All Episodes
Previous Next
March 9, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:22:44
Situation Update, 3/9/22 - The STARVATION MATRIX decoded...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, this is going to get interesting.
This is the Situation Update for Wednesday, March 9th, 2022.
This is Mike Adams, Health Ranger here.
And if I were to pick a title for this today, I mean, the morbid version of that title would be, do people die via vaccines before they starve to death due to lack of fertilizer?
Or do they live long enough to suffer famine and starvation?
In other words, what kills people first?
Is it the spike protein or is it the engineered collapse of the hydrocarbon economy that results in the collapse of fertilizers and the collapse of food?
So, this isn't going to be all doom and gloom today, by the way.
Of course, I have solutions, and I have, well, solutions on a global scale, but also personal solutions for this.
But we've got to get into this today.
We're going to get a little bit geeky.
We're going to understand more, hopefully, by the end of this podcast about...
Oh, photosynthesis and the Haber chemical equation and combustion, nitrogen cycles and CO2 cycles and so on.
Because this all feeds into Russia, Ukraine, war, economic sanctions, oil, all of it, natural gas pipelines.
And the thing is, our so-called world leaders are ignorant morons when it comes to all of this.
So they have no idea.
They have no idea that fertilizer comes from hydrocarbons.
No, seriously, we are being run by a suicide cult of just completely oblivious morons who think that by cutting off the fertilizer supply to the West, that that's going to punish Russia.
And not realizing what it's going to do to cause famine, starvation, food scarcity, and food inflation among Western nations.
So, oh, buckle up.
This is going to get interesting.
Also, the other thing that happened yesterday is people started texting me.
Alex Jones was talking live on the air about he was kind of getting into fertilizer exports, and he said something live on the air.
He said, we got to get Mike Adams in here because Mike Adams gave a talk on this last year on InfoWars.
And it's true.
I had gone in and hosted, I think it was a fourth hour show where I went over the basics of all of this many, many months ago.
And I was talking about what happens if you shut down the fossil fuel infrastructure and it leads to a collapse of fertilizer and global famine.
And at the time, people found it interesting, but not a crisis topic.
It wasn't an emergency at that time.
It was just, well, that's interesting.
Let's hope the fertilizer keeps flowing.
And then when Russia attacks Ukraine, And you start to realize, whoa, how much nitrogen comes out of Russia?
How much potash is produced by Belarus?
How much grain is grown in Ukraine?
You start to look at those numbers and you have a, what would be the equivalent in the financial markets?
You have a margin call type of moment.
Like, wait a second!
We don't have enough assets to cover the margin calls on this.
It means we don't have enough fertilizer in the pipeline to produce enough food to feed the world.
That's where we are right now.
Now, the pipeline extends out for several months because that's how long it takes for plants to grow.
And right now, the world is eating the winter wheat or the grains from last fall.
So, you know, there's a buffer.
And yet, if you look at what's being planted or not planted right now, what's happening to fertilizer prices and fuel prices and so on, and you start to extend that forward a few months, you know, you get pretty worried about where this is going.
And that's a lot of what we're going to cover today.
I'm also, the Infowars producers did reach out to me.
And so I'm going to be on with Alice Jones live today at 2 p.m.
Central, covering a lot of the same things I'll be covering right here in this podcast, but maybe with some visuals.
I'm going to have maybe some equations made up on charts.
It's like, this is photosynthesis, you know?
We'll see how that goes.
I'm not sure if I can get them done in time.
But real quick, before we get into all that, let me just cover some of the economic news and some of the bombshell things that have been happening over the last 24 hours.
Also, I got a lot of positive feedback from pro-Bitcoin people or pro-crypto people about my coverage yesterday.
And thank you for that feedback.
I got a little bit of criticism from people who were in the anti-Bitcoin camp.
They're like, hey, man, you know, you used to be just critical of crypto.
Like, what happened?
Why are you saying that everybody needs to learn how to use crypto?
And I just want to clarify, I've never been opposed to the underlying idea of decentralized cryptocurrency.
I've always said I support the concept and the technology.
What I never supported was the speculation and the hype and so on that went along with it.
But things have changed quite dramatically in the world, where even though crypto has risks, the risks of using the banking system are now far greater in my assessment.
So what Canada did, and then the economic sanctions happening right now, bank seizures of private individuals and so on, this has changed the entire equation.
It's now clear to me that banks cannot be trusted, and crypto suddenly has a kind of a perfect storm of usefulness in this scenario in order to be able to engage in transactions away from the banking systems, and also to move money across borders quickly. and also to move money across borders quickly.
And to have something, a purely private wallet that governments can't come in and seize without due process, which is what they're doing if you have a bank account.
So, folks, look, I am always going to adjust...
My view based on new information.
So you'll find this is true with me on every topic.
I'm not dogmatic about it.
I'm not tied to one position and that's it forever no matter what.
If new information comes in or if the world changes, I'm going to reassess my position.
And that's what I've done with cryptocurrency.
The world has changed.
It is different today than it was 30 days ago.
And in this world, cryptocurrency I consider to be a kind of like a flotation device when you're out in a canoe.
You know, cryptocurrency is a survival skill now, financial survival.
And just as I wouldn't go, I wouldn't, you know, paddle in a canoe without a life vest or I'm not going to try to navigate the financial world right now without at least being competent in cryptocurrency skills and understanding how it works and being able to use that system.
And I think it's a basic skill set.
So that's just my explanation on that.
I appreciate all your feedback.
And for those of you who have been cheering Bitcoin for quite a long time, I'm telling you...
You're not going to like to hear this, but Bitcoin is still not digital gold, folks.
Only gold is gold.
Okay, real gold is gold.
Bitcoin is a digital abstraction, and it could lose a lot of, quote, value.
And I'm not telling people to hold assets in Bitcoin, but rather to learn how to use Bitcoin to engage in transactions or other cryptocurrencies.
You don't even have to use Bitcoin.
So there's a very big difference.
I just want to be clear where I stand on all of that.
And also just reinforce, ultimately you should be getting into physical something.
And if crypto is a good use for things that you need to be near liquid, and crypto is a good transition into physical things, for example, buying gold with crypto, or buying ammunition with crypto, or even maybe buying a ranch if you have enough crypto.
You know, get some land.
In my opinion, that should be your ultimate goal because that's where it's most secure.
You know, dirt beneath your feet, roof over your head, Glock in a holster with a spare magazine, right?
And some stored food on the shelf.
That's real security and that can't just vanish overnight.
So that should be the ultimate goal, in my opinion.
Now, interestingly, remember how I said, don't store your coins in an online wallet where the online wallet controls your keys.
And I specifically mentioned that I don't trust Coinbase.
And sure enough, Coinbase comes out yesterday and says, oh, they just cut off 25,000 wallets of Russian nationals.
That they said were engaged in, quote, illicit activity.
So if you're a Russian person using Coinbase, what would be illicit activity?
Oh, logging in.
Right?
So Coinbase just cut them all off.
25,000 Russians.
So this is why I say don't use Coinbase, by the way.
This is why I've recommended Exodus, because Exodus, it runs and is stored on your local computer or your mobile device, and no CEO of some other tech company can shut off your wallet Because, well, it's running on your local system, okay?
So I just want to be clear about that.
