Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 14, 2018 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:02:42

Health Ranger interviews SGT Report founder on CENSORSHIP

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Mike Adams.
	Humanity has become domineering.
	It has become dangerous.
	It has become arrogant.
	It's kind of like the infant putting his or her hand on a hot stove.
	The Health Ranger Report.
	We are at that moment right now in human history where we, humanity, are putting our hand on the hot stove and we are about to get burned.
	It's time for the Health Ranger Report.
	And now from naturalnews.com, here's Mike Adams.
	Welcome everybody, this is Mike Adams, the health ranger of naturalnews.com.
	Today I've got a special treat for you.
	I'm interviewing one of the pioneers in independent or alternative media.
	His name is Sean.
	He's the founder of SGT Report.
	Truly one of the most pioneering independent publishers.
	They are putting out an incredible collection of videos and information and articles every single day.
	And he joins us to talk today about the media censorship of truth.
	In other words, we are the ones, we the independent media, we're the ones telling the truth, and the mainstream media, or maybe what used to be the mainstream media, the collapsing corporate media, we'll say, is lying to you constantly, and they always have been.
	So welcome, Sean.
	It's great to talk to you today.
	Well, Mike, thank you so much for inviting me on.
	And first of all, I should say I'm shaking my head no as you're giving me that adulation because I'm not the pioneer.
	You know, I'm new to this around 2011, 2012.
	You're the pioneer.
	You're the leader in this space.
	And I don't know if people know this, but I just want to publicly tell everybody that you stepped up after you found out about our YouTube demonetization problems, which hit incredibly fast.
	Powerful and dramatic way on March 31st.
	They literally turned off our advertising opportunities and shut down revenue 95%.
	It's really remained that way ever since.
	And you stepped up out of nowhere to email and say, you'd love to place an ad at SGT Report to support us.
	And I just want people to understand how generous you are.
	You offered to pay two to three times market value for that spot.
	And For that ad, and I just couldn't do that.
	I got to sleep at night, and I couldn't take advantage of your generosity that way.
	But we did arrive at a more equitable price for that ad, and I just want to thank you so much for your support, because you're one of very few who stepped up to do that.
	And I should say, though, my Patreon, people, unbelievable, 800-some people have stepped up to try to support us, because it looks like that is the only avenue we're going to have moving forward.
	These globalists want to shut us down.
	They want to shut us up.
	Well, we're going to get into details of all that.
	I thank you for bringing this up.
	I didn't even realize you were going to.
	We have helped a lot of small independent publishers quietly behind the scenes, and we'll continue to do so because...
	Well, this is what we're going to talk about, how the corporate-controlled system is demonetizing all truth-tellers.
	They're trying to bankrupt all independent media or slander or defame all independent media and censor them off the search engines, censor you off YouTube and so on.
	So, yeah, it's an all-out assault, and the truth is...
	That we who really care about America, we care about the future of our society, we have to help each other because we are the only remaining free press in America, literally, right?
	We're it.
	Yeah, that's 100% right.
	And it's because of this rejection of globalism and the rise of nationalism.
	It's us versus the international banking and ruling elite.
	And they don't want the genie out of the bottle.
	But I got news for them.
	The genie's already out of the bottle.
	Once you're awake, you're awake.
	You can't go back to sleep.
	And millions and millions and millions of people around this planet are waking up to this Orwellian nightmarish boot stomping on the face of humanity forever.
	And we're fed up.
	But that's exactly why they're moving against us.
	And I just want to say again, thank you for that offer to put an ad on SGT Report.
	You guys, it's on the right-hand side of SGT Report.
	It's for the Health Rangers store.
	Click through and support Mike, and you'll support us by doing that.
	Because you're right, we're all in this mess together, Mike, and they are turning their full assault weapons around on us, and they're trying to shut us all down.
	And they're doing a pretty good job of it, actually, at this point.
	Well, their narratives are failing, but they are succeeding at the demonetization side of this.
	But I've got news to share with you after this interview, actually, about...
	About a solution to that, so I'll share that with you afterwards and then maybe publicly announce it when it's ready.
	But let's go back to the history of journalism in America.
	And just a quick programming note for everybody.
	You can find all of SGT Report's posts also at censored.news, which is a news aggregation site.
	You click right over to SGT Report to see their posts.
	Also, Sean, I put you in the top position over at Censored.News as well because you're doing a lot of quantity.
	You're posting frequently throughout the day, so it's very fresh.
	Thank you.
	You're on the top right-hand corner right now.
	Let's go back to the history of media now.
	This term fake news hasn't, it didn't really enter the mainstream vernacular until recently when the fake news corporate media tried to condemn independent media as being fake news.
	But isn't it true?
	This is what I want to ask you.
	You don't have to agree.
	I'd just like to hear your thoughts on this.
	But isn't it true that the mainstream corporate-run media has been fake news for decades?
	It's just that there wasn't a counter-narrative from the independent media before the rise of the internet, right?
	Yeah, that's 100% right.
	And anybody that would want to dispute that only need to understand, and you can Google this, Operation Project Mockingbird and the Mockingbird mainstream media, which is why we call them that.
	But CIA's Operation Mockingbird was a program basically in which the CIA bragged back in the 60s that they could get on the front page of every major newspaper in the country any headline and news story they wanted because those avenues were controlled or at least infiltrated to a large degree by the CIA.
	And so, of course, this has been going on forever.
	But it wasn't until November of 2016 that this fake news meme really hit the lexicon in a big way when Google CEO Sundar Pichai announced that there is no place at Google for fake news.
	And I should have had that clip queued up here for you.
	I've got it somewhere in my final cut.
	I should have had that queued up because it needs to be said that this all rolled out in earnest, of course, based on the lies of the election fraud and the Russians meddling in the election and the straw man that they set up to try to set all this up.
	And then, of course, they targeted PewDiePie, right, the number one YouTuber on the planet, by trying to paint him as an anti-Semite, taking hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours of his content out of context, combing through that to find a couple of clips in which they could try to portray him as a Nazi, right?
	And so they targeted him first, and I knew that was a shot over the bow.
	I knew it because, and I did a video about it, Mike, because I figured that if they could make an example of PewDiePie, who had made, I think, $15 million off of YouTube last year.
	Really?
	Yeah, and if they could bring him down, certainly they could bring us all down, just like they targeted you in natural news and Google took you down for six days.
	So this rise of the fake news meme, of course, started after the election or during the election, right, as a straw man.
	But then in November 2016, it's Google CEO Sundar Pichai who announced there is no place at Google for fake news.
	And he announced so gleefully that they were literally changing their algorithms to filter out what they deem fake news, which begs the question, who decides?
