Rifle Planted! Bullet DOESN'T Match – Tyler Robinson NOT Guilty in Kirk Case
Former prosecutor with 43 years of experience argues Tyler Robinson must be acquitted in the Charlie Kirk murder case because prosecution evidence fails to meet the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard. He critiques ballistics, noting the Mauser 98 rifle was a "lint brush" since no bullet fragments were found in Kirk's body and gun-sniffing dogs failed to detect it. The speaker questions the confession's validity due to inconsistencies regarding an unfired weapon and highlights missing gunshot residue tests, suggesting Robinson should be found not guilty if the jury cannot link the rifle to the crime. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Reasonable Doubt in Real Life00:05:52
I'm a lawyer.
I'm a trial lawyer.
Former prosecutor.
For 43 years.
And for 43 years, you think like one.
You think like a lawyer, like a prosecutor, and then you try to introduce that way of thinking, which is completely and totally.
It doesn't exist in the real world.
And I'll tell you why.
When I tell you that Tyler Robinson is not guilty or will be acquitted or should be acquitted or will walk, I say this carefully.
I am not saying he's innocent, driven snow.
He might be, could very well be.
I wouldn't be surprised.
That's not what I'm saying.
In my world, we sit back.
And somebody will prosecute us, accuse us, arrest us, sue us.
They will come forward and they say, This is what you did.
This.
Okay, now follow me on this.
And sometimes you might say, I didn't do that.
Or you might say, Well, I didn't do that.
Or, well, I did that, but not the way you think, or not as bad.
I didn't burglarize a home.
It was a trespass.
It wasn't aggravated battery.
It was battery.
You know what I mean?
So we start off with the premise you've got to tell me what I did.
I'm not going to say anything.
I don't have to disprove, prove anything.
I might.
I might want to.
I don't have to show you motivation, thinking, nothing.
You.
Came to me.
And you are giving me this charge, you are hitting me with this, and now I'm going to have to ask you can you prove this in the case of Tyler Robinson beyond and to the exclusion?
I know this is kind of weird language of every reasonable doubt.
Meaning, if I come up with a doubt that I can attach a reason to or on, for example, if I say, you know, I doubt this is because I think.
The alibi that was presented was one thing, or I think the connection to the rifle was faulty, or I think that identification was wrong, or I don't believe the confession, or I don't believe the cop.
I have to have a reason.
I just don't say, no, it's not a forced doubt, a speculative doubt.
Read the jury instructions for reasonable doubt in your jurisdiction, and it's kind of weird, but it means reasonable doubt is.
If I can tell you, I doubt this one particular very important element that you were trying to prove, and I've got a reason for it, there's a reason why I doubt it, that's it.
It's not guilty.
That's it.
And the best part is, the best part is, you can know in your heart of hearts, you could say, that son of a bitch did this, theoretically.
But you're not the detective.
You're the juror.
You're not Colombo.
You're the juror.
You're the doctor who holds up the x-ray and says, broken, not broken.
Or pregnant?
Not pregnant.
That's it.
We don't know whether you tried to get pregnant, how many times you tried, whether you're a slattern, how old you are.
We don't even know who this person is.
Pregnant.
This sample.
Pregnant.
Yep, you proved it.
That's it.
Very, very.
And when you think like that, it helps you.
Now.
What we like to do in the world of this, which is great.
I love this.
We love it.
We love to get into the granular, the atomistic, the particular, the interstitial, the abecedarian, just atomic.
Love that stuff.
That doesn't come up here.
That's not in the courtroom.
This is great for this.
Do you think that maybe, do you think that maybe, maybe, when they told Charlie, That he had better watch what he says as far as not supporting certain countries.
That was it.
Could be.
That doesn't come into this.
Do you think that maybe, maybe we can go on to this.
We could, I'm telling you, do you think that maybe Charlie might be alive?
If Charlie's alive, that is the, that is an affirmative defense.
That is a defense.
Because one of the first elements in murder is that he's got to be dead.
Not only that.
That Charlie Kirk is dead.