Coinbase just proved that concept in the last 24 hours.
Do not use Coinbase.
And even if you use Gemini, don't keep money in Gemini because that's a cloud-based system.
Keep your assets in your own wallet like Exodus.
Frankly, Coinbase, in my view, is just as bad as the bank's.
You know, if the US government orders Coinbase to seize your account, they'll do it just like that.
They're going to seize your account.
So don't give them that power.
All right, in other economic news, it's now clear based on where oil is heading.
Oil's right now about $139 a barrel, something in that range.
It's probably, almost certainly going to hit $200.
Now, it may take a couple of months to get there, but that's where it's headed.
And, you know, Joe Biden announced, this is kind of the big economic news yesterday, Joe Biden announced a total ban on U.S. purchases of all Russian oil.
So, the US does get quite a bit of oil from Russia.
Now, the US does not need to get oil from Russia.
The US, under President Trump, was self-sufficient, producing more than enough oil domestically.
It even had a surplus.
Being able to export oil to other countries.
But even if we had just that Keystone XL pipeline, which is the safest way to move oil, by the way, safer than moving oil by rail or by truck, pipelines are mile per mile, gallon per gallon, the safest way to transport oil.
We could be buying oil from Canada right now to replace all the oil that we would be buying from Russia or that we were previously buying from Russia until today.
But instead of having a pipeline, because Democrats and leftists, they have a knee-jerk reaction against pipelines.
They don't think about why they oppose pipelines.
They just oppose them from almost a cultist or weird left-wing religious point of view.
They don't think about, well, they need food, and they need fertilizer, and fertilizer is made from fossil fuels and so on, and they need transportation.
They don't think about that.
They just say, oh, pipeline's bad, all pipeline's bad.
So we end up with no pipelines, and thus, in California, soon, they're going to be paying $10 a gallon for gasoline.
Right now, gasoline in America is the highest price ever recorded in the history of the country, on average.
And that's like $4.16 a gallon on average, something in that range.
Highest ever.
It's never been that high.
It's going to go much higher.
And in California, trust me, by the end of this year, unless something dramatically changes, they're going to be paying $10 a gallon.
They're going to be begging for pipelines when that happens.
Please, install some pipelines!
We can't afford to drive across LA! And if you've lived in LA, you know that half your existence is driving on the freeways and waiting in traffic, right?
So when fuel prices are sky high, they're going to lose their minds.
But Joe Biden banning Russian oil is going to send the price per barrel above $200.
And now some people are even talking $250 or $300 a barrel as a possibility.
I'm not predicting it's going to go there, but it certainly is possible.
In my mind, it's certain it's going to go beyond $200 a barrel, which means that the price you pay for gas is I mean, get out your pocketbook.
You know, get out your debit card.
You're going to start emptying your bank account into your gas tank.
You're going to be paying $6, $7 a gallon even in places like Texas.
Diesel is going to be $5 a gallon.
Maybe by the time you hear this, then diesel will hit $6 a gallon.
You know what that's going to do to the price of food and transportation for lumber and building supplies?
It's going to go through the roof.
And farming and food production, through the roof.
And it's all by design.
That's the other part of the story.
It's all by design.
So we've cut off all oil from Russia.
Russia has responded by cutting off exports of fertilizer.
Yep, the Russian government has, quote, encouraged all of its fertilizer exporters to halt such exports entirely.
Now, you might think, well, does that matter?
How much fertilizer comes out of Russia?
Well, so it's about a quarter of the world's ammonia production.
Now, ammonia is NH3. In fact, I'd like you to forget about the word ammonia.
Just think about the elements here.
NH3. The N is nitrogen.
The H is hydrogen from hydrocarbons.
The nitrogen comes out of the air.
Now, plants need nitrogen to grow, right?
Nitrogen fertilizers.
And there are a lot of different ones, you know, urea comes from ammonia and so on.
But yet, the plants can't just take nitrogen out of the air by itself.
It's not bioavailable to plant roots when it's just floating around the air.
And the atmosphere is about 80% or 79% nitrogen.
But you have to take nitrogen and combine it with hydrogen to make NH3. That's ammonia.
And then from there, you can create all kinds of different fertilizers like ammonium nitrate and then calcium ammonium nitrate, urea, Sulfate nitrates.
Now you're talking about just adding different minerals like sulfur or magnesium or calcium and so on.
Or I think there's potassium nitrate and phosphorus, different versions of it, all kinds of interesting chemistry.
But it all starts with nitrogen.
And that's what you've got to understand.
Nitrogen is necessary to feed the world.
And ammonia is the base form of nitrogen combined with hydrocarbons.
And Russia provides about a quarter of the ammonia to the world.
It also provides, by the way, I did a little research on this, 17% of the potash, which is potassium, a form of potassium, 14% of urea, which is a derivative of ammonia, 10% of phosphates, And so, you know how fertilizer is NPK? N is nitrogen, P is phosphorus, and K is potassium, right?
So Russia provides a significant portion of NPK to the world.
Now, what's fascinating is Belarus, which is working with Russia, also provides, get this, about 21% of the potash to the world.
That's right.
So if you combine Russia and Belarus, again, which is cooperating with Russia, you're talking a big chunk, big chunk, like a quarter or more of the world's fertilizer that is now just stopped as of what yesterday stopped.
And this is in retaliation to Joe Biden announcing a ban on Russia's oil.
And at the same time this is happening, Russia is also shutting down its natural gas pipelines to Europe.
Not just the Nord Stream 2, which was already shuttered, but other pipelines.
I don't know the names of all of them, or there's a couple other ones.
Those are apparently getting shut down as well, or they're in the process of being shut down.
And the result is that The world is not going to get the fertilizer out of Russia, the ammonia and the urea and so on, and the world is not going to get the hydrocarbons out of Russia that would be needed to make your own fertilizer.
So if you don't get fertilizer and you don't get fossil fuels to make fertilizer, you can't grow crops, obviously.
And then what happens?
Well, Now, I have a little correction on this.
Check this out again today.
About half the world's population survives only because of synthetic fertilizers making food available to them.
So that's about 4 billion people.
I had accidentally been saying that was 5 billion people.
But I checked it again today.
It's actually 4 billion people, and that's from Our World in Data.
That's the source on that.
It's actually from the UN. What is it?
The FAO, I think it's called.
I forgot what that stands for.
It's some kind of food unit there at the UN. But about half the world's population needs synthetic fertilizer, or they die.
Now, I did a lot of deep research into this because I am all about permaculture and organic agriculture.
And, you know, I would prefer natural fertilizers, not synthetic fertilizers.
Not that there's anything wrong with just, you know, the basic chemistry of what is ammonia.
You know, the ammonia molecule, it doesn't care if it's organic or inorganic or where it came from.
It's just NH3, right?
And there's some NH3 in goat poop, and there's NH3 coming out of the Russian fertilizer factories.
It's the same NH3. But here's the thing.
If you try to grow food in your own homemade fertilizers, let's say you're collecting goat poop to put on your garden, which is nice because it's already pre-pelletized.
If you have goats, you know what I'm talking about.
Like, wow, it's a walking fertilizer pellet generating machine right there, the back end of that goat.
That's amazing.
But they just scatter it all over the place.
You have to find a way to collect it if you want to use it.