	It's a pretty objective term, fake news.
	What may be fake to the uninformed is certainly not fake to the informed.
	Right.
	In fact, I was thinking of writing a book called Everything You Think You Know Is Wrong because the reality, the Truman Show reality that people are living in is almost 100% fake.
	Everything they think they know about science, climatology, history, finance, money, technology, there is fakery to all of it and they don't even realize it.
	They have no idea.
	I've lived outside the country.
	I don't know if you have done that as well, but when you live outside the country and you read international newspapers, it's a completely different view of what's happening in America versus the U.S. press, which is state-run media, and this is why I laugh hysterically every time I see the New York Times report on North Korea's propaganda state-run media branch said this and this and this.
	I'm like, New York Times, you are state-run fake news media.
	What are you talking about, right?
	Oh, absolutely.
	And CNN specifically, I refer to as State Department talking points.
	I mean, it is the absolute epitome of the Mockingbird mainstream media.
	And Anderson Cooper, I believe, had ties to the CIA while he was in college.
	Of course, he claims he, you know, didn't follow through with that.
	You know, Wolf Blitzer, I believe, was a leading spokesperson at some point for AIPAC or some Israeli organization.
	And so we're not getting the real news from CNN. We're getting their version of what they call news.
	And I think a lot of people are waking up to it.
	And I want to play a clip for you here in a second that I think will really set the stage here.
	But before I do that, I need to say that this assault against freedom and liberty and the truth media has only just begun because it was on April 5th, 2017 here that the Independent reported that Germany is going to fine social networks up to 50 million euro for not taking down illegal, quote unquote, fake news posts.
	Right.
	I saw that.
	I don't know what to tell you, because that is Orwellian, big brother, anti-freedom, fascist, beast system nonsense rolling out in earnest, and they don't care about the truth.
	They're just hoping enough people are still asleep that they can get away with this.
	Well, that's exactly right.
	The very definition of so-called fake news is impossible to nail down.
	But what it means when it's used by the establishment, it means that anything that disagrees with their false narratives.
	So if they have a fake news story involving Syria, let's say, or involving domestic terrorism, or involving unemployment statistics, anything, Any fake news item, if you disagree with their fake news, then they have you condemned as fake news.
	Because their false narrative has to be accepted as the reality, even though it's entirely fabricated.
	So, you know, what is real is deemed fake, and what is fake is pushed as if it were real.
	Right.
	You know, you mentioned earlier about, you know, how long has this been going on?
	And of course, I meant to get there and I didn't.
	It's been going on for, what, since probably forever, actually, a millennium.
	But let's go back to the 50s and the 60s with the foundation of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission and the Club of Rome, which I believe Club of Rome was...
	I think founded in the late 60s, and of course they were the think tank responsible for rolling out this climate change agenda and trying to rally the world behind the idea of overpopulation and climate change to try to band the world together to roll out essentially totalitarian Orwellian policies.
	But the CFR I bring up specifically because so many of these multimillionaires, these talking heads at these news agencies, Anderson, Cooper, etc., Our CFR members.
	And that cannot be understated.
	It can't be overstated.
	It's so important because the CFR was founded by David Rockefeller, one of these elite bankers behind the Federal Reserve System founded in 1913, which has enslaved the entire United States population to unrepayable debt because they own funny money fiat printing machines.
	So it can't be...
	Overstated how important it is for people to understand that these people that spew these talking points to you at these networks are super, super highly paid individuals.
	I think Bill O'Reilly, and I'm not even throwing him out as the worst of the worst, I'm just mentioning the guy's name because I think he made $25 million a year.
	Andrea Mitchell, by the way, over at MSNBC. We're good to go.
	And they use the exact same words and phrases every day.
	If you collect the clips from CNN and MSNBC and ABC CBS, in many cases, on the same day, they are using the exact same phrases, talking points.
	You can tell they all got the same memo.
	So the question is, who's writing the memo, and why aren't these journalists having any original thoughts whatsoever?
	I mean, you can't call them journalists.
	They're just propagandists, because journalism, by definition, has to involve asking critical questions and not believing the narrative.
	The role of the journalist is to say things that are unpopular with the status quo.
	Otherwise, you're just a propagandist.
	Well, that's right, and I'm sure you've seen the Conan O'Brien clips of even the local news media, that they just ripped these little...
	Filler reports off of the Reuters newswire, and they literally read the exact same story in every marketplace across the country.
	I mean, you want to talk about getting no news whatsoever, watch your local news.
	But at least in most cases, well, I can't even say that.
	I guess when they're talking geopolitically or on a national level, they are giving you those same government, State Department talking points, most of which is all ripped off the newswire.
	Reuters, who owns Reuters?
	The Rothschilds have a controlling interest in Reuters, and by the way, AP. So, we need to understand who really controls the system, but the point here is that the old media is deathly afraid of the shift, the cultural shift, away from this crumbling globalist system, and they fear the free marketplace of ideas because they cannot compete on a level playing field, Mike, and that's why they're changing the rules in the middle of the game with this demonetization thing.
	You just nailed it.
	I was actually going to bring up that exact point, that in the competition of ideas, the independent media keeps winning.
	And even Google has now decided they can't rely on their algorithm because algorithmically, the truth will always eventually rise to the top, which is what's been happening.
	This is why on YouTube, you know, the anti-establishment commentators keep winning and winning and winning.
	And it's because, of course, the establishment is rooted in total delusion and lunacy and economic fallacies and so on.
	So they're not hard to defeat in the realm of ideas.
	So what does Google do?
	They have to manually punish certain websites and not allow their algorithm to grade them fairly.
	So they don't want a level playing ground or real competition of ideas.
	And this gets to the intolerance of the left, right?
	They claim to be rooted in tolerance, but they're actually intolerant of any idea that they don't agree with, and they want to silence any competing ideas.
	You know, UC Berkeley, the case in point.
	No, that's 100% right, and what you'll find on YouTube right now is, for instance, I believe the Young Turks has been completely re-monetized.
	I checked the other day, and this was actually after talking to somebody at YouTube, because once you get over 100,000 subscribers, At least at the point I hit that and everything was still the way it was.
	They treat you fairly well and they give you the name of a real person who you can talk to on occasion and they'll give you pointers about how to grow your channel and do you have any problems and it's really nice to actually be able to contact somebody at YouTube and she explained to me that she thought the Young Turks had been re-monetized and I made the point to her that it seems at this point that this is worse than just censorship in the broader sense.
	It feels a lot more like They are curbing political speech.
	So they're preventing people with opposing views to the left to speak at all.
