Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 3, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:19:05

Situation Update, 02/03/22 - "Joemicron" Biden variant has unleashed an economic PLAGUE...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Situation update for Thursday, February 3rd, 2022, the This is Mike Adams.
	Thank you for joining me.
	Another day, another prediction has come true.
	This time, it's Lujan.
	He's a U.S. Senator from, I think, New Mexico.
	Senator Lujan, Ben Ray Lujan, Democrat.
	Has had a horrible stroke.
	Actually, this happened early yesterday, I think.
	And he's, of course, fully vaccinated.
	He's only four...
	How old is he?
	49?
	Something like that.
	He's not that old.
	And he's had this horrific stroke.
	Yahoo News reporting that his stroke sent shockwaves through the Senate on Tuesday, underscoring the fragility of Democrats' 50-50 majority.
	Oh, you mean the 50-50 majority they stole?
	Out of Arizona and Georgia by rigging elections?
	Well, now because they're pushing vaccines, they've just lost that 50-50 majority.
	So now they only have 49 seats until Lujan is able to come back and vote.
	And there's no word on how severe his stroke is, but obviously it's severe enough that he's not functioning in the Senate at the moment.
	According to Yahoo News, the announcement appeared to catch senators off guard.
	Quote, Oh my God, I didn't know that, said Senator Dick Durbin, the number two Senate Democrat.
	And then John Tester, a Democrat of Montana, was asked by reporters about Lujan.
	He said, Oh my God, I'll find out.
	I did not know that.
	Wow.
	And then another senator said, oh my god, was Lujan dumb enough to take the real vaccine?
	The rest of us have been taking saline shots.
	Now, I'm joking about that last quote attribution, but that's probably what they're thinking.
	They're like, seriously?
	Did he take the real jab?
	Didn't he get the memo?
	These are depopulation weapons.
	The rest of us have just been faking it, like Trudeau from Canada.
	Lujan's office did not immediately respond to a question about when he could return to the Capitol, but in a statement, they said that Lujan is expected to make a full recovery, and I'll add this, he'll be at least as functional as Joe Biden when he returns.
	No, I'm sorry, I'm not trying to mock anybody who's had a stroke.
	My point is, if you don't want to have a stroke and you don't want to die of a heart attack and you don't want to die of cancer and you don't want to have myocarditis and you don't want to have heart attacks and everything, why are you allowing yourself to be injected with biological weapons that cause those things?
	This is the legitimate question.
	It's a question to Lujan and everybody else in the Senate, in the House, I guess anywhere.
	If you don't want to have bad health effects...
	Why are you injecting yourself with biological weapons?
	Actually, I'm praying that Lujan has a full recovery and that his brain function will be restored so much that he becomes a conservative.
	I'm hoping the spike protein eats away the Democrat demons in his neurology in the hospital as he's under.
	And then when he comes back, he will reject the Democrat agenda, just like, who is it, Manchin?
	And even Sinema from Arizona has been rejecting a lot of the lunacy of the left.
	So, hey, maybe there's a silver lining in this.
	Maybe we can welcome Lujan back to the living and to rationality.
	Maybe the mRNA spike protein will exorcise the demons that have infected the skulls of so many of these Democrats.
	We'll see.
	But I wish Luhan a full and speedy recovery.
	And I'm serious about this.
	I welcome he and his family if they wish to call.
	My company for knowledge and information about how to repair your brain cells.
	I'm not joking.
	How to repair your neurology, because as you know, I've done podcasts on that, and I am happy to help Democrats as well as everybody else.
	I don't withhold healing information from people just because I disagree with them politically.
	That would not be the Christian thing to do.
	So I wish them a journey of healing and recovery, and I'm happy to help them.
	I just, I kind of doubt that they're going to reach out.
	Probably just going to, you know, go to doctors.
	The same doctors that injected them with the spike protein in the first place.
	You know, folks, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.
	But anyway, this is a prediction that I had, I guess, a year ago or so.
	I said, you know, at some point, the vaccines are going to start taking out lawmakers, you know, members of Congress.
	So here's the first one that we know of.
	Actually, you know what?
	This is not the first one.
	There's thinking of another member of Congress who died.
	I don't recall his name.
	It wasn't someone who was very well known, but a House of Representatives member.
	But there are going to be more, folks.
	There are going to be a lot more because, of course, these vaccines kill people.
	And even people they don't kill, they very often injure or maim.
	And sadly, we live in a society where almost every member of Congress is a pharma whore.
	And so they're not interested in nutrition, natural medicine, prevention, you know, how to heal, how to recover, how to be healthy.
	They're not interested in any of that.
	All they want is more drugs, pharmaceuticals, medications, chemotherapy, surgical interventions, and what have you.
	And as a result, look at the kind of decisions they make affecting our country.
	How come a huge portion of our senators are on Alzheimer's drugs?
	And then see the results we get.
	Okay, on a different topic, I know a lot of you are freezing right now.
	A lot of heavy storms, cold weather has swept in across much of North America, and it's hit me too in Texas.
	And I just want to say to all of you, wish you well, stay warm, stay prepared.
	Do all the preps.
	Make sure you've got extra containers with water in them in case there's a plumbing problem.
	Make sure you've got backup communications in case the cell towers go down.
	Make sure you've got a backup heat source that's safe, you know, in case electricity goes down and so on.
	And just use this as an opportunity for preparedness.
	I also want to mention, because I love animals, as you know, please think about your animals keeping them warm.
	If they're not inside animals, make sure they've got lots of shelter.
	Maybe some bales of hay around wherever they're sleeping.
	They've got a roof over their head, maybe a light bulb for heat.
	Whatever the case may be, just make sure your animals are doing well.
	I've taken extra steps to prepare our chickens, but chickens can handle really cold weather as long as they're out of the wind, it turns out.
	I've got to move a couple of chickens still.
	That like to hang outside for some reason.
	Got to put them in.
	And then I'm taking care of my dogs and my goats.
	They're all sleeping in the hay manger area.
	And then, of course, I have my donkeys, but they don't care about cold weather.
	They don't care at all.
	They have such large body mass that the cold doesn't even affect them.
	They don't care.
	What they hate is the heat, actually.
	They don't like the heat at all.
	But the cold?
	That's nothing.
	They brush that off like nothing.
	But in any case, I have two big round bales of hay for them in a feeding area.
	They've been munching away on that, so they've got plenty of food.
	But anyway, take care of your animals, and I'll take care of mine, and then hopefully they'll all be okay.
	And on a different subject, I don't normally talk about celebrities that much, but this one is particularly interesting.
	You know, Whoopi Goldberg is in real trouble because she said on The View, and let's just be honest, The View is one of the most dumbed-down, offensive shows of just mindlessness that anyone could possibly imagine.
	It's like daytime TV for the mentally retarded.
	And like, I don't even know how they find the people to host that show.
	But nevertheless, I don't agree with the cancel culture attacks on Whoopi.
	Because she said, I think she said, she was talking about the Holocaust.
	And she said in her view, the Holocaust wasn't about race.
	I think that's what she said.
	It was about inhumanity or something, not about race.
	And Everybody jumped all over her for saying that.
	Didn't even really give her much of a chance to explain herself.