The problem is, with that method or even composting or worm casting type of operations or other types of animal fertilizer capture, like chicken poop and so on, The problem is you're just recycling the same nutrients over and over again, and you're not putting in new inputs into the system.
And as a result, you're losing some of these nutrients as you're eating the food or as you have soil runoff and so on.
You have to find some external source to bring the nutrients into the system.
And that's what happens.
That's what is achieved by synthetic fertilizers.
Taking nitrogen out of the air, combining it with hydrogen to make NH3. It's a synthetic process, but it makes a molecule that is loved by the natural world.
And without it, again, half the world's population would not survive.
So then you might be asking the question, Well, okay, Mike, you know, what happens if, okay, if half the world, that's four billion people, if they need all this fertilizer and fossil fuels, and then, let's see, you have Russia blocking exports of essentially about a quarter of the world's fertilizer, and also a lot of the world's energy, and so on.
You could say, at minimum...
One billion people are going to face starvation because that's a quarter of the four billion that depend on synthetic fertilizers.
So at minimum, one billion people.
And it's probably more like two billion people.
So when you consider fossil fuel export blockades and the economic sanctions and so on, So because of this war situation between Russia and Ukraine and the economic sanctions,
it is a reasonable statement to say that 1 to 2 billion human beings on this planet are going to face real starvation over the next, let's say, 18 months or so, if this is not fixed, if the situation is not reversed.
1 to 2 billion people face starvation.
So the reason I mentioned at the very beginning of this podcast the title, what's going to kill us first?
Is it the spike protein or is it the starvation?
The reason I said that is because also, based on our very well-researched estimates of spike protein damage over the long run, including cancers and autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular disorders, risks of stroke,
blood clotting, thrombosis, and so on, We had been able to estimate that between 1 and 2 billion human beings would die from the vaccines because the vaccines have been administered to over 5 billion people as of right now, and that number continues to grow.
So what's strange about this dynamic, what's kind of spooky, is that the only thing that might save 1 to 2 billion people from starving to death Is if one to two billion people die from the vaccines first.
And then there might be enough food.
You see what I'm saying?
I mean, it's a very dark dynamic.
But this is indicative of the kind of vectors that the globalists have unleashed against humanity.
They're trying to kill us in different ways.
One of the ways was the vaccine, the spike protein.
You know, the mRNA injections.
Another way is weaponization of the food system, i.e.
engineered food scarcity, which is now being unleashed upon us.
Another way is potentially global nuclear war.
Another way is economic collapse, which is also in play right now.
But you start to look at the numbers here.
We are quite literally going to almost certainly lose, you know, a couple of billion people.
In the years ahead, just for the things I just mentioned.
And the globalists are so wicked and evil that in their minds, that's not even enough.
That's not success in their minds.
They're trying to kill 7 billion people, or even more, maybe 7.5 billion.
And if they can only kill 1 to 2 billion with a vaccine and another 1 to 2 billion with starvation, then, you know, that's just not good enough for them.
They haven't hit the milestone markers yet.
And that's kind of scary because it means they're going to continue to escalate this to cause more mass death.
And since they're using the big guns right now, they're using global biological weapon, they're using depopulation weaponized vaccine injections, they're using global famine, food scarcity, starvation.
What's left?
What are the cards they haven't yet played?
And you know as well as I do, there aren't that many.
And it's not difficult to guess.
It's...
Or releasing another biological weapon that's far more dangerous.
Okay, that's one card they could play.
Or unleashing an EMP attack on North America to collapse society and cause a 90% die-off.
Or cyber warfare on financial institutions to achieve a banking system collapse followed by famine and chaos and social unrest and collapse of society.
Or thermonuclear war.
Here's another one.
And the risk of that is very real right now.
Or the risk of each of those is very real.
And it's not a question of whether they will deploy some of those.
It's just a question of which one they will choose next.
Because they, the globalists, they have already decided long ago to exterminate the human population.
And these are the means by which they are achieving that.
Now, here's something else that's kind of fascinating in all of this, in a dark way, is that the globalists tell themselves, remember, when they're killing off humanity, they tell themselves that this is a good thing in their view.
This is necessary in order to save humanity.
Remember that that's the logic that is coursing through their twisted demonic minds.
And What's fascinating is if you dig into research about agricultural production and agricultural capacity across the world, you realize that the planet is pretty much at its limit of food production based on current technology.
In other words, there aren't that many unexplored areas where you can create more farm fields.
Now, I know there's still clear-cutting rainforests in Brazil to create, you know, plant soybeans and so on.
But if you look at Canada, the United States, Central and South America, all of Western Europe, most of Eastern Europe and so on, there's not that much farmland available.
And by the way, Ukraine is about 71% usable farmland.
It is truly the breadbasket of Europe.
Whereas Russia, which is much larger than Ukraine in terms of raw acreage or square miles, Russia is only, I believe, about 13% usable farmland.
And most of that farmland is in Western Russia, right next to Ukraine.
So, in other words, the Russian nation is mostly...
Not usable for farming.
You know, it's big, but not that usable for farming.
It's great for natural gas and oil and minerals and mining, not good for growing food.
So that's one reason why Russia needs Ukraine, because they need the breadbasket.
This is the same reason that China needs America, because China has no more room to find new places to grow food.
They need to conquer a new nation.
The United States and all the farmland in America and the waterways and the soils and so on.
That's what China needs.
Now China's suffering its own crop problems due to flooding.
That's right.
And just as America is suffering drought, and then Central and South America are also suffering a lot of drought, by the way.
Their food production is way down.
In fact, let me see.
I had some statistics about that here.
Oh, yeah.
Here it is from agweb.com.
Three global factors driving new commodity super cycle.
South America has experienced now a loss of one billion bushels of crops in the last growing season due to heat and drought.
Wow.
That's just South America.
Okay.
So everywhere you go around the world, there's not that much more farmland.
I mean, Australia is a big continent.
But if you know anything about Australia, you know it's mostly desert.
You know, it's not usable for farmland, most of it.
There aren't any new unexplored continents that could just produce tons of food.
So what the globalists tell themselves is something like this.
They say, well, if the population continues to grow on its current pace, especially with high population increasing nations like Nigeria...
Then we're very rapidly going to approach a time when starvation is inevitable on a global scale, even if everything's working well, because there simply isn't enough farmland.
And they're not wrong about that.
There isn't really more farmland.
the globalists tell themselves that killing off the population through vaccines or war or some other similar means, they think that's kind of a mercy killing, like a euthanasia thing that's more merciful than billions of people starving to death and suffering like a euthanasia thing that's more merciful than billions of people starving to death and suffering through famine in the long run because there's Now, obviously, I'm not justifying the way they think.
I'm trying to demonstrate how they think and how they justify it to themselves.
They think that killing billions of people is okay because they think that's the lesser evil.
But truly, they are evil.
Like, they are the greater evil to think that that's okay.
But that's the way they think.
Oh, and I should clarify, those are the good globalists.
The bad ones just want to kill everybody for the sake of killing people, okay?
So the good globalists justify it by saying it's a mercy killing.
The bad ones are just mass slaughter everywhere.
So because that's the way globalists think, they follow policies that achieve these outcomes of food collapse and fossil fuel collapse.