	And what YouTube has done is they've revamped their restricted mode, which hides channels behind a wall so that the videos can't be seen unless a user is logged into YouTube and is 18 years old or older.
	Many, many, many people that visit YouTube don't have a channel and aren't logged in.
	They just go to YouTube.
	So they're not going to see your content because it's hidden behind this restricted mode wall.
	And what you're going to find out, if you look, is that most of the lefty nonsense content isn't behind that restricted wall.
	So they are really, really pulling out, really nefarious.
	They're cheating, Mike.
	That's what they're doing.
	They're cheating because they cannot compete on the level playing field.
	So they're literally cheating and hiding us behind a wall.
	Well, that's the only way that they can maintain anything resembling success.
	They have to cheat, just like Hillary Clinton cheated in the debates, getting the questions in advance from CNN, right?
	And cheated by, you know, getting Bernie Sanders basically thrown out of the running.
	Everything's cheating, especially on the left.
	These are the people in high school, they all cheated on all their tests, right?
	Same people.
	They're cheats.
	That's all they know how to do.
	Yeah, but what I love about you, and I know that you feel the same way I do about this as it comes to false flag acts of terror and these unending international wars based on lies, what we're up against is very monolithic and it's diabolical and it's not just the left.
	I mean, we can point to people like Lindsey Graham and John McCain on the right as just being Really the same puppets as many of those on the left, Dianne Feinstein, etc.
	So the elite at the top control people on the right and the left.
	So the whole system is really aligned against us to that degree.
	Yeah, that's right.
	But let me ask you about this angle on all of that.
	You know, many people in society are not yet ready for the truth about any topic.
	And I think, and I'm going to quote, I think I saw this in the movie The Big Short, there was a quote on the screen, said that the truth is like poetry, and everybody fucking hates poetry.
	And, pardon my language, but Many people literally do not want to know the truth about what's in their food, what's in their water, what's in their psychiatric drugs, where money comes from, money is debt, the true history, nothing.
	They literally don't want to know that, and so there actually is a place for those people to watch CNN or watch MSNBC or read the New York Times because they need an artificial world.
	They need a delusional alternate reality.
	And that serves a purpose for them.
	There's really only a fraction of the population that can ever handle the kinds of truths that we explore at Natural News or SGT Report or other independent media websites.
	And, I mean, do you agree with that?
	We will never reach a majority of the population.
	That shouldn't even be our goal.
	They're not ready for that.
	It's only a certain fraction that can even handle No, 100% true.
	And I've said, and I've learned this over time, just trying to wake up friends, neighbors, and colleagues, that you can't wake up somebody who doesn't want to be woke up.
	You can't do it.
	They don't want to hear it.
	They're not ready for it.
	Their cognitive dissonance kicks in.
	Their normalcy bias kicks in.
	They are unable to process this information.
	And if you think that's poppycock, most of the people listening don't because they've all tried it.
	And I'll tell you what, when you start to speak about these things at the Thanksgiving dinner, when you're just waking up, you'd soon learn thereafter that you should probably keep some of this to yourself and compartmentalize your life if you want to have any friends.
	Or, you know, or not cause family conflicts because people don't want to wake up.
	And, you know, if you mention World Trade Center 7 on 9-11 and people don't know what you're talking about and you show them the video, which they can't possibly explain without having the conversation, people immediately dismiss it purely out of fear of trying to maintain their paradigm.
	And that's the most frustrating thing on earth to those of us who have gone through the painful, painful awakening process because it is painful.
	But you have to choose to walk that road.
	You mentioned everybody hates poetry, and of course I had to Google this, but I always loved this Robert Frost poem, The Road Not Taken.
	Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, and sorry, I could not travel both.
	You can't travel both.
	You have to choose a path.
	Those of us who have woken up chose to walk this painful path.
	But once you are awake, you are awake, and you cannot go back to sleep.
	Well, that's right.
	Obliviousness is not an acceptable state of mind for those of us who are aware, but it is very acceptable to a great many people.
	And by the way, even though this is not the subject here of this talk, I can tell you there is a chemical component to all of that, the fluoride in the water supply.
	It literally lowers IQs.
	That's straight up science.
	It's in the scientific literature.
	The heavy metals, even the aluminum in vaccines and the mercury in vaccines, both neurotoxins, chosen specifically because they...
	I'm living through it.
	I have four children and the two little ones are normally developing wonderful, bright-eyed, intellectual, wonderful people and the two older ones have struggled because they got all the vaccines.
	I can't tell you how many days in my life, how many times, how many days in a week, how many hours in a day, I wish I could rewind time.
	My awakening happened too late.
	At this point, I'm in my mid-40s, and I wish that I had woken up earlier so that those two older ones hadn't got all the vaccines.
	I call the vaccines at this point, based on movies like Vaxxed, based on the whistleblower information coming up from the CDC, vaccines to a large degree are chemical weapons delivery systems.
	And people need to understand that.
	Anybody listening to this who has a little child, a newborn, if your wife's pregnant, please, please, please, please watch Vaxxed.
	Please educate yourself before you take that needle because there are many inherent dangers to taking those vaccinations.
	And I guess, you know, sadly, Mike, you want to know how far gone the system is.
	If you're in California listening to this, you've got to take the...
	I mean, if you're in California, they're going to, by force, make you take...
	The vaccines.
	Even if you're going to homeschool, private school, public school, it doesn't matter.
	SB, what is it?
	SB277. Yeah.
	It's a mandatory lobotomy is what it is.
	It reminds me, I don't know if you're a Trekkie fan, but one of the original Star Trek episodes involved Earth running, or I'm sorry, not Earth, but the Star Trek crew being part of a simulation, a war simulation with another civilization.
	And when people died in the simulation, you were supposed to report to the euthanasia cell and they would kill you.
	And it was all part of adhering to the rules of war, but they didn't actually have to fire real bullets.
	Well, vaccines today, you're supposed to take your child and line them up to have a chemical lobotomy.
	It's the same insanity that was depicted in that Star Trek episode.
	And if you don't have your child lobotomized, then you are considered a heretic and an outcast and you are demonized by society.
	Society wants every new generation to To grow up mentally handicapped, because that's the only way they will ever believe CNN. There is absolutely nothing more totalitarian, more tyrannical than forced vaccinations, because what the government and these pharmaceutical companies are now demanding of people, they're not asking, they're demanding that you trust them.
	Well, when you trust a maniacal, monolithic entity like a pharmaceutical company that is in the business of profit, You trust them at your own peril.
	And I'll tell you what, that Star Trek story you just told gave me goosebumps because I had bookmarked this to share this with you in the audience.