	She probably just misspoke, folks.
	When you're doing live TV or live radio or live or even podcasts like this, there's sometimes I could, in retrospect, state something better.
	And you can't...
	I mean, really?
	You're going to cancel Whoopi?
	Just because she probably had a bad choice of words there?
	I mean, if you're going to cancel Whoopi, there's lots of reasons to fire her from the show.
	She's not that interesting.
	I mean, there's a reason.
	But don't fire her just because she said something that, oh, triggered a bunch of snowflakes who didn't really get to hear her full explanation.
	Whoopi's not an anti-Semite, folks.
	And yeah, I mean, I'm here.
	I'm going to defend Whoopi on this issue, even though I totally disagree with her politics.
	But they shouldn't cancel her.
	She's been suspended for two weeks by ABC. She's threatening to quit, reportedly.
	She's really angry about all this.
	But it's funny to see...
	Cancel culture pushers like Whoopi get canceled herself.
	That's the irony in all of this.
	That's what's funny to watch.
	Because how many times has Whoopi called for other people to be canceled based on what they said, even when those statements weren't fully clarified?
	I mean, Whoopi has gone after all kinds of people demanding they be banned.
	But then when she's banned because she didn't phrase everything perfectly correctly, all of a sudden it's the end of the world and it's a horrible injustice.
	And MSNBC is even excusing Whoopi.
	Don't cancel Whoopi, but we should cancel Joe Rogan, they say.
	So what's hilarious about cancel culture is eventually it comes back and bites everybody in the ass.
	And I just say, let the woman speak.
	Let the woman speak.
	Let her explain herself.
	Let her speak her mind.
	But then, Whoopi, you let other people speak.
	How about that?
	See, that's the way it works.
	It's supposed to be a two-way street.
	And, you know, the public needs to stop being so snowflake-ian and triggered and offended all the time by every little thing.
	Oh my God, I can't believe you put that idea in my head.
	Hey, welcome to the real world, you soy boys and snowflakes.
	Get used to it.
	Reality sometimes sucks.
	It's not going to be everything that you want.
	Just ask the people who are eating at the Golden Corral.
	They start throwing chairs at each other because they ran out of steak.
	Imagine being so angry at an all-you-can-eat buffet when somebody ate the last piece of steak and you start throwing baby highchairs.
	Fortunately, they removed the babies from the chairs before they started tossing them around.
	But imagine what's going to happen when the food stamp cards stop working.
	If you think the Golden Corral Brawl was something...
	There's a lot more coming.
	But anyway, put Whoopi back on the show.
	Whoopi's punishment is being a person who thinks like Whoopi.
	You don't have to punish her beyond who she already is.
	So by the way, what is the answer to the question that Whoopi was bringing up when she said that in her view the Holocaust was not about race?
	What was the Holocaust really about?
	Well, the answer is obvious because we're living it again.
	It's about the extermination.
	Of your political enemies and an entire ethnicity and just hatred for humanity.
	I guess it's all those things wrapped in one.
	I mean, it's really the Holocaust is about a group of progressive conformists going along with mass murder and extermination of those who they were, quote, othering.
	And that's exactly what the vaccine agenda is today as well.
	The vaccine Nazis today are just like the Nazis of the Holocaust.
	All want to go along and be popular and be part of the in crowd and be part of the big city parties in Berlin and everything.
	And be part of the popular political group with the nice looking curtains and the red and the swastikas and everything.
	They want to go along and get along and be part of that.
	So they didn't care that people were being murdered down the street, which is exactly what's happening in the pharmacies today.
	They're murdering children and senior citizens and, I guess, adults of all ages.
	And it's happened right down the street.
	But the vaccine Nazis want to go along with that.
	And push that on people.
	And who's a vaccine Nazi, you could say?
	Oh, whoopee is!
	She's pushing vaccines like a good little vaccine Nazi.
	So it's stunning that she doesn't understand what the Holocaust is about since she is repeating it.
	She's part of the new Holocaust, the vaccine Holocaust of the 2020s.
	How can you actually be a Nazi, a vaccine Nazi in this case, and still not understand what the Holocaust is about?
	You're actually reenacting it.
	You're doing it again.
	Are you so blind to the nature of deception and the evil that lurks in the hearts of men and women like you?
	That you don't understand that you are a Nazi?
	That you are the Holocaust personified?
	So I say, Whoopi's not an anti-Semite.
	She's an anti-Humite.
	She doesn't like any of humanity.
	I mean, we're all in the crosshairs now of the vaccine Nazis pushing their poison on humanity.
	They're anti-Humites all the way.
	Evil.
	Just pure evil.
	But just as with Senator Lujan, I'm gonna, you know, I'm gonna do the Christian thing here.
	And I'm gonna wish Whoopi some healing.
	I'm gonna pray that she gets more booster shots that eat the demon's That have infected her brain and that she comes out of it and then goes on the view and actually says something like, oh, I'm sorry for all the years of pushing censorship and lunacy and hatred towards other people.
	And I've learned that I was living under this crazy delusion.
	And now I have a new view on the view.
	My new view is a pro-human view.
	How about that?
	I pray that that happens.
	I pray that Whoopi is awakened and sees the light.
	I'm not betting on that happening, but I'm praying for it.
	We'll see.
	How about, wouldn't it be a great prayer to pray that all the radical left-wing Democrats and lunatics who are all pro-censorship and just, they hate everyone who doesn't agree with them.
	And they just want to blacklist and censor everyone.
	They want to dehumanize everyone because they're good little Nazis, just like Whoopi has been.
	Wouldn't it be amazing if we all prayed that they would suddenly see the error of their ways, that they would look in the mirror and they would see what Nazis they have become, the fascists in the mirror.
	And then they would go, whoa!
	It must have been brainwashed or something.
	What happened?
	I'm snapping out of it now.
	Realize we have to allow all types of speech.
	We have to allow a diversity of ideas, not just demand conformity and obedience.
	Wouldn't that be amazing?
	Is that day coming?
	I don't know.
	I kind of doubt it.
	I kind of think the actual day that's coming is a day where so many of these left-wing Nazis end up committing vaccine-assisted suicide.
	They just remove themselves from the conversation.
	It's kind of like the ultimate hypocritical censorship, isn't it?
	It's like, uh, you did, girl.
	You censored yourself out of existence.
	Yeah.
	Because how much you want to bet even after the vaccine holocaust is officially ended, which may not be that far away.
	Things are turning very rapidly.
	But let's say that the governments of the world and the corporations just stop pushing the vaccines because too much threat of lawsuits and criminal prosecutions against them for crimes against humanity or whatever.
	They stop pushing the vaccines.
	How much you want to bet these brainwashed leftists will...
	They will line up.
	They will pay extra in the underground economy to continue to get injections with mRNA.
	I mean, they'll keep wearing masks forever, but they'll probably go to the underground vaccine market so they can continue to keep getting injected because it's now become...
	It's part of the definition of who they are.
	It's their self-identity at this point.
	They have to...
	Physically maim themselves a little bit with needles, to the point where they have tracks up and down their arms like heroin addicts, but it's just vaccines.
	And they have to feel a little bit of internal damage from the spike protein just to...
