All Episodes
Previous Next
March 23, 2018 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
48:49
Total idiocy of Gun Free Zones eviscerated by the Health Ranger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to the Health Ranger Report.
This is Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
I'm the founder of NaturalNews.com, the creator of GoodGopher.com, which is the world's first alternative news search engine, and the creator of AlternativeNews.com, Fetch.News, and many, many other news websites and news aggregation systems.
Anyway, I'm here to talk to you today about gun control.
And the title of this interesting opinion, I guess you could call it, is The Seven Stunning Truths That Gun Control Advocates Would Be Shocked to Learn.
And it starts with the idea that behind every shooting is a media lie.
And just take the most recent shooting, for example, Chris Mercer in Oregon at Umpqua Community College, UCC in Oregon.
The entire media coverage of this event was a massive lie.
They said he was white.
Well, he's actually half black, half white.
Mixed race.
They said he was a Republican.
Well, it turns out he's actually a supporter of the Irish Republican Army, the IRA, the terror group.
That's not the same as Republicans.
They said that this was all due to guns, but they didn't tell you, well, it turns out he's taking five different types of medications and he was abusing them by consuming them in mass quantities.
He took 20 pills at once, he said, four of each kind that he had in his bottle of random medications.
So the media didn't tell you he was on psychiatric drugs.
The media also barely acknowledged that he had vaccine damage.
He had autism spectrum disorder and was potentially, it looks like he was damaged by vaccines.
The media also didn't tell you that African-Americans, especially young African-American males, are at very high risk of autism from vaccines and that this science was known by the CDC and was covered up in a massive case of scientific fraud that was publicly admitted to are at very high risk of autism from vaccines and that this science was known by the CDC and was covered up in a massive case of scientific fraud that was publicly admitted to by one of the CDC's top scientists, Dr. William Thompson, who went public last year and admitted taking part in this massive cover-up to
The mainstream media didn't tell you that.
They covered that up too.
They also covered up the fact that this Mercer guy was an immigrant from the UK.
So almost everything that you're told about shootings by the mainstream media is a lie.
And once they lie to you and create a false narrative, they then begin to demonize all gun owners.
They like to use caricatures that are really racist.
They paint gun owners as crazy southern rednecks.
Crazy people running around wanting to shoot everybody.
This is what they want you to believe and because so many people on the left listen to only the mainstream media or MSNBC or read the Washington Post or the New York Times or whatever, they never actually get an accurate picture of who are gun owners and the truth about gun owners and the truth about gun control and gun free zones and so on.
So that's what I'm here to do is to help clarify the truth about gun owners because I am one.
I'm a gun owner And I'm also a holistic medicine advocate.
I'm a nutritionist.
I take care of ranch animals, goats and chickens and some donkeys that I rescued.
I love life and I love to protect life.
And I've been around many, many gun owners over the years in training.
I'm trained in tactical handgun combat.
And I'm licensed to carry concealed firearms.
I've been licensed in multiple states, four different states.
And I've never seen a gun owner that was crazy.
All the gun owners that I've met, that I've seen, are professional people.
Many of them are doctors, lawyers, some of them are college professors, some of them are blue-collar workers, sometimes welders, sometimes people who work in insurance or real estate.
In fact, a lot of people who work in real estate carry guns for all the obvious reasons of self-defense.
Many gun owners are women.
In fact, women are the fastest rising group of gun owners because they know that we live in a more dangerous world and that they need to have better measures of self-protection because the police are not there to help them as they used to be.
So, fact number one, or truth number one in this list of seven truths, is that most people who are pro-gun actually care very deeply about protecting life and saving lives.
They have very high ethics.
In fact, they have better ethics, in my opinion, than anti-gun people.
Anti-gun people, well, I'm not going to say what I think about them.
I'm just going to talk about the pro-gun people, the gun owners, very ethical people.
The kind of people who would stop on the road and help you change a tire because you needed help.
They're the kind of people that would defend you against a mad shooter if you were all caught in a restaurant and somebody went off and started shooting.
Gun owners would help protect and save lives.
That's the kind of people they are.
