March 14, 2018 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
13:13
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| We're really living through a revolution in science. | |
| And many of us, like myself, are on the front lines of it, so we see it every day. | |
| But I think many people out there also see it as well. | |
| They feel it. | |
| They understand that the old system, the status quo science, is crumbling. | |
| They see that the monopolies are crumbling. | |
| They see that science is becoming empowered. | |
| It's becoming more grassroots. | |
| It's going into the hands of individuals who care about humanity. | |
| A lot of people ask me, what's the difference really between the old science and the new science, the new revolutionary grassroots science? | |
| And it really comes down to just two main points. | |
| The old science status quo was all about centralized controls. | |
| It's really corporate science, which is fake science. | |
| I mean, corporate science isn't really science at all. | |
| They alter the data. | |
| They commit scientific fraud. | |
| They get the results they want in order to encourage their profits. | |
| So you talk about the old-school science. | |
| It's really run by powerful, evil corporations. | |
| You talk about the pharmaceutical industry, the psychiatric drugging of children, vaccines with mercury in them that poison children, genetic engineering, the biotech industry, and the pesticide industry, pushing poisons, glyphosate, herbicides, pesticides. | |
| Into the entire food supply that's poisoning people, causing cancer, causing Alzheimer's and so on. | |
| That's the main characteristic of the old system of science, corporate-run science. | |
| It's fake science. | |
| It's poison science. | |
| It's destroying humanity and destroying the environment. | |
| And it's all about, for them, greed and making money. | |
| That's how you can tell. | |
| It's all about their profits. | |
| Well, the new science, the science that I'm part of, is a revolution in human understanding. | |
| It's about decentralization of scientific knowledge and scientific methods and even laboratories. | |
| You know, now we're seeing labs like mine, independent science labs that aren't tied to universities, they aren't tied to governments, they aren't funded by big powerful corporations. | |
| And they produce science in the interest of the public. | |
| It's all about the public good and public knowledge and sharing information with transparency. | |
| That's what we do at CWC Labs and that's really indicative of this revolution in science. | |
| So it's about decentralization. | |
| And that scares the old guard of corporate-run science. | |
| They can't stand to give up their monopolies on science, so they attack. | |
| They attack independent scientists. | |
| They attack me. | |
| They attack my publications. | |
| They attack anyone, actually, anyone who thinks critically And wants to empower individuals and wants to decentralize science and rip away that monopoly and put knowledge back into the hands of human beings to empower humanity and help move humanity forward with scientific understanding rather than holding it back like the corporations do. | |
| They suppress. | |
| Knowledge of, for example, nutritional therapies. | |
| They suppress the knowledge of botanical medicine, herbal medicine. | |
| You know, all of these areas that can help humanity and prevent disease and actually prevent suffering and lower health care costs. | |
| All of these things, they hurt the profits of the drug companies and the chemotherapy companies. | |
| So they're more about suppressing knowledge and using the label of science to produce fake science that prevents humanity from moving forward. | |
| But there's something else that's very indicative of grassroots science or the new scientific revolution. | |
| And that is that instead of focusing on poison, which is what corporate science focuses on, you know, pesticides, mercury and vaccines, chemotherapy, things that are killing you and killing humanity, we in the independent science community, we are focusing on healing. | |
| We're avoiding toxins. | |
| So we focus on environmental science. | |
| How do we get the heavy metals out of the food supply? | |
| How do we avoid toxic chemotherapy? | |
| Are there natural alternatives that can prevent cancer or even treat cancer that don't kill you in the process? | |
| What about the issue of mercury in dental amalgam, dental fillings? | |
| That mercury poisons your body. | |
| It poisons the developing fetus in pregnant women. | |
| It also poisons the environment. | |
| Even after you're dead, if you're cremated, that mercury vapor goes into the atmosphere and it goes on to poison everything downstream, downwind, because you had that poison in your mouth and now it's been turned into vapor and put into the atmosphere. | |
| So we're all about halting the poisons, including the agricultural poisons, the glyphosate, the atrazine, the pesticides, herbicides. | |
| These are all extremely toxic to humanity and the environment. | |
| And so it is us who are running the independent new revolution of science who are bringing out the truth about, hey, these pesticides are in these foods, or there's glyphosate in your breakfast cereal, for example, or you're going to find heavy metals in your protein smoothie, which is an area that we did a lot of research in, for example. | |
| The truth about science is that any idea that claims to be rooted in science which cannot survive critical questions isn't science at all. | |
| It's just dogma. | |
| It's just propaganda. | |
| And so when I ask simple, basic chemistry questions like, hey, what about this ethyl mercury that's in vaccines? | |
| This looks toxic. | |
| Why should we be injecting a child with sometimes more than 100 micrograms? | |
| of this toxic substance in a very short period of time. | |
| To even ask that question today gets you branded anti-science. | |
| But by who? | |
| By those who are pushing fake science. | |
| Because they can't handle questions. | |
| They can't handle a debate. | |
| They can't handle a conversation. | |
| You know, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | |
| put out a $100,000 reward for anybody to come up with a single scientific study that would show thimerosal, the mercury preservative, is safe to inject into children in vaccines. | |
| Nobody's claimed that reward. | |
| There's not a single study. | |
| There is no science behind it. | |
| It's complete fraud. | |
| If there were, why wouldn't somebody step forward and claim the $100,000? | |
| You know, the truth is they have no science. | |
| All they have is dogma and propaganda. | |
| And that's not science. | |