So I want you to understand something here.
Putin is playing a role.
This is global theater run by globalists, and Putin is one of the globalists.
His job is to create this war and cause these economic sanctions and cause a collapse of fuel and fertilizer and food.
And that way, the depopulation hard kill effort can be blamed on war or blamed on Putin.
And then in Russia, they can blame it on America or NATO or Ukraine.
And then in Ukraine, they can blame it on Russia.
America blames it on Russia.
Everybody's got somebody else to blame.
And China blames America and Russia for the weather weapons causing the flooding in China.
So everybody's got a blame story.
But in truth, all the globalists are really working from the same blueprint, which is to cause global depopulation one way or another.
So understand that if Joe Biden were sane and if he had morals and if he wanted America to survive, he would obviously not be making the decisions that he's making in terms of policy here.
He would be allowing America to engage in oil exploration and oil pipelines and so on.
And then fuel would become more affordable and fertilizer would become more affordable and people would not starve to death.
There's a couple other factors worth mentioning here.
Understand that the amount of money that a low income earner currently spends on food, that percentage of their income is going to rise sharply to the point of riots.
Now, I don't know right now what percentage people spend on food.
I'm guessing it might be 25% or something in that range, maybe 30%.
But I think when it rises into the 30s, people start to get really, really nervous.
And then if food starts to cost more than 40% of your take-home income, I think you're in riot territory, just historically speaking.
Like, if you have to spend almost half your money on food...
People aren't happy because the food's too expensive or they're not being paid enough.
So you have wage earners in America and all over the world who are now facing the prospect of a very high percentage of their take-home pay being consumed by food and fuel.
Whereas the price of food to a wealthy person is a very tiny percentage of their overall income, right?
So it doesn't, you know, they don't riot.
They can still pay triple or quadruple for food.
It doesn't really matter compared to their much larger overall income.
But for poor wage earners, it's devastating.
And this is what's going to plague our world in the coming couple of years is the social That's what I did the podcast about yesterday, the food riots, the flash mobs looting grocery stores, and so on.
The other thing I wanted to mention about this is that a lot of leftists in America and around the world, some so-called environmentalists, they love this idea of fossil fuels being phased out.
They think this is the way to save the planet because they're terrified of CO2, which as I'll cover here shortly, CO2 is the most important molecule for plant production and food crops on our planet.
You know, CO2 is the miracle molecule for food.
But leftists have been brainwashed by junk science to hate carbon dioxide.
And so they love shutting down oil and Because they think, well, that's going to block CO2, that's going to save the planet.
Well, they don't know anything about science.
They don't know anything about atmospheric composition or atmospheric chemistry or anything.
So they don't know that actually if you take all the CO2 out of the atmosphere, you turn Earth into a dead, frozen ice planet with no crops and no ecosystem at all.
Everybody dies.
But they think that's what they want.
So they're in the process of trying to kill a planet when they tell themselves they think they're saving it.
And they're celebrating then fuel prices and fossil fuel going much, much higher because they think this is the way to force people off of fossil fuel.
And so then what do they recommend as the alternative?
Electric vehicles.
So, of course, you have to be just a bleeping idiot to think that electric vehicles aren't powered by fossil fuels because almost all of the electric vehicles in the world are running on, of course, coal fired power plants.
And coal is a fossil fuel that produces carbon dioxide when it's burned, obviously.
So every electric vehicle on the road is actually, or nearly every, is a coal-powered car producing CO2, just not out of a tailpipe.
It's producing CO2 somewhere else at a coal plant.
All the CO2 comes out of the same smokestack instead of a million different tailpipes.
But it's still coal.
Now, I understand that some of the electricity on the grid is generated by solar and some of it's wind and some of it's generated by natural gas and so on.
Yeah, I get that, but natural gas is a fossil fuel too.
You know, it's got hydrocarbons, produces CO2. When you combust it, So really, there's no such thing as a purely electric vehicle, unless you're gathering the sunlight yourself with a giant array of solar panels at your home, and you're charging your own car off the grid, just yourself.
Then you could say it's powered by the sun.
But even then, of course, you have to get all these rare earth minerals out.
In your car, in the batteries, in the solar panels, and those come from dirty mines in China and Russia and other places like that.
So there's really no such thing as a clean electric vehicle, it turns out.
But don't bother trying to inform a left-wing cultist about any of this because they are immune to facts, immune to logic.
I think that's the only immunity they got from taking the vaccine.
It fried enough of their brains so they now have immunity to reason.
They cannot recognize facts any longer because those circuits have been burned out of their brains.
It's amazing.
But they love this idea of a fossil fuel collapse because they think that will force everybody into electric vehicles.
And what they don't realize is that electric vehicles require batteries.
Batteries require, oh, let's see, lithium, cobalt, What else?
Copper, manganese.
What else goes into batteries?
Some amount of aluminum and so on.
And guess where all those minerals are mined?
Oh, Ukraine and Russia and China.
And so you can't have a world where everybody has an electric vehicle because you don't have the bandwidth to even do the mining.
Much less to burn that much coal, much less to send all that electricity through the power grid.
The power grid wasn't built For a nation of electric cars.
But again, leftists are immune to facts.
None of this matters.
They think electric cars are the future.
Well, I'll just tell them this.
If they do succeed in shutting down fossil fuels for an extended period of time, their future will be the Fred Flintstone mobile.
You will have to pedal with your little feet moving under the car.
You know, like Fred Flintstone, right?
That's the only car you're going to get.
It's foot-powered.
And if you're going to use a lot of human power for transportation using bicycles or quadricycles, guess what?
You're going to need to eat more calories, it turns out.
That's right.
There's no free lunch in any of this.
If you're going to expend energy, you've got to get the energy from somewhere.
And if you're going to bicycle around everywhere, you're going to have to eat food.
Food needs nitrogen, so we're back to the nitrogen again.
Where are you going to get the nitrogen?
Well, again, the Haber equation and fossil fuels, hydrocarbons, and so on, that provides the nitrogen that feeds half the world.
So there's no escaping it, folks.
If you don't, let me just summarize this section as follows.
If you don't create synthetic fertilizer, you lose half the world's population, period.
There's no debate.
And there's no escaping that, okay?
If you stop fossil fuel fertilizer production, boom, In time, 4 billion people gone.
You can't sustain them.
Now, is that the goal of the left?
It seems to be so.
And this is how they're achieving it.
The question is, do they realize that they're going to be among some of the I mean, some of them will be among the 4 billion who who die in this process because, you know, starvation will be experienced on a on a widespread global basis.
Starvation is not a pretty thing brings out the worst in humanity.
And this is how they're achieving it.
And it appears that's the situation they're trying to create.
Now, in the next section here on the podcast, we're going to talk about the Haber equation and photosynthesis and hydrocarbons.
We'll get into the geeky stuff here.
It'll be fun.
Trust me, I'll make it interesting, or I'll do my best.
All right, in this section of the podcast, which is also broadcast on brighteon.tv as the Health Ranger Report, we're going to cover the three most important equations to sustain life on Earth.
And these equations have everything to do with fossil fuels and what's happening with Russia and Ukraine and food production and avoiding mass starvation and so on.
So let's just go into those.
The first equation is photosynthesis.
Photosynthesis.