They're law-abiding citizens because they've gone through the process of applying for the concealed carry license and getting licensed and going through the background checks, taking the fingerprints.
We've all been fingerprinted many times by these concealed carry systems.
We passed all the background checks and so on.
And we are people who follow the rules of society to help make society a safer place.
Now compare that to the people on the left who love, people who break the rules, they love illegal aliens, who don't follow the laws of immigration, who, and these illegal immigrants cross the borders illegally and come in and they drive Without licenses and without insurance, and they cause wrecks all over the public roads in Texas and Arizona and New Mexico and California.
Almost every accident that I've seen was caused by an illegal driver with no insurance.
People who don't follow the rules, they break the rules all the time.
Those are the danger to society.
You are far more threatened by an illegal driver on the road than We're good to go.
So, if you think pro-gun people are crazy southern Texas gunslingers, you've been punked by the mainstream media.
You've been hoodwinked.
You've been suckered.
Because that's what the media does.
And let's be honest, the mainstream media has dropped any pretense of actually being engaged in journalism.
They are nothing more than political activist organizations that are pushing liberal leftist agendas.
And those agendas include destroying the Constitution, taking away your First Amendment rights, and more importantly, your Second Amendment rights, so that they can dominate and control society without any resistance whatsoever.
So that's what the media is really about.
Now, the second stunning truth In this entire discussion is something that the mainstream media never tells you when they're reporting about mass shootings or gun deaths or whatever.
They never tell you that you're far more likely to be killed by a doctor than a crazed shooter.
In fact, thousands of times more likely to be killed by a doctor.
Every day in the United States of America, over 2,100 people are killed by our medical system.
And that is from a study, I believe the study was 1996, and it showed that the annual death count from doctors and medicine, pharmaceutical side effects, and surgical accidents and so on, they're called iatrogenic deaths, was about 784,000 Americans.
That comes out to over 2,100 people per day.
In other words, if 10 jumbo jets fell out of the sky every day and crashed and burned and killed everyone on board, that would be equal to about the number of people that are killed by the medical system, which means your doctor.
You are far more likely to be killed by a superbug infection in a hospital than to ever be killed by a crazed shooter.
In fact, the odds of being killed by a shooter, I think, are lower than the odds of being struck by lightning.
You're far more likely to be killed in a swimming pool than to be killed by a shooter.
The media's job, though, is to create...
A crazy hysteria and panic among the population making you believe that there are these crazy gun-owning shooters everywhere all over society.
Well, there aren't.
It's the same thing back in the Bush administration.
They wanted you to believe that there were terrorists hiding under every desk and around every corner so that you could support the war on terror, which continues to this day under the Obama administration, of course, and remains a complete hoax.
The real terrorists are the people on the left who want to take away your right to self-defense.
That is terrifying.
That should be terrifying to every American who believes in the Constitution, who believes in America.
The terrorists are those who want to dominate and control you and take away your freedoms.
That is real terror, and that is the political left.
Now, truth number three.
Is that even when you talk about banning guns as people on the left love to do, they say we should ban guns.
But they don't really mean ban guns from everyone.
They mean selectively ban the guns from private citizens while concentrating the guns in the hands of the government.
Isn't that interesting?
Because that's not really getting rid of the guns.
All it is is imbalancing the power of who has guns versus who doesn't.
And if you want to go back into history and look at what happens when a government has all the guns and the people don't have any guns because they've been disarmed, look no further than Nazi Germany.
Adolf Hitler was a big anti-gun guy.
He wanted to eliminate gun ownership from the Jewish people and he successfully did so.
And then, of course, he committed mass murder and genocide.
It was so much easier to do that because the Jews had turned in their guns.
So, well, not all of them.
There were some who resisted.
And to this day, there is a group called Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, the JPFO, that continues to insist that Jewish people should always have the right to self-defense precisely because governments sometimes go bad and start committing genocide.
And if you don't believe that that's ever happened, then I'm sorry, you don't know anything about actual world history and you have no business talking about anything until you go back to school and get an education.
The truth is that governments have gone bad so many times throughout human history that just in the last century, about 262 million people were mass murdered by their governments, and almost all of them were told to give up their guns first so that they could be more easily murdered.