Not that some guy that you saw there, but Charlie Kirk is dead and he was killed by Tyler Robinson.
The Charlie Kirk Affirmative Defense00:14:53
And if the, depending upon how the particular phrase of the ultimate charging document is, by gunshot or what have you.
All right.
You got that?
I just had to say that.
So I'm looking at this thing completely differently.
I don't know about Erica.
I don't even know about that.
Did you prove anything?
And here are the issues.
There's two pieces of really good evidence here.
Theoretically, theoretically.
One is the confession, the admission.
There's a difference between confession and admission.
A confession is admitting to all of the elements of the crime.
I admit that on the 10th of September in 2025, I did knowingly and intelligently and furtively and feloniously, with malice aforethought, did take the life of this two-wit with a firearm.
You know, that's the confession.
Everything.
An admission might be: I was there.
It might be a partial bore.
It might be: okay, I admit it was my gun, which.
We'll get to it in a moment.
I admit that's a different story.
But, okay, so we'll just call it the confession.
We'll get to that later.
Get to that later.
Then the gun.
The Mauser 98.
The 30 odd six.
This is a lint brush.
And I will show you that this lint brush has as much to do with the dispatch and the elimination of Charlie Kirk as that.
Rifle did.
Granddaddy's shooting iron.
Okay?
Specifically, specifically, it was found and it was alleged to be, at least what we're saying, to be the instrument of dispatch.
I've got to watch this for YouTube purposes.
The instrument of dispatch for Charlie Kirk.
All right?
This, talk about a magic bullet.
This 30 odd six hits a piece of.
Cervical color and just not his head, the bullet, it just fragments because of the food and the diet and the strength and the health.
Ridiculous story, anyway.
But that rifle, right?
That's it.
Big problem can't link into anything, can't link it because you're the same way you can't link a lint brush because this had nothing to do with it, and neither did that.
30 odd six, it had nothing to do with this.
And you can call it all you want.
I'll never forget.
I'll never forget.
I'll never forget how they said the first time this happened, they had all these cable news shows.
Well, we have an expert.
An expert says, well, there's a lot of reasons why you can't find any fragment of the bullet or the rock.
Yeah?
Why?
Well, it oftentimes just obliterates.
That's why these are so lethal.
Uh huh.
Anything else?
People are listening to this like, you've got to be kidding.
How much did they pay you to say this?
It's unbelievable.
What?
Really?
You know, I'm thinking to myself, well, it's, so what would you like me to do?
Just to say, you know what, we as a jury will just introduce it into evidence.
We'll just look, it may not be able to connect with the elimination of Mr. Kirk, but we'll just, just don't worry about that.
Why do we have ballistics tests?
Why?
Why?
Why don't we just use whatever we find on or near the defendant?
That's good enough.
No, no, no, no.
We normally like to connect them.
And if they don't connect, If you can't connect it either by evidence, ballistics, lands and grooves, whatever you want to call it, we say, sorry, this is not enough.
Sorry.
Fingerprints.
We only have one little ridge.
That's not enough.
Oh, come on.
Look, I can explain that.
Sometimes these prints get, you know, sloughed off.
What do you mean?
What is this?
You're not going to let a murder prosecution go because you can't match a print.
Yes!
There's no identification in other ways.
Oh, come on.
Look, sometimes people just can't make ID.
It's dark.
I've never heard somebody who just, you know, here's a pregnancy test.
Let me dip this in.
Oh, it says negative.
Wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
Sometimes those things can.
No, no.
It's pregnant.
Sometimes they're bad.
Sometimes maybe you didn't dip enough.
None of this makes any sense.
I'm trying to give you an analogy because analogies don't work.
Crazy.
They're acting like, well.
And then they get mad at you.
Oh, I can't believe these conspiracy theorists are making a big deal because the gun doesn't touch.
But here is the million dollar, oh my God, the million dollar piece of evidence.
The million dollar, this is it.
This, if ever you need something which is.
And by the way, when you hear this, When you hear this, when you see this, when you're aware of this, you will say to yourself, oh my God, that makes complete and total sense.