	If people want to know where this system is headed, based on Petagate, based on Pizzagate, based on the now evident problem of pedophilia and pedophilic practices among the elite, let me read this to you.
	I think it ties in nicely to what you just shared about the Star Trek.
	This comes from The Telegraph.
	And this was posted on February 29, 2012.
	By Stephen Adams, medical correspondent.
	Okay?
	This is not the onion.
	Listen to this.
	Killing babies, no different from abortion, experts say.
	That's the headline.
	Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are, quote, morally irrelevant, end quote, and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.
	All right?
	This is where they want to take us, Mike.
	This is the beast system.
	And I'm getting ahead of myself because I do want to circle back to the old media and why it's dying.
	It's fighting to stay alive.
	Six companies own 90% of the media Americans consume.
	But I just had to share that with you because this is where they want to take us.
	Why don't you play that clip that you have prepped?
	Let's hear that because that's about it.
	Yeah, I do.
	I've got a clip here.
	I want to give a shout out to a really excellent channel.
	It's Black Pigeon Speaks.
	He's got 186,000 YouTube subscribers, so people might be familiar with his work.
	This is an excellent clip.
	I want to share this with you guys.
	I think it helps set the stage to understand why the old media, the mainstream media, the Mockingbird media is putting up such a fight to try to shut us down.
	In 2010, for the first time, the viewing audience of ABC, CBS and NBC all had median ages of 50 or higher, with CBS topping out at 55.
	Currently, roughly 45% of all ad-supported cable networks measured by Nielsen have median viewer ages of 50 or higher.
	It gets particularly bad when looking at channels like CNN that peddle in what since the loss of the presidential election in November 2016 by Hillary Clinton are called by Google, for example, authoritative news.
	People are turning away from all the old forms of media, newspapers, magazines, TV, even Hollywood.
	They've been turning to platforms like YouTube for a while now, especially the young.
	Thus, the current demonetization crisis that is basically threatening to destroy Google's video platform was to be expected.
	There are two main reasons for this.
	Obviously, old media wants a piece of Google's ad revenue.
	And for an in-depth look at this, please see the great video over at Computing Forever.
	Is that YouTube is having a real effect on shifting, as stated before, the Overton window, and how this shift is reigniting the anti-globalism that the corporate media and especially their bot news teams are paid to suppress through lopsided coverage, omission, and sometimes, as was clear to all with eyes to see and ears to listen, out.
	Right lies, as was very obvious during the 2016 presidential election.
	Alright, I'll pause it there, and I just want to make the point.
	He does such a great job dissecting this thing and explaining it in that video.
	The name of the video is Why Nationalism in a Unified Country Terrifies Wall Street.
	Thank you, Mike.
	Trust.
	That's right.
	They've lost the trust of the people.
	Great point.
	It is gone.
	Even if the media were able to destroy, let's say, Trump at this point, which has been their goal for a year and a half at least, they would not have the trust restored in the media because now we know the New York Times is just a political propaganda operation, period.
	That's all.
	Washington Post, too.
	Yeah, Washington Post, absolutely.
	Owned by Bezos, right?
	He's got the multi-billion dollar contract with the CIA? Yeah, it's a multi-billion dollar contract.
	Amazon S3 kind of data server services and so on.
	And, of course, you know, look, Bezos, I know this is a bit of a tangent, but Bezos is putting retailers out of business all across America.
	He's going to monopolize the retail infrastructure and retail delivery, also, of physical goods, as well as monopolizing, well, not monopolizing, but running the Washington Post, which is a propaganda rag that deliberately, knowingly publishes fiction as if it were which is a propaganda rag that deliberately, knowingly publishes fiction as if it were news, like the whole Russians Complete fiction, written with nothing but innuendo.
	Unnamed sources told us that maybe, perhaps, this might have happened, and it could mean that possibly this might have been something this one day.
	It was like, what?
	That's a story?
	You guys made all that shit up.
	That's all they do.
	Well, same with the Syrian gas attack, right?
	And so they can use their controlled puppets and their controlled media outlets to spew these things to the American people to get the American people evidently to agree to do something that Even under Obama, nobody wanted to go into Syria, right?
	Nobody wanted that, and we were able to pull ourselves back from the brink of yet another unconstitutional war of aggression because people on the left and the right didn't want anything to do with that.
	But now under Trump, here we are, you know, messing around in Syria, dropping, you know, tomahawks on essentially abandoned airfields.
	So who really knows what the real story is there?
	What's really going on?
	You know, is it Trump versus the deep state?
	Has Trump been infiltrated by the deep state?
	Is he part of the deep state?
	All sorts of different theories on that, but...
	Evidently under Trump, Syria's A-OK with the American people.
	Well, yeah, I don't know if I want to delve into the Trump swamp at the moment, actually.
	Save that for another interview.
	But let me ask you this.
	Where do you think this is all going in terms of the media's attempted censorship?
	Are we going to see the rise of, let's say, alternatives to YouTube and Google and Facebook?
	Or are we all going to suffer under the Orwellian censorship of these internet giants?
	Or are they going to be broken up by the Trump administration?
	What do you think is going to happen?
	Well, unfortunately, I mean, and I want to see the world as cup half full.
	I really try to see both sides and sort of have a cup half full view of things, which is actually why I spoke positively about Trump when he was running and said, listen to all these great things he's saying.
	Now, if he actually does these things, we're going to be in much better shape than Hillary.
	So I think it just needs to be said, though, that these These monolithic organizations, these fascists, are not going to stop.
	And I just know, and everybody listening knows now, that this whole, oh, the corporations led by Walmart and McDonald's and, what was it, BMW and Verizon, they all banded together to boycott YouTube with their advertising because they were alarmed to find their advertising next to...
	Offensive content.
	That's the straw man.
	That's what they said.
	And then, of course, he tried to say it was because of anti-Semitism or neo-Nazis.
	Okay, so stop the advertising on those channels.
	Why did you target everybody?
	That's number one.
	Number two, what you'll find, what I think is really interesting, is that if that were true, then why are they so eager to advertise on, for instance, Fox TV's Lucifer, which is a show about a guy, the real Lucifer, in the real world, and they make him sexy and appealing, and the show's called Lucifer.
	Why are shows like the Santa Clarita Diet being made for Netflix, by Netflix, which features Drew Barrymore as a cannibal?
	There's a slippery slope into talking about all the examples of despicable television on which or before which or in which these corporations are more than happy to advertise.
	So this whole thing about YouTube is obviously a straw man set to destroy us and shut down the truth media.