So, stay with me.
We'll be right back after this break as we continue with the Health Ranger Report.
Alright, welcome back to the Health Ranger Report.
So, if you look at history, you understand that gun bans always precede mass genocide.
It's much easier for governments to kill people when they are disarmed.
And that even those who are calling for the elimination of guns from society, they don't really mean that.
Because they don't say that police officers shouldn't have guns, or that government officials, like FBI agents, they don't say that they shouldn't have guns.
No, the anti-gun people are actually pro-gun in the hands of the government.
So what happens when you have guns only owned by governments?
You know, I gave an example previously about Adolf Hitler, but you can also look at the American Revolution.
When you look at British rule over the colonies, the king did not want the colonists to be able to have firearms.
Because they could defend themselves, because they could, well, launch a revolution, which is exactly what happened.
America exists as an independent nation today precisely because the colonists were able to manufacture and distribute firearms and fight for their freedoms and their rights, which became the Constitution.
The Constitution that now the political left is trying to destroy because the political left hates America and hates freedom and hates anyone who exercises their freedoms, including the First and Second Amendment.
You know, it's also interesting, if you look at people who claim to be anti-gun, if they have someone breaking into their home at night, what do they do?
Well, they call 911.
And why do they call 911?
Because they want men with guns to show up and solve their problem.
And sometimes it could be women with guns too, because many police officers are women.
But you can bet that both men and women carry guns.
Why do they carry guns?
Because they use guns To de-escalate and stop violence and stop crime.
Now this is a very important point, and this is truth number four of my talk here.
Guns are used by ethical people to stop violence, to stop crime, to protect property, and to save lives.
This is why police carry guns.
Now if guns were automatically bad by themselves and could only destroy and damage, then why would every city in America issue guns to police officers?
Do they want police officers to run around and just randomly kill people and destroy property and shoot up the place?
Just commit mass murder because that's what guns do according to people on the left?
Well, no, of course not.
Police officers are to issue guns for the precise tactical purpose of de-escalating violence.
Using a gun as a threat of violence in order to change the mind of someone who is about to commit violence.
Now, I've trained with police officers in Arizona quite extensively.
And I'm trained in handgun combat.
And this is why those of you who are police officers out there listening to this, you recognize this is the same language that they teach you in your classes at the academy.
This is the same thing.
That firearms are used to de-escalate violence.
And the job of a police officer is to come onto the scene, assess the situation, accurately assess it, and then attempt to de-escalate the violence.
The presence of a firearm can de-escalate violence without it ever needing to be fired.
In fact, the last thing a police officer ever wants to do is pull the trigger and shoot somebody.
They hate doing that.
They don't want to do it.
There's risk to everyone, including society, because bullets sometimes go through people and keep going and damage innocent people on the other side.
Also, if you're involved in a shooting, you're going to be investigated.
Internal Affairs is going to have a look at you.
You're probably going to be off the job for a while.
You might be suspended.
You might even be sued by the family of the person you shot, even if it was a justified shooting.
So police officers do not just randomly run around shooting people simply because they have guns.
They use guns to de-escalate violence.
Now, concealed carry holders carry guns for precisely the same reason.
And every concealed carry class that takes place teaches gun owners and those who carry firearms to de-escalate violence wherever possible.
I have been through many, many concealed carry classes and tactical handgun classes, tactical shotgun classes, and so on.
I have never had an instructor tell me First thing you should do is whip out the gun and start firing.
No, never happens.
This is not how the gun culture operates, despite what you have been told by the fake, lying, hoax mainstream media and Saturday Night Live skits.
Which is all more propaganda.
In truth, every class teaches you to assess the situation.
If you're a concealed carry holder, you're operating with a similar mode of a police officer yet I don't know if you knew that, but that's absolutely the truth.
So private citizens are there to protect their life and their property, and if they're in a public place, they may choose to protect the lives of others or to stop a felony crime in progress by using a firearm.
At least that's the case in Texas and in many other states, but not every state.
Not every state allows you to use a firearm to stop a felony, but many states do.
