All Episodes
Previous Next
March 26, 2018 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
26:48
Dr. Russell Blaylock interview on mandatory vaccine trials, fraudulent vaccine science - Mar 2012
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome.
This is Mike Adams, the health ranger for naturalnews.com with a special video interview with Dr.
Russell Blaylock, a neurosurgeon, an expert on excitotoxins, and extremely well informed on the toxicity on the brain that may be caused by the chemical adjuvants and heavy metals and light metals even found in vaccines.
He joins us today by Skype video with a lot of breaking information on this front.
Dr.
Blaylock, thank you for joining me today.
Thank you, Mike.
Well, the vaccine world has gone crazy, Dr.
Blaylock.
They're saying that we should have mandatory participation in vaccine trials now.
No right to opt out.
Tell us, why is that a crazy idea?
Well, it's a violation of the Nuremberg Medical Code, for one.
This was to protect the public against being experimental animals for governments or vaccine companies.
So suddenly we have this violation of Nuremberg Protection saying that you should be forced into a vaccine trial.
And if your house is destroyed during testing this experimental vaccine, then that's just the price you pay for living in this society.
Well, that's not certainly consistent with the founding of this republic that people are forcibly put into experimental trials.
Well, right, but let me play devil's advocate with you here for a second.
The vaccine promoters, pushers, propagandists, they say, well, for every, yeah, they say, sure, a few people will die from the vaccines.
They admit that.
But they say for every one person that is killed by a vaccine, maybe a million people will be saved.
Thus, it's for the greater good of society.
What's wrong with that logic, Dr.
Blaylock?
Well, essentially, that's the very same logic that we heard in Nazi Germany under the National Socialist, that we're doing these things for the greater good, that you have to look at the long view.
If you look at the long view, sure we'll kill a couple million people, or we'll kill a couple thousand people doing this experiment or that experiment, but for the greater good.
So the greater good argument has always led into these totalitarian abuses.
And the fact is, most of the damage by vaccines is hidden.
We have the vaccine bears reporting system, which is voluntary.
But even there, we see that virtually millions of reactions to vaccines are reported.
Now, when you hear vaccine proponents talk about it, they say, oh, it's very rare that you have a reaction to a vaccine, which is a complete lie.
Even their data, which is reporting only 2 to 10 percent of vaccine complications, shows that we're seeing hundreds of thousands of serious complications from vaccine.
And often, as in the case of the Gardasil, serious complications of vaccine exceed the death rate from cervical cancer.
So this benefit-harm ratio says that we shouldn't be doing this at all.
This vaccine should be outlawed.
You're harming more people than benefit from the vaccine itself, and that's the problem.
They can hide this information.
Right, right.
They can always explain it away or just bury it or even, you know, they have the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which is this shadow court system that has more power than the U.S. Supreme Court that pays money out to parents.
Admitting, yeah, your child was damaged, even made autistic by vaccines, but here we're going to pay you this money.
It's hush money.
By accepting this settlement, you agree not to talk about it.
I mean, that exists in America today.
It's a hush money, pseudo-shadow government court system.
Well, in this vaccine injury court, it's extremely difficult to even appear before the court.
I've known a number of parents whose children were obviously destroyed by a vaccine who never got a hearing.
So to actually get any money from the court is very difficult.
And like you say, even the results showing that a lot of children were neurologically damaged by the vaccine is hidden.
The public never hears about it.
Well, yeah, that's exactly right.
Of course, the mainstream media won't cover it.
People are only going to hear this here in the alternative media.
And along those lines, by the way, I want to encourage those watching to check out your website, Dr.
Blaylock, which is, of course, RussellBlaylockMD.com.
Did I get that right?
That's right.
All right.
RussellBlaylockMD.com.
Sign up for his email newsletter there.
You can also check out his books on Amazon.com and other booksellers.
He's got books like Excitotoxins, The Taste That Kills.
And what's your latest book on cancer?
What's the title?
Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients.
Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients.
Do you have a book on vaccine toxicity yet?
Not yet, but I did the introduction to Neil Z. Miller's latest book on the Vaccine Safety Manual, which is a rather long introduction and allowed me to write a preface.
