Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 19, 2018 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

10:38

Science PROPAGANDISTS falsely claim "consensus"

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Mike Adams.
	The food companies get rich selling people all these toxins, and then the drug companies get rich treating the diseases.
	The Health Ranger Report.
	And then everybody throws their hands up in the air, we can't afford health care.
	Yeah, because you're eating death.
	It's time for the Health Ranger Report.
	And now from naturalnews.com, here's Mike Adams.
	It's always laughable to me when propagandists invoke the word science to say that their views have a monopoly consensus.
	Because we don't even really have a functioning scientific dialogue in our society today.
	And those who claim to have a monopoly on science are the biggest propagandists and biggest liars in the media, like Neil deGrasse Tyson or Bill Nye or even Al Gore, Elon Musk.
	Welcome to my show!
	Bill Gates and so on.
	President Obama, for that matter.
	They all say that the science is settled, and yet it isn't settled, and their science is bogus.
	And just as a great example of that, Bill Nye has been changing his science about genetics and transgenderism.
	Back in the 1990s, Bill Nye, the science guy, said that gender is determined by chromosomes, XX and XY chromosomes.
	Today, 20 years later, he says, no, gender is determined by a choice, by a feeling.
	By an emotion, not genetics.
	So on Netflix, they had to go back and edit out the genetics part of his series from the 1990s.
	So if Bill Nye is the science guy, and if his science is always correct, then why did it change in just 20 years?
	Did the laws of science change in 20 years?
	Did genetics change in 20 years?
	Was physics revolutionized?
	To the point where the laws that we thought were true in the 1990s have been broken in terms of gender expression chromosomes now, just 20 years later?
	No, of course not.
	The laws of science and genetics have not changed.
	What has changed is Bill Nye's opinion.
	Bill Nye's interpretation.
	And why is that?
	It's because he's human, just like everybody else, and he doesn't have any special access to a monopoly of divine truth.
	And what he's saying today could be just as subject to change as what he said 20 years ago.
	You know, what all of these science totalitarians have forgotten, especially Neil deGrasse Tyson, who is a science tyrant, what they've all forgotten is to be humble.
	They've forgotten that Mother Nature is more wise and more complex and has more technology than any human mind can ever grasp or even hope to replicate.
	Humility is lost in the sciences today.
	They've forgotten to be willing to listen To dissenting points of view or contradictory data that might go against their current belief system.
	They've forgotten that science is a process of discovery.
	And in the process of discovery, you always learn new things.
	And if you ever get to a point in so-called science where you think you know everything, then you're not a scientist anymore.
	You're a dogmatist.
	You are a cultist.
	And that's what...
	Neil Tyson and Bill Nye and all of these other so-called scientists, this is what they have become.
	Scientism cultists.
	They are actually working in the cult of scientism, you might call it.
	They are not engaged in real scientific processes anymore.
	They have abandoned that in order to promote their dogma, their propaganda.
	And on issues like vaccines, you never...
	This is where you get the most...
	Insane propaganda of all.
	This is where scientists, so-called scientists, who are promoting vaccines, this is where they abandon every rule of science.
	They abandon the rules of evidence and discovery.
	They abandon all common sense, all of their training and education, and they just become dogmatists.
	The high priest of the vaccine cult.
	And you must bow down to the obedience of the vaccine cult, or you too will be called anti-science.
	And this is also true with climate change.
	So Neil deGrasse Tyson and others like that, they say, well, people who disagree with us don't believe in science.
	Oh, really?
	Well, then you don't believe in chemistry because carbon dioxide is part of the photosynthesis process that all plants require, or at least green chlorophyll plants require, to survive.
	And if you take away carbon dioxide, you kill all life on the planet, except maybe anaerobic microbes could still survive, but you kill plants, you kill animals, you kill humans.
	The planet becomes a dead planet without CO2. So you can't be a scientist if you're at war with carbon.
	We are carbon-based life forms.
	Almost everything that matters in terms of supporting life is made out of carbon, including all the molecules in hemp, you know, THC and CBD, different cannabinoids.