So even people who carry guns are there to de-escalate, to prevent violence, to prevent crime.
The reason this is not obvious to everyone in society is because you don't see people who are carrying concealed firearms.
If you did, if you had x-ray vision, if you're a Superman, and you could see all the guns that people are carrying...
You would see all kinds of guns all around you in society, at the airport, on the streets, in restaurants, at the library, everywhere.
People are carrying guns all around you like you can't believe.
Trust me, I know because I'm one of them.
It's legal in Texas to carry a firearm in the airport.
So we do.
We carry firearms in the airport where it is legal outside the security area with extra ammo.
Typically, if I'm walking through the airport, I'm probably carrying more ammunition than the police officer that's stationed at the airport.
And you know what?
That police officer is happy to have me there.
Happy to have concealed carry citizens in the airport with extra firearms.
You know why?
Because if something goes wrong, if there is an actual terrorist that shows up with an AK-47 and starts firing away, you better believe that that police officer will welcome all the help he or she can get from the citizens of Texas who will blow that terrorist away.
And I'm not trying to sound macho.
I'm just saying, people of Texas, don't put up with that kind of nonsense.
They are armed and they're carrying all around you.
You don't even know it.
So if you're afraid of guns, it's a totally irrational fear because there are actually guns all around you all the time.
On the person, on the bodies of people.
I should say in the possession of people who could, if they wanted to, if they were crazy, they could pull out their guns and start shooting away and killing innocent victims, but they don't.
You know why?
Because most gun owners are ethical, very well-balanced, responsible citizens who are there to stop violence, protect life, and use a firearm in self-defense if that is necessary.
So this angle of gun ownership is almost never explained in the mainstream media for the simple reason that the media wants to demonize gun and demonize gun owners and they don't want you to be able to defend yourself because they don't like self-reliance.
They're attacking guns for the same reason that they attack home gardening And raw milk.
They don't want you to be able to grow your own food.
They don't want you to be self-reliant with food or water or self-defense or finances or anything.
They want you dependent on the power grid for your electricity.
They want you dependent on the government food stamp system for your food.
They want you dependent on 911 and the police for your self-defense.
They want you dependent on Big Pharma and Obamacare for your medicine.
You are a fool if you go for any of that stuff.
you are wise if you become more self-reliant and do not depend on those centralized systems of control and oppression.
You are more free if you are more self-reliant.
And that means being self-reliant with food, medicine, finances, and self-defense and other areas of course, as well.
But those, those are some really probably the big four.
Now let's move on to stunning truth.
Number five, And this gets into history.
This truth is that an armed citizenry is the only thing that prevents big government from becoming a runaway dictatorship because throughout world history all nations tend toward tyranny.
And if you look at the history of the human experience on our planet, most people, most of the population that has lived and died throughout human history has lived under tyranny.
They've lived under oppressive regimes where people were disarmed and the power of weaponry, whether it was swords, crossbows, spears, or rifles, was concentrated in the hands of the corrupt governments, kings, leaders, tyrants, dictators.
And if you look around the world today at the most corrupt, most evil nations, they are all nations where firearms are controlled only by the corrupt government and the population is disarmed.
Look at North Korea.
The most evil regime on the planet is North Korea and it's a country where the citizens are not allowed to own guns.
Where they are absolutely controlled by a dictatorial tyrant, well, a totalitarian named Kim Jong-un.
And all the guns and firepower are concentrated under his control because that is how he maintains the oppression.
If you look around the world at the history of freedom, you find that the United States is a very unique place with a unique successful track record based on individuality and the decentralization of power Combined with this power of the Second Amendment, so that the citizenry is armed, not for national defense, but so that the people can defend themselves from an overzealous, corrupt, tyrannical government.
Because those governments always rise up, and they always, throughout world history, have committed genocide against their own populations.
That is the greatest threat to all of our lives, is bad government.
Stay with me.
I'll be back after this break with more.
Continuing with the Health Ranger Report, just finishing up the thought in the last segment about corrupt governments.
People on the left, they're poor students.
They really don't understand anything at all about history.
They seem to hate history.
They hate America's founders.
They hate the principles of liberty.