So I have that, plus I have a book on autism, which links the vaccines and the mechanism, the molecular mechanism by which it produces autism.
I would like to invite you, by the way, right here on camera.
We would like to publish your articles.
I know you publish on Newsmax.
If you can get permission maybe to allow us to publish on the same day or the following day, I would really like to publish your articles in your name on Natural News.
I think it would be a great addition to the website.
You're welcome to.
I appreciate it.
Well, let's set it up after this.
You can just send us your articles.
We'll get them posted for you.
People need to see your information, but getting back to the vaccine issue, let me play devil's advocate with you again because, you know, there's so many counterarguments to this by the industry.
The industry will say, okay, well, let's say that some children are killed or maimed or made autistic by the vaccines, but it's still important to have a vaccine industry because someday there's going to be a big pandemic And if the vaccine industry doesn't have this machinery and this investment in its infrastructure, it won't be able to churn out the cure that saves us all from total death and destruction.
What about that defense there?
Well, that's assuming that we're not going to have any capability to produce a vaccine unless they are allowed to make hundreds of billions of dollars in profits.
Which is certainly not true.
And if we look at the science of vaccination process itself, it's becoming evident that the way they do the immunization, the vaccine of sticking it into your muscle of your arm and your leg, Actually suppresses a lot of the immune system, particularly in young children.
We found out that, in fact, it causes the immune system to switch to what we call Th2-type cytokine production, which inhibits immunity.
And your major protection against viruses, particularly the really virulent, deadly viruses and bacteria, is your cellular immunity.
Well, vaccines don't stimulate cellular immunity at all.
In fact, they suppress it.
And it's known, if you look on the CDC site, they'll tell you that, for instance, if a child gets a Hib vaccine for two weeks, they're much more likely to get Hib and to die from it than they would if you didn't give them the vaccine.
We see the same thing with the MMR vaccine.
The measles virus, rubella virus are immunosuppressive, just like the HIV virus.
Yeah, it's extraordinary.
We see news reports very frequently where they talk about things like a measles outbreak or a whooping cough outbreak or a chicken pox outbreak.
I notice they never tell you the truth, which is that most of those involved in the outbreak were previously vaccinated against the very thing that's breaking out.
It's like the kids with the measles are the ones who got the measles vaccine, and they don't tell you that.
Well, there's several important things they don't tell you.
Number one, when they have these so-called outbreaks, death from the outbreak is extremely rare.
Most of the kids just get a case of measles and recover, just like millions of us did when I grew up.
Now, when I grew up, there was no measles vaccine.
Virtually everybody in my class has got measles.
All of us recovered.
I don't remember anybody having a serious complication.
But you listen to these proponents today, you would think the street was littered with the bodies of dead children.
It's just nonsense.
All of us got it.
And the difference is when we got the measles, we had lifelong immunity.
And you look on the CDC site now, it says, well, if you had the measles before 1960, then you don't need any vaccination.
But if you get a vaccination for measles, you've got to keep getting vaccinated every five years or every two years in order to keep your immune system active.
But then you don't get protection, and that's why in all of these outbreak cases, the vast majority of the children were fully vaccinated.
You know, I'm glad you mentioned that because I find that the CDC has learned the tactics of the Department of Homeland Security in using fear to market its own authority, where DHS says there are terrorists everywhere, so we need more searching, we need more budgets, we need, you know, surveillance.
The CDC says, oh, there are deadly viruses everywhere and outbreaks everywhere, therefore we need more budgets, we need more vaccines, we need more Infectious disease surveillance.
It's the same exact tactic as the warmongering engine, which is Department of Homeland Security.
It's incredible.
Well, the sad thing about it is all of these fears predicated on absolute lies that are provable.
For instance, if you look at vaccine policy for six-month-old babies, they're giving them a diphtheria injection.
They're giving them injection for tetanus.
And then you ask the physician, well, what is the risk of a child in the United States of America developing tetanus if they're not vaccinated?
He doesn't have a clue.
Well, if you look back, before there was a tetanus vaccine, the incidence of tetanus in newborn babies was almost nothing, zero.
Most of the tetanus cases are in people over age 25 years, and the number of tetanus cases in the United States is infinitesimally small, even before there was a vaccine.