	And so with Google changing their algorithms, right, making it more and more difficult for searches for natural news or SGT report or activist post or, you know, pick whoever you like in the alt media, if it's more difficult for those searches to yield results in Google, I think that they're just in the beginning stages if it's more difficult for those searches to yield results in Google, I think that they're And And I've said, Mike, I could be wrong, but I've just speculated that this YouTube thing was so well organized and it rolled out so quickly.
	I wouldn't even be surprised if we learned a year or two from now that that was concocted a year or two ago at a Bilderberg group meeting.
	I mean, this was high, high, high, high, high level people, high level elites.
	Well, they've lost the control of the narrative at every level.
	See, here's what they fear the most.
	They fear decentralized ideas.
	So when the media was just, let's say in the 1980s, it was just the three big networks and, you know, New York Times and a few papers, they had absolute control over the narrative, right?
	And no one really disagreed.
	There wasn't this chasm between left and right the way that it exists today because everybody was working off the same, quote, facts, but they were fake facts.
	But nevertheless, they were homogeneous.
	Everybody had the same fake facts.
	So when people talked about things, they didn't tend to disagree.
	Like they could talk about the David Koresh raid, the ATF raid in Waco, Texas.
	Everybody had the official story, which is complete BS, of course, but there wasn't an internet then.
	There wasn't a counter narrative that said, no, wait a minute.
	What were these helicopter infrared videos of these ATF with automatic weapons guys shooting innocent children?
	Whoa, whoa, what's that all about?
	You didn't see that on ABC, NBC, CBS, anything like that.
	So it was the same homogenized, sanitized, dumbed down, fake news narrative, but everybody agreed on it, and that's why the country seemed...
	You know, I have that actual footage in a video I produced years ago, several years ago, featuring the voice of Paul Craig Roberts, and the name of that video is You Can't Handle the 9-11 Truth.
	If you search that on YouTube, it should come up, and about midway through, you're going to see that footage that Mike just described, because that's exactly what happened.
	And, you know, I just want to say this as it pertains to Black Pigeon Speaks.
	He mentioned the Overton Window, right?
	And I'd heard of it, I was familiar with it, but I wanted to get the language right, so I just Googled this, and it comes up as this.
	The Overton Window, also known as the window of discourse, is the range of ideas the public will accept.
	It is used by media pundits.
	And then I wrote here in my notes, the old media, the gatekeepers, the mainstream media is having its butt handed to it by the alter truth media, sources that refuse to be boxed in by the Overton window.
	So the difference here, and this is why what you and I do and others in the space do, is appealing to people with an open mind because we will talk about the things We'll talk about GMO foods and the associated health dangers.
	We'll talk about geoengineering.
	Climate change and how that was concocted, climate change specifically by the Club of Rome in 1968 or 69.
	We'll talk about Fukushima, the lie of mass immigration and open borders, the Federal Reserve System and central banking.
	What a blight that is on humanity.
	We'll talk about the secret societies and the think tanks that serve...
	Or we're founded by the elite themselves.
	We'll talk about these things.
	And once you want to open up your mind to these things, once you want to do the research yourself to vet out that what we're telling you is the truth, this is all based on historical fact, read the books, read the documents.
	Then history becomes pretty damn compelling, doesn't it, Mike?
	Well, yeah, but that whole list reminds me of the process by which people come to conclusions.
	You see, you and I are different, and those who listen to us are very different from the masses, the sheeple, because the sheeple don't decide what's true based on evidence or facts.
	They decide what's true based on social conformity.
	If they see an event and they're trying to make sense of it, they will turn to their friends and say, what just happened?
	You tell me what just happened and then I will take that as gospel.
	They can't decide for themselves what just happened.
	They literally cannot process it.
	And that's for the ones that even care to ask or pay attention at all, you know?
	Many, many, many people are just literally sound asleep.
	And after getting rung through this system and having to get 40-some percent of your, 50 percent of your money taken away in taxes, trying to raise kids in this culture, this nightmarish culture, I mean, it's difficult to raise kids in this culture with the rap music and the drugs everywhere and the mainstream media message coming through in all sorts of despicable TV shows.
	It's really, really difficult for many people to even find time to pay attention.
	But I think it's even more insidious than that.
	It's mass hypnosis to the point where they have the population now able to auto-hallucinate after events.
	Let me give you a specific example.
	You know the magician David Copperfield, right?
	Illusionist?
	So he did an illusion one time.
	I don't know how he did this, but obviously it was an illusion.
	He had a bunch of people seated in a park on the southern tip of New York City looking toward the Statue of Liberty, right?
	And he created the illusion that the Statue of Liberty disappeared.
	So this is called a negative hallucination.
	It removes something from your consciousness, from your awareness.
	Now, you can also, if you're a stage magician, you can do positive illusions and hallucinations, which add things into a person's reality.
	And you've probably seen demonstrations of stage hypnosis where they do this to, you know, college campus students, whatever, they're on stage.
	Yeah.
	Acting like, oh, you're a duck and whatever.
	Quack, quack, right?
	Right.
	But now the climate change narrative has hypnotized most of the population to such an incredible extent that literally after every rainstorm, after every hot day, after every snowstorm, anything, people are calling their weathermen and weatherwomen and they're asking, was that climate change?
	Was that climate change?
	They now see climate change in every weather event around them.
	It's like the system has created a climate boogeyman, and people see the boogeyman under every corner, under every bed, around every corner.
	They see it everywhere.
	They are mass hallucinating.
	This is how powerful that phenomenon is.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, well, it's exactly what Aaron Russo said would happen, right, after 9-11.
	He didn't know what was going to happen on 9-11, but he was told by, I guess, his friend Nick Rockefeller that some event was going to happen in New York City in 2001, and it would change the world.
	And soon the United States would find itself embroiled in wars in the Middle East and throughout the globe, searching for a boogeyman, searching caves in Afghanistan for somebody who's not even there.
	And he thought that was really funny.
	And ultimately, the way that narrative played out, according to Nick Rockefeller, was the ultimate goal is these bankers want to get everybody on a chip.
	So that's the master plan.
	But yeah, the point is, I think 9-11 was a spell.
	And a lot of people still fall victim to that 9-11 official narrative, which is what led us down this slippery slope and this path into bankrupting the Treasury, Right?
	Over blood spilt, American treasure spilt, all over the world, all in the name of unconstitutional wars based on a lie.
	And don't forget...
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Well, just to be clear, I don't want you to get in trouble.
	You're not saying that planes didn't hit buildings.
	You're just saying the narrative is a spell.
	No, what I'm saying is that what happened on 9-11...
	In reality, it's very different than the official story that they used to get us embroiled in this nightmarish mess, including the police state apparatus that they rolled out at home.