They want to be hip and cool and popular and they hate inanimate objects like guns because, I don't know, they're afraid of them or they've been brainwashed to be afraid of them.
They don't realize that throughout world history, governments always become corrupt and tyrannical, and that governments have to be kept in check by the citizenry.
You know, it's often said that when a government fears the citizenry, you have liberty.
When the citizenry fears the government, you have tyranny, or some paraphrased version of that.
And it's true.
An armed citizenry is the last stopgap measure that prevents a government from going all-out crazy, arresting all the political opponents, doing anything they want accidentally, And look, we are so close to that right now.
Remember the Obama administration used the IRS as a weapon to target conservative non-profits.
Right now, today, the government is used as a weapon for selective investigation, selective enforcement of political targets.
Every adult in America today commits three felonies a day, according to a book called Three Felonies a Day, by the way, written by a criminologist who says there are so many laws And regulations that you can't even exist in society today without committing three felonies a day.
And because of that, it is up to the federal government to selectively enforce these laws against their intended opponents.
Firearms are the only thing that balance the power between citizens and their government.
It doesn't mean that those citizens are crazy gun nuts or Terrorists or domestic extremists, no.
They're everyday upstanding citizens who just want to keep society free and fair and just.
That's it.
They believe in justice.
They believe in liberty.
In fact, they have the highest ideals of anyone in society.
We live under a system of absolute criminal corruption.
And that is why they want to take away the guns.
That's why Hillary Clinton is so anti-gun, because she is the biggest and most despicable criminal to ever seek the office of the presidency.
She is an absolute tyrant.
She would destroy this country.
She not only would have her political enemies killed, she has already had political enemies killed in the past.
Go back to the 1990s, look at Vince Foster, look at the history of the Clinton administration.
Any person who would put someone like that into power in a government that has a monopoly on firearms is really wishing for the United States to become like North Korea.
It wouldn't be long after that before you would have concentration camps of political prisoners, mass executions, rounding up of anyone who spoke Poorly about the government, just like in China.
If you write something on the internet critical of the government, guess what?
You disappear.
And they harvest your organs.
Yep, this has come out.
This is true.
They harvest the organs of political prisoners and sell them on the black market.
And earn money from that.
It's a sick, demented, evil operation, but they've got a steady supply of fresh organs from political prisoners who spoke out on the internet because China is a country where the citizens can't fight back.
China doesn't have a constitution like ours.
They don't have the Bill of Rights.
They don't have the freedom of speech or freedom to own firearms.
And the more people realize that, The more people wake up to the reality that Americans are not going to give up their firearms ever, ever.
There's a large contingent of Americans talking about modern-day soldiers, many, many veterans, rural farmers, people who are target shooters, police officers and retired law enforcement, many others, they will never give up their guns.
Period.
They would rather be killed, they would rather die, I should say, they would rather die fighting for their freedoms than to give up their guns and be shot in the back of the head kneeling on the edge of a ditch with a government murdering them in a case of genocide like we've seen over and over again throughout human history.
So don't expect people in America to ever give up their guns.
There may be a few weasels in the cities who will turn their guns in because they're told it's the right thing to do, or maybe some widows whose husbands passed away and now they don't know what to do with the guns, so they turn them over to a government.
But the real Americans will never turn in their guns, period.
They will die defending their rights rather than turn them in.
And that is what makes America strong.
And that is the only thing preventing the government from becoming the ultimate totalitarian dictatorship.
If you don't realize that, then...
I'm sorry, you're not informed.
Alright, next point.
Truth number six.
Is that gun-free zones are the most idiotic idea ever.
And it just shows the loopy lunacy of the political left.
That they think that a sign...
We'll somehow stop a mad shooter bent on committing murder.
That if a murderer wants to kill a bunch of people, they think that somehow that murderer encountering a sign that says gun-free zone, that that murderer is going to say, oh, well I can't enter this school because it's a gun-free zone, and what do you know?
I'm carrying a gun.
They think a sign is going to stop someone?
You see, the fact that there even are such things as gun-free zones perfectly demonstrates the absolute idiocy of the political left on this issue of gun control.