	Just to feel like they're contributing appropriately to a world of suffering and pain, and they want to make sure that they have a sufficient amount of pain so they can participate in that world, and that they're doing the right thing, and they're obedient to science.
	So they're just going to keep seeking out the injections.
	No, seriously.
	I mean, even if they're banned, they'll be meeting on dark street corners and parking lots.
	Hey, you want to buy a jab?
	Yeah, man, how much you want for that jab?
	What kind of jab is it?
	Which lot number?
	You know?
	Oh, this is the good lot number.
	This is the one that messes you up.
	I've been saving this one.
	You want some?
	Oh, yeah!
	Give me the lot number.
	575 or whatever it is.
	Yeah!
	Gonna cook that up tonight.
	I mean, it's so crazy.
	The cops bust into a trailer of a bunch of substance abusers and there'll be like a heroin addict and a meth addict and someone sniffing gasoline.
	And those will be the smart people because there'll be one person in the corner taking vaccine jabs who thinks that it's granting them immunity or something.
	All right, let's move on to some financial reports.
	We've got some unemployment numbers.
	Out of the news that in Idiocracy, remember, it was called the Ecomony.
	He's like, you're gonna fix the Ecomony!
	Well, that's what Joe Biden is doing.
	They were expecting to have a job creation of 200,000 private sector jobs in this latest report.
	This is January payrolls, but it turns out it was actually minus 300,000.
	So that's a gap of 500,000.
	And there was not one net job created in January.
	There were 300,000 jobs destroyed.
	And so...
	What do the economists blame?
	Well, it must be Omicron.
	It's the Omicron variant.
	It's destroying the jobs.
	They never think about the fact that there's too much money printing, there's price inflation, people are losing the value of their dollars, there's uncertainty in the economy, rising fuel prices.
	A lot of the supply lines are disrupted and store shelves are partially empty, truckers are being blocked.
	Because they don't want to go along with the vaccines.
	And they never think that, oh, maybe the lockdowns cause a lot of economic damage to small local businesses, restaurants, hair salons, gyms, and so on.
	And I guess if those businesses are destroyed, they're not hiring anybody, are they?
	They never think about this.
	They say, oh, it's Omicron, as if Omicron went around the country passing bad economic policies like Joe Biden.
	It's as if Joe Biden was a variant.
	Like, Jomecron Biden.
	Like, that's his name.
	He's the variant running around destroying everything.
	But they want to blame, quote, Omicron rather than Jomecron.
	Well, there is a horrible plague in America that's devastating to the economy, destroying life as we know it, and its name is Jomecron.
	And you can take all the vaccine jabs you want, whoopie.
	It doesn't solve the Jomicron variant.
	It continues to infest and invade every institution of our country.
	With all the senseless insanity of all the anal swabs and nasal testing and mandatory vaccines, it's so insane it made Tom Brady not even want to play football anymore.
	That's how bad it is.
	Tom Brady's like, football's my life, but...
	All these Omicron requirements are insane.
	I'm not going to support the NFL any longer.
	Good for you, Tom Brady.
	Good for you.
	Give him the finger.
	Walk away.
	By the way, who wants to work when the money you make is worth less and less every day anyway?
	People are seeing it.
	I had a friend telling me the other day she was at the grocery store buying butter, sticks of butter, And that a four-pack of butter sticks used to be $3.50 or something in that range, and now it's over $5.
	I'm like, what?
	It's over a dollar a stick?
	Yep, just overnight.
	Boom.
	It went from $3 and something to $5 and something.
	And people can see it.
	They see food prices are skyrocketing, and food scarcity is getting way worse.
	They see that.
	And at some point, they're like, why...
	Why should I bother working when whatever money I get, it's just going to disappear?
	And if I do nothing, the government's going to pay me and give me free food money and free everything anyway.
	So, people are doing the math, and it actually pays to not work.
	I just think a lot of people are done with the whole system, frankly.
	They really are.
	I mean, when you get interrogated by Hershey...
	The Hershey Corporation interrogating its Christian employees and saying, you're out of here!
	You're fired!
	How dare you not love aborted human fetal cells in the vaccines with your filthy Christian beliefs?
	And I bet you took ibuprofen, proving you're not a Christian.
	This is kind of just senseless, insane interrogation at the Hershey Company.
	When you're an employee and you've had that experience, you're like, why should I work with these corporate a-holes ever again anyway?
	Screw these people.
	Yeah, Hershey, the creepy company, remind me of the Oompa Loompa Willy Wonka Chocolate Factory and the little freaky people running around capturing children and everything.
	Well, I don't know what you're up to, but you lost my goodwill.
	No more Hershey.
	Not that I ever ate Hershey's anyway, but it's the thought that counts.
	Never again!
	I can just see the employees getting fired from the shipping department.
	Take this Hershey job and shove it.
	My days of fudge packing are over.
	That's it.
	I'm done throwing in the towel.
	I'm out of here.
	You can just see that happen.
	Oh, you must be Christian.
	You don't want to pack fudge anymore?
	Okay.
	We're not going to pay you anymore then.
	Okay.
	Screw you, Hershey.
	We're going to switch over to organic cacao nibs.
	How about that?
	We'll just switch to nibs.
	And you can take your fudge packet chocolate sob story somewhere else as far as we care.
	Alright, switching gears here folks from LifeSite News.
	Here's a headline.
	British children are up to 52 times more likely to die following a COVID shot.
	Data from Britain's Office of National Statistics show a stark increase in deaths among children, both single and double-jabbed, compared to their unjabbed counterparts.
	So the ONS out of the UK has released data indicating that children who receive the COVID jabs have suffered a death rate 54 times greater than their unjabbed counterparts.
	This is why they wanted to make sure that all children were vaccinated because they didn't want a control group of unvaxed children who might show higher survival rates.
	So you got to wonder, obviously, then why are they pushing vaccines on children if it's killing 52 times more children?
	The answer is because it's killing 52 times more children.
	That's what they want.
	It's a depopulation bioweapon.
	And given that almost no children die from COVID, there's no medical benefit from giving them something, even if it had zero risk associated with it.
	So when you jab children with COVID vaccines, you get A, no benefit, and B, 52 times higher death rates.
	What's not to love about that if you're a depopulation pusher?
	It's actually right on schedule, and that's why they're pushing it for children.
	I mean, folks, these are crimes against humanity.
	You're looking at mass murder.
	The murder of children.
	Not just murdering retired people, senior citizens.
	Not that that's better somehow, but it's more heinous to murder children.
	You're stealing from them their entire lives.
	There's something worse about that, right?
	And that's what the vaccine industry is.
	It's all being done in the name of science, in the name of medicine, in the name of vaccines, in the name of public health.
	And it's murder.
	It's just straight-up murder.
	And especially when the solutions are readily available.
	Here's a story from the Epoch Times, authored by Dr.
	Mercola.
	Vitamin D supplementation reduces COVID-19 deaths by 64%.
	A Spanish study found that giving supplemental vitamin D3 to hospitalized patients with PCR confirmed COVID-19 reduced ICU admissions by 82% and mortality by 64%.
	I mean, this is a dirt cheap, safe, effective, readily available nutrient.