	But you're not saying that planes were...
	No, but that's...
	You know what?
	I don't even get into the weeds on that stuff, Mike, because I've read the work.
	I own all the books by David Ray Griffin, okay?
	I go to the actual research that I think is vetable and provable.
	So I like to talk about...
	World Trade Center 7.
	I like to talk about the documentable stuff, like the fact that Six of those Saudi terrorists reported to be on the plane showed up alive and well later.
	Right, right, right.
	There's so many anomalies about what actually happened on 9-11.
	I don't get into the planes issue.
	More power to those who want to talk about that stuff.
	But you get into some real, you know, unwinnable battles on that stuff.
	The bottom line is World Trade Center 7 couldn't be explained by NIST for what?
	How many years?
	Seven, eight, nine years?
	No, this is a great example of the negative hallucination I was just talking about.
	You go to any person on the street and you say how many buildings were hit by airplanes, Or how many buildings collapsed on 9-11?
	And they'll say two.
	It was the two towers.
	Everybody says two.
	No one understands there's a third building.
	Right.
	Building seven.
	Literally, they have no idea.
	And if you show them, here, this building collapsed, and you ask them, how did that collapse?
	What's the explanation from the laws of physics?
	How did that collapse when it wasn't hit by a plane?
	They can't tell you.
	They don't know.
	Their brain can't go there.
	They are literally suffering under a negative hallucination, like I was just describing.
	Seriously, it's a mass hypnosis effect across the entire population.
	No, I know.
	And I've lived it.
	We've all lived it.
	And I'll tell you just a painful anecdote, a real story that happened to me during my awakening process.
	And I was working for A large corporation, I'll name it, I don't care, Target Corporation in the marketing department as an executive.
	I was there for 10 years.
	You weren't in the transgender bathroom division?
	No, that was before the years of the transgender bathroom, right.
	That was when Target still gave 5% back to the communities in which it serves, and I was a big part of telling those stories.
	So it felt really good because they truly were trying to give back to these communities and give to schools and, you know, Fun school libraries and all sorts of things.
	Worked with Tiger Woods through the Tiger Woods Foundation when he was associated with Target.
	And back in that day when I started to wake up, I would show friends.
	These are executives too, but I played poker with these guys.
	So they were truly friends.
	And I would show them World Trade Center 7.
	And they'd say, okay, yeah, so what?
	What are you saying?
	And then I'd say, well, check this out.
	This BBC report with Jane Stanley.
	This live via satellite report from New York City, you can see the building standing behind her, and she's telling everybody that it collapsed.
	Details are sketchy, but she's saying the building, the Solomon Building, World Trade Center 7, collapsed.
	Right.
	And it's behind her, Mike, and as you know, that signal faded out on the satellite, and 10 minutes, 15 minutes later, the building did come down.
	And you show your friends that, and they say, well, that's got to be a fake.
	That's fake.
	That's a fake video.
	But then it's not a fake video.
	It really, truly happened, and that is a real live BBC report.
	It actually happened.
	That's how dark and devious, that's how impenetrable the cognitive dissonance is.
	You can show people undisputable facts, and if it challenges their paradigm and it scares them, they just shut down.
	They won't go near it.
	Yep.
	That's absolutely true, yeah.
	They don't have the cognitive elasticity to handle it, is kind of one of the ways that I put it.
	Or the courage.
	You know what really made me angry about my target experience with those friends of mine?
	Is that they didn't have the courage to dig into it.
	That's the part that I really struggled with.
	I'm like, it's one thing to say I think it's fake, but it's a whole other thing to just call me a nut, you know, or dismiss me altogether, or...
	Make it uncomfortable to talk about these things and not look into it.
	I just could not understand the lack of courage and intellectual curiosity.
	That's truly the part that befuddles me.
	Well, what's also interesting is the mainstream media for many, many years said, they called all of us conspiracy theorists for saying things like, oh, the NSA is recording your phone calls.
	That was a conspiracy theory five years ago before the Snowden revelations.
	But now we know it was all true.
	We were called conspiracy theorists for so many things that are now proven true.
	Your Samsung smart TV is literally watching you and reporting back to Samsung.
	That's been the subject of a major lawsuit.
	Look at the Washington Post conspiracy theory now with the whole Russian conspiracy about the Trump victory.
	That is a huge conspiracy theory.
	And yet, they don't call it that, of course, because no, they say that's fact, even though it's totally unsupportable, completely fabricated.
	It's based on that crazy dossier that was just fabricated and said that Trump hired hookers to urinate on hotel beds in Europe.
	Really?
	That's your fact?
	I remember when the WikiLeaks Vault 7 information came out and I thought, well, I'll watch CNN, you know, when I'm at the club running on the treadmill and let's see what they say.
	And I think I watched an hour of, I don't know if it was Wolf Blitzer or Anderson Cooper, I don't remember which, but...
	I don't think it was mentioned once, Mike.
	I mean, it might have been mentioned in passing, but they didn't talk about what it meant or what was in it.
	They didn't talk about any of the revelations of the Vault 7 WikiLeaks email, or the WikiLeaks Vault 7 information.
	It's just more of the same, and that's why anybody who's watching CNN, and apparently it's geriatric people, it's not the young people anymore, but the people that are watching CNN specifically are truly being brainwashed.
	I mean, that's like warfare at CNN. Well, it's all about...
	I've got to bring back the stage magician metaphor because it's all about focus.
	If they can get you to focus on their right hand, which is the stories that Anderson Cooper is talking about...
	With their left hand, they're stuffing a rabbit into the hat, right?
	But you don't see it because you're distracted.
	It's all about mental focus.
	And the real function of the mainstream media, corporate media news, is to distract you from what's important while filling your brain with totally false mush.
	But the distraction part is super important.
	It's all about the news they don't cover that you actually do need to know.
	Yeah, that's right.
	And, you know, again, the six or seven major corporations that give us 90%, or at least I should say that give most Americans 90% of the information they consume, Viacom, Time Warner, Disney, GE, Comcast, News Corp, CBS, you know, who's behind them, right?
	And that's where it really gets nefarious.
	Go look at the list of shareholders of those companies.
	And you're going to see those shareholders all over most major companies, corporations across the planet, including Google.
	So if you want to know why this is happening, look no further than the elite at the top to control what?
	At this point, Mike, it's probably got to be 90% of the world's wealth.
	Oh, more than that.
	Much more.
	But let me shift gears for a little bit here because we're coming up on the last segment.
	Let me ask you this question.
	For all of this time, the global elite, for all of modern history up until now, the global elite have needed human labor.
	Because human labor was necessary to create the wealth that they are confiscating from everyone in the form of taxation or monetary deflation, what have you.