They are afraid of a physical object.
They think guns come to life on their own and that guns leap out of pockets and holsters and just start randomly shooting people on their own as if they're magical pieces of steel.
Like literal magic.
Like animated objects.
Otherwise, if they didn't believe that, why would you have a gun-free zone?
They are afraid of the gun itself, the object itself.
Well, I'll tell you something.
Guns don't shoot people by themselves.
Guns can't aim.
Guns can't reload.
Guns don't shoot.
Guns can't walk or talk or sense the environment.
Guns are just tools.
The person who pulls the trigger is the one who makes the decision.
And if that person is going to violate federal law and state law and moral law by committing mass murder, do you think they're going to be stopped by some painted text on a sign?
That is idiocy.
To believe that a gun-free zone sign is going to stop someone is complete lunacy.
And that's why almost every shooting that happens today...
Happens in a gun-free zone.
Because the shooters are not stupid.
They may be insane, but they're not stupid.
And they're asking themselves, huh, where can we pull off a mass shooting and not have someone returning fire?
And the answer is, ding, gun-free zones!
So that's where they go.
Gun-free zones might as well be called free-range shooting galleries for the criminally insane people.
That's really what they are.
They're shooting galleries for crazy people who want to go down in history as mass murderers.
And if they didn't have a gun, they could do it another way.
They could drive a car through an elementary school or something.
They could set off explosives or Bring a sword and start chopping.
I mean, there are lots of ways for crazy people to commit mass murder if that's what they're intent on doing.
It is up to us as responsible citizens to stop them.
And how do you stop them?
Well, you already know the answer, even if you're a liberal.
You call 911.
Why?
To bring men and women with guns.
Why?
So that they will use the guns to stop the violence.
Right?
Why do you have a SWAT team?
To use kinetic energy to stop the violence.
To stop the shooter.
That's why they exist.
That's why you have a SWAT team.
Why do cops carry guns?
Again, same reason, to stop the shooter.
So, if gun-free zones worked, then all the shootings that we would be seeing would be happening in non-gun-free zones, or in other words, gun-carry zones.
But that's not where they're happening.
They're happening in gun-free zones because, again, gun-free zones are advertisements that this is a free-range shooting gallery for crazy people who want to commit mass murder.
So, if you hate your children, Send them to a school that has a sign that says gun-free zone because they are more likely to be killed there than they are to be killed in a school that has armed guards.
If you really love your children, you should support the idea of armed guards and armed teachers and armed staff members of the school who pass the background checks, who have been fingerprinted, who have filled out the forms and undergone the training and who are packing some heat to stop the damn shooters from killing your kids.
If you really love your kids, you should send them to a school where the staff members are armed and there are no silly gun-free zone signs.
In fact, you should have a different sign.
You should say, heavily armed zone.
Like, if you enter here and try to harm our kids, we're going to shoot you and kill you.
Like, that should be the sign.
At every school in America, as far as I'm concerned.
And by the way, there'd be volunteer veterans ready to line up and serve in that role to help protect their country one more time.
Even though they already serve their country overseas, they would gladly help protect schools against crazy shooters.
All you've got to do is ask them to sign up.
Let them pass a background check.
Let them get training.
And they can protect our kids for free.
Wouldn't even cost you anything in society to protect our children.
But no!
The loony leftist liberals are so insane and so stupid on this issue, they're afraid of the gun, so they put up gun-free zone signs and then they can't figure out why their kids are getting all shot up in the schools.
Well, it's because you're too stupid to realize that you don't defend yourself against crazy shooters with signs.
You defend yourself with firearms.
Duh!
I don't know how many times we have to keep covering this before people on the left will ever get it.
Actually, they'll never get it.
They're too stupid to figure it out.
They're so afraid of the gun that they're willing to sacrifice their children's lives instead of actually protecting them with armed guards at the public schools, which is what the answer should be.
It's just insane.
And so they lose their children from time to time.
They should do something to protect them.
Instead of just sacrificing them to the next crazed shooter that's on psychiatric drugs and wants to go down in history as a mass murderer.
It's insane.
We've got one more segment left to wrap this up.
