Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 2, 2021 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:10:57

Situation Update, April 2nd, 2021 - Bill Gates' mad science TERRAFORMING scheme blocked by reindeer

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You know, the best comment I heard yesterday, which was April 1st, is that there's no room for April Fool's jokes on that day because nothing could be more foolish and absurd than the reality in which we find ourselves with the fake vaccines and fake pandemic and masks that are filled with toxic chemicals and everything else, right?
	I mean, the whole world around us is a giant joke, so we don't need to add to that.
	But today is April 2nd.
	Thank you for joining me.
	Mike Adams here with the Situation Update.
	It is Friday.
	I do have a little podcast bonus for you coming this weekend, which you should find interesting.
	I think that'll be posted Saturday or Sunday as well, so that'll be a special report that you'll find.
	Well, actually, the title is something along the lines of, if someone...
	If someone came to you for a job and you were hiring and you looked at the background of that person, if they had the background that vaccine companies have...
	You would never hire that person because the vaccine companies have a background of total criminal fraud, bribery, kickbacks, price fixing, you know, just complete dishonesty and criminal records.
	You wouldn't hire that person, but some people will gladly inject themselves with a cocktail from a company that has the same ethics.
	So that's the special report coming this weekend.
	Don't miss that one.
	That's going to be lots of fun.
	For today, we've got a different special report later on in this podcast entitled, Why You Should Never Take Financial Advice from Vaccinated People.
	And the answer to that is, like, why?
	Why should you never take financial advice?
	Because they don't understand risk.
	That's the big part of the answer.
	We'll get to that report later.
	Just a reminder, you can find me on Telegram.
	My username there is...
	Let's see.
	It is at HealthRanger.
	And you can also find me on Brighteon.social.
	Brighteon.social is our social media platform.
	I'm not posting there as much as I used to, just because I'm doing these daily podcasts.
	But I'm posting in the mornings and also, again, in the evenings, usually, and also sharing some memes from time to time.
	Now, I do plan to post there a lot more.
	Coming up in April, especially when I'm talking to all the people I'll be meeting at the Tulsa event and doing lots of interviews with different people, special on-site podcasts and so on.
	So you're going to get a ton of good interviews, lots of information starting at about April, what, 18th, 19th and beyond.
	It's going to be just an action-packed last half of the month of April, that's for sure.
	All right.
	Now, for today, we've got a lot of great analysis for you and important information, starting with some good news from Texas.
	The Texas Senate has passed a bill that will block social media companies from banning users.
	Welcome to my show!
	Due to their political views.
	So this is from the Epoch Times.
	This is the bill that has long been promised by Governor Abbott and Texas conservatives.
	So from the story, the Texas Senate passed a bill that forbids social media companies that have at least 100 million users per month to block, ban, demonetize, or discriminate against any of their users due to their political views.
	Oh!
	So that's an interesting definition.
	Now, isn't it interesting that I'm a Texan and I'm blocked and banned everywhere, so I kind of wonder if I'm going to be the test case for this because the minute this becomes law, guess what?
	I'm calling up my Texas lawyers and we're going to file.
	This is going to be very interesting.
	Senate Bill 12, which is sponsored by Republican State Senator Brian Hughes, passed on Thursday and would apply to Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, etc., And Hughes said this is to get Texans back online.
	And I think we all have the knowledge that these social media companies are the new town square, he said.
	And check this out.
	And a small group of people in San Francisco can't dictate free speech for the rest of us.
	What he means to say is insane libtards in San Francisco shouldn't be allowed to decide what we're allowed to say.
	But that's my version of what he said.
	Quote, it needs to be an open exchange of ideas, and Senate Bill 12 is going to get Texans back online.
	It's on its way to the House, expected to get a good consideration, and he hopes the governor will sign it into law very soon.
	Now, this is just one effort among many states, and this is where the anti-censorship push is really happening.
	Now, of course, the minute this law passes...
	The tech giants will go to work probably bribing and threatening some judges somewhere to say this is unconstitutional.
	They'll challenge it.
	It'll be a multi-year court case challenge probably at some point.
	But, you know, you got to start somewhere.
	At least we'll be backed by state law now in demanding our First Amendment rights.
	So we'll see where this goes, but I'm not expecting it to solve these issues right away.
	In fact, my advice to everyone out there is to really don't ever expect to have freedom of speech on left-wing globalist anti-human tech platforms run by libtar demons.
	It's not going to happen.
	You should move to alternative platforms like brighteon.com.
	Or the others, like BitChute, for example.
	Or what else?
	There's Parler.
	Mike Lindell is going to launch something new, some new social media platform.
	Gab has just announced a major upgrade as well.
	They're going to have a marketplace, a Gab marketplace where you can buy and sell stuff.
	That's going to be awesome!
	We're going to put all the HealthRanger store products there.
	I mean, we should be using Gab, you know, for buying and selling.
	That's going to be great.
	They'll probably accept cryptocurrency as well, which we support that, so it's going to be awesome.
	And then also, let's see what else is going on.
	Oh yeah, Trump said he's going to launch some kind of platform as well.
	Don't know a lot of details on that.
	Haven't heard all about that, so I don't know what that's going to be.
	But in the meantime, here on our platform, Brighttown.com, as you know, we're about to roll out live streaming.
	For this upcoming event in Tulsa.
	So mark your calendars for Friday, April...
	Is that the 16th?
	I think it's the 16th.
	Friday, April the 16th, and Saturday, April the 17th.
	If all goes well, we will be speaking live.
	Lots of people like Lynn Wood and Sidney Powell and General Flynn and myself and many, many others.
	Andrew Wakefield.
	We'll be speaking live at this event.
	Charlene Bollinger is going to be speaking there.
	And it's going to be live streaming for free on Brighton.com.
	Brighton.com.
	You don't need a special URL. Just go to Brighton.com on that Friday the 16th.
	And the live streaming will hopefully work.
	I've been working with the engineers on this very, very hard.
	And we have a solution right now.
	That streams to 30,000 plus people at the same time.
	And we're doing some internal testing.
	And we've also...
	We subscribe to a testing simulation service that can hammer your code with a simulated 10,000 users.
	And that's working.
	So we know for sure we can do at least 10,000.
	But anyway, we're working on that.
	And I can't 100% guarantee it's going to work.
	But it's looking pretty good right now.
	And that's still a couple of weeks away.
	So mark your calendars.
	I'm speaking – well, I'm scheduled to speak at 5 p.m.
	on that Friday the 16th live in Tulsa.
	Now, usually these events run kind of late.
	And since the first speaker starts at, I think, 11 a.m., and then there's a new speaker every 30 minutes – Not hard to figure out.
	If everybody's five minutes late, by the time it gets to me, it might be beyond 6 p.m.
	or something.