	Counterfeit currencies, you name it.
	Now, we're approaching an era now where humanoid-style robots are soon going to be able to replace much of human labor.
	We have robot fruit pickers, I just did a story on that the other day, that are going to replace a lot of the immigrant agricultural laborers, for example.
	We've got factory robots and warehouse picking robots.
	But soon, you know, fast forward 25 years, just one generation, robots could replace as much as 50% of the labor in America.
	Do you think, here's my question to you, Do you agree that the globalists at that point will see that much of the human population is no longer necessary for them?
	That they will begin to see humans as obsolete because they don't need the labor anymore?
	Yeah, you just absolutely, it's funny how you and I can resonate on this stuff because you've just triggered a whole bunch of other stuff that we should probably talk about and I'll try to do it quickly.
	My friends Aaron and Melissa over at TruStream Media just produced a fantastic documentary about this called Obsolete.
	So you hit the nail on the head with that term.
	I've seen that one, yes, excellent.
	Narrated by Melissa.
	Melissa and Aaron's in it as well and it's just, it hits the nail on the head and I think they mention in that documentary But it should be mentioned here that the elite are concerned enough about what you've just described, at least in the short term, because I think in the long term their plans are much more nefarious for humanity, But in the short term, they're so concerned about this that they're talking about, I guess at Davos, one of the leading conversations on the agenda was universal minimum income, trying to figure out how to placate humanity as the jobs go away.
	And I'll tell you what's tremendously terrifying about all of this, and we don't even have time to get into quantum computing, D-Wave, the B system, CERN, what's going on there.
	We do not have the time.
	But when I say the plans for humanity are nefarious, check out my friend Ron Johnson's channel there on YouTube and just Google this video, Skynet, Robocops and Drones Coming Soon to U.S. Cities.
	What's going on with AI in the computing technology, in these robotics, in DARPA, in the Pentagon, in the development of these systems, I'm telling you, Mike, it is literally approaching Skynet terms of technology as seen in the movie Terminator and Terminator 2.
	And God help us if that's the power that the elite end up having.
	I don't know what's going to stop them at this point.
	It seems absolutely unstoppable.
	So they may give us universal minimum income, right, for those who are unemployed in the short term.
	In the long term, think Terminator.
	Absolutely, but it may not even be a humanoid robot.
	I don't...
	It's going to be...
	I mean, I don't know why this hasn't happened already, where, let's say, a terrorist group walks into Washington, D.C. with a backpack, unloads a drone.
	A drone takes to the sky and seeks out someone with a visual matching.
	And the drone is a kamikaze drone.
	With a small explosive charge, all the drone has to do is fly down right next to your head and explode.
	Assassination drones seem like the future for governments of the world or even terrorist organizations of the world, especially when the NSA can track your exact location based on your cell phone.
	So if the state wants to eliminate you, and the state might be Google Inc.
	in the future, instead of the White House, it might be the Google House, right?
	If Google wants to eliminate you, how hard is it for Google...
	To work with the NSA, get your phone number, track your phone, send out a drone to just blow up your head, literally.
	That technology exists right now.
	Well, changing the rules in the middle of the game is certainly not beyond these people, as they've done with the demonetization, right?
	As they've done with dismantling the Smith-Munt Act and allowing the government to propagandize to the American people.
	I can't think of anything more tyrannical except for maybe a mandatory vaccinations bill.
	These people are diabolical.
	So who's to say they won't change the rules and the laws as it pertains to what they want to do in the future?
	If they say you're a terrorist...
	They may strike you with a drone, one of these little drones you've just described, because they labeled you a terrorist.
	Who's going to prove them wrong?
	Where are you going to get a platform to fight for your family member who's unjustly murdered by the government?
	No, it'll be a secret court.
	It'll be like a FISA secret warrant.
	Yeah, a rubber stamp warrant, where they say, oh yeah, you posted a video that questioned climate change, let's say.
	So you are a climate terrorist now, and that's what they'll use to justify killing you.
	Well, it's horrifying, and you know, as we talk about this technology that is moving now so quickly with AI and quantum computing, I just think that a lot of times in the media, Hollywood media in particular, they Showcase what they're going to do?
	What is the word?
	Address?
	What am I trying to say?
	Point to what they're going to do?
	Yeah, foreshadow.
	Thank you, foreshadow.
	I don't know.
	Do you remember the film with Matt Damon called Elysium?
	Oh, yeah.
	And the elite are all off-planet.
	They're off-planet in this orbiting, beautiful wonder world of high technology and comfort and nutrition.
	And the rest of us are fending for ourselves with the robot police watching over us on Earth.
	It's the nightmare scenario that the technology that is now rolling out is...
	They may have it already, if you want to get into the whole Catherine Austin Fitz, Joseph P. Farrell conversation about off-world technology and breakaway civilizations.
	They're probably already there.
	I don't mean literally with the orbiting station I've seen in that movie, but I think the technology exists, and if it doesn't exist now, it certainly will in the near future.
	And based on all of these Pentagon DARPA robots that they're so hell-bent, look at the Boston Scientific robot videos on YouTube.
	They're horrifying.
	Why are they building them?
	The answer is obvious.
	They're going to build a robot army.
	That's what's scary.
	They're building them because they want to use them.
	The question is, who are they going to use them on?
	Are they going to just use them on brown people in perpetuity?
	Or will they eventually be rolled out on we the people in this country?
	Well, yeah, absolutely.
	First, I think that the corporations like Google will use them to overthrow governments.
	So the future will probably, at least in my assessment, involve corporations as the totalitarians running entire nations using robot enforcement, robot police You know, humanoid robots on the ground, plus, of course, drone surveillance in the sky, all combined with AI system analysis, voice analysis, cell phone, texting analysis, you know, keyword analysis, everything, to just eliminate any kind of, you know, resistance.
	It's a very dystopian future that I think we're facing right now.
	No, it is.
	You know, you really hit the nail on the head, too, with the whole idea of these spells.
	Because we're also all under the spell of these smartphones.
	I mean, they literally gave us these.
	That is the chip, really.
	I mean, you don't want to take the chip, don't take the chip.
	But guess what?
	If you walk around with a smartphone, it's as good as the chip.
	They know what you're looking at on the internet.
	They know what your financial transactions are.
	They know where you are.
	I mean, they know who you're talking to.
	I mean, it's the same with Facebook.
	It's the greatest CIA treasure trove ever.
	They didn't have to build a dossier on everybody.
	Everybody built a dossier on themselves.
	Yeah, it is.
	Okay, I have one more question for you.
	This is a very offbeat kind of question.