I'll be right back.
Welcome back.
In the last segment here, I'm going to cover something I sort of mentioned in the last segment, which is the link to the psychiatric drugs.
In almost every case, including this Christopher Mercer guy, these crazed shooters are on psychiatric drugs or have recently just stopped using psychiatric drugs.
In almost every case, they have a very long history of mental health problems and medication.
Why does this link exist?
almost every school shooting in the last 20 years has this in common.
It's psychiatric drugs.
Well, here's what's going on.
These young males are being drugged by the psychiatric industry, which is itself, by the way, a criminal enterprise, a total racket, total cartel, scientific hoax, no basis in biology.
It is a complete fraud.
The psychiatric industry is an absolute fraud.
So I'll cover that another time.
But what they do is they make money putting kids on drugs.
And they've invented all these fake conditions that they make up.
They They fabricate out of thin air like ADHD or bipolar disorder or whatever, oppositional defiance disorder, ODD. That's what they call it.
Literally, they made that up and it's in the DSM guide, you know, the Bible of psychiatric disorders.
So they make up these fake diseases and then they prescribe drugs to these young kids, usually boys, and then they damage their brains as a result.
But of course, the psychiatric practitioners make money in this process.
They make money as drug dealers.
These kids, meanwhile, their brains get altered by these drugs.
These drugs, by definition, are brain chemistry-altering chemicals.
That is how they claim to work.
They claim to rebalance brain chemistry.
But what they actually do, in the case of, for example, SSRIs and antidepressants, what they actually do is they distance you from reality.
They make you think that you're not in your real world.
They sort of nullify the real world and can cause you to think that you're living out a dream world that isn't even real.
And in the case of young men who are on these drugs for many, many years and who have mental health problems, they will often think, when they're engaged in a school shooting, they will think that they're playing out a video game.
They actually think they're playing a video game.
They're not really in the real world.
And you can see this by their behavior if you look at some of the videos of the school shootings that have happened over the years and I've looked at them.
You see that these young boys are not simply insane in the classical sense.
They are, in fact, in many cases, playing out what they see as a first-person shooter like a video game that just happens to be set in their school and they think they're shooting characters but instead they're actually shooting real people.
So there's a psychiatric drug link to all of this that causes these people to just snap.
Now, psychiatric drugs obviously don't cause everyone to snap.
If they did, society would have already been destroyed because there are so many tens of millions of people on these drugs.
No, they only cause a small percentage to snap, but because so many people are on the drugs, that percentage, in terms of raw numbers, keeps rising.
And this is why we have more and more school shootings Over time, since about the 1990s, because more and more of these kids are put on psychiatric drugs, causing more of them to snap and go crazy and engage in mass killings.
Now so, those who say the problem here is guns are actually avoiding the real problem, the real cause of this, which is the mass medication of mentally imbalanced young men in American society.
We need to look at medication control more than gun control.
Now, of course we don't want guns to get into the hands of people who are mentally deranged and are going to go shoot up a school.
I think everyone agrees on that.
However, Wouldn't it make more sense to stop drugging all of our children as a starting point?
That's easy.
If we stop dosing them up on all of these medications, we can change their minds chemically.
In other words, restore a normal brain balance so that they would not engage in this detached first-person shooting that they think is a video game, but it's actually killing real people in the real world.
We need to look very hard at the medication effect of all of this.
Now, the mainstream media rarely discusses this, almost never.
It's basically a censored story in the mainstream media because they get their funding from the drug companies.
And this is why the media is so rabidly pro-vaccine and pro-medication, because that's where they make their money.
They're not going to attack their key advertisers by telling the truth about the medication link to school shootings.
It's so much easier for them, plus it's their agenda, to try to destroy the Second Amendment and ban all guns by blaming guns for the shootings.
But again, the gun did not by itself march into that school and pull the trigger at anybody.
There was a crazy person, a person who was on mass medications, holding the gun, aiming the gun, and pulling the trigger.
more.
It's that person's mind that made the choice, and that mind has been altered by the medications, by the chemicals.
So we actually have chemically altered mass murderers doing the shootings in these schools.