You don't have to memorize the equation.
It's very simple.
Plants need three basic inputs in order to function.
This is true, obviously, for food crops.
They need light.
They need sunlight.
They need water.
And they need carbon dioxide.
The carbon dioxide comes out of the air.
Water comes out of the soil, the roots.
And, of course, light comes from the sun.
Now, isn't it interesting that all three of these things are being attacked by leftists?
They're trying to dim the sun to block sunlight from reaching the surface of the earth.
They're trying to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, which would cause global crop failure and famine.
And then, in terms of water through nutrients, they're also trying to limit agricultural use of water.
Now, I understand the need for conservation, for sustainability, and plummeting water aquifers and all that.
I get that.
But there are some areas, especially in California, where there are abundant water supplies, they're not being allowed to be used by certain farmers, apparently who haven't bribed, you know, the water authority enough yet.
And so farmers are being denied the ability to use the water that is available.
So photosynthesis takes these three inputs and then it produces, well, plant sugars, metabolism for the plants.
And then the plants use that energy to produce everything.
Leaves, stems, seeds, fruits, roots, tubers, what have you.
Pollen, flowers, you know, everything.
So all the food that we get from plants.
Requires photosynthesis, right?
And then all the food that animals eat from plants, such as cows munching on grass.
That all comes from photosynthesis too.
So you could say that you'll have no beef, no hamburgers, if you don't have photosynthesis.
No sausages.
No pork chops without photosynthesis because all the animals feed on plants.
All right, so without photosynthesis, we can probably all agree that we all die without photosynthesis.
The whole planet dies.
And this is true in the ocean, too, by the way.
Of course, photosynthesis...
Provides the energy for the aquatic life that is consumed by the ocean creatures and animals and the whole web of life in the ocean.
It's all based on photosynthesis.
Okay.
All right.
The next equation is the hydrocarbon combustion equation.
So if you take hydrocarbons...
And you combine them with oxygen.
And hydrocarbons, by the way, are just the elements C and H. It's easy to remember since that's what the word is composed of.
Hydrocarbon.
So hydro is H. Carbon is C. Hydrocarbon, you say HC, but it's usually written as CH. Anyway, you get the idea.
It's carbon and hydrogen.
That's it.
You add oxygen to it and some heat.
And you get combustion.
You know, this is how engines work, right?
This is how heaters work, at least fossil fuel heaters and natural gas combustion and so on.
Now, what are the byproducts of hydrocarbon combustion?
You ever think about that?
What comes out of that equation?
So, yeah, okay, you burn hydrocarbons, you get heat.
And you get some pressure.
You get a little explosion.
You can use the drive pistons for an engine to achieve transportation.
What else do you get?
What are the waste products of hydrocarbon combustion?
And there are really only two in the chemistry of this.
And that is water and carbon dioxide.
Yeah, I know.
You're always told that hydrocarbon combustion is dirty, dirty, dirty.
Tailpipes are dirty.
It's so dirty.
Coal power plants is all dirty.
Well, except for the impurities, and there can be impurities, there can be mercury in coal, obviously, and there can be sulfur compounds and so on.
But in terms of just the hydrocarbons, if you have a clean hydrocarbon, like natural gas, and you combust it, you really only get water and carbon dioxide.
Now, water, of course, can be used to water plants.
And carbon dioxide can be used to feed plants.
That's right.
So water and carbon dioxide are two of the three inputs that plants need in order to grow.
Do you know that?
So actually burning hydrocarbons provides two out of the three things that plants need in order to produce food.
Isn't that fascinating?
There are even some pilot projects set up where they have coal-fired power plants And instead of just dumping the CO2 into the air, they dump it into a giant greenhouse.
And then they grow plants in the greenhouse.
They grow food crops.
And the plants go crazy.
They love the CO2 coming out of the coal-fired power plant.
Did you know that?
Do you know that what comes out of a coal plant is fertilizer for plants?
It's food for plants to produce food for us.
So stop believing the lies and the climate change lies and the leftists who say CO2 is a pollutant and a poison and it's going to destroy the earth.
No, it isn't.
Plants love CO2 more than plants love Brondo, by the way.
Plants love CO2. That's an idiocracy reference, by the way.
Plants love CO2. And of course, greenhouse growers know that you can buy CO2 generators for your greenhouse because often if the air is not moving enough in a greenhouse, The plants will use up all the CO2 and that'll become the limiting factor for plant growth.
There's not enough CO2 left in this greenhouse, so greenhouse growers buy carbon dioxide generators.
And you know how those work?
They're fed propane or natural gas and they just convert it into CO2 and water.
That's it.
Right?
So once again, hydrocarbons, fossil fuels provide food for plants.
It's not a pollutant.
It is a nutrient for our world.
Okay.
And you add sunlight, boom, you've got food crops.
Now the third equation, we're just going to do three today, is the Haber equation.
And this is a German scientist from many decades back.
I think his first name was Fritz.
I think it was Fritz Haber.
Sounds German enough, doesn't it?
And he came up with this pretty clever method to turn nitrogen that's in the atmosphere, which is an inert gas, to turn that into a reactive form of nitrogen that can be used by plants through their roots.
And that equation combines atmospheric nitrogen with hydrocarbons to create ammonia.
And just remember that the formula for ammonia is just NH3. So it's three hydrocarbons and one nitrogen.
And that's all the chemistry we have to get into on that, really.
You're taking nitrogen from the air, which is, remember the atmosphere is almost 80% nitrogen.
You're swimming in it all the time.
You take that, you combine it with hydrocarbons, you get ammonia.
And then the ammonia becomes, that's the basis for nitrogen-based fertilizers.
Obviously, you have urea and you have ammonium nitrate.
You have calcium ammonium nitrate and many other different forms of nitrates that go into the crops.
So that formula, of course, requires hydrocarbons, i.e.
natural gas.
So this nitrogen amplifies the potential of plants to grow food and to produce food crops.
So again, if we're going to feed the world, we have to have this Haber equation.
Thank you, Fritz.
We have to have this running every single day.
And a lot of the facilities that produce this Because they're pretty large industrial looking operations.
They have to produce 200 times atmospheric pressure.
I mean, very high pressure to achieve this.
They're basically like smashing nitrogen into the hydrocarbons and forcing it into a new molecule.
I mean, that's a simplified version, but it's a big operation.
So a lot of these operations are in Russia and now they're cut off from the world.
So we don't have this synthetic fertilizer.
So, with the Haber equation, we can use less land on the planet to grow more food.
Without the Haber equation, i.e., without synthetic fertilizers, it would take more land to grow the same amount of food, and we don't have enough land to grow enough food to feed the world without synthetic fertilizers.
I know I've said that several times, but I just want you to think about it in terms of the land.
So, if we had another Earth...
Right next door.
And you had a whole new set of continents with beautiful farmland.
Then, yeah, we might not need synthetic fertilizers.
We could just go there and grow food there and ship it back over here.
But the thing is, then, there'd be a lot of people having babies on the new earth.
And then that population would grow to billions of people.
Then they would need their food for themselves, obviously.
Everybody needs to eat, and you'd be back in the same situation before long, where you still have to have synthetic fertilizers in order to feed the population, which by that time might be 16 billion on two Earths.