	So I wouldn't count on those time slots being concrete or anything.
	They might move around.
	Okay, so anyway, go Texas and go Brighteon.
	I love it that Brighteon is really a Texas company, you know, and we're all about free speech, so keep using it.
	Now, moving on, this story is in the category of news that I call the Bill Gates Suck It category.
	Sweden has rejected the solar geoengineering test that's been pushed by Bill Gates.
	Which is called the Scopex Project.
	Now, this is funny because this comes from Reuters today, this story.
	And they're saying that...
	This is funny.
	They're saying that Sweden has rejected running this experiment because of all the pushback from environmentalists, which is amazing.
	They're finally waking up to the problems with, you know, altering the atmosphere and terraforming the planet.
	Not a good idea.
	Hey, Bill Gates, suck it.
	You know, that's the response from them.
	But what's funny to me is that when I first started talking about this a couple of years ago, and I said, hey, Bill Gates wants to pollute the atmosphere and he's going to block the sun.
	He's going to cause global dimming and disrupt photosynthesis.
	I remember, of course, you know, the mainstream media and the so-called skeptics and everybody were like, Oh, give me a break.
	That's not real.
	That's a conspiracy theory.
	That's never going to happen.
	Nobody's going to do that.
	Why would anybody want to block the sun?
	Blah, blah, blah.
	Well, turns out, of course, as with everything I tell you, it's all true.
	It's just how long it takes for the truth to come out, you know?
	So the truth has come out.
	And now Reuters is reporting on this.
	And they call it a, quote, solar geoengineering experiment.
	Now, and it's called the Scopex Project, S-C-O-P-E-X. And again, a solar geoengineering experiment.
	That's the wrong term.
	You know why that's the wrong term?
	Because solar geoengineering would be reengineering the sun.
	That's what solar means, obviously.
	That would be reengineering the sun.
	What they're doing with Project Scopex is called terraforming.
	That's what it should be called, terraforming.
	You're altering terra, which is Earth.
	You're altering Earth's atmosphere.
	So it's funny that they don't call it terraforming, but it's also fascinating that they're willing to use the term geoengineering, which was also considered a conspiracy theory five years ago.
	If you said geoengineering is happening, They're altering the atmosphere, geoengineering.
	You were called a kook, you know, a nutcase, a tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist.
	Now Reuters is using the term geoengineering because that's what it is.
	They're just calling it solar geoengineering to try to distract from the fact that it's really earth geoengineering or, in other words, terraforming.
	So, if you pollute the atmosphere, it's basically mimicking a massive natural disaster.
	The kind of disasters that have caused mass extinctions in the history of Earth.
	So, for example, when a large volcano goes off, as has happened over and over again throughout history, and may happen again soon for all we know, but it emits all this pollution into the atmosphere, sometimes going all the way up into the stratosphere, And it dims the sun or blocks some of the sunlight,
	which actually causes some of the sun's energy to be reflected off the particulate pollution back into outer space instead of being absorbed on the surface of the Earth, where, of course, sunlight helps power plants, you know, with the help of CO2. So in years past,
	when there have been large volcanic eruptions, That have blocked the sun, sometimes for a year or more, there have been mass die-offs and mass food shortages for the obvious reason that this shuts down photosynthesis.
	And without photosynthesis, well, how are you going to grow food?
	And how are the animals that eat plants going to have plants to eat?
	They're not, so even the...
	The land animals are going to die and many animals in the sea are going to die because the ocean, of course, depends on photosynthesis as well for all the sea grass and the sea plants and that whole ecosystem has to have sunlight, obviously.
	So it's bad when there's a natural disaster and there's a mass die-off and a great extinction across the planet, right?
	That's bad.
	But not according to Bill Gates.
	According to Bill Gates, that's awesome stuff.
	Because Bill Gates is also cheering all the people dying from the vaccine.
	Oh, the infertility.
	Oh, the infant deaths.
	Oh, the...
	The people dying from the adverse reactions, you know?
	It's just achieving that depopulation goal.
	Now, if only we had a way, says Bill Gates to himself, if only we had a way to starve out most of humanity.
	Huh?
	How could we do that?
	How could we engineer a global famine?
	Oh, block the sun!
	Yes!
	And then they can say that it's going to save the planet from global warming.
	So here is how Reuters explains this, quote, such technology mimics the cooling effect of volcanic eruptions.
	You mean, Reuters, you mean the planet-wide mass extinction, starvation, famine, and die-offs?
	Yeah, they call it a cooling effect and could, quote, reduce global temperatures.
	Yeah, turn us into another ice age where plants don't freaking grow, Reuters, because turns out plants don't grow in the ice, do they?
	Plants need liquid water, in other words, warm water.
	Why is it that all these lunatics in the media think that Earth would be better if it were a frozen ice planet like Hoth from the Empire Strikes Back?
	Remember that?
	It's an ice planet!
	There aren't rainforests on Hoth?
	You'll die out there, as Luke almost found out before he stuffed himself into the guts of a, uh...
	What was that creature?
	Okay, Star Wars geek quiz time.
	What was that creature?
	Alright, I'm gonna take a wild guess.
	Was that a Tauntaun?
	Is that what that was?
	Is that what Han Solo said?
	Your Tauntaun won't even make it back?
	Alright, now I gotta check.
	I gotta check this.
	Okay, alright.
	I just looked this up.
	Oh my gosh.
	I'm some kind of Star Wars nerd because I ended up on a page about the Wampa, and Wampas are powerful furry bipeds that dwell in the snowy wastes of the Ice World Hoth.
	These predators have razor-sharp fangs and claws.
	A Wampa attacked Luke Skywalker outside Echo Base, killing Luke's Tauntaun and dragging the Rebel Commander away.
	I did it, Tauntaun.
	No cheating.
	That was straight geekdom right there.
	So anyway, the point is that Bill Gates wants to turn Earth into the ice planet Hoth.
	Where there will be no Wampa, and there will be no Tauntaun, and there will be no ice base.
	There will be no humans, which is the whole point.
	That's what he's trying to do.
	Because when you screw with the atmosphere and block the sun and kill the photosynthesis, and you kill off all the life forms on the planet, there's only one person who would love that.
	And his name is Bill Gates.
	Bill Gates, suck it.
	Okay, now, just to bring in some interesting creatures here, and I'm not making this up, from the Reuters News article, here it is, alright?
	I'm not joking, this is not an April Fool's joke.
	Quote, but leaders of Sweden's indigenous Sami reindeer herders wrote to the space agency opposing the test.
	Oh!
	So wait a minute, are you saying Bill Gates got shut down by a group of indigenous reindeer herders?
	Ha!
	Oh, wouldn't Santa be impressed with that?
	Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer had a very shiny nose, and if you ever saw it, he would say that Bill Gates blows.
	A group of reindeer herders shut down Mr.
