All Episodes
Previous Next
March 21, 2018 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
13:08
Why did Amazon ban this book about Sandy Hook? Jim Fetzer part 2 of 4
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
and we're back with Jim Fetzer the editor of the book nobody died at Sandy Hook which is suddenly perhaps the most famous book of 2015 because amazon.com has chosen to ban it and And Jim, we were getting into some of the content of the book.
Yes.
And that's fine.
We can cover some of that.
But I want to ask you...
Right now about where this is going.
If Amazon.com decides that it is the Ministry of Truth and that it can decide what you are allowed to read and what you're not allowed to read, then what's next?
They've committed a colossal blunder here, Mike, because the book has gained overwhelmingly more attention than it would have otherwise.
One of the complaints was in the...
Paperback that the pictures aren't in color, which have been prohibitively expensive, but now with a PDF you can see them all in color.
So now you can go to your heart's content and examine every minute detail we talk about in the book but weren't able to show because it would have been too expensive, and now it's reaching an overwhelmingly larger audience than it would have if they'd simply ignored it and left it alone.
Well, that's right.
It's the Streisand effect, as it's called online.
But Americans, I think most people want to read something that they're told you're not allowed to read.
So it's working in your favor.
But, of course, then you're not earning any revenue off of it.
We're not in it for the money.
And the royalties on books like this are really rather modest, all things considered, Mike.
So, you know, that's not a concern.
Getting the truth out.
Actually, this was a spectacular blunder.
by the powers that be to try to inhibit information they didn't want the public to receive several friends who are very astute have observed they never in their wildest dreams imagined we would release it to the public for free.
Yeah, that's a brilliant move on your part, by the way, because now probably instead of, let's say, 10,000 people reading the book, it's probably going to be more like 10 million or beyond.
And even people like myself, this was not really on my radar.
I'd heard things, I'm aware of crisis actors and so on, but this wasn't on my radar until Amazon.com censored it.
Now, here we are doing an interview and I've written about it.
But Your book seems, it's quite, I should say, you know, I can't say that I necessarily agree with all the conclusions of all the authors, but it surely raises a lot of questions.
Like, supposedly there were, what, 400 children evacuated or something?
Yeah, according to the official report, there were 400 and...
And 89 students present that day.
Subtract 20, you got 469.
So where are the photos of all these students?
They don't exist.
You go to the police report, Mike, for the specific locations and times, and we have dash cam footage showing they aren't there.
Some people think you can't prove a negative, but look, here's an illustration.
The claim that there's an elephant in your living room, you can prove that's not true.
Prove there's not an elephant in your living room by just going and looking.
And if there's no presence of an elephant, you're entitled to prove the negative there's no elephant there.
You look at the claim about the evacuation, look at the dash cam footage, there are no children there you're entitled to infer.
There are no children there because there was no evacuation taking place.
And it looks like this one photo that's been widely publicized is just of, what, a dozen kids or something.
And it looks like it was a practice drill in a parking lot.
There are other people standing around just watching it calmly.
It doesn't look like a live evacuation from a shooting.
Mike, this is so important.
I put it on the back cover.
We have two different photographs.
Shannon Hicks of the Newtown B claims to have taken them both on 14 December.
But the temperature then was 28 degrees in the ground.
There was frost.
There's no frosting in the photograph.
Too many leaves on the tree.
Wolfgang believes they were taken in October.
And it was discovering the second photograph that blew their cover because now the kids are in a different sequence.
In one photograph, it's a little girl in a pink sweater and a short skirt.
In the other photograph, a little boy, much larger, in a blue shirt and blue jeans.
So what did they do?
Stop to rearrange the kids in the line during the emergency evacuation from a school?
And Mike, think about this.
What are parents doing there in the first place?
Did someone during the shooting massacre say, I better get on the phone and call some parents to get them down here right away?
They're standing there looking on with their arms crossed.
And actually, if you look deeper into the second photograph, there are two parents in the background who appear to be lounging, lounging at the massacre.
The Obama administration has staged issues like Fast and Furious, where they staged guns being put into the hands of Mexican drug cartels, and they were caught red-handed.
And that was all about gun control, causing gun violence in order to call for gun control.
So we have a contextual scene here of understanding that this administration engages in staged events for political purposes.
That's not even debatable.
And Mike, these are acts of terrorism.
They're intended to instill fear into specific segments of the population.
The murder of 20 kids at San Diego to instill fear into parents.
The Charleston shooting, which also appears to be a fabrication, instill fear into blacks.
The Umpqua college shooting where he asked the students, what's your religion, if they were Christians, he shot them to instill fear into Christians.
All three of these appear to be fabricated cases with a PSYOP objective of terrifying a different segment of the population.
And that, Mike, is the classic definition of terrorism, namely to instill fear into a population and make it more amenable to manipulation and promote a political agenda, which means the Obama administration has been practicing terrorism on the American people.
Well, and it seems like it's even beyond that.
The Obama administration appears to, and this is just my opinion now, this isn't in your book, but my opinion is that the Obama administration seems to be almost...
Wanting America to be invaded, to be overrun by Islamic extremists?
It's almost like Obama is working with the extremists to destroy Western culture.
What could be more obvious than that we need guns to defend ourselves?
They're trying to provoke a war with Russia, so what if Washington is nuked and the government collapses?
What are the American people supposed to do to defend themselves if they don't have guns?