They're giving the impression that before these vaccines existed, these infections were just rampant and massive.
But when we look at the data, the historical data on these infections, and that proves all the childhood infections, all of them were falling drastically before there was even a vaccine invented.
The vaccine came in on the very end of the fall in these vaccinations, and the reason is because when you get natural infection, over time, the population develops massive immunity to the infection.
You know, I'm really glad you mentioned that because there is a lot of revisionist history in, for example, polio.
You know, they talk about the polio vaccine was this great, wonderful thing.
But then if you look at the actual history, polio was on the way out before the vaccine even came in.
And then you look at Jonas Salk, He's a famed inventor of polio.
He ran illegal medical experiments using government money on innocent victims who didn't know they were being experimented on.
I mean, it's madness, and yet no one has really told this history through conventional channels today.
It's astonishing.
Well, if you read the history of the polio epidemic, of course, I grew up in the heyday of polio when there was no vaccine.
Well, we only had one child in my classroom who developed polio and she just had a minor foot atrophy, leg atrophy.
But you didn't see many children that ended up in iron lungs.
When you see these pictures of the days of polio and they show you this room full of iron lungs, those are referral centers.
They took cases from all over the United States because they had the iron lungs.
If you look in the regions, for instance, you would find in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, oh, they may have had five or six cases.
And you look at another city, they have one or two cases.
But if you combine them all, it looks real impressive.
These are referral centers.
So it's deception is what they're doing.
They know that most of the people they're addressing with this information was not alive at that time.
That the polio virus, in fact, was a mild summer virus that had been present forever before, and that this appearance of paralysis was something that shocked everybody, because this was such a mild virus norm.
Well, interestingly, the period at which this virus suddenly changed its character and produced paralysis came on the foot of the vaccination for diphtheria.
And the pertussis.
And that's when they think that the vaccine itself either altered the immunity of these children or mutated the virus itself to make it paralytic.
Well, what a great marketing scam.
You know, the vaccine comes along and actually weakens the immune system, makes people more vulnerable to infection, And then, sometimes there are live viruses inadvertently or maybe intentionally put into the vaccines that get out into the wild.
So the vaccines become a vector for introducing infection in some cases.
We saw that with Baxter Pharmaceuticals.
So then the vaccines become their own self-fulfilling prophecy.
There's infectious disease because the vaccines are weakening the immune system and putting in the infectious disease, and then they use the presence of infectious disease to call for more vaccines.
I mean, it's the ultimate circular logic marketing scam fiasco.
Well, it is, and they know that most physicians know almost nothing about vaccines.
They don't know what's in it.
They don't know anything about the immunology of the vaccination process.
They don't read this literature.
But if you get into the science of vaccines, how they work, you'll find out, in fact, they stimulate the immune suppressant part of the immune system, for instance, hepatitis B. They had this idea that they were going to vaccinate all the newborn babies with hepatitis B vaccine.
Well, what happens?
It prevents the baby's immune system from converting to a fully functional cellular-mediated type immunity.
And it prolongs it for longer than a year after birth.
So that made those infants infinitely more susceptible to hepatitis B. It made them more susceptible to HIV. So that then more kids get HIV infections.
And so they say, oh, we need more HIV vaccinations.
And like you say, it just builds on itself.
It's incredible.
Now they're pushing flu vaccines for pregnant women.
I mean, that would have been considered medically insane just 10 years ago, right?
I mean, when you were in medical training, they would never would have given vaccines like that to a pregnant woman, would they?
Well, the thing is, and this is an area of my interest, is that when you vaccinate a pregnant woman, particularly during certain periods of pregnancy, you increase the risk of her child later in life having schizophrenia and autism about six-fold.
And that's because the vaccine produces immune cytokines, particularly interleukin-6, which has been shown to cause brain alteration in the baby that leads to later life schizophrenia and autism.
Well, this research is very sound and repeated by numerous laboratories.
Yet here comes along the vaccine people saying we need to start vaccinating pregnant women.
I was shocked beyond belief with this very powerful research showing you're going to massively increase the number of people having schizophrenia and otis.