	Depopulation there.
	They were saying maybe this is a bad idea.
	How are reindeer going to survive if everything is, you know, collapsed in terms of the ecosystem?
	All right.
	Then Reuters explains, quote, they're talking about this, quote, this technology to reduce global temperatures.
	And they say, quote, though its potential risks are unclear.
	In other words, we have no freaking idea what might happen if we change the atmosphere and just screw with the planet's sunlight.
	We have no idea.
	The risks are unclear.
	Well, they should say that about vaccines too, but they don't.
	You ever notice, I mean, why is it that Reuters and the Associated Press and all these media groups, why are they always pushing technology that risks mass extinction?
	What is it about these anti-human depopulation demons?
	They just want humanity to die.
	And then they, you know, they get behind these crazy...
	The Swedish Space Corporation said it had decided not to conduct the test, which uses a high-altitude balloon that was planned for June near the Arctic Circle town of Kiruna.
	Run by Harvard University researchers, and they left out the part where it says, who are anti-human demons working for hybrid alien Bill Gates.
	Oh my.
	So just for the record here, I did not know there was a Swedish space corporation.
	I did not know there are Swedish spaceships.
	Or Swedish moon bases or Swedish satellites.
	I did not know that.
	I did not know there are indigenous reindeer herders in Sweden.
	But I kind of think that these two groups should get together.
	Because I think that we need Swedish high-orbit space reindeer, which would make a lot more sense than polluting the stratosphere to find out what happens if we block the sun.
	I'm voting for space reindeer instead of Bill Gates.
	To me, it makes more sense to support high orbital velocity space reindeer than to pollute the skies.
	And I would rather ride a tauntaun around Sweden and fight wampas rather than have Bill Gates block the sun and destroy the global food supply and thrust humanity into famine and mass extinction.
	Right?
	Makes sense.
	But then again, then again, Oh, then again, I'm not allowed to speak on any online services, except for now Texas is about to pass a new law.
	Oh, it's going to get juicy from here forward, that's for sure.
	Can't wait for that.
	When a Texas judge rules that the health ranger gets to speak again on YouTube and Facebook, it's going to break the internet.
	Not that I will really rely on those services, but I will just...
	I would have to create a video that maximizes the limits of First Amendment expression.
	And just to make sure the courts are serious about protecting freedom of speech, I would put something together that really, really, really tests their commitment to freedom of speech.
	And I would put that out on Facebook and YouTube.
	It would probably mention Bill Gates and some other choice individuals slash cyborgs, Zuckerberg, and so on.
	But by the way, you know...
	If Bill Gates wants to launch all this pollution into the stratosphere to save the planet, I've got a better idea.
	This would save everyone.
	Why don't we just launch all the vaccinated people into orbit?
	Let them block the sun.
	I mean, they want to die anyway.
	They're taking experimental vaccines.
	Let them serve a double purpose.
	You too can orbit the planet, save the Earth while you sacrifice yourself to the gods of technology and vaccinations.
	You know, have fun with that one.
	You know, we can catapult Fauci into orbit just as a test case.
	He'd be like the first space monkey, you know, the orbiting space monkey.
	Back, what was it, in the late 1950s or early 60s, right?
	We launched a monkey into space.
	We could launch Fauci.
	He's about the size of a monkey, come to think of it.
	And he's about as human as a monkey.
	So let's just get that done.
	Alright, now, speaking of Fauci, we're going to talk about vaccines here for a few minutes.
	According to the CDC, they have now reached 200 million vaccine doses being delivered.
	That doesn't mean delivered into people.
	That just means they're sitting in boxes somewhere, or at least some of them are.
	They say there's 154 million doses have been administered.
	30% of the population of the United States now has one dose, and 17% has two doses.
	So we're up from about a quarter of the population to we're approaching a third of the population now has at least one dose of the vaccine.
	Now, here's the logical conundrum that Fauci and the CDC have put themselves into, and this brings in Senator Rand Paul.
	Who has said some pretty awesome stuff and Rand Paul gets it.
	And he shared a video, what was this, two days ago, of CDC Director Rochelle Walensky announcing that new data suggests vaccinated and recovered people, that is people who have innate immunity and built their own antibodies, that both of these groups of people do not carry COVID-19.
	All right, got that?
	So again, according to the CDC, people who were vaccinated no longer carry COVID. And people who have recovered no longer carry COVID. So why would these people need to wear a mask?
	And so Senator Rand Paul is telling Fauci to drop the charade, drop the mask charade.
	And he wrote, quote, paging Dr.
	Fauci, please end the mask theater now that the CDC admits evidence that the vaccinated do not carry the virus.
	So you see, this is the conundrum the CDC has put itself into.
	The CDC wants you to believe that vaccines really work.
	But if vaccines really work, and people who are vaccinated no longer carry COVID, then shouldn't the rule be that if you're vaccinated, you no longer have to wear a mask?
	Right?
	Because that would be logical.
	That would make medical sense if you're believing what the CDC is saying in their own words.
	But they don't want to drop the mask mandate.
	You know why?
	Because they want you to obey their nonsensical junk science quackery, which is this mask mandate.
	So they're trying to say, well, vaccines do work, but you still have to wear a mask.
	And you say, but why?
	And they say, because we say so.
	And you're like, is this a game of Simon Says?
	What is this?
	Or is this supposed to be medicine or science?
	What is this?
	Some kind of weird obedience test?
	Yeah, it's an obedience test.
	You have to wear the mask because they say so.
	Even when the same agency admits that there's no reason to wear the mask for people who have been vaccinated or people who already have their own antibodies.
	And Rand Paul is the only senator who dares to bring this up.
	He shared a study that talked about T-cell responses in people who have recovered from COVID-19 themselves, who've been exposed and have their own antibodies.
	And Rand Paul, who's a doctor, of course, he says T-cell immunity after natural infection shown to include variants.
	What he means is that your natural immunity also protects you from the other COVID variants, such as what's out there, the P1 strain and other strains.
	So if you have natural immunity, and let's say if you took an antibody test and it showed that you have antibodies, why would you need to wear a mask?
	And even further, why would you need to be vaccinated?
	You already have the antibodies!
	The entire point of the vaccine, according to the CDC and according to the media doctors, is to make your body manufacture the antibodies, right?
	Isn't that the entire function of the vaccine?
	That's the whole purpose of it.
	If you already have the antibodies, then you wouldn't need a vaccine, logically.
	But vaccine passports give no weight to people who are naturally immune, do they?
	This whole idea of vaccine passports is that only if you're vaccinated are you safe to move around society.
	And if you're not vaccinated, even if you're naturally immune, you have no freedoms and no rights, and you're probably a dangerous person.