Now, let's step back and take a big picture point of view on all of this, and we're going to find some fascinating things.
Number one, what is the primary energy input in all of this?
You think about photosynthesis, you think about fossil fuels, you think about combustion.
Where did the source energy come from for all of this?
And the answer is the sun.
The sun is the giant fusion battery in the sky.
The sun provides all the energy for all of this.
direct energy to plants via photosynthesis or indirect energy into hydrocarbons, which are said to be historic plants.
We'll talk about that in a second.
And that's necessary for the hydrocarbons in the Haber equation as well as hydrocarbon combustion.
So the energy source is the sun.
And yet the globalists are trying to block the sun.
That's the Bill Gates Global Dimming Project called Project Scopex.
They want to dim the sun to, quote, save the planet.
Well, if you dim the sun, you cut off the primary energy source for food, for photosynthesis, crops, and even for future hydrocarbons as well.
So that's obviously a bad strategy unless you're trying to kill everybody, which, of course, seems to be their goal.
Now, there's a second point in all of this that's fascinating, which is that hydrocarbons are called fossil fuels.
And I've even used that term myself.
But there are credible analysts in this realm who say that hydrocarbons are not fossil fuels, that they are being created all the time.
And that there's not even a limited supply of hydrocarbons, that they are...
In other words, oil is the result of an ongoing internal process inside Earth.
And it's not a fossil fuel in the sense that it was created millions of years ago and it's dead dinosaurs and, you know, these myths that we've been told.
Rather, it's the result of an ongoing process because did you know that it's very hot inside the Earth?
Right?
It's very hot inside.
There's a lot of molten lava, and there's a lot of magnetically sensitive minerals that are swishing around inside there.
Things are happening, obviously, because we have volcanoes.
So if you weren't convinced that the inside of the Earth is very hot and there's a lot of magma movement and so on, and there's even a magnetosphere that's being projected around the Earth because of the movement of certain elements and minerals inside the Earth, you know that's where the magnetosphere comes from.
It's from the inside of the Earth.
It's projected.
It's a magnetic field that's projected through the Earth's crust.
To the outside of the Earth.
And that protects us from most of the ionizing radiation from the Sun.
Things like that.
But if you weren't convinced that the inside of the Earth was a lot of molten lava, then all you gotta do is go visit an active volcano somewhere.
You're like, yep!
It's hot!
It's lava!
I'm convinced!
The inside of the Earth is not a cold, frozen ball.
It is a very, very hot operation going on, and there's a lot of movement in there.
So again, according to some experts and analysts, the result of all that is the ongoing creation of hydrocarbons in the form of oil and natural gas and so on.
And if that's true, it means that oil is just the natural, it's part of the natural cycle of energy on our planet.
Carbon dioxide is not a poison.
Carbon dioxide is food for plants.
Carbon dioxide is released by hydrocarbon combustion, which also releases water.
Hydrocarbons are created as a natural process of the planet's internal movement itself.
It's normal.
It's natural.
Oil is not synthetic.
Oil is 100% natural.
It comes from the Earth.
And if you really understand this, you understand that Oil represents trapped carbon dioxide that has been deprived from the atmosphere.
That's not the right way to say it.
It has been withheld from the atmosphere.
And by burning oil, we are unleashing CO2, finally making it available to plants and rainforests and food crops so that the planet can grow more food.
So the reason I've mentioned all this is to say the following.
If you want to grow more food from the same amount of land, because the land is limited, the best way to achieve that is to increase carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere instead of just killing off billions of people, you see?
So the globalists say, we don't have enough farmland, got to kill a few billion people.
But I say, why not just release CO2? And then your existing land can increase yields substantially.
You could have 50% more food with just a small rise in carbon dioxide because CO2 is at a very low level, like 408 parts per million.
Very tiny sliver of the atmospheric chemistry.
If we could increase that, then we could have a lot more farmland.
I know some of you say, well, but the oceans would rise.
The oceans would rise and you wouldn't have some of the coastal land.
Okay.
Yeah, the Earth would be warmer.
Why do you think it should be colder?
Don't you realize that the Earth used to be more lush when it was warmer and it had higher CO2 and dinosaurs roamed modern-day Utah deserts?
What were the dinosaurs doing in the desert?
Well, it wasn't a desert.
It was a lush rainforest because we had more CO2. Yeah, the oceans were higher then because today they're too low.
Don't you understand?
The oceans are too low.
They're too low.
They need to be higher.
And then we'll have more rain, more rainforests, higher levels of CO2, and more productive farmland.
And yeah, we'll lose some of the coastal regions, but not much because the oceans won't rise that much.
Maybe a meter or something, you know?
You know, the Democrats say, oh, we're going to lose, like, Los Angeles, and we're going to lose Washington, D.C. We're going to lose all these liberal cities.
And I'm like, and the problem is?
No, I'm joking.
That's satire.
No, but it is crazy to think that the Earth should be colder and that the oceans should be lower.
The oceans, historically, have actually been much higher.
We are in a low period of ocean levels.
Isn't it crazy from a cosmic perspective that only liberals could complain about having too much water?
We live on a water planet in a universe where water is incredibly scarce, especially liquid water.
And mineral-rich ocean water is one of the most valuable commodities in the cosmos.
And we have so much of it here on planet Earth that liberals are terrified of it.
It's like, oh my god, it's up two inches!
Run for your life!
And all the other extraterrestrials in the cosmos are like, we'll take the water.
Can we come just get some?
You have a giant water-sucking machine.
Can we just take some?
It was a siphon a little bit out of the Indian Ocean or something.
They would love to have the water if you want to give water away, but that would be crazy because in the universe, water is worth more than gold.
And that also has to do with heavy water and deuterium and free energy and things like that.
I don't have time to go into it.
But your oceans are your energy sources, folks.
Stop thinking about water as your enemy.
This is what I don't understand about insane leftists.
They're terrified of CO2, which is a plant nutrient, and they're terrified of water, which is actually the most powerful fuel cell battery source source.
You know, through cold fusion and so on, that exists in the universe.
Water is energy.
And it terrifies leftists and Democrats.
They're afraid of everything that's good, but they love, you know, murdering and chopping babies.
That's good for them.
They love that.
But, oh, can't have water.
Too much.
Too much water.
Run!
But that does explain why they hate themselves, because the human body is, what, 70% water or something?
Or more?
I forgot the exact number.
Most of your body is water, and most of the planet's surface is water.
So if you are an Earth being and you hate water, there's something wrong with you.
From a cosmic perspective, you should love water.
Plants love water.
Every living system loves water, but not Democrats.
They hate it.
That's why they want to withhold it from everybody.
You can't have our water, you know.
They don't release the water for the farmers.
You can't grow food with the water.
And then they try to suck carbon dioxide out of the air with their carbon sequestration attempts.
We're just going to take all the CO2 out of the atmosphere and we're going to say that that's green.
And then you're like, all the plants are dying now.
They're all turning brown.
Why are you calling it green?
Like, no, it's green when they're brown.
The more brown they turn, the more green the planet gets.
And you're like, no, but the planet's actually turning brown.
Because it's dead.
How is that green again?
Like, oh, trust us, it's green.
I think libtards don't understand the difference between green and brown.
Or dead versus alive, for that matter.
It's pretty crazy stuff.