	And yet, yet no one in government has called for vitamin D. No one, not Fauci, not even Trump, of course, not Joe Micron himself, Joe Micron Biden.
	Nobody's calling for vitamin D. That's another major crime against humanity.
	We're talking a reduction of almost two-thirds of the deaths.
	How many lives could have been saved with vitamin D? And by the way, what are the other benefits of vitamin D? With, you know, preventing cancer, preventing blood sugar disorders, preventing kidney disorders, and so on.
	It's a long list of benefits.
	So I said from day one, remember this?
	I said...
	They should give out zinc and vitamin D at every post office.
	You just show up and you can just get free bottles of vitamin D. They could have spent a few billion dollars on that and saved trillions of dollars of economic damage and deaths and having to print stimulus money.
	Just a few billion dollars.
	They could have solved this entire thing.
	And there's a reason why vitamin D is in the Dr.
	Zeb Zelenko protocol.
	And the frontline doctors, all of it.
	There's a reason why I take pretty good.
	I mean, I take 10,000 IUs a day currently.
	That's what I take on vitamin D. And, you know, even though I blew out my voice like a week and a half ago, I didn't get taken down by this toxic nanoparticle.
	It didn't take me down, you know?
	I mean, it's screwed with my voice, but...
	It didn't take me out.
	I didn't spend a week in bed suffering and feeling like I'm going to die.
	Why?
	Because I'm taking zinc.
	I'm taking quercetin.
	I'm taking vitamin D. I'm doing ivermectin, as you know.
	That was miraculous.
	And then chlorine dioxide.
	I do things that work, and the results speak for themselves.
	Can you imagine all the buzz if Big Pharma came up with something?
	Let's say Pfizer came up with a new miracle pill.
	Prevents 64% of deaths from COVID. The media would go insane.
	Oh my gosh, this is the greatest breakthrough in the history of medicine.
	This is the miracle of science.
	It can save 64% of people.
	We have to approve this immediately.
	Everybody has to take it.
	Well, this thing already exists.
	It's just called vitamin D, and it's not going to make billions of dollars for Pfizer.
	So the media is just like, ah, don't even talk about it.
	Doesn't that tell you everything you need to know about the mainstream media, their total lack of ethics, their complete immorality?
	They don't give a crap about their audience.
	They don't care about humanity.
	They don't care about people having pain and suffering.
	They don't care about saving lives.
	They talk about, oh, it has to be all about public health and we have to stop disinformation and misinformation.
	But they themselves embody misinformation because they won't tell you the truth about vitamin D, will they?
	They're just pushing vaccines that are killing people.
	They're killing children.
	But they won't talk about vitamin D that would save lives.
	I mean, the entire corporate-run media has zero credibility.
	If they cared one iota about humanity, they would talk about vitamin D. If the government cared about humanity, they would make vitamin D available for free.
	Everyone should be able to get it.
	Again, just show...
	They should just send it to everybody.
	Here, have some vitamin D. It's dirt cheap.
	For every penny the government spends on vitamin D, they probably save $1,000 in long-term death and economic damage and health care costs.
	You know, we had a Surgeon General named Adams, didn't we?
	Or is he still Surgeon General?
	I forget.
	But if we had one, we could have another.
	If they dare to make me Surgeon General...
	I would go like full socialism on just vitamin D, like free vitamin D for everybody.
	That's the limit of my socialist policies.
	Everybody gets free of vitamin D. And then I would call for the arrest of the big pharma CEOs and the arrest of all the so-called journalists that got paid off and took bribe money and all the so-called doctors that are dirty that took bribery money.
	It's not all the doctors.
	I'm just talking about the dirty ones.
	But I would call for mass arrests and prosecution under the law for the crimes these people have committed against humanity.
	And I would literally have the government create free vitamin D for everybody and just hand it out with clear instructions in multiple languages.
	You know, one side of the bottle is English, the other side is Espanol.
	And it just tells you, you know, take...
	I don't know, whatever.
	We'd have to decide.
	But even if it was a low dose, like 4,000 IUs a day for adults, that would be something.
	That would be very helpful.
	And the nation would save a fortune in healthcare costs.
	Now here's some interesting news about the crumbling of the vaccine narrative.
	This is out of Israel, also from the Epoch Times.
	Top Israeli officials this week decided to abolish the country's green pass For restaurants, hotels, gyms, and theaters.
	Israel, now one of the most vaccinated and boosted nations in the world, last year became one of the first countries to impose such a mandate.
	Turns out all their high vaccination rate, I think 96.2% of the Israeli people are vaccinated.
	And they're now the most infected people in the world as well with, you know, the new Omicron variant or whatever you think it is, cases through the roof in Israel.
	So I guess they figured out that if the vaccine doesn't stop transmission, a vaccine passport is pointless.
	It doesn't mean anything.
	If you can be vaccinated and still give it to somebody else or still catch it and carry it yourself, what's the point of a vaccine passport?
	There is no point.
	There's no point other than compliance.
	And I guess, even for the Israeli people, they've reached some limit of compliance.
	At least some of them have.
	It's pretty amazing because they are some compliant folk, aren't they?
	96% of those people raised their hand and said, yeah, jab me with some...
	Weird experimental medicine.
	And let's see what happens.
	I mean, what's going through the minds of these Israeli people?
	Oh, yeah, we're being threatened by all these neighboring countries and the Palestinians and the Jordanians and everybody else.
	But let's commit suicide in a needle ourselves first.
	That would be the best way to have victory against our enemies.
	Just kill ourselves.
	And so that's what the Israeli people did.
	And now they've decided, well, it's not working.
	I mean, the killing themselves part is working.
	There's a lot of excess deaths in Israel, but the vaccine passport part of it is not working.
	So, yeah, they're abandoning that.
	Well, what are they going to tell the Israeli people when the evidence of harm from the vaccines becomes so irrefutable?
	That the Israeli government has to say, well, hey, remember those jabs and shots and boosters that we had to take?
	Yeah.
	Turns out, well, those cause, well, lifelong nerve damage, chromosomal damage.
	About a quarter of you are going to die of cancer in the next decade.
	I just thought we'd let you know now so you can plan accordingly.
	You know, you can see the government telling the people, if you ever had a secret dream to visit some part of Israel that you've never been to because, you know, it's such a vast continent, a huge, vast piece of land that it's hard to visit all of Israel, right?
	I mean, it's bigger than Australia, I'm pretty sure.
	Then you should do it now before the cancer kicks in.
	Is that what the Israeli government is going to tell their people?
	Or is it going to be more like, oh, hey, we're your government.
	We are the Israeli government.
	We possess all kinds of weapon systems.
	We have nuclear weapons and we have biological weapons.
	We have chemical weapons.
	And the good news, people of Israel, is that we've decided to save the nuclear weapons to be used against enemies of Israel, but we've decided to deploy the biological weapons against you.
	Against ourselves, against each other.
	Yes, the brother and sister right here.
	Well, it's the, you know, health department policy.
	It's for the greater good.
	Some of these weapons just have to be deployed domestically.
	Thank you for your obedience, 96% of voters.
	And the Iranian leaders sitting around a table, you know, laughing.
	It's like, gosh, we thought we were going to have to actually do battle with Israel to destroy that country.
	All we had to do was not take the vaccine.