	And even if you're vaccinated, you still need to wear a mask because this is some kind of retarded obedience drill from Fauci and the CDC, which is why we should launch that son of a bitch into high orbit as soon as we can and save humanity, as far as I'm concerned.
	And make sure you put a mask on them before you launch it.
	Put them in orbit with a mask.
	Try to breathe now, sucker!
	How thin is the air up there in the stratosphere?
	Yeah, Mr.
	F, you thought it was funny when everybody here on Earth had trouble breathing because of your toxic mask.
	Well, how does it feel now?
	Interesting.
	So this brings up the whole catch-22 of this whole foolish joke.
	It is a giant April Fool's joke, this whole thing.
	If masks work, then why do you need to be vaccinated?
	If vaccines work, then why do you need to wear a mask?
	If masks and vaccines work, then why do you need social distancing?
	If social distancing works, why do you need a mask?
	Right?
	Right?
	And if antibodies work, then why do you need vaccine passports that don't cover people with natural antibodies?
	None of it makes any sense.
	And it's not supposed to.
	It's an exercise in obedience and madness.
	It's designed to make you crazy.
	It's designed to try to sap your will and demoralize you to where you just throw up your hands.
	I give up!
	The whole world's gone insane!
	And you just end up throwing your mask on and taking a shot and just zombified, walking, sleepwalking into work and just say, whatever, man, I'm just tired of fighting with the stupidity.
	I'll just do whatever you say.
	That's what they want you to do.
	Just give in, just surrender to the nice, comfortable euthanasia shot.
	Just allow yourself to be lulled into a sense of security while they exterminate you.
	And while they block the sun and collapse the global food supply and lead to mass starvation.
	Oh, but if you want food credits, you have to have a vaccine passport.
	And when you pick up the food, you have to wear a mask.
	And in order to get your mask, you have to practice social distancing.
	And in order to social distance, you have to use the Federal Reserve new cryptocurrency wallet.
	Otherwise, you'll be fine.
	They'll take money out of your wallet if you aren't doing social distancing and masking and vaccines and also obeying what you're supposed to say on social media.
	Like if you say, oh, the election was rigged, minus 1,000 points, you're no longer safe for society.
	That's where it's all going, folks.
	All right, now, in case you thought this couldn't get any crazier, the Daily Mail, this is funny, the Daily Mail has a new story that they call Exclusive.
	They worked with a company that has done a chemical analysis of what's in the masks.
	So the fibers of the masks, turns out that the fibers are treated with chemicals, toxic chemicals, That cause watery eyes, burning sensation in the eyes, nose and throat, coughing and wheezing and nausea.
	So this is in the masks.
	So this article, the title is, quote, What we are breathing through our mouth and nose is actually hazardous waste.
	Scientists find evidence of toxic chemicals in some face masks.
	And this is the Daily Mail.
	Which, by the way, is a very difficult website to visit.
	I don't know if you've ever been to the Daily Mail, you know, dailymail.co.uk, but the whole website is just, there's so many ads, you can barely find the article on the page.
	It's like the page is just screaming at you, just buy something, buy something, buy something.
	It's insane.
	So I hate to even mention the Daily Mail, because it's, talk about pollution, that's ad pollution.
	That's abusive, what they put on their page.
	But this is an interesting story.
	So it says, a preliminary analysis found toxic chemicals in some masks.
	And it really makes me wish that in my lab I could test for formaldehyde.
	I mean, we have the equipment to do it.
	I just don't have a method for it.
	We could do it on just the simple chromatography, the LC, just liquid chromatography we could test for.
	I just don't have a method for it right now.
	And I'm sure that if we find formaldehyde in the masks, everybody's going to go, well, so what?
	We knew it was in there.
	Whatever.
	But the story goes on.
	These include known allergens and carcinogens as well as controlled substances.
	So masks intended for use by the general public are not deemed to be PPE. Did you know that?
	So they're not Subjected to the standards of masks that are worn by doctors.
	So in other words, you know, doctor's masks have to be non-toxic so that they don't kill the doctors.
	But for the public, doesn't matter.
	There are no quality standards, just like with vaccines, no quality standards at all.
	So the Daily Mail says 85% of all masks in the world come from China.
	And concerns have been raised over substandard manufacturing and opaque supply chains.
	Scientists have found evidence that some face masks that are on sale and being used by the general public are laced with toxic chemicals.
	Well, that's why Fauci wants you to wear them.
	To kill you faster.
	Preliminary tests have revealed traces of a variety of compounds which are heavily restricted for both health and environmental reasons.
	This includes formaldehyde, a chemical known to cause coughing, wheezing, nausea, and a burning sensation in the eyes, nose, and throat.
	So let me get this straight.
	So we were fine without the mask, and then when we put on the mask, suddenly there's coughing and wheezing and nausea and burning sensations.
	Huh.
	Now, if you go to a doctor, they would probably say, well, that must be COVID. You must have COVID. No, you have a mask disease is what you have.
	You have a problem with what's in the mask.
	And this is why people are getting all kinds of weird dermatitis all around their mouth where the mask is, getting all kinds of problems.
	They're getting like...
	Gum disease as well.
	And remember the other day we were talking about masks that are used in Canada in daycare centers, and they contain little graphene fibers, kind of like inhaling asbestos, which must be awesome for your lungs, right?
	The masks are the problem.
	It took a year to figure this out, I guess.
	The masks are the problem.
	And, huh, the masks are made in, where?
	China, the same country that made the virus that's trying to kill people in Western nations so that the communists can take over the world, huh?
	Hmm, what are the odds that the same communist nation that built the bioweapon and released it on the West would also make toxic masks and release those to the West?
	So that they could kill more people through toxic mass chemicals.
	Huh?
	What are the odds?
	Right?
	I mean, surely I'm not the only one who has connected those dots.
	It's kind of obvious at this point.
	Now, in case you don't have enough coughing and wheezing and nausea and burning sensations from wearing the mask, just go out and get vaccinated, too, because here's a story from the Daily Mail also.
	A mother's face and arms and chest, back and legs erupt into agonizing red rash after getting AstraZeneca's COVID vaccine.
	A 41-year-old mom claims she is still in unbearable pain two weeks later.
	I feel sorry for anybody who's in pain and suffering, but why did you get the vaccine in the first place?
	You should know that AstraZeneca is a dishonest criminal company with a history of fraud.
	They've admitted to it.
	So why would you take their vaccine cocktail?
	I feel sorry for these people, but you know what?
	You should know better.
	It's like...
	I mean, you wouldn't shoot up heroin from...
	Well, I guess any heroin dealer, hopefully.
	You don't know where that stuff came from.
	And even if it's pure, why would you want heroin in your body anyway?
	So why would you shoot up with something from a criminal corporation that's been known to be dishonest and fraudulent?
	Why would you do that?
	So this hairdresser said her skin flared up after she got the AstraZeneca jab.