| So when you hear a lot of corporations or even mainstream media outlets and they're always invoking science, just insert the word fake in front of that because they're really pushing fake science. | |
| It's not real science. | |
| You know, real science doesn't come out of monopolist corporations. | |
| Real science is far more likely to be found in grassroots, bottom-up science efforts that are conducted in the interests of humanity rather than the interests of corporate profits. | |
| Our goal is to help the planet heal and to help humanity heal. | |
| Whereas the old guard science, the corporate-run science, is all about exploiting your suffering and your disease for their profit. | |
| So it's about poisoning versus healing, which is the new science revolution. | |
| And as this is happening, of course, it's a little bit hilarious. | |
| The old guard is just flailing about, desperate to try to maintain the monopoly of their narrative. | |
| You know, for years and years they attacked herbs and said, oh, there's no such thing as herbs that can prevent disease. | |
| Or they attacked nutrition and they said, there's no such thing as a nutrient that can prevent cancer. | |
| There's no such thing as an anti-cancer food. | |
| I mean, it's absurd. | |
| Everybody knows now. | |
| The things I've been saying for over a decade, everybody knows they're true now. | |
| Of course there are anti-cancer foods. | |
| You can go in a grocery store and you can literally prevent cancer with the different pigments and the different nutrients and everything from celery to oranges to beets and onions and garlic and cabbage. | |
| It would be almost impossible not to find an anti-cancer food in the produce section in your grocery store. | |
| And yet, if you go back, you know, just 10 years, you see all these, you know, these status quo science quacks running around saying, oh, there's no such thing as a cancer treatment except for chemotherapy, which kills more people than it saves. | |
| So, you know, things are turning very rapidly. | |
| That's what's beautiful about this process. | |
| That's why I feel so blessed to be part of this revolution, this revolution of awakening. | |
| We're watching the old guard crumble and panic, and we're watching new people grow up and learn and become empowered about all these areas of scientific knowledge that have been denied to them because of the science monopolies that have been in place for so many years. | |
| And I say, you know, it's time to end those monopolies. | |
| It's time to really set humanity free. | |
| It's time to set science free. | |
| It's time to unleash a real revolution in scientific understanding. | |
| Sooner or later, it's going to be universally recognized as true, the things that I'm saying now. | |
| You know, you can imagine 20 years from now, medicine, you know, every doctor is going to be taught, no, you should never inject a child with mercury. | |
| That would be stupid. | |
| Yeah, I mean, I'm saying that today. | |
| I've been saying that for over a decade. | |
| And the vaccine industry has been, you know, like the tobacco industry. | |
| They tried to deny year after year that tobacco smoke caused lung cancer or heart disease. | |
| And it was absurd. | |
| They even tried to say it wasn't addictive. | |
| You know, it's the big tobacco denialism that is really behind the vaccine industry today, or the GMO industry, or the pesticide industry, you name it. | |
| They're all, they're just denialists, they're just propagandists, just like big tobacco. | |
| No different. | |
| In fact, in many cases they are the exact same people. | |
| It's the same front groups that used to run the big tobacco denialism who are now running the biotech denialism. | |
| Literally the same people. | |
| But if you fast forward a few years, you're going to see that everything that I've laid out In terms of mercury being damaging to children, in terms of glyphosate being damaging to human biology and the environment, the gender-bender effects of atrazine, the brain-damaging effects of different pesticides and herbicides, this is going to be widely established as accepted fact, no question about it. | |
| It's been that way for every revolutionary thinker, for every scientific revolutionary throughout history, from Einstein to Copernicus, Galileo, Mickelson or Bohr or Jenner for that matter. | |
| You go throughout the history of science, medicine, physics, atomic physics, astrophysics. | |
| Every person who was ahead of their time sort of had to suffer by living in a society where they're surrounded by ignorant scientists and ignorant academics. | |
| And they just have to wait for society to catch up to their knowledge and their ideas, their understanding of nature and the universe. | |
| And I'm in no different of a situation. | |
| It's just that... | |
| Because of the internet today, people like myself and many other individuals, we're being so much more effective at educating the public and teaching people the truth about the toxicity of mercury or the toxicity of glyphosate or real science, how to use laboratory science, you know, mass spec instrumentation for analyses, all of these kinds of things that I teach. | |
| We're so effective that we are sort of accelerating the schedule of awakening and that really angers the status quo. | |
| They don't like that at all. | |
| It doesn't matter because the beautiful thing about all of this is that the truth always wins in the end. | |
| And I stand for truth. | |
| I stand for real science. | |
| I stand for protecting children from mercury injections. | |
| I stand for protecting our planet from the toxic pesticides and herbicides that damage the environment, that contaminate our food, that damage human brains and damage the neurological development of children, for example. | |
| all of these things that I stand for will hopefully soon be accepted as almost an obvious fact, an obvious scientific fact, like gravity is today, or the idea that, you know, the earth is not the center of the universe, but rather the sun is the center of our solar system, and the the earth is not the center of the universe, but rather the sun is the That's accepted as a common fact today, yet many, many years ago that was considered, you know, heresy, that was considered anti-science. | |
| And it took time for society to finally embrace this idea that we now think of as totally obvious, And it's going to be the same thing with mercury and vaccines or the toxic effects of over-medication of children, psychiatric drugging, the environmental pollution effects of pharmaceutical factories, the contamination of water supply, bio-sludge, contamination of farm soils, all of these things. | |
| It's going to become obvious. | |
| that, you know, oh my God, we got to stop poisoning humanity if we hope to have a future. | |
| Support our films for humanity. | |
| Thank you. | |
| Visit healthrangerstore.com. |
Export Selection