	And look, cause and effect carried out the rest.
	It's amazing.
	You got to bring Whoopi back into this conversation, right?
	When she says the Holocaust was not about race.
	Well...
	Yeah, I mean, maybe the historical Holocaust was about, you know, hatred and extermination and killing off an entire ethnic group.
	The modern-day Holocaust is about being incredibly stupid and gullible to the point where you believe governments are there to protect you.
	What do you say to that?
	You believe your government was there to protect you?
	Really?
	Yeah.
	You thought that they wanted you to do well when they're run by the pharmaceutical companies that are profiting from you being sick and getting cancer?
	You realize that the same pharma companies making money off the vaccines also make money off cancer treatments, and the vaccines cause the body to be unable to repair chromosomal damage, which leads to, I don't know, cancer.
	They're injecting you with cancer-causing chemicals and then they're going to make money off the cancer.
	And 96% of the people in Israel were dumb enough or gullible enough to go along with the government?
	Thinking that the government's going to save us?
	Wow.
	Did you learn nothing in a couple thousand years of history?
	Did you learn nothing?
	But I want to meet the 4% of the Israeli people who said no.
	Those are some pretty impressive 4%, right?
	One out of 25 people in Israel.
	I wonder if they're maybe the Hasidic Jews.
	I'm just curious.
	I wonder if the more sort of traditional, the belief system...
	Are those the people who tended to say no to these vaccines?
	And if so, wouldn't that be the equivalent of like the Amish people in North America also saying no to the vaccines and having faith in God and having faith in their tradition rather than being gullible enough to surrender themselves to the false faith of a modern government that's actually wouldn't that be the equivalent of like the Amish people in North America So think about it.
	You know, 4% of the Israeli people or 3.8% are some pretty amazing folks, probably some of them listening to this podcast, too.
	Right.
	And out of those 4%, those people are probably looking around like, how did our country get overrun by complete idiots?
	Which is the question we have here in America and the question that Canadians have as well.
	We're all asking the same question.
	How do we suddenly get surrounded by idiots, gullible idiots who just go along with anything?
	I don't know the answer to that, but I know that the fluoride didn't help and I know the chemtrails didn't help and the hormones and the food and the heavy metals and all the poisoning that's been going on.
	And the organophosphate pesticides that cause brain damage, I'm pretty sure there's been a cumulative effect over time.
	But I tell you, if you're among the 4% in Israel who have said no to this jab, you might want to make it a priority to find the other members of the 4%.
	You know, connect with those folks, because you're going to be the future of Israel.
	You're going to be the ones who aren't injured or dead, and you're going to have to defend your nation.
	There's going to be far fewer people around.
	And we have the same challenge here in America, although we did not have a 96% vaccination uptake rate in America.
	I think we had about a 60%.
	I mean, that's my rough estimate.
	Might be a little bit higher, might be 65%, but Not much more than that.
	So let's say at most, two out of three people in America took the jab, whereas in Israel, 24 out of 25 people took it.
	Wow.
	Okay, we're switching gears.
	This is a fascinating story.
	This is out of science.org, which is a pro-mainstream science, pro-vaccine, pro-PCR everything publication.
	But...
	They have a really fascinating story published, well, yesterday.
	And it's called Failing the Test.
	DNA barcoding brought botanist Stephen Newmaster scientific fame and entrepreneurial success.
	Was it all based on fraud?
	This is a story by Charles Piller.
	It's a fascinating read.
	It talks about how in 2013...
	That this scientist, Stephen Newmaster, he's a botanist at the University of Gulf.
	Yeah, G-U-E-L-P-H, however that said, Gulf.
	He was looking at popular herbal products such as echinacea, ginkgo biloba, St.
	John's wort, and so on.
	And they used DNA barcoding, which is very similar to PCR tests for COVID, by the way.
	And DNA barcoding is a system to identify species using small, unique snippets of genetic material to test whether the bottles really contained what was printed on the label.
	And I'm reading from the article here from science.org.
	The results were troubling.
	Most of the tested products contained different plants and They were loaded with inert fillers or were tainted with contaminants that could cause liver and colon damage, skin tumors and serious health problems.
	This paper was published in BMC Medicine.
	It was picked up by the New York Times, CBC and all kinds of media outlets, PBS's Frontline and so on.
	His work inspired New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, remember Schneiderman, who got bleep canned not long ago, to sponsor a similar study who confirmed that consumers were misled.
	Major retailers such as GNC, Walgreens and Walmart pledged to pull the suspected products from the shelves or take other measures.
	Almost overnight, Newmaster became an authority on the verification of food and supplement ingredients.
	Supplement maker companies hired him to certify their products were authentic.
	And then in 2017, Newmaster founded the Natural Health Product Research Alliance, the NHPRA, that aimed to improve certification technologies for supplements, raise millions of dollars from herbal suppliers.
	Yeah, obviously, you know, payoffs.
	But now, in an ironic twist, eight experts in DNA barcoding now charge that the 2013 paper that indicted an entire industry and launched a new phase in Newmaster's career is itself a fraud.
	In a 43-page allegation letter sent in June of 2021 and now obtained by science, the researchers from University of Toronto, Stanford, and so on, cited major problems in the study.
	And they said, quote, the data which underpinned the papers are missing, fraudulent, or plagiarized.
	The group also charged that Newmaster, quote, recurrently failed to disclose competing financial interests in his papers.
	The accusers include co-authors of two of the papers, who now say they believe that Newmaster misled them.
	So these are whistleblowers who are saying it was all made up.
	And then, an investigation by Science found the problems in Newmaster's work go well beyond the three papers.
	They include apparent fabrication, data manipulation, and plagiarism in speeches, teaching, biographies, and scholarly writing.
	A review of thousands of pages of Newmaster's published papers, conference speeches, slide decks, and training videos...
	Revealed a charismatic and eloquent scientist who often exaggerated, fabulized his accomplishments, and presented other researchers' data as his own.
	So it goes on and on.
	It reflects a pattern of deception and academic misconduct.
	This is from a university.
	It goes on and on.
	Now, understand, this DNA barcoding, this is essentially the same as PCR testing, where They're looking for a certain number of base pairs, genetic proteins, essentially, that they say represent this species of plant.
	And then you have to use cycle thresholds.
	You have to amplify the sample.
	And as you know from the whole PCR fiasco involving COVID, the more you amplify it, the more you're going to get a positive hit.
	The less you amplify, the less you get a hit.
	And so because PCR technology cannot produce quantitation data, you don't know a quantity or how much genetic material per gram of sample, for example.
	It doesn't work that way.
	It's not a quantitation instrument like ICP-MS or triple quad mass spec instruments that we use with chromatography and so on.
	It doesn't work that way.
	So the question is, was this guy's work that attacked all these supplements and even got criminal investigations launched under Schneiderman in New York, was this whole thing the same fraud that we now know is the fraud of COVID testing via PCR? Could it be that the entire industry...
	Of PCR testing, including, by the way, criminal forensics and crime labs, the entire industry is a total freaking fraud that you can't identify plants using this.
	That you can't even really search for microbes, you know, food contamination.
	That you can't diagnose somebody as having COVID. That you can't pinpoint the culprit in a crime from so-called genetic material harvested from a crime scene.