	I guess this is the good news.
	She didn't die from a blood clot in her brain like other people do.
	The mother said she was unable to look after her 13-year-old autistic son due to the pain.
	Why is her son autistic?
	Probably because of a vaccine, right?
	Sadly, another case of vaccine damage.
	Britain's drug regulator lists rashes as a possible reaction to the AstraZeneca jab.
	Oh, so this is a known thing I mean, when someone says, oh, you might have a rash, most people don't figure it's going to be two weeks of agonizing pain with no end in sight, like I'd rather stab myself and bleed out and die kind of pain.
	That's not what's listed in the possible reactions.
	They just say, oh, it might be a rash.
	How about the whole body is a rash and your skin starts peeling off and you just want to die from the pain?
	That's a whole different ballgame.
	It says, the drug regulator says that these effects are uncommon, affecting only 1 in 100 people in clinical trials.
	1 in 100?
	That's not uncommon!
	1 in 100 people, you know, they're talking about vaccinating 100 million Americans.
	If 1 in 100 has that, obviously that's a million people who are suffering from rashes.
	That is not a rare thing.
	Why would they say 1 in 100 is rare?
	I mean, here, just as an example, if you were to apply this to the supplements industry, let's say that some company was selling, I don't know, St.
	John's wort herbs for depression or mental health.
	And then 1 in 100 people who took the herb had like crazy insane diarrhea and almost died.
	Would the media claim that it's a rare?
	That's an uncommon, that's a rare reaction.
	Nothing to worry about.
	It's only 1 in 100.
	No!
	They would say that herb is crazy dangerous and they would call for the FDA to ban it, wouldn't they?
	1 in 100 is not rare.
	That's very common when you consider the large number of people being vaccinated.
	I find it fascinating that even when potentially millions of people might have this reaction around the world, especially in all kinds of different countries in the aggregate, the media says it's rare.
	It's not rare.
	It's kind of shockingly common.
	Now, I know a lot of moms of autistic children.
	And most of those moms have, of course, sworn off vaccines because they know that a vaccine damaged their child.
	Moms of autistic children are the most passionate moms about sharing the truth about this, and they will never take vaccines again because they know what has happened.
	And I feel sorry for anyone who has been harmed by a vaccine.
	I mean, it is a crime against humanity, and it's a crime against children in particular, especially with the autism.
	But I have to wonder, you know, what kind of mom...
	I'm not going to name this woman.
	I'm not blaming her.
	I don't know her circumstances, but...
	If your child were already vaccine damaged, why would you go out and get vaccinated?
	That doesn't make any sense to me.
	So I just have a big question mark about that.
	And then why would you be surprised if you're in agonizing pain?
	Because this is what vaccines do.
	They are death shots, people.
	They are designed to kill you.
	Usually not that quickly.
	You know, they're designed to cause suffering and pain, you know, agonizing pain and neurological damage and so on.
	Long term, they definitely are designed to kill you.
	So why would you be surprised if you have bad reactions to this?
	But of course, the media just says, oh, it's uncommon.
	It's very rare.
	It's only millions of people.
	Crazy.
	All right, now, another story.
	Remember how vaccines, according to What's his name?
	Vanden Bosch, that vaccines might promote the creation of vaccine-resistant super strains in your body.
	Or in the body of someone who's vaccinated.
	And then that person might shed those super strains and then contribute to spreading more aggressive strains of the virus that are vaccine-resistant.
	And this theory makes sense to me because I know that antibiotics given to patients in hospitals result in the creation of superbugs that are antibiotic-resistant.
	And so vaccines given to patients would seemingly...
	If they work, they would neutralize that one strain that they were built for, but then they would allow other variants and other strains in that person's body to go ahead and replicate and be shared with other people with complete immunity to the vaccine.
	So the theory makes sense.
	Now, is this happening right now?
	I believe it very well may be happening.
	From the Epoch Times, quote, Michigan reports first case of the CCP virus variant first identified in Brazil.
	Now, have you heard about the variant named P1? P1? This comes from Brazil.
	It's this, I guess, super aggressive variant strain.
	It's got a name now.
	Must be crazy bad.
	It was now found in a resident in Bay County...
	Michigan, where local health officials were investigating the person's exposure history.
	They said the infected person is required to undergo a full 14-day quarantine.
	Michigan previously reported finding variants of the CCP virus first identified in Britain and South Africa So now it's got one from Brazil.
	The state also saw the nation's highest seven-day average of CCP virus cases in the past week, with numbers surging 52%.
	And that is with Governor Whitmer's mask mandate.
	So not only are you getting, you know, the Brazilian super strain, you're also getting poisoned by a mask and maybe even killed by a vaccine.
	This is all rolled together here.
	Have a toxic stew of bad science and, you know, suicide.
	And we'll call it medicine.
	We'll call it public health.
	And here you can have a vaccine passport if you live long enough to use it.
	You know, U.S. epidemiologist and health economist Eric Feigelding.
	I'm not even making that up.
	I'm not trying to make fun of his name.
	Fiegelding said officials believe, quote, the rapid rise in cases is partly attributed to the variant first identified in Britain named B.1.1.7, which is reported to be already widespread in 51 Michigan counties.
	Well, wait a minute.
	I thought you said masks work.
	So how is Michigan spreading all these crazy strains?
	And I thought you said vaccines worked.
	So how is this happening?
	I thought you said social distancing worked.
	What a joke.
	Now, the LA Times is reporting this, that a company producing the Johnson& Johnson COVID-19 vaccine has a history of violations.
	Oh, no, you're kidding.
	The company at the center of quality problems that led Johnson& Johnson to discard an unknown amount of its COVID-19 vaccine.
	We learned yesterday that was 15 million doses.
	Maybe they could launch those into orbit and block the sun.
	Has a string of citations from the U.S. health officials for quality control problems.
	So I'm going to go ahead and name the company since it's named by the LA Times.
	It's called Emergent Biosolutions.
	Emergent BioSolutions.
	Maybe they should call it Emergency BioProblems.
	A little-known company at the center of the vaccine supply chain was a key to Johnson& Johnson's plan to deliver 100 million doses by the end of May.
	But this company, Emergent BioSolutions, has been cited repeatedly by the FDA for problems such as poorly trained employees.
	Oh, I can't imagine that.
	Cracked vials, that's better than vials of crack, and mold at one of its facilities, according to records obtained by the Associated Press and through the Freedom of Information Act.
	Mold?
	Mold?
	Is it in the vials?
	Is...
	Is this causing blood clots?
	By the way, it turns out this company we learned yesterday, this company also makes the AstraZeneca vaccine that is killing people with blood clots.
	It kind of makes you wonder, what's in that vaccine?
	They've got cracked vials and mold and poorly trained employees.