	Here's what I don't understand.
	People like you and I, we are, and many others in the independent media, we're actually very sharp analysts.
	We were ahead of the curve on so many of these things.
	We understand we're years more advanced than the typical mainstream person on finances or military technology or geopolitics.
	Here's what I don't understand.
	And I'm not asking for a job or anything, by the way.
	This is not some wink-wink thing.
	I'm seriously wondering, why doesn't the Trump administration tap into some people who are out-of-the-box thinkers to help solve big problems or even if it's a strategic problem?
	You know, like analysts.
	Like the CIA has analysts, I know, but they're all status quo, sort of obedient followers of the rulebook.
	Why doesn't, you know, why doesn't Trump or, I don't know, some other branch, if government wants to survive as government, you know, government wants to get bigger, why don't they, I'm just surprised that nobody has ever reached out to any of us that I know of and said, what's your take on this thing that's happening?
	Like, why wouldn't they do that?
	Well, first of all, I think you and the listeners probably know why.
	And I know what you're asking is really just the philosophical larger picture.
	And again, I don't want to be half-empty guy.
	I want to be half-full guy.
	But I think the forces aligned against us, right, these globalist forces, have no interest.
	For instance, the guy who founded Five Hour Energy, that drink, I think his name is Minaj Bhargava, There's a documentary out on him that if you haven't watched, you have to watch it.
	It's called Billions in Change.
	It's fantastic.
	This guy is actually taking his billions of dollars and pouring it into ways to help the third world get access to clean water, to help all of us get access to clean energy.
	I'll just give you one example, and this is absolutely off the top of my head.
	I watched this documentary a couple years ago, a year and a half ago.
	He talks about this element, this mineral, that apparently can conduct energy, heat, instantly and without heat loss.
	So he talks about tapping down into the earth where it's very, very hot, and he demonstrates how this would work.
	You can get the energy We're good to go.
	Where's the promise of all this high tech?
	They want to keep us on fossil fuels.
	They want to keep us on oil.
	Meanwhile, they want to tell us that using those is destroying the planet.
	So we're going to do zero emissions by 2050, which if they don't give us new technologies, it's going to turn us all into serfs.
	Yeah.
	We'll be living in mud huts in South America.
	Yeah.
	You're right.
	There are solutions all around us right now.
	I'm a scientist.
	I run a lab.
	And even I come across some very interesting, very fascinating kinds of solutions involving chemistry or botanical medicine, things like that.
	There are solutions.
	There's a 100% cure rate for malaria right now just by using the herb called Artemisia annua or sweet wormwood.
	100% cure rate for people who are about to die from malaria, right?
	But the establishment never talks about that What do you see in the headlines?
	Oh, we're about to do trials on a new malaria vaccine.
	We hope it might work.
	Right.
	Like, you don't need a malaria vaccine.
	You need to grow wormwood herb.
	Right.
	Well, oh my God.
	You're so over the target.
	And I know that you do have a lab, and you've done such fantastic reporting.
	I remember when you were, I think, doing a bit of work on fast food, just for instance.
	I don't even have a name of a specific company.
	But the disgusting nature of what's in that fast food, I mean, is completely devoid of nutrition.
	Yeah.
	And don't you find it fascinating that these powers that be, going all the way back to what, Hearst in his forests, outlawed hemp.
	They don't want people to have access to cannabis oil or cannabis.
	I don't even mean the type with the THC that gets people high.
	They don't want people to have access to proven cures.
	That's right.
	And I think hemp is just a great example of, really, this goes back to these robber barons.
	That's what they are.
	They want monopolies.
	What is Google?
	At this point, it's essentially a monopoly.
	Monopolies allow them to retain their power and remain unchallenged.
	That's the problem.
	I mean, I don't know how we break through.
	I don't know how humanity truly lives free.
	I think people are waking up and that's really, really great.
	I just don't know.
	I mean, this system is moving awfully, awfully fast towards that Elysium paradigm that I described with that movie.
	Yeah, we're all ruled over by a butch lesbian Jodie Foster.
	She is in that.
	I mean, that was the character she played.
	She was actually a great actor for that role.
	She was perfect.
	I loved her in Silence of the Lambs.
	Yeah, she was great.
	Okay, well, look, we're going to wrap this up.
	Any final thoughts you want to leave everybody?
	And then stay on the line, because I've got something else to share with you.
	Okay, thank you.
	No, I don't...
	You know, first of all, I just want to thank anybody that would have taken the time to listen to all this.
	I know it's a long conversation.
	And literally, you know, Mike and I had no conversation planned today at all other than just to talk about the attack on the truth media.
	So I want to thank you for being willing to have the conversation.
	I want to thank you for being a stand-up guy.
	I want to thank you for, you know, stepping up and helping support us at SGT Report where we're completely under fire.
	We're going to try to rebuild the site.
	We're going to try to make it HTTPS-friendly.
	We're going to try to make it mobile friendly.
	We're going to try to improve this thing before it goes away altogether.
	And on YouTube, we're going to keep plugging away and putting out truthful content.
	And I want to thank the folks that have stepped up to support us at Patreon.
	They're really special people.
	Slightly over 800 of them now have stepped up to try to help us, give us a lifeline.
	To what essentially Google and YouTube have taken away in terms of monetization opportunities.
	So I want to thank you, Mike.
	You're really a leader in this, in Truth Media.
	And thanks for having me on.
	Well, thank you for joining me, Sean.
	And folks, you heard it right there.
	It's sgtreport.com.
	If you can help support their effort, please do so at Patreon.
	What is it?
	Patreon slash sgtreport.
	Is that it?
	Right, right.
	Okay, that's what I thought.
	And also, of course, check out censored.news.
	You can find sgtreport and many other censored websites every day.
	And finally, look, just understand that this is authentic discussion by people who genuinely care about the future of human civilization.
	We don't have any agenda other than to protect life and knowledge and the future of humanity.
	That's it.
	And we are up against the most insidious, most evil, most destructive forces that our world has ever known, which is the establishment, you know, the, well, it's a long list of examples, but you know what I'm saying.
	So support us if you want to have truth and real news and real information, especially as It all starts to hit the fan.
	You're going to really need some intelligent interpretation and honest reporting.
	So you'll find that at sgtreport, naturalnews.com, censored.news, and so on.
	So thank you for listening today, everybody.
	Please share this interview.
	There's much more to come.
	We're going to be doing a lot more interviews with leaders across the independent media in the weeks and months ahead.
	So thank you very much for joining us today.
	Learn more at healthrangerreport.com.
	Support our films for humanity. - Visit healthrangerstore.com.

▲