So the net effect of all of this is that you and I are living on a planet of oblivious, ignorant morons.
Of course, you already knew that, but now you might have new insight into how incredibly oblivious and ignorant they are.
They don't even know that plants need CO2 or that...
Crops need water, even.
And again, it's like something ripped right out of idiocracy, where they were spraying rondo on the crops and wondering why they were all dying.
And we're facing that kind of moment in society today.
The left-wing lunatics, they don't understand the role of hydrocarbons in creating fertilizer and the role of fertilizer in feeding the world.
And they talk about how they want to be all humanitarian and save people.
If you want to save people, stop starving them.
There's kind of a simple rule.
Stop starving them by cutting off the fossil fuel produced fertilizers that feed the world or feed half the population.
The most humanitarian thing in the world would be to actually make hydrocarbons less expensive so that everything else becomes more affordable to low income earners.
And the way to do that is to explore more oil.
And even to combust more fossil fuels, releasing more CO2 into the atmosphere so that plants can use it so we can have more crops and so on and so forth.
You're getting the picture, right?
You're seeing how this is all interrelated.
And how the message from the media and the environmentalists is completely the opposite of reality, as if they've never carried out a chemistry equation ever in their lives.
They wouldn't even recognize photosynthesis if they saw it.
They have no idea what brings life to this world.
They have no idea where the energy comes from, i.e. the sun.
And so the net effect of all this is that we are headed into a multi-year collapse of the food supply, a collapse of fertilizer, a collapse of fossil fuels, economic collapse.
This is going to be a time of incredible suffering and starvation, and it is now inescapable.
I don't think this can be reversed now, no matter what is done.
The damage is already kind of baked in, shall we say.
Or a bigger picture point of view is to say, okay, we live on a planet with 8 billion human beings.
And the globalists have just altered the infrastructure and the economies to such a radical extent that now the new economy can only support about 4 billion people.
The way it's currently, you know, structured with the lack of fossil fuels and fertilizers and so on.
So that means that obviously there's going to be a die-off of 4 billion people.
But in that die-off, those 4 billion people get pretty angry.
About starving, you know?
About food inflation, about being betrayed by their own governments.
Especially when all the solutions could have been readily available.
Just make the fertilizer, you know?
Just drill for the oil.
Just release CO2 and everybody has food.
And by the way, also with higher CO2 levels, some of the deserts become farmable land.
So if you want to turn deserts into farmland, the way to do that is for higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.
NASA studies prove this.
NASA, their satellites have been taking images of the planet for several decades, and they've noticed that since CO2 has been climbing from, I don't know, 380 parts per million or something like that to 409 or so parts per million, that the planet has been greening.
This is a satellite study from NASA. You can look it up on DuckDuckGo.
The greening of planet Earth via NASA satellites, it documents that higher levels of CO2 turn semi-arid areas into arable land, farmland.
So that's how you get more farmland, is you have more CO2. It's very simple.
This is not rocket science.
So all the solutions are available, yet they're being withheld from humanity.
In the same way that ivermectin was withheld from people who had COVID. And that's also a crime against humanity, to withhold medicine from a patient who could be cured.
And yet the hospitals did that to how many millions of people?
They just murdered them with a lack of medicine.
Well, we are being murdered on a planetary scale due to a lack of CO2. And a lack of hydrocarbons.
That's what's happening.
And it's all being done on purpose.
It's all engineered to achieve global extermination.
And by the way, everything I've said here today is 100% based on legitimate science.
You can confirm this yourself.
This is straight chemistry.
It's actually very simple chemistry.
It's undeniable.
It's irrefutable.
There is no debate about these things except from those who refuse to accept logic and reason and real science.
The only argument against this are arguments made by emotional cultists who have been brainwashed into hating humanity and murdering their own babies, hating fossil fuels, hating sunlight, hating water, being terrified of oceans.
And they're not rational.
And frankly, a lot of them won't be with us for very long because most of those people took the spike protein injections, it turns out.
Got a little mRNA boost, which is already wreaking havoc with their neurological systems.
Nothing like being, you know, internally ravaged by a biological weapon that's being produced by your own ribosomes because you've had a reverse transcriptase alteration of your chromosomes.
There's some science for you.
How about that?
You want some science?
Oh, open up your cells and look at the nightmare that is inside you.
They took that.
I'm sorry.
I tried to dissuade them from committing vaccine suicide, but they went along with it.
And of course, they want to commit starvation suicide.
So all the people who oppose CO2, who tend to be the same people that promoted the vaccines, they are part of a death cult that is trying to destroy this world, or I should say, trying to destroy humanity.
And they're very, very consistent about it.
It makes sense why they murder babies.
It makes sense why they hate sunlight and they hate ocean water and they hate carbon dioxide, a nutrient for plants.
It all makes sense.
It's all consistent because they are a cult of death and destruction.
And yet they claim to have the moral authority over our planet.
If they run it, they'll destroy it.
So we've got to be prepared to survive all of that.
That's a lot of what I focus on here.
And I'm trying to think about what might be a silver lining in all of this.
What can I share with you now?
Because I promise to at least have some positive statement.
But first, let me just give credit to today's sponsors.
The Satellite Phone Store is our sponsor today, SAT123.com.
And they're completely out of satellite phones, which you might find somewhat ironic, given that it's the Satellite Phone Store.
The satellite phones are gone.
What they have remaining now are the Bivvy Sticks, which is a two-way satellite messaging device that works without using, obviously, cell towers.
It just talks to the satellites directly.
You just hold it up.
You don't even have to hold it up, actually.
You can put it on the windowsill and it'll find the satellite and talk to it.
And it will exchange text messages.
And you can text people.
You can receive messages and so on.
Great emergency communication system.
They've got several hundred of these in stock currently.
I don't know how long they'll last.
I don't know when they're going to get new ones.
I know the sat phones are gone.
But if you want to check this out, it's sat123.com.
And then I also want to give credit to our own healthrangerstore.com where we do have the freeze-dried coffee that is good for long-term storing.
We have it in pouches and also in the number 10 cans.
I think it's 16 ounces in the number 10 cans.
This is freeze-dried certified fair trade, certified organic coffee from Colombia, Colombia.
And it's quite delicious, I'm told, although I'm not a coffee expert.
But people say it's very good.
And because it's freeze-dried, it has a very, very long shelf life, i.e.
several years.
And this is a great barter item.
It's a great preparedness item.
Because, you know, coffee drinkers go nuts without coffee.
And in a supply chain collapse, obviously it's going to be very difficult to get coffee.
So this is almost as good as stocking up on cigarettes or alcohol.
It's just like...
Coffee, or what's the federal agency?
The Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
Wait, isn't there a...
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
Yeah.
They should add coffee into that, you know?
Because this is what everybody needs in a collapse.
Alcohol, tobacco, firearms, explosives, and freeze-dried coffee.
And then you might be chill.
That's available at healthrangerstore.com.
Just the coffee, not the explosives, just to be clear.
All right, now for the practical positive news in all of this.
Based on the knowledge that I've shared here, this should lead to some fairly obvious preparedness strategies.
One is that various forms of ammonia, such as ammonium nitrate or calcium ammonium nitrate, minerals mixed with ammonia, Or pelletized urea and things like that.