	Well, obviously they're poorly trained since they mixed up all the ingredients in yesterday's story.
	And they put the AstraZeneca ingredients in the Johnson& Johnson vaccine, and then they made 15 million of them with the wrong ingredients, and then they said, uh-oh!
	Ruh-roh!
	We have a vaccine moment here.
	Well, it's a good thing that we all have legal immunity thanks to Congress passing that 1986 law where you can't sue vaccine companies.
	So it doesn't matter if they have mold or cracked vials or they might even have poorly trained employees urinating in the vials for all we know.
	It doesn't matter.
	They have no legal liability.
	So, Johnson& Johnson said on Wednesday that a batch of vaccine made by Emergent at its Baltimore factory.
	Baltimore?
	Are you kidding me?
	The collapsed city Baltimore?
	Well, there's half the problem.
	This batch couldn't be used because it didn't meet quality standards.
	Hey, I'm shocked that they have quality standards, aren't you?
	Really?
	They have quality standards?
	That's news to me.
	It was unclear how many doses were involved, blah, blah, blah.
	The company said it was still planning to deliver 100 million doses by the end of June.
	Basically, no matter what, you know.
	So I guess it doesn't matter.
	We're just going to just flush them through the supply chain here, no matter what.
	Doesn't matter.
	Okay, welcome to the vaccine industry.
	Why anyone would inject themselves with that stuff is beyond me.
	Now, I'm saying this as kind of a joke, so don't take it too seriously, and I do not recommend using recreational drugs, but it would probably be less dangerous to inject yourself.
	Now, I'm not even going to say it.
	At least street drugs don't alter your cells and your protein synthesis.
	You know what I'm saying?
	I don't advocate using drugs, but my God, at least street drugs...
	I mean, I don't know.
	What do people inject these days?
	Besides heroin, I know that one.
	Fentanyl.
	You know, fentanyl kills a lot of people.
	But even fentanyl, it doesn't alter your DNA. It doesn't turn you into something that's not quite fully human anymore.
	It just kills you with, you know, toxicity.
	But I suppose if you want to die...
	I mean, seriously, if you want to die...
	Doesn't fentanyl...
	I mean, don't the addicts say fentanyl makes them feel good?
	Whereas if you inject a vaccine, you're in screaming bloody pain for weeks until you die.
	I mean, which would be a better way to die?
	If you want to commit suicide by needle...
	Wouldn't you rather go out with something that feels good instead of something that's just completely torturous?
	I mean, it's just something to think about here.
	I say don't use any needles, frankly, except maybe acupuncture needles.
	But I would never allow myself to be vaccinated.
	I would rather be scratched by dirty barbed wire and risk tetanus because that would be less dangerous than these vaccines.
	Seriously, I would rather have tetanus Than to get an AstraZeneca or a Johnson& Johnson vaccine.
	All right.
	Now, I've got a special report coming up for you here that I recorded earlier that I think you will really enjoy.
	But let me just bring in the sponsor for today.
	And I thank you for supporting our...
	I only have one sponsor per podcast.
	On some podcasts, I don't have any sponsors at all.
	This is a satellite phone store.
	Check them out at sat123.com.
	We'll send you basically a free satellite phone.
	I have one.
	I've been using it.
	I'm loving it.
	If the cell towers go down, you have an emergency communication method.
	It works almost anywhere on the planet, including from a cruise ship or a sailboat out in the middle of the ocean somewhere.
	You can still use a satellite phone.
	And they send you the phone for free when you sign up for a minutes plan, where you pay a certain amount per month, you get a certain number of minutes, and if you don't use the minutes, they roll over to subsequent months, and so you're basically collecting kind of like this pool of minutes that you can use in an emergency.
	And I did not have a satellite phone during the Texas rolling blackouts, and all the cell towers went down, and the power grid went down, and the internet went down, and I did not have...
	A means of communication.
	That was kind of foolish on my part.
	But this company heard about my plight and they sent me a satellite phone and wanted to know if I would help share this solution with others.
	And I said, well, guess what?
	I normally say no to this, but in your case, I'm going to say yes because your solution would have actually helped me.
	And I think it can help a lot of other people.
	So check out the satellite phone store, sat123.com.
	Never be without an emergency backup communication system.
	That's what I've learned now, kind of learned it the hard way.
	But now, from now on, I'm never going to be without this satellite phone.
	Even when I travel, when I go to Tulsa, I'm going to have it there.
	So now, here comes a special report that I recorded earlier, and it's called Why You Should Never Take Financial Advice from Vaccinated People.
	So give this a listen, and then I'll wrap this up on the other side of that.
	Here we go.
	I realized the other day that you should never take financial advice from people who take vaccines for the simple reason that they don't understand risk.
	And I find that people who blindly invest in the stock market, as we are obviously near the peak of this crazy, insane bubble, are the same kind of people who not only want to take lots of vaccines for themselves, including the COVID experimental vaccines, but they also want to push you to take vaccines.
	And yet they fail to see the risk in both their stock market decisions and their vaccine decisions.
	And some of these people are investment advisors or doctors or pharmacists or what have you.
	People who should know better, and yet they still don't.
	So what is it about these people that makes them blind to risk?
	And why are they so self-deluded into thinking that they alone have clarity on all of these issues?
	They will tell themselves, I believe in the science, you know, when it comes to vaccines.
	And if you ask them, okay, great, can you summarize the science on these vaccines?
	They will say, what?
	What are you talking about?
	And you're like, well, which studies have you read?
	Which clinical trials have you looked at that showed these vaccines to be safe for widespread distribution?
	And they can't name any because there are none.
	And so when they say they believe in the science, it's kind of like a stock market investor saying, I believe in the market.
	Well, that's great, but the market doesn't believe in you.
	The market does its own thing.
	The market will murder you if you're wrong, right?
	I mean, experienced investors know that, that if you have blind faith in the market and you think that just because you bought something, it's going to go up because you wish it will.
	You're going to get murdered by the market.
	Well, the same thing can happen with vaccines.
	If you took a vaccine because you feel positive about it and you heard about it on TV and they were saying, oh, this is great.
	Everybody should get it.
	And then very quietly, oh, but it's only approved as an experimental intervention that skipped the trials.
	Well, they don't even say that.
	But if they were being honest, at least they would say that.
	But people don't listen to that.
	They just say, this is great.
	Let's take it.
	And then if they're wrong, they can end up getting murdered by it.
	Now, what investing in overinflated stocks has in common with taking unproven experimental vaccines is that the consensus tells you to do both of these things.
	You know, the fake voices of authority in the fake news media, the fake authority institutions like the CDC and the WHO They always have these kinds of messages for you.
	Oh, trust us.
	We've never lied to you before.
	Invest in the stock market.
	It will always go up.
	Or take the vaccine.
	Nothing bad will happen to you.