	The whole thing, total freaking fraud.
	And I think that the answer to that is becoming increasingly clear.
	The answer is yes, it's a fraud.
	Because if you just multiply background noise of base pairs and so-called genetic material, you can get a positive hit on anything.
	So if you're the analyst running the instruments on this, And you want a match to happen.
	You just turn up the cycle thresholds until you get a match.
	Oh, it matches.
	It's authentic.
	If you don't want to get a match, you just keep the CT level down low, like, you know, 18 or whatever.
	And then there's no match.
	Oh, it's fraudulent.
	It doesn't contain that plant.
	That's how easy it is for them to fake this.
	Now, in my food science lab, we do real science.
	Real science with quantitation data, we see the peaks.
	We see the response on the chromatography.
	We use mass spec molecular sensors.
	They actually sense what's called a mass over charge ratio, m over z, of molecules.
	And in our ICP-MS instrument, we're actually sensing the existence of atomic elements.
	We can count the number of mercury atoms or lead atoms, even different isotopes of lead, you know, 206 and 208 or whatever, and different isotopes of mercury.
	We can see all that, and there's no way to fudge it, you know?
	I mean, you can't just turn it up and get more mercury to show up.
	It doesn't work that way.
	And you can't turn it down and make mercury disappear.
	The instrument doesn't lie to you.
	The instrument just tells you what it's seeing.
	Whereas PCR instruments, so-called genetic testing instruments, you can turn them up and turn them down and you can get whatever you want.
	So recognize this, folks.
	Remember that I sat down with sales reps from Thermo Fisher.
	I don't know, it was like a year, year and a half ago or whatever it was.
	And we were looking at purchasing their PCR equipment in order to do food contamination testing for microbiology.
	Because you know...
	Let me just back up here.
	So healthrangerestore.com.
	You know, we sell the food and supplements, personal care products, and they're all lab tested in many different ways.
	And one of the series of tests that we run is for microbiology.
	So we're testing...
	Foods and raw materials, even, of course, before manufacturing, we're testing them for the presence of E. coli, salmonella, yeast and mold, and what's called total plate count, which encompasses every kind of visible microbe.
	And in order to do these tests, we have these automated machines that have special growth media, and then they have incubation Cycles and time periods.
	And then they have detection mechanisms, optical detection.
	They can examine the cloudiness of the resulting liquid and so on.
	And it gets more cloudy if the bacteria is growing in it.
	But it takes a long time.
	It takes three to four days to get results once you start it because there's an incubation period.
	And you can't speed that up.
	So if you're wondering, why are we out of stock of so much stuff?
	Often it's waiting on the microbiology test.
	It's just slow.
	You have to wait for the bacteria to grow.
	In the test sample to see if there's any bacteria there.
	Now, what if we could do that in a matter of a few hours instead of a few days?
	Well, that's what PCR promised to do.
	And we were told that if we bought this PCR equipment, that we'd be able to run these samples and use the cycle thresholds, use the genetic material amplification.
	We'd be able to run against a library and test for the presence of genetic material of common food contaminants, such as E. coli.
	They said you could just look for the genetic barcode, essentially, the DNA barcode.
	Well, RNA in this case.
	And so we thought, at first, you know, this is interesting.
	Let's look into this.
	And so I sat down with the sales reps and I asked them, because, you know, I'm a published scientist.
	I know how this stuff works.
	I asked them the question up front.
	I said, so does this PCR instrumentation, does it tell us the quantity of how much of a contaminant that it has found?
	Like, are we getting quantitation data, is the question.
	Or is it...
	Simply, what's known as a quality scan.
	Quality means yes or no.
	Like it has it or it doesn't have it and we can't tell you how much.
	And the answer that they told me was there's no quantitation information in PCR because it's using amplification.
	And thus you lose track of the original quantity.
	There's no way that the instrument can tell you how much E. coli is in food or, you know, how much salmonella or how much yeast or how much mold or anything.
	And I'm thinking to myself, well then, what good is...
	How does that help us?
	Because if he gives us a yes, that could mean like one yeast organism in an entire sample, just one.
	And I guarantee you that there's at least one piece of yeast in everything, you know, because we don't live in a sterile world, especially not with agricultural products.
	You have to have an understanding of like what's the limit?
	How much is too much?
	And the FDA publishes information about that, by the way.
	The FDA has information about how much mold or yeast is allowable in milk or chicken or whatever.
	I don't know if you knew that, but it's absolutely true.
	Like in cow's milk, there's a certain amount of allowable pus cells and blood cells.
	I don't know if you knew that.
	And when cows bleed a lot into the milk, they can make chocolate milk out of that because it hides the color of the blood.
	But there's a certain allowable pus count in milk, which is why we don't sell cow's milk, by the way.
	I'm not in the business of retailing pus for obvious reasons.
	It's just sick.
	But I am in the business of selling clean lab-tested food, so I want to know how much is in it.
	Right?
	If I get a sample, and I get a flag, it's like, boom, yeah, if it says there's E. coli in here, I want to know, well, how much?
	How much E. coli is in there?
	Would be awesome to have, you know, an answer.
	But they said, no, these instruments don't tell you how much, and you can kind of get a yes or a no based on how you run the instruments.
	See, that's all jacked up.
	Because, let me explain it this way.
	Okay, nobody wants to eat lead, right?
	Lead's a heavy metal.
	But what if I told you that there's lead in everything?
	Some really traced small amount of lead is in everything.
	Even rainwater.
	There's some very, very tiny, it might be parts per trillion or something.
	It might be like femtograms per milliliter or something.
	It's some very small amount of lead, but there's lead in everything.
	There's lead in you.
	There's lead in a piece of bread.
	There's lead in everything.
	Some amount.
	The question is not, is there lead in here?
	The question is, how much?
	You know, so we, in our lab, we have very, very strict lead limits.
	We have a rating system.
	You know, you can see it at lowheavymetalsverified.org.
	We have limits on how much lead, how much cadmium, and we have the most strict limits in the world.
	Our limits are by far the most strict, I mean, by orders of magnitude.
	But if I were to tell you, if I were to test something, let's say a piece of bread, And if the piece of bread were to come back zero on the lead, on the ICP-MS instrument, can I say that it contains zero lead, absolutely zero?
	No.
	All it means is I just need a more sensitive instrument.
	So maybe that ICP-MS can only detect lead at, let's say, one part per billion.
	Well, if you can draw a stronger vacuum and have a stronger turbine pump And have a more sensitive PMT and everything else in the instrument.
	Maybe you can detect lead at one part per trillion.
	Then could you see lead in bread?
	Yes.
	Oh, yeah, you would see.
	Oh, maybe there's five parts per trillion in this bread.
	Is it a health hazard to eat five parts per trillion of lead in a slice of bread?
	Answer, no.
	Not even close.
	It's essentially nothing, but it's not technically zero.
	There's some lead in there.
	It's just a matter of how sensitive is your instrument and getting quantitation data so that you can make an informed decision of how much is too much or how much is okay.
	And believe me, you're getting a lot more lead in a peanut butter and jelly sandwich than just five parts per trillion.