But again, this is another case of the scientists throwing out the science.
I mean, now you go into the pharmacies and they have all these ads, you know, you versus the flu, and they show pregnant women and how your baby's going to be healthy.
And Hallmark Cards puts out these vaccine reminders for new moms to make sure your child has these 18 vaccines.
And then, you know, you get these stories from parents who say, my baby was healthy, I took them in, they were given 18 vaccines all at once, or sometimes 9 or 10 all at once.
Within hours, it was lights out, and now they're autistic.
You know, you hear this time and time again, and yet the mainstream medical system, the circle of the wagons system, just denies it all, a complete denial of any of this.
It's absurd.
The shocking thing is, is they even had a secret conference, the Simpsonwood Conference in Georgia, in which they collected their scientists, studied to see if giving these vaccines with mercury in it could cause neurodevelopmental problems.
It was a secret meeting.
And their conclusion was, yes, it is causing neurodevelopmental problems in these children.
The more vaccines, the worse the problem.
Immediately, they clamped secrecy on it, said, we can't let this report be released because if the parents ever find out what we've discovered, they'll be afraid to vaccinate their children.
Right.
The chairman of the committee said, well, I'll be darned if I'll have my grandchild vaccinated based on this information.
But he wouldn't let the rest of the United States know this.
It was just for his own protection.
Well, that's the thing.
Now, they're protecting the industry.
They're protecting each other's salaries and credentials and reputations.
Forget safety.
Forget serving the public.
It has become a system that exists only to expand its own power and to protect its own financial interests.
And that is not science, Dr.
Blaylock.
That is an industry of for-profit mythology, quackery, and hucksterism.
It's not science.
No.
In fact, I wrote an article about this conference, which I'll send to you, which details and quotes these people directly, some of the shocking things they said during this conference, that if parents knew it, they would never have their children vaccinated with these dangerous vaccines.
If they knew what the science was, and this is what I hear of people like Paul Offit, who come forward and pretend that the science is on their side.
Well, the science is heavily on our side.
We have some of the biggest researchers in these areas on our side.
They ignore it.
They know that the public is not going to even know how to go to the information and read it and understand it because it's very complex immunology.
Paul often is an absolute liar when he tells these things.
For instance, he says, oh, you can take 100,000 vaccines or 10,000 vaccines, perfectly safe.
Well, I will give a public challenge to Paul Offit.
Let me give you 36 vaccines, vaccinations, for hepatitis B, and let's see how you turn out.
He won't do it.
Let's take the CEO of Merck Pharmaceuticals and say, let me give you all the vaccines that you recommend all at once, which you say is safe, and let's see how you turn out.
They won't do it.
That's absolutely brilliant, Dr.
Blaylock, a public challenge.
Let's have the CEOs of these vaccine companies take their own medicine publicly, multiple injections all at once, and see what happens.
Well, I think there should be a law that if the CDC scientists and the pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers and people like Paul Offit are going to say these things, by law, they should get every vaccine that they recommend.
I agree.
And hey, if they ever do that, can you and I administer the vaccines to these people?
I would love to, but I guarantee you, the CEO of Merck Pharmaceutical, you think he'd take his vaccine?
I remember these groups of scientists who are skeptical about homeopathy, and that's a whole other topic, regardless of what you believe about homeopathy.
These people said they were out in public drinking gallons of homeopathy and saying, well, it doesn't work because we're not dead.
But let's flip that back on them.
Let's say, okay, why don't you publicly drink your chemotherapy?
Why don't you publicly inject yourself with your vaccines?
Why don't you take your own medicine publicly?
And let's see how many of you are left standing in 30 days.
Well, I think you may remember the case in Maryland not too long ago in which the court ordered 1,000 teenagers to be vaccinated in a courtroom, got 19 vaccines, which was unbelievable anybody would order such a thing.
That is assault and battery.
It's a violation of the Nuremberg Code.
Well, they asked the governor.
I wrote an article for the paper in Maryland.
I said, challenge the governor of that state who pressed this To receive all the vaccines or see if he's had all the vaccines in his family.
A reporter asked him that.
You know what his answer was?
What?
It's my private business.
He would not admit that he didn't vaccinate his children and his grandchildren or himself.