Complete and total sense.
There is a fellow, and by the way, I always give credit to all of these great, great fellow brothers and sisters in the world who will bring things up.
I'm telling you, I hear it all the time.
And there's a fellow named Valhalla VFT who one time said something which was so good.
He said this, when did he say this?
This is not new.
It was a while back.
It was about a month ago.
I'm trying to think of new ways, new ways to bring this.
And I'm sifting through.
I'm watching so many.
Listen, I guess we're at war, and I'm just immersed in this Charlie Kirk Robinson thing.
Anyway.
He said, you know, that rifle they had, these gun sniffing dogs couldn't find it.
I'll tell you one thing, because of his special forces training and his extensive military background, he said, I can tell you these dogs can smell a fish fart.
You know, let me tell you something.
They are so, if there's one little micro, micron, microgram, any picogram of this floating around, it'll find it.
They can smell this stuff?
Huh.
And that should have been like the tip off.
That should have been like, wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
I think he just answered the question.
But he continues.
He says, and do you know why?
Do you know why the FBI dogs, whatever, couldn't find this?
Do you know why?
Do you know why they couldn't find that rifle?
Do you know why these dogs that are trained to find weapons that have been fired didn't find it?
Do you know why?
Why?
Because they didn't, it wasn't fired.
It's like the most obvious duh.
Yes.
And do you know why the blood splatter experts didn't find any blood?
Because there was no blood.
You know what I mean?
It just.
So you have this weapon that's wrapped in a towel, thrown out, that wasn't fired.
Because if it had been fired, those dogs would have been in the next county.
And they would have been off.
So, you think maybe somebody might have dropped that gun there?
You think maybe somebody might have dropped that gun there?
You think maybe somebody might have planted it?
What do you think, Aunt B?
What do you think, Gomer?
Huh?
What do you think, Shalayam?
What do you think about that?
Okay, pretty good, huh?
Good.
Makes sense to me, doesn't it?
Makes sense.
Makes a lot of sense to me.
And the first one I do is I'd call, I'd, oh my God, we've got some of the best witnesses.
You should have heard, I say this all the time, Jimmy Doar on the evidence of taking the gun apart.
I mean, this is.
The defense team has some of the best voices out there because it comes down to facts and it comes down to practical.
Okay.
Here's the problem What the hell was Tyler confessing to or admitting to his parents?
What?
What?
The magical gun?
Is he stupid?
Is he, they startled with it.
Does he think that, first of all, I don't think he brought anything, but if I could sit there and say, Tyler, I'm your lawyer, Tyler, you can answer this question.
And I can't tell anybody.
Attorney, client, privilege.
Did you shoot him?
Did you, yeah.
With what?
With what?
Sure as hell, not that thing.
Not old granddaddy shooting iron.
What did you shoot him with?
And most probably, I'll bet you anything he says, no.
Then, what the hell are they talking about?
You confess to then.
And if you did confess, you're nuts.
Then you must have a, there must be another rifle out there because it sure as hell isn't that one.
What are you confessing to?
And what do you say?
Hey guys, with your Discord and your gay girlfriend, boyfriend, whatever it is, whatever.
I was there.
He was saying some bad things.
Wait a minute.
See what I mean?
This is why I'm like that.
See, sometimes in law there are these conundrums or conundra.
These things don't make any sense.
They're kind of illogical, but they're fun.
One of them is there's no such thing as attempted assault.
Why?
Well, because assault is attempted battery.
So attempted assault would be attempted, attempted battery.
Little things like that.
People always ask the question of, can you clone yourself?
Yes, perhaps you can.
What is the clone in relation to you?
It's you.
Who are its parents?
Your parents.
I mean, you know, it's fun.
We're not there yet.
But it's kind of who we are and why we do this.
This one, You're going to need a wider race board, and you're going to need Irwin Corey or somebody to come in to explain this because I'm telling you, it's nuts.
So listen carefully.
I don't have any dog in this fight, any skin in this game, or whatever you want to call it.
Tyler Robinson is somebody who was just, well, he says who he is.