	The thing is, you know, the body has detox mechanism, the body has tolerance levels, and knows how to deal with small exposures, and that's why you want to keep exposures really, really small.
	What the body can't deal with is chronic exposure to high levels of lead, such as 100 parts per million in the water supply in Detroit, you know, a couple years ago.
	But people don't typically think in terms of concentrations.
	I don't know why, but I guess it's part of the human neurology to freak out over any level of some contaminant.
	But whereas drinking water that's 100 parts per million lead would be incredibly toxic, what about a thousand times less?
	What about 100 parts per billion?
	Would that be toxic to drink in water?
	Over time, yes.
	The answer is yes.
	The EPA would say that that's also a level of contamination that's too much for water.
	But the FDA allows that level in every food and even pharmaceuticals, by the way.
	What about another one one-thousandth of that if you go down to 100 parts per trillion?
	Which is one one millionth of 100 parts per million, which was the original number, is 100 parts per trillion a dangerous level of lead in water?
	And the answer is no.
	It is not.
	That's 0.1 parts per billion.
	It's not even one part per billion.
	It means you'd have to drink 10 billion grams of water to get one gram of lead.
	Now, in your lifetime, will you drink 10 billion grams of water?
	That's the same as a milliliter in terms of water density.
	Will you drink 10 billion milliliters of water in your lifetime?
	I don't know.
	You have to do the math on that.
	But that level of contamination is nothing.
	It's nothing compared to the toxic world in which we live.
	The point is that when you have a scientific instrument company telling you, oh yeah, we can test for stuff, but we can't tell you how much, then you're like throwing up your hands.
	It's like, why do you even exist?
	If your instruments can't tell me how much, this is pointless.
	There's no use.
	So I've come to the conclusion that this entire field of genetic testing is a total freaking fraud.
	There's no science to it at all.
	They're just making it all up.
	You can't test for food contaminants.
	You can't test for human DNA.
	Not reliably.
	You can't test for plant identity.
	And it makes me wonder who's testing for GMOs.
	I'm not making any accusations of fraud here against GMO testing companies.
	but I happen to know that the way they test for GMOs is they're testing for genetic material using PCR, using cycle thresholds.
	And it makes you wonder when they say that, oh, there's, I think, 0.9% allowable Genetic material in some food that's still considered non-GMO, but if the instruments can't detect quantities of genetic material, how do you know you have over or under 0.9%?
	You don't.
	You don't.
	It is not possible to know what percentage of some food is GMO. It's not possible.
	I mean, think about that, folks.
	I mean, again, I can tell you how many micrograms of cadmium are in a gram of coffee beans.
	I can tell you that.
	I can tell you how many micrograms of glyphosate are in beer.
	I know it, because I've done that.
	I put out a whole video on that.
	We tested all kinds of beers.
	We quantitated the glyphosate.
	And it turns out none of the levels were crazy high, by the way.
	But To my knowledge, there's no instrument that can tell you what percent of a food is GMO because it relies on, you know, PCR instruments multiplying so-called base pairs and samples, and none of these instruments have the ability to engage in quantification of anything, period.
	To my knowledge, the whole thing is fiction.
	And besides, I mean, I don't mean to geek out here, but you have a whole other problem that I haven't even described here yet.
	But let's say you take, I don't know, a gram of corn.
	Let me ask you this.
	Inside the gram of corn, what's the mass of the genetic material?
	Good question, right?
	Well, chromosomes are really small.
	Base pairs are really tiny.
	I mean, most of the corn is carbohydrate.
	Correct, right?
	It's other big molecules like carbohydrate molecules and protein molecules and fiber molecules and so on.
	So the actual genetic material inside the kernel of corn is a very, very tiny percentage.
	I mean, far less than 1% of the corn.
	I mean, it's the same question with, let's say, take your skin cells.
	If you take, I don't know, a gram of skin cells from your skin, What percentage, what mass inside that gram is genetic material?
	Now, I don't know the answer, but I have a feeling it's some number of nanograms, like billions of grams.
	That's my guess.
	It's just an educated guess.
	It's smaller than micrograms.
	I mean, genetic material is very, very small.
	So the mass of the genetic material is a very, very tiny percentage of the food to begin with.
	So even if you have 100% GMO corn, what's the percentage of the molecules in that GMO corn that are actual GMO genetic material?
	And the answer is it's billionths.
	It's X number of billionths of the corn.
	Thus, if you even had an instrument that could tell you how much genetic material is GMO in here, it would tell you it's something like, you know,.0000001% or something crazy like that, and you would say, oh, well, that's nothing, but it's 100% GMO. And the reason why that's confusing to people is because GMO corn creates carbohydrates and fiber and proteins just like non-GMO corn.
	It's just that it also creates this other pesticide in the corn.
	And even the pesticide itself is a tiny fraction of the total mass of the corn kernel.
	So if you're doing a quantitation test, the quantities that you're going to find, even if it could be done accurately, are going to be really, really tiny.
	And then if you tell me something like, you've handed me a mixture of Like 50% GMO corn and 50% organic corn.
	And you want me to confirm that the ratio is actually 50-50.
	You want me to use my little PCR magic instrument and count the genetic material and give you a scientific answer on what percentage of this pile of ground-up corn is actually GMO corn.
	You realize that no one can give you that answer?
	Because no matter what the ratio, if you could quantitate the genetic material, you're only going to get billionths of grams anyway.
	And how do you take that number and calculate it back to the percentage that was originally GMO or non-GMO when even 100% GMO is almost undetectable in terms of the mass of genetic material in the first place?
	Folks, unless they've come up with some kind of magical Star Trek technology, there is no legit percentage analysis of how much GMO something is.
	It doesn't exist.
	So I know I'm a little over time here, but...
	I thought this was a really important story to cover that even mainstream science is starting to go back to some of these papers like this one from 2013 and say, oh my gosh, this whole thing was a fraud, that there is no DNA barcoding that's legitimate of botanical identity.
	It's all bogus.
	So then the obvious question is, what about all the so-called criminals who've been convicted based on DNA matches with PCR instruments, huh?
	Somebody needs to alert the defense attorneys the whole field of quote science is completely bogus.
	We've been lied to the entire time, and even the DNA experts are just part of the same scam to tell you, oh, it's a 99.999% match.
	No, it isn't, actually.
	You're lying.
	Your whole field is a fraud.
	There is actually no match.
	You're making it up, just like they did with COVID. By the way, there is a way to identify plants.
	And that's by the chemical markers.
	So for example, if I want to test a powder that looks orange, and if I want to ask the question, oh, is that turmeric?
	I can run a plant identity analysis through multiple methods, but let's say I'm using a chromatography instrument.
	I can look for the chemical known as curcumin, which is the most prominent chemical in turmeric.
	And I can use that as one marker.
	And then there are other curcuminoids that I could use as other markers.
	And then you can get a very high confidence interval.
	It's like, yep, look at the peaks.
	Boom, boom, boom.
	There's the ratios of the molecules to each other in terms of actual quantity.
	This is turmeric.
	This is what turmeric looks like.
	This is a fingerprint.
	Doesn't require any genetics.
	Doesn't require any PCR.
	It's just pure chemistry.
	Looking at the molecules.
	Okay, that's legit.