These people are liars because they won't take the vaccine themselves.
I'll guarantee you these people are not taking the flu vaccine every year.
And I guarantee you they didn't take the H1N1 vaccine that they were hawking.
I worked with a researcher in the Czech Republic, and we wrote a number of articles, which she translated into Czech, and said that the president of the country, after reading these articles, refused to take the H1N1 vaccine, and the department head of their CDC-like organization was promoting it, but she refused to take the vaccine, and they ended up destroying millions of dollars of vaccine because nobody would take them.
You know, we see this reflected throughout the global system of so-called scientists.
We see in the Monsanto cafeterias, they won't eat genetically modified food.
We see the Queen of England not consuming pasteurized milk, having raw milk delivered to her family so they can drink raw, fresh milk.
We see, also in the UK, I think there was a group of global elitists there who ordered up green vaccines or safe vaccines for their children, which were single-dose vaccines with no preservatives, no adjuvants in them, and so on.
So we do.
We have this denial.
Even a famous TV medical personality said publicly his family isn't vaccinated, but he recommends that you get vaccinated.
Time and time again, double standard.
Exactly.
And we need to insist, anyone who makes a public demand that people take their vaccines or promotes it, then we want to know, see their vaccine record.
And if not vaccinated, then they should be vaccinated publicly by vaccines that are off the shelf.
Off the shelf, yes.
Because they would get distilled water or saline and inject themselves.
But we want the heads of these companies and the boards of the companies all to be vaccinated with every vaccine they manufacture and pull off it to get at least 36 hepatitis B vaccines all at once and videotaping for the next three weeks.
No, I think that's a great idea.
And it can't be vaccines that Paul Offit arranges himself because there'd be too much fraud going on.
We're talking about off-the-shelf, go down to CVS Pharmacy, go down to Walgreens, let's get off-the-shelf vaccines.
We independently draw the vaccine into the syringe and we inject them 36 times and see what happens.
Well, you see, when they looked at the aluminum dose that infants are getting with the hepatitis B vaccine, it was 50 times higher than the EPA's safety dose.
So that equals to an adult getting about 36 different vaccines with hepatitis B or with tetanus vaccine.
Well, if that's equal to what you're giving to a six-month-old baby or a year-old baby, then pull off it.
Let's give you 36 vaccines with Gardasil or tetanus or one of these other high aluminum vaccines, and let's see how you fare.
You know what?
I want to work with you on this public challenge, Dr.
Blaylock.
I think it's brilliant.
I think it proves the point.
And I bet you these so-called vaccine scientists will never allow themselves to be injected with all these vaccines because they know.
Of course they know.
And I guarantee you do the same challenge to the scientists in the CDC that are promoting them.
I'll guarantee you those scientists aren't taking these vaccines.
Well, hey, I took a vial of fluoride to an anti-fluoride town meeting about a decade ago and challenged the dentist there to drink the fluoride.
None of them would drink it.
They know it's toxic.
They would kill them.
Well, it's like oncologists.
They did a survey of oncologists.
They asked them, would you take the same chemotherapeutic treatments that your patients take if you had cancer?
80% of them said no.
That's right.
Now, that's more telling than anything else.
It really is, yeah.
And we're way over time on this segment, so I've got to wrap it up.
But again, man, I could talk to you for hours about this, Dr.
Blaylock, and I hope you'll come back and join us again on some future segments.
I want to thank you for your time joining us today and encourage those watching to go to your website, RussellBlaylockMD.com.
Sign up for the email newsletter.
Also, go to BlaylockWellnessCenter.com to learn more information about the books and videos and other Other information that Dr.
Blaylock has made available.
Thank you, Dr.
Blaylock, for joining us today.
Thank you, Mike.
Always great to talk with you.
And stay on the line, please.
I want to chat with you after this about some of the ideas you mentioned.
But that's the interview with Dr.
Blaylock, folks.
Thank you for joining me today.
This is Mike Adams, the Health Ranger reporting for naturalnews.com.
Be sure to share this video.
On Facebook and Twitter and social networks, get the word out there.
You might save the life of a child, an infant, an expectant mother.
▲
Export Selection