There is seemingly no end to the levels of fascination regarding the entire, I don't know what you want to call it, the Candace Owens, TPUSA, Charlie Kirk, Erica Kirk, 110 LLC, Mitch Snow, who knows, whatever this is called, whatever the name of this, you've got to give it a gate, you know, like a water gate, Kansas Gate, or it's not even Kansas, Erica, whatever.
TPUSA GATE.
But the biggest question inside TPUSA, Turning Point USA, is also the simplest one.
If nothing wrong is happening, then why is it so hard to get clear answers?
Because this incredible video put together by the YouTube channel called Wolves and Finance, which I commend to you.
It exists for one reason.
Because more and more independent auditors, accounting experts, donors, volunteers, and longtime supporters are no longer satisfied with these series of vague statements and social media insults or trust us answers when millions of dollars are moving through political nonprofits and vendors.
And they are asking some very basic adult questions about money controls and transparency and financial health.
And these questions are not extreme, not partisan, and not hostile.
They are the same questions that any responsible board member or accountant or responsible adult would ask after looking at public filings and timelines and conflicting statements.
Because at the center of this story is one clear public fact.
A company called 110LLC, that's the number one T-E-N LLC, 110 LLC, shows up in filings as a top contractor, according to this YouTube piece, paid by TPUSA about a million and a half, 1.5 million.
And when people followed the list address, or the listed address, I should say, they didn't find an office staff or visible business operation.
They found a strip mall location commonly linked to a UPS store private mailbox.
And while it's true that small businesses use mailboxes every day, that misses the real issue, which is whether millions of dollars should move through a setup where the public can't easily see where the work was done,
who did it, who approved the bills, and how the work was checked, especially when that same address appears in disclosures tied to a sitting public official who later said the company was 10 years old, even though records show it was formed in 2021.
And that matters because when dates are stretched, people start wondering what else is being stretched or fudged or massaged.
And trust breaks down fast when facts feel kind of managed, you know, for appearances.
And what makes the concern stronger is how the response has been played out.
Because when the questions turn to money, the loudest voices weren't from accountants or finance leaders or executives showing numbers and documents.
They were marketing staff and communications people and online defenders.
And that's backwards.
Because when finances are clean, the finance team usually wants to speak directly and clearly.
And when they stay silent, that silence becomes part of the story, especially to auditors who recognize what it looks like when an organization closes ranks instead of opening the books.
Especially Turning Point USA.
It's Christian Fernando.
I mean, it just kind of makes sense.
And those same observers then look at 110 LLC online and see a small website that's hard to find, rarely updated, and gives little detail about staff or scale or operations.
And while none of that alone proves wrongdoing, authors don't look at things one by one.
They look at patterns.
And when a vendor handling large sums shows limited transparency and political overlap, the same checklist always comes up.
Related party ties, you know, vendor selection, bidding, if any, invoice detail, approval steps, and board oversight.
And these concerns grow when public campaign data shows 110 LLC receiving millions more beyond TPUSA payments, which turns this into a bigger question about overall financial health and oversight, not just optics.
And this connects directly to what Candice Owens has been examining as she looks into what she describes as what remains of Charlie's work and the leadership environment around TPUSA.
And you don't have to agree with her tone or her to see that she has forced attention into areas that were once off limits.
And once attention arrives, silence becomes harder to defend, which puts Erica Kirk in a kind of a tough position.
Because ignoring financial questions, especially when she's now in charge, rarely makes them disappear.
It usually makes them spread.
And this is why the audit question matters so much.
Because while annual audits exist, they aren't designed to answer every conflict or governance question.
And that is why accounting skeptics keep saying the same thing.
Keep the regular audit, but add a separate independent review focused on vendor relationships, related parties, campaign spending, and internal transfers.
Because if nothing improper happened, that review would protect the organization, not harm it.
It would also show donors and volunteers that leadership respects them, respects them enough to prove things instead of asking for blind trust.
And this isn't unusual or radical.
It's common practice.
When trust needs to be rebuilt.
And the longer leadership resists this step, the more people ask why.
And that resistance itself becomes a problem because it invites more scrutiny from regulators and reporters and political opponents who would love to turn a conservative youth group into a warning story.
And the hard truth is that many people asking these questions aren't enemies.
They're supporters who want the mission to survive and who have seen too many movements in the past fall apart because leaders refuse transparency and the request remains simple.
Answer questions with documents, not insults.
Clearly explain the mailbox issue.
Explain the work done, the cost, the approvals, and the oversight.
Disclose any related ties, if they exist, and allow an independent review outside the normal audit, because transparency now is cheaper than scandal later.
And public life doesn't allow permanent trust or kind of a trust-me shield.
You know, trust me.
You know, don't trust me.
How dare you not trust me?
You know, that doesn't work when millions of dollars are involved.
And Americans are really tired of double standards where one side demands answers from opponents but refuses them for allies.
And that is why Wolves and Finance, this great YouTube channel, put this information together, and I'll put the link to this, in one place so people can see the timeline and the numbers and the contradictions for themselves.
And by the way, read it and listen to it and see if you disagree with it.
But here is your, as we say, call to action.
If you care about the future of TPUSA, if you have donated or volunteered or believed in Charlie and its mission, then ask for answers calmly but firmly.
Demand transparency.
I use that word a lot, but it's true.
Support independent financial journalism and refuse to let loyalty be used as silence.
Because strong organizations survive questions and weak ones fear them.
So will you ask for the answers or will you accept silence?
What's going to be your take in this?
Because I think it's incumbent upon a lot of people who really believe in TPUSA and Charlie to come forward and to ask somebody, to ask questions.
That's all it is.
Now more than ever.
You see, what's happening right now is I'm trying very hard, very hard to always keep giving Eric a pass.
Well, she's a mother.
Well, she's a widow.
Well, what do you expect?
Well, that only goes on so long.
It only goes on so long.
And the real issue is, why isn't she more concerned about this?
It's almost like she's interested more in maintaining her image than TPUSA's image.
That's Charlie's legacy.
That was the conduit.
That was the ignition switch to bring in a lot of Gen Zers and young people into the political forum and to convey to them and to make palatable and interesting and exciting and fashionable.
Traditional, if you will, Christian or American values, which I think the country needs drastically.
I think, and irrespective of religion, the idea of somebody actually making, I mean, years ago, if I would have said, you know, marriage should be one time, sex shouldn't occur before marriage.
And I mean, if you would have even tried that on a college campus, yet so many people today said, no, they appreciate it.
Because I think they like structure.
I think they like order.
And I think they love things which have been prototypically considered to be traditional.
And there's nothing wrong with traditional.
So my friend, I thank you.
Thank you so much very much.
Thank you.
What do you think about this?
Do you think this is fair?
What are the questions that you have?
What are some of the issues that you think?
And where is Erica Kirk?
And whatever happened?
Who are these other people?
Why are people jumping so much on Mitch Snow and not the other members of the TPUSA board or officers or whatever it is who could answer these questions?
What is the legacy of this?
Where did this tell me this wasn't a scam?
Was this some of the things that Charlie was purportedly worried about prior to his untimely demise?
I don't know.
But I want to know from you.
So please like this video.
Thank you so very much.
Hit that little bell so you're notified of live streams and new videos.
And also do me a favor, please, please, if you could, and you would, brighten my northern sky, as Nick Drake intoned.
No, please subscribe.
Like 70% or I forget how many people who watch us don't subscribe.