I mean, it's insane.
It's lunatic.
It's utterly irresponsible to try to take guns away from the American people, Mike.
Well, absolutely.
I completely agree with that.
And, you know, I live in Texas, and here in Texas, we are absolutely not going to voluntarily hand over our guns to anyone.
Well, who's going to have guns if the law-abiding citizens give them up?
Well, that's right.
Only the criminals who are used to violating the law, they're not going to give up their guns.
So are we going to have marauding gangs, you know, entering our towns to rape and loot and pillage, where we can't defend ourselves because we don't have any guns?
Something is terribly wrong here, Mike.
The gun control argument, though, has never been based on rational thinking.
It's always been based on emotions, which brings us back to Sandy Hook.
It seems like if your assertion is correct, if this was staged, then it seems like it was scripted to maximize the emotional impact, because that is what gets things moving in America today.
Yes, just like Charleston, Maximize Impact.
You've got nine black people in a church.
Just like the Umpqua shooting in Oregon.
Asking college students what's their religion and shooting them if they're Christians.
These are all fake.
They're all phony, Mike.
They're complete baloney.
And I tell you, this is just completely outrageous.
And I was so incensed about these claims about gun control that I found studies that show that actually, when you take guns away, when you have gun bans, crime goes up.
Yes.
Well, look at Australia.
We have a good example there.
Now, I'm scanning your book.
And again, folks, you can download the PDF at naturalnews.com or talknetwork.com.
And your book has photos of people drilling, at least appearing to depict operatives, drilling the bullet holes in cars and windows in order to stage this.
Yeah, that's right.
In particular in classroom 10, they're drilling three holes in the window there.
They'd actually bash out the window to claim this had come from the inside, but the holes are being drilled from the outside in.
I think we even have one where you can see the aluminum peeled out on the inside.
And when they put pink rods in, Mike, when they put pink rods in, each of those holes is drilled at an exactly 90 degree angle and they're exactly parallel with one another, which is ridiculous if this were real.
Of course.
Right, right.
It seems like if a forensics team that was legitimate with experience in ballistics, for example, went in there, then they would disprove this entire thing.
And isn't that one more reason probably why they demolished the building?
That's right.
That's absolutely right.
And they were required to take lifetime gag orders if they participated in the demolition, so they couldn't talk about anything they saw or did not see, Mike, which would have included no blood in the classroom, no pockmarks or bullets having been fired there.
Lifetime gag orders.
You're probably getting a lot of people curious here who maybe a lot of people listening still think that your book is complete nonsense.
Let's put that out there at least.
But at least their curiosity is raised.
What is the most compelling piece of evidence that you think they should investigate to decide for themselves what's true and what's fiction?
Oh, they can go right on to my blog and just look at a series of the last five blogs I did.
The very first, the fifth most recent is all the evidence that the Sandy Hookah School was closed.
Once you understand it was closed by 2008, all else follows.
There were no students at the school because it had been closed.
There were no students to evacuate.
There were no students to shoot.
It's a nice emotionally neutral question.
Was this an operating school?
The evidence overwhelmingly shows it was not.
And that evidence includes, I already mentioned, the internet connectivity stopped in 2008, the disrepair, and so on.
What else is the evidence that the school was closed?
Well, the condition of the school was deplorable.
You were properly describing it.
It was decrepit inside.
It was just stacked with all kinds of boxes.
Who observed the videos when I published that article or much of the evidence shown here originally said that's what they do with abandoned schools.
They use them for storage.
They're decrepit inside and out.
There was an exit that was a wooden walkway.
No wheelchair could access it.
And a PSF steel piping sticking out.
A little kid could lose an eye by running into it.
This school was a disgrace.
We went to Sandy Hook, and I tell you, that's an upscale community, Mike, and we visited a soccer field.
Every blade of grass was carefully manicured.
But at Sandy Hook, this was despicable.
So when I went with Wolfgang and we appeared before the Newtown School Board, I said, when were their parents notified that their children were attending school in a toxic waste dump?
Well, it's very intriguing, Jim.
We've got about 30 seconds left.
Anything you want to add before we wrap this up?
Check out the book.
It's rock solid.
A friend lent it to a fellow worker who read a third of it and said, this book is so powerful, it's so convincing, it's irrefutable.
All right, folks.
Well, there you have it.
Directly from the editor, Jim Fetzer.
And the book is Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
You can find that downloadable PDF for free right now at naturalnews.com and talknetwork.com.
Check out the book and decide for yourself.
That's all we ask.
Be a critical thinker and look at the evidence and then decide.
Don't let the mainstream media tell you what to believe and just blindly, obediently believe it.
Thank you, Jim, for joining us.
Thank you for listening to this episode of the Health Ranger Report.
Please support us by visiting our online store at store.naturalnews.com, where you can find the world's cleanest laboratory-validated superfoods, nutritional supplements, personal care products, shampoo, chemical-free products, just about everything for your home and body and health that you might want, including supplements for your pets as well.
Everything is laboratory validated in our forensic food lab, and we don't sell something unless it tests clean.
I think we're the only online reseller to do this really extensive testing of everything that we sell.
If we don't like the lab test results, meaning if it's not really, really clean, including with heavy metals, then we don't sell it, period.
We have free shipping on orders over $99 and a satisfaction guarantee on everything that we offer.
▲
Export Selection