But I've got this thing, I've got this funny thing as an officer of the court.
It's called the Constitution.
When I've sworn into a member of the Florida Bar, and the New York Bar, and the New Jersey Bar, and the D.C. Bar, and the Supreme Court of the United States, and all of the Attend in federal courts.
The thing we always swear to is to uphold the Constitution, not to uphold justice or prosecute the guilty, but to uphold the Constitution.
And if that kid is found guilty based on this shit, and you can, that's a legal term, by the way, then there's something very wrong here.
And I mean something really, really wrong.
Fine.
What the hell are you talking about?
Are you planning?
How did that get there?
Now, first of all, to know that he'd be in the room with you would be terrific.
He says, I don't know.
What if Tyler said, I never said any of that.
Yeah, I don't know why I'm here.
I don't know why I'm here.
Well, did you tell your father that you did this or you were involved in this?
And if he did, with what?
And by the way, did anybody check his hand for GSR gunshot residue or anything like that?
Remember the old days they did these nitrazine or.
Paraffin test, did anybody check his cheek?
No, this is like the worst case.
And by the way, if he had confessed, you would have bet it would have been right there, right there.
You want to confess to the cops, not the father.
Are you sure he said that?
Well, I don't know if he said that.
Now we're getting into it's not hearsay because it's an exception, because it's an admission.
But the point is, the cops would be there.
Would you sign this?
Can we reduce this to writing?
Is this your word?
Would you sign this, please?
Did anybody threaten you in any way or promise you anything?
Would you sign this?
Was this made free, you know, not out of duress?
Do we have a camera of this?
Would you sign this?
Yeah, you can keep the pen.
Well, maybe not because you'll probably.
Anyway, that's the way cops do it.
You've seen it on the TV.
So, anyway, let's move backwards.
This would be, now, assuming, assuming, and I keep saying this, That somehow that rifle gets into evidence.
How?
I don't know.
The lint brush should be in evidence.
Retrieving Evidence Under Duress00:02:50
It had nothing to do with it either.
But his DNA is all over it.
Oh, they made a big deal.
His DNA was all over it.
It's his.
What about the other people, though?
Let's check those DNAs.
By the way, who found this?
Yeah, can we check your DNA, please?
Thank you very much.
I'll measure what his DNA is fingerprints or whatever.
These are the only people who make a big deal over the fact that they found his DNA on something he owned.
This is where we're going with these people.
This is where we're going.
This is the lunacy.
This is great.
Let me tell you something.
The reason why he's going to walk is that this jury is going to say, What the hell is going on here?
What do you have?
Why is he even in jail?
Forget the preliminary hearing, that's coming up.
I'm going to say, What the hell are you holding him for?
What is your evidence?
Stated differently.
Ideally, Mr. or Mrs. Prosecutor, when the jury goes back, what exactly are they going to be finding him guilty of?
What?
The confession?
The confession of what?
Firing a rifle that was never fired?
Using an imaginary rifle?
What are you talking about?
That's it.
You told us that's it.
You said that's it.
They couldn't find it.
And if those dogs can't find that rifle, it wasn't fired.
That's it.
And guess whose evidence I use?
Their own.
And I'll call Valhalla VFT or one of these folks.
Show up with your medals and this brave American soldier who knows a little bit about war, who himself saw these people.
I mean, this is nuts.
You work backwards.
It's like they create this premise and you're saying, no, well.
Okay, there was a confession, but if he confessed, what is he confessing to?
Because he would have confessed to use the rifle, and then he.
What?
And then he supposedly said, hey, can you get Granddaddy to shoot an iron?
Why?
Why?
What are you worried about?
Did you bring that?
And this is where Jimmy Dore comes to the key, where he talks about breaking it down and how.
Preposterous, this would be not only that, not only that, trying to get somebody to go and to retrieve something.
I mean, not this case makes no sense.
I haven't even gone to the ballistics yet, I haven't even talked about that.
I haven't even.
It's like, imagine you're going to introduce a confession of a person who used a weapon that was never fired.