	They're all made out of carbon.
	Vitamin C is made out of carbon.
	The anti-cancer nutrients are The nutrients in essential oils are made out of carbon.
	Everything that matters in terms of supporting health from food or medicine or herbs is made out of carbon.
	Neil deGrasse Tyson hates carbon, which means he doesn't understand the basics of chemistry.
	He probably doesn't even know what a carbon chain is.
	I guess he just erased that whole part of education.
	Well, he's not even a chemist.
	That's not his background.
	I think he's an astrophysicist, if I'm not mistaken.
	He probably doesn't even know how to count the number of double bonds in a carbon-based molecule.
	He doesn't know.
	And yet, he's out there espousing the destruction of carbon dioxide as a way to save the planet?
	No, it would murder the planet.
	You see, these people are science totalitarians, and they're dangerous.
	Because they don't know what they're talking about.
	They have no idea.
	And if you're wondering, well, how do you know that I know what I'm talking about?
	I'm just, I'm confirming the entire history of chemistry.
	The entire history of chemistry and botany.
	Go look at any chemistry book.
	All of the plant-based molecules that matter are all carbon-based molecules.
	Where do they get the carbon?
	You don't have to take my word for it.
	Ask any botanist.
	Ask any chemist.
	Ask them, where do plants get carbon?
	Really, seriously, go to your local university, find a chemist, find any scientist, find any botanist, and ask them, where do plants get the carbon that they use to make the molecules that keep them alive or that Serve as nutrients in medicine.
	They will tell you, if they know anything, oh, well, that comes from carbon dioxide.
	I mean, where else do plants get the carbon from?
	They don't magically make it.
	It's not like a magic wand, like the way Bill Nye thinks men turn into women by waving a magic wand over their genitals.
	No, plants don't magically create carbon.
	They get it from the air.
	Where did you think it came from?
	You know, Where does vitamin C come from in an orange?
	Do you think there's a vitamin C fairy that just runs around injecting oranges with vitamin C? No!
	The tree gets the carbon out of the air, combines it with hydrogen, combines it with oxygen, and it can get both of those things out of the water, by the way, and plus there's oxygen in the air, about 20% in atmosphere as well.
	They can get all of these things out of air or water and They tear them apart.
	They disassemble the molecules and they reassemble them through chemistry to create vitamin C or to create cannabinoids or to create THC or to create curcumin in turmeric root or to create anti-cancer nutrients.
	Seriously, people, where did you think the carbon came from?
	How do you think plants build leaves?
	How do you think they make stems and seeds?
	These are all carbon-based systems.
	They're getting the carbon out of the atmosphere.
	And yet, I'm willing to bet Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn't even know that.
	He would get an F in high school science.
	Because these people are science morons, and they're totalitarians, and they insist that they know everything when, in truth, they know next to nothing about real science, real chemistry, carbon dioxide, botany, plant chemistry, you know, all of these things that really matter when we're talking about CO2. So don't listen to the science totalitarians.
	Listen to those who respect Mother Nature and who know that Mother Nature is more wise and more resourceful and more intelligent than not just any one man or woman, but any civilization based on mankind.
	We, humans, can't even come close to approaching the wisdom of Mother Nature.
	And Mother Nature tells us that plants need carbon dioxide.
	If we had higher carbon dioxide, we would have more trees, more forests, more food, more plants.
	That's the truth.
	It's a truth that's reflected throughout nature.
	You don't have to believe me.
	Just go out into nature.
	Look at what's out there.
	It's all made out of carbon, people.
	It's all carbon.
	Carbon-based life.
	That's what our planet is known for.
	Water and carbon.
	That's what Earth is.
	It's a giant water planet with carbon-based life.
	Carbon's everywhere.
	If you reject carbon, you reject life.
	It's unreal that people don't know this yet.
	In any case, I hope you're learning as you listen to these Health Ranger Science podcasts.
	Hope you find them interesting.
	You can hear more of them at healthrangerscience.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Learn more at healthrangerreport.com.
	Thank you for watching.
	If you want to support our mission, visit us at healthrangersstore.com for the world's largest selection of lab-verified superfood and nutritional products for healthy living.

▲