	You will only have positive outcomes.
	And because this is pushed through media and also through social networks, you know, you'll hear it from your friends, you'll hear it from your coworkers and so on because they're being pushed in this direction as well.
	A lot of people...
	Think that, well, gosh, if the herd is marching in that direction, they can't all be wrong.
	There must be a reason.
	It must be correct.
	I'm going to join the herd.
	Well, sometimes that herd is leaping off a cliff, which was how the Native Americans used to hunt for buffalo.
	They would just get a stampede going and direct them off a cliff, you know, and then they've got 50 dead buffalo and they can eat for a year.
	So sometimes the herd is wrong.
	In fact, much of the time, the herd is wrong.
	So following the herd, though, it's a mental shortcut that people take, especially when they want to conform socially to what's being put out there.
	And there's a word that describes people like this, and that word is gullible.
	And so everyone that you see right now who's throwing money at high-tech stocks, like buying Tesla stocks, it's going to go up a thousand times, you know, or people who are taking this experimental COVID vaccine.
	These people are incredibly gullible.
	Which means their judgment cannot be trusted in any area of their life.
	They have bad judgment.
	And extraordinarily, some of these people do both.
	You know, they're stock advisors or investment advisors, and they're taking the vaccine.
	Well, you should definitely not listen to that person because, again, they don't understand risk.
	So let's kind of delve into the risk a little bit more here.
	Now, let's start with the vaccine.
	So...
	What's the best upside?
	Let's think about this for a second.
	What's the best upside that the vaccine could give you?
	So if you're in decent health, your risk of dying from COVID is very close to zero with or without the vaccine, right?
	So let's say you have a 0.2% chance of dying from COVID if you get it.
	So the vaccine, the best possible upside is that it would reduce your risk of dying by, let's say, 0.2% or whatever that number happens to be for you.
	Now, of course, there are many other things you could do to avoid being killed by COVID. You could take vitamin D. That's probably the number one thing.
	Just to boost your immune response.
	If you're a little bit overweight, you could reduce your body weight over time.
	That would also help as well because obesity is a cofactor.
	You can maybe work to reduce your blood pressure and so on.
	There are lifestyle changes.
	But the vaccine can only give you an upside of about 0.2%.
	What's the downside for the vaccine?
	It might kill you.
	Which is kind of...
	It's kind of the other 99.8%.
	You know what I mean?
	It's the inverse of the upside.
	It's a big downside because it could kill you.
	And when you're dead, that counts for 100%.
	You're totally dead.
	And this vaccine can do that.
	And it has been doing that.
	And various vaccines from different manufacturers are killing people in different ways.
	Now you might say, well, gosh, there's been 100 million people vaccinated in America by now.
	It's actually not that high yet, but it's getting there.
	And only maybe tens of thousands have died.
	But that's so far.
	That's not the limit to the downside.
	We may yet see many more deaths.
	Especially upon secondary or second exposure to coronavirus strains in the wild or when we have super strains or other strains that begin circulating and people don't have a strong immune system because they didn't have a natural innate immune response.
	They had a medical intervention that in essence impaired their immune system's active response.
	So people who got vaccinated might have a weaker response to future strains.
	Very likely they would.
	People who get flu shots are more susceptible to future strains of influenza that are circulating in the wild.
	That's been scientifically documented.
	So we know that's the case.
	So the downside of getting the vaccine is that you might die.
	The upside is maybe a 0.2% improvement in your chances of living.
	But again, you could greatly improve your situation with nutrition and lifestyle changes and so on.
	So a rational person would look at this and say, okay, does this make sense?
	I'm going to gamble with my life.
	I'm going to play like vaccine Russian roulette with my entire life to try to get this little 0.2% upside.
	Now, you might argue for older people, Or people with other comorbidity factors, the upside might be larger than 0.2%.
	Maybe that person in that particular age group who has certain cofactors, maybe that person has a 10% chance of dying from COVID if they get infected.
	Well, they could reduce that 10% to 2% just with vitamin D, according to the medical studies.
	Really, their real chance of dying from COVID is probably less than 2%, even if you think they're in the 10% group.
	And vitamin D won't kill you, it turns out.
	So why wouldn't you try less risky interventions first before you try one that might kill you?
	See, this is a very important principle of complementary and alternative medicine.
	And the best doctors working today who are alternative and complementary medicine doctors or naturopaths, they understand this equation very well.
	That if you're going to have an intervention with someone, try to make it less traumatic.
	Try to have less risk of a catastrophic downside.
	You know, let's say someone comes to you and they have You know, atherosclerosis, they've got clogged arteries because they've been living on processed meat and homogenized milk and what have you for 50 years, and their arteries are all clogged up.
	Well, a typical Western medicine surgeon or doctor would say, oh, let's break open the sternum with a giant machine.
	Let's crack that ribcage.
	Let's get in there and let's, you know, do open heart surgery.
	Or they might say, well, let's put a stent in there.
	And then the stent, you know, wears out over time or causes other problems and they have to put another stent and so on.
	So it's still a pretty invasive thing to put a stent in there.
	But a naturopath would say, hey, why don't we get rid of the plaque through lifestyle changes?
	So here, if you take pycnogenol with an herb known as gotukola, G-O-T-U-K-O-L-A, I think that's how it's spelled.
	Guess what?
	It reduces plaque over time.
	And there are other ways to reduce plaque, like maybe you could go on a 30 day or a 60 day, you know, juice feasting fast, like raw vegan juices for a period of time.
	Just clean all that crap out of your system.
	Or just go on a water fast for a while.
	You know, guess what?
	Your body can heal.
	And you don't have to break open your sternum to do that.
	You don't have to cut out the heart and have a transplant or all these other crazy things that doctors want to do.
	So you go with the least risky intervention first.
	And when it comes to COVID, what are the least risky interventions?
	Well, obviously, it's vitamin D. It's zinc.
	You might even look at ivermectin if it's appropriate for you.
	You know, get professional help for that.
	I'm not saying to just self-diagnose and start Start chewing on ivermectin, but, you know, get some professional help.
	But why wouldn't you do these things first?
	I find it fascinating that when you talk to people who have been vaccinated and you ask them, hey, did you take vitamin D first?
	Usually the answer is no.
	So they skipped over the least risky solution, which, by the way, also helps prevent diabetes.
	Various types of cancer and tuberculosis and diabetes and mental disorders and so on.
	They skipped that and they went right to the vaccine that has the highest risk of catastrophic bad things happening, such as you dying from a blood clot in the brain.
	Thank you, AstraZeneca.
	So these people are not rational.
	Which once again brings up the question, why would you trust these people with financial advice of any kind when they don't understand risk analysis and they do risky things first?
	Instead of doing the least risky things.
	So think about this from a financial advisor point of view.