	And you can also use simpler instruments such as FTIR to look at the, well, the spectral absorbance of how light is reflected off the molecules in the substance to get a different kind of fingerprint.
	Not as accurate as single quad mass spec chromatography.
	but still pretty accurate.
	Especially if you have other confirmations of what the material is.
	Like, oh, it tastes like turmeric, too, right?
	It looks like turmeric.
	It feels like turmeric, you know?
	These are actually legitimate FDA-allowed observations.
	I don't know if you knew that.
	But the FDA has a procedure for how to do plant identity, and those are some of the things that count.
	Like, does it look like that plant?
	Does it taste like it?
	Does it feel like it?
	And does it pass the instrument test?
	So there are plenty of ways to identify plants with their chemical markers.
	You don't need genetic material.
	And the minute you start to bring in genetic material, how do you know you're only looking at the genes of the plants?
	Because plants have cells and cells have exosomes.
	And the exosomes are then called viruses.
	You know, and plants have their own microorganisms.
	There's all kinds of non-plant cells in a plant, just like there are non-human cells in a human.
	You know, you have E. coli living in your gut.
	That's not human.
	So, I mean, if they were to take a PCR test of you, most of what they would find would be non-human DNA. No joke, because that's most of the cells in your body are not human cells.
	So if you're taking DNA of a plant, what are you actually testing?
	Are you even testing plant DNA? No, you're probably testing DNA of all the bacteria and all the exosomes and all the little fragments and particles of dead cells that haven't yet been swept away.
	What are you even testing?
	This is the same question with PCR tests for COVID. What are you testing?
	You're just testing dead cell material.
	Exosomes of cells.
	That's it.
	It's just random stuff floating around everywhere that's really, really tiny.
	Look, I mean, using PCR, you could take a sample of peanut butter and identify it as jelly.
	Using PCR, you could take I don't know.
	Let's be funny here.
	You could take an anal swab from an Olympic competitor in Beijing, and you could confirm that it's a lizard.
	I mean, there's...
	PCR, it can find anything in anything.
	Anything in anything.
	It's just because it's all just cycling and multiplying, background garbage that's floating around everywhere.
	So here's my prediction.
	I'm going to wrap this up.
	My prediction is the entire field of PCR analysis collapses in the next 10 years.
	Collapses and is exposed as a total fraud.
	And it's going to affect forensics, criminal PCR tests.
	It's going to affect pharmacology.
	It's going to affect botany, nutritional supplements, and of course COVID testing, hospital work and all that.
	The whole thing is a total fraud.
	But it doesn't mean that they can't one day have a better instrument that could actually test reliably some quantitation of genetic material in some cells.
	I mean that certainly is possible.
	That technology will no doubt exist one day.
	It just doesn't exist now.
	And this is, by the way, how people, you've seen maybe these videos online where people, they take saliva from an iguana and then they mail it in to 23andMe.
	And then 23andMe does a genetic analysis of the iguana spit.
	And then they send them back a letter.
	Oh, you're 4% African-American and you're 6% ethnic Jew or whatever.
	And you're like, dude, that was my iguana.
	Like, how are they getting this data out of my iguana's spit?
	Answer.
	They're making it up!
	You could send them, you know, like rabbit poop.
	I mean, you could send them anything, and they're going to give you similar answers.
	Because there's no science to it.
	It's all made up.
	I mean, think about it, folks.
	If the 23andMe, you know, if the tests were legitimate, then the iguana drool would get flagged.
	You know, the computer would spit out, oh, whoa, this looks reptilian.
	This is non-human.
	But it doesn't.
	They just go on and say, oh, yeah, you're from the Mediterranean.
	Really?
	Really?
	Oh, you're 17% Caucasian.
	Maybe my iguana likes to change colors and self-identify as African American or Caucasian American or Italian American or whatever.
	I mean, it is an iguana.
	But you can't tell me that the genes match up with all these ancestors that are human.
	I don't think so.
	Maybe they think it's a chameleon.
	So folks, look, the final lesson here, and hopefully we've all learned this from the last two years of watching the COVID fiasco, is don't believe scientists just because they say they're scientists.
	More often than not, they're full of bunk, just like everybody else.
	It's completely full of it.
	They're the high priests of society.
	Oh, it's in the name of science, therefore you have to believe it because we make it sound really technical.
	It's just another type of fraud.
	It's, in fact, it's worse than just straight up fraud.
	You know, it's worse than a stage magician doing sleight of hand who's trying to trick you.
	At least in that context, you know you're watching, quote, magic.
	You know you're being tricked.
	And you applaud based on how impressive the trick is.
	Like, wow, I didn't even notice how he tricked me.
	That was some amazing sleight of hand.
	It made those cards just reappear and disappear.
	That's amazing.
	But you know you're being tricked.
	Well, these PCR scientists claim they're not tricking you.
	They just claim you're too stupid to understand their tricks.
	And their tricks are just as fraudulent as the sleight-of-hand stage magician.
	Just as fraudulent.
	There's no actual science behind it.
	It's just like climate change.
	Remember the hockey stick graph?
	The hockey stick graph was churned out by a piece of software.
	You could feed it any data set you wanted and it would churn out a hockey stick.
	Because it was built into the algorithm.
	It was actually hard-coded into the software.
	It would produce that no matter what.
	All a fraud.
	I mean, just because they're scientists doesn't mean that you should automatically believe them.
	In fact, if we've learned anything recently, it's that anybody who says that you have to obey them because they are, quote, the science, you should probably run from them as quickly as possible.
	You should be very, very skeptical.
	In fact, the truth today is anybody who says that they're a doctor, a pharmacist, or a scientist, or I guess even a journalist, you should be immediately skeptical.
	They're probably lying to you.
	Not all of them, but most of them.
	And the few that aren't, you should keep them around as friends because they're a rare breed these days.
	But most people operating in the realm of, quote, science, they're just taking the Fauci grant money to produce total fraud science papers.
	You know, blaming, I don't know, failed marriages on climate change or whatever.
	It's all bogus.
	It's all determined by who controls the funding.
	And right now, that's Fauci.
	And that's how, quote, science became a total, complete, laughable, pathetic fraud.
	Real science has been completely abandoned by humanity.
	Maybe we'll bring it back one day, but right now, it's kind of the low point of In scientific integrity on our planet.
	Alright, so that's my take on things, folks.
	Now, of course, I appreciate you hanging with me today as I went into a lot more detail than I had originally planned.
	And, yeah, my voice is getting better, still a little bit stressed.
	I'm editing out a few coughs here and there as I do this podcast, by the way.
	So I'm still not 100%, but...
	That's okay.
	We're having fun as we heal.
	It's all good.
	But thank you for supporting us and thank you for sharing this information with others.
	Thank you for being part of the mass awakening of humanity.
	You know, we are in search of truth.
	That's what we're all about.
	We want to spread the truth about things.
	We want to expose the lies.
	And you are a big part of that and we need your help in order to spread the truth.
	And bury the lies.
	So thank you for listening.
	You can catch more of my podcasts each day at brighttown.com and of course check out my articles at naturalnews.com and thank you for listening today.
	I'll be back with you tomorrow.
	Take care.
	A global reset is coming.
	And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