And until we come to grips with that fundamental truth, We will never solve the school shooting problem in America.
It won't be solved because as long as you have young boys who are mass medicated whose brains are being damaged and distorted by these drugs, they are going to find ways to commit violence.
Whether it's a gun or a knife or a sword or an explosive device or a vehicle or arson or whatever.
You know, if they didn't have a gun, they could build little gasoline bombs or something and blow up classrooms if that's what they were intent on doing.
Because the medication made them crazy and made them so detached that they did not realize they were destroying real human beings and ending real lives.
So there's a mental sickness that is caused by the medication, which is really absurd, it seems, because the medications claim to treat mental disorders, but they actually cause other disorders as side effects.
So, if you look at all of these seven stunning truths to summarize all of this, The big takeaway points here are, in my view, you know, number one, this medication issue.
You've got to stop drugging these young kids and then thinking they're going to be normal.
They're not normal when they're mass medicated with mind-altering drugs, period.
Secondly, we've got to get rid of these totally idiotic gun-free zone signs and just this attitude, this loony, irrational belief that designating something as a gun-free zone is somehow going to magically make mass murderers walk away from those zones.
Of course it isn't.
I mean, even as presidential candidate Ben Carson said, this is a direct quote from him, the left would have you believe that a man who asked Christians to stand up and then executed them one by one would obey new gun laws.
That kind of logic explains many of the problems we find ourselves in today.
Those are Ben Carson's words and he's right.
A gun-free zone sign is really an admission that you're incredibly stupid and you don't understand anything about how the real world works.
You want to protect your kids?
Have signs that say, heavily armed school guards are protecting these kids.
Something like that.
That's how you get the job done.
The other important point in all of this to realize is that people, citizens who carry firearms are citizens who want to protect life and protect property and stop violence.
And it is an armed citizenry that is necessary for a society to remain somewhat free.
If you don't have an armed citizenry, sooner or later you have a tyrannical government that will take over and oppress and intimidate and destroy liberty in society.
You will have, without the Second Amendment, you will have a totalitarian society very, very quickly.
Believe me, if Obama or someone like Hillary Clinton could take away all the guns right now and then follow that with the arrest of political dissidents, they would absolutely do so.
That is what they want.
Total control.
Every person who seeks office like that at those high levels, they want absolute control and that's why they hate firearms and that's why they're constantly plotting to get rid of firearms from the hands of private citizens because that's the only thing that stops them from becoming dictators, which is really their goal.
Inside every liberal is a totalitarian screaming to get out.
And guns are the one thing stopping them from doing so.
And finally, realize that people who own firearms are upstanding, ethical, moral citizens.
They are law-abiding citizens.
They are people who are the most upstanding members of society.
They are people who would help you, who would assist you in an emergency.
They would protect you and defend you in a crisis.
They are people who want to protect children, want to protect senior citizens.
They want to protect life.
They even want to protect unborn life.
It's the gun owners who are opposed to Planned Parenthood chopping up babies for organ harvesting profits.
And isn't it interesting that it's all the anti-gun people who claim they want to protect children in schools who are the ones who are all pro-abortion and partial birth abortions.
They want to chop up babies for their body parts.
So that logic makes no sense.
What?
They don't want to protect children until they get to school and then they want to protect them?
Doesn't work.
A life is a life.
You should protect it at all times, which is what gun owners seek to do.
People who own guns consistently and reliably seek to protect life at all stages.
Those are the kind of people that you should want to have around you.
Those are the kind of people that create a safe society.
The kind of society where your kids aren't getting shot up in the schools.
The kind of society where you have justice and liberty and self-reliance.
And you've got citizens helping law enforcement when needed to stop crazy people from committing violence because that's what good gun owners do.
They help protect and defend the population.
So I hope this has been somewhat educational.
Whether you're anti-gun or pro-gun, I hope you learned something from this.
This is information that you just simply do not get from the mainstream media because they don't want you to know the truth about gun owners and the importance of gun ownership in society.
Even if you don't own guns yourself, you should support that others around you do because they will, when called upon, use them to help defend your life.
So thanks for listening.
This is Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
▲
Export Selection