These have essentially a forever type of lifetime, shelf life.
And if you can acquire these and you can store them safely, just remember that some of them, they can be detonated, so be careful.
It's not like they're just going to explode safely.
I mean, they're safe to handle, but just be aware of that.
You can store them, and they represent future food production.
And every farmer is going to need fertilizer.
Every farmer needs nitrogen.
Every farmer needs potash.
Every farmer is going to need a source of potassium and phosphorus.
And so stocking up on fertilizers is a really smart thing because it is future food.
And this is true even if you're just doing hydroponic production, which, of course, I advocate, as you've heard many times.
But if you store seeds...
And then the fertilizers for hydroponic production, which are the same fertilizers as soil fertilizers.
They're just in liquid form, by the way.
Exact same stuff.
You can buy it in a powdered form or a granular form and just mix it with liquid and use that in your hydroponic system, in case you're wondering.
As a side note, people tend to really overpay for hydroponic fertilizers, like 100 times more than it should cost.
If you live in an agricultural community, just drive down to your local fertilizer operation and ask, like, what would it cost to get a 50-pound bag Some form of ammonia.
Maybe calcium ammonia, nitrate, because it's got calcium in it.
Just find out what that is.
You're going to be shocked, even with the inflation, how cheap it is compared to hydroponic fertilizers that you buy in liquid form.
That's just a side note.
But if you stockpile fertilizers, you're stockpiling future food.
It's like stored food in the pre-food format, if you think about it.
It's stored food potential.
It's kind of like concentrated sunlight in a way, you might say, because you can turn that pile of, you know, rock or pellets or ash-looking stuff, powder, you can turn that into food just by adding water and sunlight and, you know, seeds and what have you.
And that's pretty amazing.
So stocking up on food as a prepper makes a lot of sense.
But what if you could stock up on pre-food?
What if you could stock up on something that would allow you to double your food yields when it comes time to growing that survival garden that you need?
How many people have a can of seeds that they bought?
You know, like the survival seed collection.
50,000 seeds, right?
You've seen this?
And they don't have any fertilizer.
So the seeds are great, but without some form of nitrogen, your yields are going to be pretty poor.
And you know the name of the game when it comes to survival gardening is how many calories do you have to put into the food, you know, into the garden to get how many calories out.
And if you don't have fertilizer...
That equation's not going to work for you.
You may die from starvation even while farming because you're not getting the yields that you need to live.
And of course, potatoes are one of the best returns on investment in terms of your caloric expenditure.
But potatoes with nitrogen are even better.
Potatoes with goat poop would also work.
If you could just get the goats to walk and poop in rows with the potatoes, that would be great.
But you might die of starvation trying to train the goats, too.
It could take a while.
But you see what I mean?
Think about your preparedness strategies in terms of understanding the role of fertilizer.
I've got a lot of fertilizer because we were selling it as part of the Health Ranger store with the hydroponic grow boxes, the food rising grow systems, which we're not currently selling.
We had a lot of fertilizer that we were offering to the public.
We stopped offering it to the public a couple of years ago because the shipping cost became too great because of the weight of the fertilizer.
And so I ended up inheriting like pallets of certain types of fertilizers that I'm holding on to as an agricultural preparedness item for future farming, future food production at the community level.
or future hydroponics.
And so I just kind of lucked into that.
But you can do it on purpose, and you don't need that much.
You don't need pallets.
You just need...
I mean, 100 pounds of the right mix of fertilizers can grow, I don't know, thousands of pounds of food.
Maybe the ratio is even better than that.
A little bit of fertilizer goes a long way.
So that's my message for you today.
The more knowledge you have about this topic, the more empowered you are to be able to anticipate what's coming down the line because of Russia, Ukraine, grain exports being halted, fertilizer halted, fossil fuels halted, all this economic sanctions and everything.
You can anticipate that, and then you can apply the knowledge that we've talked about here and other things that you already know, and you can make strategic decisions about how to survive all of this and make it through.
Where other people will be starving because they don't know where food comes from.
They just think it comes from the grocery store.
Grocery store shelves are empty.
Like, that's the end of their possibilities.
Like, what do I do now?
The shelves are empty.
You know, but you have options.
Because you understand all this stuff.
Knowledge that is lacking in the minds of the masses.
Oh, one more final thought on all of this.
There's also bacteria in the soil that fixes nitrogen and creates a form of ammonia for plants.
And there are, these bacteria exist in legumes.
The root nodules of legumes, they have nitrogen-fixing bacteria.
And so if you plant legumes, they will actually leave nitrogen behind in the soil.
And then the next crop comes along, you know, you can take advantage of that nitrogen that's been put into the soil by the legumes.
I mean, permaculture farmers know all this stuff.
That's pretty common knowledge.
Because the bacteria in the soil are good at fixing nitrogen, if you poison your soil with pesticides and herbicides and glyphosate and all that garbage, you kill the bacteria that creates the nitrogen.
So it's one more reason not to poison your soils.
It's one more reason to actually practice clean, green farming methods in terms of avoiding chemical pesticides, which are poisons.
But chemical fertilizers are not poison.
It's just basic chemistry.
That's ammonia, which is the same thing that the bacteria produce in the soil.
Okay, so understand the difference.
I know that sometimes people say, well, you know, fertilizers, they're synthetic and they're dirty.
Not really.
Pesticides are dirty.
Pesticides are poisons.
They kill insects by poisoning them to death.
Produce life.
I mean, they support life.
It's the opposite of a pesticide.
Pesticide is designed to kill.
Fertilizer is designed to support life.
To grow.
Okay?
Completely different categories.
And it's important that you don't group them all in one basket and say, oh, all fertilizers are bad because they come from petroleum.
It's not the case, not the case at all.
Plants need them.
Plants need ammonia or, you know, ammonium nitrate and other chemicals.
Plants need phosphorus and potassium and other trace minerals as well, by the way, which is why we need more seawater with the minerals in it.
We need the magnesium too.
But understand the difference in this and don't be misled by cultists, dogmatic cultists who don't know anything about botany or atmospheric chemistry or hydrocarbons or any of that.
And that's most people, it turns out.
They have no idea what they're talking about.
Crazy world.
I mean, we all eat food.
Most people have no clue where it comes from.
We mostly eat food grown in fertilizer.
People don't know a dang thing about fertilizer.
It's amazing.
Just truly amazing.
Alright, so that's my message for today.
Again, thank you for listening.
I'm sorry if this got a little bit nerdy today.
A few too many equations, was it?
Huh?
Should I have just stopped at E equals MC squared or something?
Just one equation allowed like Stephen Hawking?
Well, we did three equations today, and they're all important, and that's what's keeping us alive.
So understand this, and you'll do well, I think.
You'll be ready for what's coming.
It's going to be brutal, truly.
There's going to be a lot of starvation, a lot of suffering.
But this is the time to learn to grow food, to be more food self-reliant.
And I'm right there with you.
I can't wait to grow more food.
I love it.
I love doing it.
It's a real joy for me.
So we'll do it together.
And if we still have an internet functioning, then, you know, we'll share the information online.
If not, we'll just be doing it on our own, and we'll talk about it later.
All right.
Thanks for listening.
Have a great day.
God bless.
Talk to you tomorrow.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection