All Episodes
Previous Next
March 12, 2018 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
15:45
Scientist exposes flu shot lies and media propaganda
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
If you'd like to hear a real scientific point of view on the influenza deaths and the push for flu shots that we're seeing in the media, then listen to this screencast here.
My name is Mike Adams.
I'm the Health Ranger.
That's my picture there.
I created the Natural News Forensic Food Lab, and in fact, I'm the one who does all the testing for the heavy metals analysis, high-level analytical chemistry, and I'm the creator of these processes called metals capturing capacity and many others.
And I'm working on a number of scientific papers right now, which will be published in 2014.
Now looking at flu shots, here's the issue.
When we see flu shots or influenza mentioned in the mainstream media, it's always mentioned with a doom and gloom type of attitude, that you're all going to die unless you get a flu shot.
And this article in the LA Times, right here, is no different.
It's the same as every other article in the mainstream media.
In that it mentions, first it creates a lot of fear by saying, oh my gosh, there have been 45 deaths from influenza this season, the health officials have reported.
But it doesn't tell you whether or not they actually confirmed that those were the strains that caused death.
Because what we've seen with the CDC is that they will simply assume that these deaths are caused by the flu because they want to.
They don't actually do the microbiology to determine what caused the deaths.
And then this right here, the state epidemiologist says, the great majority of the newly confirmed patients who died had not received an influenza vaccine, says Dr.
Gil Chavez.
Now, this is most certainly an outright lie.
And here's why.
It doesn't say that they had not received an influenza vaccine ever.
So the question is, what period of time has it been since they received an influenza vaccine?
Most people have been vaccinated against influenza at one time or another.
And even one vaccine can compromise your immune system because flu shots still contain mercury, a potent neurotoxic heavy metal.
And it goes right into your tissues and it causes damage, including damage to your immune system, which can make you more susceptible to future infections of influenza.
So when they say the great majority of the newly confirmed patients who died had not received an influenza vaccine, this is a lie because first of all, how do you ask dead people whether they were vaccinated, right?
So where's the data?
Where's the paper showing that this statement is true?
I'm calling Dr.
Gil Chavez a liar, right here, publicly, because I know he's lying, just as everybody in the vaccine industry lies.
And let me explain this to you.
Here we go.
Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists.
It turns out that the Merck company has been faking its vaccine results, according to these virologists, who filed a False Claims Act document with the federal government.
Stating that Merck had spiked blood samples with animal antibodies So, to create the false impression that their mumps and measles vaccines were actually working when, in fact, they were not.
And it was these scientists said in the False Claims Act that Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine tests to fabricate a 95% efficacy rate.
And you can read that right here.
Just go to naturalnews.com and search for this article, Merck Vaccine Fraud Exposed.
And you can see the actual document that they filed with the federal government.
But if you go back to the LA Times, guess what?
There's no mention of any fraud whatsoever in the vaccine industry.
No mention at all.
In fact, there's not even any mention across the mainstream media that flu shots have risk.
So let's talk about risk and possible benefit from a scientific perspective.
And by the way, scientific thinking is not allowed in the vaccine industry.
You are not allowed.
The vaccine industry is a cult.
In that you must believe the faith of vaccines, no matter what the evidence says.
Otherwise, you are attacked for being an anti-vaxxer or anti-vaccine person.
But let's actually use real rational thinking, scientific thinking, to talk about this.
Every medical procedure has risk.
And as you can see here, this is a table of iatrogenic deaths in the United States.
And this shows the results of some of the risks that people take when they undergo Medical treatments.
So these are adverse drug reactions.
Killing 106,000 Americans a year.
There you go.
And there's the authors, and this is a study that has been cited thousands of times.
It's a very reliable study.
Medical error kills 98,000 people a year.
Now compare this to the LA Times.
California has confirmed 45 deaths.
And with a kind of alarmist...
Angle on this whole story.
Oh my God, we've received a total of 106 deaths.
That's 95 right there.
We're still not at the peak of the season where more deaths are being reported.
This is very alarmist and doom and gloom type of language.
Meanwhile, 100,000 Americans are dying from drug reactions.
You don't hear any mention of that in the LA Times.
The mainstream media won't talk about that.
Won't talk about infections.
Superbugs.
88,000 Americans a year.
That's actually an old number.
It's probably higher than that.
Unnecessary procedures kill another 37,000.
Surgery kills another 32,000.
783,000 Americans are killed every year by medicine.
Why?
Because medicine has inherent risk.
So no matter what you're talking about in medicine, you have to talk about risk versus possible reward.
And in these kinds of articles, like the LA Times is publishing, they only talk about the need for flu shots, but never the risk of flu shots.
Never the risk.
Well, let's talk about that risk.
Oh, by the way, a British medical journal right here admits antipsychotic drugs kill more people than terrorism.
See, here's another piece of information that talks about how drugs are just killing.
At least 1,800 dementia patients a year in the United States.
The LA Times isn't really talking about that, are they?
So let's talk about what's really in vaccines.
Here we go.
Here's the article.
This is on Natural News.
And yeah, I'm the author of this article as well.
But this is based on information from the CDC. And it says the CDC webpage...
Actually admits, and I'm going to show you that page here in a second, it actually admits that vaccines still contain aluminum, a metal linked to dementia and Alzheimer's, antibiotics that cause superbugs, formaldehyde, a very deadly neurotoxin, monosodium glutamate, Thimerosal, which contains mercury, which is extremely toxic to the brain.
Now, the CDC admits all of these are true, that they are still contained in vaccines.
Let's see if the CDC still has this on their fact page.
Well, I see that it's a little bit off here.
Let me see if I can do something to rearrange this for you.
There we go.
Alright, so now you can see, this is the CDC. You see the URL, cdc.gov.
And the title of this page is, Ingredients of Vaccines, the Fact Sheet.
What's in it?
Aluminum, antibiotics, egg protein, formaldehyde, MSG, and thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative.
So, you see, the CDC is openly admitting what I've been telling you, which is that these vaccines contain toxic, deadly neurotoxins, heavy metals that are very dangerous to consume even orally, not to mention having them injected into tissue or your bloodstream.
In other words, all vaccines have risk, especially flu shots, because flu shots still contain mercury.
You have to now, if you're going to be a rational thinker, if you're going to be a skeptic of vaccines, if you're going to be a scientist as I am, you have to start a conversation about what is the risk associated with these chemicals and heavy metals that are used in vaccines and injected into children.
What is the risk of them?
Back to the LA Times article, there's no discussion of any risk whatsoever.
It's always get a flu shot, get a flu shot, get a flu shot.
There's no risk mentioned in the story.
It's as if they believe flu shots are 100% effective and have 0% risk.
But, there is risk inherent in all of these substances.
Now, you might ask, well, how do we calculate the risk?
To do that, you would have to ask, methylmercury, what is the safe dose of methylmercury to be injected into a human body?
Let's say a dose that might have been considered safe by the FDA, or the CDC, or some other agency.
What would be the safe dose?
Well, guess what?
There is no safe dose.
There has never been a safe dose of methylmercury established by any government agency in the United States, and certainly not anything in the EU as well.
The FDA doesn't have any safe dose.
The CDC and especially the EPA don't have any safe dose of methylmercury for a human child, especially.
And you might wonder, why is there no safe dose of methylmercury?
Because it's dangerous to consume.
And in fact, the National Toxicology Program admits in its documents, which you can link to right there at NIH.gov, that thimerosal crosses the blood, brain, and placenta barriers.
The hazards of thimerosal include neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, which means kidney damage.
And so on and so forth.
These discuss and reveal the dangers of the thimerosal that the CDC admits is in the vaccines that the LA Times is pushing.
And again, the LA Times being incredibly irresponsible And this person, Aaron Brown, an absolutely irresponsible journalist who is potentially subjecting people to incredible harm by neglecting to mention the other side of the story, which is that flu vaccines have inherent risk.
Now, what kind of risk actually exists in these vaccines?
Here are some of the articles that we've published at Natural News that document these risks.
Risks which, again, are never talked about in the mainstream media nor acknowledged by people who push vaccines.
Here's one.
The DPT vaccine causes permanent brain damage.
150 seizures a day in a young girl.
And this story goes on to describe what is happening to that girl because of that faulty vaccine.
Combination tetanus whooping cough vaccine linked to seizures in babies.
It's a scientific study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, clearly talking about seizures from vaccines.
And again, you never hear about this in the mainstream media.
Flu vaccines cause febrile seizures in toddlers.
Here we go.
Another study talking about vaccines caused in toddlers.
Institute of Medicine Adverse Reactions Report admits MMR vaccines cause measles, seizures, anaphylaxis, and other health problems.
And this story, which I wrote, It goes in a document how the Institute of Medicine actually admits and publishes these risks that vaccines present to humans.
Here's another one.
Flu vaccine causing infant seizures, FDA to investigate.
The flu zone vaccine was investigated.
42 cases of seizures have been reported in children.
So you go back to the LA Times, yeah, they'll report deaths and push a vaccine, but they won't report any news about toxic side effects.
Australia bans flu vaccines in children after vomiting, fevers, and seizures.
This is from 2010.
And there's a link to the story.
And see, babies are being harmed all around the world by flu shots and vaccines because of what's in them.
This is what's really crucial to understand.
MSG, formaldehyde, aluminum, and mercury.
Now, as a scientist, I don't have that much of an issue with the idea of exposing someone to just weakened viral strains if they're purified and they don't contain stealth cancer viruses as many of these vaccines do.
I'm not against the theory of vaccination.
What I'm against is This use of chemical adjuvants and toxic heavy metals in the vaccines that cause all of this neurotoxicity and kidney damage.
In fact, the dialysis industry is very successful today because of vaccines and how much kidney damage they cause.
So I'm against what they put in the vaccines, these toxic poisons.
And you have to ask yourself, as just a human being, If the vaccine industry cared about life and health and children and toddlers, as they claim to, with all their pushing of these toxic chemicals with symbols of love and caring and so on, if they really cared, why wouldn't they take the mercury out?
Why wouldn't they have all vaccines mercury free?
Why do they still inject children with mercury?
The answer is because they don't care about the health of children and they use articles like this.
From the LA Times to spread fear and doom and gloom and negativity and to push this all out of proportion compared to the number of deaths that are actually caused by other forms of medicine in order to sell more flu shots that contain more mercury to harm more children.
That is what's really going on.
From a scientist's perspective, that's the truth about vaccines, about the LA Times, about these scientists who are liars, Dr.
Gil, Chavez, lying to people.
If he's quoted accurately in this, he doesn't know that.
He's making that up.
This is the real truth about vaccines that you're not going to hear anywhere else.
So if you want more scientific discussion of reality when it comes to foods, medicine, nutrition, you can check out my website, the Forensic Food Lab.
That's labs.naturalnews.com.
Or you can just go to naturalnews.com itself.
Here's the homepage.
And you can see all kinds of amazing stories every day that give you the raw truth that you're not going to get in the mainstream media.
▲
Export Selection