.
Yeah, he's not a communist.
That's clear.
Certainly not.
All right.
Then let me share one tip that I've had, which is that the RICO Act may be invoked, and that would allow the DOJ to shut down all the financial transactions and to seize bank accounts associated with Antifa funding, because there's a lot of funding.
How do you buy all those pallets of bricks?
How do you buy All the transportation services to provide the logistics.
I mean, these people, they have water supplies, you know, they've got bail money ready if they get arrested.
I mean, this is a very elaborate, complex warfare type of system and it's well-funded.
And it seems like that's an easy way to shut this down and just go after all the funding.
Yeah, and that's where I really started to have faith in Barr, because he immediately stepped out and said, look, it normally takes a couple of years to do a massive investigation.
If he said, we're going to investigate this and see how it comes...
No, he said, we have information that these people are well-funded, that they're using a communications network, that they are receiving money from XYZ. They're outwardly saying this.
Well...
You can't, if you're the DOJ, especially after the Russia-Russia-Russia collusion hoax investigation and John Durham's deep state investigation, he doesn't have enough time on his platter to be investigating Antifa.
So he came out early.
They've been listening to them for a long time.
This thing has been in the planning, from what I'm being told, three to five years they've been planning for this moment right now what's happening.
Three to five years.
Yes.
Yes.
So, you know, there are rumors flying around.
I don't believe this particular rumor, but I'll share it just for context.
Some rumor says, oh, the whole country's going to be locked down for two weeks while Trump deploys the military police and Barr has all the arrests of the swamp creatures and, you know, 50,000 unsealed indictments get acted on and all the evil people are arrested.
Okay, great.
That's a nice fairy tale.
I don't think that's going to happen, but is...
How do you think this is going to play out?
How does Trump save America, so to speak, or stop this insanity well before the election?
Or does he?
You know what I love about it?
Is that I just don't know.
What I love about it is that it's such a great kept secret.
I love that small circle of influencers that Trump has surrounded himself with.
When even Secretary Esper steps outside of the box, he goes to the podium and says something inconsistent with what Trump's doing.
Trump responded by saying, A.G. Barr is in charge of our federal response and just basically neutralized the Secretary of Defense.
I think Trump has probably four or five trusted advisors that are privy to this stuff that military intelligence has been in charge of for the past three or four years.
We're talking about a level of secrecy that not even the Mossad can penetrate.
And I love that.
I love that we don't know what's going to come.
And there's great speculation out there, but there's no proof of any lockdowns or anything like that.
That's just...
You know, that's just internet fodder.
Would you theoretically support, let's say, two weeks of nationwide martial law if it were a period during which those arrests took place?
I'm not even hesitating.
As a matter of fact, I've just about interrupted you and I apologize.
It's okay.
No, this is serious.
I'm speaking as a former United States Marine.
Once a Marine, always a Marine.
Yet, right now, we need to act in the biggest way we've ever acted.
We need absolute military.
We have to have the military because we cannot trust the CIA, the FBI, the DOJ. Our entire system has been corrupted.
We have a communist insurrection.
How do we deal with our domestic enemies?
In the same exact fashion that we wouldn't hesitate to With our foreign enemies.
We used to carpet bomb communists.
Now we've got them running around in our neighborhoods.
We need military intervention.
We need it swiftly.
They're going to destroy.
This thing is not going to stop.
It's not going to die down.
It's going to go all the way to the election.
I think the next step is going to be false flags to blame because you're already starting to hear the narrative.
I hear J.J. McNabb.
I don't know if you know who she is.
She used to work for Forbes.
She's one of the biggest Southern Poverty Law Center propagandists out there.
They're already starting to paint the picture that it's been white nationals behind the scenes that have caused all this civil unrest.
They're going to start blaming stuff on the deplorables.
Then it's going to get really nasty.
False flags are coming.
Yeah, false flags are coming.
I completely agree.
My sources are confirming the same thing, including attacks on infrastructure.
Yeah, infrastructure attacks.
Yeah.
I also did a story about how Antifa is branching out into the rural areas.
And I've got confirmations from Montana and Arizona.
And I did a story about Illinois that Antifa is trying to send a message that it's not just the cities.
Like, you, white farmer, you're not safe on your farm in Sparta, Illinois, or wherever.
But last question, because we're coming up on the hour here, and I know you've got to get back to your show, too.
If If the elections are held, and I'm not actually sure they will be on time, but if they're held on time, and if the Democrats manage to finagle some way of claiming they won with a mail-in ballot fraud or all these false attacks on Trump or what have you, what happens to the country if the Democrats win?