	Suppose you went to an investment advisor and you said, here, I have a million dollars and I would like you to help me not lose this million dollars.
	That's the only goal.
	I just want to not lose this million dollars because these days that might be tough to do.
	And all you want is the return on your principal.
	Which, by the way, technically, you should move it out of dollars and get it into gold and silver, but that's a different podcast because dollars are losing value every day.
	But forget that.
	Suppose dollars are not eroding in terms of value because of all the money printing by the Federal Reserve.
	If your investment advisor said to you, hey, great, I'll take your million dollars, and I'm going to go to the dog racing track, and we're going to put it on Mr.
	Doggy over here called Super Fido.
	Like, happy running Fido dog.
	We're going to put your million dollars on this dog.
	You might say, isn't that kind of a risky approach to preserving this capital?
	And your investment advisor says, well, everybody else is betting on Super Fido.
	And my friend said this was great.
	And I saw on the news, the media told me that this dog racing is a really great thing.
	So I'm going to go with it because it's socially acceptable.
	You should fire that financial advisor, right?
	Because they're a moron.
	But that's what a lot of financial advisors are doing by getting the vaccine.
	See?
	Except they're gambling with their lives instead of with your million dollars.
	But take another investment advisor.
	And again, you have the same instructions like, hey, don't lose this money.
	Do something that protects this money.
	And they turn around and say, I'm going to buy Tesla stock.
	It's all going into Tesla.
	Or, you know, Apple and Google and Amazon and everything, all the high-tech hyperinflated stocks.
	You should also have a little slight panic at that moment.
	Like, whoa!
	How did I find this guy?
	This guy's nuts.
	And yes, he's probably vaccinated as well because he doesn't understand risk.
	See, what's the downside of investing in those tech stocks?
	The downside is that you could be buying into the peak of another dot-com bubble and you could lose 99% of your investment in certain companies when the crash comes.
	Another dot-com crash.
	That's the downside.
	What's the upside?
	Well, we don't know exactly, but things are really hyperinflated right now in terms of stock valuations, and you can see that rationally by looking at just something simple like the PE ratios, price-to-earnings ratios of these stocks.
	It's not hard to tell.
	They're overvalued and hyperinflated and overhyped and everything.
	So I don't know how much upside is out there.
	But it's probably not that much.
	As I say, don't pick up nickels in front of a steamroller because you're going to get steamrolled.
	You're trying to gain a little bit of additional profit by putting everything at risk where you might lose a big chunk of it, 50% or 70% or 95% for all you know.
	But a lot of people don't ever consider the downside.
	And you find this also in prepping.
	Or I should say lack of prepping.
	So a lot of mainstream people or normies, as we call them, they like to mock preppers.
	Say, oh, you're so funny.
	Why are you storing food, man?
	Oh, you think you're going to need food?
	Why are you so funny?
	And they have no food in their pantry.
	They have no planning, no preparedness.
	They don't have backup radios, communications, satellite phones.
	They don't have any way to grow food.
	They just trust the system.
	These are the same people who get vaccinated and buy Tesla stock.
	So They mock you for being prepared.
	But if you would ask them, well, what's the downside if the power grid goes down or the grocery stores are shut for 60 days or there's a global economic collapse or whatever?
	What's your downside?
	Because their downside is that they would starve to death.
	They don't think about that downside, though.
	They just think that everything's going to work out just fine because that's all they can remember.
	So they're not even able to imagine risk when it comes to food security.
	Now what I find funny, especially odd, is that a lot of these people love to buy insurance policies on everything.
	They'll buy home insurance, car insurance, life insurance, and this is what they think is eliminating their risk.
	So while they're buying all this insurance, They're taking the vaccine shot.
	Good thing they have life insurance.
	They're investing in stocks, you know, overpriced stocks.
	They have no backup food supplies, so they're taking a massive starvation risk.
	So they're not really risk averse, but they tell themselves they are because they've given their money to a corporation that they hope will one day give them money back if things go horribly wrong.
	But they don't realize the systemic risk.
	Or what's called counterparty risk.
	What if things go so horribly wrong that your insurance company can't make the payments to you?
	Such as what would happen during a global economic collapse or a power grid failure or global warfare or whatever.
	Collapse of the dollar.
	Are your insurance companies going to be solvent?
	Probably not.
	So these people have put their money in vehicles that have enormous systemic risk, and yet they think that they've covered their risk or suppressed risk.
	So the bottom line in all this is that most people don't understand risk at all.
	And so they make bad decisions.
	And the number one telltale sign right now of people who make bad decisions is people who are getting the COVID-19 vaccine.
	It tells you they do not understand risk, they have poor judgment, and they are willing to put their lives at risk to get a very tiny benefit.
	Even with unknown long-term negative consequences that in some ways they've probably never even pondered.
	Should you take advice from these people?
	No.
	What should you do with these people?
	I don't know.
	Get as far away as possible from these people because they're going to be bad for your health and for your survival.
	But thanks for listening.
	That's my special report on the subject of risk.
	All right, so I hope you enjoyed that special report.
	I certainly enjoyed sharing that with you.
	It gives you something to think about.
	You know, risk analysis is very, very important in our world today when there are so many risks and even systemic risks, which means risks that are related to other risks that have, you know, cascading failure potential.
	And very few people think about that.
	But that's kind of our job, to think about that, help you get prepared for whatever's coming, because it's probably not going to get better out there Not for a while.
	It's going to get probably crazier.
	Toilet paper prices are going up as well, by the way, if you haven't heard that.
	So people hoping to stockpile toilet paper will now have to pay a little more.
	Maybe that will dissuade some stockpiling behavior on the part of toilet paper stockpilers.
	It's fine.
	It's fine to stack toilet paper if you want, but you should also stack maybe silver and gold as well because that'll be even more useful than toilet paper at saving your life.
	In any case, it is Friday and I want to thank you for joining me today and thank you for tolerating all of my twisted humor and my Star Wars nerd distractions as well.
	There is a special report coming out this weekend, just kind of a short episode.
	So watch my channel at Brighteon.com.
	That's the Health Ranger Report channel.
	Definitely give that a listen.
	And then I will bring you a new episode here Monday morning with a full situation update podcast.
	There's a lot of headlines I didn't even get to today.
	So there's more coming next week.
	In the meantime...
	Avoid inhaling toxic chemicals from masks.
	Avoid committing vaccine suicide.
	Avoid brainwashing by the fake news media.
	And use this weekend to get prepared.
	Because it's going to be quite a ride, just the remainder of 2021, if not beyond.
	So thank you for listening.
	I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, naturalnews.com, and brighteon.com.
	Take care.
	Survival Nutrition is our new free audiobook that you can download right now from survivalnutrition.com.
	In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
	I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
	I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
	I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
	I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
	At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full free audiobook as MP3 files.

▲