I mean, what happens next?
I have this right now because we're literally really close to the election and there's so much to do, especially in light of the civil unrest.
I honestly cannot see an election happening.
Really?
In November.
And I mean, I'm not just saying this just to, like, fear-monger or scare people.
There's so much work that needs to be done as a result of the investigations that I believe have been going on.
Admiral Rogers, President Trump has had access to the NSA database.
All the tools that were used against him, he's had full access to it.
He's been listening to Adam Schiff.
He knows that Adam Schiff is banging little boys at the standard...
Motel with Marie Abramovich.
I mean, he knows all this stuff.
He's got access to all their video.
Excuse the expression, but this is what this guy does.
I mean, him, Ed Buck, all these people.
He has access to all surveillance technology that was used against him.
These are criminals.
These are pedophiles.
These are sex traffickers.
These people are going to be dealt with.
Over the past three years, the NSA has been surveilling them.
The military intelligence knows who the criminals aren't.
Now, if we forgot about, and I know we're coming up on the top of the hour here, don't forget about Wiener's laptop, and don't forget about Imran Awan, and don't forget about the mirrors of the servers.
Of Hillary's emails?
The DNC servers were replicated, put on a flash drive, and Seth Rich had them given to, I think it was 10 people as an insurance policy, if anything happened, when he conveyed that.
Now, this is true.
It went to the DOJ. It went to John Durham.
Those are all the emails that they were using to blackmail every member of Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike.
We can't forget about this massive investigation, the world's largest investigation, definitely within our history.
Well, these investigations need to be concluded.
People need to be held accountable.
It's going to happen here in the next couple of months.
They need to be concluded well before the election.
I mean, what you're describing sounds like a mega, MAGA data dump.
You know, just releasing all this to the public and people will freak out.
But, you know, I've long believed that they stole from Trump much of his first term.
And with the impeachment efforts and the deep state backstabbing inside his own administration, I mean, Trump should be given, like, an extra term credit.
You know, he should get a do-over of a term, in my view, because they interfered with so much of his first term.
Not just Trump.
You and I cast our vote.
We have a right to a free and fair election.
We have a right to a peaceful transition of power.
We elected 63 million people voted him in.
Were we given the opportunity?
And they've kept this guy back in his heels.
We expected him to be the chief executive of the United States.
Has he been allowed to do that?
No, they've been impeaching him for four years.
You know, he hasn't been allowed to govern.
That's stealing from the voters, essentially.
We had a duly elected president that was sent there, and they sent him back in his heels.
We need a do-over on behalf of the 63 million people that sent him there to go clean house.
Well, and not only do we need a do-over, I agree with you.
We must defeat these radical communist leftists because their promise to America now is essentially, if you re-elect Trump, we will burn your nation to the ground.
That has become what the left, their basic premise.
That's their threat.
They are extortionists.
They are arsonists.
They are criminals.
You can't coexist with it.
You have discussions online right now?
Everyone needs to remember exactly what it is.
Once you recognize what it is, patriots will do what patriots do.
This is a communist insurrection.
Okay?
Just take that into your soul.
You'll know how to respond to it.
Yeah, Antifa won't get far in, let's say, rural Texas, for example.
They may make some gains in rural Illinois because all the population has been disarmed by the corrupt bureaucrats in Chicago, but in Texas, farmers, you know, they shoot steel at 500 yards for fun.
I mean, that's just a Saturday morning, you know what I mean?
There's one of us behind every blade of grass.
Yeah, like the Japanese said, exactly.
In World War II. Okay.
Well, thank you, Pete.
It's been truly fascinating.
I hope we get a chance to do this again.
I'm sure we're going to elicit enormous responses and chatter with these videos.
I want to remind people, it's petelive.tv, correct?
PeteLive.tv.
You can catch our stream.
That's absolutely right.
We'll redirect that if your favorite platform is disconnected or whatever.
What's nice about that, that lands on our 24-7 live stream.
But yeah, PeteLive.tv.
Join us 9 a.m., 6 p.m.
Eastern every day and when news breaks.
Okay, sounds good.
Thank you so much, Pete.
It's been a fascinating conversation.
And for those of you watching, share this video and find more videos like this at brighteon.com.
I'm doing about five interviews a week right now, by the way, with intriguing people such as Pete.
And we'll keep bringing them to you on the free speech platform, brighteon.com.
Thanks for joining.
This video was made possible by Brighteon.com.
After being deplatformed by YouTube, I built Brighteon.com so that we can speak.
All voices of dissent are welcome.
▲
Export Selection